CPA-DD Maris Biogas PoA Indonesia Webhosting

UNFCCC/CCNUCC
CDM – Executive Board Page 1
COMPONENT PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR

SMALL-SCALE COMPONENT PROJECT ACTIVITIES (F-CDM-SSC-CPA-DD)
Version 02.0
COMPONENT PROJECT ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT (CPA-DD)
SECTION A. General description of CPA

A.1. Title of the proposed or registered PoA
>>
BWC Sustainable Biogas Recovery Programme of Activities in Indonesia
Version: 01
Date: 22/05/2012
A.2. Title of the CPA

>>
CPA 1.1 – Maris – PTPN VII Biogas Project
Version: 01
Date: 22/05/2012
A.3. Description of the CPA

>>
The proposed small-scale CDM Programme activity “CPA 1.1 – Maris – PTPN VII Biogas Project”
(hereafter referred to as the “The CPA”) is developed by the PT. Maris Sustainable Indonesia (hereafter
referred to as the “The CPA implementer”), The CPA consists of new biogas plant programme activity
under the under the PoA titled “BWC Sustainable Biogas Recovery Programme of Activities in
Indonesia”. The CPA involves the treatment of POME from a palm oil mill with a nominal capacity to
treat 468 m3/wastewater per day with an expected COD content of 44,249 mg/l.
The PoA is operated and implemented by PT. Blue World Indonesia (hereinafter referred to as “BWC”).
BWC is the “Coordinating / Managing Entity” (hereinafter referred to as “CME”).
The CPA complies with the following project scenario(s) (referred to as scenario throughout this
document) as described in the PoA-DD:
Table I.A.3.1 - Description of the small-scale CDM programme activity technology scenario
Project Scenario Description of scenario
1 Biogas plants installed at new (Greenfield) facilities
2 Biogas plants installed at existing facilities
E Utilization of biogas for grid connected power generation (in combination with
scenario 1 or 2)
CPA that utilize biogas for the production of electricity can optionally select scenario E to be able to
claim the emission reduction due to exported of electricity to the grid.
Technology / measures employed: a biogas plant installed at existing facilities

Type: Other projects
Category: III.H: AMS-III.H “Methane Recovery in Wastewater Treatment” Version 16, EB 58, Sectoral
Scope 13.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
The CPA will contribute to climate change mitigation efforts through the reduction of Green House
Gases (GHG) emissions through introduction of technology that captures and subsequently utilizes or
destroys methane released during wastewater treatment. In the baseline situation the methane would be
released into the atmosphere.
In addition to the above, CPA that also select project scenario E implement the following measure:
Technology / measures employed: a new small-scale renewable power plant.
Type: renewable energy projects
Category: I.D: “Grid connected renewable electricity generation”; Version 17, EB 61, Sectoral Scope
01.
The CPA will contribute to climate change mitigation efforts through the reduction of Green House
Gases (GHG) emissions through displacement from of more carbon intensive power generation in the
grid.
A.4. Entity/individual responsible for CPA

>>
BWC is the CME whereas the biogas plant implementer is addressed as “CPA implementer”. These
terminologies are used consistently throughout the generic CPA-DD.
BWC is the Coordinating/Managing Entity of the PoA.

The CPA implementer is the entity/individual responsible for the small scale CPA and they
are aware and have agreed that their activity is being subscribed to the PoA.
The CPA Implementer – PT. Maris Sustainable Indonesia has given mandate to the CME to
consider the inclusion of CPA under PoA.
BWC and Blue World Carbon SEA Pte Ltd are the Project Participants of the PoA.
The CME has considered the CPA in the PoA. For inclusion it has obtained the mandate from the CPA
Implementer.
A.5. Technical description of the CPA

>>
(a) A list and the arrangement of the main manufacturing/production technologies, systems
and equipment involved.
The proposed CPA project activity will convert the existing effluent treatment system into one efficient
covered bio digester with methane collection point. An enclosed flare will be installed to combust the
biogas for the first year and will combust the excess gas when the biogas could not be used for electricity
generation in the second year onwards. The biogas run gensets for a total capacity of 1 MW will be
installed to generate electricity to be exported to the nearest grid (Sumatera Grid).
Item Type/Brand
Cover Geo Membrane HDPE
Base lining Geo Membrane HDPE
Flare system + additional Kobar Flare / KF-GF-XX
Sistem monitoring MARIS
Gas engine + additional *) MARIS
Lifetime of the equipment 15 years
Overhaul of Gas Engine/Flare 8000 hour
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
(b) Energy and mass flows and balances of the systems and equipment included in the CPA;
The specifications of the main equipment for wastewater treatment that are implemented under the
project activity are as follows:
Description Value Unit

POME treatment capacity (max.) 850 m3/day
COD at inlet to wastewater treatment system 44,249 mg/l
COD Removal of Digester 85 %
Biogas Production 9,208 M3/day
Installed capacity of generator 1 Unit 1 MW
Flaring system Enclosed Flare

Type of Cover HDPE Membrane
Methane Fraction 60 %
(c) The types and levels of services

The CPA involves implementation of a CIGAR (Covered In Ground Anaerobic Reactor). This is done by
covering 02 of the exiting lagoons with a HDPE membrane and biogas recovery equipment. This will
lead to an increase in efficiency of the anaerobic digestion process and hence enhance biogas production.
The methane rich biogas will be fed to a 01 MW generator that is connected to the grid.
(d) Facilities, systems and equipment in operation under the existing scenario prior to the
implementation of the CPA;
The existing situation on baseline scenario is using the open lagoon as the conventional wastewater
treatment at palm oil mill in Indonesia.
In the baseline, the wastewater is treated in an open lagoon system where methane is emitted as a result
of anaerobic digestion. The palm oil mill and open lagoon system are existing facilities.
The baseline scenario for power generation is grid connected electricity generation in the Thai national
grid. The CPA will displace electricity generation in the baseline.
(e) Facilities, systems and equipment in the baseline scenario.

The existing open lagoon system consists of a series of fat pits, cooling points and 04 anaerobic open
lagoons with a design depth of 5 meter. The entire system is described in the picture below:
3
Unit Dimensions Volume (M )
Fat Pit 1 10 x 12 x 2 120
Fat Pit 2 10 x 8 x 1,8 144

Fat Pit 3 10 x 12 x 2 120
Fat Pit 4 13 x 4 x 1.75 91
Cooling Pond 1 6 x 30 x 2.5 450
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

Anaerobic 1 40 x 40 x 5 8,000
Anaerobic 2 40 x 40 x 5 8,000
Anaerobic 3 40 x 40 x 5 8,000
Anaerobic 4 40 x 40 x 5 8,000
The baseline scenario is a continuation of current practice, thus identical to the scenario existing prior to
the implementation of the CPA.
A.6. Party(ies)
Private and/or public
Indicate if the Party involved
Name of Party involved (host) entity(ies) CPA
wishes to be considered as
indicates a host Party implementer(s)
CPA implementer (Yes/No)
(as applicable)
Private Entity: PT. Blue World
Indonesia (host) No
Indonesia
Private Entity: Blue World
Netherlands No
Carbon SEA Pte Ltd
A.7. Geographic reference or other means of identification

>>
As per PoA section C, the identification parameters as per table I.A.7.1 are required for each CPA.
Table I.A.7.1 unique identification of the CPA

Component Details
Project Entity PT. Maris Sustainable Indonesia
Project Identification Number CPA 1.1
Village/city Sinar Banten, Bekri
District Lampung Tengah
Province Lampung Province
Country Indonesia
GPS coordinates 5° 4'33.10"S; 105° 8'1.50"E
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Figure I.A.7.1 Map of Indonesia
Figure I.A.7.2 Map of the project Location.
A.8. Duration of the CPA

A.8.1. Start date of the CPA
>>
[DD/MM/YYYY] (The CPA has not started yet. During course of validation the actual starting date as
per CDM glossary of terms will be indicated.)
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Confirmation that the start date of this CPA is not before DD/MM/YYYY (date of commencement of
PoA validation).
A.8.2. Expected operational lifetime of the CPA

>>
The expected operational lifetime of this CPA is 15 years (feasibility study report).
A.9. Choice of the crediting period and related information

>>
Fixed Crediting period
Renewable Crediting period
A.9.1. Start date of the crediting period

>>
01/01/2013
A.9.2. Length of the crediting period

>>
10 Years (The duration of crediting period, fixed or renewable, of any CPA is limited to the end date of
the PoA regardless of when the CPA was added.).
A.10. Estimated amount of GHG emission reductions

Emission reductions during the crediting period
Annual GHG emission reductions
Years
(in tonnes of CO2e) for each year
01/01/2013 - 31/12/2013 19,004
01/01/2014 - 31/12/2014 19,004
01/01/2015 - 31/12/2015 19,004
01/01/2016 - 31/12/2016 19,004
01/01/2017 - 31/12/2017 19,004
01/01/2018 - 31/12/2018 19,004
01/01/2019 - 31/12/2019 19,004
01/01/2020 - 31/12/2020 19,004
01/01/2021 - 31/12/2021 19,004
01/01/2022 - 31/12/2022 19,004
Total number of crediting years 10
Annual average GHG emission 19,004
reductions over the crediting period
Total estimated reductions (tonnes of CO2e) 186,106
A.11. Public funding of the CPA

>>
The CPA will not receive any public funding from Parties included in Annex I of the UNFCCC.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
A.12. Debundling of small-scale component project activities

>>
The CPA included in the PoA is not a debundled component of another CDM Programme Activity or
CDM Project activity:
It has been demonstrated that this CPA included in the PoA is not a debundled component of another
CDM Programme of Activities or another CDM Project activity. The following approach has been
applied as per the guidance for determining the occurrence of de bundling under a Programme of
Activities (EB 54, Annex 13):
Paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 of EB 54, Annex 13 states:
Para 8. For the purposes of registration of a Programme of Activities (PoA)1 a proposed small-scale
CPA of a PoA shall be deemed to be a de-bundled component of a large scale activity if there is already
an activity2, which satisfies both conditions (a) and (b) below:
(a) Has the same activity implementer as the proposed small scale CPA or has a Coordinating or
Managing entity, which also manages a large scale PoA of the same technology/measure, and;
Substantiation: Neither the CPA Implementer (PT. Maris Sustainable Indonesia) nor the CME (BWC)
have implemented a large scale PoA/CDM Project activity of the same technology/measure.
(b) The boundary is within 1 km of the boundary of the proposed small-scale CPA, at the closest point.
Substantiation: As the CPA implementer and the CME have not implemented a large scale PoA/CDM
Project activity of the same technology/measure this condition is not applicable.
Para 9. If a proposed small-scale CPA of a PoA is deemed to be a debundled component in accordance

with paragraph 2 above, but the total size of such a CPA combined with a registered small-scale CPA of
a PoA or a registered CDM Project activity does not exceed the limits for small-scale CDM and
smallscale A/R Project activities as set out in Annex II of the decision 4/CMP.1 3 and 5/CMP.1
respectively, the CPA of a PoA can qualify to use simplified modalities and procedures for small-scale
CDM and smallscale A/R CDM Project activities.
Substantiation: As the CPA implementer and the CME have not implemented a PoA/CDM Project
activity of the same technology/measure this condition is not applicable.
Para 10. If each of the independent subsystems/measures (e.g. biogas digester, solar home system)
included in the CPA of a PoA is no larger than 1% of the small scale thresholds defined by the
methodology applied 4 , than that CPA of PoA is exempted from performing de-bundling check i.e.
considered as being not a de-bundled component of a large scale activity.
Substantiation: Not applicable to this CPA as the measure is larger than 1% of the small scale thresholds
defined by the methodology applied.
1
Only those POAs need to be considered in determining de-bundling that are: (i) in the same geographical area; and (ii) use the
same methodology; as the POA to which proposed CPA is being added
2
Which may be a (i) registered small-scale CPA of a PoA, (ii) an application to register another small-scale CPA of a PoA or
(iii) another registered CDM Project activity
3
Limits have been revised as set in paragraph 28 of decision 1/CMP.2
4
i.e. 450 kW thermal installed capacity
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Based on the above description, the proposed small scale CPA under PoA is not deemed to be de-bundled
component of a large-scale activity, therefore is eligible to use the simplified modalities and procedures
for small-scale project activities. The CPA implementer PT. Maris Sustainable Indonesia has given a
declaration to CME that the Project activity is not a debundled component of large scale Project.
The CME confirms that the CPA is not a de-bundled component of large scale Project activity.
A.13. Confirmation for CPA

>>
The proposed CPA is not registered as an individual CDM project and is not part of another PoA.
SECTION B. Environmental analysis

B.1. Analysis of the environmental impacts
>>
According to Indonesia’s regulation, the project does not require an Environmental Impact Analysis (EIA
or AMDAL). The Ministry of Environment’s Decree No. 86/2002 stipulates that such project activity
requires an Environmental Management Program (UKL) and an Environmental Monitoring Program
(UPL). An application for UKL/UPL has been dully submitted to the Environmental Department
Lampung Tengah.
Environmental impacts of the biogas project are expected to occur in different stages from pre-
construction, construction stage, operational and post-operational stage. In pre-construction stage, no
significant impact is expected. The company will have to engage employees and people living nearby to
communicate the project idea, the benefit of electricity supply it will bring and possible negative impacts.
Construction stage will give positive impact to the community for it creates job opportunities. Some of
the local villagers will be involved during this phase. It is expected that members of the local community
will be employed as unskilled workers during the construction phases of the project.
Transportation of equipment and material might cause damage to the roads surrounding the project
location. The magnitude of the construction is small and therefore the impact is considered smaller or
insignificant. Transportation activity might also emit pollutants, dust and noise. The scale of the impact
is considered minor. Construction of biogas plant and its facilities might also emit pollutants, dust and
noise. It is considered significant notably to construction workers, mill and estate workers and their
family who live in the surrounding. The company will have to control and monitor these impacts on a
regular basis.
Operational stage of the project will include the activities of methane capture, operation of biogas plant,
power generation.
Possible impact that might occur is gas leakage and explosion. The company has to carefully control and
monitor the safety procedures to prevent leakage and explosion. All operation and maintenance of the
biodigester will be undertaken by trained personnel working for the technology provider. This will ensure
optimal operation.
Additional small number of employees involved in power plant operation will not give significant
impact. The impact from maintenance activity is also considered insignificant.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
SECTION C. Local stakeholder comments

