Professional Documents
Culture Documents
First up, the state of mobile youths, as released as the 2017 Mobile World
Congress is underway in Barcelona. Nielsen’s latest Mobile Kids
Report surveyed parents of US kids ages 6-12 in the fourth quarter of last
year about their offspring’s mobile habits.
The topline findings: Slightly less than half (45%) of mobile-using kids
received a service plan at 10-12 years old, with the predominant age being
10 (22%), followed by 8 years old (16%) and ages 9 and 11 tied at 15%.
More boys (56%) than girls (44%) aged 6-12 own a mobile device, with one
in five being Hispanic.
Among 10 to 12-year-olds, the highest percentage of age represented was
age 10 at 34%. The vast majority (93%) are on a shared wireless plan
with their parents, and 72% have all-mobile wireless services including
voice, messaging and data.
Ninety prevent of parents surveyed identified being able to reach their kids
as the top reason for wireless service before the age of 13—with the
advent of middle school in the US a big motivating factor—while 80% of
parents said it also allows them to track his or her location.
For kids with wireless service, speaking on the phone is the least attractive
part of a smartphone; top activities include text messaging (81%),
downloading apps (59%) and accessing websites (53%).
Parents’ concerns about kids and mobile devices include how easily the
phone could be lost (77%), how much of a distraction it could be (72%);
and concerns (expressed by 71%) that kids will spend too much time on
it. Sixty percent of parents also report their child began asking for wireless
service before the age of 13 – repeatedly.
The findings are in line with a study published last year by Common Sense
Media found that 50 percent of children admitted they were addicted to
their smartphones. Additionally, it found that 66 percent of parents felt their
children used mobile devices too much—and 52 percent of children
agreed. Nearly 36 percent of parents said they argued daily with their
children about device use.
“Mobile devices are fundamentally changing how families go about day-to-
day lives, be it doing homework, driving, or having dinner together,” said
James Steyer, founder and CEO of Common Sense. “As a society we all
have a responsibility to take media use and addiction seriously and make
sure parents have the information to help them make smart choices for
their families.”
Nielsen also this week released its first comprehensive and cross-platform
look at Millennials — and yes, they’re pretty much as distracted and glued
to their mobile devices as kids (and everyone else) these days.
Parents are often told they need to get their kids outside to play to combat childhood
obesity - which is more widespread than ever. But outside play isn’t only important
in combating childhood obesity. And too much “screen time” does more than just
make our kids fat.
Kids are spending more and more time looking at screens. Flickr/Honza Soukup, CC BY
Spending prolonged periods in front of screens isn’t only bad for weight management
in kids, it has also been shown to be detrimental to cognitive
development, psychological health and sleep.
A smorgasbord of studies points to more than two hours of screen time per day as the
perfect recipe for a fat and unhappy child (see here, here and here).
From a psychological perspective, children get a kick out of feeling effective and in
control of themselves in their surroundings. (Remember the look of glee on your
child’s face when they took their first steps, mastered a puzzle, first kicked a footy?)
Most also prefer to exercise free will in choosing activities that appeal to them.
These two crucial factors in building psychological well-being are referred to by
psychologists as “competence” and “autonomy”.
Sounds so simple! Enter the barrier to providing said play opportunities: the fearful
and risk-averse parent, strongly backed by Australia’s litigious compensation
schemes.
But are parental fears of harm and injury justified? The notoriously reckless
researcher Professor Paul Tranter introduced children to a “playground” filled with
ropes, 44-gallon drums, milk crates and all manner of certain death traps. The
result? A reduction in fighting and bullying and, interestingly, an increase in the
social status of the creative kids.
Not to be outdone, our Kiwi cousins banned playground “rules” in several primary
schools. Kids were allowed to climb trees, negotiate play and choose their own
adventure. Their results? A similar reduction in bullying, as well as a drop in
vandalism and serious injuries. I repeat, a drop in serious injuries.
Why? Because the kids are learning self-discipline and self-control, taking personal
responsibility for their own risk and ability evaluation, thereby increasing autonomy
and competence.
If you can survive a New Zealand playground, you can go onto achieve anything.
He doesn’t know how right he is.
You can’t sue a tree if you fall off and break your arm. Flickr/Mike Prince, CC BY
The architects were particularly interested in the benefits of nature play. Why?
