Students’ Profile

Age frequency percent

1 2 0.9
2 189 87.9
3 18 8.4
4 6 2.8
total 215 100.0

Sex frequency percent

1 71 33.0
2 144 67.0
total 215 100.0

Year Level frequency percent

2 95 44.2
3 120 55.8
total 215 100.0
Employees’ Profile

Age frequency percent

1 1 5.9
2 4 23.5
3 3 17.6
4 2 11.8
5 7 41.2
Total 17 100.0

Sex frequency percent

1 7 41.2
2 10 58.8
Total 17 100.0

CS frequency percent
1 9 52.9
2 8 47.1
Total 17 100.0

HEA frequency percent

8 3 17.6
9 4 23.5
10 7 41.2
11 3 17.6
Total 17 100.0

posi frequency percent

1 6 35.3
2 2 11.8
3 9 52.9
Total 17 100.0

YIS frequency percent

2 12 70.6
3 1 5.9
4 4 23.5
Total 17 100.0
 Students Employees
Instruction WM DV WM DV
1. Enhancing overall quality of education in the institution 2.59 2.58
2. Improvement in the quality of classroom instruction 2.59 2.47
3. Ensuring educational improvement in the institution 2.59 2.6
4. Improvement in the academic environment, including
the classroom and non classroom environment for
students 2.65 2.47
5. College level of quality education 2.65 2.64
6. Ensuring education improvement in all aspect 2.59 2.53
7. Improve outcome based instruction 2.82 2.52
8. Improvement in the professional development of faculty/
students 2.65 2.57
9. Improvement of students academic performance 2.53 2.54
10. Increased students participation in academic activities 2.65 2.52
General Weighted Mean 2.63 2.55

Students Employees
Research WM DV WM DV
1. Participation of faculty, students, administration in
research activities 2.82 2.51
2. Knowledge and awareness of faculty, students,
administration in research process 2.82 2.45
3. Promotion of research culture in the institution 2.94 2.51
4. Encourage faculty, students, administration in doing
research 2.94 2.47
5. Lead institution to do systematic and relevant/significant
research 2.76 2.51
6. Production of none quality research works and output
among faculty, students, and administration 2.35 2.36
7. Provision of clerical assistance 2.41 2.36
8. Provision of statistical assistance 2.59 2.38
9. Strict screening of the data gathering output 2.65 2.47
10. Incorporation of research process in subject matter 2.65 2.44
General Weighted Mean 2.69 2.45
 Students Employees
Social orientation and community involvement WM DV WM DV
1. Participation of faculty, students and administration in
community involvement 2.65 2.57
2. Development of students , faculty and administration
awareness and involvement in community growth and
development 2.59 2.59
3. Increase knowledge and information about national and
social environment of the community among students,
faculty and administration 2.59 2.57
4. Awareness on the needs, problems, and resources of the
partner community 2.59 2.49
5. Maintains harmonious relationship with the partner
community 2.47 2.47
6. Institution commitment to community upliftment and
social change 2.53 2.5
7. Inculcating service orientation among students, faculty,
and administration 2.65 2.45
8. Sense of voluntarism among the school constitution 2.53 2.41
9. Implementation of programs and projects for community
improvement 2.65 2.5
10. Institution involvement in total community development 2.65 2.51
General Weighted Mean 2.59 2.5

Students Employees
Organization and administration WM DV WM DV
1. Improvement in the work environment of the staff 2.35 2.54
2. Improvement of the organizational management in the
institution 2.29 2.54
3. Better staff communication 2.35 2.45
4. Improvement in the institution 2.47 2.54
5. More team work among staff 2.41 2.53
6. Improvement use and allocation of resources in the
institution 2.24 2.5
7. Improved harmonious relationship among members of
the organization 2.65 2.46
8. Improvement of overall organization culture 2.59 2.48
9. Enhance organizational process 2.47 2.51
10. Professional development of faculty and administration 2.59 2.56
General Weighted Mean 2.44 2.51
 Test of Difference between the Assessments of the Two Groups of

Respondents on their Assessment on the Impact of PACUCOA in the Quality of Education

Sig. (2-
t df
Dimensions Respondents N Mean tailed)
Instruction Students 215 2.546
-0.86 230 .3901
Employees 17 2.629
Research Students 215 2.694
-2.48 230 .0140*
Employees 17 3.617706
Social orientation and community Students 215 2.505
-0.82 230 .4103
involvement Employees 17 2.588
Students 215 2.512
Organization and administration 0.67 230 .5010
Employees 17 2.441
*α = 0.05
 Test of Relationship between the Perceptions of the Student
Respondents on the impact of PACUCOA and their Profile Variables

Profile Variables/ Level of Competencies of

Age Sex Year Level
the Middle Managaers
Pearson Correlation -0.053 -0.064 0.249
Instruction Sig. (2-tailed) .4412 .3514 .0002*
N 215 215 215
Pearson Correlation -0.029 -0.061 0.309
Research Sig. (2-tailed) .6686 .3712 0.000*
N 215 215 215
Social orientation Pearson Correlation -0.001 -0.092 0.284
and community Sig. (2-tailed) .9907 .1779 0.000*
involvement N 215 215 215
Pearson Correlation -0.006 -0.056 0.314
Organization and
Sig. (2-tailed) .9285 .4171 0.000*
Administration
N 215 215 215

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)

Test of Relationship between the Perceptions of the Employee

Respondents on the impact of PACUCOA and their Profile Variables

Profile Variables/ Level of Competencies Social

of the Middle Managaers orientation Organization
Instruction Research and and
community Administration
involvement
Pearson Correlation -0.171 -0.257 -0.316 -0.451
Age Sig. (2-tailed) .5116 .3193 .2164 .0690
N 17 17 17 17
Pearson Correlation -0.139 -0.062 -0.165 0.143
Sex Sig. (2-tailed) .5939 .8139 .5271 .5847
N 17 17 17 17
Pearson Correlation 0.185 -0.195 -0.036 0.395
Civil Status Sig. (2-tailed) .4777 .4524 .8918 .1165
N 17 17 17 17
Highest Pearson Correlation 0.428 0.367 -0.066 0.279
Educational Sig. (2-tailed) .0863 .1476 .8011 .2781
Attainment N 17 17 17 17
Pearson Correlation 0.242 0.191 -0.030 0.121
Position Sig. (2-tailed) .3486 .4633 .9089 .6434
N 17 17 17 17
Pearson Correlation 0.464 0.090 0.140 0.514
Years in Service Sig. (2-tailed) .0608 .7325 .5920 .0349*
N 17 17 17 17
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed)