Retrofitting Design & Analysis Report

Retrofitting Design & Analysis Report
of
NEPAL ELECTION COMMISSION
At Sarlahi, JANAKPUR
MARCH 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. GENERAL STATEMENT: .................................................................................................................................. 2
2. SCOPE OF DESIGN: ........................................................................................................................................ 2
3. CODE BASIC SEISMIC ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................... 5
4. METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................. 5
5. ASSUMPTIONA AND LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................. 5
6. PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 6
7. BUILDING SITE LOCATION .............................................................................................................................. 6
8. BASIC STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ........................................................................................................................ 6
9. DESIGN CODE AND CRITERIA ......................................................................................................................... 6
10. MATERIAL SPECIFICATION USED ................................................................................................................. 7
11. ASSUMPTION IN LOADING AS SPECIFIED IN EXISTING AVAILABLE DRAWINGS & SITE VERIFICATION ...... 7
12. SEISMIC LOADS: ........................................................................................................................................... 7
13. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: .................................................................................................................... 9
14. STRUCTURAL NOTES: .................................................................................................................................. 9
A. GENERAL ................................................................................................................................................ 9
B. FOUNDATION .......................................................................................................................................... 9
C BACK FILLING ......................................................................................................................................... 9
D CONCRETE & REINFORCEING STEEL ..................................................................................................... 9
REFERENCES: .............................................................................................................................................. 10
ANNEXURE ....................................................................................................................................................... 11
Retrofitting Design & Pushover Analysis Report of NEC Sarlahi Branch

1
1. GENERAL STATEMENT:
The principle aim of the structural design is to prepare necessary data for the construction of the structure, which
shall possess adequate strength and stability during the action of all possible loads in its life span. The process
consists of integration of consideration of design regulation, local condition and functional need. The behaviors
of the structure in terms of stresses and strength have to be determined closer to the reality when subjected to
the possible actions The subject matter, such as, the properties and mechanics of the materials, analytical
methods, design techniques and production of the construction documents, studied in isolation to address in an
integral approach to arrive at the creation of the needful structure. This report summarizes structural analysis
and design of a building. In general context of the country, Nepal, the building is located in seismic zone V, with
the considerable medium denseness sand. According to the seismographs and risk zoning maps, the country
lies in a very high seismically active zone. Thus, the seismic structural design of structures is found to be very
essential for countries like Nepal. The structures need to be designed and detailed so as to counteract, the
internal forces induce due to the earth mass shaking in base of these structures. The design should ensure the
structure against stability, strength and serviceability with acceptable levels of seismic safety. Both code basic
seismic analysis, and performance based seismic analysis of the structure was made to ensure further building
safety.
This report includes qualitative earthquake vulnerability assessment and strengthening measures of the NIC
ASIA building at Aadarshnagar, Birgunj. The report describes the method and findings of the assessment. The
study was conducted at October 14, 2017. Recommendations are provided for improving seismic performance
of the assessed building. This report is based on the site visit, study of structural systems, limited number of field
exploration and prevailing practices of building construction in the region. All possible efforts have been made
to provide accurate and authoritative seismic vulnerability assessment of the building in the given circumstances
of information provided by the available client on the design and construction details of the building qualitative
field survey. So, the designer neither can make warranty, expressed or implied, nor assumes any responsibility
for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the statement made in this report in case the starting
information does not stand correct.
The building is assumed never to be examined under the seismic effect and thus the building model is analyzed
in IS load combination. The loads, stress, moments shown by the FEM analyzer after this analysis is there after
called as the "Demand" parameters for the building to be strengthened and retrofitted.
2. SCOPE OF DESIGN:
The three-staged process for seismic evaluation of buildings is depicted in Figure 1-1. in accordance with the
retrofitting requirements as per FEMA guidelines, as applicable, of compliant/non-compliant statements related
to structural, nonstructural and foundation conditions, shall be selected and completed in accordance with the
requirements for a Frist stage Evaluation. Potential deficiencies shall be summarized upon completion of the 1st
stage evaluation [Screening phase].
Deficiency-Only pointed out in 1st stage Evaluation, Second Stage Evaluation may be performed. For a
Deficiency-Only 2nd stage Evaluation, only the procedures associated with non-compliant checklist statements
need be completed. Potential deficiencies shall be summarized upon completion of the 2nd Stage Evaluation.
A Third stage evaluation shall be performed in accordance with the requirements for buildings or when the design
professional chooses to further evaluate buildings for which potential deficiencies were identified in Tier 1 or Tier
2. Potential deficiencies shall be 1st stage and 2nd stage will be summarized upon completion of the Last stage
[3rd stage] Evaluation.

2
The final report serves to communicate the results to the owner and record the process and assumptions used
to complete the evaluation. Each section should be carefully written in a manner that is understandable to its
intended audience. The extent of the final report may range from a letter to a detailed document. The final report
should include at least the following items:
1) Scope and Intent: a list of the tier(s) followed and level of investigation conducted;
2) Site and Building Data:
 General building description (number of stories and dimensions),
 Structural system description (framing, lateral load resisting system, floor and roof diaphragm
construction, basement, and foundation system),
 Non-structural element description (nonstructural elements that could interact with the structure and
affect seismic performance) Building type,
 Performance Level,
 Region of Seismicity,
 Soil Type,
 Building Occupancy, and
 Historic Significance;
3) List of Assumptions: material properties, site soil conditions;
4) Findings: list of deficiencies;
5) Recommendations: mitigation schemes or further evaluation;
6) Appendix: references, preliminary calculations.
The following scope of work has been defined to:

1) Conduct a visual assessment reconnaissance survey to determine the structural characteristic of the
existing building
2) Assess the seismic structural vulnerability of the buildings.
3) Prepare Retrofitting design drawings of existing buildings.
4) Compilation of report detailing procedures and presenting findings and recommendations for improving
its seismic resilience

3
Understand the Evaluation
Process
1) Collect Data and Visit Site

2) Determine Region of Seismicity
3) Determine Level of Performance
Benchmark Building? OR QUICK

1) Complete the Structural CHECKS
Checklist(s).
2) Complete the Foundation 1st Stage Screening
Checklist.
Phase
N Ye N
Deficiencies s
Further
o o
? Eval?
Ye
s
FULL BUILDING or DEFICIENCY-ONLY

EVALUATE Building using one of the ANALYSIS
following procedures:
1) Linear Static Procedure
2) Linear Dynamic Procedure
2nd Stage Evaluation
3) Special Procedure.
Phase
Comprehensive Investigation
(Nonlinear Analysis)
3rd Stage Detailed Evaluation
Building N Ye
Building
Complie o Deficiencies s
Does NOT
? Complies
Final Evaluation and

Report
Mitigate :- Final Retrofitting Design of

the Buildings and Reports

4
3. CODE BASIC SEISMIC ANALYSIS
Code basic seismic analysis is prescriptive measure, which is based on design basic earthquakes [DBE levels].
In this method, assumption is based on: The maximum considered earthquake [MCE levels] occurrences are
not so frequent; it would not be economically feasible to design the building so as to ensure that they remain
elastic and damage-free. Thus it is reliable to design the ductile structure and not to design damage free structure
during the major earthquake. The building has been designed as earthquake resistant design, i.e. building should
not be collapsed during major earthquake. The design shall ensure the structure against stability, strength and
serviceability with acceptable levels of seismic safety.
In case of earthquake analysis and load to be considered with their appropriate load combination, the more
stringent requirement among the listed codes NBC based load combination and IS Earthquake in the structural
design criteria for Commercial buildings has been used to check the performance and design. The analysis has
been based on IS 1893-2016 and RCC design has been based on IS 456-2000. Considering the requirements
of service and seismic loading the structure is prone to, detail structural analysis and design is carried out.
4. METHODOLOGY
The overall methodology for this study is summarized as follows.
1) Reconnaissance Survey of building structures is carried out.

