Professional Documents
Culture Documents
925
P1: OSO/OVY P2: OSO/OVY QC: OSO/OVY T1: OSO Printer: Yet to come
GRBT291-59 GRBT291-3641G GRBT291-Gabrielli-v2.cls October 23, 2008 13:22
Neuroendocrine Shock
due to pituitary or adrenergic
dysfunction after CNS injury
• Hypotension poorly responsive
to vasopressor therapy
• Seen in TBI, SAH, hypothalamic
stroke
FIGURE 59.1. Neurogenic shock consists of three pathomechanisms. CNS, central nervous system; CO,
cardiac output; CVP, central venous pressure; PCWP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; SAH, sub-
arachnoid hemorrhage; TBI, traumatic brain injury.
brainstem—the periaqueductal gray matter in the midbrain, the blood pressure, reflex bradycardia, and peripheral adrenore-
parabrachial regions in the pons, and the intermediate reticu- ceptor hyperresponsiveness (14). The latter accounts for the
lar formation located in the ventrolateral medulla. From here, excessive vasopressor response repeatedly seen in this clinical
neurons project to nuclei in the spinal cord. The sympathetic scenario. The acute phase, also known as spinal shock, more
preganglionic neurons originate in the intermediolateral cell frequently consists of periods of hypotension. After the acute
column within the spinal cord gray matter between T1 and phase, starting about 2 months after the injury, autonomic dys-
L2 and are therefore called the thoracolumbar branches. From reflexia occurs in patients with lesions above T5 (15). This state
here, they exit the spinal cord and project to 22 pairs of paraver- is characterized by sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction
tebral sympathetic trunk ganglia next to the vertebral column. in muscular, skin, renal, and presumably gastrointestinal vas-
The main ganglia within the sympathetic trunk are the cervi- cular beds, induced by afferent peripheral stimulation below
cal and stellate ganglia. The adrenal medulla receives pregan- the level of the lesion. For example, stimuli such as urinary
glionic fibers and thus is equivalent to a sympathetic ganglion. catheterization, dressing changes, or surgical stimulation can
Blood pressure control depends on tonic activation of the sym- lead to severe blood pressure spikes out of proportion to the
pathetic preganglionic neurons by descending input from the stimulus. In Guillain-Barré syndrome, the autonomic dysregu-
supraspinal structures (8). lation is likely caused by acute demyelination not only of sen-
The parasympathetic nervous system consists of cranial sory and motor fibers, but also of autonomic fibers.
and sacral aspects. The cranial subdivision originates from the Injury to the brain can also lead to vasodilatory neurogenic
parasympathetic brainstem nuclei of cranial nerves III, VII, IX, shock. Certain cerebral structures, such as the insular cortex,
X, and XI. The cranial parasympathetic neurons travel along amygdala, lateral hypothalamus, and medulla, have great in-
the cranial nerves until they synapse in the parasympathetic fluence on the autonomic nervous system. Cortical asymme-
ganglia in close proximity to the target organ. The sacral sub- try is present and is reflected in a higher incidence of tachy-
division originates in the sacral spinal cord (S2–S4), forming cardia, ventricular arrhythmias, and hypertension with lesions
the lateral intermediate gray zone where preganglionic neurons of the right insula—resulting in loss of parasympathetic in-
travel with the pelvic nerves to the inferior hypogastric plexus put and thus sympathetic predominance—and a higher inci-
and synapse on parasympathetic ganglia within the target or- dence of bradycardia and hypotension with injuries to the left
gans. insula—resulting in a loss of sympathetic input and subsequent
Following a spinal cord injury, the sympathetic pathways parasympathetic predominance (16–18) (Fig. 59.2).
are interrupted with dissociation of the sympathetic supply
from higher control below the level of transection (9,10).
Parasympathetic fibers are usually spared. This results in auto- Cardiogenic Neurogenic Shock
nomic hyperreflexia with associated hypertension or hypoten-
sion with bradycardia, all observed in human studies as well This form of neurogenic shock is primarily encountered in SAH
as in animal models (10–13). Loss of supraspinal control of and TBI but is also seen in ischemic stroke and intracerebral
the sympathetic nervous system leads to unopposed vagal tone hemorrhage. Cardiac dysfunction is a well-known complica-
with relaxation of vascular smooth muscles below the level of tion of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, first described over
the cord injury, resulting in decreased venous return, decreased 50 years ago (19). It is most often recognized on the elec-
cardiac output, hypotension, loss of diurnal fluctuations of trocardiogram (ECG) as arrhythmias, QRS, ST-segment, and
P1: OSO/OVY P2: OSO/OVY QC: OSO/OVY T1: OSO Printer: Yet to come
GRBT291-59 GRBT291-3641G GRBT291-Gabrielli-v2.cls October 23, 2008 13:22
A C
FIGURE 59.4. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. A: Japanese octopus fishing pot. B: CT brain of a 47-year-
old woman with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). C: Chest x-ray view of the same patient with typical
cardiac silhouette of Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. An echocardiogram revealed an ejection fraction of 29
degrees with apical ballooning, global hypokinesis, and sparing of the apex. The chest radiograph and
echocardiogram became normal within 1 week after her SAH.
entity its other name, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, derived from increases in pulmonary capillary pressures lead to pulmonary
the Japanese word for the Japanese octopus fishing pot, tako- edema and hypoxia, which in turn decreases the uptake of
tsubo (35–37) (Fig. 59.4). oxygen in a high demand state, contributing to hemodynamic
Pulmonary edema with concomitant hypoxia is frequently instability. The Vietnam war era head injury series (38) re-
encountered in this context and may result from cardiac con- ported the rapid onset of acute pulmonary edema after severe
gestion but can occur independently from the cardiac dysfunc- head injury. In addition, experimental models as well as mul-
tion as its own entity: neurogenic pulmonary edema. Massive tiple human case reports of TBI and SAH have shown massive
P1: OSO/OVY P2: OSO/OVY QC: OSO/OVY T1: OSO Printer: Yet to come
GRBT291-59 GRBT291-3641G GRBT291-Gabrielli-v2.cls October 23, 2008 13:22
Catecholamine Surge
α α+β β
Peripheral Pulmonary
venous Platelet Myocardial
vasoconstriction
constriction aggregation contraction band
necrosis
Microemboli
↑Pulmonary
capillary LVEF ↓
pressure Damaged
endothelium
FIGURE 59.5. Summary of the pathophysiology of
Neurogenic ↑Pulmonary Shock the cardiogenic type of neurogenic shock. ICH, in-
pulmonary permeability tracerebral hemorrhage; LVEF, left ventricular ejection
edema fraction; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage; TBI, trau-
matic brain injury.
sympathetic discharges as the primary cause of neurogenic pul- ognized, primary and secondary adrenal insufficiency can easily
monary edema (39–41). Figure 59.5 summarizes the patho- be treated.
physiology of cardiogenic neurogenic shock. In septic shock, a low-dose vasopressin infusion has been
Overall, cardiac neurogenic shock, with or without neuro- shown to successfully restore blood pressure in hypotension
genic pulmonary edema, is usually transient, with resolution refractory to standard catecholamine therapy (43,44). Recent
within several days to 2 weeks (2–4). Prevention of secondary studies in SAH have shown that endogenous vasopressin serum
brain injury from hypoxia and decreased cerebral perfusion levels are elevated during the first 2 days after SAH but decrease
pressures should be the focus of care in the management of to subnormal levels after 4 days (45–47). Arginine vasopressin
this neurally mediated complication. supplementation in SAH at low dose (0.01–0.04 units/min)
has been studied in only one single retrospective study (48).
The role of vasopressin in the setting of neurogenic shock re-
mains to be studied in a prospective manner, but the changes in
Neuroendocrine Neurogenic Shock endogenous vasopressin levels might indicate neuroendocrine
changes in neurogenic shock and potential new treatment op-
Insufficiency of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis has
tions in SAH.
been recognized as an important cause for shock. Inappropri-
ately reduced release of cortisol in stress situations can lead
to decreased systemic vascular resistance, reduced cardiac con-
tractility, hypovolemic shock, or hyperdynamic shock that can CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
mimic septic shock. Secondary adrenal insufficiency due to
injury to the hypothalamic-hypopituitary feedback loop can Figure 59.6 illustrates the clinical manifestations and symp-
cause neuroendocrine neurogenic shock. Acute brain injury, toms seen in neurogenic shock. Acutely, vasodilatory neuro-
particularly TBI and SAH, can commonly lead to injury of genic shock presents with a “warm and dry” hemodynamic
the hypothalamus, pituitary gland, or the connecting structures profile. The patient is hypotensive and frequently bradycardic;
(42). Cohan et al. (6) revealed that adrenal insufficiency after however, the peripheral vessels are dilated, leading to warm
traumatic brain injury occurred in about half of all patients limbs and a normal capillary refill time. Central venous pres-
and led to a significantly higher rate of hypotension in these sure (CVP) is normal or low, and systemic venous resistance
patients. Most cases of adrenal insufficiency developed within (SVR) is always low. Stroke volume and cardiac output are
4 days of injury. Importantly, the authors defined adrenal insuf- low due to the unopposed vagal tone. When a spinal cord in-
ficiency using a low random serum cortisol value and highlight jury is present, a difference in smooth muscle and vasculature
the fact that an increase in the cortisol level after a stimula- tone can be observed between the body parts above and below
tion test does not rule out the presence of adrenal insufficiency. the level of the injury. For example, in an injury at thoracic level
This issue is particularly relevant in TBI patients, in whom 7 (T7), normal upper limb perfusion might be observed, while
the hypothalamus and the pituitary gland are the likely af- vasodilatation below T7 leads to warm and dry lower extrem-
fected organs, and the adrenal glands might well be expected ities. Orthostatic hypotension without reflex tachycardia on
to mount an appropriate response when stimulated. When rec- changing from a supine to an upright position—by standing
P1: OSO/OVY P2: OSO/OVY QC: OSO/OVY T1: OSO Printer: Yet to come
GRBT291-59 GRBT291-3641G GRBT291-Gabrielli-v2.cls October 23, 2008 13:22
Every patient should undergo serial ECGs, serial cardiac injury, low random serum cortisol levels, and thus adrenal in-
enzyme measurements, and a chest radiograph. As previously sufficiency, may be encountered for several days after injury (6).
mentioned, pulmonary edema and neurocardiogenic injury Many neurologically injured patients, especially those with
may occur together or separately, making chest x-ray films im- spinal cord injuries, receive steroids while in the neurointen-
portant diagnostic tools. In particular, one should look for pul- sive care unit. The doses administered may be high enough to
monary vascular congestion and evaluate the size and shape of alter the result of a random serum cortisol level, but often the
the cardiac silhouette. Hemodynamic monitoring with continu- dose is not enough to treat true adrenal insufficiency appro-
ous blood pressure and central venous pressure (CVP) monitor- priately. In these cases, one could either empirically treat with
ing with an arterial line and central venous line (CVL) should higher doses of steroids that also treat adrenal insufficiency—
be undertaken. Blood pressure measurements should be done hydrocortisone, with or without fludrocortisone—or, keeping
continuously with an arterial line. Arteriosclerosis of the up- the potential adverse effects of steroids in acute injury in mind,
per extremities is common and should be kept in mind either one could withhold the administration of steroids for 12 hours,
when there is a large discrepancy between right- and left-sided then obtain a random cortisol level and resume steroid treat-
pressures or when the clinical appearance of the patient does ment right after the blood draw. However, hypotension is fre-
not match the readings from the arterial line. Central venous quently severe enough that immediate treatment is warranted,
access is key for determining CVP and for the administration and withholding steroids often is not an option. Dexametha-
of fluids and medications, especially vasopressors. The site of sone, which is frequently used in the neurointensive care unit, is
the placement of the central venous line (CVL) may play an the steroid that interferes the least with the cortisol assay after
important role in the management of shock in a neurologically a corticotropin stimulation test and therefore allows for such a
injured patient. Subclavian vein catheters are the preferred site test. In cases of high suspicion, a random cortisol level is often
in patients with elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), as there preferred because of its simplicity. The cortisol level should be
is a theoretical risk of venous stasis within the internal jugular drawn immediately before the steroid dose. However, given the
vein with venous congestion and higher risk for venous sinus lack of mineralocorticoid activity of dexamethasone, changing
thrombosis, which could result in increased ICP (55). In ad- to hydrocortisone with or without fludrocortisone is recom-
dition, trauma patients frequently have cervical spine injuries mended when adrenal insufficiency is suspected.
and require cervical collars, making the internal jugular vein
accessible only with difficulty.
In patients with cardiogenic neurogenic shock, more exten- MANAGEMENT
sive hemodynamic monitoring may be necessary with either
noninvasive cardiac monitoring devices or a pulmonary artery Two important reasons for early and proactive treatment of
catheter (PAC). Echocardiography is very important to under- patients in neurogenic shock are as follows:
standing the etiology of shock. In most cases, a transthoracic
1. Prevention of secondary brain injury from hypoxia and hy-
echocardiogram is sufficient. The typical echocardiographic
potension
appearance is that of apical ballooning, which results from
2. The fact that neurogenic shock, especially cardiogenic and
global hypokinesis sparing the apex (56). This part of the heart
neuroendocrine forms, is easily treatable and transient, with
is devoid of sympathetic nerve terminals, supporting the hy-
potentially good outcomes despite the moribund appearance
pothesis that cardiac injury in SAH is neurally mediated by a
of the patient in the acute phase.
sympathetic storm. Segmental wall motion abnormalities not
conforming to distinct coronary artery territories is another Identifying patients at risk has been very difficult, but at least
characteristic echocardiographic finding. However, myocardial in SAH it appears that poor neurologic grade, age older than
infarction from ischemic coronary disease is frequently seen in 30 years, and ventricular repolarization abnormalities are risk
brain-injured patients, just as in any critically ill patient, and factors for neurogenic shock (57).
should always be ruled out first as a cause of shock. In the set- Once the diagnosis of neurogenic shock has been established
ting of fever and shock, blood cultures must be obtained and the and the pathophysiology (subtype) has been understood, treat-
patient appropriately covered with antibiotics until the cultures ment tailored to the specific subtype is initiated. In all cases,
yield results. However, older and immunosuppressed patients euvolemia is of utmost importance and must be achieved before
may not mount an appropriate febrile response, and thus sep- any other treatment can be successful. In general, vasopressor
sis should still be considered in these patients even when they treatment as a continuous infusion is initiated and titrated to a
are afebrile, especially in the setting of a rising white blood cell goal MAP and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP). As an impor-
(WBC) count. Cerebral spinal fluid cultures are very impor- tant management tool, an intracranial pressure measurement
tant in the neurointensive care unit, with antibiotic coverage device is very helpful, allowing the indirect measurement of
of potential central nervous system CNS infections, especially CPP. We recommend a goal CPP of greater than or equal to 65
in patients after head trauma with skull fracture or sinus dis- mm Hg. The optimal CPP is not known. Data regarding the
ease, after instrumentation of the head or spinal canal, or in minimum tolerable CPP comes from TBI patients, in whom
immunocompromised patients. Placement of intracranial pres- the ICP is often elevated. Several studies have suggested an im-
sure measurement devices do not contribute to the diagnostic proved outcome when CPP is maintained at greater than 70 mm
workup of shock, but they are important tools in the manage- Hg (58,59). Other studies using physiologic measurements,
ment of neurogenic shock, such as when the goal mean arterial such as cerebral blood flow and brain tissue PO2 (Pbt O2 ), indi-
pressure (MAP) is being titrated to the cerebral perfusion pres- cate that adverse changes do not occur unless the CPP is below
sure. Finally, adrenal insufficiency should always be considered. 50 to 60 mm Hg (60,61).
