Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
Content
1. Introduction
2. Wind Power Plant Structure
3. Wind Power Plant Control
4. Wind Turbine Technologies and Control
5. Grid Connection Requirements
3
1.1 Wind Energy in the World
How much is Wind Energy in the World ?
Estimated Renewable
Energy Share of Total
Final Energy
Consumption, 2015
Estimated Renewable
Energy Share of
Global Electricity
Production, End-2015
4
1.1 Wind Energy in the World
Wind Power Capacity [1]
Global Capacity and additions, 2006-2016 Top 10 countries, 2016
x 6,5
[1]
China – 35%
Offshore Wind Capacity, 2006-2016
United States – 17%
Germany – 10%
6
2.1 Onshore Wind Power Plant
[2] [3]
[4]
8
2.2 Offshore Wind Power Plant
DC-connected
[4]
[4]
Ring configuration
[4]
Single-sided Double-sided 10
2.4 Future trends
• Larger Wind Turbines: >8 MW
• Increase of Offshore Wind Power Plant capacity
• Interconnection of DC-connected OWPPs: increase reliability
[5] 11
Content
1. Introduction
2. Wind Power Plant Structure
3. Wind Power Plant Control
4. Wind Turbine Technologies and Control
5. Grid Connection Requirements
12
3.1 General control structure
• TSO requests to the WPP :
• Ancillary services for the
main ac grid.
• Power reductions for
congestion management.
• WPP control:
• Measures powers (P,Q), ac
voltage and frequency at
the point of connection
(POC).
• Dispatches power
references to the WTs.
• WT control:
• Measures powers at WT
connection.
• Receives power references
from WPP control.
13
3.2 WPP control structure
Active Power Control
• Power curtailment
• Ramp rates
• Frequency response
(frequency droop function)
[4]
Reactive Power Control
[4]
17
4.1 Wind Turbine Type 1 and 2
Type 1: Fixed-Speed Wind Turbines
• Squirrel Cage
Induction
Generator (SCIG)
• No ride-through
capability/ grid
[4] support
18
4.2 Wind Turbine Type 3
Type 3: Variable-Speed with Partial-Scale Converter Wind Turbines
[4]
𝑃𝑃𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟,𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑄𝑄𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟,𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤
[4]
21
4.3 Wind Turbine Type 4
General control structure
𝑃𝑃𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟,𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑄𝑄𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟𝑟,𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤
22
4.4 Wind Turbine operation
• At Wind Turbine level (only variable-speed topologies)
Wind speed Operation
Low-medium wind speeds (Partial load) Optimal power extraction with
Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT)
High wind speed (Full load) Nominal power (additional power is
curtailed with pitch control)
I- Partial load
II Transition
III- Full load
[4]
23
4.4 Wind Turbine operation
Optimal power extraction
1
𝑃𝑃𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡𝑡 = 𝐶𝐶𝑝𝑝 𝜌𝜌𝐴𝐴𝑣𝑣𝑤𝑤3
2
• 𝐶𝐶𝑝𝑝 : power coefficient
• 𝜌𝜌: air density
• 𝐴𝐴: swept area of blades
• 𝑣𝑣𝑤𝑤3 : wind speed
[7]
Pitch control
[7] 25
4.4 Wind Turbine operation
Example: Type 4 WT for different wind speed [7]
26
4.4 Wind Turbine operation
Example: Type 4 WT at full load with steps in reactive power set point [7]
27
Content
1. Introduction
2. Wind Power Plant Structure
3. Wind Power Plant Control
4. Wind Turbine Technologies and Control
5. Grid Connection Requirements
28
5.1 General Requirements
• Active Power Management
• Reactive power and Voltage Support
• Frequency Support
• Fault-Ride Through
• Short Circuit Current contribution
• Power Oscillation Damping
• Power quality (harmonics, flicker)
• Protection
29
5.2 Grid Points
• Grid code requirements are defined at different points in onshore and
offshore WPPs
Onshore WPP
Offshore WPP
[8] 31
5.3 Active Power Management
• Example: Horns Rev Offshore Wind Farm [9]
32
5.4 Reactive Power & Voltage
• Reactive power is provided by,
• Wind Turbine converters.
• Other devices: capacitors, synchronous condensers, FACTS or
transformer regulation.
• Possible control modes:
• Reactive power control
• AC voltage control
• Power factor control
33
5.4 Reactive Power & Voltage
• Grid codes define
• Voltage operating range
• PQ curves: reactive power limits depending on active power generation
34
5.5 Frequency response
Frequency evolution after power imbalance (loss of generation/load connection)
50 or 60 Hz
Standard limit 𝑓𝑓𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠
Instantaneous 𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖
limit
- Names and characteristics of frequency support services are defined by each Transmission
System Operator 35
5.5 Frequency response
Actuation
time
Inertia Reserve
Frequency Frequency Replacement
or Fast
Containment Restoration Reserve
Frequency
Reserve Reserve
Reserve
Activation
time
37
5.5 Frequency response
Deloading operation of WTs:
• It ensures power reserve for underfrequency events.
• Advantages:
• It can be used to provide any frequency support service.
