You are on page 1of 10

BIBLIOGRAFIE

Alessi, S. M. & Trollip, S. R. (1991). Computer Based Instruction: Methods and Development.
New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Alberta Education. (2004). Focus on inquiry: A teacher’s guide to implementing inquiry-based
learning. Edmonton, AB: Alberta Education.
http://www.learning.gov.ab.ca/k_12/curriculum/bySubject/focusoninquiry.pdf
Andersen, L., Boud, D. & Cohen, R. (2000). Experienced-based learning. In Understanding
adult education and training. Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 225-239.
Alaska Science Consortium, (2011). The Learning Science Model for Science Teaching.
http://www.aksci.org/pdf/TheLearningCycleModelForScienceTeaching.pdf.
Astolfi, J. P., Develay, M. (1989). La didactique des sciences. Paris: PUF.
Astolfi, J.P., Peterfalvi, B. (1993). Obstacle et constructions des situations didactiques en
sciences experimentales. ASTER n° 16. Modèles pédagogiques 1, 1NRP.
Atkin, J.M. & Karplus, R. (1962). Discovery or invention? The Science Teacher, 29(5), 45-51.
Balleux, A., (2000). Revue des sciences de l'éducation, 26, 2, 2000, 263-286.
http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/000123ar.
Barke-Dieter, H., Hazari, Al., Yitbarek, S. (2009). Missconceptions in Chemistry. Adressing
Perceptions in Chemical Education. Springer.
Benander, R. (2009). Experiential learning in the scholarship of teaching and learning. Journal
of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9 (2), 36-41.
Bêty, M.N. (2009), Les principaux modèles de changement conceptuel et l'enseignement des
sciences au primaire: état de la question. Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des études
supérieures en vue de l'obtention du grade de Maître ès arts (M. A.) en sciences de
l'éducation option didactique Avril, 2009, Université de Montréal.
Bocoş, M. (2002). Instruire interactivă. Repere pentru reflecţie şi acţiune. Cluj-Napoca: P.U.C.
Bocos, M., Diaconu, M. (2009). Problematizarea. Aplicaţii la nivel universitar. Cluj-Napoca:
P.U.C.
Boisvert, J. (1999). La formation de la pensée critique: théorie et pratique. Chapitre 1: La
pensée critique. http://www.teluq.ca/ted1270-v2/media/pdf/texte_Boisvert.pdf (14
August 2012)
Bybee, R.W. et al. (1989). Science and technology education for the elementary years:
Frameworks for curriculum and instruction. Washington, D.C.: The National Center
for Improving Instruction.) The 5E Learning Cycle:
http://faculty.mwsu.edu/west/maryann.coe/coe/inquire/inquiry.htm. (22
Septembrie 2011).
Bybee, R.W. (2002). Scientific Inquiry, Student Learning, and the Science Curriculum. În:
Learning Science and the science of learning. Rodger W. Bybee (ed.). USA: National
Science Teachers Association.