Random serum cortisol levels should be obtained in the early Vasodilatory neurogenic shock can be difficult to treat.
stages of shock, keeping in mind that in some forms of brain In general, vagal tone predominates; however, in this state,
P1: OSO/OVY P2: OSO/OVY QC: OSO/OVY T1: OSO Printer: Yet to come
GRBT291-59 GRBT291-3641G GRBT291-Gabrielli-v2.cls October 23, 2008 13:22
patients frequently have peripheral α-adrenoceptor hyperre- ciple of management to prevent secondary brain injury and
sponsiveness, limiting the use of norepinephrine, epinephrine, improve outcome.
ephedrine, and phenylephrine. In fact, sympathomimetics
should be avoided as they can lead to severe blood pressure
fluctuations. Since arginine vasopressin (AVP) does not affect
α- or β-adrenergic receptors, but acts on V1 receptors, AVP References
may have an advantage over catecholamines or phenylephrine
in this form of neurogenic shock. It has not been studied in neu- 1. Bilello JF, Davis JW, Cunningham MA, et al. Cervical spinal cord injury and
rogenic shock, however, and it remains unclear whether AVP the need for cardiovascular intervention. Arch Surg. 2003;138(10):1127–
1129.
may have adverse effects on neurologically ill patients. This 2. Banki N, Kopelnik A, Tung P, et al. Prospective analysis of prevalence, distri-
concern is based on animal studies indicating that vasopressin bution, and rate of recovery of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients
may promote the development of vasospasm in SAH, and indi- with subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2006;105(1):15–20.
3. Mayer SA, Lin J, Homma S, et al. Myocardial injury and left ventricular
rect experimental studies showing a reduction in brain edema performance after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1999;30(4):780–786.
with vasopressin antagonists. No prospective human study has 4. Pollick C, Cujec B, Parker S, et al. Left ventricular wall motion abnormal-
been undertaken to confirm or dismiss this concern, and the ities in subarachnoid hemorrhage: an echocardiographic study. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1988;12(3):600–605.
only retrospective study on the use of vasopressin in SAH did 5. Kono T, Morita H, Kuroiwa T, et al. Left ventricular wall motion abnor-
not show any of these potentially adverse effects (48). In addi- malities in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: neurogenic stunned my-
ocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24(3):636–640.
tion to vasopressors, a temporary demand pacemaker and/or 6. Cohan P, Wang C, McArthur DL, et al. Acute secondary adrenal insuf-
atropine may be required in cases of refractory bradycardia ficiency after traumatic brain injury: a prospective study. Crit Care Med.
and hypotension. 2005;33(10):2358–2366.
7. Dimopoulou I, Tsagarakis S, Douka E, et al. The low-dose corticotropin
In cardiogenic neurogenic shock, some form of inotropic stimulation test in acute traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury: incidence
support may be necessary, either in the form of a dobutamine, of hypo-responsiveness and relationship to outcome. Intensive Care Med.
milrinone, or norepinephrine infusion. Dopamine is generally 2004;30(6):1216–1219.
8. Calaresu FR, Yardley CP. Medullary basal sympathetic tone. Ann Rev Phys-
avoided because of its proarrhythmic properties. Dobutamine iol. 1988;50:511–524.
and milrinone also have vasodilatory effects, frequently lead- 9. Osborn JW, Taylor RF, Schramm LP. Determinants of arterial pressure after
chronic spinal transection in rats. Am J Physiol. 1989;256(3 Pt 2):R666–673.
ing to more hypotension, requiring additional therapy with an 10. Maiorov DN, Weaver LC, Krassioukov AV. Relationship between sympa-
α-receptor agonist, such as phenylephrine or norepinephrine. thetic activity and arterial pressure in conscious spinal rats. Am J Physiol.
Afterload increases in the former, and tachycardia in the latter, 1997;272(2 Pt 2):H625–631.
11. Osborn JW, Taylor RF, Schramm LP. Chronic cervical spinal cord injury and
might be limiting factors and need careful monitoring. Cardiac autonomic hyperreflexia in rats. Am J Physiol. 1990;258(1 Pt 2):R169–174.
output monitoring may be undertaken with the guidance of 12. Krassioukov AV, Weaver LC. Episodic hypertension due to autonomic dysre-
a PAC. Beta-blockade is usually not recommended. In neuro- flexia in acute and chronic spinal cord-injured rats. Am J Physiol. 1995;268(5
Pt 2):H2077–2083.
genic cardiogenic shock, coronary artery disease is typically not 13. Sutters M, Wakefield C, O’Neil K, et al. The cardiovascular, endocrine and
present, and compensatory tachycardia is necessary to main- renal response of tetraplegic and paraplegic subjects to dietary sodium re-
striction. J Physiology. 1992;457:515–523.
tain cardiac output. Afterload reduction with cautious use of 14. Teasell RW, Arnold JM, Krassioukov A, et al. Cardiovascular consequences
angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors should be at- of loss of supraspinal control of the sympathetic nervous system after spinal
tempted, but further hypotension must be avoided to main- cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2000;81(4):506–516.
15. Karlsson AK. Autonomic dysfunction in spinal cord injury: clinical presen-
tain tenuous cerebral perfusion pressures. Short-acting agents tation of symptoms and signs. Prog Brain Res. 2006;152:1–8.
should be used whenever possible. Repeating an echocardio- 16. Lane RD, Wallace JD, Petrosky PP, et al. Supraventricular tachycardia in
gram several days after the initial one is recommended to moni- patients with right hemisphere strokes. Stroke. 1992;23(3):362–366.
17. Oppenheimer SM, Gelb A, Girvin JP, et al. Cardiovascular effects of human
tor the progression/resolution of cardiac dysfunction. The need insular cortex stimulation. Neurology. 1992;42(9):1727–1732.
for an intra-aortic balloon pump to mechanically reduce after- 18. Zamrini EY, Meador KJ, Loring DW, et al. Unilateral cerebral inac-
tivation produces differential left/right heart rate responses. Neurology.
load and improve coronary perfusion pressure may be consid- 1990;40(9):1408–1411.
ered, albeit rarely used. 19. Burch GE, Meyers R, Abildskov JA. A new electrocardiographic pattern
Once diagnosed, neuroendocrine neurogenic shock from observed in cerebrovascular accidents. Circulation. 1954;9(5):719–723.
