You are on page 1of 68

INTRODUCTION

RESEARCH DESIGN

Introduction

The study regarding consumer preference for cars was

made in respect of selected major car marketers in Trichhy.

The area of consumer preference is one of the most

interesting areas, because it is concerned with

understanding consumers with regard to why individuals

act in certain consumption related ways. Initially most

concepts of consumer preference were related with

economic theories.

The mass communication has also changed the whole

theory concept of marketing. The marketers, who were

concentrating only on urban consumers, have started to

shift their target towards rural markets too. Increasing

awareness of new products has made consumer choosier,

there by consumer’s preference values have been

changing very fast. Nowadays it has become inevitable to

find a place in an individual consumer’s. Preference frame

work for the survival of the product.


Objectives

1. Psychology of how consumers think, feel, reason, and

select from among different alternatives.

2. Psychology of how the consumer is influenced by his

or her environment.

3. Consumer preference while shopping or making other

marketing decisions.

In the economic development of a country, transport

takes a vital role. The demand for transport as far as

passengers and goods transport have made substantial

growth in the recent years, Road Transport plays a larger

role in the recent years. The user prefers this because of

its availability; adoptability to individual needs, door to

door services and reliability. At present; 80 percent of

passengers move by roads. Road transport has been very

useful which connects railways stations, port and other

important places.

With higher volumes of production of all models of

vehicles in the year ahead, road transport assumed still

greater importance. Meeting the present and future


demand on road transport is an arduous task since the

existing road network is quite inadequate, both in terms of

quantum and quality. This has resulted in heavy

congestion on roads, high vehicles operating, rising

vehicles maintenance and road user costs, heavy loss of

output of both material and man power on account of high

turn-around time of vehicles and the like.

The next major area of concern is environmental

pollution caused by emission of vehicular smoke and other

harmful gases. The supreme court order stipulates that,

with effect from may 1, 1999, 250 diesel drive vehicles and

1,250 petrol driven vehicles per month, against the normal

12,000 cars per month, may be registered on a first-come-

first. Served basis in the National Capital Region (NCR) till

1st April 2000, only if they conform to Euro 1 norms from

April 15,000 no vehicle shall be registered if it fails.

Consumer Preference

In olden days fiat and ambassador cars were very

popular in India. As many companies have introduced

many models, the Indian users have the changes. For


selection of cars according to their tastes and the

availability of funds at their disposal.

Just as human beings have personality showing a

summation of characteristics, a brand also has a

personality with a set of characteristic which are human in

nature. These characteristics are demographic, for

example, sex or genders, age and socio-economic class. It

takes image characteristics of a brand and venders them in

human as seen by the consumer. Brand image is broader

than brand personality because by the time we enter the

personality real, we are dealing with feelings and emotions

that the consumer takes away from communications. A

well-established brand has a clear brand personality. It

may remain unstated. But it can play a strategic role in

brand wars. Closely position brands may also acquire

distinct personalities as a result of exposure to the quality

of the product, attraction in packing, service at the time of

sale and after sale, word-of-mouth and advertising

strategies adapted by the company. Brand is thought as

being friendly, boring, funny, rude, caring stylish etc.

Consumers need to think of brands in human terms,


memorability of a brand personality comes through

consistency.

Brands are much like people. They have certain

physical characteristics, certain skills and abilities and

certain associations and attitudes. Like an individual, a

brand too is a blend of all these. The brand therefore;

appeals to senses, to reason and to emotions.

Various factors influence a human beings perceived

personality. Example, family, friends, neighbours, school,

religious, institutions, socialization in general, similarly,

various factors influence formation of a brand personality,

they are either product related or non-product related

factors.

Statement of Problem

The people will think either a fiat and Ambassador in

1980s. Around 30,000 would sell every year. Selling above

this level has been a great task. In the years to come

Maruti became very popular. A few models were only

produced. For the Indian’s size and its population, the

basic three models are not enough. How ever,

improvements and research activities are going on


continuously to provide more economic models to suit the

Indian requirements.

It is a lot faster now, and not only because there are

cars around that don’t shake and rattle when the Speedo

meter hits 50. Today, you have too many in an infinitely

Freer market that has grown more than 10 times in

the past 10 years, almost touching four lakhs in the year

ended last march.

Fast, but not fast enough for top international names

such as Mercedes, Ford and General Motors, Fiat, Peugeot

and Daewoo. They have had to collectively absorb

hundreds of crores of rupees in losses in the past two

years, the effect few years of keeping pace at about 15

percent a year more than twice the speed of the economy

is now matching with more sedate 6 to 7 percent. It is still

growth, but the bigger car makers like Maruti and TELCO

which make less expensive, hardly cars with strong

networks have accounted for most of it.

Though competition among car makers is growing day

by day, what would determine the success of a company in

terms of production and sales is the product quality and


technology and the comforts provided in the cars not the

price fixed for the vehicle. The Maruti experience has more

than proved this point. No sooner did Telco announce the

bunch of its Indica decided to slash its profit margins by

cutting vehicle prices. At that point of time, the

introduction of small cars like Santro, Matiz and uno did not

bother the company as much as launch of the 100%

indigenous India, which is now gradually improving its

market share.

