Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Opas 47 Guide 47
FOREGS GEOCHEMICAL
MAPPING
FIELD MANUAL
ISBN 951-690-693-1
ISSN 0781-643X
R. Salminen, T. Tarvainen, A. Demetriades, M. Duris, F. M. Fordyce,
V. Gregorauskiene, H. Kahelin, J. Kivisilla, G. Klaver, H. Klein, J.
O. Larson, J. Lis, J. Locutura, K. Marsina, H. Mjartanova, C.
Mouvet, P. OConnor, L. Odor, G. Ottonello, T. Paukola, J. A. Plant,
C. Reimann, O. Schermann, U. Siewers, A. Steenfelt, J. Van der Sluys,
B. de Vivo & L. Williams 1998. FOREGS geochemical mapping. Field
manual. Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas - Geological Survey of Fin-
land, Guide 47. 36 sivua, 15 kuvaa ja yksi liite.
Euroopan geologisten tutkimuslaitosten yhteistyöelimen FOREGSin
(Forum of European Geological Surveys) geokemiallinen kartoitus-
ohjelma tuottaa korkeatasoista ympäristögeokemiallista tietoa alkuainei-
den pitoisuuksien perustasosta koko Euroopasta. Näytemateriaaleina
käytetään purovettä, purosedimenttiä, tulvasedimenttiä, maaperää ja
humusta. Kerättävän tiedon laatu ja yhtenäisyys varmistetaan käyttämäl-
lä standardoituja näytteenottomenetelmiä sekä esikäsittelemällä ja
analyoismalla kukin näytetyyppi samassa laboratoriossa.
Tämä kartoitusohjelma on Euroopan FOREGS-maiden osuus kansain-
väliseen geokemialliseen kartoitusohjelmaan (International Union of
Geological Sciences / International Association of Geochemistry and
Cosmochemistry Working Group on Global Geochemical Baselines).
Näytteenotto-ohjeet perustuvat kansainvälisen geologisen korrelaatio-
ohjelman hankkeiden IGCP 259 (Interntional geochemical mapping) ja
IGCP 360 (Global geochemical baselines) suosituksiin.
Opas antaa yksityiskohtaiset ohjeet näytepaikkojen valintaan ja näyt-
teiden keräämiseen. Lopussa on yhteenveto suunnitelluista esikäsittely-
menetelmistä.
Preface .............................................................................................................................................5
List of members................................................................................................................................6
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................8
1.1 FOREGS Geochemical Baseline Programme (FGBP) ...............................................................8
1.2 The need for environmental geochemical baseline data in Europe ............................................ 8
1.3 Sampling media .......................................................................................................................... 9
1.4 Organisation and time frame .......................................................................................................9
2. Selection of sample sites ........................................................................................................... 11
2.1 GTN grid cells .......................................................................................................................... 11
2.2 Selecting sample sites ...............................................................................................................12
2.3 Identifiers ..................................................................................................................................15
3. Sampling ................................................................................................................................... 16
3.1 Stream water ............................................................................................................................. 16
3.1.1 Water samples to be collected ................................................................................................16
3.1.2 Equipment ..............................................................................................................................16
3.1.3 Water sampling procedure ..................................................................................................... 17
3.1.4 Treatment of water samples ...................................................................................................18
3.2 Stream sediment ........................................................................................................................19
3.2.1 Stream sediment samples to be collected ...............................................................................19
3.2.2 Equipment ..............................................................................................................................19
3.2.3 Sampling procedure ...............................................................................................................20
3.2.4 Photographing ........................................................................................................................21
3.3 Humus and residual soil samples ..............................................................................................22
3.3.1 Humus and soil samples to be collected ................................................................................22
3.3.2 Equipment ..............................................................................................................................22
3.3.3 Humus ....................................................................................................................................22
3.3.4 Residual soil samples .............................................................................................................22
3.3.5 Photographing ........................................................................................................................25
3.4 Floodplain sediments ................................................................................................................25
3.4.1 Floodplain sediment samples to be taken .............................................................................. 25
3.4.2 Equipment ..............................................................................................................................27
3.4.3 Sampling procedure ...............................................................................................................27
3.4.4 Photographing ........................................................................................................................28
3.5 Overbank sediments ..................................................................................................................28
3.5.1 Overbank sediments to be taken ............................................................................................ 28
3.5.2 Equipment to be purchased by each participant .................................................................... 29
3.5.3 Sampling ................................................................................................................................ 29
4. Field observations ..................................................................................................................... 30
4.1 Photographs .............................................................................................................................. 30
4.2 Gamma ray spectrometry ..........................................................................................................30
4.3 Sampling site coordinates .........................................................................................................30
5. Differences between FOREGS geochemical sampling and IGCP 259 recommendations ........ 31
6. Sample preparations and analysis ............................................................................................. 32
6.1 Handling of collected sample material .....................................................................................32
6.2 Sample preparation equipment and methods ............................................................................32
6.2.1 Equipment ..............................................................................................................................32
6.2.2 Types of prepared samples .....................................................................................................32
6.2.3 Sample preparation procedures ............................................................................................32
7. References .................................................................................................................................36
APPENDIX 1: Field observation sheets: Stream water/stream sediment, humus, soil, floodplain
sediment, overbank sediment
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
Preface
Research conducted since 1988 as part of Interna- der to make an inventory of geochemical databases
tional Geochemical Mapping project (IGCP 259) in European countries. The Group identified 120
indicated that although there are several national and separate geochemical databases, but found that the
regional datasets describing the geochemistry of the materials collected, the sampling methods and ana-
Earths surface they are incomplete and inconsistent lytical techniques used varied widely so that the GRN
between different national surveys. It has become was needed urgently to extend across Europe, (Plant
apparent that the need for a consistent and interna- et al, 1996).
