Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name of Student:
Name of University:
PERFORMANCE STRATEGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL 2
Abstract
This report intends to evaluate the performance strategy of Royal Dutch Shell. An
environmental analysis has also been included in this report with the help of
PESTEL analysis. Furthermore, the report has also assessed the impact post-
financial crisis on the performance of the firm. The report has revealed that with
the help of its effective management, Shell will be able to recover from the effect
of post-financial crisis.
PERFORMANCE STRATEGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL 3
Table of Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4
2.0. Social and Ethical Issues for Evaluation of Economic Impact ................................................ 5
Conclusion .................................................................................................................................... 11
References ..................................................................................................................................... 12
PERFORMANCE STRATEGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL 4
Introduction
Environment, performance and strategies of the Multinational companies need to be
improved in order to survive in the competitive scenario. The major challenges faced by MNCs
to strive in the competitive global market are in the area of market and sales, financial resources,
cultural and ethical differences and management (Crook et al. 2011). In this context, the
performance of The Royal Dutch Shell which is one such MNC listed among the top ranking
MNCs can be used to show how the financial and operational strategies can be improved in order
to increase the revenues and sales. Royal Dutch Shell commonly known as Shell is an
amalgamation of two companies Royal Dutch Petroleum and Shell Transport and Trading and its
headquarter is in Hague, Netherlands. Founded in 1907, Shell is now one of the largest Oil and
Gas producing company with annual revenue of about US $ 421.105 billion (2014) with total
assets of US $ 353.116 billion and providing employment to nearly 94000 employees worldwide
(Shell.com, 2015). The purpose of the project is to provide a detailed analysis of the financial
and marketing strategies used by the MNCs to grow in terms of revenue and production. Shell is
chosen because it has undergone a number of changes and has undertaken different strategic
plans in the recent years.
According to Panwar, Kaushik & Kothari (2011), the major strength of Shell is its vast
markets in North America, Europe and Asia and the growth of the Shell is mainly based on
integrated gas and deep water resources. These resources will enable them to meet the increasing
PERFORMANCE STRATEGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL 5
global demand for the energy and energy resources. Shell has strong exploration capacity due to
which there has been increase in their number of projects and hence, expansion of market. The
major weaknesses of Shell are the environmental and health issues due to the growth in pollution
and global warming (Crook et al. 2011). The cases of oil spillage are serious issue and also the
shift of the consumers demand towards cleaner technologies to reduce pollution is a serious
problem. In terms of opportunities, Shell is innovating newer technologies and low carbon
solutions so as to ensure product standard and cleaner environment. The company has been
benefitted by the rise in the global demand for the Liquefied Natural Gas and therefore, there is
an opportunity to expand in other economies. The threats faced by Shell are mainly oil price
fluctuations in the global market, high competition, product substitution and stringent
governmental rules and regulations regarding environmental concerns (Colborn et al. 2011).
investments in renewable resources recently, but a company like Shell whose worth is measured
in terms of production and oil reserves this is a huge challenge.
Seeing the need of the hour, Shell has been primarily focusing on the reduction of local
environmental pollution for which they have been seeking newer renewable oil and gas products
(Shell.com, 2015). It is believed that a well established company like Shell will meet the
environmental challenges soon without even harming their production volume and revenues
(Crook et al. 2011). It is expected that the company will act wisely in a responsible way and
abide by the social and environmental laws to ensure efficiency in their operation.
Political Factors: Though Dutch Shell has been working in cooperation with the UK
government, there have been certain agreements in the recent years with Shell and the
Government to change the senior managers for better management of the corporation
(Slack, 2015). In oil and gas companies, the role of the government is dominant and it is only
because of its support they can expand their market and undertake innovation and technological
advancement in this sector (Gaughran et al. 2015).