The overall situation is changing, thanks to positive

signs of recovery in sales of the commercial vehicles and

cars. With the rebound in critical segments of the economy

and improved industrial and agricultural activity, demand

for commercial vehicles is moving up for the first time in

two years.

The general expectation is that the Indian auto

industry will undergo tremendous changes, with the

opening up of the domestic market to imports and

development of local assembly by leading MNCS. To meet

the challenges ahead, vehicle manufactures will have to

strive to cut costs further, improve productivity, enhance


market orientation and successfully create a high level of

consumer loyalty.

The ultimate success of a car manufacturer is

depending on one important factor i.e., now for the car

manufacturers are able to convince the customers about

the respective brands. In the present study, an attempt is

made to study the consumer preference to cars in Trichy

city.

Collection of Data

The present study was conducted using the primary

data and secondary data. The required secondary data

was collected from the dealers in the study area and

various journals were referred like business India, India

today, and Business world. To ascertain the consumer

preference the data were collected from the respondents

with the help of a interview schedule.


CHAPTER – II

INDIAN CAR INDUSTRY – AN OVERVIEW

Revolution in Car Market

The mid-1980 registered a revolution in the car

market when the government decided to issued license to

all automobile manufactures to produce allied vehicles as

well. This move showed the entry of Maruti Udyog Ltd.,

which launched the Maruti 800 cars. This model was

considered to be modern car with contemporary styling and

much better fuel efficiency.

In this way, Maruti Udyog Ltd., very soon became the

market leader and has been occupying a dominant place in

the Indian market for more than two decades.

The late eighties and the early nineties witnessed the

emergence of a marketing orientation. Car man factures

tried to position themselves in various segments. A few

new models were introduced-mostly with foreign

collaboration. Following the liberalization of the car market

by the government, for the first time, international car

manufacturers began to take keen interest in the Indian car


market; Dalimier-Benz, Daewoo GM, Ford, Fiat and Peugeat

were the companies to enter the car market in India.

Historical Perspective:-

As regards automobiles industry it plays an important

role in terms of curbing un employment. A number of

skilled-unskilled, educated-uneducated, technical-non

technical persons have got employment directly or

indirectly in the industry in many ways such as in

manufacturing units, repairing workshops, dealership,

authorized service stations, car drivers, sale and purchase

work etc.

The history of car industry, it is found out that the first

car in India appeared in 1938 with taxicab in Bombay.

Before partition, some assembly plants were established at

Bombay, Calcutta and Madras by leading foreign

manufacturers. The premier Automobiles Ltd(Bombay) and

Hindustan Motors Ltd(Calcutta) were set up in 1943 and

1944 respectively.

On the recommendation of the Tariff Commission

Government of India discouraged the activities of

assemblers to ensure economic output of the automobiles


in 1953 and provided a further protection to the Industry in

1956 with priority for manufacturers of commercial

vehicles, expansion of capacity of existing units and

increased production of diesel vehicle for ten years. In

1959, JHA committee in his report recommended a uniform

import duty and brought this giant industry under

distribution and price control.

The Car Industry and The Car Market

The car market is clearly maturing with a full range of

cars from segment A Economy models to the highest end

segment E cars. This ensures that there is a car for every

need players in the car market are Maruti, Hyundai, Tata,

Ford.

Trend in The Car Market

Now-a-days in India novelty is no more a key drive for

car sales and customers are more demanding and discern

in now. Cars are more affordable and available than they

were before, thus serving to broad base the market.

Additionally, increased options in used cars that are much

more affordable and easily available have also led to


increase in first time car buyers entering the market. The

car market is very healthy.


India’s Most Respected Automobile Companies

Current year Rank Previous

year

1st Rank - Maruti Udyog IIIrd Rank

IInd Rank - Tatamotors Ist Rank

IIIrd Rank - Ford VIIIth Rank

Vth Rank - Hyundai Motor India VIth Rank

Source: Business world – 9 April 2007

TATA

A Tata motor owes its leading position in the Indian

automobile industry and well known for the use Indian

parts. This focus has driven the company to set up world-

class manufacturing units with state-of-the-art technology.

Every stage of product evolution-design, development,

manufacturing, assembly and quality control, is perfectly

checked out. Its manufacturing plants are situated at

Jamshedpur in the East, Pune in the west and Luck now in

the North.
In the field of automobiles, Telco is the largest

commercial vehicle manufacturer in Indian and ranks 6th

worldwide.

