Professional Documents
Culture Documents
6lj
NY'1d
ru00z-ru0g
,\
l_
replS
SSJ0ASUe{
ru s'l
utz I J0qJuts
,Ad,CJ3S
.
I,-L/
we q11
-<
NOLTYAS'1A
redaels uepoo
auru{ essg
t.
aAI�^ IorluoS \
, OAIBA [O]]uoJ
luorudrnbo Surmseep.l
rus
repurl{c paieredo
dllecrperp,(g
_t
'uot1D34satur
99 uo4etaldxS ltog
56 Advanced Foundation Engineering
-l
Sounding rod
-]-bl
a+b
t -L
T-
bl
----r-
alI
f Frictionjacket
Position I
Position 2
Cone assembly
Position 3
Position 4
Fig. 3.14 Four positions of the sounding apparatus with friction jacket
To surface
UJ
o\
Piezo<
4 63 7251 8
2. Friction sleeve
record ofthe bearing resistance q" and frictional resistance{ against depth is
produced in theofa graph at the surface in the recording unit.
)h
(ct l s) J"/
:ra
Ju'olleH *
= :
'leleurorleued Ip crueq3aur
u Jo esec eql ur ;aqle8o1 lelcel uorlcl{ pue euoc eql qsnd ol perrnbe: ecroJ letot
aqr :
-=
/u
Y sr
(qr l E)
'o
sr'/uor1cr4 eprs Iucol eql ',{e.r:=:i
tv
(eu'il _ : "t)
'a
'ouoc0r{1fc';
eq1,(q euoc eql uo Surlce 2fi actol Ielol oql Surpra.rp,{q peurelqo sr'D ecuelslser
uoriE;::i.
uollerlauad lo olEH lc
auocozerd zrxc O L /oog lo spelaq g t'g '6lJ 'c1e 'seur1 edrd euueu 3uo1e 's1ue1
p:'
JeurEl0u
'srusos pues eql urqlr,r,r, ,(e1c 3 ur soleJ uorlr
rocnpsue4 emsseJd
euo
t9 uotptoldxl pog
58 Advanced Foundation Engineering
3_t:-4 and q, are measured a1 the same depth. RTis expressed as a percentage.
Friction ratrmponant parameter for classifring soil (Fig. 3.19).
provided a set of curves (Fig. 3.17) which may.be used to estimate D, based on q,
and efoverburden pressure' These curves are supposed to be applicable for-n'ormally
consolidate<
sand. Figure 3. r 8 gives the rerationship between q" and $(Rob..tron and
campanelra,
r 9g3
\, \\..
50 N\
100
Pi
{ r5o \
200
!()
a
{)
E
E
2so
()
\
E 300 \ \\
()
350
nrI\\l \ \
=40 50 60 70 80 90%
I
400
D, expressed in percent
letw.een
(3
No
where, l/6 : cone factor,
Lune and Kelven ( I 98 I ), investigated the value of the cone factor 1y'7, for
both normally consolid;and overconsolidated crays. The values ofNo as obtained
uollec!l!ssE
'onle^ elqr8rlSeuyo sr uorlcarroc uoprnqrono ue oror{,r\ ses�c II� JoJ enl�^ orups
eql spu;
'QIAD 1ere18ueg 'tuo1ce3sr1zs eq ,(uru s,(e1c go sed,! qloq nJ tN roJ OZ 3o an1u.t
u .(1<
T,' \
\
\
\\r 0st
00�
(D
\\ 0sz4
x
x
o
FI
.D'
\ 007, o
CD
\\ o
0sl (D
\ ev
9n
7(
\ 001
"8? = ,0
0s
N\ 0
0s 0n0t OZ OI
zrulNl4tr'D'Suueeq ouo3
8l o1 zl sqldap deep te
0z ol EI sqtdep lrolluqs 1u
pelupr Iosuo3l3^o
6l o1 tl peteprlosuoc,(11un.uo51
69 uotptoldx31og
6A Advanced Foundation Engineering
For clay soils, it has been found that the friction ratio decreases with increasing
liquidity indTherefore, the friction ratio is an indicator of the soir.rype
penetrated. It permit. uppro*i,
103
800
Heavily over
600
consolidated or
cemented soils
400
lH
80
tr 60
q Sandy silt to
40
0)clayey silt
C)
i,)
N
(g l0r Clay to
tr organic
tr
zo
68
clay
t:23456
In conclusion, CPT data provide a repeatable index ofthe aggregate behavior of in-
situsoil. TCPT classification method provides a betterpicture of overall .rurr.ru""
conditions than is availalwith most other methods of exploration.
with the type of soil. The variation ofrqTfor the various t1p
Yt a
(e1c puu OI o
,(u1c,$pg o
ZT
(?
vL!
