Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Published
Catalysis by
Ceria and Related
Materials
2nd Edition
edited by
Alessandro Trovarelli
Università di Udine, Italy
Paolo Fornasiero
Università di Trieste, Italy
Distributed by
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.
5 Toh Tuck Link, Singapore 596224
USA office: 27 Warren Street, Suite 401-402, Hackensack, NJ 07601
UK office: 57 Shelton Street, Covent Garden, London WC2H 9HE
For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright
Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to
photocopy is not required from the publisher.
ISBN 978-1-84816-963-0
Printed in Singapore
PREFACE
vi Preface
Preface vii
The Editors
Alessandro Trovarelli
Paolo Fornasiero
CONTENTS
Preface v
ix
x Contents
Contents xi
xii Contents
Contents xiii
xiv Contents
Contents xv
xvi Contents
Contents xvii
xviii Contents
Contents xix
Index 881
CHAPTER 1
2 M. Yashima
Figure 1.1 Phase diagrams of the Ce–O system. (a) Phase diagram of CeOy, 1.7 ≤
y ≤ 2.0, temperature range 630 ≤ T ≤ 1270 K.1, 2 (b)–(d) Calculated phase diagrams of
the Ce–O system. Mole fraction of O is x in Ce1-xOx (b) 0.0 ≤ x ≤ 1.0, 500 ≤ T ≤ 4500 K,
(c) 0.55 ≤ x ≤ 0.70, 500 ≤ T ≤ 3000 K, (d) 0.63 ≤ x ≤ 0.67, 600 ≤ T ≤ 1200 K.3 Reprinted
with permission from Elsevier.
4 M. Yashima
Figure 1.2 (a) Crystal structure of the cubic fluorite-type ceria CeO2. (b) Crystal
structure of ceria with OCe4 tetrahedra. (c) Crystal structure of ceria with CeO8
cubes. These figures were drawn with the program VESTA.11
Figure 1.3 Temperature dependence of (a) unit-cell parameter a and (b) atomic
displacement parameters of the cubic fluorite-type CeO2.5 Reprinted with permis-
sion from Yashima et al.5 Copyright 2003 Elsevier. (c) Nuclear-density distribution of
the fluorite-type CeO2 at 1770 K.6, 7 Reprinted with permission from Yashima et al.6
Copyright 2004 American Institute of Physics.
6 M. Yashima
Figure 1.4 (a) Crystal structure of the monoclinic ZrO2 projected on to the (100)
plane. The ZrO7 polyhedra are drawn from crystallographic data.19 Schematic cat-
ion coordination polyhedra of (b) monoclinic, (c) tetragonal, and (d) cubic phases.
Panel (b–d) reprinted with permission from Yashima et al.19 Copyright 1995
American Physical Society.
Figure 1.5 Crystal structure of tetragonal zirconia and relation between tetragonal
(t) cell and pseudo-cubic fluorite (F) cell. The closed and shaded open circles
denote the cations and anions, respectively. An arrow in an open circle indicates the
displacement of oxygen atoms along the c axis. The thick blue dashed lines indicate
a primitive tetragonal cell and thin solid lines stand for two pseudo-fluorite cells.20,21
8 M. Yashima
Compositional
range of Phases and Space Unit-cell
CexZr1-xO2 crystal system group References parameters
0 ≤ x < 0.08a Monoclinic (m) P 21/c 17, 19 a ≠ b ≠ c,
β > 90ο
0.08a ≤ x ≤ 0.12a m+t P 21/c + 17, 19
P 42/nmc
0.12a < x ≤ 0.20 Tetragonal (t) P 42/nmc 17, 19 c/aF > 1b
0.20 < x ≤ 0.60a Tetragonal (t′) P 42/nmc 22–24 c/aF > 1
0.60a ≤ x < 0.65a t′ + t″ P 42/nmc + 22–24
P 42/nmc
0.65a ≤ x < 0.90 Tetragonal (t″) P 42/nmc 22–24 c/aF = 1
0.90 ≤ x Cubic (c) F m3m 22–24 c/aF = 1
Notes: a The compositional range is dependent on the processing and grain size. baF is the unit-
cell parameter a of the pseudo-cubic fluorite cell.
10 M. Yashima
12 M. Yashima
lattice. The t″ form is tetragonal because the oxygen atoms are dis-
placed along the c axis from the regular 8c position of the cubic phase
(Figs. 1.4(c) and 1.5). The three forms, t, t′, and t″, belong to the same
tetragonal phase with P42/nmc symmetry. The existence of the t″ form
is evidenced by X-ray23, 24 and neutron24 powder diffraction, Raman
scattering,23 transmission electron microscopy (TEM),35 and density
functional theory (DFT) calculations.41 The t′–t″ phase boundary is
detectable by high-angular-resolution synchrotron X-ray diffractome-
try (Fig. 1.11).24 In bulk samples of CexZr1-xO2 for x = 0.65 and x = 0.70,
no peak splitting between the 004F and 400F reflections was detected,
Figure 1.12 Neutron diffraction profiles around the 112F reflection of CexZr1-xO2.24
Reprinted with permission from Yashima et al.24 Copyright 1998 American Institute
of Physics.
while the 112F reflection and tetragonal Raman bands were clearly
observed (Figs. 1.1224 and 1.1323). The subscript F denotes the pseudo-
fluorite lattice. These results indicate the existence of the t″ form. The
t″ form appears not only in bulk CexZr1-xO223,24 but also in nano-crystal-
line samples.36 In the nano-sized CexZr1-xO2, it is difficult to distinguish
t″ from t′ due to peak broadening. For example, peak splitting
between the 004F and 400F reflections is not detectable in nano-sized
Ce0.2Zr0.8O242 and Ce0.4Zr0.6O2.36
Figure 1.10 shows the composition x dependence of the unit-cell
parameters of the compositionally homogeneous CexZr1-xO2 materi-
als.22,25 The unit-cell parameters and volume of tetragonal and cubic
CexZr1-xO2 increase with an increase of ceria concentration x. The
increase of unit-cell volume with x is attributable to the larger ionic
14 M. Yashima
Figure 1.14 Variation of (a) axial ratio c/aF and (b) oxygen displacement along
the c axis from the regular 8c position in CexZr1-xO2.24 Reprinted with permission
from Yashima et al.24 Copyright 1998 American Institute of Physics.
16 M. Yashima
Figure 1.16 Calculated51 (solid line) and measured52 (A),53 (B),54 and (C)55 mean
heat capacity of CeO2. Mean heat capacity is defined as (H(T) − H(294 K))/
(T − 294), where H is the enthalpy in J (mol of cation)−1 K−1. Reprinted with permis-
sion from Du et al.51 Copyright 1994 Elsevier.
18 M. Yashima
Figure 1.17 Calculated equilibrium phase diagram of the CeO2–ZrO2 system using
the CALPHAD method.51 liq.: liquid, c: cubic, t: tetragonal, m: monoclinic. Symbols
stand for experimental data. See Du et al.51 for an explanation of the symbols.
Reprinted with permission from Du et al.51 Copyright 1994 Elsevier.
20 M. Yashima
Figure 1.19 (a) Annealing temperature dependence of ex situ X-ray powder diffrac-
tion profiles of compositionally homogeneous Ce0.65Zr0.35O2 obtained by quenching
after annealing the tetragonal t′ phase for a short time (typically 3 min.).56 (b) Variation
of the axial ratio c/aF of compositionally homogeneous CexZr1-xO2 with annealing tem-
perature.25,56,57 In Ce0.65Zr0.35O2, the t′ (c/aF > 1) and t″ or cubic (c/aF = 1) phases coexist
below the finishing point of the t′-to-(t″ or cubic) transformation. Reprinted with
permission from Yashima et al.56 Copyright 1993 John Wiley & Sons.
Figure 1.20 Temperature dependence of (a) axial ratio c/aF and (b) oxygen dis-
placement from the fluorite regular position along the c axis in the compositionally
homogeneous Ce0.5Zr0.5O2.21 Open and closed circles are for the t′ and cubic phases,
respectively. Reprinted with permission from Wakita et al.21 Copyright 2007 IUCr.
22 M. Yashima
Figure 1.21 (a) Schematic phase diagram, showing the equilibrium phase bounda-
ries (solid lines) and partitionless transformation temperatures (dotted line and
dashed lines). (b)–(e) Gibbs free energy-composition (G-x) diagram of the CeO2–
ZrO2 system.16 Schematic G-x diagrams at temperatures (b) T = T 1, (c) T = T 2, and
(d) T = T 3. (e) Schematic G-x diagram for constant temperature to explain the
formation of the t′ form by annealing the precursor containing Ce and Zr cations.42
(a)–(d) Reprinted with permission from Yashima et al.16 Copyright 1996 Elsevier.
(e) Reprinted with permission from Yashima et al.42 Copyright 1994 John Wiley & Sons.
Figure 1.22 Raman spectra of (a) the precursor, and (b) compositionally homo-
geneous nano-sized and (c) bulk ceria–zirconia solid solutions Ce0.2Zr0.8O2 obtained
by heating the precursor at 723 K (b) and at 1863 K (c).42 The tetragonal phase has
six Raman active modes of A1g + 3Eg + 2B1g. Numbers in the figure are the six
Raman bands. The asterisk (*) denotes the band of structural disorder. The third
band is a good indication of the tetragonal phase. Reprinted with permission from
Yashima et al.42 Copyright 1994 John Wiley & Sons.
24 M. Yashima
Figure 1.23 (a) Optimized structure and (b) isosurface of valence-electron den-
sity at 0.0133 Å−3 with valence-electron density distributions on the (100), (010),
and (001) planes of a supercell (2 × 2 × 2) of tetragonal zirconia ZrO2.41 (c)
Optimized structure and (d) isosurface of valence-electron density at 0.0133 Å−3
with valence-electron density distributions on the (100), (010), and (001) planes of
a (2 × 2 × 1) supercell of tetragonal ceria CeO2.41 The optimized structure of CeO2
is of the cubic fluorite type. Yellow and green spheres are Ce and Zr atoms, respec-
tively. Pink/purple spheres in (a) and (c) are oxygen atoms. The arrows along the
c axis in (a) indicate the direction of oxygen displacement from the ideal fluorite
8c position. On the color scale for the valence-electron density, 0 and 100% corre-
spond to 0.0133 and 0.148 Å−3, respectively. Reprinted with permission from
Yashima.41 Copyright 2009 ACS.
26 M. Yashima
Figure 1.24 (a) Refined crystal structure and (b) isosurface of experimental elec-
tron density of tetragonal zirconium oxide.73 The arrows in (a) show oxygen dis-
placement along the c axis from the regular fluorite 8c position. Reprinted with
permission from Yashima and Tsunekawa.73 Copyright 2006 IUCr.
Figure 1.25 (a) Optimized crystal structure and (b) yellow isosurface of valence-
electron density at 0.0133 Å−3 with valence-electron density distributions on the
(100), (010), and (001) planes of the (2 × 2 × 1) supercell of tetragonal (t′) ceria-
zirconia solid solution Ce0.5Zr0.5O2.41 The arrows in (a) and (b) show oxygen
displacement along the c axis from the regular fluorite 8c position. Reprinted with
permission from Yashima.41 Copyright 2009 ACS.
28 M. Yashima
Figure 1.27 (a) Axial ratio c/aF −1 and (b) average value of oxygen displacement
from the ideal fluorite 8c position of ceria–zirconia solid solutions CexZr1-xO2 as a
function of CeO2 content x in (2 × 2 × 1) supercells. Solid circles and open squares
denote theoretical41 and experimental24 data, respectively.
30 M. Yashima
32 M. Yashima
Figure 1.30 Electron density distributions on the (100) planes of (a) Ce0.12Zr0.88O2
and (b) Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 with black contours in the range from 4.0 to 20.0 Å−3 (steps of
2.0 Å−3) at 299 K, 1/2 ≤ z ≤ 1. (c) Electron density distribution on the (110) plane
of cubic CeO2 with black contours in the range from 4.0 to 20.0 Å−3 (steps of 2.0 Å−3)
at 299 K, 1/2 ≤ z ≤ 1.32 Reprinted with permission from Yashima et al.32 Copyright
2009 American Institute of Physics.
Figure 1.31 Nuclear density distributions on the (110) planes of (a) cubic
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 at 1832 K and (b) CeO2 at 1826 K with black contours in the range from
0.7 to 5.0 fm Å−3 (steps of 0.5 fm Å−3).83 The dotted lines (A) and (B) with arrows
are possible diffusion paths in the <100> and <110> directions, respectively.
Reprinted with permission from Wakita and Yashima.83 Copyright 2008 American
Institute of Physics.
<100> and <110> directions ((A) and (B) in Fig. 1.31, respectively).
The spatial distribution of oxide ions in Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 (Fig. 1.31(a)) is
greater than that of CeO2 (Fig. 1.31(b)). The greater degree of posi-
tional disorder in Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 is responsible for the higher diffusivity
of the oxide ions leading to higher catalytic activity.
34 M. Yashima
Figure 1.32 Isosurface of nuclear density at 0.003 fm Å−3 (0.15 < x < 0.3) with nuclear-
density distribution on the bc plane at x = 0.3 of Ce0.93Y0.07O1.96 obtained by the combina-
tion of Rietveld refinement and the maximum-entropy method of neutron powder
diffraction data measured at 296 K for (c), and at 1707 K for (b) and (d).89
36 M. Yashima
Figure 1.33 (a) Crystal structure of the defect fluorite-type ceria–rare-earth oxide
solid solution Ce0.8R0.2O1.9.81 (b), (c), (d) Schematic diagrams of potential curves for
oxide ions, with vibrating oxide ions.81 Figures (b) and (c) show small and large
thermal vibrations of oxide ions, respectively. Large thermal vibrations can lead to
oxide ions hopping to a neighboring oxygen site. Figure (d) schematically indicates
that large static disorder has higher and lower energy barriers. The higher activation
energy in (d) means lower mobility of oxide ions, which leads to lower oxide-ion
conductivity. Reprinted with permission from Yashima et al.81 Copyright 2010 ACS.
Figure 1.34 (a) Variation of atomic displacement parameter UO(R) for an anion
with the ionic radius of a dopant cation r(R) for Ce0.8R0.2O1.9 (R = La, Nd, Sm, Gd,
Y, and Yb) measured at 948 K.81 (b) Variation of ionic conductivity σ with UO(R) for
Ce0.8R0.2O1.981 measured at 1073 K.97 Reprinted with permission from Yashima et al.81
Copyright 2010 ACS.
The mismatch between dopant rare-earth oxide and host ceria gives
rise to the static positional disorder, which leads to the higher
atomic displacement parameters. The static positional disorder
reflects the local distortion or lattice strain due to the mismatch
between host CeO2 and dopant RO1.5, which prevents fast oxide-ion
movement across the crystal lattice (Fig. 1.33(d)). Therefore, oxide-
ion conductivity decreases with increasing UO(R) as shown in Fig.
1.34(b). On the other hand, we would expect that an increase of
dynamic disorder and effective index would improve oxide-ion con-
ductivity.81 UO(R) increases with an increase of effective index from
R = Gd to R = La,81 which indicates the possibility that the bulk
oxide-ion conductivity of Ce0.8R0.2O1.9 increases with an increase of
dopant ionic radius r(R) from R = Gd to R = La.81 Further careful
structural investigation of ceria-based materials is needed to deter-
mine both the dynamic and static components of the atomic dis-
placement parameter of oxygen atoms.
38 M. Yashima
40 M. Yashima
Acknowledgments
I would like to express special thanks to all my co-authors and col-
laborators mentioned in the literature. Some of this work was finan-
cially supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports,
Science and Technology of Japan, through Grant-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (A) and (B), and Challenging Exploratory Research
(Nos. 24246107, 21360318, 23655190). This work was carried out
under the Joint-use Research Program for Neutron Scattering,
Institute for Solid State Physics (ISSP), the University of Tokyo, at
the Research Reactor JRR-3, JAEA (Proposal Nos. 8766, 7768, 6723,
6721, 5681, 5682, 4688, 4689, 3653). The synchrotron data were col-
lected at the BL-4B2 beam line of the Photon Factory under the
projects 2008G084, 2006G264, 2005G158 and at the BL02B2 beam
line of SPring-8 (Project Nos. 2011B1995 and 2011A1442).
References
1. Trovarelli, A., in Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, ed. A. Trovarelli,
Imperial College Press, London, (2002), pp. 15–50.
2. Antonov, V.E., Fig. 11152: System Ce2O3-CeO2 in Phase Equilibria
Diagrams Online, http://ceramics.org/publications-and-resources/
phase-equilibria-diagrams. Accessed 21 March 2011.
3. Zinkevich, M., Djurovic, D., Aldinger, F., Solid State Ionics, 177 (2006)
989–1001.
4. Kümmerle, E.A., Heger, G., J. Solid State Chem., 147 (1999) 485–500.
5. Yashima, M., Ishimura, D., Yamaguchi, Y., Ohoyama, K., Kawachi, K.,
Chem. Phys. Lett., 372 (2003) 784–787.
6. Yashima, M., Kobayashi, S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 84 (2004) 526–528.
7. Yashima, M., Kobayashi, S., Yasui, T., Solid State Ionics, 177 (2006)
211–215.
8. Knappe, P., Eyring, L., J. Solid State Chem., 58 (1985) 312–314.
9. Ray, S.P., Nowick A.S., Cox., D.E., J. Solid State Chem., 15 (1975)
344–351.
10. Bärnigshausen, H., Schiller, G., J. Less-Common Met., 110 (1985)
385–390.
11. Momma, K., Izumi, F., J. Appl. Crystallogr., 41 (2008) 653–658.
12. Yashima, M., Ishimura, D., Chem. Phys. Lett., 378 (2003) 395–399.
13. Brauer, G., Gingerich, K.A., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 16 (1960) 87–89.
14. Shannon, R.D., Acta Crystallogr., 32 (1976) 751–767.
15. Ozawa, M., Kimura, M., Isogai, A., J. Alloys Compd., 193 (1993) 73–75.
16. Yashima, M., Kakihana, M., Yoshimura, M., Solid State Ionics, 86–88
(1996) 1131–1149.
17. Yashima, M., Mitsuhashi, T., Takashina, H., Kakihana, M., Ikegami, T.,
Yoshimura, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 78 (1995) 2225–2228.
18. Du, Y., Jin, Z., Huang, P., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 74 (1991) 1569–1577.
19. Yashima, M., Hirose, T., Katano, S., Suzuki, Y., Kakihana, M.,
Yoshimura, M., Phys. Rev. B, 51 (1995) 8018–8025.
20. Yashima, M., Sasaki, S., Kakihana, M., Yamaguchi, Y., Arashi, H.,
Yoshimura, M., Acta Crystallogr. B, 50 (1994) 663–672.
21. Wakita, T., Yashima, M., Acta Crystallogr. B, 63 (2007) 384–389.
22. Yashima, M., Morimoto, K., Ishizawa, N., Yoshimura, M., J. Am. Ceram.
Soc., 76 (1993) 1745–1750.
23. Yashima, M., Arashi, H., Kakihana, M., Yoshimura, M., J. Am. Ceram.
Soc., 77 (1994) 1067–1071.
24. Yashima, M., Sasaki, S., Yamaguchi, Y., Kakihana, M., Yoshimura, M.,
Mori, T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 72 (1998) 182–184.
25. Yashima, M., Morimoto, K., Ishizawa, N., Yoshimura, M., in Science and
Technology of ZIRCONIA V, eds. S.P.S. Badwal, M.J. Bannister R.H.J.
Hannink, Technomic Pub. Co., Lancaster, PA, (1993), pp. 108–116.
26. Tsukuma, K., Shimada, M., J. Mater. Sci., 20 (1984) 1178–1184.
42 M. Yashima
27. Duwez, P., Odell, F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 33 (1950) 274–283.
28. Tani, E., Yoshimura, M., Somiya, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 66 (1983)
506–510.
29. Meriani, S., Mater. Sci. Eng., 71 (1985) 369–370.
30. Meriani, S., J. Phys. (Les Vlis. Fr.), Suppl., 47 (1986) C1-485–489.
31. Meriani, S., Spinolo, G., Powder Diffr., 2 (1987) 255–256.
32. Yashima, M., Wakita, T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 94 (2009) 171902-1–3.
33. Muroi, T., Echigoya, J., Suto, H., Trans. Jpn. Inst. Metals, 29 (1988)
634–641.
34. Meriani, S., Mater. Sci. Eng., A109 (1988) 121–130.
35. Torng, S., Miyazaki, K., Sakuma, T., Ceram. Int., 22 (1996) 309–315.
36. Lamas, D.G., Fuentes, R.O., Fabregas, I.O., Fernandez de Rapp, M.E.,
Lascalea, G.E., Casanova, J.R., Walsoe de Reca, N.E., Craievich, A.F.,
J. Appl. Crystallogr., 38 (2005) 867–873.
37. Larrondo, S., Adelina Vidal, M., Irigoyen, B., Craievich, A.F.,
Lamas, D.G., Fábregas, I.O., Lascalea, G.E., Walsoë de Reca, N.E.,
Amadeo, N., Catal. Today, 107–108 (2005) 53–59.
38. Zhang, F., Chen, C.-H., Hanson, J.C., Robinson, R.D., Herman, I.P.,
Chan, S.-W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 89 (2006) 1028–1036.
39. Acuña, L.M., Fuentes, R.O., Lamas, D.G., Fábregas, I.O., Walsöe de
Reca, N.E., Craievich, A.F., Powder Diffraction, 23 (2008) S70–74.
40. Yoshimura, M., Yashima, M., Noma, T., Somiya, S., J. Mater. Sci., 25 (1990)
2011–2016.
41. Yashima, M., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 12658–12662.
42. Yashima, M., Ohtake, K., Kakihana, M., Yoshimura, M., J. Am. Ceram.
Soc., 77 (1994) 2773–2776.
43. Duwez, P., Odell, F., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 33 (1950) 274–283.
44. Rouanet, A., C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci., 266 (1968) C-908–911.
45. Longo, V., Roitti, S., Ceramurgia Int., 1 (1971) 4–10.
46. Roitti, S., Longo, V., Ceramurgia Int., 2 (1972) 97–102.
47. Yoshimura, M., Tani, E., Somiya, S., Solid State Ionics, 3–4 (1981) 477–481.
48. Tani, E., Yoshimura, M., Somiya, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 66 (1983)
506–510.
49. Duran, P., Gonzalez, M., Moure, C., Jurado, J.R., Pascual, C., J. Mater.
Sci., 25 (1990) 5001–5006.
50. Yashima, M., Takashina, H., Kakihana, M., Yoshimura, M., J. Am.
Ceram. Soc., 77 (1994) 1869–1874.
51. Du, Y., Yashima, M., Koura, T., Kakihana, M., Yoshimura, M., Script
Metall. Mater., 31 (1994) 327–332.
52. Kuznctsov, F.A., Rezukhina, F.N., Zhur. Fiz. Khim., 34 (1960)
C-2467–2468.
53. Westrum Jr., E.F., Beale Jr., A.F., J. Phys. Chem., 65 (1961) 353–355.
54. Ricken, M., Nolting, J., Riess, I., J. Solid State Chem., 54 (1984) 89–99.
55. Gallagher, S.A., Dworzak, W.R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 68 (1985) C-206–207.
56. Yashima, M., Morimoto, K., Ishizawa, N., Yoshimura, M., J. Am. Ceram.
Soc., 76 (1993) 2865–2868.
57. Yashima, M., Yoshimura, M., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31 (1992) L1614–1617.
58. Várez, A., Jolly, J., Oliete, P., Sanjuán, M.L., Garcia-Gonzalez, E.,
Jardiel, T., Sanz, J., Inorg. Chem., 48 (2009) 9693–9699.
59. Kresse, G., Joubert, D., Hafner, J., Phys. Rev. B, 59 (1999) 1758–1775.
60. Rodriguez, J.A., Hanson, J.C., Kim, J.-Y., Liu, G., Iglesias-Juez, A.,
Fernandez-Garcia, M., J. Phys. Chem. B, 107 (2003) 3535–3543.
61. Conesa, J., J. Phys. Chem. B, 107 (2003) 8840–8853.
62. Tibiletti, D., Amieiro-Fonseca, A., Burch, R., Chen, Y., Fisher, J.M.,
Goguet, A., Hardacre, C., Hu, P., Thompsett, D., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109
(2005) 22553–22559.
63. Yang, Z., Fu, Z., Wei, Y., Lu, Z., J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008)
15341–15347.
64. Yang, Z., Fu, Z., Wei, Y., Hermansson, K., Chem. Phys. Lett., 450 (2008)
286–291.
65. Nolan, M., Fearon, J.E., Watson, G.W., Solid State Ionics, 177 (2006)
3069–3074.
66. Castleton, C.W., Kullgren, J., Hermansson, K., J. Chem. Phys., 127
(2007) 244704-1–11.
67. Da Silva, J.L.F., Verónica Ganduglia-Pirovano, M., Sauer, J., Bayer, V.,
Kresse, G., Phys. Rev. B, 75 (2007) 045121-1–10.
68. Andersson, D.A., Simak, S.I., Skorodumova, N.V., Abrikosov, I.A.,
Johansson, B., Appl. Phys. Lett., 90 (2007) 031909-1–3.
69. Jomard, G., Petit, T., Pasturel, A., Magaud, L., Kresse, G., Hafner, J.,
Phys. Rev. B, 59 (1999) 4044–4052.
44 M. Yashima
70. Kuwabara, A., Tohei, T., Yamamoto, T., Tanaka, I., Phys. Rev. B, 71
(2005) 064301-1–7.
71. Jaffe, J.E., Bachorz, R.A., Gutowski, M., Phys. Rev. B, 72 (2005)
144107-1–9.
72. Igawa, N., Ishii, Y., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 84 (2001) 1169–1171.
73. Yashima, M., Tsunekawa, S., Acta Crystallogr. B, 61 (2006) 161–164.
74. Yashima, M., Oh-uchi, K., Tanaka, M., Ida, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 89
(2006) 1395–1399.
75. Yashima, M., Solid State Ionics, 179 (2008) 797–803.
76. Yashima, M., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn., 117 (2009) 1055–1059.
77. Yashima, M., Itoh, M., Inaguma, Y., Morii, Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127
(2005) 3491–3495.
78. Yashima, M., Sirikanda, N., Ishihara, T., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132 (2010)
2385–2392.
79. Yashima, M., Yonehara, Y., Fujimori, H., J. Phys. Chem. C, 115 (2011)
25077–25087.
80. Chen, Y.-C., Yashima, M., Ohta, T., Ohoyama, K., Yamamoto, S.,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 116 (2012) 5246–5254.
81. Yashima, M., Takizawa, T., J. Phys. Chem. C, 114 (2010) 2385–2392.
82. Duprez, D., Descorme, C., in Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, ed.
A. Trovarelli, Imperial College Press, London, (2002), pp. 243–280.
83. Wakita, T., Yashima, M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 92 (2008) 101921-1–3.
84. Boaro, M., Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A., J. Catal., 193
(2000) 338–347.
85. Faber Jr., J., Seitz, M.A., Mueller, M.H., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 37 (1976)
903–907.
86. Faber Jr., J., Seitz, M.A., Mueller, M.H., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 37 (1976)
909–915.
87. Faber Jr., J., Physica B, 150 (1988) 241–249.
88. Berber, K., Martin, U., Mursic, Z., Schneider, J., Boysen, H., Frey, F.,
Mater. Sci. Forum, 79–82 (1991) 685–690.
89. Yashima, M., Kobayashi, S., Yasui, T., Faraday Discussions, 134 (2007)
369–376.
90. Wang, D.Y., Park, D.S., Griffth, J., Nowick, A.S., Solid State Ionics, 2
(1981) 95–105.
91. Sammes, N.M., Tompsett, G.A., Näfe, H., Aldinger, F., J. Eur. Ceram.
Soc., 19 (1999) 1801–1826.
92. Battle, P.D., Catlow, R.A., Drennan, J., Murray, A.D., J. Phys. C: Solid
State Phys., 16 (1983) L561–566.
93. Yashima, M., Ishimura, D., Appl. Phys. Lett., 87 (2005) 221909-1–3.
94. Battle, P.D., Catlow, C.R.A., Heap, J.W., Moroney, L.M., J. Solid State
Chem., 63 (1986) 8–15.
95. Battle, P.D., Catlow, C.R.A., Heap, J.W., Moroney, L M., J. Solid State
Chem., 67 (1987) 42–50.
96. Lerch, M., Boysen, H., Radaelli, P.G., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 58 (1997)
1557–1568.
97. Eguchi, K., Setoguchi, T., Inoue, T., Arai, H., Solid State Ionics, 52
(1992) 165–172.
98. Otsuka-Yao, S., Morikawa, H., Izu, N., Okuda, K., J. Jpn. Inst. Metals, 59
(1995) 1237–1246.
99. Thomson, J.B., Armstrong, A.R., Bruce, P.G., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 118
(1999) 11129–11133.
100. Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, S., Izu, N., Omata, T., Ikeda, K., J. Electrochem. Soc.,
145 (1998) 1406–1413.
101. Omata, T., Kishimoto, H., Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, S., Ohtori, N.,
Umesaki, N., J. Solid State Chem., 147 (1999) 573–583.
102. Thomson, J.B., Armstrong, A.R., Bruce, P.G., J. Solid State Chem., 148
(1999) 56–62.
103. Sasaki, T., Ukyo, Y., Kuroda, K., Arai, S., Muto, S., Saka, H., J. Ceram.
Soc. Jpn., 111 (2003) 382–385.
104. Sasaki, T., Ukyo, Y., Suda, A., Sugiura, M., Kuroda, K., Arai, S.,
Saka, H., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn., 112 (2004) 440–444.
105. Achary, S.N., Sali, S.K., Kulkarni, N.K., Krishna, P.S.R., Shinde, A.B.,
Tyagi, A.K., Chem. Mater., 21 (2009) 5848–5859.
CHAPTER 2
UNDERSTANDING CERIA-BASED
CATALYTIC MATERIALS:
AN OVERVIEW OF RECENT PROGRESS
Juan José Delgado, Eloy del Río, Xiaowei Chen,
Ginesa Blanco, José María Pintado, Serafín Bernal
and José Juan Calvino
Departamento de Ciencia de los Materiales e Ingeniería Metalúrgica y
Química Inorgánica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Cádiz,
11510-Cádiz, Spain
2.1 Introduction
The literature that has appeared since the publication of the first
edition of Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials,1 some ten years ago,
has allowed us to identify a number of major breakthroughs in the
chemical and nanostructural characterization of this highly inter-
esting family of catalytic materials, which are discussed in the differ-
ent sections of this chapter.
Among the driving forces responsible for these recent develop-
ments, hydrogen production for fuel cells is certainly one of them.
To illustrate this trend with actual figures, we could simply mention
that a literature search comprising simultaneously the keywords
hydrogen production, catalyst and fuel cells returns currently nearly
1,500 references within the period 2002–2011, whereas this number
drops dramatically to just 85 in the much larger 1900–2001 time
span. From the references corresponding to the most recent period
over 200 contain ceria or ceria–zirconia as keywords. In addition to
47
48 J. J. Delgado et al.
50 J. J. Delgado et al.
52 J. J. Delgado et al.
1
1 1
H2 Consumption(a.u.)
2 2
3
3 2
4
5
3 6
4
7
4 8
5 9
5 10
6
200 400 600 800 1000 400 600 800 1000 1200 400 600 800 1000 1200
Temperature (K) Temperature (K) Temperature (K)
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 2.1 (a) TPR curves of zirconium-containing CeO2: (1) CeO2, (2) 90CeO2–
10ZrO2, (3) 70CeO2–30ZrO2, (4) 50CeO2–50ZrO2, (5) 15CeO2–85ZrO2, (6) 7CeO2–
93ZrO2; (b) TPR profiles of: (1) fresh Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 and (2–3) recycled 1 and 7 times,
respectively, (4) fresh CeO2 and (5) CeO2 recycled 2 times; (c) Influence of the pre-
treatment conditions on the reducibility of a Ce/Zr mixed oxide (CZ-68/32-LS).
TPR-MS traces corresponding to the sample pre-treated as follows: (1) fresh oxide
sample, (2) SR pre-treatment, (3) SR-SO, (4) SR-MO, (5) SR-MO, (6) SR-SO, (7)
SR-MO, (8) SR-MO, (9) SR-SO, (10) SR-MO (abbreviations are explained in the text).
Experiments (2)–(6) were recorded successively on the same oxide sample. Adapted
from Murota et al.,168 and Baker et al.179 with permission from Elsevier, and adapted
from Fornasiero et al.180 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
54 J. J. Delgado et al.
56 J. J. Delgado et al.
3 nm
[110] [001]
111
(1-11)
Figure 2.2 HRTEM images for a Ce0.62Zr0.38O2 oxide after the following treatments:
(a) fresh oxide; (b) SR-MO; (c) SR-SO. Adapted from López-Haro et al.66 with per-
mission from John Wiley & Sons.
and 0.270 nm {200} type planes can be measured on the digital dif-
fraction pattern (DDP) shown as the inset in Fig. 2.2(a). After
SR-MO, the image contrast does not change dramatically, but the
DDPs clearly show the appearance of superstructure reflections,
marked on the inset in Fig. 2.2(b). These extra superstructure spots
are located at ½ {111} and ½ {200}, which is in good agreement with
the transformation of the solid solution with cubic fluorite structure
into the Ce2Zr2O8 pyrochlore. This last structural type has a unit cell
whose dimensions are double those of fluorite due to ordering, in an
alternating fashion, of Ce and Zr species along the three major <100>
cubic directions. Finally, after SR-SO, both the HRTEM images and
DDP show only features characteristic of a simple fluorite-type cell.
Bearing in mind that superstructure-type HRTEM image contrasts
may have their origin either in changes related to the cationic sublat-
tice or in the oxygen sublattice (e.g. by modulation of the oxygen
displacements or oxygen vacancy ordering), as suggested in Torng
et al.195 and Masui et al.,196 the interpretation of the HRTEM studies
proposed in the paragraphs above,192 suggesting the occurrence of a
disorder-order transition in the cationic sublattice of the mixed oxide,
could only be confirmed after a subsequent HAADF-STEM study.197
Image contrasts in HAADF-STEM images depend on, roughly,
the squared average value of the atomic number (Z 2) in each atomic
column.198 Under these conditions, in a material like the mixed
oxides we are considering, which contain oxygen (Z = 8) and heavy
metal elements, Zr (Z = 40) and Ce (Z = 58), image contrasts feature
mostly the location of the latter. Thus, white contrasts observed in
these images correspond, for those projections in which the cations
and anions do not overlap, to the position of Ce and Zr species.
Likewise, higher intensities would be expected at sites populated by
Ce species. With this simple image interpretation, a comparison of
the HAADF-STEM images in Fig. 2.3 clearly reveals significant
changes in the arrangement of cations in the mixed oxides between
the fresh or SR-SO and the SR-MO materials. In the former,
Fig. 2.3(a), the DDPs show reflections corresponding to a fluorite cell
whereas in the SR-MO oxide, Fig. 2.3(b), the ½-type reflections are
clearly visible, confirming the presence of a superstructure, which is
58 J. J. Delgado et al.
Ce
Zr Ce/Zr
(a) (b)
Figure 2.3 HAADF-STEM images for a Ce0.62Zr0.38O2 oxide after the following
treatments: (a) SR-SO; (b) SR-MO. Adapted from López-Haro et al.66 with permis-
sion from John Wiley & Sons.
60 J. J. Delgado et al.
4
m/e: 18
SR SO m/e: 2
SR SO H1123
SR MO
A 3
Intensity (a.u.)
Intensity (a.u.)
B
2
B´
1
C
400 600 800 1000 1200 350 400 450 500 550 600 400 600 800 1000 1200
Temperature (K) Temperature (K) Temperature (K)
(a) (b) (c)
Figure 2.4 (a) Influence of supported rhodium on the redox response of ceria–
zirconia mixed oxides. Temperature-programmed reaction mass spectroscopic
(TPR-MS) study. Traces for the H2O (m/e (mass/charge ratio) = 18) signal for
SR-MO (A), SR-SO (B), 0.3% Rh/SR-MO (C), and 0.3% Rh/SR-SO (D) samples.
Trace B’ was recorded after applying the first series of ultimate OSC measurements
to the SR-SO sample. (b) Volumetric study of hydrogen chemisorption on
Ce0.62Zr0.38O2 samples. Initial hydrogen pressure was 38 torr. The samples were sub-
mitted to successive cycles of heating at the indicated temperatures for 30 min fol-
lowed by cooling to 298 K always under hydrogen. Pressure drops were determined
at 298 K . SR-SO (first series) accounts for the sample resulting from the first series
of ultimate OSC measurements carried out on the SR-SO sample. (c) TPR-MS
traces for H2 (m/e = 2) and H2O (m/e = 18) corresponding to a Ce0.62Zr0.38O2 sam-
ple submitted, respectively, to SR-MO and SR-SO aging routines. To facilitate the
comparison between H2 and H2O traces, hydrogen consumption is plotted as a
positive signal. The effect of supported Rh on the reducibility of the oxides is exem-
plified by the diagrams recorded for the 0.3% Rh/SR-SO sample, bottom part of
the figure. Adapted from Yeste el al.207,208 with permission from the American
Chemical Society, and adapted from Bernal et al.212 with permission from Elsevier.
62 J. J. Delgado et al.
100
CZ-MO/H2
90
0.3%Rh/CZ-MO/H2
CZ-SO/H2
80
0.3%Rh/CZ-SO/H2
70
60
% Ce3+
50
40
30
20
10
0
373 473 573 673 773 873 973 1073 1173 1273
Temperature (K)
Figure 2.5 Evolution with reduction temperature of the ultimate H2-OSC values
determined for bare and rhodium-loaded (0.3 wt%) SR-SO and SR-MO oxides.
Adapted from Yeste et al.208 with permission from the American Chemical Society.
64 J. J. Delgado et al.
(d)
Zr rich variant
Ce rich variant
a b c
surface
d
66 J. J. Delgado et al.
one. For a 50/50 pyrochlore the Ce/Zr molar ratio in the Ce-rich
planes is 75/25 whereas it is 25/75 in the Zr-rich variant. Piling up
these two variants, in an alternating fashion, along the <111> direc-
tion gives rise to the final structure.
Due to the direct relation existing between contrast intensity
and atomic number, HAADF-STEM images of the pyrochlore struc-
ture along these directions show lines of alternating high and low
intensity, see Fig. 2.7(b). The high-intensity lines indicate the posi-
tions of the Ce-rich {111} planes, whereas the low-intensity ones cor-
respond to the Zr-rich variant. The intensity profiles from the
experimental images clearly reveal, as expected, an alternation of
the intensities, which, according to a simulated image, Fig. 2.7(c),
can be interpreted as proposed.
From the intensity profiles, Figs. 2.7(d) and (e), the stacking
sequence can be continuously tracked from the bulk of the crystal-
lites outwards to the surface. Moreover, from an observation of the
image intensity level at the surface, a conclusion can be drawn about
which kind of {111} variant is exposed. In this respect, the intensity
profiles recorded from the experimental images, Fig. 2.7(d), repre-
sentative of an SR-MO oxide, indicate the presence at the surface of
a low-intensity Zr-rich plane.
Therefore, electron microscopy data have revealed that the
disorder-order transformation taking place in the bulk is accompa-
nied by parallel structural and compositional rearrangements at the
surface. The {111} facets resulting from the bulk transformation,
which are Zr rich and cation ordered, provide more effective routes
for dissociating H2.
In Yeste et al.208 the key influence of the surface structure on the
OSC has been explored in more detail. The evolution of total OSC
with reduction temperature was studied for a Ce0.62Zr0.38O2 sample
submitted to two additional treatments: (1) SR-MO followed by a
short, 30 minute, oxidation at medium temperature, 1073 K, under
5% O2/He (SR-MO-O1073) and (2) SR-SO followed by a short, 1 h,
reduction at 1123 K under 5% H2/Ar (SR-SO-H1123). OSC data for
these samples are presented in Fig. 2.8, together with those for
SR-MO and SR-SO oxides.
Figure 2.8 Evolution with reduction temperature of the ultimate H2-OSC values
determined for a Ce0.62Zr0.38O2 oxide after the treatments indicated in the leg-
ends. Adapted from Yeste et al.208 with permission from the American Chemical
Society.
68 J. J. Delgado et al.
(a) (d)
(b) (c)
SR-SO
SR-MO-O1073
SR-MO
Figure 2.10 XEDS study of Ce–Zr distribution in SR-MO, SR-SO and SR-MO-O1073
oxide nano-crystals. Data expressed as atomic percentage of Ce: 100[Ce/(Ce + Zr)].
Adapted from Yeste et al.208 with permission from the American Chemical Society.
In summary, these HRTEM results show that the short redox treat-
ments produce subtle changes at the surface of SR-MO and SR-SO
oxides but they are not strong enough to modify the bulk structure.
The STEM-XEDS study shown in Fig. 2.10 provides some addi-
tional interesting pieces of information regarding the short oxida-
tion treatments. This figure summarizes the nano-analytical data
corresponding to a series of XEDS studies carried out on SR-MO,
SR-SO and SR-MO-O1073 samples. Remarkable differences may be
noticed from one oxide to another. In Fig. 2.10 it can be seen that
SR-MO has the narrowest compositional distribution, with most of
the analysed nano-regions exhibiting Ce/Zr molar ratios close to
the nominal value, 62:38. By contrast, the sample resulting from the
high-temperature oxidizing aging treatment, SR-SO, has the broad-
est range of Ce/Zr values.
This observation suggests compositional segregation, a process
that is known to be induced in oxides with Ce/Zr molar ratios typi-
cally ranging from 50:50 to 70:30, by thermal aging (T > 1173 K),
70 J. J. Delgado et al.
SR-MO
SR-SO-H1123
SR-MO-O1123
SR-SO
72 J. J. Delgado et al.
CO-OSC H2-OSC
SR-SO
SR-SO
SR-MO
SR-MO
(a) (b)
Figure 2.13 DTG diagrams corresponding to (a) the reduction in flow of 5% CO/
He of SR-SO and SR-MO oxide samples, heating rate 10 K.min−1; (b) the reduction
in flow of 5% H2/Ar of SR-SO and SR-MO oxide samples, heating rate 10 K.min−1.
Prior to the experiments the oxides were in all cases heated under flowing 5% O2/
He at 773 K (1 h). Adapted from Yeste et al.213 with permission from Elsevier.
74 J. J. Delgado et al.
CO. The SR-MO oxide has weight loss peaks at lower temperatures
than the SR-SO one. Therefore the reducibility of SR-MO under CO
seems higher than that of the SR-SO oxide.
Compared to the corresponding H2-DTG traces, the main reduc-
tion peak in the CO-DTG diagrams is significantly shifted towards
lower temperatures. We should conclude, accordingly, that for both
oxide samples the low-temperature reducibility under flowing 5%
CO/He is higher than that observed in a flow of 5% H2/Ar. From a
thermodynamic point of view, for temperatures below 900 K, the
reducing power of CO is superior to that of H2, the difference pro-
gressively increasing as the temperature decreases. Accordingly, in
the low-temperature range, CO should be expected to behave as a
more effective reductant than H2.
Nevertheless, the question arises again whether the recorded
CO-DTG traces are mainly determined by thermodynamic factors or
if kinetic aspects of the process must also be considered in the inter-
pretation of these diagrams. An analysis of the ultimate OSC data,
shown in Table 2.2 and Fig. 2.14, will shed some light on this issue.
As deduced from Table 2.2 and Fig. 2.14, both the H2-OSC and
CO-OSC data show that, throughout the whole range of investigated
temperatures, the degree of reduction by the SR-MO sample is
higher than for SR-SO. This is a consequence of the change in the
relative thermodynamic stability of the ordered and disordered struc-
tures as a function of the redox state of the samples, Fig. 2.15(a).
Under oxidizing conditions, the higher stability corresponds to the
Table 2.2 Ultimate H2- and CO-OSC values for bare and 0.3% rhodium-loaded
SR-MO and SR-SO oxide samples.
SR-MO/ SR-MO/ 0.3% Rh/ SR-SO/ SR-SO/ 0.3% Rh/
T (K) CO H2 SR-MO/H2 CO H2 SR-SO/H2
473 28 8 45 5 0 23
623 59 45 55 27 2 31
773 72 63 65 47 22 39
973 79 74 75 59 55
1173 83 82 82 69 70 67
Figure 2.14 Evolution with reduction temperature of the ultimate H2-OSC and
CO-OSC values determined for the systems indicated in the legend. Adapted from
Yeste et al.213 with permission from Elsevier.
76 J. J. Delgado et al.
py-Ce2Zr2O8
∆G0
c,t-Ce0.5Zr0.5O2
cc,t-Ce0.5Zr0.5O1.75
c,
py-Ce2Zr2O7
0 100 %Ce3+
(a) (b)
Figure 2.15 (a) The expected change in the relative thermodynamic stability of
the fully oxidized and fully reduced states of the pyrochlore-like and solid-solution-
type phases of a Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 oxide. (b) ∆Gor vs. T plots for CO and H2 oxidation
reactions. Adapted from Yeste et al.213 with permission from Elsevier.
SR-MO
SR-SO
Figure 2.16 Ultimate CO-OSC study. DTG traces corresponding to the stepwise
reduction of SR-MO (full line) and SR-SO (dotted line) in a flow of 5% CO/He.
Heating rate between successive steps: 10 K.min−1. Duration of the isothermal steps:
1 h. Prior to the experiments the oxides were heated under flowing 5% O2/He at
773 K (1 h). Adapted from Yeste et al.213 with permission from Elsevier.
bare oxides, we may notice that, at 473 K, the former are much larger
than the latter. As already discussed, this is unexpected from the
thermodynamic point of view. Actually, in accordance with Fig. 2.15,
if a true equilibrium state had been reached, at 473 K, the CO-OSC
data should be larger than the corresponding H2-OSC values.
Therefore, as for the H2-OSC values, for the bare oxides the
CO-OSC data recorded at the lowest temperatures are determined
by kinetic rather than thermodynamic factors. This conclusion is
also supported by the shape of the stepwise CO-DTG diagrams, as
shown in Fig. 2.16. As clearly shown in the first step of the CO-DTG
trace for SR-MO in Fig. 2.16, after 1 h isothermal heating at 473 K,
the rate of reduction is still measurable, i.e. the equilibrium reduced
state was not reached at the end of this isothermal step. The same is
true for SR-SO even at 623 K, which suggests that the kinetic restric-
tions are, as already happened for H2, even stronger for this sample.
78 J. J. Delgado et al.
80 J. J. Delgado et al.
82 J. J. Delgado et al.
20
15
P·106(torr)
10
0
100 150 200 250
Temperature (K)
84 J. J. Delgado et al.
86 J. J. Delgado et al.
Figure 2.18 Plot of rates of HD formation, and TOF data, at 425 K, against mean Au
nanoparticle size for a series of Au/TiO2(110) model catalysts with the same metal
loading. TOF data are referred to Au surface atom at the perimeter of the metal/
support interface. Reproduced from Fujitani et al.263 with permission from Wiley-VCH.
88 J. J. Delgado et al.
Table 2.3 Some theoretical data for the molecular and dissociative adsorption of
hydrogen on gold single-crystal and cluster surfaces.
Eadsa Eads b
Au Surface (Molecular) (Atomic) Ea Reference
Au{111} −0.9 +41.7 — 262
Au{001} −0.5 +20.2 — 262
Edge atoms of a monoatomic row grown −52.5 −31.2 27.8c 262
on an Au{111} surface
Au25 cluster. Isomer A. Corner −30.1 −25.9 25.0c 262
Au25 cluster. Isomer B. Top −2.1 −9.0 86.0 c
262
Au25 cluster. Isomer B. Corner −3.6 −16.9 9.0c 262
Au7 cluster. Flat structure as in Au{100} — +137.9 188.1 c
258
Au13 cluster. Icosahedron. Corner 0.29 −36.7 30.5d 233
a −1
Notes: Calculated energy for the molecular adsorption of H2 (kJ.molH ). The reference state was the free
2
Au surface and a hydrogen molecule.
b
Calculated energy for the dissociative adsorption of H2 (kJ.molH −1). The reference state was the molecular
2
form of adsorbed H2.
c
Activation energy (kJ.molH2−1) for the dissociation of H2. The reference for the energy of the transition
state was the H2 adsorbed in molecular form.
d
Activation energy (kJ.molH2−1) for the dissociation of H2. The reference for the energy of the transition
state was the free Au cluster and a H2 molecule.
90 J. J. Delgado et al.
reported in Table 2.3 were used as the basis for the elaboration of
these profiles.
As can be seen in Fig. 2.19, the specific nanostructure of the
clusters has a remarkable influence not only on the thermodynam-
ics of the H2 dissociation process, but also, very importantly, on its
kinetics. If the difference between the energy calculated for the
transition state and that of the initial state constituted by a free H2
molecule and the corresponding Au cluster is considered, the
results reported in Corma et al.262 clearly show that even for sites
accomplishing the general structural requirements (coordination
number ≤ 7), the activation energy could be significantly different
depending on the morphology of the Au25 cluster, and for the same
morphology, on the specific nanostructure of the surface site. This
introduces some additional, very subtle, elements to the discussion
of chemical interaction of Au clusters with H2. Also, interestingly, in
contrast to the experimental results that suggested the activated
nature of hydrogen dissociation on supported gold nanoparticles,260
the theoretical calculation mentioned above may be interpreted as
implying that, for some specific morphologies, there are sites on
which the dissociation of H2 could be a non-activated process.
92 J. J. Delgado et al.
9.0 700
8.0 1 600
7.0
Adsorbed amount
6.0
400
5.0
4.0 300
3.0
200
2.0
2 100
1.0
7
7
2 2 1
(b)
Figure 2.20 (a) Volumetric and (b) FTIR studies of the H2–(Au/CZ) interaction.
(a) Isotherms recorded at 308 K on (1) the as-pre-treated catalyst and (2) the
sample resulting from experiment (1) further evacuated for 30 min at 308 K.
(b) Spectra recorded for (1) pre-treated catalyst and at (2) 3 min, (3) 5 min,
(4) 10 min, (5) 15 min, (6) 20 min and (7) 30 min after admission into the IR cell
of 40 torr of H2 at 298 K. Adapted from Collins et al.241 with permission from the
American Chemical Society.
94 J. J. Delgado et al.
96 J. J. Delgado et al.
98 J. J. Delgado et al.
from 1620 cm−1 for Au/TiO2 and Au/ZrO2, to 1800 cm−1 for Au/
CeO2. The assignment was based on isotopic exchange experiments
with D2 described in the same paper270 and discussed in Juárez
et al.,267 a paper in which the Au–H band was proposed to occur at a
much higher frequency 2126 cm−1. Regarding the origin of the
higher frequency at which the Au–H band is found in Au/CeO2
compared to Au/TiO2 and Au/ZrO2 catalysts, Boccuzzi and co-
workers270 suggested on the basis of theoretical calculations266 that it
is most likely due to the negatively charged nature of the Au nano-
particles dispersed on the partly reduced ceria support.
To summarize, despite the limited number of studies dealing
with the adsorption of H2 on Au/CeO2 and closely related catalysts
which have been published, a number of reasonably well supported
conclusions may be drawn. In good agreement with numerous
theoretical and experimental studies carried out on several
other oxide-supported gold catalysts, particularly on Au/TiO2
samples,256,263,265,270,287,305,308 Au nanoparticles supported on ceria and
ceria-containing mixed oxides are able to activate the dissociation of
H2 at room temperature.241,253,270 Volumetric adsorption and FTIR
studies have revealed that, on Au/CZ, at room temperature, the
chemisorption for Au is accompanied by a fast and very strong
spillover effect leading to the practical saturation of the support,
with the simultaneous onset of an IR band at approximately
2130 cm−1, which is usually interpreted as due to Ce3+ species. This
reduction process implies electron transfer from the spilled-over
atoms of hydrogen to the support. Though not confirmed by experi-
ments on gold catalysts yet, this reduction process is expected to be
partly reversible, i.e. re-oxidation of the support may occur by
simple evacuation of the pre-adsorbed hydrogen under appropriate
conditions. Reversible changes in the redox state of the support
associated with hydrogen adsorption/desorption cycles are known
to occur for a number of cerium-containing oxide-supported noble-
metal catalysts.216
In contrast to CO adsorption on Au/CZ catalysts,250–252 to be dis-
cussed at length in Section 2.3.2 of this chapter, no procedures allow-
ing a quantitative estimate of the metal and support contributions to
b
a
b
Figure 2.21 FTIR study of CO adsorption on CZ support (left) and the corre-
sponding Au/CZ catalyst (right). (a) Spectra recorded for the support and catalyst
samples heated in a flow of 5% O2/He at 523 K (1 h), further evacuated at 523 K
(1 h), and finally treated with 100 torr of CO for 30 min at room temperature. (b)
Spectra recorded after 30 min evacuation at 298 K of samples resulting from (a).
Reproduced from Collins et al.241 with permission from Wiley-VCH.
140
120 (1)
(µmole CO/g of catalyst)
(1-2)
100
Adsorbed CO
80
60
(2)
40
(3) (2-3)
20
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 50 100 150 200 250 300
PCO (Torr) PCO (Torr)
(a) (b)
Figure 2.22 Determining the metal and support contributions to the total amount
of CO adsorbed on the catalyst for an AU/CZ sample. (a) First (1) and second
(2) isotherms for Au/CZ, and second isotherm for CZ (3). (b) Difference isotherms
resulting from the subtraction of those in (a): (1–2), and (2–3). Isotherms recorded
at 308 K. Adapted from Cíes et al.251 with permission from Wiley-VCH.
(d)
8 7
3 4 6 9
0.5nm 0.6nm 1.3 nm
1.9nm 5
2.9nm
30 30
25
D = 0.29 D = 0.69 25
= 1.94 ± 0.01 nm = 1.29 ± 0.03 nm
Frequency (%)
Frequency (%)
20 20
15 1 15
10 10
5 5
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 12 14 16 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 12 14 16
Particle Diameter (nm) Particle Diameter (nm)
Figure 2.25 Particle size distributions for catalysts Au-MD (upper left) and Au-HD
(upper right). Difference isotherms (lower) for the CO strongly chemisorbed on
CZ for the Au/CZ-MD () and Au/CZ-HD (T) catalysts, as well the bare CZ support
(•). Adapted from Cíes et al.251 with permission from John Wiley & Sons.
the authors to conclude that the supported gold phase must play a
key role in determining the CO/CZ interaction. Likewise, the
amount of CO adsorbed on Au/CZ-HD is more than double that
determined for Au/CZ-MD. Taking into account that the only sig-
nificant difference between the Au catalysts is their metal disper-
sion, which is higher for the HD sample, it becomes obvious that
metal dispersion, i.e. the Au nanoparticle size distribution, plays an
important role in the process.
Despite the shape of the difference isotherms shown in Fig. 2.25,
which might suggest that a true equilibrium was reached, these
results can only be rationalized by assuming that the irreversible
adsorption of CO on the CZ support is actually controlled by kinetic
factors, and that the presence of the supported Au nanoparticles
makes the first stages of the process much faster.
To understand the influence of metal dispersion on the pro-
cess, a second proposal was made in Cíes et al.251 The growth of the
CO adsorbed phase on the CZ support should follow an annular
model, in which the diffusion of the CO adsorbed on the surface
of the CZ oxide should be the rate-determining step. In accord-
ance with this model, the adsorbed phase would grow around the
Au nanoparticles in the form of annuli, which are assumed to have
the same radius. By using the corresponding Au particle size distri-
bution as an input, Cíes et al.251 were able to make a rough estimate
of this mean radius for both Au/CZ-HD and Au/CZ-MD catalysts.
To simplify their calculations, the surface of the support was
assumed to consist of [111] facets, which have both the highest
thermodynamic stability and the highest surface density of O2−
ions.391 Likewise, in accordance with the stoichiometric require-
ments, one CO molecule was assumed to be adsorbed on two oxide
sites at the surface of the support. Figure 2.26 illustrates the pro-
posed model.
In accordance with the assumptions made, the mean radius
determined for the annuli of the CO phase irreversibly chemisorbed
on the CZ support was found to be 1.7 nm for the Au/CZ-HD sam-
ple and 1.9 nm for the Au/CZ-MD sample. The similarity of the
Figure 2.26 Schematic of the annular (blue) model proposed to interpret the
irreversible adsorption of CO on the CZ support in Au/CZ catalysts. Reproduced
from Cíes et al.251 with permission from John Wiley & Sons.
were not responsible for the reversible changes that occurred in the
FTIR spectra of the Au/CZ sample after alternating oxidizing and
reducing pre-treatments. They proposed, accordingly, that the most
likely interpretation for the observed effects was an SMSI effect,
similar to that originally reported by Tauster et al.,362,393 i.e. the redox
state of the CZ support reversibly modifies the CO adsorption capa-
bility of the gold nanoparticles supported on it.
In addition to the FTIR study, volumetric measurements pro-
vided quantitative information about the CO chemisorbed on the
metal in the series of catalysts resulting from the three redox pre-
treatments successively applied to the same Au/CZ sample. In
accordance with the methodology developed by López-Haro et al.,250
these quantitative data were determined by subtraction of the sec-
ond isotherms recorded for the catalyst pre-treated as indicated
above, and the corresponding bare support. In this particular case,
because one of the investigated Au/CZ samples had been reduced
at 473 K, the second isotherm corresponding to the bare support
was recorded on an oxide previously reduced at 773 K. As revealed
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and
Innovation (FEDER/MICINN programme) through the funding of
projects NANOLANCAT (Ref: MAT2008–00889NAN) and IMAGINE
(MAT2009-CSD-00013). Support from Junta de Andalucía (FQM110
and FQM334 groups) is also gratefully acknowledged. X. Chen
acknowledges the Ramón y Cajal program of the Spanish Ministry of
Science and Innovation. Most of the electron microscopy material
included in this chapter was obtained at the Electron Microscopy
Facilities at SCCyT UCA. Data obtained at the University of Cádiz
were completed with different collaborators developed within the
FP6-I3 Project ESTEEM (Contract number RI-I3–026019).
References
1. Trovarelli, A., ed., Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, Imperial
College Press, London, (2002).
2. Karatzas, X., Jansson, K., Gonzalez, A., Dawody, J., Pettersson, L.J.,
Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 106 (2011) 476–487.
3. Wang, N., Chu, W., Zhang, T., Zhao, X.S., Chem. Eng. J., 170 (2011)
457–463.
4. Sukonket, T., Khan, A., Saha, B., Ibrahim, H., Tantayanon, S., Kumar,
P., Idem, R., Energy Fuels, 25 (2011) 864–877.
5. Halabi, M.H., de Croon, M.H.J.M., van der Schaaf, J., Cobden, P.D.,
Schouten, J.C., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 389 (2010) 68–79.
6. Ambroise, E., Courson, C., Roger, A.C., Kiennemann, A., Blanchard,
G., Rousseau, S., Carrier, X., Marceau, E., La Fontaine, C., Villain, F.,
Catal. Today, 154 (2010) 133–141.
7. Kambolis, A., Matralis, H., Trovarelli, A., Papadopoulou, C., Appl. Catal.
A, Gen., 377 (2010) 16–26.
8. Bampenrat, A., Meeyoo, V., Kitiyanan, B., Rangsunvigit, P.,
Rirksomboon, T., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 373 (2010) 154–159.
9. Dantas, S.C., Escritori, J.C., Soares, R.R., Hori, C.E., Chem. Eng. J., 156
(2010) 380–387.
10. Alphonse, P., Ansart, F., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 336 (2009) 658–666.
11. Yuan, Z., Ni, C., Zhang, C., Gao, D., Wang, S., Xie, Y., Okada, A., Catal.
Today, 146 (2009) 124–131.
12. Damyanova, S., Pawelec, B., Arishtirova, K., Martinez Huerta, M.V.,
Fierro, J.L.G., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 89 (2009) 149–159.
13. Escritori, J.C., Dantas, S.C., Soares, R.R., Hori, C.E., Catal. Commun.,
10 (2009) 1090–1094.
14. Therdthianwong, S., Srisiriwat, N., Therdthianwong, A., Croiset, E.,
Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36 (2011) 2877–2886.
15. Vagia, E.C., Lemonidou, A.A., J. Catal., 269 (2010) 388–396.
16. De Rogatis, L., Montini, T., Casula, M.E., Fornasiero, P., J. Alloys
Compd., 451 (2008) 516–520.
17. Birot, A., Epron, F., Descorme, C., Duprez, D., Appl. Catal. B, Environ.,
79 (2008) 17–25.
18. Yamaguchi, D., Tang, L., Wong, L., Burke, N., Trimm, D., Nguyen, K.,
Chiang, K., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36 (2011) 6646–6656.
19. Sim, A., Cant, N.W., Trimm, D.L., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 35 (2010)
8953–8961.
20. Ambroise, E., Courson, C., Kiennemann, A., Roger, A.C., Pajot, O.,
Samson, E., Blanchard, G., Top. Catal., 52 (2009) 2101–2107.
21. Laosiripojana, N., Kiatkittipong, W., Assabumrungrat, S., A. I. Ch. E.
J., 57 (2011) 2861–2869.
22. Boullosa-Eiras, S., Zhao, T., Chen, D., Holmen, A., Catal. Today, 171
(2011) 104–115.
23. Sadykov, V.A., Sazonova, N.N., Bobin, A.S., Muzykantov, V.S.,
Gubanova, E.L., Alikina, G.M., Lukashevich, A.I., Rogov, V.A.,
Ermakova, E.N., Sadovskaya, E.M., Mezentseva, N.V., Zevak, E.G.,
Veniaminov, S.A., Muhler, M., Mirodatos, C., Schuurman, Y., van
Veen, A.C., Catal. Today, 169 (2011) 125–137.
24. Silva, F.d., Ruiz, J.A.C., de Souza, K.R., Bueno, J.M.C., Mattos, L.V.,
Noronha, F.B., Hori, C.E., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 364 (2009) 122–129.
25. Lanza, R., Canu, P., Jaeras, S.G., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 348 (2008)
221–228.
26. Larrondo, S.A., Kodjaian, A., Fabregas, I., Zimicz, M.G., Lamas, D.G.,
Walsoee de Reca, B.E., Amadeo, N.E., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 33
(2008) 3607–3613.
27. Mortola, V.B., Ruiz, J.A.C., Mattos, L.V., Noronha, F.B., Hori, C.E.,
Catal. Today, 133 (2008) 906–912.
28. Reddy, B.M., Thrimurthulu, G., Katta, L., Catal. Lett., 141 (2011)
572–581.
29. Ayastuy, J.L., Gurbani, A., Gonzalez-Marcos, M.P., Gutierrez-Ortiz,
M.A., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 387 (2010) 119–128.
30. Das, D., Thrimurthulu, G., Lakshmi, K., Reddy, B.M., Int. J. Nanotechnol.,
7 (2010) 1166–1177.
31. Reddy, B.M., Reddy, G.K., Ganesh, I., Ferreira, J.M.F., Catal. Lett., 130
(2009) 227–234.
32. Hosseinpour, N., Khodadadi, A.A., Mortazavi, Y., Bazyari, A., Appl.
Catal. A, Gen., 353 (2009) 271–281.
33. Reddy, B.M., Bharali, P., Seo, Y.H., Prasetyanto, E.A., Park, S.E., Catal.
Lett., 126 (2008) 125–133.
34. Moretti, E., Storaro, L., Talon, A., Lenarda, M., Riello, P., Frattini, R., del
Valle Martinez de Yuso, M., Jimenez-López, A., Rodriguez-Castellon, E.,
Ternero, F., Caballero, A., Holgado, J.P., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 102
(2011) 627–637.
35. Teng, M., Luo, L., Chinese J. Catal., 29 (2008) 1215–1220.
36. Watanabe, K., Miyao, T., Higashiyama, K., Yamashita, H., Watanabe,
M., Catal. Commun., 12 (2011) 976–979.
37. Li, G., Wang, Q., Zhao, B., Shen, M., Zhou, R., J. Hazard. Mater., 186
(2011) 911–920.
38. Wang, Q., Zhao, B., Li, G., Zhou, R., Environ. Sci. Technol., 44 (2010)
3870–3875.
39. Burch, R., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 8 (2006) 5483–5500.
40. Goguet, A., Burch, R., Chen, Y., Hardacre, C., Hu, P., Joyner, R.W.,
Meunier, F., Mun, B.S., Thompsett, D., Tibiletti, D., J. Phys. Chem. C,
111 (2007) 16927–16933.
41. Tibiletti, D., Amieiro-Fonseca, A., Burch, R., Chen, Y., Fisher, J.M.,
Goguet, A., Hardacre, C., Hu, P., Thompsett, D., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109
(2005) 22553–22559.
42. Fu, Q., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Science, 301 (2003)
935–938.
43. Gayen, A., Boaro, M., de Leitenburg, C., Llorca, J., Trovarelli, A., J.
Catal., 270 (2010) 285–298.
44. Boisen, A., Janssens, T.V.W., Schumacher, N., Chorkendorff, I., Dahl, S.,
J. Mol. Catal. A, Chem., 315 (2010) 163–170.
45. Duarte de Farias, A.M., Nguyen-Thanh, D., Fraga, M.A., Appl. Catal. B,
Environ., 93 (2010) 250–258.
46. de Rivas, B., Lopez-Fonseca, R., Sampedro, C., Gutierez-Ortiz, J.I.,
Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 90 (2009) 545–555.
47. Boaro, M., Vicario, M., Llorca, J., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G.,
Trovarelli, A., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 88 (2009) 272–282.
48. Chen, H., Ye, Z., Cui, X., Shi, J., Yan, D., Micropor. Mesopor. Mat., 143
(2011) 368–374.
49. Wang, Q., Li, Z., Zhao, B., Li, G., Zhou, R., J. Mol. Catal. A, Chem., 344
(2011) 132–137.
50. Li, G., Wang, Q., Zhao, B., Zhou, R., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 105
(2011) 151–162.
51. Zhu, C., Liang, H., Li, S., Hong, Y., Ye, D., Chinese J. Inorg. Chem., 27
(2011) 1093–1100.
52. Wang, Q., Li, G., Zhao, B., Zhou, R., J. Hazard. Mater., 189 (2011)
150–157.
53. Wang, Q., Li, G., Zhao, B., Zhou, R., J. Mol. Catal. A, Chem., 339 (2011)
52–60.
54. Han, Z., Wang, J., Yan, H., Shen, M., Wang, J., Wang, W., Yang, M.,
Catal. Today, 158 (2010) 481–489.
55. Zhao, B., Wang, Q., Li, G., Zhou, R., J. Alloys Compd., 508 (2010)
500–506.
56. Wang, Q., Li, G., Zhao, B., Zhou, R., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 100
(2010) 516–528.
57. Li, G., Wang, Q., Zhao, B., Zhou, R., J. Mol. Catal. A, Chem., 326 (2010)
69–74.
58. Zhao, B., Li, G., Ge, C., Wang, Q., Zhou, R., Appl. Catal. B, Environ.,
96 (2010) 338–349.
59. Lamacz, A., Krzton, A., Musi, A., Da Costa, P., Catal. Lett., 128 (2009)
40–48.
60. Shen, M., Yang, M., Wang, J., Wen, J., Zhao, M., Wang, W., J. Phys.
Chem. C, 113 (2009) 3212–3221.
61. Zhang, L., Weng, D., Wang, B., Wu, X., Catal. Commun., 11 (2010)
1229–1232.
62. Specchia, S., Finocchio, E., Busca, G., Palmisano, P., Specchia, V.,
J. Catal., 263 (2009) 134–145.
63. Sanchez Escribano, V., del Hoyo Martinez, C., Fernandez López, E.,
Gallardo Amores, J.M., Busca, G., Catal. Commun., 10 (2009) 861–864.
64. Zhang, Y., Deng, J., Zhang, L., Qiu, W., Dai, H., He, H., Catal. Today,
139 (2008) 29–36.
65. de Rivas, B., Lopez-Fonseca, R., Gonzalez-Velasco, J.R., Gutierrez-
Ortiz, J.I., Catal. Commun., 9 (2008) 2018–2021.
66. López-Haro, M., Perez-Omil, J.A., Hernandez-Garrido, J.C., Trasobares,
S., Hungria, A.B., Cíes, J.M., Midgley, P.A., Bayle-Guillemaud, P.,
Martinez-Arias, A., Bernal, S., Delgado, J.J., Calvino, J.J., Chem. Cat.
Chem, 3 (2011) 1015–1027.
67. Wu, X., Liu, S., Weng, D., Lin, F., Catal. Commun., 12 (2011) 345–348.
68. Silva, R.F., DeOliveira, E., de Sousa Filho, P.C., Neri, C.R., Serra, O.A.,
Quimica Nova, 34 (2011) 759–763.
69. Weng, D., Li, J., Wu, X., Si, Z., J. Environ. Sci., China, 23 (2011)
145–150.
70. Katta, L., Sudarsanam, P., Thrimurthulu, G., Reddy, B.M., Appl. Catal.
B, Environ., 101 (2010) 101–108.
71. Kolli, T., Kanerva, T., Lappalainen, P., Huuhtanen, M., Vippola, M.,
Kinnunen, T., Kallinen, K., Lepisto, T., Lahtinen, J., Keiski, R.L., Top.
Catal., 52 (2009) 2025–2028.
72. Atribak, I., Bueno-Lopez, A., Garcia-Garcia, A., Top. Catal., 52 (2009)
2088–2091.
73. Reddy, B.M., Rao, K.N., Catal. Commun., 10 (2009) 1350–1353.
74. Atribak, I., Bueno-Lopez, A., Garcia-Garcia, A., J. Mol. Catal. A, Chem.,
300 (2009) 103–110.
75. Atribak, I., Bueno-Lopez, A., Garcia-Garcia, A., J. Catal., 259 (2008)
123–132.
76. Sanchez Escribano, V., Fernandez Lopez, E., Gallardo-Amores, J.M.,
del Hoyo Martinez, C., Pistarino, C., Panizza, M., Resini, C., Busca, G.,
Combust. Flame, 153 (2008) 97–104.
77. Liang, Q., Wu, X., Weng, D., Lu, Z., Catal. Commun., 9 (2008) 202–206.
78. Atribak, I., Bueno-Lopez, A., Garcia-Garcia, A., Catal. Commun., 9
(2008) 250–255.
79. Zhong, J.B., Ma, D., He, X.Y., Li, J.Z., Chen, Y.Q., Appl. Surf. Sci., 256
(2010) 2859–2862.
80. Hu, C., Zhu, Q., Jiang, Z., Powder Technol., 194 (2009) 109–114.
81. Gubanova, E.L., Sadykov, V.A., van Veen, A.C., Mirodatos, C., React.
Kinet. Catal. L., 97 (2009) 349–354.
82. Yang, S., Besson, M., Descorme, C., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 100 (2010)
282–288.
83. Kim, K.H., Kim, J.R., Ihm, S.K., J. Hazard. Mater., 167 (2009)
1158–1162.
