Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tonya Carline
11-27-16
Miguel Franco
2
Each of the sources I found had a very similar stance that supports my topic on Diversity: the
interactions with one another as human beings. Although the sources have similar perspectives,
they all say something exclusively designed to start a conversation about its importance, either,
On the one hand, J. Mena-Gonzalez, Diversity in Early Care and Education: Honoring
Differences (2008), on the other hand you have, The House on Mango Street S.Cisneros (1994).
In Diversity in Early Care, she argues that there are problem resolutions between teachers and
families of diverse cultures, that with a balance of understanding, and respect for each other
culturally we can find honor in our differences and be able to work with one another, teachers
In contrast, the House on Mango street, she makes a point that culture and poverty have its
own place in the world, and people overcome those life situations, and that identity and culture
can become a crisis for some people, that may lead them to other negative outcomes. Some
would argue that both sources, although they clearly deal with diversity, the contrast is that
maybe J. Mena-Gonzalez argument is more solution based and offers more strategies as to how
to reach levels of inclusion and celebration of diversity and culture as opposed to S. Cisneros
argument that tells a story of poverty. In hopes that it would generate a spark of hope that will
enable people to be more sympathetic when considering what some cultures experience when
trying to survive.
In our course reading “They Say/I Say” by: Gerald Graff & Cathy Birkenstein, they say: “It
is what others are saying and thinking that motivates our writing and gives it a reason for being.
3
I agree with that, with regards to the two sources that I just briefly discussed, If the topics that
they have written motivates and inspires the reader, then the writing has served its purpose.
In Tatum Daniel, B. Writing “Why Are All The Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria”
The issue being: the complexity of identity, as it relates to identifying one’s culture, She argues
that the topic of race and identity is such a sensitive topic, Americans tend to believe that racism
is no longer an issue, because many are uncomfortable with the conversation- so we culturally
navigate to what is familiar to us, while the issue continues to become an even greater problem.
In discussions of the rout to racial divides and diversity, one controversial issue has been
How to bring an end to what divides us all as human beings. J. Erikson (1991) “Wisdom and the
Senses: The Way of Creativity, she says, in collaboration with the other sources demanding
strategies, acceptance, and inclusion, as a means to bridging the divide to cultural issues, that we
must celebrate life cycles within itself, dealing with the starting point of our intellectual,
emotional, interactions with one another, she argues that basically- the information that we
receive while we are babies, or young can be shifted into positive stimuli that will later in our
If I were to compare all of the source up to this point, my own view is that what is similar, is
that each source is communicating formulae to assist in dealing with some sort of solution to as
to what separates us as human beings. In Lisa Delpit’s, “Multiplication is for White People” Her
argument about racial disparities within our education system, is supported by Academic
Performance Index scores in many school districts, it is a conventional wisdom that if one sub-
group continues to decline in academic standardized test, the entire school is affected by the
score. She argues that racial disparities are disparities for us all as human beings. The idea that
4
what happens to one culturally, in the long run may influence all is a theme that each of my
sources collaborate, the idea of being “my brother’s keeper” Finding was to understand our
stories and bridge them collaboratively to find ways that create understanding.
In our course read “They Say/I Say” It stated: “When entering a conversation, you need to
start off with “what others are saying.” In this conversation of my sources, the collaboration of
how each source connects, has to do with each of the sources interpretation of Diversity and
inclusion, although they may have a different stance on each of the sources I chose, their
perspective is what’s similar, the perspective that the conversation of culture, diversity and
humanity is important enough to create literature that engages the conscious and invokes change.
Just as J.Erikson depicts the child as a blank slate from birth, able to receive programing that
will shape who they become as a productive human being, Lisa Delpit depicts the same argument
that there is no achievement gap when a child is born, both arguments reflect how there are
elements that conspire against a human beings natural ability to be an accepting individual
In Cisnero’s “The House on mango Street” the story depicts a girl who’s relationship with
her family provides her with a sense of belonging, much like Daniel Tatum’s “Why Are All The
Black Kids Sitting Together” The similarity is the sense of cultural belonging that one finds in
what is familiar- the contrast is that, one source depicts the same principal , but on a very
different scale. Tatum’s depiction deals with an entire sub-group of people, where Cisneros, is
more from the perspective of one family, but with a larger audience in mind.
To Conclude, the sources that I chose was because of a conversation that I saw taking place
Bibliography
Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein, They Say/I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic
Tatum Daniel, B. (1999). Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?
Erikson, J. (1991). Wisdom and the senses: the way of creativity. San Francisco: WW.
Norton Company.
Delpit, L. (2012). Multiplication is for white people; raising expectations for other people’s