->
9Ic
(
OSZ
OsI 00r
,b
uouercldxS ttos
62 Advanced Foundation Engineering
Correlation between SpT and CpT
)vleyerhof (1965), presented comparative data between Spr and cpr. For fine or
silty mediurrloose to medium dense sands, he presents the correlation as
q, = 0.4 i/MN/m2
(3.20)
The lowest values of the angle of internal friction given in Tabre 3 .j are
conservative estimates
for uniform' clean sand and they should be reduced by at least 5o for clayey sand.
These values, aswell as the upper values of the angles of internal friction *hi.h
up;i;to r,"rr graded sand, may be
1 965)
State o/sand
D,
q, (MPa)
0"
Very loose
Loose
0.2-0.4
Medium /ense
0.4-0.6
l0-30
4-12 35-40
Dense
0.6-0,8
30-50 t2-20 40-45
Very dense
0.8-1.0 >50
>20
45
Figure3'21showsacorrelationpresentedbyRobertsonandcampanella(19g3)betweentheratioof
qrl N and mean grain size, Drq. It can be seen from the figure that the ratio
varies from I at
D5s:0'001 mm to a maxi*u-,rilrr" of 8 atD5s: 1.0 mm. rne s-oit fype also varies
from clayto sand.
l0
9
q"inkg'cm2; Ir blows/foot
tI
ti 6 l./
*\5 ^^*' A
3+ {ffi l.
4^J {tI
{t
--4
0.001 0.01
0.1
1.0
Me4n grain size Dro, mm
Fig. 3.21 Relati.orship between g"iN and mean grain size Duo (mm)
(Flobertson and Campanella, 1 9g3a)
It is clear from the above discussions that the value of n (: qr lN)is not a
constant for anyparticularsoil Designers must use their own judgement while
selecting a value for n for a particular rype of soil.
llec 6utJnseau
luapuadeput qltM ajlaLlraJnssord (c) 'sllac luapuodaput aotLll r-lltM arlauaJnssal
'ollauarnssald aql to saldrcuud crsPE (E) :lalaulernssetd pJeuaw lo stuauodtuoc
(e)
J?4uo3
11ec Eurmseol4l
weeqS
3qqn1
seD
oloq arog
se0
IIec pr�nc
eqq Ie4uoJ
rolelA
11ec Surmsesyq
IIoc prsnc
sec
lIm IoIuoS
s8en8 emsser6
'3urqru oqt pue lrun Iorluoceq1 ,(1eueu 'sged eerql Jo slsrsuoc relsruornsserd. eq1
.aqoq eql pellec sr reqle8ol
or{1 qlL&\ Jeqrueqc elpplw oql'silac pnnS se u^\oDI are eseql pue ,sryeredde
aqt Jo rll
eqt .(q pesnuc slcoge pue eql ruo4 roqrrreqc elpprru egl lcelord sJoqrueqc uollog
pu'ortuoc oql lu oqru ,$olloq pr8u u r{t!r scsrp 1ee1s .,(q urolloq puu do1 te
reqle8ot plsq s
Josn olqplsuur rJlr.&\ G7t 'Ag) rer{lo eql eloqu ouo pe{cpls sroqrueqc
luapuedepuslsrsuoc preual4l ,{q penrecuoc se lueurrulsul aq1-.61Lt uorleu8rseq tsoJ
htrJSV se pel
suq lse1 preuow orlJ 'suorlBpuno;30 uSrsep er{l roJ ,{1lceJlpur ro (I1ce:rp roqlre
posn
lsel or.lJ'LS6I ocuts osn ur ueog seq,acuerCJo (rS6I) pruuol4l ,,(q pesn pue
polcrutsuoc
'pe,lrecuoc lsrg se,& qcrq,u 1e1eua;nssard eq1 ',(11urper potugur eq u,c luqt aqo,d
e Sursn aloq o,oq uJo sllu,&\ eqr uo pouuoJred lsel uru,rs-ssars nils-ul ve sr lsor
Joleu.
u3l3t/lt3Hnss3E
l9 uorptoldxS 1og
70 Advanced Foundation Engineering
Menard pressure test is canied out in a hole drilled in advance. The drilling of
hole is done
use of a suitable drilling rig which disturbs the soil the least. Drilling mud may
be used if rt
for stabilising the sides of the hole. The diameter of the bore hole, D1,, in which
the test i
conducted shall satisff the condition.
