You are on page 1of 3

North American Steel Construction Conference

S.F. Airport Roof Truss Erection

Roger E.
Ferch, P.E.,
is a Vice
President
with The
Herrick
Corporation. tures that housed the aircraft gates were
Patrick M.
Hassett,
S.E., P.E.,
T he architects for the San
Francisco International Terminal
constructed before the new terminal
building. The center truss section spans
the existing ten-lane airport entrance
described their design as a dramatic 860’ road. This roadway had to remain open
has 12 years long “winglike” roof that presents its pro- during construction and the contract was
experience file to cars arriving on the access road very restrictive on activities in the vicini-
as a consul- while soaring 60 to 90’ above the floor of ty. Any total road closure had to be lim-
tant on the a cavernous ticketing hall. Couple this ited to a maximum of five minutes
architectural statement with the high between the hours of midnight and 5:00
fabrication
seismic design requirements of northern AM.
and erection California, and the result was the massive
of major structural steel bid documents for the Below the trusses were two floors of
new terminal. AISC-member Herrick conventional beam and column framing.
structural
Corporation was the successful bidder on The existing airport terminals and park-
steel con- ing structure blocked access from the
the 30,000-ton project and signed the
struction pro- east. New construction was already in
contract with the airport in May of 1996.
jects and cur- place on both the north and south sides
rently heads The main roof structure, with a total at the beginning of roof construction.
weight of 4,200 tons, included five sets of Therefore, the only access to the site was
up his own consulting engineering
trusses at 40’ centers. Each truss incor- from the west and the steel had to be
firm. This article is based on their porated two 320’ long double cantilever erected from this side.
scheduled presentation at the 2000 one-way sections resting atop spherical
North American Steel Construction bearings and a two-way 180’ long three-
Conference in Las Vegas. chord center section. The tubular truss Erection of Support Trusses
members range from 12 to 20” in diame- Double cantilever trusses support the
ter and with wall thickness from 7/8 to center span three-chord “football”
2”. All joints were complete penetration shaped trusses. The middle sections were
welds. The final erection tolerance was erected first, followed by the outside can-
one inch in any direction. tilever and the inside cantilever trusses.
Nylon Kevlar slings were used to cradle
The project site contributed to the top chord pipe sections at designated
project challenges. The new 2,000,000- pick points rather than welding lifting
sq. ft. facility provides 26 gates for Boeing lugs to the API pipe and having to grind
747 and 777 jumbo aircraft. The struc-

Modern Steel Construction / February 2000


Center Span Jacking Operation
With erection of the support trusses
complete on both sides, the center span
trusses were ready for jacking the 60’ to
their final position. The original plan
was to jack all five trusses into place and
pin the ends in one operation. This plan
was feasible, however, for the benefit of
the project schedule, and to allow other
trades to begin work, it was more advan-
tageous to do the lifts in two phases. The
first two trusses at the east side would be
left unattached to the other three in
order to jack them into position first.
This would allow work on the east win-
dow wall to proceed, as well as other
tasks. An additional benefit was the jack-
ing towers and pinning platforms could
be reached for removal by the cranes at
the completion of the lift.
The jacks were positioned just
inboard from the ends of the football
trusses. This allowed the erector to use
the nylon slings to cradle the bottom
chord of the truss near the pin casting.
Each jack lifted the trusses up using a
200-ton Hollow Ram Jack with a 4”
diameter threaded rod. The rod sections
were 20’ long and were uncoupled and
removed after passing through the jack.
The hydraulic system was coupled to
provide the same lifting rate at all four
jacking points. Even with this precau-
tion, each jacking point was continuously
monitored and measured during the lift.
them off. The support trusses rested atop onto dollies and towed across the airport Any time the differential exceeded 1”,
two box columns. Special column splice runways and service-ways to the site. the individual jacks were adjusted.
erection aids were designed due to the This operation was performed at night The jacks required support platforms
height of the freestanding 46” box when no flights were scheduled. They designed for 150 kips each at 80’ above
columns that support these trusses. A were lifted with a Manitowoc M250 the working floor. These “jacking tow-
minimum column splice weld was also crawler crane using nylon slings at four ers” consisted of W36 columns on each
specified prior to erection of trusses in pick points, and walked into position. side of each jack. Struts and double
order to provide the required lateral The crane then rotated to swing one truss angle bracing were framed between the
strength. Stability during erection of end onto the rail system near the edge of columns for lateral strength and stability.
trusses is always a concern. The connec- the third floor. The opposite end was A pinning platform was also built on the
tion between the truss and the box col- then connected to a waiting Manitowac jacking towers for safe access during the
umn is a ball and socket bearing struc- 888, and the first crane released the load. pinning operation. The jacking towers
ture; therefore, there was uncertainty as The 888 walked forward with the truss, were supported on the third floor steel.
to the stiffness at the supports. The erec- rolling it across the floor on W14 beam- Some members were added and some
tor was directed to tie the trusses laterally rails on Hillman rollers. The rollers were permanent member sizes were changed
at specified points prior to releasing them bolted directly to the shipping cradles. in order to sustain the loads imparted by
from the crane. This required the use of An air-tugger was also connected to the the lift. The entire erection procedure
two cranes within the restricted work lead end of the truss in the event that any and design was submitted to the owner
area. binding of the rollers occurred, which for review prior to beginning the opera-
did not. This process was repeated four tion.
more times for the remainder of the foot-
Shipping and Delivery of ball shaped trusses. The roof structure The first lift of two trusses as well as
Center Span Trusses purlins and bracing was framed between the second lift of three trusses were com-
The five center span trusses are three the “football” trusses while they were pleted and pinned without incident. The
chord trusses consisting of two pipe top resting on the third floor. This allowed jacking took approximately 10 hours
chords and one pipe bottom chord. The the ironworkers to work 25’ above a slab each lift. The tolerances were tight, but
182’, 100-ton trusses were shipped on floor, utilizing scissor lifts and other tools the pinning went smoothly, using a
cradles in one piece from the fabrication that would be difficult to utilize at 75’ tapered lead pin attached to the perma-
plant by barge across San Francisco Bay above a working floor. The structural nent pin in order to mate the two mem-
to the airport. The trusses were loaded slab would not support high-lift working bers. Upon completion of each lift, the
booms. few remaining roof purlins were installed
and the jacking towers removed.
The San Francisco International
Terminal was a very challenging fabrica-
tion and erection project. However, the
fabrication and erection of the tubular
roof trusses on a constricted site with an
active 10-lane road underneath was the
greatest of these challenges. Herrick
began to address this challenge during
the bidding phase and spent over a year
adapting this plan to changing site condi-
tions, needs of subsequent trades, and
revisions in the scope of work. Herrick’s
contract called for the delivery of over
30,000 tons of structural steel and instal-
lation of the metal decking. Erection of
the terminal began in November 1997
and continued through December 1998.
The terminal is scheduled to open in
early 2000. The successful erection of
this roof structure is a credit not only to
Herrick and its lead consultant, Hassett
Engineering, but also to the entire San
Francisco Airport project team and the
steel construction industry.

Modern Steel Construction / February 2000

You might also like