tionally comparable geochemical dataset is urgent, The FOREGS Directors agreed that there was a
for example not only for scientists but also for policy need for a European geochemical baseline and de-
makers, especially in the area of contaminated land. cided that the way forward was to integrate this
It is vital to have as detailed an understanding as project with the ongoing Global Geochemical Base-
possible of background variation in the natural sys- lines project, (IGCP 360), an international project
tem before defining limits for contamination. which aimed to realize the recommendations of IGCP
The International Geological Correlation Pro- 259. The FOREGS Geochemistry Task Force there-
gramme (IGCP) project 259 recommended the col- fore became the European subcommittee within
lection of a global reference set of materials, which IGCP 360.
should be collected following predefined, system- Currently 25 European countries have participated
atic methods, and which should also be consistently in the work of the FOREGS Geochemistry Task
analysed in designated laboratories. In this way, a Force. At recent meetings in Aveiro, Portugal and
global geochemical database based on a global ref- Limbach, Slovak Republic the main sampling and
erence network (GRN) could be created, to provide analytical strategies were discussed and accepted,
a reference against which existing national and re- resulting in the definition of a set of sampling
gional geochemical datasets could be compared. protocols. Further refinements at the final IGCP 360
These recommendations are presented in A Global meeting in Vail, Colorado have been incorporated
Geochemical Database for Environmental and Re- into this document, producing a Field Manual for
source Management by Darnley and others, 1995. the collection of a set of reference materials with the
The recommendations were endorsed by the UN aim of producing a standardized geochemical dataset.
Committee on Natural Resources which issued Reso- The collaboration of professional geochemists
lution 3/5 recognizing the urgent need for a global which has resulted in this field manual has been wide-
land monitoring programme. The resolution endorsed spread both in terms of geographical location and
the need to establish a global geochemical database experience. Most of the contributors have been ac-
and recommended that the Global Geochemical Base- knowledged as co-authors, but there are many oth-
lines Project forms the core of the programme. ers who have contributed to the preparation of this
The findings of the IGCP 259 were also reinforced document. This process has been extremely success-
by the findings of the FOREGS Geochemistry Task ful and an active network of European geochemists
Force, which was established in 1994 by the Direc- has developed as a direct result, with a biennially
tors of the main European Geological Surveys in or- rotating leadership.
Reijo Salminen
5
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
List of members
List of members of the FOREGS Geochemistry Task Force 1997-2001. These persons, whose name
is printed in bold are officially nominated as contact persons. Others have participated in meetings
and other activities.
6
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
NORWAY SWITZERLAND
Dr. Clemens Reimann Dr. Petr Heitzmann
Mr. Jaeger Oystein Swiss National Hydrological and Geological Survey
Geological Survey of Norway CH-3003 Berne
P.O. Box 3006-Lade
N-7002 Trondheim UNITED KINGDOM
Dr. John Baldock
POLAND Professor Jane Plant
Dr. Jozef Lis Ms. Fiona Fordyce
Dr. Anna Pasieczna Ms. Lorraine Williams
Panstwowy Instytut Geologiczny British Geological Survey
Ul. Rakowiecka 4 Kingsley Dunham Center
PL-00975 Warszawa Keyworth
Nottingham NG12 5GG
PORTUGAL
Dr. Luis Martins FINLAND
Ms. Maria João Batista Prof. Reijo Salminen
Instituto Geológico e Mineiro Dr. Timo Tarvainen
Estrada da Portela-Zambujal Mr. Nils Gustavsson
Apartado 7586 Mr. Harry Sandström
2720 Alfragide Ms. Hanna Kahelin
Ms. Tarja Paukola
Prof. Manuel Pinto Geologian tutkimuskeskus
Dept. de Geosciencias PL 96
Universidade de Aveiro FIN-02151 Espoo
3810 Aveiro
7
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 FOREGS Geochemical Baseline FOREGS countries. The following is an extract from
Programme (FGBP) that report.
Throughout Europe public concern about the
This programme has been initiated to provide high environment is growing. In response, national gov-
quality environmental geochemical baseline data for ernments and the European Union (EU) are attempt-
Europe. The data will be based on samples of stream ing to develop policies, legislation and infrastruc-
water, stream sediment, floodplain sediment, soil, and ture, such as the European Environment Agency
humus collected from all over Europe. High quality (EEA). Attempts are also being made to establish
and consistency of the obtained data are ensured by Safe Levels of Potentially Harmful Elements and
using standardised sampling methods and by treat- Species (PHES), but these are often based on lim-
ing and analysing all samples in the same laborato- ited and/or inadequate information. The available
ries. data on environmental geochemical baselines and
The FGBP is authorised by the directors of the radioactivity are not systematic in coverage or qual-
Geological Surveys within FOREGS (Forum of Eu- ity and, therefore, are not of the standard required to
ropean Geological Surveys). The FGBP also repre- quantify the distribution of PHES at the European
sents the European contribution to the International scale as a basis for policy-making and monitoring
Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS)/ International future change to the environment.
Association of Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry At the present time, knowledge of the geochem-
(IAGC) Working Group on Global Geochemical istry of the surface environment of Europe is based
Baselines. on different surveys of variable standards carried out
The present report contains comprehensive in- by different organisations in the public and private
structions for sample site selection and sample col- sectors. Whilst there are exceptions, Geological Sur-
lection. In addition, a summary of methods intended veys have, in the past, provided data on rock and
for sample preparation and analysis is included. De- stream sediments; Soil Surveys on soils; Hydrologi-
tailed descriptions of analytical methods used in cal Surveys on ground and surface water and biolo-
FGBP will appear in a separate report. gists/agriculturists on plant and animal tissue sam-
ples.
In general, there is a failure to recognise that the
1.2 The need for environmental geochemical natural geochemical background is highly variable
and the natural levels of PHES (such as As, Cd, Pb,
baseline data in Europe. NO3-, the radioactive elements and organic pollut-
ants) can be as high or higher than those caused by
Data on geochemical baselines are urgently needed man-made sources of pollution. Even where synthetic
in Europe, because environmental authorities are pollutants are concerned, it is the natural geology
defining limits for levels of contaminants in soils used and geochemistry which frequently exert the funda-
for different purposes in most European countries. mental controls on the distribution of the PHES and
As geochemists know, the natural concentrations of consequently determine their potential to create haz-
elements are different in the various constituents of ards.
overburden, and vary markedly between geologically Systematic baseline environmental geochemical
disparate areas. State authorities, however, are not data are necessary to inform policy makers and pro-
aware of these significant natural variations, which vide a sound basis for legislation. According to Plant
should be taken into account in defining action lim- and others (1996), for this purpose such data are re-
its. There are already examples of action limits that quired to be
are lower than natural concentrations.
