Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CHAPTER 4
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The following section deals with the various techniques available for
performing voltage stability analysis.
Different methods exist in the literature for carrying out a steady state
voltage stability analysis. The conventional methods can be broadly classified
into the following types.
The Q-V curve method is one of the most popular ways to investigate
voltage instability problems in power systems during the post transient period
[18], [21],[29], [30]. Unlike the P-V curve method, it doesn’t require the
system to be represented as two-bus equivalent. Voltage at a test bus or
critical bus is plotted against reactive power at that bus. A fictitious
synchronous generator with zero active power and no reactive power limit is
connected to the test bus. The power-flow program is run for a range of
specified voltages with the test bus treated as the generator bus. Reactive
power at the bus is noted from the power flow solutions and plotted against
the specified voltage. The operating point corresponding to zero reactive
power represents the condition when the fictitious reactive power source is
removed from the test bus.
A number of methods have been proposed in the literature that uses the
fact that the power flow Jacobian matrix becomes singular at the point of
voltage collapse. Modal analysis of the Jacobian matrix is one of the most
popular methods.
be obtained near or at the voltage collapse point. Normally the loading factor
is the varying parameter; however, as the system gets closer to bifurcation the
classical power flow Jacobian becomes ill-conditioned. A parameterization
makes the power flow Jacobian nonsingular at the voltage collapse point. The
method naturally goes around the collapse point, allowing the user to trace the
unstable side of the branch.
The linearized steady state system power voltage equations are given by.
(4.1)
Where,
the Jacobian matrix used when the powerflow equations are solved using the
Newton-Raphson technique. With enhanced device models included, the
elements of the Jacobian matrix in (4.1) are modified as discussed as follows.
System voltage stability is affected by both P and Q. However. at each
operating point P is kept constant and voltage stability is evaluated by
considering the incremental relationship between Q and V. This is analogous
to the Q-V curve approach. Although incremental changes in P are neglected
in the formulation, the effects of changes in system load or power transfer
levels are taken into account by studying the incremental relationship between
Q and Vat different operating conditions.
= J R ∆V (4.2)
and
∆V = J R -1 ∆Q (4.3)
Where,
(4.4)
state equations allows us to focus on the study of the reactive demand and
supply problem of the system as well as minimize computational effort.
Let
JR = ξ∧η (4.5)
where;
and
J R -1 = ξΛ-1η (4.6)
∆V = ξΛ-1η ∆Q (4.7)
or
(4.8)
86
Where ξ i is the ith column right eigenvector and η i, the ith row left
eigenvector of J R . Similar to the concept used in linear dynamic system
analysis each eigen value A and the corresponding right and left eigenvectors
ξ i and η i are the ith mode of the system.
∆Q mi = Ki ξi (4.9)
Where,
(4.10)
∆V mi = (1/Λ i) * ∆Q mi (4.11)
It is seen that, when the reactive power variation is along the direction
of ξ ji , the corresponding voltage variation is also along the same direction and
the magnitude is amplified by a factor which is equal to the magnitude of the
inverse of the ith eigen value.
Then,
(4.12)
87
(4.13)
A system is voltage stable if the eigen values of the Jacobian are all
positive. The relationship between system voltage stability and eigen values
of the Jacobian J, is best understood by relating the eigen values of J, with the
V-Q sensitivities, (which must be positive for stability), at each bus.
If some of the eigen values of J R are negative, the system has passed
the critical point of voltage stability because the eigen values of J R change
continuously from positive to zero to negative as the system is stressed. While
the magnitude of the eigen values can provide a relative measure of the
proximity to instability, they do not provide an absolute measure because of
the non-linearity problem. This is analogous to the damping factor in small
signal stability analysis, which is indicative of the degree of damping but is
not an absolute measure of stability margin. If a megawatt distance to voltage
instability is required, the system is stressed incrementally until it becomes
unstable and modal analysis applied at each operating point. The application
88
P ki = ξ ik * η ik (4.14)
2. Premultiply R by A. S = AR.
4. Solve GB = H for B.
5. Do full eigen-solution of B.
7. Set R = W', where W' is W normalized such that all the vectors have
their largest element equal to unity.
9. Otherwise go back to 2.
which correspond to the largest eigen values of J R -l, the simultaneous iteration
algorithm has to be applied to J R -l. At each iteration, the premultiplication is,
S = J R -1R (4.15)
J Pθ J PV Z 0 J Pθ J PV Z 0
= = (4.16)
J Qθ J QV S R J Qθ J QV S R
1. If Λ i = 0, the ith modal voltage will collapse because any change in that
modal reactive power will cause infinite modal voltage variation.