The product basket of Tata Motors Limited consists

1. Tata Indica V2

2. Tata Indica V2 Turbo

3. Tata Indigo

4. Tata Indigo Marino

5. Tata Indica GSX

6. Tata Safari

7. Tata Sumo

8. Tata Toyota

9. Tata Qualise

Hyundai

The Hyundai given to Susee, Trichyin 1998 is nine

years old. Hyundai has also balancing its Santro and Verna

model cars with in the existing capacity constraint and is

looking for respite through operating a third shift. In a

couple of months Hyundai expects to sell beyond the


break-even of 90,000 cars and Ratan Tata has indicated

that the Indica project would reach the level in the year

2004. Daewoo and Honda expect to get closer this year,

achieving break-even in 2004-2005.

The product basket of Hyundai Ltd consists mainly of

1. Santro

2. Get Z

3. Verna

4. Elantra

5. Sonata

6. Tucson

7. Accent

Maruti

Dealership for the MUL given to A.R.A.S.P.V.P.V & Co.,

Trichyin August 1996 is ten years old, but with an

experience that spans six decades.

Maruti Udyog Ltd., was established in Feb 1981

through an act of parliament, to meet the growing demand

of a personal mode of transport caused by the lack of an


efficient public transport system. Suzuki Motor Company

was chosen from seven prospective partners worldwide.

This was due not only to their undisputed leadership in

small cars but also to their commitment to actively bring to

Maruti Udyog Ltd., contemporary technology and Japanese

management practices. A license and a joint venture

agreement were signed between Government of India and

Suzuki Motor Company in Oct.1982. Now, the company has

a vision to be the leader, in THE INDIAN AUTOMOBILE

INDUSTRY and wants to create customer delight and

shareholders.

The product basket of Maruti Udyog Ltd., consists

mainly of

1. 800 6. Swift

2. Alto 7. Esteem

3. Zen 8. Baleno

4. Wagon R 9. Gypsy

5. Versa 10. Omni


along their variants between a price range of

Rs.2,01,767 to Rs.6,64,318 Mauti Grand Vitara is also in

the list of utility vehicles of the company.

Ford

Ford Motor Company entered the business world on

June 16, 1903, when Henry ford and 11 business associates

signed the company’s articles of incorporation few

companies are as closely identified with the history and

development of Industry and society through out the 20th

century as ford motor company, first implemented at the

Highland Park plant in 1913. Ford motors is one of the

oldest car manufacturing company of the world. They

completed their official 100th anniversary in 2003. Their

brands worldwide include Aston Martin, Ford, Jaguar, Land

Rover. India started their operations in India in the 90’s

and since then they have created a market for them selves.

The product basket of Ford Motor Company. Consists

mainly of

1. Ford Ikon

2. Ford Fiesta
3. Ford Fusion

4. Ford Mondeo

5. Ford Endeavour

6. Ford Ikon NXT Sxi


Indian Car Industry: Models & Status

Status Models

I. Super luxury car 1st class Hundai Sonata,

Ford Mondeo,

Maruti Grand Vitara,

Baleno, Swift, Ford

Fiesta

II. Luxury car 2nd class Tata Estate, Tata

Sierra, Ford

Ikon, Hyundai Accent,

Maruti Esteem,

M.Wagon R Tata Safari,

Tata Sumo, DX, Qualis,

Ford, Ford Ikon NXT Sxi

M.Versa, M.Zen Estilo

III. Economy car 3rd class M-Omni 800, Alto

M,1000,

Tata Sumose, Tata

Indica, Tata Hyundai

Santro
A Problem of Plenty Car Majors Have Set Ambitious

Capacity Targets

Company Capacity

Likely Capacity

in 2006 in 2010

1.Maruti Udyog 6,00,000 1,00,000

2.Tata Motors 2,25,000 3,25,000

3.Hyundai Motor India 3,00,000 6,00,000

4.Honda Siel 60,000 2,00,000

5.Toyota Kivioskar 60,000 2,00,000

6.General Motors India 85,000 2,15,000

7.Ford India 60,000 1,00,000

8.Mahindra & Mahindra 1,00,000 5,00,000

9.Daimler Chrysler 2,000 2,000

10.skoda/Volkswagen 30,000 1,40,000

----------------------------------------------

Total Capacity 15,22,000 32,80,000


Total Demand 14,00,000 23,00,000

Source: - Business World 29, Jan 2007


Advantages of Foreign Entry

The Indian automobile industry has recorded an

unprecedented growth of 30% in 2002-03 to reach a

production of 4.5 million units. all manufacturers have

foreign collaboration to produce quality product to meet

the competition.

As significant feature of these joint ventures is the fact

that the foreign collaboration have a major stake in their

Indian projects.

After the recent economic reforms the international

car market identified a local partner and went in for joint

ventures with them. The foreign partners were allowed a

maximum of 51% equity. However, the Government

relaxed the composition of equity and has allowed foreign

companies even a 100% equity on their side.

Growth in Production of Cars

Automobile production has grown faster than sales. In

the market, the competitor started looking into the ordinary

car as well as premium segmented cars to meet the needs

of rich and other layers of the society. A leading car


manufacturing in different parts of the world wive with

each other targeting to capture Indian market with a sharp

sense of product differentiation, and quality upgraduation

India is one of the fast growing markets with 25% growth

rate in her Rs.30,000/- crores size of her automobile

Industry.