84. Nousir, S., Keav, S., Barbier J., Jr, Bensitel, M., Brahmi, R., Duprez, D.,
Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 84 (2008) 723–731.
85. Yu, Q., Wu, X., Yao, X., Liu, B., Gao, F., Wang, J., Dong, L., Catal.
Commun., 12 (2011) 1311–1317.
86. Atribak, I., Guillen-Hurtado, N., Bueno-Lopez, A., Garcia-Garcia, A.,
Appl. Surf. Sci., 256 (2010) 7706–7712.
87. Liu, L., Yu, Q., Zhu, J., Wan, H., Sun, K., Liu, B., Zhu, H., Gao, F.,
Dong, L., Chen, Y., J. Colloid. Interface Sci., 349 (2010) 246–255.
88. Zhang, R., Teoh, W.Y., Amal, R., Chen, B., Kaliaguine, S., J. Catal., 272
(2010) 210–219.
89. Yu, Q., Liu, L., Dong, L., Li, D., Liu, B., Gao, F., Sun, K., Dong, L.,
Chen, Y., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 96 (2010) 350–360.
90. Guillen-Hurtado, N., Atribak, I., Bueno-Lopez, A., Garcia-Garcia, A.,
J. Mol. Catal. A, Chem., 323 (2010) 52–58.
91. Atribak, I., Bueno-Lopez, A., Garcia-Garcia, A., Azambre, B., Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 12 (2010) 13770–13779.
92. Adamowska, M., Krzton, A., Najbar, M., Camra, J., Djega-Mariadassou,
G., Da Costa, P., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 90 (2009) 535–544.
93. Haneda, M., Shinoda, K., Nagane, A., Houshito, O., Takagi, H.,
Nakahara, Y., Hiroe, K., Fujitani, T., Hamada, H., J. Catal., 259 (2008)
223–231.
94. Liu, Y., Murata, K., Inaba, M., Takahara, I., Okabe, K., J. Jpn Petrol.
Inst., 53 (2010) 153–159.
95. Gurbuz, E.I., Kunkes, E.L., Dumesic, J.A., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 94
(2010) 134–141.
96. Wang, G., Dai, H., Zhang, L., Deng, J., Liu, C., He, H., Au, C.T., Appl.
Catal. A, Gen., 375 (2010) 272–278.
97. Nedyalkova, R., Niznansky, D., Roger, A.C., Catal. Commun., 10 (2009)
1875–1880.
98. Lee, H.J., Park, S., Jung, J.C., Song, I.K., Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28
(2011) 1518–1522.
99. Lee, H.J., Park, S., Song, I.K., Jung, J.C., Catal. Lett., 141 (2011) 531–537.
100. Hu, Y., Liang, T., Zhou, L., Yu, X., Yin, P., Curr. Nanosci., 6 (2010)
666–668.
101. Gaertner, C.A., Serrano-Ruiz, J.C., Braden, D.J., Dumesic, J.A., Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res., 49 (2010) 6027–6033.
102. Postole, G., Chowdhury, B., Karmakar, B., Pinki, K., Banerji, J.,
Auroux, A., J. Catal., 269 (2010) 110–121.
103. Azizi, Y., Petit, C., Pitchon, V., J. Catal., 256 (2008) 338–344.
104. Boronat, M., Corma, A., Langmuir, 26 (2010) 16607–16614.
105. Campo, B., Volpe, M., Ivanova, S., Touroude, R., J. Catal., 242 (2006)
162–171.
106. Campo, B.C., Ivanova, S., Gigola, C., Petit, C., Volpe, M.A., Catal.
Today, 133–135 (2004) 661–666.
107. Cárdenas-Lizana, F., Gómez-Quero, S., Hugon, A., Delannoy, L.,
Louis, C., Keane, M.A., J. Catal., 262 (2009) 235–243.
108. Cárdenas-Lizana, F., Gómez-Quero, S., Perret, N., Keane, M.A., Gold
Bull., 42 (2009) 124–132.
109. Chen, C.S., Lin, J.H., Chen, H.W., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 298 (2006)
161–167.
110. Chen, Y., Qiu, J., Wang, X., Xiu, J., J. Catal., 242 (2006) 227–230.
111. Cárdenas-Lizana, F., de Pedro, Z.M., Gómez-Quero, S., Keane, M.A.,
J. Molec. Catal. A, Chem., 326 (2010) 48–54.
112. Cárdenas-Lizana, F., Gómez-Quero, S., Idriss, H., Keane, M.A.,
J. Catal., 268 (2009) 223–234.
113. Hutchings, G.J., Hall, M.S., Carley, A.F., Landon, P., Solsona, B.E.,
Kiely, C.J., Herzing, A., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Overweg, A.,
J. Catal., 242 (2006) 71–81.
114. Kartusch, C., van Bokhoven, J.A., Gold Bull., 42 (2009) 343–347.
115. Li, S.-C., Diebold, U., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132 (2010) 64–66.
116. McEwan, L., Julius, M., Roberts, S., Fletcher, J.C.Q., Gold Bull., 43
(2010) 298–306.
117. Mertens, P., Wahlen, J., Ye, X., Poelman, H., De Vos, D., Catal. Lett.,
118 (2007) 15–21.
118. Milone, C., Trapani, M.C., Galvagno, S., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 337
(2008) 163–167.
119. Mohr, C., Hofmeister, H., Claus, P., J. Catal., 213 (2003) 86–94.
120. Nikolaev, S.A., Smirnov, V.V., Gold Bull., 42 (2009) 182–189.
121. Okumura, M., Akita, T., Haruta, M., Catal. Today, 74 (2002) 265–269.
122. Claus, P., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 291 (2005) 222–229.
123. Schimpf, S., Lucas, M., Mohr, C., Rodemerck, U., Bruckner, A.,
Radnik, J., Hofmeister, H., Claus, P., Catal. Today, 72 (2002) 63–78.
124. Segura, Y., Lopez, N., Perez-Ramirez, J., J. Catal., 247 (2007) 383–386.
125. Wang, C.M., Fan, K.N., Liu, Z.P., J. Catal., 266 (2009) 343–350.
126. Haruta, M., Kobayashi, T., Sano, H., Yamada, N., Chem. Lett., 16 (1987)
405–408.
127. Haruta, M., Kobayashi, K., Sano, H., Yamada, N., Chem. Lett., (1987)
405–408.
128. Haruta, M., Kobayashi, K., Tsubota, S., Nakahara, Y., Chem. Express., 3
(1988) 159.
129. Haruta, M., Yamada, N., Kobayashi, T., Iijima, S., J. Catal., 115 (1989)
301–309.
149. Ward, E.P.W., Yates, T.J.V., Fernandez, J.J., Vaughan, D.E.W., Midgley,
P.A., J. Phys. Chem. C, 111 (2007) 11501–11505.
150. Midgley, P.A., Thomas, J.M., Laffont, L., Weyland, M., Raja, R.,
Johnson, B.F.G., Khimyak, T., J. Phys. Chem. B, 108 (2004) 4590–4592.
151. Laffont, L., Weyland, M., Raja, R., Thomas, J.M., Midgley, P.A., Elec.
Microsc. Ana., 2003, (2004) 459–462.
152. Midgley, P.A., Weyland, M., Ultramicroscopy, 96 (2003) 413–431.
153. Midgley, P.A., Weyland, M., Thomas, J.M., Gai, P.L., Boyes, E.D.,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 41 (2002) 3804–3807.
154. Weyland, M., Midgley, P.A., Thomas, J.M., J. Phys. Chem. B, 105 (2001)
7882–7886.
155. Midgley, P.A., Weyland, M., Thomas, J.M., Johnson, B.F.G., Chem.
Commun., (2001) 907–908.
156. Liu, J., Chem. Cat. Chem., 3 (2011) 934–948.
157. Thomas, J.M., Midgley, P.A., Chem. Cat. Chem., 2 (2010) 783–798.
158. Krumeich, F., Mueller, E., Wepf, R.A., Nesper, R., J. Phys. Chem. C, 115
(2011) 1080–1083.
159. Hansen, T.W., Wagner, J.B., Dunin-Borkowski, R.E., Mater. Sci. Technol.,
26 (2010) 1338–1344.
160. Nellist, P.D., Kirkland, A.I., Philos. Mag., 90 (2010) 4751–4767.
161. Gai, P.L., Boyes, E.D., Electron Microscopy and Analysis Group
Conference 2009 (Emag 2009), 241 (2010) 012055.
162. Thomas, J.M., Gal, P.L., Adv. Catal., 48 (2004) 171–227.
163. Pijolat, M., Prin, M., Soustelle, M., Touret, O., Nortier, P., J. Chem. Soc.,
Faraday T., 91 (1995) 3941–3948.
164. Cuif, J.P., Blanchard, G., Touret, O., Seigneurin, A., Marczi, M.,
Quemere, E., SAE Technical Paper 970463 (1997).
165. Ozawa, M., Kimura, M., Isogai, A., J. Alloys Compd., 193 (1993) 73–75.
166. Haneda, M., Miki, K., Kakuta, N., Ueno, A., Tani, S., Matsuura, S.,
Sato, M., Nihon Kagaku Kaishi, (1990) 820.
167. Ohata, T., Rare Earths, 17 (1990) 37.
168. Murota, T., Hasegawa, T., Aozasa, S., Matsui, H., Motoyama, M.,
J. Alloys Compd., 193 (1993) 298–299.
169. Rao, G.R., Kašpar, J., Meriani, S., Di Monte, R., Graziani, M., Catal.
Lett., 24 (1994) 107–112.
170. Ozawa, M., Kimura, M., Isogai, A., J. Alloys Compd., 193 (1993) 73–75.
171. Trovarelli, A., Zamar, F., Llorca, J., De Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G.,
Kiss, J.T., J. Catal., 169 (1997) 490–502.
172. Rao, G.R., Fornasiero, P., Kašpar, J., Meriani, S., Monte, R.D.,
Graziani, M., Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 96 (1995) 631–643.
173. Fornasiero, P., Dimonte, R., Rao, G.R., Kašpar, J., Meriani, S.,
Trovarelli, A., Graziani, M., J. Catal., 151 (1995) 168–177.
174. Fornasiero, P., Fonda, E., Di Monte, R., Vlaic, G., Kašpar, J., Graziani,
M., J. Catal., 187 (1999) 177–185.
175. Vlaic, G., Di Monte, R., Fornasiero, P., Fonda, E., Kašpar, J., Graziani,
M., J. Catal., 182 (1999) 378–389.
176. Boaro, M., De Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A., J. Catal., 193
(2000) 338–347.
177. Hickey, N., Fornasiero, P., Kašpar, J., Graziani, M., Blanco, G., Bernal,
S., Chem. Commun., (2000) 357–358.
178. Hickey, N., Fornasiero, P., Kašpar, J., Gatica, J.M., Bernal, S., J. Catal.,
200 (2001) 181–193.
179. Baker, R.T., Bernal, S., Blanco, G., Cordon, A.M., Pintado, J.M.,
Rodriguez-Izquierdo, J.M., Fally, F., Perrichon, V., Chem. Commun.,
(1999) 149–150.
180. Fornasiero, P., Balducci, G., Kašpar, J., Meriani, S., Di Monte, R.,
Graziani, M., Catal. Today, 29 (1996) 47–52.
181. Fornasiero, P., Balducci, G., Di Monte, R., Kašpar, J., Sergo, V.,
Gubitosa, G., Ferrero, A., Graziani, M., J. Catal., 164 (1996) 173–183.
182. Perrichon, V., Laachir, A., Bergeret, G., Fréty, R., Tournayan, L.,
Touret, O., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T., 90 (1994) 773–781.
183. Laachir, A., Perrichon, V., Badri, A., Lamotte, J., Catherine, E.,
Lavalley, J.C., El Fallah, J., Hilaire, L., Le Normand, F., Quéméré, E.,
Sauvion, G.N., Touret, O., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T., 87 (1991)
1601–1609.
184. Izu, N., Omata, T., Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, S., J. Alloys Compd., 270 (1998)
107–114.
185. Fornasiero, P., Montini, T., Graziani, M., Kašpar, J., Hungría, A.B.,
Martínez-Arias, A., Conesa, J.C., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 4 (2002)
149–159.
186. Montini, T., Bañares, M.A., Hickey, N., Di Monte, R., Fornasiero, P.,
Kašpar, J., Graziani, M., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 6 (2004) 1–3.
187. Montini, T., Hickey, N., Fornasiero, P., Graziani, M., Bañares, M.A.,
Martínez-Huerta, M.V., Alessandri, I., Depero, L.E., Chem. Mater., 17
(2005) 1157–1166.
188. Yashima, M., Arashi, H., Kakihana, M., Yoshimura, M., J. Am. Ceram.
Soc., 77 (1994) 1067–1071.
189. Yashima, M., Sasaki, S., Yamaguchi, Y., Kakihana, M., Yoshimura, M.,
Mori, T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 72 (1998) 182–184.
190. Kishimoto, H., Omata, T., Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, S., Ueda, K., Hosono,
H., Kawazoe, H., J. Alloys Compd., 312 (2000) 94–103.
191. Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, S., Omata, T., Izu, N., Kishimoto, H., J. Solid State
Chem., 138 (1998) 47–54.
192. Perez Omil, J.A., Bernal, S., Calvino, J.J., Hernández, J.C., Mira, C.,
Rodríguez-Luque, M.P., Erni, R., Browning, N.D., Chem. Mater., 17
(2005) 4282–4285.
193. Sasaki, T., Ukyo, Y., Kuroda, K., Arai, S., Saka, H., J. Electron. Microsc.,
52 (2003) 309–312.
194. Sasaki, T., Ukyo, Y., Suda, A., Sugiura, M., Kuroda, K., Arai, S., Saka,
H., J. Ceram. Soc. Japan, 111 (2003) 382–385.
195. Torng, S., Miyazawa, K., Suzuki, K., Sakuma, T., Philos. Mag. A, 70 (1994)
505.
196. Masui, T., Ozaki, T., Adachi, G., Kang, Z., Eyring, L., Chem. Lett.,
(2000) 840–841.
197. Hernández, J.C., Hungría, A.B., Pérez-Omil, J.A., Trasobares, S.,
Bernal, S., Midgley, P.A., Alavi, A., Calvino, J.J., J. Phys. Chem. C, 111
(2007) 9001–9004.
198. Pennycook, S.J., Jesson, D.E., Ultramicroscopy, 37 (1991), 14.
199. Trasobares, S., López-Haro, M., Kociak, M., March, K., de la Peña, F.,
Perez-Omil, J.A., Calvino, J.J., Lugg, N.R., D’Alfonso, A.J., Allen, L.J.,
Colliex, C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 50 (2011) 868–872.
200. Izu, N., Kishimoto, H., Omata, T., Yao, T., Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, S., Sci.
Technol. Adv. Mat., 2 (2001) 443–448.
201. Izu, N., Kishimoto, H., Omata, T., Ono, K., Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, S., Sci.
Technol. Adv. Mat., 2 (2001) 397–404.
202. Colon, G., Pijolat, M., Valdivieso, F., Vidal, H., Kašpar, J., Finocchio, E.,
Daturi, M., Binet, C., Lavalley, J.C., Baker, R.T., Bernal, S., J. Chem. Soc.
Faraday T., 94 (1998) 3717–3726.
203. Colon, G., Valdivieso, F., Pijolat, M., Baker, R.T., Calvino, J.J., Bernal,
S., Catal. Today, 50 (1999) 271–284.
204. Shah, P.R., Kim, T., Zhou, G., Fornasiero, P., Gorte, R.J., Chem. Mater.,
18 (2006) 5363–5369.
205. Zhou, G., Shah, P.R., Kim, T., Fornasiero, P., Gorte, R.J., Catal. Today,
123 (2007) 86–93.
206. Wang, H.-F., Guo, Y.-L., Lu, G.-Z., Hu, P., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 48
(2009) 8289–8292.
207. Yeste, M.P., Hernández, J.C., Bernal, S., Blanco, G., Calvino, J.J., Pérez-
Omil, J.A., Pintado, J.M., Chem. Mater., 18 (2006) 2750–2757.
208. Yeste, M.P., Hernandez, J.C., Trasobares, S., Bernal, S., Blanco, G.,
Calvino, J.J., Perez-Omil, J.A., Pintado, J.M., Chem. Mater., 20 (2008)
5107–5113.
209. Bernal, S., Calving, J.J., Cifredo, G.A., Rodríguez-Izquierdo, J.M.,
Perrichon, V., Laachir, A., J. Catal., 137 (1992) 1–11.
210. Bernal, S., Calvino, J.J., Cifredo, G.A., Rodríguez-Izquierdo, J.M.,
J. Phys. Chem., 99 (1995) 11794–11796.
211. Norman, A., Perrichon, V., Bensaddik, A., Lemaux, S., Bitter, H.,
Koningsberger, D., Top. Catal., 16–17 (2001) 363–368.
212. Bernal, S., Blanco, G., Calvino, J.J., Hernández, J.C., Pérez-Omil, J.A.,
Pintado, J.M., Yeste, M.P., J. Alloys Compd., 451 (2008) 521–525.
213. Yeste, M.P., Hernandez, J.C., Bernal, S., Blanco, G., Calvino, J.J., Pérez-
Omil, J.A., Pintado, J.M., Catal. Today, 141 (2009) 409–414.
214. Mondelli, C., Santo, V.D., Trovarelli, A., Boaro, M., Fusi, A., Psaro, R.,
Recchia, S., Catal. Today, 113 (2006) 81–86.
215. Boaro, M., Giordano, F., Recchia, S., Santo, V.D., Giona, M., Trovarelli, A.,
Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 52 (2004) 225–237.
216. Bernal, S., Calvino, J.J., Gatica, J.M., López-Cartes, C., Pintado, J.M.,
in Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, ed. A. Trovarelli, Imperial
College Press, London, (2002), pp. 85–168.
217. Hutchings, G.J., Dalton T., (2008) 5523–5536.
218. Bond, G.C., Louis, C., Thompson, D.T., Catalysis by Gold, Imperial
College Press, London, (2006).
219. Bond, G.C., Thompson, D.T., Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 41 (1999) 319–388.
220. Meyer, R., Lemire, C., Shaikhutdinov, S.K., Freund, H.J., Gold Bull., 37
(2004) 72–124.
239. Concepcion, P., Carrettin, S., Corma, A., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 307
(2006) 42–45.
240. Tabakova, T., Boccuzzi, F., Manzoli, M., Sobczak, J.W., Idakiev, V.,
Andreeva, D., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 298 (2006) 127–143.
241. Collins, S.E., Cíes, J.M., del Río, E., López-Haro, M., Trasobares, S.,
Calvino, J.J., Pintado, J.M., Bernal, S., J. Phys. Chem. C, 111 (2007)
14371–14379.
242. Diemant, T., Hartmann, H., Bansmann, J., Behm, R.J., J. Catal., 252
(2007) 171–177.
243. Chen, M., Goodman, D.W., Chem. Soc. Rev., 37 (2008) 1860–1870.
244. Avgouropoulos, G., Manzoli, M., Boccuzzi, F., Tabakova, T.,
Papavasiliou, J., Ioannides, T., Idakiev, V., J. Catal., 256 (2008) 237–247.
245. Weststrate, C.J., Resta, A., Westerström, R., Lundgren, E., Mikkelsen, A.,
Andersen, J.N., J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008) 6900–6906.
246. Weststrate, C.J., Westerström, R., Lundgren, E., Mikkelsen, A.,
Andersen, J.N., Resta, A., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 724–728.
247. Baron, M., Bondarchuk, O., Stacchiola, D., Shaikhutdinov, S., Freund,
H.J., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 6042–6049.
248. Menegazzo, F., Pinna, F., Signoretto, M., Trevisan, V., Boccuzzi, F.,
Chiorino, A., Manzoli, M., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 356 (2009) 31–35.
249. Vindigni, F., Manzoli, M., Chiorino, A., Boccuzzi, F., Gold Bull., 42
(2009) 106–112.
250. López-Haro, M., Delgado, J.J., Cíes, J.M., del Río, E., Bernal, S.,
Burch, R., Cauqui, M.A., Trasobares, S., Pérez-Omil, J.A., Bayle-
Guillemaud, P., Calvino, J.J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 49 (2010) 1981–1985.
251. Cíes, J.M., Delgado, J.J., López-Haro, M., Pilasombat, R., Trasobares, S.,
Bernal, S., Calvino, J.J., Chem. Eur. J., 16 (2010) 9536–9543.
252. Cíes, J.M., del Río, E., López-Haro, M., Delgado, J.J., Blanco, G.,
Collins, S.E., Calvino, J.J., Bernal, S., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 49 (2010)
9744–9748.
253. Tabakova, T., Manzoli, M., Vindigni, F., Idakiev, V., Boccuzzi, F., J. Phys.
Chem. A, 114 (2010) 3909–3915.
254. Brown, M.A., Fujimori, Y., Ringle, F., Shao, X., Stavale, F., Nilius, N.,
Sterrer, M., Freund, H.-J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133 (2011) 10668–10676.
255. Sun, K., Kohyama, M., Tanaka, S., Takeda, S., J. Comput. Chem., 32
(2011) 3276–3282.
256. Panayotov, D.A., Burrows, S.P., Yates Jr., J.T., Morris, J.R., J. Phys. Chem.
C, 115 (2011) 22400–22408.
257. Hammer, B., Norskov, J.K., Nature, 376 (1995) 238–240.
258. Stromsnes, H., Jusuf, S., Schimmelpfennig, B., Wahlgren, U., Gropen, O.,
J. Mol. Struct., 567–568 (2001) 137–143.
259. Gluhoi, A.C., Vreeburg, H.S., Bakker, J.W., Nieuwenhuys, B.E., Appl.
Catal. A, Gen., 291 (2005) 145–150.
260. Bus, E., Miller, J.T., van Bokhoven, J.A., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (2005)
14581–14587.
261. Bus, E., van Bokhoven, J.A., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9 (2007)
2894–2902.
262. Corma, A., Boronat, M., González, S., Illas, F., Chem. Commun., (2007)
3371–3373.
263. Fujitani, T., Nakamura, I., Akita, T., Okumura, M., Haruta, M., Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed., 48 (2009) 9515–9518.
264. Guzmán, C., Del Angel, G., Gómez, R., Galindo, F., Zanella, R.,
Torres, G., Angeles-Chavez, C., Fierro, J.L.G., J. Nano. Res., 5 (2009)
13–23.
265. Boronat, M., Illas, F., Corma, A., J. Phys. Chem. A, 113 (2009)
3750–3757.
266. Zhao, S., Ren, Y., Ren, Y., Wang, J., Yin, W., J. Phys. Chem. A, 114 (2010)
4917–4923.
267. Juárez, R., Parker, S.F., Concepción, P., Corma, A., García, H., Chem.
Sci., 1 (2010) 731–738.
268. Nakamura, I., Mantoku, H., Furukawa, T., Fujitani, T., J. Phys. Chem. C,
115 (2011) 16074–16080.
269. Joshi, A.M., Delgass, W.N., Thomson, K.T., Top. Catal., 44 (2011)
27–39.
270. Manzoli, M., Chiorino, A., Vindigni, F., Boccuzzi, F., Catal. Today, 181
(2012) 62–67.
271. Oh, H.S., Yang, J.H., Costello, C.K., Wang, Y.M., Bare, S.R., Kung, H.H.,
Kung, M.C., J. Catal., 210 (2002) 375–386.
272. Guzmán, J., Carrettin, S., Corma, A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127 (2005)
3286–3287.
273. Guzmán, J., Carrettin, S., Fierro-González, J.C., Hao, Y., Gates, B.C.,
Corma, A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44 (2005) 4778–4781.
274. Kotobuki, M., Leppelt, R., Hansgen, D.A., Widmann, D., Behm, R.J.,
J. Catal., 264 (2009) 67–76.
275. Tost, A., Widmann, D., Behm, R.J., J. Catal., 266 (2009) 299–307.
276. Widmann, D., Liu, Y., Schuth, F., Behm, R.J., J. Catal., 276 (2010)
292–305.
277. Roldan, A., Ricart, J.M., Illas, F., Pacchioni, G., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
12 (2010) 10723–10729.
278. Roldán, A., Ricart, J.M., Illas, F., Theor. Chem. Acc., 128 (2011)
675–681.
279. Boronat, M., Corma, A., Dalton T., 39 (2010) 8538–8546.
280. Wang, L.C., Jin, H.J., Widmann, D., Weissmüller, J., Behm, R.J.,
J. Catal., 278 (2011) 219–227.
281. Widmann, D., Behm, R.J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 50 (2011)
10241–10245.
282. Fu, Q., Wagner, T., Surf. Sci. Reports, 62 (2007) 431–498.
283. Senanayake, S.D., Stacchiola, D., Liu, P., Mullins, C.B., Hrebk, J.,
Rodriguez, J.A., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 19536–19544.
284. Chen, M., Goodman, D.W., Acc. Chem. Res., 39 (2006) 739–746.
285. Risse, T., Shaikhutdinov, S., Nilius, N., Sterrer, M., Freund, H.-J., Acc.
Chem. Res., 41 (2008) 949–956.
286. Iizuka, Y., Fujiki, H., Ymauchi, N., Chijiiwa, T., Arai, S., Tsubota, S.,
Haruta, M., Catal. Today, 36 (1997) 115–123.
287. Panayotov, D.A., Yates, J.T., J. Phys. Chem. C, 111 (2007) 2959–2964.
288. Chiorino, A., Manzoli, M., Menegazzo, F., Signoretto, M., Vindigni, F.,
Pinna, F., Boccuzzi, F., J. Catal., 262 (2009) 169–176.
289. Roze, E., Quinet, E., Caps, V., Bianchi, D., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009)
8194–8200.
290. Juárez, R., Parker, S.F., Concepción, P., Corma, A., García, H., Chem.
Sci., 1 (2010) 731–738.
291. Green, I.X., Tang, W., Neurock, M., Yates, J.T., Science, 333 (2011)
736–739.
292. Zhou, Z., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Saltsburg, H., J. Catal., 280
(2011) 255–263.
293. Phala, N.S., Klatt, G., Steen, E.v., Chem. Phys. Lett., 395 (2004) 33–37.
294. Varganov, S.A., Olson, R.M., Gordon, M.S., Mills, G., Metiu, H.,
J. Chem. Phys., 120 (2004) 5169–5175.
295. Loffreda, D., Piccolo, L., Sautet, P., Phys. Rev. B, 71 (2005)
113414-1–4.
296. Barnard, A.S., Lin, X.M., Curtiss, L.A., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (2005)
24465–24472.
297. Fielicke, A., von Helden, G., Meijer, G., Pedersen, D.B., Simard, B.,
Rayner, D.M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127 (2005) 8416–8423.
298. Wörz, A.S., Heiz, U., Cinquini, F., Pacchioni, G., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109
(2005) 18418–18426.
299. Rashkeev, S.N., Lupini, A.R., Overbury, S.H., Pennycook, S.J.,
Pantelides, S.T., Phys. Rev. B, 76 (2007) 035438-1–8.
300. Hvolbaek, B., Janssens, T.V.W., Clausen, B.S., Falsig, H., Christensen,
C., Norskov, J.K., Nanotoday, 2 (2007) 14–18.
301. Janssens, T.V.W., Clausen, B.S., Hvolbaek, B., Falsig, H., Christensen,
C., Bligaard, T., Norskov, J.K., Top. Catal., 44 (2007) 15–26.
302. Huang, W., Ji, M., Dong, C.-D., Gu, X., Wang, L.-M., Gong, X.G.,
Wang, L.-S., ACS Nano, 2 (2008) 897–904.
303. Ojifinni, R.A., Froemming, N.S., Gong, J., Pan, M., Kim, T.S., White,
J.M., Henkelman, G., Mullins, C.B., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130 (2008)
6801–6812.
304. Coquet, R., Howard, K.L., Willock, D.J., Chem. Soc. Rev., 37 (2008)
2046–2076.
305. Boronat, M., Concepción, P., Corma, A., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009)
16772–16784.
306. Zhu, W.J., Zhang, J., Gong, X.Q., Lu, G., Catal. Today, 165 (2011)
19–24.
307. Brodersen, S.H., Gronbjerg, U., Hvolbaek, B., Schiotz, J., J. Catal., 284
(2011) 34–41.
308. Green, I.X., Tang, W., Neurock, M., Yates, J.T., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
50 (2011) 10186–10189.
309. Golunski, S., Rajaram, R., Hodge, N., Hutchings, G.J., Kiely, C.J.,
Catal. Today, 72 (2002) 107–113.
310. Carrettin, S., Concepción, P., Corma, A., López-Nieto, J.M., Puntes,
V.F., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 43 (2004) 2538–2540.
311. Venezia, A.M., Pantaleo, G., Longo, A., Di Carlo, G., Casaletto, M.P.,
Liotta, F.L., Deganello, G., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (2005) 2821–2827.
312. Arena, F., Famulari, P., Trunfio, G., Bonura, G., Frusteri, F., Spadaro, L.,
Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 66 (2006) 81–91.
313. Lai, S.Y., Qiu, Y., Wang, S., J. Catal., 237 (2006) 303–313.
314. Pillai, U.R., Deevi, S., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 299 (2006) 266–273.
315. Lu, J.-L., Gao, H.-J., Shaikhutdinov, S., Freund, H.J., Catal. Lett., 114
(2007) 8–16.
316. Shapovalov, V., Metiu, H., J. Catal., 245 (2007) 205–214.
317. Tang, Z.R., Edwards, J.K., Bartley, J.K., Taylor, S.H., Carley, A.F.,
Herzing, A.A., Kiely, C.J., Hutchings, G.J., J. Catal., 249 (2007)
208–219.
318. Wang, S.P., Zhang, T.Y., Wang, X.Y., Zhang, S.M., Wang, S.R., Huang,
W.P., Wu, S.H., J. Molec. Catal. A, Chem., 272 (2007) 45–52.
319. Widmann, D., Leppelt, R., Behm, R.J., J. Catal., 251 (2007) 437–442.
320. Dobrosz-Gómez, I., Kocemba, I., Rynkowski, J.M., Appl. Catal. B,
Environ., 83 (2008) 240–255.
321. Aguilar-Guerrero, V., Lobo-Lapidus, R.J., Gates, B.C., J. Phys. Chem. C,
113 (2009) 3259–3269.
322. Dobrosz-Gómez, I., Kocemba, I., Rynkowski, J.M., Catal. Lett., 128
(2009) 297–306.
323. Dobrosz-Gómez, I., Kocemba, I., Rynkowski, J.M., Appl. Catal. B,
Environ., 88 (2009) 83–97.
324. Huang, X.S., Sun, H., Wang, L.C., Liu, Y.M., Fan, K.N., Cao, Y., Appl.
Catal. B, Environ., 90 (2009) 224–232.
325. Li, Q., Zhang, Y., Chen, G., Fan, J., Lan, H., Yang, Y., J. Catal., 273
(2010) 167–176.
326. Liotta, L.F., Di Carlo, G., Pantaleo, G., Venezia, A.M., Catal. Today, 158
(2010) 56–62.
327. Shimada, S., Takei, T., Akita, T., Takeda, S., Haruta, M., Stud. Surf. Sci.
Catal., 175 (2010) 843–847.
328. del Río, E., Blanco, G., Collins, S.E., López-Haro, M., Chen, X.,
Delgado, J.J., Calvino, J.J., Bernal, S., Top. Catal., 54 (2011)
931–940.
329. Fu, Q., Weber, A., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Catal. Lett., 77 (2001)
87–95.
330. Fu, Q., Kudriavtseva, S., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M.,
Chem. Eng. J., 93 (2003) 41–53.
331. Jacobs, G., Chenu, E., Patterson, P.M., Williams, L., Sparks, D.,
Thomas, G., Davis, B.H., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 258 (2004) 203–214.
332. Liu, Z.-P., Jenkins, S., King, D.A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 94 (2005) 196102-1–4.
333. Deng, W., Jesus, J.D., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Appl.
Catal. A, Gen., 291 (2005) 126–135.
334. Fu, Q., Deng, W., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Appl.
Catal. B, Environ., 56 (2005) 57–68.
335. Deng, W., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 45
(2006) 2285–2289.
336. Jacobs, G., Ricote, S., Davis, B.H., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 302 (2006)
14–21.
337. Kim, C.H., Thompson, L.T., J. Catal., 244 (2006) 248–250.
338. Leppelt, R., Schumacher, B., Plzak, V., Kinne, M., Behm, R.J., J. Catal.,
244 (2006) 137–152.
339. Amieiro-Fonseca, A., Fisher, J.M., Ozkaya, D., Shannon, M.D.,
Thompsett, D., Top. Catal., 44 (2007) 223–235.
340. Denkwitz, Y., Karpenko, A., Plzak, V., Leppelt, R., Schumacher, B.,
Behm, R.J., J. Catal., 246 (2007) 74–90.
341. Karpenko, A., Leppelt, R., Cai, J., Plzak, V., Chuvilin, A., Kaiser, U.,
Behm, R.J., J. Catal., 250 (2007) 139–150.
342. Karpenko, A., Leppelt, R., Plzak, V., Behm, R.J., J. Catal., 252 (2007)
231–242.
343. Karpenko, A., Denkwitz, Y., Plzak, V., Cai, J., Leppelt, R., Schumacher,
B., Behm, R.J., Catal. Lett., 116 (2007) 105–115.
344. Meunier, F.C., Reid, D., Goguet, A., Shekhtman, S., Hardacre, C.,
Burch, R., Deng, W., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., J. Catal., 247 (2007)
277–287.
345. Meunier, F.C., Goguet, A., Hardacre, C., Burch, R., Thompsett, D.,
J. Catal., 252 (2007) 18–22.
346. Rodríguez, J.A., Liu, P., Hrbek, J., Evans, J., Pérez, M., Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed., 46 (2007) 1329–1332.
347. Daly, H., Ni, J., Thompsett, D., Meunier, F.C., J. Catal., 254 (2008)
238–243.
348. Andreeva, D., Ivanov, I., Ilieva, L., Abrashev, M.V., Zanella, R.,
Sobczak, J.W., Lisowski, W., Kantcheva, M., Avdeev, G., Petrov, K.,
Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 357 (2009) 159–169.
349. Abd El-Moemen, A., Karpenko, A., Denkwitz, Y., Behm, R.J., J. Power
Sources, 190 (2009) 64–75.
350. Boaro, M., Vicario, M., Llorca, J., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G.,
Trovarelli, A., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 88 (2009) 272–282.
351. Bond, G., Gold Bull., 42 (2009) 337–342.
352. Andreeva, D., Kantcheva, M., Ivanov, I., Ilieva, L., Sobczak, J.W.,
Lisowski, W., Catal. Today, 158 (2010) 69–77.
353. Boisen, A., Janssens, T.V.W., Schumacher, N., Chorkendorff, I., Dahl,
S., J. Molec. Catal. A, Chem., 315 (2010) 163–170.
354. Daly, H., Goguet, A., Hardacre, C., Meunier, F.C., Pilasombat, R.,
Thompsett, D., J. Catal., 273 (2010) 257–265.
355. Wang, Y., Liang, S., Cao, A., Thompson, R.L., Veser, G., Appl. Catal. B,
Environ., 99 (2010) 89–95.
356. Rodriguez, J.A., Catal. Today, 160 (2011) 3–10.
357. Luengnaruemitchai, A., Osuwan, S., Gulari, E., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy,
29 (2004) 429–435.
358. Trimm, D.L., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 296 (2005) 1–11.
359. Ilieva, L., Pantaleo, G., Ivanov, I., Maximova, A., Zanella, R., Kaszkur, Z.,
Venezia, A.M., Andreeva, D., Catal. Today, 158 (2010) 44–55.
360. Laguna, O.H., Romero Sarria, F., Centeno, M.A., Odriozola, J.A.,
J. Catal., 276 (2010) 360–370.
361. Yi, G., Yang, H., Li, B., Lin, H., Tanaka, K.I., Yuan, Y., Catal. Today, 157
(2010) 83–88.
362. Tauster, S.J., Fung, S.C., Garten, R.L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 100 (1978)
170–175.
363. Bernal, S., Calvino, J.J., Cauqui, M.A., Gatica, J.M., Larese, C., Perez
Omil, J.A., Pintado, J.M., Catal. Today, 50 (1999) 175–206.
364. Gatica, J.M., Baker, R.T., Fornasiero, P., Bernal, S., Blanco, G., Kašpar,
J., J. Phys. Chem. B, 104 (2000) 4667–4672.
365. Gatica, J.M., Baker, R.T., Fornasiero, P., Bernal, S., Kašpar, J., J. Phys.
Chem. B, 105 (2001) 1191–1199.
366. Sault, A.G., Madix, R.J., Campbell, C.T., Surf. Sci., 169 (1986) 347–356.
367. Lisowski, E., Stobinski, L., Dus, R., Surf. Sci., 188 (1987) L735–L741.
368. Stobinski, L., Appl. Surf. Sci., 103 (1996) 503–508.
369. Sermon, P.A., Bond, G.C., Wells, P.B., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T. 1, 75
(1979) 385–394.
388. Mehmood, F., Kara, A., Rahman, T.S., Henry, C.R., Phys. Rev. B, 79
(2009) 075422.
389. Mavrikakis, M., Stoltze, P., Norskov, J.K., Catal. Lett., 64 (2000)
101–106.
390. Bianchi, C.L., Pirola, C., Ragaini, V., Catal. Commun., 7 (2006)
669–672.
391. Nolan, M., Grigoleit, S., Sayle, D.C., Parker, S.C., Watson, G.W., Surf.
Sci., 576 (2005) 217–229.
392. Loschen, C., Bromley, S.T., Neyman, K.M., Illas, F., J. Phys. Chem. C,
111 (2007) 10142–10145.
393. Tauster, S.J., Acc. Chem. Res., 20 (1987) 389–394.
CHAPTER 3
3.1 Scope
The use of powerful analytical methodologies for the evaluation of
the oxygen storage capacity (OSC) and essential parameters of the
transient kinetics of oxygen storage and release in model and com-
mercial three-way catalysts (TWCs) are described in this chapter.
Sequences of alternate pulses or step changes in the feed-gas com-
position made at the inlet of a catalytic microreactor, temperature-
programmed, and transient isothermal 16O/18O isotopic exchange
methodologies are reviewed, with an emphasis on their power to
efficiently characterize oxygen mobility in CexZr1−xO2-based oxygen
storage components presently used in modern TWCs. An attempt is
made to describe the essential theoretical and experimental features
of these techniques through several examples. Case studies of the
deterioration of the oxygen storage and release kinetics in CeO2 and
CexZr1−xO2 solids due to chemical poisoning and thermal aging are
139
3.2 Introduction
It is well known that automotive catalytic converters have a highly
dynamic operation due to fluctuations in composition, tempera-
ture, and flow rate of an engine’s exhaust gases.1–3 Because of
this, much research has been conducted toward identifying the
chemical processes that determine the efficiency of TWCs under
cycling conditions of the air/fuel ratio in the frequency range of
0.1 Hz (rapid changes in traffic and driving conditions) to about
1 Hz (electronic control of the air/fuel ratio).1–5 In order to
understand and best describe the behavior of TWCs under the
oscillatory conditions in which they operate, it is imperative that
their characterization is carried out under such dynamic
conditions.
In order to reduce the effects of the prevailing oscillatory behav-
ior in an exhaust gas on the performance of a TWC, one of the
required properties for the support structure of the noble metals
used is its ability to store oxygen under “lean” conditions (excess
oxygen in the feed) and release it under “rich” conditions (oxygen
deficiency in the feed). This allows the TWC to operate in a wide
range of air/fuel ratios (λ) under dynamic conditions.6–12 This prop-
erty is termed the oxygen storage capacity (OSC), and it is a key
parameter for the appropriate performance of a TWC, namely, oxi-
dation of CO and hydrocarbons when the engine’s exhaust-gas com-
position is rich in oxygen, and reduction of NOx when the engine’s
exhaust-gas composition is on the lean side of the stoichiometric
Æ CeO2-x + x O2
H2 /CO
æææææ
CeO2 ¨ææææ æ (3.1)
H2O /CO2 2
(3.2)
(e.g., 0.5–1.0 mL) and a valve actuator operated so that the pulse
sequence and timing can be changed in an accurate and reproduc-
ible manner producing distinctive concentration pulse curves. The
gas loop is used to store the quantity (mol) of the oxidizing or
reducing gas to be injected into the He carrier gas stream, and then
to the reactor through the use of a six-way chromatographic valve
(V3). The exit stream from the microreactor is connected to an
online mass spectrometer for gas analysis. Table 3.1 shows the neces-
sary sequence of feed-gas composition switches applied during a
pulse-injection experiment for the measurement of OSC and OSCC,
using CO or H2 as the reducing gas (e.g., Eq. (3.3)).
In the experimental set-up shown in Fig. 3.1, the OSC/OSCC
measurements using the most common reducing/oxidizing gas
pairs, e.g., CO/O2 or H2/O2, take place as follows:
The catalyst sample is initially pre-treated in an O2/He gas mixture
(e.g., 20 vol% O2) for 2 h at the maximum temperature for the
OSC/OSCC measurements in order to ensure that the catalyst is
fully oxidized at the prevailing treatment conditions. The experi-
mental protocol following this oxygen pre-treatment for the meas-
urement of OSC on a typical Pd/CexZr1−xO2−δ catalyst is schematically
illustrated in Fig. 3.2, and is described as follows:
Figure 3.3 Ar, CO, and CO2 gas-phase dynamic responses obtained during the
measurement of OSC in a CO pulse-injection experiment.
t
FT f out
-1
OSC(mol O ◊ g ) = ◊ Ú ( y Ar - yCO
out
)dt (3.5)
W 0
where, FT is the molar flow rate of the He carrier gas (mol·s−1), W (g)
is the mass of the catalyst sample, and youtAr and youtCO are the mole
fractions of Ar and CO, respectively, at the outlet of the
microreactor.
The OSC and OSCC quantities strongly depend on the experi-
mental conditions applied, e.g., the nature and the partial pres-
sure of the reducing gas (H2 or CO), the pre-treatment and
reaction temperature (TOSC), the frequency of the pulses applied,
the chemical composition of the catalyst, and other structural
characteristics of the catalyst. Yao and Yu Yao6 first reported that
the OSC of CeO2, CeO2/Al2O3, and PM/CeO2–Al2O3 solids meas-
ured by the pulse-injection method was affected by the pre-treat-
ment temperature, the reaction temperature, the partial pressure
of CO, the presence and dispersion of precious metals (PM: Pt, Pd,
or Rh), and the concentration of CeO2 in the alumina matrix. For
example, the OSC was found to increase in the presence of noble
metals, with an increase in the partial pressure of the reducing gas,
and an increase in TOSC and the metal loading, whereas it was
found to decrease with an increase in the catalyst’s pre-treatment
temperature.
OSC and OSCC measurements are also performed using H2 as a
reducing agent,8,33–35 whereas hydrocarbons, like CH4, C3H6, and
O − S2 + S1 → O − S1 + S2 (3.10)
2 (S2) → CO 3 – S2
CO(g) + O2− 2−
(3.11)
the latter chemical steps are limited to a small degree, then estima-
tion of the OSC based on the re-oxidation step 6 can be considered
as a reliable measurement.
Bernal et al.43 pointed out also the particular issues that need to
be considered in using H2 pulse-injection experiments for accurate
OSC measurements, for example, the hydrogen chemisorbed spe-
cies formed on the noble metal and those remaining after the He
purge (step 3, Fig. 3.2) prior to re-oxidation. The relative contribu-
tion of this chemisorbed hydrogen to the total oxygen consumption
may be important for high surface area supports and moderate
reduction temperatures (TOSC < 500 °C).43
Table 3.2 Step changes in gas concentration for DOSC measurements over a TWC
sample (FT = 30 cm3·min−1).34
Experiment Sequence of step changes in gas concentration
A 1.5% O2/He (TDOSC, t) → He (TDOSC, ∆t) → 3% CO/3% Ar/He
(TDOSC, t) → He (TDOSC, ∆t) → repeat cycle
B 10% CO2/1.5% O2/He (TDOSC, t) → He (TDOSC, ∆t) → 3% CO/3%
Ar/He (TDOSC, t) → He (TDOSC, ∆t) → repeat cycle
C 20 ppm SO2/1.5% O2/He (TDOSC, t) → He (TDOSC, ∆t) →
3% CO/3% Ar/He (TDOSC, t) → He (TDOSC, ∆t) → repeat cycle
3%CO/3%Ar/He
3
Ar
Concentration (mol %) 2 CO
TDOSC=400oC
1 CO2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (sec)
Figure 3.4 Transient response curves of CO, CO2, and Ar during the CO step of
the gas delivery sequence: 1.5% O2/He (30 s) → He (30 s) → 3% CO/3% Ar/He
(t) at 400 °C over a commercial Pd–Rh TWC. Adapted with permission from
Lambrou et al.34 Copyright 2004 Elsevier.
Figure 3.5 Partial pressures of CO (- - -), O2 (…), and CO2 (—) during the gas
delivery sequence: 4% CO/He (5 s) → He (5 s) → 2% O2/He (5 s) over CeO2 at
400 °C. Adapted with permission from Boaro et al.29 Copyright 2004 Elsevier.
(CO step) CO2 production (peak 1) takes place through the reac-
tion of CO with oxygen stored in the solid sample (CeO2−δ) and the
CO2 (1) peak is in phase with the CO pulse. The O2 peak is delayed
compared to the CO2 (2) peak (Fig. 3.5) because oxygen is first
utilized by ceria for re-oxidation.29 The interpretation of the appear-
ance of CO2 (peak 2) in the second half of the period (O2 step) is
not straightforward. Boaro et al.29 were among the first to investigate
in some detail the origin of this CO2 (2) peak. After performing in
situ diffuse reflectance Fourier transform spectroscopy–mass spec-
trometry (DRIFTS-MS) studies during the same CO/O2 DOSC
experiment, they concluded the following: (i) when CO is pulsed
into the reactor, the ceria support is reduced and CO2 forms; (ii) a
fraction of this CO2 is instantaneously released, thus giving rise to
the CO2 (1) peak (Fig. 3.5). The remaining CO2 strongly interacts
with the ceria support, forming a carbonate-like species; (iii) during
the oxygen pulse, the carbonate-like intermediates decompose to
release CO2 (peak 2), or alternatively, oxygen is adsorbed on oxygen
vacant sites (reduced Ce3+ sites), thus re-oxidizing the ceria and
releasing CO2. It is also likely that in other metal-oxide OSC materi-
als or supported noble-metal catalysts, the CO2 (2) peak represents
the reaction of oxygen with carbon, the latter originating from CO
disproportionation, Eq. (3.13), during the first half cycle (CO puls-
ing). For supported noble metals, it is also possible that during the
He purge, following the CO step, some strongly adsorbed CO on
the noble metal remains, which then readily reacts with oxygen dur-
ing the O2 step to form CO2.
As mentioned earlier, the DOSC strongly depends on the lean/
rich engine exhaust-gas composition.23 Lambrou et al.34 investigated
the effects of the presence of 10 vol% CO2 or 20 ppm SO2 in the
oxidizing gas mixture on the DOSC (experiments B and C, respec-
tively, in Table 3.2). The concentrations of CO2 and SO2 used were
similar to those encountered in the exhaust-gas composition of a
gasoline-driven car. It was found that the amount of CO2 produced
(Fig. 3.4) decreases in the presence of 10% CO2 or 20 ppm SO2 in
the O2/He feed-gas stream. It was suggested that the presence of
CO2 or SO2 in the oxidizing gas mixture, under which oxygen is
stored, does not affect the quality of sites associated with the back
spillover of labile oxygen species, but only the concentration of
stored oxygen due to the formation of stable carbonate or sulfate
species in ceria.
Boaro et al.44 and Zhao et al.48 investigated the rate of CO oxida-
tion under steady-state reaction conditions (4% CO/2% O2/He gas
mixture), and that obtained during OSC measurements by (i) pulse
injection (one 4% CO/He pulse followed by five 2% O2/He pulses),
and (ii) alternate switching 4% CO/He (1 s) → He (2 s) → 2% O2/
He (1 s). It was found that the rate of CO oxidation under stationary
conditions over a series of CexZr1−xO2−δ (0 ≤ x ≤1) solids is influ-
enced by the number of exposed surface redox sites of Ce4+/Ce3+.
When the CO oxidation reaction was carried out under transient
conditions (OSC measurements), oxygen diffusion plays an impor-
tant role in the enhancement of the redox properties of ceria–
zirconia compared to ceria. It was found that the performance of
solid ceria–zirconia for CO oxidation was significantly better than
that of ceria, with optimum performance in the middle composi-
tional range, especially with low-surface area samples, for which
participation of lattice oxygen is more likely to occur.44,48 It is thus
clear that under dynamic conditions, the structural features of the
catalysts are more important in evaluating the OSC. The effect of
intrinsic microstructure variations in ceria–zirconia on Zr4+ coordi-
nation can be correlated to the oxygen mobility.53 This is the
primary reason why CexZr1−xO2−δ materials are used nowadays in
TWCs in place of pure CeO2.
OSC investigations on a time scale of a few seconds, such as those
previously discussed, are usually interconnected with gas-phase diffu-
sion (inter/intra particle) and desorption phenomena, the dynamics
of which is slower than surface phenomena. In addition, the actual
change in composition of the exhaust gas for a TWC between lean
and rich occurs on a millisecond scale. In this respect, only a limited
number of studies have presented OSC data on a millisecond
scale.45,54–56 The surface science approach56 employs an ultrahigh
vacuum with gas-pulsed valves, a catalyst on a planar substrate, and a
turn over frequency (TOF) mass spectrometer. This set-up allows
18
O2(g) +16O2(g) 218O16O(g)
(3.14)
(2) Simple heteroexchange (Type II, R1, or R′), which involves one
surface oxygen atom from the metal oxide, 16O(s), and one 18O
atom from the 18O2 isotope gas molecule according to the fol-
lowing steps:
18
O2(g) +16O(s) 18O16O(g)+18O(s) (3.15)
18
O16O(g) +16O(s) 16O2(g)+18O(s) (3.16)
18
O2(g) + 216O(s) 16O2(g)+ 218O(s) (3.17)
18
O16 O(g) + 216 O(s) 16 O2(g)+16 O(s)+18 O(s) (3.18)
18
O16 O(g) + 216 O(s) 16 O2(g)+16 O(s)+18 O(s) (3.19)
18
O16O 18
16 O2 18
O2 O2
6 1
6 16 18 8
16 O O
O 18
O
2 18 18 16
16 5 O O O
O 3 4
Metal particle
16
Metal oxide support O
-
O2(g) Æ O2ads Æ O2ads Æ O22-ads Æ 2O2-ads Æ 2O2- lattice (3.22)
5%18O2/He 5%18O2/He
5.0 5.0
16
16
O2 O2
18
18 O16O
Concentration (mol%)
Concentration (mol%)
4.0 O2 4.0
18
18 16
O O O2
3.0
3.0
tmax T=700oC
2.0 2.0
0.0 0.0
200 300 400 500 600 700 800 T = const. 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Temperature ( oC) Time (s)
(a) (b)
Figure 3.7 Transient response curves of 16O2, 18O16O, and 16O2 gaseous species
obtained during (a) TPIE and (b) TIIE experiments over a CexZr1−xO2−δ solid.
oxygen due to surface and bulk oxygen diffusion during TPIE and
TIIE experiments are described below.
Rate of exchange
The transient rate of 18O16O (g) production during an isothermal
step x vol% 16O2/He → x vol% 18O2/He in an isotopic exchange
experiment conducted in an open-flow microreactor can be esti-
mated based on a material balance given by the following
relationship:
FT
R16O18O (µmol16 O18 O ◊ g -1 ◊ s -1 ) = ◊ y16O18O (t ) (3.23)
W
FT
R16O (µmol16O2◊ g -1◊ s -1 ) = y16O (t ) (3.24)
2 W 2
16
The overall rate of exchange (R E) of O atoms from the solid is
given by the following relationship:
Q16O ◊ N A
Ne = (3.26)
SSA ◊ a
Ê p ˆ Ê S1 ˆ
DS = Á ˜ ◊ Á
Ë 4 ¯ Ë C18 I o ¯˜
(3.27)
O
2
N et = C18O I o Dst = 4rNC18O p Dst (3.28)
p
where, N and r are the number and radius of the metal particles,
respectively.
The effective diffusion coefficient for bulk oxygen diffusion
(D eff
b ) within the subsurface and bulk of the solid can be deter-
mined according to Peil et al.95 using the pseudo-steady state rate of
18 16
O O production at time equal to ts.s. (Fig. 3.7(b)):
2
ÊN ˆ
Deff
b = p t s.s. Á a ˜ (3.29)
Ë Cα O ¯
FT .
Na = y18O16O (s .s .) (3.30)
W ◊ SSA
where FT is the total molar flow rate (mol·s−1) of the 18O2/He gas
mixture used.
An advanced kinetic analysis of 18O/16O isotopic exchange over
CeO2–ZrO2–La2O3 and Pt/CeO2–ZrO2 solids was recently reported96
under conditions of dynamic adsorption-desorption equilibrium in
a plug-flow microreactor at 1 atm in the temperature range 650–850 °C
Figure 3.8 (a) OSC (µmol O·gcat−1) measured over Ce, CeP0.01, CeP0.02,
CeP0.05, CeP0.1, and CeP0.2 solids by H2/O2 pulse experiments in the 400–600 °C
range as a function of the experimental P/Ce ratio determined by total reflection
X-ray fluorescence (TXRF). (b) Number of equivalent monolayers of atomic oxy-
gen species exchanged during the TPIE experiment (Ne, Eq. (3.26)) for the inves-
tigated solids. Adapted with permission from Granados et al.70 Copyright 2006
Elsevier.
(a)
(b)
Figure 3.9 (a) TIIE experiment performed at 600 °C over Ce and CeP samples
according to the gas delivery sequence: 3% 16O2/He (600 °C, 2 h) → 3% 18O2/He
(600 °C, t). (Adapted from Larese et al.61) (b) Transient response curves of 16O2(g)
species during a TPIE experiment over CeZrc600, CeZrPc600, CeZrc1000, and
CeZrPc1000 solids. Adapted with permission from Larese et al.69 Copyright 2005
Elsevier.
(a) (b)
Figure 3.10 (a) OSCC values measured at 600 °C over CaO/CeZrO4 samples as a
function of CaO molar fraction (values in brackets correspond to the nominal Ca/
(Ce+Zr) atom ratio). (b) FTIR spectral region for which O−2 is visible (1126 cm−1)
as a function of Ca/(Ce+Zr) atom ratio. Adapted with permission from Granados
et al.116 Copyright 2008 Elsevier.
1600
P-Zn/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 P-Zn/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2
600
1200
400 800
200 400
0 0
550 650 750 850 550 650 750 850
Temperature ( oC) Temperature (oC)
(a) (b)
Figure 3.11 (a) OSC and (b) OSCC (µmol O·g−1) measured over uncontaminated
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 solids and Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 solids contaminated with P, P–Zn, or P–Ca in the
550–850 °C range. Adapted with permission from Christou et al.73 Copyright 2011
Elsevier.
4.0 4.0
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 Ce0.5Zr0.5O2
P/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 730 T > 850oC P/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2
635 760 830
3.0 P-Ca/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 3.0 P-Ca/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2
O18 O (mol%)
O2 (mol%)
725 780
P-Zn/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 P-Zn/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2
2.0 2.0
16
16
1.0 1.0
0.0 0.0
400 500 600 700 800 T = 850oC 400 500 600 700 800 T=850 oC
Temperature (oC) Temperature ( oC)
(a) (b)
Figure 3.12 Transient response curves for (a) 16O2 and (b) 18O16O gaseous oxygen
isotopic species obtained during TPIE over fresh Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 solids and Ce0.5Zr0.5O2
solids contaminated with P, P–Zn, or P–Ca. Adapted with permission from Christou
et al.73 Copyright 2011 Elsevier.
Ce 0.5Zr0.5O2 6.0
Ce 0.5Zr0.5O2
P/Ce 0.5Zr0.5O2 P/Ce 0.5Zr0.5O2
5.0 P-Ca/Ce 0.5Zr0.5O2 5.0
P-Ca/Ce 0.5Zr0.5O2
P-Zn/Ce 0.5Zr0.5O2 P-Zn/Ce 0.5Zr0.5O2
4.0 4.0
3.0 3.0
2.0 2.0
1.0 1.0
16O18O
2
16O
0.0 0.0
450 550 650 750 850 450 550 650 750 850
Temperature (oC) Temperature (oC)
(a) (b)
Figure 3.13 Specific rates of (a) 16O2 and (b) 18O16O gaseous dioxygen formation
obtained during TPIE over the uncontaminated Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 solid and Ce0.5Zr0.5O2
solids contaminated with P, P–Ca, and P–Zn. Adapted with permission from
Christou et al.73 Copyright 2011 Elsevier.
(Fig. 3.13(a)) is derived from the first surface layer (Ne < 1), it
becomes clear that the presence of contaminants strongly sup-
presses surface oxygen diffusion. In addition, the rate of 18O16O(g)
formation for T < 750 °C was found to be up to 37 times larger for
Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 than for the poisoned samples. It is thus postulated that
bulk oxygen diffusion within the crystal particles of Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 is
strongly affected by chemical poisoning.
In order to ascertain the level of influence of the chemical con-
taminants on the kinetics of the surface and bulk oxygen diffusion,
the apparent activation energy barriers for surface oxygen diffusion
Esapp (estimated for Ne < 1) and bulk oxygen diffusion Ebapp (esti-
mated for Ne > 1) were estimated. The incorporation of P within the
subsurface and bulk of Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 solid oxide particles was found
to significantly increase Ebapp from 126.5 to 169.6 kJ·mol−1, while the
concurrent deposition of Ca or Zn along with P was found to
strongly suppress surface oxygen diffusion. In fact, Esapp increased
from 112.7 to 135.9 (P–Ca) and 149.3 kJ·mol−1 (P–Zn). It was thus
shown that the introduction of P, P–Ca, and P–Zn into Ce0.5Zr0.5O2
induces the formation of strongly bound surface oxygen, whereas P
(PO 43−) is mainly responsible for restricting bulk oxygen mobility.73
Although the deterioration of the OSR properties of CeO2 and
CexZr1−xO2 by P, Ca, and Zn poisoning has been extensively investi-
gated,61,68–70,73,115,116 most of this effort was focused on the effects of
contaminants on the support materials of TWCs in the absence
of noble metals. Only a very few studies focused on the effects of
chemical poisons on the oxygen storage and catalytic properties
of model three-way catalysts. The study by Tabata et al.100 on model
Zn-, Fe-, and Pb-poisoned catalysts showed that only Pb caused a
considerable decrease in the activity and selectivity of NO reduction.
On studying the effect of various dopants used in Rh/CeO2 as OSC
promoters, it was observed that Pb significantly damaged the OSC.12
Based on the findings of another study,111 Pb was found to dissolve
in CeO2 after its deposition at the level of 0.4 and 1 wt% on a model
1 wt% Rh/CeO2 catalyst. Lead was also found to cause severe dete-
rioration of catalytic performance for C3H6 oxidation, whereas CO
and NO conversions were only slightly affected, likely due to CO and
even though the OSC and OSCC were significantly lower compared
to the uncontaminated solids, these values were found to be 7–10
times higher in the contaminated Pd/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 than the contami-
nated Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 solids. For example, the OSC of P/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 at
550 °C was 68 µmol O.g−1 and that of P–Pd/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 was 665
µmol O·g−1. As the reaction temperature increased, the differences
between the poisoned Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 and Pd/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 solids were
less pronounced. Also, the percentage reduction in OSC and OSCC
at 550 °C after poisoning the Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 solid was about 50–70%73
compared to 16–40% for the aged Pd/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 solids.118 Thus,
the presence of a noble metal on the surface of the CexZr1−xO2 sup-
port diminishes to a considerable extent the negative effects of P,
Ca, and Zn poisons on the OSR properties. This is likely to be the
result of the promotion of hydrogen dissociation and activation
steps and of the back-spillover of oxygen from Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 to the
oxygen vacant sites formed during reduction of PdO to Pd0. This is
in agreement with the XPS findings, which showed that after poison-
ing the proportion of Ce(IV) in CexZr1−xO2 after oxidation decreased
from 82 to 37–46%, whereas in the presence of Pd it decreased to
∼66%. This is a very important finding, showing the positive effect
of Pd in preventing the deactivation of OSC in a Pd/CexZr1−xO2 cata-
lyst (Ce3+ is mainly associated with CePO4 formation), which was
confirmed by OSC measurements. Kroger et al.109,110 studied the
individual and combined effects of P and Ca on the OSC and cata-
lytic activity of supported Rh catalysts. A strong catalyst deactivating
effect was observed in the presence of P, whereas the addition of
P–Ca had a regenerating effect since the poisoning effect of phos-
phorus alone was reduced.
The role of an Fe contaminant in the chemical deactivation of a
1 wt% Pd–Rh/20 wt% CeO2–Al2O3 (PRCA) model TWC has been
investigated.71 H2/O2 pulsed-feed OSC measurements in the 500–
850 °C range indicated that OSC and OSCC (Fig. 3.15(a)) increased
by up to 40% in the presence of 0.1–0.3 wt% Fe. The amount
of oxygen stored in pure Fe2O3 corresponding to 0.3 wt% Fe was
found to be 80 µmol O·g−1. This amount cannot explain the OSCC
found in the 0.3 wt% Fe/PRCA solid measured at 700 °C, which was
o
T=125 C
-
O O
16
16
o
T=225 C
e/ A
e/ A
A
2F CA
2F CA
A
C
C
0. PR
PR
0. PR
PR
PR
0. PR
PR
e/
e/
4F
4F
0.
(a) (b)
Figure 3.15 (a) OSCC (µmol O·gcat−1) measured by H2/O2 pulsed-feed experiments
over 0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 wt% Fe/PRCA solids in the 500–850 °C range. (b) Integral
band at 1126 cm−1 due to O−2 estimated after oxygen chemisorption at 25 °C followed
by TPD in Ar flow (125 and 225 °C) over PRCA, 0.2, and 0.4 wt% Fe/PRCA solids.
Adapted with permission from Lambrou and Efstathiou.71 Copyright 2006 Elsevier.
found to be equal to 345 compared to 208 mmol O·g−1 for the PRCA
catalyst; an increase in the OSCC of 27% was estimated after sub-
tracting the Fe2O3 contribution. This synergistic effect was investi-
gated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, where it was found that
iron deposited on the Pd/Rh and CeO2 surfaces induced the devel-
opment of electronic interactions that influenced the oxidation
states of the noble metals and also enhanced the oxygen chemisorp-
tion on ceria, likely affecting to some extent the Ce–O–Ce bond
strength. It was concluded that Fe can act as an additional OSC
promoter under oxidizing conditions through the process: Fe →
FeO → Fe3O4 (FeO·Fe2O3) → Fe2O3, and not as a chemical poison of
the OSR properties of the solid. On the other hand, when the
amount of Fe deposited increased to 0.4 wt%, the OSCC deterio-
rated but remained slightly greater than that measured over the
PRCA catalyst (Fig. 3.15(a)). In situ DRIFTS oxygen chemisorption
at 25 °C followed by temperature-programmed desorption in Ar
(Ar-TPD) showed that after 0.2 wt% Fe deposition, the formation of
superoxide species on CeO2 was strongly enhanced (Fig. 3.15(b)).
By increasing the temperature in Ar flow during TPD, superoxide
species were found to desorb completely at T > 250 °C. By further
600 800
CexZr 1-xO2-A-700 oC CexZr 1-xO2-A-700 oC
A-1000 oC 700 A-1000 oC
OSCC-H2 (µmol-O/g)
500
OSC-H2 (µmol-O/g)
Figure 3.16 Comparison of (a) OSC and (b) OSCC obtained in the 450–750 °C
range over CexZr1−xO2–A and CexZr1−xO2–B solids calcined at 700 °C (solid A),
850 °C (solid B), 1000 °C, and 1100 °C. Adapted with permission from Christou
et al.72 Copyright 2006 Springer.
Table 3.4 BET surface area and activation energies of surface oxygen mobility
(E sapp) and bulk oxygen diffusion (Eb) for CexZr1−xO2 solids.72
Solid BET (m2·g−1) Esapp (kJ·mol−1) Eb (kJ·mol−1)
CexZr1−xO2–A/700 °C 89 28 ± 2 104 ± 4
CexZr1−xO2–A/1000 °C 50 62 ± 3 105 ± 5
CexZr1−xO2–A/1100 °C 10 114 ± 4 116 ± 5
CexZr1−xO2–B/850 °C 90 44 ± 3 98 ± 3
CexZr1−xO2–B/1000 °C 56 47 ± 3 108 ± 5
CexZr1−xO2–B/1100 °C 16 112 ± 4 113 ± 5
2 mol% 18O2/He
1.0
0.2
0.0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Time (s)
(a)
2 mol%18 O2 /He
4.0
Rmax
3.5
CexZr1-xO2-A
(µmol/g.s)
3.0
550o C
2.5 700o C
2.0 800o C
O18O
1.5
RS.S.
16
1.0
R
0.5
0.0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Time (s)
(b)
18
O with surface 16O takes place. Based on the material balance and
using the 16O2(g), 18O16O(g), and Ar response curves, it was esti-
mated that the amount of 16O exchanged was less than one equiva-
lent monolayer of surface oxygen. Therefore, up to the maximum
in the rate of 18O16O(g) formation, surface oxygen adsorption,
exchange, and diffusion processes prevail. On the other hand, the
reduced rate of 18O16O(g) formation following the peak maximum
shows a long tail that reaches a pseudo-steady state after about
83 min on stream (Fig. 3.17(a)). The latter originates from the
continuous but slow feed of the surface with 16O from the subsur-
face and bulk of the solid.
Figure 3.17(b) shows the evolution of the transient rate of
18 16
O O(g) formation obtained for CexZr1−xO2–A solid after applying
the TIIE technique at 550 °C, 700 °C, and 800 °C. In the time regime
where surface oxygen exchange and diffusion prevail, it is seen that
the rate of 18O16O(g) formation increases significantly with exchange
temperature. However, subsurface and bulk diffusion rates depend
to a smaller degree on reaction T (see transient rates at t > 3000 s,
Fig. 3.17(b)). R max and R s.s (pseudo-steady state exchange rate)
shown in Fig. 3.17(b) characterize the effect of Tcalc on the transient
rate and activation energies of the oxygen release kinetics from the
surface, and on the oxygen diffusion from the bulk to the surface
of the solids. It can be seen that there is a clear monotonic increase
of E sapp with increasing Tcalc (Table 3.4). For CexZr1−xO2–A, E sapp
increased from 28.0 to 114.0 kJ.mol−1 on increasing Tcalc from 700
to 1100 °C, while for CexZr1−xO2–B, E sapp increased from 44.0 to
112.0 kJ·mol−1. It was suggested that thermal aging in air caused a
drastic change in the surface morphology or surface composition
(e.g., La and Nd enrichment) of CexZr1−xO2-based solids, which
affected the energetics of surface oxygen mobility. The Rs.s. values
(see Fig. 3.17(b)) were used to estimate the activation energy (Eb)
of bulk oxygen diffusion (Table 3.4), which was found to only
slightly increase with increasing calcination temperature in the
range investigated.72
The aging effect on the OSC was also investigated over the Rh,
Pt, Pd, Ru, and Ir metals supported on CeO2 and Ce0.63Zr0.37O2,
metal dispersion: D(%)= 62, 55, 14, and 8 for samples 1, 2, 3, and 4,
respectively.133 The continuous OSC decrease with increasing calci-
nation temperature was ascribed to kinetic factors that control the
OSC process, with a higher aging temperature leading to larger NM
particles, larger ceria–zirconia grains, and lower rates for oxygen
diffusion and/or the creation of surface vacancies.128 Above 300 °C,
the OSC is due essentially to the participation of support. The unex-
pected enhancement of OSC for the fourth sample, when the oxide
starts participating in the OSC process, was ascribed to the severe
reduction of the solid in H2 during aging, which appears to be ben-
eficial to the overall reducibility of Ce0.63Zr0.37O2.133
To isolate the effects of Pt from those inherent in the OSC
material, Pt was deposited on pre-sintered CeO2 and Ce0.75Zr0.25O2
solids.134 The rate of CO2 production measured by CO/O2 step-
change OSC experiments on Pt/CeO2 was found to be linearly
dependent on Pt dispersion; however, this was not the case with Pt/
Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 for which the rate was independent of Pt dispersion
above a threshold of the support’s surface area. Although Pt was
found to sinter more readily on a Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 support, the disper-
sion effect was more than compensated by the enhanced availabil-
ity of bulk O2− within the mixed-oxide crystal particles. On a surface
area basis, the mixed-oxide support was 2.5 times more active com-
pared to ceria.134 The encapsulation of Pt metal particles by the
low-surface area CeO2–ZrO2–La2O3, besides Pt sintering, was the
reason why the OSC performance deteriorated after calcination of
the supported Pt catalyst at 900 °C.135 The latter resulted in a large
decline in the concentration of chemisorption sites, as shown by
temperature-programmed reduction in H2 (H2-TPR) and OSC
studies. At higher temperatures, the concentration of chemisorp-
tion sites on Pt particles, which relies heavily on the loading and
dispersion of Pt, was found not to be essentially responsible for the
enhancement of OSC, since the sample calcined at 700 °C had a
higher OSC compared to those calcined at 500 °C or 900 °C. This
shows that partial encapsulation of the metal by the support might
be beneficial for the OSC process. It was proposed that distortion
of the support’s lattice and other crystal defects observed at the
Tred (°C) HS LS SR
up to 7.5 times (Table 3.5) compared to the fresh (HS) and air-
aged (LS) solids after decreasing the reduction temperature.54
The degree of promotion of the reducibility by redox cycling was
found to increase with increasing Zr content in the CexZr1−xO2
solid. However, the OSC was limited due to the small amount of Ce
present.142 Although thermal aging in air was found to negatively
influence H2-TPR traces of the LS samples compared to those of
HS ones, remarkably, the favorable effects of the redox aging on
the reduction behavior were more pronounced in the low-surface
area CexZr1−xO2 solids compared to the fresh high-surface area
ones.143
Raman spectroscopy can be used to provide insights into the
origin of these observations with respect to modifications in the
oxygen sublattice (Fig. 3.19). For the fresh Ce0.68Zr0.32O2 sample
(HS), it was observed that the F2g mode (473–478 cm−1), which is
characteristic of a perfect fluorite lattice, was broad suggesting a
partial breaking of the selection rules due to the small particle size.
The increase in the intensity of the F2g mode after oxidative aging
(LS) was consistent with sintering of the sample, which apparently
leads to a relatively ordered situation with an oxygen polyhedron
around the metal cations. However, for the sample subjected to SR,
the broadening of the band at 473 cm−1 cannot be due to the small
particle size effect since this was treated at 950 °C. It might be
Figure 3.19 Raman spectra of the Ce0.68Zr0.32O2 samples. Adapted with permission
from Vidal et al.54 Copyright 1999 Elsevier.
Figure 3.20 HRTEM images of (a) fresh, (b) SR/MO-aged, and (c) SR/SO-aged
Ce0.62Zr0.38O2 samples, and (d) their respective H2-TPR response curves. Adapted
with permission from Yeste et al.150 Copyright 1999 Elsevier.
Figure 3.21 OSCC (µmol O·g−1) measured by H2/O2 pulses over fresh, aged
(A973), and oxy-chlorinated (A973Cl) samples of (a) Pd–Rh/CZA and (b) Pt–Rh/
CZA. Adapted with permission from Daley et al.160 and Anderson et al.161 Copyrights
2005160 and 2006161 Elsevier.
Figure 3.22 (a) Removal of P (%) after washing the aged TWC (83,000 km) with
acetic, citric, NTA, EDTA, and oxalic acid solutions (0.1 M). Adapted with permis-
sion from Christou et al.165 Copyright 2006 American Chemical Society. (b) XRD
patterns for the aged and EDTA, citric, and oxalic acid treated TWC samples
(cordierite (•); CexZr1−xO2 (d); MgZn2(PO4)2 (
); CaZn2(PO4)2/AlPO4 ({);
CePO4 (V). Adapted with permission from Christou.169 Copyright 2006 Central
Library of the University of Cyprus.
appeared to be more efficient in removing Pb, Zn, Ca, Mn, Fe, Cr,
or Ni metal contaminants through complexation, while acetic acid
proved to be the least effective.164–167,170 Combinations of oxalic acid
with citric acid or EDTA aiming at effectively extracting a wider
range of contaminants, were found to be less efficient and led to
intermediate removal efficiencies than those obtained by any of the
individual acid washing solutions investigated.166,167,169
XPS analysis also revealed a significant increase in the Ce, Zr,
and Rh surface concentrations after washing with a weak oxalic acid
solution (0.1 M). This was ascribed to the uncovering of the TWC
washcoat surface on removal of the P crust.165–167 Figure 3.22(b)
shows XRD patterns of the aged TWC samples and TWC samples
regenerated with EDTA, citric, and oxalic acids. It can be observed
that the peaks assigned to (Mg,Ca,Zn)3(PO4)2, Ce and Al phos-
phates disappear after washing with oxalic acid. The BET area and
pore volume of the washed catalyst increased, which implies that the
removal of large quantities of P-containing compounds led to the
unclogging of fouled washcoat pores.165,167 Thus, diffusional resist-
ance caused by the blocking of pore mouths might be overcome and
the diffusion rate of gases at the newly exposed catalytic sites can be
significantly enhanced. The latter was confirmed by in situ DRIFTS
CO and NO chemisorption studies, which indicated significant
enhancement in the concentration of adsorbed CO and NO on Pd
and Rh surfaces after regeneration with oxalic acid.165
All regeneration procedures applied led to the partial recovery
of catalytic activity of the TWC (CO, CxHy, and NOx conversions)
under real exhaust-gas conditions (dynamometer tests), and
improvements in the oxygen storage capacity, due to the removal
of large amounts of contaminants from the catalyst surface.168
However, oxalic acid washing was found to be the most effective in
improving the oxygen storage and release rates evaluated by pulse
(Fig. 3.23(a)) and step-change OSC measurements, a result that is
strongly related to its efficacy in removing P-containing spe-
cies.164–167 The most significant improvements in the catalytic activ-
ity of an aged TWC for CO (Fig. 3.23(b)), CxHy, and NOx
conversions were also obtained after oxalic acid washing.166,167,169
Similar results were also obtained by Shim et al.172 by evaluating
200
Aged
Oxalic acid
OSC (µmol-O/gcat)
150 Citric acid
EDTA
100
50
0
450 550 650 750
Temperature ( o C)
(a)
100
Aged
Oxalic acid
80
Citric acid
EDTA
XCO (%)
60
40
20
0
200 250 300 350 400 450
Temperature ( o C)
(b)
Figure 3.23 (a) OSC and (b) XCO values for aged TWC samples (83,000 km) and
TWC samples regenerated after using oxalic acid, citric acid, and EDTA. Adapted
with permission from Christou.169 Copyright 2006 Central Library of the University
of Cyprus.
acetic, citric, and oxalic acid washing procedures for regaining the
oxidation activity of spent TWCs with 120,000 and 160,000 km mile-
age towards VOCs. The acid-treated TWCs were found to be more
active than the untreated ones, with the oxalic acid treatment being
the most suitable in improving the oxidation of aromatic
hydrocarbons.172
Table 3.6 CO, NOx, and HC emission results (g·km−1) from NEDC tests performed
over aged and regenerated commercial TWCs. (Adapted from Christou et al.168)
P42 M156 A165
Emissions
(g·km−1) Aged Regenerated Aged Regenerated Aged Regenerated
CO 1.90 1.70 4.50 2.30 2.20 2.00
NOx 0.33 0.13 1.04 0.52 0.44 0.11
HC 0.28 0.23 0.47 0.32 0.38 0.26
Acknowledgments
The European Regional Development Fund, the Republic of
Cyprus, the Cyprus Research Promotion Foundation, and the
Research Committee of the University of Cyprus are gratefully
acknowledged for their financial support through the project
DIDAKTOR/DISEK/0308/33.
References
1. Herz, R.K., Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 20 (1981) 451–457.
2. Herz, R.K., Kiela, J.B., Sell, J.A., Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., 22 (1983)
387–396.
27. Bedrane, S., Descorme, C., Duprez, D., Catal. Today, 75 (2002)
401–405.
28. Di Monte, R., Kašpar, J., Top. Catal., 28 (2004) 47–57.
29. Boaro, M., Giordano, F., Recchia, S., Dal Santo, V., Giona, M.,
Trovarelli, A., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 52 (2004) 225–237.
30. Aneggi, E., Boaro, M., De Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A.,
J. Alloys Compd., 408–412 (2006) 1096–1102.
31. Koltsakis, G.C., Stamatelos, A.M., Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 23 (1997)
1–39.
32. Costa, C.N., Christou, S.Y., Georgiou, G., Efstathiou, A.M., J. Catal.,
219 (2003) 259–272.
33. Yamada, K., Tanaka, H., Yamamoto, M., SAE Technical Paper 970464
(1997).
34. Lambrou, P.S., Costa, C.N., Christou, S.Y., Efstathiou, A.M., Appl.
Catal. B, Environ., 54 (2004) 237–250.
35. Hickey, N., Fornaciero, P., Kašpar, J., Gatica, J.M., Bernal, S., J. Catal.,
200 (2001) 181–193.
36. Duprez, D., Descorme, C., Birchem, T., Rohart, E., Top. Catal., 16/17
(2004) 49–56.
37. Christou, S.Y., Costa, C.N., Efstathiou, A.M., Top. Catal., 30/31 (2004)
325–331.
38. Salomons, S., Hayes, R.E., Votsmeier, M., Drochner, A., Vogel, H.,
Malmberg, S., Gieshoff, J., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 70 (2007) 305–313.
39. Li, C., Sakata, Y., Arai, T., Domen, K., Maruya, K.-I., Onishi, T., J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday T. 1, 85 (1989) 929–943.
40. Li, C., Sakata, Y., Arai, T., Domen, K., Maruya, K.-I., Onishi, T., J. Chem.
Soc., Faraday T. 1, 85 (1989) 1451–1461.
41. Holmgren, A., Andersson, B., Duprez, D., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 22
(1999) 215–230.
42. Song, Z., Liu, W., Nishigushi, H., Catal. Commun., 8 (2007) 725–730.
43. Bernal, S., Calvino, J.J., Gatica, J.M., Cartes, C.L., Pintado, J.M. in
Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, ed. A. Trovarelli, Imperial
College Press, London, (2002), pp. 85–168.
44. Boaro, M., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A., J. Catal., 193
(2000) 338–347.
45. Descorme, C., Taha, R., Mouaddib-Moral, N., Duprez, D., Appl. Catal.
A, Gen., 223 (2002) 287–299.
46. Aneggi, E., Boaro, M., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A.,
Catal. Today, 112 (2006) 94–98.
47. Meiqing, S., Xinquan, W., Yuan, W., Duan, W., Minwei, Z., Jun, W.,
J. Rare Earths, 25 (2007) 48–52.
48. Zhao, M., Shen, M., Wang, J., J. Catal., 248 (2007) 258–267.
49. Wang, B., Weng, D., Wu, X., Fan, J., Catal. Today, 153 (2010) 111–117.
50. Wang, Q., Li, G., Zhao, B., Zhou, R., J. Mol. Catal. A, Chem., 339 (2011)
52–60.
51. Wang, Q., Li, G., Zhao, B., Zhou, R., Fuel, 90 (2011) 3047–3055.
52. Li, G., Wang, Q., Zhao, B., Zhou, R., Fuel, 92 (2012) 360–368.
53. Fornasiero, P., Fonda, E., Di Monte, R., Vlaic, G., Kašpar, J., Graziani,
M., J. Catal., 187 (1999) 177–185.
54. Vidal, H., Bernal, S., Kašpar, J., Pijolat, M., Perrichon, V., Blanco, G.,
Pintado, J.M., Baker, R.T., Colon, G., Fally, F., Catal. Today, 54 (1999)
93–100.
55. Nibbelke, R.H., Nievergerd, A.J.L., Hoebnik, J.H.B.J., Marin, G.B.,
Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 19 (1998) 245–259.
56. Sakamoto, Y., Kizaki, K., Motohiro, T., Yokota, Y., Sobukawa, H.,
Uenishi, M., Tanaka, H., Sugiura, M., J. Catal., 211 (2002) 157–164.
57. Miyamoto, K., Takebayashi, H., Ishihara, T., Kido, H., Hatamura, K.,
SAE Technical Paper 2002–01–1094 (2002).
58. Holmgren, A., Andersson, B., J. Catal., 178 (1998) 14–25.
59. Nievergeld, A.J.L., PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology
(1998).
60. Tsinoglou, D.N., Koltsakis, G.C., Peyton Jones, J.C., Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res., 41 (2002) 1152–1165.
61. Larese, C., Galisteo, F.C., Granados, M.L., Mariscal, R., Fierro, J.L.G.,
Lambrou, P.S., Efstathiou, A.M., J. Catal., 226 (2004) 443–456.
62. Martin, D., Kaur, P., Duprez, D., Gaigneaux, E., Ruiz, P., Delmon, B.,
Catal. Today, 32 (1996) 329–336.
63. Ezin, A.N., Tsilidilkovski, V.I., Kurumchin, E.K., Solid State Ionics, 84
(1996) 105–112.
64. Doornkamp, C., Clement, M., Ponec, V., J. Catal., 182 (1999) 390–399.
65. Madier, Y., Descorme, C., Le Govic, A.M., Duprez, D., J. Phys. Chem. B,
103 (1999) 10999–11006.
66. Descorme, C., Madier, Y., Duprez, D., J. Catal., 196 (2000) 167–173.
67. Den Otter, M.W., Boukamp, B.A., Bouwmeester, H.J.M., Solid State
Ionics, 139 (2001) 89–94.
68. Larese, C., Galisteo, F.C., Granados, M.L., Lopez, R.M., Fierro, J.L.G.,
Lambrou, P.S., Efstathiou, A.M., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 48 (2004)
113–123.
69. Larese, C., Granados, M.L., Mariscal, R., Fierro, J.L.G., Lambrou, P.,
Efstathiou, A.M., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 59 (2005) 13–25.
70. Granados, M.L., Galisteo, F.C., Lambrou, P.S., Mariscal, R., Sanz, J.,
Sobrados, I., Fierro, J.L.G., Efstathiou, A.M., J. Catal., 239 (2006)
410–421.
71. Lambrou, P.S., Efstathiou, A.M., J. Catal., 240 (2006) 182–193.
72. Christou, S.Y., Bradshaw, H., Butler, C., Darab, J., Efstathiou, A.M.,
Top. Catal., 52 (2009) 2013–2018.
73. Christou, S.Y., Alvarez, M.C.G., Fierro, J.L.G., Efstathiou, A.M., Appl.
Catal. B, Environ., 106 (2011) 103–113.
74. Cunningham, J., Farrell, F., Gibson, C., McCarthy, J., Catal. Today, 50
(1999) 429–443.
75. Holmgren, A., Duprez, D., Andersson, B., J. Catal., 182 (1999) 441–448.
76. Ciuparu, D., Bozon-Verduraz, F., Pfefferle, L., J. Phys. Chem. B, 106
(2002) 3434–3442.
77. Jerdev, D.I., Kim, J., Batzill, M., Koel, B.E., Surf. Sci. Lett., 498 (2002)
L91–L96.
78. Galdikas, A., Duprez, D., Descorme, C., Appl. Surf. Sci., 236 (2004)
342–355.
79. Galdikas, A., Descorme, C., Duprez, D., Solid State Ionics, 166 (2004)
147–155.
80. Dong, F., Suda, A., Tanade, T., Nagai, Y., Sobukawa, H., Shinjoh, H.,
Sugiura, M., Descorme, C., Duprez, D., Catal. Today, 90 (2004)
223–229.
81. Lin, R., Inmaculada, R.-R., Belen, B.-B., Antonio, G.-R., Sun, G., Xin, Q.,
Chinese J. Catal., 27 (2006) 109–114.
82. Galdikas, A., Descorme, C., Duprez, D., Mater. Sci., 13 (2007)
193–205.
120. Lambrou, P.S., Savva, P.G., Fierro, J.L.G., Efstathiou, A.M., Appl. Catal.
B, Environ., 76 (2007) 375–385.
121. Fernandes, D.M., Scofield, C.F., Neto, A.A., Baldini Cardoso, M.J.,
Zanon Zotin, F.M., Process Saf. Environ., 87 (2009) 315–322.
122. Fernandes, D.M., Scofield, C.F., Neto, A.A., Baldini Cardoso, M.J.,
Zanon Zotin, F.M., Chem. Eng. J., 160 (2010) 85–92.
123. Neyestanaki, A.K., Klingstedt, F., Salmi, T., Murzin, D.Yu., Fuel, 83
(2004) 395–408.
124. Hori, C.E., Permana, H., Simon Ng, K.Y., Brenner, A., More, K.,
Rahmoeller, K.M., Belton, D., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 16 (1998)
105–117.
125. Graham, G.W., Jen, H.-W., Chun, W., McCabe, R.W., J. Catal., 182
(1999) 228–233.
126. Inglesias-Juez, A., Martínez-Arias, A., Fernández-García, M., J. Catal.,
221 (2004) 148–161.
127. Lassi, U., Polvinen, R., Suhonen, S., Kallinen, K., Savimaki, A., Harkonen,
M., Valden, M., Keiski, R.L., Appl. Catal. A, Gen., 263 (2004) 241–248.
128. Jen, H.-W., Graham, G.W., Chun, W., McCabe, R.W., Cuif, J.-P.,
Deutsch, S.E., Touret, O., Catal. Today, 50 (1999) 309–328.
129. Kozlov, A.I., Kim, D.H., Yezerets, A., Andersen, P., Kung, H.H.,
Kung, M.C., J. Catal., 209 (2002) 417–426.
130. Liotta, L.F., Longo, A., Pantaleo, G., Di Carlo, G., Martorana, A.,
Cimino, S., Russo, G., Deganello, G, Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 90 (2009)
470–477.
131. Yashima, M., Arashi, H., Kakihana, M., Yoshimura, M., J. Am. Ceram.
Soc., 77 (1994) 1067–1071.
132. Kenevey, K., Valdivieso, F., Soustelle, M., Pijolat, M., Appl. Catal. B,
Environ., 29 (2001) 93–101.
133. Bedrane, S., Descorme, C., Duprez, D., Catal. Today, 73 (2002) 233–238.
134. Hori, C.E., Brenner, A., Simon Ng, K.Y., Rahmoeller, K.M., Belton, D.,
Catal. Today, 50 (1999) 299–308.
135. Fan, J., Wu, X., Wu, X., Liang, Q., Ran, R., Weng, D., Appl. Catal. B,
Environ., 81 (2008) 38–48.
136. Bernal, S., Blanco, G., Calvino, J.J., Gatica, J.M., Pérez-Omil, J.A.,
Pintado, J.M., Top. Catal., 28 (2004) 31–45.
137. Fan, J., Wu, X., Ran, R., Weng, D., Appl. Surf. Sci., 245 (2005) 162–171.
138. Liotta, L.F., Longo, A., Macaluso, A., Martorana, A., Pantaleo, G.,
Venezia, A.M., Deganello, G, Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 48 (2004) 133–149.
139. Kašpar, J., Di Monte, R., Fornasiero, P., Graziani, M., Bradshaw, H.,
Norman, C., Top. Catal., 16/17 (2001) 83–87.
140. Hickey, N., Fornasiero, P., Di Monte, R., Kašpar, J., Graziani, M.,
Dolcetti, G., Catal. Lett., 72 (2001) 45–50.
141. Fally, F., Perrichon, V., Vidal, H., Kašpar, J., Blanco, G., Pintado, J.M.,
Bernal, S., Colon, G., Daturi, M., Lavalley, J.C., Catal. Today, 59 (2000)
373–386.
142. Vidal, H., Kašpar, J., Pijolat, M., Colon, G., Bernal, S., Gordón, A.,
Perrichon, V., Fally, F., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 27 (2000) 49–63.
143. Vidal, H., Kašpar, J., Pijolat, M., Colon, G., Bernal, S., Gordón, A.,
Perrichon, V., Fally, F., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 30 (2001) 75–85.
144. Otsuka-Yao, S., Morikawa, H., Izu, N., Okuda, K., J. Japan Inst. Metals,
59 (2003) 1237–1246.
145. Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, S., Omata, T., Izu, N., Kishimoto, H., J. Solid State
Chem., 138 (1998) 47–54.
146. Omata, T., Kishimoto, H., Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, S., Ohtori, N.,
Umesaki, N., J. Solid State Chem., 147 (1999) 573–583.
147. Kishimoto, H., Omata, T., Otsuka-Yao-Matsuo, S., Ueda, K., Hosono,
H., Kawazoe, H., J. Alloys Compd., 312 (2000) 94–103.
148. Di Monte, R., Kašpar, J., J. Mater. Chem., 15 (2005) 633–648.
149. Nagai, Y., Yamamoto, T., Tanaka, T., Yoshida, S., Nonaka, T.,
Okamoto, T., Suda, A., Sugiura, M., Top. Catal., 47 (2008) 137–147.
150. Yeste, M.P., Hernández, J.C., Bernal, S., Blanco, G., Calvino, J.J., Pérez-
Omil, J.A., Pintado, J.M., Chem. Mater., 18 (2006) 2750–2757.
151. Bernal, S., Blanco, G., Calvino, J.J., Hernández, J.C., Pérez-Omil, J.A.,
Pintado, J.M., Yeste, M.P., J. Alloys Compd., 451 (2008) 521–524.
152. Yeste, M.P., Hernández, J.C., Trasobares, S., Bernal, S., Blanco, G.,
Calvino, J.J., Pérez-Omil, J.A., Pintado, J.M., Chem. Mater., 20 (2008)
5107–5113.
153. Yeste, M.P., Hernández, J.C., Bernal, S., Blanco, G., Calvino, J.J., Pérez-
Omil, J.A., Pintado, J.M., Catal. Today, 141 (2009) 409–414.
154. Hernández, J.C., Hungría, A.B., Pérez-Omil, J.A., Trasobares, S.,
Bernal, S., Midgley, P.A., Alavi, A., Calvino, J.J., J. Phys. Chem. C, 111
(2007) 9001–9004.
155. Lemaux, S., Bensaddik, A., van der Eerden, A.M.J., Bitter, J.H.,
Koningsberger, D.C., J. Phys. Chem. B, 105 (2001) 4810–4815.
156. Nagai, Y., Yamamoto, T., Tanaka, T., Yoshida, S., Nonaka, T., Okamoto,
T., Suda, A., Sugiura, M., Catal. Today, 74 (2002) 225–234.
157. Birgersson, H., Boutonnet, M., Järås, S., Eriksson, L., Top. Catal.,
30/31 (2004) 433–437.
158. Birgersson, H., Eriksson, L., Boutonnet, M., Järås, S., Appl. Catal. B,
Environ., 54 (2004) 193–200, and references therein.
159. Birgersson, H., Boutonnet, M., Klingstedt, F., Murzin, D.Y., Stefanov, P.,
Naydenov, A., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 65 (2006) 93–100.
160. Daley, R.A., Christou, S.Y., Efstathiou, A.M., Anderson, J.A., Appl.
Catal. B, Environ., 60 (2005) 117–127.
161. Anderson, J.A., Daley, R.A., Christou, S.Y., Efstathiou, A.M., Appl.
Catal. B, Environ., 64 (2006) 189–200.
162. Angelidis T.N., Papadakis, V.G., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 12 (1997)
193–206.
163. Darr, S.T., Choksi, R.A., Hubbard, C.P., Johnson, M.D., McCabe, R.W.,
SAE Technical Paper 2000–01–1881 (2000).
164. Lambrou, P.S., Christou, S.Y., Fotopoulos, A.P., Foti, F.K., Angelidis,
T.N., Efstathiou, A.M., Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 59 (2005) 1–11.
165. Christou, S.Y., Birgersson, H., Fierro J.L.G., Efstathiou, A.M., Environ.
Sci. Technol., 40 (2006) 2030–2036.
166. Christou, S.Y., Efstathiou, A.M., Top. Catal., 42/43 (2007) 415–419.
167. Christou, S.Y., Birgersson, H., Efstathiou, A.M., Appl. Catal. B, Environ.,
71 (2007) 185–198.
168. Christou, S.Y., Gåsste, J., Karlsson, H.L., Fierro, J.L.G., Efstathiou,
A.M., Top. Catal., 52 (2009) 2029–2034.
169. Christou, S.Y., PhD Thesis, University of Cyprus (2006).
170. Subramanian, B., Christou, S.Y., Efstathiou, A.M., Dionysiou, D.,
J. Hazard. Mater., 186 (2011) 999–1006.
171. Kim, S.C., Nahm, S.W., Shim, W.G., Seo, S.G., Lee, J.W., J. Nanosci.
Nanotechnol., 8 (2008) 5398–5403.
172. Shim, W.G., Jung, S.C., Seo, S.G., Kim, S.C., Catal. Today, 164 (2011)
500–506.
173. Lambrou, P.S., Polychronopoulou, K., Petallidou, K.C., Efstathiou, A.M.,
Appl. Catal. B, Environ., 111–112 (2012) 349–359.
CHAPTER 4
4.1 Introduction
Nitrogen is able to form no fewer than eight oxides1 and three of
these gases (N2O, NO, and NO2) are of special interest due to their
environmental and health impact.
Nitrous oxide (N2O) has long been considered a relatively
harmless gas and its atmospheric emissions have not received
much attention from scientists, engineers, or politicians. However,
there is growing concern since N2O is a harmful gas in our environ-
ment contributing to the greenhouse effect and the depletion of
the ozone layer. Although N2O is not the major contributor to
global warming it is much more potent than the other two most
common anthropogenic greenhouse gases, CO2 and CH4. Due to
its long lifespan of approximately 150 years in the atmosphere,
N2O has 310 and 21 times the global-warming potential (GWP) of
CO2 and CH4, respectively.2,3 The estimated contribution of anthro-
pogenic N2O emissions to the atmosphere is 4.7–7 million tons per
year (1 ton = 907.2 kg) and some scientists point out the need for
a 70–80% reduction in human emissions to achieve a null balance
between N2O emissions and N2O abatement provided naturally by
the planet.2,3 From the point of view of the greenhouse effect, the
required reduction in N2O emissions from anthropogenic sources
223
NO + 1/2O2 NO2
100
N2O decomposed to N2 and O2 (%)
80
0.5 wt% Rh/CeO2
60
40
Ce0.9La0.1O2
20
N2O N2 + O2
N2O N2
O O
Rh Rh Rh
Rh Rh Rh
O2 N-N
N2O O
1/2O2 N2
Ce0.9La0.1O2
Ar
150ºC 25ºC
350ºC
Figure 4.4 F2g band measured by in situ Raman spectroscopy performed with
a 0.5 wt% Rh/CeO2 catalyst in Ar and 1000 ppm N2O/Ar flows at different
temperatures.
and 1000 ppm N2O/Ar flows at different temperatures with a 0.5 wt%
Rh/CeO2 catalyst.
For both gases, the position of the F2g peak decreases with tem-
perature, and this is attributed to the thermal expansion of the unit
cell of ceria due to the partial reduction of Ce4+ cations (0.097 nm)
to larger Ce3+ cations (0.114 nm). Thermal reduction occurs because
of O2 release with temperature, but at 350 ºC, that is, once the tem-
perature is high enough for N2O decomposition (see Fig. 4.1), the
shift of the F2g peak mainly affects the experiment performed in the
inert (Ar) flow. In N2O/Ar, N2O re-oxidizes the thermally reduced
cerium cations. The thermal reduction of ceria in Ar and also the
reoxidation by N2O was confirmed by XPS measurements.28 These
experiments evidence the oxidizing character of N2O towards
reduced ceria, N2O oxidation being an intermediate step on the cata-
lytic decomposition of N2O on Rh/ceria.
DRIFTS is also a powerful tool for studying the interaction of
N2O with ceria-based materials, and as an example, Fig. 4.5 shows
DRIFT spectra recorded at 375°C during in situ experiments per-
formed with two ceria samples of composition 0.25 wt% Rh/50 wt%
Ce0.9Pr0.1O2/γ-Al2O3 and 50 wt% Ce0.9Pr0.1O2/γ-Al2O3 in a 1000 ppm
N2O/He flow.
In general, there are three regions of the infrared (IR) spectra
that merit special attention. Bands in the range 2400–2100 cm−1 can
be assigned to the N–N stretching frequency of adsorbed N2 or
N2O,31–33 bands below 1700 cm−1 can be attributed to oxidized nitro-
gen species (nitrite, nitrate, and nitro compounds), and those
around 3800–3600 cm−1 to hydroxyl groups.34,35 Table 4.1 summa-
rizes the main IR bands identified for a Rh/ceria catalyst in contact
with a N2O/He flow.
Bands of N–N stretching are observed in Fig. 4.5 both in the
Rh-free and Rh-containing samples (2400–2100 cm−1), indicating
that N2O is chemisorbed on ceria (not just on Rh). The formation
of more than a single band occurs due to the presence of different
chemisorption sites, which is an evidence of the heterogeneity of the
ceria surface. Bands between 2400 cm−1 and 2100 cm−1 appear in
ceria samples typically above 200ºC. On γ-Al2O3 and Rh/γ-Al2O3
2400-2100 cm-1
without Rh
with Rh
Figure 4.5 DRIFT spectra of the samples 0.25 wt% Rh/50 wt% Ce0.9Pr0.1O2/γ-Al2O3
(with rhodium) and 50 wt% Ce0.9Pr0.1O2/γ-Al2O3 (without rhodium) recorded
in situ at 375°C in a gas flow of 1000 ppm N2O/He (baselines recorded at room
temperature in He were subtracted).
samples, for instance, a single band at 2315 cm−1 was observed for
N2O chemisorption above 200°C.28
In Fig. 4.5, the negative band at 3740 cm−1 is attributed to the
depletion of hydroxyl groups on ceria, according to Step 4 of the
20
12
0
225 325 425 525 625
Temperature (ºC)
(a)
40
Thermodynamic equilibrium
NO + 1/2O2 NO2
30
CeO2 (calcined at 500ºC)
NO2 (%)
20
10
CeO2 (calcined at 1000ºC)
Empty reactor
0
225 325 425 525 625
Temperature (ºC)
(b)
Figure 4.6 Interaction of a 500 ppm NO + 5% O2 gas flow (30,000 h−1) at atmos-
pheric pressure with powdered ceria samples calcined at different temperatures.
Experiments were performed in a fixed-bed reactor heated at 10°C/min and cou-
pled to NDIR-UV specific gas analyzers. (a) NOx chemisorbed (%) = 100·([NOx]in-
[NOx]out)/ [NOx]in and (b) NO2 (%) = 100·[NO2]out/([NO]out + [NO2]out).
NO
Re-adsorbed NO2 Gas phase NO2
Nitrites Nitrates
OH
O
CeO2 CeO2-x CeO2
Oxygen
vacancies
O2
ZrO2
Surface nitrites population
Surface nitrates population
Ce0.76Zr0.24O2
CeO2
ZrO2
CeO2
Ce0.76Zr0.24O2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Time (min)
Figure 4.8 Transformation over time of surface nitrites (open symbols) and
nitrates (solid symbols) on CeO2, ZrO2, and Ce0.76Zr0.24O2 during in situ DRIFTS
experiments performed at 350°C with 2000 ppm NO + 5% O2.
ZrO2
NO2 concentration (arbitrary untis)
Ce0.76Zr0.24O2
CeO2
4.4 Conclusions
In this chapter, the interaction of nitrogen oxides (N2O, NO, and
NO2) with ceria-based materials has been discussed, with a focus on
two catalyzed reactions of practical relevance: the catalytic decom-
position of N2O on Rh/ceria catalysts and the ceria-catalyzed oxida-
tion of NO to NO2.
The interaction of N2O with ceria materials leads to the formation
of several surface nitrogen groups, including N2O itself but also oxi-
dized species like nitrites and nitrates due to the highly oxidizing
character of ceria. In some conditions (a high enough temperature,
the presence of certain metals like rhodium, etc.) N2O is decomposed
to N2 and O2. For Rh/ceria catalysts, it has been demonstrated that
ceria is actively involved in the decomposition and the active sites for
N2O chemisorption and decomposition are not only located on rho-
dium but also on ceria.
In contrast to N2O, the interaction of NOx (NO + NO2) with
ceria-based materials does not yield N2 + O2 and the main reaction
is the oxidation of NO to NO2. This oxidation process involves NO
chemisorption on the catalyst, oxidation of the nitrogen surface spe-
cies created, and NO2 desorption. The surface nitrogen species
identified on the ceria surface after NOx chemisorption are nitrites,
nitrates, and nitro groups. These species are progressively converted
with time to more oxidized nitrogen groups. After these oxidation
processes NO2 is released. Ceria oxygen is used in these surface oxi-
dation steps, but it is not only the oxidizing character of the ceria
material that affects the net oxidation of NO to NO2. NO2 produc-
tion is also affected by the adsorption strength of the nitrogen
species on the ceria surface. For ceria–zirconia mixed oxides, for
instance, surface nitrogen groups are attached more strongly to Zr
sites than to Ce sites.
The commonality of the interaction of N2O and NOx with ceria-
based materials is the important role of the properties of ceria,
which are affected, as is well known, by variables like the calcination
temperature, dopants, etc. A ceria-based material with “good” prop-
erties (easy reducibility, high oxygen storage capacity, high surface
References
1. Greenwood, N.N., Earnshaw, A., Chemistry of the Elements, 2nd edition,
Elsevier, Oxford, (1997).
2. Kapteijn, F., Rodríguez-Mirasol, J., Moulijn, J.A., Appl. Catal. B, 9
(1996) 25–64.
3. Pérez-Ramírez, J., Kapteijn, F., Schoffel, K., Moulijn, J.A., Appl. Catal.
B, 44 (2003) 117–151.
4. Lee, S.J., Ryu, I.S., Kim, B.M., Moon, S.H., Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 5
(2011) 167–176.
5. Gandhi, H.S., Graham, G.W., McCabe, R., J. Catal., 216 (2003)
433–442.
6. Garrigós-Pastor, G., Parres-Escaplez, S., Bueno-López, A., Illán-Gómez,
M.J., Salinas-Martínez de Lecea, C., Appl. Catal. A, 354 (2009) 63–71.
7. Bueno-López, A., Lozano-Castello, D., Such-Basáñez, I., García-Cortés,
J.M., Illán-Gómez, M.J., Salinas-Martínez de Lecea, C., Appl. Catal. B,
58 (2005) 1–7.
8. Shimizu, A., Tanaka, K., Fujimori. M., Chemosphere, 2 (2000) 425–434.
9. Granger, P., Esteves, P., Kieger, S., Navascues, L., Leclercq, G., Appl.
Catal. B, 62 (2006) 236–243.
10. Alini, S., Basile, F., Blasioli, S., Rinaldi, C., Vaccari, A., Appl. Catal. B,
70 (2007) 323–329.
11. Pérez-Ramírez, J., Santiago, M., Chem. Commun., 6 (2007) 619–621.
12. Giecko, G., Borowiecki, T., Gac, W., Kruk, J., Catal. Today, 137 (2008)
403–409.
13. Ruszak, M., Inger, M., Witkowski, S., Wilk, M., Kotarba, A., Sokja, Z.,
Catal. Letters, 126 (2008) 72–77.
32. Oktar, N., Mitome, J., Holmgreen, E.M., Ozkan, U.S., J. Mol. Catal., A.
259 (2006) 171–182.
33. Wang, Y., Lei, Z., Chen, B., Guo, Q., Liu, N., Appl. Surf. Sci., 256 (2010)
4042–4047.
34. Djinović, P., Batista, J., Pintar, A. Catal. Today, 147 (2009) 191–197.
35. Menacherry, P.V., Haller, G.L., Catal. Letters, 44 (1997) 135–144.
36. Kustova, M.Yu., Rasmussen, S.B., Kustov, A.L., Christensen, C.H., Appl.
Catal. B, 67 (2006) 60–67.
37. Parvulescu, V.I., Granger, P., Delmon, B., Catal. Today, 46 (1998)
233–316.
38. Miguel-García, I., Parres-Esclapez, S., Lozano-Castelló, D., Bueno-
López, A. Catal. Commun., 11 (2010) 848–852.
39. Binet, C., Daturi, M., Lavalley, J.C. Catal. Today, 50 (1999) 207–225.
40. Daturi, M., Finocchio, E., Binet, C., Lavalley, J.C., Fally, F., Perrichon,
V., J. Phys. Chem. B, 103 (1999) 4884–4891.
41. Graf, P.O., de Vlieger, D.J.M., Mohet, B.L., Lefferts, L., J. Catal., 262
(2009) 181–187.
42. Azambre, B., Atribak, I., Bueno-López, A., García-García, A., J. Phys.
Chem. C, 114 (2010) 13300–13312.
43. Azambre, B., Zenboury, L., Koch, A., Weber, J.A., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113
(2009) 13287–13299.
44. Atribak, I., Azambre, B., Bueno-López, A., García-García, A., Top.
Catal., 52 (2009) 2092–2096.
45. Martinez-Arias, A., Soria, J., Conesa, J.C., Seoane, X.L., Arcoya, A.,
Cataluna, R.J., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday T., 91 (1995) 1679–1687.
46. Azambre, B., Atribak, I., Bueno-López, A., García-García, A., Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 12 (2010) 13770–13779.
47. Atribak, I., Guillén-Hurtado, N., Bueno-López, A., García-García, A.,
Appl. Surf. Sci., 256 (2010) 7706–7712.
CHAPTER 5
5.1 Methodology
Atomistic computer simulation is an intuitive approach in that it
involves generating the (atomistic) structure and then calculating a
particular property or simulating a process using this structure.
Many texts have been devoted to describing such an approach with
various levels of detail, for example, Catlow et al.1 Accordingly, only
the salient details are provided here. For example, to explore the
oxidative catalysis of ceria one can envisage determining how easy it
is to remove an oxygen atom from the surface of ceria. Accordingly,
one first generates an atomistic model — in this case an array of
atoms to represent the crystal structure of ceria and the particular
surface. One then calculates the energy of this structure compared
to the energy of the same structure after having removed oxygen
from the surface. The study can then be extended to a range of
surfaces to help predict which surfaces are likely to be catalytically
reactive.
247
where Eij is the interaction energy of ions i and j, rij the interatomic
distance between ions i and j, qi the charge of ion i and A and ρ are
variable parameters. The first term of the equation is the classical cou-
lombic term, and the second term is the short-range repulsion
between ions. The accuracy and reliability of all atomistic simulation
rests critically upon the potential models used to describe the inter-
actions between the component ions comprising the material.
Accordingly, careful consideration and choice of the variable param-
eters, in this case, A and ρ, must be exercised.
Vacancy Oxygen
5.2.4 Surfaces
For oxidative catalysis using ceria, oxygen is necessarily extracted
from the surface of the material. Similar to constructing models for
the bulk material, symmetry operators can be used to construct
atomistic models of surfaces. Generally one needs simply to specify
the Miller index of the particular surface in the code, which then
constructs an atomistic model; an unrelaxed CeO2(310) surface is
shown in Fig. 5.2.
Two strategies for simulating surfaces at the atomistic level have
been considered. The simplest approach uses 3D periodic boundary
conditions and includes a large void to represent the free surface.8
Alternatively, the surface can be considered explicitly using 2D peri-
odic boundary conditions and requires special consideration of the
electrostatics.9
The atomistic structure of a surface is not generally a simple
termination of the bulk material; the surface atoms undergo relaxa-
tion and rumpling. This is hardly surprising as the environment,
such as the coordination number, of a surface atom is profoundly
different from that of an equivalent atom in the bulk. The surface
relaxation can be captured using energy minimisation or molecular
dynamics, which direct the (surface) atoms into low-energy
SURFACE
more reactive surfaces are also less stable and therefore less likely to
be exposed in preference to the more stable (and less reactive)
(111). On the other hand, various methods are available to help
selectively expose the most active surfaces, including supporting the
CeO2 on a substrate, which helps template the evolution of more
reactive ceria surfaces, or, more recently, by working at the
nanoscale.
In an attempt to explore how chemically reactive surfaces might
be exposed in preference to less reactive, but thermodynamically
more stable surfaces, thin films of ceria were supported on an
yttrium-stabilised zirconia (YSZ) (110) surface. The rationale under-
pinning the strategy was that the (110) surface expressed by the YSZ
substrate might template the ceria thin film to also express the (110)
surface in preference to the less reactive (111) surface as both the
ceria and YSZ have a fluorite crystal structure. The simulations
revealed that although the CeO2(110) surface was indeed expressed
at the surface of the thin film, the CeO2(111) and (100) surfaces
were also observed. In particular, the ceria thin film comprised
many misoriented nanocrystalline grains. This was attributed to the
lattice misfit between the ceria and underlying YSZ substrate.
It is perhaps gratifying to note that the ‘perceived’ simplicity of
ceria surfaces, surface steps and surface vacancies, based upon
inspection of the atomistic models, for example Fig. 5.2, are not that
dissimilar to experimental images measured more recently, Fig. 5.3,
using AFM.16,17
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
Figure 5.3 (a), (b) Step edges on a CeO2(111) surface as revealed by dynamic scan-
ning force microscopy (SFM). Reproduced with permission from Gritschneder et al.17
(c)–(f) Surface vacancies appearing as (c) single vacancies, (d) in-line configurations
and (e), (f) triangular vacancy clusters, as revealed using high-resolution dynamic
scanning force microscopy operated in non-contact mode. Reproduced with permis-
sion from Gritschneder and Reichling.16 Copyright 2007 IOP Publishing Ltd.
5.2.7 Dislocations
A dislocation (necessarily) terminates at a free surface. Accordingly,
similar to a surface step, the coordination number and local envi-
ronment of surface oxygen in the core region of a dislocation differs
to that of surface oxygen ions far from the core,21 Fig. 5.4, which will
influence the lability of surface oxygen at or near dislocation cores.
Similarly, the local environment of an oxygen ion in the core of the
dislocation far below the surface is also different compared to oxy-
gen residing in (pristine) bulk regions, with implications for ionic
transport in the material. Accordingly, if simulation is to be used to
explore the catalytic activity of oxides, which rests upon surface
lability and ionic transport, it is important to include dislocations
in the atomistic model. The influence of dislocations on point
defects in ionic oxides has been explored by Zhang and co-workers
who constructed atomistic models of dislocations in MgO and
found that defects are strongly bound to the dislocation cores.22
Specifically, vacancies are found to be most stable when they remove
under-coordinated ions at the tip of the extra half plane. They also
found that vacancy migration along the dislocation line will be sub-
stantially enhanced compared to migration through the dislocation-
free crystal structure. On the other hand the mechanisms for oxygen
transport in ceramic oxides are material (crystal structure) specific.
Accordingly, one cannot extend trends identified for one material
to other material classes; rather all one can safely attest is that the
strain fields, emanating from dislocations, will influence surface
oxygen vacancy formation and mobility with important conse-
quences for catalysis. Such calculations can now be explored rou-
tinely using the GULP code.3
(c)
(b) (d) (f)
Figure 5.5 Images of a [001](210) Σ5 grain boundary in a CeO2 thin film. Left:
Scanning tunnelling electron micrographs. Right: Atomistic models. Reproduced
with permission from Hojo et al.23 Copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.
a
For example, the stress field of a dislocation will likely influence the structural
configuration of intrinsic and extrinsic defects localised in or near the core region
of the dislocation.
Figure 5.6 Top: Atomistic model of a CeO2 nanotube, which includes microstruc-
tural features such as dislocations and grain boundaries. Bottom: The method used
to generate such models. Reprinted with permission from Martin et al.30 Copyright
2007 American Chemical Society.
5.3.2 Outlook
Atomistic simulation methodologies that first construct a crystal of
the pristine material, derive appropriate forcefields and then
introduce microstructural features are well placed to help experi-
ments elucidate phenomena of critical importance for catalysis.
However, the competence of the simulator is necessarily at the
expert level, because they need to be conversant with the workings
of the code and therefore be able to perform and interpret the
data emanating from such methods. To help address such techni-
cal issues, commercial packages are available that enable one to
perform all these simulations at a single ‘point of contact’. For
example, via a graphical interface, one can build the structural
model with template examples, link the structure with appropriate
forcefields, introduce pertinent microstructural features (point
defects, morphology, dislocations, grain boundaries) and then cal-
culate properties (such as oxygen vacancy formation energy) and
simulate pertinent processes (such as oxygen diffusion), using, for
example, energy minimisation or molecular dynamical simulation.
Moreover, this can all be achieved using appropriate ‘clicks of a
mouse button’. Such ‘simulation studios’ reduce the amount of
time required to extract data, offer high throughput and do not
necessarily require the user to be an ‘expert’. Conversely, limited
knowledge of the workings, subtleties and science underpinning
such studios can potentially lead to naïve or indeed incorrect
information being computed. Accordingly, one must advocate care
in the utilisation of such methods and be critically aware of the
pitfalls.
5.4 Nanocatalysis
A recent major scientific finding reveals that one can modify or
indeed control the physical, chemical and mechanical properties of
a material simply by limiting the size of the material to the nanome-
tre range. Indeed, it has been proposed that nanomaterials will
transform the scientific landscape of the 21st century. Certainly, its
influence on catalysis cannot be understated as evidenced by an
exponential growth in publications in this area, proffering new
physical phenomena, with exploitation of the science giving rise to
new and proven applications. If atomistic simulation is to continue
to provide valuable insights and predictions, one must strive to gen-
erate models for nanomaterials.
One of the benefits of the ‘nanoscale’ is that atomistic simula-
tion can simulate every atom comprising the nanomaterial explic-
itly, without resorting to symmetry methods to facilitate periodic
boundaries. On the other hand, it brings new hierarchical levels of
structural complexity. For example, to simulate a nanomaterial, one
must capture in the atomistic model:
Figure 5.7 CeO2 cluster comprising 50 formula units; the (111) plane is high-
lighted. Reprinted with permission from Cordatos et al.32 Copyright 1996 American
Chemical Society.
Pivotal to this study was that the nanoparticle structure was not
influenced (perhaps erroneously) by the simulator constructing
configurations that appear intuitively feasible according to, for
example, the crystal structure or likely surfaces exposed; rather the
configurations were driven energetically. Moreover, it is gratifying
to see that the lowest energy surface of ceria, CeO2(111), indeed
evolved using this method.
b
The energetically most stable ceria surface CeO2(111) is catalytically less reactive
compared to CeO2(110) or CeO2(100), yet is preferentially exposed in the parent
bulk material because of its inherent stability.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 5.8 Atomistic models of supported thin films generated by simulating atom
deposition onto a substrate. (a) Illustration of the process. (b) The mobility of the
ions once deposited onto the surface. (c) Atomistic model of a CaO thin film sup-
ported on MgO(100) after the deposition of 1.8 equivalent monolayers onto the
surface. (d) After 3.6 equivalent monolayers have been deposited onto the surface.
Note in (d) the presence of a mixed screw-edge dislocation (arrow), which evolves
in the supported CaO thin film to accommodate the lattice misfit. Reproduced
from Sayle et al.33 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Figure 5.9 MgO thin film supported on a BaO(001) substrate. (a) Plan view look-
ing down onto the MgO thin film showing the polycrystallinity of the material.
(b) Segment of (a) showing more clearly the structure between two misoriented
MgO grains. (c) Enlarged segment of (b) showing the dislocation core.
(d) Perspective view of the MgO/BaO(001) system — only two layers of the BaO
substrate are shown to improve clarity. Reproduced from Sayle and Watson39 with
permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 5.10 Molecular dynamics simulation of water freezing at 180 K showing the
growth of a critical nucleus as a function of simulation time. Hydrogen bonds
connecting molecules, identified as solid, are highlighted. Reproduced from
Quigley and Rodger40 with permission from the Taylor & Francis Group.
(k) (l)
(a) (b)
Figure 5.12 Atomistic models and HRTEM images of ceria nanorods. (a) and (b)
Model CeO2 nanorods, which extend along [110] and (b), respectively. (c) Nanorod
with twin-grain boundaries; the atomistic structure of the grain-boundary region is
shown enlarged in the inset. HRTEM images of nanorods with [110] and [211] growth
directions are shown in (d) and (e), respectively. (a)–(c) Reprinted with permission
from Sayle et al.46 Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society. (d), (e) Reprinted with
permission from Du et al.48 Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society.
not only for catalysis but for many other applications of ceria (nota-
bly in solid oxide fuel cells). Accordingly, ceria heterolayers, inter-
faced with YSZ thin films, were constructed using simulated
crystallisation and the ionic conductivity was calculated. During
crystallisation, the ceria evolved misfit dislocations to help accom-
modate the strain in the system associated with the lattice misfit
between the ceria and YSZ, Fig. 5.13. In this instance, the disloca-
tions evolved during the crystallisation and were not introduced
‘manually’ via symmetry operators based upon the relative lattice
parameters.
However, the introduction of such microstructural complexity
led to a significant reduction in the conductivity of oxygen. In par-
ticular, the simulations revealed that O conduction in the ceria was
CeO2
YSZ
Figure 5.13 Atomistic model of a CeO2 thin film supported on YSZ. Top:
Perspective view showing the atomistic structure; a dislocation is shown in the white
oval. Bottom: Side view revealing the periodicity of the misfit dislocations.
Reproduced from Sayle et al.56 by permission of the Royal Society of Chemistry.
-16
Ln(Di)
Pure CeO2
-17 nanoparticle
CeO1.95
nanoparticle
-18
Rh0.1Ce0.9O1.95
nanoparticle
-19
1000/T
(g) (h)
Figure 5.15 Model atomistic structures and electron tomograms of ceria nano-
chains comprising individual CeO2 nanoparticles. (a), (b) Iso-surface rendered
STEM images of the reconstructed 3D volume of CeO2 nanoparticles comprising a
ceria nanochain. (c) Schematic illustrating the morphology of the individual nano-
particles. (d) HRTEM image of a ceria nanochain revealing the oriented attach-
ment of individual ceria nanoparticles at (100) and (111) faces. (e) Atomistic
model of ceria nanoparticles that (self-) assembled into a nanochain. (f) Iso-surface
rendered model of a ceria nanochain showing oriented attachment at (100) and
(111) faces. (g), (h) Model atomistic structures of individual ceria nanoparticles.
(a), (b), (c) Reprinted with permission from Tan et al.64 Copyright 2011 American
Chemical Society. (d) Reprinted with permission from Du et al.48 Copyright 2007
American Chemical Society. (e), (f) Reproduced with permission from the
American Chemical Society from Kuchibhatla et al.65 (g), (h) Reproduced from
Sayle et al.45 with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
{111}
CO
CO2
{100}
FCC
120o
CUBIC TETRAGONAL HEXAGONAL
a=b=c; α=β=γ=90o a=b≠c; α=β= γ=90o a=b≠c; α=β=90; γ=120o
Figure 5.17 Procedure for generating atomistic models for mesoporous materials
by positioning nanoparticles at crystallographic positions. The images at the bot-
tom are atomistic models of mesoporous MgO generated by positioning MgO
nanoparticles at FCC positions. Reprinted with permission from Sayle et al.44
Copyright 2008 American Chemical Society.
Figure 5.18 Atomistic model for mesoporous MgO showing the three levels of
structural complexity: (left) crystal structure, (middle) microstructure and (right)
nanostructure. Reprinted with permission from Sayle et al.44 Copyright 2008
American Chemical Society.
for example, see Sayle et al.47 and Sayle and Sayle,67 it is becoming
apparent that nanomaterials have the capability to proffer ‘ultra-
strength’ phenomena68 in that they can support stresses up to ‘a
significant fraction (>1/10) of their ideal strength — the highest
achievable stress of a defect-free crystal at zero temperature’. In par-
ticular, it has been predicted (via simulation) that ceria nanorods
can sustain yield strengths up to 50 GPa.47 Moreover, experimental
studies have revealed that ceria nanoparticles, 3 nm in diameter,
under quasihydrostatic pressure, are stable up to 60 GPa compared
to 30 GPa associated with the parent bulk material.69 It is likely
that the field of nanomechanics will unravel new physics pertain-
ing to nano(porous) materials with important implications for
nanocatalysis.
used for DFT calculations is necessarily more simplistic for the calcu-
lation to be tractable using current computational facilities.
Consequently, such methods are used in parallel with atomistic simu-
lation to provide complementary information for experiments.
To help circumvent this limitation, an approach to couple QM
with atomistic modelling, while at present in its infancy, has enjoyed
much success. Such quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics
(QM/MM) simulations include an inner core region, which com-
prises relatively few atoms and is treated quantum mechanically,
surrounded by a larger region which is treated atomistically,
Fig. 5.19. While the challenges associated with this method are con-
siderable–for example, the need to ensure the potential models
describing the MM component are commensurate with QM72 and
include dynamic reassignment ‘on-the-fly’ of the QM domain as the
‘reaction’ proceeds73–they promise the ability to simulate catalysis
explicitly spanning several hierarchical structural levels including:
electronic structure < crystal structure < microstructure < meso-
structure and ‘continuum’. In particular, the advantage of the
method is that they do not consider each hierarchical level in turn,
but similar to experiments, may be performed in a single simulation
CO CO2
5.7 Outlook
Atomistic computer simulation has continued to provide experi-
menters with unique insights and predictions. However, capturing
the hierarchical complexity associated with nanomaterials, within a
single atomistic model, is difficult; perhaps the easiest way to gener-
ate such models is by simulating, in part, the synthetic method used
during their manufacture. Moreover, a benefit of this approach is
the ability to be able to make direct comparisons between experi-
ment and simulation.
On the other hand, if the models comprising all hierarchical
levels of structural complexity are generated by ‘simulating synthe-
sis’ rather than generating each component ‘by-hand’ using symme-
try operators, one loses ultimate control over the atomistic structure;
instead, similar to experiments, control over the microstructures
and architectures may only be achieved indirectly by controlling, for
example, temperature, pressure and methods of (self-) assembly.
QM/MM methods74,75–which enable one to simulate the core
region quantum mechanically, to model bond formation or break-
ing, coupled with an atomistic level description of the surrounding
regions, which include microstructural features and nanoarchitec-
ture, together with continuum methods that effectively extend the
material to ‘infinity’–while at time of writing are in their infancy,
span hierarchical length scales from the electronic structure to a
continuum and have the potential to truly ‘Simulate the dirt’!
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from EPSRC EP/
H001220.
References
1. Catlow, C.R.A., Smith, B.J., van Santen, R.A., eds., Computer Modelling
of Microporous Materials, Academic Press, Amsterdam, (2004).
2. Smith, W., Forester, T.R., DL_POLY, copyright by the Council for the
Central Laboratory of the Research Councils, Daresbury Laboratory,
Daresbury, Warrington, UK (1996). www.cse.clrc.ac.uk/msi/software/
DL_POLY/.
3. Gale, J.D., Rohl, A.L., Mol. Simulat., 29 (2003) 291–341.
4. Hamad, S., Catlow, C.R.A., Woodley, S.M., Lago, S., Mejías, J.A.,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (2005) 15741–15748.
5. Johnston, R.L., Dalton T., (2003) 4193–4207.
6. Sayle, T.X.T., Parker, S.C., Catlow, C.R.A., Chem. Commun., 14 (1992)
977–978.
7. Balducci, G., Islam, M.S., Kaspar, J., Fornasiero, P., Graziani, M., Chem.
Mater., 15 (2003) 3781–3785.
8. Goniakowski, J., Finocchi, F., Noguera, C., Rep. Prog. Phys., 71 (2008)
016501.
9. Watson, G.W., Kelsey, E.T., de Leeuw, N.H., Harris, D.J., Parker, S.C.,
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T., 92 (1996) 433–438.
10. Norenberg, H., Harding, J.H., Surf. Sci., 477 (2001) 17–24.
11. Conesa, J.C., Surf. Sci., 339 (1995) 337–352.
12. Mai, H.X., Sun, L.D., Zhang, Y.W., Si, R., Feng, W., Zhang, H.P.,
Liu, H., Yan, C.H., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (2005) 24380–24385.
13. Niesz, K., Reji, C., Neilson, J.R. Vargas, R.C., Morse, D.E., ACS Crystal
Growth and Design, 10 (2010) 4485–4490.
14. Zhang, J., Kumagai, H., Yamamura, K., Ohara, S., Takami, S.,
Morikawa, A., Shinjoh, H., Kaneko, K., Adschiri, T., Suda, A., Nano
Lett., 11 (2011) 361–364.
15. Wu, Z., Li, M., Howe, H., Meyer, H.M., Overbury, S.H., Langmuir, 26
(2010) 16595–16606.
16. Gritschneder, S., Reichling, M., Nanotechnology, 18 (2007) 044024.
17. Gritschneder, S., Namba, Y., Reichling, M., Nanotechnology, 16 (2005)
S41–S48.
18. Baudin, M., Wojcik, M., Hermansson, K., Palmqvist, A.E.C.,
Muhammed, M., Chem. Phys. Lett., 335 (2001) 517–523.
19. Li, H.-Y., Wang, H.-F., Guo, Y.-L., Lu, G.-Z., Hu, P., Chem. Commun., 47
(2011) 6105–6107.
20. Gotte, A., Hermansson, K., Baudin, M., Surf. Sci., 552 (2004) 273–280.
21. Sayle. D.C., J. Mater. Chem., 9 (1999) 2961–2964.
22. Zhang, F., Walker, A.M., Wright, K., Gale, J.D., J. Mater. Chem., 20
(2010) 10445–10451.
23. Hojo, H., Mizoguchi, T., Ohta, H., Findlay, S.D., Shibata, N.,
Yamamoto, T., Ikuhara, Y., Nano Lett., 10 (2010) 4668–4672.
24. Tasker, P.W., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday T., 86 (1990) 1311–1315.
25. Duffy, D.M., Tasker, P.W., Philos. Mag. A, 54 (1986) 759–771.
26. Fisher, C.A.J., Matsubara, H., J. Euro. Ceram. Soc., 19 (1999) 703–707.
27. Sutton, A.P., Balluffi, R.W., Interfaces in Crystalline Materials: Monographs
on the Physics and Chemistry of Materials, Clarendon Press, Oxford,
(1995).
28. Sayle, T.X.T., Catlow, C.R.A., Sayle, D.C. Parker, S.C., Harding, J.H.,
Philos. Mag. A, 68 (1993) 565–573.
29. Sayle, D.C., Maicaneanu, A.S. Watson, G.W., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124
(2002) 11429–11439.
30. Martin, P., Parker, S.C., Sayle, D.C., Watson, G.W., Nano Lett., 7 (2007)
543–546.
31. Zhou, K., Yang, Z., Yang, S., Chem. Mater., 19 (2007) 1215–1217.
32. Cordatos, H., Ford, D., Gorte, R.J., J. Phys. Chem., 100 (1996)
18128–18132.
33. Sayle, D.C., Maicaneanu, S.A., Slater, B., Catlow, C.R.A., J. Mater.
Chem., 9 (1999) 2779–2787.
34. Mohn, C.E., Stein, M.J., Allan, N.L., J. Mater. Chem., 20 (2010)
10403–10411.
35. Piana, S., Reyhani, M., Gale, J.D., Nature, 438 (2005) 70–73.
36. Phillpot, S.R., Keblinski, P., Wolf, D., Cleri, F., Interface Sci., 7 (1999)
15–31.
37. Sayle, D.C., Watson, G.W., J. Phys. Chem. B, 106 (2002) 3778–3787.
38. Sayle, D.C., Watson, G.W., J. Mater. Chem., 10 (2000) 2241–2243.
39. Quigley, D., Rodger, P.M., Mol. Simulat., 35 (2009) 613–623.
40. Anwar, J., Zahn, D., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 50 (2011) 1996–2013.
41. Streitz, F.H., Glosli, J.N., Patel, M.V., Phys. Rev. Letters, 96 (2006)
225701.
42. Sayle, T.X.T., Parker, S.C., Sayle, D.C., Chem. Commun., 21 (2004)
2438–2439.
43. Feng, X.D., Sayle, D.C., Wang, Z.L., Paras, M.S., Santora, B., Sutorik,
A., Sayle, T.X.T., Yang, Y., Ding, Y., Wang, X.D., Her, Y.S., Science, 312
(2006) 1504–1508.
44. Sayle, D.C., Seal, S., Wang, Z.W., Mangili, B.C., Price, D.W.,
Karakoti, A.S., Kuchibhatla, S.V.T.N., Hao, Q., Moebus, G., Xu, X.,
Sayle, T.X.T., ACS Nano, 2 (2008) 1237–1251.
45. Sayle, T.X.T., Parker, S.C., Sayle, D.C., Faraday Discuss., 134 (2007)
377–397.
46. Sayle, D.C., Feng, X., Ding, Y., Wang, Z.L., Sayle, T.X.T., J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 129 (2007) 7924–7935.
47. Sayle, T.X.T., Inkson, B.J., Karakoti, A., Kumar, A., Molinari, M.,
Mobus, G., Parker, S.C., Seal, S., Sayle, D.C., Nanoscale, 3 (2011)
18223–18237.
48. Du, N., Zhang, H., Chen, B., Ma, X., Yang, D., J. Phys. Chem. C, 111
(2007) 12677–12680.
49. Barnard, A.S., Rep. Prog. Phys., 73 (2010) 086502.
50. Catlow, C.R.A., Stefan, T., Brombley, T., Hamad, S., Mora-Fonz, M.,
Sokola, A., Woodley, S.M., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 12 (2010)
786–811.
51. Sayle, T.X.T., Parker, S.C., Sayle, D.C., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 7
(2005) 2936–2941.
52. Migani, A., Vayssilov, G.N., Bromley, S.T., Illas, F., Neyman, K.M.,
J. Mater. Chem., 20 (2010) 10535–10546.
53. Liu, X., Zhou, K., Wang, L., Wang, B., Li, Y, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131
(2009) 3140–3141.
54. Sata, N., Eberman, K., Eberl, K., Maier, J., Nature, 408 (2000) 946–949.
55. Sayle, D.C., Doig, J.A., Parker, S.C., Watson, G.W., Sayle, T.X.T., Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 7 (2005) 16–18.
56. Sayle, T.X.T., Parker, S.C., Sayle, D.C., J. Mater. Chem., 16 (2006)
1067–1081.
57. Ji, P., Zhang, J., Chen, F., Anpo, M., J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008)
17809–17813.
58. Möbus, G., Inkson, B.J., Materials Today, 10 (2007) 18–25.
59. Satyanarayana, V.N., Kuchibhatla, A.S., Karakoti, S., Bera, D., Seal, S.,
Prog. Mat. Sci., 52 (2007) 699–913.
60. Ji, P., Zhang, J., Chen, F., Anpo, M., J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008)
17809–17813.
61. Smarsly, B., Antoinietti, M., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., (2006) 1111–1119.
62. Deville, S., Saiz, E., Nalla, R.K., Tomsia, A.P., Science, 311 (2006)
515–518.
63. Grzelczak, M., Vermant, J., Furst, E.M., Liz-Marza, L.M., ACS Nano, 4
(2010) 3591–3605.
64. Tan, J.P.Y., Tan, H.R., Boothroyd, C., Foo, Y.L, He, C.B., Lin, M.,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 115 (2011) 3544–3551.
65. Kuchibhatla, S.V.N.T., Karakoti, A.S., Sayle, D.C., Heinrich, H.,
Seal, S., Cryst.Growth Des., 9 (2009) 1614–1620.
66. Sayle, T.X.T., Maphanga, R.R., Ngoepe, P.E., Sayle, D.C., J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 131 (2009) 6161–6173.
67. Sayle, T.X.T., Sayle, D.C., ACS Nano, 4 (2010) 879–886.
68. Zhu, T., Li, J., Prog. Mater. Sci., 55 (2010) 710–757.
69. Wang, Z.W., Seal, S., Patil, S., Zha, C.S., Xue, Q., J. Phys. Chem. C, 111
(2007) 11756–11759.
70. Nolan, M., Chem. Phys. Lett., 499 (2010) 126–130.
71. Nolan, M., Parker, S.C., Watson, G.W., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 8
(2006) 216–218.
72. Galea, N.M., Scanlon, D.O., Martin, P., Watson, G.M., Sherwood, P.,
J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol., 7 (2009) 413–420.
73. Kermode, J.R., Albaret, T., Sherman, D., Bersteinet, N., Gumbsch, P.,
Payne, M.C., Csanyi, G., De Vita, A., Nature, 455 (2008) 1224–1227.
74. Sherwood, P., de Viers, A.H., Guest, M.F., Schreckenbach, G.,
Catlow, C.R.A., French, S.A., Sokol, A.A., Brombley, S.T., Thiel, W.,
Turner, A.J., Billeter, S., Terstegen, F., Thiel, S., Kendrick, J.,
Rogers, S.C., Casci, J., Watson, M., King, F., Karlsen, E., Sjovoll, M.,
Fahmi, A., Scheafer, A., Lennartz, C., J. Mol. Struct., 632 (2003) 1–28.
75. Sokol, A.A., French, S.A., Bromley, S.T. Catlow, C.R.A., van Dam, H.J.J.,
Sherwood, P., Faraday Discuss., 134 (2007) 267–282.
76. Sankaranarayanan, S.K.R..S., Ramanathan, S., J.Chem. Phys., 134 (2011)
064703.
CHAPTER 6
TWO-DIMENSIONAL AND
THREE-DIMENSIONAL CERIA-BASED
NANOARCHITECTURES
Zhen-Xing Li, Wei Feng, Chao Zhang, Ling-Dong Sun,
Ya-Wen Zhang, and Chun-Hua Yan
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Science, State Key Laboratory
of Rare Earth Materials Chemistry and Applications, PKU-HKU
Joint Laboratory on Rare Earth Materials and Bioinorganic Chemistry,
Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China
6.1 Introduction
Reducing the size of inorganic materials to the nanometer scale has
been one of the most attractive realms in materials science.
Nanomaterials are notable for their featured small size, which
endows them with size- and shape-dependent physical and chemical
properties owing to the high surface/volume ratio and quantum
effects.1–10 With the booming evolution of this field, different nano-
materials have been developed in several large families.11–20 Ceria-
based materials are of great interest for researchers all over the
world due to their many applications, in particular as redox or oxy-
gen storage promoters in three-way catalysts,21–23 catalysts for H2
production from fuels, and solid-state conductors for fuel cells.24–27
Pure stoichiometric CeO2 has a calcium fluoride (fluorite)-type
structure with space group Fm3m over the whole range from room
temperature to its melting point; its color is pale yellow, probably
due to Ce(IV)–O(II) charge transfer. Ceria, in the fluorite structure,
295
Figure 6.2 Modeling the atom positions of a single nanoparticle using molecular
dynamics through an annealing process. Top, starting configurations, left to right:
(a): {100}; (b): {110}; (c): {111} and {110}. Middle: final configurations. Bottom: final
configurations with surface-filling representation to aid interpretation. Cerium is
white and oxygen is black. Reprinted with permission from Sayle et al.70 Copyright
2004 the Royal Chemical Society.
have proved that the surface energies of these facets are in the fol-
lowing order: {111} < {200} < {110} in vacuum.53,68,69 So the common
exposed facets are {111} and {200}, which result in the polyhedral
({111} + {200}), octahedral (pure {111}), or cubic (pure {200}) shape
of the final product. Because the surface energies of {111} and {200}
are nearly the same in ambient conditions, the final products are
usually polyhedra (Fig. 6.2).53,70
Different anions are applied in the synthetic procedures to
adjust the surface energies of different facets of ceria, and therefore
Figure 6.3 (a)–(c) TEM images of ceria nanocubes with average sizes of (a) 4.43 nm,
(b) 7.76 nm, and (c) 15.65 nm; the insets are selected-area electron diffraction
(SAED) patterns of individual NPs. (d) High-resolution transmission electron
microscopy (HRTEM) image of ceria nanocubes. (e) Typical X-ray diffraction pat-
tern of ceria nanocubes assembled on an Si wafer; the inset is the schematic illustra-
tion of the facets of an individual cube. Reprinted with permission from Yang and
Gao.71 Copyright 2006 the American Chemical Society.
Figure 6.5 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) plate-like precur-
sors and (b) final ceria products after calcining at 400°C. Reprinted with permis-
sion from Minamidate et al.110 Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V.
Figure 6.6 (a) TEM and (b) HRTEM images of 33.8 nm ceria nanoflowers.
(c) HRTEM image of a corner of (b). (d) TEM image of 37.6 nm ceria nanoflowers.
Reprinted with permission from Zhou et al.114 Copyright 2008 Wiley-VCH.
Figure 6.7 (a) SEM and (b) TEM images of hollow ceria nanospheres. Reprinted
with permission from Cao et al.121 Copyright 2010 the American Chemical Society.
surface area and largest pore volume had the highest oxygen stor-
age capacity of 233 mmol CO g−1 at 773 K and the lowest 50% con-
version temperature of 641 K.132
Yuan et al. produced mesoporous Ce0.2Zr0.8O2 solid solutions via the
non-template hydrothermal route.133 The mesoporous structure was
fabricated during the nanocrystal growth process and exhibits short-
range order but long-range disorder, which is a result of the natural
agglomeration of uniform nanoparticles after hydrothermal treat-
ment. The as-prepared powders had high surface areas (232–281 m2.g−
1
) and narrow pore size distributions (3.5–4.0 nm). The mesostructured
material with the highest surface area and the largest pore volume had
the highest oxygen storage capacity and the lowest 50% conversion
temperature for CO oxidation. The researchers further developed a
facile method via sol-gel and an evaporation-induced self-assembly
process to synthesize highly ordered 2D hexagonal mesoporous Ce1−
xZrxO2 solid solutions with crystalline walls (Fig. 6.9). The Ce/Zr ratio
can be tuned over a wide range. These novel structured ceria–zirconia
solid solutions are good candidates for application in catalysis due to
Figure 6.9 TEM images of mesoporous Ce1-xZrxO2 (x = 0.5) recorded along the
(a) [001] and (b) [110] orientations. The inset in (a) is the corresponding FFT
(fast Fourier transform) diffraction image, and the one in (b) is the corresponding
SAED pattern. Reprinted with permission from Yuan et al.133 Copyright 2007 the
American Chemical Society.
their high surface area and uniform channels. Very recently, Li et al.
made a breakthrough in the self-assembly of CeO2 spherical aggregates
directed by ionic liquids (ILs) (Fig. 6.10),134 which act as both templates
and cosolvent agents in fabricating the ceria spherical aggregates. Li
et al. described a hierarchically macroporous- and mesoporous-
structured cerium–tin mixed oxide with nanocrystalline walls, which
was synthesized through a simple one-step sol-gel process with a block
copolymer as a single template (Fig. 6.11).135 Various kinds of
(a)
(c)
(b)
Figure 6.13 Nano-building blocks. (a) HRTEM of a CeO2 nanocrystal. (b) Three-
dimensional tomogram of a CeO2 nanocrystal generated from computer-aided
tomography of sequentially oriented TEM images. (c) Atomistic model of a CeO2
nanocrystal. (d) Ti-doped CeO2 nanocrystal showing the (amorphous) TiO2 shell
encapsulating the inner (crystalline) CeO2 core rendering it spherical. (e)
Atomistic model of a Ti-doped CeO2 nanocrystal. Reprinted with permission from
Sayle et al.140 Copyright 2008 the American Chemical Society.
Figure 6.14 (a) Image generated by selected masking and inverse FFT of a
HRTEM of CeO2 nanorods showing the dislocations (circles) formed during orien-
tation and self-assembly. (b) Structure of a chain/nanorod comprising CeO2
nanocrystals. Top: After 300 ps of MD simulation; the arrows indicate the trajectory
followed by the blue and green nanoparticles as they attach themselves to one
another. Bottom: After 1500 ps showing the attached configuration. Reprinted with
permission from Karakoti et al.141 Copyright 2008 Wiley-VCH.
proposed that the blue shift is due to the valence change of the Ce
ions.149 Spanier et al. reported on Raman spectra studies of CeO2−y
nanoparticles. As the particle size becomes smaller, the peak position
of the strong, triply degenerate, first-order Raman line in CeO2−y at
464 cm−1 is shifted to progressively lower energies and the peak gets
progressively broader and asymmetric on the low-energy side.150 The
size-dependent properties of ceria nanoparticles are explained by
the combined effect of strain and phonon confinement effects. The
lattice constants increased with a decrease in particle size, and there-
fore, the Raman peaks shift to low energies. The line-width change
was explained by inhomogeneous strain broadening with a small
dispersion in particle size and by phonon confinement.
6.3.1 Catalysis
In most catalytic reactions, CeO2 acts as an oxygen buffer by storing
and releasing O2 due to the Ce4+/Ce3+ redox couple, which is a
result of the intrinsic defect chemistry of ceria (Ce3+ and O vacancy
concentrations). In simulation studies, the role of CeO2 in the oxi-
dation of carbon monoxide (CO) has been investigated and this
reaction can be described, following Guo et al.,118 and the oxidation
of CO to CO2 can be described, following Sayle et al.151 as:
(a)
(b)
Figure 6.16 Composition and activity for the WGS of low content gold–ceria catalysts.
(a) Amount of gold before and after leaching at different calcination temperatures.
