Mace Audit Sheet

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED
Issue Deptt. MACE Prepared Verified Approved

Vendor Quality System Assessment Report - Tier II
Date of Issue Avneet
Copy to Supplier Name 24/10/2017 Singh Kalsi
Vendor 1 Audit Date

Supplier Attendant Name
SC 1 M/s Swaran Enterprises
New Jail Road Vill. Dhumaspur, Mr.Hemant Kumar (Managing Partner)
24th October 2017
Tier 1 1 Gurgaon-122101
Mr. Kuldeep- QA
MACE 1 Mr. Inderjeet- Production Audit Person
Mr. Sultan Sharma- Purchase
Cluster Name Jay ushin Ltd Mr. Rajesh Kaushik- HR
(Audit Score) Avneet Singh Kalsi
Achieved Score： 71
Vendor (Tier 1) Person
×１００ = 68
Total Score： 104 Mr Tinku Jaaglan
Total 4
Part Number：
Subject: Vendor System Audit- Tier II
Part Name: Terminal Base (YE-3)
Observation:-
1. M/s Swaran Enterprises is an ISO 9001 certified company.
2. Company Is Home Grown

3. Company is manufacturing Injection Molding Parts
4 Customers: JNS, Jay Ushin, Snadan Vikas
5 Fianacial Condition is good
6. No Major Observation
Following area needs to be focus for improvement :-
1. Regulation for initial production control
2. Education and Training
3. Handling Abnormality In Quality
Detail report is enclosed for your kind consideration & improvement actions -
Total
Achieved
0 1 2
1 6/ 8 0 2 2
1.Production
2 3/ 6 0 3 0 preparation 2.Regulation for initial
16. Process Audit production control
3 8 / 10 0 2 3
100
4 3/ 4 0 1 1 15. Adequate testing facility 3.Changing management
5 / 6 0 3 0
6 4/ 6 0 2 1 14.Critical parts Management 50 4.Standards

management
7 2/ 2 0 0 1
8 7 / 12 0 5 1
13.Handling Management 0 5.Education and training
9 7 / 10 0 3 2
10 6 / 10 0 4 1
12.Products
6.Quality audit and process verification
11 5/ 8 0 3 1 management
12 6 / 10 0 4 1
13 4/ 4 0 0 2 11.Implementation 7.Supplier control

of standards
14 NA / NA 0 0 0
10.Equipment/ 8.Handling abnormality
15 4/ 4 0 0 2 Inspection
equipment's
9.5S management in quality
management
16 3/ 4 0 1 1
Total
(MSI 68 / 104 0 33 19
L)
Pre decided negative Improvement Submission
0 10/7/2016 Last Audit Rating Nil
marking (if any) Date　
F003-3 QA/MT Ver. 5

MARUTI VENDOR QUALITY SYSTEM AUDIT CUM FO
Vendor Attendees:
Mr.Hemant Kumar (Managing Partner)
M/s Swaran EnterprisesNew Jail Mr. Kuldeep- QA
Supplier
Road Vill. Dhumaspur,Gurgaon- Mr. Inderjeet- Production
Name 122101 Mr. Sultan Sharma- Purchase
Mr. Rajesh Kaushik- HR
Part Name Terminals
Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment
Do you define the procedure for Product development

Regarding implementation rule 1 including the following ? -scope of parts, responsibility of each 2
1 of production preparation
department, control contents / items?
Regarding management /
Do you implement follow-up to control the schedule and
implementation by production 1 progress of production preparation items? Incl top 1
2 preparation plan / report (master
management
plan)
1. Production
preparation /
New Product
Development
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Part Name Terminals

