Professional Documents
Culture Documents
05 of April 2018
Literature, Myth and Human Condition: An analysis on Eliot’s The Wasteland and Van
The study of mythology, its relationship with literature, and the nature of the human
psyche has troubled academics over decades. From Taylor in the 19th century, through
Jung and Freud in the 20th, to more contemporary and scientific approaches such as
phylogenetics. Later on, Northrop Frye further problematized the discussion by adding a
precursory relation between literature and myth. This short essay will discuss the use that
literature gives to myths and its effectiveness. Resting on Frye’s ideas of the relation
between literature and myths, as well as the psychoanalytic and phylogenetic theory of
myths, and by applying this lens to T.S Elliot’s The Wasteland and Richard Van Camp’s
Children of the Sundance, this essay will develop the argument that literature makes use
of myths in the form of conventions and allegories, to achieve universality and resonate
Northrop Frye’s argument states that myths preceded and act as precursors of
literature. Frye ties the appearance of myths to the development of human language,
existence and give rise to the humanization of nature (Frye 4). Furthermore, this reflection
of humanity in the outside world later gives rise to stories through the means of
Henao 2
imagination, these stories will become conventional in the world of literature (Frye 25).
Amongst these conventions are the story of the jilted lover, the journey of self-discovery,
the unrequited love, the love triangle, the coming of age, and many more. All of these
conventions are put to use in various myths that, through the means of imagination,
portray human condition and manage to resonate with all the individuals of the species.
Later on, myths the give rise to literature, which in its turn, makes use of the same
conventional stories. For example, T.S Eliot’s The Wasteland relies heavily on the journey
of discovery, the same can be said of Richard Van Camp ‘s Children of the Sundance,
and other literary works. By means of these conventions literature manages to resonate
with the deeper layers of human condition, becoming universal to the species.
However, conventions are not the only usage that literature has found in myths to
connect and express human experience, they also heavily rely on allegories. In the same
way that conventions represent the myth’s story structure, allegories relate to its contents
and characters. If one is to analyze a myth such as Perseus’s myth, the conventional
structure would that of a “journey story”. However, an allegory extracted from this myth
of literature. Elliot’s The Wasteland deliberately makes use of various allegories, as can
(Eliot)
On this passage Elliot refers to Arthurian legend, by making use of the symbol of
the Fisher King. This particular case of usage of myths by literature cannot be examined
as the borrowing of conventions, but as the usage of content present in myths. In other
words, Elliot is using a symbol, an allegory. The effectiveness in the usage of allegories
Psychology has dealt with problematizing the role of myths in the subconscious for
decades now, renown theorist such as Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud tried to tackle this
issue on their respective time. According to Main et al., both Freud and Jung agree that
“… the subject matter of myth is the human mind, which projects, but thereby falsely
projects, itself on to the physical world” (Main, Bahun, and Burnett 107).Furthermore, both
Jung and Freud argue that myths are closely related to an “unconscious state of mind”
(Main, Bahun, and Burnett 107) and their main reason for existence is to help this
“unconscious state of mind” find itself in the outside world. Though both schools of
psychology agree in the existence of this deeper layer of consciousness, Freud advocates
that myths help relate the individual to its outside world, whilst Jung argues that myths
are a tool for self cultivation (Main, Bahun, and Burnett 107) . Whichever the case, both
psychoanalysts state that myths relate to a subconscious layer that is common through
the species, which explains the usage of allegories and symbols borrowed from myths
and later put to usage in literature. These perspectives have been refined as more
Henao 4
scientific attempts have been carried to understand the existence of myths in the human
condition.
argues that these conventions have a common ancestor that developed simultaneously
with the human species. The phylogenetic approach to myths argues for a common
geographical location in which most of the conventional stories of myths originated. Later,
through migration, these conventions spread from Africa to the rest of continents. As
history went by, further migrations modified some histories giving rise to different myths
that share the same theme. These explains why common events appear in myths from
different cultures, such as the flood, it also accounts for some events that seem exclusive
to a geographical location. According to, Julien D'Huy various myth present statistical
similarities when analyzed in contrast to the geographical migrations that took place and
the cultures that perpetuated the myth. D’Huy proceeds to analyze a set of conventional
stories to determine why they became universal (d'Huy 05 Apr 2018). This theory does
not delegitimize either Frye, Jung or Freud’s arguments, on the contrary it further
strengthens the notion that myths share a direct connection to humanity, and that
literature’s usage of this tools, whether intentional or nor, manages to resonate a string
that is closely connected to human condition. Elliot developed a method around it, the
mythical method.
