Copy and paste

They have submitted several certificates, the status of which is as follows:

The proposal of supplying 33kV CB from this manufacturer may be considered as Responsive since all the
required documents, such as ISO certificate, supply record, performance certificate, type test report, technical
particulars as per schedule-E, have been submitted against this manufacturer

They have not submitted any confirmation letter that, “Installation, testing and Commissioning of all
switchgears (CB) shall be done by the Switchgear Engineer(s) of the switchgear(s) manufacturer(s) (CB)” as
per requirement of clause no.3.1 of section 3 of volume 2 of 3 of the Bidding Document.

They have furnished supply record for the last ten years (requirement: at least 100) for 4000A, 420kV, double

break type (S3CD ) DS without mentioning Short circuit current rating as per requirement of Sub-clause 2.5 of
Section 3 - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

They have submitted all qualification document as per bid requirement from this manufacturer except

They have furnished supply record for the last ten years (requirement: at least 100) for 4000A, 420kV, double
break type (S3CD ) DS without mentioning Short circuit current rating as per requirement of Sub-clause 2.5 of
Section 3 - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

They have not submitted confirmation letter as per the following note of DS in Sub-clause no. 2.5 of Section 3-
Evaluation and Qualification Criteria of volume 1 of 3 of the bidding document:

“The Post Insulator (PI) of disconnector (DS) shall preferably be from DS main part (Contact blade)
manufacturer. However, if the PI manufacturer is different from DS main part manufacturer, the supply record
must include the name of PI manufacturer and the type test of the DS must be with the same type PI to be
supplied alongwith the DS under this project; that is, the complete DS assembly, including PI, to be supplied
under this project must be type tested.”

In schedule-E, they have following deviations: outside manufacturer’s own country In item no . of
Schedule-E, they have declared total loss as

They have submitted a certificate from GETCO, India issued on 19th October 2013 without mentioning the
commissioning date for 400kV 8kN BPI. It is to be mentioned here that, the 400kV BPI strength shall be
minimum 10kN as per Appendix A12 of Schedule A of Volume 3 of 3 of the Bidding Document.

They have not mentioned any relationship between EMCO & IEC, India.
GE, italy

In schedule-E (Technical Particulars), they have the following deviations:

1. In item 22 (1.2), There is no auxiliary contacts – in the middle position though there should at least one contact
as per requirement.

2. No auxiliary contacts for earthing switch is provided.

Coelme, Italy

In schedule-E, they have following deviations:

i) Corona extinction Voltage for 420kV disconnector has not been mentioned.
ii) In item 22 (1.2), No of auxiliary contacts at in the middle position has been provided instead of at least one
contact as per requirement.
iii) No auxiliary contacts for earthing switch has been provided.

Hapam
iv) Corona extinction Voltage for 420kV disconnector has not been mentioned.
v) No auxiliary contacts for earthing switch has been provided.

Tri-delta Germany

In schedule E they have following deviations:

i) In item no. 9(1.5), They have mentioned continuous operating voltage for as followings;
420 kV-312 kV rms instead of 303 kV rms.
145 kV-96 kV rms instead of 102 kV rms.

36 kV-24 kV rms instead of 25 kV rms.

They have submitted the following 3 (three) certificates in favor of GE T&D Ltd, India
,the status of which are as follows:

Therefore, clarification is required regarding the above issues. The end user certificate as
evidence with notarized English version ( if main document is not in English) mentioning the
required information as per Clause 2.4.1 of Evaluation and Qualification Criteria, Volume 1 of 3
of the Bidding Document is required to be submitted.
 i. They have not submitted the lists of IEC standards in the technical bid which have been considered
by the bidder in the price bid as per requirement of item no. 01 of clarification no.05 of the Bidding
document.

ii. The Bidder shall have to confirm that any information contained in any drawings, data tables,
manufacturers catalogues, method statements and any other printed material contained in submitted
bid is for information only, and does not grant rights to deviate from requirements of the employer’s
tender documents.

iii. The Bidder shall have to confirm that all equipment, systems and works that is outlined in their bid will
be designed, manufactured, tested supplied and installed in full compliant with all of the requirements
of the employer’s tender documents during execution stage if contract is awarded to them.

iv. The Bidder shall have to confirm that all Equipment will be manufactured and tested according to the
relevant Standards, as required in the Technical Data Schedules and Technical Specifications. The
Bidder shall have to confirm that all requirements of Schedule E are fulfilled and all lacking data,
lacking documents and minor mistakes in their Bid shall be completed and/ or corrected in case of
award of Contract to them.

v. The Bidder shall have to agree that all Tender drawings are preliminary and general, without any
detail and with minimum requirements. Confirmation is required in respect that all drawings shall be
as per bid requirement irrespective of whatever is submitted in the bid. The final & details drawings
and arrangement shall be defined & finalized accordingly during detailed engineering of execution
stage after award of contract if contract is awarded to them.

vi. The Bidder shall have to provide detail design & calculation of complete facilities and shall provide
detail drawings as well as all other documents during execution stage, which will be subject of
Employer’s final approval if contract is awarded to them.

