Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Emma Porio
Ateneo de Manila University
Abstract
Climate change and flooding in Asian cities pose great challenges to the environmen-
tal and human security of the population and their governance systems. This paper
examines the intersections of ecological-environmental and social vulnerability and
the adaptive responses of urban poor communities and commercial-industrial estab-
lishments in Metro Manila to floods and other climate change-related effects, such
as storm surges and sea-level rise (SLR). These weaken the communities’ ecological-
environmental systems, threaten the well-being and security of the people and strain
the resources of city governments. Disaggregating the ecological-environment vulner-
abilities of a city/community according to specific places/spaces (or place-based vul-
nerabilities) that lead also to variable patterns among different groups (e.g., gender,
income group, sector) of adaptive responses to flooding. Drawing a systematic sam-
ple of urban poor households and industrial-commercial establishments along the
Pasig-Marikina River Basin of Metro Manila, this study utilised household surveys, key
informant interviews, focus group discussions (FGD) and secondary data sources, in
analysing the sources of their vulnerability and adaptive responses. Existing studies
generally focus on the vulnerability and adaptation of urban-rural populations and
do not highlight the interaction of place-based vulnerabilities with sector-specific vul-
nerabilities that reconfigure flood impacts and responses among the urban poor com-
munities and commercial-industrial establishments during and after floods. In partic-
ular, poor and female-headed households residing in highly degraded environments
* This paper was originally presented in the 10th ASEAN Inter-University Seminars, organised
by the National University of Singapore and Universiti Dar Es Salaam Brunei, 10–13 December
2012. The author is grateful for the invaluable research assistance provided by John Paul
Dalupang (maps) and Cora Bolong (data collection and field supervision).
or places/spaces within and across urban poor communities suffered higher damages
and losses compared to better-off households and establishments. The interaction of
these drivers of vulnerability further heightens and compromises the environmental
and human security needs of poor people, their communities and those in the private
sector that local/national government agencies need to respond.
Keywords
Introduction
The World Risk Report 2013 ranked the Philippines as the third highest country
at risk to critical environmental, geo-political, economic, societal and techno-
logical changes. Like other Asian coastal megacities, Metro Manila’s environ-
mental risks include floods and coastal inundation brought about by sea-level
rise and the increasing intensity and irregularity of typhoons, storm surges and
monsoon rains. These hazards have heightened the environmental degrada-
tion of the metropolis, as well as the environmental risks faced by the resi-
dents. Compounding the effects of these natural and human-induced risks are
governance-related factors like deficits in environmental and fiscal reforms,
infrastructure and delivery of social services. In a sense, government initiatives
towards enhancing the environmental, economic and social security of its cities
also pose contradictory challenges to the environmental security of informal
settlements and the human security needs of its most vulnerable population,
the urban poor.
Eliott (2000) argues for analysing environmental degradation as a key com-
ponent in understanding initiatives towards human security. She elaborates
that “the relationship between human security and traditional security is there-
fore embedded in complexity … provides an opportunity to recognize different
kinds of threats, not to states but to peoples and communities, and to reassess
the probability of insecurities” (2000:158). She suggests that “environmental
concerns be integrated with traditional approaches and strategies” to address
more effectively the human security agenda. She further asserts that “protec-
tion of the environment is crucial to human security”, a “decisive factor in
economic vitality” and “economic security fundamental to individual and com-
munity health and well-being and, in some cases, to survival (ultimate security
challenge).” Studies on climate change vulnerability and adaptation, therefore,
provide a rich opportunity to define security threats to urban poor communi-
ties and their environments.
Meanwhile, Redclift (2009), citing Opchoot (1996), views human security
as talking about the degree to which human beings are sheltered from envi-
ronmental degradation, resource scarcity and environmental hazards by their
own social institutions. He further argued that in pursuing environmental and
human security, we are addressing the main dimensions of sustainable devel-
opment, namely, economic development, environmental protection and social
inequality. Thus, he suggested “widening people’s entitlements, duties and obli-
gations as citizens” is central to designing initiatives towards sustainable devel-
opment. As governments pursue economic growth through increased resource
extraction, environmental degradation and compromised land use regulations
becomes central issue in addressing sustainable development goals.
