Professional Documents
Culture Documents
v.
DIVISION: B
COMES NOW the Defendant, HOWELL E. DONALDSON, III, by and through the
undersigned attorney, and moves this Honorable Court, pursuant to Rule 3.190 of the Florida Rules
of Criminal Procedure, for an Order requiring the redaction of discovery materials disclosed to the
media and the public by the State of Florida in this cause as required by the guidelines of Chapter
Inherent in all criminal prosecutions when considering the scope of appropriate disclosure
of information concerning an alleged crime, is the need to carefully balance the constitutional
rights of the accused with the rights of the public. This motion is filed in order to claim and to
attempt to insure the protection of the rights of the Defendant in this cause with respect to the
scope of discovery and the dissemination of said discovery to the media and the public. This
motion seeks an order compelling the restriction of materials released or distributed by the State
of Florida and further seeks a copy of all materials released or distributed to insure the ability of
the Defendant in this cause to seek appropriate remedies for improper release or disclosure.
The relevant facts in this cause that are germane to the motion are that the Defendant,
Howell E. Donaldson, III, has been charged with a criminal offense, he has been found to be
indigent, the Office of the Public Defender has been appointed to represent him, and he will
participate in discovery by the filing of a Demand for Discovery pursuant to Rule 3.220, Florida
MEMORANDUM OF LAW
Both Federal and State law provide limitations on the disclosure of discovery materials in
possession of the government to the public and the media. These limitations are set forth primarily
in Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (2018), but are also found in other statutes as well as in applicable
case law. The Defendant’s rights to due process and a fair trial are set forth in part in the Fifth,
Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America, Article I,
Sections 9, 16 and 22 of the Constitution of the State of Florida; Sections 90.202 (11) and (12) and
90.203 Florida Statutes (2018) and Rules 3.190 and 3.220 Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
(2018). Additional guidelines are contained within the Rules of Professional Conduct of the
Florida Bar and the ethical guidelines of the American Bar Association.
Once the State releases discovery material to the defense, such material potentially
becomes subject to Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (2018). Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v.
McCrary, 520 So.2d 32 (Fla. 1988); see also WESH Television, Inc. v. Freeman, 691 So.2d 532
(Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (in which the State Attorney resisted media efforts to obtain discovery
material claiming that disclosure would hinder his efforts to afford the defendant a fair trial).
In this case, the potential disclosure of the discovery material within the purview of the
could potentially contain matters which would not be admitted or admissible in evidence, or which
is otherwise protected from disclosure would irretrievably prejudice the Defendant and would
preclude the Defendant from receiving a fair trial in Hillsborough County, Florida. See e.g. Reilly
v. State, 557 So.2d 1365 (Fla. 1990) (cited in Bolin v. State, 736 So. 2d 1160, 1164-65 (Fla. 1999)
(the Florida Supreme Court found “publicity concerning inadmissible information (a suppressed
confession) to be so prejudicial that even a prospective juror without a preformed opinion should
To safeguard the rights of the Defendant in this cause to receive a fair trial, the Court has
a Constitutional duty to minimize the effects of prejudicial pretrial publicity and to determine
which measures may be taken even, when they are not strictly and inescapably necessary. See:
Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. McCray, 497 So.2d 652 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). In addition,
there are obligations under the law that restrict the scope of public disclosure of discovery materials
WHEREFORE, the Defendant requests that the Court enter an order requiring the redaction
of discovery materials disclosed to the media and the public by the State of Florida in this cause
as required under the guidelines of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes (2018), interpretive case law and
as otherwise required by law. It is further requested that the Court order that if such disclosures
are made to the press or the public that copies of said disclosure be provided to counsel for the
Defendant in this cause within five days of the disclosure or dissemination of such materials for
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing motion has been furnished to JAY
Boulevard, Tampa, Florida, 33606; Tampa Bay Times c/o Allison Steele, Esquire, 535 Central
Avenue, St. Petersburg, FL 33702; WFLA-TV, Attn: Legal Department, 200 S. Parker Street,
Tampa, FL 33609; Bay News 9, Attn: Legal Department, 700 Carillon Parkway, Suite 9, St.
Respectfully submitted,
LAW OFFICE OF JULIANNE M. HOLT
PUBLIC DEFENDER