Putting numbers to responses

Dept. Student Community Ethics

September ’16

Pre-Implementation
z
Qualtrics Survey
Analytics
Data Compilation
z
• The analytics and graphic representations to come have
been formed from different and independent questions.

• For those that attended their initial meetings, they were sent
an invitation to take this survey. (n=28)

• There were some students, n=6, who did not participate in

an initial meetings due to selected circumstances with a
truncated survey.

• In total, there were 34 gathered responses.

 DatazAnalysis:
Participation Student Participation in an initial meeting or hearing
with DSCE*.
Results
Did the student participate in
Meeting?
No
Yes? 28
18%
No? 6

Yes
82%

*n=34*
 Data Analysis:
z
Conduct Case Reasoning

Reasons for coming into the

office

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Sexual Misconduct Student Conduct

N=28

Reason for Coming into the office

Student Conduct 27

Sexual Misconduct 1
 Data Analysis:
z Students who have Seen/Read the Creed
when students see/read the
Creed in relation to their 18

16
meeting.
14

# of Students (n=28)
12

10

8
Seen/Read the Creed
6
Before 4 4

After 7 2

Both 17 0
Before After Both
Time reading took place
 Data Analysis:
z
STUDENT IDENTIFICATION WITH CREED PRINCIPLES
Pride
N=55

Student Identification with 6%

creed values
Engagement
• Students were asked to identify 2 Respect
36%
27%
creed principles.

• Please note that there were some

surveys that only one of two creed
principles were given.
Creed Value Identification
Engagement 20
Integrity 6 Responsibility Integrity
20% 11%
Responsibility 11
Respect 15
Pride 3
 Data Analysis:
z
when students see/read the
Code in relation to their Students who have Seen/Read the Code
meeting. 16

14

12

# of Students (n=28)
Seen/Read the Code 10

Before 4 8

After 9 6

Both 15 4

0
Before After Both
Time reading took place
 Data Analysis:
z Reflection occurrence from Student Conduct Meeting
Did this process allow for some
sort of reflection
11%

7%
This process allowed for some
reflection
Strongly Disagree 3 43%
Disagree 2
Neutral 0
Agree 11
39%
Strongly Agree 12

Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

N=28
 Data Analysis:
z Student Conduct meeting was thoroughly explained
The conduct process was
thoroughly explained to me.
11%

7%
The Process was Explained?
Strongly Disagree 2
Disagree 1 43%
Neutral 0
Agree 11
Strongly Agree 14 39%

Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

N=28
 Student Rights were explained thoroughly to student
Data Analysis:
z
My Student rights were
thoroughly explained to me.
7%

Student Rights were Explained?

Strongly Disagree 2
Disagree 0 36%
Neutral 0 57%
Agree 10
Strongly Agree 16

Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

N=28
 Planning to learn to event
Data Analysis:
z
I plan to learn from the event
and my meeting. 11%

3%

Students plan to learn from this

event?
50%
Strongly Disagree 3
Disagree 1
36%
Neutral 0
Agree 10
Strongly Agree 14

Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

N=28
 Data Analysis:
z
During my meeting I was
treated with Respect.

Was respect perceived during my conduct meeting?

30

25

Respect Perceived 20

No 1 15
Yes 27
10

0
No Yes
N=28
 Data Analysis:
z
During my meeting any and all
questions were answered

Questions Answered Questions answered?

30
No 1
25
Yes 27
20

15

10

0
No Yes

N=28
 Data Analysis:
z Self-Disclosed Sex:
Self Disclosure of Sex from
Student 4%

I am:
Male: 13
Female: 14
Prefer not to
1
Answer 46%
50%

Male Female Prefer not to answer

N=28
 Alleged students campus residency
12
Data Analysis:
z
On or OFF Campus and 10

residency
8

Do you live on campus? 2

0
AB BA BR CD MA RE RO SC VI WA N/A

If yes, which hall?

AB Albright Benton 11
BA Balsam 2
BR Blue Ridge 1
CD Central Drive 1
MA Madison 1
RE Reynolds 1
RO Robertson 1
SC Scott 4
VI Village 2
WA Walker 1
N/A Not on Campus 3
Yes No N=28
 Limitations and
z Suggestions
• There are ways that this survey can be improved and made to fit with the changing tide.

• Antiquated Questioning.
• Sex vs. Gender self-disclosure

• Shift exposure to the code and creed for alleged students.

• Better placement
• Additional Maxient generated letter

• Pre vs. Post Assessment Creation

• Better data collection

• 34 surveys