1
Bybee, R.W., Van Scotter, P. (2007). Reinventing the Science Curriculum. The Biological
Sciences Curriculum Study proposes a curriculum that puts meaningful learning first.
Educational Leadership, Science in the Spotlight, 64(4), pp. 43-47.
Bybee, R.W. (2010). The teaching of science. 21st Century Perspectives. NSTA Press.
Bybee, R.W. (2013). Translating the NGSS for classroom instruction. NSTA Press
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, Executive control, Self-regulation, and Other more
mysterious mechanisms, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brown, F. Apprentissage par investigation: enseignement pour le changement conceptuel en
éducation environmentale.
http://www.greenteacher.com/articles/apprentissageparinvestigation.pdf
Cerghit, I. (2006). Metode de învăţământ. Iasi: Polirom.
Center for Studies on Behavior and Development (2004). How Students Learn: History,
Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom. A Targeted Report for Teachers,
Committee on How People Learn, National Research Council, Division of Behavioral
and Social Sciences and Education, Board on Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory
Sciences.
Cheng, V.M. (2011). Infusing creativity into Eastern classrooms: evaluations from student
perspectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6, 67-87.
http://ac.els-cdn.com/S1871187110000271/1-s2.0-S1871187110000271-
main.pdf?_tid=3d4a5406-0355-11e2-bedb
00000aacb35f&acdnat=1348167721_b44fc083f18de3e9b4f824da86840fcf
Ciascai, L. (2011). Practici educaţionale în domeniul învăţării autoreglate şi dezvoltării
metacognitive. Cluj-Napoca: Casa Cărţii de Ştiinţă.
Ciascai, L. , Fundamente teoretice ale unei didactici a fizicii centrate pe competenţe,
Ministerul Educaţiei Naţionale, Calitate, inovare, comunicare în sistemul de formare
continuă a didacticienilor din învăţământul superior.
Cleverly, D. (2003). Implementing inquiry-based learning in nursing. London, NY: Routlege,
Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Closset, J.L. (1983). Le raisonnement séquentiel en électrocinétique, Thèse. Université Paris 7.
Closset, J.L. (1989) Les obstacles à l’apprentissage de l’électrocinétique, BUP, 716, 931-950.
Closset, J.L. (1992) Raisonnements en électricité et en hydrodynamique, Aster, 14, 143-155.
Coll, R. K., Lajium, D. (2011). Modeling and the Future of Science Learning. Models and
Modeling. Cognitive Tools for Scientific Enquiry. Myint Swe Khine& Issa M. Saleh
(eds.) Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York.
Creţu, D. Proiectul Lectura şi scrierea pentru dezvoltarea gândirii critice. Fundament pentru
un nou cadru de predare-învăţare. http://www.actrus.ro/reviste/3_2001/rev2s.html
(18 iulie 2012).
De Jong, T. & Van Joolingen, W.R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer
simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68, 179-201.

2
Doly, A.-M. (2007). La métacognition: définition, intéréts, modes et conditions de
fonctionement. În: Apprendre et comprendre. Place et rôle de la métacognition dans
l’aide spécilisée. G. Dupiol. Rets: FNAME.
Dumitru I.Al. (2000). Dezvoltarea gândirii critice şi învăţarea eficientă. Timişoara: Editura de
Vest.
Dumitru D. (2013) Cui ii e frică de gândirea critică ? Programele educaționale integrate și
gândirea critică. Editura Universității din București.
Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E Model. A proposed 7E model emphasizes “transfer of
learning” and the importance of eliciting prior understanding. The Science Teacher",
National Science Teachers Association (NSTA) 70, 6, 56-59. http://www.its-about-
time.com/htmls/ap/eisenkrafttst.pdf. (26 august 2012).
Elder, L. & Paul, R. (1994). Critical thinking: Why we must transform our teaching. Journal of
Developmental Education, 18, 34-35.
Ennis, Robert. A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In Joan Baron and
Robert Sternberg (Eds.) Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice. New York: W.H.
http://www.oracler.ro/fodlink/a%20kreativ%20szemely.htmlFlavell, (25 august
2012).
Erdei, I. (2008). Cum să învăţăm eficient. În Z. Bogathy & C. Sulea. Manual de tehnici şi
abilităţi academice. Timişoara: Universitatea de Vest, 1-24.
Erskine, D. (2009). Effect of Prompted Reflection and Metacognitive Skill Instruction on
University Freshmen’s use of Metacognition. A dissertation submitted to the faculty
of Brigham Young University, Department of Instructional Psychology and
Technology.
Etkina, E., Warren, A. & Gentile M. (2006). The role of models in physics instruction. The
Physics Teacher, 44, 34-39.
Facione, P.A., Sánchez, C.A., Facione, N.C. & Gainen, J. (1995). The disposition toward critical
thinking. Journal of General Education, 44 (1), 1-25.
Facione, P. A. (2007). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts.
http://ctac.gmu.edu/documents/facione%20what&why2007.pdf (22 august 2012)
Fischbein, H. (1987). Intuition in Science and Mathematics. Holland, Dordrecht: D. Reidel
Publishing Company.
Fittell, D. (2010). Inquiry-based science in a primary classroom: professional development
impacting practice. Masters by Research thesis, Queensland University of
Technology. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/37633/ (12 septembrie 2012)
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.).
Thenature of intelligence. New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 231- 235.
Flavell J.H., Wellmann, H.M. (1977). Metamemory. In: R.V. Kail & J.W. Hagen (eds):
Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition. Hillsdale. N. J.: Lawrence
Erlbaum Association.
Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new are of cognitive
developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.

