Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Annotated Bibliography
Bailey Jackson
UWRT 1104
11 March 2018
AZA. “We Believe in a Better Future for All Living Things.” Association of Zoos & Aquariums:
AZA.org, 2018, www.aza.org/.
This credible website entails a pro-zoo standpoint with safety tips, services, and Commented [2]: Try explaining how you know the
website is credible.
conservations that were made to give an understanding of how zoos are regulated and
what you can do to help. From government affairs to professional development, AZA
provides services, tools, and resources needed. They have a “Safe” section that entails
what they are doing for animals who may be becoming extinct. “AZA Safe” focuses on
saving animals from going extinct by concentrating on collective enterprises within their
accredited zoos and aquariums and leverages their massive audiences to save species.
There are tabs of different animals in which you can see the statistics of the species, how Commented [3]: Instead of saying “There are” you
could try “The website has” to make the sentence more
clear.
many there are today, and how these animals numbers are shrinking. For example, the
number of Asian Elephants has shrunk from over 3 million to 188,000 over a few Commented [4]: Replace with “the last few”
centuries. You can also join their program to help animals in need and to give animals the
best quality of life. They have jobs, a place to locate zoos and aquariums, a calendar, and
a place where you can make a donation. This website was created by many members who
are a part of the AZA organization. It is a very credible source with corporate
partnerships and is the only organization that can provide a national sponsorship platform
representing more than 200 accredited zoos and aquariums. This source will be very
useful to me while researching ways to help zoo animals and how to get involved. It will
also provide specific facts about many species that are becoming extinct and to what
extent these programs are going to help grow the population. I will use this credible
source as an argument for pro-zoo beliefs. Commented [5]: It was definitely a good idea to add
your side of the argument at the end!
Baird, Bonnie A., et al. "Program animal welfare: using behavioral and physiological measures
to assess the well-being of animals used for education programs in zoos." Applied Animal
The academic article discusses an experiment that was conducted to examine program
animal welfare using both behavioral and psychological measures in two different
experiments. Investigation shows that zoo visitors can have an effect on exhibited
animals in three ways: stress, enrichment, or a neutral effect. The experiment used
armadillos, hedgehogs, and red-tailed hawks, and while handling these species, they
showed behavioral signs such as undesirable, rest, and self-directed behavior. The size of
the enclosure that they were held in negatively correlated with their behavior in both
experiments. The primary question raised in this source is whether or not program animal
psychological observations. The study shows the importance of the housing environment
for animal welfare. The findings will be used as a basis for creating handling
recommendations for enclosed armadillos, hedgehogs, and red-tailed hawks in zoos. The
information presented in the article is supported by numerous studied and trusted sources.
The author examined both experiments, showing how each animal was affected by
enclosed areas by displaying data in charts and grafts. This article also suggests ways on
how further handling in animal welfare should be done. I will use this source as a proven
example of how animals are being affected by being in enclosed spaces. This article has
also given me an insight into written data and statistics showing the effects enclosures
have on animals such as armadillos. Commented [6]: The only other thing I would say is
that the first annotation is sort of drawn out, almost
runny, and the second annotation is kind of short and
choppy. Other than that it’s really good.
Halberstadt, Alex. "Zoo Animals and Their Discontents." The New York Times Magazine, July 6
(2014).
This source in an excerpt from The New York Times Magazine that begins to discuss what
Dr. Vint Virga, a veterinarian, does almost every day of his life. This article is written by
Alex Halberstadt a journalist, blogger, and author from Moscow, Russia. He is the author
of the coming family memoir “Young Heros of the Soviet Union” and has written many
magazine articles in The New York Times. Virga is a behaviorist and knows exactly what
signs from animals indicate. For example, when an elephant lowers her head and folds
her trunk underneath, the action marks a sense of disturbance. He expresses plainly that
his job is to see into the inner lives of animals. The main article discusses how animals
are much more similar to humans than we ever thought. He states that animals are
showing us their inner states but we are just not listening. The entire article discusses
different animals and his first-hand experiences while watching them for hours a day.
Throughout the article, Virga discusses how animals are affected and what he witnesses
on a daily basis. Staff members at Roger Williams told Alex Halberstadt privately that
they are uncomfortable discussing what their animals feel, especially in front of their
animals feel while in captivity, and I felt as though the author was very biased toward the
topic. He mainly points out the negative experiences while researching zoos and uses
many examples from first-hand witnesses. The information presented in this magazine is
supported by many studies and trusted sources. The author used many points from actual
zoo workers and a veterinarian who studies the lives of animals kept in captivity. This
magazine article has helped me gain insight into how animals actually feel and what they
encounter. I will use this source to show many examples of why anti-zoo supporters feel
the way they do. Overall, this magazine article has provided an interesting perspective as
Taylor, Marc Alain. "Zootopia-Animal Welfare, Species Preservation and the Ethics of
The academic article discusses whether the keeping of exotic animals in zoos is the most
ethical way to conserve, preserve, and educate the public about these animals. Written by
Marc Alain Taylor who attends a Veterinary Technology Program in Northern Virginia
Community College, this article represents the history and purposes of zoos. Taylor first
begins to discuss the earliest zoos dating back to 2,500 B.C.E. in Ancient Egypt when
zoos were used to show power and wealth by kings and the wealthy. However, in the
19th century, enclosed animals shifted from a man's domination of nature toward a more
enlightened concern for and scientific interest in wild animals. He argues that the modern
zoo with its four main objectives (1) public research, (2) scientific research, (3)
endangered species conservation, and (4) personal recreation provides the best means to
educate the public. He states that zoos care for their animals in an ethical way and also
points out that animals that are placed in zoos are often threatened or endangered in their
natural habitat. He also discusses how critics of utilitarianism have concerns about the
limit of what knowledge human beings are actually capable of acquiring considering how
difficult it is to understand exactly how an animal feels. Marc Alain Taylor discusses
different essays such as Are Zoos Morally Defensible? By Tom Regan and Zoo
Conservation and Ethical Paradoxes by William Conway to provide other examples that
support his own beliefs. This source will be very useful to me while developing different
standpoints. I will use this article to show an opinion from a pro-zoo standpoint and to
bolster the discussion about why some individuals support zoos. Commented [7]: Really good job, I think you have
some really strong sources, and really good
arguments.