Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Course Outline
Atty. Bernice Piñol
2nd Semester SY 2017-2018
WEEK 1
PART 1: PRESCRIPTION
(Articles 1106-1155)
A. Definition
B. Types
a. Extinctive Prescription
b. Acquisitive Prescription
C. Doctrine of Laches
a. Prescription vs. Laches
D. Interruption of Prescriptive Period
E. Actions which do not prescribe
CASES:
1. PLDT v. Pingol, G.R. No. 182622, Sept. 8, 2010
2. Lourdes Suites v. Binarao, G.R. No. 204729, August 06, 2014
3. China Banking Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, G.R. No. 172509,
February 4, 2015
WEEK 2
PART 2: OBLIGATIONS
A. General Provisions
Definition (Art. 1156)
Sources
a. Law
(Art.
1158)
b. Contracts
(Art.
1159,
1305)
c. Quasi‐contracts
(Art.
1160,
2142)
Kinds:
i. Negotiorum
gestio
(Art.
2144)
ii. Solutio
indebiti
(Art.
2154)
iii. Others
(Art.
2164
to
2175)
d. Delicts
or
Crime
(Art.
1161)
e. Quasi‐delicts
(Art.
1162,
2176)
Distinction
between
crimes
and
quasi‐delicts
Vicarious
liability
(Art.
2180,
Art.
218‐219,
Family
Code)
Civil
liability
arising
from
crime
(Art.
1161;
Rule
111,
RoC)
CASES:
1. Amadora v. CA, 160 SCRA 315 (1988)
2. PSBA v. CA, 205 SCRA 729 (1992)
Classifications
o Types of Breach
o Substantial
o Casual
CASES:
1. Song Fo v. Hawaiian Philippines, 47 Phil 821
(1925)
2. Velarde v. CA, 361 SCRA 56 (2001)
3. Golden Valley v. Pinkian Mining, GR No.
190080, June 11, 2014
4. Villamar v. Mangaoil, GR No. 188661, April
11, 2012
WEEK 3
Modes of Breach
o Fraud (dolo): 1171
CASES:
a. Woodhouse v. Halili, 93 Phil 526 (1953)
b. Geraldez v. CA, 230 SCRA 329 (1994)
c. Tankeh v. DBP, GR No. 171428, Nov. 11, 2013
d. Watercraft v. Wolfe, GR No. 181721, Sept. 9, 2015
e. Security Bank v. Great Wall, GR No. 219345, Jan. 30, 2017
WEEK 4
CASES:
1. Eastern Shipping Lines v. CA, 234 SCRA 781
(1994)
2. Security Bank v. RTC Makati, 263 SCRA 453
(1996)
3. Almeda v. CA, 256 SCRA 292 (1996)
4. Keng Hua Products v. CA, 286 SCRA 257
(1998)
5. Cristina Garments v. CA, 304 SCRA 356
(1999)
6. First Metro Investment v. Estate of Del Sol,
420 Phil 902 (2001)
7. RCBC v. Buenaventura, GR No. 176479, Oct.
6, 2010
8. Marquez v. Elisan Credit Corp., GR No.
194642, April 6, 2015
WEEK 5
Subsidiary Remedies
o Accion Subrogatoria (Art. 1177, 772)
o Accion Pauliana (Art. 1177, 1381)
CASES:
1. Khe Hong Seng v. CA, 355 SCRA 701 (2001)
2. Siguan v. Lim, 318 SCRA 725 (1999)
3. Anchor Savings v. Furigay, GR No. 191178, March 13,
2013
o Others (Art. 1652, 1729,1608,1893)
WEEK 6
B. Extinguishment of Obligations
Payment or performance (Art. 1231.1)
o Definition (Art. 1232)
CASES:
1. Arrieta v. NARIC, 10 SCRA 79 (1964)
2. Kalalo v. Luz, 34 SCRA 377 (1940)
3. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance v. Macondray, 70 SCRA
122 (1976)
4. Papa v. A.V. Valencia, 284 SCRA 643 (1998)
5. PAL v. CA, 181 SCRA557 (1990)
6. Cinco v. CA, GR No. 151903, Oct. 9, 2009
o How made
o Ways, 1233, 1248-1250
o No substitution, 1244, 1246
o Costs/ expenses, 1247
o By whom
o Debtor
o 3rd person, 1236-39, 1427
o To whom
o Creditor, 1240-41
o 3rd person, 1241-42
o Where made, 1251
Application, 1252-54
CASES:
1. Reparations Commission v. Universal Deep Sea Fishing, 83
SCRA 764 (1978)
2. Paculdo v. Regalado, 345 SCRA 134 (2000)
3. Premiere Devt. v. Central Surety, GR No. 176246, Feb. 13,
2009
4. Sps. Calina v. DBP, GR No. 159748, July 31, 2007
5. Abella v. Abella, GR No. 195166, July 8, 2015
Invalid payment, 1243
Other forms of payment
o Cession, 1255
o Dation in payment, 1245
CASES:
1. DBP v. CA, GR 118342, 05 Jan 1998
2. Filinvest Credit Corp. v. Philippine Acetylene, 111 SCRA
421 (1982)
3. Tan Shuy v. Sps. Maulawin, GR No. 190375, Feb. 8, 2012
4. Ramos v. PNB, GR No. 178218, Dec. 14, 2011
5. Sps. Villaluz v. Land Bank, GR No. 192602, Jan. 18, 2017
o Tender of payment and consignation
Requisites, 1256-57
How made, 1258
Effect of withdrawal, 1260-61
Effect of valid consignation, 1259-60
CASES:
1. De Guzman v. CA, 137 SCRA 730 (1985)
2. TLG International Continental Enterprising Inc. v.
Flores, 47 SCRA 437 (1972)
3. McLaughlin v. CA, 144 SCRA 693 (1986)
4. Soco v. Militante, 123 SCRA 160 (1983)
5. Sotto v. Mijares, 28 SCRA 17 (1969)
6. Meat Packing Corp. v. Sandiganbayan, 359 SCRA
409 (2001)
7. Pabugais v. Sahijwani, 423 SCRA 596 (2004)
8. Banco Filipino v. Diaz, GR No. 153134, June 27,
2006
WEEK 7
Compensation (1231.5)
o Concept. 1278, 1286, 1289-90
o Requisites, 1279, 1287-88, 1282-84
CASES:
1. Gan Tion v. CA, 28 SCRA 235 (1969)
2. Silahis Marketing v. lAC, 180 SCRA 29 (1989)
3. BPI v. Reyes, 255 SCRA 571 (1996)
4. PNB v. Sapphire Shipping, 259 SCRA 174 (1996)
5. Mirasol v. CA, 351 SCRA 44 (2001)
6. Trinidad v. Acapulco, GR No. 147477, June 27, 2006
7. Montemayor v. Millora, Gr No. 168251, July 27, 2011
8. Union Bank v. DBP, GR No. 191555, Jan. 20, 2014
o Kinds, 1281
o 3rd persons' interests
o Guarantor (of the debt), 1280
o Assignee (of the credit), 1285
Novation (1231.6)
o Concept, 1291-92
o Changing their object or principal conditions (objective novation),
1292
CASES:
1. Miller v. CA, 38 SCRA 642 (1971)
2. Dormitorio v. Fernandez, 72 SCRA 388 (1976)
3. Magdalena Estate v. Rodriguez, 18 SCRA 967 (1966)
4. Reyes v. Secretary of Justice, 264 SCRA 35 (1996)
5. Conchingyan v. RB Surety and Insurance, 151 SCRA
339 (1987)
6. Broadway Centrum Condominium Corp v. Tropical
Hut, GR 79642, 05 Jul 1993
7. California Bus Lines v. State Investment, GR 14 79 50,
11 Dec 2003
8. Wellex v. U-Land, GR No. 167519, Jan. 14, 2015
9. CCC Insurance v. Kawasaki Steel, GR No. 156162,
June 22, 2015
b. Conventional, 1300-01
CASES:
1. Licaros v. Gatmaitan, GR No. 142838, 09 Aug
2001
2. Ledonio v. Capitol Devt, GR No. 149040, July
4, 2007
o Effects, 1296-99, 1304
Others (1231, p. 2)
o Annulment
o Rescission
o Fulfillment of a resolutory condition
o Prescription
WEEK 8
WEEK 10 - 11
A. Concept
Definition, 1305
CASE: GSIS v. CA, 228 SCRA 183 (1993)
Kinds
By name
o Nominate
o lnnominate, 1307
CASES:
1. Dizon v. Gaborro, 83 SCRA 688 (1978)
2. Almario v. PAL, GR No. 170928, Sept. 11, 2007
By perfection
o Consensual, 1315
o Real, 1316
By subject matter: things, services
By relationship to other contracts: preparatory, principal, accessory
By nature of the vinculum produced: unilateral, bilateral, reciprocal
By cause: onerous, gratuitous
WEEK 12
In General
Perfection, 1315-16
Privity of contracts, 1309-14
CASES:
1. Coquia v. Fieldmen's Insurance Co., 26 SCRA 178 (1968)
2. Constantino v. Espiritu, 39 SCRA 206 (1971)
3. Florentino v. Encarnacion, 79 SCRA 192 (1977)
4. So Ping Bun v. CA, 314 SCRA 751 (1999)
5. Integrated Packaging Corp. v. CA, 333 SCRA 171 (2000)
6. DKC Holdings Corp. v. CA, 329 SCRA 666 (2000)
Stipulations
o Freedom of contract, 1306,1490-91,1782,1799, 2088, 2130, Family Code 87
CASES:
1. Pakistan International Airlines v. Ople, 190 SCRA 90 (1990)