3
Flick, B. (2006). Developing understanding of scientific inquiry in secondary students. In: L.B.
Flick, & N.G. Lederman (eds.) Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science. Implications for
Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education. Netherlands: Springer, 157-172.
Giordan, A. (1989). Vers un modèle didactique d'apprentissage allostérique. In: N.Bednarz &
C. Garnier (Eds.), Construction des savoirs: obstacles et conflits (pp. 240-257).
Montréal: Éditions Agence d'ARC.
Giordan, A. (1990). O ambianţă pedagogică pentru învăţare. Modelul alosteric. Revista de
pedagogie, 12.
Giordan, A. (1990). O ambianţă pedagogică pentru învăţare. Modelul alosteric. În: Revista de
Pedagogie, nr. 12.
Giordan, A. (1996), Conceptions et raisonnements. Paris, Cahiers pédagogiques, Nr. 344/345.
Giry, M. (1994). Apprendre à raisonner, apprendre à penser. Paris: Hachette.
Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D. & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights
from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and Science Achievement of U.S. Fourth- and Eighth-
Grade Students in an International Context (NCES 2009–001) (U.S. Department of
Education, National Center for Education Statistics) (Washington, DC: U.S.
Government Printing Office).
Gott, S. P., Lesgold, A., & Kane, R. S. (1996). Tutoring for transfer of technical competence.
In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments: Case Studies in
Instructional Design , 33-48. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
Guilbert, L., Oullet, L. (1999). Études de cas - Apprentissage par problèmes. Québec: Presses
de l'Université du Québec.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5., 444-454.
Hacker, D. J. (1998). Definition and empirical foundations.In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C.
Graesser (Eds.). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. NJ: The Erlbaum
Group, 1-23.
Hartman H.J. (2001). Teaching Metacogntively. In H.J. Hartman (eds.). Metacognition in
learning and instruction. Olanda: Kluwer.
Harlen, W. (2004). Evaluation of Inquiry-based Science. National Academy of Science.
http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/wharlen_inquiry_mtg_paper.pdf (14
septembrie, 2012)
Henshall Wilson, L. (2006). How students really learn: instructional strategies that work.
Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online
learning environments. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19 (1), 59–71.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., Oliver, R., & Woo, Y. (2004). Designing authentic activities in
Web-based courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16 (1), 3–29.
Hermida, J. Deep Learning,
http://www.julianhermida.com/algoma/law1scotldeeplearning.htm (15 mai 2012)
Hestenes, D. (1995) Modeling Software for Learning and Doing Physics. Thinking Physics for
Teaching. Carlo Bernardini, Carlo Tarsiatni & Matilde Vicentini (eds). New York &
London: Plenum Press.