• Disadvantages:
• Wind generation has to be permanently curtailed, which reduces the
income from power generation.
• Implementation:
• Droop control based on frequency deviation
• Manual active power dispatch
38
5.5 Frequency response
WT control structure with pitch and rotor speed control [10]
Pitch Control
Rotor speed control
39
5.5 Frequency response
Inertia Emulation:
• Extraction of kinetic energy from WT rotational mass.
• Only variable-speed WTs using additional converter controls
• It can be used to provide Inertia response.
• Advantages:
• It does not require wind power curtailment.
• Disadvantages:
• It requires recovery power.
• The kinetic energy from rotational mass has to be recovered to
bring the rotation speed to initial operation.
• If WTs operate below rated speed, power generation is reduced to
compensate the recovery power.
• It can generate second frequency drop
1
∆E𝑘𝑘 = 𝐽𝐽𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝜔𝜔02 − 𝜔𝜔𝑓𝑓2
2
𝐽𝐽𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 : WT inertia constant
40
5.5 Frequency response
Inertia Emulation (continuation)
• Implementation:
• Synthetic Inertia*: mimics inertia response of synchronous generators
using a derivative-based control
• Temporary Overproduction*: active power variation for predefined period
of time.
*In the literature different name are found for both strategies 41
5.5 Frequency response
• Grid codes define
• Frequency operating range
• Frequency-power droop characteristic:
EirGrid TenneT
- Deadband between B-C - Only overfrequency events
- Over and underfrequency
events
42
5.5 Frequency response
Example:
• WPP of 100 MW
• Synchronous generator 1400 MVA
• Load increase 200 MW (underfrequency event)
WTs provide frequency Support from deloading operation using frequency droop
control
43
5.5 Frequency response
Example:
• Introduction of WPPs without replacing Synchronous Generators (SGs) and WPP
does not participate in frequency response
If the WPP does not replace conventional generating units, it does not affect
frequency control
44
5.5 Frequency response
Example:
• Introduction of WPP that replaces Synchronous Generators (SGs) and WPP does not
participate in frequency response
45
5.5 Frequency response
Example:
• Introduction of 10% of initial load level as WPP that replaces Synchronous
Generators (SGs) and WPP participates in frequency response
46
5.6 Fault-Ride Through
• Capability to remain connected to the main grid during temporarily faults
[8]
47
5.6 Fault-Ride Through
• Examples
Type 3 WT (with DFIG) Type 4 WT (with PMSG)
48
5.6 Fault-Ride Through
• Consequences of FRT for the WTs if wind power cannot be transferred:
• Only fixed-speed and DFIG-based WTs: wind power is stored in the
rotating mass, i.e. the rotor speed increases.
• Only variable-speed WTs: wind power is stored in the dc link of the
back-to-back VSC, i.e. dc voltage increases.
ωr increases
Vac
decreases
Vdc increases
• Solutions
• Reduce wind power generation quickly
• Dissipate power in resistor (crowbar or dc chopper)
49
5.6 Fault-Ride Through
• Example: Activation of crowbar and dc chopper in DFIG-based WT [11]
FRT without DC chopper and crowbar FRT with DC chopper and crowbar
50
References
[1] REN21, “Renewables 2016 – Global Status Report, “ 2016, 1-23
[2] “Wind Plant Power Flow Modeling Guide”, [Online]. Available:
http://wiki.uvig.org/index.php/Wind_Plant_Power_Flow_Modeling_Guide [Accessed: 06-10-2017]
[3] L. Monjo, L. Sainz, J. Liang and J. Pedra, “Study of resonance in wind parks ,” Electric Power Systems
Research, 2015, 128, 30-38
[4] D. Hertem, O. Gomis-Bellmunt, J. Liang, “HVDC Grids: For Offshore and Supergrid of the Future,” Wiley-
IEEE Press, 2016
[5] P. Lakshmanan, J. Liang and N. Jenkins, “Assessment of collection systems for HVDC connected offshore
wind farms,” Electric Power Systems Research, 2015, vol. 129, pp 75-82
[6] A. D. Hansen, M. Altin and N. A. Cutululis, “Modelling of Wind Power Plant Controller, Wind Speed
Time Series , Aggregation and Sample Results,” DTU Wind Energy, 2015.
[7] A. D. Hansen and I. D. Margaris, “Type IV Wind Turbine Model, ” DTU Wind Energy, 2014.
[8] M. Tsili and S. Papathanassiou, “A review of grid code technical requirements for wind farms, ” IET
Renewable Power Generation, 2009, vol. 3, issue 3, pp 308
[9] J. R. Kristoffersen, “The Horns Rev Wind Farm and the Operational Experience with the Wind Farm
Main Controller”, Copenhagen Offshore Wind 2005, 2005.
[10] F. Díaz-González, Hau, Melanie, A. Sumper and Gomis-Bellmunt, “Participation of wind power plants in
system frequency control: Review of grid code requirements and control methods,” Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 34, 2014, pp, 551-564
[11] D.H. Nguyen, M. Negnevitsky , “A review of fault ride through strategies for different wind turbine
systems, “Universities' Power Engineering Conference, 2010 51
Feel free to ask questions