Biosolids MGMT Plan by Stantec Band C

Geotechnical Data Report
Proposed Hartland Development
Prepared for:
Capital Regional District
c/o Wastewater Treatment
Project
625 Fisgard Street
Victoria, BC V8W 1R7
Prepared by:
Stantec Consulting Ltd.
500-4730 Kingsway
Burnaby, BC V5H 0C6
111700431
February 17, 2017
GEOTECHNICAL DATA REPORT
Rev. Description Author Quality Check Independent Review

0 Geotechnical Data Report K. Tai A. McIntyre H. Kristiansen
1 Updated Geotechnical C. Hajen B. Huynh W. Quong
Data Report
sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx i
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 2
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 3
4.0 REVIEW OF HISTORICAL DATA ...................................................................................... 6
5.0 STANTEC GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION........................................................... 7

5.1 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................ 7
5.2 2014 TEST PIT FIELD PROGRAM ......................................................................................... 7
5.3 2017 TEST HOLE FIELD PROGRAM .................................................................................... 9
5.3.1 ODEX Drilling .................................................................................................. 11
5.3.2 Standard Penetration Test ........................................................................... 11
5.3.3 Rotary Rock Coring ...................................................................................... 12
5.4 LABORATORY PROGRAM............................................................................................... 12
6.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ......................................................................................... 13

6.1 GENERAL .......................................................................................................................... 13
6.2 EXISTING CRUSH ROCK STOCKPILE ............................................................................... 13
6.3 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS ..................................................................... 14
6.3.1 Gravel Fill........................................................................................................ 14
6.3.2 Blast Rock Fill.................................................................................................. 14
6.3.3 In-Filled Swamp (Silty Sand to Sandy Silt Fill) ............................................. 14
6.3.4 Silt/Topsoil....................................................................................................... 15
6.3.5 Granular Native Soil...................................................................................... 15
6.3.6 Glacial Till ....................................................................................................... 15
6.3.7 Blasted Bedrock ............................................................................................ 15
6.3.8 Bedrock .......................................................................................................... 16
6.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS....................................................................................... 18
7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................... 19

7.1 BEDROCK RIPPABILITY ..................................................................................................... 19
7.2 BEDROCK FLUID CONTAINMENT ................................................................................... 20
7.3 FILLED-IN SWAMP ............................................................................................................ 20
8.0 CLOSURE ...................................................................................................................... 21

bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx i
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Summary of 2014 Test Pit Investigation .............................................................. 8
Table 2 Summary of 2017 Borehole Investigation ........................................................ 10
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Bedrock outcrop on southeast site boundary (2014) ...................................... 3
Figure 2 Bedrock outcrop and sloped ground within footprint of proposed
digestion facility (2017) ........................................................................................ 4
Figure 3 Crush Rock Stockpile (2014) ................................................................................ 5
Figure 5 Extensive fracturing and joint infill on Run No. 5 in BH17-09 (2017) .............. 17
Figure 6 Close-up view of bedrock outcrop 8 m south of BH17-09; rock hammer for
scale (2017) ......................................................................................................... 19
LIST OF APPENDICES
STATEMENT OF GENERAL CONDITIONS.................................................... A.1
REFERENCE DRAWINGS ............................................................................ B.1
EXISTING SUBSURFACE INFORMATION .................................................... C.1
STANTEC SITE PLAN ................................................................................... D.2
STANTEC TEST PIT AND TEST HOLE RECORDS .............................................E.1
STANTEC LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS.................................................. F.1

bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx ii
Introduction
February 17, 2017
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Stantec Consulting Ltd. (Stantec) has revised our original Geotechnical Data Report (dated
May 5, 2014) to provide additional information on the soil, rock and groundwater conditions
encountered to date at the proposed Hartland Plant Site (the Site) in Saanich, BC.
The scope of work for this revised Geotechnical Data Report comprised the completion of a
supplemental test hole investigation program, laboratory testing of rock samples collected
during the test hole investigation, and a revision to Stantec’s original Geotechnical Data Report.
This Geotechnical Data Report presents the geotechnical procedures and findings of the 2014
and 2017 site investigations and laboratory testing programs conducted by Stantec, as well as
discussion of limitations to the site investigation.
In March 2014, Stantec completed a test pit investigation program at the Site in general
accordance with the Stantec proposal dated February 28, 2014. However, due to the
unforeseen existence of a large crush rock stockpile near the centre of the investigation area,
the proposed geotechnical site investigation could not be carried out within a large area of the
Site. Accordingly, the original Geotechnical Data Report provided a list of options for a
supplemental site investigation to assess the soil, rock and groundwater conditions of the site not
accessible during the March 2014 investigation.
In January 2017, Stantec completed a supplemental test hole investigation. The purpose of the
supplemental investigation was to target the previously inaccessible portion of the Site and to
characterize the bedrock at select locations across the Site.

bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx 1
Project Description
February 17, 2017
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed Hartland Plant Site development is understood to comprise of a Resource

Recovery Centre (RRC) and a Front End Area. Due to the density of proposed infrastructure in
the RRC area, the 2014 and 2017 geotechnical investigations have focused on this area;
however, select test pits and test holes are located within the Front End Area.
Based on a concept design drawing prepared by Stantec Architecture (dated December 20,
2016), the Resource Recovery Centre will be located within an approximately 2.6 hectare (ha)
area located in the northwest portion of the Site. The general arrangement of the plant is
included in Appendix B. The proposed works for the RRC will include a digestion facility
(including four 20 m diameter digestion tanks and a single 16 m diameter digested biosolids
storage tank), a thickening and dewatering facility, power distribution equipment and standby
power, waste gas burners, a hot water facility, a water tower, administrative building and
internal access roads. The northwest-most end of the Site (west of the RRC) is allocated for future
expansion and will remain undeveloped and tree covered. Stantec understands that there are
currently no plans for buildings or other infrastructure at the Front End Area; however, the
installation of a liquids containment basin in this area is being considered by the CRD as part of
future expansions.
It is understood that the digestion facility, and the thickening and dewatering facility could
house below grade storage tanks, that will require building foundations to be 4 to 5 m below
final grades.

Site Description
February 17, 2017
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The proposed Hartland Plant Site is located roughly 200 m northwest of the existing Hartland
Landfill Facility in Saanich, BC, in a tree-cleared area that is generally undeveloped. The Site is
bounded to the north by Willis Point Road and to the south, east and west by undeveloped,
densely tree-covered land. The Site is accessible via an access road which connects Willis Point
Road, runs along the north and west and south perimeter of the Site, and continues south past
the site, connecting to the Hartland Landfill. Tree-coverage presently extends into the western
footprint of the RRC and covers the future expansion area as well as the location of two of the
proposed digestion facility tanks. Bedrock outcrops were observed along the north and south
sides of the Site, an example of which is shown in Figure 1. Outcrops of bedrock and sloped
ground rising approximately 4 m above a flat, gravel-covered area were also observed partially
within the footprint of the digestion facility, as shown in Figure 2 and roughly outlined in
Drawing No. 1 (Appendix D).
Figure 1 Bedrock outcrop on southeast site boundary (2014)

Site Description
February 17, 2017
Figure 2 Bedrock outcrop and sloped ground within footprint of proposed digestion
facility (2017)
As shown on Drawing No. 1 (Appendix D), a large crush rock stockpile covers a portion of the
proposed RRC development. Based on visual observations, the stockpile ranges from
approximately 6 m and 9 m in height. It should be noted that compared to the size of the
stockpile as observed during the March 2014 site investigation, the size of the stockpile appears
to have decreased by approximately 30 to 40% in area. Specifically, the toe of the stockpile at
the northwest edge was found to be approximately 10 m southeast of its original location.
The remaining perimeter of the stockpile does not appear to have been altered since the
March 2014 site investigation.
During both the 2014 and 2017 Stantec site investigations, the stockpile was entirely covered with
a black semi-elastic tarpaulin membrane, except for along the northwest edge of the stockpile.
A photo of the northeast side of the stockpile is shown in Figure 3.

Site Description
February 17, 2017
Figure 3 Crush Rock Stockpile (2014)
The remaining areas of the Site are generally flat and covered by imported granular fill material.
The area to the north of the Site slopes down to Willis Point Road from the Hartland Plant Site.
A drainage trench is located along the north side of the site and runs parallel to the access road
to collect and drain water runoff from the stockpile.
Based on the site topographic information shown on the Existing Conditions drawing prepared
by Brown and Caldwell, dated November 19, 2013 (Appendix B), a hill bounds the site to the
southwest. The stockpile of crush rock was placed against this hill as shown in Drawing No. 1
(Appendix D). The future Front End Area to the east of the RRC development is presently cleared
of trees and relatively flat.

Review of Historical data

February 17, 2017
4.0 REVIEW OF HISTORICAL DATA
Based on our review of the Geological Survey Branch’s Geoscience Map 2000-2 “Quaternary
Geological Map of Greater Victoria”, the surficial geology of the Site comprises sparsely
developed, mainly rocky, upland areas.
Based on the information provided to Stantec, we understand that a series of groundwater level
monitoring locations are established at the Hartland Landfill Facility. The location of existing
groundwater monitoring wells is shown on the Hartland Landfill Groundwater Level Monitoring
Locations drawing in Appendix C.
For reference purposes, borehole logs completed by Gartner Lee Limited for groundwater
monitoring wells installed at the Hartland Landfill Facility and near the proposed RCC facility are
included in Appendix C. The provided borehole logs indicate that subsurface conditions are
likely to comprise between 1.2 m and 4.6 m of crushed rock and gravel fill overlying bedrock.
For the areas surrounding the proposed RCC facility, the borehole logs suggest that the bedrock
is overlain by native sand with variable amounts of silt and gravel that is further overlain by
surficial topsoil or crushed rock fill. The bedrock is described as comprising wark gneiss
(metamorphic rock).
Based on discussions with CRD site personnel and as shown on two archived CRD drawings
provided to Stantec (included in Appendix B and superimposed onto Stantec’s test hole
location plan in Appendix D), we understand that a swamp measuring approximately 80 m by
50 m once existed in the approximate center of the site to a depth of up to approximately 6 m.
The drawing indicates that the swamp was filled in, but neither the backfill material nor the
method of compaction, if any, are specified on the drawings. At the time of Stantec’s 2014 site
investigation, the gravel fill which presently covers the site obscured the extents of the former
swamp. Details regarding the subsurface conditions observed in the footprint of the former
swamp, and construction considerations related to the filled-in swamp are included in
Sections 6.3 and 7.3, respectively.

