Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0.08
Chl a Chl b 90% acetone Conc. a:b
(ml) (ml) (ml) (mg/l) 0.06 Chlorophyll b
1.0 - 0 1.0:0.0 0.04
0.8 - 0.2 0.8:0.0 0.02
0.6 - 0.4 0.6:0.0
0.4 - 0.6 0.4:0.0 0
600 620 640 660 680 700
0.2 - 0.8 0.2:0.0
- 1.0 0 0.0:1.0 Wavelength (nm)
- 0.8 0.2 0.0:0.8
- 0.6 0.4 0.0:0.6
- 0.4 0.6 0.0:0.4
Figure 1: Absorbance spectra of chlorophylls a and b.
- 0.2 0.8 0.0:0.2 Both samples were at a concentration of 1mg/l.
0.9 0.1 - 0.9:0.1
0.8 0.2 - 0.8:0.2 In certain methods of chlorophyll determination,
0.6 0.4 - 0.6:0.4 acidification of the chlorophyll samples can help to
0.5 0.5 - 0.5:0.5 remove the interferences of degradation products.
When chlorophylls are acidified, the magnesium ion is
Table 1: Dilutions and mixtures of chlorophyll (Chl) a lost from the porphyrin ring, resulting in the production
and b solutions. The final volume was 1ml in each of pheophytin. The ratio of pure chlorophyll a before
case. acidification to that after is around 1.7 (1). Presence
of degradation products and other chlorophylls have
Photosynthetic pigments were extracted from a the effect of lowering the ratio.
sample of slime algae isolated from a domestic
marine fish tank. The algae were ground in a mortar
jenwayhelp@bibby-scientific.com
www.jenway.com
Tel: 01785 810433
Figure 2 shows the effect of adding HCl to a final The approximate amounts of chlorophyll a and b
concentration of 0.003N to a sample of chlorophyll a. present in a sample can be calculated by a number of
The degradation was virtually complete within 90 different formulae. The formulae of Lichtenthaler and
seconds (2). The absorbance maximum fell by Wellburn (3) are based on the absorbance maxima of
approximately 45% and the peak shifted each pigment and are dependent on the solvent used.
approximately 2nm to the red. The ratio was The formulae for samples dissolved in acetone are as
calculated to be 1.8, slightly higher than the expected follows:
value of 1.7. This may indicate further degradation of
pheophytin by the acid. Ca = 11.75 A662.6 – 2.35 A645.6
0.04
0.8 0.2 1.18 0.24
0.03 0.6 0.4 0.93 0.40
0.02 0.5 0.5 0.75 0.50
0.01
Table 2: Nominal chlorophyll a and b concentrations
0 based on dilutions and mixtures and the calculated
600 620 640 660 680 700 concentrations based on the absorbance values at
Wavelength (nm) 662.6nm and 645.6nm.
Figure 3: Degradation of chlorophyll b following
acidification. The values calculated for chlorophyll a are somewhat
higher that expected, which may indicate that the
Due to this acid effect, the presence of chlorophyll b original dilution was inaccurate, however, there is very
in a mixture with chlorophyll a can be determined as good linear correlation between the expected and
the relative amount increases by observing the calculated values as shown in Figure 4. Similar
presence of a shoulder at around 646nm on the results were obtained for chlorophyll b with calculated
chlorophyll a peak. concentrations very close to the expected values.
jenwayhelp@bibby-scientific.com
www.jenway.com
Tel: 01785 810433
Conclusions
Chlorophyll a We have demonstrated here that samples containing
1.40
mixtures of chlorophyll a and b can be distinguished
Calculated conc. (mg/l)
0.20
0.00
References
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 (1) Lorenzen. C. J., Determination of chlorophyll and
Expected conc. (mg/l) pheopigments: Spectrophotometric equations.
Limnol. Oceanogr. 12: 343-346, (1967)
Figure 4: Correlation of expected concentration (2) Method based on EPA Method 445.0: In vitro
against calculated concentration for chlorophylls a determination of chlorophyll a and pheophytin a
and b using the formulae of Lichtenthaler and in marine and freshwater algae by fluorescence.
Wellburn. Arar, E. J. and Collins, G. B. (1997).
(3) Lichtenthaler, H. K., and Wellburn, A.R.,
Determination of total carotenoids and
chlorophylls a and b of leaf in different solvents.
Biol. Soc. Trans. 11: 591-592 (1983).
jenwayhelp@bibby-scientific.com
www.jenway.com
Tel: 01785 810433