Aljaafari A

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VAPOR COMPRESSION AND HYBRID LIQUID
DESICCANT DEHUMIDIFICATION SYSTEMS
By
A. M. AL-JAAFARI
A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL

OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT
OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF
MASTER OF SCIENCE
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA
2003
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Sherif for his guidance and cooperation and
for helping me successfully complete my degree requirements. I would like also to thank
Dr. Ingley for his help and advice during the preparation of my thesis, and particularly in
the use of the HAP 4.1 program. I would like also to thank Dr. Goswami for stimulating
my interest in the subject of liquid desiccants.
Special thanks are due to Robert N. Van Der Like, Energy Management Specialist
of Marion County Public Schools, for his help in providing information about the internal
loads and building structure of the school model examined in this thesis. Special thanks
are also due to Yigal Lazarov, Regional Marketing Manager and Alon Landsman, Senior
Application Engineer of DryKor, for their help in providing technical data pertaining to
their products.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
page
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................. ii
LIST OF TABLES...............................................................................................................v
LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... xi
NOMENCLATURE ......................................................................................................... xii
ABSTRACT..................................................................................................................... xiv
CHAPTER
1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................1
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE .......................................................................................4
3 COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS AND PSYCHROMETRIC ANALYSIS........8
3.1 Cooling Load Calculations ....................................................................................8

3.1.1 Internal Loads..............................................................................................8
3.1.2 Indoor Design Conditions............................................................................9
3.1.3 Outdoor Conditions .....................................................................................9
3.2 Psychrometric Analysis .......................................................................................16
4 CYCLE DESCRIPTION AND THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A HYBRID

LIQUID DESICCANT (HLD) SYSTEM ..................................................................18
4.1 System Description..............................................................................................18

4.2 Thermodynamic Analysis of the DryKor Cycle..................................................21
4.2.1. Thermodynamic Properties of Liquid Desiccants ....................................21
4.2.2 Evaluating the COP of the DryKor HLD System .....................................23
4.2.3 HLD System COP .....................................................................................25
5 ENERGY ANALYSIS ...............................................................................................27
5.1 Model I: Existing Air-Conditioning and Ventilation System.............................27

5.1.1 Energy Consumption of the Building Excluding the Ventilation Load ....28
5.1.2 DX Outside-air Make-up Unit Process Description..................................28
5.1.3 Energy Consumption of the Outside-Air (OA) Make-Up Unit.................30
iii
5.2 Model II: DryKor HLD Packaged System ..........................................................32
5.3 Model III: Hybrid Solid Desiccant Cooling System...........................................34
6 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.................................................................................36
6.1 Energy Consumption Summary...........................................................................36

6.1.1 Outside-Air Make-Up Unit Energy Consumption ....................................36
6.1.2 Building Total Cooling Energy Consumption...........................................39
6.2 Cost Summary and Analysis................................................................................43
6.2.1 Cost of Electric Energy .............................................................................43
6.2.2 Capital and Other Costs.............................................................................45
7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................47
APPENDIX
A PSYCHROMETRIC PROPERTY TABLES .............................................................48
B AVERAGE ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR MODEL I........................................84
C AVERAGE ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR MODEL II ....................................120
LIST OF REFERENCES.................................................................................................156
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ...........................................................................................158
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table page
3.1 Cooling Spaces Internal Loads ................................................................................9
3.2 Miami’s Weather Data from January-June ............................................................10
3.3 Miami’s Weather Data from from July-December................................................11
3.4 Gainesville’s Weather Data from January-June ....................................................12
3.5 Gainesville’s Weather Data from July-December .................................................13
3.6 Chicago’s Weather Data from January-June .........................................................14
3.7 Chicago’s Weather Data from July-December ......................................................15
3.8 January Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami..............................17
5.1 Cooling Energy Consumption by the Building Excluding Ventilation .................28
5.2 Number of Working Days per Month....................................................................31
5.3 January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami .......................32
5.4 January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami ......................34
5.5 Miami Energy Consumption for Model III............................................................35
5.6 Chicago Energy Consumption for Model III .........................................................35
6.1 Miami’s Monthly Energy Consumption for the Make-Up Unit ............................36
6.2 Gainesville’s Monthly Energy Consumption for the Make-Up Unit.....................37
6.3 Chicago’s Monthly Energy Consumption for the Make-Up Unit .........................37
6.4 Total Cooling Energy Consumption for the Miami Building................................40
6.5 Total Cooling Energy Consumption for the Gainesville Building ........................41
6.6 Miami’s Energy Cost Summary.............................................................................43
v
6.7 Gainesville’s Energy Cost Summary .....................................................................44
6.8 Chicago’s Energy Cost Summary..........................................................................44
6.9 Operation and Capital Cost Summary ...................................................................45
A.1 January Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami..............................48
A.2 February Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami............................49
A.3 March Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami................................50
A.4 April Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami..................................51
A.5 May Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami...................................52
A.6 June Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami...................................53
A.7 July Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami ...................................54
A.8 August Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami ..............................55
A.9 September Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami.........................56
A.10 October Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami .............................57
A.11 November Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami .........................58
A.12 December Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami..........................59
A.13 January Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ......................60
A.14 February Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ....................61
A.15 March Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ........................62
A.16 April Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ..........................63
A.17 May Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ...........................64
A.18 June Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ...........................65
A.19 July Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville............................66
A.20 August Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville.......................67
A.21 September Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville .................68
A.22 October Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville......................69
vi
A.23 November Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville..................70
A.24 December Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ..................71
A.25 January Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago...........................72
A.26 February Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago.........................73
A.27 March Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago.............................74
A.28 April Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago...............................75
A.29 May Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago ................................76
A.30 June Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago ................................77
A.31 July Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago.................................78
A.32 August Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago............................79
A.33 September Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago ......................80
A.34 October Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago ..........................81
A.35 November Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago ......................82
A.36 December Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago.......................83
B.1 January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami .......................84
B.2 February Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami .....................85
B.3 March Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami .........................86
B.4 April Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami ...........................87
B.5 May Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami.............................88
B.6 June Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami.............................89
B.7 July Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami .............................90
B.8 August Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami ........................91
B.9 September Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami...................92
B.10 October Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami .......................93
B.11 November Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami ...................94
vii
B.12 December Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami ...................95
B.13 January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville................96
B.14 February Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville..............97
B.15 March Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville..................98
B.16 April Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville....................99
B.17 May Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville ...................100
B.18 June Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville ...................101
B.19 July Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville....................102
B.20 August Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville...............103
B.21 September Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville .........104
B.22 October Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville .............105
B.23 November Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville .........106
B.24 December Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville..........107
B.25 January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago...................108
B.26 February Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago.................109
B.27 March Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago.....................110
B.28 April Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago.......................111
B.29 May Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago........................112
B.30 June Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago........................113
B.31 July Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago.........................114
B.32 August Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago....................115
B.33 September Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago ..............116
B.34 October Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago ..................117
B.35 November Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago ..............118
B.36 December Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago...............119
viii
C.1 January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami ....................120
C.2 February Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami ..................121
C.3 March Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami ......................122
C.4 April Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami ........................123
C.5 May Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami .........................124
C.6 June Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami .........................125
C.7 July Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami..........................126
C.8 August Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami .....................127
C.9 September Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami ...............128
C.10 October Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami....................129
C.11 November Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami................130
C.12 December Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami ................131
C.13 January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville.............132
C.14 February Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville...........133
C.15 March Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville...............134
C.16 April Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville.................135
C.17 May Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville..................136
C.18 June Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville..................137
C.19 July Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville ..................138
C.20 August Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville .............139
C.21 September Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville........140
C.22 October Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville ............141
C.23 November Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville ........142
C.24 December Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville.........143
C.25. January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago....................144
ix
C.26 February Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago ...............145
C.27 March Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago ...................146
C.28 April Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago .....................147
C.29 May Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago.......................148
C.30 June Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago.......................149
C.31 July Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago .......................150
C.32 August Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago ..................151
C.33 September Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago.............152
C.34 October Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago .................153
C.35 November Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago .............154
C.36 December Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago .............155
x
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure page
3.1 Building layout.........................................................................................................8
4.1 Psychrometric depiction of the DryKor cooling and dehumidifying process........20
4.2 Schematic diagram of the DryKor system .............................................................21
4.3 Effect of temperature on the specific heat and density of LiCl at a 40%
concentration..........................................................................................................22
4.4 Schematic diagram of the absorber/cooler chamber..............................................23
5.1 Cooling and dehumidifying process performed by the vapor compression

system ....................................................................................................................29
5.2 Reheat system (Addison, 2002) .............................................................................29
6.1A HLD and DX make-up unit’s electric energy consumption for Miami .................38
6.1B HLD and DX make-up unit’s electric energy consumption for Gainesville .........38
6.1C HLD and DX make-up unit’s electric energy consumption for Chicago ..............39
6.2A Monthly energy consumption for the Miami building...........................................42
6.2B Monthly energy consumption for the Gainesville building ...................................42
6.2C Monthly energy consumption for the Chicago building ........................................43
xi
NOMENCLATURE
Latin Symbols
COP coefficient of performance
COPHLD coefficient of performance of hybrid liquid desiccant system
Cp specific heat, kJ/(kg K)
h specific enthalpy, kJ/kg
m& mass flow rate, kg/s
Patm atmospheric pressure, Pa
Pw water vapor pressure, Pa
Pws water vapor saturation pressure, Pa
Q& cooling rate, kW
Ra gas constant for air, J/(kg K)
T absolute temperature, K
t temperature, oC
t* wet-bulb temperature, oC
v specific volume, m3/kg
V& volumetric flow rate, m3/s
W humidity ratio, kgv /kga
W& electrical power, kW
W& comp compressor electrical power
xii
W& f regeneration fan electrical power, kW
W& d , P liquid desiccant pump electrical power, kW
Ws saturation humidity ratio, kgv /kga
x percent concentration of liquid desiccant solution, kgd / kgs
Greek Symbols
φ relative humidity, dimensionless
µ degree of saturation, dimensionless
Subscripts
a dry air
atm atmospheric
c condenser
d desiccant
e evaporator
E entering
L leaving
m moist air
P pump
r refrigerant
s solution or saturated
v vapor
w water
xiii
Abstract of Thesis Presented to the Graduate School
of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VAPOR COMPRESSION AND HYBRID LIQUID

DESICCANT DEHUMIDIFICATION SYSTEMS
By
A. M. Al-Jaafari
August, 2003
Chair: S. A. Sherif
Major Department: Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
The objective of this study was to evaluate the energy savings of a commercially
available hybrid liquid desiccant (HLD) cooling system relative to a conventional vapor
compression system used for an existing school building where 100% outside air is used
for ventilation. Psychrometric analysis and hour-by-hour simulations for three energy
models were developed for three cities in the United States using available weather data
assuming normal operation and typical building occupancy. Energy calculation software
such as the Carrier Hourly Analysis Program (HAP 4.1) and Desicalc along with
generated spreadsheets was used to compute the energy consumption for the models
under study. Results of each model are summarized and comparisons are made. The
annual energy savings employing the HLD system were found to reach 46% for Chicago,
37% for Gainesville and 32% for Miami. Simple cost analysis and associated payback
periods were also performed.
xiv
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Saving Energy is one of the main concerns in the HVAC industry. A large
percentage of the energy consumed for cooling (up to 50%) is directed towards removing
the latent load.
Dehumidification using a chemical substance (desiccant) was proposed by
researchers as a potentially good method to remove the latent load. While the widely
used desiccant cooling methods in the HVAC market today utilize solid desiccants,
recent research suggests that liquid desiccants are also promising. Compared to solid
desiccant systems, liquid desiccant systems are more efficient, easy to install, and have
low maintenance costs. In addition to its dehumidification effect, liquid desiccants could
also be used as efficient substances to wash air from suspended particles. Since liquid
desiccant cooling systems are still not widely commercialized, a relatively small number
of investigations have discussed practical comparisons between hybrid liquid desiccant
(HLD) cooling systems and vapor compression cooling systems. The market for liquid
desiccant cooling system products is growing, however not many clients are comfortable
enough with the reliability and efficiency of these systems. In this thesis an existing
school with 100% outside air (OA) preconditioning with a direct expansion (DX) cooling
unit (with hot gas reheat for temperature control and hot gas bypass for capacity control)
will be compared with a hybrid desiccant cooling system for the purpose of computing
the energy savings resulting from the use of the latter. The expectation is that the use of
liquid desiccant cooling would reduce both capital and operating costs.
1
2
The model will be studied using weather data for three locations (Gainesville,
Miami, and Chicago) in the United States for the purpose of investigating the effect of the
change in weather on the performance of the system as well as on the energy
consumption. However, the model will be shown to fit any other location where weather
data are available. A Parametric study that provides the coefficient of performance
(COP) of the HLD cooling system will be demonstrated for the chosen cycle, however
for energy calculation in this thesis, vendor software will be used to compute the system
COP.
Economics of the system will be briefly discussed and will focus on the cost of
energy. Recently developed software for energy calculation such as the Carrier Hourly
Analysis Program (HAP 4.1, Carrier 2002) and Desicalc (Desicalc, 2002) will be used to
compute the hourly energy consumption rate for conventional and solid desiccant
systems, respectively. To date, analysis of liquid desiccant systems is still not part of the
software. For this purpose, a model capable of computing the hourly energy
consumption along with internal loads will be developed. Internal load calculations to
reflect the effect of seasonal variations on cooling loads will be computed by the HAP 4.1
(Carrier, 2002).
This thesis is divided into seven (7) chapters including the Introduction as Chapter
1. Chapter 2 reviews the literature for related studies. In Chapter 3, the hourly space
cooling load calculation of the building under study and psychrometric analysis for the
ambient air for the three cities will be performed. Chapter 4 presents thermodynamic
analysis of the hybrid desiccant system cycle. Electric energy consumption for different
energy models for the three cities will be evaluated in Chapter 5. Chapter 6 will
3
summarize and discuss the energy consumption results obtained in Chapter 5.
Conclusions and recommendations for future work will be provided in Chapter 7.

CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
The idea of using a liquid chemical substance (desiccant) for dehumidification was
first applied to industrial processes in the early 1930s. Kathabar Inc., produced the first
cooling and dehumidifying desiccant system in 1937 for a large central system used for
an industrial plant (Kathabar, 2003). Later in 1953, Kathabar developed air-conditioning
units providing dehumidification from 1100 cfm to 22,500 cfm. The development
continued on to improve the efficiency of regeneration to reduce the energy cost. In the
early 1980s researchers investigated applying cheaper regeneration methods using
renewable energy (solar), exhaust heat, and membrane separation regeneration to
improve the COP of liquid desiccant air conditioning systems. Research has generally
concentrated on optimizing the performance of liquid desiccant systems and improving
the regeneration process of the used desiccant to reduce energy cost. In order to optimize
the desiccant cooling process, researchers extensively utilized thermodynamic modeling
and parametric analysis. Different models and experimental verification were performed
showing promising results. In the late 1990s, DryKor produced the first liquid desiccant
air-conditioning unit that utilizes no external heat sources for regeneration. Based on
their study, the COP of such units could reach 4 and provide a cooling capacity that
varies from 2000 cfm and 17.5 MBH to 2800 cfm and 37.8 MBH.
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) of the U. S. Department of
Energy established a task force to assist the commercialization of liquid and solid
desiccant systems. One of many studies and reports that they published is entitled
4
5
Advanced Commercial Liquid-Desiccant Technology Development Study (1998) which
stated that liquid desiccant systems could produce as much as a 40% reduction in
operating costs compared to solid desiccants (Lowensteien et al., 1998).
Johannsen (1984) investigated the performance of hybrid solar air conditioning
systems with liquid desiccants under different climatic conditions for five cities in South
Africa. His experimental setup used four solar collectors to heat the weak desiccant
solution for regeneration. He also used a water-cooling tower to cool the dehumidified
air through a heat exchanger. The achieved seasonal COP of the system ranged from
0.36 to 0.47 at that early time of exploring solar liquid desiccant system performance.
Johannsen (1984) found that his system could provide 1.91 to 2.90 kWh of cooling per
square meter of collector area.
Ahmed et al. (1996) performed an optimization study to find the optimum desiccant
mass flow rate with the least irreversibility in a solar regenerator cycle where they used
one solar collector to regenerate the weak desiccant solution exiting the absorber. Based
on their analysis, the optimum mass flow rate was found to be 30 kg/(h m2) for an
ambient temperature of 40 oC. They suggested that the absorber irreversibility be treated
in the same manner as that of the regenerator since the components are similar.
Khan and Martinez (1996) developed a mathematical model to study the
performance of a liquid desiccant absorber under isothermal conditions. A partial load
performance of the absorber was studied to illustrate the effect of variable
dehumidification load. Annual energy savings were predicted by a simple model. Based
on their analysis, the performance of the absorber was affected significantly by the
desiccant inlet temperature.

6
Ahmed et al. (1997) performed thermodynamic property analysis for LiCl and
CaCl using classical thermodynamic techniques. Density, vapor pressure, and viscosity
for LiCl, CaCl and their mixtures at different concentrations were computed and plotted.
Al-Rabghi et al. (1997) performed a parametric study of the effect of outside
ambient temperature and relative humidity on a proposed hybrid liquid desiccant system.
A comparison between the coefficient of performance of a liquid desiccant system
(COP)HLD and that of a conventional system (COP)c was made. Results suggested that
increasing the ambient temperature and latent-to-sensible heat ratio to certain limits
improved the (COP)HLD/(COP)c ratio.
Ahmed et al. (1999) studied regeneration of a weak desiccant solution by a
mechanical process instead of a thermal process by means of osmotic pressure. Pressures
required for regeneration for different solution concentrations for LiCl and CaCl were
computed and plotted.
An optimization study by Dhar et al. (2000) to minimize the lifetime cost of a
liquid desiccant system was performed. Results of their program showed that waste heat
availability would promote the liquid desiccant system against conventional compression
systems from operating and initial cost points of view.
Mago (2000) developed a simulation model and software for a liquid desiccant
system with a solar collector regenerator and a vapor compression system performance
using Fumo’s (1999) modified model. Effect of variation of different parameters such as
the desiccant mass flow rate, inlet temperature, and concentration were computed and
plotted. Cost analysis for selected vapor compression systems with an equivalent hybrid
7
desiccant system was performed. The result showed savings of $3426/yr for electricity
and a payback period of two years for a two-ton vapor compression system.
Al-Frayedhi et al. (2002) performed an evaluation of the heat and mass transfer
coefficients in a gauze-type structured packing liquid desiccant air dehumidifier. A
theoretical model was developed and values for different concentrations of LiCl, CaCl,
and a mixture of both were computed and plotted.
Dai et al. (2001) performed an experimental comparative analysis between hybrid
liquid desiccants and vapor compression cooling systems. The study showed that adding
desiccant dehumidification improved the cycle COP and reduced compressor size as well
as the electrical energy consumed.

CHAPTER 3
COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS AND PSYCHROMETRIC ANALYSIS
3.1 Cooling Load Calculations
An existing school building (Figure 3.1) was used as a model to study the cooling
load and energy analysis. The building was divided into thirteen (13) spaces assigned to
nine (9) zones where each zone is assigned to one heat pump (HP). To maximize the
accuracy, the Carrier HAP 4.1 program was used to compute the hour-by-hour load.
(SPACE 5)
(SPACE 5)
HP3.1
HP3.4
H P 3 .2 & 3
L ib r a r y &
C o m p u te r
L ab
H P 3 .2 & 3
up H a ll & E /W up
V E S T
WOMEN WC
(SPACE 2)
(SPACE 3)
(SPACE 4)
(SPACE 6)
MEN WC
HP3.5
HP3.6
HP3.7
HP3.8
HP3.9
N o rth
Figure 3.1. Building layout
3.1.1 Internal Loads
Internal loads for each space are summarized in Table 3.1. Values provided by the
American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-Conditioning Engineers [ASHRAE]
8
9
(2001) for equipment sensible and latent loads considering moderate office work were
used
Table 3.1. Cooling Spaces Internal Loads

Library
Space Space Space Space Space Space & PC East West Men Women
1 2 3 4 5 6 Lab Hall Vest Vest Counsel WC WC
Floor Area
m2 67.7 67.7 63.4 61.3 67.7 67.7 158 120 18.4 18.4 27.9 18 18.4
People
(rounded
adults) 16 16 16 16 16 16 3 1
Equipment
(kW) 302 302 302 302 302 302 3550 7000
Lights
(kW/m2) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
Misc.
(kW/m2) 280
3.1.2 Indoor Design Conditions
The indoor design dry-bulb temperature (DBT) and wet-bulb temperature WBT
used for all cooling load calculations in this study were assumed to be DBT=24oC and
WBT=17oC.
3.1.3 Outdoor Conditions
The design conditions for the three cities are summarized as follows:
Summer Winter
City o o o o
DBT ( C) WBT ( C) DBT ( C) WBT ( C)
Miami 32.8 25 7.8 3.7
Gainesville 34.4 25 -1.1 -3.7
Chicago 32.8 23.3 -21.1 -21.8
The average hourly dry-bulb and wet-bulb temperatures obtained from the HAP 4.1
program for Miami, Gainesville, and Chicago are shown in Tables 3.2 through 3.7.
Table 3.2. Miami’s Weather Data from January-June
Hr January February March April May June
DBT WBT DBT WBT DBT WBT DBT WBT DBT WBT DBT WBT
(oC) (oC) (oC) (oC) (oC) (oC) (oC) (oC) (oC) (oC) (oC) (oC)
0000 22.0 20.1 23.1 20.7 24.8 21.9 25.4 22.5 25.9 23.0 27.0 23.6
0100 21.7 20.0 22.8 20.6 24.5 21.8 25.0 22.4 25.6 23.0 26.7 23.5
0200 21.4 19.9 22.5 20.5 24.2 21.7 24.7 22.3 25.3 22.9 26.4 23.5
0300 21.1 19.8 22.3 20.4 23.9 21.6 24.5 22.2 25.0 22.8 26.1 23.4
0400 21.0 19.8 22.1 20.4 23.7 21.6 24.3 22.2 24.8 22.7 26.0 23.3
0500 20.9 19.8 22.0 20.3 23.7 21.5 24.2 22.1 24.8 22.7 25.9 23.3
0600 21.0 19.8 22.1 20.4 23.8 21.6 24.3 22.2 24.9 22.8 26.0 23.4
0700 21.3 19.9 22.4 20.5 24.1 21.7 24.7 22.3 25.2 22.9 26.3 23.4
0800 21.9 20.1 23.0 20.7 24.7 21.8 25.2 22.4 25.8 23.0 26.9 23.6
0900 22.7 20.3 23.8 20.9 25.5 22.1 26.1 22.7 26.6 23.2 27.7 23.8
1000 23.7 20.6 24.8 21.2 26.5 22.3 27.0 22.9 27.6 23.5 28.7 24.1
10
1100 24.8 20.9 25.9 21.5 27.5 22.6 28.1 23.2 28.6 23.8 29.8 24.4
1200 25.8 21.2 26.9 21.8 28.5 22.9 29.1 23.5 29.7 24.1 30.8 24.6
1300 26.5 21.5 27.6 22.0 29.3 23.1 29.9 23.7 30.4 24.3 31.5 24.8
1400 27.0 21.6 28.1 22.2 29.8 23.3 30.4 23.8 30.9 24.4 32.0 25.0
1500 27.2 21.7 28.3 22.2 30.0 23.3 30.6 23.9 31.1 24.4 32.2 25.0
1600 27.0 21.6 28.1 22.2 29.8 23.3 30.4 23.8 30.9 24.4 32.0 25.0
1700 26.6 21.5 27.7 22.0 29.4 23.2 29.9 23.7 30.5 24.3 31.6 24.8
1800 25.9 21.3 27.0 21.8 28.7 23.0 29.2 23.5 29.8 24.1 30.9 24.7
1900 25.1 21.0 26.2 21.6 27.8 22.7 28.4 23.3 29.0 23.9 30.1 24.4
2000 24.2 20.8 25.4 21.4 27.0 22.5 27.6 23.1 28.1 23.7 29.2 24.2
2100 23.5 20.6 24.7 21.2 26.3 22.3 26.9 22.9 27.4 23.5 28.5 24.0
2200 22.9 20.4 24.0 21.0 25.7 22.1 26.2 22.7 26.8 23.3 27.9 23.9
2300 22.4 20.2 23.5 20.8 25.2 22.0 25.7 22.6 26.3 23.2 27.4 23.7
(Carrier, 2002)
Table 3.3. Miami’s Weather Data from from July-December
Hr July August September October November December
0000 27.6 23.6 27.6 23.6 26.5 23.0 25.4 22.5 23.7 21.9 22.6 20.7
0100 27.3 23.6 27.3 23.6 26.2 23.0 25.0 22.4 23.4 21.8 22.3 20.6
0200 27.0 23.5 27.0 23.5 25.8 22.9 24.7 22.3 23.1 21.7 22.0 20.5
0300 26.7 23.4 26.7 23.4 25.6 22.8 24.5 22.2 22.8 21.6 21.7 20.4
0400 26.5 23.3 26.5 23.3 25.4 22.7 24.3 22.2 22.6 21.6 21.5 20.4
0500 26.4 23.3 26.4 23.3 25.3 22.7 24.2 22.1 22.6 21.5 21.4 20.4
0600 26.6 23.4 26.6 23.4 25.5 22.8 24.3 22.2 22.7 21.6 21.6 20.4
0700 26.9 23.4 26.9 23.4 25.8 22.9 24.7 22.3 23.0 21.7 21.9 20.5
0800 27.5 23.6 27.5 23.6 26.3 23.0 25.2 22.4 23.6 21.8 22.5 20.7
0900 28.3 23.8 28.3 23.8 27.2 23.2 26.1 22.7 24.4 22.1 23.3 20.9
1000 29.2 24.1 29.2 24.1 28.1 23.5 27.0 22.9 25.3 22.3 24.2 21.2
11
1100 30.3 24.4 30.3 24.4 29.2 23.8 28.1 23.2 26.4 22.7 25.3 21.5
1200 31.3 24.6 31.3 24.6 30.2 24.1 29.1 23.5 27.4 22.9 26.3 21.8
1300 32.1 24.8 32.1 24.8 31.0 24.3 29.9 23.7 28.2 23.1 27.1 22.0
1400 32.6 25.0 32.6 25.0 31.5 24.4 30.4 23.8 28.7 23.3 27.6 22.2
1500 32.8 25.0 32.8 25.0 31.7 24.4 30.6 23.9 28.9 23.3 27.8 22.2
1600 32.6 25.0 32.6 25.0 31.5 24.4 30.4 23.8 28.7 23.3 27.6 22.2
1700 32.1 24.8 32.1 24.8 31.0 24.3 29.9 23.7 28.3 23.2 27.1 22.0
1800 31.4 24.7 31.4 24.7 30.3 24.1 29.2 23.5 27.6 23.0 26.4 21.8
1900 30.6 24.4 30.6 24.4 29.5 23.9 28.4 23.3 26.7 22.7 25.6 21.6
2000 29.8 24.2 29.8 24.2 28.7 23.7 27.6 23.1 25.9 22.5 24.8 21.4
2100 29.1 24.0 29.1 24.0 28.0 23.5 26.9 22.9 25.2 22.3 24.1 21.2
2200 28.5 23.9 28.5 23.9 27.4 23.3 26.2 22.7 24.6 22.1 23.5 21.0
2300 28.0 23.7 28.0 23.7 26.9 23.2 25.7 22.6 24.1 22.0 23.0 20.8
(Carrier, 2002)
Table 3.4. Gainesville’s Weather Data from January-June
0000 16.3 15.0 17.4 16.1 20.0 18.7 21.6 20.1 23.8 21.5 25.4 22.7
0100 15.7 14.7 16.9 15.8 19.5 18.4 21.1 19.9 23.3 21.4 24.9 22.6
0200 15.2 14.5 16.3 15.6 19.0 18.2 20.6 19.7 22.8 21.2 24.3 22.4
0300 14.8 14.3 15.9 15.4 18.6 18.1 20.1 19.6 22.4 21.1 23.9 22.3
0400 14.5 14.2 15.6 15.3 18.3 17.9 19.8 19.5 22.0 21.0 23.6 22.2
0500 14.4 14.1 15.5 15.2 18.2 17.9 19.7 19.4 21.9 21.0 23.5 22.2
0600 14.6 14.2 15.7 15.3 18.4 18.0 19.9 19.5 22.2 21.0 23.7 22.3
0700 15.1 14.5 16.2 15.6 18.9 18.2 20.4 19.7 22.7 21.2 24.2 22.4
0800 16.1 14.9 17.2 16.0 19.8 18.6 21.4 20.0 23.6 21.5 25.2 22.7
0900 17.4 15.5 18.5 16.6 21.2 19.1 22.7 20.5 25.0 21.8 26.5 23.0
1000 19.0 16.2 20.1 17.3 22.7 19.7 24.3 21.0 26.5 22.3 28.1 23.5
12
1100 20.7 17.0 21.8 18.0 24.5 20.4 26.1 21.6 28.3 22.8 29.8 23.9
1200 22.4 17.7 23.5 18.7 26.2 21.0 27.7 22.1 29.9 23.2 31.5 24.4
1300 23.6 18.2 24.7 19.2 27.4 21.5 29.0 22.5 31.2 23.6 32.7 24.7
1400 24.5 18.5 25.6 19.5 28.2 21.8 29.8 22.8 32.0 23.8 33.6 24.9
1500 24.8 18.7 25.9 19.7 28.6 21.9 30.1 22.9 32.3 23.9 33.9 25.0
1600 24.5 18.5 25.6 19.5 28.2 21.8 29.8 22.8 32.0 23.8 33.6 24.9
1700 23.7 18.2 24.8 19.3 27.5 21.5 29.1 22.6 31.3 23.6 32.8 24.7
1800 22.6 17.8 23.7 18.8 26.4 21.1 27.9 22.2 30.2 23.3 31.7 24.4
1900 21.2 17.2 22.4 18.2 25.0 20.6 26.6 21.8 28.8 22.9 30.4 24.1
2000 19.9 16.6 21.0 17.7 23.7 20.1 25.2 21.3 27.5 22.6 29.0 23.7
2100 18.8 16.1 19.9 17.2 22.5 19.6 24.1 20.9 26.3 22.2 27.9 23.4
2200 17.7 15.7 18.8 16.7 21.5 19.2 23.0 20.6 25.3 21.9 26.8 23.1
2300 16.9 15.3 18.0 16.4 20.7 18.9 22.2 20.3 24.4 21.7 26.0 22.9
(Carrier, 2002)
Table 3.5. Gainesville’s Weather Data from July-December
0000 25.9 22.7 25.9 22.7 24.8 22.1 22.7 20.9 19.5 18.2 16.8 15.7
0100 25.4 22.6 25.4 22.6 24.3 22.0 22.2 20.7 19.0 18.0 16.3 15.4
0200 24.9 22.4 24.9 22.4 23.8 21.8 21.7 20.6 18.4 17.7 15.8 15.1
0300 24.5 22.3 24.5 22.3 23.4 21.7 21.2 20.5 18.0 17.5 15.4 14.9
0400 24.2 22.2 24.2 22.2 23.0 21.6 20.9 20.4 17.7 17.4 15.0 14.7
0500 24.1 22.2 24.1 22.2 22.9 21.6 20.8 20.3 17.6 17.3 14.9 14.7
0600 24.3 22.3 24.3 22.3 23.2 21.6 21.0 20.4 17.8 17.4 15.2 14.8
0700 24.8 22.4 24.8 22.4 23.7 21.8 21.6 20.6 18.3 17.7 15.7 15.1
0800 25.7 22.7 25.7 22.7 24.6 22.1 22.5 20.8 19.3 18.1 16.6 15.6
0900 27.1 23.0 27.1 23.0 26.0 22.4 23.8 21.2 20.6 18.7 18.0 16.3
1000 28.6 23.5 28.6 23.5 27.5 22.9 25.4 21.7 22.2 19.4 19.5 17.0
13
1100 30.4 23.9 30.4 23.9 29.3 23.4 27.2 22.2 23.9 20.1 21.3 17.9
1200 32.1 24.4 32.1 24.4 30.9 23.8 28.8 22.7 25.6 20.8 22.9 18.7
1300 33.3 24.7 33.3 24.7 32.2 24.1 30.1 23.0 26.9 21.3 24.2 19.3
1400 34.1 24.9 34.1 24.9 33.0 24.4 30.9 23.3 27.7 21.7 25.0 19.6
1500 34.4 25.0 34.4 25.0 33.3 24.4 31.2 23.3 28.0 21.8 25.3 19.8
1600 34.1 24.9 34.1 24.9 33.0 24.4 30.9 23.3 27.7 21.7 25.0 19.6
1700 33.4 24.7 33.4 24.7 32.3 24.2 30.2 23.1 27.0 21.4 24.3 19.3
1800 32.3 24.4 32.3 24.4 31.2 23.9 29.0 22.7 25.8 20.9 23.2 18.8
1900 30.9 24.1 30.9 24.1 29.8 23.5 27.7 22.4 24.5 20.4 21.8 18.1
2000 29.6 23.7 29.6 23.7 28.5 23.1 26.3 22.0 23.1 19.8 20.5 17.5
2100 28.4 23.4 28.4 23.4 27.3 22.8 25.2 21.6 22.0 19.3 19.3 16.9
2200 27.4 23.1 27.4 23.1 26.3 22.5 24.2 21.3 20.9 18.8 18.3 16.4
2300 26.5 22.9 26.5 22.9 25.4 22.3 23.3 21.1 20.1 18.5 17.4 16.0
(Carrier, 2002)
Table 3.6. Chicago’s Weather Data from January-June
0000 -1.2 -1.2 1.1 1.0 7.7 7.6 13.3 12.4 18.3 16.9 22.2 19.6
0100 -1.7 -1.8 0.5 0.4 7.2 7.0 12.7 12.0 17.7 16.7 21.6 19.4
0200 -2.2 -2.4 0.0 -0.2 6.6 6.4 12.2 11.7 17.2 16.4 21.1 19.3
0300 -2.7 -2.9 -0.5 -0.7 6.2 6.0 11.8 11.4 16.8 16.3 20.7 19.1
0400 -3.0 -3.3 -0.8 -1.0 5.9 5.6 11.4 11.1 16.4 16.1 20.3 19.0
0500 -3.1 -3.4 -0.9 -1.2 5.8 5.5 11.3 11.1 16.3 16.1 20.2 19.0
0600 -2.9 -3.1 -0.7 -0.9 6.0 5.7 11.6 11.2 16.6 16.2 20.4 19.0
0700 -2.3 -2.5 -0.1 -0.3 6.5 6.3 12.1 11.6 17.1 16.4 21.0 19.2
0800 -1.4 -1.5 0.9 0.8 7.5 7.4 13.1 12.2 18.1 16.8 22.0 19.5
0900 0.0 0.0 2.3 2.3 8.9 8.8 14.5 13.2 19.5 17.4 23.4 20.0
1000 1.7 1.7 3.9 3.9 10.6 10.4 16.1 14.2 21.1 18.1 25.0 20.5
14
1100 3.5 3.5 5.8 5.8 12.4 12.0 18.0 15.3 23.0 18.9 26.9 21.0
1200 5.3 5.3 7.5 7.5 14.2 13.5 19.7 16.4 24.7 19.6 28.6 21.5
1300 6.6 6.5 8.8 8.7 15.5 14.6 21.0 17.1 26.0 20.1 29.9 21.9
1400 7.5 7.2 9.7 9.4 16.3 15.3 21.9 17.6 26.9 20.4 30.8 22.1
1500 7.8 7.5 10.0 9.7 16.7 15.6 22.2 17.8 27.2 20.6 31.1 22.2
1600 7.5 7.2 9.7 9.4 16.3 15.3 21.9 17.6 26.9 20.4 30.8 22.1
1700 6.7 6.5 8.9 8.8 15.6 14.7 21.1 17.2 26.1 20.1 30.0 21.9
1800 5.5 5.5 7.7 7.7 14.4 13.7 19.9 16.5 24.9 19.7 28.8 21.6
1900 4.1 4.1 6.3 6.3 13.0 12.5 18.5 15.7 23.5 19.1 27.4 21.2
2000 2.7 2.7 4.9 4.9 11.5 11.3 17.1 14.8 22.1 18.5 26.0 20.7
2100 1.5 1.5 3.7 3.7 10.4 10.2 15.9 14.1 20.9 18.0 24.8 20.4
2200 0.4 0.4 2.6 2.6 9.3 9.1 14.8 13.4 19.8 17.6 23.7 20.1
2300 -0.5 -0.5 1.7 1.7 8.4 8.2 13.9 12.8 18.9 17.2 22.8 19.8
(Carrier, 2002)
Table 3.7. Chicago’s Weather Data from July-December
0000 23.8 20.8 23.8 20.8 20.5 18.9 15.0 13.9 8.8 8.4 2.2 2.1
0100 23.3 20.7 23.3 20.7 20.0 18.7 14.4 13.6 8.3 7.9 1.6 1.5
0200 22.8 20.5 22.8 20.5 19.4 18.6 13.9 13.3 7.8 7.4 1.1 0.9
0300 22.3 20.4 22.3 20.4 19.0 18.4 13.4 13.0 7.3 7.0 0.7 0.4
0400 22.0 20.3 22.0 20.3 18.7 18.3 13.1 12.8 7.0 6.7 0.3 0.1
0500 21.9 20.2 21.9 20.2 18.6 18.3 13.0 12.7 6.9 6.6 0.2 -0.1
0600 22.1 20.3 22.1 20.3 18.8 18.4 13.2 12.9 7.1 6.8 0.4 0.2
0700 22.7 20.5 22.7 20.5 19.3 18.5 13.8 13.2 7.7 7.3 1.0 0.8
0800 23.6 20.8 23.6 20.8 20.3 18.9 14.7 13.8 8.6 8.2 2.0 1.9
0900 25.0 21.2 25.0 21.2 21.7 19.3 16.2 14.7 10.0 9.5 3.4 3.4
1000 26.7 21.6 26.7 21.6 23.3 19.8 17.8 15.6 11.7 10.9 5.0 5.0
15
1100 28.5 22.2 28.5 22.2 25.2 20.4 19.6 16.6 13.5 12.4 6.9 6.8
1200 30.3 22.7 30.3 22.7 26.9 20.9 21.4 17.6 15.3 13.7 8.6 8.4
1300 31.6 23.0 31.6 23.0 28.2 21.3 22.7 18.3 16.6 14.7 9.9 9.6
1400 32.5 23.3 32.5 23.3 29.1 21.6 23.6 18.7 17.5 15.3 10.8 10.3
1500 32.8 23.3 32.8 23.3 29.4 21.7 23.9 18.9 17.8 15.6 11.1 10.6
1600 32.5 23.3 32.5 23.3 29.1 21.6 23.6 18.7 17.5 15.3 10.8 10.3
1700 31.7 23.0 31.7 23.0 28.4 21.3 22.8 18.3 16.7 14.8 10.0 9.6
1800 30.5 22.7 30.5 22.7 27.2 21.0 21.6 17.7 15.5 13.9 8.8 8.6
1900 29.1 22.3 29.1 22.3 25.7 20.6 20.2 16.9 14.1 12.8 7.4 7.3
2000 27.7 21.9 27.7 21.9 24.3 20.1 18.8 16.2 12.7 11.7 6.0 6.0
2100 26.5 21.6 26.5 21.6 23.1 19.8 17.6 15.5 11.5 10.7 4.8 4.8
2200 25.4 21.3 25.4 21.3 22.0 19.4 16.5 14.9 10.4 9.8 3.7 3.7
2300 24.5 21.0 24.5 21.0 21.2 19.1 15.6 14.3 9.5 9.0 2.8 2.8
(Carrier, 2002)
16
3.2 Psychrometric Analysis
For the purpose of analyzing the hybrid liquid desiccant system it was necessary to
have the psychrometric properties of ambient air for each city under different weather
conditions. In this study, the DBT and WBT were the basis to evaluate the remaining key
properties from the psychrometric equations presented in ASHRAE (1989). These are
summarized below as follows:
Pws = Exp [C1/T + C2 + C3 T + C4 T2 + C5T3 + C6 ln(T)], for 0 < t <200 oC
= Exp [C7/T + C8 + C9 T + C10 T2 + C11T3 + C12 T4 + C13 ln(T)], for -100<t<0oC
C1 = -5.8002206 x103 , C2 = 1.3914493, C3 = -4.8640239x10-2
C4 = 4.1764768 x10-5, C5 = -1.4452093x10-8, C6 = 6.54596738
C7 = -5.6745359 x103, C8 = 6.3925247, C9= -9.677843 x10–3
C10= 6.22115701 x10-7, C11 = 2.0747825 x10–9, C12 = -9.484024 x10–13
C13 = 4.1635019
Ws =0.62198[Pws/( Patm -Pws)]
W = [(2501-2.381t*) Ws *- (t - t*)]/(2501+1.805t-4.186t*)
µ = W/Ws
φ = µ /[1-(1- µ)(Pws/Patm)]
v = (RaT/Patm)(1+1.6078 W)
h = t + W(2501+1.805t)
Pw = PatmW/(0.62198+W)
17
where
Ra is the gas constant for air and is equal to 287.055 J/(kg K)
Patm is the atmospheric pressure and is equal to101325 Pa
These equations were used to find the hourly psychometric properties for the three
cities, which were employed later to perform the energy calculations. Annual average
hourly psychrometric properties obtained for Miami, Gainesville, and Chicago are shown
in Appendix A. A sample table for Miami’s average hourly psychrometric properties in
January is shown below.
Table 3.8. January Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami
DBT WBT DPT Pws Pws* v h Pw

o o o
hour ( C) ( C) ( C) (Pa) (Pa) Ws Ws* W µ φ 3
(m /kg) (kJ/kg) (Pa)
0 22.1 20.1 20.0 2770.49 2458.57 0.0174847 0.01547 0.014654 0.84 0.84 0.8560 59.2874 2332.22
1 21.7 20.0 20.0 2714.68 2441.71 0.0171227 0.01536 0.014638 0.85 0.86 0.8550 58.9056 2329.79
2 21.4 19.9 19.9 2659.86 2424.96 0.0167676 0.01525 0.014623 0.87 0.88 0.8541 58.5256 2327.47
3 21.2 19.8 20.0 2623.85 2416.62 0.0165346 0.0152 0.014639 0.89 0.89 0.8534 58.3382 2329.96
4 20.9 19.8 20.0 2588.27 2408.30 0.0163045 0.01514 0.014655 0.90 0.90 0.8528 58.1511 2332.48
5 20.9 19.8 20.0 2579.44 2408.30 0.0162474 0.01514 0.014678 0.90 0.91 0.8527 58.1530 2336.09
6 21.0 19.8 19.9 2597.12 2408.30 0.0163617 0.01514 0.014632 0.89 0.90 0.8529 58.1492 2328.87
7 21.3 19.9 20.0 2650.82 2424.96 0.0167091 0.01525 0.014646 0.88 0.88 0.8539 58.5275 2331.08
8 21.9 20.1 20.0 2742.46 2450.13 0.0173028 0.01541 0.014646 0.85 0.85 0.8555 59.0963 2330.99
9 22.7 20.3 20.0 2885.13 2492.59 0.0182293 0.01569 0.014687 0.81 0.81 0.8580 60.0560 2337.37
10 23.7 20.6 20.0 3054.61 2535.69 0.0193335 0.01596 0.014686 0.76 0.77 0.8607 61.0225 2337.19
11 24.8 20.9 20.0 3265.08 2588.27 0.0207099 0.0163 0.014699 0.71 0.72 0.8640 62.1976 2339.30
12 25.8 21.2 20.0 3465.21 2632.81 0.0220243 0.01659 0.014684 0.67 0.67 0.8669 63.1863 2336.99
13 26.5 21.4 20.0 3616.32 2668.93 0.0230203 0.01683 0.014708 0.64 0.65 0.8690 63.9883 2340.69
14 27.1 21.6 20.0 3736.44 2696.30 0.0238142 0.017 0.014722 0.62 0.63 0.8706 64.5940 2342.85
15 27.2 21.7 20.1 3773.15 2705.48 0.0240572 0.01706 0.014735 0.61 0.62 0.8711 64.7976 2344.83
16 27.1 21.6 20.0 3736.44 2696.30 0.0238142 0.017 0.014722 0.62 0.63 0.8706 64.5940 2342.85
17 26.6 21.5 20.1 3640.07 2678.03 0.0231771 0.01689 0.014743 0.64 0.64 0.8694 64.1925 2346.19
18 25.9 21.3 20.0 3488.10 2641.80 0.0221749 0.01665 0.014719 0.66 0.67 0.8672 63.3887 2342.38
19 25.1 21.1 20.1 3319.64 2606.01 0.0210677 0.01642 0.014744 0.70 0.71 0.8648 62.5962 2346.23
20 24.2 20.8 20.0 3158.32 2561.86 0.020011 0.01613 0.014692 0.73 0.74 0.8624 61.6081 2338.13
21 23.6 20.6 20.0 3034.23 2527.02 0.0192005 0.01591 0.014653 0.76 0.77 0.8604 60.8256 2332.13
22 22.9 20.4 20.0 2914.43 2501.15 0.0184199 0.01574 0.014695 0.80 0.80 0.8585 60.2492 2338.73
23 22.4 20.2 20.0 2827.30 2475.53 0.0178535 0.01558 0.01467 0.82 0.83 0.8570 59.6708 2334.74
CHAPTER 4
CYCLE DESCRIPTION AND THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A HYBRID
LIQUID DESICCANT (HLD) SYSTEM
4.1 System Description
Hybrid liquid desiccant (HLD) systems are cooling systems where the latent load is
removed by a liquid desiccant dehumidifier, while the sensible load is removed by a
conventional air cooler (i.e. DX, chilled water, etc.). In some cases such as the DryKor
packaged system, the conventional vapor compression cooler is used to cool the
desiccant, then the latter cools the air. The desiccant dehumidifies the air by combining
with water particles to form a weaker solution. Dehumidifying the air reduces the
required latent cooling load, which reduces the energy consumption, and hence improves
the COP of the system. The weak solution is regenerated at certain temperatures and
airflow to allow reuse of the liquid desiccant. The heat required for regeneration is
usually provided by outer sources like natural gas or solar collectors. In DryKor systems,
waste heat from the condenser is utilized for regeneration.
In addition to its dehumidification effect liquid desiccants could be used as efficient
methods to wash air from suspended particles and/or microorganisms. If the right mass
flow rate is used with the rated capacity, the amount of carryover LiCl will be in the order
of 1 ppm. However, LiCl is environmentally safe and is not classified as a toxic,
carcinogenic or hazardous material.
HLD systems may be recommended to replace conventional vapor compression air
conditioning systems for the following reasons:
18
19
• Cost effectiveness helps in complying with ventilation requirements as per

standards and building codes.
• Improvement of indoor air quality (IAQ) and prevention of the so called sick
building syndrome.
• Prevention of mold and mildew growth.
• Reduction of corrosion to internal fixtures.
HLD systems are more efficient in applications where the latent cooling load is
high enough such as cooling the ventilation air.
According to market surveys performed by the author, DryKor and Kathabar are
the only manufacturers that produce packaged units utilizing hybrid liquid desiccant
cooling systems for dehumidification. The Kathabar system has been on the market since
the early 1930s. However additional sources of heat for the regeneration process are still
used in the system. The COP of the Kathabar unit is low compared to the DryKor system
for small packaged units since the latter makes use of the condenser waste heat to
regenerate the desiccant. Kathabar systems are more suitable for large cooling capacity
installations (i.e. 20 tons of cooling and above). For the purpose of this study, the
DryKor system will be considered for energy calculations and analysis. Based on the
manufacturer’s data sheet, the unit selected for this study is DryKor model UDT 7.5 with
a rated energy efficiency ratio (EER) of 11.62 and a cooling capacity of 10 tons.
DryKor systems cool and dehumidify at the same time. The desiccant is first cooled
to about 10 oC then sprayed onto the fresh air entering the absorber. This eliminates the
reheat process needed by the conventional evaporative cooler, which enhances the COP
of the system. Figure 4.1 illustrates the psychrometric process for the DryKor cooling
and dehumidifying system.