(b) Steady-state WGS reaction rates. Solid triangles: 4.7Au–10% La doped ceria (dep-
osition-precipitation); open triangles: leached 0.44Au – 10%La doped ceria (deposi-
tion-precipitation, NaCN). Other reference catalysts are also shown: solid circles:
0.62Au–TiO2 (deposition-precipitation), solid squares: 2.02Au–Fe2O3 (co-precipita-
tion), open squares: leached 0.73Au–Fe2O3 (co-precipitation, NaCN). Reprinted with
permission from Flytzani-Stephanopoulos.163 Copyright 2004 Elsevier.
reasons. A low gold content catalyst is free of metallic gold NPs while
exhibiting high catalytic activity (Fig. 6.16).165
The known WGS catalysts based on ceria or copper oxide both
suffer greatly from deactivation with time on-stream and in
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(a) (b)
6.3.2 Sensors
The fundamental sensing mechanism for metal oxide-based gas sen-
sors relies on a change in electrical conductivity due to the interaction
Figure 6.19 (a) Synthesis protocol for Pt/CeO2@SiO2 nanospheres and Pt/CeO2
hetero-nanocomposites. (b) CO conversion vs. reaction temperature over Pt/CeO2
hetero-nanocomposite catalysts and two mixtures of CeO2 and Pt. Reprinted with
permission from Zhou et al.183 Copyright 2010 the American Chemical Society.
between surface complexes of O−, O2−, H+, and OH− reactive chemical
species and the gas molecules to be detected. The redox catalytic activ-
ity and the semiconductivity of ceria allow it to be used as a gas sensor
for reductive and oxidative gases such as CO, NO2, O2, and alcohols
using resistivity or cataluminescence measurements. The effects of the
microstructure, namely, the ratio of surface area to volume, grain size,
and pore size on gas-sensing performance is of significant importance,
since reactions at the grain boundaries and a significant depletion of
carriers in anisotropic nanosystems can strongly modify the redox and
transport properties, leading ultimately to the development of quan-
tum-confined structures.12–20 Hence, a ceria nanostructure could also
be used in a gas sensor. In order to increase the sensitivity of ceria for
gas sensing, noble metals or metal oxides are usually applied to acti-
vate the ceria catalytic process.
Liao and co-workers successfully fabricated a gas sensor using a
single ceria nanowire (NW)33 as the sensing unit. The gas sensitivity
of this nanodevice can be improved by depositing Pt nanoparticles
on the ceria nanowire. The nanodevice exhibited high selectivity in
detecting CO over other reductive gases, such as H2, H2S, ethanol,
and gasoline. The researchers thought that the strong adsorption of
the Pt nanoparticles on the ceria nanowire and the charge transfer
between the Pt nanoparticles and the ceria nanowire were the most
important contributions to the high gas sensitivity of this Pt/CeO2
nanowire sensor. Based on the excellent chemical stability of ceria
and its high gas-sensing behavior, Pt/CeO2 nanowire sensors are
expected to have promising applications in various complex envi-
ronments for the fast detection of poisonous gases (Fig. 6.20).33
Fu et al. described fast humidity sensors based on ceria nano-
wires prepared by a hydrothermal method. Sensitivity increased
gradually as the humidity increased and resistance decreased expo-
nentially with increasing humidity. The humidity sensing mecha-
nism was ion-type conductivity, and a model based on the morphology
and surface energy of the nanowires was used to explain these
results (Fig. 6.21).184
Barreca et al. prepared columnar ceria nanostructures on Si(100)
or Al2O3 substrates by a catalyst-free CVD process at 623–723 K using
Figure 6.20 (a) SEM image of a single CeO2 NW gas sensor, inset is an optical
image of the NW sensor chip. I-V curves of a single CeO2 NW and a single Pt NC/
CeO2 NW (b) before and (c) after annealing at 400°C for 1 h. (d) Gas sensibility
response curves of a single CeO2 NW and a single Pt NCs/CeO2 NW, after being
annealed, for different CO concentrations. Reprinted with permission from Liao
et al.33 Copyright 2008 the American Chemical Society.
Figure 6.22 Nanoceria particles provide pan-retinal protection against light dam-
age. The thickness of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) of the retina was measured
along the vertical meridian every 220 mm, starting at the optic nerve. Reprinted
with permission from Chen et al.198 Copyright 2006 Nature Publishing Group.
Figure 6.23 Ceria nanoparticles act as catalysts that mimic superoxide dismutase
(SOD) with a catalytic rate constant exceeding that determined for the enzyme
SOD. Reprinted with permission from Korsvik et al.200 Copyright 2007 the Royal
Chemical Society.
Figure 6.24 Atomic structural model and energy profile of a carboxyl ion of a
glycinate interacting with a ceria nanoparticle. (a) Side view of the relaxed configu-
ration of a negatively charged glycinate ion on a triply protonated facet of ceria
nanoparticle. (b), (c) Projection of the electron localization function (ELF) on
different planes passing through oxygen atoms of a protonated ceria nanoparticle
and a glycinate ion, revealing the weak and strong hydrogen bonds between them.
Color code blue (ELF = 0) and red (ELF = 1.0) are for the full absence and full
presence of an electron pair at an actual point of space, respectively. (d) Ground-
state energy profile. Blue curve: ground-state energy levels of a protonated ceria
nanoparticle (CNP) interacting with the carboxyl ion of a glycinate. Red curve:
sum of the ground-state energies of a protonated ceria nanoparticle and a glyci-
nate ion located at infinite distance. Cyan curve: binding energy between the
protonated ceria nanoparticle and a carboxyl ion of the glycinate evaluated as the
difference between the red and blue energy curves. ELF plots also reveal that all
the protons formed strong hydrogen bonds with oxygen atoms of cerium oxide.
Reprinted with permission from Vincent et al.202 Copyright 2009 the American
Chemical Society.
Figure 6.27 (a) SEM image of PMMA opal photonic crystal. (b) SEM image of ceria
inverse opal photonic crystal made from the PMMA template. Reprinted with per-
mission from Waterhouse et al.214 Copyright 2008 The American Chemical Society.
Figure 6.28 HRTEM image of (a) Gd-doped CeO2 nanorod (reprinted with per-
mission from Godinho et al.230 Copyright 2008 the American Chemical Society) and
(b) CeO2/Eu3+ nanocrystals. Photographs of (c) CeO2 nanocrystals and (d) CeO2/
Eu3+ nanocrystals (in a hexane solution). (e) Excitation and emission spectra of
CeO2 (red dashed line) and CeO2/Eu3+ (black solid line) nanocrystals in a hexane
solution. Reprinted with permission from Wang et al.231 Copyright 2007 the
American Chemical Society.
References
1. Iijima, S., Nature, 354 (1991) 56–58.
2. Delgado, J.L., Herranz, M., Martin, N., J. Mater. Chem., 18 (2008)
1417–1426.
3. Thess, A., Lee, R., Nikolaev, P., Dai, H., Petit, P., Robert, J., Xu, C., Lee,
Y.H., Kim, S.G., Rinzler, S.G., Colbert, D.T., Scuseria, G.E., Tomanek, D.,
Fischer, J.E., Smalley, R.E., Science, 273 (1996) 483–487.
4. Tans, S.J., Verschueren, A.R.M., Dekker, C., Nature, 393 (1998) 49–52.
5. Deheer, W.A., Chatelain, A., Ugarte, D., Science, 270 (1995) 1179–1180.
6. Treacy, M.M.J., Ebbesen, T.W., Gibson, J.M., Nature, 381 (1996) 678–680.
7. Fan, S.S., Chapline, M.G., Franklin, N.R., Tombler, T.W., Cassell, A.M.,
Dai, H., Science, 283 (1999) 512–514.
8. Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A.K., Morozov, S.V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M.I.,
Grigorieva, I.V., Dubonos, S.V., Firsov, A.A., Nature, 438 (2005)
197–200.
9. Geim, A.K., Novoselov, K.S., Nat. Mater., 3 (2007) 183–191.
10. Alivisatos, A.P., Science, 271 (1996) 933–937.
11. Murray, C.B., Norris, D.J., Bawendi, M.G., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115
(1993) 8706–8715.
12. Klimov, V.I., Mikhailovsky A.A., Xu, S., Malko, A., Hollingsworth, J.A.,
Leatherdale, C.A., Eisler, H.-J., Bawendi, M.G., Science, 290 (2000)
314–317.
13. Bruchez Jr., M., Moronne, M., Gin, P., Weiss, S., Alivisatos, A.P., Science,
281 (1998) 2013–2016.
14. Ozgur, U., Alivov, Y.I., Liu, C., Teke, A., Reshchikov, M.A., Dogan, S.,
Avrutin, V., Cho, S.-J., Morkoc, H., J. Appl. Phys., 98 (2005) 041301–
041301-103.
15. Wang, Z.L., Song, J.H., Science, 312 (2006) 242–246.
16. Kelly, K.L., Coronado, E., Zhao, L.L., Schatz, G.C., J. Phys. Chem. B,
107 (2003) 668–677.
17. Homola, J., Yee, S.S., Gauglitz, G., Sens. Act. B, 54 (1999) 3–15.
18. Nie, S.M., Emery, S.R., Science, 275 (1997) 1102–1106.
19. Kneipp, K., Wang, Y., Kneipp, H., Perelman, L.T., Itzkan, I.,
Ramachandra, R.D., Feld, M.S., Phys. Rev. Lett., 78 (1997) 1667–1670.
20. Xia, Y.N., Yang, P.D., Sun, Y.G., Wu, Y., Mayers, B., Gates, B., Yin, Y.,
Kim, F., Yan, H., Adv. Mater., 15 (2003) 353–389.
21. Trovarelli, A., ed. in Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, Imperial
College Press, London, (2002).
22. Kašpar, J., Fornasiero, P., Graziani, M., Catal. Today, 50 (1999)
285–298.
23. Kašpar, J., Graziani, M., Fornasiero, P., in Handbook on the Physics and
Chemistry of Rare Earths: The Role of Rare Earths in Catalysis, eds. K.A.
Gschneidner Jr., L. Eyring, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, (2000),
pp. 159–267.
24. Steele, B.C.H., Nature, 400 (1999) 619–621.
25. Steele, B.C.H., J. Mater. Sci., 36 (2001) 1053–1068.
26. Steele, B.C.H., Heinzel, A., Nature, 414 (2001) 345–352.
27. Li, R.X., Yabe, S., Yamashita, M., Momose, S., Yoshida, S., Yin, S.,
Sato, T., Solid State Ionics, 151 (2002) 235–241.
28. Tsunekawa, S., Sivamohan, R., Ohsuna, T., Mater. Sci. Forum, 315–317
(1999) 439–445.
29. Wu, L.J., Wiesmann, H.J., Moodenbaugh, A.R., Kile, R.F., Zhu, Y.,
Welch, D.O., Suenaga, M., Phys. Rev. B, 69 (2004) 125415.
30. Tsunekawa, S., Fukuda, T., Kasuya, A., Surf. Sci., 457 (2000) L437–440.
31. Carrettin, S., Concepcion, P., Corma, A., Lopez Nieto, J.M., Puntes, V.F.,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 43 (2004) 2538–2540.
32. Tschope, A., Sommer, E., Birringer, R., Solid State Ionics, 139 (2001)
255–265.
33. Liao, L., Mai, H.X., Yuan, Q., Lu, H.B., Li, J.C., Liu, C., Yan, C.H.,
Shen, Z.X., Yu, T., J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008) 9061–9065.
34. Chen, L., Fleming, P., Morris, V., Holmes, J.D., Morris, M.A., J. Phys.
Chem. C, 114 (2010) 12909–12919.
35. Yamashita, M., Kameyama, K., Yabe, S., Yoshhida, S., Fujishiro, Y.,
Kawai, T., Sato, T., J. Mater. Sci., 37 (2002) 683–687.
36. Jin, H.Y., Wang, N., Xu, L., Hou, S., Mater. Lett., 64 (2010) 1254–1256.
37. Zhou, X.D., Huebner, W., Anderson, H.U., Appl. Phys. Lett., 80 (2002)
3814–3816.
38. Chen, J.C., Chen, W.C., Tien, Y.C., Shih, C.J., J. Alloys Compd., 496
(2010) 364–369.
39. Matijevic, E., Hsu, W.P., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 118 (1987) 506–523.
40. Tsai, M.S., Mat. Sci. Eng. B-Solid, 110 (2004) 132–134.
41. Chen, F.J., Cao, Y.L., Jia, D.Z., Appl. Surf. Sci., 257 (2011) 9226–9231.
42. Wang, G.F., Mu, Q.Y., Chen, T., Wang, Y., J. Alloys Compd., 493 (2010)
202–207.
43. Liu, J., Wang, L.N., Wu, H.M., Mo, L.Y., Lou, H., Zheng, X.M., React.
Kinet. Catal. Lett., 98 (2009) 311–318.
44. Chaudhary, Y.S., Panigrahi, S., Nayak, S., Satpati, B., Bhattacharjee, S.,
Kulkarni, N., J. Mater. Chem., 20 (2010) 2381–2385.
45. Zhang, D.S., Niu, F.H., Li, H.R., Shi, L.Y., Fang, J.H., Powder Technol.,
207 (2011) 35–41.
46. Hakuta, Y., Onai, S., Terayama, H., Adschiri, T., Arai, K., J. Mater. Sci.
Lett., 17 (1998) 1211–1213.
47. Hirano, M., Kato, E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 82 (1999) 786–788.
48. Wu, N.C., Shi, E.W., Zheng, Y.Q., Li, W.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 85 (2002)
2462–2468.
49. Hirano, M., Kato, E., J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 15 (1996) 1249–1250.
50. Zhou, Y.C., Rahaman, M.N., J. Mater. Res., 8 (1993) 1680–1686.
51. Lakhwani, S., Rahaman, M.N., J. Mater. Res., 14 (1999) 1455–1461.
52. Hirano, M., Fukuda, Y., Iwata, H., Hotta, Y., Inagaki, M., J. Am. Ceram.
Soc., 83 (2000) 1287–1289.
53. Wang, Z.L., Feng, X.D., J. Phys. Chem. B, 107 (2003) 13563–13566.
54. Fu, C., Li, R.X., Zhang, Y., Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 24 (2010) 3230–3235.
55. Yin, L.X., Wang, Y.Q., Pang, G.S., Koltypin, Y., Gedankan, A., J. Colloid
Interface Sci., 246 (2002) 78–84.
56. Xu, H.R., Gao, L., Gu, H.C., Guo, J.K., Yan, D.S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 85
(2002) 139–144.
57. Verma, A., Karar, N., Bakhshi, A.K., Chander, H., Shivaprasad, S.M.,
Agnihotri, S.A., J. Nanopart. Res., 9 (2007) 317–322.
58. Chu, X., Chung, W.I., Schmidt, L.D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76 (1993)
2115–2118.
59. Oh, M.H., Nho, J.S., Cho, S.B., Lee, J.S., Singh, R.K., Mater. Chem.
Phys., 124 (2010) 134–139.
60. Fu, C., Li, R.X., Tang, Q., Li, C.Q., Yin, S., Sato, T., Res. Chem.
Intermediat., 37 (2011) 319–327.
61. Masui, T., Fujiwara, K., Machida, K., Adachi, G.Y., Sakata, T., Mori, H.,
Chem. Mater., 9 (1997) 2197–2204.
62. Zhou, H.P., Zhang, Y.W., Si, R., Zhang, L.S., Song, W.G., Yan, C.H.,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008) 20366–20374.
63. Goharshadi, E.K., Samiee, S., Nancarrow, P., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 356
(2011) 473–480.
64. Wilson, M.S., Delariva, A., Garzon, F.H., J. Mater. Chem., 21 (2011)
7418–7424.
65. Wu, Z.L., Li, M.J., Howe, J., Meyer Ill, H.M., Overbury, S.H., Langmuir,
26 (2010) 16595–16606.
66. Lv, J.G., Shen, Y., Peng, L.M., Guo, X.F., Ding, W.P., Chem. Commun.,
46 (2010) 5909–5911.
67. Yang, Z.X., Woo, T.K., Baudin, M., Hermansson, K., J. Chem. Phys., 120
(2004) 7741–7749.
68. Skorodumova, N.V., Baudin, M., Hermansson, K., Phys. Rev. B, 69
(2004) 075401.
69. Conesa, J.C., Surf. Sci., 339 (1995) 337–352.
70. Sayle, T.X.T., Parker, S.C., Sayle, D.C., Chem. Commun., (2004)
2438–2439.
71. Yang, S.W., Gao, L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 128 (2006) 9330–9331.
72. Taniguchi, T., Katsumata, K., Omata, S., Okada, K., Matsuhita, N.,
Cryst. Growth & Des., 11 (2011) 3754–3760.
73. Wu, Q., Zhang, F., Xiao, P., Tao, H.S., Wang, X.Z., Hu, Z., Lu, Y.N.,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008) 17076–17080.
74. Qiu, H.L., Chen, G.Y., Fan, R.W., Cheng, C., Hao, S.W., Chen, D.Y.,
Yang, C.H., Chem. Commun., 47 (2011) 9648–9650.
75. Lin, K.S., Chowdhury, S., Int. J. Mol. Sci., 11 (2010) 3226–3251.
76. Yu, K.L., Ruan, G.L., Ben, Y.H., Zou, J.J., Mat. Sci. Eng. B-Solid, 139
(2007) 197–200.
77. Yang, T., Xia, D.G., Mater. Chem. Phys., 123 (2010) 816–820.
78. Li, Y.H., Ding, J., Chen, J.F., Xu, C.L., Wei, B.Q., Liang, J., Wu, D.H.,
Mater. Res. Bull., 37 (2002) 313–318.
79. Zhang, D.S., Fu, H.X., Shi, L.Y., Fang, J.H., Li, Q., J. Solid State Chem.,
180 (2007) 654–660.
80. Wei, J.Q., Ding, J., Zhang, X.F., Wu, D.H., Wang, Z.C., Luo, J.B.,
Wan, K.L., Mater. Lett., 59 (2005) 322–325.
81. Fang, J.H., Cao, Z.Y., Zhang, D.S., Shen, X., Ding, W.Z., Shi, L.Y.,
J. Rare Earth., 26 (2008) 153–157.
82. Zhang, D.S., Shi, L.Y., Fu, H.X., Fang, J.H., Carbon, 44 (2006)
2853–2855.
83. Fu, H.X., Zhang, D.S., Shi, L.Y., Fang, J.H., Chem. J. Chinese U., 28
(2007) 617–620.
84. Zhang, D.S., Pan, C.S., Shi, L.Y., Huang, L., Fang, J.H., Fu, H.X.,
Micropor. Mesopor. Mat., 117 (2009) 193–200.
85. Zhang, L.S., Jiang, L.Y., Chen, C.Q., Li, W., Song, W.G., Guo, Y.G.,
Chem. Mater., 22 (2010) 414–419.
86. Chen, Z.G., Chen, F., Li, X.Z., Lu, X.W., Ni, C.Y., Zhao, X.B., J. Rare
Earth, 28 (2010) 566–570.
87. Boehme, M., Fu, G., Ionescu, E., Ensinger, W., Nanotechnology, 22
(2011) 065602.
88. Vantomme, A., Yuan, Z.Y., Du, G.H., Su, B.L., Langmuir, 21 (2005)
1132–1135.
89. Yang, Y.F., Jin, Y.Z., He, H.P., Ye, Z.Z., CrystEngComm, 12 (2010)
2663–2665.
90. Yu, T.Y., Joo, J., Park, Y.I., Hyeon, T., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44 (2005)
7411–7414.
91. Huo, Z.Y., Tsung, C.K., Huang, W.Y., Zhang, X.F., Yang, P.D., Nano
Lett., 8 (2008) 2041–2044.
92. Lu, X.M., Yavuz, M.S., Tuan, H.Y., Korgel, B.A., Xia, Y., J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 130 (2008) 8900–8901.
93. Han, W.Q., Wu L.J., Zhu, Y.M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127 (2005)
12814–12815.
94. Chen, H.I., Chang, H.Y., Solid State Commun., 133 (2005) 593–598.
95. Mai, H.X., Sun, L.D., Zhang, Y.W., Si, R., Feng, W., Zhang, H.P., Liu,
H.C., Yan, C.H., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (2005) 24380–24385.
96. Pan, C.S., Zhang, D.S., Shi, L.Y., Fang, J.H., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., (2008)
2429–2436.
97. Wang, W., Howe, J.Y., Li, Y.A., Qiu, X.F., Joy, D.C., Paranthaman, M.P.,
Doktycz, M.J., Gu, B.H., J. Mater. Chem., 20 (2010) 7776–7781.
98. Chen, G.Z., Xu, C.X., Song, X.Y., Zhao, W., Ding, Y., Sun, S.X., Inorg.
Chem., 47 (2008) 723–728.
99. Zhou, K.B., Yang, Z.Q., Yang, S., Chem. Mater., 19 (2007) 1215–1217.
100. Miao, J.J., Wang, H., Li, Y.R., Zhu, J.M., Zhu, J.J., J. Cryst. Growth, 281
(2005) 525–529.
101. Kuiry, S.C., Patil, S.D., Deshpande, S., Seal, S., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109
(2005) 6936–6939.
102. Ge, M., Guo, C.S., Li, L., Zhang, B.Q., Feng, Y.C., Wang, Y.Q., Mater.
Lett., 63 (2009) 1269–1271.
103. Sun, Z.Y., Zhang, H.Y., An, G.M., Yang, G.Y., Liu, Z.M., J. Mater. Chem.,
20 (2010) 1947–1952.
104. Martin, P., Parker, S.C., Sayle, D.C., Watson, G.W., Nano Lett., 7 (2007)
543–546.
105. Zhang, D.E., Zhang, X.J., Ni, X.M., Song, J.M., Zheng, H.G.,
Chemphyschem, 7 (2006) 2468–2470.
106. Zhang, D.S., Niu, F.H., Yan, T.T., Shi, L.Y., Du, X.J., Fang, J.H., Appl.
Surf. Sci., 257 (2011) 10161–10167.
107. Sun, C.W., Chen, L.Q., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., (2009) 3883–3887.
108. Zhang, D.E., Wu, W., Ni, X.J., Cao, X.Y., Zhang, X.B., Xu, X.Y., Li, S.Z.,
Han, G.Q., Ying, A.L., Tong, Z.W., J. Mater. Sci., 44 (2009) 3344–3348.
109. Wang, D.Y., Kang, Y.J., Doan-Nguyen, V., Chen, J., Kungas, R.,
Wider, N.L., Bakhmutsky, K., Gorte, R.J., Murray, C.B., Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 50 (2011) 4378–4381.
110. Minamidate, Y., Yin, S., Sato, T., Mater. Chem. Phys., 123 (2010)
516–520.
111. Chen, J.J., Zhong, S.L., Liu, Q.Y., Wang, Y.L., Wang, S.P., Xu, R.,
Luo, L.F., Wang, S.J., Powder Technol., 197 (2010) 136–139.
112. Zhang, D.S., Huang, L., Zhang, J.P., Shi, L.Y., J. Mater. Sci., 43 (2008)
5647–5650.
113. Wang, Z.L., Li, G.R., Ou, Y.N., Feng, Z.P., Qu, D.L., Tong, Y.X., J. Phys.
Chem. C, 115 (2011) 351–356.
114. Zhou, H.P., Zhang, Y.W., Mai, H.X., Sun, X., Liu, Q., Song, W.G.,
Yan, C.H., Chem. Eur. J., 14 (2008) 3380–3390.
115. Li, J.F., Lu, G.Z., Li, H.F., Wang, Y.Q., Guo, Y., Guo, Y.L., J. Colloid
Interface Sci., 360 (2011) 93–99.
116. Kempaiah, D.M., Yin, S., Sato, T., CrystEngComm, 13 (2011) 741–746.
117. Zhang, D.S., Yan, T.T., Pan, C.S., Shi, L.Y., Zhang, J.P., Mater. Chem.
Phys., 113 (2009) 527–530.
118. Guo, Z.Y., Jian, F.F., Du, F.L., Scripta Mater., 61 (2009) 48–51.
119. Strandwitz, N.C., Stucky, G.D., Chem. Mater., 21 (2009) 4577–4582.
120. Sun, X.M., Liu, J.F., Li, Y.D., Chem. Eur. J., 12 (2006) 2039–2047.
121. Cao, C.Y., Cui, Z.M., Chen, C.Q., Song, W.G., Cai, W., J. Phys. Chem. C,
114 (2010) 9865–9870.
122. Yang, Z.J., Han, D.Q., Ma, D.L., Liang, H., Liu, L., Yang, Y.Z., Cryst.
Growth & Des., 10 (2010) 291–295.
123. Chen, G.Z., Zhu, F.F., Sun, X.A., Sun, S.X., Chen, R.P., CrystEngComm,
13 (2011) 2904–2908.
124. Zhang, Y.J., Cheng, T., Hu, Q.X., Fang, Z., Han, K., J. Mater. Res., 22
(2007) 1472–1478.
125. Chen, G.Z., Xu, C.X., Song, X.Y., Xu, S.L., Ding, Y., Sun, S.X., Cryst.
Growth & Des., 8 (2008) 4449–4453.
126. Lu, X.W., Li, X.Z., Chen, F., Ni, C.Y., Chen, Z.G., J. Alloys Compd., 476
(2009) 958–962.
127. Motte, L., Billoudet, F., Pileni, M.P., J. Phys. Chem., 99 (1995)
16425–16429.
128. Murray, C.B., Kagan, C.R., Bawendi, M.G., Science, 270 (1995)
1335–1338.
129. Corma, A., Atienzar, P., Garcia, H., Chane-Ching, J.Y., Nat. Mater., 3
(2004) 394–397.
130. Lyons, D.l M., Ryan, K.M., Morris, M.A., J. Mater. Chem., 12 (2004)
1207–12012.
131. Yu, J.C., Zhang, L., Lin, J., J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 260 (2003) 240–243.
132. Si, R., Zhang, Y.W., Xiao, C.X., Li, S.J., Lin, B.X., Kou, Y., Yan, C.H.,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 6 (2004) 1056–1063.
133. Yuan, Q., Liu, Q., Song, W.G., Feng, W., Pu, W.L., Sun, L.D., Zhang, Y.W.,
Yan, C.H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129 (2007) 6698–6699.
134. Li, Z.X., Li, L.L., Yuan, Q., Feng, W., Xu, J., Sun, L.D., Song, W.G.,
Yan, C.H., J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008) 18405–18411.
135. Li, L.L., Xu, J., Yuan, Q., Li, Z.X., Song, W.G., Yan, C.H., Small, 5
(2009) 2730–2737.
136. Chane-Ching, J.Y., Cobo, F., Aubert, D., Harvey, H.G., Airiau, M.,
Corma, A., Chem. Eur. J., 11 (2005) 979–987.
137. Deshpande, A.S., Pinna, N., Smarsly, B., Antonietti, M., Niederberger, M.,
Small, 1 (2005) 313–316.
138. Si, R., Zhang, Y.W., You, L.P., Yan, C.-H., J. Phys. Chem. B, 110 (2006)
5994–6000.
139. Huo, Z.Y., Chen, C., Liu, X.W., Chu, D.R., Li, H.H., Peng, Q., Li, Y.D.,
Chem. Commun., 32 (2008) 3741–3743.
140. Sayle, D.C., Seal, S., Wang, Z.W., Mangili, B.C., Price, D.W., Karakoti,
A.S., Kuchibhatla, S.V.T.N., Hao, Q., Mobus, G., Xu, X.J., Sayle, T.X.T.,
ACS Nano, 2 (2008) 1237–1251.
141. Karakoti, A.S., Kuchibhatla, S.V.N.T., Baer, D.R., Thevuthasan, S.,
Sayle, D.C., Seal, S., Small, 4 (2008) 1210–1216.
142. Kuchibhatla, S.V.N.T., Karakoti, A.S., Sayle, D.C., Heinrich, H., Seal, S.,
Cryst. Growth Des., 9 (2009) 1614–1620.
143. Kuchibhatla, S.V.N.T., Karakoti, A.S., Seal, S., Nanotechnology, 18
(2007) 075303.
144. Zhou, X.D., Huebner, W., Appl. Phys. Lett., 79 (2001) 3512.
145. Wang, Z.W., Saxena, S.K., Pischedda, V., Liermann, H.P., Zha, C.S.,
Phys. Rev. B, 64 (2001) 012102.
146. Wang, Z.W., Zhao, Y.S., Schiferl, D., Zha, C.S., Downs, R.T., Appl. Phys.
Lett., 85 (2004) 124–126.
147. Tsunekawa, S., Ishikawa, K., Li, Z.Q., Kawazoe, Y., Kasuya, A., Phys. Rev.
Lett., 85 (2000) 3440–3443.
148. Zhang, Y.W., Si, R., Liao, C.S., J. Phys. Chem. B, 107 (2003)
10159–10167.
149. Tsunekawa, S., Fukuda, T., Kasuya, A., J. Appl. Phys., 87 (2000)
1318–1321.
150. Spanier, J.E., Robinson, R.D., Zhang, F., Chan, S.W., Herman, I.P.,
Phys. Rev. B, 64 (2001) 245407.
151. Sayle, T.X.T., Parker, S.C., Catlow, C.R.A., Surf. Sci., 316 (1994)
329–336.
152. Sayle, T.X.T., Parker, S.C., Catlow, C.R.A., J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.,
14 (1992) 977–978.
153. Wu, L.J., Wiesmann, H.J., Moodenbaugh, A.R., Klie, R.F., Zhu, Y.M.,
Welch, D.O., Suenaga, M., Phys. Rev. B, 69 (2004) 125415.
154. Murray, E.P., Tsai, T., Barnett, S.A., Nature, 400 (1999) 649–651.
155. Park, S.D., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J., Nature, 404 (2000) 265–267.
156. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Sakbodin, M., Wang, Z., Science, 312
(2006) 1508–1510.
157. Azad, S., Marina, O.A., Wang, C.M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 86 (2005) 131906.
158. Sholklapper, T.Z., Kurokawa, H., Jacobson, C.P., Visco, S.J., De Jonghe,
L.C., Nano Lett., 7 (2007) 2136–2141.
159. Bernal, S., Calvino, J.J., Cauqui, M.A., Catal. Today, 50 (1999)
175–206.
160. Fu, Q., Weber, A., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Catal. Lett., 77 (2001)
87–95.
161. Fu, Q., Kudriavtseva, S., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M.,
Chem. Eng. J., 93 (2003) 41–53.
162. Fu, Q., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Science, 301 (2003)
935–938.
163. Liu, W., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., J. Catal., 153 (1995) 304–316.
164. Liu, W., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., J. Catal., 153 (1995) 317–332.
165. Fu, Q., Deng, W.L., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Appl.
Catal. B, 56 (2005) 57–68.
166. Deng, W.L., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 45
(2006) 2285–2289.
167. Corma, A., Domine, M.E., Chem. Commun., (2005) 4042–4044.
168. Guzman, J., Carrettin, S., Fierro-Gonzalez, J.C., Hao, Y.L., Gates, B.C.,
Corma, A., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 44 (2005) 4778–4781.
169. Carrettin, S., Corma, A., Iglesias, M., Sanchez, A., Appl. Catal. A, 291
(2005) 247–252.
170. Sedmak, G., Hočevar, S., Levec, J., J. Catal., 213 (2003) 135–150.
171. Avgouropoulos, G., Ioannides, T., Appl. Catal. A, 244 (2003) 155–167.
172. Ratnasamy, P., Srinivas, D., Satyanarayana, C.V.V., Manikandan, P.,
Senthil Kumaran, R.S., Sachin, M., Shetti, V.N., System J. Catal., 221
(2005) 455–465.
173. Murugan, B., Ramaswamy, A.V., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129 (2007)
3062–3063.
174. Concepcion, P., Corma, A., Silvestre-Albero, J., Franco, V., Chane-
Ching, J.Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126 (2005) 5523–5532.
175. Guzman, J., Carrettin, S., Corma, A., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127 (2004)
3286–3287.
176. Mamontov, E., Egami, T., Brezny, R., Koranne, M., Tyagi, S., J. Phys.
Chem. B, 104 (2000) 11110.
177. Si, R., Zhang, Y.W., Li, S.J., Lin, B.X., Yan, C.H., J. Phys. Chem. B, 108
(2004) 12481–12488.
178. Zhou, K.B., Wang, X., Sun, X.M., Peng, Q., Li, Y.D., J. Catal., 229
(2005) 206–212.
179. Si, R., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 47 (2008)
2884–2887.
180. Liu, P., Rodriguez, J.A., J. Chem. Phys., 126 (2007) 164705.
181. Abad, A., Almela, C., Corma, A., Garcia, H., Chem. Commun., 30
(2006) 3178–3180.
182. Abad, A., Corma, A., García, H., Chem. Eur. J., 14 (2008) 212–222.
183. Zhou, H.P., Wu, H.S., Shen, J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132 (2010)
4998–4999.
184. Fu, X.Q., Wang, C., Yu, H.C., Wang, Y.G., Wang, T.H., Nanotechnology,
18 (2007) 145503.
185. Barreca, D., Gasparotto, A., Maccato, C., Maragno, C., Tondello, E.,
Langmuir, 22 (2006) 8639–8641.
186. Barreca, D., Gasparotto, A., Maccato, C., Maragno, C., Tondello, E.,
Comini, E., Sberveglieri, G., Nanotechnology, 18 (2007) 125502.
187. Ansari, A.A., Solanki, P.R., Malhotra, B.D., Appl. Phys. Lett., 92 (2008)
263901.
188. Saha, S., Arya, S.K., Singh, S.P., Sreenivas, K., Malhotra, B.D., Gupta, V.,
Biosens. Bioelect., 24 (2009) 2040–2045.
189. Guo, Z.Y., Du, F.L., Li, G.C., Cui, Z.L., Cryst. Growth & Des., 8 (2008)
2674–2677.
190. Zhang, W., Yang, T., Zhuang, X.M., Guo, Z.Y., Jiao, K., Biosens.
Bioelectron., 24 (2009) 2417–2422.
191. Ye, Q., Gao, Q., Zhang, X.R., Xu, B.Q., Catal. Comm., 7 (2006)
589–592.
192. Xuan, Y.L., Hu, J., Xu, K.L., Hou, X.D., Lu, Y., Sens. Act. B, 136 (2009)
218–223.
193. Celardo, I., Pedersen, J.Z. Traversab, E., Ghibelli, L., Nanoscale, 3
(2011) 1411–1420.
194. Colon, J., Herrera, L., Smith, J., Patil, S., Komanski, C., Kupelian, P.,
Seal, S., Jenkins, D.W., Baker, C.H., Nanomedicine, 5 (2009) 225–231.
195. Das, M., Patil, S., Bhargava, N., Kang, J.F., Riedel, L.M., Seal, S.,
Hickman, J.J., Biomaterials, 28 (2009) 1918–1925.
196. Colon, J., Hsieh, N., Ferguson, A., Kupelian, P., Seal, S., Jenkins, D.W.,
Baker, C.H., Nanomedicine, 6 (2010) 698–705.
197. Tarnuzzer, R.W., Colon, J., Patil, S., Seal, S., Nano Lett., 5 (2005)
2573–2577.
198. Chen, J.P., Patil, S., Seal, S., McGinnis, J.F., Nat. Nanotech., 1 (2006)
142–150.
199. Tang, B., Zhuo, L.H., Ge, J.C., Wang, G.L., Shi, Z.Q., Niu, J.Y., Chem.
Commun., 28 (2005) 3565–3567.
200. Korsvik, C., Patil, S., Seal, S., Self, W.T., Chem. Commun., 10 (2007)
1056–1058.
201. Perez, J.M., Asati, A., Nath, S., Kaittanis, C., Small, 4 (2008) 552–556.
202. Vincent, A., Babu, S., Heckert, E., Dowding, J., Hirst, S.M.,
Inerbaev, T.M., Self, W.T., Reilly, C.M., Masunov, A.E., Rahman, T.S.,
Seal, S., ACS Nano, 3 (2009) 1203–1211.
203. Asati, A., Santra, S., Kaittanis, C., Nath, S., Perez, J.M., Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 48 (2009) 2308–2312.
204. Heckert, E.G., Karakoti, A.S., Seal S., Self, W.T., Biomaterials, 29 (2008)
2705–2709.
205. Pirmohamed, T., Dowding, J.M., Singh, S., Wasserman, B., Heckert, E.,
Karakoti, A.S., King, J.E.S., Seal,S., Self, W.T., Chem. Commun., 46 (2010)
2736–2738.
206. Mandoli, C., Pagliari, F., Pagliari, S., Forte, G., Di Nardo, P.,
Licoccia, S., Traversa, E., Adv. Funct. Mater., 20 (2010) 1617–1624.
207. Sobek, J.M., Talburt, D.E., J. Bacteriol., 1 (1968) 47–51.
208. Limbach, L.K., Li, Y.C., Grass, R.N., Brunner, T.J., Hintermann, M.A.,
Muller, M., Gunther, D., Stark, W.J., Environ. Sci. Technol., 39 (2005)
9370–9376.
209. Thill, A., Zeyons, O., Spalla, O., Chauvat, F., Rose, J., Auffan, M.,
Flank, A.M., Environ. Sci. Technol., 40 (2006) 6151–6156.
210. Xia, T., Kovochich, M., Liong, M., Madler, L., Gilbert, B., Shi, H.,
Yeh, J.I., Zink, J.I., Nel, A.E., ACS Nano, 2 (2008) 2121–2134.
211. Patsalas, P., Logothetidis, S., Metaxa, C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81 (2002)
466–468.
212. Yablonovitch, E., Phys. Rev. Lett., 58 (1987) 2059–2062.
213. John, S., Phys. Rev. Lett., 58 (1987) 2486–2489.
214. Waterhouse, G.I.N., Metson, J.B., Idriss, H., Sun-Waterhouse, D.,
Chem. Mater., 20 (2008) 1183–1190.
215. Waterhouse, G.I.N., Waterland, M.R., Polyhedron, 26 (2007) 356–368.
216. Masui, T., Fujiwara, K., Machida, K.I., Adachi, G.Y., Sakata, T.,
Mori, H., Chem. Mater., 9 (1997) 2197–2204.
217. Li, R.X., Yabe, S., Yamashita, M., Momose, S., Yoshida, S., Yin, S.,
Sato, T., Solid State Ionics, 151 (2002) 235–241.
218. Van Leeuwen, R.A., Huang, C.J., Kammler, D.R., Switzer, J.A., J. Phys.
Chem., 99 (1995) 15247–15252.
219. Guo, S., Arwin, H., Jacobsen, S.N., Jarrendahl, K., Helmersson, U.,
J. Appl. Phys., 77 (1995) 5369.
220. Orel, Z.C., Orel, B., Phys. Status Solid B, 186 (1994) K33–36.
221. Tsunekawa, S., Fukuda, T., J. Appl. Phys., 87 (2000) 1318.
222. Tsunekawa, S., Sahara, R., Kawazoe, Y., Kasuya, A., Mater. Trans., JIM,
41 (2000) 1104–1147.
223. Inoue, M., Kimura, M., Inui, T., Chem. Commun., 11 (1999) 957–958.
224. Yin, L.X., Wang, Y.Q., Pang, G.S., Koltypin, Y., Gadanken, A., J. Colloid
Interface Sci. 246 (2002) 78–84.
225. Wang, H., Zhu, J.J., Zhu, J.M., Liao, X.H., Xu, S., Ding, T., Chen, H.Y.,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4 (2002) 3794–3799.
226. Si, R., Zhang, Y.W., You, L.P., Yan, C.H., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 44
(2005) 3256–3260.
227. Yabe, S., Sato, T., J. Solid State Chem., 171 (2003) 7–11.
228. El-Toni, A.M., Yin, S., Hayasaka, Y., Sato, T., J. Mater. Chem., 15 (2005)
1293–1297.
229. El-Toni, A.M., Yin, S., Sato, T., Appl. Surf. Sci., 252 (2006) 5063–5070.
230. Godinho, M., Ribeiro, C., Longo, E., Leite, E.R., Cryst. Growth & Des.,
8 (2008) 384–386.
231. Wang, Z.L., Quan, Z.W., Lin, J., Inorg. Chem., 46 (2007) 5237–5242.
232. Babu, S., Schulte, A., Seal, S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 92 (2008) 123112.
233. Yuan, Q., Duan, H.H., Li, L.L., Sun, L.D., Zhang, Y.W., Yan, C.H.,
J. Colloid Interface Sci., 335 (2009) 151–167.
234. Kaneko, K., Inoke, K., Freitag, B., Hungria, A.B., Midgley, P.A.,
Hansen, T.W., Zhang, J., Ohara, S., Adschiri, T., Nano Lett., 7 (2007)
421–425.
CHAPTER 7
CORE-SHELL-TYPE MATERIALS
BASED ON CERIA
Matteo Cargnello,1 Raymond J. Gorte,2
and Paolo Fornasiero1
1
Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences,
University of Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri, 1, 34127 Trieste, Italy
2
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
University of Pennsylvania, 311A Towne Building,
220 South 33rd Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
7.1 Introduction
In recent years, there have been many advances in the synthetic
methods for controlling the size and shape of materials at the
nanometer scale for applications in a number of fields, including
electronics, biology, materials science, catalysis, and medicinal
chemistry.1 The ability to tailor the structure of these materials to
obtain precise functionalities has been extensively highlighted in
the literature. In many of these applications, the interaction between
different components is a key factor for achieving the desired prop-
erties, so that the level of complexity in these materials is high.
A nice demonstration of this was given by Banin and co-workers,
who showed that the photo-induced charge separation between
CdS–PdO and CdS–Pd4S heterostructures, with applications for the
photo-reduction of water, could be obtained by tuning the morphol-
ogy of the material.2 Another interesting example is the synthesis of
binary nanocrystal superlattices using monodisperse nanoparticles
361
(i) The oxide coating can prevent the coalescence of the metal par-
ticles, especially when the reactions are to be carried out at
medium to high temperatures. At higher temperatures, metal
sintering is one of the main causes for the deactivation of
7.2.1 Co-precipitation
The co-precipitation method is based on the precipitation either of
a mixture of metal and metal-oxide precursors or of preformed
metal particles and the metal-oxide precursor. Although precipita-
tion is a common phenomenon, the details behind the steps needed
to understand how core-shell materials are formed requires recog-
nition of the fact that precipitation goes through a number of
different stages, including nucleation, Ostwald ripening of the crys-
tallites, and aggregation processes.25 The preparation of core-shell
structures with this method requires good control over the
Figure 7.5 Silane conjugation chemistry used to cover several oxide and non-
oxide particles with a thin layer of silica. Reprinted from Jana et al.38 Copyright 2007
the American Chemical Society.
7.3 Applications
7.3.1 Water gas shift reaction (WGSR)
The WGSR, shown in Eq. (7.1), is a key step in a number of indus-
trial applications:
Figure 7.8 CO conversions at 250 °C (a), (b) and 300°C (c) under WGSR condi-
tions for (a) Pd/CeO2-IMP, (b) Pd@CeO2-CP, and (c) Pd@CeO2-ME catalysts after
different subsequent treatments. Reproduced from Cargnello et al.29 by permission
of the Royal Society of Chemistry.
WGS was also the target reaction to test the activity and stability
of Pd@CeO2 core-shell structures prepared by self-assembly.39,60 As dis-
cussed in Section 7.2.3, these structures are dispersible in organic
solvents and can be adsorbed on relatively high-surface-area alu-
mina (100 m2·g−1) in order to isolate single entities on the surface of
the support. The samples that were studied are referred to here by
their composition (e.g. Pd(1%)@CeO2(9%)/Al2O3). The initial rate
for the Pd(1%)@CeO2(9%)/Al2O3 catalyst was very good, similar to
that observed over a conventional Pd(1%)/CeO2 sample. However,
the rate over the core-shell catalyst decreased dramatically over a
period of 1 hour, with the initial CO conversion at 350 °C going
from 12% to only 4% after 60 minutes. The loss of activity could be
completely reversed following a brief oxidation treatment in air at
the same temperature for 10 minutes, suggesting that the deactiva-
tion of the catalyst was not related to changes in metal particle size
but more likely to changes in the redox states of the components.
We found that the WGS rates of the embedded sample were lower
when it was subjected to a reduction pretreatment in H2 before col-
lecting the WGS data. All these observations pointed to a special and
unusual redox behavior of the ceria component of the catalyst
under WGS conditions.
To understand these characteristics we measured the oxidation
states of the Pd@CeO2/Al2O3 sample after various pretreatments
using oxygen titration experiments, with the results shown in
Table 7.1. The pretreatment in hydrogen caused a significant
reduction of the catalyst, so that the O:Ce ratio in the catalyst was
calculated to be approximately 1.61. (This calculation did not take
into account the reduction of PdO to Pd because it was difficult to
distinguish between these two contributions.) This degree of reduc-
tion was similar to that observed for conventional Pd/CeO2 catalysts
after treatment in H2.77 More interesting are the other data in
Table 7.1. Pretreatment of the sample in air, followed by WGS, gave
an approximate O:Ce ratio of 1.70, which implies that the catalyst
existed in a reduced state under WGS conditions. The WGS environ-
ment is relatively oxidizing for ceria, so that a traditional catalyst
remains essentially oxidized following this pretreatment. Because Pd
will be reduced under WGS conditions, the calculation for the O:Ce
ratio should not be affected by the Pd in this case. The interesting
fact here was that the catalyst was effectively reduced by H2 or CO
but was not reoxidized by H2O and CO2. To further test this idea, we
prereduced the catalyst in dry H2 and then treated it under steam.
The O:Ce ratio was again approximately 1.66, clearly demonstrating
that the catalyst could not be significantly reoxidized by steam, in
sharp contrast with a conventional Pd/CeO2 system where steam is
a very effective oxidizing agent. All these observations suggested that
the ceria shell in the embedded system had very different properties
to bulk ceria, being much more easily reduced.
Although we did not provide a definitive explanation for this
behavior, we suggest that the Pd particles might act as template for
the growth of a disordered ceria shell, with a local structure that is
different from the usual bulk, fluorite structure. The fluorite struc-
ture is key for stabilizing Ce(IV),61 while Ce(III) is the most stable
species in many other environments. For example, Ce exists as
Ce(III) in CeVO4 no matter how oxidizing the environment.62 If a
significant fraction of the Ce atoms exist in a disordered structure
within the shell, Ce(III) could be stabilized after reduction. In this
regard, it is noteworthy that ceria powders can have very different
thermodynamic, redox properties when they are prepared at lower
temperatures.63,64
Another interesting feature of these core-shell catalysts is the
effect of reduction on the accessibility of reactants to the Pd.
Figure 7.9 Changes in shell morphology for oxidized and reduced Pd@CeO2/
Al2O3 core-shell catalysts. Reprinted from Wieder et al.60 Copyright 2011 the
American Chemical Society.
Figure 7.10 (a) Evaluation of catalytic activity for soot oxidation of rice-ball Ag@
CeO2 structures (squares), conventional Ag/CeO2 (diamonds), CeO2 alone (dots)
and in the absence of any catalyst (triangles). (b) Arrhenius plots. Reprinted from
Kayama et al.28 Copyright 2010 the American Chemical Society.
300 °C, while a conventional Ag/CeO2 system was active only for
temperatures well above this (Fig. 7.10).
Unfortunately, the thermal stability of the Ag@CeO2 was limited
because the ceria shell sintered at high temperatures (800 °C).
Indeed, the stability of similar structures prepared using a La-doped
ceria shell (La doping improves ceria thermal stability) was much
improved, to a sufficient extent that the catalyst prepared with
La doping exhibited activity similar to that shown by the rice-ball
catalyst in Fig. 7.11 before and after an aging treatment at 800 °C for
50 h.
Based on the Arrhenius plots in Fig. 7.10(b), the frequency fac-
tors of the rate constants for the reactions carried out over Ag@
CeO2, over CeO2, and with no catalyst were very similar. The primary
effect of the catalysts was to change the activation energy. This obser-
vation was explained by arguing that the formation of active oxygen
species was more efficient in the embedded system. Based on studies
of O2 isotopic exchange (IE), the authors argued that the highest
concentration of reactive oxygen species, which they believed to be
O2− based on electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements at 20 K,
were formed in the Ag@CeO2 sample.72 They argued that the
Figure 7.11 Mechanism for soot oxidation over a Ag@CeO2 catalyst with a rice-ball
morphology. Reprinted from Yamazaki et al.72 with permission from Elsevier.
nearly 100%. This result is in sharp contrast with data for conven-
tional Pd/CeO2 catalysts, which displayed much lower conversions
and selectivities. The improved activity in the core-shell system was
again attributed to the formation of reactive oxygen species such as
superoxides.
Figure 7.12 (a) Nyquist plots of ac-impedance data obtained from symmetric cells
with LSCM/YSZ composite anodes containing the following catalysts: 1 wt% Pd; 1
wt% Pd + 9 wt% CeO2; 10 wt% Pd@CeO2. The circles correspond to data from
freshly prepared electrodes calcined at 700 °C (973 K) and the triangles correspond
to electrodes subjected to rapid thermal aging by calcining at 900 °C (1173 K).
(b) Maximum power density at 700 °C in humidified H2 (3% H2O) as a function of
time for complete fuel cells with Pd@CeO2 and Pd+CeO2 catalysts. Reproduced
from Kim et al.74 by permission of the Electrochemical Society.
Figure 7.13 SEM images of Pd+CeO2 catalyst supported on porous YSZ and
LSCM substrates after calcining at (a) 700 °C and (b) 900 °C. Bottom: Similar
investigation for a Pd@CeO2 formulation after calcining at (c) 700 °C and (d) 900 °C.
Reproduced from Kim et al.74 by permission of the Electrochemical Society.
7.4 Conclusions
This chapter gives an overview of core-shell materials based on
ceria. Some very recent developments have been presented to
highlight that these materials show novel properties compared
to conventional, supported ceria-based catalysts. The protection
offered by the ceria shell against sintering and the active role of the
metal/ceria interface under catalytic conditions are among the
most interesting properties of these systems. These characteristics
are a result of the special metal/support interaction that is cre-
ated as this interface is also maximized using the core-shell
configuration.
Though a very new field of research, this area is expected to
drastically increase in the next few years.
Acknowledgements
M.C. and P.F. acknowledge the University of Trieste and the Italian
Consortium on Materials Science and Technology (INSTM) for
financial support. R.J.G. acknowledges support from the Department
of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences,
Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Grant DE-FG02-85ER13350.
References
1. Schartl, W., Nanoscale, 2 (2010) 829–843.
2. Shemesh, Y., Macdonald, J.E., Menagen, G., Banin, U., Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 50 (2011) 1185–1189.
3. Dong, A., Chen J., Vora, P.M., Kikkawa, J.M., Murray, C.B., Nature,
466 (2010) 474–477.
4. Greeley, J., Norskov, J.K., Kibler, L.A., El-Aziz, A.M., Kolb, D.M.,
J. Chem. Phys., 7 (2006) 1032–1035.
5. Tao, F., Grass, M.E., Zhang, Y., Butcher, D.R., Renzas, J.R., Liu, Z.,
Chung, J.Y., Mun, B.S., Salmeron, M., Somorjai, G.A., Science, 322
(2008) 932–934.
6. Lim, D.K., Jeon, K.S., Hwang, J.H., Kim, H., Kwon, S., Suh, Y.D., Nam,
J.M., Nat. Nanotechnol., 6 (2011) 452–460.
7. Yeung, C.M.Y., Meunier, F., Burch, R., Thompsett, D., Tsang, S.C.,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 110 (2006) 8540–8543.
8. Fu, Q., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Science, 301 (2003)
935–938.
9. Wang, X., Gorte, R.J., Wagner, J.P., J. Catal., 212 (2002) 225–230.
10. De Rogatis, L., Cargnello, M., Gombac, V., Lorenzut, B., Montini, T.,
Fornasiero, P., ChemSusChem, 3 (2010) 24–42.
11. Bunluesin, T., Gorte, R.J., Graham, G.W., Appl. Catal. B, 15 (1998)
107–114.
12. Roh, H.S., Jun, K.W., Dong, W.S., Chang, J.S., Park, S.E., Joe, Y.I.,
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 181 (2002) 137–142.
13. Wang, X. Gorte, R.J., Appl. Catal. A, 224 (2002) 209–218.
14. Montoya, J.A., Romero-Pascual, E., Gimon, C., Del Angel, P.,
Monzón, A., Catal. Today, 63 (2000) 71–85.
15. Wang, S., Lu, G.Q., Appl. Catal. B, 19 (1998) 267–277.
16. Trovarelli, A., Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 38 (1996) 439–520.
17. Bernal, S., Calvino, J.J., Cauqui, M.A., Gatica, J.M., Larese, C.,
Pérez Omil, J.A., Pintado, J.M., Catal. Today, 50 (1999) 175–206.
18. Gorte, R.J., Vohs, J.M., Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng., 2 (2011) 9–30.
19. Green, I.X., Tang, W., Neurock, M., Yates, J.T., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
50 (2011) 10186–10189.
20. Green, I.X., Tang, W., Neurock, M., Yates, J.T., Science, 333 (2011)
736–739.
21. Arnal, P.M., Comotti, M., Schuth, F., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 45 (2006)
8224–8227.
22. Park, J.N., Forman, A.J., Tang, W., Cheng, J., Hu, Y.S., Lin, H.,
McFarland, E.W., Small, 4 (2008) 1694–1697.
23. Joo, S.H., Park, J.Y., Tsung, C.K., Yamada, Y., Yang, P., Somorjai, G.A.,
Nat. Mater., 8 (2009) 126–131.
24. Lee, I., Joo, J.B., Yin, Y., Zaera, F., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 50 (2011)
10208–102011.
25. Cushing, B.L., Kolesnichenko, V.L., O’Connor, C.J., Chem. Rev., 104
(2004), 3893–3946.
26. Huang, Y., Wang, A., Li, L., Wang, X., Su, D., Zhang, T., J. Catal., 255
(2008) 144–152.
27. Cargnello, M., Gentilini, C., Montini, T., Fonda, E., Mehraeen, S.,
Chi, M., Herrera-Collado, M., Browning, N.D., Polizzi, S., Pasquato, L.,
Fornasiero, P., Chem.Mater., 22 (2010) 4335–4345.
28. Kayama, T., Yamazaki, K., Shinjoh, H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132 (2010)
13154–13155.
29. Cargnello, M., Montini, T., Polizzi, S., Wieder, N.L., Gorte, R.J.,
Graziani, M., Fornasiero, P., Dalton Trans., 39 (2010) 2122–2127.
30. Hwai, P.C., Kong, Y.L., Liu, H., J. Mater. Chem., 12 (2002) 934–937.
31. Zhang, N., Fu, X., Xu, Y.J., J. Mater. Chem., 21 (2011) 8152–8158.
32. Zhang, N., Liu, S., Fu, X., Xu, Y.J., J. Phys. Chem. C, 115 (2011)
22901–22909.
33. Ganguli, A.K., Ganguly, A., Vaidya, S., Chem. Soc. Rev., 39 (2010)
474–485.
34. Yeung, C.M.Y., Yu, K.M.K., Fu, Q.J., Thompsett, D., Petch, M.I.,
Tsang, S.C., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127 (2005) 18010–18011.
35. Yeung, C.M.Y., Tsang, S.C., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 6074–6087.
36. Mitsudome, T., Mikami, Y., Matoba, M., Mizugaki, T., Jitsukawa, K.,
Kaneda, K., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 51 (2012) 136–139.
37. Liz-Marzán, L.M., Giersig, M., Mulvaney, P., Langmuir, 12 (1996)
4329–4335.
38. Jana, N.R., Earhart, C., Ying, J.Y., Chem. Mater., 19 (2007) 5074–5082.
39. Cargnello, M., Wieder, N.L., Montini, T., Gorte, R.J., Fornasiero, P.,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132 (2010) 1402–1409.
40. Cargnello, M., Wieder, N.L., Canton, P., Montini, T., Giambastiani, G.,
Benedetti, A., Gorte, R.J., Fornasiero, P., Chem. Mater., 23 (2011)
3961–3969.
41. Gradeff, P.S., Schreiber, F.G., Brooks, K.C., Sievers, R.E., Inorg. Chem.,
24 (1985) 1110–1111.
CHAPTER 8
8.1 Introduction
There has been an explosion of interest and investment in nanosci-
ence and nanotechnology over the last few years. The nanoscience
revolution is one of the biggest things to happen since the beginning
of modern science, and it is nowadays at the centre of future techno-
logical progress owing to the increasing ability to manipulate matter
on the nanometre scale. One of the important driving forces for the
rapidly developing field of nanoparticle synthesis is the distinctly
different physicochemical properties exhibited by nanoparticles
compared to their bulk counterparts.1–3 The differences may be due
to surface effects, small size effects, quantum size effects and so on;
they open up new opportunities for the development of materials
with unusual or tailored properties. Like nanomaterials, bulk materi-
als also exhibit surface-dependent properties but these are dominant
in the case of nanoparticles only because they possess a vast surface
area per unit volume and a high proportion of atoms at the surface
and near surface layers rather than in the particle interior.
397
Figure 8.1 Synthesis of ceria-based oxides. Reprinted with permission from Guo
and Wang.12 Copyright 2011 the American Chemical Society.
8.2.1 Co-precipitation
In recent decades, co-precipitation was recognized as a method of
preparing nanomaterials using a trial-and-error approach. Often
Figure 8.3 (a) TEM and (b), (c) HREM images of a ceria–lanthana sample
calcined at 1,073 K. Inset: Enlarged views of selected areas. Reprinted with permis-
sion from Reddy et al.19 Copyright 2010 the American Chemical Society.
volume of the materials. It was observed that when the catalysts were
prepared using ILs, the surface area and pore volume were
enhanced 2.0–6.0 and 5.5–10.7 times, respectively, compared to
materials prepared by simple co-precipitation without ILs. The use
of ILs in the co-precipitation method changes not only the structure
of the particles, but also surface basicity and basic strength
distribution.
To prepare ceria–zirconia over alumina, Wang et al.24 used two
methods: co-precipitation with supercritical drying and co-precipita-
tion with common drying. When drying was performed under
supercritical conditions in ethanol (250 °C, 7.5 MPa) there was no
liquid/vapour interface during drying, which resulted in smaller
crystallites, high BET surface area, better thermal stability and supe-
rior redox properties compared to the material prepared by co-
precipitation with common drying. In another study, Feng et al.25
prepared cubic fluorite nano-Ce1-xZrxO2 with co-precipitation using
NH4OH as precipitant followed by hydrothermal crystallization at
different temperatures.
By adopting a similar approach, Reddy et al.26 prepared alumina-
supported nanosized ceria–terbia solid solutions by deposition co-
precipitation at ambient conditions. The literature reveals several
Figure 8.5 SEM images of as-prepared CeCu0.33 nanospheres at (a) low magnifica-
tion and (b) high magnification. Reprinted from Qin et al.35 with permission from
the Royal Society of Chemistry.
100 °C, and with this method it decreased to 71 °C. In this proce-
dure, Ce(NO3)3.6H2O and Cu(NO3)2.3H2O were used as the precur-
sors and urea as the precipitating agent. The prepared solutions
were transferred to a Teflon-lined autoclave and heated at 180 °C for
100 min, which led to the precipitation of the precursor. The pre-
cipitate was centrifuged, washed, dried and finally calcined at 600 °C
for 4 h. SEM images of the resulting products are shown in Fig. 8.5.
The control of shape and particle size is not easy with this
method. Therefore, various modifications have been introduced to
improve the material properties and include the surfactant-assisted
hydrothermal method, the microwave-assisted hydrothermal
method, the supercritical hydrothermal method, etc.
There is a relation between material properties and morphology.
In order to investigate this relation, Zhang et al.36 prepared nanorod-
like, micro-spherical, micro-bowknot-like and micro-octahedral
shaped ceria–zirconia–yttria (CZY) solid solutions with the surfactant-
assisted hydrothermal method using a triblock copolymer (Pluronic
P123) or cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) surfactant. The
formation mechanism of these materials by the surfactant-assisted
hydrothermal method is shown schematically in Fig. 8.6.
To prepare different shapes of CZY particles, firstly the precipita-
tion mixture was obtained by mixing metal precursors [Ce(NO3)3·
6H2O, ZrO(NO3)2·2H2O and Y(NO3)3·6H2O], a surfactant and urea.
Figure 8.7 SEM images of the as-synthesized (raw) Ce0.45Pr0.05Ti0.5O2 sample and
after firing at 1000 °C. Reprinted from Fernández-González et al.40 with permission
from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 8.8 FESEM images of as-prepared samples using CeCl3·7H2O in (a) etha-
nol and (c) methanol at 400 °C for 15 min, and calcined in air at 500 °C for 1 h,
(b) and (d), respectively. Reprinted with permission from Devaraju et al.41 Copyright
2009 the American Chemical Society.
Table 8.1 Effect of relative rates of hydrolysis and condensation on gel quality.
Reproduced with permission from David et al.47 Copyright 1995 the American
Chemical Society.
Hydrolysis rate Condensation rate Result
Slow Slow Colloids/sol
Slow Fast Controlled precipitation
Fast Fast Colloidal gel or gelatinous precipitate
Fast Slow Polymeric gels
Figure 8.12 Assembly of metal precursors with triblock copolymer P123 as struc-
ture-directing agent to form highly ordered mesostructures. Reprinted from Yuan
et al.55 with permission from Elsevier.
8.2.5 Microemulsions
Among the various low-temperature techniques, microemulsion
has received considerable interest for the synthesis of ceria-based
nano-oxides. Microemulsions are colloidal ‘nano-dispersions’ of
water in oil (or oil in water), which are immiscible because of the
very high interfacial energy that exists between the oil/water or
water/oil interface. However, surfactants and cosurfactants reduce
the interfacial energy resulting in the spontaneous mixing of one
liquid in the other. At low concentrations, the surfactant (emulsi-
fier) dissolves in the aqueous phase, but when the concentration
exceeds a critical micellar concentration, the surfactant molecules
organize spontaneously to form aggregates such as micelles, vesi-
cles, etc., because at this concentration the bulk properties of the
surfactant, such as surface tension, conductivity and solubilisation,
change.56,57
(a) (b)
Figure 8.18 TEM images of ceria nanorods prepared by the sonochemical method.
Reprinted with permission from Zhang et al.83 Copyright 2007 the American
Chemical Society.
confirmed that with the increase of sonication time, more and more
nanoparticles disappeared and nanorods were the main product.
Sonochemical reaction rates depend on the irradiation fre-
quency, acoustic power and volatility of the solvent, which influence
the cavitation strength. From a preparation point of view, sono-
chemical approaches are advantageous because they speed up reac-
tion rates and favour the formation of porous products with a high
specific surface, and have the additional economic benefit of rela-
tively low reaction temperatures.83,84
Figure 8.19 Solution combustion process before, during and after the reaction.90
Reprinted from Mukasyan et al.90 with permission from Springer.
filling the pores of a support with a solution of the metal salt from
which the solvent is subsequently evaporated. The impregnation
method has two main steps. The first step is to deposit the active
component precursor, mostly using aqueous solutions, onto a sup-
port, and the second step is to transform this precursor into the final
active phase, which often involves drying and heat treatment (calci-
nation or reduction). In this process the metal compounds are held
by adsorption of metal cations on a basic site of the support (O2−,
OH−).3,60,97
Zhao et al.98 used a low-temperature polymerizable metal com-
plex solution as an active component precursor to prepare sup-
ported (structured) catalysts by a sequence of impregnation, drying
and calcination. The polymerizable metal complex method is often
referred to as the Pechini method.99 In this method polymerization
between citric acid and ethylene glycol or polyethylene glycol takes
place. The strongly chelating ability of citric acid with most metal
ions frequently facilitates the formation of a metal citrate complex
during polymerization. A 5 wt% ZrxCe1-xO2/Al2O3 and structured
carbon nanofibre (SCNF) supported Cu–CeO2 were prepared using
this method. Amounts of ZrO(NO3)2.xH2O, Ce(NO3)3.6H2O and
citric acid (C6H8O7) in a weight ratio of 1:1:2 were added to deion-
ized water to form the complex solution. PEG was added and then
a weighed amount of alumina powder was gradually added under
vigorous stirring to produce a suspension. The suspension was sub-
sequently evaporated to form the dried solid. A similar procedure
was carried out to prepare SCNF supported Cu–CeO2, which is sche-
matically shown in Fig. 8.21. Forming a stable active component
complex with a suitable support is a promising strategy for avoiding
the drawbacks of the impregnation method.
Tang et al.100 prepared a CeO2–CoOx catalyst for CO oxidation by
using impregnation, precipitation-oxidation, co-precipitation and
the hydrothermal method. Of these methods, the impregnation
method yielded well-dispersed ceria strongly interacting with the
cobalt oxide. The impregnated catalyst was the most active for CO
oxidation followed by precipitation-oxidation, co-precipitation and
the hydrothermal method.100 Several publications can be found in
Figure 8.22 (a) SEM, (b) TEM, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy
(inset), and selected area electron diffraction (inset) images of Ce1−xCoxO2−δ
nanorods. Reprinted with permission from Ou et al.103 Copyright 2010 the American
Chemical Society.
Figure 8.23 Changes in a material trapped between colliding balls in a ball mill.110
Figure 8.26 TEM image of contact between ceria and soot.154 Reprinted from
Simonsen et al.154 with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 8.27 T50 against surface area for each composition as obtained from TG
experiments over a soot/catalyst mixture under air. Reprinted from Aneggi et al.155
with permission from Elsevier.
than the BET surface area. It was also observed that all Ce–Zr cata-
lysts tested were more effective for soot combustion than a reference
Pt catalyst, due to the active oxygen-assisted mechanism. The extent
to which Ce–Zr catalysts accelerate the combustion of Printex-U (as
well Vulcan XC72R) commercial soot depends on the nature of cata-
lyst, as shown in Fig. 8.28.
It was reported that CeO2–Fe2O3 mixed oxides improve the
kinetic performance of soot combustion. The reaction proceeds
through a redox cycle between Ce4+/Fe3+ and Ce3+/Fe2+, and Fe2O3
has been shown to exhibit a ‘push–pull’ redox mechanism for soot
combustion at higher temperatures. The active sites involved are
Fe–O–Ce-type species. The mechanism shown in Fig. 8.29 involves
the surface oxide anion bound to the Fe3+, which reacts with the soot
Figure 8.30. Reaction mechanism and active oxygen species. (a) Mn–Ce mixed
oxides under loose contact conditions. (b) Cu–Ce mixed oxides under tight con-
tact conditions. Reprinted from Liang et al.160 with permission from Elsevier.
8.3.3 CO oxidation
Of the various metal oxides, ceria-based materials have a special sig-
nificance because of their peculiar properties and wide applicability
Figure 8.32 Differential thermal analysis (DTA) profiles of carbon oxidation with
20 wt% metal + CeO2 after calcination at 500 °C for 3 h in air. Reprinted from
Shimizu et al.162 with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 8.34 CO oxidation activity (at 350 °C) against textural and reducible prop-
erties. Reprinted from Yu et al.167 with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 8.35 CO conversion vs. temperature over various catalysts. Reprinted from
Rovira et al.169 with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 8.39 Endurance test for uncalcined and calcined Au/CeO2 catalysts.
Reprinted from Panzera et al.176 with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 8.40 CO oxidation over various gold catalysts. Reprinted from Laguna
et al.178 with permission from Elsevier.
8.4 Conclusions
This chapter has summarized recent progress in the synthetic tech-
niques and application of ceria-based catalysts for combustion and
oxidation reactions. The growing interest in the synthesis of novel
nanosized ceria-based materials is primarily due to their many appli-
cations in different fields. These materials are prepared by both
physical (top-down) and chemical (bottom-up) methods. Compared
to physical methods, the chemical methods play a unique role in
assembling and building ceria-based nanometric units from smaller
Acknowledgments
We wish to specially acknowledge all the researchers whose work is
described in this chapter for their valuable contributions. T.V.K. and
N.D.S. are the recipients of a junior research fellowship from CSIR,
New Delhi. Financial support was received from Department of Science
and Technology, New Delhi, under SERC Scheme (SR/S1/PC-63/2008).
References
1. Mirkin, C.A., Small, 1 (2005) 14–16.
2. Campelo, J.M., Luna, D., Luque, R., Marinas, J.M., Romero, A.A.,
Chem Sus Chem., 2 (2009) 18–45.
3. White, R.J., Luque, R., Budarin, V.L., Clark, J.H., Macquarrie, D.J.,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 38 (2009) 481–494.
4. Goesmann, H., Feldmann, C., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 49 (2010)
1362–1395.
5. Nagarajan, R., in Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Stabilization, Passivation, and
Functionalization, ed. R. Nagarajan, American Chemical Society,
Washington, DC, (2008) pp. 1–14, http://users.encs.concordia.ca/
~mojtaba/elec6271/Assignment1-2010.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2011.
6. Bromley, S.T., Moreira, I. de P.R., Neyman, M.K., Illas, F., Chem. Soc.
Rev., 38 (2009) 2657–2670.
7. Ma, Y., Wang, X., Li, S., Toprak, M.S., Zhu, B., Muhammed, M., Adv.
Mater., 22 (2010) 1640–1644.
8. Reddy, B.M., in Metal Oxides: Chemistry and Applications, ed. J.L.G. Fierro,
CRC Press, Florida, (2006) pp. 215–246.
9. Bruix, A., Migani, A., Vayssilov, G.N., Neyman, K.M., Libuda, J., Illas, F.,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13 (2011) 11384–11392.
10. Silva, G.A., Nat. Nano Technol., 1 (2006) 92–94.
11. Mallikarjuna, N.N., Thomas, F.S., Rajender, S.V., Acc. Chem. Res., 44
(2011) 469–478.
12. Guo, S., Wang, E., Acc. Chem. Res., 44 (2011) 491–500.
13. Brian, L.C., Vladimir, L.K., O’Connor, C.J., Chem. Rev., 104 (2004)
3893–3946.
14. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coprecipitation. Accessed 16 June 2011.
15. http://nanospinel.blogspot.in/2007/08/nanopspinel-synthesis-by.
html. Accessed 16 June 2011.
16. Gaikwad, A.B., Navale, S.C., Samuel, V., Murugan, A.V., Ravi, V., Mater.
Res. Bull., 41 (2006) 347–353.
17. Reddy, B.M., Khan, A., Yamada, Y., Kobayashi, T., Loridant, S.,
Volta, J.-C., J. Phys. Chem. B, 107 (2003) 11475–11484.
18. Reddy, B.M., Bharali, P., Saikia, P., Ataullah, K., Stephane, L., Muhler, M.,
Grunert, W., J. Phys. Chem. C, 111 (2007) 1878–1881.
19. Reddy, B.M., Lakshmi, K., Gode, T., Chem. Mater., 22 (2010) 467–475.
20. Reddy, B.M., Saikia, P., Bharali, P., Yusuke, Y., Tetsuhiko, K., Muhler, M.,
Grunert, W., J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008) 16393–16399.
21. Reddy, B.M., Gode, T., Lakshmi, K., Yusuke, Y., Park. S.-E., J. Phys.
Chem. C, 113 (2009) 15882–15890.
22. Reddy, B.M., Thrimurthulu, G., Lakshmi, K., Chin. J. Catal., 32 (2011)
800–806.
23. Abimanyu, H., Ahn, B.S., Kim, C.S., Yoo, K.S., Ind. Eng. Chem., Res., 46
(2007) 7936–7941.
24. Wang, Q., Li, Z., Zhao, B., Li, G., Zhou, R., J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 344
(2011) 132–137.