4
Hestenes, D. (1996). Modeling Method for Physics teachers. Proceedings of the International
Conference on Undergraduate Physics Education (College Park, August 1996).
Hestenes, D. (2006). Notes for a Modeling Theory of Science, Cognition and Instruction.
Proceedings of the 2006 GIREP conference: Modelling in Physics and Physics
Education.
Holbrook, J., Rannikmae, M. (2009), The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. International Journal
of Environmental & Science Education, Special Isue on Scientific Literacy, Editors:
Richard K. Coll & Neil Taylor, 4(3), 275-288.
Howard, D. R., & Miskowski, J. A. (2005). Using a module-based laboratory to incorporate
inquiry into a large cell biology course. Cell Biology Education, 4, 249–260.
Hu, W. & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students.
International Journal of Science Education, 24 (4), 389-403.
Hutton, M. (1989). Learning from action: a conceptual framework. In S. Warner & M. McGill
(eds). Making sense of experiential learning. Miltion Keynes: Open University Press,
50-59.
Iwai, Y. (2011). The effects of metacognitive reading strategies: pedagogical implications for
EFL/ESL teachers. The Reading Matrix, 11 (2), 150-159.
Jarvis, L., Odell, K. & Troiano, M. (2002). Role playing as a teaching strategy. Strategies for
Application and Presentation Staff Development and Presentation.
http://imet.csus.edu/imet3/odell/portfolio/grartifacts/Lit%20review.pdf
Johnston, J. (2004). The value of exploration and discovery. Primary Science Review, Nov/Dec
2004, 21.
Johnston, J. (2011). Early explorations in science. NY: Open University Press.
Johnston, C. (n.d.) Fostering deeper learning, Carol Johnston, from the Teaching and Learning
Unit in the Faculty of Economics and Commerce at the University of Melbourne,
http://tlu.ecom.unimelb.edu.au/papers/DEEPL1.pdf (14 August 2010).
Johsua S., Dupin, J.J. (1989). Répresentation et modélisations: „le débat scientifique” dans la
classe et l’apprentissage de la physique. Paris, Peter Lang.
Johsua S., Dupin, J.J. (1993). Introduction à la didactique des sciences et des mathématiques.
Paris, Presses Universitaires de France.
Jorgenson, O., Cleveland,J., Vanosda, R. (2004). Doing Good Science In Middle School: A
Practical Guide To Inquiry-Based Instruction. NSTA Press.
Justice, C., Rice, J., Warry, W., Inglis, S., Miller, S., Sammon, S., (2007). Inquiry in Higher
Education: Reflections and Directions on Course Design and Teaching Methods.
Innovative Higher Education (2007) 31, 201–214.
Karakas, M. (2008) Graduating reflective science teachers through problem based learning
instruction. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), 2, 1.
Karplus, R. (1964). The science curriculum improvement study. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 2, 293-303. http://www.pvc.maricopa.edu/~sheets/lmw/. (13 Septembrie
2011)

5
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and
development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, A.Y. & Kolb, D.A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential
learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4 (2),
193-212.
Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R.E. (2004). Why Unguided Learning Does Not Work: An
Analysis of the Failure of Discovery Learning, Problem-Based Learning, Experiential
Learning and Inquiry-Based Learning.
http://www.ydae.purdue.edu/lct/hbcu/documents/Analysis_of_the_Failure_of_Disc
overy_PBL__Experiential_Inquiry_Learning.pdf
Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J. & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction
Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-
Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–
86, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Ku, K. & Ho, I. (2010). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition
and Learning, 5 (3), 251-267.
Lasky, D. & Yoon, S.A. (2011). Making space for the act of making: creativity in the
engineering design classroom. Science Educator, 20 (1), 34-43.
Lautrey, J., Rémi-Girauld, S., Sander, E.& Tiberghien, A. (2008). Les connaissances naïves.
Paris: Armand Colin.
Magno, C. (2010). The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking.
Metacognition Learning, 5, 137–156. Springer Science & Business Media, LLC,
Published online.
Magnusson, S.J., Sullivan Palincsar, A.,Templin, M, (2006). Community, culture, and
conversation in inquiry-based science instruction. In: L.B. Flick, & N.G. Lederman
(eds.) Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science. Implications for Teaching, Learning,
and Teacher Education. Netherlands: Springer, 131-155,
Mahmoodabad, S., Nadrian. H. & Nahangi, H. (2012). Critical thinking ability and its
associated factors among preclinical students in Yazd Shaheed Sadoughi University of
Medical Sciences (Iran). Medical Journal of Islamic Republic of Iran, 26 (2), 50-57.
Mason, M. (2008). Critical Thinking and Learning. In: Critical Thinking and Learning. Mason
Mark (ed.) Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Miclea, M. (1994). Psihologie cognitivă. Cluj-Napoca: Casa de Editură Gloria.