2) Detail visual survey of the building is done which included:
a) Identification of strengths and deficiencies according to the educated guess.
b) Identification of structural vulnerability factors: Plan and vertical irregularities, load path,
configuration problems, lateral force resisting system, material deterioration etc.
3) Identification of building structural systems and its probable design history is made using proper
judgment.
4) Analysis and design stresses of the structural elements are carried out based on Finite Element software
with proper material input parameters.
5) Tensile and shear stresses in frames are taken from the software.
6) Foundation width is checked for bearing and four Corner pressure.
7) Inter-Storey drift and eccentricity are also checked from the FEM Model.
8) Demand and capacity of the structure calculated for with the help of Pushover Analysis.
9) Structural elements such as Existing Footing, Existing column, New Column and New Shear wall are
strengthened on the basis of demand for DBE analysis as per IS load combination.
10) Slab deflection is also checked and is made under the permissible range.
11) Findings and conclusions are postulated for improving the seismic performance of the building.
5. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

The survey is carried mainly by visual inspection with limited resources. Few stripped plasters, couple of Column
beam joints and some of the wall were observed with some major cracks and no any destructive tests considers
in the overall building structure. No material testing is conducted to determine the material properties of building
materials. Structural or any as-built drawings of the surveyed building are available. Since building is covered
with plaster work, it is difficult to make firm decision on material quality, state of their deterioration and overall
structural system with limited field exploration. In such cases educated guess is made to simulate the real

5
scenario. Similarly, for existing beam and column minimum area of rebar is taken as an assumption for the
further calculation.
6. PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC ANALYSIS

Performance based seismic analysis gives a clear insight about the building response, and the targeted level of
building performances, like, life-safety and Collapse preventions using Pushover analysis. The performance
based analysis of the building was performed after assigning nonlinear hinges as per ASCE41 code. The
performance curve and FEMA 310 and 356 retrofitting procedure are adopted whose calculation and comparison
charts are attached in Annex of this report.
7. BUILDING SITE LOCATION

The purpose of this report is to summarize analysis and Performance evaluation and retrofitting design of the
existing NEC Sarlahi branch building at Sarlahi. This project includes construction of three story building. NEC
Sarlahi Branch building is located in Sarlahi on Mangsir, 2074 B.S. The shape of the building is “Rectangular” in
shape and the plinth area is 146.428sqm. The building consists of infill wall frame structure with 3.5 story. The
wall thickness is 0.25m on ground floor and on floor above. Joint mortar consists of cement mortar and the floor
type is R.C.C.
8. BASIC STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

Basic structural system of the building is specially designed Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame. The floor
diaphragms of the building are of reinforced concrete solid slab of 125 mm thick. The existing sizes of existing
column is 350mm x 350mm, and the existing sizes of beam is 250mm x 350mm. The Existing foundation system
of the building is isolated foundation with one level of tie beam at plinth level only. The Existing Sizes of plinth
beam is 250x300 mm.
All the Columns are jacketing with 100mm thick concrete resulting Existing Column of size 550mm x 550mm in
order to increase the performance and pass the FEMA guidelines for this building.
Shape of Building- Rectangular Shape
 Plinth Area- 146.428Sqm.
 Building Storey- Three and a half
 Building Type- RCC frame with infill Brick Masonry
 Wall Thickness- 0.25 m in ground floor and floors above
 Joint Mortar-Cement Mortar
 Floor Type- R.C.C
 Presence of movable black boards
 Foundation- Refer drawing
 Presence of - Lintel Band-No
 -Intermediate Band - No
 -Plinth Beam – Yes
 Double Tie beam for Foundation - No
9. DESIGN CODE AND CRITERIA

The building is designed to satisfy Indian code which is more stringent than Nepal Building code for design basic
earthquake [DBE] level and IS456-2000 for RCC design criteria for this commercial building. Both the Code
basic and the performance based [Pushover] analysis of the building was made. ASCE41 non-linear hinges is
used in performance based analysis.

6
Life safety occupancy level of seismic performance of the building is looked into the design, at design basic plus
maximum credible earthquake level. The drifts, demand to capacity ratio, and deflections are maintained within
the requirement of the design codes.
10. MATERIAL SPECIFICATION USED

Properties of used Material
Cement Masonry
Gamma, brick 20 KN/m3
Poisson's ratio 0.2
Young's modulus 2200 MPa
PCC
Gamma, PCC (M10) 23.5 KN/m3
Gamma, RCC (M15) 23.5 KN/m3
Poisson's ratio 0.17
Young's modulus 21710 MPa
53 or 43 Grade Ordinary Portland Cement for the main structural elements
Reinforce Steel: TMT-steel of Fe500 N/mm2
Structural Steel: Fe 250
Bricks: Class 'A' bricks with compressive
strength of 10 kN/m2
Sand: Specification as per IS Code
Aggregate: Specification as per IS Code
M20 for foundations, and M25 for all structural elements, beams, columns and slabs. Fe500 (for both
longitudinal and shear reinforcement)
11. ASSUMPTION IN LOADING AS SPECIFIED IN EXISTING AVAILABLE

DRAWINGS & SITE VERIFICATION
Dead Load:
Comprises of all the self-weight of all the components of the building each floor wise
Floor finish: =0.98 KN/m2 As per IS 875-Part1-1987
Unit weight of Brick Masonry wall = 20 KN/m3 As per IS 875-Part1-1987
Unit weight of Materials: Reinforced Concrete = 24.5 KN/m3 As per IS 875-Part1-1987
Live Load: As per IS 875- Part 2
Live load = 3.0kN/m2 for Officerooms

For staircases, corridors and passages = 4.0 KN/m2
Seismic Load: As per the recommendation and guide lines provided in IS 875-Part 2 for Seismic loading.
12. SEISMIC LOADS:

Seismic load on the building is calculated automatically and distribute to each floor from software ETABS2016
Version 3.0 and only seismic coefficient is inputted to the software as calculated before. The seismic
coefficient is calculated as follows:

7
The design base shear (Vb) is distributed along the height of the building as per IS1893-2016 by the following
expression:
Vb = Ah W…………………………………….……………..Eqn (1)
And
𝑍∗𝐼∗𝑆𝑎
𝐴ℎ = ……………………………………………Eqn(2)
2∗𝑅∗𝑔
where
Ah = Base Shear Coefficient,
V = total design lateral force or shear at the base of the structure (kN)
w, and w, = the portion of the total effective seismic weight of the structure (W) located or assigned to Level
Z =Seismic Zoning Coefficient
I = Importance factor related to the structure
R = Response Reduction factor of Building Photo: 2 Earthquake definition as per IS1893-2016
Sa/g = Spectral acceleration of Soil for the specified Time period of structures

8
13. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS:
1) The Existing Columns does not meet the Strong Column – weak beam concept neither it meets the Life
safety inter story drift nor it meets Collapse prevention [CP] inter Storey drift in crack sections.
2) Also, the Performance of the building under Pushover does not meet as there are hinge formation at the
Plinth level in the CP level.
3) In order to cope with this requirement, all the columns are jacketed with new column sections.
4) Also, Existing foundation is also jacketed in order to cope the additional jacketing section and rebar from
footings.
5) Since, no beams are casted, so all the beams will be casted as per rebar shown in the DBE analysis of the
buildings.
14. STRUCTURAL NOTES:

A. GENERAL
1. Read structural drawings in conjunction with architectural, sanitary & electrical drawings, and report nay
discrepancies to the consultant prior to the fabrication or construction. Any conflict between the specifications,
site condition & drawings shall be likewise reported prior to execution.
2. Contractors shall be responsible for checking field dimension & site conditions prior to execution of the work.
3. No measurement shall be directly taken from the print; written dimension shall be followed.
4. All dimensions are in millimeter unless noted otherwise.
5. The contractor shall start the work from the lower level grounds toward the top incase the ground profile is
different.
B. FOUNDATION
1. Foundation shall be on undisturbed soil. The foundation is not allowed to lie on fill up ground or base unless
otherwise specified. The contractor shall inform to the consultant for checking the foundation base after
excavation before placing lean concrete. The foundation depth given in the structural drawings is from the lowest
ground level and from the original soil.
2. The line slope between the adjacent excavations for footing or along the steeped footing shall not exceed a rise
1 in a run of 2.
3. Incase the footing is on the fill up ground, the contractor shall fill the ground or pit by the dry mixtures of stone
dust and aggregate in the specified ratio in layers by layers (not to exceed 150 mm before compaction) achieving
95% compaction in relation to undisturbed soil with well compaction to achieve hard bed upto the soffits of the
footing concrete level or as directed.
4. Placing of foundation concrete shall be done as soon as excavations have been completed, well compacted,
leveled & written approved by the consultant.
5. The contractor shall take all the responsibility for full protection, pumping water if occur while doing excavation
until completion of the foundation work.
6. The adjacent structure, if existing any, shall be fully protected by shoring while digging and laying of foundation.
C BACK FILLING
1. Backfill to the foundation pit shall be done simultaneously on both sides.
2. Back filling shall be done in layers of not more than 150 mm. Each layer being properly compacted to at least
95% modified proctor density.
D CONCRETE & REINFORCEING STEEL

1. Cast in situ concrete shall have minimum 28 days compressive cube strength of 20 N/mm2 as mentioned for all
the structural members.
2. Cement for the reinforced concrete works shall be ordinary Portland cement comply to IS Code 269-1967 or
approve relevant standards.
9
3. Reinforcing steel shall be new hot rolled deformed bars having minimum yield strength of 500 N/mm 2 &
Conforming to IS 1786:1979 or IS 1139:1966.
4. Minimum reinforcing laps shall be in accordance with IS13920 & but not less than as specified on structural
drawings.
5. Cover to main reinforcing steel shall be in accordance with IS456 & as specified.
CLEAR COVER OF CONCRETE
Beam 25 mm
Column 40 mm
Footing 75 mm
6. Provide corner bars to match horizontal reinforcing steel in slab.

