Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Any information contained in this pdf file is automatically generated from digital material
submitted to EPOS by third parties in the form of scientific presentations. References
to any names, marks, products, or services of third parties or hypertext links to third-
party sites or information are provided solely as a convenience to you and do not in
any way constitute or imply ECR's endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation of the
third party, information, product or service. ECR is not responsible for the content of
these pages and does not make any representations regarding the content or accuracy
of material in this file.
As per copyright regulations, any unauthorised use of the material or parts thereof as
well as commercial reproduction or multiple distribution by any traditional or electronically
based reproduction/publication method ist strictly prohibited.
You agree to defend, indemnify, and hold ECR harmless from and against any and all
claims, damages, costs, and expenses, including attorneys' fees, arising from or related
to your use of these pages.
Please note: Links to movies, ppt slideshows and any other multimedia files are not
available in the pdf version of presentations.
www.myESR.org
Page 1 of 37
Learning objectives
Background
We encourage you to evaluate your knowdlege with this exhibit in which we show some
chest X-ray misinterpretations made at our hospital. ¿Would you have made the same
mistakes?
PROCEDURE DETAILS
We present a series of chest X-ray cases which were misinterpreted at the initial patient
evaluation at our hospital and we reevaluate them to show the key to succeeding in right
diagnosis with basic principles and signs.
FINDINGS
CASE 1
Page 2 of 37
Middle-aged woman with the following evolution:
A preoperative chest-X ray was performed. Please, look at this image and try to find any
abnormality. This chest radiography was interpreted as normal. Fig. 1 on page 10
LEARNING POINTS
Nodule
- Nodule = Up to 3 cm in size.
- There are two characterictics that suggest benignity and, therefore, the CT would be
not necessary:
• Diffuse.
• Central.
• Laminated and concentric.
• Popcorn.
- Bare in mind pseudolesions: skin lesions, nipple, calcification and/or ossification at the
first costochondral junctions.
- Lung apices are difficult to evaluate. Lordotic chest radiography can facilitate the
visualization of this region.
CASE 2
Have a look at the following image, do you see any abnormality? Fig. 4 on page 13
Page 3 of 37
First clue: back pain.
A dorsal spine X-ray was performed the same day. Fig. 6 on page 15
12 days later, the patient came back to the hospital with more severe pain.
LEARNING POINTS:
Spondylodiscitis
• Vertebral bodies.
• Paravertebral tissues.
• Descending aorta.
• Azygos and hemiazygos veins.
• Lymph nodes.
Page 4 of 37
CASE 3
The next chest X-ray (PA and lateral) was interpreted as a pneumonia. What do you think
about? Fig. 8 on page 17, Fig. 9 on page 18
LEARNING POINTS
- Contact between the right lung and the right tracheal wall.
- Thickening causes:
Aortopulmonary window
Page 5 of 37
- Decrease in depth: Right ventricular and main pulmonary artery dilatation.
CASE 4
The next chest X-ray was interpreted as normal twice. What's your opinion? Fig. 13 on
page 22
LEARNING POINTS
Azygoesophageal recess
Interface between the mediastinum (esophagus) and the posteromedial portion of the
right lower lobe.
• Hiatal hernia
• Esophageal mass or dilatation
CASE 5
Can you see the abnormality? Fig. 15 on page 24, Fig. 16 on page 25
LEARNING POINTS
Page 6 of 37
Silhouette sign
The normal silhouette (outline) of the mediastinum, diaphragm, and chest wall is
possible because of the contrast between the low attenuation of the lung and the higher
attenuation (water density) of the other structures. When two substances have the same
density and they are in direct contact, it is not possible to differenciate them on a chest
X-ray. Therefore, any water density lesion of the lung, mediastinum or pleura that lies
adjacent to a normal air/fluid interface will cause a loss of this landmark.
The silhoutte sign refers to the absence of a soft tissue border (it is a misnomer). This
sign is useful to identify and localize lung diseases. It is also helpful for soft tissue density
mediastinum and pleural lesions.
Page 7 of 37
Fig. 26: SILHOUETTE SIGN
References: - Toledo/ES
- Apices.
- Hila.
- Retrocardial zone.
Progressively increased radiolucency of the vertebral bodies, from upper to lower chest.
