Professional Documents
Culture Documents
law for. Rape cases are one of the most prevalent. However, fortunately for women,
with the luck of Pauli Murray, some strides were made in rape law. Although there is
still a long way to go until law concerning rape is just and female friendly, the
strides made in the 1980s helped shed light on how toxic the rape laws that were in
place are.
One of the main problems in rape cases was the jury. Similar to other places
of legislation, women were extremely underrepresented and because of this, law
was designed with the male perspective in the spotlight. Some of this was entirely
done with the best intentions. Guy Miller, a prominent Chicago judge confessed,
“through what turned out to be a mistaken sense of chivalry”, he had once excused
women from juries involving rape because he considered them revolting or
gruesome and unsuitable for women to hear.1 But he found that women were upset
over this discrimination and wanted to be jurors in those cases. Miller had good
intentions and thought he was making the correct decision by shielding women
from serving on the jury of rape cases, but all he was doing was erasing the female
voice from sharing perspective on rape cases. Because of the lack of female
representation harmful jury statements like “You can’t kill a man for giving you a
good time”2 when a woman killed her rapist in self-defense. Until the 1970s, marital
rape wasn’t acknowledged as legitimate because a wife was considered her
husband’s property. 3 But although rape injustice was an issue that was not
exclusive to one race, white women were better heard in rape cases and better
supported through women’s groups and homes. Black women, were depicted and
viewed as naturally immoral and were shamed not only for being a woman but also
for being a black woman.
The consequence of the shame placed upon rape victims and the lack of
available and legitimate resources were botched abortions. It took until the Great
depression for contraceptives to become introduced and less taboo.4 But, even the
introduction of contraceptives wasn’t centered on female reproductive
empowerment. The government only stepped in to help introduce family planning
techniques as a way to help alleviate the costs of child rearing that an impoverished
family could not afford. Before condoms were somewhat streamlined, women were
subjugating themselves to harmful methods like coat hanger abortions, or rolling
themselves downstairs to try and destroy their unborn child. 5