1. Production
preparation /
New Product
Development Do you consider following items and implement corrective
and preventive action to the processes and standards before
Defect prevention on the stage
regular production?
of process design by using 1 1
3 -Troubles in the past; -Defect items expected;
FMEA/Matrix diagram
-Defect items unable to capture at customer;
-Defect items difficult to repair;
Product/process evaluation at
Do you prevent defects by quality improving activities of
the quality evaluation meeting in 1 2
4 cross-function team to evaluate quality performance?
each trial
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Part Name Terminals
Do you define following items related to initial production

control by standards ?
-controlled parts; -controlled items; -inspection method;
1 1
-initial production control period;
Regulation for -a person who announce start/end of initial production control;
1 initial production control -finish condition;
２．
Regulation
for How do you define items required special control during initial
initial 2 production control? Do you set stricter inspection methods 1
production than the ordinal inspection?
control
Do you control process capability and defect rate during initial

Implementation of initial 1 1
2 production control?
production control
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Part Name Terminals
Do you define unexpected change (unusual) and planned

1 1
change clearly?
Definition and implementation of

1 changing management
Do you define procedure(rules applied from sharing
2 2
information to result confirmation) at change occurrence?
３．
Changing
management Do you record product quality check results to ensure
3 1
traceability? Incl retroactive checks
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
３．
Part Name
Changing Terminals
management
1 Do you define and control initial part clearly? 2
Definition and control method

2 for initial part
Do you control initial parts separately and make quality
2 records about them?(both internal and outsourced process 2
are included)
Procedure to make process Do you make and review process control standards,
1 control standards(QA process 1 Inspection specifications, Operation instructions for all 1
charts) products which is shipped to SMC / MSIL / Tier 1 ?
４．
Standards
management
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Part Name Terminals

４．
Standards
management
Procedure to control standards

Do you have consistency to keep process control standard,
2 ・Process control standards 1 inspection specification, operation inspection and parameter 2
・Inspection specifications chart?
・Operation instructions
Do you clarify the department in charge of promoting quality

1 education, implement education based on annual plan? 1
Are records of education kept?
1 Education/ training procedure

５．
Education
and training
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Part Name Terminals
1 Education/ training procedure

５．Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment
Education
and training
Do you define and implement the skill evaluation of operator
to determine whether operator can work without surveillance?
2 1
(e.g. acceptable revel/evaluation frequency/evaluation
method)
Education for
Do you periodically monitor the skill of certificated operators
managers/Inspectors/ 1 1
2 and follow up to improve their skill?
Special operators
Do you conduct quality audit to identify issues and properly

Activity to keep/improve 1 1
1 improve them?
production quality
６．
Quality audit
and process
verification
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Part Name Terminals

６．
Quality audit
and process Do you confirm consistency between actual operation and
verification 1 1
standard?
2 Content of process review
Do you confirm if countermeasures are taken properly to

2 2
prevent reoccurring of quality fail?
７．
Evaluation method for new Do you define criteria to certificate new suppliers and
Supplier 1 1 2
suppliers implement them?
control
Do you define clearly what is abnormal situation and make

1 1
operators know the definition?
Handling when abnormal

1
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Part Name Terminals
Handling when abnormal Do you clarify and standardize the handling rules/routes for
2 1
1 situation occurs customer claims, in process failure and supplier failure?
Do you have criteria to estimate the scope of suspected lot

3 for abnormal situation?　When abnormal situation occurs, do 2
you trace suspected　lot based upon the criteria?
８．
Handling
abnormality
in quality Do you prevent recurrence of issues by analysing cause of
1 occurring defect based on process investigation result such 1
as 5-why analysis?
Prevention of recurrence
2 ・Customer claims
・In process failure
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
８．
Handling
Part Name
abnormality Terminals
in quality
Prevention of recurrence Do you reflect corrective action to improvement of process

2 1
control and review of standards?
2 ・Customer claims
・In process failure
・Suppliers failure
After corrective action are taken, do you conduct on-site

3 check up and evaluate the effectiveness? And horizontal 1
deployment.
Do you keep store material, work-in-process, finished

products, inventory and container at appropriate storage
1 1
prevented from dust, lust, scratch, deformation and
rainwater?
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Part Name Terminals
Do you control material, work-in-process and finished product