C.1. Solicitation of comments from local stakeholders
>>
On 29 March 2012, a stakeholder consultation meeting was successfully conducted in function hall
PTPN VII UU Bekri located in the mill. The project owner, PT MSI and PTPN VII UU Bekri was host of
the event. A public notice was published on a local newspaper ahead of the stakeholders meeting and
invitation letters were sent out to representatives of the local government, and University of Lampung.
Others who attended the meeting include CDM and technology consultants, local villagers and media, as
well as employees of the Mill and Estate. A total of 63 participants were present as reported in the table
below.
A presentation was delivered by CDM Consultant (BWC), Project Owner (PT. MSI), Manager Mill
(PTPN VII) during the meeting on the CDM, sustainability criteria and an overview of the Kyoto
Protocol, Technical aspects of the biogas project were also described together with the methane recovery
details for the mill. It was also described how the implementation of the project can save GHG emissions
by avoiding the usage of diesel for power generation and can also create job opportunities for local
people. Representatives of the local government believed that the project will reduce GHG emission
globally and locally improve the working conditions at the mill and claimed that, together with the
private sector and local communities, they are ready to further support national programs that reduce
GHG emissions locally.
C.2. Summary of comments received

>>
Following are the summary of the feedback from the participants during the stakeholder consultation
meeting for the CPA
Question1 (Mr. Fathullah-BLHD Lampung Tengah) - Suggestion
- Clarify about the meaning of the CDM and climate change issue. It would be better if we can
make the explanation of the related matter (project, cdm, mill information) to a simple
explanation.
- We support the development of the project which related to environmentally friendly.
- What is the social benefit of the project, are the community could get the electricity from the
project?
Answer: Mr. Syarifuddin – Mill Manager of PTPN VII

- The electricity should have the direct and indirect benefit to the community. As the entity who
has authority for transmission will be PLN, we hope there will be no cut of in the further after the
project is running.
Question 2. (Mr. Jamin Hasan)

- We hope that PTPN could rebuild the road in the village.
Answer:
- OK, we take into consideration of this suggestion.
Question 3. (Dr. Udin – UNILA) (suggestion/clarification)

- There is a lot of opportunity / potential residual product from POME. So we hope we can
develop a product from POME which has a benefit to the community.
Question 4. (Ms. Wiwid – PLN)
- PLN is welcome to off take the electricity production from the project.
Answer to Q3-4 (Mr. Syarifuddin)

UNFCCC/CCNUCC
- Thank you for all of suggestion and supporting for the project.
C.3. Report on consideration of comments received

>>
In conclusion, Project Owner has given response to all comment or question raised during the
stakeholder consultation meeting. No negative comment was received during the meeting.
SECTION D. Eligibility of CPA and Estimation of emissions reductions

D.1. Title and reference of the approved baseline and monitoring methodology(ies) selected:
>>
The approved baseline and monitoring methodology applied to a SSC-CPA included in this PoA is:
 AMS-III.H “Methane Recovery in Wastewater Treatment” Version 16, EB 58, Sectoral Scope 13
(Waste handling and disposal)
 AMS.I.D: “Grid connected renewable electricity generation”; Version 17, EB 61, Sectoral Scope
01 (energy industries).
Reference to the approved baseline and monitoring methodologies:

http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/SSCmethodologies/approved
D.2. Application of methodology(ies)

>>
The SSC-CPA complies with the applicability conditions as stipulated in AMS.III.H Version 16 as
indicated in the table below.
Table D.2.1: Applicability conditions of methodology AMS.III.H Version 165

Applicability Conditions CPA compliance
This methodology comprises measures that recover biogas

from biogenic organic matter in wastewater by means of
one, or a combination, of the following options:
(a) Not applicable to the CPA
Substitution of aerobic wastewater or sludge treatment (b) Not applicable to the CPA
systems with anaerobic systems with biogas recovery and (c) Not applicable to the CPA
combustion; (d) The proposed CPA will convert
the existing open anaerobic
Introduction of anaerobic sludge treatment system with lagoon into covered bio
biogas recovery and combustion to a wastewater treatment digester with methane
plant without sludge treatment; collection point.
(e) Not applicable to the CPA
Introduction of biogas recovery and combustion to a
(f) Not applicable to the CPA
sludge treatment system;
Introduction of biogas recovery and combustion to an
anaerobic wastewater treatment system such as anaerobic
reactor, lagoon, septic tank or an on site industrial plant;6
5
The number in front of each paragraph indicates the respective paragraph of AMS.III.H Version 16.
6
Other technologies in Table 6.3 of Chapter 6: Wastewater Treatment and Discharge of 2006 IPCC Guidelines for
National Greenhouse Gas Inventories are included.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Introduction of anaerobic wastewater treatment with

biogas recovery and combustion, with or without
anaerobic sludge treatment, to an untreated wastewater
stream;
Introduction of a sequential stage of wastewater treatment
with biogas recovery and combustion, with or without
sludge treatment, to an anaerobic wastewater treatment
system without biogas recovery (e.g. introduction of
treatment in an anaerobic reactor with biogas recovery as a
sequential treatment step for the wastewater that is
presently being treated in an anaerobic lagoon without
methane recovery).
(a) Baseline lagoons have a depth
In cases where baseline system is anaerobic lagoon the of five meters, hence meets the
methodology is applicable if: criteria
The lagoons are ponds with a depth greater than two (b) Average ambient temperature
meters, without aeration. The value for depth is obtained of Lampung Tengah Region on
from engineering design documents, or through direct 2001 is 26-28oC7, hence meets
measurement, or by dividing the surface area by the total the criteria
volume. If the lagoon filling level varies seasonally, the The sludge is mixed with the
average of the highest and lowest levels may be taken; wastewater for discharging to land
application. Retention time of the
Ambient temperature above 15C, at least during part of sludge removal is 2 years , hence meets
the year, on a monthly average basis; the criteria.
The minimum interval between two consecutive sludge

removal events shall be 30 days.
The project activity proposes to
The recovered biogas from the above measures may also combust the gas in flaring system at the
be utilised for the following applications instead of first stage, then utilise the biogas for
combustion/flaring: electricity generation at the second
Thermal or mechanical,8 electrical energy generation stage. Hence, meets the criteria.
directly;
Thermal or mechanical, electrical energy generation after
bottling of upgraded biogas, in this case additional
guidance provided in Annex 1 shall be followed; or
Thermal or mechanical, electrical energy generation after
upgrading and distribution, in this case additional
guidance provided in Annex 1 shall be followed:
Upgrading and injection of biogas into a natural gas
distribution grid with no significant transmission
constraints;
Upgrading and transportation of biogas via a dedicated
7
Source: “Sekilas Lintas Kabupaten Lampung Tengah” page 6
8
For example combusted in a prime mover such as an engine coupled to a machine such as grinding machine.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
piped network to a group of end users; or

Upgrading and transportation of biogas (e.g. by trucks) to
distribution points for end users.
Hydrogen production;
Use as fuel in transportation applications after upgrading.
This is applicable, since electricity is
If the recovered biogas is used for project activities generated using the biogas. The
covered under paragraph 3 (a), that component of the appropriate methodology, AMS.I.D has
project activity can use a corresponding methodology been applied.
under Type I.
Applicable to the proposed CPA
For project activities covered under paragraph 3 (b), if
bottles with upgraded biogas are sold outside the project
boundary, the end-use of the biogas shall be ensured via a
contract between the bottled biogas vendor and the end-
user. No emission reductions may be claimed from the
displacement of fuels from the end use of bottled biogas in
such situations. If however the end use of the bottled
biogas is included in the project boundary and is
monitored during the crediting period CO2 emissions
avoided by the displacement of fossil fuel can be claimed
under the corresponding Type I methodology, e.g. AMS-
I.C “Thermal energy production with or without
electricity”.
For project activities covered under paragraph 3 (c) (i),
emission reductions from the displacement of the use of
natural gas are eligible under this methodology, provided
the geographical extent of the natural gas distribution grid
is within the host country boundaries.
For project activities covered under paragraph 3 (c) (ii),
emission reductions for the displacement of the use of
fuels can be claimed following the provision in the
corresponding Type I methodology, e.g. AMS-I.C.
In particular, for the case of 3 (b) and (c) (iii), the physical
leakage during storage and transportation of upgraded
biogas, as well as the emissions from fossil fuel consumed
by vehicles for transporting biogas shall be considered.
Relevant procedures in paragraph 11 of Annex 1 of
AMS-III.H “Methane recovery in wastewater treatment”
shall be followed in this regard.
For project activities covered under paragraph 3 (b) and
(c), this methodology is applicable if the upgraded
methane content of the biogas is in accordance with
relevant national regulations (where these exist) or, in the
absence of national regulations, a minimum of 96% (by
volume).
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

If the recovered biogas is utilized for the production of
hydrogen (project activities covered under paragraph
3 (d)), that component of the project activity shall use the
corresponding methodology AMS-III.O “Hydrogen
production using methane extracted from biogas”.
If the recovered biogas is used for project activities
covered under paragraph 3 (e), that component of the
project activity shall use corresponding methodology
AMS-III.AQ “Introduction of Bio-CNG in road
transportation”.
The proposed CPA project activity is
New facilities (Greenfield projects) and project activities not Greenfield and does not involve the
involving a change of equipment resulting in a capacity change of equipment involving a
addition of the wastewater or sludge treatment system capacity addition.
compared to the designed capacity of the baseline Hence, meets the criteria
treatment system are only eligible to apply this
methodology if they comply with the relevant
requirements in the “General guidelines to SSC CDM
methodologies”. In addition the requirements for
demonstrating the remaining lifetime of the equipment
replaced, as described in the general guidelines shall be
followed.
The co-ordinates of the current
The location of the wastewater treatment plant as well as wastewater treatment plant have been
the source generating the wastewater shall be uniquely given in this PDD and the source of
defined and described in the PDD. wastewater described in the CPA DD
Hence, meets the criteria
The ex-ante estimation of emission
Measures are limited to those that result in aggregate reduction from the proposed project
emissions reductions of less than or equal to 60 kt CO2 amount to 20 ktCO2 e annually, below
equivalent annually from all Type III components of the the limit.
project activity. Hence, meets the criteria
Not Applicable to the proposed CPA
38. The following conditions apply for use of this
methodology in a project activity under a programme of
activities:
In case the project activity involves the replacement of
equipment, and the leakage effect of the use of the
replaced equipment in another activity is neglected,
because the replaced equipment is scrapped, an
independent monitoring of scrapping of replaced
equipment needs to be implemented. The monitoring
should include a check if the number of project activity
equipment distributed by the project and the number of
scrapped equipment correspond with each other. For this
purpose scrapped equipment should be stored until such
correspondence has been checked. The scrapping of
replaced equipment should be documented and
independently verified.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Projects that have selected scenario E (utilization of biogas as fuel for power generation and export to the
grid) shall also comply with the applicability conditions of AMS.I.D Version 17. Demonstration of the
applicability or a typical CPA is described below:
Table D.2.2: Applicability conditions of methodology AMS.I.D9

Applicability Conditions CPA Status
§1: This methodology comprises renewable energy The Project generates electricity by utilising
generation units, such as photovoltaic, hydro, biogas and therefore considered a renewable
tidal/wave, wind, geothermal and renewable generation unit. The project activity
biomass:10 supplies all its power to the grid.
(a) Supplying electricity to a national or Hence meet the criteria
a regional grid; or
(b) Supplying electricity to an identified
consumer facility via national/regional grid through a
contractual arrangement such as wheeling.
The Project generates electricity by utilising
§2: Illustration of respective situations under which biogas and therefore considered a renewable
each of the methodology (i.e. AMS-I.D, AMS-I.F and generation unit. The project activity
AMS-I.A11) applies is included in Table 2. supplies all its power to the grid.
Hence meet the criteria
The proposed CPA will install a new power
§3: This methodology is applicable to project plant with utilize the biogas from POME
activities that: (a) Install a new power plant at a site (greenfield plant).
where there was no renewable energy power plant
operating prior to the implementation of the project Hence meet the criteria.
activity (Greenfield plant); (b) Involve a capacity
addition;12 (c) Involve a retrofit13 of (an) existing
plant(s); or (d) Involve a replacement14 of (an)
existing plant(s).
9
The number in front of each paragraph indicates the respective paragraph of AMS.I.D Version 17.
10
Refer to EB 23, annex 18 or the definition of renewable biomass.
11
AMS-I.D “Grid connected renewable electricity generation”, AMS-I.F “Renewable electricity generation for
captive use and mini-grid” and AMS-I.A “Electricity generation by the user”
12
A capacity addition is an increase in the installed power generation capacity of an existing power plant through:
(i) The installation of a new power plant besides the existing power plant/units; or (ii) The installation of new
power units, additional to the existing power plant/units. The existing power plant/units continue to operate after
the implementation of the project activity.
13
Retrofit (or rehabilitation or refurbishment). It involves an investment to repair or modify an existing power
plant/unit, with the purpose to increase the efficiency, performance or power generation capacity of the plant,
without adding new power plants or units, or to resume the operation of closed (mothballed) power plants. A
retrofit restores the installed power generation capacity to or above its original level. Retrofits shall only include
measures that involve capital investments and not regular maintenance or housekeeping measures.
14
Replacement. It involves investment in a new power plant or unit that replaces one or several existing unit(s) at
the existing power plant. The installed capacity of the new plant or unit is equal to or higher than the plant or unit
that was replaced.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Not Applicable to the proposed CPA

§4: Hydro power plants with reservoirs15 that satisfy
at least one of the following conditions are eligible to
apply this methodology:
A. The project activity is implemented in an
existing reservoir with no change in the
volume of reservoir;
B. The project activity is implemented in an
existing reservoir,16 where the volume of
reservoir is increased and the power density
of the project activity, as per definitions
given in the project emissions section, is
greater than 4 W/m2;
C. The project activity results in new reservoirs
and the power density of the power plant, as
per definitions given in the project emissions
section, is greater than 4 W/m2.
§5: If the new unit has both renewable and non- the installed capacity generator of the
renewable components (e.g. a wind/diesel unit), the project activity is 1 MW
eligibility limit of 15 MW for a small-scale CDM Hence meet the criteria
project activity applies only to the renewable
component. If the new unit co-fires fossil fuel, the
capacity of the entire unit shall not exceed the limit of
15 MW.
§6: Combined heat and power (co-generation) The project activity producing power only
systems are not eligible under this category.
Hence meet the criteria
§7: In the case of project activities that involve the The project activity is new facility of
addition of renewable energy generation units at an generating unit
existing renewable power generation facility, the Hence meet the criteria
added capacity of the units added by the project
should be lower than 15 MW and should be
physically distinct from the existing units.
§8: In the case of retrofit or replacement, to qualify as The project activity is new facility of
a small-scale project, the total output of the retrofitted generating unit.
or replacement unit shall not exceed the limit of 15 Hence meet the criteria
MW.
§25: In the specific case of biomass project activities Not applicable to the proposed CPA
the applicability of the methodology is limited to
either project activities that use biomass residues only
or biomass from dedicated plantations complying
with the applicability conditions of AM0042.
§26: In the specific case of biomass project activities Not Applicable to the proposed CPA
the determination of leakage shall be done following
15
A reservoir is a water body created in valleys to store water generally made by the construction of a dam.
16
A reservoir is to be considered as an “existing reservoir” if it has been in operation for at least three years before
the implementation of the project activity.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
the general guidance for leakage in small-scale

biomass project activities (attachment C of Appendix
B17 of simplified modalities and procedures for small-
scale clean development mechanism project
activities; decision 4/CMP.1) or following the
procedures included in the leakage section of
AM0042.
§27: In case the project activity involves the Not Applicable to the proposed CPA
replacement of equipment, and the leakage from the
use of the replaced equipment in another activity is
neglected because the replaced equipment is
scrapped, an independent monitoring of scrapping of
replaced equipment needs to be implemented. The
monitoring should include a check if the number of
project activity equipment distributed by the project
and the number of scrapped equipment correspond
with each other. For this purpose scrapped
equipment should be stored until such
correspondence has been checked. The scrapping of
replaced equipment should be documented and
independently verified.
D.3. Sources and GHGs

>>
The CPA is approved for development in Lampung Province of Indonesia. Therefore, the CPA is located
within the geographical boundary of the registered PoA.
Table I.D.3.1 Emission sources and gases included in the SSC-CPA boundary
Source Gas Included Justification
Decay emissions from CO2 No Excluded for simplification.
the baseline wastewater CH4 Yes Major emission source in case of wastewater
treatment system treatment plants.
N2O No Excluded for simplification.
Decay emissions from CO2 No Excluded for simplification.
the baseline sludge CH4 No Sludge treatment is not included in the boundary
Baseline Scenario
treatment system
Emissions on account CO2 Yes May be an important source of emission if the
of electricity or fossil baseline involves the use of electricity or fossil
fuel used fuels.
CH4 No Excluded for simplification.
Emissions from the CO2 No Excluded for simplification.
discharge of the effluent CH4 Yes Major emission source in case of wastewater being
into river/lake/sea discharged to sea/river/lake.
Emissions from CO2 No Excluded for simplification.
17
Available on <http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/SSCmethodologies/approved.html>.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
anaerobic decay of CH4 No Sludge treatment is not included in the boundary

final sludge
Emissions from CO2 Yes May be a source of emissions.
electricity or fuel CH4 No Minor source. Excluded for simplification.
consumption in the N2O No Minor source. Excluded for simplification.
project activity
Emissions from CO2 No Minor source. Excluded for simplification.
wastewater treatment CH4 Yes Important emission source in case of wastewater
system affected by the treatment plants.
project activity and not N2O No Minor source. Excluded for simplification.
equipped with biogas
recovery
Emissions from sludge CO2 No Minor source. Excluded for simplification.
treatment system CH4 Yes Important emission source in case of sludge
affected by the project treatment plants.
Project Scenario
activity and not N2O No Minor source. Excluded for simplification.

equipped with biogas
recovery
Emissions from the CO2 No Minor source. Excluded for simplification
discharge of the effluent CH4 Yes Important emission source in case of wastewater
into river/lake/sea discharge to sea/river/lake.
N2O No Minor source. Excluded for simplification.
Emissions from biogas CO2 No Minor source. Excluded for simplification.
release in capture CH4 Yes Inefficiency in methane capture in the anaerobic
system digesters may contribute to methane emissions
from biogas systems.
N2O No Minor source. Excluded for simplification.
Emissions due to CO2 No It is assumed that CO2 emissions from recovered
incomplete flaring of biogas do not lead to changes of carbon pools.
biogas CH4 Yes May be an important source of emission. Incomplete
combustion of biogas due to efficiency of flaring
system leads to fugitive emission of methane.
N2O No Not applicable
Emissions from CO2 No Excluded for simplification.
anaerobic decay of the CH4 No Sludge treatment is not included in the boundary
final sludge N2O No Excluded for simplification.
The emission sources and gases below only need to be included in the boundary for CPA that comply
with technology scenario E (Utilization of biogas for grid connected power generation):
The CPA complies with technology scenario E, the tables below have been completed
The CPA does not comply with technology scenario E, the tables below have not been completed.
According to “Indicative simplified baseline and monitoring methodologies for selected small scale
CDM project activity categories, AMS-I.D., Version 17, EB 61, 3 June 2011, the spatial extent of the
CPA its project boundary includes the physical and geographical site of the renewable generation source
that includes the biogas power plant as well as the sub-station connection to the relevant electricity grid
(a regional grid system). Figure E.3.1 shows the project flowchart and its boundaries.
Table E.3.2 Emission sources and gases included in the SSC-CPA boundary for scenario E
Source Gas Included? Justification / Explanation
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Baseline CO2 emission from electricity CO2 Included Main emission source
generation in fossil fuel fired CH4 Excluded Minor emission source.
power plants that are N2O Excluded Minor emission source.
displaced due to the project
activity
CO2 Included May be an important emission
CPA Projgrame
Electricity consumption / source. If electricity from grid

activity
generation and/or electricity from captive

diesel power plant is consumed to
run the project activity, emissions
from these sources shall be
included.
Figure D.3.1 - Flow diagram physically delineating the CPA

Biogas
Wastewater Anaerobic digester (Optionally) Electricity Generator

with methane secondary treatment and emergency flaring
recovery of wastewater or system
sludge
Electricity and other Electricity
fossil fuel usage at Onsite transformer to the grid
project site Project Boundary station
Treated wastewater
D.4. Description of the baseline scenario

>>
As per AMS-III.H version 16, in case of existing industrial wastewater treatment facilities, the baseline
will be the continuation of the existing system for wastewater treatment. This is evident in the paragraph
26 and 27 of the methodology where the past historic records or baseline measurement campaign
undertaken before project implementation is required for estimating emissions associated with the
prevailing baseline.
In the baseline scenario of the existing palm oil mill the wastewater is treated in an open anaerobic
lagoon system. Hence, based on the paragraph above, the baseline is continuation of the existing open
lagoon system with associated methane emissions.
The baseline scenario is in compliance with host country regulations for wastewater treatment and the
CPA implementer is not
Since the CPA also applies technology scenario E the baseline shall be also defined as follows:
In accordance with AMS-I.D version 17, paragraph 10, the baseline scenario is that the electricity
delivered to the grid by the project activity would have otherwise been generated by the operation of
grid-connected power plants and by the addition of new generation sources into the grid.
D.5. Demonstration of eligibility for a CPA

>>
[NOTE: The remainder of this page is left blank intentionally.]

UNFCCC/CCNUCC
The compliance of the CPA with the eligibility criteria is outlined in the table below:
Table D.5.1 – Eligibility criteria for a CPA to enrol in the PoA

Nr. Eligibility criteria description Information requirement Eligibility Justification
check
outcome18
A. The CPA shall be located within the One of the following documents shall be Yes The CPA implementer has
geographical territory of Indonesia. provided: provided a declaration with
Declaration from the CPA implementer No address, GPS coordinates and
confirm that the boundary of the implemented confirmation that the project is
CPA is within the geographical territory of implemented within the
Indonesia and including information regarding geographical boundary.
geographic reference (latitude and longitude),
name and address of the SSC-CPA. The business license has been
issued and approves the CPA
Business license of the CPA implementer implementer to operate the
issued by Indonesian local authorities. entity in Indonesia.
CME has confirmed the same.

B. The CPA implementer has signed a valid The following document shall be provided: Yes The contractual agreement
contractual agreement with the CME which Contractual agreement between CME and describing that the CPA
permits its participation and inclusion in the CPA implementer. No implementer is aware of its
PoA and specifies the duties and subscription, duties and
responsibilities of a CPA implementer and responsibilities in relation to
the acceptance of the terms and conditions of the PoA have been provided.
the PoA. This contract is one of the measures
to avoid double counting as it would contain
the name and full details of CPA
implementer at the same time, it would
18
To be confirmed at CPA level by the CME
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

check
outcome18
contain an agreement/undertaking by the
CPA implementer stating that the CPA is
only a part of this PoA and shall not be
subscribed as a stand-alone project or part of
any other PoA.
C. The CPA must demonstrate that the The following document shall be provided: Yes Declaration from the CPA
participation of the CPA is voluntary and Declaration from the CPA Implementer Implementer regarding
there is no requirement or enforcement under regarding voluntary implementation of the No voluntary implementation of
existing national/state/local regulations to wastewater treatment technology and the wastewater treatment
introduce anaerobic digester equipped with confirmation that there is no requirement or technology and confirmation
methane recovery system. enforcement under existing national/state/local that there is no requirement or
regulations to introduce anaerobic digester enforcement under existing
equipped with methane recovery system. national/state/local regulations
to introduce anaerobic digester
And: equipped with methane
Confirmation in the SSC-CPA-DD recovery system has been
regarding voluntary implementation by CPA provided in conjunction with
implementer of the wastewater treatment the declaration in the CPA-
technology and confirmation that there is no DD.
requirement or enforcement under existing
national/state/local regulations to introduce
anaerobic digester equipped with methane
recovery system.
D. The SSC-CPA shall confirm to one of The following document shall be provided: Yes Based on the information
technological scenarios as described in Confirmation by the CME regarding the provided in the FSR of the
section A.4.2 of the SSC-PoA-DD applicable technological scenario for the CPA. No CPA, the project is
implemented at an existing
Any of the following documents shall be facility that matches with
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

check
outcome18
provided: technology scenario 2.
Purchase order of equipment
Feasibility Study / Technical Proposal of the
project that describes the project technology.
E. The start date of the SSC-CPA shall not be One of the following documents shall be Yes A declaration has been
before the commencement of validation of provided: provided by CPA implementer
the PoA as a whole (date the PoA was In case available, the earliest signed No to state that no contracts have
published for global stakeholders comment) equipment or (sub) contractor agreement with a been signed with a total
total contract value that is significant to the contract value that is
project activity (the date of signing the purchase significant to the project
order by SSC-CPA Implementer shall constitute activity.
the starting date of the SSC-CPA).
Declaration of from the CPA Implementer Based on document review,
that no contracts have been signed with a total the CME has concluded that
contract value that is significant to the project the CPA has not started prior
activity to the date the PoA was
published for global
stakeholders comment.
F. The CPA shall meet the applicability and As described in section E.2 of the PoA-DD the Yes Full assessment of the
other requirements of the methodology CPA shall meet all relevant requirements of the applicability and other
AMS.III.H Version 16. methodology and the required evidence No requirements of the
documentation shall be provided to the DOE at methodology AMS.III.H
the time of inclusion. Version 16 was described in
section E.2 of the PoA-DD.
G. Demonstration of additionality as described Any of the following documents at CPA level Yes The investment barrier has
in section B.5 of the PoA-DD in line with shall be provided: been demonstrated and an
paragraph 6 and 8 of annex 2, EB 63. In case the CPAs falling into Microscale No investment analysis
projects (up to 5 MW): Documentation to calculation sheet has been
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

check
outcome18
Additionality for the CPAs is demonstrated support the conditions satisfied based on provided (the details are
by applying one of the two options as “Guidelines for demonstrating additionality of provided below this table), as
following: microscale project activity”, version 03, Annex per requirements of
Approach 1: 23 of EB 63; or Attachment A of Appendix
In case the CPAs falling into Microscale B”, version 08, Annex 24 of
projects (up to 5 MW): Documentation to For CPAs as small scale project activities: EB 63. Based on the
support the conditions satisfied based on Evidences that at least one of the barriers investment analysis the project
“Guidelines for demonstrating additionality described in the section B.5 (according to the is additional.
of microscale project activity”, version 03, “Attachment A of Appendix B”, version 08,
Annex 23 of EB 63; Annex 24 of EB 63 or the latest version at the
Approach 2: time of inclusion) would prevent the
For CPAs as small scale project activities: implementation of the proposed CPAs.
evidences that at least one of the barriers
described in the section B.5 (according to the CPA shall provide all relevant documents to
“Attachment A of Appendix B”, version 08, substantiate the barrier analysis put forth in
Annex 24 of EB 63 or the latest version at section B.5 of the PoA-DD to DOE at time of
the time of inclusion) would prevent the inclusion.
implementation of the proposed CPAs.
H. The CPA shall conduct a local stakeholder The following document shall be provided: Yes CPA Implementer has
consultation and Environmental Analysis (if Meeting minutes and other related conducted a local stakeholder
mandated by law) at CPA level. This shall be documents of the local stakeholder consultation. No consultation in 29/03/2012 at
carried out prior to the inclusion. PTPN VII UU Bekir (Mill
If law / regulations mandate environmental Location). The information
analysis: relates to stakeholder
Copy of environmental analysis report. consultation is provided in
Meeting minutes dated
If there is no law / regulation to mandate 29/03/2012 and its attachment.
environmental analysis: While an Environmental
Declaration from CPA implementer Impact Assessment
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

check
outcome18
regarding applicable laws for the CPA and (UKL/UPL) has been obtained
explanation why environmental analysis is not by CPA implementer and
required. approved by Head of
Environment Department of
Lampung Tengah Region.
I. CPA of the PoA shall be within the threshold The CPA implementer and CME shall consider Yes The CPA has an emission
(i.e. emission reduction of less than or equal this condition in the CPA DD and Emission reduction of less than 20
to 60 kilotons of CO2 equivalent annually) as reduction spread sheet. No kilotons of CO2 per year,
per the §14 of applied Baseline and hence meeting the criteria.
Monitoring Methodology AMS III.H version
16.
J. Confirmation that the SSC-CPA is not The following document shall be provided: Yes Declaration from the CPA
registered or being registered as a stand-Declaration from the CPA Implementer Implementer confirming that
alone CDM project outside of this PoA, a
confirming that the project is not registered or No the project is not registered or
bundled CDM Project Activity or another
in the process of being registered as a stand- in the process of being
registered PoA. alone CDM project, outside of the PoA, a registered as a stand-alone
bundled CDM Project Activity or another CDM project, outside of the
The SSC-CPA shall not lead to double registered PoA. PoA, a bundled CDM Project
counting of emission reductions. Activity or another registered
And: PoA has been provided.
Confirmation described in the SSC-CPA-
DD that states that the project is not registered Confirmation described in the
or in the process of being registered as a stand- SSC-CPA-DD that states that
alone CDM project, outside of the PoA. the project is not registered or
Confirmation check by reviewing the in the process of being
website of the UNFCCC. registered as a stand-alone
CDM project outside of the
PoA has been indicated in this
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

check
outcome18
CPA-DD.
K. Confirmation that the CPA is not a de- The following document shall be provided: Yes Declaration from the CPA
bundled component of another large-scale Declaration from the CPA Implementer Implementer confirming that
CPA or CDM project activity as per latest confirming that the CPA is not a de-bundled No the CPA is not a de-bundled
guidance given by the CDM Executive Board component of another large-scale CPA or CDM component of another large-
project activity as per latest guidance given by scale CPA or CDM project
the CDM Executive Board. activity as per latest guidance
And: given by the CDM Executive
Confirmation that the SSC-CPA is not a de- Board has been provided.
bundled component of another large-scale SSC-
CPA or CDM project activity as per latest Confirmation that the SSC-
guidance given by the CDM Executive Board CPA is not a de-bundled
shall be provided in the SSC-CPA-DD. component of another large-
scale SSC-CPA or CDM
project activity as per latest
guidance given by the CDM
Executive Board has been
indicated in the SSC-CPA-DD.
L. Confirmation on involvement of public The following document shall be provided: Yes Declaration from the CPA
funding or ODA from Annex I Parties in Declaration from the CPA Implementer Implementer regarding no
SSC-CPA regarding the no involvement of public funding No involvement of public funding
or ODA from Annex I Parties. or ODA from Annex I Parties
compliance has been provided.
And:
Confirmation in the SSC-CPA-DD
regarding no involvement of public funding or
ODA from Annex I Parties.
M. A SSC-CPA level local stakeholder’s The following document shall be provided: Yes Business license of the CPA
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

