Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Current Issues
Dr. Metzler
their own opinion, regardless if you agree with it or not. When it comes to physical education,
there has been a lot of controversy lately, and where there is controversy, you can bet there is
opinions. Physical education is centered around our nation’s youth, but there are many other
parties that generate opinions on what physical education is, how it should be taught, and if it is
even worth it to continue teaching it. Here we will examine various parties and their perceptions
of physical education and what we can do as physical educators to improve their opinion on the
value of P.E.
The first and perhaps most important group is the P-12 students themselves. Beginning
early on, elementary students see P.E. as a time to have fun, socialize, and take a break from
their other classes. They come excited expect for their teachers to have fun games to play.
Secondary students often see P.E. as boring, a waste of time, and quite often embarrassing.
Changing in crowded locker rooms and being expected to play sports they are not good at does
not make P.E. fun for these high schoolers. That being said, according to the 2015 SHAPE
report, 80% of students felt that physical education is important for their overall school
experience (SHAPE). Two things that physical educators could do to improve the value of P.E.
for the students is to have well developed curriculum that minimizes down time and create
diverse units that provide a wide range of activities for all students to enjoy.
The second group of constituents is the parents. Parents virtually always want what is best for
their children. Parents want physical education to be a place for their children to have fun, learn
imperative motor skills, and get healthier. According to the Youtube video titled “Physical
Education Campaign,” the 2000 NASPE report found that 95% of parents think that regular,
daily exercise helps children perform better academically (Phys Ed Campaign). Parents seem to
value physical education as much as their children do. Two things that physical educators can do
to improve the value of P.E. for parents is to provide hard evidence that P.E. is positively
impacting their children, and to regularly engage parents and children in physical activities that
The third group of constituents is the taxpayers. Taxpayers may be the least impacted by
physical education, but provide the majority of the funding through state and federal taxes. Since
many taxpayers are parents, they too want what is best for the children, but also want to see that
their money is going to a good cause and not wasted. Many taxpayers haven’t experienced P.E.
since they were younger and have a skewed perception of what it may be like these days. They
may still refer to P.E. as “gym class,” think that teachers only roll a ball out, and that there is low
probability of student learning (Gaudreault). Because of these things, they may see P.E. as a
waste of hard earned tax dollars. Physical educators can improve taxpayer’s value of P.E. by
providing evidence of a continuous need for funding, as well as show how this funding impacts
students.
The fourth group is the media. Everyone knows the media is notorious for deception,
inaccurate information, and bias among many other discrepancies. The media also is one of the
easiest ways to present information to the masses, and unfortunately, many people buy into this
information without second thought. The media’s perception of physical education is quite
drastic. Movies portray P.E. teachers as incompetent, objects of fantasies, miracle workers, etc.
(Duncan, et al.). Gym class and the locker rooms are breeding grounds for bullies to pick on
vulnerable kids, P.E. is extremely competitive, and P.E. is viewed as a nonacademic subject are
other misnomers portrayed by the media. To be frank, I don’t believe there will ever be a change
in what the media wants to report. Physical educators could try to improve the media’s portrayal
about P.E. by documenting what their P.E. program entails and proving its credibility.
The last group of constituents is health care professionals. Health care professionals work
cooperatively with national education bodies to form the recommendations for physical
education standards. Health care professionals expect for P.E. programs to increase overall
health and wellness of students, as well as be a means for fighting the childhood obesity
epidemic. The Centers for Disease Control note that schools should have a comprehensive
physical education program that includes recess, P.E., classroom physical activity, and
intramural and interscholastic sports (CDC). Two things that physical educators can do to
improve the value of P.E. for health care professionals is to continuously provide feedback and
research for promotion of standards and recommendations, and promote recommendations from
Overall, each group has their own perceptions and expectations of physical education.
Though some of these perceptions may be skewed, there is a decent understanding of what
physical education should entail. It is very obvious that a physical educator’s job is not only to
teach students, but to promote a positive appearance of P.E., keep parents involved and happy,
ensure that taxpayer dollars are not going to waste, and give reason for a need for continuous
research to ensure that the best standards are implemented for the students.
Works Cited
Duncan, Charles A;Nolan, Joe;Wood, Ralph Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance;
<http://www.shapeamerica.org/advocacy/upload/A-in-A_May-June-14.pdf>.
Perceptions About the Value of Physical Education Classes." SHAPE America. N.p., n.d.
study-2015.cfm>.
"PE Advocacy - Get Parents Involved!" PE4life. N.p., 24 Feb. 2012. Web. 23 Oct. 2016.
<http://pe4lifeblog.blogspot.com/2012/02/pe-advocacy-get-parents-involved.html>.
"Physical Activity Facts." Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Centers for Disease
<http://www.cdc.gov/healthyschools/physicalactivity/facts.htm>.
Physical Education Campaign. Dir. Eurasiantke98. YouTube. N.p., 8 Oct. 2006. Web. 23 Oct.
2016. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBfJeO_dGu0>.