Geochemical mapping produces data, which
should be used as one of the major criteria for defin- 1.Standardized across national boundaries.
ing action limits. Existing geochemical data in Eu- 2.Available in digital form for use on GIS so that they
can be viewed interactively with other datasets, such
rope are not in a form that can be readily used for
as those for landuse and for animal and human mor-
this purpose (Plant et al. 1996, 1997). It is not, there- bidity and mortality data.
fore, possible, on the basis of existing geochemical 3.Comprehensive, to include the majority of PHES and
data, to define the European Geochemical Baseline ideally as many harmful chemical species as possible,
even for a single element. including synthetic compounds.
The need for geochemical baseline data in Europe 4.Based on a full suite of sample types including soil,
has been stated very clearly by Plant et al. (1996) in stream sediment, surface water, groundwater and off-
an inventory of existing geochemical data in shore marine and estuarine sediment in the coastal zone.
8
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
The report by Plant et al. (1996) also gives rea- are necessary to link these surveys to a baseline level.
sons why Geological Surveys or equivalent govern- Stream water reflects the interplay between
mental institutions are particularly well suited to pro- geosphere/hydrosphere and pollution. At the same
vide the data needed to establish systematic envi- time it is the main source of drinking water. Many
ronmental geochemical baseline databases for Eu- surveys have completed local studies, so the GTN
rope. data can be used to link results across Europe.
In Europe, the results of the Global Terrestrial Net- Soil samples (topsoil 0-25 cm) and subsoil (a 25
work (GTN, also called the Global Reference Net- cm layer within a depth range of 50 cm - 200 cm) are
work) sampling, as recommended by IGCP 259 and taken to reflect variations in geogenic composition
360 projects (Darnley et al. 1995), will be used as of the uppermost layers of the Earths crust. For this
reference material to normalise baseline datasets of purpose it is important to avoid soil sampling at lo-
Europe. The final product will then be geochemical cations that have visible or known contamination.
baseline datasets of Europe. Priority for site selection should be given to
The sampling will be carried out in FOREGS coun-
tries by the end of September 1998. The FOREGS 1. forested and unused lands
geochemical sampling forms the European contri- 2. greenland and pastures, and
bution to the IGCP 360 and the International Union 3. agricultural land.
of Geological Sciences (IUGS)/ International Asso-
ciation of Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry Comparison with topsoil and subsoil samples will
(IAGC) Working Group on Global Geochemical give information about enrichment or depletion proc-
Baselines. The work is coordinated by the FOREGS esses between the layers. One such process is an-
Geochemistry Task Force. FOREGS directors have thropogenic contamination of the top layer. The <2
stipulated that the whole project, including analyses mm fraction will be taken according to environmen-
and reporting, must be completed by September 2001. tal standards. The <0.18 mm and finer fractions have
been widely used in mineral exploration programmes
and the GTN data will be used to create a link be-
1.3 Sampling media tween environmental and mineral exploration
databases.
The choice of sampling media has been made in Humus samples can be used to determine the at-
accordance with the recommendations of the IUGS mospheric (anthropogenic) input of elements to the
working group on Global Geochemical Baselines ecosystem. To reach this aim samples should be col-
(Darnley et al. 1995). These media, described be- lected in forested areas as near as possible to the other
low, are considered to be the most representative of sampling sites. To reflect the atmospheric input, the
the surface environment, and they are the most com- uppermost few centimetres of the organic layer
monly used media in previous and present environ- should be collected immediately under the green
mental geochemical investigations. Sampling sites vegetation and under the litter (max 3 cm).
are chosen at random, so that the data for each of the The sampling locations are totally randomized and
chosen media will document the actual situation are not designed to show the lowest natural back-
within Europe. ground concentrations in the European environment,
but to demonstrate the current geochemistry of the
Stream water (filtered and unfiltered) surface environment.
Stream sediment (mineral sediment, <0.150 mm)
Residual soil, upper horizon (topsoil) 0 - 25 cm with
out the top organic layer (<2 mm) 1.4 Organisation and time frame
Residual soil, lower (C) horizon (subsoil); a 25 cm
layer within a depth range of 50 cm - 200 cm (<2 mm) The sampling will be carried out by the institu-
Humus where present tions of the FOREGS countries listed in pages 4 to
Overbank sediment, upper horizon 0-25 cm (<0.150
5, and be completed by the end of September 1998.
mm, optional)
Overbank sediment, bottom layer (<0.150 mm, op-
The whole project, including analyses and report-
tional) ing, must be completed by September 2001, accord-
Floodplain sediment, upper horizon 0 - 25 cm (<2 mm) ing to the decision of the FOREGS Directors.
Floodplain sediment, bottom layer (<2 mm, optional) SAMPLING COORDINATOR: The Geological
Survey of Finland (GSF) will be the sampling coor-
Stream sediment (<0.15 mm) and floodplain sedi- dinator. GSF will provide detailed sampling instruc-
ment (<2 mm) samples are collected because they tions (also on web pages), send all maps of random
reflect the average geogenic composition of a catch- sampling sites within GTN cells, check all the sam-
ment basin. Most Geological Surveys have under- pling plans and give further information whenever
taken national stream sediment studies. The new data needed.
