B&SE_Volume 45_Number 4_December 2015
BU erate eae
aA JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN NATIONAL GROUP OF THE INTERNATIONAL
MR ASSOCIATION FOR BRIDGE & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Geotechniques & Foundation
SSeS CabosWith Best Compliments from :
Intercontinental Con
Cle Wn Cde ce iN Ce eT
ridges Fyovers. Interchange.
Tunnels and Othe Structures
aS
~—
Tali, anspenatio nd Lkan Reena nd ‘nestor Development ter Resources,
Intallgent Transport Systems Rural nrastrocre Manning ‘nd CapactyBulaing ater Supply & abc Heath
‘EDeveopment nghcering
Duling& svehtecute Socal and Environmental Scences
Goter tent tienen
ICT isproud to announce that, we ar one of the few Consultants inthe
Country to own an clectro-Mechanicalimpulse-loading device knovin as the
Faling Weight Deflectometer (WD) which isa revlutonary and te most
accurate method for Pavement Evaluation
With the recent ntraduction of the codal provisions of RC:115-2014 and
1Rc:137-2015 (Guidelines for Structural Evaluation and Strengthening of
Flexible and Rigi Pavement), ICT offers to provide pavement evaluation by
Using FWD equipment supported with analytical tac: to backecalclate the
efastle modulus of pavement ayers
oxng ish Depts 0)Ree erred
-mail: business@ictonline.com, Website : www.ictonline.com
Oasys
YOUR IDEAS BROUGHT TO LIFE
THE LEADING SOFTWARETG
FOR ANALYSING SECTION
+,
fea
: Download your
= = free 30-day
trial from our
. : site dayThe Bridge and Structural Engineer Volume 45| Number |Desember 2015 i
f strat
Bron rte ene
Se ee ee ee ced
ee eee ee eeeRee aed ene
poorer eas
Pe ue ee
fi Volume 45 | Number | Decenber 2015 The Bridge and Structural Engineer
The Bridge & Structural Engineer
lian Nai! Group ofthe latemat ons Anecaon fr Bridge and Susur Zapaeenag
Contents Volume 45, Number 4 : December 2015
Editorial
‘+ From the Desk of Chairman, Fitorial Board : Mr. Alok Bhownick vi
‘+ From the desk of Guest Editor : Mr: Ravi Sundaram. vii
Highlights of ING-LABSE Event
‘+ Highlights ofthe ING-IABSE Workshop on “Code of Practice for Concrete Road Bridges xi
IRC:L122011" held at Hyderabad on 30% & 31* October 2015,
Special Topic : Geotechniques & Foundation Design of Structures
Pee ain eee i
Senne
5, BAS iti: siicin el ieniodgneen j
Sunil S. Basarkar, Ravikiran Vaidya
eT ET, iasiBlpulambeasomis! on
isla pum 7)
Nee ee ee ea
See -e
‘swe
4: OI dtm rpa ~ iT
a ae x man
Re cameron io ne
eee .
Te cteees teria tiemeniae ts
» ees are ote oes »
en sas
4 eee aie citaincd Oo
ree (haart »
Sefali Biswas, R. B. Salm, Satyendra Minal, G. Bhandari oO
Pee eee »
aeean
ae ”
SE
sa Pan et we
Altaf Usman, Chaadan Keunac, Atal NandaDr. Rajbat Singh
44, Disaster Mitigation aud Role of Civil Engineers us
Dr. R. Kuberar
Research Paper
An Experimental study on the Behaviour of Steel
Plate-Anchor Assembly Embedded in Concrete under Cyclic Loading Ls
Deepak K. Sal Saiwal Krishna, .K. Chakrabarti
Panorama
Office Bearers snd Managing Commitee ~201$ 145
+) ist of ING-IABSE Publications 148
The Bridge and Structural Engineer Volume 45| Number 4 [December 2015. ii
The Bridge & Structural Engineer
JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN NATIONAL GROUP OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
ING- IABSE BRIDGE & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
March 2016 Issue of the Journal will be a Special Issue
with focus on
ENABLING WORKS, FORMWORKS & SACAFFOLDING
SYSTEMS-Principles of Design and Construction
SALIENT TOPICS TO BE COVERED ARE :
1. Modern Formwork system
. Enabling & Temporary Works
._ Lifting, Transportation, Handling & Erection
|. Scaffolding Systems
5. Design & Codal Provisions
3. Safety & Precautions
/. Formwork Failures & Case Studies
A The Bridge & Structural Engineer
JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN NATIONAL GROUP OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
ING-IABSE ‘BRIDGE & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
June 2016 Issue will be a Special Issue with focus
on
TALL STRUCTURES
(Tall Buildings, Chimneys, Silos, TV Towers, Cooling Towers, Transmission Towers)SALIENT TOPICS TO BE COVERED ARE :
Structural System & Forms
Green Building & Smart Cities
Wind induced response & EQ resistant design of tall structures
Critical Appraisal of Existing Codes & Standards (Indian as well as International)
New Construction Materials and Techniques.
