Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kayla Boyer
Clinical decision making, and judgement is a vital component of the nursing profession.
Clinical judgment can be defined as the process by which the nurse decides on data to be
collected about a client, makes an interpretation of the data, arrives at a nursing diagnosis, and
identifies appropriate nursing actions: this involves problem solving, decision making, and
critical thinking (Saunders 2003). The process of critical judgement is becoming even more vital
important for a nurse to be able to build on his or her clinical judgment skills and be able to care
Victor-Chmil (2013) described three levels of thinking and knowing. The first is critical
thinking, a mental process. The second is clinical reasoning, which starts to take into
consideration the contextual concepts of patients, their family members, and the practice
situation. The third level is clinical judgment, which encompasses the mental and contextual
influences and extends to the embodied and affective aspect of nursing care. Nursing is
frequently viewed as a physical task to keep the patient safe, clean, nourished and comfortable; a
doctor assisting in completing orders; however, nursing goes beyond that. Nursing care lies in
the clinical judgment skills obtained by assessment, diagnosis, planning, implementation, and
evaluation (Graan, Williams, Koen 2016). Furthermore, Clinical judgment extends to being able
to properly delegate task to other staff, and it is important for proper, sound patient care.
Critical thinking and clinical judgment are key components of nursing and assist in the
provision of safe, effective patient care (Victor-Chmil, 2013). Estimates vary but nurses make
lots of decisions: acute care nurses facing a decision or judgement “task” every 10 min, and
“Worldwide, 19 million nurses (WHO, 2011) will exercise their clinical judgement
before making choices with, for and on behalf of patients. These patients trust nurses to
make decisions that do more good than harm. Nurses have a key role to play in
produce the biggest health gains in the most efficient and acceptable manner possible.
Health systems require nurses whose clinical judgements and decisions contribute to, not
detract from, the quality of health systems (Thompson, Aitken, Doran, and Dowding
2013).”
Throughout the day, nurses make a lot of decisions that affect the patient they are caring for. It is
important to obtain the appropriate skills and knowledge base to affect patient care in a positive
way, while also learning to apply them to a real-life situation. Clinical nursing judgment
fundamentals begins in classroom and expands with experience while in the work place.
Fundamentals are expanded upon via help from an experienced nurse and instructors guiding you
into making judgment decisions. During my short career as a nursing student, I have seen clinical
judgment, experience, and a knowledge basics utilized several times to positively influence
To conclude my final year of nursing school, I precepted in the Surgical Intensive Care
Unit (SICU) at Mercy Youngstown. One patient stands on in my mind for needing strong clinical
judgment skills. I was caring for a gentleman in the SICU who was in the hospital for falling at
the nursing home from the bed. Due to the fall, the patient sustained a scalp laceration. The
4
patient had a CT scan, which showed an old subdural bleed. The doctor admitted the patient to
On the patients first day of admission, I was caring for the patient during the night shift.
The patient was noted to be an 85-year-old male, having no known allergies and was a full code.
Upon assessment, the patient had a Normal Saline running at 25 mL/hr. in a peripheral line and
had TPN running at 35 mL/hr. I concluded one of my highest priorities was patient’s
neurological assessments. When assessing the patient noted there was a left sided head
laceration, which was covered by a dressing and no drainage noted. Patient’s eye assessment
noted to be having a pupil size of 3 bilaterally and were equally reactive round to light. Patient
had a difficult time talking due to his history of ALS, but was able to state name, year, location,
and reason for admission. Patient was able to squeeze hands, wiggle toes, and put both thumbs
up. Patient reported no numbness or tingling and had strength to be noted equally strong
throughout all four extremities. The patient was receiving 2L nasal cannula of oxygen and his
lung sounds were clear and diminished. Cardiac assessment noted that the patient was in normal
sinus rhythm, having normal heart sounds of S1 and S2. Noted in patient’s abdominal
assessment, he had active bowel sounds, was flat, and non-distended, having no bowel
movements during current admission thus far. Patient had adequate urine output of at least 30
mL an hour, yellow and clear in color. Patient’s pulses were +2 bilaterally, having no edema, and
In the SICU, vitals need to be check every hour. The patient’s heart rate stayed between
60-70 bpm, RR 14-16, SpO2 95-97%, Temperature 97.1-97.2 and BP 110/60-100/57 mmHg.