Table 3.8 Typical sizes ol probe and bore hole for pressuremeter test
lo I Nominal
Designation (mm) cm
cnl mm
AX 44 3666
46
BX 582t
42 60
NX 70 2550 72
l{ote: ls: length of measuring cell; /: length of probe. See Fig. 3.2 (b).
The probe is lowered down the hole soon after boring to the desired elevation and
held in pr
by a clamping device. Pressuremeter tests are usually carried out at I m intervals
in all th
holes.
With the probe in position in the bore hole, the test is started by opening the
valves in the contr
for admitting water and gas (or water) to the measuring cell and the guard cells
respectivel
pressure in the guard cells is normally kept equal to the pressure in the measuring
cell. The pre
to the soil through the measuring cell is applied by any one of the following
methods:
If pressure is applied by the second method, the volume ofthe probe shall be
increased in incre
equal to 5 percent of the nominal volume of the probe (in the deflated condition)
and held co
for 30 seconds. Pressure readings are taken after 30 seconds ofelapsed time.
Steps in both the methods are continued until the maximum probe volume to be used
in the
reached. The test may last at each position from l0 to I 5 minutes. This means that
the test is esser
an undrained test in clay soils and drained test in a freely draining material.
Typicaltest result
First a typical curve based on the observed readings in the field may be plotted.
The plot is mi
the volume of the water read at the volumeter in the control unit, v, as abscissa
for each increm
pressure, p, as ordinate. The curve is a result ofthe test conducted on the basis
ofequal incre
Gzz'il 'd *^d +td : d
:a,to1eq ue,tr8
oqt red se peurElqo eq,(eur o^rnc oql uo 1urod,(uu ro3 'a'otunloA pue ,d,:rnsse;d
pe1cefi
.^d,sso1
''d'sso1 ernssl
(ezz't)
^H^L:^d
VZ.t.Brg ur ueas
'ornsserdgo e8uls Xue JoJ o^Jnc aql uo{ poutulqo ,r,r ,sso1 elunlo^ aql sr u
ounlo^ oqJ 'e^Jnc Surpeer ounlo^.etl s./a^ ornssordSo .ua{�l
oqord eq1 puu Surqnl aql t11er1ru1 '3urqn1 eqlJo slle,r\ oql ol oJnssoJd re1e,vr3o
uorlucrldde e
puedxe lou xuur eqord eql lgrlr os eqnl Iools rcrql e ur Burgg-esolc ur ,{11ecrpen
rq-d
"q,
,(q ouop sr ssol aunlo^ JoJ uorreJqrle3 'prnbrl eql pue eqord eql Burpnlcur
lueudrnba Burlr
gud xueSo ,{llllqrsserdruoc aql puu ruels,(s Burqnl eq1;o uorsuudxe oq1 ol onp
srncco ,r^ .sso
crt 'sso; �
'(e) gz' t'3rg ur uarroqs su ssol e;nsserd oqr JoJ o^Jnc uorluJqrluc e se,,rr8 a,
snstat d
3o 1o1d v'pernsBoru are eqo;d oql olu pelcalur ',r le1e,tt;o ounlo^ Burpuodsarroc
oql pue (
puudxe o1 perrnber dernssa.td aqJ'oloq aql oprslno ornsso.rd cueqdsoulu repun eqord
eql
,(q euop sl slqJ 'sernsserd poleuur luaJerlp lE sossol oql ou*ruolop ol pol,Jqrlu3
eq oJoJaler
aqord eq1'[os aql uo pouoxe ernsserd lenlcE or{1 ul?lqo 01 polJnpop eq lsnu qrrq/,\
seuuJq
puedxe o1 polnber sernssard sopnlcur slsol ploll Buunp Iun loJluo, aql uo poululqo
s8urpuaroqJ'euerqureu raqqru sqlJo ocu�lstsoJ eql euocro^o o1,{russecou sr
srnssatdJo lunou
e 'palegur sr eqord aql sv'sauerqueur aqord aqlgo ,{lrpr8u oql or anp sJnoco
,rd;ssoJ
e;ns
ed'sso;ott
'u8rsl
pasn sl 11 oJoJeq poleJqlIEc sq ol 'oJoJeroql 'suq releruernsserd oqJ 'suorlcortoc
euos setrnbt
a^rnc u sr o^Jns s[IJ'olnuru euo30 porred e JoJ luelsuoc plaq ornssord qcee puu oJn
^\�J
ll uorptoldx3ltog
72 Advanced Foundation Engineering
where,p, is the actual pressure reading ofthe gauge in the control unit.
v: vr-vc (,
where, v" is the actual volume reading of the volumeter in the control unit.