check
outcome18
consultation has to be carried out prior to Meeting minutes of the stakeholder Implementer issued by
inclusion. consultation. No Thailand local authorities has
been provided.
N. The CPA implementer shall be duly The following document shall be provided: Yes Declaration from the CPA
registered by the Indonesian authorities prior Business license of the CPA Implementer Implementer confirming that
to inclusion issued by Indonesian local authorities. No the applicable statutory
requirements for establishment
and operation of the CPA.
Evidence of compliance of the
same has been demonstrated.
O. The SSC-CPA shall be in conformance to The following document shall be provided: Yes The project meets the relevant
statutory requirements of Indonesia. Business license of the CPA Implementer statutory requirements of the
issued by Indonesian local authorities. No host country.
P. Confirmation on the crediting period of the Confirmation described in the SSC-CPA-DD Yes Confirmation of the same has
SSC-CPA which shall not exceed the length that states that the crediting period of the SSC- been indicated in the CPA-
of the PoA (28 years) regardless of the time CPA shall not exceed the length of the PoA. No DD.
of inclusion of CPA in the PoA
Q. The CPA shall not involve biomass storage The following document shall be provided: Yes As per information provided in
under anaerobic conditions. Declaration from the CPA Implementer that the FSR the project does not
the CPA does not involve biomass storage No involve storage of biomass in
under anaerobic conditions. any case.
The eligibility criteria below only need to be completed for CPA that comply with technology scenario E (Utilization of biogas for grid connected power
generation):
The CPA complies with technology scenario E, the tables below have been completed
The CPA does not comply with technology scenario E, the tables below have not been completed.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Table D.5.2 – Eligibility criteria for a CPA to enrol in the PoA

R. CPA of the PoA shall be within the threshold Any of the following documents shall be Yes The capacity of the project has
(i.e. combined installed electricity generation provided: been confirmed to be less than
capacity less than or equal to 15 MW) the Feasibility Study / Project Proposal of the No 15 MW.
limit for small-scale project activities project that describes the project technology.
S. The CPA shall meet the applicability and As described in section E.2 of the PoA-DD the Yes Section D.2 has been
other requirements of the methodology CPA shall meet all relevant requirements of the completed and concludes that
AMS.I.D Version 17. methodology and the required evidence No the CPA complies with
documentation shall be provided to the DOE at applicability and other
the time of inclusion. requirements of the
methodology AMS.I.D
Version 17.
T. The plant must be connected to an Any of the following documents shall be Yes As per pre-PPA and details for
Indonesian Electricity Grid. provided: grid connection that are
Feasibility Study / Project Proposal of the No provided in the FSR, the plant
project that describes the project technology. is connected to an Indonesian
Power Purchase Agreement. Electricity Grid
[NOTE: The remainder of this page is left blank intentionally.]
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
>>
The assessment and demonstration of additionality of the CPA has been based on the criteria
mentioned in the section E.5.1 of the PoA-DD. The Additionality for the CPA is demonstrated by:
Approach A: MICROSCALE PROJECTS

Approach B: SMALL SCALE PROJECT ACTIVITIES
As prescribed in the simplified modalities and procedures of small scale CDM Project activities, the
Project can demonstrate the additionality as per any of the prescribed approaches. Therefore, the
approach(es) selected above shall be completed below for the specific CPA and the remaining
approach(es) does not have to be completed.
The additionality for the SSC-CPA is demonstrated by Approach [B], applicable for the Project
activity.
Approach B: SMALL SCALE PROJECT ACTIVITIES

As described in section E.5.1 of the PoA-DD here the analysis method chosen to demonstrate the
existence of an investment barrier shall be elaborated.
All small scale projects may follow the approaches defined in Attachment A to Appendix B to Annex
II of 4/CMP.1 (“Attachment A”) to prove additionality. Herein all CPAs will have to demonstrate the
presence of an investment barrier, i.e. a financially more viable alternative to the project activity
would have led to higher emissions
The detailed investment calculation, indicating all assumptions will be provided to the DOE at time of
inclusion of the CPA.
In application of the Investment Analysis, an appropriate financial/economic indicator and

benchmark will be selected for the programme activity. Project IRR and Equity IRR are
considered appropriate financial/economic indicators. The weighted average cost of capital
(WACC) and Return on Equity (ROE) are considered suitable benchmarks. The financing data
used to calculate the benchmarks will be obtained from public sources.
The investment analysis will be based on the project details considered by the board when
approving the investment in the project. Therefore, the inputs to the investment analysis will be
considered relevant to the timing of the investment decision.
The parameters applied are as follows:

Table B.5.5 – additionality framework
Step Description Application to a typical CPA
1. Choose a method for demonstrating additionality Step 2 (Investment Analysis) of the Tool for the
from the Tool for the demonstration and assessment Demonstration and assessment of additionality,
of additionality. Version 6.0.0 will be applied to the CPA.
2. Apply Benchmark Analysis: Sub Step 2b: Step 2b Option III (Benchmark Analysis) of the
Option III of the Tool for the demonstration and Tool for the Demonstration and assessment of
assessment of additionality. additionality, Version 6.0.0 will be applied.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
3. Identify the financial/economic indicator, such as The CPA will apply the Project IRR
IRR, most suitable for the project type and decision
context.
4. Determine financial benchmark The benchmark for Project IRR is calculated as per
Guidance on the Assessment of Investment
Analysis Version 05, the default value for the
expected return on equity shown below are
calculated after taxes in Indonesia for group 1
(waste handling and disposal and energy industries.
The benchmark is 12.5%.
5. Present a clear comparison of the financial indicator As per financial analysis the IRR of the project is
and the financial benchmark. If the CDM project 2.30%, which is lower than the benchmark of
activity has a less favourable indicator (e.g. lower 12.5%.
IRR) than the benchmark, then the CDM project
activity cannot be considered as financially
attractive.
6. Include a Sensitivity Analysis to show that the Please refer to table B.5.7 – investment analysis
conclusions regarding the financial/economic outcome for the sensitivity analysis.
attractiveness are robust to reasonable variations in
the critical assumptions. After the sensitivity
analysis, it must be concluded that the proposed
CDM project activity is unlikely to be
financially/economic attractive.
7. Determine sources of data for calculating the The benchmark for Project IRR is calculated as per
benchmark Guidance on the Assessment of Investment
Analysis Version 05, the default value for the
expected return on equity shown below are
calculated after taxes in Indonesia for group 1
(waste handling and disposal and energy industries.
8. Calculation and comparison of financial indicators The investment analysis is based on the information
provided in the FSR of the project and describes the
method of calculation in a transparent manner.
Key criteria and data required for assessing the additionality of the CPA are summarised below.
Table B.5.6 – investment analysis description

No. Description Units Possible Source
1. Date of Board Date Company Board Minutes dated 21/05/2012.
Decision
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
2. Yearly Methane Nm3/year 1.328.262 Nm3/year. Based on available data at the time of
Production (Optional) investment decision. This is based on the Third Feasibility
Study.
3. Yearly Electricity MWh/year 3,699,034 kWh/year. Based on available data at the time of
Production (Optional) investment decision. This is based on the Third Feasibility
Study.
4. Percentage of Biogas % 0%. Based on available data at the time of investment decision.
Flared This is based on the Third Feasibility Study.
5. Biogas Sale/Income Project No biogas is sold.

Price specific
6. Electricity Tariff Project 450 IDR/ kWh (government regulation).

Specific
7. Escalation of Tariff % No tariff escalation is applied.

UNFCCC/CCNUCC
8. Residual value of IDR Base on national accounting practices for depreciation, where
equipment the equipment is fully depreciated by the end of the lifetime of
the asset, the value is zero.
9. Emission Reductions tCO2e 19,004

10. CER sale price € 6 EUR/ton (this is a third party estimate).
11. Conversion Rate €/IDR dan € 1 = Rp 11.000 (exchange rate that was applied in
feasibility study report)
12. CPI (O&M escalation % This may include one of the following:
rate) (a) Estimates of national CPI
(b) Investment Memorandum
(c) Escalation as agreed in contract
13. Percentage of Debt % Debt portion 50.0%
Financing
14. Percentage of Equity % Equity portion 50.0%

Financing
15. Total Investment Cost IDR 21,227,750,000 IDR
16. Total Operation and IDR 1,061,387,500 IDR/year (Third Party feasibility study)
Maintenance Cost
17. Operational Lifetime Years 15 years (Third Party feasibility study)
(Supply Period)
The PoA investment spread sheet template is applied to the CPA to demonstrate that the project
is not financially feasible without the revenue from CERs. The outcomes of the financial analysis
spread sheet are shown below:
Table B.5.7 – investment analysis outcome
Financial Parameter CPA Value

Financial Benchmark 12.5%
Project IRR without CDM Below 0
The results of the financial analysis spreadsheet demonstrate that the project is not financially
feasible without the revenue from CERs. The financial analysis is robust to reasonable variations of
+10% and -10% in the critical assumptions, as is shown in the table below:
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
No Parameter IRR IRR W/O CDM Benchmark
1 Capex +10% 1.13% Negative 10.94%

Capex -10% 3.64% Negative 10.94%
2 O&M +10% 1.68% Negative 10.94%
O&M -10% 2.90% Negative 10.94%
3 Power Output +10% 4.08% Negative 10.94%
Power Output -10% 0.35% Negative 10.94%
4 Power Sales +10% 4.08% Negative 10.94%
Power Sales -10% 0.35% Negative 10.94%
For CPA that generate electricity from biogas with an installed capacity of 10 MW or less, the power
tariff is affected by MEMR No.31/2009, identified as an E- policy. Hence, according the EB 65
(annex 5) paragraph 44, the power tariff applied for the purpose of the investment analysis is selected
to accurately reflect the Host Country regulations that were in effect as of 11/11/2001 and shall
exclude the introduction of the identified E- policy. On that basis, CPAs under this PoA with less than
10 MW installed capacity have the option to not account for the impacts of MEMR No.31/2009 and
conduct all analysis as if the policy did not exist.
As an approach in determining the power tariff in the hypothetical case without the E- policy in place
the following methodology is applied: The power tariff is determined on the basis of available
empirical data of similar biogas power plants that supply power to the same regional electricity
system as the CPA
Documentation relevant to substantiation of the investment barrier shall be provided to the DOE at
time of inclusion
Conclusion
In accordance with the benchmark analysis, if the financial indicators (such as the IRR) of a project
are lower than the benchmark, the project is not considered to be financially attractive. From the table
above it is clear that the project activity is not financially viable with only the cost savings arising
from diesel and shell consumption as the IRR for the project activities calculated over a period of 15
years without CDM benefit is 2.3%. This is lower than the chosen benchmark (10.94%) and therefore
the proposed project is not financially attractive.
Based on the above analysis it can be concluded that the specific CPA titled “CPA 1.1 – Maris –
PTPN VII Biogas Project” is therefore additional and eligible for inclusion as per eligibility criteria
specified in the registered PoA-DD.
D.6. Estimation of emission reductions

D.6.1. Explanation of methodological choices
>>
A typical CPA may be one of the technological measures as explained in paragraph 1 of the baseline
and monitoring methodology AMS-III.H “Methane Recovery in Wastewater Treatment” (version 16).
Following are the methodological choices used for calculating emission reductions.
Baseline Emissions
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Baseline emissions will include greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with the following
sources:
(a) Emissions associated with electricity or fuel consumption in the baseline wastewater treatment
system- The CPA will follow the “Tool to calculate baseline, project and/or leakage emissions for
electricity consumption” and/or “Tool to calculate project or leakage emissions for fossil fuel
combustion” for calculating emissions associated with electricity or fuel consumption.
(b) Emissions associated with baseline wastewater treatment not equipped with a biogas recovery
system and which is affected by the project activity treatment system- organic content in the
wastewater will be decomposed in the baseline treatment system and would result in generation of
methane. Since the baseline wastewater system is not equipped with methane recovery system, it will
result in GHG emissions into the atmosphere. Baseline emissions will account for this source of
emissions.
(c) Emissions associated with discharge of treated wastewater into sea/river/lake- this is in relation to
the amount of chemical oxygen demand (COD) present in the wastewater even after being treated by
the baseline wastewater system. If such treated wastewater is discharged to downstream such as
sea/river/lake, baseline emissions to account for the un-removed COD in the treated wastewater.
(d) Emissions associated with anaerobic decay of final sludge- if in the baseline scenario, the sludge
is allowed to decay under anaerobic conditions it will result in generation of methane which will be
emitted into the atmosphere, baseline emissions will account for this source of emissions.
In determining the baseline emissions, past historic records (e.g. COD removal efficiency of the
wastewater treatment systems, the amount of dry matter in sludge, power and electricity consumption
per m3 of wastewater treated, the amount of final sludge generated per tonne of COD removed) of at
least one year prior to the project implementation shall be used. If the historical data is not available
or for the case of Greenfield projects and capacity addition projects, a baseline measurement
campaign should be undertaken for at least 10 days before project implementation. The average
values from the measurement campaign shall be multiplied by 0.89 to account for the uncertainty
range (30% to 50%) and used for estimating emissions associated with the prevailing baseline.
For the existing plant without the historical data, the baseline emissions in year y are taken as the
minimum between the result of:
(a) All the available data in determining the required parameters, and
(b) Ex-ante calculation from the aforementioned measurement campaign.
The approach (e.g. past historic records, 10-day measurement campaign, value from
manufacturer/designer) and the associated data which are selected and applied in determining the
baseline emissions shall be recorded under Annex 3 of the CPA-DD.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
D.6.2. Data and parameters that are to be reported ex-ante

(Copy this table for each data and parameter.)
Data / Parameter EFCO2,grid,y
Unit tCO2e/MWh
Description Amount of carbon dioxide emitted per Mega Watt hour electricity
generated
Source of data As stipulated by Indonesian DNA or per approach defined in section E.6.1 of
the SSC-PoA-DD
Value(s) applied 0.748
Choice of data
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Purpose of data The data is used to estimate the baseline emission.
Additional comment
Data / Parameter MCFww,treatment,BL,i
Unit -
Description Methane correction factor for baseline wastewater treatment system i
Source of data Table III.H.1 of AMS-III.H (version 16)
Choice of data In line with the requirement of the baseline and monitoring methodology
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment
Data / Parameter Bo,ww

