Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Times-Picayune,
22 May BP Miss Canyon 252 #1
Deepwater Horizon:
State of the art “Semi-Submersible”
Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit
• Built in Korea,
completed 2001
• Cost $560 Million
• Contracted to BP since
2002, $500k/day
• Designed for 8000 ft
water depth, 30000 ft drill
depth
• When operating, rig is
partially submerged to
keep it stable.
• Equipped with real-time
monitoring (satellite link
to BP’s Houston office)
MC 252: Normal well operations
to complete a successful well
• Drilled to 18000 ft total depth, to be completed as a
productive oil/gas well
• Production casing set and cemented 20 hours prior to
explosion
• Preparing for
temporary
abandonment
• Bottom hole packer,
production tubing
and perforations
to be installed at a
later date (the wellbore
should not permit fluid entry
at this time).
MC 252: Normal well operations
to complete a successful well
• Under normal operations, neither oil
from depth or surface “shallow gas”
can enter the wellbore in this
condition
• Main question:
What part of the
wellbore integrity
was breached?
April 20: Blowout and fire
• Explosion 9:59pm CDT
• 126 on board: 79 TransOcean employees,
6 BP employees,
41 contractors
• 115 survivors;
9 man drilling
crew (TransOcean)
and 2 mud
engineers
(Smith Intl) lost
Oil slick
visible
prior to rig
collapse
(April 21)
possibly rig
fuel; could
be leaking
crude oil
Second day on fire:
Rig about to capsize
Video of the oil leaks
• Multiple leak points:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RngYv4SYMCY
• Comparison of before and after riser insertion tube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyxjGoBn-YM
What happened and why?
Areas of concern and who would
bear responsibility
• Routine BOP test followup (BP as operator, TransOcean
as drilling contractor, MMS exemptions)
• Risky(?) well plan (BP)
• Integrity of casing cement (Halliburton)
• Wellhead seal integrity (TransOcean and DrilQuip
(supplier))
• Post-cementing test procedure and time allotted for
cement to cure (BP)
• Hurried preparation for temporary abandonment (BP)
Continued
What happened and why?
Areas of concern and who would
responsibility
– independent analysis
at www.drillingahead.com
“One tough well”:
--Times-Picayune, 19 May
(from nola.com)
Analysis (2): BP’s well plan
• “BP's well design had a fatal flaw (ie. long
string production casing instead of liner
and tieback). This casing design depends
upon a 100% effective cement job in order
to keep the production out of the annulus
behind the production casing right up to
the wellhead.”
-- drillingahead.com
Bottom hole casing string detail
TransOcean CEO testifies to
Senate committee, 11 May
• "At this point, drilling mud was no longer being
used as a means of reservoir pressure
containment; the cement and the casing were
the barriers controlling pressure from the
reservoir," Newman said. "Indeed, at the time of
the explosion, the rig crew, at the direction of the
operator, was in the process of displacing drilling
mud and replacing it with seawater."
Known bottom hole pressure
problems
• Drilling mud: 14.5 pounds per gallon (ppg), at
total depth equates to 13000 psi at the bottom of
the well
--http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/
article7128842.ece
Analysis (4): What were the exact
order of procedures?
• “monitoring the volumes and rates that fluids are
pumped and returned from a well is the number one
cardinal rule to maintaining constant BHP and control of
the well. ”
• “If the fluid was going to the boat from the same tank it
was being received from the well - it would be very
difficult to determine pit gain or loss with any degree of
accuracy. ”
Analysis (5) “Nature always finds the
hidden flaw”
• At 2149
(not logged)
gas in riser
escapes at surface,
reports of loud hissing noise, explosion follows
Analysis (6): well control
procedure
--drillingahead.com
Eyewitness account:
TransOcean rig hand
• "The derrickman called Derrickman
works up
the driller and said he here
needed help, he had mud
going everywhere, and
about this time the drill
floor disappeared, then
there was an explosion,
then a second explosion."
-- quoted on www.drillingahead.com
Captain of the nearby
workboat Damon Bankston
• Shortly after 9 p.m. CDT, "my mate advised
there was mud coming off the rig. It looked like it
was a black rain coming down," Landry said.
If communication with
rig is lost or other
serious problem
detected, BOP shuts
itself in.
MMS grants subsea BOP stacks
an exemption? 10 Feb test
• http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_111/20100512/Transocean-
Deepwater%20Horizon%20BOP%20Test.pdf
No backup needed for the
automatic kill system?
-- http://media.mcclatchydc.com/static/pdf/Les-oilspill-ABSC.pdf
BOP Problems Continue
• “A 2008 paper co-authored by Jeff S.
Shepard,” [a TransOcean manager],
"cautioned that "BOP shear rams may also
have difficulty shearing today's high-
strength, high-toughness drill-pipe”
--http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/05/14/27286.htm
BOP problems addressed by
UNOCAL moving this equipment to
the surface (SBOP)
• In a study … 7,200 subsea BOP days were
considered in water depths greater than 1,312 ft.
… 31 BOP failures occurred that had the
potential for uncontrolled flow. This translates to
4.1 incidents per 1,000 BOP days.
• In comparison, Unocal has recorded four
incidents that had the potential for uncontrolled
flow over 1,360 SBOP days. This yields 2.9
incidents per 1,000 SBOPdays.
-- http://www.iadc.org/dcpi/dc-julyaug03/July3-surface%20BOP.pdf
No question that the BOP failed
• “oil was flowing into the [BOP] at 8,000 to
9,000 psi and flowing out into the Gulf at
around 2,650 psi.”
http://blog.al.com/live/2010/05/national_incident_commander_oi_1.h
tml
Conclusion: The TransOcean
driller did his job to the end,
knowing he was in imminent
grave danger.
-- drillingahead.com
How big is the spill?
• BP’s initial guess of 5000 Bbl/day * 60 days to
relief well (hopefully) = 300 MBbl
• Other estimates mid range 50000 Bbl/day * 60
days = 3 MMBbl