Variables Influencing the Production of Cars

a. There has been an exceptional and sustained demand

pull in all commercial vehicles

b. Sharper initiatives from the industry for diversification

of model

c. Improvement in technology to make the product more

operator friendly and environmental friendly.

Production and Sales

The production and sales information of cars for the

year 2001-02 to the year 2005-06 has been presented.

Year Production Sales Exports


2001-2002 5,00,301 5,09,088 49,273
2002-2003 5,57,410 5,41,491 40,263
2003-2004 7,82,562 6,96,153 1,25,320
2004-2005 9,60,487 8,20,179 1,60,670
2005-2006 10,45,881 8,82,094 1,70,193
Source: Siamindia.com/scripts/market-share

From the above table it is noticed that the production

of cars has been showing an increasing trend except in the

year.

New Models to Hit the Indian Road

The past few years seen a proliferation of entrants

into the passenger car sector following the liberalization of

the economy Hyundai corporation has set up a

manufacturing unit near Chennai and is all set to launch

the hatch back, Santro model this year as a competitor to

the MUL’S zen.

The Japanese automobile giant Honda has set up a

plant in Uttar Pradesh and production of the “City” a mid-

size model devised foe the Asian Market began in

Dec.1997. General motors, in a tie-up with Hindustan

motors, had already launched its opel Astra about two

years ago while the collaboration between Mahindra’s and

Ford. Mahindra Ford India Limited, had introduced the Ford

Escort almost simultaneously.


Hindustan motors also has a technical collaboration

with Mitsubishi of Japan and has launched the medium-size

lancer with a fairly high indigenous content. Toyota of

Japan too has arrived on the scene with its manufacturing

facilities in Karnataka. Mercedes Banz of Germany went to

the luxury category by entering into a collaboration with

Telco and setting up a plant near Pune to product limited

quantities of the Ezzo and the 250D for the upper crust of

Indian society as well as to meet the needs of the Asian

Market.

Auto Mobile Revolution

The market for small cars has suddenly wins wide

open, with the introduction of variety of cars, the last but

not least being the Tata Indica. Simultaneously, Maruti has

announced drastic reduction in the price of their small cars,

proving conclusively, once and for all, that most of the

Indian driving public was being taken for a ride in more

ways than one all these years.

It is also likely that soon, the prices may well be

reduced further, as the installed capacity for small cars is

now almost 3 times the likely demand, if you take into


account the fact that the Maruti 800, Omni will continue to

be the large selling entry-level cars for most Indians.

Furthers more, the automobile industry is pressing for a

rebate excise duties from the existing 40% to 25%.

All in all, it will be important for prospective buyers to

be tally informed on these matters.

Turnover of Automobile Manufacturers


Year (Rs.In Million)
1999-00 422,933
2000-01 492,024
2001-02 499,136
2002-03 595,184
2003-04 661,769
2004-05 835,851

Table No. 2.1: Sale of Automobiles in India

(Value in Millions)

S. Sales in Amount of Growth


Year
No. Rupees Growth Percentage
1 1999-00 422933 - -
2 2000-01 492024 69091 16.34%
3 2001-02 499136 7112 1.45%
4 2002-03 595184 96048 19.24%
5 2003-04 661769 66585 11.19%
6 2004-05 835851 174082 26.31%
Chart No. 2.1: Sale of Automobiles in India
(in Rupees)

900
Amount in millions

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

0
1999- 2000- 2001- 2002- 2003- 2004-
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Year

Table No. 2.3: Installed Capacities of Automobile


Industry in India

2003-2004 2004-2005
Installed Capacity (In Installed Capacity (In
Million) Million)
a) Four Wheelers 1.51 a) Four Wheelers 1.72
b) Two &Three b) Two &Three
7.83 9.13
Wheelers Wheelers
c) Engines 0.18 c) Engines 0.18
Market Share for Automobiles in the year 2005-06

Installed Capacity in
Type of Vehicle
Million
CVs 3.94
Total Passenger Vehicles 12.83
Total Two Wheelers 79.19
Three Wheelers 4.04

Prices of Various Cars (Price in Rs.)