Using the insights of Eliott (2000) and Redclift (2009), this essay explores
the strategic links between environmental degradation and vulnerability to
flood impacts among urban poor communities and their local governments
in pursuing human security goals or the well-being of its people. This link
between vulnerability and adaptation can be seen in the ability of groups and
communities to cope with extreme environmental stresses and disturbances,
such as typhoons and floods (Adger, 2004). Furthermore, exposure and cop-
ing mechanisms to these risks, especially in the context of climate change,
can vary greatly across different political-economic groups (Blaikie et al., 1994).
However, these conceptual links need to be empirically validated and refined
when applied to different Asian contexts. In Metro Manila, these variations in
the flood responses and adaptation can be accounted by particular vulnera-
bilities of places/spaces because of environmental degradation (e.g., intense
development in areas with high soil subsidence/siltation, swampy areas/wet-
lands that are heavily inhabited) and the communities’/households’ levels of
social vulnerability as seen in Figures 1 to 3 below. The vulnerability levels of
families or households living in these environmentally vulnerable places then
becomes heightened because their capacity to recover from flood impacts is
also compromised by their poverty/low incomes, fragile occupational or liveli-
hood bases and the gender status of their household head.
Utilising primary (household and commercial-industrial surveys, key
informant interviews and focus group discussions)1 and secondary sources
1 The study is based on two surveys of systematically drawn sample households: (1) 200 house
(population census, land use plans), this paper examined the flood-related
impacts and experiences of urban poor communities and commercial-business
establishments in two cities of Metro Manila, namely Marikina and Pasig. It
also explored the flood responses of their local governments. Data collected be-
tween September and November 2011 focused on the flood impacts of Typhoons
Ondoy (international name, Ketsana) on 28 September 2009 and Typhoon
Pedring (international name, Nesat) on 27 September 2011. This database was
supplemented by a 2008 survey of urban poor households in three flood basins
of the metropolis, namely, KAMANAVA (Kaloocan, Malabon, Navotas and Va-
lenzuela), Pasig-Marikina and West Manggahan.
Examining the flood vulnerability and adaptation of urban poor communi-
ties and their local governments, the study argues that climate change-related
effects put cities at risk to flooding and inundation, posing great challenges
to the communities’ ecological-environmental systems and the well-being and
security of its residents. In riverlines and bay areas, where large numbers of
the poor reside, land and infrastructural development initiatives of the gov-
ernment and the private sector often collide with the pursuit of security and
well-being among its populace. This gives rise to particular place-based vul-
nerabilities and sector-specific patterns of response and adaptation to flood-
ing and environmental degradation. This paper illustrates this by examin-
ing flood-related damage and losses to residential and commercial-business
establishments in low-lying riverine communities and their local governments’
responses. The study concludes that the interaction of place-based and sector-
specific vulnerabilities, especially among the urban poor in informal settle-
ments, heightens and compromises both the environmental and human secu-
rity needs of the people and their communities.
The next two sections describe the political-economic and environmental
context of the study and the flood impacts and responses to Typhoons Ondoy
and Pedring among the riverine communities along the Pasig-Marikina river
system, as well as that of their local governments. It explores the link between
environmental degradation and the security and well-being of urban poor
households and commercial-industrial establishments in these flood-prone
areas. While local governments strive to provide relief and rehabilitation needs
for its citizens, the demands for environmental security and economic growth
often collide with the urban poor communities’ struggle for economic and
social security. Finally, the flood adaptive responses of the vulnerable commu-
nities, commercial-industrial establishments and local governments provide
valuable potentials for mainstreaming them into land use planning, gover-
nance and to medium/long-term development.