Stantec Geotechnical Site Investigation

February 17, 2017
5.0 STANTEC GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION
5.1 GENERAL
The approximate locations of the test holes are shown on Drawing No. 1 (Appendix D). The test
pit and borehole coordinates are listed in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. The test pit and
borehole locations were recorded using a hand-held GPS unit, which is generally accurate to
within ±3 m. The test pits were backfilled with the excavated material, and bucket and track-
packed to existing grade. Any excavated spoils that could not be placed as test pit backfill
were stockpiled along the perimeter of the Site.
The field work for the 2014 test pit and 2017 test hole site investigations was continuously
monitored by a Stantec field engineer, who identified the sample locations, classified the soils,
kept a detailed log of each test pit/borehole, and observed and recorded pertinent site
features. Representative soil and rock samples collected during the site investigations were
brought to the Stantec geotechnical laboratory in Burnaby, BC for further classification and
testing.
5.2 2014 TEST PIT FIELD PROGRAM

A geotechnical site investigation program was carried out by Stantec from March 19 to 20, 2014.
The investigation included twenty-five (25) mechanically-excavated test pits to refusal on hard,
intact bedrock. The depth to intact bedrock at the test pit locations are also listed in Table 1.
The investigation was conducted using a 225 Link-Belt excavator sub-contracted through
RG Excavating of Victoria, BC. The test pits were distributed throughout the accessible areas of
the proposed RRC development (i.e., around the stockpile), though four test pits were also
completed in the Front End Area of the site to assess general soil stratigraphy and bedrock
depth in the region.
As previously discussed, a large portion of the site was inaccessible at the time of the site
investigation due to the crush rock stockpile. A sample of the stockpile was collected by Stantec
for classification and testing purposes.


February 17, 2017
Table 1 Summary of 2014 Test Pit Investigation
Coordinates (UTM)
Depth to Intact Bedrock
Test Pit No. Easting Northing (m below grade)
TP14-1 465321 5376737 1.8
TP14-2 465313 5376727 1.8
TP14-3 465303 5376716 2.1
TP14-4 465308 5376745 1.8
TP14-5 465301 5376735 2.0
TP14-6 465292 5376725 0.8
TP14-7 465294 5376753 1.8
TP14-8 465283 5376738 1.7
TP14-9 465284 5376761 2.3
TP14-10 465275 5376751 1.8
TP14-11 465266 5376770 2.4
TP14-12 465244 5376783 1.2
TP14-13 465222 5376780 3.7
TP14-14 465206 5376781 5.2
TP14-15 465191 5376798 2.9
TP14-16 465180 5376776 2.1
TP14-17 465164 5376799 2.0
TP14-18 465158 5376783 1.7
TP14-19 465137 5376787 2.1
TP14-20 465139 5376803 2.1
TP14-21 465150 5376826 1.5
TP14-22 465356 5376706 3.4
TP14-23 465411 5376690 2.4
TP14-24 465445 5376639 3.4
TP14-25 465401 5376625 1.8


February 17, 2017
5.3 2017 TEST HOLE FIELD PROGRAM

A supplemental geotechnical site investigation program was carried out by Stantec from
January 18 to 22, 2017. The investigation included twelve (12) boreholes using a combination of
the percussive air-rotary (ODEX) drilling and bedrock coring, plus Standard Penetration Tests
(SPTs) on select soil strata.
The investigation was conducted using a track-mounted Fraste MDXL drill rig sub-contracted
through Geotech Drilling Services of Delta, BC. The boreholes were distributed throughout the
Site, including four boreholes in the footprint of the crush rock stockpile. Ten of the twelve
boreholes were located within the proposed RRC development, and the other two boreholes
were completed in the Front End area of the site to assess general soil stratigraphy, bedrock
depth and bedrock condition in the region.
The locations of the boreholes are shown on Drawing No. 1 (Appendix D). The borehole
coordinates area listed in Table 2 below, along with the drilling and in-situ sampling
methodologies employed, the depth to bedrock, the length of bedrock drilled through with
ODEX and rotary coring methods, as well as the termination depth of the borehole.


February 17, 2017
Table 2 Summary of 2017 Borehole Investigation
Length of Length of Bedrock Total Length of Termination

Coordinates (UTM) Depth to Intact Bedrock Drilled, Drilled, Rotary Coring Bedrock Drilled Depth
Borehole Bedrock ODEX (m) (m) (m) (m below
ID Easting Northing (m below grade) (A) (B) (A+B) grade)
*BH17-01 5376689 465267 7.2 1.2 - 1.2 8.4
*BH17-02 5376676 465239 7.2 1.3 - 1.3 8.5
*BH17-03 5376724 465237 15.0 1.3 - 1.3 16.3
*BH17-04 5376696 465212 10.7 1.0 - 1 11.7
BH17-05 5376760 465207 5.3 0.2 1.1 1.3 6.6
BH17-06 5376742 465193 4.5 1.2 - 1.2 5.7
BH17-07 5376787 465201 4.1 0.2 - 0.2 4.3
BH17-08 5376759 465172 2.3 0.5 - 0.5 2.8
BH17-09 5376777 465153 1.2 1.4 4.3 5.7 6.9
BH17-10 5376749 465279 2.1 0.7 4.1 4.8 6.9
BH17-11 5376673 465341 2.0 0.6 4.0 4.6 6.6
BH17-12 5376662 465406 1.1 0.4 5.4 5.8 6.9
NOTE:
* Boreholes drilled from on top of existing crush rock stockpile
sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey, bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx 10


February 17, 2017
In boreholes BH17-01 to BH17-04, and BH17-06 to BH17-08, the ODEX method was used to drill
through overburden soils until inferred bedrock was reached, after which point the borehole was
advanced approximately an additional 0.5 to 1 m to confirm the presence of bedrock before
the test hole was terminated. The purpose of these test holes was to evaluate the thickness and
general engineering properties of the soil, as well as to determine the depth to intact bedrock.
It should be noted that boreholes BH17-01 to BH17-04 were completed on top of the existing
stockpile and had to be advanced through the crush rock to determine the depth to bedrock.
In boreholes BH17-05, BH17-09, BH17-10, BH17-11 and BH17-12, the ODEX method was used to drill
through overburden soils until inferred bedrock was reached, at which point the drilling method
was switched to rotary rock coring using an HQ3 triple tube, where the borehole was advanced
approximately an addition 5 m into bedrock, or to a depth of at least 6 m below existing grade.
In addition to determining the thicknesses and engineering properties of soil strata, and
determining the depth to in-tact bedrock, the purpose of these test holes was to characterize
the bedrock by collecting continuous bedrock core samples.
5.3.1 ODEX Drilling
The ODEX drilling method uses a percussive, pneumatic, down-the-hole hammer to advance
through soil and most rock formations. A steel casing with an outer diameter of approximately
115 mm is advanced down the hole by the hammer, and serves as a conduit up which
disturbed drill cuttings are ejected.
Through the course of ODEX drilling, changes in stratigraphy are observed based on drilling
reaction (i.e., relative drilling difficulty and rate of advancement of the casing) as well as visual
observation and collection of disturbed soil cuttings ejected up the casing.
Soil samples are collected from ODEX cuttings ejected up the casing. Where inferred native soil
(e.g., buried organic topsoil, glacial till, etc.) was observed from the ODEX cuttings, a Standard
Penetration Test was performed.
5.3.2 Standard Penetration Test
The Standard Penetration Test (SPT) is an in-situ geotechnical method to roughly assess the
compactness or consistency of a soil, and to obtain a representative soil sample at the test
depth. When in the course of ODEX drilling a native soil was identified based on ejected ODEX
cuttings, a 51 mm outer diameter split spoon was lowered into the borehole and an SPT was
completed in accordance with ASTM D1586.
SPT blow counts were recorded by the Stantec Drilling supervisor and the soil sample was
classified, described, and bagged for further classification and/or testing.


February 17, 2017
5.3.3 Rotary Rock Coring
Conventional rotary rock coring was used to advance the boreholes up to 5.8 m into bedrock
and recover continuous samples of rock in accordance with ASTM D2113.
Upon encountering inferred bedrock during ODEX drilling, a 96 mm diameter hole was drilled
into the bedrock using a diamond-impregnated, annular, rotary drill bit with an inner diameter of
61.1 mm (Boart Longyear HQ3 size).
The drill rig used a triple inner tube system to recover the rock core sample. Throughout the
drilling process, water was pumped down the drill rods to both lubricate and cool the drill bit.
The inner most tube may periodically impede the flow of water from reaching the coring bit.
When this occurred, a run was terminated early and the core barrel emptied. Once lowered
back down to the previous drilled depth, another drill run may be advanced into the bedrock.
Very poor quality rock (highly fractured) with extensive infilling was encountered at BH17-09,
resulting in short drill runs and poor rock recovery.
Geological and engineering descriptions and rock quality designation (RQD) were recorded on
the borehole log for each core run. The rock core was photographed, placed in core boxes and
returned to the Burnaby laboratory.
5.4 LABORATORY PROGRAM

The primary objectives of the Stantec laboratory testing program were to aid in the visual
classification of the soil and rock samples and to measure their pertinent engineering
parameters. Geotechnical laboratory testing was performed in accordance with applicable
American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) test procedures and/or laboratory equipment
manufacturer’s recommended test procedures.
Laboratory testing for the soil samples from the 2014 test pitting investigation was performed in
Stantec’s laboratory in Burnaby, BC, and generally comprised moisture content and fines
content determination.
Detailed logging of the rock core samples from the 2017 test hole investigation was also
performed in Stantec’s Burnaby laboratory, after which photographs were taken of the rock
core samples. The photographs are included in Appendix G. After the rock core was logged
and photographed, select representative rock core samples were shipped to Stantec’s
materials testing laboratory in Calgary, AB for point load testing together with unconfined
compressive strength (UCS) testing. The results of the laboratory testing program are included in
Appendix F.