Case studies for Design, Construction and Rehabilitation
ona w ye
Those interested to contribute Technical Papers on above themes shall submit the
abstract by 30” April 2016 and full paper latest by 30" May 2016 in a prescribed
format, at email id : ingiabse@bol.net.in
iv Volume 45 | Number 4| Desember 2015 The Bridge and Structural Engineer
The Bridge and Structural Engineer December 2015
‘BASE: Tea Bridge and Sractrel Ingiear. 1 @ quarter soumal published by INO-IABSE. 21s one ofthe olds and he
ramon zhactaral ongynering Journal fie nad repaint wos faded way back 1957 ea snc tne
Sour relents dszeminaing tet technological progres inthe spheres ofsnetural engineering and Bridging the
‘ap etuoen profcsionas and acadomies. Artes nts journal are writen by practicing engined’ as well a acadomia
‘om around the wort
a Editorial Board
AD matericl publahed im O12 | Cygip
‘B&SB journal undergoes. peor
renew 10 eawe jar baler,
Shectngy independence and | Monaging Directer, BAS Enginaring Consults Pt Lid, Neda
relevance. The Contents of this
Journal are however conributons | Members
‘of individual euthors and refict | Mahesh Tandon,
theirindependent opinions Neither | Managing Dicester, Tandon Coontets Prt Led, New Delhi
the “members of the editorial | 4 x mwaree,Fosase Meaber (Toc) NHAL New Deis
board, nor ite publishers will be
liable Sor any direct, indirect
consequential special exemplars, | Chamuen & MD, Construn
Srother danagse ancive fom any | Ninmalya Baudyopaiiyay
imreprecentaton nthe papers. | pyecer, STUPCaneltants Pt Ltd, New Delhi
Tho artiore dt advertcamant | doe Kurlan, Fosee Chief Eagines, DTTDC Lt, New Del
indie urna ave no nuerceo® | $c Miter, Chit Bare, Meo Contents, New Deli
‘ihtorial content or presentation,
Tre posing of parteuar | _Aviore
aftracemant in ie sounel dee? | 5.» ari, Ferer DG (RD) & Aden! Seer he COE
hc br the Company Sxling | 8K Sha, Fener DC (D) Spel Seta tthe COL
thom by INGIABSB, te BOSE | Sharan, Farmer DG (RD) & Spa Sexetay tothe GOL
a AV Sinha, Former DG (RD) é Special Secretary to the GOL
$ K Pr, Farmer DG (RD) & Spc Sect tothe GOL
KP Indra, Famer (RD) & Spa Secretary he GOL
S 8 Conkeaorey, Ferner hasan. CES (1) Pt Le, ew Dt
Pubs
Harshavardhan Subbarae,
ntensy Pt Lad, Mamba
COME Ee corre unt Cur}
Front Cover :
Top Left = Triaxal test in
soul sample in progress. The
Ey
4
g
i
=
z
7
2pneumatic panel measures
the pore-water pressure
and volume change in the
sample.
Publisher.
IGaBss,
Bottom Left : Pile load
test for the Commonwealth
Games Project in progress.
Abshardham complex in the
background.