7. Plumbing, slots, holes around pipes ducts or other items which pass through concrete slab or wall shall be filled
& patched to the same depths as the slab or wall.
8. Bar bending schedule shall be approved by the consultant before cutting, bending and binding and verified at site
after placing in position prior to pour concrete.
9. Unless otherwise indicated, vertical construction joints shall be roughened.
10. The contractor shall strictly follow the seismic details attached in the drawings package for placing reinforcement
in all beams and column joints, lap location and stirrups, hooks etc during execution.
REFERENCES:
1. IS875 part 1, Code for design loads in building and structure
2. IS 875 part 2, Code for design Imposed loads in building
3. IS 1893-2016, Code of practice for design of Seismic Resistant Concrete structures.
4. ASCE41, for assigning deformation controlled non –linear hinges for RCC Frames.
5. IS800-1984 Code for practice for general construction in steel
6. Design of Reinforced Concrete Structure – IS456:2000
7. Ductility design for earthquake resistant structure IS13920
8. Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings (FEMA 310)
9. Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings (FEMA 356)
10. IIT, Madras – Handbook on Seismic Retrofit of Buildings, 2010.

10
ANNEXURE

11
CALCULATION OF EQUV. SECTION FOR MASONRY INFILL IN-PLANE AS PER IS 1893-2016 CL 7.9
Finite element programs such as FEM may be useful in analyzing masonry infills with openings. The elastic
in-plane stiffness of a solid unreinforced masonry infill panel prior to cracking shall be represented with an
equivalent diagonal compression strut of width, a, given by following Equation. The equivalent strut shall have
the same thickness and modulus of elasticity as the infill panel it represents
40.986 inch 1.041 m OK
where:
0.0159
λ1= Coefficient used to determine equivalent width of infill strut

h col = Column height between centerlines of beams, inch = 62.99212598 1.600 m
h inf = Height of infill panel, inch = 47.24409449 1.200 m
2
fck = New Concrete Grade 20 N/mm
2
E fe = Expected modulus of elasticity of Concrete,M20, ksi 3243.142 22360679.8 KN/m
2
f b = Compressive strength of Class A bricks as per NBC109:1994 15 N/mm
2
f mo = Comp. strength of H1 mortar type for Seismic Zone V as per NBC109:1994 15 N/mm
0.64 0.36 2
fme = Allowable Compressibe strength of Brick masonry=0.433f b f mo 6495 KN/m
2
E me = Expected modulus of elasticity of infill brick wall, ksi=550f me 518.111 3572250 KN/m
b co l = width of infill wall 9.843 0.250 m
dco l = depth of infill wall 40.984 1.041 m
4 4
I col = Moment of inertia of column, inch . 56464.57774 0.02350233 m
L inf = Length of infill panel, inch 225.984 5.740 m
r inf = Diagonal length of infill panel, inch 234.599 5.959 m
t inf = Thickness of infill panel and equivalent strut, inch 9.843 0.250 m
θ= Angle whose tangent is the infill height to length aspect ratio, radians 0.227 radians
For noncomposite infill panels, only the wythes in full contact with the frame elements shall be considered when
computing in-plane stiffness unless positive anchorage capable of transmitting in-plane forces from frame
members to all masonry wythes is provided on all sides of the walls. Stiffness of cracked unreinforced masonry
infill panels shall be represented with equivalent struts; the strut properties shall be determined from analysis that
consider the nonlinear behavior of the infilled frame system after masonry is cracked. The equivalent compression
strut analogy shall be used to represent the elastic stiffness of a perforated unreinforced masonry infill panel; the
equivalent strut properties shall be determined from stress analysis of infill walls with representative opening patterns
Stiffnesses for existing and new infills shall be assumed to be the same
brick wall
Length of Breadth of Adopted
S. No Location of wall height of wall Depth of bracing Remarls unit wt
wall wall-bracing Depth
KN/m
A-A/1-2, A-A/2-3, B-B/1-2,B-
1
B/2-3, C-C/1-2, C-C/2-3 5.740 1.600 0.250 1.041 1.050 Type-1 5.250
1-1/A-B,1-1/C-D,2-2/A-B,2-
2
2/C-D,3-3/A-B,3-3/C-D 4.420 1.600 0.250 0.715 0.750 Type-2 3.750
3 1-1/B-C, 2-2/B-C, 3-3/B-C 3.200 1.600 0.250 0.464 0.500 Type-3 2.500
Page 1 of 3
X
A B C D
40'-8"
14'-6" 10'-6" 14'-6"
1'-2" 3'-8" 6'-0" 3'-8" 3'-10" 4'-0" 3'-10" 3'-8" 6'-0" 3'-8" 1'-2" 3'-0" 2'-0"
3'-4" 1'-2"
1'-2"
1 1
W1 W W1
4'-4"
NASU
5'-0"
W2
BALCONY
(13'-9"X11'-8")
6'-0"
W1
18'-10"
18'-10"
3'-10"
D2
4'-4"
STORE UP
3'-0"
4'-4"
W4 MEETING ROOM
(10'-5"X4'-0") D3
(13'-9"X18'-1")
D1
3'-0"
1'-2" 2'-7"
D2
2'-6"
38'-3"
38'-3"
2 2
3'-3"
1'-1"
COMPUTER D2 D1
(14'-7"X10'-0")
7'-10"
5'-0"
W2 OFFICER
5'-0"
W2
5'-3" 5'-3"
4'-0"
18'-3"
18'-3"
3'-9"
D2 DISTRICT ELECTION
OFFICER
D3 (13'-9"X18'-8")
D3
ACCOUNTANT W2
5'-0"
W2
5'-0"
(14'-7"X10'-1") C.TOILET ATT.TOILET
6'-9"
(4'-6"X8'-0") (5'-4"X8'-0")
1'-2"2'-1"
W1 W4 W4 W1
3'-3"
3
1'-2" 3'-8" 6'-0" 3'-8" 1'-2"9" 3'-0" 1'-10" 3'-0" 9" 4'-9" 6" 6'-0" 6" 4'-9" 2'-3"
14'-6" 10'-6" 14'-6"
40'-8"
A B C D
X
FIRST FLOOR PLAN

AREA:1575.56 SQ.FT
2 2
Young modulus of Brick Masonry, Em, KN/m = 3572250 KN/m
2
Unit weight of Brick Masonry, ϒbw= 20.000 KN/m
Poission Ratio of Bric kMasonry = 0.200
2
Set Tension limit of Brick Masonry struct = 0.000 KN/m
Set M22 & M33 at joint to = 0.000 KNm
DEDUCTION OF MASS FOR IN-FILL WALLS

UDL weight to be
Unit Weight
TYPE OF Adopted Breadth of deducted in
S. No of wall,
WALL Depth wall-bracing 3 DEAD LOAD
KN/m
Case
1 Type-1 1.050 0.250 20 -5.250
2 Type-2 0.750 0.250 21 -3.750
3 Type-3 0.500 0.250 22 -2.500
Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3
TABLE: Centers of Mass and Rigidity
Center of mass, Center of Length of
Diap Mass Y, m Rigidity, m Building Eccentricity between CM & CR ∆E=
Story Mass X kg √Ex2+Ey
hm. kg Along Along Y,
XCM, m YCM, m 2
XCR, m YCR, m X, m m Ex, m Ey, m Ex [%] Ey [%] X- Dir Y- Dir
OFFICE BUILDING
SFL D1 273175.92 273175.92 15.71 4.44 15.83 5.32 32.65 10.80 0.119 0.878 0.4% 8.1% OK Ecc. 5% 0.886
GFL D1 480481.18 480481.18 15.44 4.51 15.68 5.13 33.65 10.80 0.240 0.613 0.7% 5.7% OK Ecc. 5% 0.658
EQ+X---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section before jacketting
Story Elevation FL Height Location X-Dir Max Y-Dir Max Inter Story Drift [ in ratio] Drift , % Result
m m mm mm X-Dir Max
Top Slab 11.950 3.200 Top 21.026 0.589 6.669 H/ 480 0.2084% Not OK
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 14.357 0.781 7.198 H/ 445 0.2249% Not OK
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 7.159 0.629 5.524 H/ 579 0.1726% OK LS
Plinth TB 2.350 1.600 Top 1.635 0.552 1.444 H/ 1108 0.0903% OK LS
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.191 0.012 0.191 H/ 3927 0.0255% OK LS
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
EQ+Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section before jacketting
m m mm mm Y-Dir Max
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 0.714 7.243 6.116 H/ 523 0.1911% OK LS
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.027 0.231 0.231 H/ 3247 0.0308% OK LS
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
EQ-X---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section before jacketting
m m mm mm X-Dir Max
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 10.907 3.780 9.536 H/ 336 0.2980% Not OK
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.139 0.028 0.139 H/ 5396 0.0185% OK LS
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
EQ-Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section before jacketting
m m mm mm Y-Dir Max
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.048 0.246 0.246 H/ 3049 0.0328% OK LS
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
Resp+X---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section
m m mm mm X-Dir Max
Top Slab 11.950 3.200 Top 15.522 11.320 3.54 H/ 904 0.1106% OK LS
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 11.982 9.112 5.609 H/ 571 0.1753% OK LS
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 6.373 4.857 5.068 H/ 631 0.1584% OK LS
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.135 0.101 0.135 H/ 5556 0.0180% OK LS
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
Resp+Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section

