Table I. Brief literature review of face recognition.

Tide Database Feature

Author(s) Pre-Processing extraction Classifier Accuracy

Two-dimensional
PCA: a new approach ORL - 98.3%
Yangetal.(2004) to appearance-based ORL, AR and Yale No Pixel + 2DPCA kNN
fa. representation and Yale - 84.24%
recognition
(2D)2PCA - Two-
dir.tional two-
dimensional PCA kNN ORL - 90.5%
2hang and Zhou (2005) ORL and FERET Image resize 60.60 Pixel +(2D)2PCA FERET- 85%.
for efficient face
representation and
r.ogrutt.
Two-dimensional
Yang €1 06 (2005) discriminant transformfor ORL No Pixel + 2DLDA kNN ORL -96.4%
face recutg.."
(2D)2LDA: An efficient
Noushath et al. (2006) approach for face ORL No Pixel + (2D)2LDA kNN ORL - 99.75%
recognition
Gabor f.tur. and LDA Coefficients of kNN - 99.75%
MageshKumar et al. ORL image res ' ..
(2011) based Face Recognition Gabor wavelet kNN and neural network nen.. network: 98:94
transfonn + PCA+ LDA
with ANN classifier
Illumination invariant
face recognition
Shermina (2011) using Discrete Cos ine Yale B nminalization and Pixel +PCA Not mentioned Yale B: 94.2%
Transform and Principal correction using DCT
Component Analysis
ORL - 91.5% (KNN),
2D Principal Compcnent 93.1% (SVM) ;
Analysis for fa. ORL, AR, Feret, Yale Pixel + 2DPCA + Genetic FERET - 9CP/o (SVM);
No kNN and SVM
Oliveira m al. (20.1) and facial-expression and Jafe algorithm YALE - 89.2%(SVM);
recognition AR - 921% (SVM)
Jaffe - 94% (SVM).
ORL - 97.3% (SVM),
Face reccgnition based on image 5 .5 . P ixel + P CA + 2DP CA 96.2% (MN);
Le and Bui (2011) FERET and ORL kNN and SVM
SVM and 2DPCA (FERET) FERET - 95.1%
(SVIv1),