Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Affective Filter and Reading Acquisition: How classroom practices can lower the affective filter and
Carolina Musawwir
Abstract
In this paper I explore the possible connection between the affective filter and reading
acquisition in students’ at risk for reading difficulties. It is my position that positive relationships in the
classroom positively impact learning by lowering the affective filter. I specifically look into relationship
building, through home visits and small group instruction/small group projects, to foster classroom
have the potential to lower the stress and anxiety which many children who struggle with reading could
experience, thus leading to higher levels of reading achievement for these students.
The Affective Filter and Reading Acquisition 2
The Affective Filter and Reading Acquisition: how classroom practices can lower the affective filter and
Reading is a very complex process that we expect children to acquire at a relatively fast
pace, and while some children take to reading with little difficulty others struggle with the task.
After all, the task of reading springs out of a series of foundational skills that children are
exposed to (or not) since their birth, and the variations of exposure to these foundational skills
allow some children to master the skills much faster and easier than others. This
underperformance is very much noticed by the struggling student and can lead to stress, anxiety
As an ESL teacher I know that the affective filter plays a very important role in the
acquirement of a second language. The affective filter is a term Stephen Krashen coined to refer
to the negative emotional and motivational factor that may interfere with the reception and
processing of comprehensible input. It’s an invisible filter that can cause stress, anxiety and lack
of confidence and that can be raised or lowered as a result of the environment that individuals are
in, interactions with peers and/or teachers, or due to personal factors such as insecurity and
anxiety (What is the Affective Filter, 2017). Learning to read is very similar to learning a
second language, since it’s learning a new code system, and could bring upon the same feeling of
stress and anxiety for students who have to work harder at the task. It is my believe that
beginning readers, particularly those at risk for reading difficulties, could be positively impacted
by lowering affective filters, since high affective filters could impede the students ability take in
The Affective Filter and Reading Acquisition 3
and internalize information. For this position paper I will explore two practices that I believe
help to lower the affective filter in students by encouraging relationship, home visits and small
group instruction/small group projects, and I will investigate what research says about these
practices.
believe that teachers are role models for the interactions that they want to see in their classrooms.
According to Hamre and Pianta, who did a study in 2001 on Early Teacher-Child Relationships
When teachers form positive bonds with students, classrooms become supportive spaces
in which students can engage in academically and socially productive ways. Positive
and positivity. Students who have positive relationships with their teachers use them as a
secure base from which they can explore the classroom and school setting both
development.
The student that arrives at our classroom door each morning is a product of their home
life. Home visits at the beginning of the year give us great insight about the child as a whole.
After a three year study of 14 schools engaging in teacher home visits for students, researchers at
the California State University at Sacramento (CSUS) found evidence that home visits could
The Affective Filter and Reading Acquisition 4
increase student performance, jumpstart parent involvement, reduce discipline problems and
increase overall positive attitudes toward school (Project). These can be particularly impactful
for the teacher-student relationship at the beginning of the year in order to create trust. Home
visits have the potential to not only lower the affective filter for the child but also for his family.
Immigrant families in particular, due to language and cultural differences many times have high
affective filters towards the school setting that keeps them from reaching out and feeling like a
These visits yield very important information about the children in our classrooms,
information that we could use as we plan instruction. The more we know about our students the
better we will be at keeping them engaged in learning, because for example, we could bring into
the classroom reading material with topics which interest the children in the class. Choice in
reading material and integration of materials which mirror the cultural and racial makeup of the
children in the classroom are key to fostering reading motivation and engagement. These books
might also mirror some of the experiences and background knowledge of the student, which will
validate their outside experiences and give the student greater confidence in the school
environment. When students are familiar with the topics discussed, their anxiety will decrease
and they will feel more comfortable participating in class discussions. Because home visits give
teachers opportunities to connect with students and their families in the safe environment of the
home, they demonstrate caring, commitment and build trust…all very important in building
relationships.
The Affective Filter and Reading Acquisition 5
Another great way to decrease the affective filter, which could have a positive effect in
increasing reading motivation and thus achievement, is through small group instruction/small
group projects. From my experience working with small groups, the intimacy helps relationships
to develop and grow by allowing for all involved to learn more about each other, interact and
participate in more meaningful ways. In an article titled. “Classroom Peer Relationships and
Behavioral Engagement in Elementary School: The Role of Social Network Equity.” the authors
state that:
interactions (Hamre and Pianta 2010), with academic behaviors and achievement
heightened when students are connected in positive and productive ways (Johnson et al.
1991; Rohrbeck et al. 2003). Engagement is seen as a social and collective process
facilitated through resource access, shared conversations, and behaviors (Parr and
Students who feel secure in their environment will take more chances, be more vocal and their
brain will be more receptive to take in new information. Small group instruction and group work
help to build classroom community by allowing students to work together for a common goal.
This practice encourages students to rely and learn from each other, sharing experiences and
knowledge. The child that feels part of a community and appreciated as a person will have a
better school experience and according to The Gully in the "Brain Glitch" Theory By: Willis,
Judy:
The Affective Filter and Reading Acquisition 6
associated with attention, memory, learning, and executive function, it follows that when
the brain releases dopamine in expectation of pleasurable experience, this dopamine will
Thus small groups have the potential to lower the student’s anxiety and promote more risk taking
In my opinion, and through several studies quoted above, I believe that the practices
noted above could lower affective filters for students’ at risk for reading difficulties. These are
practices that encourage and build relationships and focus on the child as an emotional being. As
we stand today little research has focused on the emotional barriers that hinder academic success,
and even less on professional development practices to lower these barriers. While relationships
hold great importance to the students, they are often under-valued, underexplored and not
encouraged in intentional and systematic ways by school systems. I stand behind my position of
lowering the affective filter as a means to promote success in reading development, although we
Works cited
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher–child relationships and the trajectory
625-638.
Project Appleseed. Parental Involvement in Public Schools. N.p., n.d. Web. 30 Apr. 2017.
"What Is the Affective Filter." What Is the Affective Filter? N.p., n.d. Web. 24 Apr. 2017.
Willis J. The Gully in the "Brain Glitch" Theory. Educational Leadership [serial online].