MARUTI

Maruti 800 STD Rs. 2, 20,308

A/C Rs. 2, 43,626

Omni E Rs. 2, 68,491

5 Rs. 2, 66,114

LPG Rs. 2, 77,024

Cargo Rs. 2, 46,569

Cargolpg Rs. 2, 26,950

ALTO STD Rs. 2, 63,100

LX Rs. 3, 00,832

LXI Rs. 3, 21,234

Wagon R LX Rs. 3, 72,053

LXI Rs. 3, 94,126

VXI Rs. 4, 14,936


VXI{ABSBAIRBOG} Rs. 4,

49,611

LX DUO {LPG} Rs. 3, 95,243

LXI DUO {LPG} Rs. 4, 20,177

Zen Estilo LX Estilo Rs. 3, 64,259

LXI Estilo Rs. 3, 90,122

VXI {NONABS} Rs. 4,

12,591

VXI {ABS} Rs. 4, 45,187

Esteem LX Rs. 4, 73,363

LXI Rs. 5, 06,532

VXI Rs. 5, 45,320

Swift LXI Rs. 4, 46,942

VXI {NONABS} Rs. 4,

76,481

VXI {ABS} Rs. 5, 66,387

Versa STD Rs. 4, 05,428

DX1 Rs. 4, 87,957

DX2 Rs. 5, 30,092

BALENO LXI Rs. 6, 38,962

VXI Rs. 7, 30,129


HYUNDAI

SANTRO

XING - XK- NON AIC Rs. 3, 00,521

XING - XK- METALLIC Rs. 3, 62,850

XING - XL- METALLIC Rs. 3, 89,441

XING - XO- METALLIC Rs. 4, 14,638

XING - AT- METALLIC Rs. 4, 63,216

GETZ

GLE Rs. 4, 68,898

GVS Rs. 5, 06,622

GLS Rs. 5, 34,656

GLX Rs. 5, 73,086

VERNA

VTVT-1 Rs. 6, 89,176

VTVT-X1 Rs. 7, 05,723

VTVT-XX1 Rs. 7, 68,658

CRDI -VGT Rs. 8, 13,942

ELANTRA

GT -D Rs. 7, 88,111

GLS -LP Rs. 9, 36,716

GRDI -D Rs. 9, 52,793


GRDI -LP Rs.10,89,383

SONATA EMBERA {MT-LP} Rs.15,39,344

TUCSON CRDI Rs.19,28,610


CHAPTER-III

ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION

Introduction

In the recent years the marketers find it very difficult

to come to decisions, they conduct frequently consumer

research. They spend big amount to provide maximum

satisfaction to the consumers and provide enough after

sales services.

The company that really understands how consumers

will respond to different features, prices advertising

appeals and so on will have enormous advantages over its

competitors.

Branding has grown so strong that today hardly

anything goes on branded sellers to process orders.

Branding also gives the sellers the opportunity to attract a

loyal and profitable set of customers. At present in the

passenger car industry variety of brands are available.

Some customers may look into fuel efficiency and some

other customers may look into the capacity and so on.


As already pointed out to study the customer

preference towards passenger cars, required information

were collected from 50 respondents.

Table No.1

Age of Respondents

Age (in No of % of
years) Respondents Respondents
21-30 15 30
31-40 16 32
41-50 19 18
51-60 9 18
Above 61 1 2
Total 50 100
Source : Primary Data

The above table shows that 32% of respondents

beloved to the age group of 31-40 years. 30% of

respondents belonged to the age group of 21-30 years.

18% of respondents belonged to the age group of 41-50

years and 51-60 years. 2% of respondents beloved to the

age group of above 61 years.

There fore it is clear that majority 32% of respondents

were in the age group of 31-40 years.


Chart No.1

Age of Respondents

2%
18%
30%

18%

32%

21-30 31-40 41-50 51-60 Above 61

Table No.2

Occupation

For buying any consumer durable or luxury products,

the earnings are considered to be important. The amount

of earnings has been much influenced by the occupation of

the individual. The following table shows the occupation of

the respondents.
Occupation No of % of
Respondents Respondents
Govt. 5 10%
Employee 15 30%
Private 14 28%
Employee
5 10%
Profession
9 18%
Agricultural
2 4%
Business
Others
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

10% of respondents beloved to the Govt. Employees.

30% of respondents beloved to the private employee. 28%

of respondents beloved to the profession. 10% of

respondents beloved to the agricultural. 18% of

respondent’s beloved to the business. 4% of respondent’s

beloved to the other employees.

There fore it is clear that highly 30% of respondents

were in private employees.

Table No.3

Income
In some family the head of the family make the

earnings, there may to be more number of members who

earn either by salaries or by business. In the study area it

was found that in many cases both husband and wife were

employed the following table shows the income per month.

Income per No of % of
month Respondents Respondents
Less than 10,000 9 18%
11,000-20,000 19 38%
21,000-30,000 11 22%
31,000-40,000 9 18%
41,000 above 2 4%
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

The above table shows that the 38% of respondents

beloved to the income per month of 11,000 to 20,000.

22% of respondents beloved to the income per month

21,000 to 30,000. 18% of respondents beloved to the

income per month less than 10,000 and 31,000 to 40,000.

4% of respondents beloved to the income per month above

41,000.

There fore it is clear that 38% of respondents were in

11,000 to 20,000.
Table No.4

Number of Family Members

The earnings and savings are influenced by the

number of members in the family. The family may be a

joint family or nuclear family normally in a joint family, the

number of members in the family will be more. The

following table shows the number of family members.

Total No of
No of % of
Family
Respondents Respondents
Members
2 5 10%
3 15 30%
4 24 48%
5 6 12%
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

48% of families were having four members, 30% of

families were having three members. 12% of families were

having five members. 10% of families were having two

members.