9
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
10
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
2.1 GTN grid cells Some cells are located in more than one country.
In these cases the sampling of that particular cell is
For the purpose of Global Geochemical Baseline coordinated by the country (organisation) in which
the entire land surface of the Earth is divided into the centre of the cell is located. The coordinating
160 km x 160 km cells (Darnley et al. 1995). The countries are indicated in the GTN cell list.
cells have their origin on the equator at the 0o (Green- Participating surveys should not carry out any sam-
wich) meridian. European cells (Fig. 1) have identi- pling on the territory of any other country without
fiers like N36W01, which is the 36th cell North of agreement with the organisation responsible for sam-
the equator and the 1st cell West of the 0o (Green- pling in that territory. If one or more of the ran-
wich) meridian. The coordinates of the cells will be domly selected catchments are located in the
provided by the Geochemistry Task Force coordina- neighboring country, please contact your neighbor
tor. They are also available from the web-pages of Survey and agree on sampling of those sites.
the GSF (http://www.gsf.fi).
11
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
2.2 Selecting sample sites km2 in area. Prepare sample sites for stream water
(filtered and unfiltered), stream sediment, residual
1. From the GTN cell list, find the cells which are soil (top and subsoil), humus and optional surficial
coordinated by your country (organisation). The iden- overbank sediment (0-25 cm) (see Figs. 3, 4 and 5).
tifier of the GTN cell is for example N43E09. The Soil samples should represent the dominant residual
grid cells are shown on Fig. 1. It is noted that there soil type of the small catchment basin. In the case
are more cells in Fig. 1 than in the GTN cell list (file). that the randomly selected point happens to be in the
Some of the cells which are shown in Fig. 1 consist sea or in an unreachable area, the nearest useable
mostly of water area, and only those grid cells men- catchment basin should be used.
tioned in the GTN cell list (file) should be sampled. Selection of large drainage basins in each GTN
However, you are allowed to take samples from some cell: The floodplain sediment sample (upper 25 cm)
of the cells which are shown on the map but not listed. is collected from the lowermost point of the larger
If you want to sample other GTN cells, please send drainage basin (area 1000 - 6000 km2) to which the
the list of additional cell identifiers to Timo Tarvainen small catchment is connected (see Figs. 3 and 5). If
(Timo.Tarvainen@gsf.fi, address above) to obtain no suitable size drainage basin is available, the
maps of randomized sampling sites. floodplain sediment can be taken from a smaller
2. From your national GTN cells randomly select drainage basin (> 500 km2). If the size of the largest
one cell for duplicate sampling. Countries which have related drainage basin is less than 500 km2, the
9 or more GTN cells should select 2 cells for dupli- floodplain sample should not be taken. Justified ex-
cate sampling. Duplicate samples of each material ceptions can also be made to this recommendation.
must be taken from one geologically representative Baltic Soil Survey: Those countries which have
small catchment (1, 2, 3, 4 or 5) of the selected GTN taken part in the Baltic Soil Survey (BSS) can use the
cell. BSS soil samples in the FOREGS mapping. If you
3. The GSF will provide small maps of each of want to do so, please use the randomly selected
your GTN cells with five randomly selected num- points provided by the GSF to select the nearest BSS
bered points (Fig. 2). Point number 1 is located in sampling site. The stream sediment, stream water
the NE quadrant of the grid cell, number 2 in the and optional overbank sediment samples should be
NW quadrant, number 3 in the SW quadrant and taken from the same small catchment and the
number 4 in the SE quadrant. Point number 5 is ran- floodplain sediment from the adjacent large drainage
domly located in the grid. basin. You can decide whether you want to use the
Selection of small drainage basins in each GTN BSS samples or take new residual soil samples. If
cell: The randomly selected points should be used to you use a BSS sample, mark it on the field
select the five nearest small drainage basins of <100 observation sheet.
12
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
Fig. 2. Example of randomly selected sampling points from one 160 km x 160 km grid cell.
Fig. 3. Selection of sampling sites (Modified after Darnley et al. 1995). Schematic outline of sampling pattern and
sampling pit for geochemical reference network. The sample pit applies to all residual soil locations. Deep sample (C): a
25 cm thick section within a depth range of 50 cm - 200 cm.
13
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
Fig. 4. Block diagram showing possible sampling sites of GTN sampling media (modified after Strahler 1969).
Fig. 5. Block diagram showing residual overburden (soil), colluvium, old and present day floodplain sediments (modi-
fied after Strahler 1969).
14
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
4. From the small drainage basin (< 100 km2) collect the following sample types:
Symbol
Stream water W
Stream sediment (mineral sediment) S
Residual soil, upper horizon (topsoil); 0 - 25 cm without organic layer T
Residual soil, lower (C) horizon (subsoil); a 25 cm layer within a depth range of 50 cm - 200 cm C
Soil samples should represent the dominant soil type of the small catchment.
Humus where present H
5. From the large drainage basin (1000-6000 km2) collect one sample type:
Symbol
2.3 Identifiers
The following example clarifies the sample iden- The duplicate sample would be N43E09S4D,
tification system. The identifier of the stream sedi- where D is the duplicate sample identifier. Identifi-
ment sample may be ers for filtered blank (or zero) water samples are:
GTN cell / W / Catchment basin number / 0 (zero),
N43E09S4, where for example N43E09W40.
N43E09 = GTN cell
S = Sample medium symbol
4 = Catchment (drainage) basin number
15
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
3. SAMPLING
Due to the significantly increased performance of emphasised that sampling procedures should be fol-
analytical methods especially in terms of sensitivity, lowed as closely as possible to avoid contamination
precission and accuracy, the most dominant source during sampling
of error is sampling. For this reason it should be
16
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
Stream water
filter if needed) and close it tightly. Note that the fil-
-1.6 N H2SO4: Dilute 44.4 ml of concentrated H2SO4 tered sample water should go straight into the bottle
(mass-% = 96, density = 1840 g/l) to 1000 ml with without contact with your hands
deionized water. -Take 60 ml marked sample bottle for DOC sample
-0.16 N H2SO4: Dilute 10 ml of 1.6 N H2SO4 to 100 ml and rinse it twice with filtered sample water
with deionized water. -Fill the DOC sample bottle up to its neck with filtered
-Bromocresol green indicator solution: Accurately water (change filter if needed) and close the bottle
weigh 0.1 g of bromcresol green into a brown con- tightly.
tainer flask. Add 14.3 ml of 0.01 M NaOH + 235.7 ml -Note that the samplers are not allowed to smoke, or
distilled and deionized water and swirl to dissolve (Lide have the vehicle running, when the water sample is
1991). taken.