Like other megacities in the South, Metro Manila’s growth and expansion
remain largely uncontrolled. This has greatly contributed to the increased vul-
nerability of the residents, especially those from the urban poor communities,
to climate-related effects like typhoons and floods. More importantly, this has
compromised the potential for adaptation and resilience on the part of resi-
dents, local governments and the private sector.
Metro Manila or the National Capital Region (NCR) has a land area of
636km2 on a semi-alluvial plain formed by the sediment flows from the Mey-
cauayan and Malabon-Tullahan river basins in the north, the Pasig-Marikina
river basin in the east (Bankoff, 2003), and Manggahan river basin in the west.
These river systems used to be active transport gateways to the central dis-
trict of Manila until heavy siltation and land-based transport rendered this
system ineffective (Porio, 2011). The coastal margin of NCR consists of a partly
reclaimed area in Manila Bay, the central plateau and the Marikina Valley.
The metropolis is open to Manila Bay in the west and connects to a large
lake, Laguna de Bay, in the south-east. Thus, “the metropolitan area is a vast
drainage basin that experiences frequent inundations from overflowing rivers
and storm waters that render the existing system of esteros (modified natural
channels) and canals constructed during the Spanish and American colonial
periods inadequate” (Liongson, 2000, cited in Bankoff, 2003). Manila and the
surrounding cities are prone to flooding alongside Marikina Valley and along
the coast of Laguna de Bay. The effects of climate change on these river sys-
tems are highlighted by sea-level rise (SLR) and increases in monsoon rains,
typhoons and floods (see Figure 1).
Traversing in the north-south direction of the metropolis are several fault-
lines: (1) the Marikina Valley Fault, (2) the Philippine Fault, (3) the Lubang
figure 1 The three flood basins and sample communities in Metro Manila. Source: Porio and
Dalupang (2013).
Fault, (4) the Manila Trench, and (5) the Casiguran Fault. This environmental
context interacts in complex ways with the patterns of human activities in the
metropolis, giving rise to patterns of survival strategies among the residents and
institutional and regulatory responses of the local government units and the
national government agencies in-charged of disaster risk reduction and man-
agement policies and programmes (Porio, 2011).
With Metro Manila as the centre of political, economic, and socio-cultural
activities of the nation, its vulnerability to climate change becomes heightened.
Its strategic location by Manila Bay and the mouth of the Pasig River accounts
for the growth of the capital city and the suburban expansion of the city for
the last 30 years. With large in-migration and rapid population growth, this led
to peri-urban expansion to the surrounding municipalities, and more signifi-
cantly to dangerous areas for habitation (e.g., swampy areas, along esteros or
water canals, rivers and/or earthquake fault-lines). Services and infrastructural
development could hardly keep pace with the needs of the burgeoning popula-
tion. While large public and private investments try to operate within existing
regulatory frameworks, the ability of government agencies to impose build-
ing and infrastructure standards is quite weak. Meanwhile, the growth and
expansion of informal settlements have gone largely unregulated. Thus, many
buildings and infrastructure are built in danger zones (e.g., near the seashore or
flood zones, unstable and landslide-prone ground, etc.) without permits (Porio,
2011).
Rapid urbanisation, population growth and the weak infrastructural and
economic bases of the metropolis have heightened its vulnerability to the
effects of climate change. As seen in Figure 2, Metro Manila’s population ex-
panded from 5.93 million in 1980 to 7.95 million in 1990, 9.93 million in 2000
and is projected to reach 19.43 million in 2020. In 2007, the National Statis-
tics Office (NSO) reported that Metro Manila has 12 million residents but the
average daytime population is about 16–18 million (see Figure 2). In 2000, the
population density in the metropolis was 15,617 persons per km2 and is pro-
jected to increase to 29,146 in 2020. These forces have dramatically increased
the demand for goods and services, as well as the removal of waste generated
in the metropolis. Since this trend shows no signs of abating, the impacts of
climate change on the vulnerable populations of the metropolis will definitely
be heightened in the coming years (Porio, 2011).
