Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Keywords: Grain drying machine; Saturated pressure; Finite element; Rectangular silo; Simulated
analysis
Abstract. This paper we intend to test the pressure during the process of grain drying in the
rectangular silo and explore the change regularity of dynamic and static pressure. According to the
trend of the dynamic and static pressure with height, we analyzed the pressure and the structure stress
in the silo that could have effects on the structure of grain drying machine by the finite element
analysissoftware. We obtain the relationship of the dynamic and static pressure between the corn
moisture content through contrasting the result of the experiment and the finite element simulated
analysis.
Introduction
When we filled particles within the silo, the bottom pressure of the silo was not increased linearly with
the filling height like filled liquid. But filled to a certain height, it could reach a saturation value[1-2]. The
phenomenon was derived from the particle tangential friction force between the particle medium and
the silo wall[3-4].
In this paper, we analyzed the change rule of grain storage pressure and the correlation between
the stress and the grain moisture. At the same time, we carried out the optimized analysis on the
structure of the grain dryer using the change law of pressure in the silo. We put forward a new method
of detecting the grain moisture by pressure.
12. 51%
受 力,kg
0. 5
0. 4
0. 3
0. 2
0. 1
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Corn weight (kg)
1239
Table 3 The bottom surface deformation of rectangular silo(mm)
Position 710 kg/m3 610 kg/m3 510 kg/m3 410 kg/m3
A 0.46 0.39 0.33 0.27
B 0.43 0.38 0.31 0.257
C 0.29 0.31 0.20 0.167
D 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.028
E 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.016
F 0.01 0.01 0.006 0.005
Thus, with the increase of fluid density, the deformation was increased. The largest stress was the
bottom center position and two sides were decreased gradually. Fig.4 was the deformation of the silo
wall under different fluid filling density. The density was respectively 710kg/m3 、 610kg/m3 、
510kg/m3、410kg/m3 in Fig.5(a)、(b)、(c)、(d).
Fig.5 The stress analysis of side wall Fig.6 The deformation analysis of side wall
In the same way, we analyzed the force and deformation of the side wall in the silo respectively
when the loading height was 1.2m、1.4m、1.6m,1.8m.The loading height was 1.2m.The maximum
stress was 7.63MPa. The maximum deformation was 0.34mm.The loading height was 1.4m.The
maximum stress was 8.78MPa. The maximum deformation was 0.41mm.The loading height was
1.6m.The maximal stress was 9.27MPa. The maximum deformation was 0.45mm.The loading height
was 1.8m.The maximum stress was 12.45MPa. The maximum deformation was 0.52mm.
Conclusions
The results showed that the maximum deformation was happened at the bottom of the silo with the
increase of height. The same flat surface pressure distribution were reduced gradually from center to
1240
around when the filling fluid density was changed, the pressure was increased with the increase of
density.
The simulation analysis was showed that the side wall deformation value was changed little with
the increase of filling height in the silo according withthe pressure saturation phenomenon. At the same
time, the deformation value of the side wall was the basic linear trend after the height of the filling was
1m high approximately, namely the pressure saturation phenomenon.
Acknowledgements
This paper was supported by the funding of the national science and technology plan
subproject(NO.2011BAD03B01).
References
[1] Li,Y.and Puri,V.M. Finite element model prediction of cyclic thermally induced in a scaled bin
using elastic plastic constitutive equation.Trans.ASAE.1991,34(5):2207-2215.
[2] Pablo Vidal, Manuel Guaita, Francisco Ayuga, Analysis of Dynamic Discharge Pressures in
Cylindrical Slender Silos with a Flat Bottom or with a1-Iopper: Comparison with Euro- code 1;
Biosystems Engineering; 2005:335-348.
[3] F.Ayuga, M.Guaita, Discharge and the eccentricity of the hopper in fluence on the silo wall
pressure. 14th engineering Mechanical conference, May 21-24,2000,Austin.
1241