CASE 6
LEARNING POINTS
Consolidation
• Transudate.
• Pus.
• Blood.
• Cells.
Page 8 of 37
• Other.
Radiological signs
In this case, the morphology and localization of the consolidation (peripheral lower
lobe, and pleural-based consolidation) associated with ipsilateral lung volume loss
suggest PULMONARY INFARCTION, instead of pneumonia.
Radiography signs:
- Subsegmental atelectasis.
- Pleural effusion.
- Pulmonary infarction
• Wedge-shaped consolidation.
• Most common in the base of lower lobes.
• Hampton hump: a pleural-based consolidation with a convex border toward
the hilum.
• Air-bronchogram is not common because of blood filling the bronchi.
• Melting sign: the infarction decrease in size from the periphery to the centre
maintaining the same shape (pneumonia shows a patchy resolution or
fading away of the density throughout the whole involved area).
• Loss of lung volume.
Page 9 of 37
CASE 7
LEARNING POINTS
Subcarinal angle
Normal: Up to 90º.
Page 10 of 37
Fig. 1: CASE 1
© - Toledo/ES
Page 11 of 37
Fig. 2: CASE 1 SOLUTION
© - Toledo/ES
Page 12 of 37
Fig. 3: CASE 1 THREE YEARS LATER
© - Toledo/ES
Page 13 of 37
Fig. 4: CASE 2
© - Toledo/ES
Page 14 of 37
Fig. 5: CASE 2 SOLUTION
© - Toledo/ES
Page 15 of 37
Fig. 6: CASE 2 SOLUTION (2)
© - Toledo/ES
Page 16 of 37
Fig. 7: CASE 2 CT
© - Toledo/ES
Page 17 of 37
Fig. 8: CASE 3 PA VIEW
© - Toledo/ES
Page 18 of 37
Fig. 9: CASE 3 LATERAL VIEW
© - Toledo/ES
Page 19 of 37
Fig. 10: CASE 3 SOLUTION
© - Toledo/ES
Page 20 of 37
Fig. 11: CASE 3 SOLUTION
© - Toledo/ES
Page 21 of 37
Fig. 12: CASE 3 CT
© - Toledo/ES
Page 22 of 37
Fig. 13: CASE 4
© - Toledo/ES
Page 23 of 37
Fig. 14: CASE 4 SOLUTION
© - Toledo/ES
Page 24 of 37
Fig. 15: CASE 5 PA VIEW
© - Toledo/ES
Page 25 of 37
Fig. 16: CASE 5 LATERAL VIEW
© - Toledo/ES
Page 26 of 37
Fig. 17: CASE 5 SOLUTION
© - Toledo/ES
Page 27 of 37
Fig. 18: CASE 6
© - Toledo/ES
Page 28 of 37
Fig. 19: CASE 6 SOLUTION
© - Toledo/ES
Page 29 of 37
Fig. 20: CASE 6 EVOLUTION
© - Toledo/ES
Page 30 of 37
Fig. 21: CASE 7
© - Toledo/ES
Page 31 of 37
Fig. 22: CASE 7 SOLUTION
© - Toledo/ES
Page 32 of 37
Fig. 23: CASE 7 EVOLUTION (NOT DIAGNOSED)
© - Toledo/ES
Page 33 of 37
Fig. 24: CASE 7 EVOLUTION (2)
© - Toledo/ES
Page 34 of 37
Fig. 25: CASE 7 EVOLUTION (2) LATERAL VIEW
© - Toledo/ES
Page 35 of 37
Fig. 26: SILHOUETTE SIGN
© - Toledo/ES
Page 36 of 37
Conclusion
Chest X-ray mistakes are common because of the difficult interpretation, limitations and
pitfalls of this 2-D technique. However, conventional chest radiology is an accesible
procedure and a useful tool for early diagnosis, so a great effort should be done by
radiologists to have a good preparation for it.
Personal information
References
Pedrosa C et al. Pedrosa ddx Diagnóstico por Imagen Tórax. Madrid: Marbán; 2016.
Gibbs JM, Chandrasekhar CA, Ferguson EC, Oldham SA. Lines and stripes: where
did they go? From conventional radiography to CT. Radiographics. 2007 Jan-
Feb;27(1):33-48
Page 37 of 37