Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dear Readers
As an effort in furtherance to the ultimate objective of IRC to promote and encourage the
excel in highway profession and related activities in particular “Road Safety” and promotion
of indigenous innovative and environment friendly road and bridge construction technologies,
some of the important topics in this edition has been covered namely “Simplified Method of
Calculation of Dynamic Increment Component of Earth Pressure and Live Load Surcharge for Bridge Abutments &
Retaining Walls” and “Estimation of Capacity for Multilane Divided National Highways in India” I hope this will
benefit the highway profession to a large extent.
I would like to share with you the alarming rate of road accidents in India. It is revealed that about 70%
of the fatal road accidents in India occurred in the eight States only namely Uttar Pradesh (12%); Tamil
Nadu (11%); Andhra Pradesh (10%); Maharashtra (10%); Karnataka (8%); Rajasthan & Madhya Pradesh
(7% each state) and Gujarat (5%).
Over 80 percent vulnerable road users (pedestrians, bicyclists, users of two wheeler/autorickshaw) are killed
in road accidents in India. Nearly 90% of the road accidents are attributed to the drivers (human) fault leaving only
10% due to other factors like poor road geometry, lack of safety elements, poor conditions of the vehicles and bad
weather etc.
It is stunning to share serious and dubious distinction that about 50% road accident victims are of the age
group of less than 40 years. This is severe stigma not only to the society as a whole but irreparable loss to the
nation economy as well. Perhaps, none of us has realised to the desired degree, the result of our usual casual
approach towards the warranted precautionary road safety provisions to avert the avoidable loss of lives, a
heinous mishap at our part.
I sincerely appeal to all readers, let us make a conscious self commitment to be equally sensitive for the road safety
and play a constructive role to ensure the mandatory inclusion of the warranted road safety provisions like ensuring
minimum setback distance on curves, rectification of black spots, proper sign boards (preferably solar based)/retro-
reflective road marking (including solar studs) at the vulnerable locations like inter-sections/junctions etc. while
preparing/ implementing the road maintenance and development projects.
I would like to further appeal to all our engineering fraternity to join in this event and endeavour and to share their
experience and wisdom in this noble cause of saving avoidable loss of lives and injury due to road accidents.
(S.S. Nahar)
Secretary General
Email: secgen.rs@gmail.com
Place: New Delhi
Dated: 24th December, 2014
Outside Back Cover-Unisteel Engineering Works 271 Paper No. 627 "Estimation of Capacity for Multi-
Lane Divided National Highways In India"
260 SA Infrastructure Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
262 National Projects Construction Corporation Ltd.
270 Tinna Rubber Infrastructure Ltd. by Naveen Sharma P.K. Sarkar
Jamnagar House, Shahjahan Road, Kama Koti Marg, Sector 6, R.K. Puram,
New Delhi – 110 011 New Delhi – 110 022
Tel: Secretary General: +91(11) 2338 6486 Tel : Secretary General : +91 (11) 2618 5303
Sectt.: (11) 2338 5395, 2338 7140, 2338 4543, 2338 6274 Sectt. : (11) 2618 5273, 2617 1548, 2671 6778,
Fax : +91 (11) 2338 1649 2618 5315, 2618 5319, Fax : +91 (11) 2618 3669
No part of this publication may be reproduced by any means without prior written permission from the Secretary General, IRC.
Edited and Published by Shri S.S. Nahar on behalf of the Indian Roads Congress (IRC), New Delhi. Printed by Aravali Printers
& Publishers, Pvt. Ltd, W-30, Okhla Industrial Area, Phase-II, New Delhi on behalf of the Indian Roads Congress. The responsibility
of the contents and the opinions expressed in Journal of the IRC is exclusively of the author/s concerned. IRC and the Editor disclaim
responsibility and liability for any statement or opinion, originality of contents and of any copyright violations by the authors. The opinions
expressed in the papers and contents published in the Journal of the IRC do not necessarily represent the views of the Editor or IRC.
14000 Copies, October-December, 2014 (28 Pages)
Journal of the Indian Roads Congress, October-December 2014
Paper No. 626
ABSTRACT
The paper briefly explains the method of calculation of dynamic increment component of earth pressure &
uniform live load surcharge, which has been introduced in the revised IRC:6-2014. Theory behind the formulae
given in IS:1893 – 1984 pertaining to dynamic increment and the revisions required in the formulas to account
for the revision in seismic codal provisions subsequent to 1984 code is explained in this paper. Solved examples
given to demonstrate the simplified method. Practicing bridge engineers will find these equations and the method
of calculation extremely useful.