20. Davies KR, Gelb AW, Manninen PH, et al. Cardiac function in aneurysmal
primary, or more often secondary, adrenal insufficiency is subarachnoid haemorrhage: a study of electrocardiographic and echocardio-
treated with steroid replacement therapy. We use the same dos- graphic abnormalities. Br J Anaesth. 1991;67(1):58–63.
ing as in adrenal insufficiency in septic shock: hydrocortisone, 21. Macrea LM, Tramer MR, Walder B. Spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage
and serious cardiopulmonary dysfunction–a systematic review. Resuscita-
50 mg intravenously every 6 hours. As previously discussed, tion. 2005;65(2):139–148.
a cortisol stimulation test is usually not helpful, and empiric 22. Tung P, Kopelnik A, Banki N, et al. Predictors of neurocardiogenic injury
after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 2004;35(2):548–551.
treatment after a random cortisol level should be initiated. 23. Naredi S, Lambert G, Eden E, et al. Increased sympathetic nervous ac-
tivity in patients with nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke.
2000;31(4):901–906.
24. Elrifai AM, Bailes JE, Shih SR, et al. Characterization of the cardiac effects
SUMMARY of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage in dogs. Stroke. 1996;27(4):737–741;
discussion 741–732.
Neurogenic shock is not a single entity, but rather is composed 25. Cowan MJ, Giddens WE Jr, Reichenbach DD. Selective myocardial cell
necrosis in nonhuman primates. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1983;107(1):34–39.
of three subtypes and pathophysiologies: vasodilatory, cardiac, 26. Baroldi G, Mittleman RE, Parolini M, et al. Myocardial contraction bands.
and neuroendocrine. Other causes of hypotension should be Definition, quantification and significance in forensic pathology. Intern J
Legal Med. 2001;115(3):142–151.
ruled out first, prior to making the diagnosis of neurogenic 27. Todd GL, Baroldi G, Pieper GM, et al. Experimental catecholamine-induced
shock. In most cases, neurogenic shock is transient and re- myocardial necrosis, I: morphology, quantification and regional distribution
versible, making this entity very treatable. Diagnosis and treat- of acute contraction band lesions. J Molecular Cell Cardiol. 1985;17(4):317–
338.
ment should be tailored to the subtype of neurogenic shock. 28. Kline IK. Myocardial alterations associated with pheochromocytomas. Am
Maintenance of cerebral perfusion pressures is the key prin- J Pathol. 1961;38:539–551.
P1: OSO/OVY P2: OSO/OVY QC: OSO/OVY T1: OSO Printer: Yet to come
GRBT291-59 GRBT291-3641G GRBT291-Gabrielli-v2.cls October 23, 2008 13:22
29. Hammermeister KE, Reichenbach DD. QRS changes, pulmonary edema, and derly patients with acute traumatic cerebral injury. Chinese J Traumatol.
myocardial necrosis associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Am Heart J 2003;6(3):139–141.
1969;78(1):94–100. 47. Barreca T, Gandolfo C, Corsini G, et al. Evaluation of the secretory pattern
30. Koskelo P, Punsar S, Sipilae W. Subendocardial haemorrhage and E.C.G. of plasma arginine vasopressin in stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001;
Changes in Intracranial Bleeding. Br Med J. 1964;1(5396):1479–1480. 11(2):113–118.
31. Smith RP, Tomlinson BE. Subendocardial haemorrhages associated with in- 48. Muehlschlegel S, Dunser MW, Gabrielli A, et al. Arginine vasopressin
tracranial lesions. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1954;68(2):327–334. as a supplementary vasopressor in refractory hypertensive, hypervolemic,
32. Doshi R, Neil-Dwyer G. A clinicopathological study of patients following a hemodilutional therapy in subarachnoid hemorrhage Neurocrit Care. 2007;
subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 1980;52(3):295–301. 6(1):3–10.
33. Crompton MR. Hypothalamic lesions following the rupture of cerebral berry 49. Bulsara KR, McGirt MJ, Liao L, et al. Use of the peak troponin value
aneurysms. Brain. 1963;86:301–314. to differentiate myocardial infarction from reversible neurogenic left ven-
34. Greenhoot JH, Reichenbach DD. Cardiac injury and subarachnoid hemor- tricular dysfunction associated with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
rhage. A clinical, pathological, and physiological correlation. J Neurosurg. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(3):524–528.
1969;30(5):521–531. 50. Skaf E, Stein PD, Beemath A, et al. Venous thromboembolism in patients with
35. Kawai S, Suzuki H, Yamaguchi H, et al. Ampulla cardiomyopathy (‘Tako- ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96(12):1731–1733.
tsubo’ cardiomyopathy)–reversible left ventricular dysfunction: with ST seg- 51. Hamilton MG, Hull RD, Pineo GF. Venous thromboembolism in neuro-
ment elevation. Jpn Circ J. 2000;64(2):156–159. surgery and neurology patients: a review. Neurosurgery. 1994;34(2):280–
36. Akashi YJ, Nakazawa K, Sakakibara M, et al. Reversible left ventricular dys- 296; discussion 296.
function “takotsubo” cardiomyopathy related to catecholamine cardiotoxi- 52. Maramattom BV, Weigand S, Reinalda M, et al. Pulmonary complications
city. J Electrocardiol. 2002;35(4):351–356. after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2006;5(2):115–119.
37. Akashi YJ, Nakazawa K, Sakakibara M, et al. The clinical features of takot- 53. Brisman R, Mendell J. Thromboembolism and brain tumors. J Neurosurg.
subo cardiomyopathy. QJM 2003;96(8):563–573. 1973;38(3):337–338.
38. Simmons RL, Martin AM Jr, Heisterkamp CA 3rd, et al. Respiratory insuffi- 54. Skaf E, Stein PD, Beemath A, et al. Fatal pulmonary embolism and stroke.
ciency in combat casualties, II: pulmonary edema following head injury. Ann Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(12):1776–1777.
Surg. 1969;170(1):39–44. 55. Stephens PH, Lennox G, Hirsch N, et al. Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis
39. Pender ES, Pollack CV Jr. Neurogenic pulmonary edema: case reports and after internal jugular vein cannulation. Br J Anaesth. 1991;67(4):476–479.
review. J Emerg Med. 1992;10(1):45–51. 56. Zaroff JG, Rordorf GA, Ogilvy CS, et al. Regional patterns of left ventricular
40. Hoff JT, Nishimura M, Garcia-Uria J, et al. Experimental neurogenic pul- systolic dysfunction after subarachnoid hemorrhage: evidence for neurally
monary edema, 1: the role of systemic hypertension. J Neurosurg. 1981; mediated cardiac injury. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13(8):774–779.
54(5):627–631. 57. Mayer SA, LiMandri G, Sherman D, et al. Electrocardiographic markers of
41. Lang SA, Maron MB, Signs SA. Oxygen consumption after massive sympa- abnormal left ventricular wall motion in acute subarachnoid hemorrhage.
thetic nervous system discharge. Am J Physiol. 1989;256(3 Pt 1):E345–351. J Neurosurg. 1995;83(5):889–896.
42. Aimaretti G, Ambrosio MR, Di Somma C, et al. Traumatic brain injury 58. Eisenberg HM, Frankowski RF, Contant CF, et al. High-dose barbiturate
and subarachnoid haemorrhage are conditions at high risk for hypopitu- control of elevated intracranial pressure in patients with severe head injury.
itarism: screening study at 3 months after the brain injury. Clin Endocrinol. J Neurosurg. 1988;69(1):15–23.
2004;61(3):320–326. 59. Narayan RK, Kishore PR, Becker DP, et al. Intracranial pressure: to moni-
43. Dunser MW, Wenzel V, Mayr AJ, et al. Management of vasodilatory shock: tor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury.
defining the role of arginine vasopressin. Drugs. 2003;63(3):237–256. J Neurosurg. 1982;56(5):650–659.
