You are on page 1of 2

1

Distribution Vision 2010: Planning for


Automation
R. Fanning, Senior Member, IEEE R. Huber, Fellow, IEEE

Abstract-- Utilities are being pushed to provide better service


to customers. High technology customers manufacturing II. THE DISTRIBUTION AUTOMATION CONCEPT
processes are not as immune to power fluctuations as they once
were. Performance based rates move the utilities to constantly
Overall, network power supplies are the most reliable
improve on their service reliability indices. To make matters means of providing power to distribution customers. The tied
more difficult, these have to be accomplished without a rate network provides a continuous, uninterrupted supply to the
increase to the customer. Yet, when is good, good enough? And customer even during system fault conditions. Examples of
how much better can we be using the tried and true planning and network systems exist at both the primary voltage level and
design practices used over the past 50 years. Automation and the secondary voltage level. However, the design, operating
advanced distribution systems provide an option for higher concerns, costs and maintenance of such systems can be a
reliability and premium power options. Distribution Vision 2010 challenge. Open loop and closed loop systems with automatic
is a plan for automated distribution systems implemented in an
reconfiguration and appropriate communication systems can
incremental manner.
also approach the reliability of network systems.
Index Terms — Distribution automation, distribution control,
The addition of automation for control of line devices
distributed resources. allows the distribution system to be partitioned into
Automated Control Areas called Premium Operating Districts
(PODs). A POD is a customer or a group of customers that is
I. INTRODUCTION served between two or more automated interrupting devices,
with sufficient capacity available from either source to
T His paper presents the vision for an automated
distribution system that is implemented in incremental
steps from today’s radial distribution systems. Future
support the load of the “POD” under first contingency
conditions (see Figure 1). The important point is that the
Customer Perceived Reliability is the reliability of the POD,
automated systems will result in higher reliability and more not the Feeder. The reliability can be determined by the
efficient operation of the entire system. extent of the POD - small PODs result in high reliability.
Table 1 provides an example of the contributions to overall
reliability for a typical power system. It is clear that faults on Station A Station B
the primary distribution system are the most important
contributor to overall reliability experienced by customers, Pod 1 Pod 2 Pod 3 Pod 4 Pod 5 Pod 6
R R R R R
especially considering the duration of outages experienced.
Table 1 illustrates that the greatest improvements in reliability Fig. 1. Concept of Premium Operating Districts (PODs) for reliability
can be achieved through reducing the contribution of improvement.
distribution system fault events to overall reliability.
Automation provides the opportunity to accomplish this III. THE RESEARCH PLAN
improved performance. The Distribution Vision 2010 consortium is coordinating
the development of new technologies to facilitate the
TABLE I implementation of automated distribution systems that will
EXAMPLE OF RELIABILITY CONTRIBUTIONS AT DIFFERENT LEVELS OF THE
SYSTEM FOR NUMBER OF OUTAGES (SAIFI) AND OUTAGE DURATION (SAIDI)
consist of a combination of open loops, closed loops, and
primary networks. Research is needed to solve problems
Category SAIFI (%) SAIDI (%)
associated with migration to bi-directional protection,
Transmission < ½% 3% automatic reconfiguration, and network systems. New
Substation < ½% 8% technology will help resolve problems that include:
Primary Distribution 47% 83% o Difficult to Coordinate Directional Devices
Secondary Distribution 52% 6% o Differences in Source Impedance and Phase Angles
o Circulating Currents
o Line Overloading
R. Fanning is a Senior Engineer with We Energies, Milwaukee, WI (e-mail: Initial technologies are already being demonstrated on
russ.fanning@we-energies.com). R. Huber is Director of the DV 2010 alliance, actual distribution systems. These technologies include:
Milwaukee, WI (e-mail: robertleehuber@aol.com).
2

o Improved recloser and recloser control system


o The POD concept
o Improved Communication systems
o Local Area Controller
o System made of a combination of open loops, closed
loops and primary networks
o Elimination of Distribution Dispatcher as first
response
o Move from a reactive mode to a proactive mode

As the automation is implemented on more systems, a wide


area controller provides optimization at the next level. An
initial controller has already been developed for this
application. This is part of a hierarchical control structure
proposed for the overall automation:
Tier 1: Autonomous Protection
Tier 2: Distributed Automation Logic
Tier 3: Local Area Control - Substation
Tier 4: Wide Area Control – Region

An overall research plan has been developed to develop the


needed technologies and demonstrate their application in
actual field trials. Figure 2 illustrates some of the major
development needs in a timeline form.

Fig. 2. Timeline for distribution automation technology development and


demonstration.

IV. CONCLUSIONS
A combination of advanced communication, advanced
technology, distribution system automation, and eventually
networked primary distribution systems will enable us to
make a major improvement in system reliability and system
performance. A consortium approach helps assure that the
technologies developed are widely applicable and meet
general requirements for advancing the industry.

You might also like