-Volumetric flasks, capacity of 100 and 1000 ml
-Burette or equivalent equipment, 10 ml capacity, 5. Rinse the marked 500 ml sample bottle with
graduated in divisions of 0.02 ml sample water twice and fill it up so that the bottle is
-Disposable Pasteur-pipettes completely submerged in the water and no air bub-
bles are left in the bottle. Fill the bottle as full as you
Field observation sheets are included in this can and close it tightly below water level.
manual (see Appendix 1). 6. Rinse the marked Hg sample bottle with sam-
ple water twice and fill it to its neck and close it
tightly.
3.1.3 Water sampling procedure 7. Note the pH - (with 1 decimal figure) and EC-
value (mS/m) on the field observation sheet. Rinse
It would be best if sampling is carried out by per- the electrodes and decanters with distilled and
sons who have experience in water sampling. If sam- deionized water and keep the electrodes in their meas-
pling staff are inexperienced, they should be trained uring decanters until all daily sampling sites are vis-
and closely supervised for at least a few days. ited. Then place the meters in their cases. The me-
Avoid sampling during rainy periods and flood ters are calibrated every day before the first meas-
events. The water sample must be taken before the urements are taken.
stream sediment sample, for obvious reasons (dur-
ing the collection of the stream sediment, fine-grained
material is agitated and transported in suspension).
The stream sediment sample is composited from 5-
10 subsamples in the field. The water sample should
be taken from the first, lowermost stream sediment
sampling point.
Water samples to be taken in the manner described
below:
1. Write the sample number on 100 ml bottles, 500
ml bottle and on 100 ml Hg sample bottle and the
sample number and DOC on 60 ml DOC sample
bottle.
2. Complete sample card and mark your posititon
and sample number on the map.
3. Rinse twice and fill the polyethylene decanters
with stream water, place the electrodes in water and
measure the pH and conductivity with calibrated
meter (mark with permanent drawing ink marker two
decanters for pH and conductivity).
4. Filter one 100 ml sample (Fig. 6)
17
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
18
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
3. Place the bottles in a cool unit, e.g. refrigerator. 3.2.1 Stream sediment samples to be
4. Send water samples to the laboratory soon after collected
sampling.
Each stream sediment sample comprises material
taken from 5-10 points over a stream stretch of 250 -
3.2 Stream sediment 500 m. Prior to stream water and stream sediment
collection, it is important to identify the 250 - 500 m
Active stream sediment represents the fine- to stream stretch where obvious signs of contamination
medium-grained bed load material (silty-clayey- can be avoided and suitable sediment can be collected
sandy), which is transported by running water. The from 5-10 different locations. Sites should be located
Stream sediment
active stream sediment is collected from the small, at least 100 m upstream of roads and settlements.
second order, drainage basin (< 100 km2) at a suit- Stream sediment sampling should start from the wa-
able site above its confluence point with the main, ter sampling point and the other sub-samples should
third order, channel of the large drainage basin. be collected up stream. A composite sample should
Studies into the distribution of trace elements in not be made from samples taken from beds of differ-
relation to the size fraction of stream sediments gen- ent nature (ISO 5667-12:1995). From one small
erally show that several elements including Mo, Cu, catchment basin of a duplicate cell (one in each coun-
Zn, Mn and Fe are concentrated in the finest frac- try) minimum 0.5 kg (dry weight) + 0.5 kg (dupli-
tions of the sediment. The majority of stream sedi- cate sample) of <0.150 mm material is required. From
ment surveys have, therefore, been based on the col- all other small catchment basins a minimum of 0.5
lection of <0.200 mm material. The IGCP 259 and kg (dry weight) <0.150 mm material is required.
FOREGS standard sieve mesh is <0.150 mm as this Larger sample quantities can be taken and stored
is fine enough to only include the very fine sand, separately in each country.
silt, clay and colloidal fractions, but is coarse enough
to yield sufficient fine material in the majority of
situations. 3.2.2 Equipment
Studies in the UK have shown the recovery of
stream sediments by dry sieving methods is not quan- 3.2.2.1 Equipment to be provided by
titative owing to the agglomeration of fine material
to form larger particles which are then screened out
regional laboratories:
in varying amounts. A system of wet sieving stream
sediments wherever possible is therefore recom- -Kraft paper bags
mended for IGCP 259/360 and FOREGS. -Polyethylene bags
It is important to avoid metal contamination at
every stage of sampling as follows; 3.2.2.2 Equipment to be purchased by each
participant:
No hand jewellery or medical dressings should be worn
during sampling. If medical dressings are worn, heavy -Heavy duty elbow length rubber gloves
duty rubber gloves must be worn at all times to avoid -Metal free polyethylene funnel
contamination of the samples. -Sieve set with 2 preferably wooden or plastic frames
Metal free polyethylene or unpainted wooden spades/ containing nylon 2.0 mm mesh and nylon 0.150 mm
scoops should be used. mesh screens
Metal free nylon sieve-mesh housed in inert wooden -Metal free gold pan or plastic bucket
or metal free plastic frames should be used. -Metal free plastic crates
Metal free funnels and sample collection containers -Metal free plastic buckets or containers with lids
should be used. -Trenching tool - metal free, polyethylene (PE) or
polypropylene (PP)
If it is not possible to use non-metal equipment -Permanent drawing ink marker (preferably black or
(e.g. spades and sieve frames), unpainted steel equip- blue)
ment should be used. Aluminium and brass equip- -Permanent ink pen
ment should be avoided. -Maps (topographical maps, preferred scale 1:50 000)
Sampling sites should be selected sufficiently up- -Chisel-end geological hammer for dry areas (e.g.
stream of confluences with higher order streams to Mediterranean countries)
-Bristle brush (dry sediment samples)
avoid sampling sediment that may result from a mix-
ing of material from the two channels during flood Field observation sheets are included in this
flow. manual (see Appendix 1).