McDermott, L.C., Schaffer, P.S. Preparing teachers to teach Physics and Physical Science by
Inquiry. Pp.71-85
McSharry, G., Jones, S. (2000). Role-play in science teaching and learning. School Science
Review, 82 (298), 73-82.
Mih, C. (2010). Învăţarea auto-reglată şi dezvoltarea metacognitivă. Modele teoretice şi
aplicaţii. Cluj-Napoca: Casa Cărţii de Ştiinţă.

6
Minder, M. (2011). Didactică funcţională. Obiective, strategii, evaluare. Constructivismul
operant. Cluj-Napoca: Editura ASCR.
Montalvo, T. & Torres, G. (2004). Self-regulated learning: current and future directions.
Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2(1), 1-34.
Moon, J.A. (2004). Exploring experiential learning. In J.A. Moon. A handbook of reflective and
experiential learning. Theory and practice. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 103-121.
Moon, J. (2008). Critical Thinking. An exploration of theory and practice. London: Taylor &
Francis Group, 21-22.
Munteanu, A. (1994). Incursiune în creatologie. Timişoara, Editura Augusta.

National Research Council (NRC)/ National Academy of Sciences (1996). National Science
Education Standards. Washington D.S. National Academy Press.
National Research Council (NRC)/ Committee on Learning, Research and Educational
Practice. (1999). How People Learn: Bridging Research and Practice, M. Suzanne
Donovan, John D. Bransford, and James W. Pellegrino (eds.)
National Research Council (NRC), Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering
Education (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: a guide for
teaching and learning. Steve Olson and Susan Loucks-Horsley (eds.) Washington D.S.
National Academy Press.
National Research Council (NRC)/Committee on How People Learn (2005). How Students
Learn: Mathematics in the Classroom. A Targeted Report for Teachers. Board on
Behavioral, Cognitive, and Sensory Sciences, Division of Behavioral and Social
Sciences and Education, National Academies Press
Nicu, A. (2007). Strategii de formare a gândirii critice. Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi
Pedagogică, R.A.
Negovan, V. (2010). Psihologia învăţării. Universitatea din Bucureşti: Editura CREDIS.

Noveanu, G., Noveanu, D., Singer, M. & Pop, V. (2002). Invaţarea matematicii şi a ştiinţelor
naturii.Studiu comparativ (1).Bucureşti: S.C. Aramis print S.R. L., Consiuliul Naţional
pentru Curriculum, 21-25.
OECD (2007). PISA 2006. Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World, Vol. 1. A profile of
student performance in reading and mathematics from PISA 2000 to PISA 2006 (Paris:
OECD).
OECD (2010). Pisa 2009 Results: What students Know and Can Do. Student Performance in
Reading, Mathematics and Science. Volume 1. OECD: Paris.
OCDE (2013), Résultats du PISA 2012 : Savoirs et savoir-faire des élèves: Performance des
élèves en mathématiques, en compréhension de l’écrit et en sciences, PISA, Éditions
OCDE.
Olson, S., Loucks-Horsley, S. (eds.) (2000). Inquiry and the National Education Standards: A
Guide for Teaching and Learning. http://www.nap.edu (15 decembrie 2012)

