Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1) Paste your data for the bright and faint star in all 3 images below. It should be organized into
a 6 row, 6 column table with column headings: COORDINATES, R, MAG, FLUX and SKY
2) Cut and paste your scripts used to calculate SNR for each image below. If you used excel,
type out the formula.
t = t*60
Gain = 10
S = Sky * np.pi * (R*R)
SNR = t*Flux*(Gain/(((Flux/n)+S)*t))**(1/2)
return SNR
3) By what factor is the SNR greater for the 15 min exposure to the 10 min exposure. Based on
the formula, is this what you expect? What about the added exposure vs the 15 min exposure?
Did the SNR improve according to what you expect?
The SNR value for the 15 minute exposure is about 1.18x larger which makes sense based on
the formula because the entire value is multiplied by t and 15 is 1.5x larger than 10, but also
divided by the square root of t bringing this value down by a small amount. The SNR value for
the added exposure is about 2.2x larger than the 15 minute exposure. This also makes sense
for the same reason as before, but also the multiple value is also reduced to to the n value in
the denominator of the SNR formula.
4) If there is a neighboring star in annulus that measures the sky background, how will that
effect the flux estimated from the star?
If there is a neighboring star, this would cause the flux to increase as the program would not be
able to differentiate between the two stars if they are close enough. This is a systematic error
and would be very difficult to correct.
Part B:
5) Paste your data for the cluster stars. It should be organized into 2 - 28 row, 6 column tables
with column headings: COORDINATES, R, MAG, FLUX and SKY
M39B
M39V
6) Paste your table of SNR values and errors (you don’t need to show the calculation scripts).
Data should be organized with columns COORDINATES (can either be from B or V) BSNR
VSNR mverror mBerror
7) Paste your data for the standard stars. It should be organized into 2 - 15 row, 6 column tables
with column headings: COORDINATES, R, MAG, FLUX and SKY. Include the zero point
average and standard deviation.
M39B
M39V
8) Paste your data for your corrected B, V, B-V values and errors
B V B-V
m - M = 5log10(d) - 5
(m - M + 5)/5 = log10(d)
d = 10^((m - M + 5)/5)
For a star with the B-V value of .6 I will average between two stars, one with a value of 0.607
and one with a value of 0.557.
The first B-V is calculated below:
d = 10^((12.897 - 4.8 + 5)/5)
d = 416.31715 ps
The second gave a distance of 164.21934 ps through the same method.
Averaging these two we get the final distance of 290 ps.
The actual value for the distance of the M39 cluster is about 252.8 parsecs. This means the
percentage value from the actual value is
(290ps-252.8ps)/252.8ps * 100% = 15%
F = L/d2
d2*F1/d2*F2 = L1/L2
F1/F2 = L1/L2
m1 - m2 = -2.5log10(F1/F2)
m1 - m2 = -2.5log10(L1/L2)
(L1/L2)=10^[(m1 - m2 )/-2.5]
M = L(1/3.5)
age = M/L
m1 will be the magnitude V of the brightest star in the cluster, determined by the HR diagram as
the beginning of the turn off point.
m1 = 7.097
m2 will be the average magnitude V for the two stars the distance was calculated from.
m2 = 11.89
L2 is the luminosity of the sun. Finding L1 we get
(L1/L2)=10^[(m1 - m2 )/-2.5]
(L1/L2)=10^[(7.10 - 11.89 )/-2.5]
(L1/L2)= 83.4
So L1 = 83 Lsun
M = L1(1/3.5)
M = (83 Lsun)(1/3.5)
Lsun(1/3.5) = Msun
M = 83(1/3.5) Msun
13) How would the age change if dust lies between our line of sight and the cluster? Dust
“reddens” starlight by significantly scattering blue light more so than red light.
If dust lied between our line of sight and the cluster, the magnitude of the blue light we
are able to see would decrease for all values. Thus the B-V value’s would also decrease and the
HR diagram would be shifted to the left. From this, the extracted age of the cluster would be
older.