Submision of Papert
Bord
Right: Feld SPTin progress
using automatic trip hammer | Advertsing:
Pee eto ‘New Delt-110011
‘The Bridge and Structural Engineer
From the Desk of Chai
Quatety. Mach June September and December
{lo Seceary, Indian Nations Grou of the LABSE.
IDA Bailing Ground Flor Room Nos. and |2)
Jenaoger House, shayaen Boe
New Delli-11001, India
‘Tel steoLt+23386132, 8101123380734
Emal upadse@bel actin wpabse@houal com
sesyinpaber@ael asta
‘Alt edtonal commancatons should be adebessed 10 Chairman 2Atarat
of chan Natonal Crow of ts IABSB, IDA Bualdtng, Grow Fla
Jenagar Howse, Shalahan Road New Del 110011
All enquires and cerespondence ts comacton with adbortsng a the
SqupmentsMaenols and Induety Ness Sections should be addressed
to Si Ri Pandey. Secrotay inckan National Group of the IABSS
BDA Diclaing Orount “Moor Jamnagar oie Shaohon Road
Rrra}
Volume 45| Number [December 2015
‘man, Editorial Board
To maintain the high quality of this esteemed
journal, there is a dire need to maintain a
strong flow of comprehensive papers on
seminal theoretical as well as practical topics
of interest, case studies highlighting important
innovations in the field, professional issues
that a Civil Engineer is beleaguered with and
technical papers pertaining to critical review
and codes and standards. Preparing such high
quality papers generally requires significant
time commitments from senior level academics
and practicing engineers, I find that there is a
reduced willingness of industry now a days to
industry and would continue to make efforts in
bridging this gap.
‘Thisissue of the journal is focussed on the theme
of “GEOTECHNIQUES & FOUNDATION
DESIGN OF STRUCTURES". Interaction
always takes place between a structure and
its foundation, whether one likes it or not. If
structure-ground interaction is to be taken into
account in the design properly, structural and
geotechnical engineers have to. themselves
interact closely. In my professional career, T
have often encountered profound differences ininvest time and energy in preparing their most
significant projects for joumal publications.
‘We in the editorial board do recognize the fact
that there isa time constraints dhe to a quantum
increase in number of infrastructure projects in
the country, which is keeping all the competent
engineers busy. However it is to be realised
by all that ‘publication is vital to a profession’
and I would urge for a greater commitment
to contribute papers, from senior structural
and geotechnical engineers of the industry,
in the larger interest of this civil engineering,
fratemity.
‘The journal “The Bridge & Structural Engineer”
is one amongst very few committed and
collaborative linkage between academia and
i Volume 4s | Number | December 2015
Our Guest Editor for this issue is Mr Ravi
Sundaram, wio is a well-known personality
in the field of Geotechnical Engineering. He
has been involved in developing engineering
solutions to problems of collapsible soils, soft
clays, expansive soils, weak rocks, ete, on major
projects in India and abroad. He has published
several technical papers that reflect his
experience in geotechnical engineering practice.
‘Mr Ravi Sundaram has taken considerable pains
in carefully selecting the sub-theme topics and.
approach between structural and geotechnical
engineers, leading to a lack of understanding,
of the structural behaviour by the geotechnical
engineer and lack of understanding of the soil-
structure interaction by the structural engineer
These differences in approach are not only
restricted to academics, but also between
practicing structural and geotechnical engineers.
‘The Editorial Board thought prudent to take
steps in improving the understanding of so
structure behaviour between structural as well
as geotechnical engineers. The Editorial Board
of ING-IABSE therefore decided to dedicate
this issue on the topic of “GEOTECHNIQUES
& FOUNDATION DESIGN OF
STRUCTURES".
‘The Bridge and Structural Engineer
the expert authors suitable for the sub-theme,
50 as to give broad coverage to all aspects of
geotechnical and foundation engineering It
is hoped that the readers will find this issue of
interest and value.
