The Burning Door: Capitalist posttextual theory and capitalist

discourse
Catherine V. Geoffrey

Department of Literature, Harvard University

1. Capitalist theory and presemiotic narrative

�Reality is intrinsically responsible for class divisions,� says Derrida.
Tilton[1] suggests that we have to choose between
neodialectic theory and Foucaultist power relations. It could be said that
Debord uses the term �presemiotic narrative� to denote the role of the writer
as reader.

If one examines modern deappropriation, one is faced with a choice: either

reject capitalist discourse or conclude that expression is created by the
masses. The subject is contextualised into a precapitalist rationalism that
includes narrativity as a paradox. In a sense, if presemiotic narrative holds,
we have to choose between capitalist posttextual theory and patriarchialist
modernism.

Lacan promotes the use of presemiotic narrative to read and deconstruct

society. But the subject is interpolated into a capitalist posttextual theory
that includes consciousness as a reality.

The postcultural paradigm of discourse implies that art is part of the

stasis of language. In a sense, in Foucault�s Pendulum, Eco deconstructs
capitalist posttextual theory; in The Aesthetics of Thomas Aquinas,
although, he analyses capitalist discourse.

The subject is contextualised into a capitalist posttextual theory that

includes sexuality as a paradox. However, a number of theories concerning
capitalist discourse may be found.

2. Eco and presemiotic narrative

�Culture is fundamentally dead,� says Marx. Baudrillard uses the term
�semantic subtextual theory� to denote the defining characteristic, and
therefore the futility, of dialectic sexual identity. But the premise of
capitalist posttextual theory states that the goal of the participant is social
comment, given that preconceptual nationalism is valid.

Hanfkopf[2] implies that we have to choose between

capitalist posttextual theory and textual postcapitalist theory. Therefore,
Marx uses the term �presemiotic narrative� to denote not narrative, as
capitalist discourse suggests, but neonarrative.

The primary theme of Bailey�s[3] critique of capitalist

posttextual theory is the role of the reader as observer. It could be said that
any number of deappropriations concerning a mythopoetical totality exist.

Sartre uses the term �material discourse� to denote the common ground
between class and art. Thus, if capitalist posttextual theory holds, the works
of Burroughs are modernistic.

1. Tilton, T. B. ed. (1971)

Nationalism, the capitalist paradigm of reality and capitalist
discourse. Oxford University Press

2. Hanfkopf, C. N. E. (1992) Forgetting Sontag: Capitalist

posttextual theory in the works of Stone. And/Or Press
3. Bailey, A. ed. (1970) Capitalist discourse in the works
of Burroughs. University of Michigan Press

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated
by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link
for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine,
a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very
slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 17,800,743 essays since

25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of

Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: �On the Simulation of Postmodernism and
Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks�.
More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where
NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal�s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was
accepted by a cultural criticism publication.