Professional Documents
Culture Documents
McKelley
SPF 203
Professor Nyachae
I will be writing my essay on what affects politics and economy had on society. When
schools were made they were not made with intent to guide everyone to their specific desires,
they were made to serve the public. According to Springs (2014) “Given the political control of
public schools, it is not possible for a principal of a public school to design the content and
methods of instruction to suit the wishes of individual parents or students(p.3). When students
enter a public school they are submitting to the will of the public as determined by local, state,
and federal governments”. I agree with this quote in the sense that because of the political
control the principal wouldn't have any kind of control under the materials that will be taught.
The principal is under the command of the government as well. This also means that although
the principal is at the school everyday and far more often than either of the controlling
governments, they still can not design the material that will be taught in the school. In my
personal experience I think that is not the smartest thing that could have happened. It makes no
sense to me that the people that are hired by the government aren't deemed fit to design and
create the structure that the school should teach. Teachers and school staff are so concerned with
things such as sticking to the curriculum and the principal automatically has to reinforce these
concepts and three types of governments have made up. Those rules don't always fit the ever
First, the families carried responsibility for its members’ welfare...the farmer's fields were
appropriate training grounds for sons, and the household was an appropriate training grounds for
daughters”(p.8). I believe what Coleman is saying is that the basis of social classes were formed
around the “job” that the families held, such as a shoemaker or a baker, and the amount of money
that the job would bring into the family, to remain in a specific social class. I feel as if these
political welfare classes and the economic step stools have created a rigged society. Later in this
reading Coleman(1968) also says “In this kind of society, the concept of educational
opportunities had no relevance at all. The child and adult were embedded within the extended
family, and the child's education or training was merely whatever seemed necessary to maintain
the family's productivity”(p.8). The political and economic prominence affected this group of
people in this social food chain severely. So much that they have made the public schools act in
agreeance of this by teaching the farmers sons, farming and the baker's sons baking. This way
because the children are succeeding the parents in the same footsteps, the families stay in the
Springs (2014) later stated “Before the actual establishment of public schools, public
leaders argued that public schools were needed to create a national culture and to educate
qualified politicians for a republican government” (p.6). This sounds a lot like Coleman's reading
except these schools are more in favor of the political side of things. Instead of gearing the
schools to catering to the economic classes and to stay in the same social ranking, the schools
that Springs it talking about is gearing children to rise in the political and social ranks. This
affected the social ranks in the sense that going to college were only for the economically
equipped. In conjunction with that Springs(2014) also said “ To avoid the problem of elitism,
Thomas Jefferson suggested using education to promote a meritocracy; a term still used to
describe the effect of schools on society”(p.6). Without using education to promote meritocracy
the society would possibly have fallen into an era where only the rich could go to school and get
the jobs that would make more money. Leaving only room for those with money to rise in the
social class rankings of this time. Personally this reminds me of a classroom where only the top
percentage was picked to receive help to rise the ranks quickly and all of the students below the
elite of the class were left to struggle. Nor were they ever given their chance to prove themselves
Coleman (1968) says “As families lost their economic production activities, they also
began to lose their welfare functions, and the poor or ill or incapacitated became more nearly a
community responsibility” (p.9). As this was happening the economic and social classes
changed. With the Industrial Revolution taking place the living situations had changed therefore
a need for modulation of social classes and education structure needed to come around. Now the
families and the schools were becoming more concerned with giving children a general
education with general skills that would benefit for working outside the family. I can relate to
this because I am an arts kid. To me that means that I was apart of a generation that was more
interested in things other than general education. Music to a degree was more important than my
other classes, and I knew that i just wanted to teach music. Nowadays there's is a struggle for
music teachers and music programs are getting threatened to be cut from schools, so the need for
Lastly the hold that economics and politics has on society is a strong one. It is like a three
legged chair and that can't stand on one leg. These concepts need each other to survive and
remain relevant. To me, Springs and Coleman have a good sense of relevance for the cause and
Referances