Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A complaint filed to the International Criminal Court calls President Rodrigo Duterte
the “mastermind” of a campaign of extrajudicial killings in the Philippines.
Credit Rolex Dela Pena/European Pressphoto Agency
“My office undertakes this work with full independence and impartiality,”
Ms. Bensouda said. “As we do, we hope to count on the full engagement of
the relevant national authorities in the Philippines.”
Harry Roque, a spokesman for the Philippine president, said that the
government’s crackdown was a “legitimate police operation” and that the
president welcomed The Hague-based tribunal’s decision.
“He is sick and tired of being accused of the commission of crimes against
humanity,” Mr. Roque told reporters in Manila.
The lawyer, Jude Josue Sabio, represented two men who said they had
been assassins for Mr. Duterte in Davao.
Mr. Duterte, who has bragged about personally killing criminals as mayor
of Davao, won the presidency promising to fill Manila Bay with the bodies
of drug addicts. After taking office, he urged the police to kill drug
suspects and promised to protect officers from prosecution. Thousands of
Filipinos have been killed by the police, in what the authorities said were
shootouts, or by unidentified gunmen.
Last year, after an outcry over the killings of three teenagers by police
officers, Mr. Duterte suspended the police operations and put the antidrug
campaign in the hands of the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency. But he
put the police back in charge in December. Last week, the police said that
46 people suspected of using or selling drugs had been killed by the
policesince then.
That brought the police’s official death toll from the campaign to over
4,000, a number much lower than the estimated 12,000 deaths reported
by various international and local rights groups.
The tribunal can take cases only if a country’s own judicial system is
unable or unwilling to pursue them, a condition that Mr. Roque said did
not apply to the Philippines. “We view, of course, this decision of the
prosecutor as a waste of the court’s time and resources,” he said.