Atypical corrected plot of the pressure-volume curve is given in Fig. 3.26 (b). The
characl
parts of this curve are three in number. They are:
I . The initial part of the curve OA . This curve is a result of pushing the
yielded wall of tt
back to the original position. At point l, the at rest condition is supposed to
have been rer
The expansion of the cavity is considered only from pointA.vsis the volume of water
re
to be injected over and above the volume V, of the probe under the deflated
conditior
is the total volume of cavity at point l, we can write
Vg: V.+v, (:
2. The second part of the curve is lB. This is supposed to be a straight line
portion of the
and may represent the elastic range. Since lB gives an impression of an elastic
rang
called the pseudo-elastlc phase of the test. The point I is considered to be the
start
pressuremeter test in most theories. The point B marks the end of the straight line
por
the curve. The coordinates of the point B are p1 and v7, where p7 is known as the
pressure.
3. The curve BC marks the final phase. The plastic phase is supposed to start from
point
the curve becomes eventually asymptotic at point C atalarge deformation of the
cavit
limit pressure, pt, is usually defined as the pressure that is required to double
the
volume of the cavity. It occurs at a volume such that
ve is normally limited to about 300 cm3 for probes used in AX and,BXholes. The
volume of these probes is of the order of 535 cm3. This means that (V,+ 2vs) is of
tht
of 1135 cm3. These values may vary according to the design of the pressuremeter.
It is, therefore, necessary that the reservoir bapacity in the control unit should
be ofthe o
ll35 cm3. In case the reservoir capacity is limited andpT is not reached within its
limit, tl
therefore, has to be stopped at that level. In such a case, the limit value, p1,
has to be extrap(
In some of the pressuremeters, provision is made to measure the increase in the
probe ra
every increment of pressure applied. This system replaces the measurement of change
in volr
the probe. Gas is used to inflate the measuring cell in such pressuremeters.
Measurement of
of volume by the change in the probe radius is also shown in Fig. 3.26 (b).
(q)
orrmlol,QJle3
(',r +"1) z
A
,I snIpEJ ur esearcul f"r I.t ot
'"d e
q
la
(!
u1rd
td
d
Fd
(!
(D
iJ
(D
rt
o
U uorptoldxg 7og
74 Advanced Foundation Engineering
u:\-(r-h*) (3.1
As per Fig.3.26 (b), po^ is the pressure which corresponds to the volume v0 at the
start o
straighi line portion ofthe curve. Since it has been found that it is very
difficult to determine accuri
pom, pohmay not be equal to Po*. As such, po^bears no relation to what it is to be
the true t
at rest. In E q. (3 .22g),Ks has to be assumed and its accuracy is doubtful. In
such circumsta
;,offi
it is not possible to calculate popalso. However, pomcatbe used for calculating the
pressuren
modulus E*. The experience oi.any investigator is that a self-boring pressuremeter
gives t
Lp(3
o:rfr
For the pressuremeter test, we may write LV: Lv, and as such Eq.3.23 (a) becomes'
Lo
(J
G_';
Between points I and B in Fig.3.26 (b), the slope of the curve is constant, whereas
the volur
the cavity changes from v6 alAto vyat B. The value ofG, therefore, depends on the
location
line AB.By convention, the volume at mid point of lB is chosen for computingG'lf Y^
volume at mid-point, we maY write,
vs*v7
(3
V: V.: Vr* ?
