Professional Documents
Culture Documents
umi.maryamhusna@gmail.com
naxifa.axiz@gmail.com
Abstract
This paper is done to discuss about improving students’ collaborative writing using blog. It will
first discuss the four skills in English language learning and focused on productive skill which is
writing. Then, it will highlight about collaborative learning followed by collaborative writing.
After that, the use of digital technology in teaching writing will be presented. SAMR model will
be used to show the transformation phase in teaching writing. Later, it will share about the use
of Weebly to improve students’ collaborative writing skills. An example of lesson plan will be
presented afterwards. In conclusion, students will improve their writing skills through
1
1.0 Introduction
Learning the English language requires the learners to develop important skills such as
listening, speaking, reading and writing. There are many ways of introducing, teaching and
learning the skills related to English language. The approaches in the teaching and learning of the
skills varies depending on the learning theory available. The use of technology has always been
encouraged in the education system. This is because the use of technology can enhance learning
experiences and enable to develop the 21st century learners among the students. Moulding 21st
century learners are very important because of the ever changing demand in the society. Thus,
this paper will present how pupil’s collaborative writing can be improved by using a Web 2.0
tool which is Weebly. This paper will focus on writing skills, collaboration or collaborative
learning as the 4C skills and collaborative writing before presenting how the use of such online
There are four main skills in learning English language. The four skills are reading,
writing, speaking and listening. They are usually divided into two types. Receptive skills is a
term used for reading and listening which the meaning is extracted from the discourse.
Productive skills is the term for speaking and writing which the students actually have to produce
language themselves (Harmer, 2007, as cited in Bashrin, 2013). According to Bashrin (2013)
reading and listening are called receptive skills because when we listen and read something, we
receive the language, understand it and decode the meaning. While speaking and writing are
2
called productive skills because we use the language to produce a message through speech or
written text.
The productive skills are speaking and writing, because learners need to articulate words
and write to produce language. Learners receive language by listening to conversation, music,
video and also by reading comprehension, newspaper, poem, book and etc. Then they move on
to productive skills where they produce the language to express their thoughts (Bashrin, 2013). in
addition to that, Bashrin (2013) mentioned that writing is a productive skill in written mode.
There are two-way distinction of writing. They are institutional and personal writing.
Berthoff (1981, as cited in Hudelson, 1989) has defined writing as an act of the mind by
which writers create meaning. According to him, writing is the creation of meaning from one's
own intellectual and linguistic resources and activity, rather than the copying of someone else's
text, or the use of prepared lists of words to create sentences or stories. Writing is a fundamental
component of language. When a child writes, thoughts and knowledge are blended together
creating a unique meaning (Jones, Reutzel, & Fargo, 2010, as cited in Cole & Feng 2015).
Consequently, students identify the skill of writing, as more difficult than listening and reading
(Berman & Cheng, 2010, as cited in Cole & Feng 2015). Furthermore, writing is the skill that
most students are least proficient in when acquiring a new language (Nesamalar, Saratha & Teh,
In recent years, teachers have given more attention to literacy development, recognizing
that students need to be able to read and write effectively if they are going to be successful in
3
English language classrooms (Allen, 1986; Hudelson, 1984; Urzua, 1987b, as cited in Hudelson,
1989). The children learned about writing because the demonstrations they witnessed engaged
them as they saw how writing was done (Smith, 1982 as cited in Hudelson, 1989). It is becoming
increasingly evident that young children in print-oriented or print-saturated societies, long before
they enter school or receive formal literacy instruction, interact with print, make hypotheses
about how the written language works, and engage in reading and writing behaviours (Ferreiro &
Teberosky, 1982; Harste, Woodward & Burke, 1984 as cited in Hudelson, 1989).
Collaborative learning is one of the component of the 21st century learning. Famous by
the term 4C skills which includes critical thinking, creative thinking, communication and
collaborative, these 4C skills help students learn thus has became important to success in school
and the future (University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2018). Collaborative learning is not new in
teaching and learning because it stems from the constructivist learning theory. The
constructivists’ learning theory believes that learners construct knowledge for themselves (Hein,
1991). For constructivism, learning is a construction process where learners have the active roles
to control their learning process by being reflective and relies heavily on collaboration among
students (Educational Broadcasting Corporation, 2004). This believes bring out approaches
which focus on the learners’ experiences in making meaning in the learning process rather than
focusing on the teacher as the transmitter of knowledge as the behaviourism learning theory. The
differences in how learning occurs between these two learning theories result in different
approaches towards learning and the learning process. One of the approaches is collaborative
learning.