Economic Factors: The major economic factors that show a company’s performance
are; prices, annual revenue, total assets, debts, capital stocks, equities to the shareholders, share
earnings, dividends paid etc. The current revenue of the company is about $ 421,117 million with
PERFORMANCE STRATEGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL 8
total assets of $ 353,208 (Reports.Shell.com, 2014). Shell has been facing competition in the
global market mainly from the oil producers of Russia and Ukraine. There has been fall in the oil
prices over the past years due to growing number of oil exporters which has resulted in
significant loss of revenue. As a consequence, reports say that the company is reducing their
employment to cope up with the revenue losses (Terziovski, 2010). The earnings of Shell in the
second quarter have fallen to $ 3.1 Billion from $ 5.1 billion in last year which meant earnings
per share have also fallen. Shell is therefore expected to cut down their investments in the future
as it expects a further downward shift in the oil prices. (Reports.Shell.com, 2014)
Social Factors: The Shell being a leading oil producer in the global market is supposed
to have good social connections in the global platform with other MNCs, but it is not so. Thus, in
order to expand and enhance their business, Shell and its management team should look into the
ways to make ties and incorporate with other oil corporations in the market with the help of the
government. This can also help them to reduce competition and even provide opportunities of
seeking innovations and knowledge from others.
Legal Issues: Shell has been facing criticisms in the legal front from human rights
activists for the past years because of its oil extraction techniques and spillage occurrences in
Nigeria and environmental issues of contamination, explosions, leakages and other such toxic
events. Earlier in 1990s, it has been criticized in Africa due to the protests of the Ogoni and
Dutch government, who found Shell guilty of violating human rights including inhumane
treatment and arbitrary arrest for which they had to a hefty fine. They have been criticized for its
gas flaring technologies and Shell’s deliberate responses to oil spills (Teece, 2010). These series
of incidents over the past years have badly affected the company’s reputation and safety records.
PERFORMANCE STRATEGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL 9
Shell has been also getting repetitive warnings from the UK Health and Safety Executive
regarding the bad state of affairs in its oil platforms of North Sea. Shell is therefore making
efforts to introduce environmental friendly policies and gain back the support of the campaigners
by following the rules and guidelines of the UK government. The company is also looking
forward to find some efficient technologies and friendly resources of oil extraction and drilling in
these areas.
Environmental Issues: Shell has been less successful in cutting down the rate of air and
water pollution caused by its activities. There have been ecological damages caused by Nigeria’s
Delta ecosystem due to drilling sludge, construction of roads, dams, canals required for
companies infrastructural development. As a result, there have been frequent oppositions from
farming and fishing communities in the delta. Shell is also facing oppositions from global
platform for its new hydraulic technology of 3 Drills wells in Egyptian Desert, as it is estimated
that this will contaminate the ground water. Shell is therefore making efforts to gain confidence
in the Egyptian market by promising that they will come up with less toxic chemical ingredients
so that depletion of groundwater can be stopped. (Brinckmann, Grichnik & Kapsa, 2010).
Despite of such environmental questions faced by Shell, the US government has shown faith in
them and gave the green signal for initiating drilling and gas exploration activities in Arctic
region so as to explore the region’s potential. It has been reported that Shell will come up with
containment equipments and would provide less risks to wildlife and the Arctic ecosystem
(Gaughran et al. 2015). This is a step taken by the USA so as to reduce their dependence on oil
imports.
Apart from SWOT analysis, the PESTLE analysis is also important to understand the
performance of a company in all aspects. It gives an insight picture of the company and analyzes
the various aspects of the company that would help the management to take important decisions
and actions for better performance.
in meeting the global demand along with reduction in carbon emissions (Terziovski, 2010). The
lower oil prices over the last year also challenges the financial condition of the company as it
now have lesser resources to spend on technology, innovations, and newer projects. The stiff
competition faced from other oil producers and substitution of the non renewable resources to
renewable resources is also a major threat (Brinckmann, Grichnik and Kapsa, 2010). The
financial performance can be analyzed from the Shell’s Business segment (Upstream,
Downstream and Corporate) revenues over the past years. The revenues rose from $ 86 million
in 2012 to $ 161 million in 2013, but there has been some fall in 2014 as revenues were $ 115
million (Reports.Shell.com, 2015). On the other hand, revenue earnings over the geographical
area (Europe, Asia, Africa, USA, and other American countries) showed a gradual decline from
$ 472, 156 millions in 2012 to $ 451,236 in 2013 and further to $ 421, 110 million in the year
2014. This figure clearly shows that the fall in the oil prices in the global market, as well as
global concerns for reducing pollution by replacing fossil fuels with alternative sources are
having a serious impact on the company’s earnings (Reports.Shell.com, 2015). There has been
subsequent decline in the production of the Shell subsidiaries, its joint ventures from 1,196 BOE
in 2012 to 1,125 BOE in 2014 (BOE is the natural gas volumes after converting oil into
correspondents using a variable of 5800 scf per barrel). The net capital investment of Shell also
experienced a fall of about 45% in the year 2013, whereas the shareholders earnings were
increased by 13% in the year 2014 compared to 2013 (Finance.yahoo, 2015).