7
Ogle, D. M. (1998). K-W-L: a teaching model that develops active reading of expository text .
The Reading Teacher, 39 (6), 564-570. http://fu-ctge-
5245.wikispaces.com/file/view/Ogle.pdf (12 septembrie 2011)
Papaleontiou-Louca, E. (2003). The concept and instruction of metacognition. Teacher
Development, 7 (1), 9-30.
http://vcell.ndsu.nodak.edu/~ganesh/seminar/2003_Louca_The%20Concept%20and
%20Instruction%20of%20Metacognition.pdf (16 decembrie 2010)
Parker, B., J. (2009). Critical Thinking. Social Psychology- PGS 350 2003. Citat de Jákó Katalin.
In: Kovács Zoltán (editor): A kritikai gondolkodás fejlesztése. Cluj-Napoca: Presa
Universitară Clujeană.
Petty, G. (2009).Teaching today. A practical guide. Fourth edition. UK: Nelson Thornes Ltd.
Peirce, B. (2004). Handbook of Critical Thinking Resources. Authors: Prince George’s
Community CollegeFaculty Members.
http://academic.pg.cc.md.us/~wpeirce/MCCCTR/handbook.pdf (23 august 2012)
Prince, M.J., Felder, R.M. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions,
Comparisons, and Research Bases.Journal of Engineering Education.www.ncsu.edu
(14 august 2012)
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London, Routledge.
Ridgeway, V. G. (2005, Spring). Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking: Open minds, open
hearts, open schools. Literacy & Social Responsibility, 1(1).
www.clemson.edu/uwp/.../Ridgeway.doc.
Réthy Endréné. (1998). Az oktatási folyamat. In: Falus, I. (szerk.): Didaktika: Elméleti alapok a
tanítás tanulásához. Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest.
Robardet, G., Guillaud, J. C. (1997). Eléments de didactique des sciences physiques. De la
rechèrche à la pratique: théories, modèles, conceptions et raisonnement spontané,
Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Saltier, E., Worth, K., Duque, M. (2009). Pollen. L’enseignement des sciences fondé sur
l’investigation. Conseils pour les enseignants. www.pollen-europa.net
Sahin, S.D. (2006). Computer simulations in science education: implications for distance
education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 4 (12), 132-146.
https://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde24/pdf/article_12.pdf (12 august 2012)
Settlage, J., Southerland, S. (2012). Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a
Starting Point. Routledge.
Schmidt, W., Houang, R. & Cogan, L. (2002). A Coherent Curriculum: The Case of
Mathematics. American Educator: 1–17.
http://www.aft.org/pdfs/americaneducator/summer2002/curriculum.pdf (12 august
2012)
Schraw, G., Crippen, J.K, Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education:
Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning, Research in Science
Education (2006) 36, 111–139, Springer.

8
Shunk, D. & Ertmer, P. (2000). Self-regulation and academic learning: self-efficacy enhancing
interventions. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of self-
regulation. USA: Academic Press, 631-649.
Sinatra, G.M., Pintrich, P.R. (2003). The Role of Intentions in Conceptual Change Learning. In:
Intentional conceptual change. Gale M. Sinatra & Paul R. Pintrich (eds.). Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers
Specht, L. B., & Sandlin, P. K. (1991). The differential effects of experiential learning activities
and traditional lecture classes in accounting. Simulation and Gaming, 22 (2), 196–
210.
Steele, J.L. (2001). The Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking Project: A Framework for
School Change. Chapter 1. In D. Klooster, J. Steele, & P. Bloem (Eds.), Ideas Without
Boundaries: International Educational Reform through Reading, Writing and Critical
Thinking. International Reading Association (capitol disponibil online la adresa
http://www.rwctic.org/The-Reading-and-Writing-for-Critical-Thinking-Project-2.pdf
(15 august 2012).
Scriven, M., Paul, R. (1987). Critical Thinking as Defined by the National Council for Excellence
in Critical Thinking. A statement by for the 8th Annual International Conference on
Critical Thinking and Education Reform, Summer 1987.
http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766 (12 August,
2012).
Shymansky, J., Hedges, L., and Woodworth, G. (1990). A Reassessment of the Effects of
Inquiry-Based Science Curricula of the 60’s on Student Performance. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 27 (2), 127–144.
Spronken-Smith, R., Experiencing the Process of Knowledge Creation: The Nature and Use of
Inquiry-Based Learning in Higher Education.
http://akoaotearoa.ac.nz/sites/default/files/u14/IBL%20-%20Report%20-
%20Appendix%20A%20-%20Review.pdf (17 August 2012)
Spronken-Smith, R., Angelo, T., Matthews, H., O’Steen, B., Robertson, J. (2007). How
Effective is Inquiry-Based Learning in Linking Teaching and Research? Paper prepared
for An International Colloquium on International Policies and Practices for Academic
Enquiry, Marwell, Winchester, UK, April 19-21.
http://portal-live.solent.ac.uk/university/rtconference/colloquium_papers.aspx.
Spronken-Smith, R., 2007. Issues in Teaching Through Inquiry. Joint Centre for Active
Learning and Centre for Learning and TeachingSeminar, (12 septembrie, 2012)
Sungur, S., Tekkaya, C. (2006). Effects of Problem-Based Learning and Traditional Instruction
on Self-Regulated Learning, The Journal of Educational Research, 99(5), 307-317.
Sutman, X.F.,Schmuckler, J.S. & Woodfield, J.D. (2008). The science quest: using inquiry/
discovery to enhance student learning, grades 7–12. Published by Jossey-Bass, A
Wiley Imprint, USA.
Tan, O. (2004). Enhancing thinking through problem-based learning approaches:
international perspectives. Asia: Cengage Learning.