1 Location of production site 2 by designated location, volume and standard using visual 1
control?
９．
5S
management
Do you implement inspection or critical operation under the
3 properly controlled environment luminance 1
/temperature/humidity/vibration/noise/work table, etc.)?
Do you keep condition of production equipment's, jigs and

1 2
tools properly?
Production equipment's
2 management
Vendor Attendees:
９． Mr.Hemant Kumar (Managing Partner)
5S M/s Swaran EnterprisesNew Jail Mr. Kuldeep- QA
Supplier
management Road Vill. Dhumaspur,Gurgaon- Mr. Inderjeet- Production
Part Name Terminals

Production equipment's
2 management
Do you keep condition of inspection equipment's properly to
2 2
ensure accuracy?
Do you conduct daily/regularly check of production

1 1
equipment's, dies and jigs? Are records of maintenance kept?
Maintenance of equipment's ,
1 jigs and tools
１０． Do you confirm regularly the function of Pokayoke, automated

2 1
Equipment/In stop and alarm? Are records of maintenance kept?
spection
equipment's
management
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Maintenance of equipment's ,
1 jigs and tools
Part Name Terminals
１０．
Category
Equipment/In Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment
spection
equipment's
management Do you standardize frequency of polishing and replacement
3 1
for consumable tools(blade/electrode/rub stone, etc.)?
Do you calibrate regularly inspection equipment's and put the

1 2
expire date on them?
Maintenance of inspection
2 equipment's
Do you control deterioration (expire date) of boundary
2 samples for objective judgments such as appearance 1
inspection?
Do you use easy expression (visualizer, onomatopoeia ,etc.)

1 for operation instructions? So that operator can easily 1
understand process and critical points.
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Part Name Terminals
Do you keep operation instructions on the accessible place

2 and post important quality points and critical operation points 1
on the place where operators can see it easily?
１１．
Implementati
Implementation of standards
on of 1
standards
Do you regularly monitored that each operator operates

3 1
according to the operation instructions？
Is it possible to judge OK/NG specifically by each check sheet

4 (of daily equipment check, quality control report, etc.) you 2
use?
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Part Name Terminals
Do you keep first-in first-out of finished products and work-in-

1 process (material, reserve parts） by using identification tag or 1
lot indication?
management of parts flow Do you control follows production history by product lot
1
2 numbers? 1
-production date; -production volume; -shipping date
１２．
Products 3 Do you control identification of similar parts separately? 1
management
Do you control identification of non-confirming parts and parts

1 1
on hold. Do you store them separately?
Non-confirming parts
2 management
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
１２． Name 122101 Mr. Sultan Sharma- Purchase
Products Mr. Rajesh Kaushik- HR
management
Part Name Terminals

Non-confirming parts
2 management
Regarding repaired non-confirming parts and parts on hold to
2 re-use, do you define responsibility to implement? Are repair 2
record kept?　
Do you make arrangements with customers about the

1 packing style & transportation system to prevent damage 2
13. during handling of finished products & perform accordingly.
Handling 1 Bins/ Trolley Management
Management
Do you have system to maintain Bins /Trolleys in Good
2 2
Condition.
Do you have Special checks/Inspection for Maru A

1 NA
parameters of Maru A part are available .
14.
Critical parts 1 Maru A Parts Management
Management
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Part Name Terminals

14.
Critical parts 1 Maru A Parts Management Do you have Identification of Maru A Process/Operator on
2 NA
Management Shop Floor.
Do you keep the repair history when repairing & using Maru A
3 NA
items
Does the supplier has all inspection instruments required as

1 2
per drawing requirements
15.
Adequate 1 Testing Facility Does the supplier has all Testing Equipments/Rigs required
testing 2
as per drawing requirements
NA
facility
Does the Supplier has trained manpower to operate these
3 2
inspection and testing instruments
1 Conduct process audit as per process control standard 2