m m mm mm Y-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 10.386 12.824 6.132 H/ 522 0.1916% OK LS
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 5.456 6.692 5.820 H/ 550 0.1819% OK LS
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.120 0.190 0.190 H/ 3947 0.0253% OK LS
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
Note:
Drift 0.1% -- Passed in Immediate Occupancy limit
Drift 0.2%-- Passed in Life Safety limit
Drift 0.4%-- Passed in Collapse Prevention limit
EQ+X---> Max Inter Story Drift for Crack Section before jacketting
m m mm mm X-Dir Max
Top Slab 11.950 3.200 Top 32.650 0.889 10.419 H/ 307 0.3256% OK CP
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 22.231 1.431 11.513 H/ 278 0.3598% OK CP
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 10.718 0.706 7.853 H/ 407 0.2454% OK CP
Plinth TB 2.350 1.600 Top 2.865 0.820 2.64 H/ 606 0.1650% OK CP
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.225 0.007 0.225 H/ 3333 0.0300% OK CP
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
EQ+Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Crack Section before jacketting
m m mm mm Y-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 1.849 21.755 11.404 H/ 281 0.3564% OK CP
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 1.087 10.351 8.659 H/ 370 0.2706% OK CP
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.030 0.269 0.269 H/ 2788 0.0359% OK CP
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
EQ-X---> Max Inter Story Drift for Crack Section before jacketting
m m mm mm X-Dir Max
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.164 0.029 0.164 H/ 4573 0.0219% OK CP
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
EQ-Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Crack Section before jacketting
m m mm mm Y-Dir Max
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.048 0.285 0.285 H/ 2632 0.0380% OK CP
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
Resp+X---> Max Inter Story Drift for Crack Section before jacketting
m m mm mm X-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 14.474 10.629 7.049 H/ 454 0.2203% OK CP
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 7.425 5.306 5.549 H/ 577 0.1734% OK CP
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.125 0.091 0.124999999 H/ 6000 0.0167% OK CP
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
Resp+Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Crack Section before jacketting
m m mm mm Y-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 11.978 15.344 7.240 H/ 442 0.2263% OK CP
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 6.144 8.104 6.979 H/ 459 0.2181% OK CP
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.122 0.170 0.170 H/ 4412 0.0227% OK CP
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
Note:
→Crack Section used are I22=I33=0.35 for beams, I22=I33=0.7 for Columns & Walls F11=F22= 0.7
→It is called that if the drift is within 0.5%, the building should be within Immediate Occupancy use
→If the drift is within 1 ~2%, the building should be within Life safety
→If the drift is within 2 ~4%, the building should be within Collapse prevention
EQ+X---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section after Jacketting
m m mm mm X-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 6.935 0.348 3.274 H/ 977 0.1023% OK LS
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 3.661 0.269 2.609 H/ 1227 0.0815% OK LS
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.108 0.005 0.108 H/ 6944 0.0144% OK LS
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
EQ+Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section after Jacketting
m m mm mm Y-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 0.560 7.355 3.617 H/ 885 0.1130% OK LS
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 0.423 3.738 2.856 H/ 1120 0.0893% OK LS
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.006 0.119 0.119 H/ 6303 0.0159% OK LS
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
EQ-X---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section after Jacketting
m m mm mm X-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 9.606 2.969 4.77 H/ 671 0.1491% OK LS
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 4.836 1.382 3.927 H/ 815 0.1227% OK LS
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.096 0.019 0.096 H/ 7813 0.0128% OK LS
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
EQ-Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section after Jacketting
m m mm mm Y-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 3.385 10.289 5.076 H/ 630 0.1586% OK LS
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 1.660 5.213 4.370 H/ 732 0.1366% OK LS
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.029 0.127 0.127 H/ 5906 0.0169% OK LS
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
Resp+X---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section after Jacketting
m m mm mm X-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 8.294 4.864 3.874 H/ 826 0.1211% OK LS
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 4.420 2.569 3.335 H/ 960 0.1042% OK LS
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.094 0.049 0.094 H/ 7979 0.0125% OK LS
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
Resp+Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section after Jacketting
m m mm mm Y-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 6.017 10.116 4.693 H/ 682 0.1467% OK LS
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 3.172 5.423 4.517 H/ 708 0.1412% OK LS
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.072 0.137 0.137 H/ 5474 0.0183% OK LS
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
Note:
Drift 0.1% -- Passed in Immediate Occupancy limit
Drift 0.2%-- Passed in Life Safety limit
Drift 0.4%-- Passed in Collapse Prevention limit
EQ+X---> Max Inter Story Drift for Crack Section after Jacketting
m m mm mm X-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 11.208 0.482 5.639 H/ 567 0.1762% OK CP
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 5.569 0.318 3.938 H/ 813 0.1231% OK CP
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.127 0.006 0.127 H/ 5906 0.0169% OK CP
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
EQ+Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Crack Section after Jacketting
m m mm mm Y-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 0.936 11.672 6.109 H/ 524 0.1909% OK CP
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 0.597 5.563 4.294 H/ 745 0.1342% OK CP
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.008 0.138 0.138 H/ 5435 0.0184% OK CP
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
EQ-X---> Max Inter Story Drift for Crack Section after Jacketting
m m mm mm X-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 15.662 4.854 8.242 H/ 388 0.2576% OK CP
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 7.420 2.129 5.986 H/ 535 0.1871% OK CP
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.105 0.021 0.105 H/ 7143 0.0140% OK CP
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
EQ-Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Crack Section after Jacketting
m m mm mm Y-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 5.600 16.414 8.606 H/ 372 0.2689% OK CP
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 2.568 7.808 6.604 H/ 485 0.2064% OK CP
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.031 0.146 0.146 H/ 5137 0.0195% OK CP
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
Resp+X---> Max Inter Story Drift for Crack Section after Jacketting
m m mm mm X-Dir Max
Top Slab 11.950 3.200 Top 15.552 7.652 4.302H/ 744 0.1344% OK CP
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 11.250 6.604 5.632H/ 568 0.1760% OK CP
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 5.618 3.272 4.063 H/ 788 0.1270% OK CP
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.097 0.050 0.096999999 H/ 7732 0.0129% OK CP
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
Resp+Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Crack Section after Jacketting
m m mm mm Y-Dir Max
FF Slab 8.750 3.200 Top 8.021 12.982 6.458 H/ 496 0.2018% OK CP
GFSlab 5.550 3.200 Top 3.964 6.524 5.436 H/ 589 0.1699% OK CP
LTB 0.750 0.750 Top 0.083 0.128 0.128 H/ 5859 0.0171% OK CP
Base 0.000 0.000 0.000
Note:
→Crack Section used are I22=I33=0.35 for beams, I22=I33=0.7 for Columns & Walls F11=F22= 0.7
→It is called that if the drift is within 0.5%, the building should be within Immediate Occupancy use
→If the drift is within 1 ~2%, the building should be within Life safety
→If the drift is within 2 ~4%, the building should be within Collapse prevention
DRIFT CALCULATIONS BEFORE JACKETING
LOCAL CODE: IS1893:2016-DBE Analysis
Story Elevation EQ+X EQ-X EQ+Y EQ-Y RespX RespY
m X X Y Y X Y
Top Slab 11.950 0.208% 0.266% 0.222% 0.315% 0.111% 0.151%
FF Slab 8.750 0.225% 0.351% 0.239% 0.353% 0.175% 0.192%
GFSlab 5.550 0.173% 0.298% 0.191% 0.300% 0.158% 0.182%
Plinth TB 2.350 0.090% 0.077% 0.056% 0.048% 0.073% 0.043%
LTB 0.750 0.025% 0.019% 0.031% 0.033% 0.018% 0.025%
Base 0.000
DRIFT CALCULATIONS AFTER JACKETING

m X X Y Y X Y
Top Slab 11.950 0.103% 0.121% 0.097% 0.136% 0.086% 0.111%
FF Slab 8.750 0.102% 0.149% 0.113% 0.159% 0.121% 0.147%
GFSlab 5.550 0.082% 0.123% 0.089% 0.137% 0.104% 0.141%
Plinth TB 2.350 0.059% 0.051% 0.048% 0.045% 0.062% 0.048%
LTB 0.750 0.014% 0.013% 0.016% 0.017% 0.013% 0.018%
Base 0.000
DRIFT CALCULATIONS BEFORE JACKETING USING CRACK SECTIONS