The current scenario of the company in financial aspect can be presented by studying the
data of major key statistics like valuation measures, profitability, income statement, management
effectiveness and cash flow statement. The current market capital of Shell is 97.92 billion and
the profit margin is estimated as 3.98 % with operating margin of about 5.5 %. The net revenue
of the company stands at $ 338.33 billion with gross profit of $ 63.79 billion (Finance.yahoo,
2015). The outstanding debt of the company is 52.94 billion and the debt equity ratio is 29.54
which not a good sign for the company. The return on the assets is 3.17% and returns on the
equity are around 7% ,whereas the operating cash flow of the company is 35.58 billion at present
(Reports.Shell.com, 2014).
Shell is facing intense competition in the global market along with environmental and
social challenges, so, it has to undertake relevant strategies to maintain themselves as leader in
PERFORMANCE STRATEGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL 11
the global market. It is believed that they are good players in the global stage in terms of
technology, project delivery capabilities and in operations and management. According to
Colborn et al. (2011), Royal Dutch Shell are also focusing on the risk management and are
adopting distinctive technological approach to increase their upstream and downstream
production that will generate cash and enhances profitability. Shell also has potential for growth
in future due to recent strategies by its leaders like exploring the reserves in Arctic, Kazakhstan,
Nigeria and Iraq which will increase their production in the future (Brinckmann, Grichnik &
Kapsa, 2010).
Conclusion
The main objective of the study is to provide an analysis of the external and internal
environment of the MNCs and the financial as well as operational strategies they are required to
undertake to strive in the competitive market. The study is based on the performance of the UK
based MNC Royal Dutch Shell, a leading company in Oil and Natural Gas based products. The
SWOT analysis is used initially to understand the financial and operational strategies used by the
company but the overall performance can been studied after PESTLE analysis. This study gives
an overview that although Shell is financial strong and has huge potential for growth but at the
same time they has been facing number of challenges regarding social, environmental and legal
issues. Shell is capable enough to overcome these challenges as it has been developing their
management skills, delivering large projects, adopting environment friendly technologies of
production and investing in the newer fields for further growth.
PERFORMANCE STRATEGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL 12
References
Brinckmann, J., Grichnik, D. & Kapsa, D. (2010). Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the
castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning–
performance relationship in small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 24-40.
Colborn, T., Kwiatkowski, C., Schultz, K., & Bachran, M. (2011). Natural gas operations from a
public health perspective. Human and ecological risk assessment: An International
Journal, 17(5), 1039-1056.
Crook, T. R., Todd, S. Y., Combs, J. G., Woehr, D. J. & Ketchen Jr, D. J. (2011). Does human
capital matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between human capital and firm
performance. Journal of applied psychology, 96(3), 443.
Gaughran, A., Heuvel, A ., Ritsema, G. & Hassink, E. (2015). Is Royal Dutch Shell responsible
for irresponsible operations of Shell Nigeria? Retrieved from
http://www.theecologist.org/News/news_analysis/1809728/is_royal_dutch_shell_respons
ible_for_irresponsible_operations_of_shell_nigeria.html
Hill, C., Jones, G., & Schilling, M., (2014). Strategic management: theory: an integrated
approach.Boston; Cengage Learning.
Hitt, M., Ireland, R. D. & Hoskisson, R. (2012). Strategic management cases: competitiveness
and globalization. Boston; Cengage Learning.
Panwar, N. L., Kaushik, S. C. & Kothari, S. (2011). Role of renewable energy sources in
environmental protection: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(3),
pp. 1513-1524.
Slack, N. (2015). Operations strategy. New Jersey; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Teece, D. J., (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long range
planning, 43(2), 172-194.
Terziovski, M. (2010). Innovation practice and its performance implications in small and
medium enterprises (SMEs) in the manufacturing sector: a resource‐based view. Strategic
Management Journal, 31(8), 892-902.