16. Process 1 As per PCS
Audit
Vendor Attendees:
Supplier
Part Name Terminals
16.Category
Process Audit Area
1 As per PCS
Concerning regulation Judgment
Audit
2 Closure of all the observations 1
Achieved Score 71
Maximum Score 104
Audit Rating 68
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
Found OK
A) Development timing plan has not covered reason of

delay/advancement and some activity like production
readiness and last review meeting was not planned.
B) There is some mismatching between planned and actual
date as mentioned on the time plan e.g. FMEA review was
planned and done in Feb'16 but actual it was finalized in
Apr'16.
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
No evidence found that past trouble history and defect items

expected list are considered as a input to planning of new
part
Process FMEA - SOD ratings are not assigned as per AIAG

guidelines like detection rating for attribute and visual
inspection are given 3~4 which is not correct.
FMEA of Base terminal Bkt is not revised after the customer
complaint for flash problem.
Found OK
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
MR/Quality person is not aware about the initial supply

control activity however procedure is available as provided
by customer.
Procedure of Initial supply control is not followed effectively

as this activity should be started after SOP but it was
completed during APQP phase as per the APQP plan of
Base I3S.
No evidence found of Initial supply control termination by
monitoring all parameter / condition including defect rate,
capability study and effectiveness of countermeasure.
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
Kindly define some more abnormal (unusual) situation with

role and responsibility of each operator / supervisor such as
sudden oil/ air leakage from machine, sudden lux level drop
during inspection, tool worn out, Sudden operator
injury/fever and leaving the work area by operator during
break for tea, lunch and Dinner etc.
Found OK
No evidence found for quality check result to ensure

traceability and retroactive check in case of sudden
breakdown in mold.
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
Found OK
Found OK
A) Review and issue record of Control plan and Work

Instructions does not exist, documents has not revised after
the modification in switch base assay (U30)
B) Retention period of documents is not defined as per MSIL
requirements.
- Document retention time to be defined as per MSIL
requirements i.e. Product life (model obsolete at customer
end) + 11 years.
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
Found OK
A) Training plan is not prepared on the basis of TNI of

employee due to which many training topics like FMEA, SPC
, MSA are not reflected in the plan.
B) Trainings are not being imparted according to the plan
incase of training on 7 QC Tools which was planned in
Mar'16 but not done yet.
C) No system and evidence found of effectiveness check
after imparting the training e.g. 7QC Tools and 5'S'
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
As system is defined for skill up gradation and evaluation of

operators level wise but the same is not followed effectively
in case for skill matrix of operator and supervisor e.g.
Mr.Lalmani is working at skill level 4 but he is not able to
explain the requirements as decided for this level.
No system and evidence found for cross checking of

operator's skill periodically against a decided parameter and
by simulating defect.
Auditor Mr. Inderjeet has not been certified and trained by a

third party for the audit of ISO/TS.
All activity like NPD, Tool Maintenance etc. are not audited
during an internal audit.
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
No evidence found of process audit conducting and

confirming of consistency between actual operation and
standard during process audit.
Found OK
Found OK
Abnormal situation to be displayed at shop floor and make it

in a local language also provide training to the supervisor
and operators about their role and responsibility when
abnormal situations happen.
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
Supplier complaint register to be made and QPCR to be

raised as per criteria defined in the procedure.
Found OK
Why-Why analysis is not being done effectively incase of

problem for soldering open as root was operator negligence
according to the report but actual cause was not considered
to prevent recurrence of issue.
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
Countermeasure action to be standardized to avoid future

reoccurrence of defect e.g. customer complaint for soldering
Joint open in part RH01000 but inspection standard is not
reviewed for increased inspection frequency as decided in
the CAPA sheet.
Onsite check up of countermeasure has started for
customer complaints but last customer complaint as reported
in June'16 is not included in the effectiveness monitoring
sheet.
Horizontal deployment of CAPA to be done for similar
process and product.
WIP Parts are overfilled in bins/trolley which may lead to

