Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Session Number : 5
Date : 09.04.2007
Subject Expert :
Dr. M.C. Nataraja
Professor
Department of Civil Engineering,
Sri Jayachamarajendra College of
Engineering,
Mysore – 570 006.
Phone:0821-2343521, 9880447742
E-mail: nataraja96@yahoo.com
1
Design and Detailing of Counterfort
Retaining wall
2
Counterfort Retaining wall
3
Parts of CRW
• Same as that of Cantilever Retaining wall Plus
Counterfort
Stem Counterforts
Toe Heel
Base slab
Cross section Plan
4
Design of Stem
• The stem acts as a continuous slab
• Soil pressure acts as the load on the
slab. BF
• Earth pressure varies linearly over
the height
• The slab deflects away from the
earth face between the counterforts
• The bending moment in the stem is
maximum at the base and reduces
towards top.
• But the thickness of the wall is kept p=Kaγh
constant and only the area of steel
is reduced.
5
Maximum Bending moments for stem
6
Design of Toe Slab
The base width=b =0.6 H to 0.7 H
The projection=1/3 to 1/4 of base width.
The toe slab is subjected to an upward
soil reaction and is designed as a H
cantilever slab fixed at the front face of
the stem.
Reinforcement is provided on earth face
along the length of the toe slab.
In case the toe slab projection is large i.e.
> b/3, front counterforts are provided b
above the toe slab and the slab is
designed as a continuous horizontal
slab spanning between the front
counterforts.
7
Design of Heel Slab
8
Design of Counterforts
• The counterforts are subjected to
outward reaction from the stem.
• This produces tension along the
outer sloping face of the counterforts.
• The inner face supporting the stem is
in compression. Thus counterforts
are designed as a T-beam of varying
depth. C T
• The main steel provided along the
sloping face shall be anchored d
properly at both ends.
• The depth of the counterfort is
measured perpendicular to the
sloping side.
9
Behaviour of Counterfort RW
-M
+M Important points
•Loads on Wall
COUNTERFORT •Deflected shape
STEM
•Nature of BMs
•Position of steel
-M
•Counterfort details
HEEL SLAB
TOE +M
10
PROBLEM
-Counterfort Retaining Wall
• A R.C.C. retaining wall with counterforts is
required to support earth to a height of 7 m above
the ground level. The top surface of the backfill is
horizontal. The trial pit taken at the site indicates
that soil of bearing capacity 220 kN/m2 is available
at a depth of 1.25 m below the ground level. The
weight of earth is 18 kN/m3 and angle of repose is
30°. The coefficient of friction between concrete
and soil is 0.58. Use concrete M20 and steel
grade Fe 415. Design the retaining wall.
11
Draw the following:
• Cross section of wall near the counterfort
• Cross section of wall between the counterforts
• L/s of stem at the base cutting the counterforts
Given:
fck = 20 N/mm2, fy = 415N/mm2, H = 7 m above G.L,
Depth of footing below G.L. = 1.25 m, γ = 18 kN/m 3,
μ = 0.58, fb =SBC= 220 kN/m2
12
a. Proportioning of Wall Components
13
Spacing of counterforts
14
Details of wall
250 mm
CF: 3m c/c,
400 mm
h=7.8 m
h1=7 m H=8.25 m
θ
1.25m 1.2 m 4.05m
T b=5.5 m
15
b. Check Stability of Wall
Dist. of Moment
Sr. Description of
Loads in kN e.g. from about
No. loads
T in m T in kN-m
Weight of stem 25x0.25x1x7.8 1.2 + 0.25/2
1 64.59
W1 = 48.75 =1.325
ΣW
Total ΣW = 679.25
=2210.71
16
250 mm
W1
W3
h1= 7000 H
8250
ΣW
R
PA
PA
Df= 1250 1200 mm 4050 mm
A B C D H/3
450 W2
T ka H
X e b/2
b/3 Pressure distribution
Overturning moment = M0
= Ph x H/3 = 204.19 x 8.25/3 = 561.52 kN.m.
Factor of safety against overturning
= ∑ M / M0 = 2210.71/561.52 = 3.94 > 1.55
safe.
18
Check for sliding
19
Check for pressure distribution at base
21
250 mm
H
8250
ΣW
R
PA
1250 1200 mm C 4050 mm
A B D
450
T X e b/2
80.39
166.61 153.9 147.8 143.9 kN/m2
kN/m2
5500 mm
22
b) Design of Toe slab
Max. BMB = psf x (moment due to soil pressure - moment
due to wt. of slab TB]
23
b) Design of Toe slab- Contd.,
To find steel
24
Check for Shear
Critical section for shear: At distance d (= 390 mm)
from the face of the toe
pE = 80.39 + (166.61 - 80.39) (4.3 + 0.39)/5.5
= 153.9kN/m2 d
COUNTERFORT
STEM
-M
HEEL SLAB
TOE +M
26
(c) Design of Heel Slab
Continuous slab.
