Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Crystal Owens
Research 4122
I pledge
INTEGRATIVE REVIEW 2
Abstract
This integrative review was done to appraise literature related to the outcomes of neoadjuvant
versus adjuvant therapy with Trastuzumab (Herceptin) on human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)
positive breast cancer on overall survival and or pathological complete response (PCR). HER2
positive breast cancer is known to have higher reoccurrence, metastasis rates, shorter disease-free
survival, and overall survival. EBSCO database was used to search for pertinent literature. The
search presented 427 articles relating to the subject. These articles clearly discussed findings
related to outcomes of treatment involving Trastuzumab, although each article discusses other
chemotherapy agents that were also involved with treatment. Due to the different staging and
other chemotherapy agents used in these treatments there are limitations in this review. More
research needs to be done and this is difficult since each case of cancer is different. A lot of
studies pertaining to the topic were reviewed but there is not a clear answer to this PICOT
Integrative Review
Breast cancers that express high levels of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
(HER2) are more likely to spread, resist treatment, and reoccur. After this discovery was made
the drug Trastuzumab (Herceptin) was developed. This drug improved survival rates in stage I-
III by more than 30% ("NCI Discovers: Linking HER2 to Breast Cancer and Beyond," n.d.). It
has been noted that resistance to Trastuzumab can develop over time. The purpose of this review
is to examine literature that answers the PICOT question; in breast cancer patients with HER2
over expression, what is effect of neoadjuvant therapy with Trastuzumab on survival compared
to adjuvant therapy over five years. The researcher has an interest in this type of cancer because
her mother was diagnosed with stage III HER2 positive breast cancer and wanted to know more
about the odds of survival with her chemotherapy treatment plan. Neoadjuvant therapy is often
used to shrink tumors before surgery takes place to make it easier for removal and improves the
chances of getting clean margins. Adjuvant treatment is chemotherapy that is started after the
This review is based on five research articles that were obtained through EBSCO
Discovery Services. The terms that were used to find these articles included “HER2 positive
breast cancer”, “neoadjuvant”, “adjuvant”, and “Trastuzumab” and yielded a result of 325
articles. These results were narrowed down to recent articles that had been published in the last
five years and were useful in addressing the PICOT question; in breast cancer patients with
HER2 over expression what is effect of neoadjuvant therapy with Trastuzumab on survival
compared to adjuvant therapy over five years. Each article used for this review are quantitative
The overall results from these studies indicate an improved prognosis, especially if they
obtain a pathological complete response (PCR) after neoadjuvant treatment that includes
Trastuzumab. Although response rates vary across breast cancer subtypes getting pathological
complete response has the strongest association for survival in those with HER2 positive breast
cancer. These articles examined several other cancer drugs that were used in combination with
Trastuzumab since most cancers are treated with drug combinations to have a more aggressive
impact on the cancers growth. It’s important to note that although other drugs are used,
Trastuzumab was the first drug designed specific to target the HER2 receptors directly. These
studies were hard to interpret due to the complexity of the information provided.
Neoadjuvant therapy
One article was based on a retrospective study that analyzed stage I-III breast cancer
patients who received neoadjuvant therapy from 2010 to 2015. This study examined other
subtypes of cancer, as well as HER2 noting differences in responses. It was noted that the NOAH
trial resulted in in a 36% reduction in death at five years when Trastuzumab was part of the
neoadjuvant treatment and increased the chance of getting pathological complete response by
20% in those who tumors were positive for overexpression of HER2. (McFarlund, Naikan,
Rozenbit, Mandeli, Bleweiss, and Tiersten, 2015) Statistical analysis was used to assess
pathological complete response rates after neoadjuvant therapy and considered tumor and patient
characteristics. Out of 113 total participants, 43 were HER2 positive and 41.9% had a
Adjuvant therapy
The article by Gonzalez, (2014), reviewed the impact of adjuvant therapy with
Trastuzumab on patients who achieved a pathologic complete response. These patients were
treated between 2001 and 2012. It is noted in the article that adjuvant therapy of Trastuzumab
did not become the standard of care until 2006. Kaplan Meier was used to estimate the overall
survival of this population. According to this study 91% had five-year overall survival estimate
who did not have adjuvant Trastuzumab after PCR and 93% for those that did.