44. Landry DW, Levin HR, Gallant EM, et al. Vasopressin pressor hypersensi- 60. Bullock R, Chesnut RM, Clifton G, et al. Guidelines for the manage-
tivity in vasodilatory septic shock. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(8):1279–1282. ment of severe head injury. Brain Trauma Foundation. Eur J Emerg Med.
45. Isotani E, Suzuki R, Tomita K, et al. Alterations in plasma concentrations 1996;3(2):109–127.
of natriuretic peptides and antidiuretic hormone after subarachnoid hemor- 61. Czosnyka M, Guazzo E, Iyer V, et al. Testing of cerebral autoregulation
rhage. Stroke. 1994;25(11):2198–2203. in head injury by waveform analysis of blood flow velocity and cerebral
46. Huang WD, Yang YM, Wu SD. Changes of arginine vasopressin in el- perfusion pressure. Acta Neurochirurgica. 1994;60:468–471.
Anaphylaxis is severe, has a rapid onset, and is potentially eralized hives, tachycardia, flushing, pruritus, faintness, and a
fatal—a systemic allergic reaction that occurs after contact with sensation of impending doom. Dermatologic (i.e., urticaria and
an allergy-causing substance (1,2). Activation of mast cell and angioedema), respiratory (i.e., dyspnea, wheeze, stridor, bron-
basophil populations by either IgE-dependent (i.e., anaphylac- chospasm, and hypoxemia), and gastrointestinal (i.e., abdom-
tic reactions) or IgE-independent (i.e., anaphylactoid reactions) inal distension, nausea, emesis, and diarrhea) manifestations
mechanisms results in the release of multiple mediators capable are common. Involvement of the cardiovascular and respira-
of altering vascular permeability and vascular and bronchial tory systems may result in potentially life-threatening manifes-
smooth muscle tone, as well as recruiting and activating in- tations, such as cardiovascular collapse caused by vasodilation
flammatory cell cascades. Because the clinical presentations and capillary leak, myocardial depression, myocardial ischemia
of anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions are indistinguish- and infarction, and atrial fibrillation (3). Prompt recogni-
able, they will be referred to as anaphylaxis for the purposes tion and effective intervention are essential to prevent
of this chapter. Initial sequelae, which occur within minutes the fatal manifestations of anaphylactic and anaphylactoid
to an hour after exposure to an inciting stimulus, include gen- reactions.
P1: OSO/OVY P2: OSO/OVY QC: OSO/OVY T1: OSO Printer: Yet to come
GRBT291-59 GRBT291-3641G GRBT291-Gabrielli-v2.cls October 23, 2008 13:22
TA B L E 6 0 . 2
ETIOLOGIC AGENTS FOR ANAPHYLACTOID REACTIONS
complications of anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions. An of a lactic acidosis and diminished oxygen consumption have
unsettling sensation—including hoarseness, dysphonia, or been noticed after an anaphylactoid reaction (45). Other po-
dyspnea—may precede acute upper airway obstruction sec- tentially serious cardiovascular manifestations are myocardial
ondary to laryngeal edema. Other pulmonary manifestations ischemia and acute myocardial infarction, atrioventricular and
include acute bronchospasm, intra-alveolar pulmonary hemor- intraventricular conduction abnormalities such as prolonged
rhage, bronchorrhea, and a noncardiogenic, high permeability– PR interval, transient left bundle branch block, and supraven-
type pulmonary edema (17,35). Tachycardia and syncope may tricular arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation. Severe, but re-
precede the development of hypotension and frank cardiovas- versible, myocardial depression also has been reported (37).
cular collapse (36,37). Anaphylactic shock occurs as a con- Hematologic manifestations, such as disseminated intravascu-
sequence of diminished venous return secondary to systemic lar coagulation and hemoconcentration secondary to volume
vasodilation and intravascular volume contraction caused by contraction, also may complicate anaphylactic and anaphy-
capillary leak. Although transient increases in cardiac output lactoid reactions (32). Gastrointestinal manifestations include
may occur at the onset of anaphylaxis, hemodynamic param- nausea, bloating, abdominal cramps, and diarrhea.
eters later reveal decreases in cardiac output, systemic vascu- In 1% to 20% of patients, there is a recurrence of symptoms
lar resistance, stroke volume, pulmonary artery occlusion, and after a period of recovery, termed biphasic anaphylaxis (46). In
central venous pressures (38–44). In addition, the acute onset most cases, the symptoms recurred 1 to 8 hours after the initial
TA B L E 6 0 . 3
CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS OF ANAPHYLACTIC AND ANAPHYLACTOID REACTIONS
RESPIRATORY 60%–80%
Upper Dyspnea, dysphonia, cough, “lump in Upper airway obstruction caused by laryngeal
throat” edema and spasm; bronchorrhea
Lower Dyspnea, cyanosis Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, bronchospasm,
acute hyperinflation, alveolar hemorrhage
CARDIOVASCULAR Palpitations, faintness, weakness 20% Shock, tachycardia, capillary leak, syncope,
supraventricular arrhythmias, conduction
disturbances, myocardial ischemia and infarction
CUTANEOUS Flushing, pruritus, rash 90% Urticaria, angioedema, diaphoresis
GASTROINTESTINAL Abdominal pain, bloating, cramps, 30% Emesis, diarrhea, hepatosplenic congestion; rarely
nausea hematemesis and bloody diarrhea
NEUROLOGIC Dizziness, disorientation, hallucinations, 5%–10% Syncope, lethargy, seizures
headache, feeling of impending doom
NASAL Pruritus, sneezing 16%–20% Rhinorrhea, nasal congestion
OCULAR Conjunctival pruritus, periorbital edema 10%–15% Conjunctival suffusion, lacrimation
presentation, although there have been reports of recurrence of inflammatory mediators by mast cells and basophils. The
up to 72 hours later. There were no features of the primary classic anaphylactic response occurs through allergen-induced
response that predicted the occurrence of a secondary response crosslinking of IgE tightly bound to the high-affinity FcR1 re-
(47). ceptor constitutively expressed by mast cells (52). Release of
histamine from preformed mast cell granules seems to be the
primary pathophysiologic mediator, resulting in systemic va-
DIAGNOSIS sodilation, increased vascular permeability, bronchoconstric-
tion, pruritus, and increased mucus production. However,
The diagnosis of anaphylaxis is established on the basis of clin-
a number of other preformed mediators are released, in-
ical grounds alone because expedient institution of appropri-
cluding heparin, serotonin, and mast cell proteases such as
ate therapy is mandatory. These diagnoses should be consid-
chymase and tryptase (53). In addition, other important medi-
ered when typical multisystem manifestations occur in a direct
ators of anaphylaxis are generated by the metabolism of mem-
temporal relationship with exposure to an inciting agent. Re-
brane phospholipids. Activation of the 5-lipoxygenase path-
cently, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
way results in synthesis of leukotrienes, including leukotrienes
(NIAID) and the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network
C4 , D4 , E4 (termed the slow-reacting substance of anaphy-
(FAAN) proposed clinical criteria for the diagnosis of anaphy-
laxis), and B4 . Leukotrienes C4 , D4 , and E4 , along with the
laxis (Fig. 60.1) (1). Because of the multisystem nature of ana-
intermediary products 5-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid and 5-
phylactic and anaphylactoid reactions, the list of differential
hydroperoxyeicosatetraenoic acid, elicit increases in vascular
diagnoses that must be considered is extensive. Diagnostic pos-
permeability and bronchoconstriction, whereas leukotriene B4
sibilities include cardiac dysrhythmias, myocardial infarction,
possesses eosinophil and neutrophil chemotactic properties.