25. Feng, S., Pan, D., Wang, Z., Adv. Powder Technol., 22 (2011) 678–681.
26. Reddy, B.M., Saikia, P., Bharali, P., Park. S.-E., Muhler, M., Grunert,
W., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 2452–2462.
27. Shigeyuku, S., Rustum, R., Bull. Mater. Sci., 23 (2000) 453–460.
28. Yoshimura, M., Byrappa, K., J Mater. Sci., 43 (2008) 2085–2103.
29. Patzhe, G.R., Zhou, Y., Kontic, R., Conrad, F., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
50 (2011) 826–859.
30. Yao, W.-T., Yu, S.-H., Int. J. Nanotecchnol., 4 (2007) 129–140.
31. Hayashi, H., Hakuta, Y., Materials, 3 (2010) 3794–3717.
32. Barrer, R.M., Hydrothermal Chemistry of Zeolites, Academic Press,
London, (1982).
33. Feng, S., Xu, R., Acc. Chem. Res., 34 (2001) 239–247.
34. http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/bitstream/handle/10635/14809/
03_Chapter%201.pdf?sequence=3. Accessed 16 June 2011.
35. Qin, J., Lu, J., Cao, M., Hu, C., Nanoscale, 2 (2010) 2739–2743.
36. Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Deng, J., Dai, H., He, H., Inorg. Chem., 48 (2009)
2181–2192.
37. Adschiri, T., Lee, Y.-W., Goto, M., Takami, S., Green Chem., 13 (2011)
1380–1390.
38. Kim, J.-R., Myeong, W.-J., Ihm, S.-K., Appl. Catal. B., 71 (2007) 57–63.
39. Devaraju, M.K., Liu, X., Yusuke, K., Yin, S., Sato, T., Nanotechnol., 20
(2009) 405606.
40. Fernández-González, R., Julián-López, B., Cordoncillo, E., Escribano,
P., J. Mater. Chem., 21 (2011) 497–504.
41. Devaraju, M.K., Shu, Y., Tsugio, S., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 1 (2009)
2694–2698.
42. http://www.gitam.edu/eresource/nano/nanotechnology/bottamup%
20app.htm. Accessed 16 June 2011.
43. Wen, J., Wilkes, G.L., Chem. Mater., 8 (1996) 1667–1681.
44. Reddy, B.M., Bharali, P., Saikia, P. (2009) In New Nanotechniques, eds.
A. Malik, R.J. Rawat, pp. 243–276.
45. Liu, J., Cao, G., Yang, Z., Wang, D., Dubois, D., Zhou, X., Graff, G.L.,
Pederson, L.R., Zhang, J., Chem Sus Chem., 1 (2008) 676–697.
46. Livage, J., Henry, M., Sanchez, C., Prog. Solid State Chem., 18 (1988)
259–341.
47. Ward, D.A., Ko, E.I, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 34 (1995) 421–433.
48. Carreon, M.A., Guliants, V.V., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem., 1 (2005) 27–43.
49. Inorganic Materials Synthesis, University of Oslo, http://www.uio.no/
studier/emner/matnat/kjemi/KJM5100/h08/undervisningsmateria
le/10KJM5100_20 08_sol_gel_a.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2011.
50. Dimitriev, Y., Ivanova, Y., Iordanova, R., J. Univ. Chem. Technol. Metall.,
43 (2008) 181–192.
51. Bonnetot, B., Rakic, V., Yuzhakova, T., Guimon, C., Auroux, A., Chem.
Mater., 20 (2008) 1585–1596.
52. Tao, Y., Shao, J., Wang, J., Wang, W., J. Alloys Compd., 484 (2009)
729–733.
53. Trinchi, A., Li, Y.X., Wlodarski, W., Kaciulis, S., Pandolfi, L., Viticoli, S.,
Comini, E., Sberveglieri, G., Sens. Actuators, B, 95 (2003) 145–150.
54. Yuan, Q., Liu, Q., Song, W.-G., Feng, W., Pu, W.-L., Sun, L.-D.,
Zhang, Y.-W., Yan, C.-H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129 (2007) 6698–6699.
55. Yuan, Q., Duan, H.-H., Li, L.-L., Sun, L.-D., Zhang, Y.-W., Yan, C.-H.,
J. Colloid Interface Sci., 335 (2009) 151–167.
56. Ashok, K.G., Aparna, G., Sonalika, V., Chem., Soc. Rev., 39 (2010)
474–485.
57. Dwars, T., Paetzold, E., Oehme, G., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 44 (2005)
7174–7199.
58. Burda, C., Chen, X., Narayanan, R., El-Sayed, M.A., Chem. Rev., 105
(2005) 1025–1102.
59. Capek, I., Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 110 (2004) 49–74.
60. Adachi, G.-Y., Masui, T., in Catalysis by Ceria Related Materials, ed.
A. Trovarelli, Imperial College Press, London, (2001) pp. 51–76.
61. Lee, J.-S., Lee, J.-S., Choi, S.-C., Mater. Lett., 59 (2005) 395–398.
62. Laguna, O.H., Centeno, M.A., Boutonnet, M., Odriozola, J.A., Appl.
Catal. B: Environ., 106 (2011) 621–629.
63. Bai, J., Xu, Z., Zheng, Y., Yin, H., Mater. Lett., 60 (2006) 1287–1290.
64. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave_oven. Accessed 16 June
2011.
65. Gaba, M., Dhingra, N., Ind. J. Pharm. Educ. Res., 45 (2011) 175–183.
66. Galema, S.A., Chem. Soc. Rev., 26 (1997) 233–238.
67. Bilecka, I., Niederberger, M., Nanoscale, 2 (2010) 1358–1374.
68. Liao, X.H., Zhu, J.J., Chen, H.Y., Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 85 (2001) 85–89.
69. Wang, H., Xu, J.-Z., Zhu, J.-J., Chen, H.-Y., J. Cryst. Growth, 244 (2002)
88–94.
70. Godinho, M., Ribeiro, C., Longo, E., Leite, E.R., Crys. Growth Des., 8
(2008) 384–386.
71. Reddy, B.M., Reddy, G.K., Ganesh, I., Ferreira, J.M.F., Catal Lett., 130
(2009) 227–234.
72. Putna, E.S., Vohs, J.M, Gorte, R.J., J. Phys. Chem., 100 (1996)
17862–17865.
73. Bondioli, F., Ferrari, A.M., Leonelli, C., Siligardi, C., Hart, N.A., Evans,
N.G., J. Mater. Chem., 11 (2001) 2620–2624.
74. Bondioli, F., Ferrari, A.M., Lusvarghi, L., Manfredini, T., Nannarone, S.,
Pasqualia, L., Selvaggia, G., J. Mater. Chem., 15 (2005) 1061–1066.
75. Tavakoli, A., Sohrabi, M., Kargari, A., Chem. Pap., 61 (2007) 151–170.
76. Khalil, H., Mahajan, D., Rafailovich, M., Gelfer, M., Pandya, K.,
Langmuir, 20 (2004) 6896–6903.
77. Rodriguez, J.A., Garcia, M.F., eds., Synthesis, Properties, and Applications
of Oxide Nanomaterials, Wiley Interscience, New Jersey, (2007).
78. Bang, J.H., Suslick, K.S., Adv. Mater. 22 (2010) 1039–1059.
79. Zhang, K., Park, B.-J., Fang, F.-F., Choi, H.J., Molecules, 14 (2009)
2095–2110.
80. Shchukin, D.G., Möhwald, H., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 8 (2006)
3496–3506.
81. Yu, J.C., Zhang, L., Lin, J., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 260 (2003)
240–243.
82. Guo, J., Xin, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., J. Nanopart. Res., 11 (2009)
737–741.
83. Zhang, D., Fu, H., Shi, L., Pan, C., Li, Q., Chu, Y., Yu, W., Inorg. Chem.,
46 (2007) 2446–2451.
84. Bhattacharyya, S., Gedanken, A., Micropor. Mesopor. Mater., 110 (2008)
553–559.
85. Aruna, S.T., Mukasyan, A.S., Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., 12
(2008) 44–50.
86. Patil, K.C., Aruna, S.T., Mimani, T., Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., 6
(2002) 507–512.
87. Chavan, S.V., Tyagi, A.K., J. Mater. Res., 19 (2004) 3181–3188.
88. Tyagi, A.K., Barc. News Lett., (2006) 39–48.
89. Kumar, A., Wolf, E.E., Mukasyan, A.S., AIChE J., 57 (2011) 2207–2214.
90. Mukasyan, A.S., Dinka, P., Int. J. Self Propag. High Temp. Synth., 16
(2007) 23–35.
91. Palmisano, P., Russo, N., Fino, P., Fino, D., Badini, C., Appl. Catal. B:
Environ., 69 (2006) 85–92.
92. Sekar, M.M.A., Manoharan, S.S., Patil, K.C., J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 9 (1990)
1205–1206.
93. Chinarro, E., Jurado, J.R., Colomer, M.T., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 27 (2007)
3619–3623.
94. Baidya, T., Marimuthu, A., Hegde, M.S., Ravishankar, N., Madras, G.,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 111 (2007) 830–839.
95. Mukasyan, A.S., Dinka, P., Adv. Eng. Mater., 9 (2007) 653–657.
96. Dinka, P., Mukasyan, A., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (2005) 21627–21633.
97. http://www.rsc.org/ebooks/archive/free/CL9780851865546/
CL9780851865546-00001.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2011.
98. Zhao, T., Boullosa-Eiras, S., Yu, Y., Chen, D., Holmen, A., Ronning, M.,
Top. Catal., 54 (2011) 1163–1174.
99. Kakihana, M., Yoshimura, M., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 72 (1999)
1427–1443.
100. Tang, C.W., Wang, C.B., Chien, S.H., Catal. Lett., 131 (2009) 76–83.
101. Therese, G.H.A., Kamath, P.V., Chem. Mater., 12 (2000) 1195–1204.
102. Karami, H., Mohammadzadeh, E., Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 5 (2010)
1032–1045.
103. Ou, Y.-N., Li, G.-R., Liang, J.-H., Feng, Z.-P., Tong, Y.-X., J. Phys. Chem.
C, 114 (2010) 13509–13514.
104. Li, G.-R., Qu, D.-L., Tong, Y.-X., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 2704–2709.
105. Wang, Z.-L., Li, G.-R., Ou, Y.-N., Feng, Z.-P., Qu, D.-L., Tong, Y.-X.,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 115 (2011) 351–356.
106. Sen, R., Das, S., Das, K., Mater. Sci. App., 2 (2011) 416–420.
107. Zheng, Y., Hu, Z., Huang, H., Ji, W., Sun, M., Chen, C., J. Nanomater.,
(2011) doi:10.1155/2011/657516.
108. Tsuzuki, T., Mccormick, P.G., J. Mater. Sci., 39 (2004) 5143–5146.
109. Fejes, D., Forró, L., Hernadi, K., Phys. Status Solidi B, 247 (2010)
2713–2716.
110. http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/sigma-aldrich/technical-documents/
articles/material-matters/mechanical-processing.html. Accessed 16
June 2011.
111. De Castro, C.L., Mitchell, B.S., in Synthesis, Functionalization and
Surface Treatment of Nanoparticles, ed. M.-I. Baraton, American Scientific
Publishers, Valencia, CA, (2002), pp. 1–15.
112. Lia, Y.X., Zhou, X.Z., Wang, Y., You, X.Z., Mater. Lett., 58 (2003) 245–249.
113. Hos, J.P., McCormick, P.G., Scr. Mater., 48 (2003) 85–90.
114. Trovarelli, A., Zamar, F., Llorca, J., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G.,
Kiss, J.T., J. Catal., 169 (1997) 490–502.
115. Zhang, T.S., Ma, J., Kong, L.B., Hing, P., Leng, Y.J., Chan, S.H.,
Kilner, J.A., J. Power Sour., 124 (2003) 26–33.
116. Rupp, J.L.M., Infortuna, A., Gauckler, L.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 90
(2007) 1792–1797.
117. Matthey, J., Platinum Met. Rev., 55 (2011) 149–151.
118. Jung, D.S., Park, S.B., Kang, Y.C., Korean J. Chem. Eng., 27 (2010)
1621–1645.
119. Chen, C.Y., Tseng, T.K., Tsai, S.C., Lin, C.K., Lin, H.M., Ceram. Inter.,
34 (2006) 409–416.
120. Min Kim., PhD Thesis, University of Michigan (2008).
121. Daniel, B., Danick, B., André, R.S., Nicolaas, F.D., Ludwig, J.G., Adv.
Mater., 18 (2006) 3015–3018.
122. Pichestapong, P., Injarean, U., J. Met. Mater. Miner., 20 (2010) 51–54.
123. Rupp, J.L.M., Drobek, T., Rossi, A., Gauckler, L.J., Chem. Mater., 19
(2007) 1134–1142.
124. Chaisuk, C., Wehatoranawee, A., Preampiyawat, S., Netiphat, S.,
Shotipruk, A., Panpranot, J., Jongsomjit, B., Mekasuwandumrong, O.,
Ceram. Int., 37 (2011) 1459–1463.
125. Fino, D., Russo, N., Saracco, G., Specchia, V., J. Catal., 217 (2003)
367–375.
126. Choudhary, T.V., Banerjee, S., Choudhary, V.R., Appl. Catal. A., 234
(2002) 1–23.
127. Gallardo, S.M., PhD Thesis, Lappeenranta University of Technology
(2008), http://www.umad.de/infos/cleanair13/pdf/full_142.pdf.
Accessed 16 June 2011.
128. Li, W.B., Wang, J.X., Gong, H., Catal. Today, 148 (2009) 81–87.
129. Enga, B.B.E., Thompson, D.T., Platinum Met. Rev., 23 (1979)
134–141.
130. Thevenin, P., PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,
(2002).
131. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/turbines/ref-
shelf/handbook/3.2.2.pdf. Accessed 16 June 2011.
132. Saint-Just, J., Kinderen, J., Catal. Today, 29 (1996) 387–395.
133. Adamopoulos, O., PhD Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm,
(2003).
134. Rivas, B., Gutiérrez-Ortiz, J.I., López-Fonseca, R., González-Velasco,
J.R., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 314 (2006) 54–63.
135. Yang, Y., Xu, X., Sun, K., Catal. Commun., 7 (2006) 756–760.
136. Liotta, L.F., Carlo, G.D., Pantaleo, G., Deganello, G., Catal. Commun.,
6 (2005) 329–336.
137. Bozo, C., Guilhaume, N., Garbowski, E., Primet, M., Catal. Today, 59
(2000) 33–45.
138. Wang, J., Liu, Z., Cao, H., Gong, M., Chen, Y., Chen, Y., Chem. Res.
Chin. Univ., 25 (2009) 81–85.
139. Alifanti, M., Florea, M., Pârvulescu, V.I., Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 70
(2007) 400–405.
140. Hu, C., Zhu, Q., Jiang, Z., Chen, L., Wu, R., Chem. Eng. J., 152 (2009)
583–590.
141. Hu, C., Chem. Eng. J., 168 (2011) 1185–1192.
142. Ontelli, G.C., Reolon, R.P., Alves, A.K., Berutti, F.A., Bergmann, C.P.,
Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 405 (2011) 79–83.
143. Scirè, S., Minicò, S., Crisafulli, C., Satriano, C., Pistone, A., Appl. Catal.
B: Environ., 40 (2003) 43–49.
144. Li, J., Li, W., J. Rare Earths, 28 (2010) 547–551.
145. Centeno, M.A., Paulis, M., Montes, M., Odriozola, J.A., Appl. Catal. A:
Gen., 234 (2002) 65–78.
146. Scirè, S., Riccobene, P.M., Crisafulli, C., Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 101
(2010) 109–117.
147. Wang, X., Kang, Q., Li, D., Catal. Commun., 9 (2008) 2158–2162.
148. Wu, M., Wang, X., Dai, Q., Gu, Y., Li, D., Catal. Today, 158 (2010)
336–342.
149. Zarur, A.J., Ying, J.Y., Nature, 403 (2000) 65–67.
150. Pez, R.R., Balderas-Tapia, L., Elizalde-Martinez, I., Viveros, T., Chem.
Eng. Commun., 196 (2009) 1189–1197.
151. Aneggi, E., Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A., Catal. Today,
114 (2006) 40–47.
152. Hensgen, L., Stöwe, K., Catal. Today, 159 (2011) 100–107.
153. Fang, P., Luo, M.-F., Lu, J.-Q., Cen, S.-Q., Yan, X.Y., Wang, X.-X.,
Thermochim. Acta, 478 (2008) 45–50.
154. Simonsen, S.B., Dahi, S., Johnson, E., Molenbroek, A.M., Helveg, S.,
J. Catal., 255 (2008) 1–5.
155. Aneggi, E., Leitenburg, C., Trovarelli, A., Catal. Today, 181 (2012)
108–115.
156. Atribak, I., López-Suárez, F., Bueno-López, A., García-García, A.,
Catal. Today, 176 (2011) 404–408.
157. Zhang, Z., Han, D., Wei, S., Zhang, Y., J. Catal., 276 (2010) 16–23.
158. Aneggi, E., Llorca, J., Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A., Appl.
Catal. B: Environ., 91 (2009) 489–498.
159. Reddy, B.M., Bharali, P., Thrimurthulu, G., Saikia, P., Katta, L.,
Park, S.-E., Catal. Lett., 123 (2008) 327–333.
160. Liang, Q., Wu, X., Weng, D., Xu, H., Catal. Today, 139 (2008) 113–118.
161. Kayama, T., Yamazaki, K., Shinjoh, H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132 (2010)
13154–13155.
162. Shimizu, K.I., Kawachi, H., Komai, S.-I. Yoshida, K., Sasaki, Y.,
Satsuma, A., Catal. Today, 175 (2011) 93–99.
163. Katta, L., Sudarsanam, P., Thrimurthulu, G., Reddy, B.M., Appl. Catal.
B: Environ., 101 (2010) 101–108.
164. Aneggi, E., Llorca, J., Boaro, M., Trovarelli, A., J. Catal., 234 (2005) 88–95.
165. Huang, M., Fabris, S., J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008) 8643–8648.
166. Valechha, D., Lokhande, S., Klementova, M., Subrt, J., Rayalu, S.,
Labhsetwar, N., J. Mater. Chem., 21 (2011) 3718–3725.
167. Yu, Q., Wu, X., Tang, C., Qi, L., Liu, B., Gao, F., Sun, K., Dong, L.,
Chen, Y., J. Colloid and Interface Sci., 354 (2011) 341–352.
168. Reddy, B.M., Reddy, G.K., Ganesh, I., Ferreira, J.M.F., J. Mater. Sci., 44
(2009) 2743–2751.
169. Rovira, L.G., Delgado, J.J., ElAmrani, K., Rio, E., Chen, X., Calvino, J.J.,
Botana, F.J., Catal. Today, 180 (2012) 167–173.
170. Hernández, W.Y., Centeno, M.A., Romero-Sarria, F., Odriozola, J.A.,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 5629–5635.
171. Li, G.-R., Qu, D.-L., Wang, Z.-L., Su, C.-Y., Tong, Y.-X., Arurault, L.,
Chem. Commun., 48 (2009) 7557–7559.
172. Reddy, B.M., Thrimurthulu, G., Katta, L., Catal. Lett., 141 (2011)
572–581.
173. Venezia, A.M., Pantaleo, G., Longo, A., Carlo, G.D., Casaletto, M.P.,
Liotta, F.L., Deganello, G., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (2005) 2821–2827.
174. Luo, M.-F., Song, Y.-P., Lu, J.-Q., Wang, X.-Y., Pu, Z.-Y., J. Phys. Chem. C,
111 (2007)12686–12692.
175. Fonseca, J.S.L., Ferreira, H.S., Bion, N., Pirault-Roy, L., Rangel, M.C.,
Duprez, D., Epron, F., Catal. Today, 180 (2012) 41–43.
176. Panzera, G., Modafferi, V., Candamano, S., Donato, A., Frusteri, F.,
Antonucci, P.L., J. Power Sources, 135 (2004) 177–183.
177. Rynkowski, J.M., Dobrosz-Gómez, I., Annales UMCS, 64 (2009) 197–217.
178. Laguna, O.H., Centeno, M.A., Romero-Sarria, F., Odriozola, J.A.,
Catal. Today, 172 (2011) 118–123.
179. Laguna, O.H., Centena, M.A., Arzamendi, G., Gandía, L.M., Romero-
Sarria, F., Odriozol, J.A., Catal. Today, 157 (2010) 155–159.
180. Ayastuy, J.L., Gurbani, A., González-Marcos, M.P., Gutiérrez-Ortiz, M.A.,
Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 387 (2010) 119–128.
181. Reddy, B.M., Lakshmanan, P., Bharali, P., Saikia, P. Thrimurthulu, G.,
Muhler, M., Grunert, W., J. Phys. Chem. C, 111 (2007) 10478–10483.
182. Lai, S.-Y., Qiu, Y., Wang, S., J. Catal., 237 (2006) 303–313.
183. Vecchietti, J., Collins, S., Delgado, J.J., Małecka, M., Rio, E., Chen, X.,
Bernal, S., Bonivardi, S., Top Catal., 54 (2011) 201–209.
184. Hernández, W.Y., Romero-Sarria, F., Centeno, M.A., Jose Odriozola, A.,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 114 (2010) 10857–10865.
185. Reddy, B.M., Rao, K.N., Bharali, P., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48 (2009)
8478–8486.
186. Vivier, L., Duprez, D., Chem Sus Chem., 3 (2010) 654–678.
187. Kundakovic, L., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., J. Catal., 179 (1998)
203–222.
188. Gaálová, J., Topka, P., Kaluža, L., Šolcová, O., Catal. Today, 175 (2011)
231–237.
189. Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Wen, X., Liu, Y., Chem. Eng. J., 121 (2006) 115–123.
190. Rao, K.N., Reddy, B.M., Park, S.-E., Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 100 (2010)
472–479.
CHAPTER 9
465
466 J. A. Rodriguez
CeO2
Cu
500oC
CuO 400oC
300oC
/h
Time
o
200 C
2θ
(a)
o
400 C o
500 C
5%Cu/CeO 2
H2 relative concentraion
o
300 C
o
400 C
o Cu0.2Ce 0.8O 2
300 C
o
200 C
o
o
500 C
400 C
300 C
o
CuO
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Time / hour
(b)
Figure 9.1 (a) In situ time-resolved XRD patterns collected for a 5% CuO/CeO2
catalyst during the WGS reaction.20 (b) Amount of H2 produced at several tempera-
tures for three different catalysts containing Cu.20 Copyright 2006 the American
Chemical Society.
468 J. A. Rodriguez
Figure 9.2 Ce L3-edge XANES spectra collected for Ce0.8Cu0.2O2 during the WGS
reaction at different temperatures.13,20 The spectrum for Ce2O3 (Ce3+) is also
included for comparison. Copyright 2006 the American Chemical Society.
470 J. A. Rodriguez
Figure 9.3 Different configurations of model catalysts used for studying the WGS.
472 J. A. Rodriguez
probably reflect changes in the size of the gold particles: high catalytic
activity is seen for small gold particles (size < 4 nm), and it decreases
as the particle size increases. Although the optimum WGS activity in
Fig. 9.4 is for admetal coverages of 0.4–0.5 ML, metal/oxide catalysts
with gold coverages near 1 ML are still substantially more active than
Au(111) or polycrystalline gold, surfaces that are not catalytically
active.4 For the deposition of Cu on CeO2(111) and ZnO(000ī), one
sees trends that are similar to those found in the case of Au deposi-
tion, but the admetal coverage for higher WGS is somewhat different.
The most active Au/CeO2(111) and Cu/CeO2(111) catalysts have
comparable activity.28 This is quite remarkable because extended sur-
faces of pure copper and pure gold exhibit quite different activities
for the WGS,4,12 with bulk metallic gold being inactive. Thus, the ceria
probably plays an active role behind the excellent performance of
Au/CeO2 catalysts.4
The gold and copper atoms on the CeO2(111) and ZnO(000ī)
surfaces were probably not oxidized during the WGS process.4 After
reaction, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) showed Au 4f and
Cu 2p positions that were almost identical to those seen upon depo-
sition of gold and Cu on the oxides and were very different from
those typically seen for AuOx and CuOx species.4,10 Post-reaction
surface analysis also showed the presence of formate-like and car-
bonate-like groups on the surface of the catalysts. Possible reaction
paths for the formation of these groups are discussed in Burch.5 It is
not completely clear if they are key intermediates in the WGS pro-
cess or simple spectators.4,5,27
Figure 9.5(a) compares the WGS activity of Au(111) and 0.5 ML
of Au supported on ZnO(000ī),4 CeO2(111),4 and an MoO2 film.27
The nature of the support plays a key role in the activation of the
gold nanoparticles. Zinc oxide is frequently used in industrial Cu–
ZnO WGS catalysts.1,5 However, the Au/ZnO(000ī) system displays
low WGS activity when compared to Au/CeO2(111). A similar trend
is found when comparing the activities of Cu/CeO2(111) and Cu/
Zn O(000ī), see Fig. 9.4. The ceria contains a substantial number of
metal cations not fully oxidized under WGS reaction conditions and
may participate directly in important steps of the process.4 This is
not the case for ZnO.4
474 J. A. Rodriguez
476 J. A. Rodriguez
Figure 9.6 (a) STM image obtained after annealing a Ce–Au(111) surface alloy at
450 K in 1 × 10−8 torr of O2 for 30 min and flashed to 650 K. (b) STM image
recorded after depositing Ce on Au(111) at 550 K in 1.5 × 10−7 torr of O2. Taken
from Ma et al.42 Both graphs are differential images. Copyright 2007 Elsevier.
Figure 9.7 STM image taken after dosing Ce to Cu(111) at 650 K under an atmos-
phere of O2 (p ∼ 5 × 10−7 torr).16,17 Taken from Rodriguez et al.17. Copyright 2009 Wiley.
478 J. A. Rodriguez
Figure 9.8 (a) Typical Ce 3d core level spectra for Ce4+, from CeO2/Au(111), and
Ce3+, from Ce2O3/Au(111). (b) Two sets of O 1s core level spectra obtained from
CeO2/Au(111) and Ce2O3/Au(111) before and after dosing water at 300 K.46
Copyright 2007 Elsevier.
480 J. A. Rodriguez
Figure 9.9 Arrhenius plot for the WGS reaction rate on Cu(111),17 Cu(100),4 Cu/
ZnO(000ī),4 and on an Au(111) surface approximately 20% covered by ceria.15 The
data were acquired with a pressure of 20 torr of CO and 10 torr of H2O and tem-
peratures of 575, 600, 625, and 650 K.
interface.9,15 Thus, one can gain activity due to the active participa-
tion of the oxide in the catalytic reaction.9,15
Post-reaction characterization of the inverse CeOx/Au(111)
catalyst with XPS pointed to a Ce4+→Ce3+ transformation and identi-
fied a C 1s feature at 289–290 eV corresponding to either HCOO or
CO3 species on the CeOx/Au(111) surface.9 The mechanism for the
WGS in CeOx/Au(111) is assumed to be the following pathway:5,12
CO → CO (a)
H2O → H2O (a)
H2O (a) → OH (a) + H (a)
CO (a) +OH (a) → HCOx (a)
HCOx (a) → CO2 + H (a)
2H (a) → H2
H O H
O O
C C C
O O O O
Ce Ce Ce Ce Ce
Formate Carbonate Carboxylate
482 J. A. Rodriguez
2.2
CeOx - Cu(111)
O1s
2.0
Intensity (arb. units)
1.8
OH
1.6
1.4
300 - 600 K
1.2
1.0
538 536 534 532 530 528
Binding energy (eV)
Figure 9.11 XPS spectra in the O 1s region for a dose of H2O to CeO1.75/Au(111)
followed by annealing steps as depicted from 150 to 600 K.15 Copyright 2010 Elsevier.
0.6
0.5
o
65
301.5
Intensity (arbitrary units)
0.4 286.1
290.4
0.3
288.4
o
303.6 0
0.2 290.3
0.1
0.0
284 288 292 296 300 304 308 312
Photon energy (eV)
Figure 9.12 C K-edge from near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS)
plots of CO (3 L) dosed to hydroxylated CeO1.75/Au(111) at 100 K. Both the normal
incidence (0°) angle and the grazing incidence (65°) spectra are shown in the
figure.15 Copyright 2010 Elsevier.
484 J. A. Rodriguez
486 J. A. Rodriguez
Figure 9.13 (a) STM image of CeOx on a TiO2(110) surface after depositing Ce
atoms at 600 K in O2 (PO = 1 × 10−7 torr) and subsequent annealing at 900 K in O2
2
(PO2 = 1 × 10−4 torr, Vt = 1.2 V, It = 0.07 nA). (b) Bias-dependent STM images of a
diagonal array of CeOx nanoparticles taken at the imaging bias of 1.2 V, 0.06 nA
(top) and 0.4 V, 0.06 nA (bottom).18,50
42° with respect to the [1–1 0] direction. When this feature was
imaged at +0.4 V, the individual bright features appeared as dimers.18
Each ceria dimer is located in between two rows of oxygen species
protruding from the surface. Spectra from XPS and ultraviolet pho-
toelectron spectroscopy indicated that the oxidation state of the Ce
atoms in the dimers was essentially +3.18,50 The titanium cations were
mainly Ti4+ with a small amount (< 5 %) of Ti 3+ comparable to that
found on clean TiO2(110).18,50
DF calculations were used to study the bonding configuration of
the ceria dimers on TiO2(110), as shown in Fig. 9.14.50 A Ce atom
interacts with two bridging and one in-plane O atom of the titania
surface. Starting with this structure, the dissociation of an O2 mole-
cule near the adsorbed Ce is a highly exothermic process and an
energy of 6.88 eV is released.50 If a second Ce atom is deposited on
this surface, the CeO2 monomer would be an excellent binding site
to create a dimer. At the end, the ceria dimer adopts a configuration
comparable to STM images in Fig. 9.13(b) and has an oxidation
state of +3, without the generation of Ti3+ species, as seen in the XPS
measurements.50
The surface in Fig. 9.13(a) can be used as a model to study the
catalytic behavior of mixed metal oxide supports.10 CeOx nanoparti-
cles drastically affect the growth mode of Au, Cu, and Pt on
TiO2(110).10,40 On this surface, the admetals grow forming three-
dimensional particles. For example, gold exhibits very weak interac-
tions with the ideal terraces of TiO2(110) and mainly binds to
defects or step sites.24,55 Figure 9.15 shows STM images acquired
from the same surface area before (a) and after (b) depositing gold
Figure 9.14 Most stable geometries for the formation of a Ce2O3 dimer on
TiO2(110). DF calculations were used to study the interaction of Ce and O2 with the
titania substrate.10,50
488 J. A. Rodriguez
Figure 9.15 STM images for (a) CeOx/TiO2(110) and (b) Au/CeOx/TiO2(110).
The gold was deposited on the area shown in (a) at ∼ 300 K. ∼ 6% of the surface was
covered with Au. Taken in part from Park et al.18 Copyright 2009 National Academy
of Sciences USA.
-2
molec cm
20 torr CO, 10 torr H2O
20
625 K
17
15 on CeOx/TiO2(110)
Molecules produced / 10
10
on TiO2(110)
5
H2
CO2
0
0.0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.4
Au coverage / ML
490 J. A. Rodriguez
Pt nano
10
Au nano
0
TiO2 CeOx/TiO2 TiO2 CeOx/TiO2 TiO2 CeOx/TiO2
9.6 Conclusion
Experiments performed using model catalysts indicate that ceria
can play a key role in the performance of water gas catalysts.
Although zinc oxide is frequently used in industrial WGS catalysts,
the Cu/ZnO(000ī) and Au/ZnO(000ī) systems display low WGS
activity compared to CuCeO2(111) and Au/CeO2(111). A ceria sup-
port contains a substantial number of metal cations that are not fully
oxidized under WGS reaction conditions and may participate
directly in the dissociation of water and other important steps of the
catalytic process. Extremely active WGS catalysts have been found
after coadsorbing nanoparticles of ceria and noble metals on a
TiO2(110) substrate. The M/CeOx/TiO2(110) (M=Cu, Au, or Pt)
system takes advantage of the complex interactions that occur in a
mixed metal oxide at the nanometer level, opening new directions
for tuning catalytic activity by coupling appropriate pairs of oxides.
492 J. A. Rodriguez
Acknowledgements
Many of the experiments described in this chapter were done by the
Group of Catalysis and Surface Science at Brookhaven National
Laboratory (L. Barrio, M. Estrella, J.C. Hanson, J. Hrbek, P. Liu,
S. Ma, A. Nambu, J.-B. Park, J.A. Rodriguez, S.D. Senanayake,
D. Stacchiola, X. Wang, W. Wen) in collaboration with research
groups at the Universidad Central de Venezuela (J. Evans, M. Pèrez)
and the Universidad de Sevilla (J. Graciani, J.F. Sanz). The research
carried out at Brookhaven National Laboratory was supported by
the US Department of Energy (Chemical Sciences Division,
DE-AC02–98CH10886).
References
1.Thomas, J.M., Thomas, W.J., Principles and Practice of Heterogeneous
Catalysis, VCH, New York, (1997).
2. Si, R., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 47 (2008)
2884–2889.
3. Fu, Q., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M. Science, 301 (2003)
935–938.
4. Rodriguez, J.A., Liu, P., Hrbek, J., Evans, J., Pérez, M., Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed., 46 (2007) 1329–1332.
5. Burch, R., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 8 (2006) 5483–5500.
6. Rodriguez, J.A., Pérez, M., Evans, J., Liu, G., Hrbek, J., J. Chem. Phys.,
122 (2005) 241101.
7. Rodriguez, J.A., Pérez, M., Jirsak, T., Evans, J., Hrbek, J., González, L.,
Chem. Phys. Lett., 378 (2003) 526–530.
8. Fu, Q., Deng, W., Saltsburg, M. Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Appl.
Catal. B: Environ., 56 (2005) 57–68.
9. Rodriguez, J.A., Ma, S., Liu, P., Hrbek, J., Evans, J., Pérez, M., Science,
18 (2007) 1757–1760.
10. Ricote, S., Jacobs, G., Milling, M., Ji, Y.Y., Patterson, P.M., Davis, B.H.,
Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 303 (2006) 35–41.
11. Bunluesin, T., Gorte, R.J., Graham, G.W., Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 15
(1998) 107–112.
12. Liu, P., Rodriguez, J.A., J. Chem. Phys., 126 (2007) 164705.
13. Wang, X., Rodriguez, J.A., Hanson, J.C., Gamarra, D., Martinez-Arias, A.,
Fernandez-Garcia, M., Top. Catal., 49 (2008) 81–88.
14. Senanayake, S.D., Stacchiola, D., Liu, P., Mullins, C.B., Hrbek, J.,
Rodriguez, J.A., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 19536–19544.
15. Senanayake, S.D., Stacchiola, D., Evans, J., Estrella, M., Barrio-Pliego, L.,
Pérez, M., Hrbek, J., Rodríguez, J.A., J. Catal., 271 (2010) 392–401.
16. Rodriguez, J.A., Hrbek, J., Surf. Sci., 604 (2010) 241–245.
17. Rodriguez, J.A., Graciani, J., Evans, J., Park, J.B., Yang, F., Stacchiola, D.,
Senanayake, S.D., Ma, S., Perez, M., Liu, P.J., Sanz, J.F., Hrbek, J.J.,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 48 (2009) 8047–8050.
18. Park, J.B., Graciani, J., Evans, J., Stacchiola, D., Ma, S., Liu, P., Nambu, A.,
Sanz, J.F., Hrbek, J., Rodriguez, J.A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (PNAS), 106
(2009) 4975–4980.
19. Gonzalez, I.D., Navarro, R.M., Wen, W., Marinkovic, N., Rodríguez, J.A.,
Rosa, F., Fierro, J.L.G., Catal. Today, 149 (2010) 372–380.
20. Wang, X., Rodriguez, J.A., Hanson, J.C., Gamarra, D., Martinez-Arias, A.,
Fernandez-Garcia, M., J. Phys. Chem. B, 110 (2006) 428–434.
21. Wang, X., Rodriguez, J.A., Hanson, J.C., Gamarra, D., Martinez-Arias, A.,
Fernandez-Garcia, M., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (2005) 19595–19603.
22. Wang, X., Rodriguez, J.A., Hanson, J.C., Perez, M., Evans, J., J. Chem.
Phys., 123 (2005) 221101.
23. Walden, M., Lai, X., Goodman, D.W., Science, 281 (1998) 1647–1651.
24. Park, J.B., Ratliff, J.S., Ma, S., Chen, D.A., J. Phys. Chem. C, 111 (2007)
2165–2171.
25. Baron, M., Bondarchuk, O., Stacchiola, D., Shaikhutdinov, S., Freund,
H.J., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 6042–6049.
26. Rodríguez, J.A., Evans, J., Graciani, J., Park, J.-B., Liu, P., Hrbek, J.,
Sanz, J.F., J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 7364–7370.
27. Rodriguez, J.A., Liu, P., Hrbek, J., Pérez, M., Evans, J., J. Molecular
Catal. A: Chem., 281 (2008) 59–65.
28. Campbell, C.T., Koel, B., Daube, K.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 5 (1987)
810–815.
29. Mullins, D.R., Radulovic, P.V., Overbury, S.H., Surf. Sci., 429 (1999)
186–197.
494 J. A. Rodriguez
30. Matolin, V., Sedlacek, L., Matolinova, I., Sutara, F., Skala, T., Smid, B.,
Libra, J., Nehasil, V., Prince, K.C., J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008)
3751–3758.
31. Staudt, T., Lykhach, Y., Hammer, L., Schneider, M.A., Matolin, V.,
Libuda, J., Surf. Sci., 603 (2009) 3382–3388.
32. Castellarin-Cudia, C., Surnev, S., Schneider G., Podlucky, R., Ramsey,
M.G., Netzer, F.P., Surf. Sci., 554 (2004) L120–124.
33. Mullins, D.R., Robbins, M.D., Zhou, J., Surf. Sci., 600 (2006)
1547–1551.
34. Lu, J.-L., Gao, H.-J., Shaikhutdinov, S., Freund, H.-J., Surf. Sci., 600
(2006) 5004–5010.
35. Alexandrou, M., Nix, R.M., Surf. Sci., 321 (1994) 47–57.
36. Xiao, W., Guo, Q., Wang, E.G., Chem. Phys. Lett., 368 (2003) 527–531.
37. Schierbaum, K.-D., Surf. Sci., 399 (1998) 29–34.
38. Berner, U., Schierbaum, K., Phys. Rev. B, 65 (2002) 235404.
39. Berner, U., Schierbaum, K., Johnes, G., Wincott, P., Haq, S., Thornton,
G., Surf. Sci., 467 (2000) 201–208.
40. Grinter, D., Pang, C.L., Ithnin, R., Thornton, G., J. Phys. Chem. C, 114
(2010) 17036–17041.
41. Hardacre, C., Roe, G.M., Lambert, R.M., Surf. Sci., 326 (1995) 1–10.
42. Ma, S., Rodriguez, J.A., Hrbek, J., Surf. Sci., 602 (2008) 3272–3279.
43. Eck, S., Castellarin-Cudia, C., Surnev, S., Ramsey, M.G., Netzer, F.P.,
Surf. Sci., 520 (2002) 173–185.
44. Trovarelli, A. Catal. Reviews, 38 (1996) 439–520.
45. Nakamura, J., Campbell, J.M., Campbell, C.T., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday
Trans., 86 (1990) 2725–2730.
46. Zhao, X., Ma, S., Hrbek, J., Rodriguez, J.A., Surf. Sci., 601 (2007)
2445–2452.
47. Gokhale, A.A., Dumesic, J.A., Mavrikakis, M., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130
(2008) 1402–1409.
48. Callaghan, C.A., Vilekar, S.A., Fishtik, I., Datta, R., Appl. Catal. A, 345
(2008) 213–232.
49. Fajín, J.L.C., Illas, F., Gomes, J.R.B., J. Chem. Phys., 130 (2009) 224702.
50. Park, J.B., Graciani, J., Evans, J., Stacchiola, D., Senanayake, S.D.,
Barrio, L., Liu, P., Sanz, J.F., Hrbek J., Rodriguez, J.A., J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 132 (2010) 356–363.
51. Rodriguez, J.A., Stacchiola, D., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 12 (2010)
9557–9565.
52. Kung, H.H., Transition Metal Oxides: Surface Chemistry and Catalysis,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, (1989).
53. Muylaert, I., Van Der Voort, P., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 11 (2009)
2826–2832.
54. Rodriguez, J.A., Catal. Today, 85 (2003) 177–192.
55. Valden, M., Lai, X., Goodman, D.W., Science, 281 (1998) 1647–1651.
56. Ojifinni, R.A., Froemming, N.S., Gong, J., Pan, M., Kim, T.S.,
White, J.M., Henkelman, G., Mullins, C.B., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130
(2008) 6801–6812.
57. Kim, T.S., Gong, J., Ojifinni, R.A., White, J.M., Mullins, C.B., J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 128 (2006) 6282–6283.
CHAPTER 10
10.1 Introduction
During the past two decades catalysis by gold has been one of the
fastest growing fields in catalytic research.1 The discovery by Haruta
and co-workers that highly dispersed gold nanoparticles supported
on reducible oxide supports exhibit an exceptional activity in CO
oxidation below ambient temperature inspired an increased level of
interest in the catalytic studies of gold.2 Currently, there is an appre-
ciable amount of research into the application of gold catalysts for
promoting many reactions of both environmental and industrial
significance. In particular, the water gas shift (WGS) and preferential
CO oxidation (PROX) reactions are important process steps in one
very attractive approach to CO-free hydrogen production for fuel-
cell applications. In the past decade, research has demonstrated the
very high potential of fuel cells to replace the internal-combustion
engine in vehicles and to provide power for stationary and portable
497
power applications because they are energy efficient, clean, and fuel
flexible.3 Hydrogen has a great potential as an environmentally
clean, renewable, and highly efficient energy carrier. Nowadays,
hydrogen is mostly produced from fossil fuels by a multistep process
that includes catalytic reforming or autothermal reforming of hydro-
carbons, followed by the WGS reaction (CO + H2O ↔ CO2 + H2).
This reaction has a long historical application as an industrially
important process for hydrogen production. Recently it has attracted
renewed interest due to the increasing demands for high-purity
hydrogen. The hydrogen-rich gas stream after the WGSR contains
typically 0.5–1 vol% CO. Due to the high sensitivity of the platinum
anode electrode in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells
(PEMFCs) towards even low levels of CO, the concentration of CO
should be reduced to below 10 ppm (below 100 ppm for CO-tolerant
alloy anodes). The selective catalytic oxidation of CO in a hydrogen-
rich gas stream, known as the PROX reaction, appears to be the
simplest and most cost-effective method for this purpose.
The development of fuel-cell technology has focused consider-
able research interest on the design of active, stable, and poison-
resistant catalysts for a low-temperature WGSR as well as active and
highly selective catalysts for PROX. Supported gold catalysts have
been extensively studied during the last two decades in view of their
high WGS activity at low temperatures.4–10 The nature of the sup-
port on which nanosized gold particles are dispersed plays a crucial
role in determining catalytic activity. Recent investigations have
revealed the beneficial application of ceria as a support for active
catalysts for WGS and PROX reactions. The distinctive defect chem-
istry of ceria and its ability to exchange lattice oxygen with the gas
phase results in an oxide with unique catalytic properties, including
the promotion of precious-metal dispersion and the enhancement
of catalytic activity at interfacial metal-support sites.11 Numerous
studies of Au/CeO2 catalysts have addressed how various factors,
including the method of preparation, gold loading and support
surface area, gold particle size, structure and oxidation state, nature
of the active gold species, and reactivity of surface species, correlate
with catalytic performance in the WGSR.12–33
which interact with the support, resulting in small gold particles well
dispersed on the surface.
An analysis of scanning transmission electron microscope
(STEM) micrographs and elemental maps of Au/ceria catalysts pre-
pared by co-precipitation and deposition-precipitation show a large
difference in the structure of the ceria.14 Although XRD analysis
evidenced the fluorite oxide-type diffraction pattern of CeO2 in
both cases, the sample prepared by CP had a needlelike and layered
bulk structure while the DP sample had a uniform spherical struc-
ture. Differences were also registered for gold particle size: they had
an average size of 8 nm in the CP sample while in the DP sample, the
gold particles were < 5 nm.
By comparing the structure and redox features of Au/CeO2 pre-
pared by different methods, Arena et al. found that dispersion is not
the only parameter determining the reactivity of the studied cata-
lysts. The effect of preparation method (DP, CP, incipient-wetness
(IW), combustion (CB)) was studied with a special emphasis on the
amount of residual chlorine.41 It was concluded that different syn-
thesis routes produce substantial variations in the amount of resid-
ual chlorine, which controls the strength of the Au3+–CeO2
interaction resulting in changes in the reducibility of the active
phase. The following activity scale for CO oxidation was observed:
DP > CP >> CB > IW. The removal of residual chlorine by washing in
an alkali solution enhances the reducibility of the active phase, lev-
eling off the functionality of the Au/CeO2 system in both total and
preferential CO oxidation reactions.
One of the main drawbacks of ceria-based catalysts is deactiva-
tion with time-on-stream. In order to overcome this Cargnello
et al. applied a new method to create very small Au nanoparticles
(average diameter > 2 nm) embedded inside the CeO2 support.
There was good thermal stability after aging treatments at
relatively high temperatures (up to 250 °C).44 The aim of this
methodology was to stabilize the Au phase by encapsulation of
preformed Au nanoparticles inside a porous ceria layer. A mixture
of thiolates was used to protect the gold particles and to direct
the self-assembly assisted precipitation of Ce(OH)x species around
the preformed particles. The removal of the organic layer was car-
ried out by calcination. Although very good catalytic activity was
obtained with low Au loading (1 wt%) under real PROX condi-
tions, CO chemisorption experiments demonstrated lower acces-
sibility of the gold phase over embedded catalysts in comparison
with reference Au/ceria samples prepared by DP. TPR experi-
ments on the embedded samples also suggested that a fraction of
the Au nanoparticles was completely buried inside the ceria layer
and further improvements could be achieved by better tuning the
porosity of the support.
Table 10.1 Average size and lattice parameter of gold in fresh and used catalysts.
Average size (nm) Lattice constant (Å)
Catalysts Fresh Used Fresh Used
AuCe < 2.0 (HRTEM) 6.5 — 4.073(5)
AuCeAl10CP 3.1 4.5 4.058(5) 4.055(5)
AuCeAl20CP 5.9 7.4 4.060(5) 4.065(5)
AuCeAl10MA 2.9 3.0 4.063(5) 4.064(5)
AuCeAl20MA 3.5 3.9 4.058(5) 4.047(5)
Table 10.2 XPS data (Au 4f7/2 region) of fresh and used (after WGSR) gold
catalysts.
Fresh samples Used samples
Catalyst Peak position (eV) At % Peak position (eV) At %
AuCe 84.70 0.56 84.15 0.45
85.90 0.12
AuCeAl10CP 84.14 0.31 84.04 0.35
85.69 0.07
AuCeAl10MA 84.24 0.29 84.27 0.34
85.77 0.06
AuCeAl20CP 84.20 0.21 83.92 0.24
86.00 0.03
AuCeAl20MA 84.26 0.27 84.14 0.27
85.95 0.03
AuCeSm10CP 84.45 0.44 84.07 0.47
85.61 0.29
AuCeSm10MA 84.25 0.11 84.17 0.24
85.91 0.15
AuCeYbMA 85.14 0.38 84.16 0.30
86.95 0.13
half maximum (FWHM) of the main ceria band depends on the ceria
particle size as well as on defects in the ceria lattice, mainly related to
the presence of dopant ions or oxygen vacancies.88,89 The values of the
FWHM reported by Andreeva et al. studying gold catalysts supported
on ceria doped with different amounts of Al2O3 (10 or 20 wt%)20,64
show that the addition of alumina, either by CP or MA, causes widen-
ing of the main ceria line. The FWHM values are larger for CP com-
pared to MA catalysts. The higher broadening with CP samples may
be due to the higher dispersion of the CeO2 particles and to the more
defective structure caused by the co-precipitation. Solids with higher
amounts of alumina, synthesized by the same preparation mode
(CP or MA), demonstrate higher broadening. Raman spectroscopy
data for RE-containing gold catalysts (10 wt%)51,52 differ from those
obtained with alumina as dopant. Figure 10.1 shows Raman spectra of
the initial ceria supports modified with La, Sm, Gd, and Y using
different methods.
The weak band detected at about 600 cm−1 is evidence for the
defective ceria structure induced by both CP and MA. However, in
the case of initial supports prepared by MA, the FWHM data for the
main ceria band suggested a larger number of defects. These
defects could be mainly oxygen vacancies because the rare-earth
(3+) ions, applied as dopants, are with ionic radii that suppose a
vacancies formation in order to attain the neutrality. The calcu-
lated FWHM values for MA samples are in contrast to the expecta-
tion of higher defectivity caused by co-precipitation as with
Al-containing ceria supports. The average size of ceria crystallites
was quite close for both preparation modes, so any dependence of
the FWHM on the dispersion has to be excluded. The proposed
explanation was that most probably the oxygen vacancies were adja-
cent to the RE3+ dopant and the ceria structure seems to be better
ordered than ceria modified with alumina. The changes in the posi-
tion of the main ceria band are informative for the insertion of the
dopants and the position shift is visible only for the RE-containing
supports prepared by CP (Fig. 10.1). In this case the dependence
of the frequency on the dopant ionic radius was linear. No such
correlation was found when using MA.51 The results are in
Figure 10.1 Raman spectra of initial ceria supports doped with REs: (a) prepared
by CP and (b) prepared by MA. Reprinted from Ilieva et al.52 with permission from
Elsevier.
Figure 10.2 Raman spectra of the oxides. Reprinted from Laguna et al.57 with
permission from Elsevier.
Figure 10.3 Low-temperature TPR profiles of samples with different gold loading.
Reprinted from Andreeva et al.12 with permission from Elsevier.
550
535
Detector responce
510 855
150
Detector responce
CeAl20 x 64
CeAl10 x 64
CeO2 x 64
x 128 x 32
AuCeAl10
x 128 x 32
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Temperature, °C
Figure 10.4 TPR profiles of gold catalysts on ceria and ceria–alumina supports
prepared by CP. Inset: TPR of the corresponding initial supports. Reprinted from
Andreeva et al.20 with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 10.5 TPR profiles of gold catalysts on ceria doped with alumina (10 or
20 wt%) after re-oxidation at RT and HT: (a) samples prepared by CP and (b) sam-
ples prepared by MA. Reprinted from Andreeva et al.20 with permission from Elsevier.
103
118
108 149
Detector responce
Detector responce
117
x2 AuCeYCP 155 AuCeGdMA
x2 94 AuCeGdCP 140
108 109 AuCeSmMA
x2 AuCeSmCP
AuCeLaMA
x2 AuCeLaCP
Figure 10.6 Low-temperature TPR patterns of gold catalysts on ceria doped with
RE: (a) prepared by CP and (b) prepared by MA. Reprinted from Ilieva et al.52 with
permission from Elsevier.
TPR peak was registered with the AuCeYCP sample, which could
mean that the surface is homogeneous and there is close contact
between the gold and the ceria. It is interesting to comment that this
catalyst exhibited the highest activity in PROX52 and the lowest activ-
ity in WGSR.51 This was reasonably explained as being due to the
redox properties of the catalysts at different temperatures. After
re-oxidation at 220 °C (the temperature which is of interest for
WGS)51 a very low value for hydrogen consumption of the AuCeYCP
sample was observed. Compared to other RE-containing catalysts, it
had the largest difference in HC between fresh and re-oxidized sam-
ples. However, after re-oxidation at 100 °C (the temperature of inter-
est for PROX) oxygen capacity almost fully recovered, being only a
little lower compared to the fresh sample.52 Wang et al.55 observed a
correlation between WGS activity and the reducibility of gold cata-
lysts supported on ceria doped with different La amounts. The
authors observed that the TPR peak area for ceria surface reduction
initially increased significantly with La doping between 10% and
25% and then dropped with further La addition. This is the same
dependence on La content as in catalytic activity in WGS.
When the dopants are also reducible, the assignment of the
reduction processes is more complicated as changes to the oxida-
tion states of the dopants’ ions have to be taken into consideration
as well. The TPR processes for gold catalysts for WGS or PROX sup-
ported on ceria doped with transition metals have been studied in
relation to the nature and concentration of the dopant as well as the
method of preparation.48,52,56,59
Fewer studies deal with CO-TPR, nevertheless this technique
could be more informative concerning the catalytic behavior for
WGS and PROX reactions. Fu and co-workers showed that in the
presence of gold, the surface reduction of ceria by CO begins below
room temperature and several surface oxygen species of different
reducibility were distinguished.78 The drop in PROX selectivity with
temperature can be explained by the results showing that the tem-
perature of H2 oxidation is higher than that of CO oxidation on
gold–ceria, as evidenced by comparison of H2- and CO-TPR.15,17
Studying gold on La-doped ceria Jain et al.45 performed CO-TPR
100
AuCeAlMA
90 AuCe
80
AuCeAlW
CO conversion, %
70
60
50 AuCeAlCP
40
30
20
10
0
Catalysts
Figure 10.7 WGS activity of gold catalysts supported on ceria and ceria modified
by alumina, prepared by different methods.
100
AuCeYbMA
90 AuCeSmMA
80 AuCeSmCP
CO conversion, %
70 AuCe AuCeGdMA
AuCeLaMA AuCeGdCP
60
50 AuCeLaCP
40
30
20
10
0
Catalysts
Figure 10.8 WGS activity of gold catalysts based on doped ceria (as prepared)
at 240 °C.
100
90 AuCeYbMA
AuCeSmCP
AuCe AuCeSmMA
80
AuCeLaMA AuCeGdMA
CO conversion, %
70 AuCeGdCP
60 AuCeLaCP
50
40
30
20
10
0
Catalysts
Figure 10.9 WGS activity of gold catalysts based on doped ceria activated in air
at 240 °C.
nature of the dopant. Raman spectroscopy data show that ceria dop-
ing leads to the formation of defects, thus causing higher oxygen
mobility, i.e. a higher oxygen capacity than for a gold catalyst on
undoped ceria, as proven by TPR results. Oxygen capacity is affected
by the preparation technique as well as by the nature of the dopant.
Tabakova et al.59 studied the influence of the amount of iron
oxide in ceria on WGS catalytic activity.19 Mixed oxide supports were
prepared by urea gelation co-precipitation. The following order of
activity was observed:
Au/CeO 2 >Au/Ce50Fe50>>Au/Ce75Fe25>Au/Ce25Fe75>
Au/Fe2O3
Differences in gold particle size and in the concentration of sur-
face Ce3+ defect sites could explain the WGS activity order. The
lower oxygen vacancy concentration and Ce3+ amount in all gold
catalysts supported on mixed CeO2–Fe2O3 materials in comparison
to Au/CeO2 could be responsible for the observed performance.
In conclusion, catalysts prepared by MA are much more active
than the CP ones even when the dopants are not reducible and not
active in the WGS reaction (e.g. alumina and irreducible lantha-
nide oxides as dopants). Figure 10.10 compares results for WGS
70
60
AuCeFeCP
50
AuCeAlCP
40
30 AuCeMnCP
20
10
0
Catalysts
Figure 10.10 WGS activity of gold catalysts based on ceria doped by Al, Sm, Fe,
and Mn, prepared by different methods (catalytic activity data from Andreeva
et al.20,21,51).
CO CO Ox-
δ
Au - Ce3+ + O2 → Au Ce4+
2153
2151 2137
2157
0.2 A 2143
0.1 A
2140
2060
2170
2200 2150 2100 2050 2000 2200 2150 2100 2050 2000 1950
-1 -1
Wavenumbers (cm ) Wavenumbers (cm )
(a) (b)
Figure 10.12 Model for the WGS reaction on a gold–ceria catalyst. The 14-atom
Au cluster is deposited on the (001) plane of oxygen deficient CeOy (y < 2.0), con-
taining Ce4+ and Ce3+ ions. V0: oxygen vacancy; Au0: neutral Au atom; Auδ+: posi-
tively charged gold; Ow: water oxygen atom. Reprinted from Andreeva et al.64 with
permission from Springer.
with the ceria contributed to the excellent WGS activity of the gold–
ceria catalysts and they considered the metallic gold nanoparticles
to be spectator species only. Manzoli et al. used FTIR measure-
ments on the same catalysts to reveal the presence of cationic gold
species in a strong interaction with the ceria.100 The main observa-
tions were that in oxidizing conditions the CO interaction produces
absorption bands in the region typical for cationic gold clusters
(2130–2140 cm−1), whereas in reducing conditions zerovalent gold
clusters are produced, possibly negatively charged by strong interac-
tions with the reduced ceria and characterized by a CO IR band
red-shifted to below 2100 cm−1.
In a very recent study Guan et al. examined the interaction of
gold atoms with CeO2 nanocrystals having rod and cube shapes.101
Gold nanoparticles with sizes in the range 2–6 nm were observed
after deposition-precipitation. In addition to these nanoparticles,
EXAFS analysis showed that a substantial amount of the gold is
present as cations that replace Ce ions at the surface of the ceria
nanorods and could not be removed by cyanide leaching. After
reduction these isolated Au atoms formed finely dispersed Au clus-
ters with a high activity in the WGS reaction. The higher activity of
and nucleation at O vacancies and showed that only Auδ+ can adsorb
CO sufficiently strongly for subsequent catalysis. The combination
of several such Auδ+ ions in the vicinity of an O vacancy formed ultra-
small Au clusters that were thought to be the active sites for the WGS
reaction.
Results from Hernández et al. show that Au adatoms at the CeO2
(111) surface can adopt Au0, Au+, or Au− electronic configurations
depending on the adsorption site.106 Charge transfer from the gold
atom to the Ce cation occurs for gold adsorption on top of the
surface oxygen and in a bridge position between two surface oxygen
atoms, when adsorption is strongest. Adsorption at an oxygen
vacancy site is very strong and involves the formation of an Au−
anion. In discussing the advantages and drawbacks of the different
approaches that can be used to model the properties of ceria sur-
faces, Branda et al. demonstrated that the theoretical answer to the
problem of the oxidation of atomic gold on the atop site of CeO2
(111) is indeed critically affected by the choice of computational
approach.107 The conclusion of their calculations was that a very
small energy difference between neutral and cationic Au adsorbed
at the surface strongly suggests the statistical distribution of the two
species at the most stable adsorption sites of the CeO2 (111) surface
as a function of temperature.
Summarizing recent advances, it seems that all results support
the earlier conclusion of Burch28 that the active sites for the WGSR
over Au/ceria catalysts are the metallic gold in the form of very
small clusters in intimate contact with the ceria support through
interaction with surface vacancies.
There is still no consensus concerning the mechanism for the
WGSR over Au/ceria catalysts. Two reaction mechanisms have
mainly been considered in the literature — the so-called redox
mechanism and the associative mechanism, which needs further
discussion for the type of intermediate: bicarbonate, formate, or
carboxyl.28,108 According to the redox mechanism, the WGS reaction
proceeds via consecutive steps of reduction and oxidation at the
catalyst’s surface.14 These steps include: CO adsorption on the
metal surface and interaction with lattice oxygen in the ceria to
form CO2 and water dissociation on the reduced support sites with
release of H2.
The Ce-mediated redox mechanism is:
CO + Au → CO—Au
CO—Au + 2CeO2 → CO2 + Ce2O3 + Au
H2O + Ce2O3 → 2CeO2 + H2
Figure 10.14 Activity and selectivity in PROX using a gas feed (a) without and
(b) with CO2 and water. Reprinted from Avgouropoulos et al.49 with permission
from Elsevier.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of COST
Action D 36/003 and CM 0903/02.
References
1. Bond, G.C., Louis, C., Thompson, D.T., Catalysis by Gold, Imperial
College Press, London, (2006).
2. Haruta, M., Kobayashi, T., Sano, H., Yamada, N., Chem. Lett., 16 (1987)
405–408.
3. Ghenciu, A.F., Curr. Opin. Solid St. M., 6 (2002) 389–399.
4. Andreeva, D., Idakiev, V., Tabakova, T., Andreev, A., J. Catal., 158
(1996) 354–355.
5. Sakurai, H., Ueda, A., Kobayashi, T., Haruta, M., Chem. Commun.,
(1997) 271–272.
6. Andreeva, D., Gold Bull., 35 (2002) 82–88.
7. Luengaruemitchai, A., Osuwan, S., Gulabi, E., Catal. Commun., 4
(2003) 215–221.
8. Hua, J., Zheng, Q., Zheng, Y., Wei, K., Lin, X., Catal. Lett., 102 (2005)
99–108.
9. Sandoval, A., Gomez-Cortes, A., Zanella, R., Dıaz, G., Saniger, J.M.,
J. Mol. Cat. A: Chem., 278 (2007) 200–208.
10. Boaro, M., Vicario, M., Llorca, J., De Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G.,
Trovarelli, A., Appl. Catal. B, 88 (2009) 272–282.
11. Trovarelli, A., Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 38 (1996) 439–520.
12. Andreeva, D., Idakiev, V., Tabakova, T., Ilieva, L., Falaras, P., Bourlinos, A.,
Travlos, A., Catal. Today, 72 (2002) 51–57.
13. Tabakova, T., Boccuzzi, F., Manzoli, M., Andreeva, D., Appl. Catal. A,
252 (2003) 385–397.
14. Fu, Q., Weber, A., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Catal. Lett., 77 (2001)
87–95.
15. Fu, Q., Kudriavtseva, S., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M.,
Chem. Eng. J., 93 (2003) 41–53.
16. Sakurai, H., Akita, T., Tsubota, S., Kiuchi, M., Haruta, M., Appl. Catal.
A, 291 (2005) 179–187.
17. Fu, Q., Deng, W., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Appl.
Catal. B, 56 (2005) 57–68.
18. Kim, C.H., Thompson, L.T., J. Catal., 230 (2005) 66–74.
19. Jacobs, G., Ricote, S., Patterson, P.M., Graham, U.M., Dozier, A.,
Khalid, S., Rhodus, E., Davis, B.H., Appl. Cat. A, 292 (2005)
229–243.
20. Andreeva, D., Ivanov, I., Ilieva, L., Abrashev, M.V., Appl. Catal. A, 302
(2006) 127−132.
21. Andreeva, D., Ivanov, I., Ilieva, L., Sobczak, J.W., Avdeev, G., Tabakova, T.,
Appl. Catal. A, 333 (2007) 153–160.
22. Leppelt, R., Schumacher, B., Plzak, V., Kinne, M., Behm, R.J., J. Catal.,
244 (2006) 137–152.
23. Denkwitz, Y., Karpenko, A., Plzak, V., Leppelt, R., Schumacher, B.,
Behm, R.J., J. Catal., 246 (2007) 74–90.
24. Karpenko, A., Leppelt, R., Plzak, V., Cai, J., Chuvilin, A., Schumacher, B.,
Kaiser, U., Behm, R.J., Top. Catal., 44 (2007) 183–198.
25. Karpenko, A., Leppelt, R., Cai, J., Plzak, V., Chuvilin, A., Kaiser, U.,
Behm, R.J., J. Catal., 250 (2007) 139–150.
26. Karpenko, A., Leppelt, R., Plzak, V., Behm, R.J., J. Catal., 252 (2007)
231–242.
27. Karpenko, A., Denkwitz, Y., Plzak, V., Cai, J., Leppelt, R., Schumacher, B.,
Behm, R.J., Catal. Lett., 116 (2007) 105–115.
28. Burch, R., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 8 (2006) 5483–5500.
29. Deng, W., Frenkel, A.I., Si, R., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., J. Phys.
Chem. C, 112 (2008) 12834–12840.
30. Daly, H., Ni, J., Thompsett, D., Meunier, F.C., J. Catal., 254 (2008)
238–243.
31. Abd El-Moemen, A., Karpenko, A., Denkwitz, Y., Behm, R.J., J. Power
Sources, 190 (2009) 64–75.
32. Abd El-Moemen, A., Kucerova, G., Behm, R.J., Appl. Catal. B, 95
(2010) 57–70.
33. Galletti, C., Specchia, S., Saracco, G., Specchia, V., Top. Catal., 52 (2009)
688–692.
34. Schubert, M.M., Plzak, V., Garche, J., Behm, R.J., Catal. Lett., 76 (2001)
143–150.
35. Panzera, G., Modafferi, V., Candamano, S., Donato, A., Frusteri, F.,
Antonucci, P.L., J. Power Sources, 135 (2004) 177–183.
36. Ko, E.Y., Park, E.D., Seo, K.W., Lee, H.C., Lee, D., Kim, S., Catal.
Today, 116 (2006) 377–383.
37. Deng, W., De Jesus, J., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M.,
Appl. Catal. A, 291 (2005) 126–135.
38. Luengnaruemitchai, A., Osuwan, S., Gulari, E., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy,
29 (2004) 429–435.
39. Carrettin, S., Concepcion, P., Corma, A., Nieto, J.M.L., Puntes, V.F.,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 43 (2004) 2538–2540.
40. Goerke, O., Pfeifer, P., Schubert, K., Appl. Catal. A, 263 (2004) 11–18.
41. Arena, F., Famulari, P., Trunfio, G., Bonura, G., Appl. Catal. B, 66
(2006) 81–91.
42. Avgouropoulos, G., Papavasiliou, J., Tabakova, T., Idakiev, V.,
Ioannides, T., Chem. Eng. J., 124 (2006) 41–45.
43. Yi, G., Xu, Z., Guo, G., Tanaka, K., Yuan, Y., Chem. Phys. Lett., 479
(2009) 128–132.
44. Cargnello, M., Gentilini, C., Montini, T., Fonda, E., Mehraeen, S.,
Chi, M., Herrera-Collado, M., Browning, N.D., Polizzi, S., Pasquato, L.,
Fornasiero, P., Chem. Mater., 22 (2010) 4335–4345.
45. Jain, A., Zhao, X., Kjergaard, S., Stagg-Williams, S.M., Catal. Lett., 104
(2005) 191–197.
46. Chang, L.-H., Sasirekha, N., Chen, Y.-W., Wang, W.-J., Ind. Eng. Chem.
Res., 45 (2006) 4927–4935.
47. Zhang, Q., Zhan, Y., Lin, X., Zheng, Q., Catal. Lett., 115 (2007)
143–147.
48. Wang, H., Zhu, H., Qin, Z., Wang, G., Liang, F., Wang, J., Catal.
Commun., 9 (2008) 1487–1492.
49. Avgouropoulos, G., Manzoli, M., Boccuzzi, F., Tabakova, T.,
Papavasiliou, J., Ioannides, T., Idakiev, V., J. Catal., 256 (2008)
237–247.
50. Manzoli, M., Avgouropoulos, G., Tabakova, T., Papavasiliou, J.,
Ioannides, T., Boccuzzi, F., Catal. Today, 138 (2008) 239–243.
51. Andreeva, D., Ivanov, I., Ilieva, L., Abrashev, M.V., Zanella, R.,
Sobczak, J.W., Lisowski, W., Kantcheva, M., Avdeev, G., Petrov, K.,
Appl. Catal. A, 357 (2009) 159–169.
52. Ilieva, L., Pantaleo, G., Ivanov, I., Zanella, R., Venezia, A.M.,
Andreeva, D., Inter. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34 (2009) 6505–6515.
53. Andreeva, D., Kantcheva, M., Ivanov, I., Ilieva, L., Sobczak, J.W.,
Lisowski, W., Catal. Today, 158 (2010) 69–77.
54. Ilieva, L., Pantaleo, G., Ivanov, I., Maximova, A., Zanella, R., Kaszkur,
Z., Venezia, A.M., Andreeva, D., Catal. Today, 158 (2010) 44–55.
55. Wang, Y., Liang, S., Cao, A., Thompson, R.L., Veser, G., Appl. Catal. B,
99 (2010) 89–95.
56. Laguna, O.H., Romero Sarria, F., Centeno, M.A., Odriozola, J.A.,
J. Catal., 276 (2010) 360–370.
57. Laguna, O.H., Centeno, M.A., Arzamendi, G., Gandia, L.M., Romero
Sarria, F., Odriozola, J.A., Catal. Today, 157 (2010) 155–159.
58. Tabakova, T., Avgouropoulos, G., Papavasiliou, J., Manzoli, M.,
Boccuzzi, F., Tenchev, K., Vindigni, F., Ioannides, T., Appl. Catal. B,
101 (2011) 256–265.
59. Tabakova, T., Manzoli, M., Paneva, D., Boccuzzi, F., Idakiev, V., Mitov, I.,
Appl. Catal. B, 101 (2011) 266–274.
60. Adachi, G.Y., Masui, T., in Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, ed.
A. Trovarelli, Imperial College Press, London, (2002), pp. 51–83.
61. Scirè, S., Riccobene, P.M., Crisafulli, C., Appl. Catal. B, 101 (2010)
109–117.
62. Yuan, Z.Y., Idakiev, V., Vantomme, A., Tabakova, T., Ren, T.Z., Su, B.L.,
Catal. Today, 131 (2008) 203–210.
63. Lenite, B.A., Galletti, C., Specchia, S., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 36 (2011)
7750–7758.
64. Andreeva, D., Ivanov, I., Ilieva, L., Sobczak, J.W., Avdeev, G., Petrov, K.,
Top. Catal., 44 (2007) 173–182.
65. Zhang, Q., Zhan, Y., Lin, X., Zheng, Q., Catal. Lett., 115 (2007)
143–147.
66. Vindigni, F., Manzoli, M., Chiorino, A., Tabakova, T., Boccuzzi, F.,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 110 (2006) 23329–23336.
67. Manzoli, M., Vindigni, F., Chiorino, A., Tabakova, T., Idakiev, V.,
Boccuzzi, F., React. Kin. Catal. Lett., 91 (2007) 213–221.
68. Idakiev, V., Tabakova, T., Tenchev, K., Yuan, Z.Y., Ren, T.Z., Su, B.L.,
Catal. Today, 128 (2007) 223–229.
69. Idakiev, V., Tabakova, T., Tenchev, K., Yuan, Z.Y., Ren, T.Z., Vantomme, A.,
Su, B.L., J. Mat. Sci., 44 (2009) 6637–6643.
70. Si, R., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 47 (2008)
2884–2887.
71. Sayle, T.X.T., Parker, S.C., Sayle, D.C., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 7
(2005) 2936–2941.
72. Tabakova, T., Boccuzzi, F., Manzoli, M., Sobczak, J.W., Idakiev, V.,
Andreeva, D., Appl. Catal. B, 49 (2004) 73–81.
73. Haruta, M., Cattech, 6 (2002) 102–115.
74. Kozlov, A.I., Kozlova, A.P., Liu, H., Iwasawa, Y., Appl. Catal. A, 182
(1999) 9–28.