4
Collaborative learning is constructed based on the view that knowledge is a social
construct (Center for Teaching Innovation, 2012). Collaborative learning happens where
interaction occurs between peers who are engaged to complete a common task. (Ingleton, Doube
& Rogers, 2000). Laal & Ghodsi (2011) further explain that learners could complete a task, solve
to reach a goal and putting talent, expertise, and smarts to work (Pakizer, 2016). Lejeune (1998,
as cited in Collaborative Learning, 2015) suggests a common task or activity, small group
are in accord with the constructivist theory of learning which are important in the learning
There are many benefits of collaborative learning. Ingleton, Doube and Rogers (2000) list
a few benefits especially for the students when collaborative learning is applied in the learning
process such as it can develop lifelong learning skills, it fosters teamwork and it could develop
interpersonal skills. In addition to that, it could also develop generic skills needed for future
employment and ease the pupil’s transition to higher education learning such as in the university
(Ingleton, Doube & Rogers, 2000). This is because Nagata and Ronkowski (1998, as cited in
Ingleton, Doube & Rogers, 2000) suggest that collaborative learning could give the opportunity
for the pupils to think for themselves, compare their thinking with others, conduct small research
projects and do investigation with their peers and practice higher order thinking skills. Based on
the presented discussion, it could be agreed that collaborative learning provides many benefits to
5
the learners in many areas which need to be addressed by the educators and education system in
collaborative learning, collaborative writing involves two or more persons working together to
produce a written document (Nordquist, 2017). The students’ collaboration is considered the
most important and helpful part of their learning (Lunsford, 1991, as cited in Nordquist, 2017).
The importance of interaction in learning which is based on the Vygotskian theory of learning,
has gotten many support from educators who become the advocates of students’ collaboration in
Collaborative writing has been done in the normal classroom setting such as in group
work or pair work. In the past, interaction in the writing activity was usually focused on the
beginning part of the writing process which is brainstorming and the end part which is peer
review (Storch, 2005). Whereas in the current setting of collaborative writing, learners work
together throughout the whole writing process where they make decision and bear the
responsibilities together (Storch, 2005). In collaborative writing, the presence of multiple author
may cause conflict to resurface. However, this can be avoided by having a few important things
such as setting goals, assigning tasks, generating and recording ideas which can be used in
production of the text and editing where members of the group can comment about and
enhancements for the text (Spring, 1997). Based on this discussion on collaborative writing, it is
6
evident that collaborative writing could enhance the learning experience for the 21st century
learners and is inline with the 4C skills discussed here which is collaborative learning.
there is a widespread acceptance that writing has moved from a paper and pen activity to one that
is technology-driven. Throughout this paper, the term ‘technology’ will refer to digital
technology. Technologies are recognized as having potential both to support writing and the
teaching of writing (National Commission on Writing, 2003; National Writing Project & Nagin,
2006 as cited in Karlan, 2010) and to represent new venues for writing itself (National Council
of Teachers of English, 2004 as cited in Karlan, 2010). There are quick changes in literacy as the
result of emergence of computer and the development of new technologies (Cole & Feng, 2015).
Some of the changes are in favour of technology such as writing in e-journal, blogs (Yamac &
Ulusoy, 2016). The use of technology can motivate and encourage pupils to engage in reading
and writing and it has been proved to be beneficial in fostering writing skills among the pupils
As Hockly (2013, as cited in Kamijo, 2017) states, it is not the technology itself that
enhances learning, but rather the use to which it is put. The substitution augmentation
modification redefinition (SAMR) model (Puentedura, 2010) provides teachers with a useful
framework for successful technology integration while it helps them design and evaluate mobile
learning activities. SAMR model includes four different levels in which technology can be
integrated in the classroom. The first is substitution where the technology is just a tool substitute
with no functional change. The second is augmentation where the technology still acts as a direct
7
tool substitute, but with functional improvement. Next is modification which technology allows
for significant task redesign while the last is redefinition, where the technology allows for the
According to Romrell, Kidder, and Wood (2014, as cited in Kamijo, 2017), learning
activities using technology that fall within the substitution and augmentation stages are said to
enhance learning, while learning activities that fall within the modification and redefinition
classifications are said to transform learning. The ratio of activities the teachers use within each
classification depends on the level of technology integration the teachers are seeking. If the
objective is to embed technology fully into the curriculum, the teacher should aim for all the
activities to fall within the modification and redefinition classifications. This discussion shows
that all activities involving technology could transform the students’ learning experiences
(Kamijo, 2017).