distributive or hypovolemic shock, vasovagal syncope, asthma,
Activation of the cyclooxygenase pathway leads to the produc-
pulmonary embolism, upper airway obstruction secondary to
tion of prostaglandin D2 , which produces bronchoconstriction.
ingestion of a foreign body, hypoglycemia, and the carcinoid
Platelet-activating factor is also newly synthesized by activated
syndrome (Table 60.4).
mast cells and can result in bronchoconstriction, increased vas-
Demonstration of acute elevations of markers specific to
cular permeability, platelet aggregation, and neutrophil chemo-
mast cell activation such as histamine and tryptase have been
taxis. It also leads to further production of platelet-activating
proposed to help confirm the diagnosis of anaphylaxis (48,49).
factor through stimulation of nuclear factor (NF)-κB, a posi-
However, in a series of 97 patients presenting to an emergency
tive feedback mechanism involving the cytokines interleukin-1
department and given the diagnosis of anaphylaxis, only 42%
(IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and contributes
were found to have elevated plasma histamine levels, and 24%
to a biphasic pattern seen in some patients (54). Combined,
had increased plasma tryptase levels (50). Skin testing or serum
these primary mediators then facilitate the production of a di-
antibody tests can help demonstrate the presence of IgE against
verse number of secondary mediators by platelets, neutrophils,
a specific allergen. Skin testing should be delayed for up to 4
eosinophils, and other cells, resulting in activation of the com-
weeks to allow the dermal mast cells to replenish intracellular
plement, coagulation, and fibrinolytic pathways (55).
mediators (51).
Many of these mediators have complicated effects, and their
relative roles in mediating anaphylaxis in vivo have been dif-
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY ficult to evaluate. Mouse models of anaphylaxis using strains
with targeted deletions of specific mediators have been useful
The systemic manifestations of anaphylactic and anaphylac- in elucidating the importance of different effector molecules,
toid reactions represent sequelae that result from the release such as the leukotrienes (56–58), and in identifying regulatory
TA B L E 6 0 . 4
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF ANAPHYLAXIS
RESPIRATORY DISTRESS
Status asthmaticus
Airway foreign body
Epiglottitis
Pulmonary embolism
Asthma and COPD exacerbation
Vocal cord dysfunction
pathways, such as IL-10 (59), but have also provided some Epinephrine is the mainstay of initial management and
surprises that may lead to clinically useful information. For ex- should be administered immediately. It decreases mediator syn-
ample, mice with targeted deletions of either the high-affinity thesis and release by increasing intracellular concentrations
FcR1 receptor or IgE, not surprisingly, had a markedly de- of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and antagonizes
creased susceptibility to IgE-mediated anaphylaxis (53,60). many of the adverse actions of the mediators of anaphylaxis
This pathway can also be blocked with targeted deletion of (41). Aqueous epinephrine, 0.01 mg/kg (maximum dose 0.5
histamine receptor 1 and, to a lesser extent, platelet-activating mg) administered intramuscularly every 5 to 15 minutes as
factor (52,53). However, such mice also revealed the presence necessary to control symptoms and maintain blood pressure, is
of an alternate IgE-independent pathway of anaphylaxis (61). recommended (41,64). The participants of the NIAID/FAAN
This pathway was mediated largely through platelet-activating symposium concluded that the intramuscular administration of
factor, which was triggered by the binding of IgG to Fcγ RIII epinephrine in the anterior lateral thigh is preferred over sub-
receptors present on macrophages (52,62). Like the classic IgE- cutaneous injection (1,2). In cases of severe laryngospasm or
mediated pathway, this alternative pathway required prior ex- frank cardiovascular collapse, or when there is an inadequate
posure to antigen, but differed in that much higher concentra- response to subcutaneous epinephrine administration and fluid
tions of antigen were required. The importance of this pathway resuscitation, intravenous epinephrine is an option. There is
in humans is as yet unclear (52). However, the administration no established dosage regimen for intravenous epinephrine in
of biologic agents, such as the anti-TNF antibody infliximab, anaphylaxis, but suggested dosages are 5 to 10 μg bolus (0.2
has been reported to cause an IgE-independent anaphylactic μg/kg) for hypotension and 0.1 to 0.5 mg in the setting of
response (63), and may be an example of this alternative path- cardiovascular collapse (1,2,65). When epinephrine is admin-
way. The use of these biologic agents is expected to continue istered IV, the clinician should be aware of the potential ad-
to increase. verse consequences of severe tachycardia, myocardial ischemia,
hypertension, severe vasospasm, and gangrene—the latter
when infused by peripheral venous access (66).
MANAGEMENT Blood pressure measurements should be obtained fre-
quently, and an indwelling arterial catheter should be inserted
The clinician must have a high index of suspicion for ana- in cases of moderate to severe anaphylaxis. High-flow oxygen
phylactic and anaphylactoid reactions because they require a given via endotracheal tube or a nonrebreather mask should
prompt clinical diagnosis and a rapid therapeutic response. Be- be administered to patients experiencing hypoxemia, respira-
cause anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions both represent tory distress, or hemodynamic instability (1,2). Orotracheal
sequelae of mast cell and basophil degranulation, the thera- intubation may be attempted if the airway obstruction com-
peutic approaches to these disorders are identical. Initial at- promises effective ventilation despite pharmacologic interven-
tention should be given to assessment and stabilization of the tion; however, attempts may be unsuccessful if laryngeal edema
pulmonary and cardiovascular manifestations of anaphylaxis, is severe. If endotracheal intubation is unsuccessful, then ei-
because these are the major causes of death. ther needle-catheter cricothyroid ventilation, cricothyrotomy,
P1: OSO/OVY P2: OSO/OVY QC: OSO/OVY T1: OSO Printer: Yet to come
GRBT291-59 GRBT291-3641G GRBT291-Gabrielli-v2.cls October 23, 2008 13:22
or surgical tracheostomy is required to maintain an adequate agent is identified, the clinician should attempt to prevent fur-
airway. Clinicians must be familiar with at least one of these ther access to the circulation or limit further absorption. In-
techniques in the event that endotracheal intubation cannot be fusions of possible etiologic agents should be stopped and the
accomplished. It has been suggested that inhaled β 2 -agonists contents saved for analysis. If a Hymenoptera sting is respon-
such as albuterol may be useful for bronchospasm refrac- sible, the stinger should be removed. Small amounts of local
tory to epinephrine (1,2,67). Patients should be placed in the epinephrine—0.1 to 0.2 mL of a 1:1,000 solution—should be
recumbent position, with lower extremities elevated to in- injected next to a subcutaneous or intramuscular injection site
crease fluid return centrally, thereby increasing cardiac out- that is dispersing the inciting agent. A tourniquet also should
put (68). Airway protection should be ensured in the event of be placed proximal to the injection site and pressure applied to
vomiting. occlude venous return. After successful pharmacologic therapy,
Antihistamines (H1 and H2 antagonists) are considered the tourniquet may be cautiously removed and the patient care-
second-line treatment for anaphylaxis (1,2). They are useful in fully observed for recurrent adverse sequelae. In cases where
the treatment of symptomatic urticaria-angioedema and pruri- the offending agent was ingested, consideration may be given
tus. Recent studies suggest that treatment with a combination to insertion of a nasogastric tube to perform gastric lavage and
of H1 and H2 antagonists is more effective in attenuating the gastric instillation of activated charcoal.