20
y
lp
a
EA
th
n
E
Humidity Ratio
)
A
L
h
-
A
E
(h
LA
D r y B u lb T e m p e r a tu r e
Figure 4.1. Psychrometric depiction of the DryKor cooling and dehumidifying process
DryKor came up with an innovative idea that improved liquid desiccant
regeneration efficiency of their system. The system makes use of the tendency of the
weak salt solution at the absorber portion to be in equilibrium with the strong solution at
the regenerator portion of the cycle. A concentration sensor that gives a signal to control
the valve that allows mixing of the two solutions helps maintain the concentration in the
cooling chamber to about 40%. By doing so, the amount of liquid desiccant requiring
regeneration is reduced, which in turn reduces the required heat. Figure 4.2. shows the
simplified flow diagram of the system. At steady state, only water would be flowing
from the weak solution to the strong solution, which is the basic assumption used to
analyze the COP of the cycle in the preceding section. In this case, the amount of water
flowing should be the same as the amount collected from the moist air.
21
Fresh outside air Supply air to space

Regeneration air exhaust
Regenerator Absorber/Cooler
I-2
Condenser Evaporator
Compressor
&
Wcomp
Figure 4.2. Schematic diagram of the DryKor system
4.2 Thermodynamic Analysis of the DryKor Cycle
4.2.1. Thermodynamic Properties of Liquid Desiccants
Desiccants are chemical salts that have high affinity for moisture due to the low
vapor pressure of its solution in certain pressure and temperature ranges. The most
famous liquid desiccants used in industry are lithium chloride (LiCl) and calcium
chloride (CaCl). Lithium chloride is more popular because of its low vapor pressure
compared to other desiccants. In this thesis, LiCl is the liquid desiccant selected unless
otherwise indicated.
A significant amount of the work published in the open literature discussed how to
obtain the thermodynamic properties of different types of liquid desiccants. The density
of the LiCl solutions was determined using the equation proposed by Berntsson and
Wimby (1994)
22
ρ= a1+a2t+a3 t2+a4x+a5 x2+a6xt+a7 x2t+a8x t2+a9 x3+a10x4
Specific heat, vapor pressure, viscosity, and equilibrium mole fraction for LiCl
were determined using the following polynomial (Aseyev and Zaytsev, 1992):
Y= (b0 + b1t + b2t2) + (c0 + c1t + c2t2)x + (d0 + d1t + d2t2)x2
Where: Y= LiCl property (Cp, ρ , Pv, xi …etc)
Values of the constants a, b, c, and d are listed below.
a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 a7 a8 a9 a10
1002.8 -0.15582 -0.00288 6.1379 -0.058452 0.0006065 -0.000125 0.000058 0.0026623 -0.000025941
b0 b1 b2 c0 c1 c2 d0 d1 d2
3.90446 0.01743 -0.00026 -3.57625 -0.09055 0.001391 0.26192 0.11345 -0.00174
To illustrate the effect of temperature on LiCl properties, the result of using the
above equations to obtain the specific heat and density for LiCl at different temperatures
and a fixed concentration of 40% are graphically represented in Figure 4.3.
1200
1000
Cp (kJ/kgK) , ρ (kg/m )
3
800
C p vs t
x = 0 .4
ρ vs t
600
400
200
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Temperature ( o C)
Figure 4.3. Effect of temperature on the specific heat and density of LiCl at a 40%
concentration
23
4.2.2 Evaluating the COP of the DryKor HLD System
ta ,E ,φ E , Pa ,E , m& m ,E ta , L , φ L , Pa , L , m& m , L
td , E , xE , m& d , E
t d , L , x L , m& d , L
m& w , hw
W& d , p
Evaporator
Q& c hd , P , E , xP , E , m& d , P , E
m& r
Expansion Valve m& r

Condenser Q& d
m& r m& r
Compressor
m& r m& r
W& comp
Figure 4.4. Schematic diagram of the absorber/cooler chamber
Considering the cooling chamber shown in Figure 4.3, energy and mass balances
can be expressed assuming an adiabatic wall, steady state, and constant properties
a) Air mass balance:
m& m,E = m
& a,E + m& v,E (1)
m& m,L= m& a,L + m& v,L (2)
m& a,E = m& a,L (3)
Subtracting Equation (1) from Equation (2) and substituting Equation (3), we get
( m& m,E - m& m,L) = ( m& v,E - m& v,L) (4)

24
b) Liquid desiccant and water mass balances:
m& d,E = m& d,L = m& d,P,E = m& d (5)
m& v,E + m& d,E= m& v,L + m& d,L + m& w (6)
Substituting Equation (5) into Equation (6) and rearranging we get
m& w = ( m& v,E- m& v,L) (7)
c) Liquid desiccant energy Balance:
m& d hd,P,E = m& d hd,E - W& d , P (8)
Q& d = m& d hd,L- m& d hd,P,E (9)
Substituting Equation (8) into Equation (9) and rearranging we get
Q& d - W& d , P = m& d (hd,L-hd,E) (10)
Utilizing the approximation that the liquid enthalpy is equal to the product of the
specific heat and the temperature, Equation (10) can be expressed as
Q& d = m& d (Cp,d,Ltd,L-Cp,d,Etd,E) + W& d , p (11)
d) Absorber/cooler chamber energy balance:
m& m,E hm,E + m& d hd,E = m& m,L hm,L + m& dhd,L + m& w hw (12)
By definition cooling rate Q& a can be expressed as
Q& a = ( m& m,E hm,E - m& m,L hm,L) (13)
Rearranging Equation (12)
( m& m,Ehm,E - m& m,L hm,L) = m& d (hd,L-hd,E) + m& w Cp,w tw (14)
Substituting equation (10) and (13) into Equation (14) we get
Q& a = Q& d + m& w Cp,w tw - W& d , P (15)

25
The temperature tw, in this case is approximately equal to td2 for steady state flow
which along with td1 could obtained from experimental data or computed analytically by
analyzing the absorber geometry as performed by Mago (2000). All other properties
could be obtained from psychrometric tables developed in Chapter 3. According to
manufacturer’s technical data, the desiccant entering temperature (td,E), condenser
temperature (tc) and liquid desiccant mass flow rate ( m& d ) are approximately 50 oF (10
o
C), 130 oF (54.4 oC) and 0.75 kg/s, respectively.
4.2.3 HLD System COP
COPHLD = Q& a / W& total (16)
W& total = W& comp +2 W& d , P + W& f (17)
The following example illustrates how to analytically obtain the coefficient of
performance for the cycle at a given point. Assuming a temperature difference in the
evaporator of ∆te = 10 oF, a condensing temperature of tc = 130 oF (54.4 oC), and a
desiccant inlet temperature of td,E= 50 oF (10 oC), then the evaporator temperature te = 50-
10 = 40 F (4.4 oC). Then from the manufacturer’s data sheet for a Copeland compressor
model number ZR94KC, the corresponding input power ( W& comp ) would be 8.23 kW while
desiccant pump ( W& d , p ) would be 0.19 kW and the regeneration fan would be 0.3 kW
(DryKor, 2002). Considering the cooling requirement Q& a = 28.91 kW for Miami in June
at 3:00 pm (Table5.6F), the COP may be evaluated using Equation (17) to yield a value
of 8.91 kW for the total power consumed Equation (16) in turn gives a COP of 3.24.
This is 1.7% smaller than the value obtained from the DryKor software. The
difference between the calculated values and the one provided by the manufacturer’s
26
software is due to the approximate values used for td,E, ∆te, and tc. Based on their
experiments and technical data, DryKor engineers had developed software to calculate
the COP of their systems. To ensure accuracy of the energy analysis performed in the
preceding chapter, COP calculations were performed using the DryKor software.
CHAPTER 5
ENERGY ANALYSIS
One of the main objectives of this research is to compare the energy consumption
of a hybrid liquid desiccant (HLD) system to a conventional vapor compression system.
For the purpose of obtaining results with reasonable accuracy, an hour-by-hour energy
analysis approach has been implemented. The HAP 4.1 program (carrier, 2002) was used
to find the energy consumed by the building without including ventilation air. Due to
limitations of the program capabilities, the energy consumption by the outside-air (OA)
make-up unit and the hybrid liquid desiccant system was performed on an Excel
spreadsheet generated for this purpose. Details of the model equations and variables will
be illustrated in the coming sections. The average monthly hour-by-hour temperatures
for the three cities listed in Chapter 3 were the basis for computing outside air properties
in this chapter.
5.1 Model I: Existing Air-Conditioning and Ventilation System
The existing air conditioning system consists of nine (9) heat pumps and one
outside-air make-up unit for ventilation. The existing system was designed in such a way
that the heat pumps supply the required internal cooling load, while the outside-air make
up unit provides the required cooling load for ventilation air. The HAP4.1 software
(Carrier, 2002) was used to calculate the electrical energy consumption of the nine heat
pumps. The electrical consumption by the outside-air make-up unit was calculated with
the help of the Excel spreadsheet explained later in Section 5.1.3.
27
28
5.1.1 Energy Consumption of the Building Excluding the Ventilation Load
The HAP 4.1 program was used to evaluate the load of the nine heat pumps for the
three cities using the same internal load and weather conditions reported earlier in
Chapter 3. Results for the three cities are summarized in Table 5.1.
Table 5.1 Cooling Energy Consumption by the Building Excluding Ventilation

Heat Pumps 1-9 Energy
Consumption (kWh)
Month Miami Gainesville Chicago
January 2147 1482 0
February 1642 1348 0
March 2303 2061 64
April 2460 2362 652
May 2537 2536 1378
June 2511 2517 2228
July 2762 2764 2608
August 2579 2545 2350
September 2556 2487 1880
October 2664 2549 574
November 1956 1761 180
December 2002 1424 5
Annual 28119 25836 11919
5.1.2 DX Outside-air Make-up Unit Process Description
The cooling and dehumidifying process performed by the DX outside-air make-up
unit is shown on the psychrometric chart of Figure 5.1. First, the equipment cools the
entering air from Point EA approaching the apparatus dew-point (ADP). Further cooling
beyond saturation causes the moisture to condense out of the air until the coil leaving air
condition (LA) is reached. Then the unit reheats the air at a constant humidity ratio till it
reaches the required supply air (SA) temperature (Sherif, 2002). To improve the COP of
such a system, usually the reheat makes use of the waste heat from the condenser (hot gas
bypass) where the capacity is controlled by means of the reheat bypass arrangement
shown in Figure 5.2.

29
EA
y
lp
ng
a
fy i
th
di
mi
n
E
u
eh
d D
an
o l in g
Co
SA
Humidity Ratio
LA re h e a t
LA
- h
ADP h EA
P
AD
LA
- h
h
D r y B u lb T e m p e r a tu r e
Figure 5.1. Cooling and dehumidifying process performed by the vapor compression
system
In this study the existing outside-air make-up unit selected is the Addison model#
PCA141E with a10-ton capacity. According to the manufacturer’s data sheet the rated
energy efficiency ratio (EER) for the unit is 9.9 Watts/Btuh.
Figure 5.2. Reheat system (Addison, 2002)

30
5.1.3 Energy Consumption of the Outside-Air (OA) Make-Up Unit
The model used to compute the energy consumption by the 100% OA vapor
compression make-up unit is explained in the following steps:
1. The hourly average properties obtained from Chapter 3 for a designated city are
used to find the enthalpy and specific volume at State EA in Figure 5.1.
2. For Point LA the following equations are used to compute hLA and vLA,
respectively:
hLA = tLA + WLA(2501+1.805 tLA)
vLA = (Ra TLA/Patm)(1+1.6078 WLA)
In this case WLA is the humidity ratio at Point LA and t is the corresponding DBT.
Based on the manufacturer’s data sheet for the selected system, the average leaving
air dry-bulb and wet-bulb temperatures are 15.1 oC and 15.1oC.
Properties for Point LA are computed using the same model described in Chapter 3
and found to be:
WLA = 0.01112 kgv/kga
hLA = 43.1427 kJ/(kg K)
vLA = 0.8309 m3/kg
3. Specific enthalpy for Point SA is obtained using the same equations in the previous
step with WSA=WLA and tSA= 24 oC. This yields hSA to be equal to 52.2928
kJ/(kgK).
4. The difference between the specific enthalpies at Points EA and LA is obtained in

order to determine whether or not cooling is required.
5. The required cooling rate Q& in kW is set to zero when (hEA-hLA) is less than or
equal to zero, otherwise Q& is set equal to [(hEA / vEA) - (hLA / vLA)] V&
Where: V& is the volumetric flow rate, m3/s
6. The EER for the system is obtained from the manufacturer’s data sheet.
7. The electrical consumption per hour is then computed from the relationship
EER = Q& / W& ⇒ W& = Q& / EER

31
8. The computed W& in Step 7 is multiplied by a utilization factor f1 , which is obtained

from the information given by the building owner. This is equal to unity from 6:00
am-4:00 pm and equal to zero otherwise.
9. The figure obtained from Step 8 represents the electrical work per working day. To
obtain the total electrical consumption per month, the computed W& from Step 8 is
multiplied by the number of working days per month. Based on a typical calendar
year, the number of working days per month is listed in Table 5.2.
Table 5.2. Number of Working Days per Month

Month Operating
Days
January 21
February 20
March 18
April 22
May 21
June 22
July 22
August 22
September 22
October 21
November 17
December 18
Using the above model, the energy consumption by the Addison outside-air (OA)
make-up unit can be computed for the three cities. Results obtained from the model for
Miami, Gainesville, and Chicago are listed in Appendix B. A sample of the daily average
energy consumption for Model I is shown on Table 5.3. The annual electric consumption
and cost for the three cities will be summarized and discussed in Chapter 6.
32
Table 5.3. January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
Hour of vEA hEA hSA hLA m& w hEA - hLA Q& Input
3
day (m /kg) (kJ/kg) (kJ/kg) ((kJ/kg) vLA (kg/s) (kJ/kg) (kW) kWh
0 0.8560 59.2874 52.2928 43.1247 0.8309 0.00352 16.1627 16.39 0
1 0.8550 58.9056 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00388 6.6128 16.04 0
2 0.8541 58.5256 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00387 6.2328 15.7 0
3 0.8534 58.3382 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00389 6.0454 15.54 0
4 0.8528 58.1511 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00391 5.8583 15.38 0
5 0.8527 58.1530 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00393 5.8602 15.39 0
6 0.8529 58.1492 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00388 5.8564 15.36 5.298
7 0.8539 58.5275 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00389 6.2347 15.71 5.417
8 0.8555 59.0963 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00388 6.8035 16.21 5.591
9 0.8580 60.0560 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00392 7.7632 17.08 5.891
10 0.8607 61.0225 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00391 8.7297 17.93 6.184
11 0.8640 62.1976 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00391 9.9048 18.97 6.54
12 0.8669 63.1863 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00388 10.8935 19.82 6.833
13 0.8690 63.9883 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00389 11.6955 20.52 7.076
14 0.8706 64.5940 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00390 12.3012 21.05 7.257
15 0.8711 64.7976 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00391 12.5048 21.23 7.319
16 0.8706 64.5940 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00390 12.3012 21.05 7.257
17 0.8694 64.1925 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00393 11.8997 20.71 0
18 0.8672 63.3887 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00391 11.0959 20.01 0
19 0.8648 62.5962 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00395 10.3034 19.33 0
20 0.8624 61.6081 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00390 9.3153 18.45 0
21 0.8604 60.8256 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00387 8.5328 17.74 0
22 0.8585 60.2492 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00393 7.9564 17.26 0
23 0.8570 59.6708 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00390 7.3780 16.73 0
5.2 Model II: DryKor HLD Packaged System
In this section an hour-by-hour energy analysis of the DryKor hybrid liquid
desiccant (HLD) system acting as an outside-air make-up unit is computed with the help
of an Excel spreadsheet using the following model:
1. The hourly average properties obtained from Chapter 3 for a designated city are
used to find the enthalpy and specific volume at State EA in Figure 4.1
2. The difference between the humidity ratio at Points EA and LA is obtained in order
to determine whether or not dehumidification is required.
3. The difference between the specific enthalpies at Points EA and LA is obtained in

order to determine whether or not cooling is required.
33
4. The required cooling rate Q& in kW is set to zero when the quantity (hEA-hLA) is less
than or equal to zero, otherwise Q& is equal to [(hEA / vEA) - (hLA / vLA)] V&
5. The monthly average EER for the system was obtained from the DryKor software
(DryKor, 2002).
6. The electrical consumption in kWh is then computed from the relationship
EER = Q& / W& ⇒ W& = Q& / EER
7. The computed W& in Step 6 is multiplied by a utilization factor f1 , which is

obtained from the information given by the building owner. This is equal to unity
from 6:00 am – 4:00 pm and equal to zero otherwise.
8. The figure obtained from Step 8 represents the electrical work per working day. To
obtain the total electrical consumption per month, the computed W& from Step 7 is
multiplied by the number of working days per month. Based on a typical calendar
year, the number of working days per each month is listed in Table 5.2.
Using the above model, the energy consumption by the DryKor outside-air (OA)
make-up unit can be computed for the three cities. Results obtained from the model for
Miami, Gainesville, and Chicago are listed in Appendix C. A sample of the daily average
energy consumption for Model II is shown on Table 5.4. The annual electric
consumption and cost for the three cities will be summarized and discussed in Chapter 6.
34
Table 5.4. January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
&
Hour vEA hEA hLA m& w hEA - hLA Q Average Electric
3
of day (m /kg) (kJ/kg) ((kJ/kg) (kg/s) (kJ/kg) (kW) COP kWh
0 0.8560 59.2874 48.8767 0.0054 10.41 11.42 3.10 0.00
1 0.8550 58.9056 48.8767 0.0054 10.03 11.07 3.10 0.00
2 0.8541 58.5256 48.8767 0.0054 9.65 10.73 3.10 0.00
3 0.8534 58.3382 48.8767 0.0054 9.46 10.57 3.10 0.00
4 0.8528 58.1511 48.8767 0.0054 9.27 10.41 3.10 0.00
5 0.8527 58.1530 48.8767 0.0054 9.28 10.42 3.10 0.00
6 0.8529 58.1492 48.8767 0.0054 9.27 10.4 3.10 3.35
7 0.8539 58.5275 48.8767 0.0054 9.65 10.74 3.10 3.46
8 0.8555 59.0963 48.8767 0.0054 10.22 11.25 3.10 3.63
9 0.8580 60.0560 48.8767 0.0054 11.18 12.11 3.10 3.91
10 0.8607 61.0225 48.8767 0.0054 12.15 12.96 3.10 4.18
11 0.8640 62.1976 48.8767 0.0054 13.32 14.0 3.10 4.52
12 0.8669 63.1863 48.8767 0.0053 14.31 14.85 3.10 4.79
13 0.8690 63.9883 48.8767 0.0054 15.11 15.55 3.10 5.02
14 0.8706 64.5940 48.8767 0.0054 15.72 16.08 3.10 5.19
15 0.8711 64.7976 48.8767 0.0054 15.92 16.26 3.10 5.24
16 0.8706 64.5940 48.8767 0.0054 15.72 16.08 3.10 5.19
17 0.8694 64.1925 48.8767 0.0054 15.32 15.74 3.10 0.00
18 0.8672 63.3887 48.8767 0.0054 14.51 15.04 3.10 0.00
19 0.8648 62.5962 48.8767 0.0054 13.72 14.36 3.10 0.00
20 0.8624 61.6081 48.8767 0.0054 12.73 13.48 3.10 0.00
21 0.8604 60.8256 48.8767 0.0053 11.95 12.78 3.10 0.00
22 0.8585 60.2492 48.8767 0.0054 11.37 12.29 3.10 0.00
23 0.8570 59.6708 48.8767 0.0054 10.79 11.77 3.10 0.00
5.3 Model III: Hybrid Solid Desiccant Cooling System
The latest solid desiccant system energy calculation software (Desicalc, 2002) was
used to perform the analysis. Due to limitations in the database of the Desicalc software,
Gainesville was not considered in this model. The software allows calculation of the
total hour-by-hour energy consumption for a specific building envelope including the
energy consumed by lighting, equipment, and other electrical devices. For the purpose of
this analysis, only results of the energy consumed for cooling were considered from the
output. One of the concerns about using Desicalc for energy calculation is that it doesn’t
35
allow customizing of the cooling equipment or internal loads, which affect the accuracy
of the results. Results for Miami and Chicago are summarized in Tables 5.5 and 5.6,
respectively.
Table 5.5. Miami Energy Consumption for Model III

Energy
Month (kW)
January 2391
February 2274
March 3070
April 3821
May 5159
June 5227
July 5286
August 5534
September 5221
October 4776
November 3455
December 2282
Total 48496
Table 5.6. Chicago Energy Consumption for Model III

Energy
Month (kW)
January 117
February 110
March 198
April 554
May 1916
June 3314
July 3752
August 3309
September 2239
October 914
November 249
December 111
Total 16783
Results of the above three models for the three cities are summarized and discussed
in the next chapter.

CHAPTER 6
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
6.1 Energy Consumption Summary
The results obtained for the models described in Chapter 5 are summarized in this
chapter for purposes of comparison and discussion.
6.1.1 Outside-Air Make-Up Unit Energy Consumption
The energy consumed by the make-up unit for the three cities is summarized in
Tables 6.1 through 6.3 and graphically represented in Figure 6.1.
Table 6.1. Miami’s Monthly Energy Consumption for the Make-Up Unit
Energy kWh
Month DX HLD Savings Savings %
January 1480 680 800 54.1
February 1560 810 750 48.2
March 1690 1140 550 32.5
April 2260 1670 590 26.0
May 2330 1700 630 27.0
June 2620 1940 680 26.0
July 2610 1930 680 26.1
August 2610 2050 556 21.3
September 2430 1770 660 27.1
October 2155 1590 560 26.0
November 1620 925 690 42.8
December 1420 730 680 48.1
Annual 24790 16960 7840 31.6
From Tables 5.1 and 6.1 one may observe that the cooling required for the
ventilation air costs more than 40% of the total energy input for building cooling in the
three cities employing the existing system. It is also observed that the energy input varies
considerably with variations in the weather conditions.
36
37
Table 6.2. Gainesville’s Monthly Energy Consumption for the Make-Up Unit
Energy kWh
January 418 197 222 53.0
February 621 295 326 52.5
March 1112 574 538 48.4
April 1360 702 657 48.4
May 1990 1172 818 41.1
June 2460 1678 782 31.8
July 2447 1842 605 24.7
August 2448 1843 605 24.7
September 2269 1464 805 35.5
October 1824.66 1004 820 45.0
November 990.19 543 447 45.2
December 532.1 274 258 48.4
Annual 18470 11590 6880 37.3
Table 6.3. Chicago’s Monthly Energy Consumption for the Make-Up Unit
Energy kWh
January 0 0 0 0.0
February 0 0 0 0.0
March 18 0 18 0.0
April 250 65 185 74.2
May 877 477 400 45.6
June 1520 821 698 45.9
July 1872 1125 747 39.9
August 1872 1125 747 39.9
September 1357 670 687 50.7
October 411 151 260 63.3
November 15 0 15 0.0
December 0 0 0 0.0
Annual 8190 4435 3755 45.9
38
3000
o
tS A = 2 4 C
D X m a k e -u p u n it
φSA = 50 %
Electric Energy Consumption (kWh)
H L D m a k e -u p u n it
V& = 9 4 4 L /s
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay Jun Jul Aug Sep O ct N ov D ec
M o n th
Figure 6.1A. HLD and DX make-up unit’s electric energy consumption for Miami
3000
tSA = 2 4 oC
D X m a k e -u p u n it φS A = 5 0 %
2500 H L D m a k e -u p u n it V& = 9 4 4 L /s
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Jan F eb M ar Apr M ay Jun Jul Aug Sep O ct Nov D ec
M o n th
Figure 6.1B. HLD and DX make-up unit’s electric energy consumption for Gainesville
39
2000
t S A = 24 o C
D X m ake-up unit φ S A = 50%
H LD m ake-up unit V& = 944 L/s
1500
1000
500
Jan F eb M ar A pr M ay Jun Jul A ug S ep O ct N ov D ec
M onth
Figure 6.1C. HLD and DX make-up unit’s electric energy consumption for Chicago
The annual electrical energy savings resulting from employing the hybrid liquid
desiccant system (HLD) compared to the DX system for Miami, Gainesville, and
Chicago were found to be as much as 26%, 28.5%, and 31.5%, respectively. However
the amount of energy savings for Miami is 12% and 52% more than that of Gainesville
and Chicago, respectively. It can be observed that for summer the energy savings of the
HLD system are higher than those for the winter. In general, the COP of the HLD system
is higher for hot and humid entering-air conditions.
6.1.2 Building Total Cooling Energy Consumption
The total cooling energy consumed by the building as computed by the three
models described earlier for the three cities in question are summarized in Tables 6.4
through 6.6. It is important to note that the results obtained in this study are for a specific
application where constant flow of ventilation air is required for certain periods of time.
40
The results are also represented graphically in Figure 6.2. The annual savings by
employing the HLD system compared to the total energy consumption by existing
cooling systems is found to be 15.0% for Miami and Gainesville, and 18.6% for Chicago.
As mentioned earlier, Desicalc doesn’t provide enough flexibility to allow customizing
the building internal load and HVAC equipment; therefore the results obtained for solid
desiccants systems are approximate values. Since the energy consumption by solid
desiccants is not the main objective of this study, the resulting accuracy is acceptable for
illustration purposes.
Table 6.4. Total Cooling Energy Consumption for the Miami Building
Energy kWh
Month Model I Model II Model III
January 3631 2828 2391
February 3204 2452 2274
March 3996 3446 3070
April 4717 4130 3821
May 4868 4238 5159
June 5133 4451 5227
July 5372 4692 5286
August 5189 4633 5534
September 4987 4328 5221
October 4819 4258 4776
November 3572 2880 3455
December 3417 2736 2282
Overall 52910 45070 48500
41
Table 6.5. Total Cooling Energy Consumption for the Gainesville Building
Energy kWh
Month Model I Model II
January 1900 1679
February 1969 1643
March 3173 2635
April 3721 3064
May 4526 3708
June 4976 4195
July 5212 4607
August 4993 4388
September 4756 3951
October 4374 3553
November 2751 2304
December 1956 1698
Overall 44309 37425
Table 6.6. Total Cooling Energy Consumption for the Chicago Building
Energy kWh
January 0 0 117
February 0 0 110
March 82 64 198
April 902 716 554
May 2255 1855 1916
June 3747 3050 3314
July 4480 3734 3752
August 4222 3476 3309
September 3237 2549 2239
October 985 725 914
November 195 180 249
December 5 5 111
Overall 20110 16354 16783
42
6000
o
t SA = 24 C
Model I
Model II φ SA = 50%
5500
Energy Consumption (kWh) Model III
5000
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Month
Figure 6.2A. Monthly energy consumption for the Miami building
6000
M odel I t SA = 24 o C
M odel II φ SA = 50%
5000
Energy Consumption (kWh)
4000
3000
2000
1000
Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
M onth
Figure 6.2B. Monthly energy consumption for the Gainesville building
43
5000
o
M odel I t S A = 24 C
M odel II φ S A = 50%
4000 M odel III
Energy Consumption (kWh)
3000
2000
1000
Jan Feb M ar A pr M ay Jun Jul A ug S ep O ct N ov D ec
M onth
Figure 6.2C. Monthly energy consumption for the Chicago building
6.2 Cost Summary and Analysis
6.2.1 Cost of Electric Energy
Assuming a cost of $0.08 per kWh of electricity for the three cities, the annual cost
of the three models for the three cities are summarized in Tables 6.6 through 6.8.
Table 6.6. Miami’s Energy Cost Summary

Cost ($)
January 290 226 191
February 256 196 182
March 320 276 246
April 377 330 306
May 389 339 413
June 411 356 418
July 430 375 423
August 415 371 443
September 399 346 418
October 386 341 382
November 286 230 276
December 273 219 183
Annual 4,240 3,600 3,900
44
Table 6.7. Gainesville’s Energy Cost Summary

Cost ($)
January 152 134 N/A
February 158 131 N/A
March 254 211 N/A
April 298 245 N/A
May 362 297 N/A
June 398 336 N/A
July 417 369 N/A
August 399 351 N/A
September 381 316 N/A
October 350 284 N/A
November 220 184 N/A
December 156 136 N/A
Annual 3,550 3000 N/A
Table 6.8. Chicago’s Energy Cost Summary

Cost ($)
January 0 0 9
February 0 0 9
March 7 5 16
April 72 57 44
May 180 148 153
June 300 244 265
July 358 299 300
August 338 278 265
September 259 204 179
October 79 58 73
November 16 14 20
December 0 0 9
Annual 1,600 1,300 1,340
Based on the information provided in Tables 6.6 through 6.8, one can conclude that
the annual operating cost savings resulting from employing the HLD system compared to
the existing system for one unit in the building under study are $627/year for Miami,
$551/year for Gainesville, and $301/year for Chicago.

45
6.2.2 Capital and Other Costs
From the manufacturer’s data and the calculated cost savings as described in the
previous section, the costs of the conventional outside-air make-up unit versus the hybrid
liquid desiccant (HLD) unit for the three cities are summarized in Table 6.9.
Table 6.9. Operation and Capital Cost Summary

Miami
DX HLD Savings
Equipment cost ($)
7000 8000 -1000
Operating cost ($/year) 4,233 3,606 627.0
Maintenance cost ($/year) 300 300 0
Gainesville
DX HLD Savings
Equipment cost ($)
7000 8000 -1000
Chicago
DX HLD Savings
Equipment cost ($)
7000 8000 -1000
From the above information the pay-back period for replacing the conventional
system with a hybrid liquid desiccant system including the difference in initial cost is
calculated to be 16 years for Miami, 18 years for Gainesville, and 30 years for Chicago.
The payback period is high because of the operating time effect. For this study the air-
make-up unit is operated less than 30% of the time. If the operation time increased to
50% and above then the savings will yield reasonable payback periods. It can be
observed that for Miami the period of recovering the capital cost difference is almost 19
months.
Based on electric consumption information for a typical school building in Florida
where three outside-air make-up units are used, the expected annual saving is about 4%
46
of the building total electricity bill when conventional outside-air make-up units are
replaced with hybrid liquid desiccant ones.

CHAPTER 7
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In this thesis a comparison between a conventional air-cooling system and a hybrid
liquid desiccant (HLD) system used for cooling ventilation air for an existing school
building was performed. Energy models to calculate the energy consumption by both
systems were generated. Models were examined for three cities in the United States in
order to study the effect of weather changes on the system’s performance.
The energy analysis results suggest a savings of more than 32% in electric
consumption of the HLD system when compared to conventional air coolers. Simple cost
comparison suggested a payback period of 16 years if a conventional cooler is replaced
with a hybrid liquid desiccant system in Miami. The pay back period is affected by the
operating time of the equipment. In general for operating times above 50%, the savings
yield reasonable payback period. It was concluded that the HLD system provides
significant energy savings when used to cool ventilation air in hot and humid climatic
conditions.
A further study should be carried out to reduce the initial cost of HLD system.
Introducing a reheat by-pass arrangement to control the leaving air conditions is an
interesting subject of further research. Optimization of the COP of the DryKor HLD
system and studying the effect of varying values of the different parameters such as
entering desiccant temperature, the mass flow rate of the desiccant solution, and the
entering air flow rate on the system COP are also potential areas of further research.
47
APPENDIX A
PSYCHROMETRIC PROPERTY TABLES
Table A.1. January Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami

o o o
0 22.1 20.1 20.0 2770.49 2458.57 0.0174847 0.01547 0.014654 0.84 0.84 0.8560 59.2874 2332.22
1 21.7 20.0 20.0 2714.68 2441.71 0.0171227 0.01536 0.014638 0.85 0.86 0.8550 58.9056 2329.79
2 21.4 19.9 19.9 2659.86 2424.96 0.0167676 0.01525 0.014623 0.87 0.88 0.8541 58.5256 2327.47
3 21.2 19.8 20.0 2623.85 2416.62 0.0165346 0.0152 0.014639 0.89 0.89 0.8534 58.3382 2329.96
4 20.9 19.8 20.0 2588.27 2408.30 0.0163045 0.01514 0.014655 0.90 0.90 0.8528 58.1511 2332.48
5 20.9 19.8 20.0 2579.44 2408.30 0.0162474 0.01514 0.014678 0.90 0.91 0.8527 58.1530 2336.09
6 21.0 19.8 19.9 2597.12 2408.30 0.0163617 0.01514 0.014632 0.89 0.90 0.8529 58.1492 2328.87
7 21.3 19.9 20.0 2650.82 2424.96 0.0167091 0.01525 0.014646 0.88 0.88 0.8539 58.5275 2331.08
8 21.9 20.1 20.0 2742.46 2450.13 0.0173028 0.01541 0.014646 0.85 0.85 0.8555 59.0963 2330.99
9 22.7 20.3 20.0 2885.13 2492.59 0.0182293 0.01569 0.014687 0.81 0.81 0.8580 60.0560 2337.37
10 23.7 20.6 20.0 3054.61 2535.69 0.0193335 0.01596 0.014686 0.76 0.77 0.8607 61.0225 2337.19
11 24.8 20.9 20.0 3265.08 2588.27 0.0207099 0.0163 0.014699 0.71 0.72 0.8640 62.1976 2339.30
12 25.8 21.2 20.0 3465.21 2632.81 0.0220243 0.01659 0.014684 0.67 0.67 0.8669 63.1863 2336.99
13 26.5 21.4 20.0 3616.32 2668.93 0.0230203 0.01683 0.014708 0.64 0.65 0.8690 63.9883 2340.69
14 27.1 21.6 20.0 3736.44 2696.30 0.0238142 0.017 0.014722 0.62 0.63 0.8706 64.5940 2342.85
15 27.2 21.7 20.1 3773.15 2705.48 0.0240572 0.01706 0.014735 0.61 0.62 0.8711 64.7976 2344.83
16 27.1 21.6 20.0 3736.44 2696.30 0.0238142 0.017 0.014722 0.62 0.63 0.8706 64.5940 2342.85
17 26.6 21.5 20.1 3640.07 2678.03 0.0231771 0.01689 0.014743 0.64 0.64 0.8694 64.1925 2346.19
18 25.9 21.3 20.0 3488.10 2641.80 0.0221749 0.01665 0.014719 0.66 0.67 0.8672 63.3887 2342.38
19 25.1 21.1 20.1 3319.64 2606.01 0.0210677 0.01642 0.014744 0.70 0.71 0.8648 62.5962 2346.23
20 24.2 20.8 20.0 3158.32 2561.86 0.020011 0.01613 0.014692 0.73 0.74 0.8624 61.6081 2338.13
21 23.6 20.6 20.0 3034.23 2527.02 0.0192005 0.01591 0.014653 0.76 0.77 0.8604 60.8256 2332.13
22 22.9 20.4 20.0 2914.43 2501.15 0.0184199 0.01574 0.014695 0.80 0.80 0.8585 60.2492 2338.73
23 22.4 20.2 20.0 2827.30 2475.53 0.0178535 0.01558 0.01467 0.82 0.83 0.8570 59.6708 2334.74
48
49
Table A.2. February Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami

o o o
0 23.2 20.7 20.4 2963.83 2553.11 0.0187416 0.01608 0.015053 0.80 0.81 0.8598 61.4440 2394.32
1 22.8 20.6 20.4 2904.63 2535.69 0.0183562 0.01596 0.015034 0.82 0.82 0.8588 61.0526 2391.32
2 22.5 20.5 20.4 2846.46 2518.37 0.017978 0.01585 0.015015 0.84 0.84 0.8578 60.6629 2388.43
3 22.3 20.4 20.4 2808.25 2509.75 0.0177298 0.0158 0.015029 0.85 0.85 0.8572 60.4707 2390.63
4 22.1 20.4 20.4 2770.49 2501.15 0.0174847 0.01574 0.015044 0.86 0.86 0.8565 60.2790 2392.86
5 22.0 20.3 20.3 2761.12 2492.59 0.0174239 0.01569 0.014989 0.86 0.86 0.8563 60.0817 2384.29
6 22.1 20.4 20.4 2779.89 2501.15 0.0175456 0.01574 0.015021 0.86 0.86 0.8567 60.2770 2389.25
7 22.4 20.5 20.4 2836.87 2518.37 0.0179156 0.01585 0.015038 0.84 0.84 0.8577 60.6649 2392.04
8 23.0 20.7 20.4 2934.10 2544.39 0.018548 0.01602 0.015043 0.81 0.82 0.8593 61.2481 2392.80
9 23.8 20.9 20.4 3085.41 2579.44 0.0195345 0.01625 0.015014 0.77 0.77 0.8617 62.0284 2388.19
10 24.8 21.2 20.4 3265.08 2623.85 0.0207099 0.01653 0.015021 0.73 0.73 0.8644 63.0173 2389.34
11 25.9 21.5 20.4 3488.10 2678.03 0.0221749 0.01689 0.015045 0.68 0.69 0.8677 64.2197 2393.06
12 26.9 21.8 20.4 3700.05 2723.92 0.0235734 0.01718 0.015039 0.64 0.65 0.8706 65.2314 2392.13
13 27.6 22.0 20.4 3860.02 2761.12 0.024633 0.01742 0.01507 0.61 0.62 0.8727 66.0522 2396.93
14 28.2 22.2 20.4 3987.14 2789.32 0.0254774 0.01761 0.015089 0.59 0.60 0.8743 66.6722 2399.93
15 28.3 22.2 20.4 4025.98 2798.77 0.0257359 0.01767 0.015104 0.59 0.60 0.8748 66.8805 2402.19
16 28.2 22.2 20.4 3987.14 2789.32 0.0254774 0.01761 0.015089 0.59 0.60 0.8743 66.6722 2399.93
17 27.7 22.1 20.4 3885.15 2770.49 0.0247998 0.01748 0.015107 0.61 0.62 0.8731 66.2612 2402.71
18 27.0 21.8 20.4 3724.27 2733.18 0.0237337 0.01724 0.015076 0.64 0.64 0.8709 65.4386 2397.79
19 26.2 21.6 20.4 3545.88 2696.30 0.0225556 0.017 0.015093 0.67 0.68 0.8685 64.6276 2400.54
20 25.3 21.4 20.5 3374.98 2659.86 0.021431 0.01677 0.015114 0.71 0.71 0.8662 63.8240 2403.73
21 24.7 21.2 20.4 3243.48 2623.85 0.0205684 0.01653 0.015068 0.73 0.74 0.8642 63.0214 2396.55
22 24.0 20.9 20.4 3116.47 2588.27 0.0197374 0.0163 0.015024 0.76 0.77 0.8622 62.2261 2389.81
23 23.5 20.8 20.4 3024.09 2570.64 0.0191343 0.01619 0.015073 0.79 0.79 0.8608 61.8372 2397.42
50
Table A.3. March Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami

o o o
0 24.8 21.9 21.4 3275.93 2742.46 0.0207811 0.0173 0.016066 0.77 0.78 0.8660 65.7336 2551.30
1 24.5 21.8 21.4 3211.31 2723.92 0.0203577 0.01718 0.016039 0.79 0.79 0.8650 65.3226 2547.17
2 24.2 21.7 21.4 3147.81 2705.48 0.0199423 0.01706 0.016013 0.80 0.81 0.8640 64.9135 2543.15
3 23.9 21.6 21.4 3106.09 2696.30 0.0196696 0.017 0.016024 0.81 0.82 0.8634 64.7118 2544.79
4 23.7 21.6 21.4 3064.85 2687.15 0.0194003 0.01694 0.016034 0.83 0.83 0.8627 64.5105 2546.45
5 23.7 21.6 21.4 3054.61 2687.15 0.0193335 0.01694 0.016058 0.83 0.83 0.8626 64.5126 2550.06
6 23.8 21.6 21.4 3075.11 2687.15 0.0194673 0.01694 0.016011 0.82 0.83 0.8629 64.5084 2542.84
7 24.1 21.7 21.4 3137.33 2705.48 0.0198738 0.01706 0.016036 0.81 0.81 0.8639 64.9156 2546.75
8 24.7 21.8 21.4 3243.48 2733.18 0.0205684 0.01724 0.016052 0.78 0.79 0.8655 65.5278 2549.22
9 25.5 22.1 21.4 3408.58 2770.49 0.0216518 0.01748 0.016037 0.74 0.75 0.8679 66.3471 2546.90
10 26.4 22.3 21.4 3604.50 2817.76 0.0229422 0.01779 0.016063 0.70 0.71 0.8707 67.3856 2550.95
11 27.6 22.7 21.5 3847.50 2875.42 0.02455 0.01817 0.01611 0.66 0.66 0.8740 68.6484 2558.21
12 28.6 22.9 21.5 4078.28 2924.25 0.0260842 0.01848 0.016123 0.62 0.63 0.8769 69.7113 2560.26
13 29.3 23.2 21.5 4252.35 2963.83 0.0272464 0.01874 0.01617 0.59 0.60 0.8791 70.5737 2567.48
14 29.8 23.3 21.5 4390.62 2983.80 0.0281724 0.01887 0.016113 0.57 0.58 0.8806 71.0000 2558.66
15 30.0 23.3 21.5 4432.86 2993.83 0.0284558 0.01894 0.016131 0.57 0.58 0.8811 71.2184 2561.50
16 29.8 23.3 21.5 4390.62 2983.80 0.0281724 0.01887 0.016113 0.57 0.58 0.8806 71.0000 2558.66
17 29.4 23.2 21.5 4279.70 2963.83 0.0274293 0.01874 0.016124 0.59 0.60 0.8793 70.5692 2560.27
18 28.7 22.9 21.4 4104.65 2924.25 0.02626 0.01848 0.016077 0.61 0.62 0.8772 69.7069 2553.05
19 27.8 22.7 21.4 3910.43 2885.13 0.0249676 0.01823 0.01608 0.64 0.65 0.8747 68.8569 2553.51
20 27.0 22.5 21.4 3724.27 2846.46 0.0237337 0.01798 0.016086 0.68 0.69 0.8723 68.0148 2554.45
21 26.3 22.3 21.5 3580.95 2817.76 0.0227869 0.01779 0.01611 0.71 0.71 0.8704 67.3899 2558.16
22 25.7 22.1 21.4 3442.46 2779.89 0.0218746 0.01755 0.016051 0.73 0.74 0.8684 66.5547 2549.09
23 25.2 22.0 21.4 3341.68 2761.12 0.0212124 0.01742 0.016093 0.76 0.76 0.8670 66.1464 2555.55
51
Table A.4. April Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami

o o o
0 25.4 22.4 22.0 3386.15 2836.87 0.0215044 0.01792 0.016676 0.78 0.78 0.8684 67.8608 2645.77
1 25.1 22.4 22.1 3319.64 2827.30 0.0210677 0.01785 0.016731 0.79 0.80 0.8675 67.6567 2654.22
2 24.7 22.3 22.0 3254.27 2808.25 0.0206391 0.01773 0.016701 0.81 0.81 0.8665 67.2369 2649.58
3 24.5 22.2 22.0 3211.31 2798.77 0.0203577 0.01767 0.01671 0.82 0.83 0.8659 67.0299 2650.91
4 24.3 22.2 22.1 3168.86 2789.32 0.0200799 0.01761 0.016718 0.83 0.84 0.8653 66.8234 2652.27
5 24.2 22.1 22.0 3158.32 2779.89 0.020011 0.01755 0.016657 0.83 0.84 0.8650 66.6108 2642.84
6 24.3 22.2 22.0 3179.42 2789.32 0.020149 0.01761 0.016695 0.83 0.83 0.8654 66.8212 2648.66
7 24.7 22.3 22.1 3243.48 2808.25 0.0205684 0.01773 0.016724 0.81 0.82 0.8664 67.2391 2653.19
8 25.2 22.4 22.1 3352.75 2836.87 0.021285 0.01792 0.016746 0.79 0.79 0.8681 67.8674 2656.58
9 26.1 22.7 22.1 3522.67 2875.42 0.0224026 0.01817 0.016739 0.75 0.75 0.8705 68.7082 2655.51
10 27.0 22.9 22.1 3724.27 2924.25 0.0237337 0.01848 0.016776 0.71 0.71 0.8733 69.7740 2661.13
11 28.1 23.2 22.1 3974.26 2973.80 0.0253918 0.01881 0.016747 0.66 0.67 0.8765 70.8455 2656.70
12 29.1 23.5 22.1 4211.62 3024.09 0.0269741 0.01913 0.01677 0.62 0.63 0.8794 71.9340 2660.22
13 29.8 23.7 22.2 4390.62 3064.85 0.0281724 0.0194 0.016824 0.60 0.61 0.8816 72.8172 2668.63
14 30.4 23.8 22.1 4532.78 3085.41 0.0291273 0.01953 0.016771 0.58 0.59 0.8831 73.2538 2660.43
15 30.6 23.9 22.1 4576.20 3095.73 0.0294195 0.0196 0.016792 0.57 0.58 0.8836 73.4775 2663.57
16 30.4 23.8 22.1 4532.78 3085.41 0.0291273 0.01953 0.016771 0.58 0.59 0.8831 73.2538 2660.43
17 29.9 23.7 22.1 4418.74 3064.85 0.0283611 0.0194 0.016778 0.59 0.60 0.8818 72.8126 2661.43
18 29.2 23.6 22.1 4238.74 3034.23 0.0271553 0.0192 0.016812 0.62 0.63 0.8798 72.1569 2666.78
19 28.4 23.3 22.1 4039.00 2993.83 0.0258226 0.01894 0.016807 0.65 0.66 0.8773 71.2844 2665.94
20 27.6 23.1 22.1 3847.50 2943.98 0.02455 0.01861 0.016717 0.68 0.69 0.8748 70.1966 2652.06
21 26.9 22.9 22.1 3700.05 2914.43 0.0235734 0.01842 0.016736 0.71 0.72 0.8729 69.5567 2654.90
22 26.2 22.7 22.1 3557.54 2885.13 0.0226324 0.01823 0.016756 0.74 0.75 0.8710 68.9212 2658.01
23 25.7 22.6 22.0 3453.82 2856.09 0.0219493 0.01804 0.016708 0.76 0.77 0.8695 68.2835 2650.58
52
Table A.5. May Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami

o o o
0 25.9 23.1 22.7 3499.59 2943.98 0.0222506 0.01861 0.017394 0.78 0.79 0.8710 70.2620 2756.55
1 25.6 22.9 22.7 3431.13 2924.25 0.0218001 0.01848 0.01736 0.80 0.80 0.8700 69.8301 2751.22
2 25.3 22.9 22.7 3363.85 2914.43 0.0213579 0.01842 0.017413 0.82 0.82 0.8691 69.6216 2759.41
3 25.1 22.8 22.6 3319.64 2894.86 0.0210677 0.01829 0.017333 0.82 0.83 0.8684 69.1882 2747.05
4 24.8 22.7 22.6 3275.93 2885.13 0.0207811 0.01823 0.01734 0.83 0.84 0.8677 68.9768 2748.12
5 24.8 22.7 22.7 3265.08 2885.13 0.0207099 0.01823 0.017363 0.84 0.84 0.8676 68.9790 2751.73
6 24.9 22.8 22.7 3286.81 2894.86 0.0208524 0.01829 0.017403 0.83 0.84 0.8680 69.1949 2757.87
7 25.2 22.8 22.6 3352.75 2904.63 0.021285 0.01836 0.017349 0.82 0.82 0.8689 69.4024 2749.61
8 25.8 23.0 22.7 3465.21 2934.10 0.0220243 0.01855 0.017377 0.79 0.79 0.8705 70.0458 2753.87
9 26.6 23.2 22.7 3640.07 2973.80 0.0231771 0.01881 0.017377 0.75 0.76 0.8730 70.9067 2753.96
10 27.6 23.5 22.7 3847.50 3024.09 0.02455 0.01913 0.017423 0.71 0.72 0.8758 71.9983 2761.06
11 28.7 23.8 22.7 4104.65 3075.11 0.02626 0.01947 0.017404 0.66 0.67 0.8790 73.0956 2758.12
12 29.7 24.1 22.7 4348.74 3126.89 0.0278916 0.01981 0.017437 0.63 0.64 0.8819 74.2106 2763.16
13 30.4 24.3 22.8 4532.78 3168.86 0.0291273 0.02008 0.0175 0.60 0.61 0.8841 75.1153 2772.80
14 30.9 24.4 22.7 4678.93 3190.02 0.0301119 0.02022 0.01745 0.58 0.59 0.8857 75.5625 2765.21
15 31.1 24.4 22.8 4723.56 3200.65 0.0304132 0.02029 0.017473 0.57 0.59 0.8862 75.7917 2768.66
16 30.9 24.4 22.7 4678.93 3190.02 0.0301119 0.02022 0.01745 0.58 0.59 0.8857 75.5625 2765.21
17 30.5 24.3 22.7 4561.69 3168.86 0.0293218 0.02008 0.017453 0.60 0.61 0.8844 75.1105 2765.60
18 29.8 24.1 22.8 4376.62 3137.33 0.0280785 0.01987 0.017482 0.62 0.63 0.8823 74.4389 2770.02
19 28.9 23.9 22.8 4171.22 3095.73 0.0267042 0.0196 0.017468 0.65 0.66 0.8799 73.5452 2767.97
20 28.1 23.7 22.7 3974.26 3054.61 0.0253918 0.01933 0.017458 0.69 0.70 0.8774 72.6598 2766.41
21 27.4 23.4 22.7 3822.58 3013.97 0.0243847 0.01907 0.017381 0.71 0.72 0.8754 71.7757 2754.54
22 26.8 23.3 22.7 3675.95 2983.80 0.0234142 0.01887 0.017396 0.74 0.75 0.8735 71.1249 2756.76
23 26.3 23.2 22.7 3569.23 2963.83 0.0227095 0.01874 0.01743 0.77 0.77 0.8721 70.6958 2762.00
53
Table A.6. June Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami

o o o
0 27.1 23.6 23.1 3736.44 3044.41 0.0238142 0.01927 0.017813 0.75 0.76 0.8748 72.4750 2821.02
1 26.7 23.6 23.1 3663.96 3034.23 0.0233349 0.0192 0.017864 0.77 0.77 0.8739 72.2605 2828.85
2 26.4 23.4 23.1 3592.71 3013.97 0.0228644 0.01907 0.017825 0.78 0.79 0.8729 71.8193 2822.99
3 26.2 23.4 23.1 3545.88 3003.88 0.0225556 0.019 0.01783 0.79 0.80 0.8723 71.6018 2823.70
4 25.9 23.3 23.1 3499.59 2993.83 0.0222506 0.01894 0.017835 0.80 0.81 0.8716 71.3848 2824.45
5 25.9 23.3 23.1 3488.10 2993.83 0.0221749 0.01894 0.017858 0.81 0.81 0.8715 71.3871 2828.05
6 26.0 23.3 23.1 3511.11 2993.83 0.0223265 0.01894 0.017812 0.80 0.80 0.8718 71.3825 2820.84
7 26.3 23.4 23.1 3580.95 3013.97 0.0227869 0.01907 0.017849 0.78 0.79 0.8728 71.8216 2826.59
8 26.9 23.6 23.1 3700.05 3044.41 0.0235734 0.01927 0.017883 0.76 0.77 0.8745 72.4819 2831.83
9 27.7 23.8 23.1 3885.15 3085.41 0.0247998 0.01953 0.017892 0.72 0.73 0.8769 73.3656 2833.25
10 28.7 24.1 23.1 4104.65 3126.89 0.02626 0.01981 0.017858 0.68 0.69 0.8796 74.2529 2827.96
11 29.8 24.3 23.1 4376.62 3179.42 0.0280785 0.02015 0.017849 0.64 0.65 0.8828 75.3767 2826.57
12 30.8 24.6 23.1 4634.66 3232.73 0.0298134 0.0205 0.017892 0.60 0.61 0.8858 76.5186 2833.17
13 31.5 24.8 23.2 4829.15 3275.93 0.0311271 0.02078 0.017962 0.58 0.59 0.8880 77.4452 2844.07
14 32.1 24.9 23.2 4983.54 3297.72 0.0321737 0.02092 0.017917 0.56 0.57 0.8896 77.9033 2837.12
15 32.2 25.0 23.2 5030.68 3308.66 0.032494 0.021 0.017942 0.55 0.56 0.8901 78.1381 2840.89
16 32.1 24.9 23.2 4983.54 3297.72 0.0321737 0.02092 0.017917 0.56 0.57 0.8896 77.9033 2837.12
17 31.6 24.8 23.2 4859.69 3275.93 0.0313338 0.02078 0.017916 0.57 0.58 0.8883 77.4404 2836.87
18 30.9 24.7 23.2 4664.13 3243.48 0.0300121 0.02057 0.017938 0.60 0.61 0.8862 76.7524 2840.34
19 30.1 24.4 23.2 4447.01 3200.65 0.0285509 0.02029 0.017917 0.63 0.64 0.8837 75.8371 2837.03
20 29.2 24.2 23.1 4238.74 3158.32 0.0271553 0.02001 0.017898 0.66 0.67 0.8813 74.9304 2834.23
21 28.6 24.1 23.1 4078.28 3126.89 0.0260842 0.01981 0.017905 0.69 0.70 0.8793 74.2576 2835.16
22 27.9 23.9 23.2 3923.13 3095.73 0.025052 0.0196 0.017912 0.72 0.72 0.8774 73.5896 2836.38
23 27.4 23.7 23.1 3810.17 3064.85 0.0243024 0.0194 0.017852 0.73 0.74 0.8759 72.9193 2827.07
54
Table A.7. July Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami

o o o
0 27.6 23.7 22.9 3860.02 3054.61 0.024633 0.01933 0.017669 0.72 0.73 0.8763 72.6806 2798.82
1 27.3 23.6 22.9 3785.45 3034.23 0.0241387 0.0192 0.01763 0.73 0.74 0.8752 72.2375 2792.83
2 26.9 23.4 22.9 3712.14 3013.97 0.0236534 0.01907 0.017592 0.74 0.75 0.8742 71.7964 2786.96
3 26.7 23.4 22.9 3663.96 3003.88 0.0233349 0.019 0.017596 0.75 0.76 0.8736 71.5789 2787.67
4 26.5 23.3 22.9 3616.32 2993.83 0.0230203 0.01894 0.017601 0.76 0.77 0.8729 71.3619 2788.42
5 26.4 23.3 22.9 3604.50 2993.83 0.0229422 0.01894 0.017624 0.77 0.77 0.8728 71.3642 2792.02
6 26.6 23.3 22.9 3628.18 2993.83 0.0230986 0.01894 0.017578 0.76 0.77 0.8731 71.3596 2784.81
7 26.9 23.4 22.9 3700.05 3013.97 0.0235734 0.01907 0.017615 0.75 0.75 0.8741 71.7987 2790.56
8 27.4 23.6 22.9 3822.58 3044.41 0.0243847 0.01927 0.017649 0.72 0.73 0.8758 72.4588 2795.81
9 28.3 23.8 22.9 4012.99 3085.41 0.0256495 0.01953 0.017658 0.69 0.70 0.8782 73.3423 2797.24
10 29.2 24.1 22.9 4238.74 3126.89 0.0271553 0.01981 0.017624 0.65 0.66 0.8809 74.2294 2791.96
11 30.3 24.3 22.9 4518.39 3179.42 0.0290305 0.02015 0.017615 0.61 0.62 0.8841 75.3529 2790.58
12 31.3 24.6 22.9 4783.65 3232.73 0.0308193 0.0205 0.017658 0.57 0.58 0.8871 76.4945 2797.19
13 32.1 24.8 23.0 4983.54 3275.93 0.0321737 0.02078 0.017729 0.55 0.56 0.8893 77.4209 2808.10
14 32.6 24.9 23.0 5142.20 3297.72 0.0332528 0.02092 0.017684 0.53 0.54 0.8909 77.8789 2801.16
15 32.8 25.0 23.0 5190.64 3308.66 0.033583 0.021 0.017708 0.53 0.54 0.8914 78.1136 2804.93
16 32.6 24.9 23.0 5142.20 3297.72 0.0332528 0.02092 0.017684 0.53 0.54 0.8909 77.8789 2801.16
17 32.2 24.8 22.9 5014.93 3275.93 0.0323869 0.02078 0.017682 0.55 0.56 0.8896 77.4161 2800.91
18 31.4 24.7 23.0 4813.94 3243.48 0.0310241 0.02057 0.017705 0.57 0.58 0.8875 76.7283 2804.37
19 30.6 24.4 22.9 4590.76 3200.65 0.0295176 0.02029 0.017683 0.60 0.61 0.8850 75.8132 2801.04
20 29.8 24.2 22.9 4376.62 3158.32 0.0280785 0.02001 0.017665 0.63 0.64 0.8826 74.9067 2798.23
21 29.1 24.1 22.9 4211.62 3126.89 0.0269741 0.01981 0.017671 0.66 0.66 0.8806 74.2341 2799.16
22 28.4 23.9 22.9 4052.05 3095.73 0.0259095 0.0196 0.017679 0.68 0.69 0.8787 73.5662 2800.37
23 27.9 23.7 22.9 3935.86 3064.85 0.0251365 0.0194 0.017618 0.70 0.71 0.8772 72.8960 2791.06
55
Table A.8. August Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami

o o o
0 27.6 23.7 22.9 3860.02 3054.61 0.024633 0.01933 0.017669 0.72 0.73 0.8763 72.6806 2798.82
1 27.3 23.6 22.9 3785.45 3034.23 0.0241387 0.0192 0.01763 0.73 0.74 0.8752 72.2375 2792.83
2 26.9 23.4 22.9 3712.14 3013.97 0.0236534 0.01907 0.017592 0.74 0.75 0.8742 71.7964 2786.96
3 26.7 23.4 22.9 3663.96 3003.88 0.0233349 0.019 0.017596 0.75 0.76 0.8736 71.5789 2787.67
4 26.5 23.3 22.9 3616.32 2993.83 0.0230203 0.01894 0.017601 0.76 0.77 0.8729 71.3619 2788.42
5 26.4 23.3 22.9 3604.50 2993.83 0.0229422 0.01894 0.017624 0.77 0.77 0.8728 71.3642 2792.02
6 26.6 23.3 22.9 3628.18 2993.83 0.0230986 0.01894 0.017578 0.76 0.77 0.8731 71.3596 2784.81
7 26.9 23.4 22.9 3700.05 3013.97 0.0235734 0.01907 0.017615 0.75 0.75 0.8741 71.7987 2790.56
8 27.4 23.6 22.9 3822.58 3044.41 0.0243847 0.01927 0.017649 0.72 0.73 0.8758 72.4588 2795.81
9 28.3 23.8 22.9 4012.99 3085.41 0.0256495 0.01953 0.017658 0.69 0.70 0.8782 73.3423 2797.24
10 29.2 24.1 22.9 4238.74 3126.89 0.0271553 0.01981 0.017624 0.65 0.66 0.8809 74.2294 2791.96
11 30.3 24.3 22.9 4518.39 3179.42 0.0290305 0.02015 0.017615 0.61 0.62 0.8841 75.3529 2790.58
12 31.3 24.6 22.9 4783.65 3232.73 0.0308193 0.0205 0.017658 0.57 0.58 0.8871 76.4945 2797.19
13 32.1 24.8 23.0 4983.54 3275.93 0.0321737 0.02078 0.017729 0.55 0.56 0.8893 77.4209 2808.10
14 32.6 24.9 23.0 5142.20 3297.72 0.0332528 0.02092 0.017684 0.53 0.54 0.8909 77.8789 2801.16
15 32.8 25.0 23.0 5190.64 3308.66 0.033583 0.021 0.017708 0.53 0.54 0.8914 78.1136 2804.93
16 32.6 24.9 23.0 5142.20 3297.72 0.0332528 0.02092 0.017684 0.53 0.54 0.8909 77.8789 2801.16
17 32.2 24.8 22.9 5014.93 3275.93 0.0323869 0.02078 0.017682 0.55 0.56 0.8896 77.4161 2800.91
18 31.4 24.7 23.0 4813.94 3243.48 0.0310241 0.02057 0.017705 0.57 0.58 0.8875 76.7283 2804.37
19 30.6 24.4 22.9 4590.76 3200.65 0.0295176 0.02029 0.017683 0.60 0.61 0.8850 75.8132 2801.04
20 29.8 24.2 22.9 4376.62 3158.32 0.0280785 0.02001 0.017665 0.63 0.64 0.8826 74.9067 2798.23
21 29.1 24.1 22.9 4211.62 3126.89 0.0269741 0.01981 0.017671 0.66 0.66 0.8806 74.2341 2799.16
22 28.4 23.9 22.9 4052.05 3095.73 0.0259095 0.0196 0.017679 0.68 0.69 0.8787 73.5662 2800.37
23 27.9 23.7 22.9 3935.86 3064.85 0.0251365 0.0194 0.017618 0.70 0.71 0.8772 72.8960 2791.06
56
Table A.9. September Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami

o o o
0 26.5 23.1 22.5 3616.32 2943.98 0.0230203 0.01861 0.017161 0.75 0.75 0.8723 70.2394 2720.52
1 26.2 22.9 22.4 3545.88 2924.25 0.0225556 0.01848 0.017126 0.76 0.77 0.8713 69.8076 2715.18
2 25.8 22.9 22.5 3476.64 2914.43 0.0220995 0.01842 0.017179 0.78 0.78 0.8704 69.5992 2723.37
3 25.6 22.8 22.4 3431.13 2894.86 0.0218001 0.01829 0.017099 0.78 0.79 0.8697 69.1660 2711.01
4 25.4 22.7 22.4 3386.15 2885.13 0.0215044 0.01823 0.017106 0.80 0.80 0.8690 68.9545 2712.08
5 25.3 22.7 22.4 3374.98 2885.13 0.021431 0.01823 0.017129 0.80 0.80 0.8689 68.9568 2715.68
6 25.4 22.8 22.5 3397.35 2894.86 0.021578 0.01829 0.017169 0.80 0.80 0.8693 69.1726 2721.82
7 25.8 22.8 22.4 3465.21 2904.63 0.0220243 0.01836 0.017116 0.78 0.78 0.8702 69.3801 2713.57
8 26.3 23.0 22.5 3580.95 2934.10 0.0227869 0.01855 0.017143 0.75 0.76 0.8718 70.0233 2717.84
9 27.2 23.2 22.5 3760.88 2973.80 0.0239759 0.01881 0.017144 0.72 0.72 0.8743 70.8840 2717.94
10 28.1 23.5 22.5 3974.26 3024.09 0.0253918 0.01913 0.01719 0.68 0.69 0.8771 71.9753 2725.05
11 29.2 23.8 22.5 4238.74 3075.11 0.0271553 0.01947 0.017171 0.63 0.64 0.8803 73.0724 2722.12
12 30.2 24.1 22.5 4489.72 3126.89 0.0288378 0.01981 0.017204 0.60 0.61 0.8832 74.1871 2727.17
13 30.9 24.3 22.6 4678.93 3168.86 0.0301119 0.02008 0.017266 0.57 0.58 0.8854 75.0916 2736.81
14 31.5 24.4 22.5 4829.15 3190.02 0.0311271 0.02022 0.017217 0.55 0.57 0.8870 75.5387 2729.23
15 31.7 24.4 22.5 4875.02 3200.65 0.0314377 0.02029 0.017239 0.55 0.56 0.8875 75.7678 2732.68
16 31.5 24.4 22.5 4829.15 3190.02 0.0311271 0.02022 0.017217 0.55 0.57 0.8870 75.5387 2729.23
17 31.1 24.3 22.5 4708.64 3168.86 0.0303125 0.02008 0.01722 0.57 0.58 0.8857 75.0868 2729.61
18 30.3 24.1 22.6 4518.39 3137.33 0.0290305 0.01987 0.017248 0.59 0.61 0.8836 74.4153 2734.03
19 29.5 23.9 22.5 4307.20 3095.73 0.0276134 0.0196 0.017235 0.62 0.63 0.8812 73.5218 2731.96
20 28.7 23.7 22.5 4104.65 3054.61 0.02626 0.01933 0.017225 0.66 0.67 0.8787 72.6367 2730.40
21 28.0 23.4 22.5 3948.62 3013.97 0.0252214 0.01907 0.017148 0.68 0.69 0.8767 71.7528 2718.52
22 27.3 23.3 22.5 3797.79 2983.80 0.0242204 0.01887 0.017162 0.71 0.72 0.8748 71.1022 2720.74
23 26.8 23.2 22.5 3687.98 2963.83 0.0234937 0.01874 0.017196 0.73 0.74 0.8734 70.6732 2725.97
57
Table A.10. October Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami

o o o
0 25.4 22.4 22.0 3386.15 2836.87 0.0215044 0.01792 0.016676 0.78 0.78 0.8684 67.8608 2645.77
1 25.1 22.4 22.1 3319.64 2827.30 0.0210677 0.01785 0.016731 0.79 0.80 0.8675 67.6567 2654.22
2 24.7 22.3 22.0 3254.27 2808.25 0.0206391 0.01773 0.016701 0.81 0.81 0.8665 67.2369 2649.58
3 24.5 22.2 22.0 3211.31 2798.77 0.0203577 0.01767 0.01671 0.82 0.83 0.8659 67.0299 2650.91
4 24.3 22.2 22.1 3168.86 2789.32 0.0200799 0.01761 0.016718 0.83 0.84 0.8653 66.8234 2652.27
5 24.2 22.1 22.0 3158.32 2779.89 0.020011 0.01755 0.016657 0.83 0.84 0.8650 66.6108 2642.84
6 24.3 22.2 22.0 3179.42 2789.32 0.020149 0.01761 0.016695 0.83 0.83 0.8654 66.8212 2648.66
7 24.7 22.3 22.1 3243.48 2808.25 0.0205684 0.01773 0.016724 0.81 0.82 0.8664 67.2391 2653.19
8 25.2 22.4 22.1 3352.75 2836.87 0.021285 0.01792 0.016746 0.79 0.79 0.8681 67.8674 2656.58
9 26.1 22.7 22.1 3522.67 2875.42 0.0224026 0.01817 0.016739 0.75 0.75 0.8705 68.7082 2655.51
10 27.0 22.9 22.1 3724.27 2924.25 0.0237337 0.01848 0.016776 0.71 0.71 0.8733 69.7740 2661.13
11 28.1 23.2 22.1 3974.26 2973.80 0.0253918 0.01881 0.016747 0.66 0.67 0.8765 70.8455 2656.70
12 29.1 23.5 22.1 4211.62 3024.09 0.0269741 0.01913 0.01677 0.62 0.63 0.8794 71.9340 2660.22
13 29.8 23.7 22.2 4390.62 3064.85 0.0281724 0.0194 0.016824 0.60 0.61 0.8816 72.8172 2668.63
14 30.4 23.8 22.1 4532.78 3085.41 0.0291273 0.01953 0.016771 0.58 0.59 0.8831 73.2538 2660.43
15 30.6 23.9 22.1 4576.20 3095.73 0.0294195 0.0196 0.016792 0.57 0.58 0.8836 73.4775 2663.57
16 30.4 23.8 22.1 4532.78 3085.41 0.0291273 0.01953 0.016771 0.58 0.59 0.8831 73.2538 2660.43
17 29.9 23.7 22.1 4418.74 3064.85 0.0283611 0.0194 0.016778 0.59 0.60 0.8818 72.8126 2661.43
18 29.2 23.6 22.1 4238.74 3034.23 0.0271553 0.0192 0.016812 0.62 0.63 0.8798 72.1569 2666.78
19 28.4 23.3 22.1 4039.00 2993.83 0.0258226 0.01894 0.016807 0.65 0.66 0.8773 71.2844 2665.94
20 27.6 23.1 22.1 3847.50 2943.98 0.02455 0.01861 0.016717 0.68 0.69 0.8748 70.1966 2652.06
21 26.9 22.9 22.1 3700.05 2914.43 0.0235734 0.01842 0.016736 0.71 0.72 0.8729 69.5567 2654.90
22 26.2 22.7 22.1 3557.54 2885.13 0.0226324 0.01823 0.016756 0.74 0.75 0.8710 68.9212 2658.01
23 25.7 22.6 22.0 3453.82 2856.09 0.0219493 0.01804 0.016708 0.76 0.77 0.8695 68.2835 2650.58
58
Table A.11. November Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami

o o o
0 23.7 21.9 21.9 3064.85 2742.46 0.0194003 0.0173 0.016532 0.85 0.86 0.8634 65.7763 2623.43
1 23.4 21.8 21.9 3003.88 2723.92 0.0190026 0.01718 0.016505 0.87 0.87 0.8624 65.3651 2619.30
2 23.1 21.7 21.8 2943.98 2705.48 0.0186123 0.01706 0.016479 0.89 0.89 0.8614 64.9558 2615.29
3 22.8 21.6 21.8 2904.63 2696.30 0.0183562 0.017 0.01649 0.90 0.90 0.8608 64.7540 2616.93
4 22.6 21.6 21.8 2865.74 2687.15 0.0181032 0.01694 0.016501 0.91 0.91 0.8601 64.5526 2618.60
5 22.6 21.6 21.9 2856.09 2687.15 0.0180405 0.01694 0.016524 0.92 0.92 0.8600 64.5547 2622.21
6 22.7 21.6 21.8 2875.42 2687.15 0.0181662 0.01694 0.016477 0.91 0.91 0.8603 64.5505 2614.99
7 23.0 21.7 21.8 2934.10 2705.48 0.018548 0.01706 0.016503 0.89 0.89 0.8613 64.9579 2618.89
8 23.6 21.8 21.9 3034.23 2733.18 0.0192005 0.01724 0.016518 0.86 0.86 0.8629 65.5705 2621.35
9 24.4 22.1 21.8 3190.02 2770.49 0.0202184 0.01748 0.016503 0.82 0.82 0.8653 66.3901 2619.01
10 25.3 22.3 21.9 3374.98 2817.76 0.021431 0.01779 0.016529 0.77 0.78 0.8681 67.4291 2623.04
11 26.4 22.7 21.9 3604.50 2875.42 0.0229422 0.01817 0.016576 0.72 0.73 0.8714 68.6927 2630.28
12 27.4 22.9 21.9 3822.58 2924.25 0.0243847 0.01848 0.016589 0.68 0.69 0.8743 69.7561 2632.31
13 28.2 23.2 22.0 3987.14 2963.83 0.0254774 0.01874 0.016636 0.65 0.66 0.8765 70.6189 2639.51
14 28.7 23.3 21.9 4117.89 2983.80 0.0263483 0.01887 0.016579 0.63 0.64 0.8780 71.0454 2630.69
15 28.9 23.3 21.9 4157.83 2993.83 0.0266148 0.01894 0.016597 0.62 0.63 0.8785 71.2639 2633.53
16 28.7 23.3 21.9 4117.89 2983.80 0.0263483 0.01887 0.016579 0.63 0.64 0.8780 71.0454 2630.69
17 28.3 23.2 21.9 4012.99 2963.83 0.0256495 0.01874 0.016589 0.65 0.66 0.8767 70.6144 2632.31
18 27.6 22.9 21.9 3847.50 2924.25 0.02455 0.01848 0.016543 0.67 0.68 0.8746 69.7516 2625.10
19 26.7 22.7 21.9 3663.96 2885.13 0.0233349 0.01823 0.016546 0.71 0.72 0.8721 68.9013 2625.58
20 25.9 22.5 21.9 3488.10 2846.46 0.0221749 0.01798 0.016552 0.75 0.75 0.8697 68.0587 2626.53
21 25.2 22.3 21.9 3352.75 2817.76 0.021285 0.01779 0.016576 0.78 0.78 0.8678 67.4335 2630.25
22 24.6 22.1 21.9 3222.00 2779.89 0.0204277 0.01755 0.016517 0.81 0.81 0.8658 66.5978 2621.20
23 24.1 22.0 21.9 3126.89 2761.12 0.0198055 0.01742 0.016559 0.84 0.84 0.8644 66.1893 2627.67
59
Table A.12. December Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami

o o o
0 22.6 20.7 20.6 2865.74 2553.11 0.0181032 0.01608 0.015286 0.84 0.85 0.8585 61.4642 2430.40
1 22.3 20.6 20.6 2808.25 2535.69 0.0177298 0.01596 0.015266 0.86 0.86 0.8575 61.0726 2427.41
2 21.9 20.5 20.6 2751.78 2518.37 0.0173633 0.01585 0.015248 0.88 0.88 0.8565 60.6829 2424.52
3 21.7 20.4 20.6 2714.68 2509.75 0.0171227 0.0158 0.015262 0.89 0.89 0.8559 60.4906 2426.73
4 21.5 20.4 20.6 2678.03 2501.15 0.0168852 0.01574 0.015276 0.90 0.91 0.8552 60.2988 2428.96
5 21.4 20.3 20.6 2668.93 2492.59 0.0168263 0.01569 0.015221 0.90 0.91 0.8550 60.1015 2420.39
6 21.6 20.4 20.6 2687.15 2501.15 0.0169443 0.01574 0.015253 0.90 0.90 0.8554 60.2968 2425.35
7 21.9 20.5 20.6 2742.46 2518.37 0.0173028 0.01585 0.015271 0.88 0.89 0.8564 60.6848 2428.13
8 22.4 20.7 20.6 2836.87 2544.39 0.0179156 0.01602 0.015276 0.85 0.86 0.8580 61.2682 2428.89
9 23.3 20.9 20.6 2983.80 2579.44 0.0188717 0.01625 0.015246 0.81 0.81 0.8604 62.0487 2424.27
10 24.2 21.2 20.6 3158.32 2623.85 0.020011 0.01653 0.015253 0.76 0.77 0.8631 63.0379 2425.41
11 25.3 21.5 20.6 3374.98 2678.03 0.021431 0.01689 0.015277 0.71 0.72 0.8664 64.2406 2429.12
12 26.3 21.8 20.6 3580.95 2723.92 0.0227869 0.01718 0.015271 0.67 0.68 0.8693 65.2526 2428.18
13 27.1 22.0 20.7 3736.44 2761.12 0.0238142 0.01742 0.015302 0.64 0.65 0.8714 66.0736 2432.98
14 27.6 22.2 20.7 3860.02 2789.32 0.024633 0.01761 0.015321 0.62 0.63 0.8730 66.6937 2435.97
15 27.8 22.2 20.7 3897.78 2798.77 0.0248836 0.01767 0.015336 0.62 0.63 0.8736 66.9021 2438.23
16 27.6 22.2 20.7 3860.02 2789.32 0.024633 0.01761 0.015321 0.62 0.63 0.8730 66.6937 2435.97
17 27.2 22.1 20.7 3760.88 2770.49 0.0239759 0.01748 0.015339 0.64 0.65 0.8718 66.2827 2438.75
18 26.4 21.8 20.7 3604.50 2733.18 0.0229422 0.01724 0.015308 0.67 0.68 0.8696 65.4598 2433.84
19 25.6 21.6 20.7 3431.13 2696.30 0.0218001 0.017 0.015325 0.70 0.71 0.8672 64.6486 2436.59
20 24.8 21.4 20.7 3265.08 2659.86 0.0207099 0.01677 0.015346 0.74 0.75 0.8649 63.8448 2439.80
21 24.1 21.2 20.6 3137.33 2623.85 0.0198738 0.01653 0.0153 0.77 0.78 0.8629 63.0420 2432.62
22 23.4 20.9 20.6 3013.97 2588.27 0.0190684 0.0163 0.015256 0.80 0.80 0.8609 62.2465 2425.88
23 22.9 20.8 20.7 2924.25 2570.64 0.0184838 0.01619 0.015306 0.83 0.83 0.8595 61.8575 2433.50
60
Table A.13. January Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville

o o o
0 16.3 15.0 15.0 1932.41 1780.49 0.0120927 0.0111249 0.0105967 0.88 0.88 0.8339 43.0915 1697.36
1 15.7 14.7 14.8 1865.01 1748.88 0.011663 0.010924 0.0105108 0.90 0.90 0.8322 42.3080 1683.83
2 15.2 14.5 14.8 1806.13 1723.96 0.0112881 0.0107656 0.0104673 0.93 0.93 0.8307 41.6885 1676.97
3 14.8 14.3 14.8 1755.17 1705.47 0.0109639 0.0106482 0.0104646 0.95 0.96 0.8294 41.2289 1676.55
4 14.5 14.2 14.7 1723.96 1687.15 0.0107656 0.0105319 0.0103943 0.97 0.97 0.8285 40.7681 1665.47
5 14.4 14.1 14.6 1711.61 1681.09 0.0106872 0.0104934 0.0103787 0.97 0.97 0.8282 40.6156 1663.01
6 14.6 14.2 14.7 1736.38 1693.24 0.0108446 0.0105705 0.0104099 0.96 0.96 0.8289 40.9209 1667.94
7 15.1 14.4 14.7 1793.27 1717.77 0.0112062 0.0107263 0.010451 0.93 0.93 0.8304 41.5340 1674.40
8 16.1 14.9 14.9 1905.20 1767.79 0.0119191 0.0110442 0.010562 0.89 0.89 0.8332 42.7771 1691.89
9 17.4 15.5 15.1 2073.65 1838.64 0.012995 0.011495 0.0107136 0.82 0.83 0.8373 44.5199 1715.77
10 18.9 16.2 15.4 2286.55 1925.58 0.01436 0.0120491 0.0109218 0.76 0.76 0.8420 46.6332 1748.53
11 20.7 17.0 15.7 2553.11 2023.22 0.0160773 0.0126725 0.0111293 0.69 0.70 0.8474 48.9730 1781.18
12 22.4 17.7 15.9 2827.30 2110.34 0.0178535 0.0132298 0.0112703 0.63 0.64 0.8524 51.0313 1803.33
13 23.6 18.2 16.2 3044.41 2185.44 0.0192669 0.0137109 0.0114728 0.60 0.60 0.8562 52.7935 1835.15
14 24.4 18.6 16.3 3200.65 2231.61 0.0202879 0.0140071 0.0115602 0.57 0.58 0.8588 53.8665 1848.87
15 24.8 18.7 16.3 3265.08 2247.19 0.0207099 0.0141071 0.0115675 0.56 0.57 0.8597 54.2255 1850.03
16 24.4 18.6 16.3 3200.65 2231.61 0.0202879 0.0140071 0.0115602 0.57 0.58 0.8588 53.8665 1848.87
17 23.7 18.2 16.1 3064.85 2185.44 0.0194003 0.0137109 0.0114268 0.59 0.60 0.8565 52.7900 1827.93
18 22.6 17.8 16.0 2865.74 2125.18 0.0181032 0.0133248 0.0113188 0.63 0.63 0.8531 51.3814 1810.96
19 21.2 17.2 15.8 2632.81 2051.90 0.0165926 0.0128559 0.011197 0.67 0.68 0.8490 49.6548 1791.81
20 19.9 16.6 15.5 2424.96 1973.87 0.0152505 0.0123572 0.0109992 0.72 0.73 0.8449 47.7927 1760.71
21 18.8 16.1 15.3 2262.86 1911.97 0.0142078 0.0119623 0.0108582 0.76 0.77 0.8415 46.3022 1738.53
22 17.7 15.7 15.2 2117.75 1858.39 0.0132772 0.0116208 0.0107702 0.81 0.81 0.8383 45.0031 1724.68
23 16.9 15.3 15.0 2009.01 1812.59 0.0125817 0.0113292 0.0106629 0.85 0.85 0.8358 43.8819 1707.79
61
Table A.14. February Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville
Hou DBT WBT DPT Pws Pws* v h Pw

o o o
r ( C) ( C) ( C) (Pa) (Pa) Ws Ws* W µ φ 3
0 17.4 16.1 16.0 2073.65 1905.20 0.012995 0.0119191 0.0113666 0.87 0.88 0.8381 46.1736 1818.47
1 16.8 15.8 16.0 2001.94 1878.33 0.0125365 0.0117478 0.0113336 0.90 0.91 0.8365 45.5229 1813.28
2 16.3 15.6 15.9 1939.27 1851.79 0.0121364 0.0115787 0.0112796 0.93 0.93 0.8350 44.8762 1804.80
3 15.9 15.4 15.9 1885.01 1832.10 0.0117904 0.0114534 0.0112693 0.96 0.96 0.8337 44.3967 1803.18
4 15.6 15.3 15.8 1851.79 1812.59 0.0115787 0.0113292 0.0111912 0.97 0.97 0.8328 43.9157 1790.91
5 15.5 15.2 15.8 1838.64 1806.13 0.011495 0.0112881 0.0111731 0.97 0.97 0.8324 43.7565 1788.06
6 15.7 15.3 15.8 1865.01 1819.07 0.011663 0.0113704 0.0112095 0.96 0.96 0.8331 44.0752 1793.77
7 16.2 15.6 15.9 1925.58 1845.20 0.0120491 0.0115368 0.0112607 0.93 0.94 0.8346 44.7150 1801.83
8 17.2 16.0 16.1 2044.70 1898.45 0.0128098 0.0118761 0.0113927 0.89 0.89 0.8375 46.0127 1822.56
9 18.5 16.6 16.3 2223.85 1973.87 0.0139574 0.0123572 0.0115738 0.83 0.83 0.8416 47.8326 1851.02
10 20.1 17.3 16.5 2450.13 2059.13 0.0154127 0.0129021 0.0117489 0.76 0.77 0.8463 49.8648 1878.49
11 21.8 18.0 16.8 2733.18 2155.12 0.0172426 0.0135166 0.0119236 0.69 0.70 0.8517 52.1242 1905.91
12 23.5 18.7 17.1 3024.09 2255.01 0.0191343 0.0141574 0.0121697 0.64 0.64 0.8569 54.4525 1944.48
13 24.7 19.2 17.3 3254.27 2326.52 0.0206391 0.0146169 0.0123269 0.60 0.61 0.8606 56.1020 1969.12
14 25.6 19.6 17.4 3419.84 2375.29 0.0217258 0.0149307 0.0124313 0.57 0.58 0.8632 57.2196 1985.46
15 25.9 19.7 17.4 3488.10 2391.75 0.0221749 0.0150366 0.0124443 0.56 0.57 0.8641 57.5936 1987.50
16 25.6 19.6 17.4 3419.84 2375.29 0.0217258 0.0149307 0.0124313 0.57 0.58 0.8632 57.2196 1985.46
17 24.8 19.3 17.3 3275.93 2334.59 0.0207811 0.0146688 0.0123555 0.59 0.60 0.8610 56.2881 1973.59
18 23.7 18.8 17.1 3064.85 2262.86 0.0194003 0.0142078 0.0121507 0.63 0.63 0.8575 54.6313 1941.50
19 22.3 18.2 16.9 2817.76 2185.44 0.0177915 0.0137109 0.0120019 0.67 0.68 0.8533 52.8339 1918.18
20 21.0 17.7 16.7 2597.12 2110.34 0.0163617 0.0132298 0.0118452 0.72 0.73 0.8492 51.0739 1893.61
21 19.9 17.2 16.4 2424.96 2044.70 0.0152505 0.0128098 0.0116799 0.77 0.77 0.8458 49.5197 1867.67
22 18.8 16.7 16.3 2270.74 1987.86 0.0142584 0.0124466 0.0115709 0.81 0.81 0.8426 48.1655 1850.56
23 18.0 16.3 16.1 2155.12 1939.27 0.0135166 0.0121364 0.0114455 0.85 0.85 0.8400 46.9971 1830.86
62
Table A.15. March Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville

o o o
0 20.1 18.7 18.7 2450.13 2247.19 0.0154127 0.0141071 0.013528 0.88 0.88 0.8487 54.3787 2156.89
1 19.5 18.4 18.6 2367.10 2216.12 0.014878 0.0139078 0.0134677 0.91 0.91 0.8470 53.6568 2147.49
2 19.0 18.2 18.6 2294.50 2185.44 0.014411 0.0137109 0.0133868 0.93 0.93 0.8455 52.9395 2134.86
3 18.6 18.1 18.5 2231.61 2162.66 0.0140071 0.013565 0.0133566 0.95 0.95 0.8442 52.4079 2130.15
4 18.3 17.9 18.5 2193.07 2147.60 0.0137599 0.0134684 0.0133296 0.97 0.97 0.8433 52.0548 2125.92
5 18.2 17.9 18.5 2177.82 2140.10 0.0136621 0.0134204 0.0133047 0.97 0.97 0.8430 51.8780 2122.04
6 18.4 18.0 18.5 2208.42 2155.12 0.0138583 0.0135166 0.0133546 0.96 0.96 0.8437 52.2320 2129.83
7 18.9 18.2 18.5 2278.63 2177.82 0.0143091 0.0136621 0.0133612 0.93 0.94 0.8451 52.7608 2130.86
8 19.8 18.6 18.7 2416.62 2231.61 0.0151968 0.0140071 0.0134744 0.89 0.89 0.8480 54.0152 2148.53
9 21.2 19.1 18.9 2623.85 2310.46 0.0165346 0.0145136 0.0136559 0.83 0.83 0.8521 55.8418 2176.85
10 22.7 19.7 19.1 2885.13 2400.01 0.0182293 0.0150898 0.0138368 0.76 0.76 0.8569 57.8956 2205.06
11 24.5 20.4 19.3 3211.31 2501.15 0.0203577 0.0157418 0.0140231 0.69 0.70 0.8623 60.1918 2234.09
12 26.2 21.0 19.5 3545.88 2597.12 0.0225556 0.0163617 0.0141997 0.63 0.64 0.8673 62.3508 2261.60
13 27.4 21.5 19.7 3810.17 2678.03 0.0243024 0.0168852 0.0144189 0.59 0.60 0.8712 64.1633 2295.72
14 28.2 21.8 19.8 4000.05 2723.92 0.0255633 0.0171826 0.0144825 0.57 0.58 0.8737 65.1807 2305.62
15 28.6 21.9 19.8 4078.28 2742.46 0.0260842 0.0173028 0.0145092 0.56 0.57 0.8747 65.5909 2309.77
16 28.2 21.8 19.8 4000.05 2723.92 0.0255633 0.0171826 0.0144825 0.57 0.58 0.8737 65.1807 2305.62
17 27.5 21.5 19.7 3835.02 2678.03 0.0244672 0.0168852 0.0143725 0.59 0.60 0.8714 64.1591 2288.51
18 26.4 21.1 19.6 3592.71 2614.92 0.0228644 0.0164768 0.0142678 0.62 0.63 0.8681 62.7522 2272.20
19 25.0 20.6 19.4 3308.66 2535.69 0.0209957 0.0159648 0.0141291 0.67 0.68 0.8639 60.9745 2250.61
20 23.7 20.1 19.2 3054.61 2458.57 0.0193335 0.0154671 0.0139811 0.72 0.73 0.8598 59.2308 2227.56
21 22.6 19.7 19.1 2856.09 2391.75 0.0180405 0.0150366 0.0138301 0.77 0.77 0.8564 57.7076 2204.01
22 21.5 19.2 18.9 2678.03 2326.52 0.0168852 0.0146169 0.0136663 0.81 0.81 0.8531 56.2098 2178.47
23 20.7 18.9 18.8 2544.39 2278.63 0.0160209 0.0143091 0.0135675 0.85 0.85 0.8505 55.1052 2163.06
63
Table A.16. April Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville

o o o
0 20.1 18.7 18.7 2450.13 2247.19 0.0154127 0.0141071 0.013528 0.88 0.88 0.8487 54.3787 2156.89
1 19.5 18.4 18.6 2367.10 2216.12 0.014878 0.0139078 0.0134677 0.91 0.91 0.8470 53.6568 2147.49
2 19.0 18.2 18.6 2294.50 2185.44 0.014411 0.0137109 0.0133868 0.93 0.93 0.8455 52.9395 2134.86
3 18.6 18.1 18.5 2231.61 2162.66 0.0140071 0.013565 0.0133566 0.95 0.95 0.8442 52.4079 2130.15
4 18.3 17.9 18.5 2193.07 2147.60 0.0137599 0.0134684 0.0133296 0.97 0.97 0.8433 52.0548 2125.92
5 18.2 17.9 18.5 2177.82 2140.10 0.0136621 0.0134204 0.0133047 0.97 0.97 0.8430 51.8780 2122.04
6 18.4 18.0 18.5 2208.42 2155.12 0.0138583 0.0135166 0.0133546 0.96 0.96 0.8437 52.2320 2129.83
7 18.9 18.2 18.5 2278.63 2177.82 0.0143091 0.0136621 0.0133612 0.93 0.94 0.8451 52.7608 2130.86
8 19.8 18.6 18.7 2416.62 2231.61 0.0151968 0.0140071 0.0134744 0.89 0.89 0.8480 54.0152 2148.53
9 21.2 19.1 18.9 2623.85 2310.46 0.0165346 0.0145136 0.0136559 0.83 0.83 0.8521 55.8418 2176.85
10 22.7 19.7 19.1 2885.13 2400.01 0.0182293 0.0150898 0.0138368 0.76 0.76 0.8569 57.8956 2205.06
11 24.5 20.4 19.3 3211.31 2501.15 0.0203577 0.0157418 0.0140231 0.69 0.70 0.8623 60.1918 2234.09
12 26.2 21.0 19.5 3545.88 2597.12 0.0225556 0.0163617 0.0141997 0.63 0.64 0.8673 62.3508 2261.60
13 27.4 21.5 19.7 3810.17 2678.03 0.0243024 0.0168852 0.0144189 0.59 0.60 0.8712 64.1633 2295.72
14 28.2 21.8 19.8 4000.05 2723.92 0.0255633 0.0171826 0.0144825 0.57 0.58 0.8737 65.1807 2305.62
15 28.6 21.9 19.8 4078.28 2742.46 0.0260842 0.0173028 0.0145092 0.56 0.57 0.8747 65.5909 2309.77
16 28.2 21.8 19.8 4000.05 2723.92 0.0255633 0.0171826 0.0144825 0.57 0.58 0.8737 65.1807 2305.62
17 27.5 21.5 19.7 3835.02 2678.03 0.0244672 0.0168852 0.0143725 0.59 0.60 0.8714 64.1591 2288.51
18 26.4 21.1 19.6 3592.71 2614.92 0.0228644 0.0164768 0.0142678 0.62 0.63 0.8681 62.7522 2272.20
19 25.0 20.6 19.4 3308.66 2535.69 0.0209957 0.0159648 0.0141291 0.67 0.68 0.8639 60.9745 2250.61
20 23.7 20.1 19.2 3054.61 2458.57 0.0193335 0.0154671 0.0139811 0.72 0.73 0.8598 59.2308 2227.56
21 22.6 19.7 19.1 2856.09 2391.75 0.0180405 0.0150366 0.0138301 0.77 0.77 0.8564 57.7076 2204.01
22 21.5 19.2 18.9 2678.03 2326.52 0.0168852 0.0146169 0.0136663 0.81 0.81 0.8531 56.2098 2178.47
23 20.7 18.9 18.8 2544.39 2278.63 0.0160209 0.0143091 0.0135675 0.85 0.85 0.8505 55.1052 2163.06
64
Table A.17. May Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville

o o o
0 23.8 21.5 21.3 3085.41 2678.03 0.0195345 0.0168852 0.0159054 0.81 0.82 0.8629 64.2971 2526.50
1 23.3 21.4 21.3 2983.80 2659.86 0.0188717 0.0167676 0.0159744 0.85 0.85 0.8614 63.9010 2537.19
2 22.8 21.2 21.3 2894.86 2632.81 0.0182926 0.0165926 0.0159395 0.87 0.87 0.8599 63.2978 2531.78
3 22.3 21.1 21.3 2817.76 2614.92 0.0177915 0.0164768 0.0159637 0.90 0.90 0.8586 62.9021 2535.52
4 22.1 21.0 21.3 2770.49 2597.12 0.0174847 0.0163617 0.0159187 0.91 0.91 0.8577 62.5019 2528.56
5 21.9 20.9 21.2 2751.78 2588.27 0.0173633 0.0163045 0.0158848 0.91 0.92 0.8574 62.3016 2523.31
6 22.2 21.0 21.2 2789.32 2597.12 0.0176068 0.0163617 0.0158721 0.90 0.90 0.8580 62.4979 2521.34
7 22.7 21.2 21.3 2875.42 2623.85 0.0181662 0.0165346 0.0159049 0.88 0.88 0.8595 63.0956 2526.42
8 23.6 21.4 21.3 3044.41 2668.93 0.0192669 0.0168263 0.0159166 0.83 0.83 0.8622 64.0968 2528.22
9 24.9 21.8 21.3 3297.72 2733.18 0.0209239 0.0172426 0.0159357 0.76 0.77 0.8661 65.5172 2531.19
10 26.5 22.3 21.3 3616.32 2808.25 0.0230203 0.0177298 0.0159553 0.69 0.70 0.8707 67.1674 2534.22
11 28.3 22.8 21.3 4012.99 2894.86 0.0256495 0.0182926 0.0159799 0.62 0.63 0.8759 69.0593 2538.04
12 29.9 23.2 21.3 4418.74 2973.80 0.0283611 0.0188065 0.0159787 0.56 0.57 0.8807 70.7708 2537.84
13 31.2 23.6 21.4 4738.52 3044.41 0.0305143 0.0192669 0.0160867 0.53 0.54 0.8844 72.3044 2554.56
14 32.0 23.8 21.5 4967.91 3085.41 0.0320676 0.0195345 0.0160963 0.50 0.51 0.8869 73.1865 2556.05
15 32.3 23.9 21.4 5062.33 3095.73 0.0327091 0.0196019 0.0160469 0.49 0.50 0.8878 73.4030 2548.40
16 32.0 23.8 21.5 4967.91 3085.41 0.0320676 0.0195345 0.0160963 0.50 0.51 0.8869 73.1865 2556.05
17 31.3 23.6 21.4 4768.56 3044.41 0.0307173 0.0192669 0.0160402 0.52 0.53 0.8847 72.2998 2547.36
18 30.2 23.3 21.3 4475.44 2983.80 0.0287419 0.0188717 0.0159736 0.56 0.57 0.8814 70.9864 2537.06
19 28.8 22.9 21.4 4131.17 2924.25 0.0264369 0.0184838 0.0160304 0.61 0.62 0.8774 69.7024 2545.85
20 27.4 22.6 21.3 3822.58 2856.09 0.0243847 0.0180405 0.0159852 0.66 0.66 0.8735 68.2153 2538.85
21 26.3 22.2 21.3 3580.95 2798.77 0.0227869 0.0176682 0.0159406 0.70 0.71 0.8702 66.9583 2531.94
22 25.3 21.9 21.3 3363.85 2751.78 0.0213579 0.0173633 0.0159628 0.75 0.75 0.8671 65.9290 2535.38
23 24.4 21.7 21.3 3200.65 2714.68 0.0202879 0.0171227 0.0159792 0.79 0.79 0.8647 65.1136 2537.93
65
Table A.18. June Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville

o o o
0 25.4 22.7 22.4 3386.15 2885.13 0.0215044 0.0182293 0.0171059 0.80 0.80 0.8690 68.9545 2712.08
1 24.8 22.6 22.5 3275.93 2865.74 0.0207811 0.0181032 0.017167 0.83 0.83 0.8675 68.5376 2721.52
2 24.3 22.4 22.4 3179.42 2836.87 0.020149 0.0179156 0.01712 0.85 0.85 0.8660 67.9025 2714.26
3 23.9 22.3 22.4 3095.73 2817.76 0.0196019 0.0177915 0.0171364 0.87 0.88 0.8647 67.4859 2716.79
4 23.6 22.2 22.4 3044.41 2798.77 0.0192669 0.0176682 0.0170834 0.89 0.89 0.8638 67.0647 2708.61
5 23.5 22.2 22.4 3024.09 2798.77 0.0191343 0.0176682 0.0171301 0.90 0.90 0.8636 67.0690 2715.82
6 23.7 22.3 22.4 3064.85 2808.25 0.0194003 0.0177298 0.0171215 0.88 0.89 0.8642 67.2761 2714.49
7 24.2 22.4 22.4 3158.32 2827.30 0.020011 0.0178535 0.0170814 0.85 0.86 0.8656 67.6895 2708.30
8 25.2 22.7 22.4 3341.68 2875.42 0.0212124 0.0181662 0.017113 0.81 0.81 0.8684 68.7436 2713.18
9 26.5 23.1 22.5 3616.32 2943.98 0.0230203 0.0186123 0.0171606 0.75 0.75 0.8723 70.2394 2720.52
10 28.1 23.4 22.4 3961.43 3013.97 0.0253065 0.0190684 0.0171243 0.68 0.69 0.8768 71.7505 2714.92
11 29.8 23.9 22.5 4390.62 3106.09 0.0281724 0.0196696 0.0171853 0.61 0.62 0.8821 73.7392 2724.33
12 31.5 24.4 22.5 4829.15 3190.02 0.0311271 0.0202184 0.017217 0.55 0.57 0.8870 75.5387 2729.23
13 32.7 24.7 22.6 5174.45 3254.27 0.0334726 0.0206391 0.0172612 0.52 0.53 0.8906 76.9120 2736.04
14 33.6 24.9 22.6 5421.99 3297.72 0.0351644 0.0209239 0.0172871 0.49 0.51 0.8931 77.8375 2740.03
15 33.9 25.0 22.5 5523.85 3308.66 0.0358631 0.0209957 0.0172416 0.48 0.49 0.8940 78.0648 2733.02
16 33.6 24.9 22.6 5421.99 3297.72 0.0351644 0.0209239 0.0172871 0.49 0.51 0.8931 77.8375 2740.03
17 32.8 24.7 22.5 5206.88 3254.27 0.0336937 0.0206391 0.0172145 0.51 0.52 0.8908 76.9071 2728.85
18 31.7 24.4 22.5 4890.40 3200.65 0.0315419 0.0202879 0.0172161 0.55 0.56 0.8876 75.7654 2729.08
19 30.3 24.1 22.6 4518.39 3137.33 0.0290305 0.0198738 0.0172482 0.59 0.61 0.8836 74.4153 2734.03
20 29.0 23.7 22.5 4184.65 3064.85 0.0267939 0.0194003 0.0171743 0.64 0.65 0.8796 72.8520 2722.64
21 27.9 23.4 22.4 3923.13 3003.88 0.025052 0.0190026 0.0171055 0.68 0.69 0.8763 71.5309 2712.03
22 26.8 23.1 22.4 3687.98 2953.89 0.0234937 0.0186769 0.0171081 0.73 0.74 0.8732 70.4493 2712.42
23 26.0 22.9 22.4 3511.11 2914.43 0.0223265 0.0184199 0.017109 0.77 0.77 0.8708 69.5925 2712.56
66
Table A.19. July Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville

o o o
0 27.6 23.7 22.9 3860.02 3054.61 0.024633 0.01933 0.017669 0.72 0.73 0.8763 72.6806 2798.82
1 27.3 23.6 22.9 3785.45 3034.23 0.0241387 0.0192 0.01763 0.73 0.74 0.8752 72.2375 2792.83
2 26.9 23.4 22.9 3712.14 3013.97 0.0236534 0.01907 0.017592 0.74 0.75 0.8742 71.7964 2786.96
3 26.7 23.4 22.9 3663.96 3003.88 0.0233349 0.019 0.017596 0.75 0.76 0.8736 71.5789 2787.67
4 26.5 23.3 22.9 3616.32 2993.83 0.0230203 0.01894 0.017601 0.76 0.77 0.8729 71.3619 2788.42
5 26.4 23.3 22.9 3604.50 2993.83 0.0229422 0.01894 0.017624 0.77 0.77 0.8728 71.3642 2792.02
6 26.6 23.3 22.9 3628.18 2993.83 0.0230986 0.01894 0.017578 0.76 0.77 0.8731 71.3596 2784.81
7 26.9 23.4 22.9 3700.05 3013.97 0.0235734 0.01907 0.017615 0.75 0.75 0.8741 71.7987 2790.56
8 27.4 23.6 22.9 3822.58 3044.41 0.0243847 0.01927 0.017649 0.72 0.73 0.8758 72.4588 2795.81
9 28.3 23.8 22.9 4012.99 3085.41 0.0256495 0.01953 0.017658 0.69 0.70 0.8782 73.3423 2797.24
10 29.2 24.1 22.9 4238.74 3126.89 0.0271553 0.01981 0.017624 0.65 0.66 0.8809 74.2294 2791.96
11 30.3 24.3 22.9 4518.39 3179.42 0.0290305 0.02015 0.017615 0.61 0.62 0.8841 75.3529 2790.58
12 31.3 24.6 22.9 4783.65 3232.73 0.0308193 0.0205 0.017658 0.57 0.58 0.8871 76.4945 2797.19
13 32.1 24.8 23.0 4983.54 3275.93 0.0321737 0.02078 0.017729 0.55 0.56 0.8893 77.4209 2808.10
14 32.6 24.9 23.0 5142.20 3297.72 0.0332528 0.02092 0.017684 0.53 0.54 0.8909 77.8789 2801.16
15 32.8 25.0 23.0 5190.64 3308.66 0.033583 0.021 0.017708 0.53 0.54 0.8914 78.1136 2804.93
16 32.6 24.9 23.0 5142.20 3297.72 0.0332528 0.02092 0.017684 0.53 0.54 0.8909 77.8789 2801.16
17 32.2 24.8 22.9 5014.93 3275.93 0.0323869 0.02078 0.017682 0.55 0.56 0.8896 77.4161 2800.91
18 31.4 24.7 23.0 4813.94 3243.48 0.0310241 0.02057 0.017705 0.57 0.58 0.8875 76.7283 2804.37
19 30.6 24.4 22.9 4590.76 3200.65 0.0295176 0.02029 0.017683 0.60 0.61 0.8850 75.8132 2801.04
20 29.8 24.2 22.9 4376.62 3158.32 0.0280785 0.02001 0.017665 0.63 0.64 0.8826 74.9067 2798.23
21 29.1 24.1 22.9 4211.62 3126.89 0.0269741 0.01981 0.017671 0.66 0.66 0.8806 74.2341 2799.16
22 28.4 23.9 22.9 4052.05 3095.73 0.0259095 0.0196 0.017679 0.68 0.69 0.8787 73.5662 2800.37
23 27.9 23.7 22.9 3935.86 3064.85 0.0251365 0.0194 0.017618 0.70 0.71 0.8772 72.8960 2791.06
67
Table A.20. August Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville

o o o
0 25.9 22.7 22.2 3499.59 2885.13 0.0222506 0.0182293 0.0168724 0.76 0.76 0.8703 68.9323 2676.03
1 25.4 22.6 22.3 3386.15 2865.74 0.0215044 0.0181032 0.0169334 0.79 0.79 0.8688 68.5155 2685.47
2 24.9 22.4 22.2 3286.81 2836.87 0.0208524 0.0179156 0.0168865 0.81 0.81 0.8673 67.8805 2678.21
3 24.4 22.3 22.2 3200.65 2817.76 0.0202879 0.0177915 0.0169028 0.83 0.84 0.8660 67.4640 2680.73
4 24.2 22.2 22.2 3147.81 2798.77 0.0199423 0.0176682 0.0168498 0.84 0.85 0.8651 67.0429 2672.55
5 24.1 22.2 22.2 3126.89 2798.77 0.0198055 0.0176682 0.0168965 0.85 0.86 0.8649 67.0473 2679.76
6 24.3 22.3 22.2 3168.86 2808.25 0.0200799 0.0177298 0.0168878 0.84 0.85 0.8655 67.2543 2678.43
7 24.8 22.4 22.2 3265.08 2827.30 0.0207099 0.0178535 0.0168478 0.81 0.82 0.8669 67.6677 2672.25
8 25.7 22.7 22.2 3453.82 2875.42 0.0219493 0.0181662 0.0168795 0.77 0.78 0.8697 68.7214 2677.13
9 27.1 23.1 22.3 3736.44 2943.98 0.0238142 0.0186123 0.0169271 0.71 0.72 0.8736 70.2169 2684.49
10 28.6 23.4 22.2 4091.44 3013.97 0.026172 0.0190684 0.0168909 0.65 0.65 0.8781 71.7276 2678.90
11 30.4 23.9 22.3 4532.78 3106.09 0.0291273 0.0196696 0.016952 0.58 0.59 0.8834 73.7158 2688.34
12 32.1 24.4 22.3 4983.54 3190.02 0.0321737 0.0202184 0.0169839 0.53 0.54 0.8883 75.5149 2693.25
13 33.3 24.7 22.3 5338.36 3254.27 0.0345918 0.0206391 0.0170281 0.49 0.51 0.8919 76.8878 2700.08
14 34.1 24.9 22.4 5592.67 3297.72 0.036336 0.0209239 0.017054 0.47 0.48 0.8943 77.8132 2704.08
15 34.4 25.0 22.3 5697.30 3308.66 0.0370562 0.0209957 0.0170086 0.46 0.47 0.8952 78.0404 2697.07
16 34.1 24.9 22.4 5592.67 3297.72 0.036336 0.0209239 0.017054 0.47 0.48 0.8943 77.8132 2704.08
17 33.4 24.7 22.3 5371.68 3254.27 0.0348198 0.0206391 0.0169815 0.49 0.50 0.8921 76.8830 2692.88
18 32.3 24.4 22.3 5046.49 3200.65 0.0326014 0.0202879 0.0169829 0.52 0.53 0.8889 75.7416 2693.11
19 30.9 24.1 22.3 4664.13 3137.33 0.0300121 0.0198738 0.0170149 0.57 0.58 0.8849 74.3918 2698.04
20 29.6 23.7 22.3 4321.01 3064.85 0.0277059 0.0194003 0.016941 0.61 0.62 0.8809 72.8288 2686.64
21 28.4 23.4 22.2 4052.05 3003.88 0.0259095 0.0190026 0.0168722 0.65 0.66 0.8776 71.5080 2676.01
22 27.4 23.1 22.2 3810.17 2953.89 0.0243024 0.0186769 0.0168747 0.69 0.70 0.8745 70.4267 2676.39
23 26.6 22.9 22.2 3628.18 2914.43 0.0230986 0.0184199 0.0168755 0.73 0.74 0.8721 69.5701 2676.52
68
Table A.21. September Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville

o o o
0 24.8 22.1 21.7 3275.93 2779.89 0.0207811 0.0175456 0.0164009 0.79 0.79 0.8665 66.5871 2603.18
1 24.3 21.9 21.7 3168.86 2751.78 0.0200799 0.0173633 0.0163822 0.82 0.82 0.8648 65.9676 2600.29
2 23.8 21.8 21.8 3075.11 2733.18 0.0194673 0.0172426 0.0164251 0.84 0.85 0.8634 65.5619 2606.92
3 23.3 21.7 21.8 2993.83 2714.68 0.018937 0.0171227 0.0164454 0.87 0.87 0.8621 65.1560 2610.07
4 23.1 21.6 21.7 2943.98 2696.30 0.0186123 0.0170036 0.0163965 0.88 0.88 0.8613 64.7455 2602.50
5 22.9 21.6 21.7 2924.25 2687.15 0.0184838 0.0169443 0.0163606 0.89 0.89 0.8609 64.5399 2596.95
6 23.2 21.7 21.8 2963.83 2705.48 0.0187416 0.0170631 0.0164325 0.88 0.88 0.8616 64.9516 2608.07
7 23.7 21.8 21.7 3054.61 2723.92 0.0193335 0.0171826 0.0163885 0.85 0.85 0.8630 65.3545 2601.27
8 24.6 22.1 21.8 3232.73 2770.49 0.020498 0.0174847 0.01641 0.80 0.81 0.8658 66.3815 2604.59
9 25.9 22.4 21.8 3499.59 2836.87 0.0222506 0.0179156 0.0164432 0.74 0.75 0.8697 67.8389 2609.72
10 27.5 22.9 21.8 3835.02 2914.43 0.0244672 0.0184199 0.0164791 0.67 0.68 0.8743 69.5321 2615.27
11 29.3 23.4 21.9 4252.35 3003.88 0.0272464 0.0190026 0.0165225 0.61 0.62 0.8795 71.4738 2621.99
12 30.9 23.8 21.9 4678.93 3085.41 0.0301119 0.0195345 0.0165383 0.55 0.56 0.8844 73.2306 2624.43
13 32.2 24.2 21.9 5014.93 3147.81 0.0323869 0.0199423 0.0165703 0.51 0.52 0.8880 74.5710 2629.37
14 33.0 24.4 21.9 5255.85 3190.02 0.0340279 0.0202184 0.0165879 0.49 0.50 0.8905 75.4745 2632.10
15 33.3 24.4 21.9 5355.00 3200.65 0.0347057 0.0202879 0.0165405 0.48 0.49 0.8914 75.6963 2624.76
16 33.0 24.4 21.9 5255.85 3190.02 0.0340279 0.0202184 0.0165879 0.49 0.50 0.8905 75.4745 2632.10
17 32.3 24.2 21.9 5046.49 3147.81 0.0326014 0.0199423 0.0165237 0.51 0.52 0.8883 74.5663 2622.17
18 31.2 23.9 21.9 4738.52 3095.73 0.0305143 0.0196019 0.0165354 0.54 0.55 0.8851 73.4519 2623.98
19 29.8 23.5 21.8 4376.62 3024.09 0.0280785 0.0191343 0.0164904 0.59 0.60 0.8810 71.9065 2617.01
20 28.4 23.2 21.9 4052.05 2963.83 0.0259095 0.0187416 0.0165194 0.64 0.65 0.8771 70.6076 2621.50
21 27.3 22.8 21.8 3797.79 2904.63 0.0242204 0.0183562 0.0164623 0.68 0.69 0.8738 69.3177 2612.67
22 26.3 22.6 21.8 3569.23 2856.09 0.0227095 0.0180405 0.0164743 0.73 0.73 0.8708 68.2615 2614.53
23 25.4 22.3 21.7 3397.35 2808.25 0.021578 0.0177298 0.0163979 0.76 0.77 0.8682 67.2086 2602.71
69
Table A.22. October Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville

o o o
0 22.7 20.9 20.8 2885.13 2579.44 0.0182293 0.0162474 0.0154786 0.85 0.85 0.8591 62.0690 2460.35
1 22.2 20.7 20.8 2789.32 2553.11 0.0176068 0.0160773 0.0154717 0.88 0.88 0.8574 61.4803 2459.27
2 21.7 20.6 20.9 2705.48 2535.69 0.0170631 0.0159648 0.0155222 0.91 0.91 0.8561 61.0947 2467.11
3 21.2 20.4 20.8 2632.81 2509.75 0.0165926 0.0157973 0.0154713 0.93 0.93 0.8547 60.5085 2459.21
4 20.9 20.4 20.9 2588.27 2501.15 0.0163045 0.0157418 0.015509 0.95 0.95 0.8539 60.3187 2465.05
5 20.8 20.3 20.8 2570.64 2492.59 0.0161905 0.0156865 0.015477 0.96 0.96 0.8536 60.1232 2460.09
6 21.1 20.4 20.8 2606.01 2501.15 0.0164192 0.0157418 0.0154624 0.94 0.94 0.8542 60.3147 2457.83
7 21.6 20.6 20.8 2687.15 2527.02 0.0169443 0.0159088 0.0154895 0.91 0.92 0.8557 60.8975 2462.04
8 22.5 20.8 20.8 2846.46 2570.64 0.017978 0.0161905 0.0154916 0.86 0.87 0.8584 61.8737 2462.37
9 23.8 21.2 20.9 3085.41 2632.81 0.0195345 0.0165926 0.0154972 0.79 0.80 0.8623 63.2585 2463.23
10 25.4 21.7 20.9 3386.15 2714.68 0.0215044 0.0171227 0.0155836 0.72 0.73 0.8670 65.0776 2476.63
11 27.2 22.2 20.9 3760.88 2798.77 0.0239759 0.0176682 0.0155916 0.65 0.66 0.8721 66.9259 2477.87
12 28.8 22.7 20.9 4144.48 2875.42 0.0265257 0.0181662 0.0155753 0.59 0.60 0.8769 68.5977 2475.34
13 30.1 23.0 20.9 4447.01 2934.10 0.0285509 0.018548 0.0155826 0.55 0.56 0.8805 69.8730 2476.47
14 30.9 23.3 21.0 4664.13 2983.80 0.0300121 0.0188717 0.0156715 0.52 0.53 0.8830 70.9569 2490.25
15 31.2 23.3 21.0 4753.52 2993.83 0.0306156 0.018937 0.0156201 0.51 0.52 0.8839 71.1684 2482.29
16 30.9 23.3 21.0 4664.13 2983.80 0.0300121 0.0188717 0.0156715 0.52 0.53 0.8830 70.9569 2490.25
17 30.2 23.1 21.0 4475.44 2943.98 0.0287419 0.0186123 0.0156232 0.54 0.55 0.8809 70.0910 2482.77
18 29.1 22.7 20.9 4198.11 2885.13 0.0268838 0.0182293 0.0155683 0.58 0.59 0.8776 68.8083 2474.25
19 27.7 22.3 20.9 3872.57 2817.76 0.0247163 0.0177915 0.0155515 0.63 0.64 0.8735 67.3377 2471.66
20 26.3 21.9 20.9 3580.95 2751.78 0.0227869 0.0173633 0.0155207 0.68 0.69 0.8696 65.8884 2466.88
21 25.2 21.7 20.9 3352.75 2705.48 0.021285 0.0170631 0.0155707 0.73 0.74 0.8665 64.8734 2474.63
22 24.2 21.3 20.9 3147.81 2650.82 0.0199423 0.0167091 0.0155203 0.78 0.78 0.8633 63.6600 2466.82
23 23.3 21.1 20.9 2993.83 2614.92 0.018937 0.0164768 0.0155446 0.82 0.83 0.8609 62.8650 2470.58
70
Table A.23. November Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville

o o o
0 19.5 18.2 18.2 2367.10 2177.82 0.014878 0.0136621 0.0131068 0.88 0.88 0.8466 52.7414 2091.12
1 18.9 17.9 18.2 2286.55 2147.60 0.01436 0.0134684 0.0130521 0.91 0.91 0.8449 52.0340 2082.57
2 18.4 17.7 18.1 2216.12 2117.75 0.0139078 0.0132772 0.0129766 0.93 0.93 0.8433 51.3309 2070.78
3 18.0 17.6 18.0 2155.12 2095.59 0.0135166 0.0131354 0.0129505 0.96 0.96 0.8420 50.8098 2066.69
4 17.7 17.4 17.9 2117.75 2073.65 0.0132772 0.012995 0.0128563 0.97 0.97 0.8411 50.2871 2051.97
5 17.6 17.3 17.9 2102.96 2066.38 0.0131825 0.0129484 0.0128329 0.97 0.97 0.8407 50.1141 2048.31
6 17.8 17.4 18.0 2132.63 2080.94 0.0133725 0.0130416 0.0128798 0.96 0.96 0.8414 50.4604 2055.65
7 18.3 17.7 18.0 2200.73 2110.34 0.013809 0.0132298 0.0129523 0.94 0.94 0.8430 51.1557 2066.98
8 19.3 18.1 18.2 2334.59 2170.23 0.0146688 0.0136135 0.0131276 0.89 0.90 0.8459 52.5666 2094.37
9 20.6 18.7 18.5 2535.69 2255.01 0.0159648 0.0141574 0.0133699 0.84 0.84 0.8501 54.5466 2132.22
10 22.2 19.4 18.8 2789.32 2350.80 0.0176068 0.014773 0.0136137 0.77 0.78 0.8549 56.7592 2170.26
11 23.9 20.1 19.1 3106.09 2458.57 0.0196696 0.0154671 0.0138654 0.70 0.71 0.8604 59.2210 2209.51
12 25.6 20.8 19.5 3431.13 2570.64 0.0218001 0.0161905 0.0141916 0.65 0.66 0.8657 61.7603 2260.34
13 26.8 21.3 19.7 3687.98 2650.82 0.0234937 0.0167091 0.014406 0.61 0.62 0.8695 63.5605 2293.72
14 27.7 21.7 19.9 3872.57 2705.48 0.0247163 0.0170631 0.0145492 0.59 0.60 0.8722 64.7808 2315.99
15 28.0 21.8 19.9 3948.62 2723.92 0.0252214 0.0171826 0.0145752 0.58 0.59 0.8732 65.1892 2320.03
16 27.7 21.7 19.9 3872.57 2705.48 0.0247163 0.0170631 0.0145492 0.59 0.60 0.8722 64.7808 2315.99
17 26.9 21.4 19.7 3712.14 2659.86 0.0236534 0.0167676 0.014441 0.61 0.62 0.8699 63.7637 2299.16
18 25.8 20.9 19.5 3476.64 2579.44 0.0220995 0.0162474 0.0141787 0.64 0.65 0.8663 61.9554 2258.33
19 24.4 20.3 19.2 3200.65 2492.59 0.0202879 0.0156865 0.013968 0.69 0.70 0.8620 59.9948 2225.51
20 23.1 19.8 19.0 2953.89 2408.30 0.0186769 0.0151432 0.0137511 0.74 0.74 0.8579 58.0763 2191.70
21 22.0 19.3 18.7 2761.12 2334.59 0.0174239 0.0146688 0.0135329 0.78 0.78 0.8544 56.3832 2157.66
22 20.9 18.8 18.5 2588.27 2270.74 0.0163045 0.0142584 0.0133781 0.82 0.82 0.8511 54.9088 2133.50
23 20.1 18.4 18.4 2458.57 2216.12 0.0154671 0.0139078 0.0132133 0.85 0.86 0.8485 53.6372 2107.76
71
Table A.24. December Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville

o o o
0 16.8 15.7 15.7 2001.94 1858.39 0.0125365 0.0116208 0.0111377 0.89 0.89 0.8362 45.0272 1782.50
1 16.3 15.4 15.6 1932.41 1825.57 0.0120927 0.0114118 0.0110439 0.91 0.91 0.8345 44.2232 1767.75
2 15.8 15.1 15.4 1871.66 1793.27 0.0117053 0.0112062 0.0109305 0.93 0.93 0.8329 43.4261 1749.90
3 15.3 14.9 15.3 1819.07 1767.79 0.0113704 0.0110442 0.0108604 0.96 0.96 0.8315 42.7957 1738.87
4 15.1 14.7 15.2 1786.87 1748.88 0.0111655 0.010924 0.0107862 0.97 0.97 0.8306 42.3250 1727.20
5 14.9 14.7 15.2 1774.13 1742.62 0.0110845 0.0108842 0.0107694 0.97 0.97 0.8303 42.1692 1724.55
6 15.2 14.8 15.2 1799.69 1755.17 0.0112471 0.0109639 0.0108032 0.96 0.96 0.8310 42.4811 1729.86
7 15.7 15.1 15.4 1858.39 1786.87 0.0116208 0.0111655 0.0109127 0.94 0.94 0.8326 43.2680 1747.11
8 16.6 15.6 15.7 1973.87 1845.20 0.0123572 0.0115368 0.0110998 0.90 0.90 0.8355 44.7046 1776.54
9 17.9 16.3 16.1 2147.60 1932.41 0.0134684 0.0120927 0.0114018 0.85 0.85 0.8398 46.8298 1824.01
10 19.5 17.1 16.5 2367.10 2030.36 0.014878 0.0127181 0.0117036 0.79 0.79 0.8447 49.1827 1871.39
11 21.3 17.9 16.9 2641.80 2140.10 0.0166507 0.0134204 0.012012 0.72 0.73 0.8502 51.7812 1919.77
12 22.9 18.7 17.3 2924.25 2247.19 0.0184838 0.0141071 0.012327 0.67 0.67 0.8555 54.2849 1969.14
13 24.2 19.3 17.7 3147.81 2334.59 0.0199423 0.0146688 0.0126321 0.63 0.64 0.8594 56.3105 2016.89
14 25.0 19.6 17.8 3308.66 2383.51 0.0209957 0.0149835 0.0127374 0.61 0.61 0.8620 57.4310 2033.37
15 25.3 19.8 17.9 3374.98 2408.30 0.021431 0.0151432 0.0128268 0.60 0.61 0.8630 57.9997 2047.36
16 25.0 19.6 17.8 3308.66 2383.51 0.0209957 0.0149835 0.0127374 0.61 0.61 0.8620 57.4310 2033.37
17 24.3 19.3 17.7 3168.86 2342.68 0.0200799 0.0147208 0.0126607 0.63 0.64 0.8598 56.4971 2021.38
18 23.2 18.8 17.3 2963.83 2262.86 0.0187416 0.0142078 0.0123811 0.66 0.67 0.8562 54.6495 1977.60
19 21.8 18.2 17.1 2723.92 2177.82 0.0171826 0.0136621 0.0121606 0.71 0.71 0.8519 52.6695 1943.06
20 20.4 17.5 16.7 2509.75 2088.26 0.0157973 0.0130884 0.0118655 0.75 0.76 0.8476 50.5580 1896.80
21 19.3 16.9 16.4 2342.68 2016.10 0.0147208 0.012627 0.0116358 0.79 0.79 0.8441 48.8405 1860.74
22 18.3 16.4 16.1 2193.07 1946.15 0.0137599 0.0121803 0.0113973 0.83 0.83 0.8407 47.1584 1823.29
23 17.4 16.0 15.9 2080.94 1898.45 0.0130416 0.0118761 0.0112777 0.86 0.87 0.8382 46.0050 1804.49
72
Table A.25. January Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago

o o o
0 -1.2 -1.2 -0.6 586.01 583.63 0.0036182 0.0036034 0.003581 0.99 0.99 0.7750 7.7819 580.03
1 -1.7 -1.8 -1.3 562.56 557.97 0.0034725 0.0034441 0.003399 0.98 0.98 0.7732 6.7692 550.78
2 -2.2 -2.4 -1.8 542.17 535.52 0.003346 0.0033048 0.003238 0.97 0.97 0.7715 5.8627 524.74
3 -2.7 -2.9 -2.4 524.60 516.01 0.003237 0.0031837 0.003095 0.96 0.96 0.7701 5.0580 501.64
4 -3.0 -3.3 -2.8 511.76 501.27 0.0031574 0.0030923 0.002981 0.94 0.94 0.7690 4.4393 483.31
5 -3.1 -3.4 -2.9 507.54 497.13 0.0031312 0.0030666 0.002955 0.94 0.94 0.7687 4.2636 479.17
6 -2.9 -3.1 -2.6 516.01 507.54 0.0031837 0.0031312 0.003042 0.96 0.96 0.7694 4.7036 493.17
7 -2.3 -2.5 -1.9 537.73 531.13 0.0033185 0.0032775 0.003211 0.97 0.97 0.7712 5.6830 520.35
8 -1.4 -1.4 -0.8 576.53 574.18 0.0035593 0.0035447 0.003522 0.99 0.99 0.7743 7.4117 570.59
9 0.1 0.0 0.5 640.69 638.11 0.0039579 0.0039418 0.003919 0.99 0.99 0.7789 9.8585 634.51
10 1.7 1.7 2.3 719.64 719.64 0.0044491 0.0044491 0.004449 1.00 1.00 0.7841 12.8073 719.64
11 3.6 3.6 4.2 823.10 823.10 0.0050939 0.0050939 0.005094 1.00 1.00 0.7903 16.3282 823.10
12 5.3 5.3 5.9 928.67 928.67 0.0057534 0.0057534 0.005753 1.00 1.00 0.7961 19.7218 928.67
13 6.6 6.4 7.0 1014.57 1006.83 0.0062909 0.0062424 0.006197 0.99 0.99 0.8003 22.1281 999.61
14 7.4 7.2 7.7 1078.38 1062.11 0.0066908 0.0065888 0.006498 0.97 0.97 0.8032 23.7839 1047.67
15 7.8 7.5 7.9 1103.21 1082.49 0.0068466 0.0067166 0.006603 0.96 0.96 0.8043 24.3855 1064.44
16 7.4 7.2 7.7 1078.38 1062.11 0.0066908 0.0065888 0.006498 0.97 0.97 0.8032 23.7839 1047.67
17 6.7 6.6 7.1 1022.36 1014.57 0.0063397 0.0062909 0.006246 0.99 0.99 0.8007 22.3622 1007.35
18 5.5 5.4 6.0 943.13 939.50 0.0058438 0.0058211 0.005799 0.99 0.99 0.7968 20.0596 935.89
19 4.1 4.1 4.7 852.60 852.60 0.005278 0.005278 0.005278 1.00 1.00 0.7920 17.2946 852.60
20 2.7 2.7 3.3 772.88 772.88 0.0047808 0.0047808 0.004781 1.00 1.00 0.7874 14.6464 772.88
21 1.4 1.4 2.0 708.26 708.26 0.0043783 0.0043783 0.004378 1.00 1.00 0.7834 12.4059 708.26
22 0.4 0.4 1.0 656.36 656.36 0.0040553 0.0040553 0.004055 1.00 1.00 0.7800 10.5341 656.36
23 -0.5 -0.6 0.0 615.30 612.81 0.0038001 0.0037846 0.003762 0.99 0.99 0.7771 8.9060 609.21
73
Table A.26. February Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago
Hou DBT WBT DPT Pws Pws* v h Pw

o o o
r ( C) ( C) ( C) (Pa) (Pa) Ws Ws* W µ φ 3
0 1.1 1.0 1.5 688.73 685.98 0.0042567 0.0042396 0.004217 0.99 0.99 0.7821 11.6108 682.38
1 0.5 0.4 0.8 661.66 656.36 0.0040883 0.0040553 0.004011 0.98 0.98 0.7803 10.5340 649.16
2 0.0 -0.2 0.0 638.11 627.88 0.0039418 0.0038782 0.003789 0.96 0.96 0.7786 9.4758 613.49
3 -0.4 -0.7 -0.4 617.80 607.86 0.0038156 0.0037538 0.003664 0.96 0.96 0.7771 8.7174 593.47
4 -0.8 -1.1 -0.8 602.94 590.81 0.0037233 0.0036479 0.003536 0.95 0.95 0.7760 8.0614 572.82
5 -0.9 -1.2 -0.9 598.06 586.01 0.003693 0.0036182 0.003507 0.95 0.95 0.7757 7.8753 568.03
6 -0.7 -0.9 -0.7 607.86 595.64 0.0037538 0.0036779 0.003566 0.95 0.95 0.7764 8.2482 577.65
7 -0.1 -0.3 -0.1 632.97 622.82 0.0039099 0.0038468 0.003757 0.96 0.96 0.7782 9.2853 608.43
8 0.8 0.8 1.3 677.79 675.08 0.0041886 0.0041717 0.004149 0.99 0.99 0.7814 11.2171 671.48
9 2.3 2.3 2.9 751.78 751.78 0.0046492 0.0046492 0.004649 1.00 1.00 0.7861 13.9247 751.78
10 3.9 3.9 4.5 842.66 842.66 0.005216 0.005216 0.005216 1.00 1.00 0.7914 16.9708 842.66
11 5.8 5.8 6.4 961.49 961.49 0.0059586 0.0059586 0.005959 1.00 1.00 0.7978 20.7424 961.49
12 7.5 7.5 8.2 1082.49 1082.49 0.0067166 0.0067166 0.006717 1.00 1.00 0.8037 24.3891 1082.49
13 8.8 8.7 9.2 1180.76 1171.91 0.0073335 0.0072779 0.007233 0.99 0.99 0.8080 26.9809 1164.69
14 9.7 9.4 9.9 1253.68 1235.08 0.0077921 0.0076751 0.007584 0.97 0.97 0.8110 28.7670 1220.63
15 10.0 9.7 10.2 1282.03 1258.36 0.0079705 0.0078215 0.007708 0.97 0.97 0.8121 29.4165 1240.30
16 9.7 9.4 9.9 1253.68 1235.08 0.0077921 0.0076751 0.007584 0.97 0.97 0.8110 28.7670 1220.63
17 8.9 8.8 9.4 1189.66 1180.76 0.0073895 0.0073335 0.007288 0.99 0.99 0.8084 27.2333 1173.53
18 7.7 7.7 8.4 1099.04 1099.04 0.0068204 0.0068204 0.00682 1.00 1.00 0.8044 24.8751 1099.04
19 6.3 6.3 6.9 995.32 995.32 0.0061703 0.0061703 0.00617 1.00 1.00 0.7995 21.7797 995.32
20 4.9 4.9 5.5 903.84 903.84 0.0055981 0.0055981 0.005598 1.00 1.00 0.7948 18.9392 903.84
21 3.7 3.7 4.3 829.57 829.57 0.0051343 0.0051343 0.005134 1.00 1.00 0.7907 16.5416 829.57
22 2.6 2.6 3.2 769.83 769.83 0.0047618 0.0047618 0.004762 1.00 1.00 0.7872 14.5428 769.83
23 1.7 1.7 2.3 722.51 722.51 0.004467 0.004467 0.004467 1.00 1.00 0.7843 12.9080 722.51
74
Table A.27. March Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago

o o o
0 7.7 7.6 8.2 1099.04 1090.74 0.0068204 0.0067683 0.006723 0.99 0.99 0.8043 24.6302 1083.52
1 7.2 7.0 7.5 1058.07 1046.05 0.0065635 0.0064881 0.00642 0.98 0.98 0.8023 23.3067 1035.22
2 6.7 6.4 6.9 1022.36 1006.83 0.0063397 0.0062424 0.006152 0.97 0.97 0.8006 22.1269 992.39
3 6.2 6.0 6.4 991.51 976.40 0.0061465 0.0060519 0.005962 0.97 0.97 0.7991 21.1991 961.96
4 5.9 5.6 6.0 968.92 950.44 0.0060051 0.0058895 0.005777 0.96 0.96 0.7979 20.3977 932.40
5 5.8 5.5 5.9 961.49 943.13 0.0059586 0.0058438 0.005731 0.96 0.96 0.7975 20.1707 925.09
6 6.0 5.7 6.1 976.40 957.79 0.0060519 0.0059355 0.005823 0.96 0.96 0.7982 20.6254 939.75
7 6.6 6.3 6.8 1014.57 999.14 0.0062909 0.0061943 0.006104 0.97 0.97 0.8002 21.8937 984.71
8 7.5 7.3 7.8 1082.49 1070.22 0.0067166 0.0066396 0.006572 0.98 0.98 0.8035 24.0248 1059.39
9 8.9 8.8 9.3 1194.14 1180.76 0.0074176 0.0073335 0.007265 0.98 0.98 0.8085 27.2325 1169.92
10 10.6 10.3 10.8 1330.54 1310.94 0.0082761 0.0081526 0.008062 0.97 0.97 0.8142 30.8712 1296.49
11 12.4 12.1 12.5 1507.78 1469.68 0.0093953 0.0091543 0.008994 0.96 0.96 0.8208 35.1417 1444.38
12 14.2 13.6 13.9 1687.15 1621.47 0.0105319 0.0101152 0.009863 0.94 0.94 0.8269 39.0868 1581.71
13 15.4 14.6 14.8 1832.10 1736.38 0.0114534 0.0108446 0.0105 0.92 0.92 0.8314 41.9983 1682.17
14 16.3 15.3 15.4 1939.27 1812.59 0.0121364 0.0113292 0.010892 0.90 0.90 0.8345 43.8966 1743.92
15 16.7 15.6 15.6 1980.85 1845.20 0.0124018 0.0115368 0.011077 0.89 0.90 0.8357 44.7031 1772.92
16 16.3 15.3 15.4 1939.27 1812.59 0.0121364 0.0113292 0.010892 0.90 0.90 0.8345 43.8966 1743.92
17 15.6 14.7 14.9 1845.20 1748.88 0.0115368 0.010924 0.01058 0.92 0.92 0.8318 42.3123 1694.67
18 14.4 13.7 14.0 1711.61 1639.15 0.0106872 0.0102273 0.009952 0.93 0.93 0.8276 39.5383 1595.78
19 12.9 12.5 12.9 1558.04 1513.29 0.0097133 0.0094301 0.009247 0.95 0.95 0.8226 36.2880 1484.38
20 11.6 11.3 11.8 1421.94 1396.01 0.0088528 0.0086891 0.008575 0.97 0.97 0.8177 33.1807 1377.94
21 10.3 10.2 10.7 1310.94 1296.41 0.0081526 0.0080611 0.007993 0.98 0.98 0.8134 30.4726 1285.57
22 9.3 9.1 9.6 1221.30 1207.65 0.0075884 0.0075025 0.007434 0.98 0.98 0.8097 27.9957 1196.81
23 8.4 8.2 8.7 1150.05 1137.10 0.0071406 0.0070593 0.006991 0.98 0.98 0.8066 25.9799 1126.27
75
Table A.28. April Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago

o o o
0 13.3 12.4 12.5 1592.36 1502.28 0.0099307 0.0093605 0.008995 0.91 0.91 0.8232 35.9899 1444.46
1 12.7 12.1 12.3 1535.52 1469.68 0.0095708 0.0091543 0.00888 0.93 0.93 0.8214 35.1360 1426.31
2 12.2 11.7 12.0 1485.90 1432.43 0.0092569 0.008919 0.008691 0.94 0.94 0.8198 34.1498 1396.29
3 11.8 11.3 11.7 1442.98 1401.16 0.0089857 0.0087216 0.008539 0.95 0.95 0.8183 33.3158 1372.25
4 11.4 11.1 11.6 1411.52 1380.65 0.008787 0.0085922 0.008455 0.96 0.96 0.8172 32.7661 1358.97
5 11.3 11.1 11.5 1401.16 1375.57 0.0087216 0.0085601 0.008446 0.97 0.97 0.8169 32.6299 1357.50
6 11.6 11.2 11.7 1421.94 1390.88 0.0088528 0.0086567 0.00852 0.96 0.96 0.8176 33.0415 1369.19
7 12.1 11.6 11.9 1475.07 1427.17 0.0091884 0.0088858 0.00868 0.94 0.95 0.8194 34.0108 1394.65
8 13.1 12.2 12.3 1569.41 1485.90 0.0097853 0.0092569 0.008914 0.91 0.91 0.8224 35.5604 1431.69
9 14.5 13.2 13.0 1723.96 1580.85 0.0107656 0.0098578 0.009309 0.86 0.87 0.8271 38.0250 1494.11
10 16.1 14.2 13.8 1911.97 1693.24 0.0119623 0.0105705 0.009791 0.82 0.82 0.8324 40.8841 1570.36
11 18.0 15.3 14.5 2155.12 1819.07 0.0135166 0.0113704 0.010268 0.76 0.76 0.8384 44.0148 1645.62
12 19.7 16.4 15.2 2400.01 1946.15 0.0150898 0.0121803 0.0108 0.72 0.72 0.8441 47.1174 1729.36
13 21.0 17.1 15.7 2597.12 2037.52 0.0163617 0.0127639 0.011151 0.68 0.69 0.8483 49.3123 1784.64
14 21.9 17.6 16.1 2742.46 2102.96 0.0173028 0.0131825 0.011407 0.66 0.67 0.8512 50.8688 1824.83
15 22.2 17.8 16.2 2798.77 2125.18 0.0176682 0.0133248 0.01148 0.65 0.66 0.8522 51.3933 1836.23
16 21.9 17.6 16.1 2742.46 2102.96 0.0173028 0.0131825 0.011407 0.66 0.67 0.8512 50.8688 1824.83
17 21.1 17.2 15.8 2614.92 2044.70 0.0164768 0.0128098 0.011174 0.68 0.68 0.8486 49.4834 1788.22
18 19.9 16.5 15.3 2433.32 1959.96 0.0153044 0.0122685 0.010842 0.71 0.71 0.8448 47.4503 1735.96
19 18.5 15.7 14.7 2223.85 1858.39 0.0139574 0.0116208 0.010449 0.75 0.75 0.8401 44.9821 1674.10
20 17.1 14.8 14.2 2037.52 1761.47 0.0127639 0.011004 0.010063 0.79 0.79 0.8356 42.5905 1613.30
21 15.9 14.1 13.6 1885.01 1675.04 0.0117904 0.010455 0.009699 0.82 0.83 0.8316 40.4243 1555.78
22 14.8 13.4 13.2 1761.47 1603.95 0.011004 0.0100041 0.009409 0.86 0.86 0.8282 38.6177 1509.98
23 13.9 12.8 12.8 1663.00 1546.75 0.0103786 0.0096418 0.009185 0.88 0.89 0.8254 37.1463 1474.47
76
Table A.29. May Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago

o o o
0 18.3 16.9 17.0 2193.07 2016.10 0.0137599 0.012627 0.012073 0.88 0.88 0.8416 48.8716 1929.38
1 17.7 16.7 16.8 2117.75 1980.85 0.0132772 0.0124018 0.011964 0.90 0.90 0.8399 48.0262 1912.20
2 17.2 16.4 16.7 2051.90 1953.04 0.0128559 0.0122243 0.011902 0.93 0.93 0.8384 47.3581 1902.45
3 16.8 16.3 16.7 1994.89 1932.41 0.0124915 0.0120927 0.011885 0.95 0.95 0.8371 46.8627 1899.89
4 16.4 16.1 16.6 1953.04 1911.97 0.0122243 0.0119623 0.011824 0.97 0.97 0.8360 46.3674 1890.29
5 16.3 16.1 16.6 1939.27 1905.20 0.0121364 0.0119191 0.011804 0.97 0.97 0.8357 46.2030 1887.13
6 16.6 16.2 16.7 1966.91 1918.76 0.0123128 0.0120056 0.011844 0.96 0.96 0.8364 46.5321 1893.47
7 17.1 16.4 16.7 2037.52 1946.15 0.0127639 0.0121803 0.011881 0.93 0.93 0.8380 47.1916 1899.17
8 18.1 16.8 16.9 2162.66 2001.94 0.013565 0.0125365 0.012029 0.89 0.89 0.8409 48.5323 1922.44
9 19.5 17.4 17.1 2367.10 2080.94 0.014878 0.0130416 0.012187 0.82 0.82 0.8453 50.4098 1947.27
10 21.1 18.1 17.3 2614.92 2170.23 0.0164768 0.0136135 0.012366 0.75 0.76 0.8502 52.5088 1975.19
11 23.0 18.9 17.6 2934.10 2278.63 0.018548 0.0143091 0.012597 0.68 0.69 0.8560 55.0284 2011.43
12 24.7 19.6 17.9 3254.27 2383.51 0.0206391 0.0149835 0.012853 0.62 0.63 0.8613 57.4404 2051.41
13 26.0 20.1 18.1 3511.11 2458.57 0.0223265 0.0154671 0.01301 0.58 0.59 0.8652 59.1490 2076.03
14 26.9 20.4 18.2 3700.05 2509.75 0.0235734 0.0157973 0.013107 0.56 0.57 0.8679 60.3062 2091.19
15 27.2 20.6 18.2 3773.15 2527.02 0.0240572 0.0159088 0.013126 0.55 0.55 0.8689 60.6941 2094.05
16 26.9 20.4 18.2 3700.05 2509.75 0.0235734 0.0157973 0.013107 0.56 0.57 0.8679 60.3062 2091.19
17 26.1 20.2 18.1 3534.26 2467.03 0.022479 0.0155217 0.013041 0.58 0.59 0.8656 59.3421 2080.89
18 24.9 19.7 17.9 3297.72 2391.75 0.0209239 0.0150366 0.012836 0.61 0.62 0.8619 57.6258 2048.83
19 23.5 19.1 17.7 3024.09 2310.46 0.0191343 0.0145136 0.012685 0.66 0.67 0.8576 55.7641 2025.23
20 22.1 18.6 17.5 2779.89 2231.61 0.0175456 0.0140071 0.012527 0.71 0.72 0.8533 53.9416 2000.48
21 20.9 18.1 17.3 2579.44 2162.66 0.0162474 0.013565 0.012387 0.76 0.77 0.8496 52.3346 1978.45
22 19.8 17.6 17.1 2416.62 2095.59 0.0151968 0.0131354 0.012189 0.80 0.81 0.8463 50.7539 1947.48
23 18.9 17.2 17.0 2286.55 2051.90 0.01436 0.0128559 0.01214 0.85 0.85 0.8437 49.7228 1939.90
77
Table A.30. June Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago

o o o
0 22.2 19.6 19.2 2789.32 2383.51 0.0176068 0.0149835 0.013916 0.79 0.79 0.8554 57.5277 2217.43
1 21.6 19.4 19.2 2696.30 2358.94 0.0170036 0.0148254 0.013921 0.82 0.82 0.8538 56.9695 2218.12
2 21.1 19.3 19.1 2614.92 2334.59 0.0164768 0.0146688 0.013903 0.84 0.85 0.8523 56.4130 2215.42
3 20.7 19.1 19.1 2544.39 2310.46 0.0160209 0.0145136 0.013864 0.87 0.87 0.8509 55.8584 2209.34
4 20.3 19.0 19.1 2492.59 2294.50 0.0156865 0.014411 0.013855 0.88 0.89 0.8500 55.4920 2207.82
5 20.2 19.0 19.1 2475.53 2294.50 0.0155765 0.014411 0.013901 0.89 0.89 0.8497 55.4957 2215.04
6 20.4 19.1 19.1 2509.75 2302.47 0.0157973 0.0144623 0.013882 0.88 0.88 0.8503 55.6769 2212.18
7 21.0 19.2 19.1 2597.12 2326.52 0.0163617 0.0146169 0.013875 0.85 0.85 0.8519 56.2265 2210.97
8 21.9 19.6 19.2 2751.78 2375.29 0.0173633 0.0149307 0.013933 0.80 0.81 0.8547 57.3425 2220.04
9 23.4 19.9 19.1 3003.88 2433.32 0.0190026 0.0153044 0.013865 0.73 0.74 0.8588 58.6515 2209.51
10 25.0 20.4 19.1 3308.66 2509.75 0.0209957 0.0157973 0.013893 0.66 0.67 0.8635 60.3735 2213.83
11 26.9 21.0 19.1 3700.05 2597.12 0.0235734 0.0163617 0.013899 0.59 0.60 0.8690 62.3244 2214.73
12 28.6 21.5 19.2 4091.44 2678.03 0.026172 0.0168852 0.01391 0.53 0.54 0.8740 64.1175 2216.41
13 29.9 21.9 19.2 4404.66 2742.46 0.0282666 0.0173028 0.013954 0.49 0.50 0.8778 65.5401 2223.29
14 30.8 22.1 19.2 4634.66 2779.89 0.0298134 0.0175456 0.013917 0.47 0.48 0.8803 66.3571 2217.55
15 31.1 22.2 19.2 4723.56 2798.77 0.0304132 0.0176682 0.013946 0.46 0.47 0.8813 66.7728 2222.06
16 30.8 22.1 19.2 4634.66 2779.89 0.0298134 0.0175456 0.013917 0.47 0.48 0.8803 66.3571 2217.55
17 30.0 21.9 19.2 4432.86 2751.78 0.0284558 0.0173633 0.013991 0.49 0.50 0.8781 65.7479 2229.02
18 28.8 21.6 19.1 4144.48 2687.15 0.0265257 0.0169443 0.013899 0.52 0.53 0.8746 64.3178 2214.74
19 27.4 21.2 19.2 3810.17 2623.85 0.0243024 0.0165346 0.013932 0.57 0.58 0.8705 62.9208 2219.85
20 26.0 20.7 19.1 3511.11 2553.11 0.0223265 0.0160773 0.013871 0.62 0.63 0.8664 61.3414 2210.34
21 24.8 20.4 19.1 3265.08 2501.15 0.0207099 0.0157418 0.013907 0.67 0.68 0.8629 60.1820 2216.05
22 23.7 20.1 19.1 3064.85 2450.13 0.0194003 0.0154127 0.013881 0.72 0.72 0.8598 59.0321 2211.89
23 22.8 19.8 19.1 2904.63 2408.30 0.0183562 0.0151432 0.013867 0.76 0.76 0.8572 58.0859 2209.74
78
Table A.31. July Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago

o o o
0 23.8 20.8 20.3 3085.41 2570.64 0.0195345 0.0161905 0.014934 0.76 0.77 0.8616 61.8251 2375.77
1 23.3 20.7 20.3 2983.80 2544.39 0.0188717 0.0160209 0.014927 0.79 0.80 0.8599 61.2380 2374.76
2 22.8 20.5 20.2 2894.86 2518.37 0.0182926 0.0158529 0.014899 0.81 0.82 0.8584 60.6529 2370.39
3 22.3 20.4 20.3 2817.76 2501.15 0.0177915 0.0157418 0.014928 0.84 0.84 0.8572 60.2690 2374.82
4 22.0 20.3 20.2 2761.12 2484.04 0.0174239 0.0156314 0.01491 0.86 0.86 0.8562 59.8829 2372.14
5 21.9 20.2 20.2 2742.46 2475.53 0.0173028 0.0155765 0.014879 0.86 0.86 0.8558 59.6885 2367.23
6 22.1 20.3 20.2 2779.89 2484.04 0.0175456 0.0156314 0.014864 0.85 0.85 0.8565 59.8789 2364.92
7 22.7 20.4 20.2 2875.42 2509.75 0.0181662 0.0157973 0.014867 0.82 0.82 0.8581 60.4568 2365.37
8 23.6 20.8 20.3 3044.41 2561.86 0.0192669 0.0161338 0.014947 0.78 0.78 0.8609 61.6303 2377.81
9 25.1 21.2 20.2 3319.64 2623.85 0.0210677 0.0165346 0.014905 0.71 0.71 0.8651 63.0070 2371.30
10 26.7 21.7 20.3 3652.00 2705.48 0.0232559 0.0170631 0.014967 0.64 0.65 0.8698 64.8186 2380.88
11 28.6 22.2 20.3 4078.28 2789.32 0.0260842 0.0176068 0.014927 0.57 0.58 0.8752 66.6571 2374.71
12 30.3 22.7 20.3 4504.03 2875.42 0.028934 0.0181662 0.014972 0.52 0.53 0.8803 68.5404 2381.68
13 31.6 23.0 20.3 4844.40 2934.10 0.0312303 0.018548 0.014956 0.48 0.49 0.8840 69.8127 2379.25
14 32.4 23.3 20.4 5094.15 2983.80 0.0329256 0.0188717 0.015022 0.46 0.47 0.8867 70.8936 2389.45
15 32.8 23.3 20.3 5190.64 2993.83 0.033583 0.018937 0.014971 0.45 0.46 0.8876 71.1050 2381.50
16 32.4 23.3 20.4 5094.15 2983.80 0.0329256 0.0188717 0.015022 0.46 0.47 0.8867 70.8936 2389.45
17 31.7 23.1 20.3 4875.02 2943.98 0.0314377 0.0186123 0.014997 0.48 0.49 0.8844 70.0306 2385.55
18 30.5 22.7 20.3 4561.69 2885.13 0.0293218 0.0182293 0.014965 0.51 0.52 0.8809 68.7509 2380.60
19 29.1 22.3 20.3 4198.11 2817.76 0.0268838 0.0177915 0.014971 0.56 0.57 0.8768 67.2834 2381.58
20 27.7 21.9 20.3 3872.57 2751.78 0.0247163 0.0173633 0.014963 0.61 0.61 0.8727 65.8372 2380.37
21 26.4 21.6 20.2 3604.50 2687.15 0.0229422 0.0169443 0.014895 0.65 0.66 0.8691 64.4077 2369.75
22 25.4 21.3 20.3 3386.15 2641.80 0.0215044 0.0166507 0.014928 0.69 0.70 0.8661 63.4073 2374.84
23 24.5 21.0 20.2 3211.31 2597.12 0.0203577 0.0163617 0.014895 0.73 0.74 0.8634 62.4120 2369.81
79
Table A.32. August Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago

o o o
0 23.8 20.8 20.3 3085.41 2570.64 0.0195345 0.0161905 0.014934 0.76 0.77 0.8616 61.8251 2375.77
1 23.3 20.7 20.3 2983.80 2544.39 0.0188717 0.0160209 0.014927 0.79 0.80 0.8599 61.2380 2374.76
2 22.8 20.5 20.2 2894.86 2518.37 0.0182926 0.0158529 0.014899 0.81 0.82 0.8584 60.6529 2370.39
3 22.3 20.4 20.3 2817.76 2501.15 0.0177915 0.0157418 0.014928 0.84 0.84 0.8572 60.2690 2374.82
4 22.0 20.3 20.2 2761.12 2484.04 0.0174239 0.0156314 0.01491 0.86 0.86 0.8562 59.8829 2372.14
5 21.9 20.2 20.2 2742.46 2475.53 0.0173028 0.0155765 0.014879 0.86 0.86 0.8558 59.6885 2367.23
6 22.1 20.3 20.2 2779.89 2484.04 0.0175456 0.0156314 0.014864 0.85 0.85 0.8565 59.8789 2364.92
7 22.7 20.4 20.2 2875.42 2509.75 0.0181662 0.0157973 0.014867 0.82 0.82 0.8581 60.4568 2365.37
8 23.6 20.8 20.3 3044.41 2561.86 0.0192669 0.0161338 0.014947 0.78 0.78 0.8609 61.6303 2377.81
9 25.1 21.2 20.2 3319.64 2623.85 0.0210677 0.0165346 0.014905 0.71 0.71 0.8651 63.0070 2371.30
10 26.7 21.7 20.3 3652.00 2705.48 0.0232559 0.0170631 0.014967 0.64 0.65 0.8698 64.8186 2380.88
11 28.6 22.2 20.3 4078.28 2789.32 0.0260842 0.0176068 0.014927 0.57 0.58 0.8752 66.6571 2374.71
12 30.3 22.7 20.3 4504.03 2875.42 0.028934 0.0181662 0.014972 0.52 0.53 0.8803 68.5404 2381.68
13 31.6 23.0 20.3 4844.40 2934.10 0.0312303 0.018548 0.014956 0.48 0.49 0.8840 69.8127 2379.25
14 32.4 23.3 20.4 5094.15 2983.80 0.0329256 0.0188717 0.015022 0.46 0.47 0.8867 70.8936 2389.45
15 32.8 23.3 20.3 5190.64 2993.83 0.033583 0.018937 0.014971 0.45 0.46 0.8876 71.1050 2381.50
16 32.4 23.3 20.4 5094.15 2983.80 0.0329256 0.0188717 0.015022 0.46 0.47 0.8867 70.8936 2389.45
17 31.7 23.1 20.3 4875.02 2943.98 0.0314377 0.0186123 0.014997 0.48 0.49 0.8844 70.0306 2385.55
18 30.5 22.7 20.3 4561.69 2885.13 0.0293218 0.0182293 0.014965 0.51 0.52 0.8809 68.7509 2380.60
19 29.1 22.3 20.3 4198.11 2817.76 0.0268838 0.0177915 0.014971 0.56 0.57 0.8768 67.2834 2381.58
20 27.7 21.9 20.3 3872.57 2751.78 0.0247163 0.0173633 0.014963 0.61 0.61 0.8727 65.8372 2380.37
21 26.4 21.6 20.2 3604.50 2687.15 0.0229422 0.0169443 0.014895 0.65 0.66 0.8691 64.4077 2369.75
22 25.4 21.3 20.3 3386.15 2641.80 0.0215044 0.0166507 0.014928 0.69 0.70 0.8661 63.4073 2374.84
23 24.5 21.0 20.2 3211.31 2597.12 0.0203577 0.0163617 0.014895 0.73 0.74 0.8634 62.4120 2369.81
80
Table A.33. September Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago

o o o
0 20.5 18.9 18.9 2518.37 2286.55 0.0158529 0.01436 0.013711 0.86 0.87 0.8503 55.2983 2185.43
1 19.9 18.7 18.9 2433.32 2255.01 0.0153044 0.0141574 0.013648 0.89 0.89 0.8486 54.5683 2175.55
2 19.4 18.6 18.8 2358.94 2231.61 0.0148254 0.0140071 0.013636 0.92 0.92 0.8471 54.0278 2173.81
3 19.0 18.4 18.9 2294.50 2216.12 0.014411 0.0139078 0.013676 0.95 0.95 0.8459 53.6729 2180.00
4 18.7 18.3 18.9 2247.19 2200.73 0.0141071 0.013809 0.01367 0.97 0.97 0.8449 53.3160 2179.06
5 18.6 18.3 18.9 2231.61 2193.07 0.0140071 0.0137599 0.013644 0.97 0.97 0.8445 53.1364 2175.01
6 18.8 18.3 18.8 2262.86 2200.73 0.0142078 0.013809 0.013624 0.96 0.96 0.8452 53.3125 2171.83
7 19.3 18.6 18.9 2342.68 2231.61 0.0147208 0.0140071 0.013683 0.93 0.93 0.8468 54.0314 2181.04
8 20.3 18.8 18.9 2484.04 2270.74 0.0156314 0.0142584 0.013656 0.87 0.88 0.8495 54.9307 2176.83
9 21.7 19.3 18.9 2714.68 2342.68 0.0171227 0.0147208 0.013724 0.80 0.81 0.8538 56.5831 2187.41
10 23.3 19.8 19.0 2993.83 2416.62 0.018937 0.0151968 0.013735 0.73 0.73 0.8585 58.2631 2189.19
11 25.2 20.4 18.9 3352.75 2501.15 0.021285 0.0157418 0.013722 0.64 0.65 0.8639 60.1662 2187.19
12 26.9 20.9 19.0 3712.14 2588.27 0.0236534 0.0163045 0.013796 0.58 0.59 0.8690 62.1184 2198.65
13 28.2 21.3 19.1 4000.05 2650.82 0.0255633 0.0167091 0.013827 0.54 0.55 0.8728 63.5088 2203.59
14 29.1 21.6 19.0 4211.62 2687.15 0.0269741 0.0169443 0.013783 0.51 0.52 0.8753 64.3074 2196.72
15 29.4 21.7 19.0 4293.43 2705.48 0.0275212 0.0170631 0.013809 0.50 0.51 0.8763 64.7136 2200.66
16 29.1 21.6 19.0 4211.62 2687.15 0.0269741 0.0169443 0.013783 0.51 0.52 0.8753 64.3074 2196.72
17 28.3 21.3 19.0 4025.98 2650.82 0.0257359 0.0167091 0.013781 0.54 0.55 0.8730 63.5047 2196.38
18 27.2 21.0 19.0 3760.88 2597.12 0.0239759 0.0163617 0.013783 0.57 0.58 0.8697 62.3142 2196.70
19 25.7 20.6 19.0 3453.82 2527.02 0.0219493 0.0159088 0.013749 0.63 0.63 0.8654 60.7478 2191.43
20 24.3 20.1 18.9 3179.42 2458.57 0.020149 0.0154671 0.013703 0.68 0.69 0.8613 59.2074 2184.26
21 23.1 19.8 19.0 2953.89 2408.30 0.0186769 0.0151432 0.013751 0.74 0.74 0.8579 58.0763 2191.70
22 22.1 19.4 18.9 2770.49 2350.80 0.0174847 0.014773 0.01366 0.78 0.79 0.8547 56.7629 2177.48
23 21.2 19.1 18.9 2623.85 2310.46 0.0165346 0.0145136 0.013656 0.83 0.83 0.8521 55.8418 2176.85
81
Table A.34. October Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago

o o o
0 14.9 13.9 14.0 1774.13 1663.00 0.0110845 0.0103786 0.009966 0.90 0.90 0.8293 40.1385 1597.95
1 14.4 13.6 13.8 1711.61 1627.34 0.0106872 0.0101525 0.009832 0.92 0.92 0.8275 39.2335 1576.74
2 13.9 13.3 13.6 1657.01 1592.36 0.0103406 0.0099307 0.009679 0.94 0.94 0.8258 38.3385 1552.60
3 13.4 13.0 13.4 1609.77 1563.71 0.010041 0.0097493 0.009566 0.95 0.95 0.8244 37.6017 1534.80
4 13.1 12.8 13.2 1575.12 1541.12 0.0098215 0.0096063 0.009469 0.96 0.96 0.8233 37.0172 1519.44
5 13.0 12.7 13.2 1563.71 1535.52 0.0097493 0.0095708 0.009456 0.97 0.97 0.8230 36.8725 1517.45
6 13.2 12.9 13.4 1586.59 1552.38 0.0098942 0.0096775 0.00954 0.96 0.96 0.8237 37.3101 1530.70
7 13.8 13.2 13.6 1645.09 1586.59 0.010265 0.0098942 0.009665 0.94 0.94 0.8255 38.1910 1550.45
8 14.7 13.8 14.0 1748.88 1651.04 0.010924 0.0103027 0.009936 0.91 0.91 0.8286 39.8365 1593.21
9 16.2 14.7 14.5 1918.76 1742.62 0.0120056 0.0108842 0.010265 0.85 0.86 0.8332 42.1382 1645.04
10 17.8 15.6 15.1 2125.18 1851.79 0.0133248 0.0115787 0.010682 0.80 0.81 0.8384 44.8372 1710.85
11 19.7 16.7 15.7 2391.75 1980.85 0.0150366 0.0124018 0.011158 0.74 0.75 0.8444 47.9700 1785.75
12 21.4 17.6 16.4 2659.86 2102.96 0.0167676 0.0131825 0.011614 0.69 0.70 0.8500 50.8840 1857.33
13 22.7 18.3 16.8 2875.42 2193.07 0.0181662 0.0137599 0.011936 0.66 0.66 0.8541 53.0057 1907.77
14 23.6 18.7 17.0 3034.23 2255.01 0.0192005 0.0141574 0.012147 0.63 0.64 0.8570 54.4507 1940.87
15 23.9 18.9 17.1 3095.73 2278.63 0.0196019 0.0143091 0.012228 0.62 0.63 0.8581 54.9993 1953.68
16 23.6 18.7 17.0 3034.23 2255.01 0.0192005 0.0141574 0.012147 0.63 0.64 0.8570 54.4507 1940.87
17 22.8 18.3 16.8 2894.86 2200.73 0.0182926 0.013809 0.011961 0.65 0.66 0.8545 53.1849 1911.82
18 21.6 17.7 16.4 2696.30 2117.75 0.0170036 0.0132772 0.011662 0.69 0.69 0.8507 51.2334 1864.90
19 20.2 16.9 15.9 2467.03 2016.10 0.0155217 0.012627 0.011291 0.73 0.73 0.8461 48.8160 1806.56
20 18.8 16.2 15.4 2262.86 1918.76 0.0142078 0.0120056 0.010924 0.77 0.77 0.8416 46.4699 1748.94
21 17.6 15.5 15.0 2095.59 1838.64 0.0131354 0.011495 0.010645 0.81 0.81 0.8377 44.5155 1704.93
22 16.5 14.8 14.5 1959.96 1761.47 0.0122685 0.011004 0.010315 0.84 0.84 0.8342 42.6062 1653.05
23 15.6 14.3 14.3 1851.79 1705.47 0.0115787 0.0106482 0.010121 0.87 0.88 0.8314 41.2083 1622.34
82
Table A.35. November Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago

o o o
0 8.8 8.4 8.8 1185.20 1154.39 0.0073614 0.0071678 0.007009 0.95 0.95 0.8079 26.4749 1129.11
1 8.3 7.9 8.3 1141.40 1115.82 0.0070863 0.0069257 0.00679 0.96 0.96 0.8060 25.3603 1094.15
2 7.8 7.4 7.8 1103.21 1078.38 0.0068466 0.0066908 0.006555 0.96 0.96 0.8043 24.2639 1056.72
3 7.3 7.1 7.5 1070.22 1050.04 0.0066396 0.0065131 0.0064 0.96 0.96 0.8028 23.4245 1031.99
4 7.0 6.7 7.1 1046.05 1026.27 0.0064881 0.0063642 0.006251 0.96 0.96 0.8016 22.7131 1008.22
5 6.9 6.6 7.0 1038.10 1018.46 0.0064383 0.0063152 0.006202 0.96 0.96 0.8013 22.4777 1000.41
6 7.1 6.8 7.2 1054.05 1034.14 0.0065383 0.0064135 0.0063 0.96 0.96 0.8020 22.9494 1016.09
7 7.7 7.3 7.7 1094.88 1070.22 0.0067943 0.0066396 0.006504 0.96 0.96 0.8039 24.0228 1048.56
8 8.6 8.2 8.6 1167.51 1137.10 0.0072502 0.0070593 0.006901 0.95 0.95 0.8071 25.9768 1111.83
9 10.1 9.5 9.7 1286.81 1239.71 0.0080006 0.0077042 0.007477 0.93 0.94 0.8120 28.8912 1203.59
10 11.7 10.9 11.0 1432.43 1360.41 0.008919 0.0084645 0.008146 0.91 0.91 0.8175 32.2104 1309.83
11 13.6 12.4 12.3 1621.47 1502.28 0.0101152 0.0093605 0.008881 0.88 0.88 0.8238 35.9839 1426.39
12 15.3 13.7 13.4 1812.59 1639.15 0.0113292 0.0102273 0.009586 0.85 0.85 0.8297 39.5173 1537.96
13 16.6 14.7 14.3 1966.91 1748.88 0.0123128 0.010924 0.010167 0.83 0.83 0.8342 42.2868 1629.62
14 17.4 15.3 14.8 2080.94 1819.07 0.0130416 0.0113704 0.010498 0.80 0.81 0.8372 44.0295 1681.75
15 17.8 15.6 15.0 2125.18 1845.20 0.0133248 0.0115368 0.010618 0.80 0.80 0.8383 44.6732 1700.66
16 17.4 15.3 14.8 2080.94 1819.07 0.0130416 0.0113704 0.010498 0.80 0.81 0.8372 44.0295 1681.75
17 16.7 14.8 14.3 1980.85 1755.17 0.0124018 0.0109639 0.010184 0.82 0.82 0.8345 42.4428 1632.29
18 15.5 13.9 13.6 1838.64 1657.01 0.011495 0.0103406 0.009676 0.84 0.84 0.8305 39.9714 1552.21
19 14.1 12.8 12.7 1675.04 1546.75 0.010455 0.0096418 0.009139 0.87 0.88 0.8256 37.1439 1467.24
20 12.7 11.7 11.7 1529.94 1437.70 0.0095355 0.0089523 0.008564 0.90 0.90 0.8209 34.2823 1376.27
21 11.4 10.7 10.9 1411.52 1345.40 0.008787 0.0083698 0.008074 0.92 0.92 0.8167 31.8039 1298.43
22 10.4 9.8 10.0 1315.82 1263.06 0.0081834 0.0078511 0.007601 0.93 0.93 0.8131 29.5418 1223.33
23 9.5 9.0 9.3 1239.71 1198.63 0.0077042 0.0074458 0.007242 0.94 0.94 0.8101 27.7352 1166.12
83
Table A.36. December Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago

o o o
0 2.2 2.1 2.6 745.84 742.89 0.0046123 0.0045939 0.004571 0.99 0.99 0.7857 13.6177 739.29
1 1.6 1.6 2.1 716.78 713.93 0.0044313 0.0044136 0.004391 0.99 0.99 0.7839 12.6061 710.33
2 1.1 0.9 1.3 691.49 683.24 0.0042739 0.0042225 0.004155 0.97 0.97 0.7822 11.5119 672.44
3 0.7 0.4 0.7 669.68 659.01 0.0041382 0.0040718 0.003982 0.96 0.96 0.7807 10.6310 644.61
4 0.3 0.1 0.2 653.72 640.69 0.0040389 0.0039579 0.003846 0.95 0.95 0.7796 9.9545 622.69
5 0.2 -0.1 0.1 648.48 635.54 0.0040063 0.0039258 0.003814 0.95 0.95 0.7792 9.7626 617.54
6 0.4 0.2 0.3 659.01 645.87 0.0040718 0.0039901 0.003878 0.95 0.95 0.7799 10.1470 627.88
7 1.0 0.8 1.1 685.98 675.08 0.0042396 0.0041717 0.004082 0.96 0.96 0.7818 11.2168 660.68
8 1.9 1.9 2.4 734.10 731.18 0.0045391 0.004521 0.004499 0.99 0.99 0.7850 13.2111 727.58
9 3.4 3.4 4.0 813.47 813.47 0.0050339 0.0050339 0.005034 1.00 1.00 0.7898 16.0094 813.47
10 5.0 5.0 5.6 910.88 910.88 0.0056421 0.0056421 0.005642 1.00 1.00 0.7952 19.1618 910.88
11 6.9 6.8 7.4 1038.10 1034.14 0.0064383 0.0064135 0.006391 0.99 0.99 0.8015 22.9520 1030.53
12 8.6 8.4 8.9 1167.51 1150.05 0.0072502 0.0071406 0.00705 0.97 0.97 0.8073 26.3524 1135.60
13 9.9 9.6 10.0 1272.51 1244.35 0.0079106 0.0077334 0.007597 0.96 0.96 0.8116 29.0246 1222.67
14 10.8 10.3 10.6 1350.39 1306.08 0.0084013 0.008122 0.007917 0.94 0.94 0.8146 30.7329 1273.57
15 11.1 10.6 10.8 1380.65 1330.54 0.0085922 0.0082761 0.008048 0.94 0.94 0.8157 31.4018 1294.41
16 10.8 10.3 10.6 1350.39 1306.08 0.0084013 0.008122 0.007917 0.94 0.94 0.8146 30.7329 1273.57
17 10.0 9.7 10.1 1282.03 1253.68 0.0079705 0.0077921 0.007656 0.96 0.96 0.8120 29.2850 1232.00
18 8.8 8.6 9.1 1185.20 1167.51 0.0073614 0.0072502 0.007159 0.97 0.97 0.8081 26.8534 1153.06
19 7.4 7.3 7.9 1074.29 1070.22 0.0066652 0.0066396 0.006617 0.99 0.99 0.8032 24.0262 1066.61
20 6.0 6.0 6.6 976.40 976.40 0.0060519 0.0060519 0.006052 1.00 1.00 0.7985 21.2013 976.40
21 4.8 4.8 5.4 896.86 896.86 0.0055545 0.0055545 0.005554 1.00 1.00 0.7944 18.7174 896.86
22 3.7 3.7 4.3 832.83 832.83 0.0051547 0.0051547 0.005155 1.00 1.00 0.7909 16.6487 832.83
23 2.8 2.8 3.4 782.08 782.08 0.0048381 0.0048381 0.004838 1.00 1.00 0.7879 14.9583 782.08
APPENDIX B
AVERAGE ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR MODEL I
Table B.1. January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
3
0 0.8560 59.2874 52.2928 43.1247 0.8309 0.00352 16.1627 16.39 0
1 0.8550 58.9056 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00388 6.6128 16.04 0
2 0.8541 58.5256 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00387 6.2328 15.7 0
3 0.8534 58.3382 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00389 6.0454 15.54 0
4 0.8528 58.1511 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00391 5.8583 15.38 0
5 0.8527 58.1530 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00393 5.8602 15.39 0
6 0.8529 58.1492 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00388 5.8564 15.36 5.298
7 0.8539 58.5275 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00389 6.2347 15.71 5.417
8 0.8555 59.0963 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00388 6.8035 16.21 5.591
9 0.8580 60.0560 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00392 7.7632 17.08 5.891
10 0.8607 61.0225 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00391 8.7297 17.93 6.184
11 0.8640 62.1976 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00391 9.9048 18.97 6.54
12 0.8669 63.1863 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00388 10.8935 19.82 6.833
13 0.8690 63.9883 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00389 11.6955 20.52 7.076
14 0.8706 64.5940 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00390 12.3012 21.05 7.257
15 0.8711 64.7976 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00391 12.5048 21.23 7.319
16 0.8706 64.5940 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00390 12.3012 21.05 7.257
17 0.8694 64.1925 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00393 11.8997 20.71 0
18 0.8672 63.3887 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00391 11.0959 20.01 0
19 0.8648 62.5962 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00395 10.3034 19.33 0
20 0.8624 61.6081 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00390 9.3153 18.45 0
21 0.8604 60.8256 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00387 8.5328 17.74 0
22 0.8585 60.2492 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00393 7.9564 17.26 0
23 0.8570 59.6708 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00390 7.3780 16.73 0
84
85
Table B.2. February Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
3
0 0.8598 61.4440 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00431 18.3193 18.47 0
1 0.8588 61.0526 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00430 8.7598 18.12 0
2 0.8578 60.6629 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00428 8.3701 17.77 0
3 0.8572 60.4707 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00430 8.1779 17.6 0
4 0.8565 60.2790 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00432 7.9862 17.44 0
5 0.8563 60.0817 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00426 7.7889 17.24 0
6 0.8567 60.2770 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00429 7.9842 17.43 6.01
7 0.8577 60.6649 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00431 8.3721 17.78 6.13
8 0.8593 61.2481 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00430 8.9553 18.29 6.308
9 0.8617 62.0284 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00426 9.7356 18.96 6.539
10 0.8644 63.0173 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00425 10.7245 19.83 6.837
11 0.8677 64.2197 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00426 11.9269 20.88 7.199
12 0.8706 65.2314 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00424 12.9386 21.74 7.497
13 0.8727 66.0522 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00427 13.7594 22.46 7.743
14 0.8743 66.6722 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00428 14.3794 22.99 7.928
15 0.8748 66.8805 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00429 14.5877 23.17 7.991
16 0.8743 66.6722 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00428 14.3794 22.99 7.928
17 0.8731 66.2612 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00431 13.9684 22.65 0
18 0.8709 65.4386 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00428 13.1458 21.94 0
19 0.8685 64.6276 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00431 12.3348 21.25 0
20 0.8662 63.8240 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00435 11.5312 20.57 0
21 0.8642 63.0214 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00431 10.7286 19.85 0
22 0.8622 62.2261 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00427 9.9333 19.14 0
23 0.8608 61.8372 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00433 9.5444 18.82 0
86
Table B.3. March Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
3
0 0.8660 65.7336 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00539 22.6088 22.66 0
1 0.8650 65.3226 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00536 13.0298 22.3 0
2 0.8640 64.9135 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00534 12.6207 21.93 0
3 0.8634 64.7118 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00536 12.4190 21.76 0
4 0.8627 64.5105 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00537 12.2177 21.6 0
5 0.8626 64.5126 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00540 12.2198 21.61 0
6 0.8629 64.5084 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00535 12.2156 21.58 7.442
7 0.8639 64.9156 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00537 12.6228 21.95 7.567
8 0.8655 65.5278 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00537 13.2350 22.48 7.751
9 0.8679 66.3471 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00534 14.0543 23.17 7.99
10 0.8707 67.3856 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00535 15.0928 24.07 8.299
11 0.8740 68.6484 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00538 16.3556 25.16 8.675
12 0.8769 69.7113 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00538 17.4185 26.05 8.984
13 0.8791 70.5737 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00542 18.2809 26.79 9.24
14 0.8806 71.0000 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00535 18.7072 27.12 9.352
15 0.8811 71.2184 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00536 18.9256 27.31 9.417
16 0.8806 71.0000 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00535 18.7072 27.12 9.352
17 0.8793 70.5692 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00537 18.2764 26.77 0
18 0.8772 69.7069 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00533 17.4141 26.03 0
19 0.8747 68.8569 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00535 16.5641 25.32 0
20 0.8723 68.0148 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00537 15.7220 24.61 0
21 0.8704 67.3899 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00541 15.0971 24.09 0
22 0.8684 66.5547 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00536 14.2619 23.36 0
23 0.8670 66.1464 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00541 13.8536 23.03 0
87
Table B.4. April Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
3
0 0.8684 67.8608 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00603 24.7361 24.77 0
1 0.8675 67.6567 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00610 15.3639 24.63 0
2 0.8665 67.2369 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00607 14.9441 24.25 0
3 0.8659 67.0299 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00609 14.7371 24.08 0
4 0.8653 66.8234 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00610 14.5306 23.91 0
5 0.8650 66.6108 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00604 14.3180 23.7 0
6 0.8654 66.8212 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00608 14.5284 23.9 8.241
7 0.8664 67.2391 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00610 14.9463 24.27 8.368
8 0.8681 67.8674 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00611 15.5746 24.81 8.556
9 0.8705 68.7082 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00609 16.4154 25.52 8.8
10 0.8733 69.7740 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00611 17.4812 26.43 9.115
11 0.8765 70.8455 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00606 18.5527 27.31 9.418
12 0.8794 71.9340 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00606 19.6412 28.23 9.733
13 0.8816 72.8172 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00610 20.5244 28.98 9.993
14 0.8831 73.2538 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00604 20.9610 29.31 10.11
15 0.8836 73.4775 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00605 21.1847 29.5 10.17
16 0.8831 73.2538 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00604 20.9610 29.31 10.11
17 0.8818 72.8126 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00605 20.5198 28.95 0
18 0.8798 72.1569 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00610 19.8641 28.43 0
19 0.8773 71.2844 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00611 18.9916 27.71 0
20 0.8748 70.1966 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00603 17.9038 26.76 0
21 0.8729 69.5567 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00607 17.2639 26.23 0
22 0.8710 68.9212 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00610 16.6284 25.71 0
23 0.8695 68.2835 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00606 15.9907 25.15 0
88
Table B.5. May Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
3
0 0.8710 70.2620 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00679 27.1372 27.15 0
1 0.8700 69.8301 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00676 17.5373 26.78 0
2 0.8691 69.6216 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00683 17.3288 26.63 0
3 0.8684 69.1882 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00675 16.8954 26.22 0
4 0.8677 68.9768 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00676 16.6840 26.05 0
5 0.8676 68.9790 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00679 16.6862 26.06 0
6 0.8680 69.1949 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00683 16.9021 26.26 9.056
7 0.8689 69.4024 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00676 17.1096 26.41 9.107
8 0.8705 70.0458 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00678 17.7530 26.97 9.298
9 0.8730 70.9067 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00676 18.6139 27.68 9.546
10 0.8758 71.9983 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00679 19.7055 28.62 9.867
11 0.8790 73.0956 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00674 20.8028 29.51 10.18
12 0.8819 74.2106 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00676 21.9178 30.44 10.5
13 0.8841 75.1153 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00681 22.8225 31.21 10.76
14 0.8857 75.5625 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00674 23.2697 31.55 10.88
15 0.8862 75.7917 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00676 23.4989 31.74 10.95
16 0.8857 75.5625 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00674 23.2697 31.55 10.88
17 0.8844 75.1105 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00675 22.8177 31.18 0
18 0.8823 74.4389 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00680 22.1461 30.65 0
19 0.8799 73.5452 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00681 21.2524 29.91 0
20 0.8774 72.6598 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00681 20.3670 29.18 0
21 0.8754 71.7757 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00675 19.4829 28.41 0
22 0.8735 71.1249 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00678 18.8321 27.88 0
23 0.8721 70.6958 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00682 18.4030 27.54 0
89
Table B.6. June Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
3
0 0.8748 72.4750 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00722 29.3503 29.21 0
1 0.8739 72.2605 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00728 19.9677 29.06 0
2 0.8729 71.8193 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00725 19.5265 28.67 0
3 0.8723 71.6018 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00726 19.3090 28.5 0
4 0.8716 71.3848 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00727 19.0920 28.32 0
5 0.8715 71.3871 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00729 19.0943 28.33 0
6 0.8718 71.3825 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00724 19.0897 28.3 9.76
7 0.8728 71.8216 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00727 19.5288 28.69 9.893
8 0.8745 72.4819 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00730 20.1891 29.25 10.09
9 0.8769 73.3656 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00728 21.0728 29.99 10.34
10 0.8796 74.2529 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00723 21.9601 30.7 10.59
11 0.8828 75.3767 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00719 23.0839 31.61 10.9
12 0.8858 76.5186 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00721 24.2258 32.55 11.23
13 0.8880 77.4452 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00727 25.1524 33.34 11.5
14 0.8896 77.9033 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00721 25.6105 33.68 11.61
15 0.8901 78.1381 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00723 25.8453 33.88 11.68
16 0.8896 77.9033 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00721 25.6105 33.68 11.61
17 0.8883 77.4404 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00722 25.1476 33.31 0
18 0.8862 76.7524 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00726 24.4596 32.77 0
19 0.8837 75.8371 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00725 23.5443 32.02 0
20 0.8813 74.9304 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00726 22.6376 31.27 0
21 0.8793 74.2576 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00728 21.9648 30.73 0
22 0.8774 73.5896 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00730 21.2968 30.18 0
23 0.8759 72.9193 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00725 20.6265 29.6 0
90
Table B.7. July Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
3
0 0.8763 72.6806 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00705 29.5559 29.31 0
1 0.8752 72.2375 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00702 19.9447 28.92 0
2 0.8742 71.7964 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00698 19.5036 28.53 0
3 0.8736 71.5789 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00699 19.2861 28.36 0
4 0.8729 71.3619 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00700 19.0691 28.18 0
5 0.8728 71.3642 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00703 19.0714 28.19 0
6 0.8731 71.3596 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00698 19.0668 28.16 9.712
7 0.8741 71.7987 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00701 19.5059 28.55 9.844
8 0.8758 72.4588 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00703 20.1660 29.11 10.04
9 0.8782 73.3423 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00702 21.0495 29.85 10.29
10 0.8809 74.2294 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00696 21.9366 30.55 10.54
11 0.8841 75.3529 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00693 23.0601 31.46 10.85
12 0.8871 76.4945 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00695 24.2017 32.41 11.18
13 0.8893 77.4209 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00701 25.1281 33.19 11.45
14 0.8909 77.8789 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00695 25.5861 33.53 11.56
15 0.8914 78.1136 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00697 25.8208 33.73 11.63
16 0.8909 77.8789 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00695 25.5861 33.53 11.56
17 0.8896 77.4161 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00696 25.1233 33.16 0
18 0.8875 76.7283 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00700 24.4355 32.62 0
19 0.8850 75.8132 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00699 23.5204 31.87 0
20 0.8826 74.9067 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00699 22.6139 31.13 0
21 0.8806 74.2341 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00702 21.9413 30.58 0
22 0.8787 73.5662 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00704 21.2734 30.04 0
23 0.8772 72.8960 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00699 20.6032 29.46 0
91
Table B.8. August Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
3
0 0.8763 72.6806 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00705 29.5559 29.31 0
1 0.8752 72.2375 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00702 19.9447 28.92 0
2 0.8742 71.7964 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00698 19.5036 28.53 0
3 0.8736 71.5789 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00699 19.2861 28.36 0
4 0.8729 71.3619 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00700 19.0691 28.18 0
5 0.8728 71.3642 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00703 19.0714 28.19 0
6 0.8731 71.3596 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00698 19.0668 28.16 9.712
7 0.8741 71.7987 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00701 19.5059 28.55 9.844
8 0.8758 72.4588 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00703 20.1660 29.11 10.04
9 0.8782 73.3423 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00702 21.0495 29.85 10.29
10 0.8809 74.2294 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00696 21.9366 30.55 10.54
11 0.8841 75.3529 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00693 23.0601 31.46 10.85
12 0.8871 76.4945 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00695 24.2017 32.41 11.18
13 0.8893 77.4209 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00701 25.1281 33.19 11.45
14 0.8909 77.8789 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00695 25.5861 33.53 11.56
15 0.8914 78.1136 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00697 25.8208 33.73 11.63
16 0.8909 77.8789 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00695 25.5861 33.53 11.56
17 0.8896 77.4161 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00696 25.1233 33.16 0
18 0.8875 76.7283 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00700 24.4355 32.62 0
19 0.8850 75.8132 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00699 23.5204 31.87 0
20 0.8826 74.9067 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00699 22.6139 31.13 0
21 0.8806 74.2341 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00702 21.9413 30.58 0
22 0.8787 73.5662 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00704 21.2734 30.04 0
23 0.8772 72.8960 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00699 20.6032 29.46 0
92
Table B.9. September Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
3
0 0.8723 70.2394 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00653 27.1147 27.02 0
1 0.8713 69.8076 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00650 17.5148 26.64 0
2 0.8704 69.5992 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00657 17.3064 26.49 0
3 0.8697 69.1660 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00648 16.8732 26.09 0
4 0.8690 68.9545 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00650 16.6617 25.91 0
5 0.8689 68.9568 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00652 16.6640 25.92 0
6 0.8693 69.1726 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00656 16.8798 26.13 9.009
7 0.8702 69.3801 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00650 17.0873 26.27 9.06
8 0.8718 70.0233 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00652 17.7305 26.83 9.251
9 0.8743 70.8840 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00650 18.5912 27.55 9.499
10 0.8771 71.9753 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00653 19.6825 28.48 9.819
11 0.8803 73.0724 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00648 20.7796 29.37 10.13
12 0.8832 74.1871 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00650 21.8943 30.3 10.45
13 0.8854 75.0916 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00655 22.7988 31.07 10.71
14 0.8870 75.5387 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00648 23.2459 31.4 10.83
15 0.8875 75.7678 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00650 23.4750 31.6 10.9
16 0.8870 75.5387 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00648 23.2459 31.4 10.83
17 0.8857 75.0868 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00650 22.7940 31.04 0
18 0.8836 74.4153 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00654 22.1225 30.51 0
19 0.8812 73.5218 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00655 21.2290 29.77 0
20 0.8787 72.6367 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00655 20.3439 29.04 0
21 0.8767 71.7528 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00649 19.4600 28.27 0
22 0.8748 71.1022 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00651 18.8094 27.74 0
23 0.8734 70.6732 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00656 18.3804 27.4 0
93
Table B.10. October Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
3
0 0.8684 67.8608 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00603 24.7361 24.77 0
1 0.8675 67.6567 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00610 15.3639 24.63 0
2 0.8665 67.2369 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00607 14.9441 24.25 0
3 0.8659 67.0299 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00609 14.7371 24.08 0
4 0.8653 66.8234 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00610 14.5306 23.91 0
5 0.8650 66.6108 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00604 14.3180 23.7 0
6 0.8654 66.8212 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00608 14.5284 23.9 8.241
7 0.8664 67.2391 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00610 14.9463 24.27 8.368
8 0.8681 67.8674 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00611 15.5746 24.81 8.556
9 0.8705 68.7082 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00609 16.4154 25.52 8.8
10 0.8733 69.7740 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00611 17.4812 26.43 9.115
11 0.8765 70.8455 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00606 18.5527 27.31 9.418
12 0.8794 71.9340 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00606 19.6412 28.23 9.733
13 0.8816 72.8172 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00610 20.5244 28.98 9.993
14 0.8831 73.2538 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00604 20.9610 29.31 10.11
15 0.8836 73.4775 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00605 21.1847 29.5 10.17
16 0.8831 73.2538 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00604 20.9610 29.31 10.11
17 0.8818 72.8126 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00605 20.5198 28.95 0
18 0.8798 72.1569 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00610 19.8641 28.43 0
19 0.8773 71.2844 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00611 18.9916 27.71 0
20 0.8748 70.1966 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00603 17.9038 26.76 0
21 0.8729 69.5567 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00607 17.2639 26.23 0
22 0.8710 68.9212 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00610 16.6284 25.71 0
23 0.8695 68.2835 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00606 15.9907 25.15 0
94
Table B.11. November Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
3
0 0.8634 65.7763 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00591 22.6516 22.92 0
1 0.8624 65.3651 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00589 13.0723 22.56 0
2 0.8614 64.9558 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00587 12.6630 22.19 0
3 0.8608 64.7540 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00588 12.4612 22.02 0
4 0.8601 64.5526 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00590 12.2598 21.85 0
5 0.8600 64.5547 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00593 12.2619 21.87 0
6 0.8603 64.5505 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00587 12.2577 21.84 7.532
7 0.8613 64.9579 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00589 12.6651 22.21 7.657
8 0.8629 65.5705 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00590 13.2777 22.74 7.842
9 0.8653 66.3901 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00587 14.0973 23.44 8.081
10 0.8681 67.4291 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00588 15.1363 24.33 8.391
11 0.8714 68.6927 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00591 16.3999 25.43 8.767
12 0.8743 69.7561 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00590 17.4633 26.32 9.077
13 0.8765 70.6189 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00594 18.3261 27.07 9.334
14 0.8780 71.0454 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00586 18.7526 27.39 9.446
15 0.8785 71.2639 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00588 18.9711 27.58 9.511
16 0.8780 71.0454 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00586 18.7526 27.39 9.446
17 0.8767 70.6144 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00588 18.3216 27.04 0
18 0.8746 69.7516 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00585 17.4588 26.3 0
19 0.8721 68.9013 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00587 16.6085 25.59 0
20 0.8697 68.0587 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00589 15.7659 24.88 0
21 0.8678 67.4335 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00593 15.1407 24.36 0
22 0.8658 66.5978 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00588 14.3050 23.62 0
23 0.8644 66.1893 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00593 13.8965 23.29 0
95
Table B.12. December Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Miami
3
0 0.8585 61.4642 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00458 18.3395 18.59 0
1 0.8575 61.0726 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00456 8.7798 18.24 0
2 0.8565 60.6829 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00454 8.3901 17.89 0
3 0.8559 60.4906 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00456 8.1978 17.73 0
4 0.8552 60.2988 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00458 8.0060 17.56 0
5 0.8550 60.1015 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00452 7.8087 17.36 0
6 0.8554 60.2968 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00456 8.0040 17.55 6.052
7 0.8564 60.6848 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00457 8.3920 17.9 6.173
8 0.8580 61.2682 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00457 8.9754 18.42 6.351
9 0.8604 62.0487 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00452 9.7559 19.09 6.582
10 0.8631 63.0379 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00452 10.7451 19.95 6.88
11 0.8664 64.2406 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00452 11.9478 21 7.243
12 0.8693 65.2526 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00450 12.9598 21.87 7.541
13 0.8714 66.0736 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00453 13.7808 22.58 7.788
14 0.8730 66.6937 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00454 14.4009 23.12 7.973
15 0.8736 66.9021 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00455 14.6093 23.3 8.036
16 0.8730 66.6937 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00454 14.4009 23.12 7.973
17 0.8718 66.2827 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00456 13.9899 22.78 0
18 0.8696 65.4598 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00454 13.1670 22.06 0
19 0.8672 64.6486 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00457 12.3558 21.38 0
20 0.8649 63.8448 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00461 11.5520 20.69 0
21 0.8629 63.0420 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00457 10.7492 19.98 0
22 0.8609 62.2465 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00453 9.9537 19.26 0
23 0.8595 61.8575 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00459 9.5647 18.95 0
96
Table B.13. January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville
3
0 0.8339 43.0915 52.2928 43.1247 0.8309 0.00000 -0.0332 0 0
1 0.8322 42.3080 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -0.8167 0 0
2 0.8307 41.6885 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -1.4362 0 0
3 0.8294 41.2289 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -1.8958 0 0
4 0.8285 40.7681 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -2.3566 0 0
5 0.8282 40.6156 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -2.5091 0 0
6 0.8289 40.9209 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -2.2038 0 0
7 0.8304 41.5340 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -1.5907 0 0
8 0.8332 42.7771 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -0.3476 0 0
9 0.8373 44.5199 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 1.3952 1.202 0.414
10 0.8420 46.6332 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 3.5085 3.287 1.134
11 0.8474 48.9730 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 5.8482 5.56 1.917
12 0.8524 51.0313 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00016 7.9066 7.52 2.593
13 0.8562 52.7935 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00038 9.6688 9.212 3.177
14 0.8588 53.8665 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00048 10.7418 10.22 3.524
15 0.8597 54.2255 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00049 11.1008 10.55 3.637
16 0.8588 53.8665 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00048 10.7418 10.22 3.524
17 0.8565 52.7900 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00033 9.6653 9.191 0
18 0.8531 51.3814 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00021 8.2567 7.861 0
19 0.8490 49.6548 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00008 6.5301 6.22 0
20 0.8449 47.7927 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 4.6680 4.408 0
21 0.8415 46.3022 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 3.1775 2.951 0
22 0.8383 45.0031 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 1.8784 1.684 0
23 0.8358 43.8819 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 0.7572 0.572 0
97
Table B.14. February Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville
3
0 0.8381 46.1736 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00027 3.0489 3.013 0
1 0.8365 45.5229 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00024 2.3982 2.381 0
2 0.8350 44.8762 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00017 1.7515 1.743 0
3 0.8337 44.3967 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00016 1.2720 1.278 0
4 0.8328 43.9157 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00008 0.7910 0.788 0
5 0.8324 43.7565 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00005 0.6318 0.628 0
6 0.8331 44.0752 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00010 0.9505 0.948 0.327
7 0.8346 44.7150 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00015 1.5903 1.581 0.545
8 0.8375 46.0127 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00030 2.8880 2.869 0.989
9 0.8416 47.8326 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00050 4.7079 4.658 1.606
10 0.8463 49.8648 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00070 6.7401 6.626 2.285
11 0.8517 52.1242 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00089 8.9995 8.779 3.027
12 0.8569 54.4525 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00115 11.3278 11 3.792
13 0.8606 56.1020 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00132 12.9773 12.55 4.326
14 0.8632 57.2196 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00143 14.0949 13.59 4.685
15 0.8641 57.5936 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00144 14.4688 13.92 4.801
16 0.8632 57.2196 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00143 14.0949 13.59 4.685
17 0.8610 56.2881 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00135 13.1634 12.72 0
18 0.8575 54.6313 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00113 11.5066 11.15 0
19 0.8533 52.8339 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00097 9.7092 9.46 0
20 0.8492 51.0739 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00080 7.9491 7.783 0
21 0.8458 49.5197 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00062 6.3950 6.278 0
22 0.8426 48.1655 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00050 5.0408 4.97 0
23 0.8400 46.9971 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00036 3.8724 3.822 0
98
Table B.15. March Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville
3
0 0.8487 54.3787 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00267 11.2540 11.49 0
1 0.8470 53.6568 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00261 10.5321 10.81 0
2 0.8455 52.9395 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00253 9.8148 10.12 0
3 0.8442 52.4079 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00250 9.2832 9.614 0
4 0.8433 52.0548 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00247 8.9301 9.277 0
5 0.8430 51.8780 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00244 8.7533 9.104 0
6 0.8437 52.2320 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00249 9.1073 9.451 3.259
7 0.8451 52.7608 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00250 9.6361 9.941 3.428
8 0.8480 54.0152 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00262 10.8905 11.14 3.84
9 0.8521 55.8418 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00280 12.7171 12.87 4.438
10 0.8569 57.8956 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00299 14.7709 14.79 5.1
11 0.8623 60.1918 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00317 17.0671 16.91 5.829
12 0.8673 62.3508 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00335 19.2261 18.87 6.507
13 0.8712 64.1633 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00357 21.0386 20.53 7.081
14 0.8737 65.1807 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00363 22.0560 21.43 7.391
15 0.8747 65.5909 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00365 22.4662 21.8 7.516
16 0.8737 65.1807 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00363 22.0560 21.43 7.391
17 0.8714 64.1591 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00352 21.0344 20.51 0
18 0.8681 62.7522 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00342 19.6275 19.25 0
19 0.8639 60.9745 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00328 17.8498 17.64 0
20 0.8598 59.2308 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00314 16.1061 16.04 0
21 0.8564 57.7076 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00298 14.5829 14.62 0
22 0.8531 56.2098 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00281 13.0850 13.21 0
23 0.8505 55.1052 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00271 11.9805 12.17 0
99
Table B.16. April Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville
3
0 0.8487 54.3787 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00267 11.2540 11.49 0
1 0.8470 53.6568 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00261 10.5321 10.81 0
2 0.8455 52.9395 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00253 9.8148 10.12 0
3 0.8442 52.4079 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00250 9.2832 9.614 0
4 0.8433 52.0548 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00247 8.9301 9.277 0
5 0.8430 51.8780 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00244 8.7533 9.104 0
6 0.8437 52.2320 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00249 9.1073 9.451 3.259
7 0.8451 52.7608 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00250 9.6361 9.941 3.428
8 0.8480 54.0152 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00262 10.8905 11.14 3.84
9 0.8521 55.8418 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00280 12.7171 12.87 4.438
10 0.8569 57.8956 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00299 14.7709 14.79 5.1
11 0.8623 60.1918 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00317 17.0671 16.91 5.829
12 0.8673 62.3508 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00335 19.2261 18.87 6.507
13 0.8712 64.1633 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00357 21.0386 20.53 7.081
14 0.8737 65.1807 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00363 22.0560 21.43 7.391
15 0.8747 65.5909 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00365 22.4662 21.8 7.516
16 0.8737 65.1807 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00363 22.0560 21.43 7.391
17 0.8714 64.1591 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00352 21.0344 20.51 0
18 0.8681 62.7522 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00342 19.6275 19.25 0
19 0.8639 60.9745 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00328 17.8498 17.64 0
20 0.8598 59.2308 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00314 16.1061 16.04 0
21 0.8564 57.7076 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00298 14.5829 14.62 0
22 0.8531 56.2098 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00281 13.0850 13.21 0
23 0.8505 55.1052 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00271 11.9805 12.17 0
100
Table B.17. May Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville
3
0 0.8629 64.2971 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00523 21.1724 21.35 0
1 0.8614 63.9010 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00531 20.7763 21.04 0
2 0.8599 63.2978 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00529 20.1731 20.5 0
3 0.8586 62.9021 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00532 19.7774 20.17 0
4 0.8577 62.5019 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00528 19.3772 19.8 0
5 0.8574 62.3016 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00524 19.1768 19.6 0
6 0.8580 62.4979 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00522 19.3731 19.77 6.817
7 0.8595 63.0956 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00525 19.9709 20.31 7.003
8 0.8622 64.0968 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00525 20.9721 21.18 7.304
9 0.8661 65.5172 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00524 22.3925 22.41 7.729
10 0.8707 67.1674 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00524 24.0426 23.83 8.217
11 0.8759 69.0593 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00523 25.9346 25.44 8.771
12 0.8807 70.7708 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00520 27.6461 26.86 9.263
13 0.8844 72.3044 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00530 29.1797 28.18 9.718
14 0.8869 73.1865 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00529 30.0618 28.91 9.968
15 0.8878 73.4030 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00523 30.2783 29.06 10.02
16 0.8869 73.1865 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00529 30.0618 28.91 9.968
17 0.8847 72.2998 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00524 29.1751 28.15 0
18 0.8814 70.9864 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00519 27.8617 27.04 0
19 0.8774 69.7024 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00528 26.5777 26 0
20 0.8735 68.2153 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00525 25.0906 24.73 0
21 0.8702 66.9583 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00522 23.8336 23.65 0
22 0.8671 65.9290 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00527 22.8043 22.78 0
23 0.8647 65.1136 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00530 21.9889 22.09 0
101
Table B.18. June Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville
3
0 0.8690 68.9545 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00650 25.8298 25.91 0
1 0.8675 68.5376 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00657 25.4129 25.59 0
2 0.8660 67.9025 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00654 24.7778 25.03 0
3 0.8647 67.4859 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00656 24.3612 24.68 0
4 0.8638 67.0647 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00651 23.9399 24.3 0
5 0.8636 67.0690 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00656 23.9443 24.32 0
6 0.8642 67.2761 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00655 24.1514 24.5 8.447
7 0.8656 67.6895 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00650 24.5648 24.83 8.561
8 0.8684 68.7436 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00651 25.6189 25.74 8.875
9 0.8723 70.2394 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00653 27.1147 27.02 9.316
10 0.8768 71.7505 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00646 28.6258 28.26 9.743
11 0.8821 73.7392 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00649 30.6145 29.92 10.32
12 0.8870 75.5387 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00648 32.4140 31.4 10.83
13 0.8906 76.9120 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00650 33.7872 32.53 11.22
14 0.8931 77.8375 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00651 34.7128 33.29 11.48
15 0.8940 78.0648 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00646 34.9401 33.44 11.53
16 0.8931 77.8375 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00651 34.7128 33.29 11.48
17 0.8908 76.9071 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00645 33.7824 32.5 0
18 0.8876 75.7654 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00648 32.6407 31.59 0
19 0.8836 74.4153 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00654 31.2906 30.51 0
20 0.8796 72.8520 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00649 29.7273 29.19 0
21 0.8763 71.5309 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00644 28.4062 28.06 0
22 0.8732 70.4493 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00647 27.3246 27.17 0
23 0.8708 69.5925 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00649 26.4678 26.45 0
102
Table B.19. July Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville
3
0 0.8703 68.9323 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00623 25.8076 25.77 0
1 0.8688 68.5155 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00631 25.3907 25.45 0
2 0.8673 67.8805 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00627 24.7558 24.89 0
3 0.8660 67.4640 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00630 24.3393 24.55 0
4 0.8651 67.0429 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00625 23.9182 24.16 0
5 0.8649 67.0473 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00630 23.9226 24.19 0
6 0.8655 67.2543 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00629 24.1296 24.36 8.401
7 0.8669 67.6677 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00623 24.5430 24.69 8.515
8 0.8697 68.7214 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00625 25.5967 25.6 8.828
9 0.8736 70.2169 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00627 27.0922 26.88 9.269
10 0.8781 71.7276 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00620 28.6029 28.12 9.696
11 0.8834 73.7158 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00623 30.5911 29.78 10.27
12 0.8883 75.5149 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00623 32.3902 31.26 10.78
13 0.8919 76.8878 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00625 33.7631 32.39 11.17
14 0.8943 77.8132 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00626 34.6885 33.14 11.43
15 0.8952 78.0404 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00620 34.9157 33.3 11.48
16 0.8943 77.8132 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00626 34.6885 33.14 11.43
17 0.8921 76.8830 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00620 33.7583 32.36 0
18 0.8889 75.7416 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00622 32.6169 31.44 0
19 0.8849 74.3918 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00628 31.2671 30.37 0
20 0.8809 72.8288 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00623 29.7041 29.05 0
21 0.8776 71.5080 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00618 28.3833 27.93 0
22 0.8745 70.4267 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00621 27.3020 27.03 0
23 0.8721 69.5701 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00622 26.4454 26.31 0
103
Table B.20. August Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville
3
0 0.8703 68.9323 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00623 25.8076 25.77 0
1 0.8688 68.5155 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00631 25.3907 25.45 0
2 0.8673 67.8805 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00627 24.7558 24.89 0
3 0.8660 67.4640 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00630 24.3393 24.55 0
4 0.8651 67.0429 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00625 23.9182 24.16 0
5 0.8649 67.0473 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00630 23.9226 24.19 0
6 0.8655 67.2543 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00629 24.1296 24.36 8.401
7 0.8669 67.6677 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00623 24.5430 24.69 8.515
8 0.8697 68.7214 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00625 25.5967 25.6 8.828
9 0.8736 70.2169 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00627 27.0922 26.88 9.269
10 0.8781 71.7276 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00620 28.6029 28.12 9.696
11 0.8834 73.7158 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00623 30.5911 29.78 10.27
12 0.8883 75.5149 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00623 32.3902 31.26 10.78
13 0.8919 76.8878 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00625 33.7631 32.39 11.17
14 0.8943 77.8132 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00626 34.6885 33.14 11.43
15 0.8952 78.0404 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00620 34.9157 33.3 11.48
16 0.8943 77.8132 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00626 34.6885 33.14 11.43
17 0.8921 76.8830 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00620 33.7583 32.36 0
18 0.8889 75.7416 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00622 32.6169 31.44 0
19 0.8849 74.3918 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00628 31.2671 30.37 0
20 0.8809 72.8288 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00623 29.7041 29.05 0
21 0.8776 71.5080 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00618 28.3833 27.93 0
22 0.8745 70.4267 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00621 27.3020 27.03 0
23 0.8721 69.5701 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00622 26.4454 26.31 0
104
Table B.21. September Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville
3
0 0.8665 66.5871 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00575 23.4623 23.55 0
1 0.8648 65.9676 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00574 22.8429 23.02 0
2 0.8634 65.5619 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00579 22.4372 22.69 0
3 0.8621 65.1560 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00583 22.0313 22.35 0
4 0.8613 64.7455 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00578 21.6208 21.97 0
5 0.8609 64.5399 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00574 21.4152 21.78 0
6 0.8616 64.9516 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00581 21.8269 22.17 7.644
7 0.8630 65.3545 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00576 22.2298 22.49 7.756
8 0.8658 66.3815 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00576 23.2568 23.38 8.063
9 0.8697 67.8389 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00577 24.7142 24.64 8.496
10 0.8743 69.5321 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00578 26.4074 26.08 8.994
11 0.8795 71.4738 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00579 28.3491 27.72 9.558
12 0.8844 73.2306 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00578 30.1059 29.17 10.06
13 0.8880 74.5710 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00579 31.4463 30.28 10.44
14 0.8905 75.4745 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00579 32.3498 31.02 10.7
15 0.8914 75.6963 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00574 32.5716 31.17 10.75
16 0.8905 75.4745 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00579 32.3498 31.02 10.7
17 0.8883 74.5663 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00574 31.4416 30.25 0
18 0.8851 73.4519 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00577 30.3272 29.35 0
19 0.8810 71.9065 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00575 28.7818 28.06 0
20 0.8771 70.6076 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00581 27.4829 27 0
21 0.8738 69.3177 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00577 26.1930 25.89 0
22 0.8708 68.2615 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00580 25.1368 25.01 0
23 0.8682 67.2086 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00573 24.0839 24.08 0
105
Table B.22. October Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville
3
0 0.8591 62.0690 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00478 18.9443 19.21 0
1 0.8574 61.4803 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00479 18.3556 18.69 0
2 0.8561 61.0947 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00485 17.9700 18.38 0
3 0.8547 60.5085 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00480 17.3838 17.84 0
4 0.8539 60.3187 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00485 17.1939 17.69 0
5 0.8536 60.1232 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00481 16.9985 17.5 0
6 0.8542 60.3147 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00479 17.1900 17.66 6.09
7 0.8557 60.8975 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00481 17.7728 18.19 6.272
8 0.8584 61.8737 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00480 18.7490 19.05 6.568
9 0.8623 63.2585 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00479 20.1338 20.26 6.985
10 0.8670 65.0776 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00485 21.9529 21.87 7.541
11 0.8721 66.9259 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00483 23.8012 23.45 8.086
12 0.8769 68.5977 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00479 25.4730 24.85 8.569
13 0.8805 69.8730 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00478 26.7483 25.92 8.938
14 0.8830 70.9569 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00486 27.8322 26.86 9.263
15 0.8839 71.1684 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00480 28.0437 27.01 9.314
16 0.8830 70.9569 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00486 27.8322 26.86 9.263
17 0.8809 70.0910 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00482 26.9663 26.12 0
18 0.8776 68.8083 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00478 25.6836 25.02 0
19 0.8735 67.3377 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00478 24.2130 23.78 0
20 0.8696 65.8884 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00477 22.7637 22.53 0
21 0.8665 64.8734 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00484 21.7487 21.69 0
22 0.8633 63.6600 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00481 20.5353 20.62 0
23 0.8609 62.8650 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00485 19.7403 19.94 0
106
Table B.23. November Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville
3
0 0.8466 52.7414 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00221 9.6167 9.82 0
1 0.8449 52.0340 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00215 8.9092 9.146 0
2 0.8433 51.3309 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00207 8.2062 8.466 0
3 0.8420 50.8098 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00205 7.6851 7.972 0
4 0.8411 50.2871 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00194 7.1624 7.448 0
5 0.8407 50.1141 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00192 6.9894 7.277 0
6 0.8414 50.4604 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00197 7.3357 7.619 2.627
7 0.8430 51.1557 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00205 8.0310 8.294 2.86
8 0.8459 52.5666 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00223 9.4419 9.667 3.334
9 0.8501 54.5466 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00249 11.4219 11.58 3.992
10 0.8549 56.7592 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00275 13.6345 13.68 4.717
11 0.8604 59.2210 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00301 16.0963 15.98 5.51
12 0.8657 61.7603 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00334 18.6356 18.35 6.329
13 0.8695 63.5605 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00356 20.4358 20.01 6.9
14 0.8722 64.7808 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00371 21.6560 21.12 7.284
15 0.8732 65.1892 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00373 22.0645 21.49 7.409
16 0.8722 64.7808 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00371 21.6560 21.12 7.284
17 0.8699 63.7637 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00360 20.6390 20.2 0
18 0.8663 61.9554 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00333 18.8307 18.52 0
19 0.8620 59.9948 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00311 16.8701 16.71 0
20 0.8579 58.0763 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00289 14.9516 14.91 0
21 0.8544 56.3832 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00266 13.2584 13.31 0
22 0.8511 54.9088 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00250 11.7841 11.91 0
23 0.8485 53.6372 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00232 10.5125 10.68 0
107
Table B.24. December Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Gainesville
3
0 0.8362 45.0272 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00001 1.9025 1.837 0
1 0.8345 44.2232 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 1.0985 1.033 0
2 0.8329 43.4261 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 0.3014 0.225 0
3 0.8315 42.7957 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -0.3290 0 0
4 0.8306 42.3250 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -0.7997 0 0
5 0.8303 42.1692 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -0.9555 0 0
6 0.8310 42.4811 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -0.6436 0 0
7 0.8326 43.2680 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 0.1433 0.066 0.023
8 0.8355 44.7046 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 1.5799 1.514 0.522
9 0.8398 46.8298 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00031 3.7051 3.648 1.258
10 0.8447 49.1827 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00065 6.0580 5.973 2.06
11 0.8502 51.7812 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00098 8.6565 8.499 2.931
12 0.8555 54.2849 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00133 11.1602 10.91 3.762
13 0.8594 56.3105 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00166 13.1858 12.86 4.435
14 0.8620 57.4310 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00177 14.3062 13.9 4.795
15 0.8630 57.9997 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00186 14.8750 14.45 4.982
16 0.8620 57.4310 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00177 14.3062 13.9 4.795
17 0.8598 56.4971 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00169 13.3724 13.04 0
18 0.8562 54.6495 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00138 11.5247 11.26 0
19 0.8519 52.6695 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00115 9.5448 9.373 0
20 0.8476 50.5580 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00082 7.4333 7.314 0
21 0.8441 48.8405 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00057 5.7158 5.627 0
22 0.8407 47.1584 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00031 4.0337 3.957 0
23 0.8382 46.0050 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00017 2.8803 2.82 0
108
Table B.25. January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago
3
0 0.7750 7.7819 52.2928 43.1247 0.8309 0.00000 -35.3428 0 0
1 0.7732 6.7692 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -36.3555 0 0
2 0.7715 5.8627 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -37.2620 0 0
3 0.7701 5.0580 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -38.0667 0 0
4 0.7690 4.4393 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -38.6854 0 0
5 0.7687 4.2636 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -38.8611 0 0
6 0.7694 4.7036 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -38.4211 0 0
7 0.7712 5.6830 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -37.4418 0 0
8 0.7743 7.4117 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -35.7130 0 0
9 0.7789 9.8585 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -33.2662 0 0
10 0.7841 12.8073 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -30.3174 0 0
11 0.7903 16.3282 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -26.7965 0 0
12 0.7961 19.7218 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -23.4029 0 0
13 0.8003 22.1281 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -20.9966 0 0
14 0.8032 23.7839 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -19.3408 0 0
15 0.8043 24.3855 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -18.7392 0 0
16 0.8032 23.7839 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -19.3408 0 0
17 0.8007 22.3622 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -20.7625 0 0
18 0.7968 20.0596 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -23.0651 0 0
19 0.7920 17.2946 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -25.8301 0 0
20 0.7874 14.6464 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -28.4783 0 0
21 0.7834 12.4059 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -30.7188 0 0
22 0.7800 10.5341 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -32.5906 0 0
23 0.7771 8.9060 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -34.2187 0 0
109
Table B.26. February Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago
3
0 0.7821 11.6108 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -31.5139 0 0
1 0.7803 10.5340 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -32.5907 0 0
2 0.7786 9.4758 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -33.6489 0 0
3 0.7771 8.7174 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -34.4073 0 0
4 0.7760 8.0614 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -35.0633 0 0
5 0.7757 7.8753 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -35.2494 0 0
6 0.7764 8.2482 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -34.8765 0 0
7 0.7782 9.2853 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -33.8394 0 0
8 0.7814 11.2171 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -31.9076 0 0
9 0.7861 13.9247 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -29.2000 0 0
10 0.7914 16.9708 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -26.1539 0 0
11 0.7978 20.7424 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -22.3823 0 0
12 0.8037 24.3891 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -18.7356 0 0
13 0.8080 26.9809 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -16.1438 0 0
14 0.8110 28.7670 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -14.3577 0 0
15 0.8121 29.4165 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -13.7082 0 0
16 0.8110 28.7670 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -14.3577 0 0
17 0.8084 27.2333 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -15.8914 0 0
18 0.8044 24.8751 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -18.2496 0 0
19 0.7995 21.7797 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -21.3450 0 0
20 0.7948 18.9392 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -24.1855 0 0
21 0.7907 16.5416 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -26.5831 0 0
22 0.7872 14.5428 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -28.5820 0 0
23 0.7843 12.9080 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -30.2167 0 0
110
Table B.27. March Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago
3
0 0.8043 24.6302 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -18.4945 0 0
1 0.8023 23.3067 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -19.8180 0 0
2 0.8006 22.1269 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -20.9978 0 0
3 0.7991 21.1991 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -21.9256 0 0
4 0.7979 20.3977 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -22.7270 0 0
5 0.7975 20.1707 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -22.9540 0 0
6 0.7982 20.6254 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -22.4993 0 0
7 0.8002 21.8937 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -21.2310 0 0
8 0.8035 24.0248 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -19.0999 0 0
9 0.8085 27.2325 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -15.8922 0 0
10 0.8142 30.8712 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -12.2535 0 0
11 0.8208 35.1417 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -7.9830 0 0
12 0.8269 39.0868 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -4.0379 0 0
13 0.8314 41.9983 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -1.1264 0 0
14 0.8345 43.8966 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 0.7719 0.665 0.229
15 0.8357 44.7031 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 1.5784 1.505 0.519
16 0.8345 43.8966 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 0.7719 0.665 0.229
17 0.8318 42.3123 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -0.8125 0 0
18 0.8276 39.5383 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -3.5864 0 0
19 0.8226 36.2880 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -6.8368 0 0
20 0.8177 33.1807 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -9.9440 0 0
21 0.8134 30.4726 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -12.6521 0 0
22 0.8097 27.9957 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -15.1290 0 0
23 0.8066 25.9799 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -17.1448 0 0
111
Table B.28. April Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago
3
0 0.8232 35.9899 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -7.1349 0 0
1 0.8214 35.1360 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -7.9887 0 0
2 0.8198 34.1498 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -8.9750 0 0
3 0.8183 33.3158 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -9.8089 0 0
4 0.8172 32.7661 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -10.3586 0 0
5 0.8169 32.6299 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -10.4948 0 0
6 0.8176 33.0415 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -10.0832 0 0
7 0.8194 34.0108 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -9.1139 0 0
8 0.8224 35.5604 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -7.5643 0 0
9 0.8271 38.0250 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -5.0997 0 0
10 0.8324 40.8841 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -2.2406 0 0
11 0.8384 44.0148 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 0.8901 0.563 0.194
12 0.8441 47.1174 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 3.9927 3.7 1.276
13 0.8483 49.3123 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00003 6.1876 5.885 2.029
14 0.8512 50.8688 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00031 7.7441 7.423 2.56
15 0.8522 51.3933 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00039 8.2686 7.934 2.736
16 0.8512 50.8688 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00031 7.7441 7.423 2.56
17 0.8486 49.4834 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00005 6.3587 6.052 0
18 0.8448 47.4503 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 4.3256 4.029 0
19 0.8401 44.9821 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 1.8573 1.551 0
20 0.8356 42.5905 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -0.5342 0 0
21 0.8316 40.4243 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -2.7004 0 0
22 0.8282 38.6177 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -4.5070 0 0
23 0.8254 37.1463 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -5.9784 0 0
112
Table B.29. May Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago
3
0 0.8416 48.8716 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00106 5.7468 5.822 0
1 0.8399 48.0262 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00094 4.9015 4.986 0
2 0.8384 47.3581 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00087 4.2334 4.332 0