As the technology has advanced, there are many platforms available for collaborative
writing which enable experts or contributors from different parts of the world to collaborate on a
writing task such as writing journals, book and blog (Eapen, 2007). In the past few years, online
collaborative writing tools such as blogs has been integrated into education (Brodahl, Hadjerrouit
& Hansen, 2011; Richardson, 2005 as cited in Vurdien, 2012). This is because the low cost,
accessibility and ease of use of are the characteristics which make Web 2.0 technologies
attractive to be used in the teaching and learning environment (Ajjan & Hartshorne, 2008 as cited
8
Weebly is one of the blog which can be used as a platform for collaborative learning.
Weebly is a website for building website (Bernheim, 2018). Weebly is so easy to use because it
does not require the user to be an expert in HTML or coding. The drag-and-drop interface ease
the use of the software making it highly accepted by people regardless of their technology
comfort level or experience (Bernheim, 2018). It is free for user who does not desire to use its
more high end services such as the premium apps making it desirable to be used in classroom
9
The elements are provided
for the user to be
drag-and-drop to a page
which is on the right hand
side.
There are numbers of researches which show integrating technology, such as the
internet, can enhance and improve students students’ writing skill (Sandolo, 2010). Similarly,
some studies have shown that students have an easier time in expression themselves when they
can write using the computers and by using and utilizing Web 2.0 tools such as blogs, pupils are
able to run from thinking about what others might think and thus allowing them to express
themselves more freely (Sandolo, 2010). Using the blog has increase the pupils’ motivation to
10
5.0 Example of lesson plan
Year 4 Bestari
Focus Writing
Learning Pupils will be able to participate in collaborative writing with the use of
Objective
technologies.
5. For the first blog, pupils to write at self-introduction for every group
11
members with guidance.
2. Pupils to write about how to grow plants in the school garden with
guidance.
4. Teacher asks pupils to put link about the informations taken in the
blog/web.
Week 3 1. Teacher encourages the peers editing of the written work by using
3. Pupils are given time to review their blog/ their friends’ blog.
4. Pupils enhance the layout and design of the blog with guidance on
12
6.0 Discussion
online collaboration can bring additional benefits such giving flexibility, students’ participation
and behaviour towards learning, trackability and autonomy (Collaborative Learning, 2015). In
addition, Godwin-Jones (2008 as cited in Vurdien, 2012) states that blogs provide users with
new opportunities and incentives for personal writing. Learners who have joint responsibilities
over the production if the text may developed a sense of co-ownership so they would be
encouraged to contribute in all aspect of the writing process (Storch, 2005). This is evident in the
classroom setting where pupils work more seriously in completing their writing task if they are
presenting it in class.
Sandolo’s (2010) research shows that is important to incorporate technology into the
classroom while learning to write and while creating essays because the use of technology like
computers can ease the motor demand from the learners who have difficulties in fine motor skills
and it allows the learners to self-revise their writing and essay. In addition, technological tool
which is used in the writing process could assist younger generations in the future as the world
transforms itself towards a digital era (Lee, 2016). Halsey (2007 as cited in Sandolo, 2010) states
that technology might not be suitable for all pupils, but technology will give pupils the purpose
behind their writing, their motivation might possibility increase because they have the ‘real’
audience who will read their work. This is because blog writing is basically geared towards This
is evident in the use of blog where the content can bee seen by anybody around the world thus
making the learners more self-aware of their own work. In addition, a study in Spain by Vurdien
(2012) states that pupils are more aware of the mistake in the writing because peer correction
13
was done. Furthermore, the study also indicates that blog can be utilized as a tool for learning
outside class and because it is interactive, it can raise the pupils’ motivation and because pupils
are able to express their view on their peers’ blog entry, pupils could improve their linguistic
7.0 Conclusion
writing could be categorized into four categories which are the social, psychological, academic
and assessment (Johnsons, 1989; Pantiz ,1999, as cited in Laal & Ghodsi, 2011). Students’
writing skills will be improved through collaborative writing using the Weebly since it will
integrate with and address the different set of skills which will enable the learners to become 21st
century learners. This will result in increasing their confidence level in writings.