75. Bond, G.C., Thompson, D.T., Gold Bull., 33 (2000) 41–51.
76. Date, M., Haruta, M., J. Catal., 201 (2001) 221–224.
77. Ilieva, L., Pantaleo, G., Ivanov, I., Zanella, R., Sobczak, J.W., Lisowski, W.,
Venezia, A.M., Andreeva, D., Catal. Today, 175 (2011) 411–419.
78. Fu, Q., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Science, 301 (2003)
935–938.
79. Andreeva, D., Ivanov, I., Sobczak, J.W., Lissowski, W., Petrova, P.,
Abrashev, M.V., Ilieva, L., Curr. Top. Catal., 7 (2008) 33–41.
80. Jacobs, G., Patterson, P.M., Williams, L., Chenu, E., Sparks, D.,
Thomas, G., Davis, B.H., Appl. Catal. A, 262 (2004) 177–187.
81. Tibiletti, D., Amieiro-Fonseca, A., Burch, R., Chen, Y., Fisher, J.M.,
Goguet, A., Hardacre, C., Hu, P., Thompsett, A., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109
(2005) 22553–22559.
82. Wang, X., Rodriguez, J.A., Hanson, J.C., Perez, M., Evans, J., J. Chem.
Phys., 123 (2005) 221101–221105.
83. Chen, L., Fleming, P., Morris, V., Holmes, J.D., Morris, M.A., J. Phys.
Chem. C, 114 (2010) 12909–12919.
84. McBride, J.R., Hass, K.C., Poindexter, B.D., Weber, W.H., J. Appl. Phys.,
76 (1994) 2435–2441.
85. Keramidas, V.G., White, W.B., J. Chem. Phys., 59 (1973) 1561–1562.
86. Spanier, J.E., Robinson, R.D., Zhang, F., Chan, S.-W., Herman, I.P.,
Phys. Rev. B, 64 (2001) 2454071–2454078.
87. Marban, G., Fuertes, A.B., Appl. Catal. B, 57 (2004) 43–53.
88. Graham, G.W., Weber, W.H., Peters, C.R., Usmen, R., J. Catal., 130,
(1991) 310–313.
89. Kosacki, I., Suzuki, T., Anderson, H.U., Colomban, P., Solid State Ionics,
149 (2002) 99–105.
90. Bao, H., Chen, X., Fang, J., Jiang, Z., Huang, W., Catal. Lett., 125
(2008) 160–167.
91. Trovarelli, A., ed., Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, Imperial
College Press, London, (2002).
92. Yao, H.C., Yao, Y.F.Y., J. Catal., 86 (1984) 254–265.
93. Boccuzzi, F., Chiorino, A., Manzoli, M., Andreeva, D., Tabakova, T.,
J. Catal., 188 (1999) 176–185.
94. Sanchez, M.G., Gazquez, J.L., J. Catal., 104 (1987) 120–135.
95. Laachir, A., Perrichon, V., Bardi, A., Lamotte, J., Catherine, E.,
Lavalley, J.C., El Faallah, J., Hilaire, L., le Normand, F., Quemere, E.,
Sauvion, G.N., Touret, O., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 87 (1991)
1601–1609.
96. Whittington, B.I., Jiang, C.J., Trimm, D.L., Catal. Today, 26 (1995)
41–52.
97. Zhao, S., Gorte, R.J., Appl. Catal. A, 248 (2003) 9–18.
98. Zhao, S., Gorte, R.J., Appl. Catal. A, 277 (2004) 129–135.
99. Cordatos, H., Bunluesin, T., Stubenrauch, J., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J.,
J. Phys. Chem., 100 (1996) 785–793.
100. Manzoli, M., Boccuzzi, F., Chiorino, A., Vindigni, F., Deng, W.,
Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., J. Catal., 245 (2007) 306–313.
101. Guan, Y., Ligthart, D.A.J.M., Pirgon-Galin, Ö., Pieterse, J.A.Z., van
Santen, R.A., Hensen, E.J.M., Top. Catal., 54 (2011) 424–438.
102. Kim, C.H., Thompson, L.T., J. Catal., 244 (2006) 248–250.
103. Rodriguez, J.A., Catal. Today, 160 (2011) 3–10.
104. Tabakova, T., Manzoli, M., Vindigni, F., Idakiev, V., Boccuzzi, F., J. Phys.
Chem. A, 114 (2010) 3909–3915.
105. Liu, Z.-P., Jenkins, S.J., King, D.A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 94 (2005)
196102–196104.
106. Hernández, N.C., Grau-Crespo, R., de Leeuw, N.H., Sanz, J.F., Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 11 (2009) 5246–5252.
107. Branda, M.M., Castellani, N.J., Grau-Crespo, R., De Leeuw, N.H.,
Hernandez, N.C., Sanz, J.F., Neyman, K.M., Illas, F., J. Chem. Phys., 131
(2009) 094702 (1–11).
108. Bond, G.C., Gold Bull., 42 (2009) 337–342.
109. Shido, T., Iwasawa, Y., J. Catal., 141 (1993) 71–81.
110. Meunier, F.C., Reid, D., Goguet, A., Shekhtman, S., Hardacre, C.,
Burch, R., Deng, W., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., J. Catal., 247
(2007) 277–287.
111. Chen, Y., Cheng, J., Hua, P., Wang, H., Surf. Sci., 602 (2008)
2828–2834.
112. Haruta, M., Tsubota, S., Kobayashi, T., Kageyama, H., Jenet, M.,
Delmon, B., J. Catal., 144 (1993) 175–192.
113. Grisel, R.J.H., Weststrate, C.J., Goossens, A., Craje, M.W.J., Van der
Kraan, A.M., Nieuwenhuys, B.E., Catal. Today, 72 (2002) 123–132.
114. Kandoi, S., Gokhale, A.A., Grabow, L.C., Dumesic, J.A., Mavrikakis, M.,
Catal. Lett., 93 (2004) 93–100.
115. Bond G.C., Thompson, D.T., Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 41 (1999) 319–388.
116. Haruta, M., Tsubota, S., Kobayashi, T., Kageyama, H., Genet, M.J.,
Delmon, B., J. Catal., 144 (1993) 175–192.
117. Minicò, S., Scirè, S., Crisafulli, C., Visco, A.M., Galvagno, S., Catal.
Lett., 47 (1997) 273–276.
CHAPTER 11
CERIA-BASED FORMULATIONS
FOR CATALYSTS FOR DIESEL
SOOT COMBUSTION
Eleonora Aneggi, Carla de Leitenburg
and Alessandro Trovarelli
Dipartimento di Chimica, Fisica e Ambiente, via Cotonificio 108,
Università di Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
11.1 Introduction
11.1.1 Background
In recent years attention to air quality and the environment has
grown rapidly and the public is aware of problems originating from
urban air pollution due to traffic and vehicle emissions. Diesel and
gasoline engines are sources of the major outdoor air pollutants like
volatile organic compounds (VOCs), NOx and particulate matter.
The market penetration of diesel engines is progressively growing,
not only in Europe, where they benefit from an excellent reputa-
tion, but also in the USA where they have always been less popular.
Moreover, their market share is increasing not only in the heavy-
duty, but also in the light-duty vehicle market segments.1 The diesel
engine is the most efficient internal-combustion engine, providing
the greatest amount of energy from a specific amount of fuel. They
are also more reliable and durable than gasoline engines, and
they emit very low concentrations of hydrocarbons and carbon mon-
oxide when operating under lean regimes (air/fuel ratio higher
565
Nuclei mode
d(C/Ctot)/dDp
Accumulation mode
Coarse
Figure 11.1 Diesel particulate size distribution. Solid line: number distribution.
Broken line: mass distribution. Adapted from Majewski and Khair.2
factors: engine type, age, driving conditions, speed, fuel, fuel and
lube oil additives, exhaust temperatures and sampling methods.3,4
Diesel particulate emissions are suspected to induce health
problems such as asthma, bronchitis and most importantly lung
cancer; for this reason there is an increasing attention regarding
exhaust emissions in general and on diesel soot in particular. The
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)5
and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)6
consider diesel exhaust as a potential and probable human carcino-
gen.1,7 In addition to the potential hazard for human health, par-
ticulates are also among the factors responsible for damage to the
environment by diminishing air clarity and contributing to global
warming.
The most recent Euro V legislation and the forthcoming Euro VI
(Table 11.1), as well as analogous emission limits in other parts of
the world, have introduced more stringent NOx and particulate lim-
its for light- and heavy-duty vehicles and for passenger cars, which
impose the use of combined catalyst and trap technologies to reach
the required standard.
The reduction of NOx under a permanent oxygen-rich environ-
ment is a complex issue and cannot be accomplished with three-way
catalyst (TWC) technologies where the air/fuel (A/F) ratio is main-
tained within a narrow range around the stoichiometric point.
Additionally, the reduction of particulate matter, due to its very
35 40
31 35
30 28 35
30
25 30
22
Percentage (%)
Percentage (%)
25
20
20
15 16
12 15
10 10
10
5 3
2 5 3
1 1 1 2 2 1
0 0
1:2 1:4 1:5 1:9 1:10 1:20 1:50 1:80 5% 6% 8% 10% 15% 21% 30% 50% O2/NOx
Soot/catalyst ratio Amount of oxygen (%)
(a) (b)
60
50
40
Percentage (%)
30
20
10
0
N330 Printex U Printex V Elftex 125 Vulcan 6 CB (Sigma MA7 Real
(Degussa) (Degussa) (Degussa) (Cabot) (Cabot) Aldrich) (Mitsubishi
Chem.
Kind of soot Corp.)
(c)
Figure 11.2 Analysis of reaction variables used in the studies analysed in this
work. (a) Soot/catalyst ratio. (b) Amount of oxygen. (c) Kind of soot (real or
synthetic).
30
25
Number of publications 20
15
10
0
1992
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
Year
Figure 11.3 Number of papers on the use of ceria in soot oxidation published
1992–2011. Information taken from data found on ISI Web of Science.
This review is organized in four main sections: the first section dis-
cusses bare ceria systems, in the second section ceria-based solid
solutions are reviewed, while the third part covers other metal/
metal oxide doped cerias; finally, before the concluding section,
soot oxidation in an O2/NOx atmosphere is summarized.
350
300
200
150
100
50
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
Number of samples
520
500
Tm (°C) 480
460
440
420
400
0 5 10 15 20 25
Crystal size (nm)
Figure 11.5 Crystal size dependence of catalytic activity (elaboration of the results in
Kockrick et al.78). samples calcined at 400°C. c samples calcined at 600 °C. Open
symbol for samples prepared by precipitation. Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
samples is comparable in the two samples and the activity follows the
order of crystal size only within a homogeneous series of samples
(Fig. 11.5). Other effects, like agglomeration of ceria particles, can
mask the effect of crystal size dependence by lowering the catalyti-
cally active surface and leaving crystal size unaltered.
In addition to crystal size, the effect of surface area (SA) and
porosity has also been investigated. It is generally shown that a
reduction in surface area reduces Tm; this is especially true if ceria
samples of the same origin are investigated (e.g. samples of ceria
exposed to different aging temperatures).57,62,64,67,79 Rather scattered
results are found when directly comparing oxidation temperature
with surface area from data obtained in different laboratories
(Fig. 11.6). Although a general trend shows that the higher the
surface area the lower the oxidation temperature, the effect of
experimental set-up and preparation method overlap and mask the
effect of surface area.
Palmisano et al.79 studied the influence of microstructure on soot
activity. Ceria prepared by solution combustion synthesis (SCS) and
600
Tm (°C) 500
400
300
200
0 20 40 60 80 100
2
Surface area (m /g)
Table 11.2 Catalytic activity results and average pore size distribution.80
Average pore Cumulative pore
Sample Tm(°C) SA(m2.g−1) size (nm) volume (cm3.g−1)
CeO2 (CA) 387 44 14 0.126
CeO2 (CB) 434 42 5 0.049
CeO2 (CC) 440 40 6 0.046
where Mred and Mox–O represent the reduced and oxidized state of
the ceria, respectively. Gas–O indicates the oxidant gas (O2, NO,
NO2, etc.), Cf the carbon active site on the carbon surface and SOC
a surface carbon–oxygen complex. In the first equation ceria is oxi-
dized by the gas phase, in the second step the oxygen of the catalyst
is transferred to the active site on the carbon surface reducing the
catalyst and then the surface carbon–oxygen complex is decom-
posed to CO and CO2. In addition to a classical redox route a
mechanism that relies on the presence of active oxygen species has
also been proposed.87 In this case the role of the ceria could be to
cause spillover of active oxygen onto the soot surface, with active
oxygen species likely existing in the form of peroxide or superox-
ide.64,87,88 Active oxygen like superoxide (O2−) could form via oxygen
adsorption on the reduced surface of ceria in the vicinity of soot
according to:
Ce3+− + O2 → Ce4+–(O2)−
In this case reduced ceria would be the starting point for the forma-
tion of active superoxide ions. Ceria can be reduced by soot at the
contact points located at the soot/ceria interface and this will initi-
ate the ‘active oxygen’ path, which would contribute to the direct
oxidation of soot particles by a spillover mechanism. The redox of
ceria is therefore important in the generation of reduced ceria at
the interface points and lowering the reduction temperature will
therefore increase the overall activity of soot oxidation.
This indicates that in order to improve the soot oxidation abili-
ties of ceria efficiently it is important to modify its redox capacity
and to enhance the formation of active oxygen species like perox-
ide or superoxide. This can be conveniently done either through
modification of the structural features of ceria by lattice doping
(i.e. with rare-earth elements or zirconium) or by doping with met-
als able to induce the formation of active oxygen species like silver
(see later).
600 450
400
350
O2 extracted (µmol/g)
500 300
Tm (°C)
250
200
400 150
100
50
300 0
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Amount of ceria (mol %)
Figure 11.7 Tm (filled symbols) and OSC (open symbols) against composition.
(Square symbols (tight contact) from Aneggi et al.;57,62 circles (loose contact) from
Zhu et al.67). Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
800 3,5
780
3
760
740
2,5
700 2
680
1,5
660
640
1
620
600 0,5
0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Total surface available oxygens
(µmol O/g) OSC (µg O2/g)
(a) (b)
Figure 11.8 (a) T50 against total surface oxygen availability (from TG experiments
on soot/catalyst mixtures under air). (b) Oxidation in the absence of gas-phase
oxygen against OSC (from TG experiments on soot/catalyst mixtures under inert
atmosphere).111 Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
solutions pointing out that doped ceria showed higher OSC, better
thermal stability and enhanced activity.114 They used several experi-
mental techniques to investigate the reaction mechanisms, con-
cluding that the introduction of La3+ into the ceria structure
induces a lattice deformation creating oxygen vacancies, which are
responsible for the higher activity in comparison to ceria–zirconia,
although the different Zr and La loadings might have affected
their conclusions. The proposed mechanism involved the forma-
tion of active oxygen by the filling of vacancies with gaseous oxygen
followed by the transfer or spillover to soot particles.
The improvement of soot oxidation activity resulting from the
introduction of La3+ into CeO2 was also reported by Bueno-López
and co-workers;58 they studied the influence of doping ceria with
different amounts of La3+ and correlated the increase of activity to
an enhancement of the surface area of CeO2 due to the La3+ and
to an improvement in the redox properties. The incorporation of
65 Ce0.7Zr0.3O2 4,5
Ce0.7Pr0.3O2-δ 4
55 3,5
H2 consumption ratio
Surface area (m2/g)
Ce0.7Pr0.3O2-δ 3
45
Ce0.7Gd0.3O2-δ
2,5
2
35 Ce0.7Zr0.3O2
Ce0.7Gd0.3O2-δ
1,5
25
CeO2 1
0,5
CeO2
15 0
380 400 420 440 460 480 500
Tm (°C)
Figure 11.9 Surface area ( ) and H2 consumption ratio (•) against Tm.106
Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
O
n+ 4+
(O-) M - O - Ce - O -
(n-2) gas/bulk O2
O O
C O
n+ 3+
COx (O-) M - O - Ce - O -
(n-2)
O
O
(n-1)+ 4+
(O-) M - O - Ce - O -
(n-2)
O
The oxygen anion bound to the metal site reacts with carbon
moiety to give COx with the generation of an oxygen vacancy and a
reduced metal site. This is then refilled by oxygen from an adjacent
Ce4+ site, which is concomitantly reduced to Ce3+. At this point the
active oxygen species is reformed and the Ce3+ site can be oxidized
by gas-phase oxygen or (under oxygen-deficient atmospheres) by
oxygen diffusion through the bulk.
In addition to the textural and redox properties, pore structure
is also important for soot oxidation activity. Krishna et al. studied
ceria doped with La, Pr, Sm and Y.66,105 They found that the forma-
tion of macropores, which increase the accessible surface area, mul-
tiplies the contact between the catalyst and soot thus increasing
activity (Table 11.3). Indeed, by doping ceria with Pr3+/4+ and La3+,
the pore size distribution assumes a bimodal profile and is shifted
towards mesopores and macropores, increasing the external surface
area and promoting activity. In agreement with this investigation,
Aneggi et al. compared pore size distributions for a series of ceria–
zirconia solid solutions.111 When considering samples with similar
surface area, independently of the composition, a decrease in pore
size induces a decrease in activity. This is true until the surface area
is maintained above a certain minimum value; when the surface
area drops to lower values, no correlation between activity and pore
size distribution could be found.
Table 11.4 Soot oxidation temperatures (Tm) over ceria–zirconia ceria-based solid
solutions.
Aging Soot/catalyst
temperature ratio (type
Sample (°C) of contact) O2 (%) Tm (°C) Reference
Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 500 1:10 (tight) 10 380 112
CeO2+3%La 500 1:20 (tight) 20 383 61
Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 500 1:20 (tight) 6 387 62
CeO2 500 1:20 (tight) 6 389 62
Ce0.70Zr0.30O2 600 1:9 (tight) 20 397 106
Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 750 1:20 (tight) 6 400 62
Ce0.44Zr0.56O2 750 1:20 (tight) 6 401 62
CeO2+3%La 750 1:20 (tight) 20 408 61
Ce0.8Hf0.2O2 500 1:4 (tight) 20 409 113
CeO2–5La 1000 1:4 (tight) 20 410 58
Ce0.70Pr0.30O2−δ 600 1:9 (tight) 20 414 106
Ce0.90Pr0.10O2−δ 700 1:4 (tight) 20 422 105
Ce0.90La0.10O2−δ 700 1:4 (tight) 20 425 105
Ce0.69Zr0.31O2 1000 1:4 (tight) 20 455 109
Ce0.84Zr0.15Y0.01O2 1000 1:4 (tight) 20 456 104
Ce0.50Zr0.50O2 700 1:10 (loose) 10 525 67
Ce0.75Zr0.25O2 700 1:4 (loose) 5 585 108
and noble metals or alkali metal elements have been used with suc-
cess in soot oxidation.76,117,120–128 The promotion of ceria with alkali
metals60,63,68,129,130 (and especially potassium) results in a dramatic
decrease of the temperature of soot combustion, with oxidation
temperatures in the range 350–400 °C. This activity enhancement is
dependent on metal loading; in the case of potassium, compositions
containing 7–10 wt% of alkali metal are associated with optimal
activity60,129 (Fig. 11.10). Several mechanistic studies were carried out
in order to understand the role of potassium and it is generally
accepted that the high mobility of alkali metal species plays a key
role in the improvement of catalytic activity of alkali metal com-
pounds during soot oxidation. However, this is not the only reason
for activity enhancement.
500
450
Tm (°C)
400
350
300
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
amount of K (%)
Figure 11.10 TPO results for CeO2 doped with K (y from Aneggi et al.60, from
Gross et al.129). Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
Table 11.5 Soot oxidation temperatures (Tm) over metal/metal oxide doped
ceria.
Aging Soot/catalyst
temperature ratio (type of O2 Tm
Sample (°C) contact) soot type (%) (°C) Reference
Co/CeO2 400 1:20 (tight) real 6 300 76
20%Ag/CeO2 500 1:20 (tight) MA7 20 308 152
Cu–Ce 500 1:10 (tight) 9.5 324 118
Printex U
5%Ag/CeO2 500 1:20 (tight) 20 334 150
Printex U
1.5%Ru/CeO2 600 1:4 (tight) N330 20 345 120,121
0.05Mn/Ce 500 1:20 (tight) N330 20 346 123
12%Co,4.5%K/CeO2 400 1:20 (tight) real 6 350 47
7%K/CeO2 450 1:20 (tight) real 6 350 129
1Mo1000Ce 500 1:4 (tight) N330 20 354 149
Cu–Ce (1:9) 500 1:10 (tight) 10 356 117
Printex U
10%K/Ce0.50Zr0.50O2 800 1:10 (tight) 10 359 63
Printex U
KOH(4.5)/CeO2 400 1:5 (tight) real 20 360 130
10%Cs/CeO2 500 1:20 (tight) 6 360 60
Printex U
CuO (5%)–CoO(5%)/ 500 1:4 (tight) 20 363 141
CeO2–ZrO2 Printex U
Cu–Ce–Zr 500 1:10 (tight) 9.5 365 118
Printex U
22%Ba,7%K/CeO2 400 1:20 (tight) real 6 365 68
Mn-Ce (1:9) 500 1:10 (tight) 10 368 117
Printex U
7%K/Ce 400 1:20 (tight) real 6 369 68
10%K/Ce 500 1:20 (tight) 6 370 60
Printex U
10%Cs/Ce 750 1:20 (tight) 6 370 60
Printex U
(Continued )
(Continued )
(Continued )
5000
b
CO2 concentration (ppm) 4000
a
3000
2000 c
1000
0
300 400 500 600
Temperature (°C)
The doping of ceria with zirconia results in active catalysts and the
activity depends strongly on composition;166,167 a relation between
the amount of ceria and catalytic activity is shown in Fig. 11.12. Pure
ceria and Ce0.76Zr0.24O2 show the highest activity but when the con-
tent of zirconia increases, activity progressively decreases indepen-
dently of the surface area. The increase of activity has been
correlated to the NO2 production capacity of the different catalysts,
which is also affected by the production and adsorption strength of
650 70
60
50
30
550
20
10
500 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Amount of ceria (mol %)
Figure 11.12 Surface area and activity dependence vs. amount of ceria for ceria–
zirconia solid solutions. : Tm; c : surface area. Elaboration of data from Atribak
et al.167 Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
The aim was to overcome the low surface area of perovskites using a
support that is ‘inert’ toward their metal component, thus prevent-
ing the formation of inactive components. In addition the presence
of ceria might help to enhance the activity of perovskites. The rea-
sons for the enhancement of activity were related to the augmented
adsorption of oxygen species O− and O2− on oxygen vacancies. This
increase is largely due to the better redox properties of the perovskite–
ceria combination compared to the separate materials.
The enhancement of NOx adsorption through the formation of
nitrate species can be obtained by doping ceria with potassium due
to increased basicity. This effect can be augmented with the addi-
tion of barium to obtain formulations with good activity for the
simultaneous removal of soot and NOx, working either as oxidation
catalysts or NOx storage traps.45–47 In a Ba,K/CeO2 catalyst the bar-
ium is an efficient NOx trap; however, the formation of stable
nitrates species causes a loss of soot combustion activity. When Co is
incorporated in the system, the barium nitrates become unstable
and can be readily decomposed to N2 under a reducing atmosphere,
making this system very interesting as an NOx catalytic trap, which
favours soot combustion. The higher activity of Co,Ba,K/CeO2 is
probably due to the formation of the perovskite BaCoO2.93.45 This
structure is correlated with the formation of N-bound nitrate species
(O–Ba–NO2). In this case the barium is chemically bound to the
cobalt forming a mixed oxide and the formation of Ba(NO3)2 is
inhibited. In addition the Ba,K/CeO2 formulation seems to prevent
sulfation of potassium175 (which was observed in the absence of
NO68), thus preserving the activity of K towards soot combustion.
This occurs through the thermodynamically favoured reaction:
K2SO4 + Ba(NO3)2 → KNO3 + BaSO4.
A synergic effect due to the simultaneous doping of CeO2 by potas-
sium and copper has been recently reported.181 The lowering of oxida-
tion temperatures to ca. 330°C was obtained by an increased NOx
storage capacity brought about by K and Cu as shown in Fig. 11.13.
A strong enhancement of soot oxidation activity was also reported
with K-impregnated ceria–zirconia. The addition of potassium dra-
matically enhanced the catalytic activity of bare Ce0,5Zr0,5O2 due to the
800
d
NO concentration (x10-6) 600
400
b c
200
a
11.7 Conclusions
Ceria-based formulations are among the more active catalysts for
soot oxidation either under O2 or in a NOx/O2 atmosphere, which
decreases the combustion temperature from above 600°C down to
320–350°C. These results are very important for fulfilling new regu-
lations on pollutant emission control. Among the several physico-
chemical parameters that influence the overall activity, the redox
capacity and the availability of surface ‘active oxygen species’ are
certainly the most important.
There is still much work to do in the direction of improving
activity and stability under different reaction conditions and meet-
ing upcoming technological needs. The more recent strategies for
reducing pollutant emissions from diesel engines are based on a
synergetic combination of existing catalytic after-treatment tech-
nologies in order to obtain performance in the combined system
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the EU Italy-Austria Interreg Mat4Cata
project and Regione FVG is gratefully acknowledged.
References
1. Summers, J.C., Van Houtte, S., Psaras, D., Appl. Catal. B, 10 (1996)
139–156.
2. Majewski, W.A., Khair, M.K., Diesel Emissions and Their Control, SAE
International, Warrendale, PA, (2006).
3. Neeft, P.A., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Appl. Catal. B, 8 (1996) 57–78.
4. van Setten, B.A.A.L., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Catal. Rev., 43 (2001)
489–564.
5. http://www.cdc.gov/NIOSH. Accessed 16 June 2011.
6. http://www.iarc.fr. Accessed 16 June 2011.
7. Siegmann, Q.Z.K., Keller, A., Matter, U., Scherrer, L., Siegmann, H.C.,
Atmos. Environ., 34 (2000) 443–451.
8. http://www.dieselnet.com. Accessed 16 June 2011.
9. Millet, C.N., Chedotal, R., Da Costa, P., Appl. Catal. B, 90 (2009)
339–346.
10. Weibel, M., Waldbusser, N., Wunsch, R., Chatterjee, D., Bandl-Konrad,
B., Krutzsch, B., Top. Catal., 52 (2009) 1702–1708.
11. Twigg, M., Appl. Catal. B, 70 (2007) 2–15.
12. Fino, D., Sci. Techn. Adv. Mater., 8 (2007) 93–100.
13. Zelenka, P., Cartellieri, W., Herzog, P., Appl. Catal. B, 10 (1996) 3–28.
14. Stratakis, G.A., Stamatelos, A.M., Combust. Flame, 132 (2003) 157–169.
15. Shelef, M., McCabe, R.W., Catal. Today, 62 (2000) 35–50.
16. Mul, G., Zhu, W., Kapteijn, F., Moulijn, J.A., Appl. Catal. B, 17 (1998)
205–220.
17. Jelles, S.J., van Setten, B.A.A.L., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Appl. Catal.
B, 21 (1999) 35–49.
18. Liu, S., Obuchi, A., Uchisawa, J., Nanba, T., Kushiyama, S., Appl. Catal.
B, 37 (2002) 309–319.
19. Oi-Uchisawa, J., Obuchi, A., Enomoto, R., Xu, J., Nanba, T., Liu, S.,
Kushiyama, S., Appl. Catal. B, 32 (2001) 257–268.
20. Peralta, M.A, Gross, M.S., Sanchez, B.S., Querini, C.A., Chem. Eng. J.,
152 (2009) 234–241.
21. Issa, M., Petit, C., Brillard, A., Brilhac, J.-F., Fuel, 87 (2008) 740–750.
22. Saab, E., Abi-Aad, E., Bokova, M.N., Zhilinskaya, E.A., Aboukaïs, A.,
Carbon, 45 (2007) 561–567.
23. Simonsen, S.B., Dahl, S., Johnson, E., Helveg, S., J. Catal., 255 (2008)
1–5.
24. Saab, E., Aouad, S., Abi-Aad, E., Bokova, M.N., Zhilinskaya, E.A.,
Aboukaïs, A., Kinet. Catal., 48 (2007) 841–846.
25. Hensgen, L., Stowe, K., Catal. Today, 159 (2011) 100–107.
26. Stanmore, B.R., Brilhac, J.F., Gilot, P., Carbon, 39 (2001) 2247–2268.
27. Neeft, J.P.A., van Pruissen, O.P., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Appl. Catal.
B, 12 (1997) 21–31.
28. van Setten, B.A.A.L., Schouten, J.M., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Appl.
Catal. B, 28 (2000) 253–257.
29. Neeft, J.P.A., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Chem. Eng. J., 64 (1996)
295–302.
30. Trovarelli, A., ed., Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, Imperial
College Press, London, (2002).
31. Bernal, S., Kašpar J., Trovarelli, A., Catal. Today, 50 (1999) 173–443.
32. Trovarelli, A., de Leitenburg, C., Boaro, M., Dolcetti, G., Catal. Today,
50 (1999) 353–367.
33. Kašpar, J., Fornasiero, P., J. Solid State Chem., 171 (2003) 19–29.
34. Kašpar, J., Fornasiero, P., Graziani, M., Catal. Today, 50 (1999)
285–298.
35. Farrauto, R.J., Heck, R.M., Catal Today, 51 (1999) 351–360.
36. Trovarelli, A., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Chem. Tech, June (1997)
32–37.
37. Trovarelli, A., Fornasiero P, eds., Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials,
2nd ed., Imperial College Press, London (2012).
38. Trovarelli, A., Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng., 38 (1996) 439–520.
39. Bernal, S., Calvino, J.J., Cauqui, M.A., Gatica, J.M., Larese, C., Perez
Omil, J.A., Pintado, J.M., Catal. Today, 50 (1999) 175–206.
40. Trovarelli, A., Boaro, M., Rocchini, E., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G.,
J. Alloys Compd., 323 (2001) 584–591.
41. Kašpar, J., Graziani, M., Fornasiero, P., in Handbook on the Physics and
Chemistry of Rare Earths, vol. 29, eds. K.A. Gschneidner, Jr., L. Eyring,
Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, (2000), pp. 159–267.
42. Di Monte, R., Kašpar, J., Top. Catal., 28 (2004) 47–58.
43. Saracco, G., Badini, C., Russo, N., Specchia, V., Appl. Catal. B, 21
(1999) 233–242.
44. Ciambelli, P., Palma, V., Russo, P., Vaccaro, S., J. Mol. Catal. A, 204–205
(2003) 673–681.
45. Milt, V.G., Querini, C.A., Mirò, E.E., Ulla, M.A., J. Catal., 220 (2003)
424–432.
46. Pisarello, M.L., Milt, V., Peralta, M.A., Querini, C.A., Mirò, E.E., Catal.
Today, 75 (2002) 465–470.
47. Mirò, E.E., Ravelli, F., Ulla, M.A., Cornaglia, L.M., Querini, C.A.,
Catal. Today, 53 (1999) 631–638.
48. Ciambelli, P., Palma, V., Russo, P., Vaccaro, S., Catal. Today, 73 (2002)
363–370.
49. Badini, C., Saracco, G., Serra, V., Specchia, V., Appl. Catal. B, 18
(1998) 137–150.
50. Neri, G., Rizzo, G., Galvagno, S., Musolino, M.G., Donato, A.,
Pietropaolo, R., Thermochim. Acta, 381 (2002) 165–172.
51. Querini, C.A., Ulla, M.A., Requejo, F., Soria, J., Sedrán, U.A.,
Mirò, E.E., Appl. Catal. B, 15 (1998) 5–19.
52. Jimenez, R., Garcia, X., Cellier, C., Ruiz, P., Gordon, A.L., Appl. Catal.
A, 297 (2006) 125–134.
53. Fino, D., Fino, P., Saracco, G., Specchia, V., Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20
(2003) 445–450.
54. An, H., Kilroy, C., McGinn, P.J., Catal. Today, 98 (2004) 423–429.
55. Russo, N., Furfori, S., Fino, D., Saracco, G., Specchia, V., Appl. Catal.
B, 83 (2008) 85–95.
56. Aneggi, E., Boaro, M., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A.,
J. Alloys Compd., 408–412 (2006) 1096–1102.
57. Aneggi, E., Boaro, M., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A.,
Catal. Today, 112 (2006) 94–98.
58. Bueno-López, A., Krishna, K., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., J. Catal., 230
(2005) 237–248.
59. Makkee, M., Jelles, S.J., Moulijn, J.A., in Catalysis by Ceria and Related
Materials, ed. A. Trovarelli, Imperial College Press, London, (2002),
p. 391.
60. Aneggi, E., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A., Catal. Today,
136 (2008) 3–10.
61. Aneggi, E., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A., Top. Catal.,
42–43 (2007) 319–322.
62. Aneggi, E., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A., Catal. Today,
114 (2006) 40–47.
63. Wu, X., Liu, D., Li, K., Li, J., Weng, D., Catal. Commun., 8 (2007)
1274–1278.
64. Krishna, K., Bueno-López, A., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Appl. Catal.
B, 75 (2007) 189–200.
65. Krishna, K., Bueno-López, A., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Appl. Catal.
B, 75 (2007) 201–209.
66. Krishna, K., Bueno-López, A., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Appl. Catal.
B, 75 (2007) 210–220.
67. Zhu, L., Yu, J., Wang, X., J. Hazard. Mater., 140 (2007) 205–210.
68. Peralta, M.A., Milt, V.G., Cornaglia, L.M., Querini, C.A., J. Catal., 242
(2006) 118–130.
69. Farrauto, R.J., Voss, K.E., Appl. Catal. B, 10 (1996) 29–51.
70. Logothrtidis, S., Patsalas, P., Charitidis, C., Mat. Sci. Eng. C, 23 (2003)
803–806.
71. Bokova, M.N., Decarne, C., Abi-Aad, A., Pryakhin, A.N., Lunin, V.V.,
Aboukaïs, A., Thermochim. Acta, 428 (2005) 165–171.
72. Lamonier, J.F., Sergent, N., Matta, J., Aboukaïs, A., J. Therm. Anal.
Calorim., 66 (2001) 645–658.
73. Dernaika, B., Uner, D., Appl. Catal. B, 40 (2003) 219–229.
74. van Doorn, J., Varloud, J., Meriaudeau, P., Perrichon, V., Appl. Catal.
B, 1 (1992) 117–127.
75. Courcot, D., Abi-Aad, E., Capelle, S., Aboukaïs, A., Stud. Surf. Sci.
Catal., 116 (1998) 625–634.
76. Harrison, P.G., Ball, I.K., Daniell, W., Lukinskas, P., Caspedes, M.,
Mirò, E.E., Ulla, M.A., Chem. Eng. J., 95 (2003) 47–55.
77. Primet, M., Garbowski, E., in Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, ed.
A. Trovarelli, Imperial College Press, London, (2002), pp. 407–429.
78. Kockrick, E., Schrage, C., Grigas, A., Geiger, D., Kaskel, S., J. Solid State
Chem., 181 (2008) 1614–1620.
79. Palmisano, P., Russo, N., Fino, P., Fino, D., Badini, C., Appl. Catal. B,
69 (2006) 85–92.
80. Aneggi, E., de Leitenburg, C., Trovarelli, A., unpublished results.
81. Issa, M., Petit, C., Mahzoul, H., Aboukaïs, A., Brilhac, J.F., Top. Catal.,
52 (2009) 2063–2069.
82. Issa, M., Mahzoul, H., Brillard, A., Brilhac, J.-F., Chem. Eng. Technol., 32
(2009) 1859–1865.
83. Bassou, B., Guilhaume, N., Lombaert, K., Mirodatos, C., Bianchi, D.,
Energy Fuels, 24 (2010) 4766–4780.
84. Bassou, B., Guilhaume, N., Lombaert, K., Mirodatos, C., Bianchi, D.,
Energy Fuels, 24 (2010) 4781–4792.
85. Iojoiu, E.E., Bassou, B., Guilhaume, N., Farrusseng, D., Desmartin-
Chomel, A., Lombaert, K., Bianchi, D., Mirodatos, C., Catal. Today,
137 (2008) 103–109.
86. Bueno–López, A., Krishna, K., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Catal. Letters,
99 (2005) 203–205.
87. Machida, M., Murata, Y., Kishikawa, K., Zhang, D., Ikeue, K., Chem.
Mater., 20 (2008) 4489–4494.
88. Gross, M.S., Sánchez, B.S., Querini, C.A., Chem. Eng. J., 168 (2011)
413–419.
89. Li, P., Chen, I.W., Penner-Hahn, J.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 77 (1994)
118–128.
90. Nagai, Y., Yamamoto, T., Tanaka, T., Yoshida, S., Nonaka, T., Okamoto,
T., Suda, A., Sugiura, M., J. Synchrotron Rad., 8 (2001) 616–618.
91. Di Monte, R., Fornasiero, P., Graziani, M., Kašpar, J., J. Alloys Compd.,
275–277 (1998) 877–885.
92. Trovarelli, A., Zamar, F., Llorca, J., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G.,
Kiss, J.T., J. Catal., 169 (1997) 490–502.
93. Fornasiero, P., Di Monte, R., Rao, J.R., Kašpar, J., Trovarelli, A.,
Graziani, M., J. Catal., 151 (1995) 168–177.
94. Di Monte, R., Kašpar, J., J. Mater. Chem., 15 (2005) 633–648.
95. Trovarelli, A., Comments Inorg. Chem., 20 (1999) 263–284.
96. Shannon, R.D., Prewitt, C.T., Acta Cryst. B, 25 (1969) 925–946.
97. Kašpar, J., Fornasiero, P., Balducci, G., Di Monte, R., Hickey, N.,
Sergo, V., Inorg. Chim. Acta, 349 (2003) 217–226.
98. Yashima, M., in Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, 2nd edition, eds.
A. Trovarelli, P. Fornasiero, Imperial College Press, London, (2012).
99. Vlaic, G., Di Monte, R., Fornasiero, P., Fonda, E., Kašpar, J., Graziani, M.,
J. Catal., 182 (1999) 378–389.
100. Vidmar, P., Fornasiero, P., Kašpar, J., Gubitosa, G., Graziani, M.,
J. Catal., 171 (1997) 160–168.
101. He, H., Dai, H.X., Wong, K.W., Au, C.T., Appl. Catal. A, 251 (2003)
61–74.
102. He, H., Dai, H.X., Ng, L.H., Wong, K.W, Au, C.T., J. Catal., 206 (2002)
1–13.
103. Narula, C.K., Haack, L.P., Chun, W., Jen, H.-W., Graham, G.W., J. Phys.
Chem. B, 103 (1999) 3634–3639.
104. Atribak, I., Bueno-López, A., García-García, A., J. Molec. Catal. A, 300
(2009) 103–110.
105. Krishna, K., Bueno-López, A., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Top. Catal.,
42–43 (2007) 221–228.
106. Fang, P., Luo, M., Lu, J., Cen, S., Yan, X., Wang, X., Thermochim. Acta,
478 (2008) 45–50.
107. Małecka, M.A., Kεpiński, L., Miśta, W., Appl. Catal. B, 74 (2007) 290–298.
126. Bueno-López, A., Krishna, K., van der Linden, B., Mul, G., Moulijn, J.A.,
Makkee, M., Catal. Today, 121 (2007) 237–245.
127. Azambre, B., Collura, S., Darcy, P., Trichard, J.M., Da Costa, P.,
García-García, A., Bueno-López, A., Fuel Process Technol., 92 (2011)
363–371.
128. Li, X., Wei, S., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., Su, Q., Gao, X., Catal.
Today, 175 (2011) 112–116.
129. Gross, M.S., Ulla, M.A., Querini, C.A., Appl. Catal. A, 360 (2009) 81–88.
130. Peralta, M.A., Gross, M.S., Ulla, M.A., Querini, C.A., Appl. Catal. A,
367 (2009) 59–69.
131. Cerfontain, M.B., Meijer, R., Kapteijn, F., Moulijn, J.A., J. Catal., 107
(1987) 173–180.
132. Yuh, S.J., Wolf, E.E., Fuel, 62 (1983) 252–255.
133. Milt, V.G., Querini, C.A., Mirò, E.E., Thermochim. Acta, 404 (2003)
177–186.
134. Zhu, Z.H., Lu, G.Q., J. Catal.,197 (1999) 262–274.
135. Zhu, Z.H., Lu, G.Q., Yang, R.T., J. Catal., 192 (2000) 77–87.
136. López-Fonseca, R., Elizundia, U., Landa, I., Gutiérrez-Ortiz, M.A.,
González-Velasco, J.R., Appl. Catal. B, 61 (2005) 150–158.
137. Döbber, D., Kiebling, D., Schmitz, W., Wendt, G., Appl. Catal. B, 52
(2004) 135–143.
138. Terribile, D., Trovarelli, A., de Leitenburg, C., Primavera, A., Dolcetti, G.,
Catal. Today, 47 (1999) 133–140.
139. Shan, W., Ma, N., Yang, J., Dong, X., Liu, C., Wei, L., J. Natural Gas
Chem., 19 (2010) 86–90.
140. Kim, D.J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 72 (1989) 1415–1421.
141. Reddy, B.M., Rao, K.N., Catal. Comm., 10 (2009) 1350–1353.
142. Lamonier, J.F., Kulyova, S.P., Lunin, V.V., Zhilinskaya, E.A., Aboukaïs, A.,
J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 75 (2004) 857–865.
143. Pruvost, C., Lamonier, J.F., Courtcot, D., Abi Aad E., Aboukaïs, A.,
Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 130C (2000) 2159–2164.
144. Fu, M., Yue, X., Ye, D., Ouyang, J., Huang, B., Wu, J., Liang, H., Catal.
Today, 153 (2010) 125–132.
145. Muroyama, H., Hano, S., Matsui, T., Eguchi, K., Catal. Today, 153
(2010) 133–135.
146. Lamonier, J.F., Kulyova, S.P., Zhilinskaya, E.A., Kostyuk, B.G., Lunin, W.,
Aboukaïs, A., Kinet. Catal., 45 (2004) 429–435.
147. Dhakad, M., Mitshuhashi, T., Rayalu, S., Doggali, P., Bakardjiva, S.,
Subrt, J., Fino, D., Haneda, H., Labhsetwar, N., Catal. Today, 132
(2008) 188–193.
148. Liu, J., Zhao, Z., Wang, J., Xu, C., Duan, A., Jiang, G., Yang, Q., Appl.
Catal. B, 84 (2008) 185–195.
149. Flouty, R., Abi-Aad, E., Siffert, S., Aboukaïs, A., Appl. Catal. B, 46
(2003) 145–153.
150. Aneggi, E., Llorca, J., de Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A.,
Appl. Catal. B, 91 (2009) 489–498.
151. Shimizu, K., Kawachi, H., Satsuma, A., Appl. Catal., 96 (2010) 169–175.
152. Shimizu, K., Kawachi, H., Komai, S., Yoshida, K., Sasaki, Y., Satsuma, A.,
Catal. Today, 175 (2011) 93–99.
153. Lim, C.B., Kusaba, H., Einaga, H., Teraoka, Y., Catal. Today, 175
(2011) 106–111.
154. Preda, G., Pacchioni, G., Catal. Today, 177 (2011) 31–38.
155. Kayama, T., Yamazaki, K., Shinjoh, H., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132 (2010)
13154–13155.
156. Murrel, L.L., Carlin, R.T., J. Catal., 159 (1996) 479–490.
157. Kundakovic, Lj., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., Appl. Catal. A, 183
(1999) 35–51.
158. Nagy, A., Mestl, G., Appl. Catal. A, 188 (1999) 337–353.
159. Qu, Z., Cheng, M., Huang, W., Bao, X., J. Catal., 229 (2005) 446–458.
160. Gungor, N., Isci, S., Gunister, E., Mista, W., Teterycz, H., Klimkiewicz, R.,
Appl. Clay Sci., 32 (2006) 291–296.
161. Qu, Z., Cheng, M., Dong, X., Bao, X., Catal. Today, 93–95 (2004)
247–255.
162. Waterhouse, G.I.N., Bowmaker, G.A., Metson, J.B., Appl. Surf. Sci., 214
(2003) 36–51.
163. Cooper, B.J., Roth, S.A., Platinum Metals Rev., 35 (1991) 178–187.
164. Atribak, I., Such-Basánez, I., Bueno-López, A., García-García, A.,
J. Catal., 250 (2007) 75–84.
165. Setiabudi, A., Chen, J., Mul, G., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J.A., Appl. Catal.
B, 51 (2004) 9–19.
166. Atribak, I., Bueno-López, A., García-García, A., J. Catal., 259 (2008)
123–132.
167. Atribak, I., Azambre, B., Bueno López, A., García-García, A., Appl.
Catal. B, 92 (2009) 126–137.
168. Liu, J., Zhao, Z., Xu, C., Duan, A., Wang, L., Zhang, S., Catal. Comm.,
8 (2007) 220–224.
169. Weng, D., Li, J., Wu, X., Lin, F., Catal. Comm., 9 (2008) 1898–1901.
170. Wu, X., Liang, Q., Weng, D., Lu, Z., Catal. Comm., 8 (2007) 2110–2114.
171. Wu, X., Lin, F., Weng, D., Li, J., Catal. Comm., 9 (2008) 2428–2432.
172. Matyshak, V.A., Sadykov, V.A., Kuznetsova, T.G., Ukharskii, A.A.,
Khomenko, T.I., Bykhovskii, M.Ya., Sil’chenkova, O.N., Korchak, V.N.,
Kinet. Catal., 47 (2006) 400–411.
173. Tikhomirov, K., Krocher, O., Elsener, M., Wokaun, A., Appl. Catal. B,
64 (2006) 72–78.
174. Tikhomirov, K., Krocher, O., Wokaun, A., Catal. Lett., 109 (2006)
49–53.
175. Milt, V.G., Peralta, M.A., Ulla, M.A., Mirò, E.E., Catal. Comm., 8 (2007)
765–769.
176. Wu, X., Lin, F., Xu, H., Weng, D., Appl. Catal. B, 96 (2010) 101–109.
177. García-García, A., Bueno-López, A., in Catalysis by Ceria and Related
Materials, 2nd edition, eds. A. Trovarelli, P. Fornasiero, Imperial
College Press, London, (2012).
178. Atribak, I., Bueno-López, A., García-García, A.,Top. Catal., 52 (2009)
2088–2091.
179. Atribak, I., Azambre, B., Bueno-López, A., García-García, A., Top.
Catal., 52 (2009) 2092–2096.
180. Atribak, I., Bueno-López, A., García-García, A., Comb. Flame, 157
(2010) 2086–2094.
181. Weng, D., Li, J., Wu, X., Si, Z., J. Rare Earth, 28 (2010) 542–546.
182. Liu, J., Zhao, Z., Lan, J., Xu, C., Duan, A., Jiang, G., Wang, X., He, H.,
J. Phys. Chem. C, 113 (2009) 17114–17123.
183. Liu, J., Zhao, Z., Xu, C., Duan, A., Jiang, G., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49
(2010) 3112–3119.
184. Wu, X., Liu, S., Lin, F., Weng, D., J. Hazard. Mater., 181 (2010) 722–728.
185. Ito, K., Kishikawa, K., Watajima, A., Ikeue, K., Machida, M., Catal.
Comm., 8 (2007) 2176–2180.
186. Liu, J., Zhao, Z., Xu, J., Xu, C., Duan, A., Jiang, G., He, H., Chem.
Comm., 47 (2011) 11119–11121.
187. Wu, X., Liu, S., Weng, D., Lin, F., Ran, R., J. Hazard. Mater., 187 (2011)
283–290.
188. Wu, X., Liu, S., Weng, D., Lin, F., Catal. Comm., 12 (2011) 345–348.
189. Weng, D., Li, J., Weng, D., Si, Z., J. Environm. Sci., 23 (2011) 145–150.
190. Yoshioyuki, M., Yoshichika, H., US Patent 0176969 A1, to DOWA
Electronics Materials Co., Ltd. Tokyo JP, 2011.
191. Collier, J.E., Dotzel, R., Laroze, S.C., Leppelt, R., Millington, P.J.,
Münch, J.W., Rajaram, R.R., Schedel, H., Patent WO 092525 Al to
Johnson Matthey PLC, 2011.
192. Casapu, M., Bernhard, A., Peitz, D., Mehring, M., Elsener, M.,
Kröcher, O., Appl. Catal. B, 103 (2011) 79–84.
CHAPTER 12
12.1 Introduction
The solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) has been under development over
several decades1 since it was invented by Baur and Preis2 in 1937. In
order to commercialize this high temperature (600–1000 °C) fuel
cell it was necessary to reduce the costs of fabrication and operation.
Ceria-based materials are of potential interest as both pure and
doped ceria may help to decrease the internal electrical resistance
of an SOFC by reducing the ohmic resistance of the electrolyte as
well as the polarization resistance of both the fuel and the air
electrode. Furthermore, the possibility of less fuel pre-treatment
and having a lower water (steam) content in the natural gas fuel
intended for the SOFC, due to the lower susceptibility towards coke
formation of ceria-containing fuel electrodes, may simplify the fuel
cell system. Finally, ceria-based anodes seem less sensitive to poison-
ing by fuel impurities such as sulfur. The same type of cell has been
developed for electrolysis and then called a solid oxide electrolysis
cell (SOEC). As it is basically the same cell in both applications, it is
often referred to as a solid oxide cell (SOC). It is anticipated that
623
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 625
Reaction (12.1) may also take place in doped ceria, and doping
will affect the reducibility of ceria, both due to changing the
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 627
concentration of VO∑∑ and Ce′Ce , but also due to changing the partial
molar enthalpy of reduction as well as the vibrational frequency of
the lattice ions (or nonconfigurational entropy).
W = 6Ga0(∆a)2 (12.7)
where G is the shear modulus of ceria. ∆a is governed by Vegard’s
slope for the given solute. This implies that the highest solubilities
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 629
should be achieved for oxides with cations that have a radius that
results in Vegard’s slope Sv = 0. This radius is the matching radius rm.
From Eq. (12.5) the following expression can be derived for
Vegard’s slope in units of nm.mol%−1 for trivalent dopants:
The different formulas give different values for Vegard’s slope and
also imply different values of the matching radius rm. Kim’s expres-
sion implies that rm = 0.1106 nm for divalent ions and 0.1038 nm for
trivalent ions, whereas Hong and Virkar’s expression gives rm =
0.1024 nm for trivalent ions. As mentioned elsewhere24 a value of
rm = 0.101 nm may be derived from other sources.
The experimental literature shows that the fluorite structure of
ceria is in fact very tolerant to dissolution of lower valent metal
oxides with cation radii close to rm, to concentrations that in some
cases are above 40 at% at 1500 °C.25,26 However, the solubility limit is
temperature dependent, i.e. the solubility limit is expected to be
lower at lower temperatures. Although the solubility limits of rare
earth elements in ceria at temperatures below 1000 °C is still
unknown, to the best of our knowledge, recent findings indicate
solubility limits of about 20 mol% at 1000 °C. This is discussed in
more detail in Section 12.4. Oxides with cations much smaller or
bigger than rm are less soluble, but there is contradictory informa-
tion in the literature for the solubility limits.27–29 Fair predictions
of solubility limits are possible using Vegard’s slope criteria. For
example, the solubility of CoO and NiO in ceria were estimated to
be below ca. 1 at%,30 in good agreement with later experimental
DL
e= = Sx
L (12.14)
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 631
Figure 12.1 Percentage expansion of undoped ceria versus N = 2−x at 900 °C.24
The main data are from Chiang et al.,15
are from Mogensen,33 and the straight
line is the best linear fit.24 Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.
also known for oxides with other structures (e.g. perovskites), where
it also follows a relation similar to Eq. (12.14).34,35 The expansion
related to changes in oxygen stoichiometry can be distinguished
from the effect of a temperature change on the lattice by carrying
out isothermal dilatometry, where sample dimension changes are
measured as a function of oxygen activity.16,36 Table 12.1 gives exam-
ples of S values for a variety of ceria compositions. Results for pure
ceria are included for comparison.
1
2 O2(g) + VO∑∑ ´ OxO + 2h∑ (12.16)
2 1
È VO∑∑ ˘ ÈCeCe
¢ ˘˚ PO2
KR = Î ˚ Î 2
2
(12.17)
ÈOO ˘ ÈCeCe ˘
x x
Î ˚Î ˚
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 633
For heavily doped ceria, and for small deviations from stoichiome-
try, the concentration of oxide ion vacancies is effectively constant,
″ ] for divalent or 2[V ∑∑ ] = [Gd ¢ ] for trivalent dopants,
[VO∑∑ ] = [Ca Ce O Ce
and thus Eq. (12.17) gives:
- 14
x µ PO (12.19)
2
-1
∂ log x Ê 2x 2x 8x ˆ Ê ∂ log K R ˆ
= Á -4 - - - Á1 - 2 ˜ (12.20)
∂ log PO2 Ë x + y 2 - x - y 1 - 2x - y ˜¯ Ë ∂ log PO2 ¯
A similar expression can be deduced for the case of ceria doped with
a trivalent cation (e.g. Ce1–yGdyO2–x–y/2), by simply replacing y with
y/2 in the denominator of the first two fractions on the right-hand
side of Eq. (12.20). Figure 12.2 shows the dependence of the pO2
exponent on nonstoichiometry, as calculated from Eq. (12.20) for
various doping levels. As can be seen from Fig. 12.2, Eqs. (12.18)
and (12.19) are only valid for small values of x (x < 0.01). As the
value of x increases, the pO2 exponent is expected to decrease con-
tinuously (in absolute value), approaching a value of −1/10 as the
value of x approaches 0.25. Furthermore, for intermediate acceptor
doping levels of ca. 1000 ppm, the pO2 exponent is expected to shift
continuously from the −1/4 value of acceptor-doped ceria to
the −1/6 value of pure ceria at small oxygen nonstoichiometry
values (x < 0.01).
-1/10
-1/6
PO2 exponent
-1/4
pure CeO2
-1/3
10 ppm Ca
1000 ppm Ca
10 mol% Ca
pure CeO2 KR corrected
pure CeO2 experimental
-1/2
-4 -3.5 -3 -2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5
logx
The various lines plotted in Fig. 12.2 are calculated values from
Eq. (12.20), assuming that KR is independent of x or pO2. As dis-
cussed in detail later, this is not valid for ceria. The expected varia-
tion of the pO2 exponent with nonstoichiometry (at 1000 °C),
taking into account the pO2 dependence of KR (calculated from
data by Bevan and Kordis38), is illustrated in Fig. 12.2 using open
circles (pure CeO2 KR corrected). As can be seen, the pO2 depend-
ence of KR, arising from the nonstoichiometry dependence of the
equilibrium Gibbs energy change of reaction (12.1a), drastically
influences the expected variation of the pO2 exponent with oxygen
nonstoichiometry, x. The pO2 exponent is expected to pass through
a maximum (absolute) value of ca. −1/2 at intermediate x values, x
≈ 0.05. This is related to the fact that the equilibrium Gibbs energy
change of reaction (12.1a) passes through a minimum at a similar
oxygen nonstoichiometry value, x ≈ 0.1. The nonstoichiometry
dependence of the pO2 exponent, determined directly from experi-
mental data for x = f(pO2) for 99.99% (nominally) pure ceria by
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 635
Panlener et al.,39 is also shown in Fig. 12.2 using open squares (pure
CeO2 experimental). As can be seen, it matches well the expected
behavior of the KR corrected pure ceria for x > 0.001. For x < 0.001,
the pO2 exponent increases (in absolute value) towards −1/4 as x
decreases, a behavior that is characteristic of the presence of accep-
tor impurities.
For nonstoichiometries larger than ∼0.01, interactions between
the defects become significant.40,41 This leads to defect association
and ordering. In pure ceria, the singly charged “dimer” and neutral
“trimer” are anticipated to form according to the defect reactions:
( ) (12.21)
∑
¢ + VO∑∑ ´ CeCe
CeCe ¢ VO∑∑
( ) ( )
∑ x
CeCe ¢ VO∑∑
¢ + CeCe ¢ VO∑∑CeCe
´ CeCe ¢ (12.22)
Similar dimers and trimers may form in doped ceria, but in this case
the lower valent dopants may replace Ce¢Ce in the above quasi-
chemical reactions.42,43 The presence of oxide ion vacancies in mul-
tiple states of ionization (VO∑∑ , VO∑ , VO
x
) has also been proposed in the
4,44–47
past, the respective defect reactions being:
VO∑∑ + CeCe
¢ ´ VO∑ + CexCe (12.23)
VO∑ + CeCe
¢ ´ VOx + CexCe (12.24)
eq
DG O2 ,x = RT ln PO2 (12.25)
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 637
Figure 12.3 Part of Ce–O phase diagram between CeO1.702 and CeO2 as a function
of the mole fraction of oxygen (O/Ce+O). Adapted from Zinkevich et al.53 with
permission from Elsevier.
DH O2 ,x = R
(
d ln PO2
eq
) (12.26)
d 1T( ) x
DS O2 ,x = -R
(
d T ln PO2
eq
) (12.27)
d (T )
x
eq
Figure 12.4 PO2 - x isotherms for CeO2–x at various temperatures. Data from
Bevan and Kordis,38 Panlener et al.,39 and Riess et al.60 Reprinted with permission
from Elsevier.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 639
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 641
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 643
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 645
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 647
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 649
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 651
s i = ÈÎ VO∑∑ ˘˚ e mi
(12.28)
where e is the electron charge and µi the ion mobility. The ionic
conductivity of pure reduced ceria at 1000 °C is less than 3% of
the total conductivity at a pO2 of 10−6 atm and even lower at lower
pO2 and at lower temperatures.16 The ionic conductivity shows a
maximum with increasing oxide ion vacancy concentration,
which at 1000 °C is estimated to be ca. 7 × 10−2 S⋅cm−1 for CeO1.9.16
The total conductivity (ionic and electronic) for this condition is
2.5 S⋅cm−1.16 The oxide ion mobility µi follows an Arrhenius
equation:
mi0 Ê H ˆ
mi = exp Á - i ˜
T Ë kT ¯
(12.29)
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 653
s e = ÎÈCeCe
¢ ˚˘ e me
(12.30)
me0 Ê H ˆ
me = exp Á - e ˜
T Ë kT ¯
(12.31)
where He is the activation energy for the small polaron hopping. The
pre-exponential factor µe0 is given by:
ÈCexCe ˘
me0 = Î ˚ ea 2n 0 k
ÈCeCe ˘ + ÈCeCe ˘
˚ Î ¢ ˚
x
Î (12.32)
where α is the lattice parameter, ν0 the phonon frequency, and the
Ce′Ce fraction represents the fraction of sites that are available for
hopping of the small polaron.
The variation of conductivity σ of CeO2−x at a fixed temperature
(1000 °C) is shown as a function of x in Fig. 12.10. Even though σe
is known to be proportional to x in the vicinity of stoichiometry (up
to x ≈ 10−2) saturation occurs at x ≈ 0.04 and σe has a broad maxi-
mum with a peak value at x ≈ 0.1. The activation energy of the small
polaron mobility He varies with x from about 0.2 eV near stoichiom-
etry to about 0.5 eV at a vacancy concentration of x = 0.2.45,63,152 The
increase in He with increasing x is attributed to defect interactions
at higher x values, as well as to the increase in lattice parameter
with increasing x.45,63,153,154 Tuller and Nowick45 further concluded
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 655
Ê 1 ∂Df (0) ˆ
H i ,^ = H i ,• + 2e Á Df (0 ) + (12.33)
Ë T ∂1 T ˜¯
k
(
∂ ln s e ,||T ) = DH O2 ,x Ê
- H e + e Á Df (0) +
1 ∂Df (0) ˆ
(12.34)
∂1 T 4 Ë T ∂1 T ˜¯
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 657
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 659
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 661
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 663
configuration around the oxide ion vacancy and the migration path,
being larger for migration paths in between dopant cations.229
A similar conclusion was recently reached by Frayret et al.231 This is
in agreement with experimental results showing an increasing acti-
vation energy at higher acceptor dopant contents (see Fig. 12.12).
Recent micro-calorimetric measurements by Navrotsky et al.234
on ceria doped with Y, Gd, or La, have shown that the oxide ion
vacancies tend to occupy the first nearest neighbor sites to Y and Gd
dopants, but also to La, in contrast to estimates from atomistic simu-
lations.228–231 A coincidence between the dopant content where the
maximum in ionic conductivity occurs and that in enthalpy of for-
mation (from the component binary oxides) for both La- and
Gd-doped ceria was also observed.235 A rather sharp transition from
a situation of negligible clustering at a low doping level to almost
complete clustering at high (above the conductivity maximum) was
detected. Higher lattice ionic conductivity was recently observed for
Nd-doped ceria compared to Gd- or Sm-doped ceria,208 further com-
plicating the long-lasting dispute as to whether Gd or Sm is the
optimum dopant in terms of lattice ionic conductivity. Furthermore,
a clear dependence of the transport properties of rare-earth-doped
ceria (containing a low level of impurities) on sintering temperature
and preparation method is well established.178,209,236,237 The lattice
conductivity of Y-doped ceria was found to vary by more than one
order of magnitude depending on sintering temperature.178
These results indicate that the full picture of ionic transport in
doped ceria is still not complete and that there are additional
parameters in play, such as deviations from the assumption of ran-
domly distributed dopants, which may be influenced by powder
synthesis and processing. High-resolution transmission electron
microscopy (HRTEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED),
and EELS investigations have revealed the existence of dopant-rich
nano-sized domains in ceria doped with La,238 Sm,239 Y,240 Yb,241
Ho,242 Dy,243 Tb,244 and Gd.245 Ordering of oxygen vacancies was
observed to take place in these domains. Clustering of dopants and
oxide ion vacancies was also indicated by analysis of extended X-ray
absorption fine structure (EXAFS) measurements for Y- and
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 665
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 667
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 669
670
Table 12.2 Microstructural properties of thin films included in Fig. 12.13.
Technique Gd mol% Substrate Thickness (nm) Grain size (nm) Characteristics #, Ref.
SP 20 Sapphire, 310 °C — 29 Small pores 1a,160
b1469
PLD 20 Sapphire, 300 °C — 46 Dense 2a,160
PLD 20 Sapphire, 300 °C — 55 Dense 2b,160
(Continued )
4/8/2013 12:40:58 PM
b1469_Ch-12.indd 671
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes
Table 12.2 (Continued )
Technique Gd mol% Substrate Thickness (nm) Grain size (nm) Characteristics #, Ref.
b1469
Sputtering 20 Quartz 100 130 Dense 8a,282
Sputtering 20 Al2O3 100 130 Discontinuous 8b,282
671
4/8/2013 12:40:58 PM
b1469 Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 673
Figure 12.14 PO2 dependence of the electrical conductivity of Gd-doped ceria thin
films and pellets at 600 °C and microcrystalline Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95−x for comparison. The
crystallite size and composition of the films are provided in the legend.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 675
Support
(porous)
200-1000 µm
Anode
(porous) 1-30 µm
Electrolyte
(dense) 1-30 µm
Cathode
(porous) 1-50 µm
Figure 12.15 SOFC showing the basic operational principle when the cell is oper-
ated with hydrogen and air (oxygen).
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 677
interconnect
Anode Cathodeinterconnect
Electrolyte
Electrolyte
Cathode
Cathode
Air + Fuel
Flow
Figure 12.16 Different fuel cell designs. (a) Dual-chamber planar. (b) Tubular.
(c) Single-chamber planar fuel cell.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 679
also exist.306–309 There exist also special designs for SOFCs where
the targeted power output is in the W-range and are generally
referred to as µ-SOFCs. These devices operate at relatively low tem-
peratures and are fabricated using processes mainly used in the
semiconductor industry. A recent review has been carried out by
Evans et al.310
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 681
In Fig. 12.17(a), Ran and Rcat are the anode and cathode electro-
chemical polarization resistances, respectively. Rext is the external
load resistor (see below) and Rion and Relec are the resistances associ-
ated with ionic and electronic transport through the electrolyte,
0
839 mV (OCV)
500 mV
Iionic -5 10 m CGO10, 600 °C
log(pO / atm )
50% H 2 - 50% H2O
-10
2
-15
-20
-25
Figure 12.17 (a) Equivalent circuit for an SOFC with ceria as electrolyte.
(b) Oxygen activity profile through a Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95−x (CGO10) electrolyte with
irreversible electrodes at open-circuit voltage (OCV) and at a cell voltage of 500 mV.
RT ln(aO2 ,s'') s es i
i leak = Ú
4 FL ln(aO2 ,s ') s i + s e + s ext
d ln aO2 ( ) (12.36)
aO2 is the oxygen activity, aO2 ,s′ and aO2 ,s ″ are the oxygen activities
for the electrolyte/cathode and electrolyte/anode interfaces,
respectively. σi and σe are the ionic and electronic conductivity
of the MIEC electrolyte, respectively. The oxide ion current density
iionic can be calculated from:
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 683
RT Ê aO2 '' ˆ
iionic ran = ln Á ˜ (12.39)
4 F Ë aO2 ,s '' ¯
RT Ê aO2 ' ˆ
iionic rcat = - ln Á ˜ (12.40)
4 F Ë aO2 ,s ' ¯
where aO2 ′′ and aO2 ′ are the oxygen activities of the anode and cath-
ode gas, respectively, and ran and rcat are the area specific resistances
(ASRs) of the anode and cathode, respectively. These values can be
measured individually using symmetric cell measurements.
In addition, gas transport in both the support structures and the
electrodes, and variations in gas composition in the fuel flow direc-
tion should also be taken into account when modeling full
cells.326,328,329 The above represent the typical equations used for
calculating the current densities through an MIEC electrolyte.
Oxygen activity through an electrolyte at steady state can be calcu-
lated from charge conservation — ∑ J ionic = — ∑ J elec = 0 , where Jionic and
Jelec are the ionic and electronic fluxes, respectively. For the 1D case,
conservation of charge translates into ∇Jionic = ∇Jelec = 0.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 685
10 m CGO10
0.4
50% H 2 - 50% H2O 0.75 0.6
ileak (A cm )
-2
0.3
P (W cm )
550 °C
-2
650 °C
0.50 0.4
η
0.2
650°C
10 m CGO10
0.25 10 m CGO10 ideal 0.2
0.1 600°C 97% H 2 - 3% H 2O
550°C 85% FU at Pmax
500°C
0.0 0.00 0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0
-2 -2
iext (A cm ) iext (A cm )
(a) (b)
Figure 12.18 (a) Leakage current density ileak through a 10-µm-thick Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95−x
electrolyte as a function of the current density drawn in the external circuit iext at
500 °C, 550 °C, 600 °C, and 650 °C. (b) Efficiency η (left axis) as a function of the
external current density. The right axis shows the corresponding power density dis-
sipated in the external resistor. The fuel utilization is fixed at 85% at the maximum
power density for each temperature.
For a perfect electrolyte the term iext /iionic will equal one. The effi-
ciency will thus be one for a cell with a perfect electrolyte operating
at the Nernst potential. In practical terms the efficiency defined in
(12.41) is cell efficiency and does not take into account thermody-
namic efficiency nor losses due to fuel gas reformation, incomplete
fuel exploitation, and the auxiliary system.325 Figure 12.18(b) shows
cell efficiency (left axis) and the corresponding power density (right
axis) as a function of the external current density. Calculations at
650 °C and 550 °C were carried out for a 10-µm Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95−x elec-
trolyte with the electronic conductivity of this material taken from
Chatzichristodoulou and Hendriksen272 and one where the elec-
tronic conductivity has been set to zero (which will be referred to as
a “perfect” Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95−x electrolyte). The calculations were car-
ried out such that at the maximum power density the fuel utilization
was 85% for each temperature. Under open-circuit conditions the
perfect Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95−x electrolyte has an efficiency of 1 whereas the
cell with the real Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95−x electrolyte has an efficiency of zero
due to the leak current. It can be seen that the power output of the
two cases is very much alike; however, the efficiency of the SOFC
with the real Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95−x electrolyte is much lower at low current
densities. At 550 °C and 650 °C one must exceed current densities of
approximately 0.3 A⋅cm−2 and 1.3 A⋅cm−2, respectively, in order to
achieve similar electrolyte efficiencies. However, the cell voltages at
these conditions are approximately 550 mV (1,144 mV) and 470 mV
(1,127 mV) at 550 °C and 650 °C, respectively, where the numbers in
parenthesis are the EMF values. It is thus clear that the efficiencies
of cells with a “perfect” and “real” Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95−x electrolyte may be
similar; however this takes place at very low cell voltages and thus
very low efficiencies. The highest power densities are found at high
temperatures but the highest efficiencies are found at low
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 687
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 689
1.0
950
0.8 900
Pmax ( W cm )
-2
Vely ( mV )
0.6 850
800
0.4
750
0.2 ran rcat 700
30µm CGO10, 600 °C
50% H2 - 50% H2O 650
0.0
600
0.1 1 10
f
Figure 12.19 Maximum power and cell voltage (at OCV) as a function of the rela-
tive anode and cathode area specific resistances. f = rcat/rcat
0 0
where rcat is the base
cathode area specific resistance (rcat = 0.217 Ω⋅cm ), and similarly for the anode (r an
0 2 0
= 0.525 Ω⋅cm ). The solid and dotted lines show the power output and cell voltage,
2
respectively. The black and gray lines represent anode and cathode, respectively.
The calculation was for a 30-µm-thick Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95−x (CGO10) electrolyte at
600 °C for a hydrogen to steam ratio of one.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 691
Table 12.3 Performance of fuel cells with a ceria-based electrolyte. If not specified the anode gas is humidified (~3%) hydrogen
and the cathode gas is air. Further details of the design of the cells are in Table 12.4.
Pmax Pmax Pmax Pmax
Ceria and Its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes
Area (650°C) (600°C) (550°C) (500°C) OCV OCV OCV OCV
Ref. Electrolyte cm2 mW⋅cm−2 mW⋅cm−2 mW⋅cm−2 mW⋅cm−2 (650°C) V (600°C) V (550°C) V (500°C) V
b1469
353 15 µm, Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9 869 648 385 220 0.74 0.75 0.78 0.83
345 10 µm, Ce0.85Sm0.075 0.48 1430 1100 730 320 0.86 0.89 0.93 0.96
(Continued )
693
4/8/2013 12:41:01 PM
b1469_Ch-12.indd 694
694
Table 12.3 (Continued )
b1469
350 25 µm, Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 680 420 210 0.83 0.84 0.85
359 20 µm, Ce0.85Sm0.15O1.925 ~1 1,010 ~640 402 ~0.860 ~0.900
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes
345 NiO, 65% Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−x, 50% 10 µm
Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95, 35% (Anode functional Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95, 50% Ce0.85Sm0.075Nd0.075O1.925
b1469
layer)
346 NiO, 65% Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 (Anode La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−x, 50% 10 µm Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95
695
4/8/2013 12:41:01 PM
696
Table 12.4 (Continued )
b1469
359 NiO, 60% Support Sm-doped ceria porous 20 µm, Ce0.85Sm0.15O1.925
Ce0.85Sm0.15O1.925, 35% interlayer (<5 µm)
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 697
of the order 10–20 µm, which are very large compared to those seen
in other studies (typically 1–2 µm). In general large grains are pref-
erable as the total grain-boundary resistance will be lower.