Dry sieveing is an alternative method if wet sieving
(Section 3.2.3.1) cannot be used, as is the case of
seasonal streams in Mediterranean countries.
19
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
20
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
21
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
3.3 Humus and residual soil samples The sampling site should be as flatlying as possible,
unless the sample is collected from a mountainous
3.3.1 Humus and soil samples to be collected area (forest, grassland). If the organic layer is present,
collect enough humus to fill the plastic bag provided,
From one sampling site of a duplicate cell (one in avoiding contamination (use gloves to collect and
each country) collect: handle samples). Each humus sample should be a
- 2 x 1-2 L humus (where present; normal and dupli- composite sample from at least five (5) locations
cate samples) within a 50 m x 50 m area.
- topsoil: 2 kg + 2 kg (duplicate sample) All points should be selected at a sufficient dis-
- subsoil: 2 kg + 2 kg (duplicate sample) tance from the nearest trees to avoid throughfall
precipitation from the trees (a minimum distance of
From all other sampling sites collect: 5 m from nearest tree and 3 m from the nearest bush
- 1-2 L humus (where present) is recommended, but each sampling team is free to
- 2 kg of topsoil use its discretion in the selection of subsites in
- 2 kg of subsoil forested areas).
Larger sample quantities can be taken and stored A steel or plastic sampling tool is used for sam-
separately in each country. pling (Figs 8 a-d). The living surface vegetation, fresh
litter and big roots and rock fragments should be care-
fully removed wearing plastic gloves. Do not collect
3.3.2 Equipment raw humus because it is very difficult to define an
exact border between litter and raw humus. Only the
3.3.2.1 Equipment to be provided by uppermost 3 cm of humus should be sampled. The
regional laboratories mineral soil layer should be carefully removed us-
ing a plastic spoon. After collection of each sample
- Plastic bags (PE) for humus clean thoroughly the sampling equipment.
- Kraft bags for soil samples Air-dry samples thoroughly at room temperature,
- Disposable gloves (1 per sample) which should not exceed 40oC (loss of Hg!); place
the sample on the bag and turn over as necessary.
3.3.2.2 Equipment to be purchased by each Use gloves! Any residual humidity will promote
participant: anaerobic reactions, including sulphate reduction,
and must be avoided. When samples are properly
- Sampler (cylindrical sampler or spade) dried, transfer to a new bag, if necessary (field bag
- Plastic or steel scoop may still be wet), seal and send to LAB IV.
- Plastic spoon (see Fig. 8b)
- Knife 3.3.4 Residual soil samples
- Maps (topographical maps, preferred scale 1:50 000)
- Wooden folded 2 m long metre Residual and sedentary soils: Residual soil is col-
- Permanent drawing ink marker (preferably black or
lected from the small, second order, drainage basin
blue)
- Plastic boxes for sample bags
(< 100 km2) at a suitable site above its alluvial plain
and base of slope, where alluvium and colluvium are
Sampling tools should be made of unpainted wood, respectively deposited. The residual soil may be de-
polyethylene (plastic) or steel (unpainted spade). veloped either directly on bedrock or on till, as is the
Field observation sheets for humus and soil are in- case in glaciated terrains. Residual soil distributed
cluded in this manual (see Appendix 1). by agricultural activities should be avoided where
possible since the top soil is usually affected by hu-
man activities. It is important to ensure that the ma-
terial collected is residual and not transported mate-
3.3.3 Humus
rial such as coluvium or alluvium.
Select a suitable area where 3 - 5 pits can be dug.
In those climatic regions where humus is devel-
Mark the sampling site on the field map and com-
oped, it is normally found in undisturbed forested
plete the field observation sheet after digging the pits
areas above the normal mineral soil. Decomposed
and studying the soil horizons.
black coloured organic material (humus) should be
Two different depth related samples will be taken
sampled.
at each site: a topsoil sample from 0-25 cm (exclud-
Mark the sampling site on the field map and com-
ing material from the organic layer where present)
plete the field observation sheet after studing the or-
and a subsoil sample from a 25 cm thick section
ganic layer.
within a depth range of 50 - 200 cm (the C soil hori-
No samples should be taken in local depressions. zon). The soil sample should represent the dominant
22
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
Humus and soil
Fig. 8a. Humus sampling in Finland using cylindrical sampler. (Photographs: Timo Tarvainen).
Fig. 8c. Remove all mineral soil using a plastic spoon.
23
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
Fig. 8c. Pull humus (on left) and roots (on right) apart.
24
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
residual soil type of the small (< 100 km2) catch- important to show the layers and textural charac-
ment basin, it must be a residual or sedentary soil, teristics of the soil horizons.
but definitely not an alluvial soil. Each sample should
be a field composite sample from 3 - 5 subsamples
in the field. Minimum distance between any two 3.4 Floodplain sediments
subsamples should be 5 m. Avoid sampling adjacent A floodplain sediment, representing the alluvium
to roads (minimum distance 10 m) or ditches (mini- of the whole drainage basin will be collected from
mum distance 5 m), but you are free to use your dis- the alluvial plain at the lowermost point (near to the
cretion depending on the traffic density and prevail- mouth) of the large catchment basin (1000 - 6000
ing local conditions. km2).
Living surface vegetation, fresh litter, big roots Both floodplain and overbank sediments are fine-
and rock fragments (stones) are removed. grained (silty-clay, clayey-silt) alluvial soils of large
In case the whole soil profile does not reach a depth and small floodplains respectively, according to the
of 75 cm, the lower sample should be taken from a size distinction made by Darnley et al. (1995).
depth, that can be undoubtely identified as the BC- Floodplain and overbank sediments are deposited
or C-horizon (do not forget to note this down under during flood events in low energy environments
remarks on the field observation sheet!). If this is (Ottesen et al., 1989); they should, therefore, be de-
not possible another sample site should be selected. void of pebbles, which indicate medium energy en-
The subsoil sample is taken first, and then the top- vironments. The surficial floodplain and overbank
soil sample. This procedure avoids cleaning the sur- sediments are normally affected by recent anthropo-
face of the subsoil from fallen top soil, if the latter is genic activities, and may be contaminated. Deeper
taken first. samples, which are optional sample media, normally
After collection of each sample clean thoroughly show the natural background variation.
the sampling equipment.