cutaneous manifestations of anaphylaxis than H1 antagonists
alone (50,69). Diphenhydramine hydrochloride (25 to 50 mg
IV or IM for adults and 1 mg/kg, up to 50 mg, for children)
and ranitidine (50 mg IV over 5 minutes) are commonly used THERAPEUTIC PEARLS
in this setting. If hypotension persists despite administration of
epinephrine and H1 and H2 blockers, aggressive volume resus- 1. Rapidly assess and maintain the airway, breathing, and
citation should be instituted. Up to 35% of the blood volume circulation. If airway obstruction is imminent, perform
may extravasated in the first 10 minutes of a severe reaction, endotracheal intubation; if unsuccessful, consider needle-
with subsequent reduction in blood volume due to vasodilata- catheter cricothyroid ventilation, cricothyrotomy, or tra-
tion, causing distributive shock (70). Persistent hypotension cheostomy. Patients in anaphylactic shock should be placed
may require multiple fluid boluses (10 to 20 mL/kg under pres- in a recumbent position with the lower extremities ele-
sure) as well as colloid and crystalloid infusions (1,2). Vaso- vated, unless precluded by shortness of breath or vomiting.
pressors such as norepinephrine, vasopressin, Neo-Synephrine, 2. Remove the inciting agent (i.e., remove Hymenoptera
or even metaraminol may be useful in persistent hypotension stinger) and follow with an intramuscular epinephrine in-
(31). jection in the anterior lateral thigh. Consider gastric lavage
There have been no placebo-controlled trials evaluating the and administration of activated charcoal if the inciting
efficacy of corticosteroids in anaphylaxis, but their contribu- agent was ingested.
tion in other allergic diseases has led to their inclusion in ana- 3. Administer aqueous epinephrine, 0.01 mg/kg (maximum
phylactic management. Due to their slow onset of action, they dose, 0.5 mg) intramuscularly every 5 to 15 minutes as
are not useful in acute management. However, it has been sug- necessary for controlling symptoms and maintaining blood
gested that they may prevent protracted or biphasic reactions pressure.
(67,71). The usual dose is 100 to 250 mg of hydrocortisone IV 4. Establish intravenous access for hydration and provide
every 6 hours (39). supplemental oxygen.
The management of anaphylaxis in a patient receiving β- 5. Administer histamine antagonists to block vasodilation,
antagonist medications, such as β blockers, represents a spe- capillary leak, and shock (H1 blockade, 25–50 mg of
cial circumstance in which the manifestations of anaphylaxis diphenhydramine IV or IM for adults, and 1 mg/kg—up
may be exceptionally severe (72). β Blockade increases medi- to 50 mg—for children; H2 blockade, 50 mg of ranitidine
ator synthesis and release, as well as end-organ sensitivity. In IV).
addition, β-blockade antagonizes the beneficial β-mediated ef- 6. Administer vasopressors for persistent hypotension and
fects of epinephrine therapy, thereby resulting in unopposed titrate to a mean arterial pressure of 60 mm Hg.
α-adrenergic and reflex vagotonic effects: vasoconstriction, 7. Consider aggressive fluid resuscitation with multiple fluid
bronchoconstriction, and bradycardia. Therapy of anaphylaxis boluses (10–20 mL/kg under pressure), including colloid
occurring in patients receiving β-antagonist drugs, however, is as well as crystalloid, in patients who remain hypotensive
similar to that of other patients. In addition, atropine may be despite epinephrine.
useful for heart block and refractory bronchospasm, whereas 8. Administer inhaled β 2 -agonists such as albuterol for bron-
glucagons—which increase cAMP levels through a β-receptor– chospasm refractory to epinephrine (73).
independent mechanism—have been reported to reverse the 9. Consider corticosteroid therapy for protracted anaphy-
cardiovascular manifestations of anaphylaxis in patients re- laxis or to prevent biphasic anaphylaxis (1.0–2.0 mg/kg
ceiving β-antagonists (72). Glucagon can be administered as methylprednisolone IV every 6 hours). Oral prednisone at
a 1- to 5-mg (20–30 μg/kg with maximum dose of 1 mg in 1.0 mg/kg, up to 50 mg, may be used for milder attacks.
children) intravenous infusion over 5 minutes, followed by an Corticosteroids are not effective therapy for the acute man-
infusion of 5 to 15 μg/minute titrated to a clinical response ifestations of anaphylaxis.
(1,2). Furthermore, these patients may require extended peri- 10. Consider glucagon administration (1–5 mg IV over 1
ods of observation because of the long duration of action of minute, then 1–5 mg/hour in a continuous infusion) in
many β-antagonist medications. the setting of prior β-blockade because of its positive in-
An emergent evaluation for the inciting etiologic agent must otropic and chronotropic effects mediated by a β-receptor–
accompany initial therapeutic interventions. After the etiologic independent mechanism.
P1: OSO/OVY P2: OSO/OVY QC: OSO/OVY T1: OSO Printer: Yet to come
GRBT291-59 GRBT291-3641G GRBT291-Gabrielli-v2.cls October 23, 2008 13:22
clinical immunology/allergy centre in Singapore. Singapore Med J. 2005;46: 43. Moss J, Fahmy NR, Sunder N, et al. Hormonal and hemodynamic profile of
529–534. an anaphylactic reaction in man. Circulation. 1981;63:210–213.
12. Novembre E, Cianferoni A, Bernardini R, et al. Anaphylaxis in children: 44. Hanashiro PK, Weil MH. Anaphylactic shock in man. Report of two cases
clinical and allergologic features. Pediatrics. 1998;101:E8. with detailed hemodynamic and metabolic studies. Arch Intern Med. 1967;
13. Kaliner MA. Anaphylaxis. NER Allergy Proc. 1984;5:324. 119:129–140.
14. Chong SU, Worm M, Zuberbier T. Role of adverse reactions to food in 45. Fawcett WJ, Shephard JN, Soni NC, et al. Oxygen transport and haemody-
urticaria and exercise-induced anaphylaxis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002; namic changes during an anaphylactoid reaction. Anaesth Intensive Care.
129:19–26. 1994;22:300–303.
15. Dohi M, Suko M, Sugiyama H, et al. Food-dependent, exercise-induced ana- 46. Brazil E, MacNamara AF. “Not so immediate” hypersensitivity–the danger
phylaxis: a study on 11 Japanese cases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1991;87:34– of biphasic anaphylactic reactions. J Accid Emerg Med. 1998;15:252–253.
40. 47. Lieberman P. Biphasic anaphylactic reactions. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol.
16. Graham DM, McPherson H, Lieberman P. Skin testing in the evaluation of 2005;95:217–226.
Hymenoptera allergy and drug allergy. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 48. Bochner BS, Lichtenstein LM. Anaphylaxis. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:1785–
2001;21:301–320. 1790.
17. Delage C, Irey NS. Anaphylactic deaths: a clinicopathologic study of 43 49. Yocum MW, Khan DA. Assessment of patients who have experienced ana-
cases. J Forensic Sci. 1972;17:525–540. phylaxis: a 3-year survey. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;69:16–23.
18. Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, American Academy of Allergy, 50. Lin RY, Schwartz LB, Curry A, et al. Histamine and tryptase levels in patients
Asthma and Immunology, American College of Allergy, Asthma and Im- with acute allergic reactions: an emergency department-based study. J Allergy
munology, and the Joint Council of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. The di- Clin Immunol. 2000;106:65–71.
agnosis and management of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;101: 51. Weiss ME, Adkinson NF. Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to penicillin
S465–S528. and related antibiotics. Clin Allergy. 1988;18:515–540.