The environmental security of the national capital is further compromised
by its land use patterns, infrastructural development, building codes/practices
and development policies and programmes. Regulatory policies and practices,
often lacking in coherence, have resulted in a built environment that poses high
risks to residents, buildings infrastructure and settlements.
figure 2 Rapid expansion and growth of the population in Metro Manila and peri-urban areas, 1980–2007. Source: Corpuz (2010)
83
84 porio
Most of the vulnerable communities are settled in low-lying areas of the coastal
lines, riverlines and tributaries. Located near swampy/wetlands or silted river-
beds, these areas have been classified by the city as danger zones and unfit
for habitation. In city logbooks, these households are considered illegal slum/
squatter settlements, with no security of tenure and no adequate access to
water, electricity, sewage and drainage systems. Constantly exposed to the
effects of flooding and lacking adequate access to health and sanitation facil-
ities, residents often complain of diarrhoea, colds and malnutrition. Com-
pounding these are community security-related issues like drug abuse, domes-
tic violence, theft and other petty crimes.
More importantly, land along riverlines and shorelines are also heavily pop-
ulated and developed for commercial-industrial purposes. In the previous de-
cades, these areas were relatively undeveloped because these were considered
danger zones. But starting with the 1990s when the local governments were
required to provide housing and relocation for their urban poor constituents,
these un-serviced and low-quality lands became sites for relocation. This is
especially the case for Baseco in Manila, Lupang Arenda in West Manggahan,
Tanza in Navotas and Nangka and Tumana in Marikina City (see Figures 3 and
4).
The social and physical location of these flood-prone communities make them
highly vulnerable to storm surges and flooding from typhoons and heavy mon-
soon rains from June to November, the traditional rainy season for Metro
Manila. The Pasig-Marikina flood basin is prone to flash floods from the Sierra
Madre Mountains, while the KAMANAVA flood basin is particularly suscepti-
ble throughout the year to the effects of sea-level rise and tidal storms. During
the last few years, the residents have reported changes in the climate patterns
marked by increases in sea levels during tidal/storm surges, as reflected in the
water marks left in their house posts. Often these pose risks to their household
appliances, garments and their livelihood activities.
figure 3 Marikina River and land-use patterns along the riverline. Source: Porio and
Dalupang (2013).
The 2011 survey reinforced the findings of the 2008 survey that while respon-
dents recognised the risks of floods to their homes and communities, economic
problems like unemployment and lack of incomes were their over-riding con-
cern. Other important concerns were security-related risks like thefts/hold-ups,
fire and drug abuse in their neighbourhoods. These security-related issues are
closely linked to the physical congestion and economic insecurities of their
communities and families. Given these socio-economic risks, their vulnera-
bility to the climate-related effects increasingly becomes heightened (Porio,
2011). Ironically, these household-level risks and vulnerabilities also increase
with the expansion of residential, commercial and industrial development in
figure 4 Flood risk map of Barangay Tanza, Navotas City: Water bodies, informal settlements
and the relocation area. Source: Porio and Dalupang (2013).
observed in the Pasig-Markina river system where roads are being constructed
along the riversides; government buildings and services (day care, sports cen-
tre, local barangay offices) continue to be expanded, alongside the livelihood
spaces (watercress and taro gardens) of informal settlers.
Local officials assert that one major cause of flooding is the continuous
building of temporary structures in already congested, informal settlements
alongside formal residential subdivisions and commercial establishments
located in/near danger zones. However, this has not led them to regulate these
activities by controlling the approval of building permits. As shown in other
contexts, the lack of political responses to non-traditional security threats
has a significant impact on people’s everyday lives (Caballero-Anthony and
Cook, 2013:291). Meanwhile, respondents reported that land-filling activities of
middle- and upper-class real estate developments have increased the flooding
and environmental damage as traditional waterways have disappeared with
these activities. Upgrading and raising the height of road systems have also
worsened the flooding and living conditions of the informal settlers in these
areas. Informal housing built against dyke walls, along creeks, rivers, tributaries
and swampy areas abound in this part of the metropolis. Slum-lords, taking
advantage of the expanding rental markets and the lack of regulation by local
officials, further the risks faced by those residing around the nearby factories of
Pasig, Marikina and Taguig, and the fish port in Navotas City. Heightening the
risk exposure of these households are inadequate services like water, electricity,
health and substandard roads, drainage, and sewage systems (Porio, 2011).
Both the 2008 pre-Ondoy and 2011 post-Ondoy surveys (see Table 1) showed
comparable household characteristics in terms of age, civil status, education
and income levels, except that some communities in the KAMANAVA and
Manggahan flood basins had much lower household incomes. These commu-
nities had higher numbers of respondents who were old, widowed/separated,
without income and dependent on the relatives for food support and, more sig-
nificantly, they also lived in environmentally-degraded communities. Their set-
2 Based on the 2008 household survey conducted in the three flood basins and the 2011 house-
hold and commercial-industrial survey conducted in one basin, the Marikina-Pasig flood
basin that was the worst hit by the Ondoy floods.
The majority of the respondents suffered highly from the 2009 Ondoy floods
compared to the minimal losses they incurred during the 2011 Pedring floods
(rainfall was not heavy in the latter). During Ondoy, floodwaters reached an
average of seven metres, destroying homes, factories and appliances. Because
Marikina is located at the “bottom” of the Marikina-Pasig flood basin, three-
fourths of their dwelling structures were fully or partially damaged, while only
a third of Pasig residents suffered the same fate. The majority of the repairs
and reconstruction were concentrated on adding and repairing/repainting the
floors, walls and roofing of their homes, while a small number constructed a
new home, fixed their plumbing, drainage systems and toilets. The length of
time needed to repair or reconstruct their houses was dependent on the extent
of the damage and the availability of resources.
The disparity is due to the fact that Marikina City residents experienced
more extreme flooding because of their location at the bottom of the flood
basin, while those in Pasig City are further down the river system. Moreover,
there were more residential subdivisions belonging to upper/middle-income
households hit by the floods in Marikina City, while in Pasig City the floods
devastated mostly lower- and middle-income households. This reinforces our
argument that environmental location and the level of degradation of settle-
ments intensifies flood vulnerability.
The relationship between ecological-environmental degradation and flood
impacts can be seen in the subsample analysis in Table 2. Even among the poor-
est of the poor or those households with incomes below the poverty line, there
Access to water
Housing and other services
Eco-environmental No. of days fully (electricity, waste Gender of HH
characteristics of dwelling place flooded damaged collection, footpaths) respondent
N = 55 households (HH)
Average damage to buildings: Average income loss: P21,000 Average income loss: P15,000
Median (P140,000); Mean (P1.3 Average spent on repairs: Average spent on repairs: P20,000
million) P141,000 No electricity: 14 days
Average Income Loss: Median No electricity: 30 days Average no. of workdays lost: 10
(P50,000); Mean (P192,142) Average no. of workdays lost: 30 days
Average spent on repairs: Median days Housing adaptation:
(P50,000); Mean (P319, 434) Housing adaptation: Added strengthened foundations
Relocated after floods: 20 % floors Materials: Scrap, wood, hollow
Regularly maintain buildings: Materials: Scrap, wood, hollow blocks, GI sheets
51% blocks, GI sheets
Materials: concrete, brick, metal
concrete with steel, blocks, bricks,
wood and metal
table 4 Summary of costs/losses of urban poor households (HH) by gender due to floods
from Tropical Storm Ondoy
Most of the adaptations made by families and households were either physical-
structural adjustments or changes in lifestyles and habits. Of the first category,
quite a substantial number (about a third) added and/or raised the floor and
strengthened the foundations of their homes. They also moved the storage of
goods, valuables and irreplaceable items to a higher level so these would not
get wet or damaged (60 per cent). Furthermore, they prepared ready-packed
clothes/toiletries and emergency supplies (e.g., flashlights and headlamps) and
secured emergency evacuation places with relatives/friends. Meanwhile, they
became more diligent in cleaning surrounding canals/drainage channels of
garbage/debris (35 per cent). They now closely monitor the weather through
radio and TV, and keep a close watch on the early warning system installed by
their local governments that alerts them to rising water levels in the river and
directs them to prepare and evacuate. A small minority (5 per cent) said they
just pray to God to protect them.
Flood preparation and insurance was largely absent among the Ondoy flood
victims. An overwhelming 83 per cent had no form of insurance whatsoever,
while a small minority (17 per cent) had purchased life, property and medical
insurance as the latter were employed in the formal sector and/or came from
upper-income groups. Only nine per cent of the 17 per cent were able to make
insurance claims. Most of them could not file claims because damages due to
the Ondoy floods belong to the category of “fortuitous events” or “acts of God”
and were not covered by their insurance.
During and after the floods, the following measures were taken by the bar-
angay/city government to reduce the impact of flooding in their communi-
ties: (1) evacuation of residents from informal settlements along the rivers,
creeks and other danger areas, (2) clearing and rebuilding of roads and bridges,
(3) rebuilding of the water supply network, (4) clearing and rebuilding of
water channel and drainage networks (including rip-rapping/reinforcing of
river/creek walls and elevating water dykes), (5) pumping flood waters out
3 Many of these percentages do not add up to 100 per cent as they are multiple responses.
effects of climate change, the respondents suggested the following: (1) stricter
norms for pollution reduction, (2) decrease vehicles and enhance public trans-
port, (3) effective implementation of regulations/laws, (4) eradicate factories
and other polluting industries, and (5) rehabilitate the environment (e.g., plant-
ing trees). When the community residents were asked what they can do as
individuals to help their government tackle the effects of climate change, 50 per
cent said they could follow environment waste management policies (reduce,
reuse, recycle), observe government laws and ordinances (25 per cent) and the
remainder (25 per cent) said people should plant trees and conserve energy.
When asked how the city or barangay’s disaster risk reduction and manage-
ment council (DRRMC) can serve them more efficiently, only very few (less
than 10 per cent) could suggest that DRRMC monitor flooding more effectively.
This is quite logical because, as indicated earlier, only a quarter (25 per cent)
were aware of the DRRMC’s existence.
Communicating flood risk to the people seem to be institutionalised only
in Marikina City through their established early warning system, indicated by
the people’s recognition of the siren signals (e.g., the first siren is to prepare for
evacuation, with the water level at 14 metres), according to the water level in the
Marikina bridge (e.g., the third siren is for evacuation when the water is reach-
ing the critical level of 16 metres). Meanwhile, Pasig City has also installed an
early warning system communicated through the city’s disaster risk reduction
management council (chaired by the mayor) and to the barangay/community
DRRM counterpart bodies (chaired by the barangay captain). But communi-
cating flood risk to the people and making them move accordingly constitute
the most challenging task for LGUs as most residents do not want to leave their
homes because of theft/loss of belongings. They’d rather climb up to the ceil-
ings/roofs of their houses than move. To the emergency rescuers, this seem
like irrational behaviour but in the urban poor’s calculation, he might lose a
lot more if he allows himself to be rescued and be moved to safer grounds like
an evacuation centre.
The above pattern of responses among the poor show that no matter how
developed the government’s early warning system to ensure their safety is,
people will not move if their home security is not assured.