¥ 3 a
(ALOK BowMucK)
Happy Reading‘The Bridge and Structural Engineer
Volume 45| Number |Devember 2015 vi
From the Desk of Guest Editor
=
1 feel extremely privileged and honoured to
serve as Guest Editor of this issue of “The
Bridge and Structural Engineer”. This special
issue on Geotechniques and Foundation Design
of Structures covers not only bridges but a
whole range of civil engineering structures
including metro projects, underground storage
caverns dam fouindatinne ote
technical issues are effectively resolved. Also,
‘quality assurance and reliability of design and
construction have to be ensured
Geotechnical engineers have a vital role to play
in solving some of the world’s most pressing
problems of space utilization, transportation
sector, construction in areas with difficult soilThe papers received from eminent experts
cover a wide variety of topics of current
interest. such as liquefaction, ground
improvement, pile foundations, ~ sheet
piles, soft soils, gravel-boulder deposits,
deformability of rocks and disaster
mitigation. Geo-cells, a new development
in geotechnical engineering is exciting
researchers and field engineers alike. The
importance of designing foundations in
liquefiable sands has generated two very
interesting papers. State-of-the-practice
papers on Indian innovations, ground
improvement and pile toad tests by the
industry leaders have set the tone for
geotechnical engineering excellence in the
Indian construction industry.
With the rapid pace of development in the
infrastructure sector, fast-track projects have
become the norm and engineers are expected
to meet tough deadlines. This puts a lot of
pressure on engineers, not just to complete
the work on time but also to ensure that all
sili Volume 45 | Number 4] December 2015
exhibits variations, the art of interpreting the
strata conditions and assessing foundation
behaviour has to be tempered by knowledge of
local conditions, geology of the area as well as
performance of other structures in the vicinity.
‘This emphasises the need for “observational
method of design’ in which the design may
have to be modified based on the site conditions
encountered and field observations.
Expecting the “unexpected to occur”, the
geotechnical engineer has to be prepared to
change the analysis / design as per the site
conditions exposed at the construction stage.
‘The challenge in such design concept cannot
be over-emphasized and involves proactive
participation of all stakeholders for a successful
execution of the project.
‘This calls for a change inthe mindset of structural
engineers. designers. architects. clients / owners.
conditions and developments in the Himalayan
region, In doing so, they have to expand their
practice well beyond traditional soil mechanics,
‘and earth sciences into newer areas and develop
‘an understanding of related allied subjects.
It is becoming increasingly important to relate
engineering solutions not only based upon
overall stability, but also have acceptance
criterion based upon its anticipated performance
with the developments in the infrastructure
sector, construction is being taken up in areas
/ lands which were considered as “not build-
able” in the past.
Foundations being the most important element
of the structure, geotechnical aspects play a
very vital role in the design and construction of
the substructure. Any failure could jeopardize
the project, resulting in time and cost over-runs
in addition to the all too known blame-game
and litigation
It is often said that “Geotechnical Enginecring
is a science but its practice is an art”. Soil
being a natural deposition which inherently
‘The Bridge and Structural Engineer
failure or a “geotechnical surprise”. This can be
well avoided if the contract calls for including
the services of the geotechnical engineer tll the
foundation construction is over
I am extremely thankful to all the authors
who immediately responded to my request to
contribute papers and have very kindly taken
time out of their busy schedule to write such
excellent papers. These invaluable “gems” have
made this issue of the journal a collector’s item,
worth preserving and referring to whenever the
need arises. I do hope that practicing engineers
will find the papers in this issue useful and will
find answers to questions they were hesitant to
ask
I thank Mr. Alok Bhowmick and the team of
the ING-IABSE for giving me this opportunity
to edit this special issue and connect to all
members to make this effort a snecess ‘Theircontractors, etc. who are used to receiving cooperation and guidance in this cffort is
geotechnical inputs / investigation reports in the gratefully acknowledged.
early stages of the project. The design is usually
done on the basis of the soil reports and there is,
no further reference to the geotechnical engineer Qi Sacto
unless there is an unusual ground condition or (RAVISUNDARAM)
The Bridge and Structural Engineer Volume 45 | Number 4 [December 2015. ix
Brief Profile of Mr Ravi Sundaram
Mr. Ravi Sundaram completed his M.Tech. in 1980 from ITT Delhi and has 35
years experience as a consulting engineer in India and abroad. He started his career
with McClelland International Limited (USA), a worldwide reputed geotechnical
company. He was based in the company's Office at Dammam, Saudi Arabia and
‘worked on the company's projects in Saudi Arabia and Qatar. His intemational
experience includes offshore & onshore soil investigations, geophysical tests, pile
installation monitoring and pile drivability studies.