Subsurface Conditions
February 17, 2017
6.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
6.1 GENERAL
In general, the subsurface conditions encountered consisted of a surficial layer of 19 mm minus
crushed gravel over blast rock fill. The blast rock fill was typically underlain by bedrock. However,
the blast rock was underlain by deposits of native silt with organics, glacial till and/or native
granular soils (i.e., sand and gravel) deposits at a few test pit and borehole locations. In several
test pits, the blast rock fill appeared to have been bedrock that had been previously blasted
and left in place.
The soil conditions encountered in the test pits and boreholes are described in detail on the logs
in Appendix E, and summarized in the following section.
6.2 EXISTING CRUSH ROCK STOCKPILE

The footprint of the crush rock stockpile has been reduced since Stantec’s 2014 test pit
investigation; however, the stockpile still occupies a large portion of the proposed RRC site.
A sample of the stockpiled soil was collected during the 2014 Stantec test pit investigation for
classification and testing in the Stantec soil laboratory.
Based on the results of a grain size analysis performed on the sample, the crush rock is described
as 50 mm minus, sandy gravel with a trace amount of silt. The results of a standard Proctor
density test indicate that the sample of stockpiled material is slightly dry of the optimum moisture
content for compaction. The results of this lab testing are included in Appendix F.
It is important to recognize that a sample of this material could only be collected from the
stockpile surface of the stockpile due to the tarp coverage. Accordingly, we cannot confirm
whether the material is consistent throughout the entirety of the stockpile. Due to the percussive
nature of ODEX drilling, samples collected from ejected drill cuttings is not representative of the
crush rock stockpile.
Based on the four 2017 Stantec boreholes, the stockpiled material ranges from 6.4 m to 13.4 m
thick. In general, observations as to the angularity of pulverized drill cuttings and general drilling
reaction (relative drilling difficulty and rate of advancement) were used to discern between
blast rock fill and underlying stratigraphy. Specifically, the high angularity and greater degree of
pulverization of drill cuttings, together with increased drilling difficulty experienced from 13.4 m to
14.9 m in borehole BH16-03 was indicative of a change in stratigraphy, from crush rock to blast
rock fill. It is conceivable that blast rock fill may have been present below the crush rock
stockpile in boreholes BH16-01, BH16-02 and BH16-04; however, the consistency of both the drill
cuttings and the drilling reaction did not indicate this to be the case.

February 17, 2017
6.3 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS

6.3.1 Gravel Fill
A layer of 19 mm minus crushed gravel fill is present on the surface across much of the Site.
The thickness of this layer was typically found to be less than 100 mm, but occasionally up to
800 mm. At borehole BH17-05, the 19 mm minus crushed gravel fill was 2.1 m thick.
6.3.2 Blast Rock Fill
Blast rock fill was encountered in the flat, gravel-covered RRC and Front End Area in all test pits
and boreholes with the exception of borehole BH17-05. In the footprint of the tarped crush rock
stockpile, the blast rock fill was only encountered in borehole BH17-03. The blast rock fill was
found to directly underlie the 19 mm minus crushed gravel fill and ranged in thickness from 0.3 m
to 3.6 m.
The blast rock fill generally consisted of blasted cobble and boulder-sized bedrock fragments
with boulders up to 1.5 m in diameter. However, it is possible that the excavator may have
broken up larger-sized boulders during the excavating process and boulders larger than 1.5 m
may exist in the RRC area. The blast rock fill was generally dense based on the observed
excavation and drilling effort.
Varying amounts of finer soils (i.e., gravel, sand and silt) were mixed throughout the blast rock fill.
The measured moisture content of the finer portion of the blast rock fill ranged from 18% to 38%.
Roots and reworked topsoil were often encountered in the upper portion of the blast rock fill
layer, typically mixed between the surficial gravel fill and the underlying blast rock fill.
6.3.3 In-Filled Swamp (Silty Sand to Sandy Silt Fill)
A layer of fill comprising silty sand to sandy silt was encountered in beneath the gravel fill and
blast rock fill in boreholes BH17-05 and BH17-06, respectively. The thickness of the layer in the two
boreholes was found to be 1.9 m and 1.8 m, respectively and were isolated to boreholes
located within the footprint of the old swamp area. The layer was grey-brown to light brown in
colour and contained varying amounts of gravel and organic content.
A 150 mm thick layer of a maroon-brown powder with high organic content (inferred to be
partially decayed sawdust) was found directly underlying the sandy silt fill at borehole BH17-05.

February 17, 2017
6.3.4 Silt/Topsoil
A layer of native silt was encountered below the blast rock fill in test pits TP14-14, TP14-15, and
TP14-24, as well as in boreholes BH17-01 to BH17-07, BH17-11 and BH17-12. The thickness of the silt
ranged from 0.1 m to 1.5 m. The silt was generally dark brown in colour and contained varying
amounts of sand and organics, plus traces of gravel. Based on this composition, it is possible that
the native silt is a buried topsoil layer.
The silt was generally soft based on the results of in-situ pocket penetrometer tests performed on
test pit samples. However, most tested samples were heavily disturbed and the tests may not be
representative of the layer consistency. The organic material consisted of roots, tree branches
and occasionally decaying logs. The measured moisture content of samples collected from the
silt deposit ranged from 25% to 97%. Based on SPT blow counts, the silt/topsoil is described as
loose to compact.
6.3.5 Granular Native Soil
A layer of granular native soil was encountered in boreholes BH17-04, BH17-07 and BH17-09,
generally underlying a layer of native silt/topsoil and directly overlying the bedrock. The
thickness of the granular native soil deposit ranged from 0.6 to 1.3 m. The native granular soil was
grey to brown in colour, and primarily comprised sand with varying amounts of silt, gravel and
organic. Based on SPT blow counts, the granular native soil is described as compact to very
dense.
6.3.6 Glacial Till
Glacial till was only encountered in test pit TP14-14. The glacial till was encountered below the silt
at roughly 3 m depth, and had a thickness of 2.2 m. This glacial till layer generally consisted of
gravelly cobbles with some sand and some silt. The glacial till is considered dense based on the
resistance encountered while excavating. The measured moisture content of a sample
collected from the glacial till deposit was 11%.
6.3.7 Blasted Bedrock
In test pits TP14-9, TP14-10, TP14-22, and TP14-25, as shown in Figure 4, intact bedrock was
overlain by what appeared to be bedrock that had been blasted and left in-place. Blasting
wires were observed on the walls of the test pits and the walls appeared to be hard, fractured
bedrock. The layer of blasted bedrock could be broken by the excavator and the excavated
materials were cobbles and boulders.
Unlike open test pits where stratigraphy is readily apparent, boundaries between blast rock fill,
blasted bedrock and intact bedrock are more difficult to identify with ODEX drilling method,
as the pulverizing effect of the percussive hammer readily advances through these materials
with relative ease and ejects visually undiscernible drill cuttings. Blasted, in-place bedrock was

February 17, 2017
not identified during the 2017 test hole investigation; however, it is plausible that material
identified in-field as weathered bedrock based on lower drilling resistance may in fact have
been blasted in-place bedrock.
Figure 4 Blasted bedrock with exposed blasting cable in wall of test pit TP14-9
(2014)
6.3.8 Bedrock
All 2014 test pits were terminated on hard, intact bedrock. The bedrock was encountered at
depths ranging from 0.8 m to 5.2 m below existing ground surface, and could not be ripped by
the bucket of the 225 Link-Belt excavator.
Rotary rock coring was performed in five of the twelve 2017 boreholes in order to collect
samples of intact bedrock. The bedrock consisted of Schist in four of five boreholes (BH17-05,
BH17-09, BH17-10, and BH17-12) and Gneiss in one of five boreholes (BH17-11).
Bedrock core sample recovery was near 100% in four of the five boreholes (BH17-05, and
BH17-10 to BH17-12). However, in borehole BH17-09, extensive fracturing and frequent rock joint
infilling (as shown in Figure 5) resulted in frequent loss of water circulation and rock core recovery
of approximately 50%.

February 17, 2017
Bedrock was generally found to be slightly to highly weathered and in very poor to poor quality.
RQD values were found to range from 0% to 60%, with particularly poor quality in borehole
BH17-09.
Figure 4 Extensive fracturing and joint infill on Run No. 5 in BH17-09 (2017)
Unconfined Compressive Strength of Rock (UCS)
Uniaxial unconfined compressive strength tests were performed on select intact samples of the
bedrock core. Samples were prepared and tested in accordance with ASTM D2938 at the
Stantec laboratory in Calgary, AB. Axial compression load was applied continuously at a rate of
approximately 0.25 MPa/s using a Forney FT-250E-DR2000 compression testing machine, and the
maximum load sustained prior to failure by the specimen was recorded.
Results of the UCS testing are presented in Appendix F.

February 17, 2017
Point Load Testing
A RocTest Point Load Tester (Model PIL-7) was used to measure the point load strength index for
select samples of the bedrock core from each borehole. The tests were performed in
accordance with ASTM D5731.
In point load testing, compressive loads are applied with two (2) 60-degree conical shaped
platens which cause the rock to break in tension between these two points. Point load testing
were performed on core specimens with a length/diameter ratio greater than 1.0.
Point load tests were performed diametrically and axially on select samples of bedrock core.
Bedrock core samples are reported as values of the Point Load Index corrected to a standard
50 mm diameter specimen (I s(50) ). The size-corrected point load strength index of a rock
specimen is defined as the value that would have been measured by a diametral test with a
diameter equal to 50 mm. HQ3-sized core specimens (61 mm I.D.) were tested. A correction
factor is applied, given by the following equation:
Correction Factor = (Diameter Tested/50 mm)0.45
Point load tests performed axially (I s(50)A ) were completed to measure rock index strength
perpendicular/normal to the plane of bedding whereas diametrical point load tests (I s(50)D )
were completed to measure rock index strength parallel to the plane of bedding.
A summary of the Point Load test results is presented in Appendix F.
6.4 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS

Water seepage was observed along the walls of the test pits at depths between 1.5 m and 3.4 m
below existing ground surface. Based on visual observation on the test pit walls, it appears that
this water is due to surface infiltration and run-off from the stockpile.
Of the twelve boreholes completed during the 2017 test hole investigation, groundwater was
encountered only in boreholes BH17-06 to BH17-09, and BH17-11 at depths ranging from 1.5 m to
4.6 m below the ground surface and generally within 0.3 m above the bedrock surface.
It is envisaged that the groundwater is infiltrated rainfall and surface water flowing downslope
along the bedrock surface.
Based on visual observations of water in test pits, proximity to bedrock surface in test holes and
local topography, Stantec infers that the static groundwater table was not encountered in the
2014 and 2017 Stantec site investigations.