Freer argues that this method was heavily influential throughout the development of The
Wasteland. “The Wasteland, published in 1922, is famous for using the ‘mythical method’
Henao 5
correspondences” (Freer 357). As has been theorized before, myths relate to a common
migration process. Eliot willingly exploits this particularity of humanity to dote his poem of
themes of the story that are have been carried from mythology:
33 So rudely forc'd.
34 Tereu
35 Unreal City
(Eliot)
These lines of the poem reflect the human condition of desire, of thirst in the
meaning of desire. The same desire that overcomes Phaethon into riding his father’s
carriage around the ocean, before catching fire and dying by Zeus’ hand and that can be
Henao 6
found in different mythological tales. This use of conventions extracted from myths can
internal journey of discovery that, later in the story, is reflected by a physical journey. This
resonates with the ideas posted by Freud and Jung in which myths are an expression of
the subconscious. The convention borrowed from myths in the case of Van Camp’s story
is not the final journey in which Clarence embarks at the end of it, but the journey that
takes place in his mind throughout the story. According to Freud, myths are an internal
construct, which he exemplifies by using the images of hell given in Doctor Faust by
Marlowe:
Hell is described as a state of mind, rather than a place (Main, Bahun, and Burnett
101). The same way as in Van Camp’s Children of the Sundance, the journey is a state
“I walked out into the blowing wind and never felt better. It was off to the drum
dance for me. Brutus would be there and I'd give him the biggest hug, my mom the biggest
kiss and my dad and I would have tea later after Mom went to bed. This storm was
By this point the protagonist, Clarence, has already undergone the mythical
convention of journey of discovery. The physical journey he is about to undergo acts like
a symbol of a myth already fulfilled. This fulfillment is completed by the final sentence of
the Van Camp’s tale “This storm was nothing” (Van Camp 63), by this point the
protagonist has had a discovery, and epiphany, and therefore, finished his journey.
Different from Van Camp’s approach, that seems to rely on the convention of
journey, Elliot tends to be much more direct and deliberate on the usage of mythological
contents. This is better display by his usage of allegories, but also appears in conventions,
The Wasteland works as a journey, Elliot guides the reader through different cultures and
Both Elliot and Van Camp rely on the usage of myths for conventions and
allegories. The case of Elliot tends to be more upfront, with allegories aplenty. Meanwhile,
Van Camp’s approach is more tacit, and conventional. Both of them exemplify the usage
of myths in literature and why it is effective to this day. As can be drawn from
of view, Frye’s idea of myths naturally evolving from human condition and preceding
literature is correct. Therefore, the usage of myths in literature is due mainly to the way
they resonate with the underlaying layers of human experience. Literature employs myths
Works Cited
d'Huy, Julien. "Analyzing how Stories Change in the Retelling Down through the
Generations Sheds Light on the History of Human Migration Going as Far Back as
Eliot, T. S. (T. Collected Poems 1909-1962. London: Faber and Faber, 1974.
Freer, Scott. "The Mythical Method: Eliot’s 'the Waste Land' and a Canterbury Tale
(1944)." Historical Journal of Film, Radio & Television 27.3 (2007): 357.
Frye, Northrop. The Educated Imagination. Toronto: CBC Canadian Publications, 1974.
Main, Roderick, Sanja Bahun, and Leon Burnett. Myth, Literature, and the Unconscious.
Van Camp, Richard. "Children of the Sundance." Godless but Loyal to Heaven. 1st ed. 1