Heisa founder director of Cengrs Geotechnica Pvt.Ltd. and directs all geotechnical
consultancy services and geotechnical construction activities, He isin charge of soilinvestigation worksincluding field works, laboratory testing and engineering studies,
His field of activities also includes pile foundations, foundation-strensthening and
ground improvement.
Mr, Ravi Sundaram’s expertise includes boreholes through soil and rock, resistivity
and seismic surveys, dynamic testing of soils, rammed stone columns, bored piles
and groundwater studies, He has been involved in developing engineering solutions
to problems of collapsible soils, soft clays, expansive soils, weak rocks, artesian
conditions and liquefaction of soils on major projectsin India and abroad. His special
interests include installation and testing of piles, foundations for bridges, high rise
buildings, large-diameter tanks, power plants and heavy industrial structures. He
has published over 40 technical papers that reflect his experience in geotechnical
engineering practice,
He is a fellow of the Indian Geotechnical Society and member of the Intemational
Society of Soil Mechanics & Geotechnical Engineering, He is also member of the
Indian Roads Congress and the Association of Consulting Civil Engineers.
Mr. Ravi Sundaram was Chairman of the Indian Geotechnical Society Delhi Chapter
during 2009-11 and was responsible for getting it registered with the Registrar of
Societies
He is actively associated with Bhoovigyan Vikas Foundation, a non-government
organization working towards Earth-Care and advising the Indian Government on
making their policies Earth-friendly. He has published a book titled “Retrieving the
Lost Paradise ~ Celebrating the Barth Day”.
x Volume 45 | Number 4| Desember2015 The Bridge and Structural Engineer
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ING-IABSE WORKSHOP ON “CODE OF PRACTICE
FOR CONCRETE ROAD BRIDGES IRC:112:2011”
HELD AT HYDERABAD ON 30" & 315* OCTOBER 2015
‘The Indian Notional Group of the IABSE in co-operation with Govt of Telangana, Roads and Buildings
Department (NH Wing) successfully organised two day Workshop on “Code of Practice for Conerete Road
Bridges IRC:112:2011" at Hyderabad on 30 and 31" October 2015. The Workshop was wel attended by more
than 200 delegates from various Govt Departments as wel as other private and public orzanzations.
“The aim of the worksthop was to provide aunique opportunity to the practicing engineers and students to interact
“with experts for dissemination of knowledge and experiences relating to the latest techniques in design of bridges
‘aud other structures using the “Code of Practice for Concrete Road Bridges IRC:112: 2011". Pastcipation of
100.
loaded area admeasu
Fig.l: Load teat using hentledge arrangement
3 Top down load applications
Common reaction sustaining technique is by
Keatledge method, where reaction araigement
‘exists in form of concrete blocks or any counter
weights that rests on set of secondary girders, which
in tum are supported by primary girder. The primary
airder is sandvviched between the hydranlie jack and
the secondary girders. The counterweights have to
be sufficiently higher than the test load to prevent
‘cantilever action of the secondary girders during
loading. As an illustration, reaction by Kentledge
load of 18.75MN for a high tise residential tower at
Kolkata can be seen in Fig.1. This arrangement was
‘The Bridge and Structural Engineer
the anchor piles. Since the equipment and girder
requirements are small, foot print area is relatively
small; for instance, a test load of 8.00MN with
reaction arrangement comprising four active anchors
‘of 2.20 MN capacity would require and area of
approximately 6 mx 2.2.m area
In one of the sites at Karwar located on west coast
of India, a vertical Toad test was conducted, Steel
piles were driven on reclaimed area through a larger
diameter MS Liner upto weathered rock level, so that
‘contribution only from socketed rock was available
to the pile. This arrangement modelled the behaviour
of marine piles, designed for resistance arising solely
fiom weathered rock. Safe design load on this driven
steel pile 850 mm outer diameter and with a conical
bottom shoe was 3.50 MN. A 9.00MN reaction
aurangement was made comprising eight rock
‘anchors, four on each side (Fig. 2), each of 1.16 MN
ssafe capacity, deriving strength from 9 m fixed length
in rock.