1. INTRODUCTION provisions of IS:1893-1984. Designers h = Height of earth under submerged
are finding it difficult to implement this condition (from the bottom of
Past case histories of damage or failure clause properly due to (a) non-familiarity wedge failure surface)
of bridges induced by abutment failure with the subject matter and (b) lack of
or displacement during seismic event clarity in the codal provision. f = Angle of internal friction of soil
have clearly demonstrated the need for d = Angle of friction between the wall
careful attention to abutment design The objective of this paper is to briefly and earth fill
and detailing in seismic prone areas. explain the background and theory behind
a = Angle which earth face of the
While research papers on estimation of the formulas given in IS: 1893 for dynamic
wall makes with the vertical
active and passive earth pressure under increment of earth pressure and live load
normal condition is plenty, the same surcharge, demonstrate the application b = Slope of Earth fill
under seismic condition is still lacking. of the same through illustrative example
Ah = Horizontal seismic coefficient
The problem of increase in lateral earth & to give a comparative results for better
pressure during earthquake has been understanding of the impact of this clause = Z *I Sa
recognized by the Indian Roads Congress to the designers. 2 R G*
and the code IRC:6 pertaining to Loads Z = Seismic Zone Factor
and Stresses, in its 5 revision, included 2. NOTATIONS USED
th
I = Importance Factor
the dynamic increment of earth pressure
for bridges located in seismic zones gd = Unit weight of soil (Dry) R = Response reduction factor
IV and V (Clause no. 219.5.4). Prior g = Effective unit weight of soil Sa/g = Average response acceleration
to introduction of this clause, highway sub (Submerged) coefficient
bridges were not designed for earth
Av = Associated vertical seismic
pressure with any dynamic amplification gsat = Saturated unit weight of soil
coefficient = 30% of 2/3 x Ah
for seismic load combination. For g = Effective unit weight of water
values of these dynamic incremental w (hydrostatic) = 0.2 x Ah
loads, reference is made to IS:1893-
(As per IS:1893 (Part-4), the associated
1984 in the code. It is only in October H = Total height of soil face at the tip
2014, the dynamic increment formulas of heel slab (from the bottom of Av is 0.5 Ah. However revised IS:1893-
wedge failure surface) 2002 and IRC:6-2010 considers
are introduced in IRC:6, in line with
* Managing Director, B & S Engineering Consultants Pvt. Ltd., NOIDA, e-mail: bsecmail@yahoo.com
Written comments on this Paper are invited and will be received by the 10th January, 2015
Cah’ = Hor. Coeff.ofdyn. active earth pressure (submerged backfill) = Ca’ x Cos(d) Due to the complex soil-structure
interaction during the earthquake, the
Cav’ = Hor. Coeff.ofdyn. active earth pressure (submerged backfill) = Ca’ x Cos(d)
most commonly used method for the
Ca’ = Ca with value of d as half the value of d for dry backfill &l replaced by ls. design of Abutment / retaining walls is
the force-based analysis based on pseudo
3. THEORY & ASSUMPTIONS static method, which ignores the cyclic
nature of the earthquake and treats it as an
The performance of Retaining walls/Abutments during earthquakes is very additional static force upon the Abutment
complex. Due to repetitive nature of the dynamic load of earthquake, there is a need / retaining wall. Other refined method
to determine the displacement of the wall due to earthquake forces and their damage of analysis includes (a) force-based
potential. This becomes more imperative when the frequency of the dynamic load is pseudo-dynamic method (Steedman &
close to the natural frequency of the wall-backfill-foundation-base soil system. This Zeng [1990], Chaudhury and Nimbalkar
in turn requires the information on the distribution of backfill soil mass and base [2005, 2006]) and displacement based
soil mass participating in the vibrations. It is often difficult to assess & model these analysis (Richards & Elms [1979],
parameters. Laboratory tests and Analysis of such walls by Kramer (1996) indicated Chaudhury and Nimbalkar [2006]).
the following:
In case of pseudo static method,to derive
1. Abutment/retaining walls can move by translation and/or rotation. The relative the lateral force, it can be assumed that
amounts of translation and rotation depends on the geometry, type of abutment/ the force acts through the centroid of
retaining wall as well as the sub-soil condition. the active wedge. The advantage of this
method is that it is easy to understand
2. The magnitude and distribution of dynamic wall pressures are influenced by
and apply.
the mode of wall movement, e.g., translation, rotation about the base.
3. The maximum soil thrust acting on a wall generally occurs when the wall Following the great Kanto Earthquake of
has translated or rotated towards the backfill (i,e. when the inertial force on 1923, Okabe (1924) and Mononobe and
Matsuo (1929) developed an equation Where PAE = the sum of the static (PA) and Despite the limitations, the M-O
that can be used to determine the the pseudo static earthquake force (PE). method is still widely used globally.
horizontal pseudo-static force acting on ‘g’ is the total unit weight of backfill. The deficiency of the M-O method of
the retaining wall. This method is often The equation for Ca is given in clause 2.0 analysis is the following:
referred to as the Mononobe-Okabe above.
(M-O) method and is applicable for 1. It cannot handle backfill with
“yielding” type of walls. The equation Equilibrium considerations of the soil mixed soil (C-f) conditions. The
is an extension of Coulomb’s approach wedge behind the abutment / retaining entire failure wedge under seismic
and is wall under seismic action are as shown in condition behind the wall shall
Fig.1 below, for cantilever type abutment be cohesion less. In hilly terrain,
PAE = PA + PE =1/2 Ca. H2g Eq......1 / retaining walls. It can be seen from the this is often difficult to achieve,
figure that the additional component as firm natural soil is likely to be
encountered behind the backfill of
the abutment within the wedge.
The variation of pressure along the wall height due to dynamic increment can be 5. ILLUSTRATIVE DESIGN
non-linear with jump discontinuities. Structural design of Abutment components EXAMPLE
The Problem :
The Solution :
F = Force in the layer due to dynamic Increment. -Z = 0.24; I = 1.2; R = 2.5; Sa/g =
2.5
F.E =Moment due to force from bottom of the layer under consideration.
-Ah=Horizontal seismic coefficient
E = Depth of C.G of the Force from bottom of the layer under consideration.
= Z *I Sa = 0.144
D = Depth of the Layer under consideration. 2 R g*
-Av = 0.2 x Ah = 0.029
P1 = Vertical Pressure at top of the layer under consideration.
Table 1 : Dynamic Increment due to Earth Pressure b. Total Lateral Load at 3m above
base due to Dynamic Increment
Layer of the Soil on Earth Pressure : = 6.166+3.118
= 9.3 Tonnes
S. Layer-1 Layer-2 Layer-3
Component (Top Layer) (Int. Layer) (Bottom Layer)
No. c. Total Moment at Base due
(dry soil – (6m to 7m (7 to 10m from to Dynamic Increment
top 6m) from top) top) on Earth Pressure :
1 Height of Layer, D 6.0 m 1.0 m 3.0 m = [6.166 x (4+2.333) + 3.118
x (3+0.516) + 4.550 x 1.961]
2 Pressure, P1 (in t/m )
2
0.0 10.80 11.80 = 58.9t.m
3 Pressure, P2 (in t/m )
2
10.80 11.80 14.80
d. Total Moment at 3m above Base
4 Distribution Factor, K1 0.317 0.316 0.237 due to Dynamic Increment on Earth
5 Distribution Factor, K2 0.127 0.237 0.0 Pressure : = [6.166 x (1+2.333)
+ 3.118 x (0.516)] = 22.16t.m
6 Force, F (in Tonnes) 6.166 3.118 4.550
Depth of C.G from Bottomof a. Total Lateral Load at Base due to
7 2.333 0.516 1.961
the Layer, E (in Metres) Dynamic Increment on Live Load
Surcharge:= 2.877 + 0.597 + 0.768
Table 2 :Dynamic Increment due to Live Load Surcharge
= 4.2 Tonnes
Layer of the Soil
Layer-1 Layer-2 Layer-3 b. Total Lateral Load at 3m above
S. (Top Layer) (Int. Layer) (Bottom Layer) Base due to Dyn. Increment on
Component
No. (dry soil – top (6m to 7m from (7 to 10m from Live Load Surcharge:= 2.877 +
0.597 = 3.5Tonnes
6m) top) top)
1 Height of Layer, D 6.0 m 1.0 m 3.0 m c. Total Moment at Base due to
Dynamic Increment on Live Load
2 Pressure, P1 (in t/m2) 2.16 2.16 2.16 Surcharge : = [2.877 x (4+3.429) +
3 Pressure, P2 (in t/m2) 2.16 2.16 2.16 0.597 x (3+0.524) + 0.768 x 2.00]
= 25.0 t.m
4 Distribution Factor, K1 0.317 0.316 0.237
5 Distribution Factor, K2 0.127 0.237 0.0 d. Total Moment at 3m above Base
due to Dynamic Increment on
6 Force, F (in Tonnes) 2.877 0.597 0.768 Live Load Surcharge :
Depth of C.G from = [2.877 x (1+3.429) + 0.597
7 Bottom of the Layer, 3.429 0.524 2.000 x (0.524)]
E (in Metres) = 13.1t.m
abstract
For development of any country transportation plays a very significant role in improving the economic sector.