There fore it is clear that majority 48% of families

were having four members.

Table No.5
Brand Classification

A car is name term or design or a combination of them

which is intended to identify the products of one

manufacturer and to differentiate them from those of

competitors. In India after liberalization, lot of brands are

available in the case of passenger car market.

Brands No of % of
Respondents Respondents
Maruti 29 58%
Tata 5 10%
Hyundai 6 12%
Ford 9 18%
Others 1 2%
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

The table shows that the 58% of respondents used

Maruti cars. 18% of respondents used Ford cars. 12% of

respondents used Hyundai cars. 10% of respondents used

Tata cars. 2% of respondents used others cars.

Therefore it is clear that majority 58% of respondents

were using Maruti cars.


Chart No.2

Brand Classification

58%

60%

50%

40%

30%
18%
12%
20% 10%

2%
10%

0%
Maruti Tata Hyundai Ford Others

% of Respondents

The credit facilities is also one of the important

factors buying cars. The new cars purchase of most people

like them. But some buyers also not availabilities credit

facilities therefore purchase a second-hand cars.

Table No.6

New Car or Second-hand Car

Type of Cars No of % of
Respondents Respondents
New Cars 29 58%
Second-hand 21 42%
Cars
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

The table is 50 respondents of the survey. The 58% of

new car purchased, and 42% of second-hand car

purchasers.

There fore it is clear that majority 58% of respondents

bought new car purchasers.

Chart No.3
New Car or Second-hand Car

70%
58%
60%
50%
42%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
New Cars Second-hand Cars

% of Respondents

Table No.7
Main Use of The Car
There are so many reasons for using a car. It is office

and private purpose and both uses more than consumers.

Purpose No of % of
Respondents Respondents
Office 9 18%
Private 16 32%
Both 26 50%
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

From the above table that 50% of respondents used

cars both for office and private use. 32% of respondents

used cars for private purpose. 18% of respondents used

cars for office purpose.

Therefore it is clear that majority 50% of respondents

used motor cars for both office and private purposes.

Chart No.4
60% Main Use of The Car

50%

40%

30%
50%
20%
32%
10%18%

0%
Office Private Both

% of Respondents
Table No.8

Purchase Decision

In case of costly purchases, it is difficult to decide who

make the purchase decision for this purpose; before one

arrive at decisions, we have to consult the existing users,

family, friends, relations. The following table shows

Purchase No of % of
decision Respondents Respondents
Own decision 25 50%
Family members 10 20%
Joint consultation 4 8%
Friends 11 22%
Total 50 100%

Source : Primary Data

From the above table it is cleat that 50% of

respondents bought cars out of there own decision 22% of

respondents acted on friends. 20% of respondents

influenced by were family members. 8% of respondents

made joint consultation.

There fore it is clearly that 50% of respondents

depended on own decision.


Table No.5

Purchase Decision

50%

20% 22%
8%
% of Respondents

Own Family Joint Friends


decision members consultation

% of Respondents

Table No.9

Pre purchase Visit to The Dealers Show Room

Answer No of % of
Respondents Respondents
Yes 33 66%
No 17 34%
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

The above table shows that 66% of respondents

visited the dealer’s show room. 34% of respondents did

not visit the Dealer’s show room.


Therefore it is clear that majority 66% of respondents

visited the dealer’s show room.


Chart No.6

Pre purchase Visit to The Dealers Show Room

34%

66%

Yes No

Table No.9A

Number of Times frequency of visit to Dealers Show


Room

Visiting No of % of
Times Respondents Respondents
1 5 18%
2 14 42%
3 12 36%
4 1 2%
5 1 2%
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data
The table shows that 42% of respondents visited 2

times; 36% of respondents visited 3 times; 18% of

respondents visited 1 time; 2% of respondents visited four

or five times.

Therefore it is clear that 42% of respondents visited 2

times visit.

Chart No.7

Number of Times frequency of visit to Dealers Show


Room
6
5
5
4
4
3
3
2
2
1
1 42% 36%
18% 2% 2%
0
1 2 3 4 5

Visiting Times % of Respondents

Table No.10

Year of Use

The products like cars are normally retained for

certain number of years and then disposed off. As the

model of the car has been changing frequently; the owners


of the car may be interest in disposing the car in order the

get a better resale value. The following table shows.

Years No of % of
Respondents Respondents
Below 2 years 12 24%
2 to 4 years 14 28%
Above 4 years 24 48%
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

The car using the year table we observe that the

classification according to the period of ownership 48% of

respondents were using for more than 4 years. 28% of

respondents were using 2 to 4 years. 24% of respondents

were using for less than 2 years.

Therefore it is clear that the majority 48% of

respondents using the cars for more than 4 years.

Chart No.8

Year of Use 48%


50%

40%
28%
30% 24%

20%

10%

0%
Below 2 years 2 to 4 years Above 4 years

% of Respondents
Table No.11

Preference for the Car

Consumer prefers the particular car. The following

table shows.

