You are on page 1of 7

Mechanical Engineering Laboratory Report

HEAT CONDUCTION

Name: MUHAMMAD NADEEM ATTA

Student ID: SUKD1400458

Group ID: N

Course Code: EGE3431

Course Name: Laboratory Investigation 4

Submission Date: 25-09-2017


FACULTY OF ENGINEERING & BUILT ENVIROMENT

SUBJECT: EGE 3431 LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS 4

EXPERIMENT 3: HEAT CONDUCTION

1. OBJECTIVE:

To study the heat conduction along a composite bar, and to evaluate the heat conduction
coefficient, k due to the effect of different materials along the composite bar.

2. RESULTS & CALCULATIONS:

Temperature Distribution along Stainless Steel

Test No. Power meter, T1 T2 T3 T7 T8 T9


Q(watts) (˚C) (˚C) (˚C) (˚C) (˚C) (˚C)
1 4 42.2 41.3 40.3 29.5 29.4 29.2
2 5 43.9 42.8 42.1 29.4 29.2 29.1
3 6 46.3 44.9 43.8 29.3 29.2 29.0
4 7 47.9 46.2 45.0 29.3 29.1 29.0
5 8 49.8 47.6 46.3 29.3 29.1 28.9
6 9 52.2 49.6 46.7 29.2 29.0 28.9
Temperature Distribution along Brass

Test No. Power meter, T1 T2 T3 T7 T8 T9


Q(watts) (˚C) (˚C) (˚C) (˚C) (˚C) (˚C)
1 8 53.5 50.7 49.1 29.1 28.9 28.8
2 9 53.7 50.9 49.2 49.1 28.8 28.7
3 10 57.0 52.8 50.9 29.1 28.9 27.6
4 11 58.4 55.1 53.1 29.2 28.9 28.8
5 12 61.8 58.2 56.2 29.2 28.9 28.8
6 13 662.5 62.2 60.1 29.3 29.0 28.8

Graph:
Stainless steel:

1. Graph of Hot temperature.

Distance vs Temperature
60

50

40

30

20

10

0
0 5 10 15 20 25

4 watts 5 watts 6 watts 7 watts 8 watts 9 watts


2. Graph of Cooler temperature.

Distance vs Temperature
29.6

29.5

29.4

29.3

29.2

29.1

29

28.9

28.8
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

4 watts 5 watts 6 watts 7 watts 8 watts 9 watts

Brass:
3. Graph of Hot temperature.

Distance vs Temperature
70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
0 5 10 15 20 25

8 watts 9 watts 10 watts 11 watts 12 watts 13 watts


4. Graph of Cooler temperature.

Distance vs Temperature
29.4

29.3

29.2

29.1

29

28.9

28.8

28.7

28.6

28.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

8 watts 9 watts 10 watts 11 watts 12 watts 13 watts

Calculation:
0.025 2
Area = πr 2 = π( )
2

= 4.91×10-4 m2
For Stainless Steel: For Brass:
4 42.2−41.2 8 53.5−50.7
= KH = KC
4.91×10−4 0.01 4.91×10−4 0.01

KH = 81.47 W/moC for 4 watts KH = 58.19 W/moC for 8 watts


Using same equation Using same equation
KH = 92.58 W/moC for 5 watts KH = 65.46 W/moC for 9 watts
KH = 87.28 W/moC for 6 watts KH = 63.65 W/moC for 10 watts
KH = 89.10 W/moC for 7 watts KH = 67.89 W/moC for 11 watts
KH = 74.06 W/moC for 8 watts KH = 67.89 W/moC for 12 watts
KH = 70.50 W/moC for 9 watts KH = 64.58 W/moC for 13 watts
Average KH = 82.50 W/moC Average KH = 64.61 W/moC

4 40.3−29.5 8 49.1−29.1
= KS = KC
4.91×10−4 0.03 4.91×10−4 0.03

KS = 22.63 W/moC for 4 watts KS = 24.44 W/moC for 8 watts


Using same equation Using same equation
KS = 24.06 W/moC for 5 watts KS = 27.36 W/moC for 9 watts
KS = 25.28 W/moC for 6 watts KS = 28.03W/moC for 10 watts
KS = 27.24 W/moC for 7 watts KS = 28.12 W/moC for 11 watts
KS = 28.75 W/moC for 8 watts KS = 27.16 W/moC for 12 watts
KS = 31.42 W/moC for 9 watts KS = 25.79 W/moC for 13 watts
Average KS = 26.56 W/moC Average KS = 26.82 W/moC

4 8
= U (42.2-41.2) = U (53.5-50.7)
4.91×10−4 4.91×10−4

U = 8146.64 W/m2oC U = 5819.03 W/m2oC


1 1
= 1.23×10-4 = 1.72×10-4
U U
3. Discussion:

Heat conduction or thermal condition is to transfer heat by thermal radiation or convection. The
purpose of this experiment is to study the conduction of heat along the complex bar and to calculate
the total heat transfer coefficient. This experiment was focusing on the cylindrical metal bar
arrangement for heat conduction. Total heat transfer coefficient and total calculated heat transfer
coefficient was compared in this experiment.
According to the graph it displays that when we increase the input power Q (watt), the total transfer
coefficient U will decrease. While evaluating the heat transfer coefficient using the thermal
1 𝑋𝐻 𝑋𝑆 𝑋𝐶
geometry equation ( = + + ), K used for brass and stainless steel to find the total
𝑈 𝐾𝐻 𝐾𝑆 𝐾𝐶
𝑄
transfer coefficient U. When we compare the value of U using this equation 𝑈 = then
𝐴(𝑇𝐻𝑆 −𝑇𝐶𝑆 )

we can get to know the difference between theoretical and experimental values. In this experiment
the heat conduction occurs in three dimensions which often requires extensive computation to
analyze.

4. CONCLUSION:

When the input power increase the input will effect the heat transfer coefficient and the total heat
transfer coefficient will decrease. There will be the difference between the theoretical value and
experimental value of U is different just because of the difference in variables in which input
power, area, temperature distance and thermal conductivity used.

You might also like