Additionally, patient has no reports of pain. Patient assessment was stable and neurologically
5
intact. Personally, I felt the blood pressure was to be the only concerning finding during the
initial assessment. I decided to keep a close eye on it to make sure it stayed stable.
Moreover, the patient’s blood pressure continued to stay above 100/57 mmHg until
around 0300. Around 0300, the patient started to display hypotension and bradycardia. I reported
my findings to the doctor and waited for my new order, which was to administer a fluid bolus.
With the patient’s blood pressure and heart rate dropping, and I begin to closely monitor vitals
and urine output, to indicate if the patient was potentially at risk for decreased organ perfusion.
Urine output stayed above 30 mL/hr, and with the fluid bolus, the patient’s blood pressure and
Upon a reassessment at 0400, the patient was noted to be difficult to awaken, blood
pressure dropping again, and heart rate slowing down. The urine output remained above 30
mL/hr. I reported my findings to the doctor and awaited the next instruction. The doctor ordered
another fluid bolus and attempted a sternal rub to wake the patient. He then decided to give him
some time to see if the patient would wake up, and he also discussed another CT scan if he did
Despite our efforts, the fluid bolus did not work. Again, I called the doctor and notified
him of this, as well as the noted hypotension with the bolus having been completed. I further
discussed with the doctor about the possibility of running a vasopressin medication to stabilize
the blood pressure, and we also discussed potentially needing a central line to have more access
in an emergency. The patient was also noted to be having a difficult time breathing, requiring
further increase to 3L of oxygen and elevation of the head of the bed. I notified the physician of
that as well, and additionally asked if she wanted me to run lab work and ABG’s. The physician
agreed with the need for the increase in oxygen supply, as well as the initiation of a vasopressin
6
medication. She further ordered the supplies to be gathered for her insertion of a central line and
items to obtain lab work and ABG’s upon the completion of the insertion of the central line.
When the lab work came back, the patient’s CO2 was 132 and sodium levels dropping.
The doctor called the family to give an update and obtain consent to intubate the patient. The
family discussed and decided they wanted to change his code status to a DNR-CC, as they did
not want him to be intubated. They wanted to come to the hospital and see him before any
While waiting for the family to arrive, I monitored respiratory status and blood pressure.
The patients blood pressure was not stabilizing, and I had to increase the norepinephrine
bitartrate. I noticed that the nasal cannula was no longer providing adequate oxygenation for the
patient and discussed with the doctor about supplying patient with a more beneficial oxygenation
intake, like using the Bi-Pap machine. The doctor put in an order for the patient to begin on the
Bi-Pap machine, to ease the patient’s breathing. The patient was still hard to awaken, and he was
noting to be requiring higher oxygenation concentration levels, but I finally got the
norepinephrine bitartrate to stabilize the blood pressure until the family could arrive.
Once the family arrived, I explained what was going on with the patient and the steps
that were taking to stabilize him. The doctor came in and explained the patient’s status and
prognosis. After discussing the options, the family stood firm on their decision to make the
patient comfortable and remove all equipment. The family was able to stay with the patient and
say their goodbyes. Therefore, my use of critical judgment allowed staff to stabilize the patient
long enough to give the family time to say goodbye and allow the patient to pass comfortably.
In some, clinical judgment is a key component to taking care of patients. It takes time and
experience for one to develop the knowledge and skills needed. Nurses are faced with making
7
thousands of difficult decisions that impact their patients daily. The health care world is forever
changing and increasing in the difficulty level. As medicine expands so does the need for nursing
with good clinical judgment skills. Moving forward with my career it is an area I feel must be a
focal point in my continuing education. I hope to improve on the skills I started obtaining in
References
Miller-Keane Encyclopedia & Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing & Allied Health -- Revised
Reprint. (2005, February 23). Retrieved March 01, 2018, from
https://www.us.elsevierhealth.com/miller-keane-encyclopedia-dictionary-of-medicine-
nursing-allied-health-revised-reprint-9781416026044.html
Thompson, C., Dowding, D., Doran, D., & Aitken, L. (2013, December). An agenda for clinical
decision making and judgement in nursing research and education. Retrieved March 01,
2018, from http://www.journalofnursingstudies.com/article/S0020-7489(13)00144-
2/fulltext
Victor-Chmil, J. (2013). Critical thinking versus clinical reasoning versus clinical judgment.
Nurse Educator, 38(1), 34–36. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e318276dfbe