m X X Y Y X Y
Top Slab 11.950 0.326% 0.431% 0.352% 0.503% 0.143% 0.160%
FF Slab 8.750 0.360% 0.564% 0.356% 0.542% 0.220% 0.226%
GFSlab 5.550 0.245% 0.435% 0.271% 0.437% 0.173% 0.218%
Plinth TB 2.350 0.165% 0.144% 0.089% 0.075% 0.109% 0.060%
LTB 0.750 0.030% 0.022% 0.036% 0.038% 0.017% 0.023%
Base 0.000
DRIFT CALCULATIONS AFTER JACKETING USING CRACK SECTIONS
m X X Y Y X Y
Top Slab 11.950 0.182% 0.219% 0.179% 0.248% 0.134% 0.170%
FF Slab 8.750 0.176% 0.258% 0.191% 0.269% 0.176% 0.202%
GFSlab 5.550 0.123% 0.187% 0.134% 0.206% 0.127% 0.170%
Plinth TB 2.350 0.094% 0.083% 0.071% 0.066% 0.091% 0.060%
LTB 0.750 0.017% 0.014% 0.018% 0.019% 0.013% 0.017%
Base 0.000
Note: Color indicate Story fails in Life Safety [ Inter-storey drift]

Color indicate Story fails in Collapse Prevention [ Inter-storey drift]
ETABS 2016 16.2.0 License #*17UCDTVSK6G74RE
Pushover Curve - Base Shear vs Monitored Displacement

Summary Description
This is the base shear vs monitored displacement data for a pushover analysis.
Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push+X Plot Type V vs Displ
Plot
Tabulated Plot Coordinates
Capacity Curve Coordinates (Part 1 of 2)

Step Monitored Displ Base Force A-B B-C C-D D-E >E A-IO IO-LS LS-CP
mm kN
0 0 0 1744 0 0 0 0 1744 0 0
1 -21.656 1927.4996 1744 0 0 0 0 1744 0 0
2 -36.307 3171.3073 1608 136 0 0 0 1744 0 0
Election Commission Office-Sarlahi Revised Pushover Analysis.EDB Page 1 of 2

mm kN
3 -36.311 3171.3844 1608 136 0 0 0 1744 0 0
4 -36.311 3171.3848 1608 136 0 0 0 1744 0 0
5 -36.316 3171.6607 1604 140 0 0 0 1744 0 0
6 -36.316 3171.6611 1604 140 0 0 0 1744 0 0
7 -36.321 3171.9913 1604 140 0 0 0 1744 0 0
8 -36.326 3172.4084 1604 140 0 0 0 1744 0 0
9 -36.331 3172.7503 1604 140 0 0 0 1744 0 0
10 -38.118 3307.9689 1576 168 0 0 0 1744 0 0
11 -38.123 3307.2033 1576 168 0 0 0 1744 0 0
12 -38.127 3307.2198 1576 168 0 0 0 1744 0 0
13 -43.118 3652.228 1504 240 0 0 0 1744 0 0
14 -43.123 3651.7056 1504 240 0 0 0 1744 0 0
15 -44.275 3726.6745 1492 252 0 0 0 1744 0 0
16 -44.28 3726.2857 1492 252 0 0 0 1744 0 0
17 -44.281 3726.3547 1492 252 0 0 0 1744 0 0
18 -44.286 3726.4345 1492 252 0 0 0 1744 0 0
19 -44.329 3729.1966 1492 252 0 0 0 1744 0 0
20 -44.333 3729.3702 1492 252 0 0 0 1744 0 0
21 -44.516 3741.1038 1492 252 0 0 0 1744 0 0
22 -44.515 3740.2368 1492 252 0 0 0 1744 0 0

>CP Total Hinges
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744


Summary Description
Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push+Y Plot Type V vs Displ
Plot

mm kN
0 0 0 1744 0 0 0 0 1744 0 0
1 2.557 2055.4577 1740 4 0 0 0 1744 0 0
2 5.7 3979.1414 1540 204 0 0 0 1728 0 0

mm kN
3 5.846 4011.7697 1528 216 0 0 0 1728 0 0
4 6.115 4136.6928 1528 216 0 0 0 1728 0 0
5 6.129 4136.258 1528 216 0 0 0 1728 0 0
6 6.188 4161.0948 1528 216 0 0 0 1728 0 0
7 6.166 4158.1018 1528 216 0 0 0 1728 0 0
8 6.167 4143.1829 1528 216 0 0 0 1728 0 0
9 6.166 4157.8814 1528 216 0 0 0 1728 0 0
10 1.715 575.5164 1528 216 0 0 0 1728 0 0

>CP Total Hinges
0 1744
0 1744
16 1744
16 1744
16 1744
16 1744
16 1744
16 1744
16 1744
16 1744
16 1744


Summary Description
Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push-X Plot Type V vs Displ
Plot

mm kN
0 0 0 1744 0 0 0 0 1744 0 0
1 20.913 1865.8407 1740 4 0 0 0 1744 0 0
2 36.054 3158.3398 1624 120 0 0 0 1744 0 0

mm kN
3 36.059 3158.4559 1620 124 0 0 0 1744 0 0
4 36.926 3225.2063 1596 148 0 0 0 1744 0 0
5 36.931 3225.2033 1596 148 0 0 0 1744 0 0
6 36.936 3225.4553 1596 148 0 0 0 1744 0 0
7 36.936 3225.4557 1596 148 0 0 0 1744 0 0
8 36.941 3225.7741 1596 148 0 0 0 1744 0 0
9 38.836 3367.6475 1572 172 0 0 0 1744 0 0
10 38.842 3366.7161 1572 172 0 0 0 1744 0 0
11 43.347 3677.4148 1496 248 0 0 0 1744 0 0

>CP Total Hinges
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744
0 1744


Summary Description
Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push-Y Plot Type V vs Displ
Plot

mm kN
0 0 0 1744 0 0 0 0 1744 0 0
1 -1.89 1514.4788 1744 0 0 0 0 1744 0 0
2 -4.753 3586.1028 1600 144 0 0 0 1740 0 0

mm kN
3 -4.758 3587.8559 1600 144 0 0 0 1740 0 0
4 -4.861 3650.3759 1596 148 0 0 0 1736 0 0
5 -4.861 3667.2445 1596 148 0 0 0 1736 0 0
6 -4.861 3667.2455 1596 148 0 0 0 1736 0 0
7 -4.861 3667.2487 1596 148 0 0 0 1736 0 0
8 -4.866 3669.7211 1596 148 0 0 0 1736 0 0
9 -5.269 3862.1331 1556 188 0 0 0 1736 0 0

>CP Total Hinges
0 1744
0 1744
4 1744
4 1744
8 1744
8 1744
8 1744
8 1744
8 1744
8 1744

Pushover Curve - NTC 2008 Target Displacement

Summary Description
This is the data for an NTC 2008 target displacement pushover analysis.
General Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push+X Plot Type NTC 2008 Target Displ
Demand Spectrum Input Data
Source NTC 2008 ag/g 0.1972
Spectrum Type Design Horizontal F0 2.4438
Soil Type B Tc* 0.333 sec
Topography Type T1 h/H 1
Inherent Damping 0.05 q 1
Pushover Plot
Target Displacement Results
Displacement, dt 42.625 mm Shear at dt 3618.1421 kN
Calculated Parameters
Fbu* 0.568 T* 0.441 sec
Fy* 0.535 Se(T*) 0.578
dy* 26.016 mm qu 1.081116

det* 27.923 mm Gamma 1.522431
dt* 27.998 mm Tc 0.457 sec

Capacity Curve Coordinates
Sd Sa Period
mm g sec
0 0 0.441
14.224 0.294592 0.441
23.848 0.48372 0.445
23.851 0.483721 0.446
23.851 0.483721 0.446
23.854 0.483759 0.446
23.854 0.483759 0.446
23.857 0.483806 0.446
23.861 0.483868 0.446
23.864 0.483918 0.446
25.037 0.504362 0.447
25.041 0.504238 0.447
25.044 0.504234 0.447
28.322 0.554598 0.453
28.325 0.554516 0.453
29.082 0.565759 0.455
29.085 0.565654 0.455
29.086 0.565664 0.455
29.089 0.565668 0.455
29.117 0.566067 0.455
29.12 0.566082 0.455
29.24 0.567665 0.455


Summary Description
General Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push+Y Plot Type NTC 2008 Target Displ
Pushover Plot
Displacement, dt -4.637 mm Shear at dt 0 kN
Fbu* 0.637 T* 0.445 sec
Fy* 0.587 Se(T*) 0.578
dy* 30.51 mm

det* 28.42 mm Gamma -0.16317
dt* 28.42 mm Tc 0.457 sec

Sd Sa Period
mm g sec
0 0 0.445
15.67 0.318857 0.445
34.93 0.609848 0.48
35.828 0.616409 0.484
37.478 0.633501 0.488
37.564 0.633629 0.489
37.924 0.637188 0.489