As per the present estimates, the length of Indian road network is of approximately 4.3 million km. considering
the need for providing enhanced mobility, the Government of India has proposed its massive National Highway
development Program (NHDP). Despite the above program, India does not have an indigenous Highway Capacity
Manual like other developed countries. Very recently, a research study has been initiated titled Development of
Indian Highway Capacity Manual (Indo-HCM) under the aegis of Centre for Scientific and Industrial Research
(CSIR) by Planning Commission aimed at development of capacity standards for all classes of roads in India.
As a part of this study, two National Highways having four and six lane divided carriage way widths have been
considered as candidate sections. The videography technique was used to capture the speed-flow data for a period
of 12 hour. Simulation study was conducted to assess the behavior of traffic flow. In order to estimate the traffic
flow correctly, dynamic Passenger Car Unit (PCU) was derived by taking speed and influence area of the vehicle
as against the car.
Further capacity analysis was worked out for four & six lane divided carriageway using static & dynamic PCUs.
The value of capacity with respect to static and dynamic PCU for four & six lanes divided National highway was
2200 and 2250 PCU/lane/hour/direction and 2166 and 2233 PCU/lane/hour/direction respectively.
The results evolved in the study are pointers towards the need for the indigenous development of Highway
Capacity Manual.
1. INTRODUCTION capacity of four and six lane divided hour period with the help on videography
The absence of suitable capacity National highways. technique in order to determine the
standards for Indian conditions have effect of lane width, directional split and
2. DATA COLLECTION AND shoulder condition on the capacity of four-
posed severe constraints to rationally RESEARCH METHODOLOGY lane and six-lane divided Carriageways.
and economically ascertain the road 2.1 Data Collection The sections were selected in a manner
facilities required for present and The data for this study were collected that the effect of each parameter could
future conditions. In this paper an at two sections of multi-lane divided be studied individually. The details of
attempt has been made to evolve national highway roads spread over 12 these sections are presented in table 2.1:
Table 3.1: Free Speed Statistics of Different types of Vehicles on Four-Lane& Six-Lane Divided Carriageways
FOUR-LANE DIVIDED Carriageways
Vehicle Type Sample Size Avg. Speed * V15 * V50 * V85 * Max. Speed* SD* SR
Two Wheeler 267 62 48.29 62.22 76.16 100 13.45 1.000718
Auto 42 42 34.89 41.6 48.32 64 6.78 1.00149
Motorized Four Wheeler 42 57 45.7 55.77 65.84 77 9.71 1
Small Car 445 73 57.23 72.68 88.12 120 14.9 0.999353
Big Car 408 76 58.9 76.3 93.7 125 16.81 1
Bus 147 65 53.46 64.84 76.22 91 10.98 1
Mini Bus 54 62 46.9 62.26 77.61 93 14.82 0.999349
Light Commercial Vehicle 173 58 47.91 57.95 67.98 82 9.68 0.999004
Heavy Commercial Vehicle 138 53 41.08 52.86 64.64 80 11.37 1
Multi Axle Vehicle 76 64 46.17 54.52 62.86 97 8.05 0.998802
Table 3.3: Roadway Capacity of Six-Lane Divided Carriageways Evolved through Simulation Models
4. ROADWAY CAPACITY respect to estimated and observed speed to static and dynamic PCU respectively.
and traffic volume is very small. The At the same time, in the case of six-
As it has been stated in section 4.3.2, evolved capacity for multilane divided lane divided carriage way the evolved
the estimated roadway capacities based National Highway is 2200 PCU/hr/lane/ capacity is 2166 PCU/hr/lane/dir and
on simulation models proved to be dir and 2250PCU/hr/lane/dir for four- 2233 PCU/hr/lane/dir with respect to
realistic as the estimated error with lane divided carriage way with respect static and dynamic PCUs respectively.
Figure3.2: Roadway Capacity of Four-Lane Divided Carriageways Evolved through Simulation Models
Figure3.3: Roadway Capacity of Four-Lane Divided Carriageways Evolved through Simulation Models
The equation for speed-flow relationship, model. The capacity with respect to as little as 3 percent variations in
based upon this evolved capacity has four and six-lane divided National capacity values between static PCU
already been presented in section 3.3.3. highway is estimated to be around and dynamic PCU.
5. CONCLUSION 2200 PCU/hr/lane/direction, taking in Though this study is of limited in nature,
to account static and dynamic PCU. it is noteworthy to mention that the
Based on the studies carried out in this It is also observed that there is not outputs derived in this study could be
study, an attempt has been made to much difference on capacity values pointers for the ongoing comprehensive
evolve capacity of National highways between four-lane and six-lane divided study undertaken recently towards the
for four lane and six lane divided Carriageways even by considering preparation of the Indian Highway
carriage-way by deploying simulation the dynamic PCU. This accounts for Capacity Manual.