A thorough study by Ding et al.348 investigated a series of anode
supported SOFCs with a Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 electrolyte and thicknesses in
the range from 1 to 75 µm. Only the cells with the best performance
(electrolyte thicknesses: 2, 4, and 16 µm) are listed in Table 12.3. It
was claimed that electrolyte thicknesses down to 1 µm could be
made gastight. The OCV increased strongly from 0.81 to 0.95 V on
changing the electrolyte thickness from 2 to 75 µm, using humidi-
fied hydrogen as fuel (3% H2O). Most of the change in OCV took
place between electrolyte thicknesses of 2 and 4 µm. This is consist-
ent with the theoretical work of Duncan et al.327 A maximum power
density of 771 mW⋅cm−2 at 600 °C was found for the 4-µm-thick elec-
trolyte. Increasing the thickness to 16 µm decreased the power den-
sity to 644 mW⋅cm−2. Decreasing the electrolyte thickness to 1 µm
strongly decreased the maximum power output to 94 mW⋅cm−2.
In a study by Yin et al.349 a fuel derived from the gasification of
rice husks was used. The composition of the fuel was CO (14.7%),
CO2 (14.2%), H2 (15.3%), CH4 (4.2%), and N2 (51%). The biomass-
produced gas (BPG) fed an SOFC with a 35-µm-thick Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9
electrolyte. Feeding pure hydrogen to the cell resulted in a power
output of approximately 491 mW.cm−2 while the BPG resulted in a
power output of 334 mW⋅cm−2. The OCV for humidified hydrogen
(3%) and the BPG were almost equal at 0.91 V at 600 °C. However,
the theoretical equilibrium OCV of the BPG is much lower than that
of pure hydrogen. This suggests that ceria can possibly work as an
electrolyte in cells that operate with BPG as the fuel, as the theoreti-
cal OCV of the gas is lower than that found in hydrogen/methane
atmospheres. The less reducing conditions on the anode side of the
fuel cell cause a lower electronic conductance through the electro-
lyte and thus a reduced parasitic contribution.
In a detailed study by Zhang et al.342 an SOFC with a 10-µm
Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9−x electrolyte and a Ni–Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9−x anode of 15 µm
on a Ni–YSZ substrate was investigated. In this study the anode of
gas was collected, condensed and weighed. It was found that at
600 °C the leakage current at OCV was 1.06 A.cm−2. Running the cell
at 0.5 A⋅cm−2 (the cell voltage was 0.69 V) reduced the leak current
to 0.82 A⋅cm−2. In this study the leak current through a cell without
a cathode was also tested. The leak current in this case decreased to
approximately 0.3 A⋅cm−2 indicating that gas leakage through the
electrolyte is not responsible for the large leak current measured.
Park and Virkar350 investigated SOFCs with a 15-µm and a
25-µm-thick Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 electrolyte. The support was in all cases
a bimetallic support of Ni and Fe and the anode was a cermet of Ni
and Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95. The best performance was found for the 25-µm-
thick Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 electrolyte with a power density of 0.42 W⋅cm−2
at 600 °C. Reducing the thickness of the electrolyte layer to 15 µm
also reduced the power output slightly (from 0.42 W⋅cm−2 to
0.38 W⋅cm−2); however the OCV reduced drastically to approxi-
mately 0.70 V. The decrease in OCV with decreasing thickness was
attributed to the overall lower ionic transference number for thin-
ner membranes.
Wang et al.351 investigated a metal-supported planar SOFC with a
Ce0.8Sm0.2O1.9−x electrolyte. A power density of 0.176 W⋅cm−2 was
obtained at 600 °C. In a subsequent AC study by Huang et al.352 on
similar cells it was estimated that the overall resistance was domi-
nated by contact resistance due to oxidation between the metal
support and the anode layer.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 699
and power (CHP) products for the residential sector and in energy
security applications (http://www.cerespower.com). Ceres Power
Ltd. uses a metal substrate onto which different active layers are
deposited. Not much information is available either on processing
details or on the performance of the fuel cells. From the few publi-
cations available it is clear that the electrodes are deposited using
standard ceramic processing techniques (wet spraying and screen
printing). An electrolyte is produced using an electrophoretic depo-
sition technique and it is claimed that a sintering temperature
below 1000 °C can be used. The anode is a Ni–Ce1−yGdyO2−y/2−x cer-
met and the cathode is doped lanthanum ferrite. At 600 °C a power
density of 310 mW⋅cm−2 can be obtained with 4 × 4 cm2 cells. Ceres
Power is currently (2011) conducting field tests of their CHP units.
During these field tests problems with reliability and durability
emerged, but it was also claimed that these have been solved. Recent
presentations at international conferences indicate that Ceres
Power Ltd. will switch from producing a completely ceria-based elec-
trolyte to an electrolyte consisting of a thin zirconia-based electro-
lyte (electron blocking) and a thicker ceria electrolyte.
From a publication by Huijsmans et al.365 it is also evident that
the Netherlands Energy Research Foundation (ECN) has upscaled
planar SOFCs with a Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 electrolyte and that these cells
have been evaluated in the Sulzer Hexis concept.
Based on a number of publications it is clear that the National
Research Council of Canada (NRC) has a very ambitious initiative for
SOFCs with ceria-based electrolytes.342,351,354,366–369 Most of the studies
have focused on metal-supported (Hastelloy) SOFCs and a few of
them have used traditional cermet structures. It is interesting to notice
that even though the NRC clearly are aware of the internal shorting of
the cells342 a strategy for handling this has not been presented.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 701
12.6.1 Oxygen
Oxygen is an important industrial gas annually produced in large
quantities (100 million tonnes/year).391 Typically, production takes
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 703
exchange process on the two surfaces is fast the flux through the
membrane is given by:
ln(aO2 ') s is e
J O2 =
RT
2 Úln(a '')
16 F L O2 si + se
d ln aO2 ( ) (12.42)
RT 1
r = (12.43)
4 F 2 C 0 k0
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 705
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 707
Table 12.5 Characteristics of the three membrane applications shown in Fig. 12.20
and examples of ceria-based membrane materials considered for each specific
application.
Application Oxyfuel three end Oxyfuel four end Syngas
High pO2 5–20 bar 0.2–20 bar 0.2 bar
Low pO2 1 mbar–1 bar 30 mbar 10−19 bar
CO2, sulfur Not required Required Required
tolerance
Single-phase Ce1−yPryO2−x, Ce1−yPryO2−x, Ce1−yGdyO2−y/2
ceria system Ce1−yTbyO2−x, Ce1−yTbyO2−x, Ce1−ySmyO2−y/2
Ce1−y−zPryGdzO2−z/2−x Ce1−y−zPryGdzO2−z/2−x
Composite Ce1−yGdyO2−y/2– Ce1−yGdyO2−y/2– Ce1−yGdyO2−y/2–
systems (La, Sr)MnO3 (La, Sr)MnO3 (La, Sr)CrO3
Ce1−yGdyO2−y/2– Ce1−yGdyO2−y/2–
MnFe2O4 MnFe2O4
Ce1−yGdyO2−y/2–
(La, Sr)CoO3
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 709
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 711
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 713
Composite membranes
Instead of requiring high mixed conductivity of the membrane
material one could achieve high permeability by combining a good
714
Table 12.6 Recorded membrane performances of a range of different materials involving ceria.
Flux (µmol. T
Materials Geometry L (µm) cm−2⋅s−1) (°C) Gas pO2′/pO2″ Ref.
Composite membranes
b1469
1 Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9– Disk 600 0.08 950 air/He 430
La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 0.21/0.01
2 Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9– Disk 1000 0.040 950 air/He 426
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes
Mn0.5CO1.5Ni0.5O4 Planar 300 7 air/Ar,CH4 air/
Ce0.9Sm0.1O1.95– 300 6 1000 Ar,CH4
b1469
MnFe2O4 140 10 air/Ar,CH4
8 Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9– Disk 500 0.55d 950 0.21/0.005 425
715
4/8/2013 12:41:02 PM
(Continued )
b1469_Ch-12.indd 716
716
Table 12.6 (Continued )
Flux (µmol. T
Materials Geometry L (µm) cm−2⋅s−1) (°C) Gas pO2′/pO2″ Ref.
Redox active dopants
b1469
15 Ce0.6Zr0.2Pr0.2O2−x Disk 1000 0.005 700 air/He 266
0.015 950 0.21/10−4
(Continued )
4/8/2013 12:41:02 PM
b1469_Ch-12.indd 717
Flux (µmol. T
Materials Geometry L (µm) cm−2⋅s−1) (°C) Gas pO2′/pO2″ Ref.
Redox active dopants + Co
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes
20 Ce0.8Pr0.2O2−x + 2% Co Disk 1000 0.02 j 700 0.21/0.021 429
0.04 800 0.21/0.021
b1469
0.06 850 0.21/0.021
0.08 950 0.21/0.021
717
4/8/2013 12:41:02 PM
i
In this study porous electrodes were present on both membrane surfaces to enhance surface exchange kinetics.
j
Note that this value is an extrapolated estimate. The temperature interval in the experimental study is 700–850 °C.
b1469 Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 719
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 721
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 723
Effect of adding Co
Numerous studies exist on the possibility of enhancing electronic
conductivity even further in these compounds by the addition of
Co.180,270,428 Co is known to be a very effective sintering aid to
ceria180,428 capable of reducing the sintering temperatures from
around 1500 °C to around 1000 °C. The solubility limit of Co in ceria
may be as low as 0.5%;446 however, usually more Co than this is used
(~ 2%).270,271,429 It is by now fairly well established that the excess Co
forms an electronically conducting phase along the grain boundaries
enhancing the p-type electronic conductivity in the samples.270,429,446
In a study of Ce1−yPryO2−x (CPO) (20% Pr) with the addition of
0, 2, or 5% Co, Fagg268 found that the average p-type conductivity
was enhanced by the addition of 2% Co from ca. 0.018 S.cm−1 to
0.061 S⋅cm−1 at 950 °C when assessed between 1 to 0.2 atm of oxygen
partial pressure (EMF method). At 700 °C the addition of Co
increased the electronic conductivity from 0.02 to 0.04 S⋅cm−1. An
addition of 2% does not penalize the ionic conductivity whereas the
addition of 5% Co results in reduced ionic conductivity without
enhancing the electronic conductivity any further. Schmale et al.270
studied the effect of adding 2% Co to the electronic transport prop-
erties of Gd/Pr-doped ceria. The p-type conductivity increased with
Pr content over the series Ce0.8Gd0,2−yPryO2−x (y = 0.05, 0.1, 0.15). For
the Gd-rich sample a significant increase in electronic conductivity
was observed over the entire pO2 range studied from log pO2 = −0.6
to log pO2 = −13 at 700 °C, 750 °C, and 800 °C, i.e. an increase both
in the n-type region and the p-type region. For the Pr-rich sample,
Co increased the electronic conductivity over the entire pO2 range
only at 800 °C, whereas at 750 °C and 700 °C the electronic conduc-
tivity was enhanced at low pO2 (log pO2 < −7.5) but reduced at high
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 725
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 727
(10−5 < pO2 < 0.2 atm) significant fluxes have been measured on com-
posite systems. Doping with Pr or Pr/Gd and addition of Co also
seems a very promising route, but so far nobody has reported flux
measurements on thin-film systems with these materials. The advan-
tage over the alternative perovskite-based membranes is the high
chemical stability of ceria, which will not form carbonates when
exposed to CO2 and is likely to show better tolerance to pollutants.
Oxidation of hydrocarbons:
Cx H y + (2x - 2 )O2- Æ x CO2 + 2 H2O + (4x + y)e-
y y
(12.46)
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 729
In all energy systems there are inherent losses in the energy con-
version process. This is naturally also valid for SOFCs where energy
is required to overcome kinetic barriers especially at the electrodes.
These losses are usually termed the overpotential, which is by defini-
tion the difference between the actual electrode potential at a given
current and the equilibrium (zero current) electrode potential, i.e.
the extra potential that must be applied to cause an electrode reac-
tion at a certain rate. It should be noted that the SOFC literature
often refers to the electrode polarization resistance instead of speci-
fying the reaction rate, because for SOFCs there is an approximately
linear relation between current density (reaction rate) and overpo-
tential. It is important during the reading of this section to bear in
mind that a low polarization resistance is equivalent to a high reac-
tion rate.
An electrode reaction may be anodic (oxidation) or cathodic
(reduction) depending on the sign of the overpotential with respect
to the equilibrium potential of the electrode. In Fig. 12.15, each of
the two electrodes and their associated half-cell reactions requires
their own specialized electrocatalyst. The simplest definition of an
electrocatalyst might be that it is a catalyst that participates in elec-
trochemical reactions. However, some catalysts that operate through
electrochemical reactions are not regarded as electrocatalysts.
These are the so-called Mars–van Krevelen type of catalysts449,450
where both anodic and cathodic reactions take place in parallel on
the surfaces of the catalysts. This means that these catalysts need not
be part of the electrochemical cell. The electrical potential of the
catalyst in this case is a mixed potential, the value of which is deter-
mined by the reaction conditions, and it is in general not known or
measured. Thus, a definition of an electrocatalyst as a catalyst that
participates in electrochemical reactions in electrodes of electro-
chemical cells seems more in line with the actual use of the term. It
should be further stressed that in electrocatalysis the equilibrium of
a reaction can be shifted by varying the potential of the electrode,
which is not possible in heterogeneous catalysis.
Great care should therefore be exercised when data from the
catalytic literature relating to the Mars–van Krevelen type of catalysts
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 731
Figure 12.21 (left) The triple-phase boundaries (circled areas) in an SOFC with
composite electrodes. (right) If using mixed ionic and electronic conducting
(MIEC) electrodes the reactions can in principle be spread out over a larger sur-
face as indicated by the outlined particles.
for commercial use. LSM has been used due to its compatibility, or
low-level reactivity, with YSZ electrolytes and due to its similar coef-
ficient of thermal expansion to YSZ. In spite of the differences in
material properties, the two types of electrode have some common
features, one being the composite nature of the electrodes with the
electrochemical reactions taking place near the TPB. LSM is an
oxide with a perovskite structure and it has high electronic conduc-
tivity, which confines the reduction of oxygen to O2− close to the
TPB. LSM is therefore analogous to Ni in the anode, being the
electrocatalyst (for the O2 reduction) and the electronic
conductor.451,452
Despite the relative success of using Ni–YSZ cermets as the
anode and LSM–YSZ composites as the cathode in SOFCs, these
electrodes suffer from several drawbacks. Below is a selection of
some of these shortcomings:
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 733
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 735
the actual reactions take place.463 However, it has proven very diffi-
cult to find a single material that fulfils all the requirements of a fuel
electrode.464 For the air electrode the situation is quite different.
There are a number of materials that have been explored in the
literature for this purpose and there exist numerous publications on
this topic. It is not our intention to review these materials here so
the interested reader is referred to recent publications and review
articles on this topic (see e.g. the works451,452,457,465 and references
therein).
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 737
æ
Cx H y ¨
æÆ x C + y H2 (12.47)
2
æ
H2 + O2a ¨
æÆ H2O + 2e- (12.48)
C + 2O 2 - ¨
æ
æÆ CO2 + 4e- (12.49)
æ
H2 O + C ¨
æÆ CO + H2 (12.50)
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 739
æ
CO2 + C ¨
æÆ 2CO (12.51)
æ
Cx H y + xH2O ¨
æÆ x CO + x + y H2
2 ( ) (12.52)
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 741
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 743
æ
Ce2O3 + H2S ¨
æÆ Ce2O2S + H2O (12.53)
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 745
æ
CO + H2O ¨
æÆ CO2 + H2 (12.54)
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 747
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 749
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 751
2 (12.55)
x ∑∑ ∑∑
OO,YSZ + VO,YSZ x
Æ OO,ceria + VO,YSZ (12.56)
æ
H2 + 2OxO,ceria + 2CexCe ¨
æÆ 2OO,ceria H ∑ + 2CeCe
¢ (12.57)
æ
2OO,ceria H ∑ ¨
æÆ OxO,ceria + H 2O(g)+ VO,ceria
∑∑
(12.58)
¢ ¨
2CeCe æ
Æ 2CexCe + 2e-
æ (12.59)
two common surface facets, (110) with (111), suggests that the less
stable (110) surface, compared to (111), is the most energetically
favorable ceria surface for H2 oxidation.128 One reason for this could
be that oxygen vacancies have a lower formation energy on the
(110) surface compared with the (111) surface.126 Similar trends in
surface reactivity have been observed for the oxidation of CO on
various ceria surfaces.123 Experimental studies in heterogeneous
catalysis have shown that CeO2 (100) surfaces are more active than
CeO2 (111) surfaces for CO oxidation.558–60 It has been suggested
that the interaction of CO with ceria surfaces to form CO2 is:123,557
æ
CO + OxO,ceria + 2CexCe ¨
æÆ CO2 + VO,ceria
∑∑
+ 2CeCe
¢ (12.60)
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 753
regarding these issues refer to e.g. Knapp and Ziegler.557 Their calcu-
lations demonstrate that methane can be dissociated on ceria (111)
surfaces without the adsorption of carbon and the subsequent for-
mation of coke. The abstraction of the first hydrogen atom from the
methane molecule was shown to be a rate-limiting step, with the
creation of a methyl (*CH3) radical in the gas phase and a hydrogen
atom on the surface (on top of a surface oxide ion on the ceria (111)
surface) being the most probable path. The adsorption of a hydro-
gen atom also leads to reduction of one neighboring cerium ion:
æ
CH4 + OxO,ceria + 2CexCe ¨
æÆ * CH3 + OO,ceria H· + CeCe
′
(12.61)
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 755
In general, the factors that can sustain the activity and stability
of ceria-based electrocatalysts in SOFCs seem to be: (i) the flux of
oxide ions through the electrolyte (indirectly from the reduction of
O2 to 2O2− at the cathode); (ii) the release of lattice oxide ions
from the ceria phase (related to the surface exchange coefficient);
(iii) the microstructure of the electrode (electrocatalysts) or the
microstructure of the supporting backbone for infiltrated electro-
catalysts; (iv) current collection or electronic conductivity of the
backbone structure and to some extent in the ceria phase as well.
From the literature it is clear that nano-structured ceria has sev-
eral advantages over similar microcrystalline materials. In SOFC
applications, resistance to impurities such as sulfur, and resistance to
carbon formation when hydrocarbons are used as fuel, have been
reported. The high density of surface defects in nanostructured
materials provides a large number of active sites for various surface
interactions and surface exchange processes. There are clearly inter-
esting features in nano-sized ceria compounds that need further
exploration. The possibility of minimizing pretreatment and water
vapor partial pressure in e.g. the natural gas feed due to lower sus-
ceptibility to coke formation of ceria containing fuel electrodes
(anodes), may simplify the fuel cell system.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by the Danish Agency for Science,
Technology and Innovation through the Strategic Electrochemistry
Research Center (www.serc.dk, contract 2104–06–0011), Catalysis
for Sustainable Energy (www.case.dtu.dk) and the Department of
Energy Conversion and Storage. Financial support from the EU
project METSOFC (FP7-211940) is also gratefully acknowledged.
References
1. Minh, N.Q., Takahashi, T., Science and Technology of Ceramic Fuel Cells,
Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, (1995).
2. Baur, E., Preis, H., Z. Elktrochem. Angew. P, 43 (1937) 727–732.
3. Kröger, F.A., Vink, H.J., Solid State Phys., 3 (1956) 273–301.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 757
27. Keler, E.K., Godina, N.A., Kalinina, A.M., Zh. Neorgan. Khim. Mosc., 1
(1956) 2557.
28. Eguchi, K., Setoguchi, T., Inoue, T., Arai, H., Solid State Ionics, 52
(1992) 165–172.
29. Christiansen, B.Z., Jacobsen, T., Skaarup, S., Solid State Ionics, 86–88
(1996) 725–731.
30. Ranlov, J., Poulsen, F., Mogensen, M., Solid State Ionics, 61 (1993)
277–279.
31. Sirman, J.D., Waller, D., Kilner, J.A., Electrochem. Soc. Proc., (1997) 1159.
32. Yokokawa, H., J. Phase Equilib., 20 (1999) 258–287.
33. Mogensen, G., Mogensen, M., Thermochim. Acta, 214 (1993) 47–50.
34. Yasuda, I., Hishinuma, M., in Proceedings of the 4th International
Symposium on Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, eds. M. Dokiya, O. Yamamoto, H.
Tagawa, S.C., Singhal, The Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ,
(1995), p. 924.
35. Chen, X., Yu, J., Adler, S., Chem. Mater., 17 (2005) 4537–4546.
36. Hendriksen, P.V., Carter, J.D., Mogensen, M., in Proceedings of the 4th
International Symposium on Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, eds. M. Dokiya, O.
Yamamoto, H. Tagawa, S.C., Singhal, The Electrochemical Society,
Pennington, NJ (1995), p. 934.
37. Dawicke, J.W., Blumenthal, R.N., J. Electrochem. Soc., 133 (1986)
904–909.
38. Bevan, D.J.M., Kordis, J., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 26 (1964) 1509–1523.
39. Panlener, R.J., Blumenthal, R.N., Garnier, J.E., J. Phys. Chem. Sol., 36
(1975) 1213–1222.
40. Wagner, C., in Progress in Solid State Chemistry, eds. J.O. McCaldin, G.
Somorjai, Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York, (1975), p. 3.
41. Nowick, A.S., in Diffusion in Crystalline Solids, eds. G.E. Murch, A.S.
Nowick, Academic Press, New York, (1984), p. 143.
42. Schneider, D., Godickemeier, M., Gauckler, L.J., J. Electroceram., 1
(1997) 165–172.
43. Bishop, S.R., Duncan, K.L., Wachsman, E.D., Electrochim. Acta, 54
(2009) 1436–1443.
44. Campserveux, J., Gerdanian, P., J. Chem. Thermodyn., 6 (1974)
795–800.
45. Tuller, H.L., Nowick, A.S., J. Phys. Chem. Sol., 38 (1977) 859–867.
46. Tuller, H.L., Nowick, A.S., J. Electrochem. Soc., 126 (1979) 209–217.
47. Ling, S., Phys. Rev. B, 49 (1994) 864–880.
48. Bevan, D.J.M., J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1 (1955) 49–56.
49. Zhang, J., Kang, Z.C., Eyring, L., J. Alloy Compd., 192 (1993) 57–63.
50. Kang, Z.C., Eyring, L., J. Alloy Compd., 249 (1997) 206–212.
51. Kümmerle, E.A., Heger, G., J. Solid State Chem., 147 (1999) 485–500.
52. Kümmerle, E.A., Güthoff, F., Schweika, W., Heger, G., J. Solid State
Chem., 153 (2000) 218–230.
53. Zinkevich, M., Djurovic, D., Aldinger, F., Solid State Ionics, 177 (2006)
989–1001.
54. Rezukhina, T.N., Lavrentiev, V.I., Levitskii, V.A., Kuznetsov, F.A., Zh.
Fiz. Khim., 35 (1961) 1367–1369.
55. Markin, T.L., Bones, R.J., Wheeler, V.J., Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc., 8
(1967) 51.
56. Iwasaki, B., Katsura, T., B. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 44 (1971) 1297–1301.
57. Sorensen, O.T., J. Solid State Chem., 18 (1976) 217–233.
58. Sorensen, O.T., J. Therm. Anal., 13 (1978) 429–437.
59. Touzelin, B., J. Nucl. Mater., 101 (1981) 92–99.
60. Riess, I., Janczikowski, H., Nölting, J., J. Appl. Phys., 61 (1987)
4931–4393.
61. Panhans, M.A., Blumenthal, R.N., Solid State Ionics, 60 (1993)
279–298.
62. Greener, E.H., Wimmer, J.M., Hirthe, W.M., Rare Earth Research III,
Gordan and Breach Inc., New York, (1964).
63. Naik, I.K., Tien, T.Y., J. Phys. Chem. Sol., 39 (1978) 311–315.
64. Kofstad, P., Nonstoichiometry, Diffusion and Electrical Conductivity in
Binary Metal Oxides, Wiley-Interscience, New York, (1972).
65. Koelling, D.D., Boring, A.M., Wood, J.H., Solid State Commun., 47
(1983) 227–232.
66. Wuilloud, E., Delley, B., Schneider, W.D., Baer, Y., J. Magn. Magn.
Mater., 47–48 (1985) 197–199.
67. Allen, J.W., J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 47–48 (1985) 168–174.
68. Park, J.H., Blumenthal, R.N., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 71 (1988) C462–463.
69. Nakamura, A., J. Nucl. Mater., 201 (1993) 17–26.
70. Duncan, K.L., Wang, Y., Bishop, S.R., Ebrahimi, F., Wachsman, E.D.,
J. Appl. Phys., 101 (2007) 044906.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 759
92. Vanderlaan, G., Fuggle, J.C., Vandijk, M.P., Burggraaf, A.J., Esteva, J.M.,
Karnatak, R., J. Phys. Chem. Sol., 47 (1986) 413–416.
93. Martinez-Arias, A., Hungria, A.B., Fernandez-Garcia, M., Iglesias-Juez, A.,
Conesa, J.C., Mather, G.C., Munuera, G., J. Power Sources, 151 (2005)
43–51.
94. Fernandez-Garcia, M., Wang, X.Q., Belver, C., Iglesias-Juez, A.,
Hanson, J.C., Rodriguez, J.A., Chem. Mater., 17 (2005) 4181–4193.
95. Borchert, H., Frolova, Y.V., Kaichev, V.V., Prosvirin, I.P., Alikina, G.M.,
Lukashevich, A.I., Zaikovskii, V.I., Moroz, E.M., Trukhan, S.N.,
Ivanov, V.P., Paukshtis, E.A., Bukhtiyarov, V.I., Sadykov, V.A., J. Phys.
Chem. B, 109 (2005) 5728–5738.
96. Lin, X., Yan, S., Zhu, L., Li, L., Su, W., Acta Chim. Sinica, 67 (2009)
1389–1394.
97. Knauth, P., Tuller, H.L., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 19 (1999) 831–836.
98. Fagg, D.P., Marozau, I.P., Shaula, A.L., Kharton, V.V., Frade, J.R.,
J. Solid State Chem., 179 (2006) 3347–3356.
99. Chatzichristodoulou, C., Hendriksen, P.V., J. Electrochem. Soc., 157
(2010) B481–489.
100. Bishop, S.R., Stefanik, T.S., Tuller, H.L., PCCP, 13 (2011)
10165–10173.
101. Wang, X.Q., Hanson, J.C., Rodriguez, J.A., Belver, C., Fernandez-
Garcia, M., J. Chem. Phys., 122 (2005) 154711.
102. Fagg, D.P., Frade, J.R., Kharton, V.V., Marozau, I.P., J. Solid State Chem.,
179 (2006) 1469–1477.
103. Hungria, A.B., Martinez-Arias, A., Fernandez-Garcia, M., Iglesias-Juez,
A., Guerrero-Ruiz, A., Calvino, J.J., Conesa, J.C., Soria, J., Chem. Mater.,
15 (2003) 4309–4316.
104. Sakai, N., Yamaji, K., Horita, T., Yokokawa, H., Hirata, Y., Sameshima, S.,
Nigara, Y., Mizusaki, J., Solid State Ionics, 125 (1999) 325–331.
105. Sakai, N., Yamaji, K., Xiong, Y.P., Kishimoto, H., Horita, T.,
Yokokawa, H., J. Electroceram., 13 (2004) 677–682.
106. Yokokawa, H., Horita, T., Sakai, N., Yamaji, K., Brito, M.E., Xiong, Y.,
Kishimoto, H., Solid State Ionics, 177 (2006) 1705–1714.
107. Kim, S., Merkle, R., Maier, J., Solid State Ionics, 161 (2003) 113–119.
108. Yao, H.C., Yao, Y.F.Y., J. Catal., 86 (1984) 254–265.
109. Johnson, M.F.L., Mooi, J., J. Catal., 103 (1987) 502–505.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 761
110. Bernal, S., Calvino, J.J., Cifredo, G.A., Gatica, J.M., Omil, J.A.P.,
Pintado, J.M., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday T., 89 (1993) 3499–3505.
111. Zimmer, P., Tschöpe, A., Birringer, R., J. Catal., 205 (2002) 339–345.
112. Tschöpe, A., J. Electroceram., 14 (2005) 5–23.
113. Trudeau, M.L., Tschöpe, A., Ying, J.Y., Surf. Interface Anal., 23 (1995)
219–226.
114. Tschöpe, A., Birringer, R., Nanostruct. Mater., 9 (1997) 591–594.
115. Porat, O., Tuller, H.L., Lavik, E.B., Chiang, Y.M., Mat. Res. S. C, 457
(1997) 99–103.
116. Janvier, C., Pijolat, M., Valdivieso, F., Soustelle, M., Solid State Ionics,
127 (2000) 207–222.
117. Chiang, Y.M., Lavik, E.B., Kosacki, I., Tuller, H.L., Ying, J.Y., J. Electroceram.,
1 (1997) 7–14.
118. Hwang, J.H., Mason, T.O., Z. Phys. Chem., 207 (1998) 21–38.
119. Kim, S., Fleig, J., Maier, J., Elec. Soc. S., 2001 (2002) 208–217.
120. Kim, S., Merkle, R., Maier, J., Surf. Sci., 549 (2004) 196–202.
121. Suzuki, T., Kosacki, I., Anderson, H.U., Colomban, P., J. Am. Ceram.
Soc., 84 (2001) 2007–2014.
122. Kosacki, I., Suzuki, T., Anderson, H.U., Colomban, P., Solid State Ionics,
149 (2002) 99–105.
123. Sayle, T.X.T., Parker, S.C., Catlow, C.R.A., Surf. Sci., 316 (1994)
329–336.
124. Conesa, J.C., Surf. Sci., 339 (1995) 337–352.
125. Yang, Z.X., Woo, T.K., Baudin, M., Hermansson, K., J. Chem. Phys., 120
(2004) 7741–7749.
126. Fabris, S., Vicario, G., Balducci, G., de Gironcoli, S., Baroni, S., J. Phys.
Chem. B, 109 (2005) 22860–22867.
127. Nolan, M., Fearon, J.E., Watson, G.W., Solid State Ionics, 177 (2006)
3069–3074.
128. Chen, H.T., Choi, Y.M., Liu, M.L., Lin, M.C., Chemphyschem, 8 (2007)
849–855.
129. Bernal, S., Blanco, G., Cauqui, M.A., Corchado, P., Pintado, J.M.,
Rodriguez-Izquierdo, J.M., Chem. Commun., 16 (1997) 1545–1546.
130. Mista, W., Rayment, T., Hanuza, J., Macalik, L., Mater. Sci., 22 (2004)
153–170.
131. Zhao, M., Shen, M., Wang, J., J. Catal., 248 (2007) 258–267.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 763
177. Li, G.S., Mao, Y.C., Li, L.P., Feng, S.H., Wang, M.Q., Yao, X., Chem.
Mater., 11 (1999) 1259–1266.
178. Tian, C.Y., Chan, S.W., Solid State Ionics, 134 (2000) 89–102.
179. Shemilt, J.E., Stanway, C.L., Williams, H.M., Solid State Ionics, 134
(2000) 111–117.
180. Kleinlogel, C.M., Gauckler, L.J., J. Electroceram., 5 (2000) 231–243.
181. Zhan, Z.L., Wen, T.L., Tu, H.Y., Lu, Z.Y., J. Electrochem. Soc., 148 (2001)
A427–432.
182. Li, L.P., Lin, X.M., Li, G.S., Inomata, H., J. Mater. Res., 16 (2001)
3207–3213.
183. Zhou, X.D., Huebner, W., Kosacki, I., Anderson, H.U., J. Am. Ceram.
Soc., 85 (2002) 1757–1762.
184. Zhang, T.S., Zeng, Z.Q., Huang, H.T., Hing, P., Kilner, J., Mater. Lett.,
57 (2002) 124–129.
185. Zhang, T.S., Hing, P., Huang, H.T., Kilner, J., Solid State Ionics, 148
(2002) 567–573.
186. Zhang, T.S., Ma, J., Huang, H.T., Hing, P., Xia, Z.T., Chan, S.H.,
Kilner, J.A., Solid State Sci., 5 (2003) 1505–1511.
187. Zhang, T.S., Kong, L.B., Zeng, Z.Q., Huang, H.T., Hing, P., Xia, Z.T.,
Kilner, J., J. Solid State Electr., 7 (2003) 348–354.
188. Jung, G.B., Huang, T.J., J. Mater. Sci., 38 (2003) 2461–2468.
189. Perez-Coll, D., Nunez, P., Frade, J.R., Abrantes, J.C.C., Electrochim.
Acta, 48 (2003) 1551–1557.
190. Guo, X., Waser, R., Prog. Mater. Sci., 51 (2006) 151–210.
191. Guo, X., Sigle, W., Maier, J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 86 (2003) 77–87.
192. Blumenthal, R.N., Brugner, F.S., Garnier, J.E., J. Electrochem. Soc., 120
(1973) 1230–1237.
193. Kudo, T., Obayashi, H., J. Electrochem. Soc., 123 (1976) 415–419.
194. Wang, D.Y., Park, D.S., Griffith, J., Nowick, A.S., Solid State Ionics, 2
(1981) 95–105.
195. Gerhardt-Anderson, R., Nowick, A.S., Solid State Ionics, 5 (1981) 547–550.
196. Arai, H., Kunisaki, T., Shimizu, Y., Seiyama, T., Solid State Ionics, 20
(1986) 241–248.
197. Yahiro, H., Eguchi, K., Arai, H., Solid State Ionics, 21 (1986) 37–47.
198. Yahiro, H., Ohuchi, T., Eguchi, K., Arai, H., J. Mater. Sci., 23 (1988)
1036–1041.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 765
199. Yahiro, H., Eguchi, Y., Eguchi, K., Arai, H., J. Appl. Electrochem., 18
(1988) 527–531.
200. Yahiro, H., Eguchi, K., Arai, H., Solid State Ionics, 36 (1989) 71–75.
201. Faber, J., Geoffroy, C., Roux, A., Sylvestre, A., Abelard, P., Appl. Phys.
A: Mater., 49 (1989) 225–232.
202. Balazs, G.B., Glass, R.S., Solid State Ionics, 76 (1995) 155–162.
203. Tsoga, A., Naoumidis, A., Stover, D., Solid State Ionics, 135 (2000)
403–409.
204. Wang, S.R., Kobayashi, T., Dokiya, M., Hashimoto, T., J. Electrochem.
Soc., 147 (2000) 3606–3609.
205. Katsuki, M., Wang, S.R., Yasumoto, K., Dokiya, M., Solid State Ionics,
154 (2002) 589–595.
206. Yashiro, K., Onuma, S., Kaimai, A., Nigara, Y., Kawada, T., Mizusaki, J.,
Kawamura, K., Horita, T., Yokokawa, H., Solid State Ionics, 152 (2002)
469–476.
207. Omar, S., Wachsman, E.D., Nino, J.C., Solid State Ionics, 178 (2008)
1890–1897.
208. Omar, S., Wachsman, E.D., Jones, J.L., Nino, J.C., J. Am. Ceram. Soc.,
92 (2009) 2674–2681.
209. Ding, D., Liu, B., Gong, M., Liu, X., Xia, C., Electrochim. Acta, 55
(2010) 4529–4535.
210. Li, B., Liu, Y., Wei, X., Pan, W., J. Power Sources, 195 (2010) 969–976.
211. Yashima, M., Takizawa, T., J. Phys. Chem. C, 114 (2010) 2385–2392.
212. Yang, F., Zhao, X., Xiao, P., J. Power Sources, 196 (2011) 4943–4949.
213. Yao, H., Zhang, Y., Liu, J., Li, Y., Wang, J., Li, Z., Mater. Res. Bull., 46
(2011) 75–80.
214. Kilner, J.A., Waters, C.D., Solid State Ionics, 6 (1982) 253–259.
215. Kilner, J.A., Brook, R.J., Solid State Ionics, 6 (1982) 237–252.
216. Steele, B.C.H., Solid State Ionics, 129 (2000) 95–110.
217. Kilner, J.A., Solid State Ionics, 8 (1983) 201–207.
218. Wang, F., Wan, B., Cheng, S., J. Solid State Electr., 9 (2005) 168–173.
219. Omar, S., Wachsman, E.D., Nino, J.C., Solid State Ionics, 177 (2006)
3199–3203.
220. Xu, H., Yan, H., Chen, Z., Solid State Sci., 10 (2008) 1179–1184.
221. Kumar, V.P., Reddy, Y.S., Kistaiah, P., Prasad, G., Reddy, C.V., Mater.
Chem. Phys., 112 (2008) 711–718.
222. Guan, X., Zhou, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., J. Alloy Compd., 464 (2008)
310–316.
223. Liu, Y., Li, B., Wei, X., Pan, W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 91 (2008)
3926–3930.
224. Zheng, Y., Wu, L., Gu, H., Gao, L., Chen, H., Guo, L., J. Alloy Compd.,
486 (2009) 586–589.
225. Yamamura, H., Katoh, E., Ichikawa, M., Kakinuma, K., Mori, T.,
Haneda, H., Electrochemistry, 68 (2000) 455–459.
226. Yamamura, H., Katoh, E., Kakinuma, K., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn., 110 (2002)
1021–1024.
227. Butler, V., Catlow, C.R.A., Fender, B.E.F., Harding, J.H., Solid State
Ionics, 8 (1983) 109–113.
228. Minervini, L., Zacate, M.O., Grimes, R.W., Solid State Ionics, 116 (1999)
339–349.
229. Andersson, D.A., Simak, S.I., Skorodumova, N.V., Abrikosov, I.A.,
Johansson, B., P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103 (2006) 3518–3521.
230. Wei, X., Pan, W., Cheng, L., Li, B., Solid State Ionics, 180 (2009) 13–17.
231. Frayret, C., Villesuzanne, A., Pouchard, M., Mauvy, F., Bassat, J.,
Grenier, J., J. Phys. Chem. C, 114 (2010) 19062–19076.
232. Dholabhai, P.P., Adams, J.B., Crozier, P., Sharma, R., J. Chem. Phys., 132
(2010) 094104.
233. Fuda, K., Kishio, K., Yamauchi, S., Fueki, K., Onoda, Y., J. Phys. Chem.
Sol., 45 (1984) 1253–1257.
234. Navrotsky, A., J. Mater. Chem., 20 (2010) 10577–10587.
235. Avila-Paredes, H.J., Shvareva, T., Chen, W., Navrotsky, A., Kim, S.,
PCCP, 11 (2009) 8580–8585.
236. Li, H.B., Xia, C.R., Zhu, M.H., Zhou, Z.X., Meng, G.Y., Acta Mater., 54
(2006) 721–727.
237. Esposito, V., Traversa, E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 91 (2008) 1037–1051.
238. Mori, T., Drennan, J., Wang, Y.R., Lee, J.H., Li, J.G., Ikegami, T.,
J. Electrochem. Soc., 150 (2003) A665–673.
239. Mori, T., Wang, Y.R., Drennan, J., Auchterlonie, G., Li, J.G., Ikegami,
T., Solid State Ionics, 175 (2004) 641–649.
240. Ou, D.R., Mori, T., Ye, F., Takahashi, M., Zou, J., Drennan, J., Acta
Mater., 54 (2006) 3737–3746.
241. Ye, F., Mori, T., Ou, D.R., Takahashi, M., Zou, J., Drennan, J.,
J. Electrochem. Soc., 154 (2007) B180–185.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 767
242. Ou, D.R., Mori, T., Ye, F., Zou, J., Auchterlonie, G., Drennan, J.,
J. Electrochem. Soc., 154 (2007) B616–622.
243. Mori, T., Kobayashi, T., Wang, Y., Drennan, J., Nishimura, T., Li, J.G.,
Kobayashi, H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 88 (2005) 1981–1984.
244. Ye, F., Mori, T., Ou, D.R., Zou, J., Auchterlonie, G., Drennan, J.,
J. Appl. Phys., 101 (2007) 113528.
245. Li, Z., Mori, T., Auchterlonie, G.J., Zou, J., Drennan, J., Appl. Phys.
Lett., 98 (2011) 093104.
246. Deguchi, H., Yoshida, H., Inagaki, T., Horiuchi, M., Solid State Ionics,
176 (2005) 1817–1825.
247. McCullough, J., Britton, J., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 74 (1952) 5225–5227.
248. Ralph, J.M., Kilner, J.A., in Proceedings of the 2nd European SOFC Forum,
ed. B. Thorstensen, European Fuel Cell Forum Oberrohrdorf,
Switzerland, (1996), p. 773.
249. Zhang, T., Ma, J., Kong, L., Chan, S., Kilner, J., Solid State Ionics, 170
(2004) 209–217.
250. Levy, M., Fouletier, J., Solid State Ionics, 12 (1984) 467–472.
251. Xiong, Y., Yamaji, K., Kishimoto, H., Brito, M.E., Horita, T.,
Yokokawa, H., J. Electrochem. Soc., 155 (2008) B1300–1306.
252. Xiong, Y.P., Yamaji, K., Horita, T., Sakai, N., Yokokawa, H., J. Electrochem.
Soc., 151 (2004) A407–412.
253. Shimonosono, T., Hirata, Y., Ehira, Y., Sameshima, S., Horita, T.,
Yokokawa, H., Solid State Ionics, 174 (2004) 27–33.
254. Perez-Coll, D., Aguadero, A., Nunez, P., Frade, J.R., Int. J. Hydrogen
Energ., 35 (2010) 11448–11455.
255. Navarro, I., Marques, F., Frade, J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 144 (1997)
267–273.
256. Matsui, T., Minoru, I., Mineshige, A., Ogumi, Z., Solid State Ionics, 176
(2005) 647–654.
257. Gorelov, V.P., Balakireva, V.B., Yaroslavtsev, I.Y., Kazantsev, V.A.,
Vaganov, E.G., Russ. J. Electrochem., 43 (2007) 888–893.
258. Takasu, Y., Sugino, T., Matsuda, Y., J. Appl. Electrochem., 14 (1984)
79–81.
259. Nauer, M., Ftikos, C., Steele, B., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 14 (1994) 493–499.
260. Huang, W., Shuk, P., Greenblatt, M., Solid State Ionics, 113 (1998)
305–310.
261. Lübke, S., Wiemhöfer, H.D., Solid State Ionics, 117 (1999) 229–243.
262. Shuk, P., Greenblatt, M., Croft, M., Chem. Mater., 11 (1999) 473–479.
263. Shuk, P., Greenblatt, M., Solid State Ionics, 116 (1999) 217–223.
264. Kharton, V., Viskup, A., Figueiredo, F., Naumovich, E., Yaremchenko, A.,
Marques, F., Electrochim. Acta, 46 (2001) 2879–2889.
265. Stefanik, T., Tuller, H., Solid State Ionics, 756 (2003) 163–168.
266. Qi, X., Lin, Y., Holt, C., Swartz, S., J. Mater. Sci., 38 (2003)
1073–1079.
267. Fagg, D., Kharton, V., Shaula, A., Marozau, I., Frade, J., Solid State
Ionics, 176 (2005) 1723–1730.
268. Fagg, D.P., Garcia-Martin, S., Kharton, V.V., Frade, J.R., Chem. Mater.,
21 (2009) 381–391.
269. Chatzichristodoulou, C., Park, W., Kim, H., Hendriksen, P.V., Yoo, H.,
PCCP, 12 (2010) 9637–9649.
270. Schmale, K., Gruenebaum, M., Janssen, M., Baumann, S., Schulze-
Kueppers, F., Wiemhoefer, H., Phys. Stat. Sol. B, 248 (2011) 314–322.
271. Balaguer, M., Solis, C., Serra, J.M., Chem. Mater., 23 (2011) 2333–2343.
272. Chatzichristodoulou, C., Hendriksen, P.V., PCCP, 13 (2011)
21558–21572.
273. Park, W., Yang, I., Yoo, H.I., ECS Transactions, 13 (2008) 327–336.
274. Lee, H.B., Prinz, F.B., Cai, W., Acta Mater., 58 (2010) 2197–2206.
275. Göbel, M.C., Gregori, G., Maier, J., PCCP, 13 (2011) 10940–10945.
276. Yeh, T.C., Perry, N.H., Mason, T.O., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 94 (2011)
1073–1078.
277. Bonanos, N., Lilley, E., J. Phys. Chem. Sol., 42 (1981) 943–952.
278. Rodrigo, K., Heiroth, S., Lundberg, M., Bonanos, N., Kant, K.M.,
Pryds, N., Kuhn, L.T., Esposito, V., Linderoth, S., Schou, J., Lippert, T.,
Appl. Phys. A: Mater., 101 (2010) 601–607.
279. Suzuki, T., Kosacki, I., Anderson, H.U., Solid State Ionics, 151 (2002)
111–121.
280. Choi, S.H., Hwang, C.S., Lee, H., Kim, J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 156
(2009) B381–385.
281. Swanson, M., Tangtrakarn, N., Sunder, M., Moran, P.D., Solid State
Ionics, 181 (2010) 379–385.
282. Chiodelli, G., Malavasi, L., Massarotti, V., Mustarelli, P., Quartarone, E.,
Solid State Ionics, 176 (2005) 1505–1512.
283. Joo, J.H., Choi, G.M., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 27 (2007) 4273–4277.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 769
284. Huang, H., Gur, T.M., Saito, Y., Prinz, F., Appl. Phys. Lett., 89 (2006)
143107.
285. Beckel, D., Bieberle-Huetter, A., Harvey, A., Infortuna, A.,
Muecke, U.P., Prestat, M., Rupp, J.L.M., Gauckler, L.J., J. Power Sources,
173 (2007) 325–345.
286. Karthikeyan, A., Tsuchiya, M., Chang, C., Ramanathan, S., Appl. Phys.
Lett., 90 (2007) 263108.
287. Lee, W., Lee, M., Kim, Y., Prinz, F.B., Nanotechnology, 20 (2009) 445706.
288. Shirpour, M., Gregori, G., Merkle, R., Maier, J., PCCP, 13 (2011)
937–940.
289. Minh, N., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76 (1993) 563–588.
290. Appleby, A., Energy, 21 (1996) 521–653.
291. Ormerod, R., Chem. Soc. Rev., 32 (2003) 17–28.
292. Haile, S., Acta Mater., 51 (2003) 5981–6000.
293. Singhal, S.C., Kendall, K., High Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells:
Fundamentals, Design, and Applications, Elsevier Advanced Technology,
Oxford, (2003).
294. Fergus, J.W., J. Power Sources, 162 (2006) 30–40.
295. Brett, D.J.L., Atkinson, A., Brandon, N.P., Skinner, S.J., Chem. Soc. Rev.,
37 (2008) 1568–1578.
296. Jacobson, A.J., Chem. Mater., 22 (2010) 660–674.
297. Stiller, C., Thorud, B., Seljebo, S., Mathisen, O., Karoliussen, H.,
Bolland, O., J. Power Sources, 141 (2005) 227–240.
298. Singh, P., Minh, N.Q., Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Tec., 1 (2004) 5–15.
299. Singman, D., J. Electrochem. Soc., 113 (1966) 502–504.
300. Godickemeier, M., Gauckler, L.J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 145 (1998)
414–421.
301. Steele, B., Solid State Ionics, 134 (2000) 3–20.
302. Zhu, B., Yang, X., Xu, J., Zhu, Z., Ji, S., Sun, M., Sun, J., J. Power Sources,
118 (2003) 47–53.
303. Zhu, B., Liu, X., Zhu, Z., Ljungberg, R., Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., 33
(2008) 3385–3392.
304. Gao, Z., Huang, J., Mao, Z., Wang, C., Liu, Z., Int. J. Hydrogen Energ.,
35 (2010) 731–737.
305. Ma, Y., Wang, X., Li, S., Toprak, M.S., Zhu, B., Muhammed, M., Adv.
Mater., 22 (2010) 1640–1644.
306. Gardner, F., Day, M., Brandon, N., Pashley, M., Cassidy, M., J. Power
Sources, 86 (2000) 122–129.
307. George, R., J. Power Sources, 86 (2000) 134–139.
308. Agnew, G.D., Collins, R.D., Jorger, M., Pyke, S.H., Travis, R.P., SOFC-X,
7 (2007) 105–111.
309. Nagel, F.P., Schildhauer, T.J., Biollaz, S.M.A., Wokaun, A., J. Power
Sources, 184 (2008) 143–164.
310. Evans, A., Bieberle-Huetter, A., Rupp, J.L.M., Gauckler, L.J., J. Power
Sources, 194 (2009) 119–129.
311. Tucker, M.C., J. Power Sources, 195 (2010) 4570–4582.
312. Hibino, T., Hashimoto, A., Inoue, T., Tokuno, J., Yoshida, S., Sano, M.,
Science, 288 (2000) 2031–2033.
313. Shao, Z., Mederos, J., Chueh, W.C., Haile, S.M., J. Power Sources, 162
(2006) 589–596.
314. Kuhn, M., Napporn, T.W., Energies, 3 (2010) 57–134.
315. Takahashi, T., Ito, K., Iwahara, H., Electrochim. Acta, 12 (1967)
21–30.
316. Choudhury, N.S., Patterson, J.W., J. Electrochem. Soc., 118 (1971)
1398–1403.
317. Riess, I., J. Electrochem. Soc., 128 (1981) 2077–2081.
318. Riess, I., J. Phys. Chem. Sol., 47 (1986) 129–138.
319. Yuan, S., Pal, U., J. Electrochem. Soc., 143 (1996) 3214–3222.
320. Näfe, H., J. Appl. Electrochem., 31 (2001) 1235–1241.
321. Yoon, K.J., Huang, W., Ye, G., Gopalan, S., Pal, U.B., Seccombe, D.A.,
J. Electrochem. Soc., 154 (2007) B389–395.
322. Riess, I., Godickemeier, M., Gauckler, L., Solid State Ionics, 90 (1996)
91–104.
323. Godickemeier, M., Sasaki, K., Gauckler, L.J., Riess, I., J. Electrochem.
Soc., 144 (1997) 1635–1646.
324. Soral, P., Pal, U., Worrell, W., J. Electrochem. Soc., 145 (1998) 99–106.
325. Dalslet, B., Blennow, P., Hendriksen, P., Bonanos, N., Lybye, D.,
Mogensen, M., J. Solid State Electr., 10 (2006) 547–561.
326. Serincan, M.F., Pasaogullari, U., Sammes, N.M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 155
(2008) B1117–1127.
327. Duncan, K.L., Lee, K., Wachsman, E.D., J. Power Sources, 196 (2011)
2445–2451.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 771
347. Omar, S., Wachsman, E.D., Nino, J.C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 91 (2007) 144106.
348. Ding, C., Lin, H., Sato, K., Amezawa, K., Kawada, T., Mizusaki, J.,
Hashida, T., J. Power Sources, 195 (2010) 5487–5492.
349. Yin, Y., Zhu, W., Xia, C., Gao, C., Meng, G., J. Appl. Electrochem., 34
(2004) 1287–1291.
350. Park, H.C., Virkar, A.V., J. Power Sources, 186 (2009) 133–137.
351. Wang, Z., Berghaus, J.O., Yick, S., Deces-Petit, C., Qu, W., Hui, R.,
Maric, R., Ghosh, D., J. Power Sources, 176 (2008) 90–95.
352. Huang, Q., Wang, B., Qu, W., Hui, R., J. Power Sources, 191 (2009)
297–303.
353. Ai, N., Lu, Z., Chen, K., Huang, X., Liu, Y., Wang, R., Su, W.,
J. Membrane Sci., 286 (2006) 255–259.
354. Berghaus, J.O., Legoux, J., Moreau, C., Hui, R., Deces-Petit, C.,
Qu, W., Yick, S., Wang, Z., Maric, R., Ghosh, D., J. Therm. Spray Techn.,
17 (2008) 700–707.
355. Leng, Y., Chan, S., Jiang, S., Khor, K., Solid State Ionics, 170 (2004)
9–15.
356. Xia, C., Liu, M., Adv. Mater., 14 (2002) 521–523.
357. Liu, Q.L., Chan, S.H., Fu, C.J., Pasciak, G., Electrochem. Commun., 11
(2009) 871–874.
358. Misono, T., Murata, K., Fukui, T., Chaichanawong, J., Sato, K.,
Abe, H., Naito, M., J. Power Sources, 157 (2006) 754–757.
359. Shao, Z., Haile, S., Nature, 431 (2004) 170–173.
360. Hibino, T., Hashimoto, A., Asano, K., Yano, M., Suzuki, M., Sano, M.,
Electrochem. Solid St., 5 (2002) A242–244.
361. Yang, M., Yan, A., Zhang, M., Hou, Z., Dong, Y., Cheng, M., J. Power
Sources, 175 (2008) 345–352.
362. Zha, S., Moore, A., Abernathy, H., Liu, M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 151
(2004) A1128–1133.
363. Brandon, N.P., Corcoran, D., Cummins, D., Duckett, A., El-Khoury, K.,
Haigh, D., Leah, R., Lewis, G., Maynard, N., McColm, T., Trezona, R.,
Selcuk, A., Schmidt, M., J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 13 (2004) 253–256.
364. Bance, P., Brandon, N., Girvan, B., Holbeche, P., O’Dea, S., Steele, B.,
J. Power Sources, 131 (2004) 86–90.
365. Huijsmans, J., Berkel, F.V., Christie, G., J. Power Sources, 71 (1998)
107–110.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 773
366. Zhang, X., Robertson, M., Yick, S., Deces-Petit, C., Styles, E., Qu, W.,
Xie, Y., Hui, R., Roller, J., Kesler, O., Maric, R., Ghosh, D., J. Power
Sources, 160 (2006) 1211–1216.
367. Tuck, A., Zhang, X., Hui, R., Qu, W., Deces-Petit, C., Xie, Y., Roller, J.,
Min, K., Robertson, M., Yick, S., Maric, R., Ghosh, D., SOFC-X, 7
(2007) 285–294.
368. Hui, S., Yang, D., Wang, Z., Yick, S., Deces-Petit, C., Qu, W., Tuck, A.,
Maric, R., Ghosh, D., J. Power Sources, 167 (2007) 336–339.
369. Xie, Y., Neagu, R., Hsu, C., Zhang, X., Deces-Petit, C., Qu, W., Hui, R.,
Yick, S., Robertson, M., Maric, R., Ghosh, D., J. Fuel Cell Sci. Tech., 7
(2010) 021007.
370. Wang, W., Mogensen, M., Solid State Ionics, 176 (2005) 457–462.
371. Mai, A., Haanappel, V., Uhlenbruck, S., Tietz, F., Stover, D., Solid State
Ionics, 176 (2005) 1341–1350.
372. Hjelm, J., Sogaard, M., Wandel, M., Menon, M., Mogensen, M.,
Hagen, A., SOFC-X, 7 (2007) 1261–1270.
373. Simner, S., Shelton, J., Anderson, M., Stevenson, J., Solid State Ionics,
161 (2003) 11–18.
374. Uhlenbruck, S., Moskalewicz, T., Jordan, N., Penkalla, H.,
Buchkremer, H.P., Solid State Ionics, 180 (2009) 418–423.
375. Knibbe, R., Hjelm, J., Menon, M., Pryds, N., Sogaard, M., Wang, H.J.,
Neufeld, K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 93 (2010) 2877–2883.
376. Tsoga, A., Gupta, A., Naoumidis, A., Nikolopoulos, P., Acta Mater., 48
(2000) 4709–4714.
377. Zhou, X., Scarfino, B., Anderson, H., Solid State Ionics, 175 (2004)
19–22.
378. Uchida, H., Arisaka, S., Watanabe, M., Electrochem. Solid St., 2 (1999)
428–430.
379. Simner, S., Bonnett, J., Canfield, N., Meinhardt, K., Sprenkle, V.,
Stevenson, J., Electrochem. Solid St., 5 (2002) A173–175.
380. Mai, A., Haanappel, V.A.C., Tietz, F., Stoever, D., Solid State Ionics, 177
(2006) 2103–2107.
381. Uhlenbruck, S., Jordan, N., Sebold, D., Buchkremer, H.P., Haanappel,
V.A.C., Stoever, D., Thin Solid Films, 515 (2007) 4053–4060.
382. Plonczak, P., Joost, M., Hjelm, J., Sogaard, M., Lundberg, M.,
Hendriksen, P.V., J. Power Sources, 196 (2011) 1156–1162.
383. Endler-Schuck, C., Weber, A., Ivers-Tiffee, E., Guntow, U., Ernst, J.,
Ruska, J., J. Fuel Cell Sci. Tech., 8 (2011) 041001.
384. Fonseca, F.C., Uhlenbruck, S., Nedelec, R., Sebold, D., Buchkremer, H.P.,
J. Electrochem. Soc., 157 (2010) B1515–1519.
385. Nguyen, T., Kobayashi, K., Honda, T., Iimura, Y., Kato, K., Neghisi, A.,
Nozaki, K., Tappero, F., Sasaki, K., Shirahama, H., Ota, K., Dokiya, M.,
Kato, T., Solid State Ionics, 174 (2004) 163–174.
386. Kim, W., Song, H., Moon, J., Lee, H., Solid State Ionics, 177 (2006)
3211–3216.
387. Wang, Z., Hashimoto, S., Mori, M., J. Power Sources, 193 (2009) 49–54.
388. Kungas, R., Bidrawn, F., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J., Electrochem. Solid St., 13
(2010) B87–90.
389. Song, J., Park, Y., Bae, H., Ahn, J., Seong, B., Kim, D., Jun, J., in
Proceedings of the ASME 8th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science,
Engineering, and Technology, American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
Brooklyn, NY, (2010), p. 319.
390. Jordan, N., Assenmacher, W., Uhlenbruck, S., Haanappel, V.A.C.,
Buchkremer, H.P., Stoever, D., Mader, W., Solid State Ionics, 179 (2008)
919–923.
391. Emsley, J. Nature’s Building Blocks: An A–Z Guide to the Elements, Oxford
University Press, New York, (2001).
392. Bennaceur, K., Gielen, D., Kerr, T., Tam, C., CO2. Capture and Storage:
A Key Carbon Abatement Option, IEA Publications, Paris, (2008).
393. Sunarso, J., Baumann, S., Serra, J.M., Meulenberg, W.A., Liu, S.,
Lin, Y.S., da Costa, J.C.D., J. Membrane Sci., 320 (2008) 13–41.
394. Armstrong, P.A., Bennet, D.L., Foster, E.P., Stein, V.E.E., ITM Oxygen:
The New Oxygen Supply for the New IGCC Market, Paper presented at
Gasification Technologies 2005 Conference: New Technology
Developments, San Francisco, CA, (2005).
395. http://www.praxair.com/praxair.nsf/0/179a71da389ab4bb852577a7
004d7120?OpenDocument. Accessed 20 December 2012.
396. Gellings, P.J., Bouwmeester, H.J.M., in The CRC Handbook of Solid State
Electrochemistry, eds. H.J.M. Bouwmeester, Gellings, CRC Press, Boca
Raton, (1997).
397. Hendriksen, P., Larsen, P., Mogensen, M., Poulsen, F., Wiik, K., Catal.
Today, 56 (2000) 283–295.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 775
398. Sogaard, M., Hendriksen, P.V., Mogensen, M., J. Solid State Chem., 180
(2007) 1489–1503.
399. Engels, S., Beggel, F., Modigell, M., Stadler, H., J. Membrane Sci., 359
(2010) 93–101.
400. Engels, S., Modigell, M., Desalination, 199 (2006) 291–292.
401. http://www.chemmarket.info/en/home/article/1872/. Accessed 20
December 2012.
402. http://methanol.org/getattachment/Home/Methanol-Fuel-and-
Flexible-Fuel-Technology.pdf.aspx. Accessed 20 December 2012.
403. Park, H., Choi, G., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 24 (2004) 1313–1317.
404. Akin, F., Lin, Y., Catal. Lett., 78 (2002) 239–242.
405. Teraoka, Y., Zhang, H., Furukawa, S., Yamazoe, N., Chem. Lett., 11
(1985) 1743–1746.
406. Tsai, C., Dixon, A.G., Ma, Y.H., Moser, W.R., Pascucci, M.R., J. Am.
Ceram. Soc., 81 (1998) 1437–1444.
407. Wang, H., Cong, Y., Yang, W., J. Membrane Sci., 210 (2002) 259–271.
408. Lein, H.L., Wiik, K., Einarsrud, M., Grande, T., Lara-Curzio, E., J. Am.
Ceram. Soc., 89 (2006) 2895–2898.
409. Lein, H.L., Wiik, K., Grande, T., Solid State Ionics, 177 (2006)
1587–1590.
410. Sogaard, M., Hendriksen, P.V., Mogensen, M., Poulsen, F.W., Skou, E.,
Solid State Ionics, 177 (2006) 3285–3296.
411. Baumann, S., Serra, J.M., Lobera, M.P., Escolastico, S., Schulze-
Kueppers, F., Meulenberg, W.A., J. Membrane Sci., 377 (2011)
198–205.
412. Hendriksen, P.V., Hogsberg, J.R., Kjeldsen, A.M., Sorensen, B.F.,
Pedersen, H.G., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., 27 (2006) 347.
413. Niedrig, C., Taufall, S., Burriel, M., Menesklou, W., Wagner, S.F.,
Baumann, S., Ivers-Tiffee, E., Solid State Ionics, 197 (2011) 25–31.
414. Kovalevsky, A.V., Yaremchenko, A.A., Kolotygin, V.A., Snijkers, F.M.M.,
Kharton, V.V., Buekenhoudt, A., Luyten, J.J., Solid State Ionics, 192
(2011) 677–681.
415. Jiang, Q., Faraji, S., Nordheden, K.J., Stagg-Williams, S.M., J. Membrane
Sci., 368 (2011) 69–77.
416. Meixner, D., Brengel, D., Henderson, B., Abrardo, J., Wilson, M.,
Taylor, D., Cutler, R., J. Electrochem. Soc., 149 (2002) D132–136.
417. Hutchings, K.N., Bai, J., Cutler, R.A., Wilson, M.A., Taylor, D.M., Solid
State Ionics, 179 (2008) 442–450.
418. Roettger, B.F., in Proceedings of the Annual Survival and Flight Equipment
Association Symposium, 29 (1991) 247.
419. Park, H.J., Choi, G.M., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 24 (2004) 1313–1317.
420. Park, H.J., Choi, G.M., Solid State Ionics, 178 (2008) 1746–1755.
421. Yin, X., Hong, L., Liu, Z., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 300 (2006) 75–84.
422. Kaiser, A., Foghmoes, S., Chatzichristodoulou, C., Sogaard, M.,
Glasscock, J.A., Frandsen, H.L., Hendriksen, P.V., J. Membrane Sci., 378
(2011) 51–60.
423. Atkinson, A., Solid State Ionics, 95 (1997) 249–258.
424. Takamura, H., Kobayashi, T., Kasahara, T., Kamegawa, A., Okada, M.,
J. Alloy Compd., 408 (2006) 1084–1089.
425. Zhu, X., Yang, W., AIChE J., 54 (2008) 665–672.
426. Kharton, V., Kovalevsky, A., Viskup, A., Shaula, A., Figueiredo, F.,
Naumovich, E., Marques, F., Solid State Ionics, 160 (2003) 247–258.
427. Schmale, K., PhD Thesis, University of Münster (2011).
428. Perez-Coll, D., Nunez, P., Abrantes, J.C.C., Fagg, D.P., Kharton, V.V.,
Frade, J.R., Solid State Ionics, 176 (2005) 2799–2805.
429. Fagg, D.P., Shaula, A.L., Kharton, V.V., Frade, J.R., J. Membrane Sci.,
299 (2007) 1–7.
430. Kharton, V., Kovalevsky, A., Viskup, A., Figueiredo, F., Yaremchenko, A.,
Naumovich, E., Marques, F., J. Electrochem. Soc., 147 (2000) 2814–2821.
431. Kobayashi, K., Nishioka, M., Sato, K., Inoue, T., Hamakawa, S.,
Tsunoda, T., J. Solid State Electr., 10 (2006) 629–634.
432. Yi, J., Zuo, Y., Liu, W., Winnubst, L., Chen, C., J. Membrane Sci., 280
(2006) 849–855.
433. Zhu, X., Li, Q., He, Y., Cong, Y., Yang, W., J. Membrane Sci., 360 (2010)
454–460.
434. Chen, T., Zhao, H., Xu, N., Li, Y., Lu, X., Ding, W., Li, F., J. Membrane
Sci., 370 (2011) 158–165.
435. Kagomiya, I., Iijima, T., Takamura, H., J. Membrane Sci., 286 (2006)
180–184.
436. Wang, B., Yi, J., Winnubst, L., Chen, C., J. Membrane Sci., 286 (2006)
22–25.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 777
437. Li, W., Tian, T., Shi, F., Wang, Y., Chen, C., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48
(2009) 5789–5793.
438. Yin, X., Hong, L., Liu, Z., J. Membrane Sci., 268 (2006) 2–12.
439. Mazanec, T., Cable, T., Frye, J., Solid State Ionics, 53 (1992) 111–118.
440. Ji, Y., Kilner, J., Carolan, M., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 24 (2004) 3613–3616.
441. Frolova-Borchert, Y.V., Sadykov, V.A., Alikina, G.M., Lukashevich, A.I.,
Moroz, E.M., Kochubey, D.I., Kriventsov, V.V., Zaikovskii, V.I.,
Zyryanov, V.V., Uvarov, N.F., Solid State Ionics, 177 (2006) 2533–2538.
442. Seeharaj, P., Berenov, A., Raj, E., Rudkin, R., Atkinson, A., Solid State
Ionics, 192 (2011) 638–641.
443. Forskningscenter Riso, Danish Patent, WO2002041434A1, 05/23.
444. Takamura, H., Ogawa, M., Suehiro, K., Takahashi, H., Okada, M.,
Solid State Ionics, 179 (2008) 1354–1359.
445. Kharton, V.V., Figueiredo, F.M., Navarro, L., Naumovich, E.N.,
Kovalevsky, A.V., Yaremchenko, A.A., Viskup, A.P., Carneiro, A.,
Marques, F.M.B., Frade, J.R., J. Mater. Sci., 36 (2001) 1105–1117.
446. Jud, E., Zhang, Z., Sigle, W., Gauckler, L., J. Electroceram., 16 (2006)
191–197.
447. Takamura, H., Okumura, K., Koshino, Y., Kamegawa, A., Okada, M.,
J. Electroceram., 13 (2004) 613–618.
448. Mogensen, M., Kammer, K., Ann. Rev. Mater. Res., 33 (2003)
321–331.
449. Steghuis, A.G., van Ommen, J.G., Lercher, J.A., Catal. Today, 46 (1998)
91–97.
450. Doornkamp, C., Ponec, V., J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 162 (2000) 19–32.
451. Adler, S.B., Chem. Rev., 104 (2004) 4791–4843.
452. Sun, C., Hui, R., Roller, J., J. Solid State Electr., 14 (2010) 1125–1144.
453. Matsuzaki, Y., Yasuda, I., Solid State Ionics, 132 (2000) 261–269.
454. Xiong, Y., Yamaji, K., Horita, T., Yokokawa, H., Akikusa, J., Eto, H.,
Inagaki, T., J. Electrochem. Soc., 156 (2009) B588–592.
455. Pihlatie, M., Kaiser, A., Larsen, P.H., Mogensen, M., J. Electrochem. Soc.,
156 (2009) B322–329.
456. Pihlatie, M., Kaiser, A., Mogensen, M., Solid State Ionics, 180 (2009)
1100–1112.
457. Tsipis, E.V., Kharton, V.V., J. Solid State Electr., 12 (2008) 1367–1391.
458. Steele, B.C.H., Kelly, I., Middleton, H., Rudkin, R., Solid State Ionics,
28–30 (1988) 1547–1552.
459. Gorte, R.J., Vohs, J.M., J. Catal., 216 (2003) 477–486.
460. Mitterdorfer, A., Gauckler, L.J., Solid State Ionics, 111 (1998) 185–218.
461. Liu, Y.L., Hagen, A., Barfod, R., Chen, M., Wang, H.J., Poulsen, F.W.,
Hendriksen, P.V., Solid State Ionics, 180 (2009) 1298–1304.
462. Chatzichristodoulou, C., Chen, M., Bowen, J.R., Liu, Y., J. Am. Ceram.
Soc., 93 (2010) 2884–2890.
463. Primdahl, S., Mogensen, M., Solid State Ionics, 152–153 (2002)
597–608.
464. Mogensen, M., Primdahl, S., Jørgensen, M.J., Bagger, C., J. Electroceram.,
5 (2000) 141–152.
465. Tsipis, E.V., Kharton, V.V., J. Solid State Electr., 12 (2008) 1039–1060.
466. Takahashi, T., Iwahara, H., Suzuki, Y., in Proceedings of the Third
International Symposium on Fuel Cells, Presses Académiques
Européennes, Brussels, (1969) p. 114.
467. Möbius, H.H. and Rohland, B. US Patent No. 3,377,203, April 9, 1968.
468. Mogensen, M., Bentzen, J.J., in Proceedings of the 1st International
Symposium on Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, 89 (1989) 99.
469. Steele, B.C.H., Middleton, P.H., Rudkin, R.A., Solid State Ionics, 40–41
(1990) 388–393.
470. Putna, E.S., Stubenrauch, J., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J., Langmuir, 11
(1995) 4832–4837.
471. Marina, O.A., Bagger, C., Primdahl, S., Mogensen, M., Solid State
Ionics, 123 (1999) 199–208.
472. Uchida, H., Suzuki, H., Watanabe, M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 145 (1998)
615–620.
473. Primdahl, S., Liu, Y.L., J. Electrochem. Soc., 149 (2002) A1466–1472.
474. Hammer, B., Norskov, J., Surf. Sci., 343 (1995) 211–220.
475. Gross, A., Surf. Sci. Rep., 32 (1998) 291–340.
476. Greeley, J., Mavrikakis, M., Nat. Mater., 3 (2004) 810–815.
477. Chueh, W.C., Hao, Y., Jung, W., Haile, S.M., Nat. Mater., 11 (2011),
155–161.
478. Lai, W., Haile, S.M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 88 (2005) 2979–2997.
479. Chueh, W.C., Lai, W., Haile, S.M., Solid State Ionics, 179 (2008)
1036–1041.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 779
480. Zhang, C., Grass, M.E., McDaniel, A.H., Decaluwe, S.C., Gabaly, F.E.,
Liu, Z., McCarty, K.F., Farrow, R.L., Linne, M.A., Hussain, Z., Jackson, G.S.,
Bluhm, H., Eichhorn, B.W., Nat. Mater., 9 (2010) 944–949.
481. Schouler, E.J.L., Kleitz, M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 134 (1987) 1045–1050.
482. Uchida, H., Mochizuki, N., Watanabe, M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 143
(1996) 1700–1704.
483. Watanabe, M., Uchida, H., Yoshida, M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 144 (1997)
1739–1743.