Summary Description
General Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push-X Plot Type NTC 2008 Target Displ
Pushover Plot
Displacement, dt 42.467 mm Shear at dt 3616.726 kN
Fbu* 0.56 T* 0.44 sec
Fy* 0.532 Se(T*) 0.578
dy* 25.705 mm qu 1.087079

det* 27.783 mm Gamma 1.523833
dt* 27.869 mm Tc 0.457 sec

Sd Sa Period
mm g sec
0 0 0.44
13.724 0.285665 0.44
23.66 0.484825 0.443
23.663 0.484844 0.443
24.233 0.494869 0.444
24.236 0.494863 0.444
24.239 0.4949 0.444
24.239 0.4949 0.444
24.242 0.494947 0.444
25.486 0.515913 0.446
25.489 0.515777 0.446
28.446 0.560388 0.452


Summary Description
General Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push-Y Plot Type NTC 2008 Target Displ
Pushover Plot
Displacement, dt -4.634 mm Shear at dt 0 kN
Fbu* 0.59 T* 0.447 sec
Fy* 0.572 Se(T*) 0.578
dy* 29.652 mm qu 1.011443

det* 28.66 mm Gamma -0.161666
dt* 28.667 mm Tc 0.457 sec

Sd Sa Period
mm g sec
0 0 0.447
11.69 0.235873 0.447
29.403 0.549625 0.464
29.432 0.549745 0.464
30.07 0.558618 0.466
30.07 0.561046 0.465
30.07 0.561046 0.465
30.07 0.561047 0.465
30.1 0.5614 0.465
32.591 0.590171 0.472

Pushover Curve - FEMA 440 Equivalent Linearization

Summary Description
This is the data for a FEMA 440 equivalent linearization pushover analysis.
General Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push+X Plot Type FEMA 440 EL
Source Defined Function Function Name IS1893-2002
Scalefactor 6000 mm/sec²
Effective Period and Effective Damping Parameters
Inherent Damping 0.05
Damping Params Default Value Period Parameters Default Value
A 4.2 G 0.11
B -0.83 H -0.018
C 10 I 0.09
D 1.6 J 0.14
E 22 K 0.77
F 0.4 L 0.05
Pushover Plot
Plot Items
Demand Spectra Ductility Ratios 1; 1.5; 2; 2.5
Constant Period Lines 0.5; 1; 1.5; 2
Performance Point
Point Found Yes T secant 0.452 sec
Shear 3561.881 kN T effective 0.459 sec
Displacement -41.811 mm Ductility Ratio 1.469478
Sa 0.541409 Effective Damping 0.0597
Sd 27.5 mm Modification Factor 1.029805

Sd Sa Period
mm g sec
0 0 0.441
14.224 0.294592 0.441
23.856 0.48372 0.446
23.859 0.483721 0.446
23.859 0.483721 0.446
23.862 0.483759 0.446
23.862 0.483759 0.446
23.866 0.483806 0.446
23.869 0.483868 0.446
23.872 0.483918 0.446
25.058 0.504362 0.447
25.061 0.504238 0.447
25.064 0.504234 0.447
28.365 0.554598 0.454
28.367 0.554516 0.454
29.124 0.565759 0.455
29.127 0.565654 0.455
29.128 0.565664 0.455
29.131 0.565668 0.455
29.159 0.566067 0.455
29.162 0.566082 0.455
29.281 0.567665 0.456
29.282 0.567571 0.456


Summary Description
General Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push+Y Plot Type FEMA 440 EL
A 4.2 G 0.11
B -0.83 H -0.018
C 10 I 0.09
D 1.6 J 0.14
E 22 K 0.77
F 0.4 L 0.05
Pushover Plot
Plot Items
Performance Point
Displacement 5.617 mm Ductility Ratio 2.036495

Sd Sa Period
mm g sec
0 0 0.445
15.67 0.318857 0.445
32.347 0.609848 0.462
32.749 0.616409 0.462
34.062 0.633501 0.465
34.077 0.633629 0.465
34.333 0.637188 0.466


Summary Description
General Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push-X Plot Type FEMA 440 EL
A 4.2 G 0.11
B -0.83 H -0.018
C 10 I 0.09
D 1.6 J 0.14
E 22 K 0.77
F 0.4 L 0.05
Pushover Plot
Plot Items
Performance Point
Displacement 41.433 mm Ductility Ratio 1.457315

Sd Sa Period
mm g sec
0 0 0.44
13.724 0.285665 0.44
23.751 0.484825 0.444
23.755 0.484844 0.444
24.328 0.494869 0.445
24.332 0.494863 0.445
24.335 0.4949 0.445
24.335 0.4949 0.445
24.338 0.494947 0.445
25.597 0.515913 0.447
25.602 0.515777 0.447
28.581 0.560388 0.453


Summary Description
General Input Data
Name Pushover1
Load Case Push-Y Plot Type FEMA 440 EL
A 4.2 G 0.11
B -0.83 H -0.018
C 10 I 0.09
D 1.6 J 0.14
E 22 K 0.77
F 0.4 L 0.05
Pushover Plot
Plot Items
Performance Point
Displacement -4.836 mm Ductility Ratio 2.374391

Sd Sa Period
mm g sec
0 0 0.447
11.69 0.235873 0.447
29.104 0.549625 0.462
29.137 0.549745 0.462
29.729 0.558618 0.463
29.819 0.561046 0.463
29.819 0.561046 0.463
29.819 0.561047 0.463
29.843 0.5614 0.463
31.762 0.590171 0.465

TABLE: Design Reactions
Node L/C FZ Mx My
1 1 1.5[DL+Resp+X] Max
Max Fz 1796.333 6.618 90.847
1 1 0.9DL+1.5Resp+Y Max Mx 1129.080 71.720 59.490
Max My 1796.333 6.618 90.847
1 1 1.5[DL+Resp+Y] Min
MinMx 1455.087 -111.328 6.415
1 1 0.9DL+1.5EQXN MinMy 786.752 -28.169 -67.373
2 2 1.5[DL+Resp+Y] Max
Max Fz 1910.567 93.670 68.771
2 2 0.9DL+1.5Resp+Y Max Mx 1206.659 96.273 65.755
Max My 1869.301 30.104 98.903
MinMx 1608.976 -106.686 6.415
2 2 0.9DL+1.5EQXN MinMy 963.935 -6.039 -88.307
Max Fz 1703.331 40.543 55.011
3 3 0.9DL+1.5Resp+Y Max Mx 1086.495 53.310 57.601
3 3 0.9DL+1.5Resp+X Max My 1014.055 11.995 87.532
MinMx 1380.847 -104.375 6.415
3 3 1.5[DL+EQXN] MinMy 1667.288 -29.362 -99.359
4 4 1.5[DL+EQXN] Max Fz 1037.491 -6.674 -87.989
4 4 0.9DL+1.5Resp+Y Max Mx 656.989 41.474 43.671
4 4 0.9DL+1.5Resp+X Max My 651.585 22.966 68.343
MinMx 767.178 -73.205 6.415
4 4 1.5[DL+EQXN] MinMy 1037.491 -6.674 -87.989
5 5 1.5[DL+LL] Max Fz 2380.929 -13.860 13.058
5 5 0.9DL+1.5Resp+Y Max Mx 1409.284 105.765 42.315
Max My 2373.162 27.751 80.999
MinMx 2131.223 -127.585 6.415
5 5 0.9DL+1.5Resp+X MinMy
Min 1167.344 -49.571 -61.808
6 6 1.5[DL+LL] Max Fz 2454.357 21.661 -1.418
Max Mx 2389.143 155.129 38.820
6 6 0.9DL+1.5Resp+X Max My 1487.356 61.013 80.074
6 6 0.9DL+1.5Resp+Y MinMx
Min 1196.280 -121.279 6.415
6 6 1.5[DL+Resp+X] Min
MinMy 2098.068 -27.163 -83.856
7 7 1.5[DL+EQXP] Max Fz 2216.159 -14.783 -85.700
7 7 0.9DL+1.5Resp+Y Max Mx 1352.245 86.656 35.387
7 7 0.9DL+1.5Resp+X Max My 1345.171 34.192 75.609
MinMx 1884.161 -106.041 6.415
MinMy 1891.235 -53.577 -89.349
8 8 1.5[DL+EQXN] Max Fz 1683.765 16.478 -83.352
8 8 0.9DL+1.5Resp+Y Max Mx 985.666 69.328 23.381
8 8 0.9DL+1.5Resp+X Max My 1053.873 45.497 56.735
MinMx 1454.883 -73.355 6.415
MinMy 1386.676 -49.524 -83.761
9 9 1.5[DL+EQYP] Max Fz 1820.260 73.363 32.288
Max Mx 1818.255 101.594 88.865
Max My 1819.927 46.872 107.409
9 9 0.9DL+1.5Resp+Y MinMx
Min 862.567 -76.409 6.415
9 9 0.9DL+1.5EQXP MinMy 813.673 12.282 -80.751
10 10 1.5[DL+EQYP] Max Fz 2168.201 144.291 8.749
Max Mx 2134.362 157.404 72.104
Max My 2100.898 88.906 90.446
10 10 0.9DL+1.5Resp+YMinMx
Min 872.905 -76.496 6.415
10 10 0.9DL+1.5EQXP MinMy 795.700 30.640 -96.322
Max Fz 2040.207 81.665 72.818
Max Mx 2040.207 81.665 72.818
Max My 1969.424 40.453 91.604
Min 590.996 -68.792 6.415
11 11 0.9DL+1.5EQXP MinMy 1348.122 3.061 -103.241
Max Fz 1320.445 41.096 66.841
Max Mx 1301.791 58.950 51.858
Node L/C FZ Mx My
12 12 0.9DL+1.5Resp+XMax
MaxMy 854.963 38.753 68.586
Min 560.139 -49.578 6.415
12 12 1.5[DL+EQXP] MinMy 1320.372 3.234 -87.446
NEPAL ELECTION COMMISSION, SARLAHI BRANCH- ISOLATED FOOTING RETROFITTING
2 2
ABC in Seismic Condition q0 = 202.5 KN/m New Steel bar fy = 500 New Concrete fck= 20 N/m Clear Cover 75 mm
2 2
ABC Static Condition [Assumed] q0 = 135 KN/m Existing Steel bar fy = 500 Existing Concrete fck= 20 N/m Dia of Dowel bars 8 mm
Adopted Capacity- Demand Ratio [CDR] = 1.00 Length of Dowel bars 100 mm inside Existing Concrete and 91 mm on jacketted concrete
Nos Check for