Tri-Delta, Germany
They have not submitted any confirmation letter that, “Installation, testing and Commissioning of
all switchgears (LA) shall be done by the Switchgear Engineer(s) of the switchgear(s)
manufacturer(s) (LA)” as per requirement of clause no.3.1 of section 3 of volume 2 of 3 of the Bidding
Document.

a) They have not furnished any type test report for 390kV LA as per item 5 of Schedule I, Volume 3 of 3
of the Bidding Document.

They have submitted few pages of lightning impulse voltage test report for 396kV LA from EGU,
Czech Republic.

They have submitted few pages of several test (Operating duty test, Long duration current impulse
withstand test & Residual voltage test) reports (only few pages of full report has been submitted) for
block tested at CESI, Italy. The pages of test result have not been submitted.

b) In schedule E they have following deviations:

i) In item no. 9(1.5), They have mentioned continuous operating voltage for as followings;
420 kV-312 kV rms instead of 303 kV rms.
145 kV-96 kV rms instead of 102 kV rms.
36 kV-24 kV rms instead of 25 kV rms.
Tri-Delta, Germany
a) They have not submitted any confirmation letter that, “Installation, testing and Commissioning of all
switchgears (LA) shall be done by the Switchgear Engineer(s) of the switchgear(s) manufacturer(s) (LA)”
as per requirement of clause no.3.1 of section 3 of volume 2 of 3 of the Bidding Document.

b) They have submitted Supply Record (requirement: at least 100) without mentioning voltage Level but
mentioning type of SA for Last 10 years outside manufacturer own country as per requirement of Sub-
clause 2.5 of Section 3 - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

c) They have furnished the Satisfactory Service Evidence for 390kV 10kA SA for a minimum of five (5) years
outside manufacturer own country (at least one) as per requirement of Sub-clause 2.5 of Section 3-
Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

d) They have not furnished any type test report for 420kV LA as per item 5 of Schedule I, Volume 3 of 3 of the
Bidding Document.

They have submitted lightning impulse voltage test report for 396kV LA from EGU, Czech Republic. The
pages of test result have not been submitted.

They have submitted Internal Partial Discharge test & Residual Voltage test for class 3 type SBKC 6/10.3…
SBKC 312/10.3 surge Arrester from CESI, Italy. However, from catalogue, it could not be understood
whether these type are for 420kV SA or not.

They have submitted several test (Operating duty test, Long duration current impulse withstand test) reports
for resistor block tested at CESI, Italy.

e) In schedule E they have following deviations:

i) In item no. 9(1.5), They have mentioned continuous operating voltage for as followings;
420 kV-312 kV rms instead of 303 kV rms.
145 kV-96 kV rms instead of 102 kV rms.
36 kV-24 kV rms instead of 25 kV rms.

ABB, Switzerland
a) They have furnished supply record (requirement: at least 100) for the last ten years for 1mH, 4000A,
63kA/1sec 420kV line trap as per requirement of Sub-clause 2.5 of Section 3 - Evaluation and
Qualification Criteria.
 b) They have not furnished the Satisfactory Service Evidence for 1mH, 4000A, 63kA/1sec 420kV line
trap for a minimum of five (5) years outside manufacturer own country as per requirement of Sub-
clause 2.5 of Section 3 - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

They have submitted one certificate from PT PLN (PERSERO), Indonesia issued on October 12,
2012 mentioning commissioning date as 2006 & performance upto July 2010 for DTLC4000.

c) They have not furnished any type test report for 1mH, 4000A, 63kA/1sec 420kV line trap as per item
5 of Schedule I, Volume 3 of 3 of the Bidding Document mentioning that this type specification is not
commonly used in the utilities, thus, not being readily available. However, they have submitted a
sheet mentioned a concept of similarity that, other type test reports can be considered applicable for
1mH, 4000A, 63kA/1sec 420kV line trap

They have submitted RIV test & Lightning impulse test from ETH, Switzerland for main coil of 0.5mH
wave Trap without mentioning kV level but mentioning type as DLTC 9 2pages out of 11 are
submitted); Power frequency voltage test for tuning Device of 1mH,63kA Wave trap from ABB
Switzerland Laboratory; Short time current test for 500kV, 4000A, 63kA WT from KEMA, Netherland
(3 out of 29 pages are submitted); temperature rise test for DLTC 1mH 4000A & Tapping loss based
on blocking resistance for DLTC4000/1.0-63kA from ABB Switzerland Laboratory.