484. Tsai, T., Barnett, S.A., J. Electrochem. Soc., 145 (1998) 1696–1701.
485. Horita, T., Yamaji, K., Sakai, N., Ishikawa, M., Yokokawa, H., Kawada, T.,
Dokiya, M., Electrochem. Solid St., 1 (1998) 4–6.
486. Bentzen, J.J., Schwartzbach, H., Solid State Ionics, 40–41 (1990)
942–946.
487. Perry Murray, E., Tsai, T., Barnett, S.A., Nature, 400 (1999) 649–651.
488. Park, S., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J., Nature, 404 (2000) 265–267.
489. Park, S., Gorte, R.J., Vohs, J.M., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 200 (2000) 55–61.
490. Gorte, R.J., Park, S., Vohs, J.M., Wang, C., Adv. Mater., 12 (2000)
1465–1469.
491. Gorte, R.J., Kim, H., Vohs, J.M., J. Power Sources, 106 (2002) 10–15.
492. Liu, J., Madsen, B.D., Ji, Z., Barnett, S.A., Electrochem. Solid St., 5 (2002)
A122–124.
493. Marina, O.A., Mogensen, M., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 189 (1999) 117–126.
494. McIntosh, S., Gorte, R.J., Chem. Rev., 104 (2004) 4845–4865.
495. Aguiar, P., Ramírez-Cabrera, E., Lapeña-Rey, N., Atkinson, A.,
Kershenbaum, L.S., Chadwick, D., in Studies in Surface Science and
Catalysis 136: Natural Gas Conversion VI, eds. E. Iglesia, J.J. Spivey, T.H.
Fleisch, Elsevier, Amsterdam, (2001), p. 501.
496. Aguiar, P., Ramírez-Cabrera, E., Atkinson, A., Kershenbaum, L.S.,
Chadwick, D., in Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Solid
Oxide Fuel Cells, 16 (2001) 703.
497. Ramírez-Cabrera, E., Atkinson, A., Chadwick, D., Appl. Catal. B:
Environ., 47 (2004) 127–131.
498. Kammer, K., Mogensen, M., Electrochem. Solid St., 8 (2005) A108–109.
499. González-Velasco, J.R., Gutiérrez-Ortiz, M.A., Marc, J., Botas, J.A.,
González-Marcos, M.P., Blanchard, G., Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 22
(1999) 167–178.
500. Jen, H., Graham, G.W., Chun, W., McCabe, R.W., Cuif, J., Deutsch,
S.E., Touret, O., Catal. Today, 50 (1999) 309–328.
501. Hori, C.E., Permana, H., Ng, K.Y.S., Brenner, A., More, K., Rahmoeller,
K.M., Belton, D., Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 16 (1998) 105–117.
502. O’Connell, M., Morris, M.A., Catal. Today, 59 (2000) 387–393.
503. Ramírez-Cabrera, E., Atkinson, A., Chadwick, D., Appl. Catal. B:
Environ., 36 (2002) 193–206.
504. Zhao, S., Gorte, R.J., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 277 (2004) 129–136.
505. McIntosh, S., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J., Electrochim. Acta, 47 (2002)
3815–3821.
506. Wang, J.B., Jang, J., Huang, T., J. Power Sources, 122 (2003) 122–131.
507. Tao, S., Irvine, J.T.S., Chem. Rec., 4 (2004) 83–95.
508. Atkinson, A., Barnett, S., Gorte, R.J., Irvine, J.T.S., McEvoy, A.J.,
Mogensen, M., Singhal, S.C., Vohs, J., Nat. Mater., 3 (2004) 17–27.
509. Jiang, S.P., Mat. Sci. Eng. A: Struct., 418 (2006) 199–210.
510. Sholklapper, T.Z., Kurokawa, H., Jacobson, C.P., Visco, S.J., De
Jonghe, L.C., Nano Lett., 7 (2007) 2136–2141.
511. Jiang, Z., Xia, C., Chen, F., Electrochim. Acta, 55 (2010) 3595–3605.
512. Gorte, R.J., Vohs, J.M., Ann.Rev.: Chem. Biomol. Eng., 2 (2011) 9–30.
513. Hojberg, J., Sogaard, M., Electrochem. Solid St., 14 (2011) B77–79.
514. Knöfel, C., Wang, H., Thydén, K.T.S., Mogensen, M., Solid State Ionics,
195 (2011) 36–42.
515. Mogensen, M., Sogaard, M., Blennow, P., Hansen, K.K., in Proceedings
of the 8th European Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Forum, eds. R. Steinberger-
Wilckens and U. Bossel, Lucerne Fuel Cell Forum, Switzerland,
(2008) A0402.
516. Kurokawa, H., Sholklapper, T.Z., Jacobson, C.P., De Jonghe, L.C.,
Visco, S.J., Electrochem. Solid St., 10 (2007) B135–138.
517. Yun, J.W., Yoon, S.P., Park, S., Kim, H.S., Nam, S.W., Int. J. Hydrogen
Energ., 36 (2011) 787–796.
518. Ferrizz, R.M., Gorte, R.J., Vohs, J.M., Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 43 (2003)
273–280.
519. Lohsoontorn, P., Brett, D.J.L., Brandon, N.P., J. Power Sources, 175
(2008) 60–67.
520. Zeng, Y., Kaytakoglu, S., Harrison, D.P., Chem. Eng. Sci., 55 (2000)
4893–4900.
Ceria and its Use in Solid Oxide Cells and Oxygen Membranes 781
521. Kim, H., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J., Chem. Commun., 22 (2001) 2334–2335.
522. Gorte, R.J., Vohs, J.M., McIntosh, S., Solid State Ionics, 175 (2004) 1–6.
523. Brett, D.J.L., Atkinson, A., Cumming, D., Ramírez-Cabrera, E.,
Rudkin, R., Brandon, N.P., Chem. Eng. Sci., 60 (2005) 5649–5662.
524. Ye, X., Wang, S.R., Zhou, J., Zeng, F.R., Nie, H.W., Wen, T.L., J. Power
Sources, 195 (2010) 7264–7267.
525. Haryanto, A., Fernando, S., Murali, N., Adhikari, S., Energy and Fuels,
19 (2005) 2098–2106.
526. Lee, S., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 151 (2004)
A1319–1323.
527. Lee, S., Ahn, K., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J., Electrochem. Solid St., 8 (2005)
A48–51.
528. Gross, M.D., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J., Electrochim. Acta, 52 (2007)
1951–1957.
529. Tao, S., Irvine, J.T.S., Nat. Mater., 2 (2003) 320–323.
530. Tao, S., Irvine, J.T.S., J. Electrochem. Soc., 151 (2004) A252–259.
531. Jiang, S.P., Chen, X.J., Chan, S.H., Kwok, J.T., J. Electrochem. Soc., 153
(2006) A850–856.
532. Chen, X.J., Liu, Q.L., Chan, S.H., Brandon, N.P., Khor, K.A.,
J. Electrochem. Soc., 154 (2007) B1206–1210.
533. Chen, X.J., Liu, Q.L., Chan, S.H., Brandon, N.P., Khor, K.A.,
Electrochem. Commun., 9 (2007) 767–772.
534. Kim, J., Nair, V.V., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J., Scripta Mater., 65 (2011)
90–95.
535. Jiang, S.P., Chen, X.J., Chan, S.H., Kwok, J.T., Khor, K.A., Solid State
Ionics, 177 (2006) 149–157.
536. Blennow, P., Hagen, A., Hansen, K.K., Wallenberg, L.R., Mogensen, M.,
Solid State Ionics, 179 (2008) 2047–2058.
537. Blennow, P., Hansen, K.K., Wallenberg, L.R., Mogensen, M., ECS
Transactions, 13 (2008) 181–194.
538. Gross, M.D., Carver, K.M., Deighan, M.A., Schenkel, A., Smith, B.M.,
Yee, A.Z., J. Electrochem. Soc., 156 (2009) B540–545.
539. Kurokawa, H., Yang, L., Jacobson, C.P., De Jonghe, L.C., Visco, S.J.,
J. Power Sources, 164 (2007) 510–518.
540. Savaniu, C.D., Irvine, J.T.S., Solid State Ionics, 192 (2011) 491–493.
541. Blennow, P., Hjelm, J., Klemensø, T., Persson, Å.H., Ramousse, S.,
Mogensen, M., Fuel Cells, 11 (2011) 661–668.
542. Klemensø, T., Nielsen, J., Blennow, P., Persson, Å.H., Stegk, T.,
Christensen, B.H., Sønderby, S., J. Power Sources, 196 (2011) 9459–9466.
543. Blennow, P., Hjelm, J., Klemensø, T., Ramousse, S., Kromp, A.,
Leonide, A., Weber, A., J. Power Sources, 196 (2011) 7117–7125.
544. Blennow, P., Klemenso, T., Persson, A., Brodersen, K., Srivastava, A.K.,
Sudireddy, B.R., Ramousse, S., Mogensen, M., ECS Transactions, 35
(2011) 683–692.
545. Lane, J.A., Kilner, J.A., Solid State Ionics, 136–137 (2000) 927–932.
546. Armstrong, E.N., Duncan, K.L., Oh, D.J., Weaver, J.F., Wachsman,
E.D., J. Electrochem. Soc., 158 (2011) B492–499.
547. Karthikeyan, A., Ramanathan, S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 92 (2008) 243109.
548. Wang, L., Zhang, C., Grass, M., Yu, Y., Gaskell, K., Hussain, Z., Liu, Z.,
Eichhorn, B., Jackson, G., ECS Transactions, 35 (2011) 1435–1444.
549. DeCaluwe, S.C., Jackson, G., ECS Transactions, 35 (2011) 2883–2895.
550. Chen, H., Chen, Y., Aleksandrov, A., Dong, J., Liu, M., Orlando, T.M.,
Appl. Surf. Sci., 243 (2005) 166–177.
551. Green, R.D., Liu, C., Adler, S.B., Solid State Ionics, 179 (2008)
647–660.
552. Nakamura, T., Kobayashi, T., Yashiro, K., Kaimai, A., Otake, T., Sato, K.,
Mizusaki, J., Kawada, T., J. Electrochem. Soc., 155 (2008) B563–569.
553. Yokokawa, H., Horita, T., Sakai, N., Yamaji, K., Brito, M.E., Xiong, Y.,
Kishimoto, H., Solid State Ionics, 174 (2004) 205–221.
554. Tang, L., Salamon, M., de Guire, M.R., Sci. Adv. Mat., 2 (2010) 79–89.
555. He, H., Vohs, J.M., Gorte, R.J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 150 (2003)
A1470–1475.
556. Watkins, M.B., Foster, A.S., Shluger, A.L., J. Phys. Chem. C, 111 (2007)
15337–15341.
557. Knapp, D., Ziegler, T., J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008) 17311–17318.
558. Skårman, B., Grandjean, D., Benfield, R.E., Hinz, A., Andersson, A.,
Wallenberg, L.R., J. Catal., 211 (2002) 119–133.
559. Lundberg, M., Skårman, B., Wallenberg, L.R., Micropor. Mesopor. Mat.,
69 (2004) 187–195.
560. Aneggi, E., Llorca, J., Boaro, M., Trovarelli, A., J. Catal., 234 (2005)
88–95.
CHAPTER 13
TRANSFORMATION OF OXYGENATED
COMPOUNDS DERIVED FROM BIOMASS
INTO VALUABLE CHEMICALS USING
CERIA-BASED SOLID CATALYSTS
Laurence Vivier and Daniel Duprez
LACCO, Laboratoire de Catalyse en Chimie Organique
Université de Poitiers & CNRS
4, Rue Michel Brunet, 86022 POITIERS Cedex, France
13.1 Introduction
Ceria is an oxide widely employed in catalysis for its redox proper-
ties.1,2 It also has weak Lewis acid sites and stronger basic sites, which
makes this oxide suitable as a catalyst or a support for many reac-
tions requiring acid–base pairs or basic sites.3 Combining redox and
acid–base properties allows ceria-containing solids to catalyze
numerous reactions involved in biomass transformation. The objec-
tive of this chapter is to review these reactions stressing the role of
ceria-based solid catalysts in the conversion of oxygenated mole-
cules, which are essential compounds in biomass.
783
such as sugar or starch from sugar cane, sugar beet, corn and wheat,
and from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioethanol can be produced from
cellulosic residues, which are found in large quantities all over the
world. The use of ethanol as a feedstock for the chemical industry
can be foreseen.
Idriss and collaborators4–7 studied the reactions of ethanol over
noble-metal-based catalysts (Pd, Pt, Rh, and Au) supported on CeO2
by temperature-programmed desorption (TPD), infra-red (IR)
adsorption, and steady-state reactions. The surface areas of the cata-
lysts are given in Table 13.1. In the presence of Pd, Pt, or Au the
dehydrogenation reaction yields acetaldehyde from ethanol.
Acetaldehyde undergoes β-aldolization to form adsorbed crotonal-
dehyde species. Besides acetaldehyde, acetone and benzene were
also observed by TPD. Acetone formation on Pd/CeO2 may be
explained by acetate ketonization on the oxide support or by an
acetyl reaction with methyl species in the presence of Pd or Pt.
A reaction between adsorbed crotonaldehyde and acetaldehyde (via
the same β-aldolization) can explain the formation of benzene in
the vicinity of metal atoms.4,5 Raskó and Kiss showed that these reac-
tions also occurred on oxide support such as CeO2 or TiO2.8 Unlike
Pd/CeO2 and Pt/CeO2, Rh/CeO2 readily dissociates the C–C bond
of ethanol to produce adsorbed CO and CH4.6
More recently Nair et al.9 studied the activity of vanadium oxide
catalysts supported on Al2O3, TiO2, and CeO2 in the ethanol to acet-
aldehyde reaction in the oxidative dehydrogenation (ODH) process
at 180°C. The acetaldehyde formation rate and product selectivity
Table 13.1 BET surface area determination and turnover number (TON) values.
Catalyst BET surface area (m2·g−1) TON (s−1)a Reference
1 wt% Pd/CeO2 55 8.6 4
1 wt% Pt/CeO2 63 2.6 5
1 wt% Rh/CeO2 49 5.9 6
1 wt% Au/CeO2 29 — 7
a
Number of ethanol molecules converted per surface metal atom (Pd, Pt, or Rh) per second
at 127 °C.
zeolite (2.5, 5.0, 7.5, or 15 wt%) affected the acid properties of the
catalysts, and also improved the selectivity of C3 and C4 olefins. The
number of strong acid sites of the HZSM-5 zeolite decreased upon
cerium modification, which decreased the rate of coke formation
and enhanced the stability of the catalyst. The introduced cerium
promoted the formation of the C3 olefin from the metathesis of
ethene and cis-2-butene (converted rapidly from 1-butene), which
further increased the changes in the distribution of the C2–C4 ole-
fins compared with the HZSM-5 zeolite.
O O
O CO2 O O CH3OH HO OH
O O
+
R step 1 st e p 2 CH3 CH3
R R
Table 13.5 BET surface area determination and acid/base site ratio.25
Catalyst BET surface area (m2·g−1) Acid/base site ratio
Al2O3/CeO2 81 0.53
Nb2O5/CeO2 36 1.09
O OH OH OH
HO OH HO OH HO OH HO
O
O O O
dihydroxyacetone glyceric acid tartronic acid glycolic acid
oxidation
OH transesterification OH hydrogenolysis OH
HO OH
HO O R HO OH HO
O
OH O
hydroxyacetone acrolein
13.4.1 Oxidation
For the production of valuable oxygenated derivatives, glycerol can be
oxidized forming a large number of products such as dihydroxyace-
tone (DHA), glyceric acid (GLYAC), tartronic acid (TARAC), glycolic
acid, or hydroxyethanoic acid (HEA) (Fig. 13.2) among many others.
These products can be used as intermediate compounds in the
synthesis of useful chemicals.
Ceria-supported catalysts are well known in oxidation reactions
and gold nanoparticles supported on ceria are excellent general
heterogeneous catalysts for the aerobic oxidation of alcohols (see
Vivier and Duprez28 and references therein). Corma and colleagues
showed that the efficiency of the catalysts can be improved by using
ceria supports with high specific surface areas and attributed this
behavior to a cooperative effect between gold and ceria.29–33
Demirel et al.34 studied the liquid-phase oxidation of polyalcohols
with both primary and secondary alcohol groups; they compared the
reactivity of n-propanol and glycerol at 60°C, pH = 12, pO2 = 1 atm on
ceria-supported gold catalysts. It was difficult to correlate oxidation
activity with the specific surface area: the most active catalyst was
13.4.2 Dehydration
Glycerol can be converted into hydroxyacetone and acrolein by
dehydration (Fig. 13.2). Acrolein is an important intermediate used
as a raw material in the production of acrylate polymers.
The vapor-phase dehydration of glycerol to hydroxyacetone was
also studied by Sato et al. on copper catalysts at 205°C.35 They found
that the acid–base property of the support material affected the
selectivity; basic MgO, CeO2, and ZnO supports showed low hydroxy-
acetone selectivity, while acidic supports, such as Al2O3, ZrO2, Fe2O3,
and SiO2, effectively promoted hydroxyacetone selectivity.
Kinage et al.36 showed that the 5 wt% Na/CeO2 catalyst is one of
the best catalysts for high glycerol conversion with high selectivity for
hydroxyacetone at 350°C (Table 13.6). Other by-products are propa-
noic acid, ethylene glycol, 1,2-propanediol and allyl alcohol, with a
selectivity below 10%. Glycerol conversion was carried out on a
fixed-bed continuous-flow reactor at 350°C. For all catalysts, glycerol
conversion decreased initially up to 8 h and then became stable.
Table 13.6 Base/acid site ratio of Na-doped metal-oxide catalysts and their cata-
lytic performance for the dehydration of glycerol.36
Base/acid Hydroxyacetone Conversion after Hydroxyacetone
Catalyst site ratio selectivity (%)a deactivation (%)b selectivity (%)c
Na/CeO2 2.1 69 25 75
Na/Al2O3 3.6 57 15 65
Na/Ga2O3 3.2 35 5 55
Na/ZrO2 2.9 50 5 35
a
Hydroxyacetone selectivity at 10% glycerol conversion.
b
Glycerol conversion after deactivation (Time on stream = 15 h).
c
Hydroxyacetone selectivity after deactivation (Time on stream = 15 h).
Table 13.7 Properties of oxide catalysts and their catalytic performance for the
dehydration of glycerol.37 Reaction conditions: temperature: 250°C; time on
stream: 8–10 h.
Surface area Total basic sites Hydroxyacetone
Oxide catalyst (m2·g−1) (mmol CO2·g−1) Conversion (%) selectivity (%)
Ce 260 0.36 35.6 1.2
Zr 192 0.05 61.3 39.8
Ti 402 0.29 70.2 31.0
CeZr 122 0.21 93.5 42.0
13.4.3 Hydrogenolysis
Of the various promoters, cerium showed excellent promotion
effects in hydrogenation reactions (see Vivier and Duprez28 and
Table 13.9 Properties of catalysts and their catalytic performance for the dehydra-
tion of glycerol.40 Reaction conditions: temperature: 315°C; time on stream: 2 h.
Surface area Glycerol Acrolein Hydroxyacetone
Oxide catalyst (m2·g−1) conversion (%) selectivity (%) selectivity (%)
HSiW/SiO2–Al2O3 465 100.0 58.0 9.6
HSiW/ZrO2 66 83.6 58.1 11.9
HSiW/γ–Al2O3 218 87.0 45.5 13.7
HSiW/CeO2 248 62.4 5.1 23.4
13.4.4 Transesterification
Monoglycerides, the glycerol monoesters of fatty acids, are biode-
gradable and non-toxic molecules with a hydrophilic head and a
hydrophobic tail, having surfactant and emulsifying properties.
They can be used in foods, detergents, plasticizers, and cosmetic
and pharmaceutical formulations.43
The preparation of monoglycerides from fatty acids or fatty
methyl esters and glycerol can be carried out in the presence of
acidic or basic catalysts. The use of solid basic catalysts could limit
secondary reactions leading to product degradation. A comparison
of various basic oxide solids has shown that the more significant
the intrinsic basicity, the more active the catalyst is for the transes-
terification of methyl stearate with glycerol (Table 13.10).44,45
Barrault and colleagues showed that basic and solid catalysts such
as MgO and CeO2 can easily replace homogeneous catalysts while
having the same selectivity. Similar results were obtained for the
transesterification of methyl oleate with glycerol at 220°C with
MgO, Y2O3, and CeO2 catalysts. These catalysts converted more
than 90% of the methyl oleate with about 70% of monoglyceride
selectivity.46
Table 13.10 Catalyst properties and their catalytic performance for the transes-
terification of methyl stearate with glycerol.44,45 Reaction conditions: temperature:
220°C; glycerol/methyl stearate: 1; time on stream: 6 h; weight of catalyst: 0.5 g; N2
atmospheric pressure.
Oxide BET surface Total acidic sites Total basic sites Conversion Monoglyceride
catalyst area (m2·g−1) (µmol NH3·g−1) (µmol CO2·g−1) (%) selectivity (%)
ZnO 33 455 21 18 80
MgO (I) 13 110 202 83 42
MgO (II) 151 290 345 80 38
La2O3 5 565 80.6 97 28
CeO2 (I) 19 546 16.3 4.1 100
CeO2 (II) 135 805 345 82 42
Table 13.13 Catalyst properties and catalytic performance for the hydrogenation
of citral.60 Reaction conditions: temperature: 70°C; H2 pressure: 7 MPa; time on
stream: 60 min; weight of catalyst: 500 mg; 3 vol% citral/isopropanol.
Surface area Selectivity to
Catalyst (m2·g−1) Conversion (%) unsaturated alcohol (%)
Reduction (°C) 200 500 200 500
Pt/CeO2/C 428 95 75 8 16
PtSn(0.25)/CeO2/C 366 45 60 14 32
PtSn(0.5)/CeO2/C 363 40 32 18 35
PtSn(0.75)/CeO2/C 348 22 30 22 33
O
O O O
OH
O
levulinic acid γ-valerolactone 5-nonanone
Table 13.15 Catalyst properties and catalytic performance for the ketonization of
propanoic acid (PA) or butanoic acid (BA).79 Reaction conditions: temperature:
410 °C; N2 flow: 15 cm3.min−1; acid feed rate: 0.1 cm3.min−1; weight of catalyst: 1.5 g.
Surface area Total basic sites Conversion Conversion
Catalyst (m2·g−1) (µmol·g−1) of PA (%) of BA (%)
MnOx/CeO2 106 32 80 28
CM-HMS 250 26 78 36
CM-MCM-41 529 28 73 31
Table 13.17 Catalyst properties and catalytic performance with different metal
loading85 and with different Ce/Zr ratios.86 Reaction conditions: temperature:
350 °C; H2 pressure: 5 bar; weight of catalyst: 2 g; weight hourly space velocity
(WHSV): 1.92 h−1.
Surface area Basic sites Acidic sites Conversion Selectivity
Catalyst (m2·g−1) (µmol CO2·g−1) (µmol NH3·g−1) (%) to C12 (%)
CeZrOx 130 370 56 21 66
0.05% Pd/CeZrOx 135 390 50 68 85
0.25% Pd/CeZrOx 133 380 54 58 83
1.45% Pd/CeZrOx 139 395 77 85 57
0.25% Pd/CeOx 88 266 0 40 77
0.25% Pd/Ce5Zr2Ox 131 414 27 58 79
0.25% Pd/Ce1Zr1Ox 133 380 54 58 83
0.25% Pd/Ce2Zr5Ox 141 350 86 84 77
0.25% Pd/ZrOx 149 296 212 90 57
HO HO HO OH
O O O
H2 O O OH O O O O
FDCA
O
O OH
HMF
CH3OH O O O O
O O O
O OH O O O O
FDMC
13.8 Conclusions
In recent years, increasing effort has been spent in finding ways to
use biomass as a feedstock for the production of organic chemicals.
The conversion of biomass can be achieved through biochemical or
thermochemical processes to obtain a wide range of oxygenated
compounds such as aldehydes, ketones, alcohols, carboxylic acids,
and esters. These products can be a source of valuable chemicals.
Pure ceria or ceria-based catalysts can be used in several organic
reactions, such as the dehydration and dehydrogenation of alcohols,
carbonatation, transesterification, aldolization, ketonization of car-
boxylic acids and ester, and in redox reactions.
The redox ability and the acid–base properties of CeO2, either
alone or in the presence of transition metals, are important parame-
ters that activate complex organic molecules and selectively orient
their transformation. The acid–base or redox properties of ceria can
also be modified by involving other oxides (ZrO2, La2O3, MnOx, ZnO,
MoO4, VOx, …) thus increasing the scope of the reactions. Ceria has
been used as a support of noble metal catalysts (Pd, Pt, Rh, Au) in the
References
1. Bernal, S., Kaspar, J., Trovarelli A., Catal. Today, 20 (1999) 173.
2. Trovarelli, A., Catalysis by Ceria and Related Compounds, Imperial
College Press, London, (2002).
3. Binet, C., Daturi, M., Lavalley, J.-C., Catal. Today, 50 (1999) 207–225.
4. Yee, A., Morrison, S.J., Idriss, H., J. Catal., 186 (1999) 279–295.
5. Yee, A., Morrison, S.J., Idriss, H., J. Catal., 191 (2000) 30–45.
6. Yee, A., Morrison, S.J., Idriss, H., Catal. Today, 63 (2000) 327–335.
7. Sheng, P.-Y., Bowmaker, G.A., Idriss, H., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 261 (2004)
171–181.
8. Raskó, J., Kiss, J., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 287 (2005) 252–260.
9. Nair, H., Gatt, J.E., Miller, J.T., Baertsch, C.D., J. Catal., 279 (2011)
144–154.
10. Zonetti, P.C., Celnik, J., Letichevsky, S., Gaspar, A.B., Appel, L.G.,
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 334 (2011) 29–34.
11. Bi, J., Liu, M., Song, C., Wang, X., Guo, X., Appl. Catal. B: Environm.,
107 (2011) 68–76.
12. Bhanage, B.M., Fujita, S.-I., Ikushima, Y., Arai, M., Appl. Catal. A: Gen.,
219 (2001) 259–266.
13. Abimanyu, H., Soo Kim, C., Sung Ahn, B., Sang Yoo, K., Catal. Lett.,
118 (2007) 30–35.
14. Juárez, R., Corma, A., García, H., Green Chem., 11 (2009) 949–952.
15. Tomishige, K., Yasuda, H., Yoshida, Y., Nurunnabi, M., Li, B.,
Kunimori, K., Catal. Lett., 95 (2004) 45–49.
16. Tomishige, K., Yasuda, H., Yoshida, Y., Nurunnabi, M., Li, B.,
Kunimori, K., Green Chem., 6 (2004) 206–214.
17. Tomishige, K., Furusawa, Y., Ikeda, Y., Asadullah, M., Fujimoto, K.,
Catal. Lett., 76 (2001) 71–74.
18. Yoshida, Y., Arai, Y., Kado, S., Kunimori, K., Tomishige, K., Catal.
Today, 115 (2006) 95–101.
19. Aresta, M., Dibenedetto, A., Pastore, C., Cuocci, C., Aresta, B.,
Cometa, S., De Giglio, E., Catal. Today, 137 (2008) 125–131.
20. Aresta, M., Dibenedetto, A., Pastore, C., Angelini, A., Aresta, B.,
Pápai, I., J. Catal., 269 (2010) 44–52.
21. Tomishige, K., Kunimori, K., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 237 (2002) 103–109.
22. Honda, M., Suzuki, A., Noorjahan, B., Fujimoto, K.-I., Suzuki, K.,
Tomishige, K., Chem. Commun., (2009) 4596–4598.
23. Honda, M., Kuno, S., Begum, N., Fujimoto, K.-I., Suzuki, K.,
Nakagawa, Y., Tomishige, K., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 384 (2010) 165–170.
24. Honda, M., Kuno, S., Sonehara, S., Fujimoto, K.-I., Suzuki, K.,
Nakagawa, Y., Tomishige, K., ChemCatChem, 3 (2011) 365–370.
25. Dibenedetto, A., Angelini, A., Aresta, M., Ethiraj, J., Fragale, C.,
Nocito, F., Tetrahedron, 67 (2011) 1308–1313.
26. Aresta, M., Dibenedetto, A., Nocito, F., Ferragin, C., J. Catal., 268
(2009) 106–114.
27. Zhou, C., Beltramini, J.N., Fan, Y.-X., Lu, G.Q., Chem. Soc. Rev., 37
(2008) 527–549.
28. Vivier, L., Duprez, D., ChemSusChem, 3 (2010) 654–678.
29. Abad, A., Concepción, P., Corma, A., García, H., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.,
44 (2005) 4066–4069.
30. Abad, A., Almela, C., Corma, A., García, H., Tetrahedron, 62 (2006)
6666–6672.
31. Abad, A., Almela, C., Corma, A., García, H., Chem. Commun., (2006)
3178–3180.
32. Abad, A., Corma, A., García, H., Pure Appl. Chem., 79 (2007)
1847–1854.
33. Abad, A., Corma, A., García, H., Chem. Eur. J., 14 (2008) 212–222.
34. Demirel, S., Kern, P., Lucas, M., Claus, P., Catal. Today, 122 (2007)
292–300.
35. Sato, S., Akiyama, M., Takahashi, R., Hara, T., Inui, K., Yokota, M.,
Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 347 (2008) 186–191.
36. Kinage, A.K., Upare, P.P., Kasinathan, P., Kyu Hwang, Y., Chang, J.-S.,
Catal. Commun., 11 (2010) 620–623.
37. Vasconcelos, S.J.S., Lima, C.L., Filho, J.M., Oliveira, A.C., Barros, E.B.,
de Sousa, F.F., Rocha, M.G.C., Bargiela, P., Oliveira, A.C., Chem. Eng. J.,
168 (2011) 656–664.
38. de Sousa, H.S.A., de Assis F., Barros, A., Vasconcelos, S.J.S., Filho, J.M.,
Lima, C.L., Oliveira, A.C., Ayala, A.P., Junior, M.C., Oliveira, A.C.,
Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 406 (2011) 63–72.
39. Chai, S.-H., Wang, H.-P., Liang, Y., Xu, B.-Q., Green Chem., 9 (2007)
1130–1136.
40. Tae Kim, Y., Jung, K.-D., Duck Park, E., Bull. Korean Chem. Soc., 31
(2010) 3283–3289.
41. Suprun, W., Lutecki, M., Gläser, R., Papp, H., J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.,
342–3 (2011) 91–100.
42. Yu, W., Zhao, J., Ma, H., Miao, H., Song, Q., Xu, J., Appl. Catal. A: Gen.,
383 (2010) 73–78.
43. Zheng, Y., Chen, X., Shen, Y., Chem. Rev., 108 (2008) 5253–5277.
44. Bancquart, S., Vanhove, C., Pouilloux, Y., Barrault, J., Appl. Catal. A:
Gen., 218 (2001) 1–11.
45. Barrault, J., Pouilloux, Y., Clacens, J.M., Vanhove, C., Bancquart, S.,
Catal. Today, 75 (2002) 177–181.
46. Ferretti, C.A., Soldano, A., Apesteguia, C.R., Di Cosimo, J.I., Chem.
Eng. J., 161 (2010) 346–354.
47. Abid, M., Touroude, R., Catal. Lett., 69 (2000) 139–144.
48. Abid, M., Ehret, G., Touroude, R., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 217 (2001)
219–229.
49. Abid, M., Paul-Boncour, V., Touroude, R., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 297
(2006) 48–59.
50. Sepúlveda-Escribano, A., Coloma, F., Rodríguez-Reinoso, F., J. Catal.,
178 (1998) 649–657.
51. Sepúlveda-Escribano, A., Silvestre-Albero, J., Coloma, F., Rodríguez-
Reinoso, F., Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal., 130 (2000) 1013–1018.
52. Silvestre-Albero, J., Rodríguez-Reinoso, F., Sepúlveda-Escribano, A.,
J. Catal., 210 (2002) 127–136.
53. Silvestre-Albero, J., Sepúlveda-Escribano, A., Rodríguez-Reinoso, F.,
Anderson, J.A., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 5 (2003) 208–216.
54. Concepción, P., Corma, A., Silvestre-Albero, J., Franco, V., Chane-
Ching, J.Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 126 (2004) 5523–5532.
55. Silvestre-Albero, J., Coloma, F., Sepúlveda-Escribano, A., Rodríguez-
Reinoso, F., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 304 (2006) 159–167.
56. Serrano-Ruiz, J.C., Luettich, J., Sepúlveda-Escribano, A., Rodríguez-
Reinoso, F., J. Catal., 241 (2006) 45–55.
57. Serrano-Ruiz, J.C., Huber, G.W., Sánchez-Castillo, M.A., Dumesic, J.A.,
Rodríguez-Reinoso, F., Sepúlveda-Escribano, A., J. Catal., 241 (2006)
378–388.
58. Concepción, P., Corma, A., Silvestre-Albero, J., Top. Catal., 46 (2007)
31–38.
59. Malathi, R., Viswanath, R.P., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 208 (2001) 323–327.
60. Serrano-Ruiz, J.C., Sepúlveda-Escribano, A., Rodríguez-Reinoso,
F., Duprez, D., J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 268 (2007) 227–234.
61. Bachiller-Baeza, B., Rodríguez-Ramos, I., Guerrero-Ruiz, A., Appl.
Catal. A: Gen., 205 (2001) 227–237.
62. Campo, B., Volpe, M., Ivanova, S., Touroude, R., J. Catal., 242 (2006)
162–171.
63. Campo, B., Petit, C., Volpe, M.A., J. Catal., 254 (2008) 71–78.
64. Campo, B., Ivanova, S., Gigola, C., Petit, C., Volpe, M.A., Catal. Today,
133–5 (2008) 661–666.
65. Campo, B., Santori, G., Petit, C., Volpe, M., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 359
(2009) 79–83.
66. He, L., Yu, F.-J., Lou, X.-B., Cao, Y., He, H.-Y., Fan, K.-N., Chem. Commun.,
46 (2010) 1553–1555.
67. Bhogeswararao, S., Srinivas, D., Catal. Lett., 140 (2010) 55–64.
68. Hasan, M.A., Zaki, M.I., Pasupulety, L., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 243 (2003)
81–92.
69. Yamada, Y., Segawa, M., Sato, F., Kojima, T., Sato, S., J. Mol. Catal. A:
Chem., 346 (2011) 79–86.
70. Stubenrauch, J., Brosha, E., Vohs, J.M., Catal. Today, 28 (1996) 431–441.
71. Kunkes, E.L., Simonetti, D.A., West, R.M., Serrano-Ruiz, J.C., Gärtner,
C.A., Dumesic, J.A., Science, 322 (2008) 417–421.
72. Gaertner, C.A., Serrano-Ruiz, J.C., Braden, D.J., Dumesic, J.A., J. Catal.,
266 (2009) 71–78.
73. Gaertner, C.A., Serrano-Ruiz, J.C., Braden, D.J., Dumesic, J.A.,
ChemSusChem, 2 (2009) 1121–1124.
74. Gaertner, C.A., Serrano-Ruiz, J.C., Braden, D.J., Dumesic, J.A., Ind.
Eng. Chem. Res., 49 (2010) 6027–6033.
75. Serrano-Ruiz, J.C., Wang, D., Dumesic, J.A., Green Chem., 12 (2010)
574–577.
76. Serrano-Ruiz, J.C., Braden, D.J., West, R.M., Dumesic, J.A., Appl. Catal.
B: Environm., 100 (2010) 184–189.
77. Klimkiewicz, R., Tererycz, H., Grabowska, H., Morawski, I., Syper, L.,
Licnerski, B.W., J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 78 (2001) 533–535.
78. Klimkiewicz, R., Teterycza, H., React. Kinet. Catal. Lett., 75 (2002)
165–168.
79. Murkute, A.D., Jackson, J.E., Miller, D.J., J. Catal., 278 (2011)
189–199.
80. Lippert, S., Baumann, W., Thomke, K., J. Mol. Catal., 69 (1991)
199–214.
81. Idriss, H., Diagne, C., Hindermann, J.P., Kiennemann, A., Marteau,
M.A., J. Catal., 155 (1995) 219–237.
82. Raskó, J., Kiss, J., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 287 (2005) 252–260.
83. Di Cosimo, J.I., Torres, G., Apesteguía, C.R., J. Catal., 208 (2002)
114–123.
84. Torres, G., Apesteguía, C.R., Di Cosimo, J.I., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 317
(2007) 161–170.
85. Kunkes, E.L., Gürbüz, E.I., Dumesic, J.A., J. Catal., 266 (2009)
236–249.
86. Gürbüz, E.I., Kunkes, E.L., Dumesic, J.A., Appl. Catal. B: Environm., 94
(2010) 134–141.
87. Gangadharan, A., Shen, M., Sooknoi, T., Resasco, D.E., Mallinson,
R.G., Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 385 (2010) 80–91.
88. Skouta, R., Li, C.-J., Tetrahedron, 66 (2008) 4917–4938.
89. Corma, A., Garcia, H., Chem. Soc. Rev., 37 (2008) 2096–2126.
90. Casanova, O., Iborra, S., Corma, A., ChemSusChem, 2 (2009) 1138–1144.
91. Casanova, O., Iborra, S., Corma, A., J. Catal., 265 (2009) 109–116.
92. Smolentseva, E., Kusema, B.T., Beloshapkin, S., Estrada, M., Vargas, E.,
Murzin, D.Yu., Castillon, F., Fuentes, S., Simakov, A., Appl. Catal. A:
Gen., 392 (2011) 69–79.
CHAPTER 14
14.1 Introduction
Air pollution abatement is an important issue associated mainly with
the increasing demand for energy and with the volume production
of goods. A technological approach to the problem is environmental
catalysis, which provides appropriate materials for selectively and effi-
ciently converting noxious emission products to safe compounds.
Most of the catalytic processes for the removal of pollutants include
oxidation reactions with oxygen or air with low environmental impact.
In this respect ceria (CeO2) has been extensively used by virtue
of its unique electronic features.1 In contrast to the other rare-earth
elements (Ln), which normally exist as sesquioxides Ln2O3 with Ln3+
as their common valence state, cerium oxide is present mainly as
CeO2 due to the unstable [Xe] 4f 1 electronic configuration of Ce3+.
Ceria has a CaF2 fluorite structure consisting of a network of cerium
ions arranged in an fcc array.2 In certain temperature and oxygen
pressure conditions a range of intermediate oxides of composition
between Ce2O3 and CeO2 can exist.1 Reduced ceria arises with the
removal of O2− ions from the CeO2 lattice, generating anion vacancy
sites while maintaining the electrostatic balance by the reduction of
two cerium cations from the +4 to +3 oxidation state.3 Structural
813
14.2 Oxidation of CO
Carbon monoxide along with unburned hydrocarbons is one of the
main toxic pollutants emitted from the exhaust of vehicle engines
and also from combustion of fossil fuels. One way to remove it is
through catalytic oxidation to CO2 in so-called “three-way catalysis”
(TWC), used in the after-treatment devices for automotive pollu-
tion control.7 Two classes of catalysts for CO oxidation are generally
considered: those based on noble metals (Pd, Pt, Rh, Au) and those
based on transition-metal oxides.7–11 In both series, ceria has often
been considered an important constituent. Indeed, as stated above,
the electronic configuration and the easy transformation between
the two cerium oxidation states, Ce4+ and Ce3+, determine its ability
to store and release oxygen. CeO2 is an “active oxide” in the sense
that, through its lattice oxygen, it participates in the oxidation reac-
tion, at variance with “inert” oxides like SiO2 or MgO, which act
only as carriers of the active species.12 With the inert class of oxides,
characterized by a low ability to adsorb oxygen, the reaction pro-
ceeds through the dissociative adsorption of oxygen on the sup-
ported metal particles. On active oxides like CeO2 molecular
oxygen can adsorb and then may or may not dissociate before
reacting with CO adsorbed on a supported noble metal or on the
same oxide system. Density functional theory corrected for on-site
Coulomb interactions (DFT+U) has been used to describe the oxy-
gen vacancies and the localization of the charge on Ce ions near to
vacancy sites.13–14 It has been ascertained that the oxygen vacancies,
after formation, make oxygen migration possible.13 It is generally
agreed that CO oxidation over CeO2 occurs by a Mars–van Krevelen-
type mechanism,15 involving the alternate reduction and oxidation
of surface ceria with the formation of surface oxygen vacancies
and their successive annihilation by gas-phase oxygen.16 Since sub-
traction of oxygen from the lattice requires a certain energy, the
mechanism on pure CeO2 occurs at a higher temperature. The low-
temperature CO oxidation activity of CeO2 can be promoted
through morphology and structure changes, by adopting an appro-
priate synthetic procedure, adding other oxides, or by supporting
noble metals.8,10,16–18 Examples from the recent literature, repre-
sentative of each of the different approaches for increasing oxygen
vacancy mobility and achieving higher catalytic efficiency, are
described in this section.
Figure 14.1 Possible formation mechanism for CeO2 nanostructures. From Pan
et al.20 with permission.
sizes for the crystallites, identifying also the particle facets. Overall
CO oxidation activity decreased with an increase of the sample
calcination temperatures, which increases the size of the ceria par-
ticles. When the specific activity per unit of surface area was calcu-
lated and plotted versus ceria crystallite size, the CO oxidation rate
can be seen to increase with size, regardless of the preparation
history of the samples. As shown by HRTEM analyses, calcination,
besides increasing the particle size with a consequent decrease of
the surface area, contributes to restructuring the particles with
exposure of the more reactive (100) planes.
Another method recently reported for the preparation of cata-
lytically active CeO2 material is the use of the low-cost biopolymer
chitosan as a template.18 The synthesis consisted of adding together
chitosan dissolved in acetic acid and aqueous cerium nitrate in a
variable weight ratio. After precipitation with ammonia followed by
drying and calcining at the desired temperature, the cerium oxides
obtained were characterized by high surface area (∼144 m2.g−1). The
area changed as a function of the calcination temperature and also
as a function of the weight ratio Ce3+/chitosan. Increasing the tem-
perature and increasing the amount of biopolymer had the opposite
effect. TEM images showed sheets of mesoporous aggregates of
cubic CeO2 nanocrystals. The materials evaluated in the CO oxida-
tion reaction were quite active with the best catalyst giving 90%
CO conversion at 320 °C (gas hourly space velocity or GHSV of
60000 h−1), a much improved result compared to commercial CeO2.
The improvement in the activity was correlated with an increase of
the lattice parameters and the lattice volume due to chitosan-assisted
synthesis.18 In accord with Ho et al. the expansion of the lattice vol-
ume of ceria, favoring the replacement of Ce4+ of radius 0.97Å, with
Ce3+ of radius 1.14 Å, increases the redox properties of ceria.23
Table 14.1 T50, BET surface area, Co/Ce atomic ratios derived from XPS and
Co3O4 particle sizes derived from XRD for CoOx/CeO2 (15%) after 5 h in air at
different calcination temperatures. (Adapted from Kang et al.24)
characteristic of Co2+ species, and the main Co 2p3/2 peak, it was pos-
sible to ascertain the enhancement of the Co3+ formation in the
presence of ceria.
Luo et al.25 prepared a series of composite Co3O4–CeO2 catalysts
using a surfactant template (ST) method and compared them with
samples prepared by the impregnation (IM), co-precipitation (CP),
or combustion (CB) methods. The ST procedure consisted in pre-
cipitating the cerium and cobalt hydroxides in the presence of a
surfactant, CTAB, followed by thermal aging at 120 °C and calcina-
tion at 500 °C. According to nitrogen adsorption-desorption iso-
therms, mesoporous materials with uniform pore sizes (ranging from
36 Å to 61 Å with increasing cobalt loading) and quite high surface
area (∼100 m2.g−1) were obtained. The sample CeCo30 from the ST
procedure, with atomic ratio Co/(Co+Ce) = 0.30, tested in the oxida-
tion of CO (weight hourly space velocity or WHSV = 10000 ml.g−1.h−1),
exhibited the best activity with T50 = 94 °C. This value was approxi-
mately more than 30 °C below those obtained with homologous
samples prepared by different procedures. The redox properties,
revealed by the temperature-programmed reduction by H2 (H2-TPR)
patterns shown in Fig. 14.3, were very much dependent on the type
of synthesis. Pure CeO2 pattern exhibited a peak at 820 °C attributed
to bulk CeO2 and visible in all composite samples and a peak at
528 °C, due to surface oxygen species, overlapping with Co reduction
peaks. The reduction of Co3O4 depended strongly on particle size.
According to Spadaro et al.26, large particles not interacting with
other oxides are reduced directly to metallic cobalt in a temperature
range between 320 °C and 480 °C. Small Co3O4 particles interacting
with ceria are reduced in two steps, the first characterized by a low-
temperature peak at around 240–320 °C, due to the reduction of
Co3+ species to Co2+ at the interface with ceria, and a high-tempera-
ture peak in the range of 480–700 °C due to the reduction of Co2+,
interacting with CeO2, to metallic Co.25 Since the peaks in the range
320–480 °C are due to the independent or bulk-like Co3O4 phase,
their intensity gives an indication of the dispersion of the Co3O4
phase. As shown in Fig. 14.3, according to the intensity of this peak,
the dispersion of Co3O4 in the surfactant-template-prepared sample
Figure 14.3 H2-TPR profiles of (a) CeCo20 prepared by different methods, Co3O4
and CeO2; and (b) catalysts prepared by the surfactant template method. From Luo
et al.25 with permission.
(CeCo20) was the largest with respect to the other samples. A further
promotion of the activity of the composite system CeCo30 was
achieved by depositing 0.5 wt% of palladium through impregnation.
As shown in Fig. 14.3(b), the presence of palladium enhanced the
reduction of the cobalt species associated with the low-temperature
shift of the two cobalt peaks at 154 °C and at 368 °C. A diffuse reflec-
tance IR Fourier-transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) study of the
CeCo30 and Pd/CeCo30 samples, after exposure to a CO + O2 gas
mixture at 25 °C, revealed bands attributable to bidentate carbonate,
followed by the appearance of bands due to gas-phase CO2. These
bands suggested that oxidation of CO at the ambient temperature
occurred through the formation of surface carbonates as intermedi-
ates. For the Pd-promoted samples, similar bands but of lower inten-
sity were observed. Moreover, in this case, there was no direct relation
between the observed CO and CO2 bands and the activity. To account
for these results, different reaction mechanisms over the unpro-
moted and palladium-promoted CeCo30 samples were suggested as
shown in Fig. 14.4. According to the proposed mechanism, the loss
of activity observed for the unpromoted mixed-oxide catalyst was
related to the regeneration of oxygen vacancies, which was assumed
to be the rate-determining step needed for oxygen activation. For the
palladium-promoted catalyst, as shown in Fig. 14.4(b), Pd species,
like other noble metals, are able to activate oxygen by dissociating it
even at low temperatures. The atomic oxygen then spilled over the
basic support reacting with the adsorbed carbonate. The synergism
between Pd, able to activate oxygen, and the ST-prepared CeCo30
oxide, able to adsorb CO, produced a catalyst with better perfor-
mance for low-temperature CO oxidation compared to Pd supported
over ceria or over Co3O4.
14.2.2.2 CuO/CeO2
Another interesting composite system based on ceria are CuO/CeO2
mixed oxides. This system has been widely studied as a replacement
for the more expensive noble-metal systems and, with respect to the
cobalt system, it has the advantage of being environmentally greener
Figure 14.4 Proposed CO reaction mechanism over (a) CeCo30 and (b) Pd/
CeCo30. From Luo et al.25 with permission.
ion radius (0.076 Å) is smaller than that of Ce4+ (1.010 Å). XPS data
suggested that the oxidation state of copper in the mixed-oxide sam-
ples was lower than Cu2+. To conclude, once again the role of ceria
in these types of system appeared to be a modification of the chemi-
cal and structural properties of the second oxide by enhancing the
redox capability.
Because of the excellent catalytic performance of the ceria-
based Co3O4 and CuO catalysts, a combination of the two systems
was investigated by preparing, through co-precipitation, mixed Cu–
Co–Ce–O oxides with different compositions.20 The mixed oxides
had a larger surface area with respect to the Co–Ce–O and Cu–
Ce–O composite oxides. Moreover, the addition of cobalt to the
Cu–Ce–O catalyst enhanced thermal stability because the particle
size was unchanged on calcination at 850 °C. According to the
H2-TPR patterns, the peaks due to cobalt oxide reduction and those
for copper oxide reduction were reciprocally affected and shifted
towards lower temperatures. The interaction between cobalt and
Figure 14.8 TCE combustion light-off curves over CeO2 catalysts calcined at differ-
ent temperatures: 550 °C;
450 °C; z 650 °C; { 800 °C. Gas composition: 1000
ppm TCE, air balance; GHSV = 15000 h−1. From Dai et al.49 with permission.
Table 14.2 T50 ( °C) and T90 ( °C) for the decomposition of each VOC in the
corresponding binary mixture over CexZr1-xO2 catalysts. From Gutierrez-Ortiz et al.51
with permission.
concluded that there was no evidence for Mn4+ species. The agree-
ment between the analytical and the XPS-derived Mn/(Mn+Ce)
atomic ratios indicated a homogeneous distribution of manganese
up to 25 at%, thereafter segregation of the crystalline Mn3O4 phase,
as indicated by XRD, occurred. The mixed-oxide samples, tested in
the catalytic oxidation of VOCs, exhibited higher ethanol and tolu-
ene conversion (although with toluene the differences were smaller)
compared to conversion with individual oxides. Additionally, MnOx
was more active than pure CeO2. The Mn0.50Ce0.50 sample was the
most active with complete conversion to CO2 achieved at 200 °C for
ethanol and 260 °C for toluene. For ethyl acetate conversion, a simi-
lar catalyst ranking was obtained, with different reaction products
such as CO2, acetaldehyde, acetic acid, and ethanol. For ethyl ace-
tate a separate experiment with acetic acid concluded that the oxi-
dation of ethyl acetate is controlled by the reactivity of the
intermediate acetic acid, which blocks catalytic sites. Quite interest-
ingly, and in contrast to the case discussed above,54 in terms of the
specific reaction rate per unit surface area, the mixed oxides pre-
sented lower activities than single oxides.56 Moreover, the specific
activity of CeO2 for the oxidation of toluene and ethyl acetate was
higher than the activity of MnOx whereas the reverse was obtained
with ethanol oxidation. It is interesting that the enhancement of the
reducibility of the mixed oxides, as inferred from H2-TPR, did not
correspond to an increase of the specific activity in VOC oxidation.
The authors concluded that reduction in the presence of H2 as
probed by TPR was likely different when the reducing agent was a
VOC molecule. In contrast to H2, VOC molecules were adsorbed on
the catalyst surfaces under reaction conditions. This lack of correla-
tion between reducibility and VOC oxidation deserves further atten-
tion also with respect to different VOCs.
The binary system CuO–CeO2, as seen in the previous section,
is an interesting system for oxidation reactions. Different prepara-
tion procedures have been developed, enormously affecting cata-
lytic activity.28,59–62 Delimaris and Ioannides55 recently investigated
several CuO–CeO2 catalysts with different Cu/(Ce+Cu) atomic
ratios prepared by the combustion method and tested in the
much larger amount of gold was found at the catalyst surface of the
DP sample. The TPR patterns displayed a noticeable temperature
shift of the ceria surface peak confirming the promotion of ceria
reduction by gold. As a consequence of the better dispersion of sur-
face gold, the observed negative shifts were 260 °C and 360 °C with
the CP and the DP gold catalysts, respectively. On the basis of the
characterization results it was suggested that the main reason for the
increase of activity was the increased reducibility of the CeO2 sur-
face of the DP sample, thus enhancing the mobility of the surface
lattice oxygen involved in the VOC oxidation through the Mars–van
Krevelen mechanism.73
The same research team recently investigated a series of ceria-
supported catalysts using group IB metals (Ag, Au, and Cu) prepared
by DP and CP as above, but calcining at 300 °C rather than 450 °C.74
The combined effect of the metal and preparation method was
evaluated in the oxidation of methanol, toluene, and acetone. In all
cases the oxidation activity of ceria was highly promoted by the addi-
tion of the metal. On all catalysts VOC reactivity followed the order:
methanol > acetone > toluene. The preparation method strongly
affected the oxidation activity of the different molecules and the
effect depended on the particular metal. As shown in Fig. 14.11 for
methanol conversion, with respect to the DP samples, gold was always
the most active followed by silver and then copper. With respect to
the CP samples, silver was the most active followed by gold and cop-
per. The difference in catalyst surface area was quite small. According
to XRD, smaller CeO2 crystallites were obtained in the CP samples
compared to DP. This was attributed to the presence of the IB metal
during co-precipitation limiting ceria crystallite growth.74 According
to the H2-TPR patterns, all the metals promoted the surface reduci-
bility of the ceria, therefore increasing oxygen mobility and weaken-
ing the Ce–O bond located near the active metal atoms. In general,
the larger the metal dispersion, the larger the effect on ceria reduc-
ibility. The study established very well the dependence of the catalytic
effect on the preparation procedure of the particular metal. In par-
ticular, for co-precipitation, the solubility of the metal hydroxide with
respect to the solubility of Ce(OH)3 was very important. Due to the
Figure 14.12. NH3-TPD profiles of catalysts: c 1.4 Au/TiO2; 1.6 Au/Al2O3; × 1.7
Au/Fe2O3; 1.6 Au/CeO2. From Liu and Yang75 with permission.
Figure 14.13 Conversion of (a) propene and (b) toluene vs temperature over gold
supported catalysts. From Ousmane et al.76 with permission.
found over Au/Al2O3 (50–100 Å). Using a GHSV of 35000 h−1 the
Au/CeO2 catalyst was able to achieve 50% propene conversion at
152 °C and total propene conversion at 230 °C, while it achieved
50% toluene conversion at 208 °C and full toluene conversion at
290 °C.76 The efficiency of the Au/Ce7.5/Al2O3 sample was quite
interesting because only a small amount of surface-deposited ceria
was able to promote the activity of the gold over the alumina sup-
port. The supports on their own, tested in the catalytic oxidation of
increased oxygen mobility but did not compensate for the loss of
ceria adsorption sites. The authors concluded that the positive effect
of gold was determinant under those conditions where the activa-
tion of the surface oxygen is the key step for deep oxidation reac-
tions as in methanol oxidation.
As shown from the literature results mentioned above, despite
the significant progress in the development of catalysts for the total
oxidation of organic molecule, it is actually very difficult to design a
system that works efficiently as a general VOC combustion catalyst.
The variety of molecules in a real feed requires specific catalysts for
different groups of compounds, such as aliphatic, aromatic, and
chlorinated.
Figure 14.14 CH4 conversion as a function of temperature over fresh (filled sym-
bols) and aged (open symbols) samples: {z Co3O4prec; dV Co30Cecopr; cU
Co30CeZrcopr; CeZrcopr; Ë CeO2prec; at (a) λ = 8, (b) λ = 1, with WHSV = 60000
mL.g−1.h−1. From Liotta et al.83 with permission.
by XRD, TPR, and XPS confirmed the important role of the ceria
and ceria-zirconia support in maintaining the reducibility of the sam-
ple and also in avoiding sintering of the Co3O4 particles.83
Figure 14.15 Methane conversion obtained with (A) Pd/Al2O3 and (B) Pd/CeO2/
Al2O3 from Pd(C5H7OO)2 (top) and Pd(NO3)2 (bottom). From Simplício et al.98
with permission.
Figure 14.17 Conversion curves for the CO+NO reaction on Pt–Rh/Al2O3 (∆) and
on Pt–Rh/Al2O3–CeO2 ( first run); (
second run after 72 h aging in the course
of the reaction at 500 °C, with PNO = PCO= 5×10−3 atm, mcat = 0.2 g and total flow rate
= 10 L.h−1). From Granger et al.111 with permission.
14.6 Conclusion
As mentioned at the beginning of this chapter the structural and
electronic properties of CeO2 make this oxide particularly suitable
as a component of catalysts for environmental reactions involving
oxidation steps. Through specific but not exhaustive examples from
the recent literature, it was shown how the presence of CeO2 as a
main active species, as a support, or as a catalyst promoter, contrib-
utes to the enhancement of catalytic activity. Its use as a single-oxide
catalyst, particularly for the CO and VOC oxidation reactions,
requires advanced synthesis of nanostructured materials. The con-
trol of the morphology and the structure of the final CeO2 oxide,
with a high surface area and lattice defects, is important for its elec-
tronic and adsorption properties. Its successful use as a support of
noble metals requires synthetic approaches enhancing the interface
between CeO2 and the metal, favoring the eventual spillover of oxy-
gen from the support to the metal and vice versa. Likewise, as a base-
metal-oxide support, intimate contact between the two oxides with
possible solid solution formation was the best structural arrange-
ment for the promotion of oxygen mobility.
Acknowledgments
Support from the European Community through the COST Action
CM0903 and by a NATO grant, ESP CLG. 984160, is gratefully
acknowledged.
References
1. Trovarelli, A., In Catalysis by Ceria and Related Materials, ed. A. Trovarelli,
Imperial College Press, Singapore, (2002), pp. 15–50.
2. Wells, A.F., Structural Inorganic Chemistry, 3rd edition, Oxford University
Press, Oxford, (1961), p. 457.
3. Perrichon, V., Laachir, A., Bergeret, G., Frety, R., Tournayan, L.,
Touret, O., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 90 (1994) 773–781.
4. Tsunekawa, S., Sivamohan, R., Ito, S., Kasuya, A., Fukuda, T.,
Nanostructured Materials, 11 (1999) 141–147.
5. Lu J.-L., Gao, H.-J., Shaikhutdinov S., Freund H.-J., Surf. Sci., 600
(2006) 5004–5010.
6. Farmer, J.A., Campbell, T., Science, 329 (2010) 933–936.
7. Kaspar, J., Fornasiero, P., Hickey, N., Catal. Today, 77 (2003) 419–449.
8. Venezia, A.M., Pantaleo, G., Longo, A., Di Carlo, G., Casaletto, M.P.,
Liotta, L.F., Deganello, G., J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (2005) 2821–2827.
9. Liotta, L.F., Deganello, G., Di Carlo, G., Pantaleo, G., Venezia, A.M.,
Current Topics in Catalysis, 7 (2008) 77–97.
10. Su, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, T., Wang, S., Zhu, B., Cao, J., Yua, Z., Zhang, S.,
Huang, W., Wu, S., Catal. Lett., 124 (2008) 405–412.
11. Royer, S., Duprez, D., ChemCatChem, 3 (2011) 24–65.
12. Schubert, M.M., Hackenberg, S., van Veen, A.C., Muhler, M., Plzak, V.,
Behm, R.J., J. Catal., 197 (2001) 113–122.
13. Nolan, M., Fearon, J.E., Watson, G.W., Solid State Ionic, 177 (2006)
3069–3074.
14. Loschen, C., Migani, A., Bromley, S.T., Illas, F., Neyman, K.M., Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 10 (2008) 5730–5738.
15. Mars, P., van Krevelen, D.W., Chem. Eng. Sci., 3 (1954) 41–59.
16. Aneggi, E., Llorca, J., Boaro, M., Trovarelli, A., J. Catal., 234 (2005)
88–95.
17. Zhou, K., Wang, X., Sun, X., Peng, Q., Li, Y., J. Catal., 229 (2005)
206–212.
18. Valechha, D., Lokhande, S., Klementova, M., Subrt, J., Rayalu, S.,
Labhsetwar, N., J. Mater. Chem., 21 (2011) 3718–3725.
37. Haruta, M., Yamada, N., Kobayashi, T., Iijima, S., J. Catal., 115 (1989)
301–309.
38. Scirè, S., Minicò, S., Crisafulli, C., Satriano, C., Pistone, A., Appl. Catal.
B. Environm., 40 (2003) 43–49.
39. Carrettin, S., Concepcìon P., Corma, A., Lopez Nieto, J.M., Puntes, V.F.,
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 43 (2004) 2538–2540.
40. Fu, Q., Saltsburg, H., Flytzani-Stephanopolous, M., Science, 301 (2003)
935–938.
41. Casaletto, M.P., Longo, A., Martorana, A., Prestianni, A., Venezia, A.M.,
Surf. Interf. Anal., 38 (2006) 215–218.
42. Casaletto, M.P., Longo, A., Venezia, A.M., Martorana, A., Prestianni, A.,
Appl. Catal. A, 302 (2006) 309–316.
43. Liotta, L.F., Appl. Catal. B, 100 (2010) 403–412.
44. Li, W.B., Wang, J.X., Gong, H., Catal. Today, 148 (2009) 81–87.
45. Patterson, M.J., Agove, D.E., Cant, N.W., Appl. Catal. B, 26 (2000) 47–57.
46. Heynderickx, P.M., Thybaut, J.W., Poelman, H., Poelman, D.,
Marin, G.B., Appl. Catal. B, 90 (2009) 295–306.
47. Arzamenti, G., O’Shea, V.A.D., Alvarez-Galvan, M.C., Fierro, J.L.G.,
Arias, P.L., Gandia, L.M., J. Catal., 261 (2009) 50–59.
48. Baldi, M., Finocchio, E., Milella, F., Busca, G., Appl. Catal. B, 16 (1998)
43–51.
49. Dai Q., Wang, X., Lu, G., Appl. Catal. B, 81 (2008) 192–202.
50. Gutierrez-Ortiz, J.I., de Rivas, B., Lopez-Fonseca, R., Gonzalez-
Velasco, J.R, Appl. Catal. A, 269 (2004) 147–155.
51. Gutierrez-Ortiz, J.I., de Rivas, B., Lopez-Fonseca, R., Gonzalez-
Velasco, J.R., Appl. Catal. B, 65 (2006) 191–200.
52. Balducci, G., Kaspar, J., Fornasiero, P., Graziani M., J. Phys. Chem. B,
101 (1997) 1750–1753.
53. Taylor, S.H., O’Leary, R., Appl. Catal. B, 25 (2000) 137–149.
54. Delimaris, D., Ioannides, T., Appl. Catal. B, 84 (2008) 303–312.
55. Delimaris, D., Ioannides, T., Appl. Catal. B, 89 (2009) 295–302.
56. Tang, X., Li, Y., Huang, X., Xu, Y., Zhu, H., Wang, J., Shen, W., Appl.
Catal. B, 62 (2006) 265–273.
57. Kaptejin, F., Singoredjo, L., Andreini, A., Appl. Catal. B, 3 (1994)
173–189.
58. Kang, C.H.Y., Kusaba, H., Yahiro, H., Sasaki, K., Teraoka, Y., Solid State
Ionics, 177 (2006) 1799–1802.
59. Rao, G.R., Sahu, H.R., Mishra, B.G., Colloid Surf. A, 220 (2003) 261–269.
60. Xiaoyuan, J., Guanglie, I., Renxian, Z., Jianxin, M., Yu, C., Xiaoming, Z.,
Appl. Surf. Sci., 173 (2001) 208–220.
61. Avgouropoulos, G., Joannides, T., Appl. Catal. A, 244 (2003) 155–167.
62. Hu C., Zhu Q., Jiang Z., Zhang Y., Wang Y., Micropor. Mesopor. Pater. 113
(2008) 427.
63. Avgouropoulos, G., Joannides, T., Appl. Catal. B, 67 (2006) 1–11.
64. Heynderickx, P.M., Thybaut, J.W., Poelman, H., Poelman, D.,
Marin, G.B., J. Catal., 272 (2010) 109–121.
65. Balcaen, V., Poelman, H., Poelman, D., Marin, G.B., J. Catal., 283
(2011) 75–88.
66. Menon, U., Galvita, V.V., Marin, G.B., J. Catal., 283 (2011) 1–9.
67. Liotta, L.F., Ousmane, M., Di Carlo, G., Pantaleo, G., Deganello, G.,
Boreave, A., Giroir-Fendler, A., Catal. Lett., 127 (2009) 270–276.
68. Mitsui, T., Matsui, T., Kikuchi, R., Eguchi, K., Top. Catal., 52 (2009)
464–469.
69. Mitsui, T., Matsui, T., Tsutsui, M., Kikuchi, R., Eguchi, K., Appl. Catal.
B, 81 (2008) 56–63.
70. Ordòňez, S., Bello, L., Sastre, H., Rosal, R., Diez, F.V., Appl. Catal. B,
38 (2002) 139–149.
71. Radic, N., Grbic, B., Terlecki-Baricevic, A., Appl. Catal. B, 50 (2004)
153–159.
72. Duprez, D., in Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis, eds. C. Li, Q. Xin,
Vol. 112, (1997), p. 13.
73. Scirè, S., Minicò, S., Crisafulli, C., Satriano, C., Pistone, A., Appl. Catal.
B, 40 (2003) 43–49.
74. Scirè, S., Riccobene, P.M., Crisafulli, C., Appl. Catal. B, 101 (2010)
109–117.
75. Liu, S.Y., Yang, S.M., Appl. Catal., 334 (2008) 92–99.
76. Ousmane, M., Liotta, L.F., Di Carlo, G., Pantaleo, G., Venezia, A.M.,
Deganello, G., Retailleau, L., Boreave, A., Giroir-Fendler, A., Appl.
Catal. B, 101 (2011) 629–637.
77. Kasture, M.B., Patel, P., Prabhune, A.A., Ramana, C.V., Kulkarni, A.A.,
Prasad, B.L.V., J. Chem. Sci., 120 (2008) 515–520.
78. Bonelli, R., Albonetti, S., Morandi, V., Ortolani, L., Riccobene, P.M.,
Scirè, S., Zacchini, S., Appl. Catal. A, 395 (2011) 10–18.
79. Minico, S., Scirè, S., Crisafulli, C., Maggiore, R., Galvagno, S., Appl.
Catal. B, 28 (2000) 245–251.
80. Gelin, P., Primet, M., Appl. Catal. B, 39 (2002) 1–37.
81. Lambert, J.K., Kazi, M.S., Farrauto, R., J. Appl. Catal. B, 14 (1997)
211–223.
82. Liotta, L.F., Di Carlo, G., Pantaleo, G., Venezia, A.M., Deganello, Appl.
Catal. B, 66 (2006) 217–227.
83. Liotta, L.F., Di Carlo, G., Pantaleo, G., Deganello, G., Appl. Catal. B,
70 (2007) 314–322.
84. Yoshida, H., Nakajima, T., Yazawa, Y., Hattori, T., Appl. Catal. B, 71,
(2007) 70–79.
85. Venezia, A.M., Murania, R., Pantaleo, G., Deganello, G., J. Catal., 251
(2007) 94–102.
86. Venezia, A.M., Di Carlo, G., Liotta, L.F., Pantaleo, G., Kantcheva, M.,
Appl. Catal. B, 106 (2011) 529–539.
87. Venezia, A.M., Di Carlo, G., Pantaleo, G., Liotta, L.F., Melaet, G.,
Kruse, N., Appl. Catal. B, 88 (2009) 430–437.
88. Choudary, T.V., Banerjee, S., Choudhary, V.R., Appl. Catal. A, 234
(2002) 1–23.
89. Knapp, D., Ziegler, T., J. Phys. Chem. C, 112 (2008) 17311–17318.
90. Colussi, S., De Leitenburg, C., Dolcetti, G., Trovarelli, A., J. Alloys Comp.,
374 (2004) 387–392.
91. Ramirez-Lopez, R., Martinez, I.E., Balderas-Tapia, L., Catal. Today, 150
(2010) 358–362.
92. O’Connell, M., Morris, M.A., Catal. Today, 59 (2000) 387–393.
93. Santhosh Kumar, M., Eyssler, A., Hug, P., van Vegten, N., Baiker, A.,
Weidenkaff, A., Ferri, D., Appl. Catal. B., 94 (2010) 77–84.
94. Mayernick, A.D., Janik, M.J., J. Catal., 278 (2011) 16–25.
95. Liotta, L.F., Di Carlo, G., Pantaleo, G., Venezia, A.M., Deganello, G.,
Top. Catal., 52 (2009) 1989–1994.
96. Liotta, L.F., Di Carlo, G., Pantaleo, G., Venezia, A.M., Deganello, G.,
Merlone Borla, E., Pidria, M., Appl. Catal. B, 75 (2007) 182–188.
97. Colussi, S., Trovarelli, A., Vesselli, E., Baraldi, A., Comelli, G., Groppi, G.,
Llorca, J., App. Catal. A, 390 (2010) 1–10.
118. Ilieva, L., Pantaleo, G., Ivanov, I., Venezia, A.M., Andreeva, D., Appl.
Catal. B, 65 (2006) 101–109.
119. Ilieva, L., Pantaleo, G., Mintcheva, N., Ivanov, I., Venezia, A.M.,
Andreeva, D., J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 8 (2008) 867–873.
120. Ilieva, L., Pantaleo, G., Sobczak, J.W., Ivanov, I., Venezia, A.M.,
Andreeva, D., Appl. Catal. B, 76 (2007) 107–114.
121. Andreeva, D., Nedyalkova, R., Ilieva, L., Abrashev, M.V., Appl. Catal. B,
52 (2004) 157.
122. Ilieva, L., Pantaleo, G., Ivanov, I., Nedyalkova, R., Venezia, A.M.,
Andreeva, D., Catal. Today, 139 (2008) 168–173.
123. Kantcheva, M., Samarskaya, O., Ilieva, L., Pantaleo, G., Venezia, A.M.,
Andreeva, D., Appl. Catal. B, 88 (2009) 113–126.
124. Bánsági, T., Zakar, T.S., Solymosi, F., Appl. Catal. B, 66 (2006) 147–150.
125. Solymosi, F., Bánsági, T., Zakar, S., Catal. Lett., 87 (2003) 7–10.
INDEX
16
O/18O isotopic exchange 158 CO oxidation 827
deposition-precipitation (DP)
adsorption 506
hydrogen 753 hydrogenation of
N2O 228 crotonaldehyde 798
Ag/CeO2 437, 442, 596, 846 oxidation of methane 859
air/fuel ratio 141 sensors 335
Al2O3/CeO2 789 water gas shift reaction
aldol condensation 802 (WGSR) 325, 327
ammonia 706 XPS 829
anode polarization Au/CeO2–Al2O3 502, 511
resistance 687 autothermal reforming 705
anode reactions 728
anode shielding effect 684 Ba,K/CeO2 609
atomistic computer simulation ball milling 428
247, 318 Bi2O3 3, 587
ceria nanoparticle 273 bioethanol 784
ceria nanotube 261
crystallisation 269, 270 CaO 176
dislocation 256 carboxylation of glycerol 789
energy minimisation 249 Carnot cycle 676
grain boundary 257 catalytic combustion of VOC
oxygen transport 250 432
oxygen vacancies 250, 253 catalytic wet-air oxidation of
thin films 267 organics (CWAO) 48
Au/CeO2 325, 329, 331, 436, Ce0.5Zr0.5O2 20, 32, 53, 58, 59,
439, 451, 453, 466, 470, 477, 178, 417, 435, 439, 451, 453
498, 506, 510, 540, 551, Ce0.6La0.4O1.8 736
787, 843 Ce0.6Y0.4O1.8 736
881
882 Index
Index 883
884 Index
Index 885
886 Index
Index 887
888 Index