Jacketted of Check for One Two - way
Column
Existing Footing Rebar Size & Spacing from drawings Dowel - way shear (Flat slab
New Footing Rebar Size & Spacing Size of New Pheripherial Beam
Revise Base
Revised bars type ) shear
Mx, My, dL Pressu
JOINT Pu B along on Thickne
Depth of Depth of Φ long Spacing Φ Spaci Bw in KNm KNm along each re ss of
YY Nominal
XX face [ Check Jacketti Nominal Width
Distribution Overa of Main Stirr Nos Spacin
ng bw Lw terms Total ng Distribution steel
steel area short
Footing Footing long Short ll Bar ups Top / of g of
4 Depth required area Long span span
Beam
Bw, Lw, L along of Lw Depth Bot Legg Stirrup
span, Short faces New D Chec Check , mm
mm mm XX, m of Bars, ed s for
] k Spacin
at Center, at Edge, span, span, Spacing Beam Nos Stirru shear,
span, Dia of Dia of g of Φ, Φ,
No mm mm mm KN KNm KNm
Bars Φ
of Trans
Bars Φ Trans
, D, m B, m
mm mm
ps, n Sv. Mm
KN/m 2 bars
m m mm mm mm mm m m bars
1 1.5[DL+Resp+X] Max 550 550 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1796.33 6.6179 90.8467 3.15 3.15 11 OK 550 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.625 16 8 4 2 150
1 0.9DL+1.5Resp+Y Max 550 550 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1129.08 71.7196 59.4902 3.15 3.15 7 OK 325 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.625 16 8 4 2 150
1 1.5[DL+Resp+Y] Min 550 550 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1455.09 -111.328 6.4152 3.15 3.15 9 OK 425 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.625 16 8 4 2 150
1 0.9DL+1.5EQXN 550 550 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 786.752 -28.1685 -67.373 3.15 3.15 5 OK 225 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.625 16 8 4 2 150
2 1.5[DL+Resp+Y] Max 500 450 2.184 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1910.57 93.6701 68.7713 3.25 3.25 11 OK 575 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.525 16 8 3 2 150
2 0.9DL+1.5EQXN 500 450 2.184 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 963.935 -6.039 -88.307 3.25 3.25 6 OK 250 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.525 16 8 3 2 150
3 1.5[DL+Resp+Y] Max 500 450 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1703.33 40.5433 55.0112 3 3.00 10 OK 575 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 125 10 125 0.379 0.550 16 8 3 2 150
3 0.9DL+1.5Resp+Y Max 500 450 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1086.5 53.3096 57.6013 3 3.00 7 OK 325 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 125 10 125 0.379 0.550 16 8 3 2 150
3 0.9DL+1.5Resp+X Max 500 450 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1014.05 11.9945 87.5316 3 3.00 6 OK 300 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 125 10 125 0.379 0.550 16 8 3 2 150
3 1.5[DL+Resp+Y] Min 500 450 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1380.85 -104.375 6.4152 3 3.00 8 OK 450 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 125 10 125 0.379 0.550 16 8 3 2 150
3 1.5[DL+EQXN] 500 450 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1667.29 -29.3618 -99.359 3 3.00 10 OK 550 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 125 10 125 0.379 0.550 16 8 3 2 150
4 1.5[DL+EQXN] 500 450 1.524 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1037.49 -6.6743 -87.989 2.5 2.50 6 OK 400 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 150 10 150 0.379 0.500 16 8 3 2 150
4 0.9DL+1.5Resp+X Max 500 450 1.524 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 651.585 22.9661 68.3425 2.5 2.50 4 OK 225 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 150 10 150 0.379 0.500 16 8 3 2 150
4 1.5[DL+EQXN] 500 450 1.524 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1037.49 -6.6743 -87.989 2.5 2.50 6 OK 400 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 150 10 150 0.379 0.500 16 8 3 2 150
5 1.5[DL+LL] 500 450 2.184 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 2380.93 -13.8599 13.0579 3.50 3.50 14 OK 675 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.650 16 8 4 2 150
5 0.9DL+1.5Resp+X Min 500 450 2.184 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1167.34 -49.5712 -61.808 3.50 3.50 7 OK 300 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.650 16 8 4 2 150
6 1.5[DL+LL] 500 450 2.489 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 2454.36 21.6607 -1.4184 3.60 3.60 13 OK 650 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.550 16 8 3 2 150
6 0.9DL+1.5Resp+Y Min 500 450 2.489 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1196.28 -121.279 6.4152 3.60 3.60 7 OK 275 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.550 16 8 3 2 150
6 1.5[DL+Resp+X] Min 500 450 2.489 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 2098.07 -27.163 -83.856 3.60 3.60 11 OK 550 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.550 16 8 3 2 150
7 1.5[DL+EQXP] 500 450 2.489 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 2216.16 -14.7826 -85.7 3.45 3.45 11 OK 625 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.475 16 8 3 2 150
8 1.5[DL+EQXN] 500 450 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1683.77 16.4779 -83.352 3.15 3.15 10 OK 500 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.625 16 8 4 2 150
9 1.5[DL+EQYP] 500 450 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1820.26 73.3625 32.2882 3.15 3.15 11 OK 550 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.625 16 8 4 2 150
9 0.9DL+1.5EQXP 500 450 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 813.673 12.2823 -80.751 3.15 3.15 5 OK 225 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.625 16 8 4 2 150
10 1.5[DL+EQYP] 500 450 2.184 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 2168.2 144.2913 8.7493 3.45 3.45 13 OK 600 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 100 10 100 0.379 0.625 16 8 4 2 150
Nos Check for
Column
Revise bars Base
Revised type ) shear
Mx, My, dL Pressu
YY Nominal
steel area short
Beam
] k Spacin
Bars Φ
of Trans
Bars Φ Trans
, D, m B, m
mm mm
ps, n Sv. Mm
KN/m 2 bars
12 1.5[DL+EQXP] 500 450 1.524 0.762 0.229 12 150 12 150 350 350 1.000 1320.37 3.2335 -87.446 3.00 3.00 8 OK 400 OK Safe in Shear 150 10 125 10 125 0.379 0.750 16 8 4 2 150
12 Nos of footings
3
Foundation Overturning Check 10 1.5[DL+Resp+Y] Max Length of Footing L= 3.450 m, Concrete vol. of Footing only = 7.349 m
3
a) Concrete Vol. of footing including Ped. Column stem 0.208 m Breadth of Footing B= 3.450 m
3
b) Unit weight of Concrete 24.50 KN/m Depth of footing, d= 0.600 m
3
c) Unit weight of Soil 18.00 KN/m Overall depth of footing, D= 0.600 m Overall depth of Footing if Mr/Mo<1.5= 0.600 m
d) Factor of Safety against Overturning = 1.50 Assume depth of Footing H= 1.524 m
e) depth of soil for footing 0.92 m Revised Footing Area A= 11.903 m2 < 11.90 m
2
OK
f) Pedestral Column type Rec Size: 0.50 m x 0.45 m 0.924 m
g) Stem depth of Column 0.92 m depth of soil for Revised footing 0.924 m
h) Passive resistance of Soil depth 194.2 KN Stem depth of Column for Footing 0.00 KN
d) Overturning moment = 157.4 KNm Passive resistance of Soil for new depth 7.142 m3
f) Resisting moment about toe of footing= 199.3 KNm Revised Conc Vol. for Footing if Mr/Mo<1.5
g) New Resisting momen about toe of footing= 369.2 KNm
h) Ratio of Resisting /Overturning moment= 2.345 OK
Minimum Reinforcement required for Pier Column
m t d. 2
Provide 0.80% Min . reinf req for Pedestral Column = 1800 mm
Assume The Dia for Main bars = 16 mm of Numbers= 4
Assume The Dia for Main bars = 16 mm of Numbers= 4 OK
2
Hence, required Steel area = 1608 mm , So, Provide mm2
8Nos - Φ16mm
m t d. 2
Provide 0.15% Min .Shear reinf req for Pier Column =
338 mm OK
2
For Stirrups Dia 8 mm of 2 LS @ 175 mm c/c = 574 875 mm
Reinforcement for Mat Dia for Main bars = Safe inmm
Shear
of Spacings 100 mm c/c
FOOTING NODE PLAN
SCHEDULE OF FOOTING FOR JACKETTINGS