2. If Λ i >0, the ith modal voltage and ith reactive power variation are along
the same direction, indicating that the system is voltage stable.
3. If Λ i <0, the ith modal voltage and the ith reactive power variation are
along the opposite directions, indicating that the system is voltage
unstable.
91
∆P ∆θ
∆Q = [ J ] ∆V (4.17)
J J2
[ J ] = J1 (4.18)
3 J4
∂P ∂P ∂Q ∂Q
=J1 = , J2 = , J3 = , J4 (4.19)
∂θ ∂V ∂θ ∂θ
where J represents the load flow Jacobian matrix. It contains the first
derivatives of active and reactive power mismatch equations, ∆P=∆P(θ,V)
and ∆Q=∆Q(θ,V), with respect to the voltage magnitude V and angles θ. It is
93
∆Q = J R .∆V (4.20)
J=
R J 4 − J 3 J1−1 J 2 (4.21)
The participation factor of the jth variable in the ith mode is defined as
the product of the jth´s components of the right and left eigenvectors
corresponding to the ith mode
the participation factor measuring the participation of the kth bus in ith mode is
defined as
P ki = ξkiη ki
Note that for all the small eigenvalues, bus participation factors
determine the area close to voltage instability. The node or bus k with highest
P ki is the most contributing factor in determining the V-Q sensitivity at ith
mode. Therefore, the bus participation factor determines the area close to
voltage instability provided by the smallest eigenvalue of J R. A Matlab m-file
is developed to compute the participating factor at i th mode.
95
The test system as shown in figure 4.2 consists of two similar areas
connected by a weak tie [21]. Each area consists of two coupling units each
having a rating of 900MVA and 20kv. The system parameters are listed as
follows:
TRANSFORMER DATA
X = 0.15 p.u
LINE DATA
r = 0.0001p.u/km
X L = 0.001p.u/km
GENERATOR DATA
The data’s of the coupling units specified in the system are tabulated in
table 4.1
Synchronous Angle
P [MW] Q [MVAr] Et [ p.u]
machine [Deg]
G1 700 185 1.03 20.2
G2 700 235 1.01 10.5
G3 719 176 1.03 -6.8
G4 700 202 1.01 -17.0
98
LOAD DATA
For the load flow analysis the respective datas are specified in table
4.3. The load flow analysis is calculated by the Newton Raphson’s Method.
The output data which is obtained after the performance of the load
flow analysis by Newton Raphson’s load flow program is shown in table 4.4
Generation
BUS VOLTAGE Angle Load (p.u)
(p.u)
NUMBER (p.u) (p.u)
Real Reactive Real Reactive
The Voltage Profile graph which shows the voltages of all the buses in
the system after the load flow analysis is represented in the graph as shown in
figure 4.3.
100
EIGEN
Load Buses
VALUE
5 239.8881
6 62.5475
7 7.4293
8 3.39553
9 21.0177
10 61.3194
11 238.8125
101
5 0.110
6 0.129
7 0.146
8 0.224
9 0.148
10 0.131
11 0.112
From the modal analysis calculation and the load flow analysis it is
found that the participation factor is more for the Bus 8, (Participation value
=0.224) hence the bus is more sensitive to voltage collapse.
Figure 4.5 Test System with PV based STATCOM connected to weak bus
The weakest bus of the system is analysed and the bus is subjected to
an additional load so as to create a further voltage collapse to the system. It is
then tested whether the STATCOM is able to provide compensation for the
system at that bus to which it is connected.
The simulation of the test system is conducted for the period of 1 second.
4.8.3 CASE 3
In this case the load is added to the weakest bus at 0.25sec and is
allowed to be connected till the end of the simulation. At 0.5 sec PV array
STATCOM is brought into action and after 0.52 sec system is compensated
and system is restored to normal condition after 0.52 sec as shown in figure
4.8
TABULATED RESULTS
Case
Condition Voltage profile
No
Case1 Under normal condition Voltage is maintained at 1 pu
constraint
Case2 Load is connected at 0.25sec and Voltage profile finds a dip below
sustains till the complete 1pu value
simulation
Case3 Load is connected at 0.25sec and Voltage falls below 1pu and after
the STATCOM is acted at 0.5sec inclusion of STATCOM the
and system is restored to normal profile is restored at 0.52 sec
condition at about 0.52sec within limits
105
4.9 SUMMARY
The weak bus in the test system is identified using modal analysis
method. Further the PV array based STATCOM is implemented and
interfaced with the test system. A load of fixed value is connected to the weak
bus of test system to create a voltage dip and PV based STATCOM acts upon
the system to provide the required compensation. The system voltage is
restored to normal condition.