14
References
Brodahl, C., Hadjerrouit, S., & Hansen, N. K. (2011). Collaborative Writing with Web 2.0
Technologies: Education Students’ Perceptions. Journal of Information Technology
Education: Innovations in Practice, 10. Retrieved April 14, 2018, from
https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/138167/Brodahl_2011_Collaborative.p
df?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Center for Teaching Innovation (CTI). (2012).Collaborative Learning: Group Work. Retrieved
April 6, 2018, from
https://www.cte.cornell.edu/teaching-ideas/engaging-students/collaborative-learning.html
Cole, J., & Feng, J. (2015, April 15). Effective Strategies for Improving Writing Skills of
Elementary English Language Learners. In Chinese American Educational Research and
Development Association Annual Conference. Retrieved April 6, 2018, from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED556123.pdf
Collaborative Learning. (2015, April 9). Retrieved April 12, 2018, from
https://clt.curtin.edu.au/teaching_learning_practice/student_centred/collaborative.cfm
Eapen, B. R. (2007). Collaborative writing: Tools and tips. Retrieved April 14, 2018, from
http://www.ijdvl.com/article.asp?issn=0378-6323;year=2007;volume=73;issue=6;spage=439;
epage=441;aulast=Eapen
Educational Broadcasting Corporation (2004). What is constructivism? Retrieved April 12, 2018,
from https://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/index_sub3.html
15
Fong, L. S. (2012). Benefits of Collaborative Writing for ESL Advanced Diploma Students in
the Production of Reports. US-China Education Review B 4 (2012) 396-407, 396-407.
Retrieved April 14, 2018, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED533571.pdf.
Hein, G. E. (1991). Constructivist Learning Theory. Retrieved April 14, 2018, from
https://www.exploratorium.edu/education/ifi/constructivist-learning
Hudelson, S. (1989). Write On : Children Writing in ESL. Retrieved April 6, 2018, from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED309653.pdf
Ingleton, C., Doube, L., & Rogers, T. (2000). Leap Into...Collaborative Learning. University of
Adelaide, Adelaide. Retrieved April 12, 2018 from
https://digital.library.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/71211/1/hdl_71211.pdf
Karlan, G. P. (2010). Technology to Support Writing by Students with Learning and Academic
Disabilities: Recent Research Trends and Findings. Assistive Technology Outcomes and
Benefits,7(1), 1-24. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ961161.pdf.
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2011). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 31(2012), 486-490. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from
https://ac.els-cdn.com/S1877042811030205/1-s2.0-S1877042811030205-main.pdf?_tid=8a1a
81dd-6aef-42a9-828a-3a4d24070526&acdnat=1523688849_7f808da0b1ebe5bd796cdecd3473
cb60.
Lee, W. C. (2016, July 28). 7 Ways to Use Technology to Improve Your Writing Skill. Retrieved
April 6, 2018, from https://globaldigitalcitizen.org/7-ways-technology-improve-writing-skill
Nordquist, R. (2017, April 18). Collaborative Writing. Retrieved April 6, 2018, from
https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-collaborative-writing-1689761
Puentedura, R. R. (2010). SAMR and TPCK: Intro to Advanced Practice [Web log post].
Retrieved from
http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2012/08/23/SAMR_BackgroundExemplars.pdf
16
Sandolo, L. (2010). How can the use of technology enhance writing in the
classroom?(Unpublished master's thesis). New York. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from
https://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1195&context=education_ETD_masters
Spring, M. (1997, January 31). Collaboration and Collaborative Authoring. Retrieved April 12,
2018, from http://www.sis.pitt.edu/spring/cas/node30.html
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of
Second Language Writing, 14, 153-173. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002 1 / 2
University of Nebraska-Lincoln. (2018). Thoughtful Learning: What are the 4 C's of learning
skills? Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://newsroom.unl.edu/announce/csmce/5344/29195
Vurdien, R. (2012). Enhancing writing skills through blogs in an EFL class. EUROCALL 2011 –
The CALL Triangle: Student, Teacher and Institution. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED544534.pdf.
Yamac, A., & Ulusoy, M. ( 2016). The Effect of Digital Storytelling in Improving the Third
Graders' Writing Skills. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education,9(1),
59-86. Retrieved April 12, 2018, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1126674.pdf.
17