Lacanist obscurity and the precapitalist paradigm of reality

M. Wilhelm Porter

Department of English, Stanford University

1. Smith and the precapitalist paradigm of reality

In the works of Smith, a predominant concept is the concept of neocapitalist
culture. If Lacanist obscurity holds, we have to choose between the
precapitalist paradigm of reality and cultural modernism.

It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a Lacanist obscurity

that includes art as a paradox. In Chasing Amy, Smith deconstructs the
precapitalist paradigm of reality; in Dogma, however, he denies
postcapitalist socialism.

Thus, the main theme of the works of Smith is the bridge between sexual
identity and sexuality. Abian[1] implies that the works of
Smith are an example of mythopoetical libertarianism.

2. The precapitalist paradigm of reality and precultural

deappropriation
If one examines Sontagist camp, one is faced with a choice: either accept
Lacanist obscurity or conclude that the media is capable of intentionality,
given that art is interchangeable with consciousness. It could be said that the
subject is contextualised into a precapitalist paradigm of reality that
includes truth as a whole. In Chasing Amy, Smith examines Lacanist
obscurity; in Mallrats he deconstructs textual discourse.

In the works of Smith, a predominant concept is the distinction between

ground and figure. But any number of conceptualisms concerning the stasis, and
eventually the futility, of neodialectic class exist. If the precapitalist
paradigm of reality holds, we have to choose between Lacanist obscurity and
Derridaist reading.

However, the example of cultural narrative prevalent in Smith�s Dogma

is also evident in Clerks. Geoffrey[2] states that we
have to choose between precultural deappropriation and textual predialectic
theory.

Thus, the primary theme of Brophy�s[3] analysis of

Lacanist obscurity is the difference between society and sexual identity. If
postcapitalist textual theory holds, the works of Smith are postmodern.

In a sense, Sontag uses the term �the precapitalist paradigm of reality� to

denote a self-sufficient totality. The premise of precultural deappropriation
suggests that discourse is created by the collective unconscious.

1. Abian, T. B. (1987)
Deconstructing Constructivism: The precapitalist paradigm of reality and
Lacanist obscurity. Yale University Press

2. Geoffrey, S. ed. (1973) Lacanist obscurity and the

precapitalist paradigm of reality. And/Or Press

3. Brophy, Q. I. G. (1980) The Failure of Consensus:

Capitalism, Lacanist obscurity and textual discourse. Cambridge University
Press

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated
by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link
for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine,
a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very
slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 17,660,938 essays since

25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of

Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: �On the Simulation of Postmodernism and
Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks�.
More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where
NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal�s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was
accepted by a cultural criticism publication.