Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2.Why does Mr. Clarkson have to borrow money to support this profitable
business?
3.Is a line of credit of $ 750,000 sufficient to meet the firm’s future financial
needs?
4.As a banker, would you approve Mr. Clarkson’s loan request, and if so, what
conditions would you put on the loan?
The Clarkson Lumber Company has been expanding rapidly for several years.
Increases in working capital requirements have
outgrown the capacity of the firm to generate funds from internal sources. Also,
part of the funds were used to buy out a
partner, further increasing financial pressure. The firm has foregone taking
discounts on accounts payable and is borrowing
increasing amounts from the bank so as to maintain its expansion. Mr. Clarkson’s
decision today is whether to expand and , if
so, how to raise new funds. He is seeking a new bank connection from which he
can borrow larger amounts. In turn, the bank
must estimate the amount of funds actually needed by Mr. Clarkson, the probable
repayment schedule, the nature and degree
of the risks incurred and the appropriate terms of such a bank loan.
2. Why Borrow?
Points to Note:
Clarkson’s urgent need for funds. The Buyout of Clarkson’s partner has added fuel
to the fire.
A major reason for the increase in accounts receivables and inventories since 1993
has been the RISING SALES VOLUME.
Also, the Collection period has increased from 38 days at year-end 1993 to 49 days
at year-end 1995. See Table TN-B.
Refer to Table TN-D. Clarkson Lumber’s financial condition has weakened since
1993. The trade credit has been stretched
from 35 days to 54 days; the current ratio has declined from 2.5 to 1.2, and total
liabilities as a % of total assets has soared
3. Is $ 750,000 sufficient?
The answer depends on the degree to which Clarkson relies on using trade credit as
a source of funds. As exhibit 2 shows,
Clarkson has waited for about 35 to 54 days to pay his suppliers. If Mr. Clarkson is
offered a discount of 2 % for a payment
made in 10 days and he does not pay until 50 days, what interest rate is he forgoing
? On a purchase of $ 1000, he either pays
$ 980 in 10 days or $ 1,000 in 50 days. He thus pays $ 20 for the use of $ 980 for
40 days which is 2.04 % for 40 days, or
This cost may be overstated. Clarkson may be taking part of his discounts and
extending other payables beyond 50 days out;
such a policy would reduce costs shown. Also, if Mr. Clarkson could delay
payment on his purchases for more than 50 days
periods on a/c receivables has been 38 to 49 days. This cost comes to 31 % annual
( HW: calculate this #)
Assumptions:
1. Mr. Clarkson will reduce his payables period to 10 days and take the 2 %
purchase discount, and
2. Mr. Clarkson will pay his suppliers in 48 days, as per his practice in 1994 and
1995.
Table TN-E shows a projected income statement for 1996 and Table TN-F shows a
projected balance sheet.
Observe that Clarkson needs to borrow $ 971, 000 at the end of 1996 and his
PEAK loan requirements may be higher due to :
1) he may need to finance a larger volume of current assets during his seasonal
peak, which occurs well before the end of the
year, and 2) at this time, he will have accumulated only a portion of his total
retained earnings for the year.
3.Continue to rely heavily on trade credit and pay off bills slowly.
In the third case, if Mr. Clarkson waits 50 days to pay off his bills, he will have a/c
payable of $ 580,000 outstanding reducing
his bank borrowings well below 4 750,000 but will the bank lend now ???
DECISIONS, DECISIONS:
See Figure TN-A for a mapping of major alternatives. Mr. Clarkson can expand his
operations rapidly but can he increase
profits as rapidly ? To do so, he will need more financing unless he relies on high
cost trade credit. Continued expansion at a
rate that cannot be financed proportionately from retained earnings can leave hin in
a vulnerable high risk position. Clarkson
NEEDS bank financing in larger amounts for longer terms than he realizes. Float
equity?
It is NOT clear that slowing down the rate of expansion will lower profits.
Increasing scale has not improved operating
margins or the return on invested capital during 1993-95 ( See Table TN-G).
Clarkson can earn high returns on the same
volume of operations simply by taking more of his purchase discounts. With less
aggression, he may be able to charge higher
prices or avoid giving quantity discounts on sales, thus increasing profits. Such a
policy may leave him in a more flexible
Does the bank wish to make a long-term loan to Mr. Clarkson? Until the expansion
rate is curbed, there is little hope of the
bank loan being repaid, and a greater prob. of a future request to increase the loan
amount. Is Mr. Clarkson a very valuable
Long-term customer ?? if so, the bank will lend but with severe restrictions. Now,
the bank is betting heavily on Mr. Clarkson
as a manager and as a person, and it will look to long-term profits to repay the
loan. In case earnings collapse, a lien on
accounts receivables and inventories will be imposed. What is the prob. that Mr.
Clarkson will comply with the loan??