19. Idsoe O, Guthe T, Willcox RR, et al. Nature and extent of penicillin side- 52. Finkelman FD, Rothenberg ME, Brandt EB, et al. Molecular mechanisms
reactions, with particular reference to fatalities from anaphylactic shock. of anaphylaxis: lessons from studies with murine models. J Allergy Clin
Bull World Health Organ. 1968;38:159–188. Immunol. 2005;115:449–457.
20. Brown AF, McKinnon D, Chu K. Emergency department anaphylaxis: a re- 53. Strait RT, Morris SC, Yang M, et al. Pathways of anaphylaxis in the mouse.
view of 142 patients in a single year. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108:861– J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109:658–668.
866. 54. Choi IW, Kim YS, Kim DK, et al. Platelet-activating factor-mediated NF-
21. Stevenson DD. Approach to the patient with a history of adverse reac- kappaB dependency of a late anaphylactic reaction. J Exp Med. 2003;198:
tions to aspirin or NSAIDs: diagnosis and treatment. Allergy Asthma Proc. 145–151.
2000;21:25–31. 55. Kaplan AP, Joseph K, Silverberg M. Pathways for bradykinin formation and
22. Allmers H, Schmengler J, John SM. Decreasing incidence of occupational inflammatory disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;109:195–209.
contact urticaria caused by natural rubber latex allergy in German health 56. Goulet JL, Snouwaert JN, Latour AM, et al. Altered inflammatory responses
care workers. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114:347–351. in leukotriene-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994; 91:12852–
23. Schwartz HA, Zurowski D. Anaphylaxis to latex in intravenous fluids. J 12856.
Allergy Clin Immunol. 1993;92:358–359. 57. Haribabu B, Verghese MW, Steeber DA, et al. Targeted disruption of the
24. Mitsuhata H, Horiguchi Y, Saitoh J, et al. An anaphylactic reaction to topical leukotriene B(4) receptor in mice reveals its role in inflammation and platelet-
fibrin glue. Anesthesiology. 1994;81:1074–1077. activating factor-induced anaphylaxis. J Exp Med. 2000;192:433–438.
25. Laxenaire MC, Mata-Bermejo E, Moneret-Vautrin DA, et al. Life- 58. Kanaoka Y, Maekawa A, Penrose JF, et al. Attenuated zymosan-induced
threatening anaphylactoid reactions to propofol (Diprivan). Anesthesiology. peritoneal vascular permeability and IgE-dependent passive cutaneous ana-
1992;77:275–280. phylaxis in mice lacking leukotriene C4 synthase. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:
26. Katayama H, Yamaguchi K, Kozuka T, et al. Adverse reactions to ionic 22608–22613.
and nonionic contrast media. A report from the Japanese Committee on the 59. Mangan NE, Fallon RE, Smith P, et al. Helminth infection protects mice from
Safety of Contrast Media. Radiology. 1990;175:621–628. anaphylaxis via IL-10-producing B cells. J Immunol. 2004;173:6346–6356.
27. Greenberger PA, Halwig JM, Patterson R, et al. Emergency administration 60. Dombrowicz D, Brini AT, Flamand V, et al. Anaphylaxis mediated through
of radiocontrast media in high-risk patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986; a humanized high affinity IgE receptor. J Immunol. 1996;157:1645–1651.
77:630–634. 61. Oettgen HC, Martin TR, Wynshaw-Boris A, et al. Active anaphylaxis in
28. Enright T, Chua-Lim A, Duda E, et al. The role of a documented allergic IgE-deficient mice. Nature. 1994;370:367–370.
profile as a risk factor for radiographic contrast media reaction. Ann Allergy. 62. Miyajima I, Dombrowicz D, Martin TR, et al. Systemic anaphylaxis in the
1989;62:302–305. mouse can be mediated largely through IgG1 and Fc gammaRIII. Assess-
29. Bush WH, Swanson DP. Acute reactions to intravascular contrast media: ment of the cardiopulmonary changes, mast cell degranulation, and death
types, risk factors, recognition, and specific treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. associated with active or IgE- or IgG1-dependent passive anaphylaxis. J Clin
1991;157:1153–1161. Invest. 1997;99:901–914.
30. Inomata N, Osuna H, Yanagimachi M, et al. Late-onset anaphylaxis to 63. Cheifetz A, Mayer L. Monoclonal antibodies, immunogenicity, and associ-
fermented soybeans: the first confirmation of food-induced, late-onset ana- ated infusion reactions. Mt Sinai J Med. 2005;72:250–256.
phylaxis by provocation test. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005;94:402– 64. Project Team of the Resuscitation Council (UK). Emergency medical treat-
406. ment of anaphylactic reactions. Resuscitation. 1999;41:93–99.
31. Brown SG. Cardiovascular aspects of anaphylaxis: implications for treatment 65. Hepner DL, Castells MC. Anaphylaxis during the perioperative period.
and diagnosis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;5:359–364. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:1381–1395.
32. Smith PL, Kagey-Sobotka A, Bleecker ER, et al. Physiologic manifestations 66. Taneli Vayrynen MJ, Luurila HO, Maatta TK, et al. Accidental intravenous
of human anaphylaxis. J.Clin Invest. 1980;66:1072–1080. administration of racemic adrenaline: two cases associated with adverse car-
33. Kemp SF, Lockey RF, Wolf BL, et al. Anaphylaxis. A review of 266 cases. diac effects. Eur J Emerg Med. 2005;12:225–229.
Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1749–1754. 67. Lieberman P, Kemp SF, Oppenheimer J, et al. The diagnosis and manage-
34. Kemp SF, Lockey RF. Anaphylaxis: a review of causes and mechanisms. J ment of anaphylaxis: an updated practice parameter. J Allergy Clin Immunol.
Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110:341–348. 2005;115(Suppl 2):S483–S523.
35. Carlson RW, Schaeffer RC Jr, Puri VK, et al. Hypovolemia and permeability 68. Boulain T, Achard JM, Teboul JL, et al. Changes in BP induced by passive
pulmonary edema associated with anaphylaxis. Crit Care Med. 1981;9:883– leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients. Chest.
885. 2002;121:1245–1252.
36. Simon MR. Anaphylaxis associated with relative bradycardia. Ann Allergy. 69. Simons FE. Advances in H1-antihistamines. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2203–
1989;62:495–497. 2217.
37. Raper RF, Fisher MM. Profound reversible myocardial depression after ana- 70. Fisher MM. Clinical observations on the pathophysiology and treatment of
phylaxis. Lancet. 1988;1:386–388. anaphylactic cardiovascular collapse. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1986;14:17–
38. Wasserman SI. The heart in anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986; 21.
77:663–666. 71. Sampson HA, Mendelson L, Rosen JP. Fatal and near-fatal anaphylactic
39. Nicolas F, Villers D, Blanloeil Y. Hemodynamic pattern in anaphylactic shock reactions to food in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med 1992;327:380–
with cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 1984;12:144–145. 384.
40. Serafin WE, Austen KF. Mediators of immediate hypersensitivity reactions. 72. Thomas M, Crawford I. Best evidence topic report. Glucagon infusion in
N Engl J Med. 1987;317:30–34. refractory anaphylactic shock in patients on beta-blockers. Emerg Med J.
41. Perkin RM, Anas NG. Mechanisms and management of anaphylactic shock 2005;22:272–273.
not responding to traditional therapy. Ann Allergy. 1985;54:202–208. 73. Sampson HA. Anaphylaxis and emergency treatment. Pediatrics. 2003;
42. Silverman HJ, Van Hook C, Haponik EF. Hemodynamic changes in human 111:1601–1608.
anaphylaxis. Am J Med. 1984;77:341–344. 74. Sheffer AL. Anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1985;75:227–233.