Consider 1 m wide strip near the outer edge D
The forces acting near the edge are
Downward wt. of soil=18x7.8xl= 140.4 kN/m
Downward wt. of heel slab = 25 x 0.45 x 1= 11.25 kN/m
Upward soil pressure 80.39 kN/m 2= 80.39 x 1= 80.39 kN/m
Net down force at D= 140.4 + 11.25 - 80.39 = 71.26 kN/m
Also net down force at C = 140.4 + 11.25 - 143.9 = 7.75 kN/m
Mu= (psf) pl2 /12 = 1.5 x 71.26 x 2.62/12 = 60.2 kN-m (At the junction of CF)
27
80.39
166.61 153.9 147.8 143.9 kN/m2
kN/m2
5500
mm
7.75
kN/m Forces on heel slab
71.26
kN/m
C D
28
To find steel
Mu/bd2=60.2x106/(1000x3902)= 0.39 < 2.76, URS
To find steel
pt=0.114% <0.12%GA (Min. steel), <0.96%(pt,lim.)
Provide 0.12% of GA
2600 HEEL
x1
139
SFD
y1
71.28 Shear analysis and
7.75
kN/m kN/m Zone of shear steel
Net down force dia.
31
Area of steel for +ve moment
(Heel slab)
32
Check the force at junction of heel slab with stem
The intensity of downward force decreases due to
increases in upward soil reaction. Consider m width of
the slab at C
Net downward force= 18 x 7.8 +25 x 0.45 - 143.9 = 7.75
kN/m. Provide only minimum reinforcement.
Distribution steel
Ast = 0.12 x 1000 x 450/100 = 540 mm 2
Using # 12 mm bars, spacing = 1000 x 113/468 = 241 mm.
Provide # 12 mm at 200 mm c/c.
Area provided = 565 mm2
33
(d) Design of Stem (Vertical Slab).
Continuous slab spanning between the counterforts and
subjected to earth pressure.
The intensity of earth pressure
= ph = ka γh =18 x 7.8/3=46.8 kN/m2
Area of steel on earth side near counterforts :
Maximum -ve ultimate moment,
Mu = 1.5 x ph l2/12 = 1.5 x 46.8 x 2.62/12 = 39.54 kN.m.
Required d = √ (39.54 x 106/(2.76 x 1000)) = 119 mm
However provide total depth = 250 mm
Mu/bd2= 39.54x106/1000x3902=1.1 < 2.76, URS
34
To find steel: Pt=0.34% <0.96%,
Ast=646 mm2, #12 mm @ 170 mm c/c,
However provide #12 mm @ 110 mm c/c,
Area provided = 1027.27 mm2,Pt= 0.54 %.
37
Ast.min = 0.85 bd/fy = 0.85 x 400 x 3535/415 = 2896 mm 2
Provided 4- # 22 mm + 4 - # 22 mm,
Area provided = 3041 mm2
pt = 100 x 3041/(400 x 3535) = 0.21 %
38
Design of Horizontal Ties
The direct pull by the wall on counterfort for 1 m height at
base
= kaγh x c/c distance =1/3x18 x 7.8 x 3 = 140.4 kN
Area of steel required to resist the direct pull
= 1.5 x 140.4 x 103/(0.87 x 415) = 583 mm2 per m height.
Using # 8 mm 2-legged stirrups, Ast = 100 mm2
spacing = 1000 x 100/583 = 170 mm c/c.
Provide # 8 at 170 mm c/c.
Since the horizontal pressure decreases with h, the
spacing of stirrups can be increased from 170 mm c/c to
450 mm c/c towards the top.
39
Design of Vertical Ties
The maximum pull will be exerted at the end of heel slab
where the net downward force = 71.26 kN/m.
41
250 mm 0-200mm
STEM COUNTERFORT
7000
#12@200 8250 mm
#12@200
8-#22 1.77m
#12@400
1250 1200 mm
450
Backfill Backfill
0.3l
0.25 l
July 2006
• Single bay Fixed Portal Frame
• Combined footing (Beam and slab type)
December 2006
• T-shaped Cantilever Retaining wall
• Combined footing (Type not mentioned)
46
Exam Problem (Dec. 2006)
Design a T shaped cantilever retaining wall to retain earth
embankment 3.2 m high above the ground level. The
unit weight of the earth is 18 kN/m2 and its angle of
repose is 30 degrees. The embankment is horizontal
at it top. The SBC of soil is 120 kN/m2 and the co-
efficient of friction between soil and concrete is 0.5.
Use M20 concrete and Fe 415 steel. Draw the
following to a suitable scale:
1. Section of the retaining wall
2. Reinforcement details at the inner face of the stem.
60 Marks
Data: h1=3.2 m, µ=0.5, γ=18 kN/m2, ө=30º, SBC= 120
kN/m2,
M20 Concrete and Fe 415 steel
Find H= h1 + Df
47
48