A similar arrangement was also made at Tuna post
near Kandla, Gujarat, A test pile 1500 mm diameter
‘and 35,50 m depth, when loaded to 21.103 MN
indicated displacement of 8.98 mm with observed
rebound of 7.50 mm. Sixteen active anchors each of
‘capacity 1.32 MN, with arrangement for housing four
‘anchors at each comer, each with 10 m fixed length
in amygdaloidal basalt were installed. The test pile,
after 22 m of clayey silt/ silty clay layers, passed
through 10m of highly weathered amygdaloidal basalt
(average UCS of 25 MPa), and then socketed about
ately weathered amvedaloidal Inacalt
35 a in movPig. 2: Loc test sing anchor piles
Reaction Piles or Active Anchors are more
convenient where rock and competent stratm are
available at a shallow depth. Such arrangement
consists of two or more reaction piles or active
‘uchors located on either side of a test pile. In order
to minimise the interference between test and anchor
piles, a minimum distamce of three times the pile
diameter is maintained between these piles.
A reaction beam is placed on top of the anchor piles
and the test pile is loaded by utilising a hydraulic
jack placed co-axially on top. This results in applying
compressive load on the test pile and uplift load on
‘The Bridge and Structural Engineer
reliable piling proposal. Five test piles were planned,
of which three load tests of relevance to this paper are
summarized in Table 1.
Table 1: Noida load test details
fs ee foe |p [computed [aprind [rie op
fet letter fogs [ni [aeugeien [mati [ae
Jw mm) fom) |ststy [0UN) stead cement
inet fot
fru Ji200 fango Jose a0 fr sas
fs fi200 fsea0 Jose [san firm fran
A reaction arrangement for all these load tests
comprised a 22.00 MN capacity kentledge, with
maintained loading method as per provision of IS:
2911 (Part 4) [6] Comparative load-displacement
curves for these tests are reported in Fig. 3, and the
safe loads revealed for TP1, TP3 and TP4 were 3.13,
6.17 and 9.80MN respectively
[Pendgn Pig Hoag,
(core recavery excess of 97% and RQD in a range of
25 — 0%) with UCS of 100.0MPa
In another instance, at Noida, near Delhi, piled raft
supported on bored cast-in-situ pile of 1200mm
diameter was proposed for a high rise commercial
tower. Load test program was planned to determine
‘and maximize the safe pile capacity to achieve
‘most economic pilevaft combination. The ground
‘conditions were daumting, since the site was situated
at close proximity of Yamuna river and comprised
loose to medium dense sand to about Sm (SPT N
values between 4 to 34) followed by a medium dense
to dense sand (N values 10 - 93) upto an investigated
depth of 40 m. Pile bore stability was the critical
factor identified and a combination of stability fluids
were sggested for arriving at an economic and
Volume 45| Number [December 2015 9
to the manufacturer's product literatures may
improve frictional resistance at pile-soil interface, and
becomes an important factor contributing to increase
in pile capacity.
‘The conclusions on use of polymer fiuid are based
‘on site specific performance and should be used
with caution at this time. Before generalization,
dedicated laboratory and field studies in various soil
‘conditions are desired to conclusively prove apositive
‘contribution of polymer based slurry in improving the
frictional contributions
3.2 Pull out load tests
ull out load tests are earied out by connectin
test pile reinforcement to a primary girder, which
is upward loaded with hydraulic jacks. A single
hydraulic jack of high capacity may be co-asially
placed above the test pile; or alternatively, jacks are
placed atop reaction piles.
At a project site at Kalma, located near Raigad town
at Central India, a pull out load test (Fig. 4) was
conducted to confirm performance of a 900 mm
diameter RCC bored raker pile with a safe uplift load
‘of 2.02 MN. The pile passed through 4.50 m of sandy