<
where, I/" is the volume of the deflated portion of the measuring cell atzero
volume reading
(3
Lv
Eo
t-rm 2(t+p)
ri
:suosuor 3urrrto11o1 aql roJ snlnpou s,Suno^ oql se qcns sn.:t: *e qtr,{\ {llcorrp
poJudruor oq louuec ,;?',rn1i.po* _
._:
Ge) ('r-tr'\( z
*,
l-% -ii)1,;.A*'a)'g,
releuernsserd
_ ,i,,1 ,rr!,
(tz't) ( on-rn\(
;, ;rr rirdifllrlrtrr]llllluu
I
I
ruor t t 1
-U-td=;r;
Gc?.) 4Y*
ov
':1,::y"::,:::3:r.l,.ll,:-'rsnrnpouuorleuuoropsurrrnse.r,r,;x:.;::
: : : ::: :::"::: i1t'i * .'o
pn *i . i il ; ;;"i;:;;' ll:: il il]ffi ; lI -
vvu,) Jrdt ir enleA eqt.:]los Bururelp X1oo4.roj pue S.0 ol 1enba r. -,.=
@vz't) AV
*''t
Q1'
p_l
Sl uorptoldx3 ltog
76 Advanced Foundation Engineering
2.Sinceelastictheoryindicatesthattheincreaseincompressivestressinaradialdirec,
equals the increase'ln tensile stress, it is likely that the compress.ion modulus
is different f
the tension modutus. As such, Menard feels that E, probably lies between the two'
3'ThepressuremetermodulusE,isnotameasureofwhatMenardcallsthemodulusof,?xi
deformationE,whichisdefinedasthemodulusofthesoilskeletonwhenitissubjecte
small strains'
Because of the afforesaid reasons, Menard proposes the relationship between E* and
E
Young's modulus) for soils as
E^ (3
E:
Table3.9(a)givesthevaluesofcrwhichiscalledasarheologicalfactorforvarioustypesof
which depends on the ratios E, /pl where Pt: Pt-Pon'
silt Sand
Over-consolidated
Normally consolidated
Weathered and
remoulded
Slightly fractured or
Other
a:l13
cr = 0.67
overconsolidatedclaysoils'theralioE,,lplmayrangefioml'to3-0'whereasforsands'grav
sands under water, the ratio are lower and are in the range of 5 to 8'
Pt
Type ofsoil F
MPa
MPa
Mud, peat
Soft clay
Medium claY
0.6 -2.0
StiffclaY 8 -40
0.5 -2 0,1-0.5
0.2 -1,5
silt 2 -10
1.2 -5
3->10
truoJ SuL dolloJ el{l ur (Of O t ) rollnhl .(q pe1se83ns ueoq seq , Q pue /qf
uaa'r'r':aq ;
,re,rs,tro11 .s1ros Sururerp,(1eer3 ro3 ,Q puu ,a sreletuurud g13uor1s allllr-Ll
lecrrrdue ue
lsal releruernsse:d pe,luoc ol ,(u,t Ieclleroeql ou luaserd le sI eraql'(gtOt) 7o
7a wlan:
ql6ualls rBotls
0t
(qze'e) L -"'
se uellrr&\ eq,(eru "a to; uotlenbe IBuU eqJ 'pe1se33ns ueoq s�'
e8cre,{e uv.zI pus s.g uae^uaq ssrl fl;o enle^ eql lerltr pelscrpw e,tuq
suotleStlselul lelu3
d ("etiE)a3ol+l
_ n
(ezt't) 7A td
nc : td
(rs'e)
(+'a"r+ r)
ol pecnpeJ 1eB ee1nrruo3 aorql eql 1te 'uotltpuoc poulurpun JoJ petunss� sI !
oIl?J S(UOSSIOd :
(cos'E) [(.n
-,) "o ,ro, *,.1 ,,c : td
l' l
(9961) uocr
L-l
(os6 r
[(rt + r) 'cz -^ l
lsl
tt uo17erc1dx3log
78 Advanced Foundation Engineering
q'-24
where,
4
an average value.
Baguelin et at(1e78),gireirre
" "=
?:{:{i;i: ,{,7,.
varues of q"/p7 ro. vu.iou, fypes of soiis a
Type ofsoil
q"/ P,
Very soft to soft clay Close to 1 or between 2.5 andFirm to very stiff clay
2.5 to 3.5
Very stiffto hard clay
3ta4
Very loose to loose sand and compressible sill
Ito1.5or3to4
Compact silt
3to5
Sand and gravei
5 to 12
Density of soil
p1 kPa
N value
Very loose
0-200
0-4
Loose
200 -500
4 -10
Medium dense
500 -r 500
l0 -30
Dense
1500 -2500
30 -50
Very dense
> 2500
>50
Res
The pressuremeter test is a very short duration test in the field and therefore
these tests bycannot give any direct information concerning the fype of soil i,
*rri.rl the test is carried out.means that the test results alone cannot be usJa to
classifl, the soil. It cannot even indicate whthe soil is pervious or nol As per
the knowledge available at present, it is not possible to identil soil purely on
the basis of the varues dpr,p,,,'ia z*.lf however, irr" roir ,u, be crassified
byother method as cray, sand or *r,rt.r"rl it.n the condition of the r"ii..,
be determined fi,or
resurrs. However, pressuremerer test resurrs can be appried directry for rhe dr
:irr:rjj:ffj::resr