dent and scratch on parts e.g. wire harness
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
There is a need to focus on implementation of 2S' activity,

some examples are,
A) Inspected material is not identified by a tag also it is kept
at unidentified location e.g. 2L50M
B) FG item i.e. CL-0-300A placed at wrong location.
C) WIP Parts are kept at unidentified location at shop floor
Lux level was found less in the shop floor so kindly define a
minimum lux level for each area including inspection area.
Found OK
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
Found OK
A) All check points are not available in Preventive/daily

maintenance check sheet based on breakdown analysis.
B) Preventive machine check sheet should include check
method, check criteria and check condition for all the items
so that every person can follow the same system.
C) Spare parts list with a minimum inventory level to be
defined for all mold/Tools.
D) Daily check sheet of machine is not implemented
effectively
No evidence found of functional check of fool-proofing at

designated frequency.
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
Tool (cutter/drill) change and resharp frequency to be

defined for each tool and followed.
Found OK
Limit sample is not matching with actual part incase of

terminal Base RHD its visual items like colour and flash are
not matched with the limit sample.
Easy expression like visualizer/beeps/ signals/light should

provide at station for operator so that he can easily
understand process and critical points
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
A)Some important check points are not mentioned in the WI

eg. Soaking time of after Paint application.
B) Final inspection standard is not displayed at inspection
point however inspection activity is going on.
C)Operator and supervisor are not aware about the content
of daily check sheet and machine and process parameters.
Operator observance audit activity is not being carried out

for all the operators so kindly make a plan to cover all
operators and do audit at defined frequency.
Found OK
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
FIFO system needs to be reviewed for BOP items e.g. Plate

key- Its 5 lots received in June month and FIFO Sticker i.e.
white is pasted on all the lots, so it not clear which one lot
will issue first
Some BOP items are stored without tag including inspection
status, Qty, receiving date etc.
No provision of identification of similar parts with different

colour bins/tags etc.
Identification marks or tag is not available on NG parts

available at Shop floor and inspection area e.g. Terminal
CD100
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
Found OK
Found OK
Found OK
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
Found OK
Found OK
Found OK
M FOLLOW UP REPORT
24th October 2017
Auditors:
Avneet Singh Kalsi
Remarks Follow Up
As per control plan that product parameter to be be checked

in twice in a shift but the same is not evident.
MANAGEMENT & FINANCIAL INFORMATION ( TIER-2 SUPPLIER)
M/s Swaran Enterprises VENDOR ATTENDEES : CEO/MD Name: Mr.Hemat Kumar

New Jail Roaad
0
Vill-Dhumaspur,
Supplier Name PO-
Mob No: 9811137231
Badshahpur,Gurgaon-
122101
Email Id: Swaran.info@gmail.com
Plant Head Name:

Mr. Inderjeet Singh
Jay-Ushin Ltd. Mobile No:
8860712347
mail id:
Company PAN No: AALFS2199D
Part Name 0 Company status : Home-grown
S
Category Topic Details Information Remarks
No.
Background & Qualification B.TECH In Mechanical Engineering
Is there a succession plan for the owners? yes
Management information Ownership (Prop/Partnership/Pvt Ltd/Public ) Patnership
Are Quality & Productivity targets available &

yes
Monitored by mgmt.?
Is there any system by which management
yes
monitors customer rating?
Does the vendor have organization Chart. Are
Organization Chart Available
following clear in the chart:
1.Reporting levels are clear yes
2.Role clarity at each level yes
1 3.Adequate quality organization structure. Does

Qualification level meets the
company has department as HR, Production,
profile requirement .
QA, Engg (development) and Maintenance
4.Persons are available as per chart, no

NO Shortage
shortage of staff
Organization Structure
5. Is responsibility for check on check available Responsibility Defined For Check
at all levels on Check Activity
People profile :
1) 55
1. No of contract employee (Worker)
2) 05
2. No of permanent employee (Worker)
3) 13
3. No of staff
Recruitment of workers (hiring system at Tier-2) Refrencess & placement servics
What is the Qualification Criteria of Operators