Floodplain
layer and undergrowth, and the second a close-up to
sediments
show the character of the organic layer. A flash may - 2 kg of top floodplain sediment + 2 kg of top
be necessary for the second photograph. If the hu- floodplain sediment (duplicate sample)
mus samples and residual soil samples are collected
from the same site, the close-up photo can show both From all other sampling sites collect:
the character of organic layer and mineral soil hori-
zons (see below). In this case, separate photographs - 2 kg of top floodplain sediment
for the soil sample site will not be needed. Enough material must be taken to yield minimum
At each soil sample site two photographs should 0.5 kg of <2 mm grain size sediment. Larger sample
be taken; the first to show the general view about the quantities can be taken and stored separately in each
sampling site (Fig. 9), and the second a close-up of country.
one of the soil sample pits (Fig. 10). Before taking
the second photograph mark with a knife the soil OPTIONAL:
horizons, if they can be distinguished, and place an From one sampling site of a duplicate cell 2 kg of bot-
alternate coloured-section wooden metre as a scale tom floodplain sediment + 2 kg of bottom floodplain sedi-
on the face of the pit. If necessary use a fill-in flash ment (duplicate sample) and from all other sampling sites
when taking the second photograph, because it is 2 kg of bottom floodplain sediment.
25
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
Fig. 9. General view about the soil sampling site (Photo: Teppo Moisio, GSF).
Fig. 10. Close-up of one of the soil sample pits (Photo: Teppo Moisio, GSF)
26
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
Fig. 11. Floodplain sampling in southwestern Finland (Photo: Reijo Salminen, GSF).
27
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
sheet, and the number of layers sampled. The op- the overbank sediment samples.
tional deep sample should ideally be collected im-
mediately above the gravel bed (Fig. 5). Since, this OPTIONAL: From the first sampling site of a dupli-
is not always possible, the deepest possible layer cate cell (one in each country) collect:
should be sampled, for the objective is to reach a
layer, which is not affected by human activities. - 2 kg of top overbank sediment + 2 kg of top overbank
The floodplain sediment and optional overbank sediment (duplicate sample)
- 2 kg of bottom overbank sediment + 2kg of bottom
sediment samples are collected from a single site
overbank sediment (duplicate sample)
(Figs. 11 and 12).
At each exposed floodplain sediment sample site
OPTIONAL: From all other sampling sites collect:
clear the surface humus and litter to begin with, and
then cut a vertical section through the exposed - 2 kg of top overbank sediment
floodplain sediment sequence with a steel spade, thus - 2 kg of bottom overbank sediment
exposing a clean vertical surface for sampling. If
you collect both top and bottom samples, sample the Enough material must be taken to yield a minimum of
bottom layer first at each sample site, and then the 0.5 kg <0.150 mm grain size sediment.
top layer. This procedure avoids cleaning the sur-
face of the bottom layer from fallen top sample ma-
terial, if the latter is taken first.
If it is not possible to sample an exposed floodplain
sediment sequence with the aid of a spade, follow
the same procedure to select a suitable sample site
on the floodplain (e.g., inside meander) and dig a pit
down to the required depth.
Living surface vegetation, fresh litter and big roots
are removed by wearing plastic gloves.
After the collection of each sample clean thor-
oughly the sampling equipment.
3.4.4 Photographing
At each floodplain (and overbank) sediment site
two photographs should be taken, the first to show
the general view about the sampling site with refer-
ence to the stream/river channel and the second a
close-up of the sample pit. Before taking the second
photograph mark with a knife the alluvial sediment
layers, if they can be distinguished, and place an al-
ternate coloured-section wooden metre on the face
of the pit. If necessary use a fill-in flash when tak-
ing the second photograph, for it is important to show
the layers and textural charasteristics of the alluvial
beds.
28
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
3.5.2 Equipment to be purchased by each Sampling tools should be made of unpainted wood,
participant polyethylene (plastic) or steel (unpainted spade).
Containers should be made of paper (specially manu-
- Kraft bags for overbank sediment factured Kraft sample bags) or strong polyethylene.
- Disposable gloves (1 per sample)
- Unpainted spade
- Pickaxe 3.5.3 Sampling
- Stainless steel knife
- Plastic or steel scoop
Follow the instructions given in section 3.4.3 for
- Chisel-end geological hammer floodplain sediments.
- Wooden folded 2 m long metre
- Permanent drawing ink marker
- Brush for cleaning equipment
- Maps (topographical maps, preferred scale 1:50000)
- Plastic boxes for sample bags
- Kraft paper bags for overbank sediments (optional)
Overbank
sediments
29
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
4. FIELD OBSERVATIONS
There are 5 field observation sheets: one for be used when photographing the sample pits in or-
regolith soil; one for humus samples; one for stream der to ensure that all the features of the sample site
water and stream sediment samples; one for are recorded.
floodplain sediment and one for overbank sediment Two copies of each photograph will be needed:
samples. one to be stored with negatives in your own insti-
In the remarks section significant supplemen- tute, and another to be sent to the coordinator.
tary information, if any, about the sampling site
should be noted. Any deviations from the sampling
routine should also be recorded, e.g. the wearing of 4.2 Gamma ray spectrometry
jewellery during sampling, smoking, not wearing
Gamma ray spectrometer measurements should be
gloves etc.
taken at every sample site:
Colour photographs are an inherent part of field
observations, and should be taken with care and la- (a) lowermost water/stream sediment site
belled correctly (refer to section 4.1). (b) organic layer (centre of 50 x 50 m area)
It is recommended that gamma ray spectrometer (c) residual soil (near to the first pit)
measurements should be taken at each sampling site. (d) floodplain sediment
See Darnley et al. (1995) for instructions, and sec- (e) overbank sediment (optional)
tion 4.2 of this document.