Factors No of % of
Respondents Respondents
New Technology 2 4%
More Mileage 5 10%
Economy in maintenance 23 46%
Prestige 6 12%
Affordable price 14 28%
Higher resale value 0 0%
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

From the above table 50 we in tar the consumer refer

the car among. 46% of respondents gave important to

economy in maintenance. 28% of respondents gave

important to affordable price. 12% of respondents gave

important to prestige, 10% of respondents gave important

to more mileage. 4% of respondents gave important to

new technology. 0% of respondents gave important to

Higher Resale value.


Therefore it is clear that majority 46% of respondents

gave important to economy in maintenance.

Chart No.9

Preference for the Car

50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
46%
20%
15% 28%
10%
5% 10% 12%
4%
0% 0%
New More Mileage Economy in Prestige Affordable Higher resale
Technology maintenance price value

% of Respondents
Table No. 12

Brand Selection

Brand name helps the consumer to identify the

product and different it from those of competitors.

Branding play a vital role in achieving greater sales volume

and greater stabilities of price. In he case of passenger

cars, consumers look up on the brand name as a symbol of

product quality and as a symbol of satisfaction. The

following table shows the classification according to

popularity of the car.

Weighte
Factors d Rank
Average
Cost of vehicle 4 III

Mileage 4.32 I

Maintenance cost 3.74 IV

Style and comfort 3.16 IX

Prestige 3.24 VIII

Availability of spare parts 4.04 II

New technology 3.58 VI

Seating capacity 3.62 V

Suitability for roads 2.78 X


Safety 3.38 VII
Source : Primary Data

The above analysis it is clear that the first preference

selection of the motor car when to mileage. The second

preference selection of the motor car when to availability of

spare parts. The third preference selection of the motor car

when to cost of vehicle. The fourth preference selection of

the motor car when to maintenance cost. The fifth

preference selection of the motor car when to seating

capacity. The sixth preference selection of the motor car

when to new technology. The seventh preference selection

of the motor car when to safety. The eight preference

selection of the motor car when to prestige. The ninth

preference selection of the motor car when to style and

comfort. The tenth preference selection of the motor car

when to suitability for roads.

Therefore it is clear that majority of respondents were

selection to mileage is first rank.


Table No.13

Mode of Purchase

There are so many options available for an individual

to borrow money from outside agencies commercial banks

and many private financial institutions are prepared to lend

money with certain conditions of payments and security.

The following table shows

Mode No of % of
Respondents Respondents
Borrowed 9 18%
funds 21 42%
Own funds 20 40%
Both
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

The table shows that according to the source of

borrowings. 42% of respondents used own funds. 40% of

respondents used both of own funds and borrowed funds.

18% of respondents depended on borrowed funds.

Therefore it is clear that majority of 42% of

respondents used own funds.


Chart No.11

Mode of Purchase

18%
40%

42%

Borrowed funds Own funds Both

Table No. 14

Usage of Car in a Week

Consumers are usage of the car in various type more

than consumers are using the car for all days.

Days No of % of
Respondents Respondents
One day 10 0%
2 to 4 days 16 32%
5 to 6 days 14 28%
All days 20 40
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

The above table shows that 40% of respondents were

using for all days using a week 32% of respondents were in


2 to 4 days. 28% of respondents used 5 to 6 days in a

week.

Therefore it is clear that majority 40% of respondents

were using all days in a week.

Chart No. 12

Usage of Car in a Week

45%
40% 40%
35%
32%
30%
28%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0% 0%
One day 2 to 4 days 5 to 6 days All days

% of Respondents

Table No.15

Satisfaction level

Answer No of % of
Respondents Respondents
Highly 13 26%
satisfied 36 72%
Satisfied 1 2%
Mode rate 0 0%
Dissatisfied 0 0%
Highly
dissatisfied
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

The above table that following 72% of respondents

were satisfied. 26% of respondents were highly satisfied.

2% of respondents were mode rate, no respondents was in

dissatisfied and highly dissatisfied group.

Therefore it is clear that majority 72% of respondents

were satisfied.

Chart No.13

Satisfaction level

Highly dissatisfied 0%

Dissatisfied0%

Mode rate 2%

Satisfied 72%

Highly satisfied 26%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80%

% of Respondents
Table No.16

The Reason for Satisfaction

Reason for Weighted


Rank
Satisfaction Average
High Mileage 5.14 I
Good 4.72 II
performance
Good service 4.52 III
Low maintenance 4.20 IV
Low cost 4.00 V
New technology 3.10 VI
High resale value 2.40 VII
Source : Primary Data

The above analysis it is clear that the first preference

selection of the satisfaction when to high mileage. The

second preference selection of the satisfaction when to

good performance. The third preference selection of the

satisfaction when to good service. The fourth preference

selection of the satisfaction when to low maintenances. The

fifth preference selection of the satisfaction when to low

cost. The sixth preference selection of the satisfaction

when to new technology. The seventh preference selection

of the satisfaction when to high resale value.