Operator's minumum 10th class
selection?
Does The Unit have any ISO/ TS certification?. ISO 9001:2008
Does the unit review the effectiveness of

yes
Quality system ?.
Certificate (ISO or TS) ISO 9001:2008

2 Quality Systems
Name of certification body Qualityaustria Central asia
Scale of
Organization Date of issue 2/23/2017
Expiry Date 9/14/2017

1190 lacs
2013-14 1373 lacs
2014-15 1283 lacs
3 Net Sales (Rs Lacs)
2015-16 1313 lacs
2016-17
2013-14 31 lacs
2014-15 49 lacs
4 Net Profit ( Rs Lacs)
2015-16 42 lacs
2016-17 34 lacs
List of approved Tier-3

5
suppliers list attached
6 MSME Category
Any labour issue in last 5 years No

Does Union exists ? No
Does company provide Tea/Snacks to all

Provide Tea to all employees
employees
How are general working conditions (Condition

Good
of toilet, Hot, humid , Noise level etc.)
Does worker safety norms followed Yes
By what date, payments to employees is done 7th of every month

7 Industrial Climate
Minimum wages & above as per
How is Salary & PF for contract employees is
Govt of Haryana Labour
managed (Directly or Thru contractor)
Department
How often overtime is done & what is overtime
As per basic salary
rate?
Is there a suggestion scheme in the company ? yes
Are there additional benefits to employees ?

No
( Canteen, Transport, Medical etc.)
Does company provide uniform to its

No
employees?
Investment detail (In last 2 years) 15 lacs Details of investment
Future growth /Investment plan 30 lacs Details of investment
What is the D/E ratio ?

Cash Generation (PAT+Dep-Loan)? No Loan
ROCE?
Capability What are the other businesses of the promoter? No

to invest for
Investment Capability for Have supplier taken any benefit from govt on
future 8
Future Expansion No
expansion MSME category?
Have Tier-1 supplier financed tooling,

yes
equipment, testing facilities at Tier-2?
Payment terms with customers 45 days
Payment terms with Suppliers 45 days
Price updation frequency by major customer
Types of Raw Material being used. Phenollic Powder
Capacity utilisation (% age) 100% Utilised
Working hours for workers 8hrs
Adequate Layout of company (optimum and displayed) yes (Displayed)

Manufacturi 9
ng capability Make of Machine Taiwan
Life of Machine Available Years already finished -
Machine condition Well and Running
Availability of Auxiliary Equipments yes
Summary: Based on data provided by supplier as above and shop floor visit following is the overall summary
S No Topic Judgement Remarks
Productivity and quality targets are

monitored by management (trend monthly/
1 Management Outlook Good half yearly/ yearly) -Monthly
Customer rating - Y
Organisational structure: available
Investment done in last 2 years - 15Lacs

2 Financial Capability Good Future investment plan - 30Lacs
Debt condition -No Loan
Working conditions - Good

3 Industrial Relations Good Safety: Yes
Union exists - N
Layout of plant: Optimum
Process - Injection Molding
4 Manufacturing Capability Good
Product range - Bakelite Parts
Any major testing facility available - No
Vendor Performance Score Card : Jay Ushin Data
Assessment Date 24/10/2017
Vendor Name Swaran enterprises Vendor Code Location Badhshapur
1 MSIL Line Defects 2. T1 Line Defect 3. Rejection PPM at T1

14~15 15~16 16~17 13~14 14~15 15~16 14~15 15~16 16~17
Monthly Avrg 0 0 0 -0.01 Monthly Avrg 0.00 0.00 0.00 -6% Monthly Avrg 2148 3628 0 0.333
Total 0 Total 0
Monthly Avrg
Target
NA
2148
3628
14~150.00
15~160.00
13~140.00
16~170
0
15~16
14~15
10
20
30
Row 12 Row 13 Total Monthly Avrg
Remarks :- Remarks :- Quality Imp. By (%) Remarks :-
Delivery Imp. By (%)
4. Tier-2 Vendor - Internal Rejection (PPM) 5. No of Line Stoppages at T1