Unit kg CH4/kg COD
Description Methane producing capacity of the wastewater
Source of data Paragraph 20 of AMS-III.H (version 16)
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter UFBL

Unit -
Description Model correction uncertainty factor to account for model uncertainties
Source of data AMS-III.H (version 16) paragraph 20
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment -
Data / Parameter GWPCH4

Unit -
Description Global warming potential of methane
Source of data IPCC value as in AMS-III.H (version 16) paragraph 20
Value(s) applied 21
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
The data is used to estimate the project emission.
Additional comment
Data / Parameter DOCs

Unit -
Description Degradable organic content of the untreated sludge generated in the year
y (fraction, dry basis).
Source of data Default value as per paragraph 22 of AMS-III.H version 16
Value(s) applied Wet basis: 0.09
Dry basis: 0.257
Choice of data In line with the requirement of the baseline and monitoring methodology.
or The wastewater considered in this PoA is industrial wastewater.
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter DOCF

Unit -
Description Fraction of DOC dissimilated to biogas
Source of data IPCC default value as per paragraph 22 of AMS-III.H version 16
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Purpose of data The data is used to estimate the project emission.
Additional comment
Data / Parameter F
Unit -
Description Fraction of CH4 in biogas
Source of data IPCC default value as per paragraph 22 of AMS-III.H version 16
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment
Data / Parameter MCFww,BL,discharge

Unit -
Description Methane correction factor based on the discharge pathway in the
baseline situation (e.g. into sea, river or lake) of the wastewater
Source of data Values from Table III.H.1 of AMS-III.H version 16
Value(s) applied 0
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment The effluent of the wastewater treatment system is used for the plantation.
Therefore it is assumed that effluent is under aerobic conditions, hence the
MCF is 0.0.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter COD ww,discharge,BL,y

Unit t/m3
Description Chemical oxygen demand of treated wastewater discharged into sea, river
or lake
Source of data To be determined in accordance with paragraph 26, 27 or 28 of the baseline
and monitoring methodology.
Value(s) applied 3,033
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment Based on the 10 day measurement campaign.
Data / Parameter MCFs,BL,final

Unit -
Description Methane correction factor of the disposal site that receives the final sludge
in the baseline situation.
Source of data Estimated as per procedures described in the “Tool to determine
methane emissions avoided from disposal of waste at a solid waste disposal
site”
Value(s) applied Will be based on type of sludge disposal site in the baseline scenario of each
CPA
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment This table is not relevant to the project activity sludge treatment is not
included in the project boundary and can thus be ignored. The parameter will
not be monitored for this particular CPA.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter ƞCOD,BL,i

Unit %
Description COD removal efficiency of the baseline treatment system i.
Source of data To be determined in accordance with paragraph 26, 27 or 28 of the baseline
and monitoring methodology.
Value(s) applied 92%
Choice of data In line with the requirement of the baseline monitoring methodology
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment
Data / Parameter Sfinal,BL,y

Unit T
Description Amount of dry matter in the final sludge generated by the baseline
wastewater treatment systems in the year y
Source of data Measurement by CPA implementer
Value(s) applied To be determined for each CPA
Choice of data To be determined for each CPA
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Data / Parameter DF
Unit -
Description 10-day measurement campaign factor to account for the uncertainty range
(30% to 50%)
Source of data As per AMS-III.H (version 16) paragraph 27
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter MCFww,treatment PJ,k

Unit -
Description Methane correction factor for project wastewater treatment system k
Source of data Table III.H.1 of AMS-III.H version 16 or Table 6.8 of Volume 5 Chapter 6
IPCC 2006 Guideline
Value(s) applied 0
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
MCF is 0.0.
Data / Parameter UFPJ

Unit -
Description Model correction to account for model uncertainties
Source of data AMS-III.H (version 16) paragraph 29
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter MCFww,PJ,discharge

Unit -
Description Methane correction factor based on the discharge pathway of the wastewater
in
the project scenario (e.g. into sea, river or lake)
Source of data Table III.H.1. of AMS-III.H version 16
Value(s) applied 0
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
MCF is 0.0.
Data / Parameter MCFs,PJ,final

Unit -
Description Methane correction factor of disposal site that receives the final sludge in the
project situation.
Source of data Estimated as per the procedures described in the “Tool to determine methane
emissions avoided from disposal of waste at a solid waste disposal site”
Value(s) applied Will be based on the sludge disposal site in the project scenario of each CPA
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter CFEww

Unit -
Description Capture efficiency of the biogas recovery equipment in the wastewater
treatment systems
Source of data Default value as per paragraph 30 of AMS-III.H version 16
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment
Data / Parameter ηCOD,PJ,j

Unit %
Description COD removal efficiency of the project treatment system j.
Source of data The COD removal efficiency is obtained from the supplier of the technology.
Value(s) applied 95.6%
Choice of data From third party feasibility study report.
or
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment
Data / Parameter ηflare,h

Unit %
Description Flare efficiency of the open or enclosed flare
Source of data “Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane”
Choice of data default value from the “Tool to determine project emissions from flaring
or gases containing methane” is applied.
Measurement
methods and
procedures
Additional comment
D.6.3. Ex-ante calculation of emission reductions

>>
Emission reductions (ERy)
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Total emission reductions of the CPA will be calculated as a sum of emission reductions from
methane recovery in wastewater treatment (technology scenario 1 and 2) and optionally emission
reduction obtained through combustion of recovered methane for electricity generation (scenario E).
Emission reductions are calculated as follows:

ERy = ERgrid,y + ERmethane,y
Where:
ERy = Total emission reductions of the project in year y (tCO2e/year)
ERgrid,y = Emission reductions from electricity generation in year y (tCO2e/year)
ERmethane,y = Emission reductions from methane recovery in wastewater treatment in year y
(tCO2e/year)
Below are the methodological choices used for calculating emission reductions baseline and
monitoring methodology AMS-III.H “Methane Recovery in Wastewater Treatment” (version 16).
Baseline emissions (AMS-III.H)

This section provides methodological choices for all baseline emission sources. Depending on the
selected choices baseline in the table below, relevant equations and monitoring parameters shall be
selected. In case an emission source has been excluded, the respective calculations need not to be
completed.
Baseline emissions are calculated as follows:

BE methane, y  BE power, y  BE ww,treatment, y  BE s ,treatment, y  BE ww,discharge,y  BE s , final, y 
Eq. (1) of AMS-III.H Version 16

Where:
Provide explanation in case the emission source is excluded and indicate respective emissions as 0.
Included? Parameter Explanation Value Unit
BE methane, y Baseline emissions from methane recovery in 18,533 tCO2e/yr
wastewater treatment in year y
Yes 0 tCO2e/yr
BE power, y Baseline emissions from electricity or fuel
NO consumption in year y.
Yes 18,533 tCO2e/yr
BE ww,treatment, y Baseline emissions of the wastewater treatment
NO systems affected by the project activity in year y
Yes 0 tCO2e/yr
BE s ,treatment, y Baseline emissions of the sludge treatment
NO systems affected by the project activity in year y.
Provide explanation in case the emission source is
excluded.
Yes 0 tCO2e/yr
BE ww,discharge,y Baseline methane emissions from degradable
NO organic carbon in treated wastewater discharged
into sea/river/lake in year y. The wastewater will
be discharged to Land Application
Yes 0 tCO2e/yr
BE s , final, y Baseline methane emissions from anaerobic decay
NO of the final sludge produced in year y. Provide
explanation in case the emission source is
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
excluded.
i. Emissions on account of electricity or fossil fuel used (BE power,y );
In case this baseline source is excluded/disregarded: Therefore: BE power,y = 0 tCO2e
ii. Methane emissions from baseline wastewater treatment systems (BE ww,treatment,y );
Methane emissions from the baseline wastewater treatment systems affected by the project
(BEww,treatment,y) are determined using the COD removal efficiency of the baseline plant. The baseline
for the CPA is [description of the baseline. As such baseline emissions are calculated as follows:
BEww,treatment, y   (Qww,i , y * CODinf low,i , y COD,BL ,i  MCFww,treatment,BL ,i ) * Bo,ww UFBL * GWPCH4

i

Where:
Parameter Description Value Unit
BEww,treatment,y Methane emissions from baseline wastewater treatment 18,533 tCO2e/yr
systems
Qww,i , y Volume of wastewater treated in baseline wastewater 151,200 m3
treatment system i in year y.
0.036
CODinf low,i , y Chemical oxygen demand of the wastewater inflow to the t/m3
baseline treatment system i in year y.
92
 COD, BL ,i COD removal efficiency of the baseline treatment system i, %
0.8
MCFww,treatment,BL ,i Methane correction factor for baseline wastewater treatment -
systems i
i Index for baseline wastewater treatment system - -
Bo , ww Methane producing capacity of the wastewater 0.25 kgCH4/kg
COD
UFBL Model correction factor to account for model uncertainties 0.89 -
GWPCH4 Global Warming Potential for methane 21 tCO2e/tCH4
The COD removal efficiency has been calculated as simple average value based on historic records
from the existing baseline system.
iii. Methane emissions from baseline sludge treatment systems (BE s,treatment,y );
Methane emissions from the baseline sludge treatment systems affected by the project activity are
determined using the methane generation potential of the sludge treatment systems:
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
In case this baseline source is excluded/disregarded: Therefore: BE s,treatment,y = 0 tCO2e
iv. Methane emissions on account of inefficiencies in the baseline wastewater

treatment systems and presence of degradable organic carbon in the treated
wastewater discharged into river/lake/sea (BE ww,discharge,y );
Methane emissions from degradable organic carbon in treated wastewater discharged in e.g. a river,
sea or lake in the baseline situation are determined as follows:
BEww,discharge, y  Qww, y  GWPCH4 * Bo, ww *UFBL * CODww,discharge, BL , y  MCFww, BL ,discharge

Where:
BE ww,discharge,y Baseline emissions of the wastewater treatment 18,533 tCO2e/yr
systems affected by the project activity
Qww, y Volume of treated wastewater discharged in 151,200 m3
year y
GWPCH4 Global Warming Potential of methane 0.036 tCO2e/
tCH4
Bo,WW Methane producing capacity of the wastewater 92 kgCH4/kg
COD
0.8
UFBL Model correction factor to account for model -
uncertainties
CODww,discharge, BL , y Chemical oxygen demand of the treated - t/m3
wastewater discharged into sea, river or lake in
the baseline situation in the year y
MCFww, BL ,discharge Methane correction factor based on discharge 0.25 -
pathway in the baseline situation (e.g. into sea,
river or lake) of the wastewater
To determine CODww,discharge,BL,y: if the baseline treatment system(s) is different from the treatment
system(s) in the project scenario, the monitored values of the COD inflow during crediting period will
be used to calculate the baseline emissions ex post. The outflow COD of the baseline systems will be
estimated using the removal efficiency of the baseline treatment systems, estimated as per paragraphs
26, 27 or 28 of AMS.III.H. A description of this will be provided here and if applicable also in annex
3 of the CPA-DD.
v. Methane emissions from the decay of the final sludge generated by the baseline
treatment systems (BE s,final,y ).
In case this baseline source is excluded/disregarded: Therefore: BE s,final,y = 0 tCO2e
Project Activity Emissions (AMS-III.H)
The project emissions are calculated using the following equations:

UNFCCC/CCNUCC
PE power, y  PE ww,treatment, y  PE s ,treatment, y  PE ww, discharge, y  PE s , final, y

 
 Eq. (8) of AMS-III.H
PE methane, y   
PE fugitive, y  PE biomass, y  PE flaring, y
 

Version 16
Where:
Included? Parameter Description Value Unit
PE methane, y Project activity emissions from methane 3,465 tCO2e/yr
recovery in wastewater treatment in the year y
Yes PE power, y Emissions from electricity or fuel consumption 0 tCO2e/yr
NO in the year y
Yes PEww,treatment, y Methane emissions from wastewater treatment 0 tCO2e/yr
NO systems affected by the project activity, and
not equipped with biogas recovery, in year y
Yes PEs ,treatment, y Methane emissions from sludge treatment 0 tCO2e/yr
NO systems affected by the project activity, and
not equipped with biogas recovery, in year y.
Yes PEww,discharge, y Methane emissions from degradable organic 0 tCO2e/yr
NO carbon in treated wastewater in year y
Yes PE s , final, y Methane emissions from anaerobic decay of 0 tCO2e/yr
NO the final sludge produced in year y.
Yes PE fugitive, y Methane emissions from biogas release in 2,166 tCO2e/yr
NO capture systems in year y
Yes PE flaring, y Methane emissions due to incomplete flaring 1,299 tCO2e/yr
NO in year y.
Yes PEbiomass, y Methane emissions from biomass stored under 0 tCO2e/yr
NO anaerobic conditions
Sludge treatment is not included in the project boundary.
(i) CO2 emissions from electricity and fuel used by the project facilities ( PE power, y );
In case electricity is generated with biogas:
PE power,y = 0 tCO2e
Description of the determination for the emission factor EFEL,j,y and for the Average technical
transmission and distribution losses for providing electricity to source j in year y(TDLjy), CPAs of the
PoA shall consider the default value as mentioned in the tool and provide justification here.
(ii) Methane emissions from wastewater treatment systems affected by the project
activity, and not equipped with biogas recovery in the project scenario
( PEww,treatment, y );
As described above the project activity affects systems of the baseline wastewater treatment plant.
This thus is thus irrelevant. For these the project emissions are calculated as:
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
PE ww,treatment, y   (Qww,k , y * CODinf low,k , y  PJ ,i  MCFww,treatment, PE ,i ) * Bo, ww  UFBL * GWPCH4

i

PEww,treatment, y Project emissions of the wastewater treatment 0 tCO2e/yr
systems affected by the project activity
Volume of wastewater treated in the project 0 t
Qww,k,y
wastewater treatment system k
Chemical oxygen demand of the wastewater inflow to -
CODinflow,k,y -
the baseline treatment system k
COD removal efficiency of the project treatment 0
η,PJ,k, t/m3
system i
MCFww,treatment,PJ,i Methane correction factor for project wastewater 0
kg CH4/kg
treatment systems i
COD
B0,ww Methane producing capacity of the wastewater 0.25
0.89
UFPJ Model correction factor to account for model uncertainties -
21
GWPCH4 Global warming potential of methane tCO2e/tCH4
(iii) Methane emissions from sludge treatment systems affected by the project
activity, and not equipped with biogas recovery in the project situation
( PEs ,treatment, y );
The project activity does not affect systems of the baseline wastewater treatment plant as
described above. This thus is thus irrelevant.
(iv) Methane emissions on account of inefficiency of the project activity wastewater

treatment systems and presence of degradable organic carbon in treated
wastewater ( PEww,discharge, y );
Project emissions on account of inefficiency of the project wastewater treatment system are only
relevant for those systems that are affected by the project activity and that discharge treated
wastewater. The calculation of emissions from this source is as follows:
PE ww,discharg e,y  Q ww,y  GWPCH4  B0,ww  UFPJ  CODww,discharg e,PJ,y  M CFww,PJ,discharg e