Construction Considerations
February 17, 2017
7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
7.1 BEDROCK RIPPABILITY

Bedrock outcrops were observed within the footprint of the proposed digestion facility near the
west end of the Site. The outcrops were estimated to rise approximately 4 m above the flat,
gravel-covered area of the Site. While bedrock was visible in only a small portion of the sloped
ground in the southwest area of the Site, it is inferred based on site topography that shallow
bedrock may exist under the roughly outlined area indicated as sloping ground shown in
Drawing No. 1 (Appendix D) as sloped ground. A close-up view of the bedrock outcrop
identified within the proposed footprint of the digestion facility in shown on Figure 6.
Figure 5 Close-up view of bedrock outcrop 8 m south of BH17-09; rock hammer for
scale (2017)
The bedrock encountered in the borehole closest to the bedrock outcrop (BH17-09) is of very
poor quality and is highly weathered. Due to the jointing frequency of the rock cored at
borehole BH17-09 together with that observed on the bedrock outcrop, Stantec notes that the
potential exists for the bedrock to be ripped/removed using conventional heavy construction
machinery (e.g., bulldozer with ripper, excavator with hydraulic hammer, etc.); however,

Construction Considerations
February 17, 2017
geological mapping or geophysical data would be required to adequately assess whether

construction machinery would be a viable substitute for conventional blasting techniques.
7.2 BEDROCK FLUID CONTAINMENT

Stantec understands that an unlined liquids containment pond is being considered in the
Front End area, whereby liquids would be stored in an excavation into the shallow bedrock.
The two easternmost boreholes (BH17-11 and BH17-12) exhibited poor to very poor rock quality
(i.e., highly fractured). As such, use of the bedrock for containment of fluids will likely require the
use of a liner.
7.3 FILLED-IN SWAMP

As noted in Section 4.0, we understand that a swamp once existed at the approximate centre
of the Site. Deeper bedrock (at a depth of approximately 5 m), thick zones of loosely placed
variable fill as well as native soils with organic content were encountered below the flat, gravel-
covered ground surface at boreholes BH17-05 and BH17-06, thus giving some indication that the
swamp was backfilled with loosely placed and poor quality fills. Foundation designs for structures
in the approximate footprint or vicinity of the filled-in swamp should take into consideration the
presence of these poor quality fills and native soils. The actually lateral extents of the former
swamp area is unknown.

Appendix A Statement of General Conditions

February 17, 2017
STATEMENT OF GENERAL CONDITIONS

bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx A.1
Geotechnical Data Report
Proposed Hartland Development
Appendix A: Statement of General Conditions
Statement of General Conditions
USE OF THIS REPORT: This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of the Client or its agent
and may not be used by any third part without the express written consent of Stantec Consulting
Ltd. (Stantec) and the Client. Any use which a third party makes of this report is the responsibility
of such third party.
BASIS OF THE REPORT: The information, opinions, and/or recommendations made I this report are
in accordance with Stantec’s present understanding of the site specific project as described by
the Client. The applicability of these is restricted to the site conditions encountered at the time of
the investigation or study. If the proposed site-specific project differs or is modified from what is
described in this report or if the site conditions are altered, this report is no longer valid unless
Stantec is requested by the Client to review and revise the report to reflect the differing or
modified project specifics and/or the altered site conditions.
STANDARD OF CARE: Preparation of this report, and all associated work was carried out in
accordance with the normally accepted standard of care in the state or province of execution
for the specific professional service provided to the Client. No other warranty is made.
INTERPRETATION OF SITE CONDITIONS: Soil Rock, or other material descriptions, and statements
regarding their conditions, made in the report are based on site conditions encountered by
Stantec at the time of the work and at the specific testing and/or sampling locations.
Classifications and statements of condition have been made I accordance with normally
accepted practices which are judgmental in nature; no specific description should be
considered exact but rather reflective of the anticipated material behavior. Extrapolation of in
situ conditions can only be made to some limited extent beyond the sampling or test points. The
extent depends on variability of the soil, rock and groundwater conditions as influenced by
geological processes, construction activity, and site use.
VARYING OR UNEXPECTED CONDITIONS: Should any site or subsurface conditions be encountered
that are different from those described in this report or encountered at the test locations, Stantec
must be notified immediately to assess if the varying or unexpected conditions are substantial and
if reassessments of the report conclusions or recommendations are required. Stantec will not be
responsible to any party for damages incurred as a result of failing to notify Stantec that differing
site or subsurface conditions are present upon becoming aware of such conditions.
PLANNING, DESIGN, OR CONSTRUCTION: Development or design plans and specifications should
be reviewed by Stantec, sufficiently ahead of initiating the next project stage (property
acquisition, tender, construction, etc.) to confirm that this report completely addresses the
elaborated project specifics and that the contents of this report have been properly interpreted.
Specialty quality assurance services (field observations and testing) during construction are a
necessary part of the evaluation of subsurface conditions and site preparation works. Site work
relating to the recommendations included in this report should only be carried out in the
presence of a qualified geotechnical engineer; Stantec cannot be responsible for site work
carried out without being present.
May 2014
Project No. 1117-00431 A-2
Appendix B Reference Drawings

February 17, 2017
REFERENCE DRAWINGS

bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx B.1
Appendix C Existing Subsurface Information

February 17, 2017
EXISTING SUBSURFACE INFORMATION

bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx C.1
CRD Environmental Sustainability - Mar 21, 2012 - Technologist: JPB - Map Document: HartlandGroundwaterLevel2012MonFreq.mxd
HARTLAND LANDFILL
GROUNDWATER LEVEL MONITORING LOCATIONS 105
95
65
85 80
125
115
90
70
55
13
150
120
145
155
60
GW-55-1-1
GW-57-1-1
GW-41-1-1
95
75
GW-56-1-1
16 140
0
16 115
16 0
170 0
5
17
10
5
0
17
GW-42-1-1
16
5
GW-43-1-1
GW-44-1-1 17
0
165 13
20 5
5 17
0 W
illis
Po
GW-62-1-1 in t
GW-62-2-1 Rd
GW-29-1-1 GW-30-1-1
0
21 0 GW-30-1-2
18 GW-29-1-2
120
GW-31-1-1
185
200
GW-25-1-1
190
120 GW-31-1-2
GW-20-1-1
190
GW-79-1-1 GW-78-1-1 GW-25-1-2 GW-21-1-1

GW-53-1-1 GW-28-1-0 GW-20-1-2 GW-21-1-2
GW-79-2-1 GW-78-2-1
Nor GW-21-2-1
th P 16
ark 0 110
11
Roa GW-77-1-1 GW-38-1-1 GW-50-1-1
0
d
130
ad
GW-77-2-1 evel Ro GW-39-1-1
High L GW-39-2-1
GW-51-1-1
155 GW-37-1-1 13 GW-51-2-1
125 0
GW-37-2-1 GW-40-1-1 GW-51-3-1
GW-37-3-1 GW-81-1-0
135 GW-52-1-1
17
0 GW-36-1-1 GW-52-2-0
GW-36-2-1 GW-16-1-1
23
GW-27-1-1
5
GW-83-1-1 GW-36-3-1 GW-52-3-0 GW-16-1-2

170
GW-27-1-2
GW-52-4-0-P7 GW-16-2-1
GW-80-1-0-P8 130
GW-58-1-0 GW-16-2-2
0
16
25
5
140
ad
140 Ro
150 R
25
160
Q o ad 145
0
ua
rry 150 Road
GW-82-1-1 145
265 Ac 14
To
ce 0 GW-17-1-1
utl
160
150
ss Ro GW-17-1-2
Hi
eR
ad
26
Ro
gh
155 GW-17-1-3
0
ad TR-86-1-1 16 GW-75-1-1
iv e
Le
5
TR-86-2-1
v
rR
el
R
oa
VLGW-21-D
145
GW-54-1-1
oa
VLGW-26-D
d
d
GW-54-2-1
155
20
5
GW-54-3-1
VLGW-20-D
175
GW-46-3-1 VLGW-08-D
GW-46-4-1
GW-46-2-1 VLGW-19-D
Ce
180
215
GW-74-2-1 GW-18-1-1
170
175
19
ll 2
180
5 170 GW-18-1-2
GW-74-1-1 VLGW-11-S
Ha
26 GW-18-2-1
27
27
5
VLGW-18-D
0
ul R
5
GW-18-2-2
220
175
GW-61-1-1
0
oad
17
175
0
VLGW-17-D
16
GW-76-1-1
28 5
290
180
17
0
28
GW-76-2-1
0
170
18
GW-76-3-1
0
5
29
ad
17
GW-47-1-1
291
170
Ro
5
170
VLGW-16-D 18
0
180
0
17
East Hydro Road
GW-47-2-1
29
0
280
275
VLGW-04-D
VLGW-15-D
17
180
GW-48-1-1 16
0
5
GW-48-2-1
160
GW-63-1-1 VLGW-01-D
285
GW-63-2-1
Ma
in VLGW-03-D GW-09-1-0
Ac VLGW-02-D
200
ce
ss
200
Ro P4
20
Dive ad P1
0
rsio P3
160
nR P2
oad R o ad GW-12-1-0 GW-72-1-1
Berm GW-72-2-1
So
GW-85-1-1 GW-72-3-1
uth
280
290
285
P ark
19
GW-60-1-1 GW-71-1-1
0
Ro
GW-60-2-1 GW-71-2-1
ad
GW-60-3-1
Har
GW-71-3-1
170
23
GW-07-1-0
tlan
0
19
0
160
150
dA
165
ve
225
GW-19-1-1 GW-73-1-1
19
240
0
22
GW-19-1-2 GW-73-2-1
135
GW-19-2-1 GW-73-3-1
18
GW-19-2-2
5
245
GW-04-2-1
GW-04-3-1
140
130
GW-04-4-1
125
15
5
145
200
23
5
210
195
130
24
190
5
240
180
175
195 0
195 11
5
12
190
11
Metres Groundwater Level Monitoring Locations Roads

0 25 50 100 150 Monitoring Frequency (# times per year) Contours (5m interval)
Projection: UTM ZONE 10N NAD 83 6 Index
Important This map is for general information purposes only. The Capital Regional District (CRD) makes no representations or warranties
regarding the accuracy or completeness of this map or the suitability of the map for any purpose. This map is not for navigation. The CRD
10 Index-Depression
will not be liable for any damage, loss or injury resulting from the use of the map or information on the map and the map may be changed
by the CRD at any time.
Continuous
Appendix D Stantec Site Plan

February 17, 2017
STANTEC SITE PLAN

bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx D.2
N
ROA
D
TP14-21
TP14-20
TP14-17 TP14-15
X
TP14-14
BEDROCK
TP14-19 BH17-07
OUTCROP DIG TP14-18 TP14-12
ES
FAC TION
ILITY
TP14-16 DE THIC
BH17-09 WA KE TP14-13
X
TER NIN
ING G A TP14-11
FA ND
DIG CI
LIT
SL ESTE Y
TP14-09
BH17-08 STO UDG D
R E
TA AGE BH17-05
NK TP14-10 TP14-07
H
E
TP14-08
OP
O BH17-10 TP14-04
X
SW RIG AD
BH17-06
SL
AM IN OP MIN
FIL P A AL E A
BU RATI ND TP14-01
LED RE ILD ON
IN A ING S
TP14-05 TP14-06 TP14-02

X
SU BH17-03
PP
FE LEM TP14-03
E DIS POW
RE DSTO ENTA
CE L EQ TRIBU ER FLA
FA IVIN CK UIP TIO H
CI STA M N
RE W OT
LIT G ND AND ENT FA ATER TP14-22
Y CI
SLOPED GROUND BY LIT
PO Y
WE
R
EX BH17-04
X
IS
TIN
G
AC
CE WA BH17-01 TP14-23
SS TO TER
RO WE
AD R LEGEND
SC
X
AL BH17-02
E BH17-11 SITE PROPERTY LINE
TREE LINE
BH17-12
TEST PIT LOCATION
(STANTEC, 2014)
X
H TEST HOLE ADVANCED TO