Darnley et al. (1995) recommended taking in situ
measurements at each subsite of residual soil. This
4.1 Photographs is, however, impractical and is, therefore, recom-
mended to take one measurement near to the first
Colour photographs must be taken at all sampling
soil sample pit.
sites (stream water and sediment, residual soil, hu-
It is recommended to use a portable five-channel
mus, floodplain sediment and optional overbank sedi-
threshold scintillometer (e.g. Miniscint UG 130 made
ment), and recorded on the field observation sheets.
by Urec Ltd. or similar model). These instruments
Each photograph, after processing, should be care-
have the options of taking five measurements at dif-
fully labelled at the back with a fine permanent ink
ferent energy levels, i.e. two total counts, a K+U+Th,
and sent to the co-ordinator (Geological Survey of
a U+Th and a Th.
Finland) upon completion of the sampling.
Measurement must be taken at knee level, which
Since the photographs will form a unique refer-
is the normal height used for ground radiometric sur-
ence set for all sampling sites, it is important to en-
veys.
sure a good result. This means using a good camera.
The type of instrument (model, serial no., etc.)
A reflex camera with a zoom lens (e.g. 35-85 mm)
should be recorded on the field observation sheet.
and macro facility is recommeded, and an electronic
Ideally, all instruments used in this survey should be
flash.
calibrated. This may be done before or after the
Negative films of 100 ISO (ASA) rating are good
FOREGS field sampling. A meeting will be arranged
for normal lighting conditions. But since some pho-
in a country where there are calibration pads.
tographs will be taken in poor light conditions, e.g.
in forest, it is recommended to use a colour negative
of 400 ISO (ASA) rating. 4.3 Sampling site coordinates
Extra colour negative films (400 ISO), batteries
for the camera and flash must be carried in the field. Sample sites are carefully recorded on 1:50 000
Colour photographs should be printed on glossy topographical maps, and subsequently digitised in
paper of 10 x 15 cm minimum dimensions. the office, and their coordinates noted on the field
Photographs of the water/stream sediment sam- observation sheets. Since, the sample sites may be
ple site could be taken before or after the sampling. used for future monitoring, the use of a precise GPS
Organic layer (humus), residual soil pits, floodplain instrument (+/- 5 m) is recommended. If a GPS in-
and overbank sediment pits must be photographed strument is used, the model, serial no., precision, etc.
before taking the sample; fill-in flash should normally should be noted.
30
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
Upper horizon of overbank sediments, which is amount of soil sample material is compatible with
one of the mandatory sample types of the Global larger volumes suggested by Darnley et al. (1995).
Reference Network, will not be sampled during this The analysed size fraction for soil and floodplain
FOREGS sampling project. However, each country sediment samples will be <2 mm, not the fine soil,
can choose to collect upper horizon samples of and for overbank sediment samples <0.150 mm.
overbank sediments as well as deep layers of The sample identifiers used in FOREGS mapping
floodplain sediments and overbank sediments, which are much shorter than those suggested by Darnley et
are optional materials in the Global Reference Net- al. (1995) or by the Data Management Committee of
work. No regional analytical services can be provided the IGCP 360 project.
for these materials. Gamma ray spectrometer measurements at residual
The field sample weight of soil and floodplain soil sample sites are taken at only one subsite (first
sediment samples is 2 kg (to be sieved). Because 5 soil sample pit) instead at each subsite as recom-
samples are taken from each GTN cell, the total mended by Darnley et al. (1995).
31
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
32
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
Drying at 40oC
Mixing by shaking
Weighing Waste
500 g subsample
200 g subsample
Fig. 13. Screening standard operating procedure for stream sediment samples.
33
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
Drying at 40oC
Weighing
1 kg subsample
400 g subsample
Fig. 14. Screening standard operating procedure for floodplain sediment samples.
34
Geological Survey of Finland, Guide 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen and others
Drying at 40oC
Weighing
1 kg subsample
400 g subsample
35
Geologian tutkimuskeskus, Opas 47
Reijo Salminen, Timo Tarvainen ja muut
7. REFERENCES
Darnley, A.G., Björklund, A., Bølviken, B., Plant, J.A., Klaver, G., Locutura, J., Salminen, R.,
Gustavsson, N., Koval, P.V., Plant, J.A., Steenfelt, Vrana, K. & Fordyce, F.M. 1996. Forum of Euro-
A., Tauchid, M., Xie Xuejing, Garrett, R.G. & Hall, pean Geological Surveys (FOREGS) Geochemistry
G.E.M. 1995. A Global Geochemical Database for Task Group 1994-1996 Report. British Geological
Environmental and Resource Management: Recom- Survey (BGS) Technical Report WP/95/14. 52 pp.
mendations for International Geochemical Mapping.
Final report of IGCP Project 259. 2nd revised edi- Plant, J.A., Klaver, G., Locutura, J., Salminen, R.,
tion. Paris: UNESCO. 122 pp. Vrana, K. & Fordyce, F. 1997. The Forum of Euro-
pean Geological Surveys Geochemistry Task Group
ISO 5667-12:1995. Water quality - Sampling - Part inventory 1994-1996. Journal of Geochemical Ex-
12: Guidance on sampling of bottom sediments. ploration 59, 123-146.
Lide, D. R. (ed.) 1991. CRC Handbook of chemistry Strahler, A.N. 1969. Physical Geography. 3rd edi-
and physics,72th edition, CRC Press Inc., Boston, 8- tion. New York - London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15. 733 pp.
Ottesen, R.T., Bogen, J., Bølviken, B. & Volden, T.
1989. Overbank sediment: a representative sample
medium for regional geochemical mapping. Journal
of Geochemical Exploration 32, 257-277.
36
APPENDIX 1