Drug Resistance
Resistance to Trastuzumab has become a concern in the clinical setting even though this
drug has been successful. One study set out to study the results of those who has been treated
previously and then retreated when the disease reoccurred and metastasized. The researchers
conducted a retrospective review of 513 patients with HER2 positive breast cancer with only 353
examined in this primary analysis to include only those staged I-III (Murthy, et al., 2014). The
subjects studied had received Trastuzumab as a first line treatment in either the adjuvant or
neoadjuvant setting. Logistic regression determined the association between prior Trastuzumab
treatment and response to the second treatment after metastasis. Estimation of overall survival
was determined with Kaplan Meier. The researcher concluded that overall survival was 36
months for those who did not have prior Trastuzumab and 28 months for those who did.
(Murthy, et al 2014) Although Trastuzumab is a successful drug prior exposure should be taken
Discussion/Implications
The results of the reviewed literature demonstrate a better pathological complete response
for those who receive neoadjuvant Trastuzumab than those who received adjuvant therapy only.
It has been noted that pathological complete response tends to have a better overall five-year
survival rates. Most of the literature reviewed supports the PICOT question asked by the
researcher. Not every study that was reviewed showed a great difference in survival, however,
outcomes it did demonstrate a better chance of complete pathological response which can
Limitations/Conclusions
While there is a good deal of literature on the subject available, there are limitations to
this study. The articles that were reviewed looked at studies that incorporated different stages of
cancer and some included subtypes other than HER2 positive tumors which made interpretation
difficult to the lay person. This was the researchers first integrative review and the nature of the
subject was very complex and difficult to understand due to limited medical education.
Treatments that were examined incorporated several other chemotherapy agents such as Taxanes,
Anthracycline, and Carboplatin containing chemotherapy agents that may need to be taken into
consideration when examining results. With so many options and combinations of drugs used to
treat cancer it is not a one size fits all treatment even for HER2 positive cases. There were also
In conclusion, neoadjuvant Trastuzumab in HER2 positive breast cancer staged I-III has a
better chance of pathological complete response than just used in adjuvant setting. Pathological
Trastuzumab is noted to develop usually within the first year of treatment. Changing
INTEGRATIVE REVIEW 7
chemotherapy agents when the disease metastases may help to partially overcome that. More
research for new drugs to combat this type of aggressive cancer is needed. It appears that those
who received neoadjuvant treatment with Trastuzumab have better odds of survival at five years
when they have a complete pathological response as compared to those who had only adjuvant
treatment.
INTEGRATIVE REVIEW 8
References
Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M., Parinyanitikul, N., Lei, X., Mittendorf, E. A., Zhang, H., Valero, V., &
630-635. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.647
McFarland, D. C., Naikan, J., Rozenblit, M., Mandeli, J., Bleiweiss, I., & Tiersten, A. (2016).
10.1155/2016/4324863
Krishnan, Y., Al Awadi, S., Sreedharan. P.S., Sujith Nair, S., & Thuruthel, S. (2016). Analysis of
disease free survival and overall survival: 15 years follow up data from Kuwait. Asia-
Murthy, R. K., Varma, A., Mishra, P., Hess, K. R., Young, E., Murray, J. L., Koenig, K. H.,
Moulder, S. L., Melhem-Bertrandt, A., Giordano, S. H., Booser, D., Valero, V.,
NCI Discovers: Linking HER2 to Breast Cancer and Beyond. (n.d.). Retrieved from
www.cancer.gov/research/progress/discovery/HER2
Zhang, W., Tian, H., & Yang, S. (2017). The Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for HER-
2-Positive Locally Advanced Breast Cancer and Survival Analysis. Analytical Cellular
Data Analysis
Findings/Discussion 5 year OS were 91% for those who did receive adjuvant
therapy and 93% for patients who did.
Data Analysis Almost all patients with PCR survived the study whereas
59% of those who did not achieve PCR had disease free
survival of about 3 years.
Sample/ 377 patients with stage II or stage III breast cancer treated
Setting/Ethical with neoadjuvant therapy.
Considerations
Major Variables The variables relevant to this study looked at patients who
Studied (and their were treated with trastuzumab as a first line treatment in
definition), if the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting and patients who were not
appropriate treated with trastuzumab initially.
Appraisal/Worth to
practice
INTEGRATIVE REVIEW 13
Appraisal/Worth to
practice There are improved PCR rates with the use neoadjuvant
therapy especially for HER2 and TNBC.