Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract
In a 2 × 2 MIMO antenna array system envelope correlation coefficient “ρ” shows the influence of different
propagation paths of the RF signals that reach the antenna elements. The approximated value of this coeffi-
cient is based on a simple closed-form equation and also varies from 0 to 1. Quite perfect performance for
MIMO applications is achieved when this parameter approximates to zero. In this paper, we evaluate an an-
tenna diversity MIMO system by measuring the envelope correlation coefficient. The corresponding results
in our antenna array configurations show that the measured “ρ” has very small values and approximates to
zero. This observation indicates quite perfect behavior and performance of our MIMO antenna array system.
Keywords: Scattering Parameters, Envelope Correlation, Printed Dipole Antenna
It is obvious that radiation pattern in Equation (1) Definition Symbol Simulated Measured
makes the calculation more complicated than the enve- Resonance Center
f0 (GHz) 2.3 2.4
lope correlation calculations based on in Equation (2). Frequency
The practical advantage of the third method that is based Resonance Bandwidth BW (GHz) 0.5 0.5
on second equation is that not only is quite simple to use
Return Loss RL (dB) -58 -42
it experimentally, but also provides sufficiently accurate
results in many experimental environments such as in-
door environments with rich multipath propagation per-
formance.
ues in the frequency range of 1.5 to 3.5 GHz. Small ronments are neglected. In each of these indoor envi-
variations of this parameter is introduced at the frequ- ronments it is the rich multipath propagation procedure
ency range from 1.5 to 2 GHz only for the smallest dis- that provides this important agreement in the corre-
tance between the dipoles in antenna array configuration sponding measured results. It is convenient that the in-
of Group B. These variations are not provided by other door environments offer propagation processes with a
values of distance between the elements bigger than one big number of independent signal paths. This observation
wavelength for collinear antenna array configuration. indicates that in rich multipath environments the corre-
Moreover, in the frequency range from 2 to 3.5 GHz the sponding signal paths are uncorrelated and are impossi-
parameter of envelope correlation coefficient remains ble to be in deep fade, simultaneously. This feature im-
stable and close to zero for each of the collinear antenna proves the performance of MIMO communication appli-
array configuration in Group B. cations and systems.
It is also important that these considerations for group Another important consideration is that in Group B
antenna array configurations the envelope correlation is
A and B antenna array configurations are valid for labo-
quite low relative to Group A. Different antenna array
ratory’s environments A and B. The corresponding de-
geometry may be an important issue for this effect. In
clines between the two different propagation envi-
any case of them, the value of envelope correlation is
quite small and less of value 0.5.
To sum up, these antenna array configurations provide
low envelope correlation between the signals that have
received or transmitted from the corresponding elements.
In particular, Group B configurations have quite better
correlation performance and offer more efficiently in
MIMO applications’ performance.
5. Conclusions
6. Acknowledgment
7. References
[2] R. Janaswamy, “Effects of Mutual Coupling on the Capac- Spaces Linear Antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Anten-
ity of Fixed Length Linear Arrays,” IEEE Antennas and nas Propagation, Vol. 50, 2002, pp.1162-1165.
Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 1, 2002, pp. 157-160.
[9] H. T. Hui, W. T. OwYong and K. B. Toh, “Signals Cor-
[3] R. G. Vaughan and J. B. Andersen, “Antenna Diversity in relation between Two Normal-Mode Helical Antennas
Mobile Communications,” IEEE Transactions on Ve- for Diversity Reception in a Multipath Environment,”
hicular Technology, Vol. 36, 1987, pp. 149-172. IEEE Transactions on Antennas Propagation, 2004, pp.
572-577.
[4] R. G. Vaughan, “Signals in Mobile Communications,”
IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 35, [10] J. Blanch, J. Romeu and I. Cordella, “Exact Representa-
1986, pp. 133-145. tion of Antenna System Diversity Performance from In-
put Parameter Description,” Electronics Letters, Vol. 39,
[5] G. Lebrun, S. Spiteri and M. Faulkner, “MIMO Complex-
2003, pp. 705-707.
ity Reduction through Antenna Selection,” Proceedings
on Australian Telecommun Cooperative Research Center, [11] H.-R. Chuang and L.-C. Kuo, “3-D FDTD Design Analy-
ANNAC’03, Vol. 5, 2003. sis of a 2.4 GHz Polarization – Diversity Printed Dipole
Antenna with Integrated Balun and Polarization – Swit-
[6] S. Jacobs and C. P. Bean, “Fine Particles, Thin Films and
ching Circuit for Wlan and Wireless Communication Ap-
Exchange Anisotropy,” In Magnetism, G. T. Rado and H.
plication,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and
Suhl, Eds., Academic, New York, Vol. 3, 1963, pp.
Techniques, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2003.
271-350.
[12] Z. Fan, L. Ran and K. Chen, “Printed Dipole Antenna
[7] R. H. Clarke, “A Statistical Theory of Mibile Recep-
Designed with Microstrip Balun on V-Shaped Ground
tion,” Bell System Technology Journal, 1968, pp. 957-
Plane,” Progress in Electromagnetics Research Sympo-
1000. R. Nicole, “Title of Paper with Only First Word
sium Hangzhou, 2005, pp. 23-26.
Capitalized,” Journal Name Standard Abbreviations, in
Press. [13] D. M. Pozar, “Microwave Engineering,” Wiley, 1998.
[8] K. Boyle, “Radiation Pattern and Correlation of Closely