3 0.8371 46.8627 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00086 3.7380 3.857 0
4 0.8360 46.3674 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00079 3.2427 3.363 0
5 0.8357 46.2030 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00077 3.0783 3.199 0
6 0.8364 46.5321 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00081 3.4074 3.528 1.216
7 0.8380 47.1916 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00085 4.0669 4.167 1.437
8 0.8409 48.5323 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00101 5.4076 5.487 1.892
9 0.8453 50.4098 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00119 7.2851 7.301 2.518
10 0.8502 52.5088 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00138 9.3841 9.308 3.21
11 0.8560 55.0284 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00162 11.9037 11.69 4.032
12 0.8613 57.4404 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00189 14.3157 13.96 4.814
13 0.8652 59.1490 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00206 16.0243 15.54 5.359
14 0.8679 60.3062 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00216 17.1815 16.6 5.724
15 0.8689 60.6941 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00217 17.5694 16.95 5.843
16 0.8679 60.3062 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00216 17.1815 16.6 5.724
17 0.8656 59.3421 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00209 16.2174 15.73 0
18 0.8619 57.6258 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00187 14.5011 14.12 0
19 0.8576 55.7641 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00172 12.6394 12.39 0
20 0.8533 53.9416 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00155 10.8169 10.68 0
21 0.8496 52.3346 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00140 9.2099 9.156 0
22 0.8463 50.7539 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00119 7.6292 7.621 0
23 0.8437 49.7228 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00114 6.5981 6.644 0
113
Table B.30. June Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago
3
0 0.8554 57.5277 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00308 14.4030 14.5 0
1 0.8538 56.9695 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00309 13.8448 14 0
2 0.8523 56.4130 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00308 13.2883 13.49 0
3 0.8509 55.8584 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00304 12.7337 12.97 0
4 0.8500 55.4920 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00303 12.3673 12.64 0
5 0.8497 55.4957 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00308 12.3710 12.66 0
6 0.8503 55.6769 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00306 12.5522 12.82 4.42
7 0.8519 56.2265 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00305 13.1018 13.31 4.59
8 0.8547 57.3425 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00310 14.2178 14.34 4.944
9 0.8588 58.6515 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00301 15.5268 15.48 5.336
10 0.8635 60.3735 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00303 17.2488 17.01 5.864
11 0.8690 62.3244 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00301 19.1997 18.71 6.452
12 0.8740 64.1175 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00301 20.9928 20.26 6.986
13 0.8778 65.5401 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00304 22.4153 21.49 7.411
14 0.8803 66.3571 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00299 23.2324 22.17 7.644
15 0.8813 66.7728 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00302 23.6481 22.53 7.769
16 0.8803 66.3571 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00299 23.2324 22.17 7.644
17 0.8781 65.7479 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00308 22.6232 21.69 0
18 0.8746 64.3178 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00299 21.1931 20.43 0
19 0.8705 62.9208 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00304 19.7961 19.24 0
20 0.8664 61.3414 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00299 18.2167 17.84 0
21 0.8629 60.1820 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00304 17.0573 16.85 0
22 0.8598 59.0321 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00303 15.9074 15.82 0
23 0.8572 58.0859 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00302 14.9611 14.97 0
114
Table B.31. July Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago
3
0 0.8616 61.8251 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00417 18.7003 18.75 0
1 0.8599 61.2380 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00417 18.1133 18.23 0
2 0.8584 60.6529 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00415 17.5282 17.7 0
3 0.8572 60.2690 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00419 17.1443 17.38 0
4 0.8562 59.8829 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00417 16.7582 17.03 0
5 0.8558 59.6885 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00414 16.5638 16.84 0
6 0.8565 59.8789 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00412 16.7542 17.01 5.864
7 0.8581 60.4568 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00412 17.3321 17.52 6.04
8 0.8609 61.6303 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00419 18.5056 18.58 6.408
9 0.8651 63.0070 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00412 19.8823 19.76 6.815
10 0.8698 64.8186 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00417 21.6939 21.35 7.363
11 0.8752 66.6571 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00410 23.5324 22.9 7.897
12 0.8803 68.5404 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00413 25.4157 24.51 8.451
13 0.8840 69.8127 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00409 26.6880 25.56 8.813
14 0.8867 70.8936 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00415 27.7689 26.49 9.133
15 0.8876 71.1050 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00409 27.9803 26.63 9.184
16 0.8867 70.8936 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00415 27.7689 26.49 9.133
17 0.8844 70.0306 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00413 26.9059 25.76 0
18 0.8809 68.7509 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00411 25.6262 24.68 0
19 0.8768 67.2834 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00414 24.1587 23.45 0
20 0.8727 65.8372 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00415 22.7125 22.22 0
21 0.8691 64.4077 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00409 21.2830 20.97 0
22 0.8661 63.4073 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00415 20.2826 20.12 0
23 0.8634 62.4120 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00412 19.2873 19.24 0
115
Table B.32. August Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago
3
0 0.8616 61.8251 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00417 18.7003 18.75 0
1 0.8599 61.2380 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00417 18.1133 18.23 0
2 0.8584 60.6529 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00415 17.5282 17.7 0
3 0.8572 60.2690 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00419 17.1443 17.38 0
4 0.8562 59.8829 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00417 16.7582 17.03 0
5 0.8558 59.6885 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00414 16.5638 16.84 0
6 0.8565 59.8789 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00412 16.7542 17.01 5.864
7 0.8581 60.4568 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00412 17.3321 17.52 6.04
8 0.8609 61.6303 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00419 18.5056 18.58 6.408
9 0.8651 63.0070 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00412 19.8823 19.76 6.815
10 0.8698 64.8186 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00417 21.6939 21.35 7.363
11 0.8752 66.6571 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00410 23.5324 22.9 7.897
12 0.8803 68.5404 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00413 25.4157 24.51 8.451
13 0.8840 69.8127 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00409 26.6880 25.56 8.813
14 0.8867 70.8936 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00415 27.7689 26.49 9.133
15 0.8876 71.1050 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00409 27.9803 26.63 9.184
16 0.8867 70.8936 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00415 27.7689 26.49 9.133
17 0.8844 70.0306 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00413 26.9059 25.76 0
18 0.8809 68.7509 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00411 25.6262 24.68 0
19 0.8768 67.2834 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00414 24.1587 23.45 0
20 0.8727 65.8372 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00415 22.7125 22.22 0
21 0.8691 64.4077 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00409 21.2830 20.97 0
22 0.8661 63.4073 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00415 20.2826 20.12 0
23 0.8634 62.4120 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00412 19.2873 19.24 0
116
Table B.33. September Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago
3
0 0.8503 55.2983 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00287 12.1736 12.4 0
1 0.8486 54.5683 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00281 11.4436 11.71 0
2 0.8471 54.0278 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00280 10.9031 11.22 0
3 0.8459 53.6729 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00285 10.5482 10.91 0
4 0.8449 53.3160 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00284 10.1913 10.58 0
5 0.8445 53.1364 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00282 10.0117 10.4 0
6 0.8452 53.3125 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00279 10.1878 10.56 3.64
7 0.8468 54.0314 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00285 10.9067 11.24 3.875
8 0.8495 54.9307 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00281 11.8060 12.05 4.154
9 0.8538 56.5831 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00287 13.4584 13.57 4.678
10 0.8585 58.2631 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00287 15.1384 15.07 5.198
11 0.8639 60.1662 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00284 17.0415 16.75 5.775
12 0.8690 62.1184 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00290 18.9937 18.48 6.374
13 0.8728 63.5088 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00292 20.3841 19.7 6.793
14 0.8753 64.3074 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00287 21.1827 20.36 7.022
15 0.8763 64.7136 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00289 21.5889 20.72 7.145
16 0.8753 64.3074 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00287 21.1827 20.36 7.022
17 0.8730 63.5047 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00287 20.3800 19.67 0
18 0.8697 62.3142 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00289 19.1895 18.65 0
19 0.8654 60.7478 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00286 17.6231 17.27 0
20 0.8613 59.2074 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00283 16.0827 15.9 0
21 0.8579 58.0763 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00289 14.9516 14.91 0
22 0.8547 56.7629 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00280 13.6382 13.7 0
23 0.8521 55.8418 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00280 12.7171 12.87 0
117
Table B.34. October Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago
3
0 0.8293 40.1385 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -2.9862 0 0
1 0.8275 39.2335 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -3.8912 0 0
2 0.8258 38.3385 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -4.7862 0 0
3 0.8244 37.6017 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -5.5230 0 0
4 0.8233 37.0172 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -6.1075 0 0
5 0.8230 36.8725 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -6.2522 0 0
6 0.8237 37.3101 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -5.8146 0 0
7 0.8255 38.1910 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -4.9337 0 0
8 0.8286 39.8365 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -3.2882 0 0
9 0.8332 42.1382 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -0.9865 0 0
10 0.8384 44.8372 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 1.7125 1.494 0.515
11 0.8444 47.9700 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00004 4.8453 4.633 1.598
12 0.8500 50.8840 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00054 7.7593 7.518 2.592
13 0.8541 53.0057 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00090 9.8810 9.59 3.307
14 0.8570 54.4507 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00113 11.3260 10.99 3.788
15 0.8581 54.9993 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00121 11.8746 11.52 3.971
16 0.8570 54.4507 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00113 11.3260 10.99 3.788
17 0.8545 53.1849 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00092 10.0602 9.763 0
18 0.8507 51.2334 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00060 8.1087 7.858 0
19 0.8461 48.8160 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00019 5.6913 5.475 0
20 0.8416 46.4699 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 3.3452 3.134 0
21 0.8377 44.5155 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 1.3907 1.173 0
22 0.8342 42.6062 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -0.5185 0 0
23 0.8314 41.2083 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -1.9164 0 0
118
Table B.35. November Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago
3
0 0.8079 26.4749 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -16.6498 0 0
1 0.8060 25.3603 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -17.7644 0 0
2 0.8043 24.2639 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -18.8608 0 0
3 0.8028 23.4245 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -19.7002 0 0
4 0.8016 22.7131 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -20.4116 0 0
5 0.8013 22.4777 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -20.6470 0 0
6 0.8020 22.9494 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -20.1753 0 0
7 0.8039 24.0228 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -19.1020 0 0
8 0.8071 25.9768 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -17.1479 0 0
9 0.8120 28.8912 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -14.2335 0 0
10 0.8175 32.2104 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -10.9143 0 0
11 0.8238 35.9839 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -7.1408 0 0
12 0.8297 39.5173 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -3.6074 0 0
13 0.8342 42.2868 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -0.8379 0 0
14 0.8372 44.0295 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 0.9048 0.656 0.226
15 0.8383 44.6732 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 1.5485 1.315 0.453
16 0.8372 44.0295 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 0.9048 0.656 0.226
17 0.8345 42.4428 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -0.6819 0 0
18 0.8305 39.9714 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -3.1533 0 0
19 0.8256 37.1439 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -5.9808 0 0
20 0.8209 34.2823 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -8.8424 0 0
21 0.8167 31.8039 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -11.3208 0 0
22 0.8131 29.5418 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -13.5829 0 0
23 0.8101 27.7352 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -15.3895 0 0
119
Table B.36. December Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model I, Chicago
3
0 0.7857 13.6177 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -29.5070 0 0
1 0.7839 12.6061 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -30.5186 0 0
2 0.7822 11.5119 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -31.6128 0 0
3 0.7807 10.6310 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -32.4937 0 0
4 0.7796 9.9545 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -33.1702 0 0
5 0.7792 9.7626 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -33.3621 0 0
6 0.7799 10.1470 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -32.9777 0 0
7 0.7818 11.2168 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -31.9079 0 0
8 0.7850 13.2111 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -29.9136 0 0
9 0.7898 16.0094 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -27.1153 0 0
10 0.7952 19.1618 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -23.9629 0 0
11 0.8015 22.9520 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -20.1728 0 0
12 0.8073 26.3524 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -16.7723 0 0
13 0.8116 29.0246 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -14.1001 0 0
14 0.8146 30.7329 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -12.3918 0 0
15 0.8157 31.4018 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -11.7229 0 0
16 0.8146 30.7329 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -12.3918 0 0
17 0.8120 29.2850 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -13.8397 0 0
18 0.8081 26.8534 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -16.2713 0 0
19 0.8032 24.0262 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -19.0985 0 0
20 0.7985 21.2013 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -21.9234 0 0
21 0.7944 18.7174 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -24.4073 0 0
22 0.7909 16.6487 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -26.4760 0 0
23 0.7879 14.9583 52.2928 43.1247 0.8379 0.00000 -28.1664 0 0
APPENDIX C
AVERAGE ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR MODEL II
Table C.1. January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
&
3
0 0.8560 59.2874 48.8767 0.0054 10.41 11.42 3.10 0.00
1 0.8550 58.9056 48.8767 0.0054 10.03 11.07 3.10 0.00
2 0.8541 58.5256 48.8767 0.0054 9.65 10.73 3.10 0.00
3 0.8534 58.3382 48.8767 0.0054 9.46 10.57 3.10 0.00
4 0.8528 58.1511 48.8767 0.0054 9.27 10.41 3.10 0.00
5 0.8527 58.1530 48.8767 0.0054 9.28 10.42 3.10 0.00
6 0.8529 58.1492 48.8767 0.0054 9.27 10.4 3.10 3.35
7 0.8539 58.5275 48.8767 0.0054 9.65 10.74 3.10 3.46
8 0.8555 59.0963 48.8767 0.0054 10.22 11.25 3.10 3.63
9 0.8580 60.0560 48.8767 0.0054 11.18 12.11 3.10 3.91
10 0.8607 61.0225 48.8767 0.0054 12.15 12.96 3.10 4.18
11 0.8640 62.1976 48.8767 0.0054 13.32 14.0 3.10 4.52
12 0.8669 63.1863 48.8767 0.0053 14.31 14.85 3.10 4.79
13 0.8690 63.9883 48.8767 0.0054 15.11 15.55 3.10 5.02
14 0.8706 64.5940 48.8767 0.0054 15.72 16.08 3.10 5.19
15 0.8711 64.7976 48.8767 0.0054 15.92 16.26 3.10 5.24
16 0.8706 64.5940 48.8767 0.0054 15.72 16.08 3.10 5.19
17 0.8694 64.1925 48.8767 0.0054 15.32 15.74 3.10 0.00
18 0.8672 63.3887 48.8767 0.0054 14.51 15.04 3.10 0.00
19 0.8648 62.5962 48.8767 0.0054 13.72 14.36 3.10 0.00
20 0.8624 61.6081 48.8767 0.0054 12.73 13.48 3.10 0.00
21 0.8604 60.8256 48.8767 0.0053 11.95 12.78 3.10 0.00
22 0.8585 60.2492 48.8767 0.0054 11.37 12.29 3.10 0.00
23 0.8570 59.6708 48.8767 0.0054 10.79 11.77 3.10 0.00
120
121
Table C.2. February Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
hEA -
Hour vEA hEA hLA hLA Q& Average Electric
3
of day (m /kg) (kJ/kg) ((kJ/kg) m& w (kg/s) (kJ/kg) (kW) COP kWh
0 0.8598 61.4440 48.8767 0.0058 12.57 13.5 3.10 0.00
1 0.8588 61.0526 48.8767 0.0058 12.18 13.15 3.10 0.00
2 0.8578 60.6629 48.8767 0.0058 11.79 12.8 3.10 0.00
3 0.8572 60.4707 48.8767 0.0058 11.59 12.64 3.10 0.00
4 0.8565 60.2790 48.8767 0.0058 11.40 12.47 3.10 0.00
5 0.8563 60.0817 48.8767 0.0057 11.20 12.27 3.10 0.00
6 0.8567 60.2770 48.8767 0.0058 11.40 12.46 3.10 4.02
7 0.8577 60.6649 48.8767 0.0058 11.79 12.81 3.10 4.13
8 0.8593 61.2481 48.8767 0.0058 12.37 13.33 3.10 4.30
9 0.8617 62.0284 48.8767 0.0057 13.15 13.99 3.10 4.51
10 0.8644 63.0173 48.8767 0.0057 14.14 14.86 3.10 4.79
11 0.8677 64.2197 48.8767 0.0057 15.34 15.91 3.10 5.13
12 0.8706 65.2314 48.8767 0.0057 16.35 16.77 3.10 5.41
13 0.8727 66.0522 48.8767 0.0057 17.18 17.49 3.10 5.64
14 0.8743 66.6722 48.8767 0.0057 17.80 18.02 3.10 5.81
15 0.8748 66.8805 48.8767 0.0057 18.00 18.21 3.10 5.87
16 0.8743 66.6722 48.8767 0.0057 17.80 18.02 3.10 5.81
17 0.8731 66.2612 48.8767 0.0058 17.38 17.68 3.10 0.00
18 0.8709 65.4386 48.8767 0.0057 16.56 16.97 3.10 0.00
19 0.8685 64.6276 48.8767 0.0058 15.75 16.28 3.10 0.00
20 0.8662 63.8240 48.8767 0.0058 14.95 15.6 3.10 0.00
21 0.8642 63.0214 48.8767 0.0058 14.14 14.88 3.10 0.00
22 0.8622 62.2261 48.8767 0.0057 13.35 14.17 3.10 0.00
23 0.8608 61.8372 48.8767 0.0058 12.96 13.86 3.10 0.00
122
Table C.3. March Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
hEA -
3
0 0.8660 65.7336 48.8767 0.0069 16.86 17.69 3.20 0.00
1 0.8650 65.3226 48.8767 0.0068 16.45 17.33 3.20 0.00
2 0.8640 64.9135 48.8767 0.0068 16.04 16.96 3.20 0.00
3 0.8634 64.7118 48.8767 0.0068 15.84 16.8 3.20 0.00
4 0.8627 64.5105 48.8767 0.0068 15.63 16.63 3.20 0.00
5 0.8626 64.5126 48.8767 0.0069 15.64 16.64 3.20 0.00
6 0.8629 64.5084 48.8767 0.0068 15.63 16.61 3.20 5.19
7 0.8639 64.9156 48.8767 0.0068 16.04 16.98 3.20 5.31
8 0.8655 65.5278 48.8767 0.0068 16.65 17.51 3.20 5.47
9 0.8679 66.3471 48.8767 0.0068 17.47 18.2 3.20 5.69
10 0.8707 67.3856 48.8767 0.0068 18.51 19.1 3.20 5.97
11 0.8740 68.6484 48.8767 0.0068 19.77 20.19 3.20 6.31
12 0.8769 69.7113 48.8767 0.0068 20.83 21.09 3.20 6.59
13 0.8791 70.5737 48.8767 0.0069 21.70 21.83 3.20 6.82
14 0.8806 71.0000 48.8767 0.0068 22.12 22.15 3.20 6.92
15 0.8811 71.2184 48.8767 0.0068 22.34 22.34 3.20 6.98
16 0.8806 71.0000 48.8767 0.0068 22.12 22.15 3.20 6.92
17 0.8793 70.5692 48.8767 0.0068 21.69 21.8 3.20 0.00
18 0.8772 69.7069 48.8767 0.0068 20.83 21.06 3.20 0.00
19 0.8747 68.8569 48.8767 0.0068 19.98 20.35 3.20 0.00
20 0.8723 68.0148 48.8767 0.0068 19.14 19.64 3.20 0.00
21 0.8704 67.3899 48.8767 0.0069 18.51 19.13 3.20 0.00
22 0.8684 66.5547 48.8767 0.0068 17.68 18.39 3.20 0.00
23 0.8670 66.1464 48.8767 0.0069 17.27 18.06 3.20 0.00
123
Table C.4. April Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
hEA -
3
0 0.8684 67.8608 48.8767 0.0075 18.98 19.8 3.20 0.00
1 0.8675 67.6567 48.8767 0.0076 18.78 19.66 3.20 0.00
2 0.8665 67.2369 48.8767 0.0075 18.36 19.29 3.20 0.00
3 0.8659 67.0299 48.8767 0.0076 18.15 19.12 3.20 0.00
4 0.8653 66.8234 48.8767 0.0076 17.95 18.94 3.20 0.00
5 0.8650 66.6108 48.8767 0.0075 17.73 18.73 3.20 0.00
6 0.8654 66.8212 48.8767 0.0075 17.94 18.93 3.20 5.92
7 0.8664 67.2391 48.8767 0.0076 18.36 19.3 3.20 6.03
8 0.8681 67.8674 48.8767 0.0076 18.99 19.84 3.20 6.20
9 0.8705 68.7082 48.8767 0.0076 19.83 20.55 3.20 6.42
10 0.8733 69.7740 48.8767 0.0076 20.90 21.47 3.20 6.71
11 0.8765 70.8455 48.8767 0.0075 21.97 22.34 3.20 6.98
12 0.8794 71.9340 48.8767 0.0075 23.06 23.26 3.20 7.27
13 0.8816 72.8172 48.8767 0.0075 23.94 24.01 3.20 7.50
14 0.8831 73.2538 48.8767 0.0075 24.38 24.34 3.20 7.61
15 0.8836 73.4775 48.8767 0.0075 24.60 24.54 3.20 7.67
16 0.8831 73.2538 48.8767 0.0075 24.38 24.34 3.20 7.61
17 0.8818 72.8126 48.8767 0.0075 23.94 23.99 3.20 0.00
18 0.8798 72.1569 48.8767 0.0075 23.28 23.46 3.20 0.00
19 0.8773 71.2844 48.8767 0.0076 22.41 22.74 3.20 0.00
20 0.8748 70.1966 48.8767 0.0075 21.32 21.79 3.20 0.00
21 0.8729 69.5567 48.8767 0.0075 20.68 21.26 3.20 0.00
22 0.8710 68.9212 48.8767 0.0076 20.04 20.74 3.20 0.00
23 0.8695 68.2835 48.8767 0.0075 19.41 20.18 3.20 0.00
124
Table C.5. May Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
hEA -
3
0 0.8710 70.2620 48.8767 0.0083 21.39 22.19 3.30 0.00
1 0.8700 69.8301 48.8767 0.0082 20.95 21.81 3.30 0.00
2 0.8691 69.6216 48.8767 0.0083 20.74 21.66 3.30 0.00
3 0.8684 69.1882 48.8767 0.0082 20.31 21.25 3.30 0.00
4 0.8677 68.9768 48.8767 0.0082 20.10 21.08 3.30 0.00
5 0.8676 68.9790 48.8767 0.0083 20.10 21.09 3.30 0.00
6 0.8680 69.1949 48.8767 0.0083 20.32 21.3 3.30 6.45
7 0.8689 69.4024 48.8767 0.0082 20.53 21.44 3.30 6.50
8 0.8705 70.0458 48.8767 0.0082 21.17 22 3.30 6.67
9 0.8730 70.9067 48.8767 0.0082 22.03 22.72 3.30 6.88
10 0.8758 71.9983 48.8767 0.0082 23.12 23.65 3.30 7.17
11 0.8790 73.0956 48.8767 0.0082 24.22 24.54 3.30 7.44
12 0.8819 74.2106 48.8767 0.0082 25.33 25.47 3.30 7.72
13 0.8841 75.1153 48.8767 0.0082 26.24 26.24 3.30 7.95
14 0.8857 75.5625 48.8767 0.0082 26.69 26.58 3.30 8.05
15 0.8862 75.7917 48.8767 0.0082 26.91 26.78 3.30 8.11
16 0.8857 75.5625 48.8767 0.0082 26.69 26.58 3.30 8.05
17 0.8844 75.1105 48.8767 0.0082 26.23 26.21 3.30 0.00
18 0.8823 74.4389 48.8767 0.0082 25.56 25.68 3.30 0.00
19 0.8799 73.5452 48.8767 0.0083 24.67 24.94 3.30 0.00
20 0.8774 72.6598 48.8767 0.0083 23.78 24.21 3.30 0.00
21 0.8754 71.7757 48.8767 0.0082 22.90 23.44 3.30 0.00
22 0.8735 71.1249 48.8767 0.0082 22.25 22.91 3.30 0.00
23 0.8721 70.6958 48.8767 0.0083 21.82 22.57 3.30 0.00
125
Table C.6. June Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
hEA -
3
0 0.8748 72.4750 48.8767 0.0087 23.60 24.24 3.30 0.00
1 0.8739 72.2605 48.8767 0.0087 23.38 24.09 3.30 0.00
2 0.8729 71.8193 48.8767 0.0087 22.94 23.71 3.30 0.00
3 0.8723 71.6018 48.8767 0.0087 22.73 23.53 3.30 0.00
4 0.8716 71.3848 48.8767 0.0087 22.51 23.35 3.30 0.00
5 0.8715 71.3871 48.8767 0.0088 22.51 23.36 3.30 0.00
6 0.8718 71.3825 48.8767 0.0087 22.51 23.34 3.30 7.07
7 0.8728 71.8216 48.8767 0.0087 22.94 23.72 3.30 7.19
8 0.8745 72.4819 48.8767 0.0088 23.61 24.29 3.30 7.36
9 0.8769 73.3656 48.8767 0.0087 24.49 25.02 3.30 7.58
10 0.8796 74.2529 48.8767 0.0087 25.38 25.73 3.30 7.80
11 0.8828 75.3767 48.8767 0.0086 26.50 26.64 3.30 8.07
12 0.8858 76.5186 48.8767 0.0086 27.64 27.59 3.30 8.36
13 0.8880 77.4452 48.8767 0.0087 28.57 28.37 3.30 8.60
14 0.8896 77.9033 48.8767 0.0086 29.03 28.71 3.30 8.70
15 0.8901 78.1381 48.8767 0.0087 29.26 28.91 3.30 8.76
16 0.8896 77.9033 48.8767 0.0086 29.03 28.71 3.30 8.70
17 0.8883 77.4404 48.8767 0.0086 28.56 28.34 3.30 0.00
18 0.8862 76.7524 48.8767 0.0087 27.88 27.8 3.30 0.00
19 0.8837 75.8371 48.8767 0.0087 26.96 27.05 3.30 0.00
20 0.8813 74.9304 48.8767 0.0087 26.05 26.3 3.30 0.00
21 0.8793 74.2576 48.8767 0.0087 25.38 25.76 3.30 0.00
22 0.8774 73.5896 48.8767 0.0088 24.71 25.21 3.30 0.00
23 0.8759 72.9193 48.8767 0.0087 24.04 24.63 3.30 0.00
126
Table C.7. July Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
hEA -
3
0 0.8763 72.6806 48.8767 0.0085 23.80 24.34 3.30 0.00
1 0.8752 72.2375 48.8767 0.0085 23.36 23.95 3.30 0.00
2 0.8742 71.7964 48.8767 0.0084 22.92 23.57 3.30 0.00
3 0.8736 71.5789 48.8767 0.0084 22.70 23.39 3.30 0.00
4 0.8729 71.3619 48.8767 0.0085 22.49 23.21 3.30 0.00
5 0.8728 71.3642 48.8767 0.0085 22.49 23.22 3.30 0.00
6 0.8731 71.3596 48.8767 0.0084 22.48 23.2 3.30 7.03
7 0.8741 71.7987 48.8767 0.0085 22.92 23.58 3.30 7.15
8 0.8758 72.4588 48.8767 0.0085 23.58 24.15 3.30 7.32
9 0.8782 73.3423 48.8767 0.0085 24.47 24.88 3.30 7.54
10 0.8809 74.2294 48.8767 0.0084 25.35 25.59 3.30 7.75
11 0.8841 75.3529 48.8767 0.0084 26.48 26.5 3.30 8.03
12 0.8871 76.4945 48.8767 0.0084 27.62 27.44 3.30 8.32
13 0.8893 77.4209 48.8767 0.0084 28.54 28.22 3.30 8.55
14 0.8909 77.8789 48.8767 0.0084 29.00 28.56 3.30 8.66
15 0.8914 78.1136 48.8767 0.0084 29.24 28.76 3.30 8.72
16 0.8909 77.8789 48.8767 0.0084 29.00 28.56 3.30 8.66
17 0.8896 77.4161 48.8767 0.0084 28.54 28.19 3.30 0.00
18 0.8875 76.7283 48.8767 0.0084 27.85 27.65 3.30 0.00
19 0.8850 75.8132 48.8767 0.0084 26.94 26.9 3.30 0.00
20 0.8826 74.9067 48.8767 0.0084 26.03 26.16 3.30 0.00
21 0.8806 74.2341 48.8767 0.0085 25.36 25.61 3.30 0.00
22 0.8787 73.5662 48.8767 0.0085 24.69 25.07 3.30 0.00
23 0.8772 72.8960 48.8767 0.0084 24.02 24.49 3.30 0.00
127
Table C.8. August Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
hEA -
3
0 0.8763 72.6806 48.8767 0.0085 23.80 24.34 3.10 0.00
1 0.8752 72.2375 48.8767 0.0085 23.36 23.95 3.10 0.00
2 0.8742 71.7964 48.8767 0.0084 22.92 23.57 3.10 0.00
3 0.8736 71.5789 48.8767 0.0084 22.70 23.39 3.10 0.00
4 0.8729 71.3619 48.8767 0.0085 22.49 23.21 3.10 0.00
5 0.8728 71.3642 48.8767 0.0085 22.49 23.22 3.10 0.00
6 0.8731 71.3596 48.8767 0.0084 22.48 23.2 3.10 7.48
7 0.8741 71.7987 48.8767 0.0085 22.92 23.58 3.10 7.61
8 0.8758 72.4588 48.8767 0.0085 23.58 24.15 3.10 7.79
9 0.8782 73.3423 48.8767 0.0085 24.47 24.88 3.10 8.03
10 0.8809 74.2294 48.8767 0.0084 25.35 25.59 3.10 8.25
11 0.8841 75.3529 48.8767 0.0084 26.48 26.5 3.10 8.55
12 0.8871 76.4945 48.8767 0.0084 27.62 27.44 3.10 8.85
13 0.8893 77.4209 48.8767 0.0084 28.54 28.22 3.10 9.10
14 0.8909 77.8789 48.8767 0.0084 29.00 28.56 3.10 9.21
15 0.8914 78.1136 48.8767 0.0084 29.24 28.76 3.10 9.28
16 0.8909 77.8789 48.8767 0.0084 29.00 28.56 3.10 9.21
17 0.8896 77.4161 48.8767 0.0084 28.54 28.19 3.10 0.00
18 0.8875 76.7283 48.8767 0.0084 27.85 27.65 3.10 0.00
19 0.8850 75.8132 48.8767 0.0084 26.94 26.9 3.10 0.00
20 0.8826 74.9067 48.8767 0.0084 26.03 26.16 3.10 0.00
21 0.8806 74.2341 48.8767 0.0085 25.36 25.61 3.10 0.00
22 0.8787 73.5662 48.8767 0.0085 24.69 25.07 3.10 0.00
23 0.8772 72.8960 48.8767 0.0084 24.02 24.49 3.10 0.00
128
Table C.9. September Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
hEA -
3
0 0.8723 70.2394 48.8767 0.0080 21.36 22.05 3.30 0.00
1 0.8713 69.8076 48.8767 0.0080 20.93 21.67 3.30 0.00
2 0.8704 69.5992 48.8767 0.0080 20.72 21.52 3.30 0.00
3 0.8697 69.1660 48.8767 0.0079 20.29 21.12 3.30 0.00
4 0.8690 68.9545 48.8767 0.0080 20.08 20.94 3.30 0.00
5 0.8689 68.9568 48.8767 0.0080 20.08 20.96 3.30 0.00
6 0.8693 69.1726 48.8767 0.0080 20.30 21.16 3.30 6.41
7 0.8702 69.3801 48.8767 0.0080 20.50 21.31 3.30 6.46
8 0.8718 70.0233 48.8767 0.0080 21.15 21.86 3.30 6.62
9 0.8743 70.8840 48.8767 0.0080 22.01 22.58 3.30 6.84
10 0.8771 71.9753 48.8767 0.0080 23.10 23.51 3.30 7.12
11 0.8803 73.0724 48.8767 0.0079 24.20 24.4 3.30 7.39
12 0.8832 74.1871 48.8767 0.0079 25.31 25.33 3.30 7.68
13 0.8854 75.0916 48.8767 0.0080 26.21 26.1 3.30 7.91
14 0.8870 75.5387 48.8767 0.0079 26.66 26.44 3.30 8.01
15 0.8875 75.7678 48.8767 0.0079 26.89 26.63 3.30 8.07
16 0.8870 75.5387 48.8767 0.0079 26.66 26.44 3.30 8.01
17 0.8857 75.0868 48.8767 0.0079 26.21 26.07 3.30 0.00
18 0.8836 74.4153 48.8767 0.0080 25.54 25.54 3.30 0.00
19 0.8812 73.5218 48.8767 0.0080 24.65 24.8 3.30 0.00
20 0.8787 72.6367 48.8767 0.0080 23.76 24.07 3.30 0.00
21 0.8767 71.7528 48.8767 0.0079 22.88 23.3 3.30 0.00
22 0.8748 71.1022 48.8767 0.0080 22.23 22.77 3.30 0.00
23 0.8734 70.6732 48.8767 0.0080 21.80 22.43 3.30 0.00
129
Table C.10. October Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
hEA -
3
0 0.8684 67.8608 48.8767 0.0075 18.98 19.8 3.20 0.00
1 0.8675 67.6567 48.8767 0.0076 18.78 19.66 3.20 0.00
2 0.8665 67.2369 48.8767 0.0075 18.36 19.29 3.20 0.00
3 0.8659 67.0299 48.8767 0.0076 18.15 19.12 3.20 0.00
4 0.8653 66.8234 48.8767 0.0076 17.95 18.94 3.20 0.00
5 0.8650 66.6108 48.8767 0.0075 17.73 18.73 3.20 0.00
6 0.8654 66.8212 48.8767 0.0075 17.94 18.93 3.20 5.92
7 0.8664 67.2391 48.8767 0.0076 18.36 19.3 3.20 6.03
8 0.8681 67.8674 48.8767 0.0076 18.99 19.84 3.20 6.20
9 0.8705 68.7082 48.8767 0.0076 19.83 20.55 3.20 6.42
10 0.8733 69.7740 48.8767 0.0076 20.90 21.47 3.20 6.71
11 0.8765 70.8455 48.8767 0.0075 21.97 22.34 3.20 6.98
12 0.8794 71.9340 48.8767 0.0075 23.06 23.26 3.20 7.27
13 0.8816 72.8172 48.8767 0.0075 23.94 24.01 3.20 7.50
14 0.8831 73.2538 48.8767 0.0075 24.38 24.34 3.20 7.61
15 0.8836 73.4775 48.8767 0.0075 24.60 24.54 3.20 7.67
16 0.8831 73.2538 48.8767 0.0075 24.38 24.34 3.20 7.61
17 0.8818 72.8126 48.8767 0.0075 23.94 23.99 3.20 0.00
18 0.8798 72.1569 48.8767 0.0075 23.28 23.46 3.20 0.00
19 0.8773 71.2844 48.8767 0.0076 22.41 22.74 3.20 0.00
20 0.8748 70.1966 48.8767 0.0075 21.32 21.79 3.20 0.00
21 0.8729 69.5567 48.8767 0.0075 20.68 21.26 3.20 0.00
22 0.8710 68.9212 48.8767 0.0076 20.04 20.74 3.20 0.00
23 0.8695 68.2835 48.8767 0.0075 19.41 20.18 3.20 0.00
130
Table C.11. November Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
hEA -
3
0 0.8634 65.7763 48.8767 0.0074 16.90 17.96 3.20 0.00
1 0.8624 65.3651 48.8767 0.0074 16.49 17.59 3.20 0.00
2 0.8614 64.9558 48.8767 0.0073 16.08 17.22 3.20 0.00
3 0.8608 64.7540 48.8767 0.0074 15.88 17.06 3.20 0.00
4 0.8601 64.5526 48.8767 0.0074 15.68 16.89 3.20 0.00
5 0.8600 64.5547 48.8767 0.0074 15.68 16.9 3.20 0.00
6 0.8603 64.5505 48.8767 0.0074 15.67 16.87 3.20 5.27
7 0.8613 64.9579 48.8767 0.0074 16.08 17.24 3.20 5.39
8 0.8629 65.5705 48.8767 0.0074 16.69 17.77 3.20 5.55
9 0.8653 66.3901 48.8767 0.0073 17.51 18.47 3.20 5.77
10 0.8681 67.4291 48.8767 0.0073 18.55 19.37 3.20 6.05
11 0.8714 68.6927 48.8767 0.0074 19.82 20.46 3.20 6.39
12 0.8743 69.7561 48.8767 0.0074 20.88 21.36 3.20 6.67
13 0.8765 70.6189 48.8767 0.0074 21.74 22.1 3.20 6.91
14 0.8780 71.0454 48.8767 0.0073 22.17 22.43 3.20 7.01
15 0.8785 71.2639 48.8767 0.0073 22.39 22.62 3.20 7.07
16 0.8780 71.0454 48.8767 0.0073 22.17 22.43 3.20 7.01
17 0.8767 70.6144 48.8767 0.0073 21.74 22.07 3.20 0.00
18 0.8746 69.7516 48.8767 0.0073 20.87 21.33 3.20 0.00
19 0.8721 68.9013 48.8767 0.0073 20.02 20.62 3.20 0.00
20 0.8697 68.0587 48.8767 0.0074 19.18 19.91 3.20 0.00
21 0.8678 67.4335 48.8767 0.0074 18.56 19.39 3.20 0.00
22 0.8658 66.5978 48.8767 0.0073 17.72 18.65 3.20 0.00
23 0.8644 66.1893 48.8767 0.0074 17.31 18.32 3.20 0.00
131
Table C.12. December Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Miami
hEA -
3
0 0.8585 61.4642 48.8767 0.0061 12.59 13.63 3.10 0.00
1 0.8575 61.0726 48.8767 0.0060 12.20 13.27 3.10 0.00
2 0.8565 60.6829 48.8767 0.0060 11.81 12.92 3.10 0.00
3 0.8559 60.4906 48.8767 0.0060 11.61 12.76 3.10 0.00
4 0.8552 60.2988 48.8767 0.0061 11.42 12.6 3.10 0.00
5 0.8550 60.1015 48.8767 0.0060 11.22 12.4 3.10 0.00
6 0.8554 60.2968 48.8767 0.0060 11.42 12.58 3.10 4.06
7 0.8564 60.6848 48.8767 0.0061 11.81 12.93 3.10 4.17
8 0.8580 61.2682 48.8767 0.0060 12.39 13.45 3.10 4.34
9 0.8604 62.0487 48.8767 0.0060 13.17 14.12 3.10 4.55
10 0.8631 63.0379 48.8767 0.0060 14.16 14.98 3.10 4.83
11 0.8664 64.2406 48.8767 0.0060 15.36 16.04 3.10 5.17
12 0.8693 65.2526 48.8767 0.0060 16.38 16.9 3.10 5.45
13 0.8714 66.0736 48.8767 0.0060 17.20 17.62 3.10 5.68
14 0.8730 66.6937 48.8767 0.0060 17.82 18.15 3.10 5.86
15 0.8736 66.9021 48.8767 0.0060 18.03 18.34 3.10 5.92
16 0.8730 66.6937 48.8767 0.0060 17.82 18.15 3.10 5.86
17 0.8718 66.2827 48.8767 0.0060 17.41 17.81 3.10 0.00
18 0.8696 65.4598 48.8767 0.0060 16.58 17.1 3.10 0.00
19 0.8672 64.6486 48.8767 0.0060 15.77 16.41 3.10 0.00
20 0.8649 63.8448 48.8767 0.0061 14.97 15.73 3.10 0.00
21 0.8629 63.0420 48.8767 0.0060 14.17 15.01 3.10 0.00
22 0.8609 62.2465 48.8767 0.0060 13.37 14.3 3.10 0.00
23 0.8595 61.8575 48.8767 0.0061 12.98 13.98 3.10 0.00
132
Table C.13. January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville
&
3
0 0.8339 43.0915 48.8767 0.00093 -5.79 0 3.00 0
1 0.8322 42.3080 48.8767 0.00083 -6.57 0 3.00 0
2 0.8307 41.6885 48.8767 0.00078 -7.19 0 3.00 0
3 0.8294 41.2289 48.8767 0.00078 -7.65 0 3.00 0
4 0.8285 40.7681 48.8767 0.00070 -8.11 0 3.00 0
5 0.8282 40.6156 48.8767 0.00069 -8.26 0 3.00 0
6 0.8289 40.9209 48.8767 0.00072 -7.96 0 3.00 0
7 0.8304 41.5340 48.8767 0.00077 -7.34 0 3.00 0
8 0.8332 42.7771 48.8767 0.00089 -6.10 0 3.00 0
9 0.8373 44.5199 48.8767 0.00106 -4.36 0 3.00 0
10 0.8420 46.6332 48.8767 0.00128 -2.24 0 3.00 0
11 0.8474 48.9730 48.8767 0.00151 0.10 0.593 3.00 0.198
12 0.8524 51.0313 48.8767 0.00165 2.15 2.552 3.00 0.851
13 0.8562 52.7935 48.8767 0.00187 3.92 4.244 3.00 1.415
14 0.8588 53.8665 48.8767 0.00196 4.99 5.253 3.00 1.751
15 0.8597 54.2255 48.8767 0.00197 5.35 5.58 3.00 1.86
16 0.8588 53.8665 48.8767 0.00196 4.99 5.253 3.00 1.751
17 0.8565 52.7900 48.8767 0.00182 3.91 4.223 3.00 0
18 0.8531 51.3814 48.8767 0.00171 2.50 2.893 3.00 0
19 0.8490 49.6548 48.8767 0.00158 0.78 1.252 3.00 0
20 0.8449 47.7927 48.8767 0.00137 -1.08 0 3.00 0
21 0.8415 46.3022 48.8767 0.00121 -2.57 0 3.00 0
22 0.8383 45.0031 48.8767 0.00112 -3.87 0 3.00 0
23 0.8358 43.8819 48.8767 0.00100 -4.99 0 3.00 0
133
Table C.14. February Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville
hEA -
3
0 0.8381 46.1736 48.8767 0.00179 -2.70 0 3.00 0
1 0.8365 45.5229 48.8767 0.00176 -3.35 0 3.00 0
2 0.8350 44.8762 48.8767 0.00170 -4.00 0 3.00 0
3 0.8337 44.3967 48.8767 0.00169 -4.48 0 3.00 0
4 0.8328 43.9157 48.8767 0.00160 -4.96 0 3.00 0
5 0.8324 43.7565 48.8767 0.00158 -5.12 0 3.00 0
6 0.8331 44.0752 48.8767 0.00162 -4.80 0 3.00 0
7 0.8346 44.7150 48.8767 0.00168 -4.16 0 3.00 0
8 0.8375 46.0127 48.8767 0.00182 -2.86 0 3.00 0
9 0.8416 47.8326 48.8767 0.00201 -1.04 0 3.00 0
10 0.8463 49.8648 48.8767 0.00220 0.99 1.658 3.00 0.553
11 0.8517 52.1242 48.8767 0.00238 3.25 3.812 3.00 1.271
12 0.8569 54.4525 48.8767 0.00264 5.58 6.03 3.00 2.01
13 0.8606 56.1020 48.8767 0.00280 7.23 7.578 3.00 2.526
14 0.8632 57.2196 48.8767 0.00290 8.34 8.619 3.00 2.873
15 0.8641 57.5936 48.8767 0.00291 8.72 8.956 3.00 2.985
16 0.8632 57.2196 48.8767 0.00290 8.34 8.619 3.00 2.873
17 0.8610 56.2881 48.8767 0.00283 7.41 7.757 3.00 0
18 0.8575 54.6313 48.8767 0.00261 5.75 6.184 3.00 0
19 0.8533 52.8339 48.8767 0.00246 3.96 4.492 3.00 0
20 0.8492 51.0739 48.8767 0.00230 2.20 2.815 3.00 0
21 0.8458 49.5197 48.8767 0.00212 0.64 1.31 3.00 0
22 0.8426 48.1655 48.8767 0.00201 -0.71 0 3.00 0
23 0.8400 46.9971 48.8767 0.00187 -1.88 0 3.00 0
134
Table C.15. March Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville
hEA -
3
0 0.8487 54.3787 48.8767 0.00417 5.50 6.523 3.10 0
1 0.8470 53.6568 48.8767 0.00411 4.78 5.839 3.10 0
2 0.8455 52.9395 48.8767 0.00403 4.06 5.148 3.10 0
3 0.8442 52.4079 48.8767 0.00400 3.53 4.646 3.10 0
4 0.8433 52.0548 48.8767 0.00398 3.18 4.309 3.10 0
5 0.8430 51.8780 48.8767 0.00395 3.00 4.136 3.10 0
6 0.8437 52.2320 48.8767 0.00400 3.36 4.483 3.10 1.446
7 0.8451 52.7608 48.8767 0.00400 3.88 4.973 3.10 1.604
8 0.8480 54.0152 48.8767 0.00412 5.14 6.169 3.10 1.99
9 0.8521 55.8418 48.8767 0.00430 6.97 7.903 3.10 2.549
10 0.8569 57.8956 48.8767 0.00447 9.02 9.823 3.10 3.169
11 0.8623 60.1918 48.8767 0.00465 11.32 11.94 3.10 3.851
12 0.8673 62.3508 48.8767 0.00481 13.47 13.9 3.10 4.485
13 0.8712 64.1633 48.8767 0.00503 15.29 15.57 3.10 5.022
14 0.8737 65.1807 48.8767 0.00508 16.30 16.47 3.10 5.312
15 0.8747 65.5909 48.8767 0.00511 16.71 16.83 3.10 5.429
16 0.8737 65.1807 48.8767 0.00508 16.30 16.47 3.10 5.312
17 0.8714 64.1591 48.8767 0.00498 15.28 15.54 3.10 0
18 0.8681 62.7522 48.8767 0.00488 13.88 14.28 3.10 0
19 0.8639 60.9745 48.8767 0.00476 12.10 12.67 3.10 0
20 0.8598 59.2308 48.8767 0.00462 10.35 11.07 3.10 0
21 0.8564 57.7076 48.8767 0.00447 8.83 9.653 3.10 0
22 0.8531 56.2098 48.8767 0.00430 7.33 8.239 3.10 0
23 0.8505 55.1052 48.8767 0.00421 6.23 7.2 3.10 0
135
Table C.16. April Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville
hEA -
3
0 0.8487 54.3787 48.8767 0.00417 5.50 6.523 3.10 0
1 0.8470 53.6568 48.8767 0.00411 4.78 5.839 3.10 0
2 0.8455 52.9395 48.8767 0.00403 4.06 5.148 3.10 0
3 0.8442 52.4079 48.8767 0.00400 3.53 4.646 3.10 0
4 0.8433 52.0548 48.8767 0.00398 3.18 4.309 3.10 0
5 0.8430 51.8780 48.8767 0.00395 3.00 4.136 3.10 0
6 0.8437 52.2320 48.8767 0.00400 3.36 4.483 3.10 1.446
7 0.8451 52.7608 48.8767 0.00400 3.88 4.973 3.10 1.604
8 0.8480 54.0152 48.8767 0.00412 5.14 6.169 3.10 1.99
9 0.8521 55.8418 48.8767 0.00430 6.97 7.903 3.10 2.549
10 0.8569 57.8956 48.8767 0.00447 9.02 9.823 3.10 3.169
11 0.8623 60.1918 48.8767 0.00465 11.32 11.94 3.10 3.851
12 0.8673 62.3508 48.8767 0.00481 13.47 13.9 3.10 4.485
13 0.8712 64.1633 48.8767 0.00503 15.29 15.57 3.10 5.022
14 0.8737 65.1807 48.8767 0.00508 16.30 16.47 3.10 5.312
15 0.8747 65.5909 48.8767 0.00511 16.71 16.83 3.10 5.429
16 0.8737 65.1807 48.8767 0.00508 16.30 16.47 3.10 5.312
17 0.8714 64.1591 48.8767 0.00498 15.28 15.54 3.10 0
18 0.8681 62.7522 48.8767 0.00488 13.88 14.28 3.10 0
19 0.8639 60.9745 48.8767 0.00476 12.10 12.67 3.10 0
20 0.8598 59.2308 48.8767 0.00462 10.35 11.07 3.10 0
21 0.8564 57.7076 48.8767 0.00447 8.83 9.653 3.10 0
22 0.8531 56.2098 48.8767 0.00430 7.33 8.239 3.10 0
23 0.8505 55.1052 48.8767 0.00421 6.23 7.2 3.10 0
136
Table C.17. May Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville
hEA -
3
0 0.8629 64.2971 48.8767 0.00670 15.42 16.38 3.20 0
1 0.8614 63.9010 48.8767 0.00679 15.02 16.07 3.20 0
2 0.8599 63.2978 48.8767 0.00677 14.42 15.53 3.20 0
3 0.8586 62.9021 48.8767 0.00680 14.03 15.2 3.20 0
4 0.8577 62.5019 48.8767 0.00676 13.63 14.83 3.20 0
5 0.8574 62.3016 48.8767 0.00672 13.42 14.64 3.20 0
6 0.8580 62.4979 48.8767 0.00671 13.62 14.8 3.20 4.626
7 0.8595 63.0956 48.8767 0.00673 14.22 15.34 3.20 4.794
8 0.8622 64.0968 48.8767 0.00672 15.22 16.21 3.20 5.067
9 0.8661 65.5172 48.8767 0.00671 16.64 17.45 3.20 5.452
10 0.8707 67.1674 48.8767 0.00670 18.29 18.86 3.20 5.894
11 0.8759 69.0593 48.8767 0.00668 20.18 20.47 3.20 6.397
12 0.8807 70.7708 48.8767 0.00665 21.89 21.89 3.20 6.842
13 0.8844 72.3044 48.8767 0.00673 23.43 23.21 3.20 7.254
14 0.8869 73.1865 48.8767 0.00673 24.31 23.94 3.20 7.481
15 0.8878 73.4030 48.8767 0.00667 24.53 24.09 3.20 7.529
16 0.8869 73.1865 48.8767 0.00673 24.31 23.94 3.20 7.481
17 0.8847 72.2998 48.8767 0.00668 23.42 23.19 3.20 0
18 0.8814 70.9864 48.8767 0.00664 22.11 22.07 3.20 0
19 0.8774 69.7024 48.8767 0.00673 20.83 21.03 3.20 0
20 0.8735 68.2153 48.8767 0.00671 19.34 19.76 3.20 0
21 0.8702 66.9583 48.8767 0.00669 18.08 18.68 3.20 0
22 0.8671 65.9290 48.8767 0.00673 17.05 17.81 3.20 0
23 0.8647 65.1136 48.8767 0.00677 16.24 17.12 3.20 0
137
Table C.18. June Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville
hEA -
3
0 0.8690 68.9545 48.8767 0.00796 20.08 20.94 3.30 0
1 0.8675 68.5376 48.8767 0.00804 19.66 20.62 3.30 0
2 0.8660 67.9025 48.8767 0.00800 19.03 20.06 3.30 0
3 0.8647 67.4859 48.8767 0.00803 18.61 19.71 3.30 0
4 0.8638 67.0647 48.8767 0.00798 18.19 19.33 3.30 0
5 0.8636 67.0690 48.8767 0.00804 18.19 19.36 3.30 0
6 0.8642 67.2761 48.8767 0.00802 18.40 19.53 3.30 5.918
7 0.8656 67.6895 48.8767 0.00797 18.81 19.86 3.30 6.018
8 0.8684 68.7436 48.8767 0.00797 19.87 20.77 3.30 6.294
9 0.8723 70.2394 48.8767 0.00799 21.36 22.05 3.30 6.682
10 0.8768 71.7505 48.8767 0.00791 22.87 23.29 3.30 7.057
11 0.8821 73.7392 48.8767 0.00793 24.86 24.96 3.30 7.562
12 0.8870 75.5387 48.8767 0.00792 26.66 26.44 3.30 8.011
13 0.8906 76.9120 48.8767 0.00793 28.04 27.56 3.30 8.353
14 0.8931 77.8375 48.8767 0.00794 28.96 28.32 3.30 8.581
15 0.8940 78.0648 48.8767 0.00788 29.19 28.47 3.30 8.629
16 0.8931 77.8375 48.8767 0.00794 28.96 28.32 3.30 8.581
17 0.8908 76.9071 48.8767 0.00788 28.03 27.54 3.30 0
18 0.8876 75.7654 48.8767 0.00791 26.89 26.62 3.30 0
19 0.8836 74.4153 48.8767 0.00798 25.54 25.54 3.30 0
20 0.8796 72.8520 48.8767 0.00794 23.98 24.22 3.30 0
21 0.8763 71.5309 48.8767 0.00789 22.65 23.1 3.30 0
22 0.8732 70.4493 48.8767 0.00792 21.57 22.2 3.30 0
23 0.8708 69.5925 48.8767 0.00795 20.72 21.48 3.30 0
138
Table C.19. July Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville
hEA -
3
0 0.8703 68.9323 48.8767 0.00770 20.06 20.81 3.20 0
1 0.8688 68.5155 48.8767 0.00778 19.64 20.49 3.20 0
2 0.8673 67.8805 48.8767 0.00774 19.00 19.93 3.20 0
3 0.8660 67.4640 48.8767 0.00777 18.59 19.58 3.20 0
4 0.8651 67.0429 48.8767 0.00772 18.17 19.2 3.20 0
5 0.8649 67.0473 48.8767 0.00777 18.17 19.22 3.20 0
6 0.8655 67.2543 48.8767 0.00776 18.38 19.39 3.20 6.061
7 0.8669 67.6677 48.8767 0.00770 18.79 19.73 3.20 6.164
8 0.8697 68.7214 48.8767 0.00771 19.84 20.63 3.20 6.448
9 0.8736 70.2169 48.8767 0.00773 21.34 21.91 3.20 6.848
10 0.8781 71.7276 48.8767 0.00765 22.85 23.15 3.20 7.234
11 0.8834 73.7158 48.8767 0.00767 24.84 24.81 3.20 7.755
12 0.8883 75.5149 48.8767 0.00766 26.64 26.29 3.20 8.217
13 0.8919 76.8878 48.8767 0.00767 28.01 27.42 3.20 8.569
14 0.8943 77.8132 48.8767 0.00768 28.94 28.17 3.20 8.804
15 0.8952 78.0404 48.8767 0.00763 29.16 28.33 3.20 8.853
16 0.8943 77.8132 48.8767 0.00768 28.94 28.17 3.20 8.804
17 0.8921 76.8830 48.8767 0.00762 28.01 27.39 3.20 0
18 0.8889 75.7416 48.8767 0.00765 26.86 26.48 3.20 0
19 0.8849 74.3918 48.8767 0.00772 25.52 25.4 3.20 0
20 0.8809 72.8288 48.8767 0.00768 23.95 24.08 3.20 0
21 0.8776 71.5080 48.8767 0.00763 22.63 22.96 3.20 0
22 0.8745 70.4267 48.8767 0.00766 21.55 22.06 3.20 0
23 0.8721 69.5701 48.8767 0.00768 20.69 21.34 3.20 0
139
Table C.20. August Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville
hEA -
3
0 0.8703 68.9323 48.8767 0.00770 20.06 20.81 3.20 0
1 0.8688 68.5155 48.8767 0.00778 19.64 20.49 3.20 0
2 0.8673 67.8805 48.8767 0.00774 19.00 19.93 3.20 0
3 0.8660 67.4640 48.8767 0.00777 18.59 19.58 3.20 0
4 0.8651 67.0429 48.8767 0.00772 18.17 19.2 3.20 0
5 0.8649 67.0473 48.8767 0.00777 18.17 19.22 3.20 0
6 0.8655 67.2543 48.8767 0.00776 18.38 19.39 3.20 6.061
7 0.8669 67.6677 48.8767 0.00770 18.79 19.73 3.20 6.164
8 0.8697 68.7214 48.8767 0.00771 19.84 20.63 3.20 6.448
9 0.8736 70.2169 48.8767 0.00773 21.34 21.91 3.20 6.848
10 0.8781 71.7276 48.8767 0.00765 22.85 23.15 3.20 7.234
11 0.8834 73.7158 48.8767 0.00767 24.84 24.81 3.20 7.755
12 0.8883 75.5149 48.8767 0.00766 26.64 26.29 3.20 8.217
13 0.8919 76.8878 48.8767 0.00767 28.01 27.42 3.20 8.569
14 0.8943 77.8132 48.8767 0.00768 28.94 28.17 3.20 8.804
15 0.8952 78.0404 48.8767 0.00763 29.16 28.33 3.20 8.853
16 0.8943 77.8132 48.8767 0.00768 28.94 28.17 3.20 8.804
17 0.8921 76.8830 48.8767 0.00762 28.01 27.39 3.20 0
18 0.8889 75.7416 48.8767 0.00765 26.86 26.48 3.20 0
19 0.8849 74.3918 48.8767 0.00772 25.52 25.4 3.20 0
20 0.8809 72.8288 48.8767 0.00768 23.95 24.08 3.20 0
21 0.8776 71.5080 48.8767 0.00763 22.63 22.96 3.20 0
22 0.8745 70.4267 48.8767 0.00766 21.55 22.06 3.20 0
23 0.8721 69.5701 48.8767 0.00768 20.69 21.34 3.20 0
140
Table C.21. September Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville
hEA -
3
0 0.8665 66.5871 48.8767 0.00722 17.71 18.59 3.20 0
1 0.8648 65.9676 48.8767 0.00721 17.09 18.05 3.20 0
2 0.8634 65.5619 48.8767 0.00727 16.69 17.72 3.20 0
3 0.8621 65.1560 48.8767 0.00730 16.28 17.38 3.20 0
4 0.8613 64.7455 48.8767 0.00725 15.87 17 3.20 0
5 0.8609 64.5399 48.8767 0.00722 15.66 16.81 3.20 0
6 0.8616 64.9516 48.8767 0.00729 16.07 17.2 3.20 5.375
7 0.8630 65.3545 48.8767 0.00723 16.48 17.52 3.20 5.476
8 0.8658 66.3815 48.8767 0.00723 17.50 18.42 3.20 5.755
9 0.8697 67.8389 48.8767 0.00723 18.96 19.67 3.20 6.147
10 0.8743 69.5321 48.8767 0.00724 20.66 21.11 3.20 6.598
11 0.8795 71.4738 48.8767 0.00724 22.60 22.75 3.20 7.11
12 0.8844 73.2306 48.8767 0.00722 24.35 24.2 3.20 7.564
13 0.8880 74.5710 48.8767 0.00722 25.69 25.31 3.20 7.91
14 0.8905 75.4745 48.8767 0.00722 26.60 26.05 3.20 8.141
15 0.8914 75.6963 48.8767 0.00716 26.82 26.21 3.20 8.189
16 0.8905 75.4745 48.8767 0.00722 26.60 26.05 3.20 8.141
17 0.8883 74.5663 48.8767 0.00717 25.69 25.28 3.20 0
18 0.8851 73.4519 48.8767 0.00721 24.58 24.38 3.20 0
19 0.8810 71.9065 48.8767 0.00719 23.03 23.09 3.20 0
20 0.8771 70.6076 48.8767 0.00726 21.73 22.03 3.20 0
21 0.8738 69.3177 48.8767 0.00722 20.44 20.93 3.20 0
22 0.8708 68.2615 48.8767 0.00726 19.38 20.04 3.20 0
23 0.8682 67.2086 48.8767 0.00720 18.33 19.11 3.20 0
141
Table C.22. October Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville
hEA -
3
0 0.8591 62.0690 48.8767 0.00626 13.19 14.24 3.10 0
1 0.8574 61.4803 48.8767 0.00627 12.60 13.73 3.10 0
2 0.8561 61.0947 48.8767 0.00633 12.22 13.41 3.10 0
3 0.8547 60.5085 48.8767 0.00629 11.63 12.87 3.10 0
4 0.8539 60.3187 48.8767 0.00634 11.44 12.72 3.10 0
5 0.8536 60.1232 48.8767 0.00630 11.25 12.53 3.10 0
6 0.8542 60.3147 48.8767 0.00628 11.44 12.69 3.10 4.095
7 0.8557 60.8975 48.8767 0.00630 12.02 13.22 3.10 4.265
8 0.8584 61.8737 48.8767 0.00628 13.00 14.08 3.10 4.542
9 0.8623 63.2585 48.8767 0.00626 14.38 15.29 3.10 4.932
10 0.8670 65.0776 48.8767 0.00632 16.20 16.9 3.10 5.452
11 0.8721 66.9259 48.8767 0.00629 18.05 18.48 3.10 5.962
12 0.8769 68.5977 48.8767 0.00624 19.72 19.88 3.10 6.414
13 0.8805 69.8730 48.8767 0.00622 21.00 20.95 3.10 6.758
14 0.8830 70.9569 48.8767 0.00630 22.08 21.89 3.10 7.063
15 0.8839 71.1684 48.8767 0.00624 22.29 22.04 3.10 7.111
16 0.8830 70.9569 48.8767 0.00630 22.08 21.89 3.10 7.063
17 0.8809 70.0910 48.8767 0.00626 21.21 21.15 3.10 0
18 0.8776 68.8083 48.8767 0.00623 19.93 20.06 3.10 0
19 0.8735 67.3377 48.8767 0.00624 18.46 18.81 3.10 0
20 0.8696 65.8884 48.8767 0.00623 17.01 17.56 3.10 0
21 0.8665 64.8734 48.8767 0.00631 16.00 16.72 3.10 0
22 0.8633 63.6600 48.8767 0.00628 14.78 15.65 3.10 0
23 0.8609 62.8650 48.8767 0.00632 13.99 14.97 3.10 0
142
Table C.23. November Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville
hEA -
3
0 0.8466 52.7414 48.8767 0.00371 3.86 4.852 3.00 0.8466
1 0.8449 52.0340 48.8767 0.00366 3.16 4.179 3.00 0.8449
2 0.8433 51.3309 48.8767 0.00358 2.45 3.498 3.00 0.8433
3 0.8420 50.8098 48.8767 0.00356 1.93 3.004 3.00 0.8420
4 0.8411 50.2871 48.8767 0.00346 1.41 2.48 3.00 0.8411
5 0.8407 50.1141 48.8767 0.00343 1.24 2.31 3.00 0.8407
6 0.8414 50.4604 48.8767 0.00348 1.58 2.651 3.00 0.8414
7 0.8430 51.1557 48.8767 0.00356 2.28 3.326 3.00 0.8430
8 0.8459 52.5666 48.8767 0.00374 3.69 4.7 3.00 0.8459
9 0.8501 54.5466 48.8767 0.00399 5.67 6.61 3.00 0.8501
10 0.8549 56.7592 48.8767 0.00424 7.88 8.711 3.00 0.8549
11 0.8604 59.2210 48.8767 0.00449 10.34 11.01 3.00 0.8604
12 0.8657 61.7603 48.8767 0.00481 12.88 13.39 3.00 0.8657
13 0.8695 63.5605 48.8767 0.00502 14.68 15.04 3.00 0.8695
14 0.8722 64.7808 48.8767 0.00516 15.90 16.16 3.00 0.8722
15 0.8732 65.1892 48.8767 0.00519 16.31 16.52 3.00 0.8732
16 0.8722 64.7808 48.8767 0.00516 15.90 16.16 3.00 0.8722
17 0.8699 63.7637 48.8767 0.00506 14.89 15.23 3.00 0.8699
18 0.8663 61.9554 48.8767 0.00480 13.08 13.55 3.00 0.8663
19 0.8620 59.9948 48.8767 0.00459 11.12 11.74 3.00 0.8620
20 0.8579 58.0763 48.8767 0.00437 9.20 9.947 3.00 0.8579
21 0.8544 56.3832 48.8767 0.00415 7.51 8.339 3.00 0.8544
22 0.8511 54.9088 48.8767 0.00399 6.03 6.942 3.00 0.8511
23 0.8485 53.6372 48.8767 0.00382 4.76 5.716 3.00 0.8485
143
Table C.24. December Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Gainesville
hEA -
3
0 0.8362 45.0272 48.8767 0.00154 -3.85 0 3.00 0
1 0.8345 44.2232 48.8767 0.00143 -4.65 0 3.00 0
2 0.8329 43.4261 48.8767 0.00131 -5.45 0 3.00 0
3 0.8315 42.7957 48.8767 0.00123 -6.08 0 3.00 0
4 0.8306 42.3250 48.8767 0.00115 -6.55 0 3.00 0
5 0.8303 42.1692 48.8767 0.00113 -6.71 0 3.00 0
6 0.8310 42.4811 48.8767 0.00117 -6.40 0 3.00 0
7 0.8326 43.2680 48.8767 0.00129 -5.61 0 3.00 0
8 0.8355 44.7046 48.8767 0.00149 -4.17 0 3.00 0
9 0.8398 46.8298 48.8767 0.00183 -2.05 0 3.00 0
10 0.8447 49.1827 48.8767 0.00215 0.31 1.005 3.00 0.335
11 0.8502 51.7812 48.8767 0.00248 2.90 3.532 3.00 1.177
12 0.8555 54.2849 48.8767 0.00281 5.41 5.943 3.00 1.981
13 0.8594 56.3105 48.8767 0.00314 7.43 7.893 3.00 2.631
14 0.8620 57.4310 48.8767 0.00324 8.55 8.937 3.00 2.979
15 0.8630 57.9997 48.8767 0.00334 9.12 9.48 3.00 3.16
16 0.8620 57.4310 48.8767 0.00324 8.55 8.937 3.00 2.979
17 0.8598 56.4971 48.8767 0.00317 7.62 8.072 3.00 0
18 0.8562 54.6495 48.8767 0.00287 5.77 6.294 3.00 0
19 0.8519 52.6695 48.8767 0.00264 3.79 4.405 3.00 0
20 0.8476 50.5580 48.8767 0.00233 1.68 2.346 3.00 0
21 0.8441 48.8405 48.8767 0.00208 -0.04 0 3.00 0
22 0.8407 47.1584 48.8767 0.00182 -1.72 0 3.00 0
23 0.8382 46.0050 48.8767 0.00169 -2.87 0 3.00 0
144
Table C.25. January Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago
&
3
0 0.7750 7.7819 48.8767 0.0000 -41.09 0 N/A 0
1 0.7732 6.7692 48.8767 0.0000 -42.11 0 N/A 0
2 0.7715 5.8627 48.8767 0.0000 -43.01 0 N/A 0
3 0.7701 5.0580 48.8767 0.0000 -43.82 0 N/A 0
4 0.7690 4.4393 48.8767 0.0000 -44.44 0 N/A 0
5 0.7687 4.2636 48.8767 0.0000 -44.61 0 N/A 0
6 0.7694 4.7036 48.8767 0.0000 -44.17 0 N/A 0
7 0.7712 5.6830 48.8767 0.0000 -43.19 0 N/A 0
8 0.7743 7.4117 48.8767 0.0000 -41.47 0 N/A 0
9 0.7789 9.8585 48.8767 0.0000 -39.02 0 N/A 0
10 0.7841 12.8073 48.8767 0.0000 -36.07 0 N/A 0
11 0.7903 16.3282 48.8767 0.0000 -32.55 0 N/A 0
12 0.7961 19.7218 48.8767 0.0000 -29.15 0 N/A 0
13 0.8003 22.1281 48.8767 0.0000 -26.75 0 N/A 0
14 0.8032 23.7839 48.8767 0.0000 -25.09 0 N/A 0
15 0.8043 24.3855 48.8767 0.0000 -24.49 0 N/A 0
16 0.8032 23.7839 48.8767 0.0000 -25.09 0 N/A 0
17 0.8007 22.3622 48.8767 0.0000 -26.51 0 N/A 0
18 0.7968 20.0596 48.8767 0.0000 -28.82 0 N/A 0
19 0.7920 17.2946 48.8767 0.0000 -31.58 0 N/A 0
20 0.7874 14.6464 48.8767 0.0000 -34.23 0 N/A 0
21 0.7834 12.4059 48.8767 0.0000 -36.47 0 N/A 0
22 0.7800 10.5341 48.8767 0.0000 -38.34 0 N/A 0
23 0.7771 8.9060 48.8767 0.0000 -39.97 0 N/A 0
145
Table C.26. February Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago
hEA -
3
0 0.7821 11.6108 48.8767 0.0000 -37.27 0 N/A 0
1 0.7803 10.5340 48.8767 0.0000 -38.34 0 N/A 0
2 0.7786 9.4758 48.8767 0.0000 -39.40 0 N/A 0
3 0.7771 8.7174 48.8767 0.0000 -40.16 0 N/A 0
4 0.7760 8.0614 48.8767 0.0000 -40.82 0 N/A 0
5 0.7757 7.8753 48.8767 0.0000 -41.00 0 N/A 0
6 0.7764 8.2482 48.8767 0.0000 -40.63 0 N/A 0
7 0.7782 9.2853 48.8767 0.0000 -39.59 0 N/A 0
8 0.7814 11.2171 48.8767 0.0000 -37.66 0 N/A 0
9 0.7861 13.9247 48.8767 0.0000 -34.95 0 N/A 0
10 0.7914 16.9708 48.8767 0.0000 -31.91 0 N/A 0
11 0.7978 20.7424 48.8767 0.0000 -28.13 0 N/A 0
12 0.8037 24.3891 48.8767 0.0000 -24.49 0 N/A 0
13 0.8080 26.9809 48.8767 0.0000 -21.90 0 N/A 0
14 0.8110 28.7670 48.8767 0.0000 -20.11 0 N/A 0
15 0.8121 29.4165 48.8767 0.0000 -19.46 0 N/A 0
16 0.8110 28.7670 48.8767 0.0000 -20.11 0 N/A 0
17 0.8084 27.2333 48.8767 0.0000 -21.64 0 N/A 0
18 0.8044 24.8751 48.8767 0.0000 -24.00 0 N/A 0
19 0.7995 21.7797 48.8767 0.0000 -27.10 0 N/A 0
20 0.7948 18.9392 48.8767 0.0000 -29.94 0 N/A 0
21 0.7907 16.5416 48.8767 0.0000 -32.34 0 N/A 0
22 0.7872 14.5428 48.8767 0.0000 -34.33 0 N/A 0
23 0.7843 12.9080 48.8767 0.0000 -35.97 0 N/A 0
146
Table C.27. March Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago
hEA -
3
0 0.8043 24.6302 48.8767 0.0000 -24.25 0 N/A 0
1 0.8023 23.3067 48.8767 0.0000 -25.57 0 N/A 0
2 0.8006 22.1269 48.8767 0.0000 -26.75 0 N/A 0
3 0.7991 21.1991 48.8767 0.0000 -27.68 0 N/A 0
4 0.7979 20.3977 48.8767 0.0000 -28.48 0 N/A 0
5 0.7975 20.1707 48.8767 0.0000 -28.71 0 N/A 0
6 0.7982 20.6254 48.8767 0.0000 -28.25 0 N/A 0
7 0.8002 21.8937 48.8767 0.0000 -26.98 0 N/A 0
8 0.8035 24.0248 48.8767 0.0000 -24.85 0 N/A 0
9 0.8085 27.2325 48.8767 0.0000 -21.64 0 N/A 0
10 0.8142 30.8712 48.8767 0.0000 -18.01 0 N/A 0
11 0.8208 35.1417 48.8767 0.0000 -13.74 0 N/A 0
12 0.8269 39.0868 48.8767 0.0001 -9.79 0 N/A 0
13 0.8314 41.9983 48.8767 0.0008 -6.88 0 N/A 0
14 0.8345 43.8966 48.8767 0.0013 -4.98 0 N/A 0
15 0.8357 44.7031 48.8767 0.0015 -4.17 0 N/A 0
16 0.8345 43.8966 48.8767 0.0013 -4.98 0 N/A 0
17 0.8318 42.3123 48.8767 0.0009 -6.56 0 N/A 0
18 0.8276 39.5383 48.8767 0.0002 -9.34 0 N/A 0
19 0.8226 36.2880 48.8767 0.0000 -12.59 0 N/A 0
20 0.8177 33.1807 48.8767 0.0000 -15.70 0 N/A 0
21 0.8134 30.4726 48.8767 0.0000 -18.40 0 N/A 0
22 0.8097 27.9957 48.8767 0.0000 -20.88 0 N/A 0
23 0.8066 25.9799 48.8767 0.0000 -22.90 0 N/A 0
147
Table C.28. April Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago
hEA -
3
0 0.8232 35.9899 48.8767 0.0000 -12.89 0 3.00 0
1 0.8214 35.1360 48.8767 0.0000 -13.74 0 3.00 0
2 0.8198 34.1498 48.8767 0.0000 -14.73 0 3.00 0
3 0.8183 33.3158 48.8767 0.0000 -15.56 0 3.00 0
4 0.8172 32.7661 48.8767 0.0000 -16.11 0 3.00 0
5 0.8169 32.6299 48.8767 0.0000 -16.25 0 3.00 0
6 0.8176 33.0415 48.8767 0.0000 -15.84 0 3.00 0
7 0.8194 34.0108 48.8767 0.0000 -14.87 0 3.00 0
8 0.8224 35.5604 48.8767 0.0000 -13.32 0 3.00 0
9 0.8271 38.0250 48.8767 0.0000 -10.85 0 3.00 0
10 0.8324 40.8841 48.8767 0.0000 -7.99 0 3.00 0
11 0.8384 44.0148 48.8767 0.0006 -4.86 0 3.00 0
12 0.8441 47.1174 48.8767 0.0011 -1.76 0 3.00 0
13 0.8483 49.3123 48.8767 0.0015 0.44 0.917 3.00 0.306
14 0.8512 50.8688 48.8767 0.0018 1.99 2.456 3.00 0.819
15 0.8522 51.3933 48.8767 0.0019 2.52 2.966 3.00 0.989
16 0.8512 50.8688 48.8767 0.0018 1.99 2.456 3.00 0.819
17 0.8486 49.4834 48.8767 0.0016 0.61 1.084 3.00 0
18 0.8448 47.4503 48.8767 0.0012 -1.43 0 3.00 0
19 0.8401 44.9821 48.8767 0.0008 -3.89 0 3.00 0
20 0.8356 42.5905 48.8767 0.0003 -6.29 0 3.00 0
21 0.8316 40.4243 48.8767 0.0000 -8.45 0 3.00 0
22 0.8282 38.6177 48.8767 0.0000 -10.26 0 3.00 0
23 0.8254 37.1463 48.8767 0.0000 -11.73 0 3.00 0
148
Table C.29. May Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago
hEA -
3
0 0.8416 48.8716 48.8767 0.0026 -0.01 0 3.00 0
1 0.8399 48.0262 48.8767 0.0025 -0.85 0 3.00 0
2 0.8384 47.3581 48.8767 0.0024 -1.52 0 3.00 0
3 0.8371 46.8627 48.8767 0.0024 -2.01 0 3.00 0
4 0.8360 46.3674 48.8767 0.0023 -2.51 0 3.00 0
5 0.8357 46.2030 48.8767 0.0023 -2.67 0 3.00 0
6 0.8364 46.5321 48.8767 0.0023 -2.34 0 3.00 0
7 0.8380 47.1916 48.8767 0.0024 -1.69 0 3.00 0
8 0.8409 48.5323 48.8767 0.0025 -0.34 0 3.00 0
9 0.8453 50.4098 48.8767 0.0027 1.53 2.334 3.00 0.778
10 0.8502 52.5088 48.8767 0.0029 3.63 4.34 3.00 1.447
11 0.8560 55.0284 48.8767 0.0031 6.15 6.726 3.00 2.242
12 0.8613 57.4404 48.8767 0.0034 8.56 8.994 3.00 2.998
13 0.8652 59.1490 48.8767 0.0035 10.27 10.57 3.00 3.525
14 0.8679 60.3062 48.8767 0.0036 11.43 11.63 3.00 3.877
15 0.8689 60.6941 48.8767 0.0036 11.82 11.98 3.00 3.993
16 0.8679 60.3062 48.8767 0.0036 11.43 11.63 3.00 3.877
17 0.8656 59.3421 48.8767 0.0036 10.47 10.76 3.00 0
18 0.8619 57.6258 48.8767 0.0034 8.75 9.152 3.00 0
19 0.8576 55.7641 48.8767 0.0032 6.89 7.425 3.00 0
20 0.8533 53.9416 48.8767 0.0030 5.06 5.713 3.00 0
21 0.8496 52.3346 48.8767 0.0029 3.46 4.189 3.00 0
22 0.8463 50.7539 48.8767 0.0027 1.88 2.653 3.00 0
23 0.8437 49.7228 48.8767 0.0026 0.85 1.676 3.00 0
149
Table C.30. June Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago
hEA -
3
0 0.8554 57.5277 48.8767 0.0046 8.65 9.529 3.10 0
1 0.8538 56.9695 48.8767 0.0046 8.09 9.031 3.10 0
2 0.8523 56.4130 48.8767 0.0046 7.54 8.524 3.10 0
3 0.8509 55.8584 48.8767 0.0045 6.98 8.007 3.10 0
4 0.8500 55.4920 48.8767 0.0045 6.62 7.671 3.10 0
5 0.8497 55.4957 48.8767 0.0046 6.62 7.694 3.10 0
6 0.8503 55.6769 48.8767 0.0046 6.80 7.85 3.10 2.532
7 0.8519 56.2265 48.8767 0.0045 7.35 8.343 3.10 2.691
8 0.8547 57.3425 48.8767 0.0046 8.47 9.371 3.10 3.023
9 0.8588 58.6515 48.8767 0.0045 9.77 10.51 3.10 3.39
10 0.8635 60.3735 48.8767 0.0045 11.50 12.04 3.10 3.884
11 0.8690 62.3244 48.8767 0.0045 13.45 13.74 3.10 4.433
12 0.8740 64.1175 48.8767 0.0045 15.24 15.29 3.10 4.933
13 0.8778 65.5401 48.8767 0.0045 16.66 16.52 3.10 5.33
14 0.8803 66.3571 48.8767 0.0044 17.48 17.2 3.10 5.548
15 0.8813 66.7728 48.8767 0.0045 17.90 17.56 3.10 5.665
16 0.8803 66.3571 48.8767 0.0044 17.48 17.2 3.10 5.548
17 0.8781 65.7479 48.8767 0.0045 16.87 16.72 3.10 0
18 0.8746 64.3178 48.8767 0.0044 15.44 15.46 3.10 0
19 0.8705 62.9208 48.8767 0.0045 14.04 14.27 3.10 0
20 0.8664 61.3414 48.8767 0.0045 12.46 12.88 3.10 0
21 0.8629 60.1820 48.8767 0.0045 11.31 11.88 3.10 0
22 0.8598 59.0321 48.8767 0.0045 10.16 10.85 3.10 0
23 0.8572 58.0859 48.8767 0.0045 9.21 10.01 3.10 0
150
Table C.31. July Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago
hEA -
3
0 0.8616 61.8251 48.8767 0.0056 12.95 13.78 3.10 0
1 0.8599 61.2380 48.8767 0.0057 12.36 13.26 3.10 0
2 0.8584 60.6529 48.8767 0.0056 11.78 12.74 3.10 0
3 0.8572 60.2690 48.8767 0.0057 11.39 12.41 3.10 0
4 0.8562 59.8829 48.8767 0.0057 11.01 12.06 3.10 0
5 0.8558 59.6885 48.8767 0.0056 10.81 11.88 3.10 0
6 0.8565 59.8789 48.8767 0.0056 11.00 12.04 3.10 3.883
7 0.8581 60.4568 48.8767 0.0056 11.58 12.55 3.10 4.048
8 0.8609 61.6303 48.8767 0.0057 12.75 13.62 3.10 4.392
9 0.8651 63.0070 48.8767 0.0056 14.13 14.8 3.10 4.773
10 0.8698 64.8186 48.8767 0.0056 15.94 16.39 3.10 5.286
11 0.8752 66.6571 48.8767 0.0056 17.78 17.93 3.10 5.785
12 0.8803 68.5404 48.8767 0.0056 19.66 19.54 3.10 6.303
13 0.8840 69.8127 48.8767 0.0055 20.94 20.59 3.10 6.642
14 0.8867 70.8936 48.8767 0.0056 22.02 21.52 3.10 6.941
15 0.8876 71.1050 48.8767 0.0055 22.23 21.67 3.10 6.989
16 0.8867 70.8936 48.8767 0.0056 22.02 21.52 3.10 6.941
17 0.8844 70.0306 48.8767 0.0056 21.15 20.79 3.10 0
18 0.8809 68.7509 48.8767 0.0056 19.87 19.71 3.10 0
19 0.8768 67.2834 48.8767 0.0056 18.41 18.48 3.10 0
20 0.8727 65.8372 48.8767 0.0056 16.96 17.25 3.10 0
21 0.8691 64.4077 48.8767 0.0056 15.53 16 3.10 0
22 0.8661 63.4073 48.8767 0.0056 14.53 15.15 3.10 0
23 0.8634 62.4120 48.8767 0.0056 13.54 14.27 3.10 0
151
Table C.32. August Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago
hEA -
3
0 0.8616 61.8251 48.8767 0.0056 12.95 13.78 3.10 0
1 0.8599 61.2380 48.8767 0.0057 12.36 13.26 3.10 0
2 0.8584 60.6529 48.8767 0.0056 11.78 12.74 3.10 0
3 0.8572 60.2690 48.8767 0.0057 11.39 12.41 3.10 0
4 0.8562 59.8829 48.8767 0.0057 11.01 12.06 3.10 0
5 0.8558 59.6885 48.8767 0.0056 10.81 11.88 3.10 0
6 0.8565 59.8789 48.8767 0.0056 11.00 12.04 3.10 3.883
7 0.8581 60.4568 48.8767 0.0056 11.58 12.55 3.10 4.048
8 0.8609 61.6303 48.8767 0.0057 12.75 13.62 3.10 4.392
9 0.8651 63.0070 48.8767 0.0056 14.13 14.8 3.10 4.773
10 0.8698 64.8186 48.8767 0.0056 15.94 16.39 3.10 5.286
11 0.8752 66.6571 48.8767 0.0056 17.78 17.93 3.10 5.785
12 0.8803 68.5404 48.8767 0.0056 19.66 19.54 3.10 6.303
13 0.8840 69.8127 48.8767 0.0055 20.94 20.59 3.10 6.642
14 0.8867 70.8936 48.8767 0.0056 22.02 21.52 3.10 6.941
15 0.8876 71.1050 48.8767 0.0055 22.23 21.67 3.10 6.989
16 0.8867 70.8936 48.8767 0.0056 22.02 21.52 3.10 6.941
17 0.8844 70.0306 48.8767 0.0056 21.15 20.79 3.10 0
18 0.8809 68.7509 48.8767 0.0056 19.87 19.71 3.10 0
19 0.8768 67.2834 48.8767 0.0056 18.41 18.48 3.10 0
20 0.8727 65.8372 48.8767 0.0056 16.96 17.25 3.10 0
21 0.8691 64.4077 48.8767 0.0056 15.53 16 3.10 0
22 0.8661 63.4073 48.8767 0.0056 14.53 15.15 3.10 0
23 0.8634 62.4120 48.8767 0.0056 13.54 14.27 3.10 0
152
Table C.33. September Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago
hEA -
3
0 0.8503 55.2983 48.8767 0.0044 6.42 7.435 3.10 0
1 0.8486 54.5683 48.8767 0.0043 5.69 6.745 3.10 0
2 0.8471 54.0278 48.8767 0.0043 5.15 6.248 3.10 0
3 0.8459 53.6729 48.8767 0.0044 4.80 5.94 3.10 0
4 0.8449 53.3160 48.8767 0.0043 4.44 5.61 3.10 0
5 0.8445 53.1364 48.8767 0.0043 4.26 5.434 3.10 0
6 0.8452 53.3125 48.8767 0.0043 4.44 5.587 3.10 1.802
7 0.8468 54.0314 48.8767 0.0044 5.15 6.27 3.10 2.023
8 0.8495 54.9307 48.8767 0.0043 6.05 7.078 3.10 2.283
9 0.8538 56.5831 48.8767 0.0044 7.71 8.6 3.10 2.774
10 0.8585 58.2631 48.8767 0.0044 9.39 10.11 3.10 3.26
11 0.8639 60.1662 48.8767 0.0043 11.29 11.78 3.10 3.8
12 0.8690 62.1184 48.8767 0.0044 13.24 13.52 3.10 4.36
13 0.8728 63.5088 48.8767 0.0044 14.63 14.73 3.10 4.752
14 0.8753 64.3074 48.8767 0.0043 15.43 15.4 3.10 4.966
15 0.8763 64.7136 48.8767 0.0043 15.84 15.75 3.10 5.082
16 0.8753 64.3074 48.8767 0.0043 15.43 15.4 3.10 4.966
17 0.8730 63.5047 48.8767 0.0043 14.63 14.71 3.10 0
18 0.8697 62.3142 48.8767 0.0043 13.44 13.68 3.10 0
19 0.8654 60.7478 48.8767 0.0043 11.87 12.3 3.10 0
20 0.8613 59.2074 48.8767 0.0043 10.33 10.93 3.10 0
21 0.8579 58.0763 48.8767 0.0044 9.20 9.947 3.10 0
22 0.8547 56.7629 48.8767 0.0043 7.89 8.734 3.10 0
23 0.8521 55.8418 48.8767 0.0043 6.97 7.903 3.10 0
153
Table C.34. October Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago
hEA -
3
0 0.8293 40.1385 48.8767 0.0002 -8.74 0 3.00 0
1 0.8275 39.2335 48.8767 0.0001 -9.64 0 3.00 0
2 0.8258 38.3385 48.8767 0.0000 -10.54 0 3.00 0
3 0.8244 37.6017 48.8767 0.0000 -11.28 0 3.00 0
4 0.8233 37.0172 48.8767 0.0000 -11.86 0 3.00 0
5 0.8230 36.8725 48.8767 0.0000 -12.00 0 3.00 0
6 0.8237 37.3101 48.8767 0.0000 -11.57 0 3.00 0
7 0.8255 38.1910 48.8767 0.0000 -10.69 0 3.00 0
8 0.8286 39.8365 48.8767 0.0002 -9.04 0 3.00 0
9 0.8332 42.1382 48.8767 0.0006 -6.74 0 3.00 0
10 0.8384 44.8372 48.8767 0.0010 -4.04 0 3.00 0
11 0.8444 47.9700 48.8767 0.0015 -0.91 0 3.00 0
12 0.8500 50.8840 48.8767 0.0020 2.01 2.55 3.00 0.85
13 0.8541 53.0057 48.8767 0.0024 4.13 4.622 3.00 1.541
14 0.8570 54.4507 48.8767 0.0026 5.57 6.019 3.00 2.006
15 0.8581 54.9993 48.8767 0.0027 6.12 6.547 3.00 2.182
16 0.8570 54.4507 48.8767 0.0026 5.57 6.019 3.00 2.006
17 0.8545 53.1849 48.8767 0.0024 4.31 4.796 3.00 0
18 0.8507 51.2334 48.8767 0.0021 2.36 2.891 3.00 0
19 0.8461 48.8160 48.8767 0.0017 -0.06 0 3.00 0
20 0.8416 46.4699 48.8767 0.0013 -2.41 0 3.00 0
21 0.8377 44.5155 48.8767 0.0010 -4.36 0 3.00 0
22 0.8342 42.6062 48.8767 0.0006 -6.27 0 3.00 0
23 0.8314 41.2083 48.8767 0.0004 -7.67 0 3.00 0
154
Table C.35. November Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago
hEA -
3
0 0.8079 26.4749 48.8767 0.0000 -22.40 0 N/A 0
1 0.8060 25.3603 48.8767 0.0000 -23.52 0 N/A 0
2 0.8043 24.2639 48.8767 0.0000 -24.61 0 N/A 0
3 0.8028 23.4245 48.8767 0.0000 -25.45 0 N/A 0
4 0.8016 22.7131 48.8767 0.0000 -26.16 0 N/A 0
5 0.8013 22.4777 48.8767 0.0000 -26.40 0 N/A 0
6 0.8020 22.9494 48.8767 0.0000 -25.93 0 N/A 0
7 0.8039 24.0228 48.8767 0.0000 -24.85 0 N/A 0
8 0.8071 25.9768 48.8767 0.0000 -22.90 0 N/A 0
9 0.8120 28.8912 48.8767 0.0000 -19.99 0 N/A 0
10 0.8175 32.2104 48.8767 0.0000 -16.67 0 N/A 0
11 0.8238 35.9839 48.8767 0.0000 -12.89 0 N/A 0
12 0.8297 39.5173 48.8767 0.0000 -9.36 0 N/A 0
13 0.8342 42.2868 48.8767 0.0004 -6.59 0 N/A 0
14 0.8372 44.0295 48.8767 0.0008 -4.85 0 N/A 0
15 0.8383 44.6732 48.8767 0.0009 -4.20 0 N/A 0
16 0.8372 44.0295 48.8767 0.0008 -4.85 0 N/A 0
17 0.8345 42.4428 48.8767 0.0005 -6.43 0 N/A 0
18 0.8305 39.9714 48.8767 0.0000 -8.91 0 N/A 0
19 0.8256 37.1439 48.8767 0.0000 -11.73 0 N/A 0
20 0.8209 34.2823 48.8767 0.0000 -14.59 0 N/A 0
21 0.8167 31.8039 48.8767 0.0000 -17.07 0 N/A 0
22 0.8131 29.5418 48.8767 0.0000 -19.33 0 N/A 0
23 0.8101 27.7352 48.8767 0.0000 -21.14 0 N/A 0
155
Table C.36. December Daily Average Energy Consumption for Model II, Chicago
hEA -
3
0 0.7857 13.6177 48.8767 0.0000 -35.26 0 N/A 0
1 0.7839 12.6061 48.8767 0.0000 -36.27 0 N/A 0
2 0.7822 11.5119 48.8767 0.0000 -37.36 0 N/A 0
3 0.7807 10.6310 48.8767 0.0000 -38.25 0 N/A 0
4 0.7796 9.9545 48.8767 0.0000 -38.92 0 N/A 0
5 0.7792 9.7626 48.8767 0.0000 -39.11 0 N/A 0
6 0.7799 10.1470 48.8767 0.0000 -38.73 0 N/A 0
7 0.7818 11.2168 48.8767 0.0000 -37.66 0 N/A 0
8 0.7850 13.2111 48.8767 0.0000 -35.67 0 N/A 0
9 0.7898 16.0094 48.8767 0.0000 -32.87 0 N/A 0
10 0.7952 19.1618 48.8767 0.0000 -29.71 0 N/A 0
11 0.8015 22.9520 48.8767 0.0000 -25.92 0 N/A 0
12 0.8073 26.3524 48.8767 0.0000 -22.52 0 N/A 0
13 0.8116 29.0246 48.8767 0.0000 -19.85 0 N/A 0
14 0.8146 30.7329 48.8767 0.0000 -18.14 0 N/A 0
15 0.8157 31.4018 48.8767 0.0000 -17.47 0 N/A 0
16 0.8146 30.7329 48.8767 0.0000 -18.14 0 N/A 0
17 0.8120 29.2850 48.8767 0.0000 -19.59 0 N/A 0
18 0.8081 26.8534 48.8767 0.0000 -22.02 0 N/A 0
19 0.8032 24.0262 48.8767 0.0000 -24.85 0 N/A 0
20 0.7985 21.2013 48.8767 0.0000 -27.68 0 N/A 0
21 0.7944 18.7174 48.8767 0.0000 -30.16 0 N/A 0
22 0.7909 16.6487 48.8767 0.0000 -32.23 0 N/A 0
23 0.7879 14.9583 48.8767 0.0000 -33.92 0 N/A 0
LIST OF REFERENCES
Addison, 2002, Addison Products Company Specifications Manual, Orlando, Florida
Ahmed, C. S., Al-Frayedhi, A., Gandhidsan, P. and Zubair S., 1996,” Exergy Analysis of
A Liquid-Desiccant Based Hybrid Air-conditioning System,” Energy, Vol. 23,
No.1, pp. 51-59.
Ahmed, S. Y., Al-Frayedhi, A. and Gandhidsan ,P., 1997,” Thermodynamic Analysis of