TP14-24 BEDROCK SURFACE
(STANTEC, 2017)
X
TP14-25 TEST HOLE ADVANCED INTO

BEDROCK (STANTEC, 2017)
X
CRUSH ROCK STOCKPILE

NOTE:
LOCATION OF BEDROCK OUTCROPPINGS AND SLOPED
GROUND BASED ON VISUAL IN-FIELD OBSERVATION ONLY
X
SCALE IN METRES
0 25 50 75 100
1:1500
Sources Project Information Client/Project

- Plant layout from Stantec Architecture Project No.: 111700431 CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT
Dwg No.: HA-D0-G-002
Dated: 16-DEC-20 Scale: 1:1500
- Extent of filled-in swamp based on Date: 2017-JAN-27 GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT
Capital Regional District archived
drawings
Drawn by: G. HUYNH
- Extent of existing stockpile based on Checked by: C. HAJEN
aerial photography (Google, 2017) Project Location TITLE Dwg No.
HARTLAND LANDFILL SITE TEST HOLE LOCATION PLAN
1
DISCLAIMER: The Contractor shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions. DO NOT
scale the drawing - any error or omissions shall be reported to Stantec without delay.
The Copyrights to all designs and drawings are the property of Stantec. Reproduction
SAANICH, BC
or use for any purpose other than that authorized by Stantec is forbidden.
Appendix E Stantec Test Pit and Test Hole Records

February 17, 2017
STANTEC TEST PIT AND TEST HOLE RECORDS

bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx E.1
SYMBOLS AND TERMS USED ON BOREHOLE AND TEST PIT RECORDS
SOIL DESCRIPTION
Terminology describing common soil genesis:
- vegetation, roots and moss with organic matter and topsoil typically forming a
Rootmat
mattress at the ground surface
Topsoil - mixture of soil and humus capable of supporting vegetative growth
Peat - mixture of visible and invisible fragments of decayed organic matter
Till - unstratified glacial deposit which may range from clay to boulders
Fill - material below the surface identified as placed by humans (excluding buried services)
Terminology describing soil structure:

Desiccated - having visible signs of weathering by oxidization of clay minerals, shrinkage cracks, etc.
Fissured - having cracks, and hence a blocky structure
Varved - composed of regular alternating layers of silt and clay
Stratified - composed of alternating successions of different soil types, e.g. silt and sand
Layer - > 75 mm in thickness
Seam - 2 mm to 75 mm in thickness
Parting - < 2 mm in thickness
Terminology describing soil types:

The classification of soil types are made on the basis of grain size and plasticity in accordance with the Unified
Soil Classification System (USCS) (ASTM D 2487 or D 2488) which excludes particles larger than 75 mm. For
particles larger than 75 mm, and for defining percent clay fraction in hydrometer results, definitions proposed by
Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual, 4th Edition are used. The USCS provides a group symbol (e.g. SM)
and group name (e.g. silty sand) for identification.
Terminology describing cobbles, boulders, and non-matrix materials (organic matter or debris):
Terminology describing materials outside the USCS, (e.g. particles larger than 75 mm, visible organic matter, and
construction debris) is based upon the proportion of these materials present:
Trace, or occasional Less than 10%

Some 10-20%
Frequent > 20%
Terminology describing compactness of cohesionless soils:

The standard terminology to describe cohesionless soils includes compactness (formerly "relative density"), as
determined by the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) N-Value - also known as N-Index. The SPT N-Value is described
further on page 3. A relationship between compactness condition and N-Value is shown in the following table.
Compactness Condition SPT N-Value

Very Loose <4
Loose 4-10
Compact 10-30
Dense 30-50
Very Dense >50
Terminology describing consistency of cohesive soils:

The standard terminology to describe cohesive soils includes the consistency, which is based on undrained shear
strength as measured by in situ vane tests, penetrometer tests, or unconfined compression tests. Consistency
may be crudely estimated from SPT N-Value based on the correlation shown in the following table (Terzaghi and
Peck, 1967). The correlation to SPT N-Value is used with caution as it is only very approximate.
Undrained Shear Strength Approximate

Consistency
kips/sq.ft. kPa SPT N-Value
Very Soft <0.25 <12.5 <2
Soft 0.25 - 0.5 12.5 - 25 2-4
Firm 0.5 - 1.0 25 - 50 4-8
Stiff 1.0 - 2.0 50 – 100 8-15
Very Stiff 2.0 - 4.0 100 - 200 15-30
Hard >4.0 >200 >30
SYMBOLS AND TERMS USED ON BOREHOLE AND TEST PIT RECORDS – JULY 2014 Page 1 of 3
ROCK DESCRIPTION
Except where specified below, terminology for describing rock is as defined by the International Society for Rock
Mechanics (ISRM) 2007 publication “The Complete ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing
and Monitoring: 1974-2006”
Terminology describing rock quality:

RQD Rock Mass Quality Alternate (Colloquial) Rock Mass Quality
0-25 Very Poor Quality Very Severely Fractured Crushed
25-50 Poor Quality Severely Fractured Shattered or Very Blocky
50-75 Fair Quality Fractured Blocky
75-90 Good Quality Moderately Jointed Sound
90-100 Excellent Quality Intact Very Sound
RQD (Rock Quality Designation) denotes the percentage of intact and sound rock retrieved from a borehole of
any orientation. All pieces of intact and sound rock core equal to or greater than 100 mm (4 in.) long are
summed and divided by the total length of the core run. RQD is determined in accordance with ASTM D6032.
SCR (Solid Core Recovery) denotes the percentage of solid core (cylindrical) retrieved from a borehole of any
orientation. All pieces of solid (cylindrical) core are summed and divided by the total length of the core run (It
excludes all portions of core pieces that are not fully cylindrical as well as crushed or rubble zones).
Fracture Index (FI) is defined as the number of naturally occurring fractures within a given length of core. The
Fracture Index is reported as a simple count of natural occurring fractures.
Terminology describing rock with respect to discontinuity and bedding spacing:

Spacing (mm) Discontinuities Bedding
>6000 Spacing
Extremely Wide -
2000-6000 Very Wide Very Thick
600-2000 Wide Thick
200-600 Moderate Medium
60-200 Close Thin
20-60 Very Close Very Thin
<20 Extremely Close Laminated
<6 - Thinly Laminated
Terminology describing rock strength:

Strength Classification Grade Unconfined Compressive Strength (MPa)
Extremely Weak R0 <1
Very Weak R1 1–5
Weak R2 5 – 25
Medium Strong R3 25 – 50
Strong R4 50 – 100
Very Strong R5 100 – 250
Extremely Strong R6 >250
Terminology describing rock weathering:

Term Symbol Description
No visible signs of rock weathering. Slight discoloration along major
Fresh W1
discontinuities
Discoloration indicates weathering of rock on discontinuity surfaces.
Slightly W2
All the rock material may be discolored.
Moderately W3 Less than half the rock is decomposed and/or disintegrated into soil.
Highly W4 More than half the rock is decomposed and/or disintegrated into soil.
All the rock material is decomposed and/or disintegrated into soil.
Completely W5
The original mass structure is still largely intact.
Residual Soil W6 All the rock converted to soil. Structure and fabric destroyed.
STRATA PLOT
Strata plots symbolize the soil or bedrock description. They are combinations of the following basic symbols. The
dimensions within the strata symbols are not indicative of the particle size, layer thickness, etc.
Boulders Sand Silt Clay Organics Asphalt Concrete Fill Igneous Meta- Sedi-
Cobbles Bedrock morphic mentary
Gravel Bedrock Bedrock
SAMPLE TYPE
Split spoon sample (obtained by

SS WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT
performing the Standard Penetration Test)
ST Shelby tube or thin wall tube
Direct-Push sample (small diameter tube measured in standpipe,
DP piezometer, or well
sampler hydraulically advanced)
PS Piston sample
BS Bulk sample
Rock core samples obtained with the use inferred
HQ, NQ, BQ, etc.
of standard size diamond coring bits.
RECOVERY
For soil samples, the recovery is recorded as the length of the soil sample recovered. For rock core, recovery is
defined as the total cumulative length of all core recovered in the core barrel divided by the length drilled and
is recorded as a percentage on a per run basis.
N-VALUE
Numbers in this column are the field results of the Standard Penetration Test: the number of blows of a 140 pound
(63.5 kg) hammer falling 30 inches (760 mm), required to drive a 2 inch (50.8 mm) O.D. split spoon sampler one
foot (300 mm) into the soil. In accordance with ASTM D1586, the N-Value equals the sum of the number of blows
(N) required to drive the sampler over the interval of 6 to 18 in. (150 to 450 mm). However, when a 24 in. (610
mm) sampler is used, the number of blows (N) required to drive the sampler over the interval of 12 to 24 in. (300
to 610 mm) may be reported if this value is lower. For split spoon samples where insufficient penetration was
achieved and N-Values cannot be presented, the number of blows are reported over sampler penetration in
millimetres (e.g. 50/75). Some design methods make use of N-values corrected for various factors such as
overburden pressure, energy ratio, borehole diameter, etc. No corrections have been applied to the N-values
presented on the log.
DYNAMIC CONE PENETRATION TEST (DCPT)

Dynamic cone penetration tests are performed using a standard 60 degree apex cone connected to ‘A’ size
drill rods with the same standard fall height and weight as the Standard Penetration Test. The DCPT value is the
number of blows of the hammer required to drive the cone one foot (300 mm) into the soil. The DCPT is used as a
probe to assess soil variability.
OTHER TESTS
S Sieve analysis Single packer permeability test;

H Hydrometer analysis test interval from depth shown to
k Laboratory permeability bottom of borehole
γ Unit weight
Double packer permeability test;
Gs Specific gravity of soil particles
test interval as indicated
CD Consolidated drained triaxial
Consolidated undrained triaxial with pore
CU Falling head permeability test
pressure measurements
UU Unconsolidated undrained triaxial using casing
DS Direct Shear
C Consolidation Falling head permeability test
Qu Unconfined compression using well point or piezometer
Point Load Index (Ip on Borehole Record equals
Ip Ip(50) in which the index is corrected to a
reference diameter of 50 mm)
TEST PIT RECORD TP14-01
CLIENT CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT PROJECT No. 111700431
PROJECT Proposed Hartland Development 5376737
NORTHING
LOCATION Hartland Landfill Site, Saanich, BC EASTING 465321
EXCAVATION DATE Mar. 19, 2014 CONTRACTOR R G Excavating EXCAVATION METHOD Test Pitting
SAMPLES Insitu Shear Vane (kPa) Remoulded Shear Vane (kPa)