Most business and commercial establishments in this study faced high expo-
sure and vulnerability to flooding and other climate-related risks. The major-
ity of them only had one storey buildings, which were mostly submerged at
the height of Ondoy floods; thus, they incurred high levels of damage to their
buildings/equipment, besides their repair and replacement. But their insur-
ance allowed them to cover for these losses and recover faster. This also allowed
the majority of them to rehabilitate and/or move their business operations to
places outside of the Pasig-Marikina Flood Basin, where environmental secu-
rity was higher. However, these options are not available to the urban poor
dwellers in these environmentally vulnerable places. For example, Pure Foods,
a huge food processing company located by the Marikina River transferred
their manufacturing to Laguna, a province near the national capital region,
while others moved to higher ground. This was a strategy adopted by large
commercial and industrial establishments in the city, like the conglomerate,
Fortune Tobacco. For those who remained or did not relocate, they simply
strengthened their buildings or built upper floors where they could conduct
their business. Meanwhile, in Pasig, most of the factories were compelled by the
City Environment Office (CENRO) to follow safety standards. The majority of
them who refused to follow the safety standards imposed by the city moved to
other cities and municipalities in Metro Manila or nearby provinces that were
not so strict in imposing environmental laws. This poses problems when con-
sidered at the macro level, because local government units (LGUs), in order
to attract business often relax the compliance standards that they impose on
business/commercial establishments.
The above responses illustrate the private sector’s higher capacity to recover
because of their access to economic resources and political strength to avoid
the regulatory arm of the government or take advantage of its fiscal weaknesses.
In general, respondents in the study blamed the following activities for the
extreme floods: illegal logging, mining, quarrying in the upstream Marikina
watershed and the consequent siltation and clogging of the river systems and
minor water channels. The increasing pollution and overfishing of Laguna Lake
(manifested in the overpopulation of fish cages, most of them cemented, thus
obstructing water flow) also compromised the draining capacity of the lake for
dumped water from the uplands like the Marikina watershed, the Wawa Dam,
and the La Mesa Dam.
The geo-physical factors, environmental degradation, and commercial and
industrial activities that, in part, caused the floods and related disasters have
also been intensified by the uncontrolled real estate development in the up-
lands of Marikina (e.g., Antipolo, Montalban, Binangonan, Taytay, etc.). This
is further compromised by the settling of large populations of informal settle-
ments in danger zones, i.e., along riverlines, hills, slopes and ravines prone to
landslides. Most of the settlements here have weak or temporary housing, low
infrastructural support and low access to basic services.
Learning from the disastrous floods in 2009 and 2011, several policies, such
as the 2010 National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act and the 2011
National Framework Strategy on Climate Change, have been enacted. One of
the principal outcomes of the law has been the crafting of local risk reduction
and management plans at the barangay (community), city and provincial
levels, which seem to provide a very promising scenario. Because plans are
designed locally and elevated to the city level, its design strategies are deemed
more contextually-driven, appropriate, responsive and effective for local needs.
But all these expected outcomes remain at the policy level and need a large
outlay of resources and political will to achieve it.
Concluding Comments
References
Adger, W. Neil (2000) “Social and Ecological Resilience: Are They related?” Progress in
Human Geography 24(3): 347–364.
Adger, W. Neil (2003) “Social Capital, Collective Action, and Adaptation to Climate
Change”. Economic Geography 79(4): 387–404.
Bankoff, Greg (2003) “Constructing Vulnerability: The Historical, Natural and Social
Generation of Flooding in Metro Manila”. Disasters 27(3): 95–109.
Berkes, F. and D. Jolly. (2001) “Adapting to Climate Change: Social-Ecological Resilience
in Canadian Western Artic Community”. Conservation Ecology 5(2): 18.
Blaikie, P., T. Cannon, I. Davies, and B. Wisner. (1994) At Risk: Natural Hazards: People’s
Vulnerability and Disasters. London: Routledge.
Birkmann, Jorn (2009) Assessing Vulnerability in the Context of Multiple-Stressors. Unit-
ed Nations University, Institute for Environment and Human Security.
Caballero-Anthony, Melly and Alistair D.B. Cook (eds.) (2013) Non-Traditional Security
in Asia: Issues, Challenges and Framework for Action. Singapore: Institute of South-
east Asian Studies.