Because, as yet, you can’t sue a tree. Therefore nature remains the last bastion of
genuine challenge; where children can test their effectiveness (competence) in a real
rather than a sanitised, hyper-protected and restricted play environment.
If we withhold from our children the ability to take risks, evaluate consequences,
innovate and solve problems in the face of challenge or failure, how on earth can we
expect them to develop into effective, successful adults?
We should realise the damage we are doing to our kids by stifling and sanitising
every possible play experience, as well as the legal processes we have in place to
support this.
By Claire Carter
12:31PM BST 06 Apr 2014
British children are losing their sense of adventure Ben Fogle says, as a quarter spend less than
30 minutes a week playing outside.
The weather, computer games and concerns for safety have been blamed for children spending
less time doing outdoor activities.
Around 80 per cent of parents admitted they have never taken their children star gazing or fishing
– despite the majority saying they are concerned their offspring do not get outside enough.
Around half of parents said they do not let their children play outside because of concerns about
their safety, while 60 per cent said there is now more for them to do indoors – such as watch
television and play computer games.
Ben Fogle, an adventurer, writer and broadcaster and father of two, said the dwindling amount of
time children are spending outside is a worrying trend.
Related Articles
Outdoor activities: meet the family who simply won't stay home
12 Jul 2014
23 Aug 2014
05 Jul 2012
Ben Fogle: my trek with James Cracknell that tested our friendship
14 Dec 2013
14 Feb 2014
He said: “It is clear that for various reasons kids just aren’t getting out and about as much as their
parents did when they were young. From computer games to the lack of local green spaces, we
have lost our sense of adventure a little as a nation.
“Some of the things I loved as a boy, such as crabbing and star gazing, are starting to die out
which is worrying for the next generation of adventurers.”
The study of 1,000 parents revealed 90 per cent had never made a tree house with their children
and 37 per cent had never taken their family looking for wildlife.
The majority admitted their children did not play outside as much as they had during their own
childhood, with 26 per cent saying they spend less than 30 minutes a week playing outdoors.
The survey by Mothercare revealed that parents also felt homework commitments and a lack of
green spaces also stop children being able to go outside to play.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/lifestyle/10747841/Children-spend-less-than-30-minutes-playing-
outside-a-week.html
Anak-anak zaman sekarang makin sedikit yang suka bermain di luar rumah. Ini bukan sekadar
kesimpulan pribadi, namun sesuai dengan hasil penelitian Sandra L. Hofferth, Ph D, Profesor di
Department Family Science, University of Maryland School of Public Health, Amerika Serikat
(2006) yang menyebutkan bahwa waktu bermain outdoor rata-rata anak telah menurun lebih dari
9 jam per minggu dari tahun 1981 hingga 2003. Mereka lebih asyik main di dalam ruangan
dengan perangkat elektronik atau nonton TV ketimbang mencari kesenangan di alam bebas.
Padahal, acara bermain bebas di luar ruangan punya segudang manfaat bagi pertumbuhan dan
perkembangan diri anak.
Biarkan anak belajar berkomunikasi tanpa harus diperintah. Saat ia bertemu teman sebayanya
dan bermain bersama, anak akan belajar mengikuti aturan main sekaligus berkomunikasi. Atau,
pancing dengan mendeskripsikan apa yang dianggapnya menarik dari lingkungan luar, seperti
mendeskripsikan tekstur dari benda-benda di alam, cuaca, warna, dan sebagainya.
Tidak hanya itu, bermain atau beraktifitas di luar rumah memiliki manfaat dalam membantu
meningkatkan kecerdasan sosial anak-anak.
Menurut hasil pelitian sejumlah ahli di University of Minnesota, anak-anak yang sering bermain
diluar rumah terbukti memiliki tubuh yang lebih sehat, kreatif, suka berpetualang, dan
mempunyai hasrat untuk mengekspolarasi kondisi lingkungan sekitarnya.
“Dapat dipastikan bahwa anak-anak yang senang bermain di luar rumah, kepribadiannya akan
lebih kuat dan lebih berani mengambil keputusan,” tulis hasil penelitian tersebut.
Saat berada di luar ruangan, anak-anak dapat memainkan sejumlah permainan yang memiliki
banyak manfaat seperti berpikir cepat untuk menentukan strategi dalam mengalahkan lawan,
melatih ketangkasan, membedakan orientasi ruang dan arah, serta menumbuhkan kerjasama
dalam tim.