SOIL SYMBOL
Pocket Penetrometer (kPa) Disturbed Torvane (kPa)

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
50kPa 100kPa 150kPa 200kPa
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
Moisture Content & Atterberg Limits
Standard Penetration Test (blows/0.3 m)
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
FILL - 25 mm of 19 mm minus crushed Gravel over
brown/grey Cobbles and Boulders, some gravel,
some sand, some silt (Blast Rock)
- boulders up to 0.6 m in diameter
2
FL
1
4
BR 6
BEDROCK
2 End of Test Pit at 1.8 m due to refusal on
non-rippable bedrock.
Test pit backfilled with spoils, excavator bucket
compacted to surface. 8
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
Sample Type: GS - Grab Sample SPT - Split Spoon Logged by: KT/RI
ST - Shelby Tube PT - Piston Tube CC - Continuous Core Reviewed by: AM/HK
Piezometer Bentonite Sloughed Drill Cuttings Sand
Backfill Type: Date: March 26, 2014
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
2
FL
1
4
BR 6
BEDROCK
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
2
1 FL
4
6
2 - water seepage at 2.1 m
BR
BEDROCK
End of Test Pit at 2.1 m due to refusal on
non-rippable bedrock. 8
compacted to surface.
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
light brown Cobbles and Boulders, some gravel,
2
GS 1 18
FL
1
4
BR 6
BEDROCK
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
light brown silty Sand and Cobbles, some gravel,
some boulders, trace organics (Blast Rock) GS 1 19
2
1 FL
6
BR BEDROCK
2
Test pit backfilled with spoils, excavator bucket 8
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
Dark brown sandy Silt and Cobbles, some organics, GS 1 34
FL trace boulders (Blast Rock mixed with reworked
Topsoil)
- boulders up to 0.3 m in diameter 2
BR
BEDROCK
6
2
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
reddish brown/grey Cobbles and Boulders, some
gravel, trace sand, trace silt (Blast Rock)
2
FL
1
4
BR 6
BEDROCK
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
reddish-brown silty sandy Cobbles, some gravel,
trace boulders, trace organics (Blast Rock) GS 1
FL
2
1 FILL - reddish and dark brown gravelly sandy Silt,

some cobbles and boulders, trace organics (Blast
FL Rock mixed with reworked Topsoil) 4
- boulders up to 0.5 m in diameter GS 2 38
BR BEDROCK
End of Test Pit at 1.7 m due to refusal on 6
2 non-rippable bedrock.
8
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
FL FILL - 150 mm of 19 mm minus crushed Gravel over
reddish-brown/grey gravelly Cobble, some silt, some
sand (Blast Rock) GS 1
FL FILL - brown/grey gravelly Cobble, some silt, some
sand (Blast Rock) 2
1 Blasted BEDROCK (in situ)
BR
6
2
BR BEDROCK
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
FL FILL - 25 mm of 19 mm minus crushed Gravel over
reddish-brown gravelly Cobble mixed with sandy
Silt, trace organics (Blast Rock) GS 1 19
FILL - reddish-brown Gravel and Cobbles, some silt,
some sand, trace boulders (Blast Rock) 2
FL
1
4
Blasted BEDROCK (in situ)
BR
BR 6
BEDROCK
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
FILL - 19 mm minus crushed Gravel
FL
2
FILL - reddish-brown Cobbles and Boulders some
1
4
FL
6
2
BR 8
BEDROCK
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
FILL - 150 mm of 19 mm minus crushed Gravel,
over reddish-brown Cobbles and Boulders some
FL 2
1
BR 4
BEDROCK
2
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
brown/grey Cobbles and Boulders, some gravel, trace
sand, trace silt (Blast Rock)
2
1
4
FL 6
2
3 10
- water seepage at 3.4 m
BR 12
BEDROCK
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
grey Cobbles and Boulders, some gravel, trace sand,
trace silt (Blast Rock)
2
FL
1
4
Dark brown SILT, some organics, some cobbles, GS 1 35

some sand, trace gravel
- 250 mm in diameter logs 6
2
- organic Silt from 2.0 to 2.5 m 97
- water seepage at 2.1 m GS 2 97 >>
ML
8
GS 3 25
3 10
Grey glacial TILL (gravelly sandy Silt, trace GS 4 11
cobbles), dense
12
- gravelly Cobble, some sand, some silt below
4
TL
14
16
5
BR
BEDROCK
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
FILL - grey Cobbles and Boulders, some gravel,
trace sand, trace silt (Blast Rock)
FL
1
4
6
Dark brown/grey SILT, some organics, some
2 cobbles, trace gravel
ML GS 1 50
Light brown sandy SILT, some gravel, trace cobbles
8
ML - grey below 2.7 m GS 2 22
BR BEDROCK
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
1 FL
4
- water seepage at 1.8 m 6

2
BR
BEDROCK
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
1 FL
6
BR BEDROCK
2
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
2
FL
1
4
- standing water at base from surface runoff

BR
BEDROCK
8
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
reddish-brown Gravel and Cobbles, trace sand, trace
silt (Blast Rock)
1 FL
4

2
BR
BEDROCK
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
grey/reddish-brown Cobbles and Boulders, some
gravel, some sand, trace silt (Blast Rock)
1 FL
4

2
BR
BEDROCK
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
grey/reddish-brown Cobbles and Boulders, some
gravel, some sand, trace silt (Blast Rock)
2
FL
1
4
BR
BEDROCK
2 Test pit backfilled with spoils, excavator bucket
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
reddish-brown Gravel and Cobbles, trace sand, trace
silt (Blast Rock)
FL
1
4
6
2
8
BR
3 10
BR
BEDROCK
4 compacted to surface.
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
FILL - 50 mm of dark brown organic Silt (topsoil)
over brown Gravel and Cobbles, trace sand, trace silt
(Blast Rock)
- roots coming out of cracks down to 0.9 m
2
1
FL 4
6
2
BR 8
BEDROCK
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 0
FILL - grey Cobbles and Boulders, trace sand, trace
silt (Blast Rock)
- roots and wood logs mixed in down to 0.9 m
1
FL 4
6
2
8
Dark brown sandy SILT, some gravel, some organics
(100 mm in diameter branches)
GS 1 46
ML
3 10
BR
BEDROCK
4 compacted to surface.
14
16
5
18
6
20
NORTHING

SOIL SYMBOL

DEPTH (m)
SOIL TYPE
CONTENT (%)
DEPTH (ft)
MOISTURE
NUMBER
TYPE
SOIL DESCRIPTION
WP W WL
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
0 FL 0
FILL - 100 mm of 19 mm minus crushed Gravel
BR
1
4
BR 6
BEDROCK
3 10
12
14
16
5
18
6
20
BOREHOLE RECORD BH17-01
CLIENT CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT NORTHING 5376689 PROJECT NO. 111700431
PROJECT Proposed Hartland Development EASTING 465267 BH SIZE ODEX
DATES: BORING 1/19/2017 WATER LEVEL DATUM -
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
BROKEN CORE FX-FRACTURE CONT-CONTACT RZ-BROKEN CORE / UN-UNDULATING
CRUSHED CORE J-JOINT So-BEDDING RUBBLE ZONE PO-POLISHED PC-PARTIALLY COATED
STRATA PLOT / WL
MISSING CORE CLV-CLEAVAGE F-FAULT PL-PLANAR K-SLICKENSIDED CC-COMPLETELY COATED
ELEVATION (m)
INFERRED FAULT VN-VEIN FOL-FOLIATION ST-STEPPED R-ROUGH IN-FILLED
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
0
Black, 1 mm thick,
tarpaulin membrane
FILL: Grey, poorly graded
gravel with sand and silt
(50 mm minus gravel
stockpile)
5
Sample Types: SPT - Split Spoon; RC - Continuous Core
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:44
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
5
(50 mm minus gravel
stockpile)
Dark brown sandy SILT

(ML) with high organic
content GS
- traces of gravel 1 - - - - -
Very dense, brown-grey

7 SILTY SAND (SM) with SPT
gravel. Trace organics. 2 - - - - -
- SPT refusal at 7.2 m:
bouncing refusal on
bedrock
Grey BEDROCK
- severely weathered to 7.8
m based on drilling
SPT - - - - -
reaction 3
8 bouncing refusal on
bedrock
- End of test hole BH17-01

at 8.4 m below existing
ground surface
10
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:45
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
0
Black, 1 mm thick,
tarpaulin membrane
FILL: Compact, grey,
poorly graded gravel with
sand and silt (50 mm
minus gravel stockpile)
5
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:46
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
5
7
(ML) with gravel and high SPT - - - - -
1
organic content
Grey BEDROCK
bouncing refusal on
bedrock

ground surface
10
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:47
14:1:46
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
0
Black, 1 mm thick,
tarpaulin membrane
(50 mm minus gravel
stockpile)
5
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:48
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
5
(50 mm minus gravel
stockpile)
10
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:48
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
10
(50 mm minus gravel
stockpile)
11
12
13
FILL: Brown/grey cobbles

and boulders with silt,
sand and gravel (Blast
Rock)
14
Brown SILT (ML) with

15
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:49
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
15
sand
SPT - - - - -
- SPT refusal at 15.4 m: 1
bouncing refusal on
bedrock
Grey BEDROCK
- severely weathered to
15.4 m based on drilling
reaction
16

ground surface
17
18
19
20
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:49
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
0
Black, 1 mm thick,
tarpaulin membrane
5
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:53
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
5
- SPT at 5.5 m:
SPT - - - - -
21 blows/0.3 m 1
- SPT at 8.4 m: SPT