Corpuz, Arturo (2010) “Sociologizing the Environment: View from Geologists and Ur-
ban Planners”. Powerpoint presentation at the Philippine Sociological Society
National Conference, 15–18 October, Silliman University, Dumaguete City, Philip-
pines.
De Sherbinin, A., D. Carr, S. Cassels and L. Jiang (2007) “Population and Environment”.
Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32: 345–373.
Eliott, Laura (2000) “Environmental Security”, in William T. Tow, Ramesh Thakur, and
In-Taek-Hyun (eds.) Asia’s Emerging Regional Order: Reconciling Traditional and
Human Security. Tokyo: The United Nations University Press, p. 200.
Galgana, Gerald, S. Abad II, E. Capili and M.C. Vicente (2004) “Visualizing Sea Level
Rise in Navotas by GIS and Terrain Modeling”. Journal of Environmental Science and
Management 7(1): 1–9.
Marikina City Government (2004) Sound Practice No. 5, Marikina City Flood Mitigation
Counter Measure Program. http://emi.pdc.org/soundpractices/Metro-Manila/SP5
-MM-Flood-Mitigation-Marikina Downloaded: 7 January 2012.
IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Contribution
of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Klein, R.J.T. and R.J. Nicholls (1998) “Coastal zones”, in I. Burton, J.F. Feenstra, M.L. Parry,
J.B. Smith, and R.S.J. Tol (eds.) Handbook on Methods for Climate Change Impact
Assessment and Adaptation Strategies. Version 2. Amsterdam: United Nations Envi-
ronment Programme and Institute for Environmental Studies, Pp. 7–1, 7–35.
Patankar, Archana, Anand Patwardhan, Wijitbusaba Marome and Emma Porio (2013)
“Impacts of Extreme Weather Events and Implications for Adaptation Planning for
Coastal Cities”. APN Science Bulletin 3(March): 16–24.
Porio, Emma (2011) “Gender, slum poverty, and Climate Change in flooded riverlines
in Metro Manila”. Paper presented in the Seminar Series on Gender and Climate
Change, Asian Development Bank (ADB), 27–28 April, ADB Bulding, Ortigas, Man-
daluyong City, Metro Manila.
Porio, Emma (2011) “Vulnerability, Adaptation, and Resilience to Floods and Climate
Change-Related Risks Among Marginal, Riverine Communities in Metro Manila”.
Journal of Asian Social Science 39: 425–445.
Porio, Emma (2012) “Enhancing Climate Change Adaptation Through Integration to
Long-Term Development Plans and Disaster Management: The Case of Metro
Manila”. Report submitted to the Asia Pacific Network for Global Change, Tokyo,
Japan.
Porio, Emma and John Paul Dalupang (2013) “Climate Vulnerability and Adaptation
Among Marginal Populations in Metro Manila”. Paper presented in the International
Conference on Coastal Cities at Risk: Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation,
Makati City, The Philippines, 7–12 February.
Redclift, Michael (2000) “Addressing the Causes of Conflict: Human Security and Envi-
ronmental Responsibilities”. Review of European Community and International Envi-
ronmental Law 9(1): 44–51.
Sairinen, R. and L. Peltonen (n.d.) “Adaptation Strategies for Climate Change in the
Urban Environment”. FINADAPT / Appendix 13, WP 13: Urban planning. Available
at: http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=15988 (accessed on: January
7, 2012).
Velasquez, Jerry (2011) “Why we need more DRR work in the Philippines”. Available at:
http://www.facebook.com/notes/jerry-velasquez/why-we-need-more-drr-work-in-
the-philippines/320230661331687 (accessed on: February 2, 2012).
Winters, P., R. Murgair, C. Sadoulet, A. de Janvry and G. Frisvold (1998) “Economic and
Welfare Impacts of Climate Change on Developing Countries”. Environmental and
Resource Economics 12: 1–24.
World Bank (2009) “Philippine Typhoons Ondoy and Pepeng: A Joint Assessment”.
Sector Reports. Typescript. 77 pp.