PEww,discharge,y Project emissions from wastewater discharge 0 tCO2e
Qww,y Volume of treated wastewater discharged 0 m3
21
GWPCH4 Global Warming Potential of methane tCO2e/tCH4
Methane producing capacity of the wastewater
Bo,WW 0.25 kg CH4/kg COD
UFPJ Model correction factor 1.12 -

UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Chemical oxygen demand of the treated 0

CODww,discharge,PJ,y t/m3
wastewater discharged into sea, river or lake
Methane correction factor based on the discharge 0
MCFww,PJ,discharge -
pathway
(v) Methane emissions from the decay of the final sludge generated by the project
activity treatment systems ( PEs , final, y );
(vi) Methane fugitive emissions due to inefficiencies in capture systems ( PE fugitive, y );
Project activity emissions from methane release in capture systems are determined as follows: This
emission source is relevant to any project scenario as it applies to any installed biogas digester
generating biogas. The calculation of this emission source is as follows:
PEfugitive,y  0.05  BG burnt,y
For the ex-ante emission calculation the following formula will be applied:
PE fugitive, y  PE fugitive,ww, y  PE fugitive,s , y
PEfugitive,y Fugitive emissions through capture inefficiencies 2,166 tCO2e
PEfugitive,ww,y Fugitive emissions through capture inefficiencies in 2,166 tCO2e
the anaerobic wastewater treatment systems
PEfugitive,s,y Fugitive emissions through capture inefficiencies in [Value] tCO2e
the anaerobic sludge treatment systems
PE fugitive, ww, y  (1  CFEww )  MEPww,treatment, y  GWPCH4

PEfugitive,ww,y Fugitive emissions through capture inefficiencies in 2,166 tCO2e
CFEww Capture efficiency of the biogas recovery 0.9 -
equipment in the wastewater treatment systems
MEPww,treatment,y Methane emission potential of wastewater 1,031 t
treatment systems equipped with biogas
recovery system
MEPww,treatment, y  Qww, y * Bo,ww UFPJ *  CODremoved ,PJ ,k , y  MCFww,treatment,PJ ,k

k
PEfugitive,ww,y Fugitive emissions through capture inefficiencies in [Value] tCO2e
CFEww Capture efficiency of the biogas recovery 0.9 -
equipment in the wastewater treatment systems
MEPww,treatment,y Methane emission potential of wastewater 1,031 t
treatment systems equipped with biogas
recovery system
UFPJ Model correction factor 1.12 -
Methane correction factor for the project 0.8 -
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
MCFww,treatment,PJ,k wastewater treatment system k equipped with

biogas recovery equipment
In the baseline sludge treatment is not included, therefore:

PEfugitive,s,y = 0 tCO2e
(vii) Methane emissions due to incomplete flaring ( PE flaring, y );

PEflaring,y Methane emissions due to incomplete flaring. The ex post emission reduction will
be calculated as per “Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane”
by using actual monitored data.
Methane may be released as a result of incomplete combustion in the flare. To calculate project
emissions from flaring of the biogas (PEflare), the “Tool to determine project emissions from flaring
gases containing methane” (version 01 approved at EB28) is applied.
For determination of the flare efficiency, a default value of 90% will be used for the calculation of
project emissions from flaring gases if the CPA uses since an enclosed will be employed by the CPA.
The tool specifies 7 steps for calculation.
Step 1: Determination of the mass flow rate of the residual gas that is flared
This step calculates the residual gas mass flow rate in each hour h, based on the volumetric flow rate
and the density of the residual gas. The density of the residual gas is determined based on the
volumetric fraction of all components in the gas.
This step calculates the residual gas mass flow rate in each hour h, based on the volumetric flow rate
and the density of the residual gas. The density of the residual gas is determined based on the
volumetric fraction of all components in the gas. Alternatively, the tool provides a simplified
approach to only measure the volumetric fraction of methane and to consider the deference to 100%
as being nitrogen. The proposed project activity adopts this simplified approach.
Step 2 is not applicable because of the simplified approach taken where only the volumetric fraction
of methane is measured.
Steps 3 & 4 are only applicable if the combustion efficiency of the flare is continuously monitored
and are therefore not considered.
Step 5: Determination of methane mass flow rate in the residual gas on a dry basis
The quantity of methane in the residual gas flowing into the flare is the product of the volumetric flow
rate of the residual gas (FVRG,h), the volumetric fraction of methane in the residual gas (fvCH4,RG,h) and
the density of methane (CH4,n,h) in the same reference conditions (normal conditions and dry or wet
basis).
TMRG,h = FVRG,h × fvCH4,RG,h × CH4,n Eq. 13 of Flaring Tool Version 01

UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Where:
Parameter Description Unit Source
Mass flow rate of methane in Flaring tool
TMRG,h kg/h
the residual gas in the hour h Equation 13
To be
Volumetric flow rate of the residual gas in dry basis at monitored
FVRG,h m3/h
normal conditions in the hour h after project
implementation
To be
Volumetric fraction of methane
monitored
fvCH4,RG,h in the residual gas on dry basis m3/h
after project
in hour h
implementation
Flaring tool
CH4,n Density of methane at normal conditions kg/m3
Step 6: Determination of the hourly flare efficiency
The CPA uses an enclosed flare, the flare efficiency in the hour h (ηflare,h) according to the tool is:
 0% if the temperature in the exhaust gas of the flare (Tflare ) is below 500 °C for more than 20
minutes during the hour h .
 50%, if the temperature in the exhaust gas of the flare (Tflare ) is above 500 °C for more than
40 minutes during the hour h, but the manufacturer’s specifications on proper operation of the
flare are not met at any point in time during the hour h.
 90%, if the temperature in the exhaust gas of the flare (Tflare ) is above 500 °C for more than
40 minutes during the hour h and the manufacturer’s specifications on proper operation of the
flare are met continuously during the hour h.
Step 7: Calculation of annual project emissions from flaring
Project emissions from flaring are calculated as the sum of emissions from each hour h, based on the
methane flow rate in the residual gas (TMRG,h) and the flare efficiency during each hour h (flare,h), as
follows:
 1   flare,h 
8760
GWPCH 4
PEflare,y = TM
h 1
RG ,h
1000
Eq. 15 of Flaring Tool Version 01
Where:
Parameter Description Unit Source
Project emissions from flaring of Flaring tool
PEflare,y tCO2e/yr
the residual gas stream in year y Equation 15
To be
Mass flow rate of the methane in monitored
TMRG,h kg/h
the residual gas in the hour h after project
implementation
ηflare,h Flare efficiency in hour h fraction Flaring tool
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
default for open

type flare
(viii)Methane emissions from biomass stored under anaerobic conditions which

would not have occurred in the baseline situation (PEbiomass,y).
Anaerobic storage of biomass due to the project activity is excluded by the formulated eligibility
criteria. Thus:
PEbiomass,y = 0 tCO2e
Leakage (AMS-III.H)
If the technology is using equipment transferred from another facility, leakage effects at the site of
the other activity are to be considered and estimated (LEy).
Otherwise:
LEy = 0 tCO2e
Emission reductions (ERmethane,y) (AMS-III.H)

Emission reductions shall be estimated ex ante as follows:
ERmethane, y ,ex ante  BEmethane, y ,ex ante  PEmethane, y ,ex ante  LEmethane, y ,ex ante 

Where:
ERmethane, y ,ex ante Ex ante emission reduction in year y 16,120 tCO2e
0 tCO2e
LEmethane, y ,ex ante Ex ante leakage emissions in year y
2,413 tCO2e
PEmethane, y ,ex ante Ex ante project emissions in year y
18,533 tCO2e
BEmethane, y ,ex ante Ex ante baseline emissions in year y
Emission reduction calculation for scenario E

Below are the methodological choices used for calculating emission reductions baseline and
monitoring methodology AMS-I.D “Grid connected renewable electricity generation” (version 17).
The emission reduction calculations below need to be completed for CPA that comply with
technology scenario E (Utilization of biogas for grid connected power generation). If this scenario is
not applicable, then BE grid, y = 0 t CO2
Baseline emissions (AMS.I.D)

The baseline emissions ( BE grid, y ) are the product of the baseline emissions factor calculated above
times the net electricity supplied by the project activity to the national grid ( EG BL , y ), as per the
formula given below:
BEgrid, y  EGBL , y * EFCO2 , grid, y Equation (1) of AMS.I.D Version 17

UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Where:
BE grid, y Baseline Emissions for electicity generation from biogas that 4,718 (t CO2)
is exported to the grid in year y
EG BL , y Quantity of net electricity supplied to the grid as a result of 7008 MWh
the implementation of the CDM project activity in year y
EFCO2, grid, y CO2 emission factor of the grid in year y 0.748 t
CO2/M
Wh
Project Emission (PEgrid,y) (AMS.I.D)

The renewable electricity generation does not result in project emissions, since the combustion of
recovered methane for electricity generation is considered as CO2-neutral. The project emissions
solely involve emissions from methane recovery in wastewater system.
Therefore: PEgrid,y = 0 tCO2e
Leakage (LEgrid,y) (AMS.I.D)

According to AMS.I.D version 17, if the energy generating equipment is transferred from another
activity, leakage is to be considered. Otherwise, it will be neglected. This shall be taken into account
in the specific CPA-DD for each CPA.
Therefore: LEgrid,y = 0 tCO2e
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
D.6.4. Summary of the ex-ante estimates of emission reduction
Below are the ex-ante estimates of emission reduction for AMS.III.H:
Baseline Emission
Project emissions Leakage
Year emissions reductions
(t CO2e) (t CO2e)
(t CO2e) (t CO2e)
Year 1 18,533 3,465 0 15,068
Year 2 18,533 2,296 0 16,237
Year 3 18,533 2,296 0 16,237
Year 4 18,533 2,296 0 16,237
Year 5 18,533 2,296 0 16,237
Year 6 18,533 2,296 0 16,237
Year 7 18,533 2,296 0 16,237
Year 8 18,533 2,296 0 16,237
Year 9 18,533 2,296 0 16,237
Year 10 18,533 2,296 0 16,237
Total 185,331 24,127 0 161,204
Total number 10
of crediting
years
Annual 18,533 2,413 - 16,120
average over
the crediting
period
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Below are the ex-ante estimates of emission reduction for AMS.I.D:

Baseline Emission
(t CO2e) (t CO2e)
(t CO2e) (t CO2e)
Year 1 0 0 0 0
Year 2 2,767 0 0 2,767
Year 3 2,767 0 0 2,767
Year 4 2,767 0 0 2,767
Year 5 2,767 0 0 2,767
Year 6 2,767 0 0 2,767
Year 7 2,767 0 0 2,767
Year 8 2,767 0 0 2,767
Year 9 2,767 0 0 2,767
Year 10 2,767 0 0 2,767
Total 24,902 0 0 24,902
Total number 10
of crediting
years
Annual 2,490 - - 2,490
average over
the crediting
period
Below are the combined ex-ante estimates of emission reduction for AMS.III.H and AMS.I.D:
Baseline Emission
(t CO2e) (t CO2e)
(t CO2e) (t CO2e)
Year 1 18,533 3465 0 15,068
Year 2 21,300 2296 0 19,004
Year 3 21,300 2296 0 19,004
Year 4 21,300 2296 0 19,004
Year 5 21,300 2296 0 19,004
Year 6 21,300 2296 0 19,004
Year 7 21,300 2296 0 19,004
Year 8 21,300 2296 0 19,004
Year 9 21,300 2296 0 19,004
Year 10 21,300 2296 0 19,004
Total 210,233 24127 0 186,106
Total number of 10
crediting years
Annual average 21,023 2,413 - 18,611
over the
crediting period
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
D.7. Application of the monitoring methodology and description of the monitoring plan
D.7.1. Data and parameters to be monitored
(Copy this table for each data and parameter.)
Data / Parameter EGBL,y

Unit MWh
Description Electricity energy baseline in year y
Source of data Measured by electricity meter(s) for each CPA
Value(s) applied 7008

Measurement Continuous monitoring, hourly measurement and at least monthly recording.
methods and
procedures
Monitoring To be defined with respect to each CPA.
frequency
QA/QC procedures The data will be archived electronically and kept for minimum of two years
after the end of the crediting period or the last issuance of CERs for the
project activity, whichever occurs later.
Purpose of data Calculation of baseline emissions

Additional comments
Data / Parameter Qww,i , y
Unit m³/month
Description The flow of wastewater
Source of data Onsite measurements
Measurement Measurements are undertaken by using flow meter at inlet to the project
methods and activity wastewater treatment system.
procedures
Details e.g. location, configuration, accuracy, class of the measurement
device are to be provided in the CPA-DD.
Monitoring
frequency
QA/QC procedures The measurements will be monitored continuously (at least hourly
measurements will be undertaken, if less confidence/ precession level of
90/10 shall be attained). Calibration of the flow meters will also be
conducted as specified by vendor.
Purpose of data Calculation of baseline emissions;
Calculation of project emissions;
Additional comments At the time of the CPA inclusion, for each of the relevant wastewater flow
meter separate tables shall be provided.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
The data will be archived electronically and kept for minimum of two years
Data / Parameter Qww

Unit m³/month
Description The monthly flow of treated wastewater discharged
Source of data Measurements will be undertaken using flow meter
Measurement Measurements are undertaken by using flow meter at the point of discharge.
methods and
procedures Details e.g. location, configuration, accuracy, class of the measurement
Monitoring
frequency
QA/QC procedures The measurements will be monitored continuously (at least hourly
measurements will be undertaken, if less confidence/ precession level of
90/10 shall be attained). Calibration of the flow meters will also be
conducted as specified by vendor.
Purpose of data Calculation of baseline emissions;
Calculation of project emissions;
Additional comments The data will be archived electronically and kept for minimum of two years
Data / Parameter CODuntreated,y

Unit tCOD/m³
Description Chemical oxygen demand of the wastewater entering the project treatment
system
Source of data Representative Sampling by CPA implementer
Measurement Measurement of COD is according to national or international standards at
methods and in-house and/or by an accredited laboratory. COD is measured through
procedures representative sampling.
Monitoring To be defined for each CPA at time of inclusion
frequency
QA/QC procedures Average value will be used through sampling with 90/10
confidence/precision level.
Purpose of data Calculation of project emissions;
Additional The data will be archived electronically and kept for minimum of two years
comments after the end of the crediting period or the last issuance of CERs for the
[REMOVE IF THIS PARAMETER REQUIRES MONITORING: This table

is not relevant to the project activity [because [specify reason] and can thus
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
be ignored. The parameter will not be monitored for this particular CPA.]
Data / Parameter CODww,treated,y

Unit tCOD/ m³
Description Chemical oxygen demand of the treated wastewater leaving the
project treatment system
Source of data Representative Sampling by CPA implementer
frequency

