Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3) b)
We can conclude that Bartlett beamformer has the ability to maintain the Side lobe levels when the
angles change. It’s clear that the beamformer Capon possesses a better SINR response.
3)c)
The plot shows us that the Capon Beamformer has a more constant and better SINR response through
the different angles, This shows a confirmation from the information obtained in the numeral 3)b)
Code:
clear all;
close all;
M =8;
Rnn = 0.1*eye(M);
Np = 10000;
M=8;
theta1=[20 0];
theta2=[32 20];
figure(1)
for i=1:2
[P_cap, BW_cap, SLL_cap, SINR_cap, theta] = beamPattern(theta1(i), theta2(i), M, Rnn, Np,'Capon');
[P_bar, BW_bar, SLL_bar, SINR_bar] = beamPattern(theta1(i), theta2(i), M, Rnn,Np,'Bartlett');
subplot(2,1,i)
plot(theta,10*log10(P_cap), theta, 10*log10(P_bar));
grid on
axis([-90 90 -30 1]);
xlabel('\theta (degree)');
ylabel('P(\theta)(dB)');
title(['Beam pattern \theta_1= ' num2str(theta1(i)) ', \theta_2= ' num2str(theta2(i))]);
legend('Capon', 'Bartlett',2);