2. Filipinas Compania de Seguros v. Mandanas, 17 SCRA 391
(1966)
3. Bustamante v. Rosel, 319 SCRA 413 (1999)
4. Saudi Arabian Airlines v. Rebesencio, G.R. No. 198587,
January 14, 2015
o Interpretation
Plain meaning, 1370
Evident intention, 1370-71
Stipulations with different possible meanings, 1375
Interpretation of terms, 1372-73, 1376-77
Settlement of doubts, 1374, 1378
Application of the Rules of Court, 1379
CASES:
1. Kasilag v. Rodriguez, 69 Phil 217 (1939)
2. Borromeo v. CA, 47 SCRA 65 (1972)
o Simulation of contracts, 1345-46
CASES:
1. Suntay v. CA, 251 SCRA 430 (1995)
2. Blanco v. Quasha, 318 SCRA373 (1999)
3. Villegas vs. Rural Bank of Tanjay, G.R. No. 161407, June 5,
2009
4. Heirs of Mario Intac vs. CA, G.R. No. 173211, Oct. 11, 2012
Reformation
o Requisites, 1359, 1365, 1368
CASES:
1. Garcia v. Bisaya, 97 Phil 609 (1955)
2. Beutir v. Leande, 330 SCRA 591 (2000)
3. Multi-Ventures Capital vs. Stalwart, G.R. No. 157439, July 4,
2007
o When not allowed, 1365, 1367
o Concurrence of grounds, 13 61 -62
o 3rd party fault, 1364
o Applicable law, 1350, 1369
CASES:
1. Atilano v. Atilano, 28 SCRA 2232 (1969)
2. Carrantes v. CA, 76 SCRA 524 (1977)
3. Sarming et al v. Dy et al, 383 SCRA 131 (2002)
4. Malana vs. Tappa, G.R. No. 181303, Sept. 17, 2009
WEEK 13 - 14
B. Defective Contracts
Rescissible Contracts
Nature, 1383-85
When rescissible, 1380-82, 1386-87
CASES:
1. Siguan v. Lim et al, 318 SCRA 725 (1999)
2. Suntay v. CA, 251 SCRA 430 (1995)
3. The Wellex Group vs. U-Land Airlines, G.R. No. 167519
January 14, 2015
When available, 1385, 1388
Prescription, 1389
Voidable Contracts
Nature, 1390
Parties, 1397, 1402
CASES:
1. Singsong v. Isabela Sawmill, 88 SCRA 623 (1979)
2. Velarde v. CA, 361 SCRA 56 (2001)
Ratification, 1392-96
CASES:
1. Spouses Fernando v. Continental Airlines, G.R. No. 188288,
January 16, 2012
2. ECE Realty and Development vs. Mandap, G.R. No. 196182
September 1, 2014
Effect of loss of thing due, 1400-01
Effect of annulment, 1398-99
Prescription, 1391
Unenforceable Contracts
Nature, 1317
When unenforceable, 1403, 1405
CASES:
1. Carbonnel v. Poncio, 103 Phil 655 (1958)
2. Limketkai Sons Milling Inc. v. CA, 261 SCRA 464 (1995)
3. Swedish Match v. CA, 441 SCRA 1 (2004)
4. Iglesia Filipina Independiente v. Heirs of Bernardino Taeza, G.R.
No. 179597, February 03, 2014
5. San Miguel Properties v. BF Homes, G.R. No. 169343, August 05,
2015
Void/Inexistent Contracts
Nature, 1409-10, 1420
Remedies, 1413-16
CASES:
1. Liguez v. CA, 102 Phil 577 (1957)
2. Rellosa v. Gaw Cheen Hum, 93 Phil 827 (1953)
3. PNB v. Lui She, 21 SCRA 52 (1967)
4. Frenzel v. Catitu, 406 SCRA 55 (2003)
5. Fullido v. Grilli, G.R. No. 215014, February 29, 2016
Who may bring action/defense, 1411-12, 1421 ,
CASES:
1. Ubarra v. Mapalad, AM MT J 91-622 ( 1993)
2. Modina v. CA, 317 SCRA 606 (1999)
3. Constantino vs. Heirs of Constantino, G.R. No. 181508
October 2, 2013
Contracts imbued with public interest, 1417-19