Manufacturer: Oblum, India

a) They have submitted Manufacturer Authorization duly from Oblum, India but, they have not
submitted any confirmation letter that, “Installation, testing and Commissioning of all switchgears
shall be done by the Switchgear Engineer(s) of the switchgear(s) manufacturer(s)” as per
requirement of clause no.3.1 of section 3 of volume 2 of 3 of the Bidding Document.

b) They have not furnished any supply record for the last ten years (requirement: at least 100) for 390kV
LA outside manufacturer’s own country except 21 No.’s in Bangladesh in 2012 as per requirement of
Sub-clause 2.5 of Section 3 - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

They have submitted some supply record for the last ten years outside manufacturer’s own country
with mentioning rating of lower voltage level and also supply record within India satisfying 100 No.’s
LA of 390kV.

c) They have not furnished the Satisfactory Service Evidence for 420kV LA for a minimum of five (5)
years as per requirement of Sub-clause 2.5 of Section 3 - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

They have submitted one performance certificate from Taurex Exponent Merchandise, Philippines
issued on November 27, 2014 without mentioning the date of commissioning but mentioning Purchase
Order No. Ag-10-930-10 & date 30.08.2010 for 390kV 20kA Porcelain Surge Arresters.

They have submitted another performance certificate from Dogus Elektrik,Kocaeli,Turkey issued on
06/11/2017 without mentioning the date of commissioning but mentioning Purchase Order No. 005/16
dt. 01.11.2016 for 360kV 10kA Polymer Housed Metal oxide (gapless) Surge Arresters.
d) They have not furnished any type test report for 390kV LA except Lightning & Switching Impulse test
and Power frequency test as per item 5 of Schedule I, Volume 3 of 3 of the Bidding Document.

They have submitted some type test report such as Residual voltage Test, Long duration Current
impulse Withstand test for 3kV 10kA class-3 Metal oxide Varistor, Short Circuit Test for 120kV
polymer Surge Arrester, Partial Discharge Test for 120kV 10kA Class-4 polymer Surge Arrester from
CPRI, India.

They have not submitted Operating duty test as per item 5 of Schedule I, Volume 3 of 3 of the Bidding
Document.

Quality Power Electrical Equipment, India

a) They have not submitted supply record (requirement: at least 100) for the last ten years outside
manufacturer own country for 1mH, 4000A, 63kA/1sec 420kV line trap as per requirement of Sub-
clause 2.5 of Section 3 - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

They have submitted supply record with mentioning only voltage level but without mentioning other
rating (such as A, kA, mH etc).

b) They have not furnished the Satisfactory Service Evidence for 1mH, 4000A, 63kA/1sec 420kV line
trap for a minimum of five (5) years outside manufacturer own country as per requirement of Sub-
clause 2.5 of Section 3 - Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

They have submitted one certificate from Dogus, Turkey, who is not end user, issued on 06/07/2017
mentioning performing since three years for 420kV, 3150A, 0.5mH Line trap. It has to be mentioned
here that, in the certificate, at first para it is mentioned that, “to be used in TEIAS, Turkey, High
Voltage system has given a satisfactory performance withput any problem since three years”.

They have submitted another certificate from Grid Solution, Turkey, who is not end user, for 420kV,
3150A, 0.5mH Line trap issued on 31.08.2016 without mentioning commissioning date.

c) They have not furnished any type test report for 1mH, 4000A, 63kA/1sec 420kV line trap as per item
5 of Schedule I, Volume 3 of 3 of the Bidding Document.

They have submitted Short time current test for 420kV,3150A, 50kA, Wave trap from CPRI but the
applied short circuit current is only 40.1kA for 1.72s for Thermal behavior & 39.2kA for 0.18s for
Mechanical strength, as mentioned in page no. 04 of 06 of the report, which is not acceptable.
They have submitted RIV test & power frequency test from CPRI, India for 420kV, 3150A, 50kA,
0.5mH Wave trap.