Data / Parameter CODPJ,outflow,k

Unit tCOD/ m³
Description Chemical oxygen demand of the treated wastewater leaving the wastewater
treatment systems affected by the project activity and not equipped
with biogas recovery in year y
Source of data Representative Sampling by CPA Implementer
frequency
Additional This may be applicable, for instance, where the baseline scenario is the use
comments of open anaerobic lagoons and the project scenario is introduction of
anaerobic digester prior to the existing open anaerobic ponds (i.e. without
replacing the existing open anaerobic lagoons).
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter CODww,discharge,y

Unit tCOD/ m³
Description Chemical oxygen demand of the treated wastewater discharged
to river/water/lake.
Source of data Representative Sampling by CPA Implementer
frequency
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter Sfinal,PJ,y

Unit Tonnes
Description Amount of dry matter in final sludge
Source of data Measure the total quantity of sludge on a wet basis. The volume (m3) and
density or direct weighing will be used to determine the sludge amount (wet
basis). Representative samples are taken to determine the moisture content to
calculate the total sludge amount on dry basis.
If the methane emissions from anaerobic decay of the final sludge are to be
neglected because the sludge is controlled combusted, disposed of in a
landfill with methane recovery, or used for soil application, then the end-use
of the final sludge will be monitored during the crediting period.
If the baseline emissions include the anaerobic decay of final sludge

generated by the baseline treatment systems in a landfill without methane
recovery, the baseline disposal site shall be clearly defined, and verified by
the DOE.
Value(s) applied Value to be used for ex ante CER estimation for the CPA shall be based on
the data available at the time of CPA inclusion.
Measurement Monitoring of 100% of the sludge amount through continuous or batch
methods and measurements and moisture content through representative sampling to
procedures ensure the 90/10 confidence/precision level.
frequency
This table is not relevant to the project activity because sludge treatment is
not part of the project activity and can thus be ignored. The parameter will
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter BGburnt,y

Unit m³
Description Annual volume of biogas combusted in year y
Source of data Measured using continuous flow meters.
Value(s) applied 2,400,667
Measurement In all cases, the amount of biogas recovered, fuelled, flared or otherwise
methods and utilized (e.g. injected into a natural gas distribution grid or distributed via a
procedures dedicated piped network) shall be measured using continuous flow meters. If
the biogas streams flared and fuelled (or utilized) are monitored separately,
the two fractions can be added together to determine the total biogas
recovered,
without the need to monitor the recovered biogas before separation.
The methane content measurement shall be carried out close to the biogas
flow meters.

Monitoring Provided at CPA level
frequency
QA/QC procedures The measurement will be monitored continuously (at least hourly
measurements are undertaken, if less, confidence/precision level of 90/10
will be attained). Meters will be calibrated as per vendor’s specifications
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter FE
Unit Fraction
Description Flare efficiency in year y (fraction).
Source of data --
Measurement As per the “Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases
methods and containing methane”
procedures Regular maintenance shall be carried out to ensure optimal operation of
flares

Monitoring ---
frequency
QA/QC procedures The measurement will be monitored continuously (at least hourly
measurements are undertaken, if less, confidence/precision level of 90/10
will be attained). Meters will be calibrated as per vendor’s specifications.

UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter wCH4, y

Unit volume fraction
Description Methane content in biogas in year y
Source of data The fraction of methane in the gas will be measured with a
continuous analyser or, alternatively, with periodical measurements at
a 90/10 confidence/precision level. It will be measured using equipment
that can directly measure methane content in the biogas - the estimation of
methane content of biogas based on measurement of other constituents of
biogas such as CO2 is not permitted. The methane content measurement
shall be carried out close to a location in the system where a biogas flow
measurement takes place.

Measurement The equipment will be able to measure methane directly in the biogas. The
methods and measurement will be carried out close to a location in the system where a
procedures biogas flow measurement takes place.
Monitoring continuous
frequency
QA/QC procedures The measurement will be monitored regularly and the analyser used will be
calibrated periodically as per vendor’s specifications.

UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter T
o
Unit C
Description Temperature of the biogas recovered
Source of data Measurements from the temperature indicator
Value(s) applied To be monitored during operation.
Measurement The temperature of the biogas is required to determine the density of the
methods and methane combusted. If the biogas flow meter employed measures flow,
procedures pressure and temperature and displays or outputs the normalised flow
of biogas, then there is no need for separate monitoring of pressure
and temperature of the biogas.
The temperature will be monitored continuously. The temperature will be

measured at the same time when methane content (wCH4,y) is measured.

Monitoring Continuous
frequency
QA/QC procedures Calibration of the meter will be as per vendor’s specifications.
Data / Parameter P
Unit Pa
Description Pressure of the biogas
Source of data Pressure measurement device
Measurement The pressure of the biogas is required to determine the density of the
methods and methane combusted. The pressure will be measured continuously. If the
procedures biogas flow meter employed measures flow, pressure and temperature and
displays or outputs the normalised flow of biogas, then there is no need for
separate monitoring of pressure and temperature of the biogas.
The pressure of the biogas will be measured at the same time when methane
content in biogas (wCH4,y) is measured.

Monitoring Continues
frequency
QA/QC procedures Calibration of the meter will be as per vendor’s specifications.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

Data / Parameter fvi,h

Unit Ratio
Description Volumetric fraction of component i in the residual gas in hour h
Source of data Metered with continuous gas analyser
Value(s) applied 60% CH4
Measurement Measure the CH4 volumetric fraction and assume the remaining fraction was
methods and N2. Continuously monitoring. Values will be averaged hourly when the flare
procedures is in operation. Recorded hourly when residual gas is flared.
frequency
QA/QC procedures Analysers will be maintained according to the manufacturer’s
recommendations.
Calibration will be according to national standards.
Additional As a simplified approach, project participants may only measure the methane
comments content of the residual gas and consider the remaining part as N2.
Data / Parameter FVRG,h

Unit m3/h
Description Volumetric flow rate of the residual gas at normal (NTP) conditions in hour
h
Source of data Metered using a flow meter
Measurement Ensure that the same basis (dry or wet) is considered for this measurement
methods and and the measurement of volumetric fraction of all components in the residual
procedures gas (fvi,h) when the residual gas temperature exceeds 60 ºC.
Monitored continuously. Values will be averaged hourly when the flare is in
operation. Recorded hourly when residual gas is flared.
frequency
QA/QC procedures Periodical maintenance and calibration according to manufacturer’s
indications of flow meters. Calibration according to national standards.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

Data / Parameter Tflare

Unit °C
Description Temperature in the exhaust gas of the flare
Source of data Metered directly with temperature couple installed in flare
Measurement Measure the temperature of the exhaust gas stream in the flare by a Type N
methods and thermocouple. A temperature above 500 ºC indicates that a significant
procedures amount of gases are still being burnt and that the flare is operating.
Continuously monitoring. Recorded hourly when residual gas is flared.
frequency
QA/QC procedures To be defined for each CPA at time of inclusion
Purpose of data Continues
Additional comments Thermocouples should be replaced or calibrated every year.The data will be
archived electronically and kept for minimum of two years after the end of
the crediting period or the last issuance of CERs for the project activity,
whichever occurs later.

Data / Parameter Other flare operation parameters

Unit -
Description All data and parameters that are required to monitor whether the flare
operates within the range of operating conditions according to
manufacturer’s specifications.
Source of data To be defined for each CPA at time of inclusion
Value(s) applied Specifically for each project site in the specific CPA-DD
Measurement To be defined for each CPA at time of inclusion
methods and
procedures
frequency
Additional comments Create copies of this table as required to indicate more parameters.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC

Data / Parameter TDLk,y
Unit -
Description Average technical transmission and distribution losses for providing
electricity to source j/k in year y
Source of data As per “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system”.
Measurement As per “Tool to calculate the emission factor for an electricity system”.
methods and
procedures
Monitoring ----
frequency
QA/QC procedures ----
Calculation of baseline emissions;
Additional comments At the time of the CPA inclusion, for each of the relevant TDL separate
tables shall be provided.
This table shall be copied in case more than 1 parameter requires

monitoring.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter ECPJ,j,y

Unit MWh/yr
Description Quantity of electricity consumed by the project consumption source j in the
year y
Source of data Electricity meters or installed capacity multiplied by 8,760 h/yr multiplied
by 1.1 to account for technical transmission and distribution losses.
Measurement If measured: Electricity meters continuously monitor power
methods and consumption by electrical equipment within the project boundary.
procedures If based on installed capacity: Calculated based on installed capacity in MW
multiplied by 8,760 h/yr plus 10%
frequency
QA/QC procedures If measured: Regular maintenance of meters according to manufacturer’s
Indications and calibration according to national standards.

Data / Parameter FCDIESEL,j,y ; FCFO,j,y ; FCCOAL,j,y

Unit ton
Description Quantity of fossil fuel combusted in process j during year y
Source of data On site measurement
Value(s) applied Value to be used for ex ante CER estimation for the CPA shall be based on
the data available at the time of CPA inclusion.
Measurement Description of the actual measurement method using any of the three
methods and alternatives provide in the “Tool to calculate project or leakage CO2
procedures emissions from fossil fuel combustion” shall be provided at individual CPA
level.
frequency
Additional comments At the time of the CPA inclusion, for each of the relevant fossil fuel separate
This table is not relevant to the project activity because no fossil fuel is used
and can thus be ignored. The parameter will not be monitored for this
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
particular CPA.
Data / Parameter NCVDIESEL,y ; NCVFO,y ; NCVCOAL,y

Unit GJ / ton
Description Weighted average net calorific value of the fossil fuel consumed in year y
Source of data Any of the four data source in preferential order as mentioned in the Tool to
calculate project or leakage CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion”.
Value(s) applied To be determined with respect to each CPA at time of inclusion
Measurement Any of the four data source in preferential order as mentioned in the Tool to
methods and calculate project or leakage CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion”. For
procedures option a) and b): Measurements should be undertaken in line with national or
international fuel standards.
frequency
QA/QC procedures Verify if the values under a), b) and c) are within the uncertainty range of the
IPCC default values as provided in Table 1.2, Vol. 2 of the 2006 IPCC
Guidelines. If the values fall below this range collect additional information
from the testing laboratory to justify the outcome or conduct additional
measurements. The laboratories in a), b) or c) should have ISO17025
accreditation or justify that they can comply with similar quality standards.
particular CPA.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Data / Parameter EFCO2,DIESEL,y ; EFCO2,FO,y ; EFCO2,COAL,y

Unit tCO2/GJ
Description CO2 emission factor of the fossil fuel used in year y in the CPA
Source of data Any of the four data source in preferential order as mentioned in the Tool to
calculate project or leakage CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion”.
Value(s) applied Value to be determined by each CPA at time of inclusion.
Measurement Any of the four data source in preferential order as mentioned in the Tool to
methods and calculate project or leakage CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion”. For
procedures option a) and b): Measurements should be undertaken in line with national or
international fuel standards.
frequency
particular CPA.
D.7.2. Description of the monitoring plan

>>
In order to ensure all CPAs are monitored and verified as per the applied monitoring methodology, the
CME has prepared a comprehensive monitoring plan for all the CPAs to be included in the PoA.
Furthermore, the CME will conduct periodical inspection of units randomly at any given time in a
year. For this purpose the CME will deploy trained monitoring personnel who will visit the CPAs
sites, review their records and take corrective actions if required. The monitoring personnel would
duly attest the records as a mark of satisfactory inspection. The CME would randomly check the visits
of monitoring personnel in order to ensure due compliance of registered monitoring plan.
Templates (as a part of monitoring manual) are made to record the data to be monitored. The
monitoring personnel of the CME would be provided with such templates. In-house training shall be
imparted to plant personnel (at the CPA site) for the efficient monitoring/recording of the data and to
translate the same into the computation of emission reductions.
The key considerations for developing monitoring plans in individual CPAs are discussed below.
1. Introduction
The Monitoring Plan (MP) would present a plan to meet the requirements for the collection,
processing and reporting of data. It will describe the management systems and procedures to be
implemented by CME upon implementation of each CPA in order to ensure consistency between the
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
project operation as well as monitoring, processing and reporting of data required for the
calculation of emission reductions (ERs).
2. Obligations of CME
It will be the responsibility of the CME to develop and implement a management and operational
system for a CPA that will meet the requirements of the MP.
3. Description of data required to be monitored

The MP will identify the various data parameters to be monitored in order to calculate the
emission reductions. Data parameters which need to be monitored will be recorded in the following
format:
Parameter ID Name of the Data Data unit of the

Parameter parameter
Table E.7.1.1 – description of data required for monitoring
4. Recommendations for improvisation in the monitoring plan

During the course of monitoring and verification; if the CPA implementer is of the opinion that
there exist potential to improve the monitoring process which would eventually result in improving
the quality of monitoring and reporting of emission reductions, then such quality enhancement
measures may be implemented in the monitoring process.
5. Detailed description on monitoring of each of the data parameters

This section will contain a detailed description of the data collection and recording measures
to be implemented for each of the data parameter which is monitored under the CPA. This section
will address the following criteria for each of the monitoring data parameter:
1. Description of the primary source of data from where the information pertaining to the data
parameter will be collected
2. Description of the data collection process
3. Description of the data recording process
4. Description of the measurement instruments, in case a given parameter is to be measured (
for e.g. meters used for measuring energy consumption, operating hours)
5. Calibration requirement of the measurement instrument
6. Description of data storage process
7. Other information, if required
The other relevant data will be recorded by the CPA owners and would be provided on quarterly basis
to the CME. The data received will be archived electronically for computations of emission
reductions on annual basis. Such archived data will be kept until two years after the end of the
crediting period or the issuance of CERs whichever is later. Each small scale CPA shall follow all the
provision of the PoA including that related to monitoring. Only those CPA implementers who confirm
to sign an agreement in this context shall be included in the PoA, as this is a part of eligibility criteria
6. Independent monitoring of scrapping of replaced equipment:

In case project activity involves replacement of equipment, and leakage effect of the use of
replaced equipment in another activity is neglected, because the replaced equipment is scrapped, an
independent monitoring of scrapping of replaced equipment to be implemented. The monitoring
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
should include a check if the number of project activity equipment distributed by the project and
the number of scrapped equipment correspond with each other. For this purpose scrapped
equipment should be stored until such correspondence has been checked. The scrapping of
replaced equipment should be documented and independently verified
7. Procedures for emergency preparedness for cases where emergencies cause unintended
emissions:
For each CPA an emergency preparedness procedure will be developed which takes into account:
 Procedures to avoid unintended emissions during operation and maintenance
 General procedures to avoid unintended emissions due to activities near the biogas plan.
 Inspection procedures to ensure integrity of the biogas plant
8. Procedures for review of the reported results/data:

To minimize the possible errors in the process of data collection, the entry of data gathered during
onsite visits by the monitoring personnel of the CME will be compared with the data submitted by
CPA implementers throughout the year. The data will be reviewed by the CME and a comparison
between the data sent by the CPA implementers and the data obtained during the onsite visit by the
monitoring personnel shall be performed to ensure that the data are consistent and correct.
Monitoring requirements for technology scenario E (Utilization of biogas for grid connected
power generation):
The monitoring plan applies to CPA that comply with technology scenario E (Utilization of biogas for
grid connected power generation) and can the text can be deleted if scenario E is not applicable.
The proposed CPA is connected to the Public Power Grid through one or more on-site transformer
stations. The project will be connected to nearest Substation through available power lines and might
in the future also connect to the grid through other main power lines. The CPA may furthermore be
connected to a back-up power line to provide emergency power in case the project is not operational.
An indicative grid connection diagram is provided in figure E.7.2.1. The solid lines indicate
connection lines that are currently intended with the dotted lines indicating potential future additions.
The grid connection diagram indicates the principles for positioning of metering instruments that will
be used in the monitoring of emission reductions. A separate detailed grid connection diagram will be
prepared which is updated on the basis of the actual implementation of the project’s grid connection
and which will serve as the basis for periodic verification. The CPA implementer will ensure that the
actual implementation of grid connection will not deviate from the procedures outlined in this section.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Internal power line

Main power supply line
M2a M2b
Back-up power line
M2c
Project Boundary
M1a M1b M1c
Biogas power plant
M3
Figure E.7.2.1 Indicative grid connection diagram
The CPA implementer will meter electric power according to the following principles:
 Power supplied to the grid through main power lines:

As indicated in Figure E.7.2.1, the CPA might be connected by multiple main power lines
(indicated in red) which will deliver power generated by the project to the grid. Net power
supplied to the grid is metered as below:
o CPA Implementer: The power supplied to the grid is metered by the CPA
Implementer at a point after power has been transformed to high voltage. Therefore,
no further transformer losses will occur before the project is connected to the grid.
The power supply of the project to the grid will be metered with standard electricity
meters in accordance with national regulations. The metering instruments should
record the net supply as the main power supply lines can transfer power in both
directions. The metering instruments may record either a net figure of power
delivered to the grid or two readings, i.e. power delivered to the grid and power
received from the grid.
o Grid company: The grid company will meter the power supply also at the high
voltage side of the on-site transformer station with its own metering equipment. The
meter will be located at the nearest Substation owned and operated by the state utility.
The regulations of the grid company require annual calibrations of both metering
instruments.
o Calibration: Calibrations are carried out by the grid company or by a certified
company. If there are any substantial discrepancies between the readings of the
metering instruments throughout the year, both instruments will be recalibrated.
 Power received through back-up power lines: As indicated in Figure B.7.2.1 the project
may be connected by a back-up emergency power line (indicated in brown) which delivers
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
power from the grid to the project in case of emergencies or when the turbines of the
proposed CPA are not in operation. Net power received from the grid is metered as below:
o Grid company:
The grid company will meter the power supplied to the project with its own metering
equipment in accordance with national regulations.
o Calibration:
Calibrations are carried out by the grid company or by a certified company.
The CPA will collect the sales receipts for power supplied to the grid and billing receipts for power
received from the grid as evidence. The net supply (i.e. gross supply minus supply by the grid to the
project) will be used in the calculations. In case of discrepancies between the metering instruments of
the grid company and the CPA, the readings of the grid company will prevail. All records of power
delivered to the grid, sales receipts and the results of calibration will be collated in a central place by
the CPA.
An overview of detailed information on minimum accuracy requirements of the metering instruments,

measuring intervals, recording form, calibration and available documentation is provided in point
E.7.1.
Determination of net power supply:
Net electricity supplied to the grid by the project (EGBL,y in section E.7.1.) is calculated on a monthly
basis as:
Equation B.13
EGBL , y  ES y  ED y
With:
 ESy, electricity supplied by the project through the main power line(s) (in MWh) metered by
the grid company (evidenced by monthly sales receipts) and cross-checked against the
readings of metering instruments of the CPA Implementer.
 EDy, electricity delivered to the project through possible back-up power line(s) metered by the
grid company (evidenced by monthly billing receipts).
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Table B.7.2.1 Details of metering instruments

Meter Operated Electro Manual Recordin Calibratio Accurac Documentation
by nic logging g n y
measur
ement
M1 x Project Continu Daily Monthly Annually Print out of
entity ous (optional) 19 or less electronic record
and optional paper
log. Data will
1% or consist of two
more readings, i.e.
accurate power delivered to
the grid and power
received from the
grid or combined
as net supply.
M2 x Grid Continu - Monthly Annually Monthly sales
company ous or less receipts (for power
delivered to grid)
and billing
1% or invoices (for power
more received from the
accurate grid), or
alternatively a
single receipt
which shows net
power received.
M3 x Grid Continu - Monthly Annually Monthly billing
1% or
company ous or less invoices (for power
more
received from the
accurate
grid).
Reporting, archiving and preparation for periodic verification

The CPA Implementer will in principle report the monitoring data annually but may deviate to report at
intervals corresponding to agreed verification periods and will ensure that these intervals are in
accordance with CDM requirements. The CPA Implementer will ensure that all required documentation
is made available to the verifier. Data record will be archived for a period of 2 years after the crediting
period to which the records pertain.
PROCEDURES IN CASE OF DAMAGED METERING EQUIPMENT / EMERGENCIES
Damages to metering equipment:

In case metering equipment is damaged and no reliable readings can be recorded the CPA Implementer
will estimate net supply by the proposed project activity according to the following procedure:
19
The CPA Implementer intends to log the readings of meters M1x and M1x manually in daily logs, but these logs
will not form a formal requirement during verification. The ACM0002 methodology only requires hourly
electronic measurement and these manual log records will only be maintained for back-up purposes. The CPA
Implementer may deviate from this procedure during actual operation of the project.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
1. In case metering equipment operated by project entity is damaged only:

The metering data logged by the grid company, evidenced by sales receipts will be used as record
of net power supplied to the grid for the days for which no record could be recorded.
2. In case both metering equipment operated by project entity and grid company are
damaged:
The project entity and the grid company will jointly calculate a conservative estimate of power
supplied to the grid. A statement will be prepared indicating:
► the background to the damage to metering equipment
► the assumptions used to estimate net supply to the grid for the days for which no record could
be recorded
► the estimation of power supplied to the grid
The statement will be signed by both a representative of the project entity as well as a
representative of the grid company.
The project entity will furthermore document all efforts taken to restore normal monitoring procedures.
Emergencies:
In case of emergencies, the project entity will not claim emission reductions due to the project activity
for the duration of the emergency. The project entity will follow the below procedure for declaring the
emergency period to be over:
1. The project entity will ensure that all requirements for monitoring of emission reductions have
been re-established.
2. The monitoring officer and the head of operations of the power station will both sign a statement
declaring the emergency situation to have ended and normal operations to have resumed.
OPERATIONAL AND MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE FOR MONITORING

The monitoring of the emission reductions will be carried out according to the scheme shown in Figure
E.7.2.2. The project entity will engage its CDM advisor, Blue World Carbon to assure that all monitoring
requirements are met. Within the CPA Implementer a monitoring officer is appointed who will carry the
day-to-day supervision responsibility. The first step is the measurement of the electrical energy supplied
to the grid and reporting of daily operations, which will be carried out by the plant operation staff.
The monitoring officer who will be responsible for verification of the measurement, collection of sales
receipts, collection of billing receipts of the power supplied by the grid to the power plant and the
calculation of the emissions reductions. The monitoring officer will prepare operational reports of the
project activity, recording the daily operation of the power station including operating periods, power
delivered to the grid, equipment defects, etc. The selection procedure, tasks and responsibilities of the
monitoring officer are described in detail in Annex 4. Finally, the monitoring reports will be reviewed by
Blue World Carbon.
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Plant operation staff:

Measurement of
electrical power
produced
Monitoring officer:
Verification of
measurement &
calculation of emission
reductions
Blue World Indonesia:

Quality Assurance and
supervision
Figure E.7.2.2 Management structure in order to monitor emission reductions
SECTION E. Approval and authorization

>>
Approval and authorization was not available at time of publication for international stakeholder
consultation and will be provided in a later stage of the validation for the DOE.
-----
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Appendix 1: Contact information on entity/individual responsible for the CPA
Organization PT Maris Sustainable Indonesia

Street/P.O. Box Jl. Tipar Cakung, Pool PPD 5, Cakung
Building
City Jakarta Timur
State/Region DKI Jakarta
Postcode 13910
Country Indonesia
Telephone -
Fax -
E-mail ichsan.ichsan@gmail.com
Website -
Contact person Ichsan
Title Director
Salutation Mr.
Last name -
Middle name -
First name Ichsan
Department -
Mobile +6291320993115
Direct fax -
Direct tel. -
Personal e-mail -
Appendix 2: Affirmation regarding public funding
No public funding is used to implement this small scale CDM Programme of Activity (CPA).
Appendix 3: Applicability of the selected methodology(ies)
N
o Parameter Unit Value Source Comment
Baseline
Information
FSR/Mill Minutes of Starting
1 Mill Capacity tph 60 Meetings 2013
2 operational day day/year 300 FSR
operational
hours hour 14 FSR / historical data
Wastewater
Generation
3 Factor m3/tFFB 0.6 FSR
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
Wastewater
Volume m3/year 151,200 Calculated
Should be
multiply by
COD of POME 0.89 as per
entering the Meth AMS
anaerobic 10 days Campaign result III H Ver 16
4 lagoon #1 mg/l 35,824 report Para 27
COD of POME Should be
Final Discharge multiply by
to Land 0.89 as per
Application exit Meth AMS
from anaerobic 10 days Campaign result III H Ver 16
5 lagoon #4 mg/l 3,033 report Para 28
COD Removal of
6 The Lagoon % 92 Calculated
Project
Information
Type of
technology to be
1 applied Covered Lagoon
Project digester
COD treatment CIGAR
2 efficiency % 85 FSR Efficiency
COD Level out
from the
3 digester mg/l 5,374 Calculated
Biogas
production
4 potential m3/kgCOD 0.6 FSR
Biogas
5 Production m3/year 2,762,482 FSR
Fraction of
methane in m3 CH4/m3
6 biogas biogas 0.6
Methane
content in
7 biogas m3 CH4 / year 1,657,489
Electricity
8 Production kWh/year 3,699,034 FSR FSR
Table 2. Result of 10 Days Measurement Campaigns

Sampling Location
Date of
No. Inlet of anaerobic Outlet of anaerobic
Sampling Inlet of cooling pond
pond #1 pond #4
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
BOD BOD BOD

COD (mg/l) COD (mg/l) COD (mg/l)
(mg/l) (mg/l) (mg/l)
1 30-Mar-12 44,760 21,785 42,320 17,412 1,880 905
2 02-Apr-12 43,850 20,170 38,880 16,400 2,400 1,055
3 04-Apr-12 45,600 23,323 42,440 20,380 3,320 1,443
4 07-Apr-12 47,560 23,385 37,200 16,292 3,800 1,624
5 10-Apr-12 46,600 23,663 43,240 22,530 4,640 2,124
6 12-Apr-12 47,400 25,542 41,840 21,594 4,600 2,379
7 14-Apr-12 41,480 21,157 35,600 18,430 1,680 1,016
8 17-Apr-12 43,200 23,139 41,280 19,658 4,600 2,031
9 19-Apr-12 43,160 20,092 40,200 20,858 3,600 1,407
10 21-Apr-12 38,880 17,395 39,520 18,837 3,560 1,743
Average 44,249 21,965 40,252 19,239 3,408 1,573
3. Other parameters relevant to the baseline

No additional information
Appendix 4: Further background information on ex ante calculation of emission reductions
Appendix 5: Further background information on monitoring plan
-----
UNFCCC/CCNUCC
History of the document
Version Date Nature of revision(s)

02.0 EB 66 Revision required to ensure consistency with the "Guidelines for completing
13 March 2012 the component project design document form for small-scale component
project activities" (EB 66, Annex 17).
01 EB33, Annex44 Initial adoption.
27 July 2007
Decision Class: Regulatory
Document Type: Form
Business Function: Registration

CPA-DD Maris Biogas PoA Indonesia Webhosting

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CPA-DD Maris Biogas PoA Indonesia Webhosting

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

UNFCCC/CCNUCC

CDM – Executive Board Page 1

COMPONENT PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT FORM FOR

COMPONENT PROJECT ACTIVITIES DESIGN DOCUMENT (CPA-DD)

SECTION A. General description of CPA

A.2. Title of the CPA

A.3. Description of the CPA

Technology / measures employed: a biogas plant installed at existing facilities

CDM – Executive Board Page 2

A.4. Entity/individual responsible for CPA

BWC is the Coordinating/Managing Entity of the PoA.

A.5. Technical description of the CPA

CDM – Executive Board Page 3

Description Value Unit

Flaring system Enclosed Flare

(c) The types and levels of services

(e) Facilities, systems and equipment in the baseline scenario.

Fat Pit 1 10 x 12 x 2 120

Fat Pit 2 10 x 8 x 1,8 144

CDM – Executive Board Page 4

Cooling Pond 5 6 x 30 x 2.5 450

A.7. Geographic reference or other means of identification

Table I.A.7.1 unique identification of the CPA

CDM – Executive Board Page 5

Figure I.A.7.1 Map of Indonesia

Figure I.A.7.2 Map of the project Location.

A.8. Duration of the CPA

CDM – Executive Board Page 6

A.8.2. Expected operational lifetime of the CPA

A.9. Choice of the crediting period and related information

A.9.1. Start date of the crediting period

A.9.2. Length of the crediting period

A.10. Estimated amount of GHG emission reductions

A.11. Public funding of the CPA

CDM – Executive Board Page 7

A.12. Debundling of small-scale component project activities

Paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 of EB 54, Annex 13 states:

Para 9. If a proposed small-scale CPA of a PoA is deemed to be a debundled component in accordance

CDM – Executive Board Page 8

A.13. Confirmation for CPA

SECTION B. Environmental analysis

CDM – Executive Board Page 9

SECTION C. Local stakeholder comments

C.2. Summary of comments received

Answer: Mr. Syarifuddin – Mill Manager of PTPN VII

Question 2. (Mr. Jamin Hasan)

Question 3. (Dr. Udin – UNILA) (suggestion/clarification)

Answer to Q3-4 (Mr. Syarifuddin)

CDM – Executive Board Page 10

C.3. Report on consideration of comments received

SECTION D. Eligibility of CPA and Estimation of emissions reductions

Reference to the approved baseline and monitoring methodologies:

D.2. Application of methodology(ies)

Table D.2.1: Applicability conditions of methodology AMS.III.H Version 165

This methodology comprises measures that recover biogas

CDM – Executive Board Page 11

Introduction of anaerobic wastewater treatment with

The minimum interval between two consecutive sludge

CDM – Executive Board Page 12

piped network to a group of end users; or

CDM – Executive Board Page 13

Applicable to the proposed CPA

CDM – Executive Board Page 14

Table D.2.2: Applicability conditions of methodology AMS.I.D9