14~15 15~16 16~17 14~15 15~16 16~17
Monthly Avrg 13396 10307 8858 0.287 Nos 0 0 0 80% 0.547
M/s
Monthly Avrg Nos

13396
10307
8858
14~150
15~160
16~170
15~16
16~17
14~15
a b c
Monthly Avrg Nos
Remarks :- Remarks :-
COPY TO : MARUTI VENDOR ASSESSMENT (TIER II) - COUNTERMEASURE REP
RECEIVING DATE PLANNED
M/s Swaran EnterprisesNew Jail Road Vill.

VENDOR NAME Dhumaspur,Gurgaon-122101
PLANNING
PLANNING
PLANNING
CLUSTER NAME Jay ushin Ltd
TOTAL 0
AUDIT DATE 24th October 2017

RECEIVING DATE
VERIFICATION
VERIFICATION
VERIFICATION
AUDIT PART NAME Terminal Base (YE-3)
AUDIT PART NO. 0

TOTAL 0
DEADLINE FOR DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF

AUDIT POINT #VALUE!
SUBMISSION OF PLAN ACTUAL RESULT
SUB ITEM
ITEM NO. DESIRED IMPROVEMENT POINTS DETAIL OF IMPROVEMENT PLAN IN-CHARGE DATE
NO.
F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

SUB ITEM
NO.
F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

SUB ITEM
NO.
F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

SUB ITEM
NO.
F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

SUB ITEM
NO.
F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

TI VENDOR ASSESSMENT (TIER II) - COUNTERMEASURE REPORT
CHECKED APPROVED
RESULT OF VERIFICATION
F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

F003-4 QA/MT Ver. 4

Mace Audit Sheet

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mace Audit Sheet

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED

Issue Deptt. MACE Prepared Verified Approved

Vendor 1 Audit Date

2. Company Is Home Grown

6 4/ 6 0 2 1 14.Critical parts Management 50 4.Standards

13 4/ 4 0 0 2 11.Implementation 7.Supplier control

F003-3 QA/MT Ver. 5

Part Name Terminals

Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you define the procedure for Product development

Part Name Terminals

Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment

Part Name Terminals

Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you define following items related to initial production

Do you control process capability and defect rate during initial

Part Name Terminals

Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you define unexpected change (unusual) and planned

Definition and implementation of

1 Do you define and control initial part clearly? 2

Definition and control method

Part Name Terminals

Procedure to control standards

Do you clarify the department in charge of promoting quality

1 Education/ training procedure

Part Name Terminals

1 Education/ training procedure

Do you conduct quality audit to identify issues and properly

Part Name Terminals

Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you confirm if countermeasures are taken properly to

Do you define clearly what is abnormal situation and make

Handling when abnormal

Part Name Terminals

Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you have criteria to estimate the scope of suspected lot

Prevention of recurrence Do you reflect corrective action to improvement of process

After corrective action are taken, do you conduct on-site

Do you keep store material, work-in-process, finished

Part Name Terminals

Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you control material, work-in-process and finished product

Do you keep condition of production equipment's, jigs and

Part Name Terminals

Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you conduct daily/regularly check of production

１０． Do you confirm regularly the function of Pokayoke, automated

Do you calibrate regularly inspection equipment's and put the

Do you use easy expression (visualizer, onomatopoeia ,etc.)

Part Name Terminals

Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you keep operation instructions on the accessible place

Do you regularly monitored that each operator operates

Is it possible to judge OK/NG specifically by each check sheet

Part Name Terminals

Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you keep first-in first-out of finished products and work-in-

Do you control identification of non-confirming parts and parts

Part Name Terminals

Category Audit Area Concerning regulation Judgment

Do you make arrangements with customers about the

Do you have Special checks/Inspection for Maru A

Part Name Terminals