Liquid Desiccants,” Solar Energy, Vol. 62 No.1, pp. 11-18.
Ahmed, S. Y., Al-Frayedhi, A. and Gandhidsan ,P.,1999,”Regeneration of Liquid

Desiccants Using Membrane Technology,” Energy Conversion and Management,
Vol. 40, pp. 1405-1411.
Al-Frayedhi, A., Al-Mutairi, M. A. and Gandhidsan , P., 2002,” Evaluation of Heat and
Mass Transfer Coefficient in Gauze-type Structured Packing Air Dehumidifier
Operating with Liquid Desiccant,” International Journal of Refrigeration, Vol. 25,
pp. 330_339.
Al-Rabghi, O. M., Elsayed M. M. and Kinsara, A. A.,1997, ”Parametric Study of an

Energy Efficient Air Conditioning System Using Liquid Desiccant,” Applied
Thermal Engineering, Vol. 18, No 5, pp. 327-335.
Aseyev, G. G. and Zaytsev, I. D.,1992, Properties of Aqueous Solutions of Electrolytes,

CRC Press, Boca Raton.
ASHRAE, 1989, ASHRAE Handbook- Fundamentals, SI Edition, The American Society

of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia.
ASHRAE, 2001, ASHRAE Handbook- Fundamentals, SI Edition, The American Society

of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia.
Berntsson, T. S. and Wimby, M. J., 1994, “Viscosity and Density of Aqueous Solutions
of LiBr, LiCl, ZnBr2 , CaCl2 and LiNO3,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering
Data, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 68-74.
Dai, Y. J., Wang, R. Z., Yu, J. D. and Zhang H.F.,2001,” Use of Liquid Desiccant
Cooling to Improve the Performance of Vapor Compression Air Conditioning,”
Applied Thermal Engineering , Vol. 21, pp. 1185-1202.
Desicalc, 2002, Desicalc InterEnergy Software, Batavia, Illinois.
156
157
Dhar, P. L., Kaushik, S. C. and Sanjeev, J.,2000,” Optimal design of Liquid Desiccant
Cooling Systems,” ASHRAE Transaction , Vol. 106, pp. 79-86.
DryKor, 2002, DryKor Reference Handbook and Software, Fayetteville, Georgia.
Carrier, 2002, Carrier Hourly Analysis Program (HAP4.1), Syracuse, New York.
Fumo, N.,1999, Performance of a Packed Tower Absorber/Regenerator for an Aqueous

Lithium Chloride Desiccant Dehumidification Systems, M.S. Thesis, University of
Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Johannsen, A., 1984,”Performance Simulation of a Solar Air-conditioning System with

Liquid Desiccant,” International Journal of Ambient Energy, 5(2), pp. 55-89.
Kathabar, 2003, Kathabar Website, http://www.kathabar.com, April 30, 2003.
Khan, A. Y. and Martinez, J. L., 1996, “Modeling and Parametric Analysis of Heat and
Mass Transfer Performance of a Hybrid Liquid Desiccant Absorber,” Energy
Conversion and Management, Vol. 39, No 10, pp. 1095-1112.
Lowensteien, A., Pesaran, A., Ryan, J. and Slayzak S., 1998,“Advanced Commercial
Liquid-Desiccant Technology Development Study,” Report by National Renewable
Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado.
Mago, P., 2000, Performance of a Hybrid Desiccant Cooling System Using Lithium
Chloride and Its Application in Residential and Commercial Sector, M.S. Thesis,
University of Florida, Gainesville.
Sherif, S. A., 2002, “Overview of Psychometrics,” ASHRAE Journal, Vol. 44, No. 7, pp.
33-40.
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH
A. M. Al-Jaafari was born on January 13, 1974 in AL-Hassa, Saudi Arabia, where
he performed his studies until high school. In 1991 he moved to Dhahran, Saudi Arabia,
where he completed his Bachelor in Mechanical Engineering at King Fahd University of
Petroleum and Minerals by January 1996. After graduation he joined Saudi Aramco Oil
Company in March 1996 working as a Mechanical Design Engineer in the Project Design
and Construction Department. Due to his high performance and high GPA at the
bachelor’s degree he was granted a scholarship by Saudi Aramco Oil Company to
complete his master’s degree in mechanical engineering at the University of Florida in
August 2001. After graduation he will be back to the Project Design and Construction
Department of Saudi Aramco Oil Company to act as an HVAC design specialist for two
years. After that he intends to start a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering.
158

Aljaafari A

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Aljaafari A

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF VAPOR COMPRESSION AND HYBRID LIQUID

DESICCANT DEHUMIDIFICATION SYSTEMS

A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL

my interest in the subject of liquid desiccants.

LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................... xi

NOMENCLATURE ......................................................................................................... xii

2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE .......................................................................................4

3 COOLING LOAD CALCULATIONS AND PSYCHROMETRIC ANALYSIS........8

3.1 Cooling Load Calculations ....................................................................................8

4 CYCLE DESCRIPTION AND THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF A HYBRID

4.1 System Description..............................................................................................18

5 ENERGY ANALYSIS ...............................................................................................27

5.1 Model I: Existing Air-Conditioning and Ventilation System.............................27

6 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.................................................................................36

6.1 Energy Consumption Summary...........................................................................36

7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .....................................................47

A PSYCHROMETRIC PROPERTY TABLES .............................................................48

B AVERAGE ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR MODEL I........................................84

C AVERAGE ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR MODEL II ....................................120

BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ...........................................................................................158

3.1 Cooling Spaces Internal Loads ................................................................................9

3.2 Miami’s Weather Data from January-June ............................................................10

3.3 Miami’s Weather Data from from July-December................................................11

3.4 Gainesville’s Weather Data from January-June ....................................................12

3.5 Gainesville’s Weather Data from July-December .................................................13

3.6 Chicago’s Weather Data from January-June .........................................................14

3.7 Chicago’s Weather Data from July-December ......................................................15

3.8 January Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami..............................17

5.1 Cooling Energy Consumption by the Building Excluding Ventilation .................28

5.2 Number of Working Days per Month....................................................................31

5.5 Miami Energy Consumption for Model III............................................................35

5.6 Chicago Energy Consumption for Model III .........................................................35

6.2 Gainesville’s Monthly Energy Consumption for the Make-Up Unit.....................37

6.4 Total Cooling Energy Consumption for the Miami Building................................40

6.6 Miami’s Energy Cost Summary.............................................................................43

6.8 Chicago’s Energy Cost Summary..........................................................................44

6.9 Operation and Capital Cost Summary ...................................................................45

A.1 January Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami..............................48

A.2 February Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami............................49

A.3 March Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami................................50

A.4 April Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami..................................51

A.5 May Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami...................................52

A.6 June Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami...................................53

A.7 July Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami ...................................54

A.8 August Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami ..............................55

A.9 September Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami.........................56

A.10 October Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami .............................57

A.11 November Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami .........................58

A.12 December Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Miami..........................59

A.13 January Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ......................60

A.14 February Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ....................61

A.15 March Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ........................62

A.16 April Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ..........................63

A.17 May Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ...........................64

A.18 June Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ...........................65

A.19 July Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville............................66

A.20 August Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville.......................67

A.21 September Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville .................68

A.22 October Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville......................69

A.24 December Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Gainesville ..................71

A.25 January Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago...........................72

A.26 February Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago.........................73

A.27 March Average Hourly Psychrometric Properties for Chicago.............................74