9
Temple, Ch., Steele, J.L, Meredith, K.S. (2003). Iniţiere în metodologia dezvoltării gândirii
critice. Lectura şi scrierea pentru dezvoltarea gândirii critice, Ediţia a II-a. Supliment al
revistei DidacticaPro, 1(7), Chişinău.
The National Council for Excellence in Critical Thinking. A Draft Statement of Principles.
http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/the-national-council-for-excellence-in-critical-
thinking/406.
Tiberghien, A., Delacôte, G. (1976). Manipulation et representations de circuits electrique
simples chez des enfants de 7 à 12 ans. Revue Francaise de Pédagogie 34, 32-44.
Tsui, L. (2000). Effects of campus culture on students’ critical thinking. The Review of Higher
Education, 23(4), 421-441.
Vecchi, de G. (1992). Aider les élèves à apprendre. Paris, Hachette
Viennot, L., (coord.), (2001). Reasonig in physics. The part of common sense. Kluwer
Academic Publishers
Viennot, L., (coord.), (2002). Enseigner la physique. Bruxelles, De Boeck
Vosniadou, S. (2007). Conceptual Change and Education. Human Development, 50, 47–54.
Westwood, P. (2008). What teachers need to know about Teaching methods. Camberwell,
Vic.: ACER Press.
Weissinger, P.A. (2004). Critical thinking, metacognition and problem-based learning. In Tan,
O. (Ed.) (2004). Enhancing thinking through problem-based learning approaches:
international perspectives. Asia: Cengage Learning, 39-62.
White, B. & Frederiksen, J. (2000). Metacognitive facilitation: An approach to making
scientific inquiry accessible to all. In J. Minstrell and E. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into
Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science. Washington, DC: American Association for
the Advancement of Science, 331-370. http://thinkertools.org/Pages/paper.html (24
august 2012)
Wilson, N.S. & Bai, H. (2010). The Relationships and Impact of Teachers' Metacognitive
Knowledge and Pedagogical Understandings of Metacognition. Metacognition and
Learning, 5 (3), 269-288.

Zimmerman, B., Bonner, S. & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners. Beyond
achievement to self-efficacy. Washington: American Psychological Association.
*** Critical Thinking Through Writing: Georgia State University’s QEP.
http://www.gsu.edu/files/QEP_Final_Draft(1).pdf
*** European Comission, Key competences. http://ec.europa.eu/education/school-
education/competences_en.htm
*** Pathway—The Pathway to Inquiry Based Science Teaching. FP7-Science-in-Society-2010-
1-SiS-2010-2.2.1-1-266624. Ghid pentru profesori.
www.pathway-project.eu/sites/default/.../ROMANIAN_d4.3pathway.pdf

10

You might also like