15 blows/0.3 m 2 - - - - -

(ML) with gravel and high
10 - - - - -
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:53
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
10
organic content SPT
- traces of gravel 3 - - - - -
Very dense, brown SILTY
SAND (SM)
- traces of organics and
gravel
- SPT refusal at 10.1 m: SPT
bouncing refusal on 4 - - - - -
inferred gravel
Grey BEDROCK
11 - SPT refusal at 10.7 m:
bouncing refusal on
bedrock

ground surface
12
13
14
15
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:53
PROJECT Proposed Hartland Development EASTING 465207 BH SIZE ODEX/HQ3
DATES: BORING 1/22/2017 to 1/22/2017 WATER LEVEL DATUM -
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
0
FILL: Grey-brown poorly
graded gravel with silt and GS
sand (19 mm minus - - - - -
1
crushed gravel)
- traces of organics
GS - - - - -
1 2
FILL: Grey-brown sandy

silt with gravel and
GS - - - - -
organics 3
4 FILL: Maroon-brown GS - - - - -
powder with high organic 4
content (inferred sawdust)
Grey to light brown sandy
SILT (ML)
- traces of gravel
GS - - - - -
5
5
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:56
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
5
Grey to light brown sandy
SILT (ML)
Grey BEDROCK
Qu = 92.18
MPa
- switch to rotary rock
coring 22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, CLN
22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, CLN
Poor quality grey SCHIST 22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, CLN
- slightly weathered, strong 16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
- oxidized joints and thin
6 RC 91 20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
quartzite bands throughout 50 39 6.7 R4 W2
6 16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
Is(50), D =
16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC 6.58 MPa
Is(50), A =
20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC 3.86 MPa
End of BH17-05 at 6.6 m
10
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:56
DATES: BORING 1/18/2017 WATER LEVEL 4.5 m DATUM -
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
0
graded gravel with silt and
sand (19 mm minus
crushed gravel)
Rock)
1
FILL: Compact, light
brown silty sand with SPT - - - - -
1
gravel
- SPT at 1.1 m:
16 blows/0.3 m
- SPT at 2.3 m:
23 blows/0.3 m SPT - - - - -
2
Loose, dark brown sandy

3 SILT (ML) with high SPT - - - - -
3
organic content
- SPT at 2.9 m:
7 blows/0.3 m
- compact and light brown
below 3.7 m
- SPT at 3.8 m:
18 blows/0.3 m SPT - - - - -
4 4
Grey BEDROCK
- severely weathered to 4.9 SPT - - - - -
5
m based on drilling
reaction
- SPT at 4.5 m:
5
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:58
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
5
93 blows/0.3 m
Grey BEDROCK

ground surface
6
10
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:1:59
DATES: BORING 1/18/2017 WATER LEVEL 3m DATUM -
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
0
sand (19 mm minus
crushed gravel)
Rock)
Compact, dark brown

sandy SILT (ML) with high SPT - - - - -
1
organic content
- traces of wood debris
- SPT at 1.5 m:
2
12 blows/0.3 m
- grey and with gravel

below 2.4 m SPT - - - - -
2
- SPT at 2.4 m:
15 blows/0.3 m
Dense, grey poorly graded
GRAVEL (GP) with sand
3 - traces of silt SPT
3 - - - - -
- SPT at 2.9 m:
31 blows/0.3 m
4
SPT - - - - -
Grey BEDROCK 4
bouncing refusal on
bedrock
ground surface
5
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:2:1
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
0
sand (19 mm minus
crushed gravel)
FILL: Grey cobbles and
boulders with silt, sand
and gravel (Blast Rock)
- brown below 0.3 m
- grey below 1.2 m
Grey BEDROCK
bouncing refusal on
bedrock SPT - - - - -
1
3 ground surface
5
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:2:2
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
0
sand (19 mm minus
crushed gravel)
- brown below 0.3 m
Compact, brown well SPT
1 - - - - -
graded SAND (SW) with
1
gravel
- grey below 0.8 m
- SPT at 0.8 m:
14 blows/0.3 m
Grey BEDROCK
- severely weathered to 2.4
m based on drilling SPT - - - - -
reaction and SPT at 1.5 m 2
- SPT at 1.5 m:
51 blows/0.3 m
2

coring
Very poorly quality dark
grey SCHIST
3
- highly weathered, weak to RC 34
medium strong 3 2 0 >20.0 R3 W4
- garnet and mica
inclusions throughout,
oxidation on most joints
- rubble zone, 2.6 m - 5.3 m
16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC

RC 91 9 0 >20.0 R3 W4
4
- completely weathered,
4
weak, below 3.9 m
- granodiorite band, 4.0 m
to 4.5 m
RC 36 0 0 >20.0 R2 W5
5
5
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:2:4
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
5
Very poorly quality dark 16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
grey SCHIST RC 36 0 0 >20.0 R2 W5
5
16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC

20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC

6
RC 89 28 14 >20.0 R2 W5 8 1.5 8 FX, UN, R, PC
6 FX, UN, R, PC
20 3.0 1
20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, IN
- heavily fractured
below 6.5 m

7
10
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:2:4
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
0
FILL: Compact,
grey-brown poorly graded
gravel with silt and sand
(19 mm minus crushed
gravel)
- grey below 0.8 m
1
Grey BEDROCK
- switch to rotary rock 20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC

20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
coring 20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
3 FX, UN, R, PC
Poor quality grey GNEISS 20 3.0 4
- slightly weathered, weak 20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
to medium strong 20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
RC 100 20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
- some oxidation on joints 45 38 8.3 R3 W2
1 Qu = 20.32
throughout 20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
MPa
20 3.0 4 FX, ST, R, PC

20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC

4 16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
- 30 degree foliation, 4.1 m
to 4.9 m
- thin quartzite banding, 16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
RC 100 16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
4.2 m to 4.8 m 44 17 11.0 R3 W2 16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
2
22 3.00.75 FX, ST, R, PC
16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC Is(50), D =

20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC 2.12 MPa
16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC Is(50), A =
3.98 MPa
20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
5
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:2:7
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
5
Poor quality grey GNEISS
RC 100 44 17 11.0 R3 W2
2
16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
20 3.0 1
20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
20 3.0 1
FX, UN, R, PC
20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
6 FX, ST, R, PC
Is(50), D =
RC 100 28 15 9.1 R3 W2 20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC 5.05 MPa
3 20 3.0 4 FX, ST, R, PC
20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
- 45 degree foliation, 6.3 m 20 1.50.75 FX, PL, R, CLN
20 1.50.75 FX, PL, R, CLN
to 6.8 m 20 1.50.75 FX, PL, R, CLN
- thin quartz banding, 22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, PC

6.7 m to 6.9 m 22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, PC
22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, PC
7 End of BH17-10 at 6.9 m
10
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:2:7
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
0
FILL: Compact,
gravel)
- grey below 0.8 m

1 and gravel (Blast Rock)
Maroon-brown SILT (ML) GS - - - - -

with sand. 1
- traces of gravel
GS - - - - -
2
2 Grey BEDROCK
- switch to rotary rock FX, UN, R, PC

20 3.0 1
coring 20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
20 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
Very poor quality grey 20 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC Is(50), D =
GNEISS 20 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC 4.79 MPa
- slightly to moderately 20 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC

Is(50), A =
3 RC 98 10 0 9.1 R2 W3
4.07 MPa
weathered, weak to 3
medium strong 16 3.0 1 FX, PL, R, PC
- randomly oriented 20 3.0 4 FX, ST, R, PC
incipient fractures and
pyrite inclusions
throughout
- heavy oxidation staining
on joints
- light oxidation staining
below 3.5 m 20 1.50.75 FX, UN, R, PC
4 - thin, white, near-vertical
veining below 3.6 m 20 1.50.75 FX, PL, R, PC
RC 93 28 7 6.7 R3 W2
- rubble zone, 4
4.2 m to 4.4 m 20 1.50.75 FX, PL, R, PC
20 3.0 1 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.50.75 FX, ST, R, CLN
22 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC Is(50), D =
- rubble zone, 4.02 MPa
4.9 m to 5.0 m 20 3.0 2 FX, UN, R, PC Is(50), A =

2.75 MPa
20 3.0 4 FX, ST, R, CLN
5
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:2:10
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
5 22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, PC
Very poor quality grey 20 3.0 4
20 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
GNEISS 16 1.5 1 FX, ST, R, PC
16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
22 3.00.75
FX, PL, R, PC
20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, CLN
20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, PC
22 3.00.75
22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, PC
RC 97 44 40 7.4 R3 W2 FX, UN, R, PC
5 FX, UN, R, PC
6
Qu = 41.64
MPa
20 3.0 4 FX, ST, R, CLN
20 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, CLN

20 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, CLN
10
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:2:10
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
0
FILL: Compact,
gravel)
(ML) with high organic
1
content
- traces of gravel
Grey BEDROCK

coring 16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
Poor quality grey GNEISS 16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
22 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
- slightly to moderately 22 3.0 1 FX, UN, R, PC
RC 97 22 3.0 1
weathered, very strong 44 33 12.2 R5 W3 16 1.5 1 FX, UN, R, PC Is(50), A =
3.05 MPa
2 - heavy staining on all 1 16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
22 3.0 1
joints 20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
- incipient fractures, near 20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
horizontal bedding to 1.6 m FX, UN, R, PC
22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, PC
22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, CLN
22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, CLN
FX, UN, R, CLN
20 1.50.75 FX, PL, R, CLN
16 1.5 1
16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC Qu = 78.90
16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
MPa
3 FX, PL, R, PC
RC 91 16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
2 40 36 7.8 R5 W2 16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, CLN
22 3.00.75 FX, ST, R, CLN

- moderate joint staining
below 3.8 m
4 16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 4
FX, PL, R, PC
RC 98 60 44 8.0 R5 W2
3
22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, CLN Is(50), A =
16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC 4.63 MPa
20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
5
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:2:14
DISCONTINUITY
CLN-CLEAN
STRUCTURE
STRATA PLOT / WL
ELEVATION (m)
OTHER TESTS
STRUCTURE1
1
DEPTH (m)
2
DISCONTINUITY DATA
FREQUENCY
WEATHERING
LITHOLOGICAL
STRENGTH
FRACTURE
CORE (%)
CORE %
SAMPLE
30 DIP to CORE
TOTAL
R.Q.D.
INDEX
SOLID
DESCRIPTION
INDEX
(%)
AXIS (o)
TYPE AND SURFACE
JRC
Ja
Jr
2
DESCRIPTION
W2
W3
W4
W5
R5
R4
R3
R2
R1
10
15
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
80
60
40
20
60
90
5
0
5 FX, PL, R, PC
Poor quality grey GNEISS 20 1.5 4
RC 98 20 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
60 44 8.0 R5 W2 20 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
3 20 1.5 4
20 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 4 FX, PL, R, PC Qu = 82.86
FX, PL, R, PC MPa
22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, CLN

20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
20 3.0 4 FX, UN, R, PC
6
RC 102 43 43 6.7 R5 W2 22 3.00.75 FX, UN, R, CLN
4
16 1.5 4 FX, UN, R, PC
20 3.0 4 FX, PL, R, PC
22 3.0 1 FX, ST, R, PC
16 1.5 1 FX, ST, R, CLN
16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC
16 1.5 1 FX, PL, R, PC

7
10
App'd LP/BH
LP Feb 17 2017 14:2:14
Appendix F Stantec Laboratory Testing Results

February 17, 2017
STANTEC LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS

bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx F.1
COMPACTION TEST REPORT
2500
2400
6.7%, 2367 kg/m3
Dry density, kg/m 3
2300
6.7%, 2320 kg/m3
ZAV for
2200 Sp.G. =
2.85
2100
2000
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Water content, %
- Rock Corrected - Uncorrected
Test specification: ASTM D 698-91 Procedure C Standard

ASTM D 4718-87 Oversize Corr. Applied to Each Test Point
Elev/ Classification Nat. %> %<
Sp.G. LL PI
Depth USCS AASHTO Moist. 3/4 in. No.200
GP-GM 5.3 2.85 37.4 5.6
ROCK CORRECTED TEST RESULTS UNCORRECTED MATERIAL DESCRIPTION

Light brown sandy GRAVEL, trace to some silt
Maximum dry density = 2367 kg/m3 2320 kg/m3 (50mm minus crush Rock)
Optimum moisture = 6.7 % 6.7 %
Project No. 111700431 Client: CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT ENGINEERING Remarks:
Project: Hartland Landfill Site, Saanich, BC Sampled by KT
Tested by RI
Source of Sample: Proposed Backfill Sample Number: 1
Stantec Consulting, Ltd.
Burnaby, British Columbia Figure
Tested By: RI Checked By: AM

Particle Size Distribution Report
1½ in.
3/8 in.
¾ in.
½ in.
#100
#140
#200
6 in.
3 in.
2 in.
1 in.
#10
#20
#30
#40
#60
#4
100
90
80
70
PERCENT FINER
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
GRAIN SIZE - mm.