Nos Check for
Column
Revise bars Base
Revised type ) shear
Mx, My, dL Pressu
YY Nominal
steel area short
Beam
] k Spacin
Bars Φ
of Trans
Bars Φ Trans
, D, m B, m
mm mm
ps, n Sv. Mm
KN/m 2 bars
SCHEDULE OF FOOTING FOR JACKETTINGS
Pheriphery
Jack New 2LS Stirrups Founda
Along Pheriphery Beam, Jacketted blanket
Footing New New Footing Size et Footing for Pheriphery Dowel bars tion Nos D-H
Typ long/Short span Beam Size Top/Bottom Steel bars
D, thick Size Beams depth 0.15 0.15
e Main Bars
mm Spacin ness
Nos on Length
Spacing, Ø eah of bars,
Ø
Joint No L, m B, m D, m h', m Ø mm g , mm L, m B, m D, m B, m Ø mm Nos Ø mm mm mm face mm Spacing Hm
mm D D-h'
4, 7 F1 1141 2.489 2.489 0.762 0.229 12 150 150 3.45 3.45 0.379 0.481 16 3 8 150 8 12 191 10 100 1.524 2
2, 3, 6 F2 1141 1.880 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 150 2.50 3.60 0.379 0.310 16 3 8 150 8 8 191 10 150 1.524 3 H
1,5,8,9,10 F3 1141 2.184 2.184 0.762 0.229 12 150 150 3.45 3.45 0.379 0.633 16 4 8 150 8 11 191 10 125 1.524 5 h'
11 F4 1141 1.880 1.880 0.762 0.229 12 150 150 3.25 3.25 0.379 0.685 16 4 8 150 8 8 191 10 150 1.524 1
12 F5 1141 1.524 1.524 0.762 0.229 12 150 150 3.00 3.00 0.379 0.738 16 4 8 150 8 6 191 10 175 1.524 1 Existing L/B
12 New L/B
NEC, SARLAHI BRANCH REF.
0 0 1
REV.
0 0
Punching Shear Date: 4/4/2018

PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH IS STANDARD REFERS TO DRG. NO0 /
ALL DIMENTIONS IN S.I
SITE Birgunj By: PSR Checked
LOCATION BIRGUNJ, NEPAL
Column Node Number 6 1.5[DL+LL] Shape Rec
fck 2
20 N/mm h 1100 mm d= = 1015 mm a 500 mm
Ved 2454.36 KN cover 75 mm ρx,% = 0.08% b 450 mm
φx 10 mm φz 10 mm ρz,% = 0.08% Interior
at 100 mm at 100 mm Column
Punching Resistance Of Unreinforced Section
uo 14654.9 mm Ultimate Load Maximum Shear in column perimeter
ρ 0.00077 υRd,c 0.18 N/mm2 υRd,max 3.68 N/mm2
k 0.552 VRd,c 2733 KN VRd,max 7097 KN
ADEQUATE
Reinforcement Calculations
uout 13162 mm Perimeter Radius Length Link spacing Proposed Spacing Proposed Legs dmin
fywd,ef ##### N/mm 2
1 0 mm 0 0 0 0 10
xd 0 2 0 mm 0 0 0 0 10
Asw,min 549.4 mm2 3 0 mm 0 0 0 0 10
use of 10 mm bars 4 0 mm 0 0 0 0 10
diameter as minimum 5 0 mm 0 0 0 0 10
Asw 2
465.5 mm 6 0 mm 0 0 0 0 10
Number 6 Length 7 0 mm 0 0 0 0 10

Retrofitting Design &amp; Analysis Report

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Retrofitting Design &amp; Analysis Report

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Retrofitting Design & Analysis Report

2. SCOPE OF DESIGN: ........................................................................................................................................ 2

3. CODE BASIC SEISMIC ANALYSIS.................................................................................................................... 5

5. ASSUMPTIONA AND LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................. 5

6. PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC ANALYSIS .................................................................................................. 6

7. BUILDING SITE LOCATION .............................................................................................................................. 6

8. BASIC STRUCTURAL SYSTEM ........................................................................................................................ 6

9. DESIGN CODE AND CRITERIA ......................................................................................................................... 6

10. MATERIAL SPECIFICATION USED ................................................................................................................. 7

12. SEISMIC LOADS: ........................................................................................................................................... 7

13. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: .................................................................................................................... 9

14. STRUCTURAL NOTES: .................................................................................................................................. 9

Retrofitting Design & Pushover Analysis Report of NEC Sarlahi Branch

Retrofitting Design & Pushover Analysis Report of NEC Sarlahi Branch

The following scope of work has been defined to:

Retrofitting Design & Pushover Analysis Report of NEC Sarlahi Branch

1) Collect Data and Visit Site

Benchmark Building? OR QUICK

FULL BUILDING or DEFICIENCY-ONLY

Final Evaluation and

Mitigate :- Final Retrofitting Design of

Retrofitting Design & Pushover Analysis Report of NEC Sarlahi Branch

1) Reconnaissance Survey of building structures is carried out.

5. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS

Retrofitting Design & Pushover Analysis Report of NEC Sarlahi Branch

6. PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC ANALYSIS

7. BUILDING SITE LOCATION

8. BASIC STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

9. DESIGN CODE AND CRITERIA

Retrofitting Design & Pushover Analysis Report of NEC Sarlahi Branch

10. MATERIAL SPECIFICATION USED

11. ASSUMPTION IN LOADING AS SPECIFIED IN EXISTING AVAILABLE

Live Load: As per IS 875- Part 2

Live load = 3.0kN/m2 for Officerooms

12. SEISMIC LOADS:

Retrofitting Design & Pushover Analysis Report of NEC Sarlahi Branch

Retrofitting Design & Pushover Analysis Report of NEC Sarlahi Branch

14. STRUCTURAL NOTES:

D CONCRETE & REINFORCEING STEEL

CLEAR COVER OF CONCRETE

6. Provide corner bars to match horizontal reinforcing steel in slab.

Retrofitting Design & Pushover Analysis Report of NEC Sarlahi Branch

Retrofitting Design & Pushover Analysis Report of NEC Sarlahi Branch

λ1= Coefficient used to determine equivalent width of infill strut

FIRST FLOOR PLAN

DEDUCTION OF MASS FOR IN-FILL WALLS

Resp+Y---> Max Inter Story Drift for Normal Section

DRIFT CALCULATIONS AFTER JACKETING

DRIFT CALCULATIONS BEFORE JACKETING USING CRACK SECTIONS

Note: Color indicate Story fails in Life Safety [ Inter-storey drift]

Pushover Curve - Base Shear vs Monitored Displacement

Load Case Push+X Plot Type V vs Displ

Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Capacity Curve Coordinates (Part 1 of 2)

Election Commission Office-Sarlahi Revised Pushover Analysis.EDB Page 1 of 2

Capacity Curve Coordinates (Part 2 of 2)

Election Commission Office-Sarlahi Revised Pushover Analysis.EDB Page 2 of 2

Pushover Curve - Base Shear vs Monitored Displacement

Load Case Push+Y Plot Type V vs Displ

Tabulated Plot Coordinates

Capacity Curve Coordinates (Part 1 of 2)

Election Commission Office-Sarlahi Revised Pushover Analysis.EDB Page 1 of 2

Capacity Curve Coordinates (Part 2 of 2)

Election Commission Office-Sarlahi Revised Pushover Analysis.EDB Page 2 of 2

Retrofitting Design & Analysis Report

Retrofitting Design & Analysis Report