Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Civil Engineers
Geotechnical Engineering 149
January 2001 Issue 1
Pages 41^47
Paper 12211
Received 11/11/1999
Accepted 25/05/2000
Keywords:
Peter A. Cundall
design methods & aids/mathema-
Senior Consultant, Itasca
tical modelling/stress analysis
Consulting Group, Inc.,
Minneapolis
The close correspondence between particle assemblies and 3. PARTICLE MODELS OF SOIL AND ROCK FABRIC
granular material is evident, but particle simulations can also There are various schemes to simulate the behaviour of systems
represent brittle or ductile solids, such as rock and concrete. If of discrete bodies; a survey of these methods is given by
particles are bonded together, the progressive breaking of bonds Cundall and Hart.4 Although any such method can be used in
corresponds to cracking in a solid. One advantage of this the approach suggested here, the basic formulation for only one
approach is that fractures naturally form at discrete locations, methodÐthe distinct element method5Ðis described because it is
rather than being smeared across elements (which is one way in the method used to produce the examples that follow. The
which continuum methods attempt to reproduce the effects of discussion is also restricted to circular particles, although
cracks). mature computer codes exist that treat arbitrary polyhedra in
three dimensions.6 Each disk or sphere is modelled as a rigid
The methodology by which continuum modelling is replaced by body with three or six degrees of freedom, respectively (e.g.
simulation of particle assemblies is explained and illustrated in three translations and three spins, in three-dimensional form).
the following sections. The full dynamic motion of each body is modelled, with
damping being used to dissipate kinetic energy in order for
2. BEHAVIOUR OF SOIL AND ROCK systems of particles to attain static equilibrium. When particles
Soil and rock exhibit rich spectra of behaviour. Some observa- come into contact (as a result of motion induced by gravity and
tions reported in laboratory tests are listed below. boundary conditions), forces, F, are generated as a function of
the relative displacements, u, at contacts. Simple linear
(a) Continuously non-linear stress±strain response, with ulti- relations are often adequate (expressed here in incremental
mate failure, followed by softening or hardening. form)
(b) Behaviour that changes in character, according to stress
stateÐfor example, the crack patterns in rock are quite
1 F n = 7knDun
DF
different in the tensile, uncon®ned and con®ned regimes.
(c) Memory of previous stress or strain excursions, commonly
expressed in terms of yield surfacesÐthe memory may be
2 Fis = 7ksDuis
DF
modi®ed or erased (e.g. kinematic or isotropic hardening).
(d) Spontaneous localisationÐfor example, shear bands and
crack patterns. where superscripts n and s denote `normal' and `shear',
(e) Dilatancy that depends on history, mean stress and initial respectively, k is a contact stiffness coef®cient and subscript i
state. denotes the components of a vector (i = 1, 3 in three
( f ) Hysteresis at all levels of cyclic loading/unloading; cyclic dimensions).
5. EXAMPLE APPLICATIONSöROCK
An assembly of particles bonded together at their contacts acts
like a brittle solid. Such a synthetic material may be calibrated
to exhibit speci®c values of tensile strength, uncon®ned
compressive strength and fracture toughness. Fig. 3 shows an
assembly of bonded disks in which a notch has been cut. The
lateral faces are free and the upper and lower faces are
composed of particles (shown in blue) that are ®xed in the
horizontal direction and controlled in the vertical direction. By
moving the two sets of controlled particles apart at constant
speed, a simulated tensile test is performed on the sample.
Fig. 2. Particles flowing from a bin through a tapering hopper. 6. PREDICTIONS OF MODELLING FEASIBILITY
The assembly consists of approximately 55 000 irregular
`clumps', with each clump containing two overlapping spheres As the preceding examples have shown, it is possible to make
rigidly connected together useful simulations with particle models on today's personal
computers. Is it feasible to expect large, three-dimensional
groups of overlapping
spheres, the overall friction 10 years 20 years
angle is increased. The exam-
ple illustrates the size of Problem type Total particles Equivalent Total particles Equivalent
continuum elements continuum elements
problem that may be simu-
lated on a personal computer `Easy' problem 10 million 10 000 10 000 million 10 million
in 1999. The simulation `Hard' problem 100 million 100 000 100 000 million 100 million
shown took several days to
execute; the time is directly Table 1. Predicted model sizes in 10 and 20 years
proportional to the amount of
7. CONCLUSIONS
Particle simulations are often
regarded as intellectually
unsatisfying compared to ele-
gant and simple continuum
formulations. However, in
solving practical problems,
the situation may be reversed.
Continuum formulations can
become overloaded with ad
hoc assumptions and para-
Fig. 5. Cracks calculated to form around the URL Mine-by tunnel in granite. Each line denotes a meter in¯ation, while particle
bond break. The major principal stress acts in the x direction, and the ratio of major to minor
principal stresses is about six11 formulations usually need
simple laws and few para-
meters to govern interactions
at the particle level. Even
though millions of particles
may be needed to simulate a
particular system, the metho-
dology is conceptually
simple. Complexity arises as
an emergent property of the
system, not as something
speci®ed by the programmer
or modeller.
Please email, fax or post your discussion contributions to the secretary: email: sismeyh@ice.org.uk; fax: +44 (0)20 7799 1325; or
post to Helen Sismey, Journals Department, Institution of Civil Engineers, 1^7 Great George Street, London SW1P 3AA.