+3" % GRAVEL % SAND % SILT % CLAY USCS AASHTO PL LL
0.0 73.5 20.9 5.6 GP-GM
SIEVE PERCENT FINER SIEVE PERCENT FINER Material Description

inches number Light brown sandy GRAVEL, trace to some silt
size size (50mm minus crush Rock)
2 in 100.0 #4 26.5
1.5 in 93.3 #10 17.7
3/4 in 62.6 #20 12.6
3/8 in 37.0 #40 10.0
#60 8.4
#100 7.1
#140 6.3
GRAIN SIZE #200 5.6 REMARKS:
D60 18.0240 Sampled by KT
Tested by RI
D30 6.4492
D10 0.4204
COEFFICIENTS
Cc 5.49
Cu 42.88
Source of Sample: Proposed Backfill Sample Number: 1
Client: CAPITAL REGIONAL DISTRICT ENGINEERING

Stantec Consulting, Ltd.
Project: Hartland Landfill Site, Saanich, BC
Burnaby, British Columbia Project No.: 111700431 Figure
Tested By: RI Checked By: AM

Stantec Consulting Ltd.
POINT LOAD TEST RECORD 200-325 25th Street SE
(ASTM D5731-08) Calgary AB CA T2A 7H8
Project: Proposed Hartland Development Project No.: 111700431

Client: Capital Regional District Location: Saanich, BC
Device: RocTest Model PIL-7, digital gauge, standard conical platens Pressure Gauge to Load Conversion Factor, Ae [m2]: 9.48E-04
Total Length, L
Failure Equiv. Core
Spacing, D
Width, W
Diameter
Platen
Sample Test Gauge Failure Load, Is(50)
[mm]
[mm]
[mm]
Test Specimen Run 2 Is [MPa] F Rock Type Notes
Depth [m] Type1 Pressure, P L [N] Squared, De [MPa]
[MPa] [mm2]
BH17-05 RC6 6.19 D // 61 99 23.52 22,297 3,698 6.0 1.1 6.58

RC6 6.19 A // 61 52 14.64 13,879 3,998 3.5 1.1 3.86
BH17-09 RC6 5.33 D // 61 135 24.30 23,036 3,734 6.2 1.1 6.75
RC6 5.33 A ⊥ 61 53 10.50 9,954 4,142 2.4 1.1 2.69
BH17-10 RC2 4.75 D // 61 90 7.58 7,186 3,702 1.9 1.1 2.12
RC2 4.75 A ⊥ 61 56 16.04 15,206 4,319 3.5 1.1 3.98
BH17-10 RC3 6.10 D // 61 63 18.04 17,102 3,702 4.6 1.1 5.05
RC3 6.10 A ⊥ - - - Invalid break
BH17-11 RC3 2.83 D // 61 82 17.10 16,211 3,698 4.4 1.1 4.79
RC3 2.83 A ⊥ 61 55 16.14 15,301 4,235 3.6 1.1 4.07 Invalid break
BH17-11 RC4 4.75 D // 61 97 14.42 13,670 3,722 3.7 1.1 4.02
RC 4.75 A // 61 56 11.16 10,580 4,352 2.4 1.1 2.75
BH17-12 RC1 1.83 D ⊥ 61 95 31.30 29,672 3,710 8.0 1.1 8.74 Invalid Break
RC1 1.83 A // 61 59 12.84 12,172 4,580 2.7 1.1 3.05
BH17-12 RC3 4.60 D ⊥ 61 83 24.64 23,359 3,698 6.3 1.1 6.90 Invalid Break
RC3 4.60 A // 61 65 21.04 19,946 5,046 4.0 1.2 4.63
Additional Notes:
A axial
D diametral
B block
I irregular lump
⊥ perpendicular to plane of weakness
// parallel to plane of weakness
Tested By: C.Woods Date: 7-Feb-17 Reviewed By: L.Philip Date: 9-Feb-17
GE-PL-L1B point_load_summary.xlsx/123312716 @ 2/15/2017 - 2:26 PM

OFFICE LABORATORY
325 - 25th Street SE 10830 - 46th Street SE
Suite 200 Calgary, Alberta
Unconfined Compressive Calgary, Alberta Canada T2C 1G4
Strength - Rock Cores Canada T2A 7H8

Tel: (403) 716-8000 Tel: (403) 253-7876
Fax: (403) 716-8099 Fax: (403) 253-0021
Client Capital Regional District Tested By C. Woods

Project Name Proposed Hartland Development Date Tested 7-Feb-17
Project Number 111700431.805
Borehole: BH17-05 Sample ID: RC6

Depth (m): 5.49 Moisture Conent (%): 0.0
Sample Diameter (cm): 6.05 Sample Weight (g): 1058.2
Load Rate (MPa/sec): 0.58 Sample Length (cm): 13.40
Peak Load (kN): 264.99 Unit Weight (kg/m3): 2747
Compressive Stregth (MPa): 92.18



Reporting of these test results constitutes a testing service only. Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request. The
data presented above is for the sole use of the client stipulated above. Stantec is not responsible, nor can be held liable, for the use of this report by any other
party, with or without the knowledge of Stantec.
Reviewed by:
OFFICE LABORATORY
325 - 25th Street SE 10830 - 46th Street SE
Suite 200 Calgary, Alberta
Unconfined Compressive Calgary, Alberta Canada T2C 1G4
Strength - Rock Cores Canada T2A 7H8

Tel: (403) 716-8000 Tel: (403) 253-7876
Fax: (403) 716-8099 Fax: (403) 253-0021
Client Capital Regional District Tested By C. Woods

Project Name Proposed Hartland Development Date Tested 7-Feb-17
Project Number 111700431.805

Reporting of these test results constitutes a testing service only. Engineering interpretation or evaluation of the test results is provided only on written request. The
data presented above is for the sole use of the client stipulated above. Stantec is not responsible, nor can be held liable, for the use of this report by any other
party, with or without the knowledge of Stantec.
Reviewed by:
Appendix G Rock Core Photographs

February 17, 2017
ROCK CORE PHOTOGRAPHS

bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx G.2
Appendix G Photographs of Rock Core
BH17-12 (1.5 - 5.7 m) Dry
BH17-12 (1.5 - 5.7 m) Wet

BH17-12 (5.7 – 6.9 m) Dry

BH17-11 (3.6 – 5.4 m) Dry
BH17-12 (5.7 – 6.9 m) Wet

BH17-11 (3.6 – 5.4 m) Wet
BH17-11 (5.4 – 6.6 m) Dry

BH17-10 (2.8 – 5.4 m) Dry
BH17-11 (5.4 – 6.6 m) Wet

BH17-10 (2.8 – 5.4 m) Wet
BH17-10 (5.4 – 7.2 m) Dry

BH17-05 (5.5 – 6.6 m) Dry
BH17-10 (5.4 – 7.2 m) Dry

BH17-05 (5.5 – 6.6 m) Dry
BH17-09 (2.6 – 6.9 m) Dry
BH17-09 (2.6 – 6.9 m) Dry

Biosolids MGMT Plan by Stantec Band C

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Biosolids MGMT Plan by Stantec Band C

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Geotechnical Data Report

Proposed Hartland Development

Rev. Description Author Quality Check Independent Review

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 2

3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 3

4.0 REVIEW OF HISTORICAL DATA ...................................................................................... 6

5.0 STANTEC GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION........................................................... 7

6.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ......................................................................................... 13

7.0 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS ........................................................................... 19

8.0 CLOSURE ...................................................................................................................... 21

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

STATEMENT OF GENERAL CONDITIONS.................................................... A.1

REFERENCE DRAWINGS ............................................................................ B.1

EXISTING SUBSURFACE INFORMATION .................................................... C.1

STANTEC SITE PLAN ................................................................................... D.2

STANTEC TEST PIT AND TEST HOLE RECORDS .............................................E.1

STANTEC LABORATORY TESTING RESULTS.................................................. F.1

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The proposed Hartland Plant Site development is understood to comprise of a Resource

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

Figure 1 Bedrock outcrop on southeast site boundary (2014)

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

Figure 3 Crush Rock Stockpile (2014)

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

Review of Historical data

4.0 REVIEW OF HISTORICAL DATA

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

Stantec Geotechnical Site Investigation

5.0 STANTEC GEOTECHNICAL SITE INVESTIGATION

5.2 2014 TEST PIT FIELD PROGRAM

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

Stantec Geotechnical Site Investigation

Table 1 Summary of 2014 Test Pit Investigation

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

Stantec Geotechnical Site Investigation

5.3 2017 TEST HOLE FIELD PROGRAM

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

Stantec Geotechnical Site Investigation

Table 2 Summary of 2017 Borehole Investigation

Length of Length of Bedrock Total Length of Termination

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey, bc\111700431_crd\111700431.601.100_hartland\report\2017\rpt_factual_data_hartland_rev1_20170217.docx 10

Stantec Geotechnical Site Investigation

5.3.1 ODEX Drilling

5.3.2 Standard Penetration Test

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

Stantec Geotechnical Site Investigation

5.3.3 Rotary Rock Coring

5.4 LABORATORY PROGRAM

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

6.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS

6.2 EXISTING CRUSH ROCK STOCKPILE

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

6.3 SOIL AND GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS

6.3.2 Blast Rock Fill

6.3.3 In-Filled Swamp (Silty Sand to Sandy Silt Fill)

sl \\cd1183-f05\shared_projects\pc 1117 surrey,

6.3.5 Granular Native Soil

6.3.6 Glacial Till