Therefore it is clear that the majority of respondents

were satisfaction in to high mileage was first rank.

Table No.17

Need for a Car

No of % of
Factors
Respondents Respondents
Safety 0 0%
Convenience 24 48%
Prestige 8 16%
Luxury 2 4%
All the above 16 32%
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary data

From the table was 48% of respondents gave

importance to convenience. 32% of respondents were in

all the above group. 16% of respondents preferred

prestige. 4% of respondents gave important to luxury. No

respondents preferred safety.

Therefore it is clear that majority 48% of respondents

were in convenience.
Table No.14

Need for a Car

50%
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
Safety

% of Respondents
Convenience

Prestige

Luxury

All the above

% of Respondents

Table No.18

Opinion on wrathfulness of investment on car

Answer No of % of
Respondents Respondents
Yes 37 74%
No 13 26%
Total 50 100%
Source : Primary Data

The above table shows that car is worth for the

investment 74% of respondents stated that it was worthy


for it’s investment is worth. 26% of respondents disagreed

with this point no Investment is not worth.

Therefore it is clear that majority 74% of respondents

best that the Investment was worthy.

Chart No.15

Opinion on wrathfulness of investment on car

26%

74%

Table No.19

Opinion of the performance of the car

Maruti, Hyundai, Tata, Ford and others are ranking

performance of the car is the table is given below.


Brands Weighted
Rank
Average
Maruti 4.16 I
Tata 4.14 II
Ford 3.20 III
Hyundai 3.02 IV
Others 1.14 V
Source : Primary Data

The above table shows that 4.16% of respondents

gave first rank Maruti cars. 4.14% of respondents gave

second rank to Tata cars. 3.2% of respondents gave third

rank to Ford cars. 3.02% of respondents gave fourth rank

to Hyundai cars. 1.14% of respondents gave fifth rank to

other cars.

Therefore it is clear that 4.16% of respondents were in

Maruti cars.
CHAPTER-IV

4.1 FINDINGS

 It was observed that 32% of respondents were in age

group of 31-40 years.

 It was observed that the occupation of 30% of

respondents was in private sector.

 38% of respondents were in the income group of

Rs.11,000 to 20,000.

 Majority 48% of respondents were 4members in the

family.

 It was observed that 58% of respondents were using

Maruti Cars.

 58% of respondents bought new cars.

 It was observed that the main use of the car for 50%

of respondents was office and private purpose.

 50% of respondents bought cars according to there

own decision

 66% of respondents visited the showroom before

buying the cars.


 42% of respondents visited twice dealers show rooms.

 48% of respondents were using the car for past 4

years

 46% of respondents gave first preference to economy

in maintenance.

 Majority of car owners were of the opinion that they

gave (4.32%) mileage of the cars.

 Most of purchaser 42% of respondents used own funds

for buying the cars.

 40% of respondents were using the cars daily.

 Majority 72% of car owners were satisfied with the car

they own.

 The owners of almost all brands of car were satisfied

with the mileage of car, which they own.

 It is observed that car is nessing and 48% of

respondents considered it for convenience.

 Majority of 74% of respondents were of the opinion

that investment on cars were worthy investment.


 Majority of the car owner were of opinion that among

all cars Maruti car was the best car performance.


4.2 SUGGESTIONS

On the basis of the above findings the following are

the consumers and tap the market potential of the car.

 The mainly persons in the age group of 31 to 40 years.

Therefore the consumers of the all age groups should

be attracted by the manufactures by using proper

advertising and other sales promotional efforts.

 Private sector employees were the major market

segment using the cars. Therefore the segments like

government employees, professional, rich farmers,

business peoples etc. Should also be covered.

 People in the income group Rs.11,000 to Rs. 20,000

were the major buyers of the cars. Therefore other

income group should also be covered low cost cars

like the one purpose by TATA cars for rupees ONE

LAKHS should be manufactured and entered into the

market.

 The car buyers were having to family members more

than 4members travel suitable for car travels.


Therefore 4members in the family most of prefer the

car traveling.

 Maruti cars use mostly preferable by the people


4.3 CONCLUSION

Car owners view more important to low maintenance

expense and good mileage of car. Owner of all cars were

satisfied with the mileage. How ever the level of

satisfaction was not up to the mark on other features of the

car. Such as cost of vehicle, prestige value, availability of

spares, usage of modern technologies and so on.

Cars were own mostly buy a married person having

more them two or more children working in a private

sector. Widely preferred car was any one-brand

manufacturer by Maruti Udyog Ltd. Show room was

important place, which was visited by the car buyer for

more than ones.

Car manufacturer may give the importance to the

features like cost of vehicle, prestige value, available

spares and so on. The show room may be established in an

attractive manner. As maintain was considered as nature

factor in selecting a car they may try to produce maintain

free car.
BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Southern Economist, December 15th 2006

2. Business world, 5th June 2006

3. Business world, 29th January 2007

4. Business world, 9th April 2007

You might also like